WEBVTT - A Special Sit Down With Former President Donald Trump

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, the Economic Club of Chicago. Thank you David particularly.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to say two things at the beginning. The

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 2>first is just for the record and for those people

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 2>watching on television, the Economic Club of Chicago and Bloomberg

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>both invited Vice President Harris to a similar interview about

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>her economic plans that she has declined so far. And second,

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>just to set some parameters about this interview, which I

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>was just discussing with President Trump, We're going to focus

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>on business and the economy. And that's partly because this

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>is a business audience, but it's also because voters insist

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 2>that the economy is the main issue that matters when

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 2>they vote. So on that note, let me invite onto

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the stage President Trump.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>No, thanks, thank you very much.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Have a see.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 3>I like that crowd. That's a name.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, very standing ovation. Thank you, President Trump. Thank

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 2>you for doing this, as we said, and you had

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 2>the reception there. The business people of Chicago, like everywhere else,

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 2>they like a lot of the things you want to

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>do in terms of tax cuts and some of the

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 2>spending proposals. But like many business people, what they're often

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 2>worried about is the cost. And the Committee for a

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Responsible Federal Budget, which is a bipartisan outfit, put out

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>some predictions the other day. If you add up all

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the promises you've made and your plans would add seven

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>five trillion dollars to the debt. That's more than twice

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the total for Vice President Harris. You're on course to

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>push up debts up to one hundred and fifty percent

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>of GDP. This is a very business like audience. Yeah,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>why should they trust you with that?

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Because we're about growth. She's got no growth whatsoever, and

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 3>we're all about growth. We're going to bring companies back

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 3>to our country. You look at even today as I

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 3>was driving over, I see these empty, old, beautiful like

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>steel mills and factories that are empty and falling down.

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Some have been converted to senior citizens' homes. But that's

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 3>not going to do the trick. And we're going to

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>bring the companies back. We're going to lower taxes still

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 3>further for companies that are going to make their product

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 3>in the USA. We're going to protect those companies with

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 3>strong tariffs. Because I'm a believer in tariffs. I'm not

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 3>sure that you are. I don't think you are but

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I congratulate you in your career. But to me, the

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 3>most beautiful word in thection areas tariff, and it's my

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>favorite word. It needs a public relations firm just to

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>help us, but it's to miss the most beautiful word

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 3>in the tariffs.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that will bring in the revenues to

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 2>use another bipartisan group, Yeah, piece and institute. They said,

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>I only bring in two hundred billion dollars. That is

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 2>only that's barely the cost of two of your promises.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that's like for what company you're talking about. Okay,

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Look I brought in with tariffs and I was just

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 3>getting started. Then COVID came and we had a which

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, because I tell you what, I did a

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>very good job in COVID, nobody knew what the hell

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>it was. I call it the China virus because I

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>like being a little more accurate. But when that came,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>but we got hundreds of billions of dollars just from

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>China alone, and I hadn't even started yet. But tariffs

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>are too two things if you look at it. Number

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>one is for protection of the companies that we have

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 3>here and the new companies that will move in because

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>we're going to have thousands of companies coming into this country.

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>We're going to grow it like it's never grown before.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 3>And we're going to protect them when they come in

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>because we're not going to have somebody undercut them. And

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I could give you an example of this if you want,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>would you like me to, because it just and I

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>will come back. Just found out about it. So I've

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 3>been talking about for the last year about Detroit and

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 3>how horribly it has been. You know, it's just horrible

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 3>because we've been talking about Detroit's coming back for forty

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>years and it's never come back, and it's very dependent

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 3>on the car industry. Well, they've lost sixty percent of

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 3>the business over a long period of time. And what

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 3>happened is I found out friend of mine builds auto plants.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>That's only does he builds autoplants. That's what he's good at.

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't want to build an apartment, only wants to

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>build and he builds the biggest in the world. And

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 3>for the last year and a half of anybody who's

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 3>heard me speak, I was talking about Mexico is a

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 3>tremendous challenge for us right now, tremendous China is building

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>massive auto plants in Mexico, and they're going to build them,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to take those cars and sell them

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 3>into the United States. They're very near the border, and

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 3>they're going to have all the advantages and none of

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the disadvantages. And that's going to be the end of Michigan.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be the end of Frankly, South Carolina,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 3>going to be the end of everything. So I've been

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>talking about this and I said to him about nine

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 3>months ago, I said, you know what I want you

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>to do me A favorite John, his name is John.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to give his last name because he

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 3>might not like it, but I said, I want to

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 3>see an auto plant. I want to go and see

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>one of these, you know, you press a button and

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 3>everything works, right. I want to see one of the

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>big ones. He said, all right, good. I said, where

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 3>do we go? I'd like to go to Michigan. I'd

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 3>like to go to some place in the United States.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 3>He said, no, we can't do that. Why we're not

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 3>building anything big in the United States. That's not what

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>we don't build the big ones here. I said, where

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 3>are you building the biggest ones? He said, in Mexico.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>We're building giant plants, the biggest plants anywhere in the

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 3>world in Mexico. I said, so, you mean they're going

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>to make cars cheaply, they have advantages over labor and

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>other things, and they're going to sell them into the

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 3>United States and they're going to put Michigan out of business?

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Is that? What? I don't know anything about that. All

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I do is build the plants. If you want to

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>see a plant, we'll go to Mexico. I'll show you

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the biggest plant in the world. That was nine months ago.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I saw him, and I talked about it all the

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>time because I think it's a serious threat to our

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 3>country because not only outos but other things. So then

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I see him two days ago. I was talking at

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 3>another club, very nice club, and like this, except I

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I think you people are probably even wealthier. Okay.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 3>This was in Detroit, Okay, which was appropriate, and I

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.559
<v Speaker 3>was talking. I was showing them all sorts of charts

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>about how they are called. You know, it's just gotten down.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 3>It's like terrible. And I saw him and I said, oh,

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 3>how are you doing? How have you been? I said,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 3>could I ask you how are those plants that you mentioned?

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Those giant plants that you're building in Mexico. How's that

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 3>coming along? Have you finished them? No, sir, they abandoned

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the project when they heard you're running. They abandoned the

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 3>project when they saw that you were winning and doing well.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 3>I said, well, I don't do it well. The thing

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>if I told them, I told them, and I said

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 3>it publicly, They're not going to sell one car into

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the United States. I said, if I run this country,

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>if I'm going to be president of this country, I'm

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 3>going to put a one hundred, two hundred, two thousand

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>percent tariff. They're not going to sell one car into

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the United States because We're not going to destroy our

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 3>country by so because I know you're an anti tariff guy,

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 3>but I'm the exact opposite. If I had there is

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>no other way I could have stopped them, other than

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 3>what am I going to do negotiating with Mexico with China.

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to get anything from that. I said,

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to put a one hundred, two hundred or

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 3>three hundred. I'm going to put the highest tariff in history,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 3>meaning I'm going to stop them from ever selling a

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>car into the United States. So I just see the

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 3>guy by accident. I see him. He says, sir, they've abandoned.

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 3>And by the way they built foundations, they were really

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 3>rocket They were going to do it. They thought that

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I was going to win, or maybe they're just hold

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>them off. I tell you this, if I don't win,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 3>those factories are going to wipe out this country. They're

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the biggest factories ever built for cars. They're going to

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>wipe out our country. If she wins, and she wanted,

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 3>if she doesn't know what the hell she's doing. If

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>she wins, she's and she's not going to be thinking

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 3>about I couldn't every speech I made having to do

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>with cars, but every speech I made having to do

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 3>with tariffs, I'd mentioned that our country is being threatened

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 3>by Mexico. Now all of those things, beyond even the

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 3>car companies, all of those things are now dead. They're dead.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I asked them, Will they start Probably not their dead

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 3>as a door nail. If she gets in, it'll start

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 3>up again.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump. I let you give your example. You talked a

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 2>lot about tariffs. You look at the American economy. Forty

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>million jobs rely on trade. It counts for twenty seven

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 2>percent of GDP Okay that off. That's also going to

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>effect on many many business people here. Tariffs also have

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 2>another side. Isn't that something that you have to acknowledge.

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 2>You could be plunging America into the biggest trade war

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 2>since Smoothall you're going to stop, You're going to there

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 2>are tariffs already.

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>There are no tariffs. All you have to do is

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 3>build your plant in the United States and you don't

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 3>have any tariffs.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 2>People, there's a lot of places, a lot of places

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>like this, they rely there are a lot of jobs

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that rely on foreigners coming here. You're going to basically

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>stop trade with China. You're talking about sixty that sixty

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 2>plent tariffs on that. You're talking, as you said, one hundred,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 2>two hundred percent on things you don't really like. You're

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 2>also talking about twenty ten, twenty percent tariffs on the

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world. That is going to have a

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>serious effect on the overall economy. And yes, you're going

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to find some people who were gained from individual tariffs.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 2>The overall effect could be massive.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I agree, it's going to have a massive effect. Positive effect.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be a positive Let me just no no,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 4>let me give a committed You are to this, and

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 4>it must be hard for you to, you know, spend

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty five years talking about tariffs has been negative, and

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 4>then have somebody explained to you that you're totally wrong.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>It'll have a negative, it will have other if you

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>don't forty million jobs, there's a lot of jobs to

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>rely on. They're all coming back foot million jobs. There

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 2>are forty million jobs in America that rely on trade.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 3>Ready. John Deere, great company. They announced about a year

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 3>ago they're going to build big plants outside of the

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>United States. Right, They're going to build them in Mexican.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 2>You threaten they're all in a building. They still that's right.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I said, if John Deere builds those plants and not

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 3>selling anything into the United States. They just announced yesterday

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 3>they're probably not going to build the plants. Okay. I

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 3>kept the jobs here, and I'll keep them. John Dee

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 3>will stay here, and I'll tell John Deere if you

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 3>do build outside of the United States, you can if

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>you want. For instance, India is a very tough country.

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 3>It's not only China, you know, China is is the

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I would say probably the toughest, but there are a

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of tough you know, it's very tough European Union.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 3>Our beautiful European country is wonderful, wonderful. If you add

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 3>them up, they're almost the size of us. They treat

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 3>us so badly. We have a deficit. I said to

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Angela Merkel when she was there. She's not there anymore.

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I wonder why. But when she was there, I said

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 3>to Angola, how many Chevrolets do we have in Berlin? Why? Donald,

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 3>you have none? He said, that's right. How many Fords

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 3>do we have in Frankfurt? I don't know none. I said,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 3>that's right. You know how many cars we have, Mercedes, Benz,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>BMW and all of the different VOLKSWAG and millions and millions,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of course. And then I said, farm products. You know,

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>they don't want our farm They don't want anything from us.

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 3>We have deficits that are crazy. We're not going to

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 3>have anymore. We're going to put tariffs on them, and

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 3>they're going to do and you know what they can do.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>The Mercedes Bends will start building in the United States,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>have a little bit, but you know what they really

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 3>are assembled like in South Carolina. But they build everything

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>in Germany and then they assemble it here. They get

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 3>away with murder because they say, oh, yes, we're building.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 3>They don't build it. They take them out of a

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 3>box and they assemble them. We could have our child.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Don can we come back, Let's come Let's come back

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to the Europeans. In the second what about consumers people

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>out there, they're going to be the biggest TAXI critics say,

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>your tariffs will end up being like a national sales

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 2>tax because the country add if you have America the

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>moment has three trillion dollars worth of imputs. You're going

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to add tariffs to every single one of them. That

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>is going to push up the cost for all those

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>people who want to buy foreign goods. Is just simple mathematics,

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 2>President Trump.

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 3>It's not. Yeah, it is, but not the way you've

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 3>figured that was always very good in mathematics. Let me

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 3>tell you. You're saying three trilia's.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Trillion dollars worth of it and they don't have to pay.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 3>And the higher the tariff, the more likely it is

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 3>to have them come into.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Higher the tariff, the more you're going to put on

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the value of that those goods, the higher people are

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 2>going to pay in shops.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Ready, the higher the tariff, the more likely it is

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>that the company will come into the United States and

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 3>build a factory in the United States so it doesn't

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>have to pay the tariff that will.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Take That will take many many as you know, that

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 2>will take many years.

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I'll tell you know. There's another theory is

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 3>that the tariff, you make it so high, so horrible,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 3>so obnoxious, that they'll come right away. When I do

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 3>the ten percent ten percent is really first of all,

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>ten percent when you collect it is hundreds of billions

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>of numbers that you're talking all reducing our deficit. But

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 3>really so, there's two ways of looking at a tariff.

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 3>You can do it as a money making instrument, or

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 3>you can do it as something to get the companies. Now,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 3>if you want the companies to come in, the traff

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 3>has to be a lot higher than ten percent, because

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 3>ten percent is not enough. They're not going to do

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 3>it for ten But you make fifty percent tariff, they're

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 3>going to come in. Let me tell you the other

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 3>thing about tariffs that's great are steel companies. As you know,

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 3>three four years ago, they were all gone. When I

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 3>was in office, I saw a man from a big

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 3>steel company and he was devastated. I knew him for

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>a long time, and it's been a tough business. It

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>was a great business many years ago. And I would

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 3>not let you are steel be sold to Japanese by

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>the way, it just psychologically I think it.

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Was steel as you Yeah, I wouldn't.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Let Yeah, I would have let it be sold, but

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I would if I would stop it if it hasn't

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>been completed by the time I'm president, because I think

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 3>it's such a horrible tone. But I had a lot

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to do with steel. We were going to lose all

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 3>our steel companies because China, as you remember, was dumping

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 3>steel at levels that nobody's ever seen before. And I

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>put a fifty percent tax on that and tariff on

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 3>that all dumped steel. And it was also bad steal.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 3>It was dirty what they call dirty steel was a

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 3>good steal, which is a bad thing for structural components

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 3>of building and planes and things like that. They were

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 3>dumping crap into our country. And I put a fifty

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 3>percent tariff. I started at twenty five. I raised it

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>to fifty because the twenty five didn't quite do it.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I raised it to fifty and that did it. They

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 3>stopped dumping steel, and I saved our steels by having that,

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 3>we saved it. We saved our steel. Now what was

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 3>left because we've lost so much. But there are certain

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 3>companies you have to have. There are certain things you

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 3>have to have. Steel you have to have if you

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 3>go to war. You know there's a possibility you go

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 3>to war. I kept us out of where I was

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>the only president in eighty two years that kept you

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 3>out of a war except I defeated Isis. But I

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 3>inherited that one. I mean, no wars. And by the way,

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 3>by the way, and I think it's very important you

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>can go. You know, I caught the weave. You can

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 3>call it. You have the weave as long as you

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>end up in the right location at the end. But

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 3>while we're talking about it, we have never been so

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>close to World War three as we have are right

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>now with what's going on in Ukraine, in Russia, in

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East. Well, let's no wars in the whole world,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 3>think of it. And I talked about a wars. I

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 3>talk plenty of countries at a wars. I had the

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 3>whole world other than Isis, which I inherited and I

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 3>knocked out Isis. And a matter of wiks, it was

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 3>supposed to take four to five years. I did it

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 3>in a matter of weeks. And we actually have a

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 3>great military. We don't know how to use it.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 2>You present Joun with great respect. I was asking about tariffs.

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>You've gone off by that. Seeing you've brought up tariffs

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>and foreign policy, many people would say the biggest problem

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>with your tariffs is actually geopolitics. You in your first term,

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you got some credit for effectively saying that there was

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>a Cold War against China. That's what America was in

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 2>You look at the last Cold War against the Soviet Union.

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>America won it in part because it rallied allies to it.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>You're talking about slamming allies with thirty tariffs. Isn't this

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>time you're going to end up trying to rally the

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 2>West and you're dividing it instead. Isn't that the real

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>problem with tariff, even beyond all the problems to the economy,

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 2>where you you keep on bringing out these individual examples,

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>but the overall effect is going to be dramatic. Answer

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 2>first about foreign policies.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll do that.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 2>How does it help you take on China? Turning all

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>your allies.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Again tremendously because China things were a stupid country, a

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 3>very stupid country. They can't believe that somebody finally got

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>wise to them. Not one president Bush Obama, Barack Husein Obama.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Have you heard of him? Not one president, not think

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of it. Not one president charge China anything. They said, Oh,

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 3>they are third world nation, they are developing. Well, we're

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 3>a developing nation too. Take a look at Detroit. Take

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 3>a look at our cities. We're a developing nation. We

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 3>we have to develop more than they do. We're way

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 3>behind them. You take a look at what's happened to

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 3>our cities.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 2>So my question is about your allies, not about China.

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 2>You aren't going to annoy the allies behind you.

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 3>But our allies have taken advantage of us more so

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 3>than our enemies. Our allies are the European Union. We

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>have a trade deficit of three hundred billion dollars with

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the European Union. Our allies are Japan. You know, Abby

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 3>was a very good friend of mine. He was a

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 3>great guy, great and I said to him in Japan

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>he was assassinated and he was a great man, he

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 3>really was. I didn't see too many like him, and

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 3>he was. He got very sick and he had to

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.959
<v Speaker 3>take off, and then he was actually making a comeback.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 3>He was going to make a comeback and he would

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>have won easily. But he was a great gentleman, handsome,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 3>wonderful man, respected by everybody. And I went to him

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 3>and I said, Chinzo, we have to talk what trade

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 3>and he goes, I'll never forget it, I know. I said,

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 3>what do you know? I knew you'd come to me.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Why do you say that, because I can't believe I

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't tell the survey was alive. Actually said, I can't

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 3>believe how many years it's been that nobody even negotiated

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 3>with us in America. I said, Shinzo, you have to

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 3>pay for your cars. You're sending millions of cars. You

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 3>don't accept the car from US. You don't have one

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>car that you accept, and yet we're selling three million,

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 3>four million of your cars. I said, Shinzo on agriculture,

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 3>you won't even accept our agriculture. And I renegotiated a

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 3>whole trade deal from a little disadvantage because I was

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 3>stuck with a bad deal. I mean, I got we

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>have trade deals that were so bad that I said,

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 3>who are the people that are doing it? They're either

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 3>very stupid or are they getting paid off? Okay, it's

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 3>one or the other. It's very simple. We have the

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.479
<v Speaker 3>worst trade deals all over the world. South Korea. I

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 3>love South Korea. They're wonderful people, extremely ambitious. They have

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>a money machine. We protect them from North Korea and

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 3>other people. North Korea is very nuclear. I got along

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 3>with him very well, Kim Jong. But wait, they don't

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 3>pass anything. And I said, this is crazy. If I

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 3>didn't put tariffs on you know, the the car companies,

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 3>they make most of their money at small trucks. I

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 3>put tariffs on China, but I put twenty seven point

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 3>five percent. Otherwise we'd be flooded with Chinese cars and

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 3>all of our factories were clothes, would have no jobs

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 3>at all in the auto industry that goes for electric

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 3>by the way, which is a killer, which I've explained

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think I have to bore anybody by

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 3>talking about it. But I put tariffs on South Korea

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 3>because they were sending in trucks, and I put tariffs

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 3>on fairly substantial tariffs. Do you know that our car

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 3>companies make almost all of their money with the small trucks,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 3>SUVs and small trucks. If I took those tariffs on

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 3>you would be inundated. Every car company would be out

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 3>of business. And I got calls from Ford, I got

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>calls from everybody saying, Sir, I can't believe you only

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 3>this for us. You saved our company. We were going

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to they make all their money with us if they

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 3>make most of their money with a small truck. And

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 3>you know the sun is.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Many consumers ended up with more expensive cars. But let

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 2>me just let me just come at you and foreign policy.

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't have at our company.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 2>You have said that Taiwan should pay for US protection.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I asked, because this morning you just mentioned North Korea.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese Army literally as we speak, are engaged in

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 2>rehearsals for a full naval blockade of Taiwan. So I

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 2>suppose my question is if China invades Taiwan, would you

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 2>send American troops to defend it.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, the reason they're doing it now is they're not

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>going to do it afterwards. Okay, it's you know, so

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>they're doing it now. They want to do a chain. Now. Look,

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 3>I had I had a very I had a very

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>good relationship with President. She had a very good relationship

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 3>with Putin and a very good relationship with Kim Jong on,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>who has a nuclear force that you won't even believe.

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, today it was announced for those

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 3>that he just blew up the railroad going into South Korea.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>That means South Korea is now cut off from Russia

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 3>and China and various other places.

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you just mentioned these are big things.

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 3>I have to mention that you just mentioned.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 2>You just mentioned Putin though, and this has been this

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>controversy of the past week. Can you say yes or

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>no whether you have talked to Vladimir Putin since you

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>stopped being president.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't come into that, but I will tell

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 3>you that if I did, it's a smart thing. If

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm friendly with people, if I have a relationship with people,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 3>that's a good thing, not a bit. I think in

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 3>terms of a country, He's got two thousand nuclear weapons,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 3>and so do we. China has a lot less, but

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 3>they'll catch us within five years very much. I don't

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 3>talk about No, I don't talk about that.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 2>I talk about I can tell you what these people, Russia.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Has never had a president that they respect so much.

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>But more importantly or less importantly, I guess I went

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 3>into Russia and people said, no, he likes Putting, and

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 3>put likes him. Let me tell you. The first thing

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I did was terminated North Stream to nobody ever heard

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 3>of Nordstream too. It's a pipeline from Russia to Germany

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 3>and all over Europe. I said, wait a minute. To NATO,

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>I said, so, let's get this straight. My first meeting,

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 3>I said, so, Putin's building the biggest pipeline in the world.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>He's going to Germany, but all over Europe. And you're

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>paying him billions of dollars a year, billions of dollars

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 3>a month. You're paying Germany spam billions of dollars a month.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 3>And we're supposed to protect you against the guy that

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 3>you're paying all this money to. So is there's something

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 3>wrong with my thinking. So he's building a pipeline to

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.239
<v Speaker 3>Germany and we're spending And by the way, until I

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 3>got there, we were spending almost one hundred percent for

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 3>NATO because we had all these delinquent countries they weren't paying.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 3>When I got there, I said, you know what, And

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 3>by the way, my biggest fan is Stoltenberg, just leaving

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 3>Secretary General of NATO. He said. When Bush came in,

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 3>he made a speech and left. When Obama came in,

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 3>he made a speech and left. When Trump came in,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 3>he made a speech, and he said, let me see

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 3>you books. And I found out in the books that

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 3>nobody was paying. There were only seven countries that were paying.

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 3>We were supporting NATO. They screw us on trade so bad,

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 3>the European nations, and then on top of that, they

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 3>were screwing us on the military. So they'd take you

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 3>a tremendous advantage of US three hundred and fifty billion

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars on trade, and we're then supporting them. In other words,

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 3>it's not sustainable. You can't keep doing this. You can't

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 3>have that China, all of these countries, and stupid people

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 3>made these deals. I saw trade deals that were so

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 3>stupid that you have to be excuse me. That was

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 3>so bad that you'd have to be an idiot to

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 3>sign them, and we signed them for years. We had

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 3>we had I could tell you trade that I have

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 3>never seen anything. I said, who would agree to this.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 3>They had to be corrupt. They had to be corrupt

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.719
<v Speaker 3>to make those deals. They had to be corrupt, because

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 3>there is no way a rational human being. I always say,

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 3>either corrupt or extremely stupid, because there's no way a

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 3>rational human being would ever sign the trade deals at

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 3>this country signed, and I got out of many of

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 3>those deals. I told South kore I'm sorry, you're gonna

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 3>have to pay for your military. We have forty thousand

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 3>troops over there. You're gonna have to pay. You become

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 3>a very wealthy country just to finish. You become a

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 3>very wealth They said, no, no, no, we will not pay.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 3>We will not We haven't paid since the Korean War.

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 3>I said, no, you got to pay. I said, would

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollars a year to start off with? No,

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>no where. They went crazy. They agreed the two I

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 3>got two billion dollars for nothing, and I said, here's

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 3>what we're going to do. They said, we can't agree

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to this because we have to go through parliament. They

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 3>have the parliament or whatever their legislature is. They said,

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 3>that's okay, I fully understand that. Make it two billion dollars.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 3>But next year I'm going to talk to you again.

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 3>And I was going to make it five billion. And

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 3>they knew it was coming. The happiest people to see

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 3>that it was Biden instead of Trump with them. South Korea.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 3>You know they did. They cut off the deal that

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 3>I made where they were paying us. They backed to

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 3>nothing because they went back to Biden and they gave

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 3>it to them for nothing. They were willing to pay.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 3>We have forty thousand troops in harm's way, very serious

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>because you have North Korea's very serious power. They have

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>tremendous nuclear power. And I said to South Korea, you

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 3>gotta pay, and they agreed to do it, and Biden

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 3>then cut it back. And it's a shame. And I

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 3>could tell you fifty deals and if I were there now,

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 3>they'd be paying US ten billion dollars a year, and

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 3>you know what, they'd be happy to do it. It's

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>a money machine. South Korea. You're going to mention Taiwan.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 3>You wanted to mention that you mentioned.

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Taiwan, you said you would defend them. You

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 2>also seem to imply that Putin you would not putin.

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.239
<v Speaker 2>You seem to imply that you had talked to him

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 2>without actually confirming I said those things. What about? Can

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I ask you a particular thing about the dollar? You've

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 2>actually you talked about wars at the New York Economic Club.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 2>You said that if you lost the dollar as a

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 2>reserve currency, it would be like America losing a war.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You look at what you're going to do in terms

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 2>of protectionism, drive countries to use the other currencies, and

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 2>all that debt is also going to lessen the dollar's

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>status as of the world's reserve currency. Do you worry

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 2>about that?

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 3>The dollar is so secure, your reserve currency is the

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 3>strongest it'll ever be.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 2>And Trump at the moment, there is a thing called

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 2>the Trump trade in the markets. Do you know what

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 2>that is? The Trump trade is very simple. People are

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 2>betting that your policies, they're going to drive up debt.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 2>They're going to drive up inflation, so they're going to

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>drive up inflation interest rates. Are the investors wrong?

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I had four years no inflation. I had four

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 3>years now, but.

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 2>That was that was when you had much.

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I had four years. It's better than that. And Biden,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 3>who has no idea where the hell he is? Okay,

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Biden went two years with no inflation because he inherited

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 3>from me. And then they started spending money like drunken sailors.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>They spent so much money. It was so ridiculous. The

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>money they were spending. They were spending on the green

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 3>new scam, A green new scam, the green new deal.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 3>You know it was conceived of by AOC plus three.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.919
<v Speaker 3>She never even studied the environment in college. She went

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 3>to a nice college. She came out. She just said

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the green new scam. She just named all these things.

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>She meant. The markets are looking at the fact you

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>are making all these promises. Latest one was carloans. You're

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>flooding the thing with giving giveaways. But when I was

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 2>actually I was actually quite kind to you. I used

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>seven trillion. The upper estimate is fifteen trillion. People like

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>a Wall Street Journal, who's hardly a communist organization. They

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 2>have criticized you on this as well. You are running

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 2>an enormous debt.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>What is the Wall Street Journal? Now I'm meeting with

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 3>them tomorrow. What is the Wall Street Journal? That they've

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 3>been wrong about everything? So of you, by the way,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>you've been wrong.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You're trying to turn this. You're trying to turn this.

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 3>You've been wrong.

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Now you're trying to turn You're trying to turn this

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 2>into debate. There are business people You're wrong.

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 3>You've been wrong. You've been wrong all your life on

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 3>this stuff. You've been let me tell you about currency.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna you know, you're going jumping a lot of

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.719
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different subjects to the subject stick their

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>reserve currency. That's where you start, right. The reserve currency

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 3>is under threat because you have Iran, you have Russia,

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 3>you have China. Once China is the one that you

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 3>have to worry about because they want it. They want

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 3>to have the wand be the you know, thing of power.

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 3>So here's what I'm doing again. I hate to go

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 3>back to it. If somebody says, and I know countries

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 3>want to get out because they don't respect our leadership,

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 3>they look at this guy, they say, you've got to

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 3>be kidding. And she's worse than him, by the way

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 3>she's I never thought i'd say this. She is not

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 3>as smart as Biden. If you can believe, this is

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>not what we had four years of this lunacy, and

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 3>we can't have anymore. We're not gonna have a country left. Okay.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Currency very important, yes, And if you want to go

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 3>to third world, if you want to go to third

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>world status, lose your reserve currency. We have to have that.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 3>We cannot lose it. If you'll go to third world

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>status in this country because you take a look at

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the way things are running. If a country tells me, Sarah,

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 3>we like you very much, but we're going to no

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 3>longer adhere to being in the reserve currency. We're not

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 3>going to salute the dollar anymore. I'll say that's okay,

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 3>And you're going to pay one hundred percent TERI for

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 3>everything you sell into the United States. And we love

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 3>your product. I help you sell a lot of it

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 3>into the United States, but you're going to pay one

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent tab. He will then follow it up by saying, sir,

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.719
<v Speaker 3>it would be an honor to stay with the reserve

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 3>current and say I will be That will be like

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 3>just playing that's not even chess, that's checkers. But you

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 3>don't have other listen to this. You don't have other

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 3>people that can talk that way. You know a lot

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 3>of people say, we love Trump's policy, but we would

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 3>like to have another messenger because we don't like him.

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>He's a little bit crass. And then actually it was

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Lindsay Graham. I must say he was a progressive in

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 3>all fairness, but Lindsay Graham said, but Trump's policy doesn't

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 3>work with that Trump and there's a lot of truth

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 3>to that. Macron was going to nice guy Emmanuel. He's

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a wise guy, but he's for France and we're for

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the USA. You know this story. He was going to

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 3>tax American companies doing business in France a very substantial tax.

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 3>And I told my people, I'm not I didn't even

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 3>like the companies, but I'm representing American companies and this guy.

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 3>So I said, call Macron and call his people and

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 3>say we're not going to stand for that. And I

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 3>got the Mnuchin and you know a lot of guys,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 3>smart guys. If I can finish, I'll go longer.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 2>If you want about the Federal room.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.959
<v Speaker 3>You've got to be able to finish a thought because

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 3>it's very important. You know, this is big stuff we're

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>talking about. You can't go that.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 2>You've gone from the dollleuts.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Let me just tell you so. I said, no, I'm

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 3>just telling you basic. It's called the weave. It's all

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>these different things happen him. So let me just say so.

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I said to Mnuchin, call him up and say no. Way.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 3>He did, and he came back to see me. He said,

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 3>they won't do it. So it's too late. I said

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 3>to somebody as you call him. Then I said, let

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 3>me do it. And I called him and I said, Emmanuel,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 3>you're taxing American companies very substantially. You're not doing it

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 3>with other companies. You must think we're stupid. It's not

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. But doing all doing what I cannot

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 3>do anything it's too late or it was approved by

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a legislature. I said, that's okay. Here's the story. Every

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 3>bottle of wine and CHAMPI that you sent into the

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 3>United States effective immediately, and I'm signing it as I speak.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm charging you one hundred percent. Want every bottle of

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 3>wine and champagne. You know they like the wine and champagne. Right,

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Every bottle of wine and champagne that comes into the

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 3>United States of Americas has a tax on starting on

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Monday morning. This was a Friday of one hundred percent.

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's better than you're doing, okay. And he said, no, no, no,

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 3>you cannot do that. I said, I've done it. It's

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 3>already signed Monday morning, be goes. May I call you back, yes,

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 3>of course, me back in about three minutes. We have

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 3>decided to remove the tax from the communism. I did

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 3>this all day long, but you don't have you think

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Biden does that.

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so let me let me, let me change.

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you a very factual question. The Federal Reserve. Yeah,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>you say you don't want interest rates to go higher.

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 2>You've gone back with some forwards about depends what you

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 2>want to keep, whether you want to keep your own

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Powell's chair at the Federal Reserve. His term as chair

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 2>runs on to May twenty twenty six. Would you seek

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to remove, remove or demote him?

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think it's the greatest job in government. You

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 3>show up to the office once a month and you say,

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 3>let's see flip aical and everybody talks about you like

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 3>you're a god. Oh what will he do? I mean

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 3>before the guy used to walk into my office, he

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 3>was like began host. He was fine.

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.959
<v Speaker 2>You did talk about him, You talked about removing him once.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I did because he was keeping the ridge too high,

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 3>and I was right.

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>And you would do that again.

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 3>In fact, he actually dropped them too much when I

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 3>did this, because I said I was threatening to terminate him.

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 3>There was a question as to whether or not you could,

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and there was an article on the New York Times

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 3>two hair pages one page that I can do it

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 3>by lawyers one hair page that I couldn't, and that

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 3>was enough for him, and he dropped the hell out

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 3>of the rates. He dropped them too much, he went,

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 3>so he dropped them actually too much. Okay, here's the story.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that if you're a very good president with

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.479
<v Speaker 3>good sense, you should be able to at least talk

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 3>to him. I don't say make the decision at all,

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 3>but I mean I've been a very successful businessman. I've

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 3>done really good, much better now people are understanding how

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 3>good I've done because they're seeing it much better than

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the fake news wants to give me credit. What I

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 3>think I have the right to say. As a very

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 3>good businessman and somebody that's used a lot of sense,

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I think I have the right to say that. You know,

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm better than he would be. I think

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm better than most people would be in that position.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I think I have the right to say I think

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 3>you should go up or down a little bit. I

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 3>don't think I should be allowed to order it, but

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I think I have the right to put in comments

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 3>as to whether or not interest rates should go up.

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 2>You, when you looked at the Supreme Court, you came

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 2>up with a list of people, I did, who you

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>thought of replacing bringing in a Supreme Court justices? Would

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 2>you do that with the federal.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Well I no longer needed well I it was a

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 3>great thing. In fact, a lot of people said I

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 3>got elected because of that. I was an unknown quantity.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I was very known as a business guy, but I

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 3>wasn't known as a political person or the leader of

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 3>a country. And people were very worried about you know,

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 3>actually they were worried, am I going to be liberal?

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 3>If you want to know the truth? And somebody said,

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 3>would you come up with a list of twenty or

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty five justices in this case, mostly judges that you'd

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 3>put in in case it were necessary. Now it's amazing

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 3>because I got three in four years. Most people get

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 3>none because you know, you put them in the young.

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 3>You tend to put them in young. Only super people

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 3>put old. You know, you don't put old in because

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 3>they're there for two years or three years you.

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Were you know, I got three.

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Most a lot of judges, a lot of presidents get none.

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 3>I got three, and I think they've been three great

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 3>choices too, by the way, But they by the way,

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I think they have. I think they have been really

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 3>great choices. But I got three judges, and and you

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 3>know what they want to do. They want to put

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 3>up they want to now put up up to twenty

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 3>five justices into the Supreme Court, the radical left, and

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 3>that can't happen. So I think I've done a great

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 3>job in putting injustices and three hundred judges, and that

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 3>made a tremendous difference in the country. You know, I

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 3>was a little lucky because baracusay and Obama did not

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 3>get his judges approved a lot of them. So I

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 3>ended up with one hundred and twenty five judges before

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I got there. So most again, most presidents don't even

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 3>get to put a Supreme Court judge in because it's

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 3>nine and you know, they're there for a long time.

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Most of them are there for a very long time.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 3>And I got three, which is a very unusual situation.

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I got three in four years.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can change the subject's technology thing you wouldn't

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Federal Reserve. The US Justice Department is

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 2>thinking about breaking up alphabet because Google likes to be known. Now,

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 2>should Google be breaken up?

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I just haven't gotten over something. The Justice Department did

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 3>yesterday where Virginia cleaned up its voter rolls and got

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 3>rid of thousands and thousands of bad votes, and the

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department sued them that they should be allowed to

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 3>put those bad votes and illegal votes back in and

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 3>let the people vote. So I haven't gotten I haven't

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 3>gotten over that. A lot of people have seen that.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 3>They can't even believe it.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 2>The question is about Google, President Chump.

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Look, Google's got a lot of power. They're very

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 3>bad to me, very very bad to me. I mean

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I can speak from that standpoint. They only have bad stories.

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 3>In other words, if I have twenty good stories and

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty bad stories and everyone's entitled to that, you'll only

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 3>see the twenty bad stories. And I called the head

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 3>of Google the other day and I said, I'm getting

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 3>a lot of good stories lately, but you don't find

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 3>them in Google. I think it's a whole rig deal.

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I think Google's rigged, just like our government is rigged

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 3>all over you.

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 2>You would break them up.

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 3>In other words, I do something, but you have to

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 3>have Look, I give them a lot of credit. They've

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>become such a power, such a power, and you've got

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 3>to give them credit for that. How they became a

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 3>power is you know, really the discussion. At the same time,

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 3>it's a very dangerous thing because we want to have

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 3>great companies. We don't want China to have these companies.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Right now, China is a friend of Google right now.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 3>You know, China is a very powerful, very smart group

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 3>of people. I will tell you that from very personal.

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Example of a Chinese tech company at the moment. TikTok. Yeah,

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you initially wanted to ban TikTok. Now you like it,

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 2>apparently for some reason to do with Facebook. There is

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 2>a decision coming up. If you became president, it's Chinese

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 2>parent would have to sell it. I think it's by

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 2>January the nineteenth. Would you force them to do that?

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 3>So I originally had it all done, and then I

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 3>said to Congress, your decision. I said, I'm not going to,

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, pull any strings nothing. Your decision. You make it.

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 3>But I had it all done and I said, you

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 3>make it, and they decided not to make it. I

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 3>didn't care if they made it or not, because to me,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 3>it was a flip of acquiring. You know, you have

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 3>some real First Amendment problems. You have a lot of problems.

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 2>You just talked about Chinese technology, the need to defend

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 2>against it, TikTok and the threat people see too many

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 2>kind of American children and things like that. Why do

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 2>you no longer see the security threat?

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it is a threat. Frankly, I think everything's

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a threat. There's nothing that's not a threat. But sometimes

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 3>you have to fight through these threats. You know, you

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 3>can't just like Google. I'm not a fan of Google.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 3>They treat me badly. But if you are you going

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to destroy the company by doing that. If you do that,

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 3>are you going to destroy the company. What you can

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 3>do without breaking it up is make sure that it's

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 3>more fair. They do treat me very badly. Oh and

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 3>he told me, no way. You're the number one person

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 3>on all of Google first stories, I mean, which probably

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 3>makes sense, to be honestly, I actually agreeve most of

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 3>them are bad stories. But these are minor details, right,

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.919
<v Speaker 3>And it's only bad because of the fake news, because

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the news is really fake. That's the one we really

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 3>have to straighten And we have to straighten out our

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 3>press because we have a corrupt press, and.

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 5>That's the one we really can I ask you, can

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 5>I ask you about Silicon I was in Silicon Valley

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 5>recently you talk to the tech bosses and the tech people,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 5>and that seems to be real fear that what you

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 5>would do with tech is you would hand it over

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 5>to Elon Musk and say you sort it out.

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 3>No, No, I have great respect for Elon. Look. I

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 3>saw that rocket ship come in yesterday and go right

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 3>back to where it took off to the gantry. I

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 3>guess they call it. And I said, what the hell.

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 3>I was on the phone talking about probably politics and

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 3>the television, and the television's on, and I'm seeing this

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 3>big thing where the white paint was burned off it

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 3>from that, you know, thousands of miles an hour they eat.

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And I see this big, massive tube that's ten stories

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty stories tall come down. I told the person on

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 3>the phone, wait a minute. I'm seeing something that's I

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 3>don't believe it, neither does anybody else here. And I said,

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute. I put the I forgot the guy

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 3>was on the phone. He waited for a half hour,

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 3>and I watched I watched that come down, and I

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:51.919
<v Speaker 3>watched it come down and come right in between those

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 3>big levers, and I said, and it looked to me

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 3>like I was going to crash. It was coming in

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 3>hot and all of a sudden, boom, you see the

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 3>motor the fire kick in and I called it elon.

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I said, that's the most incredible thing. I said, Can

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Russia do that? Nope? I said can the United States

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 3>do it? Nope. He's the only way they can do it.

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And I said, you know, I want to put him

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 2>in charge of deregulation, not deregulation, cutting cutting wasteful spend,

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 2>cutting everything which deregulation.

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 3>When you every.

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Predial, every president comes in and talks about cutting wasteful spending.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, there's tremendous wall.

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Give me an example of something you will do that

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 2>will get rid of government spend.

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, let me give you an example. When I came

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 3>into government, I.

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Was the first example coming forward.

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 3>This is going forward because it's the same thing. When

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 3>I first sat down, a general came into my office

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and he said, sir, it's nice to meet you. Will

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 3>you please sign this? I said, what is it? It's

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a contract for a new air force one which is

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 3>actually two planes, not one two Boeing seven forty seven.

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 3>And I said, how much is it? Five point seven

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar? Dollar said, it's a hell of an expensive plan,

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 3>but there's reasons for that. He said, Nope, I'm not

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 3>signing it. I said, who negotiated Barackus, say Obama. I said,

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not signing it. Why because he because there's a

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of fat. He said, I'm not signing. It's got

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 3>to have a three on it. Anyway, long story short,

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 3>some of you have heard this. I got it down too,

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 3>because first week they cut off four hundred million, he said,

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll cut I met with the head of going Wait, Dennis.

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I said, Dennis got to have a three. Five point

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:35.439
<v Speaker 3>seven is too much? Five point seven billion. He said,

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 3>the most I'll takeoff is four hundred million dollars. I said, well,

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 3>that's not bad for one conversation. So he got it down.

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 3>I said, nope, I'm not accepting. Then he took off

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 3>two more. Then he took off anyway. Two months went by,

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 3>three months went by. I thought we blew the deal,

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 3>and I was okay with me. I didn't care, but

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 3>we should have a new air force. One when we

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:57.919
<v Speaker 3>see these planes from Saudi Arabia, from different countries brand new,

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 3>and ours is like thirty two years old, and it's

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 3>a very different plane. It's a much smaller plane near

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing. The United States should have the best plane.

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 3>I will tell you, not for me, but we should have.

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Let me. Let me give you his own, would you.

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 3>So he said, he calls up after like two three months.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I didn't call him, which is the best way to

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:20.959
<v Speaker 3>buy something. Don't call back, and he goes in fact

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:22.320
<v Speaker 3>what he called me. I said, I wonder what the

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 3>hell he wants. That's a good way to negotia. Let

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 3>me tell you. So calls back said, sir, three billion,

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:34.240
<v Speaker 3>nine hundred and ninety nine million, nine nine and ninety

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 3>nine cents one penny above below four billion. Now, so

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.919
<v Speaker 3>I said, you got yourself a deal. Then I said

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to him, let me ask you a question. So you

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 3>had a deal at five point seven billion, and in

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 3>a period of two months I got one point seven

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 3>billion off. That means you're going to make one point

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 3>seven billion dollar profit on an airplane. Did nobody ever

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:03.880
<v Speaker 3>negotiate with you? Well, not really, sir. They just this

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 3>is the price, and they said we'll take it. And

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 3>I said, you know, and then I learned. That was

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 3>my first experience from that, But then I learned everything

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 3>is like that. There is so much way so I'm

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:20.439
<v Speaker 3>getting think of this the exact same plane for one

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 3>point seven billion, less exact except to have a better

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 3>pay job. Okay, much better pay job. A different co Red, white,

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:32.320
<v Speaker 3>and blue was beautiful. And if you look at every

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 3>contract that's one contract and relatively small compared to most,

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:41.720
<v Speaker 3>think of it. You save one point seven billion because

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:45.720
<v Speaker 3>you negotiate every deal is like that. We're building ships

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 3>that are costing two three times more. A tremendous waste,

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 3>fraud and abuse in our contract and if you could

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 3>cut it, you would have a surplus without even going

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 3>into growth. But growth, we will grow. We're going to

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 3>bring companies and jobs in at levels that you've never seen.

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 3>And you would never be able to do it because

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 3>you're not a believer.

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not running for president.

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Let me tell you the only way you can do

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 3>it is through the threat of tariffs. It's the only

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 3>way you can do it.

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Can we can we come back to one thing on

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 2>that deal making. You look out across this room. There

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of there's some big businesses, but a

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 2>lot of small ones. Like the way you've given us,

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:29.879
<v Speaker 2>You've given us a lot of examples of things where

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you've negotiated with the heads of big businesses. Give you

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 2>an example, when you put the tariffs on China, much

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 2>smaller than your planning to do at the moment. When

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 2>you put them on Apple came, you negotiated a difference

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 2>for them.

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 2>That's much harder for small business people. Isn't the problem

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 2>with the way that you do these kind of deals.

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 2>You're bound to deal with the big companies. It's the

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 2>small companies who get hit by all these different things

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 2>and can't find exceptions.

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we have exceptions. No, no, we had an exceptional.

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I gave Apple an exception. Tim Cook is a great Apple.

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Apple is not a small company, and please please think it.

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 2>But here's what question is about small business? Yes, but

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 2>what would we do for them now?

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.359
<v Speaker 3>But we have a very talented group of people. Bob

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Leitheuser did a very good job. We had great people,

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 3>We had central casting. These are and a large group

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 3>of people. We made exceptions. In the case of Apple.

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 3>They need an exception. You know why because of Samsung.

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 3>He came to me. He said, Samsung makes a product

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 3>similar to ours, very good product, the phones and other things,

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 3>and because they're in South Korea, they don't have the tariffs.

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Because we're in China. We have the tariffs. I said,

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 3>you happen to be right, You're not going to be

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 3>able to compete. I said, look, I'm going to give

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 3>you a one year break, but I want you to

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 3>start building your factories in this country, whether it's Texas

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.959
<v Speaker 3>or any other place anywhere in the country. He said,

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 3>what does that mean. I said, you have everything in China.

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I want you to move it from China back to

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 3>our country. And he started doing that and he built

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 3>a factory, a big one in Texas. He built another one,

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 3>and this was all a process. It was all happening.

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:10.760
<v Speaker 3>But I did give him an exception. And the reason

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 3>was he said, as soon as he said Samsung, I said,

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 3>how is that product compared to you? As he said,

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:18.280
<v Speaker 3>it's a good product. I said, then you really can't compete.

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 3>You can't have a twenty five or fifty percent tariff

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 3>and compete, right, Yeah, And I said, I'm giving you

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 3>an exception. And I did it for many companies. When

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 3>I had some.

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Businesses come and say, that was the question.

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 3>But we do it for small businesses too. We do

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 3>for small business I'll give you who I didn't know,

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 3>but he came to me. He was at a meeting

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and he built kitchen cabinets and he was pretty big

0:49:44.040 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 3>in the business. That's all he did is built kitchen cabinets.

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 3>He said, Sir, China and South Korea are building kitchen

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 3>cabinets for one third of what I can make. I said,

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:58.840
<v Speaker 3>what's the quality. They're not as good, but they're good enough.

0:49:59.400 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 3>I can't go. I'm going out of business. I'm going

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 3>out of business. I put a twenty five percent tariff

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 3>still on one kitchen cabinets. I saw the guy two

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 3>three days ago. He said, I'm the man that saw

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 3>you about kitchen cabinets. You saved my company when you

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 3>did the tariff, and you saved thousands of jobs. And

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 3>my company is now doing very well. And he started

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 3>to cry, so to cry. And this guy hasn't cried

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 3>too much. I will tell you. He said, you saved

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 3>my company. There's nobody that could have done that.

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I can ask you Ben about something else. Business

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:40.839
<v Speaker 2>people here in this room, business people, capital markets. They

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 2>all like the rule of law. They like certainty. The

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Chinese who you mentioned other dictators, right, they don't like

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 2>it when things go but they like it when things

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 2>go wrong in America. If you look at the events

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.399
<v Speaker 2>of January sixth, twenty twenty one, it showed to many

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 2>people America's democracy was unruly and violent only three weeks

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to go to the election. Will you come it now

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:04.360
<v Speaker 2>to respecting and encouraging a peaceful transfer of power?

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, you had a peaceful transfer of power.

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:08.760
<v Speaker 2>You had a peaceful transfer power. You had a peaceful

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 2>come on present Trump. You had a piece, You had

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a piece. You had a peaceful transfer of power compared

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 2>with Venezuela. But it was by far the most the

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 2>worst transfer of power for a long time.

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. I appreciate that because this is the you

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 3>know what they like to do. This is what they

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 3>like to do.

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And question question question President Trump is would you respect

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the decision?

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 3>When I found out about this interview, I did a

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:37.319
<v Speaker 3>little check. He is a man that has not been

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 3>a big Trump fan over the years, So I had

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 3>a choice. Do I do this interview or not. I'm

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 3>glad I did it. But do I do this interview

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 3>or do I disappoint a lot of people? Because I

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 3>know a lot of people in the audience, but his

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 3>view is very different than mine.

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Let me just say I'm asking questions.

0:51:55.360 --> 0:52:00.760
<v Speaker 3>We had a term peacefully and patriotically. These were people.

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 3>If you think an election is crooked, and I do

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent. If you think the day it comes

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 3>when you can't protest, you take a look at the Democrats.

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:15.399
<v Speaker 3>They protested twenty sixteen. They're still protesting it. Nobody talks

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:18.759
<v Speaker 3>about them. But if we protest, we want to have

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 3>honest elections. You think the last election was honest, well

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:23.919
<v Speaker 3>do you think.

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 2>All the times it went to courts? The courts, no,

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it didn't govern.

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 3>They went to court and the courts all said, you

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 3>don't have standing. Nobody had standing. And it's hard, frankly

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 3>after an election for a judge, but they all said,

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 3>you don't. Nobody ever had standing. But the facts, if

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 3>you take a look, I'd show you hundreds of pages

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 3>of facts. People were angry, people went there, and I'll

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 3>tell you what they never show that. The primary scene

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:56.360
<v Speaker 3>in Washington was hundreds of thousands, the largest group of

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 3>people I've ever spoken before, and I've spoken before, and

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 3>it was love and peace. And some people went to

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the Capitol and a lot of strange things happened there.

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:09.720
<v Speaker 3>A lot of strange things with people being waved into

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 3>the capitol by police, with people screaming go in with it.

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:16.879
<v Speaker 3>That never got into trouble. You know, I don't want

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 3>to mention names, but you know who they are, a

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of strange things happened, but you had a peaceful,

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 3>very peaceful I left. I left the morning that I

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:28.840
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to leave. I went to Florida, and you

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 3>had a very peaceful transfer. This was not a And

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you what those people that did go at

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 3>which was a tiny fraction of the people that went

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 3>to Washington. I mean you're talking about of very very

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:46.399
<v Speaker 3>small because hundreds of thousands of people and I don't

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 3>know what you had five six, seven hundred people go

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 3>down to the capitol. But those people that was not

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 3>that was not one of those people had a gun.

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Nobody was killed except for Ashley Babbitt. She was killed.

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:04.880
<v Speaker 3>She was killed. She was shut their head by a

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 3>policeman that we had know. What he did was hard present.

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think we should be allowed to disagree on that.

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:13.320
<v Speaker 2>And let's return.

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 3>Do you see by the reaction.

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Let's return, Let's return. Let's return to one other big

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 2>subject you bring up repeatedly. Immigration. I know, it's a

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 2>very emotive issue for you, But just from the point

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:26.479
<v Speaker 2>of view business people here, you look at the full

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 2>effect of taking a lot of people out of the workforce,

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:33.400
<v Speaker 2>removing a lot of people. The federal the Congressional Budget

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Office is banking on the fact that there'll be nine

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars added to the GDP of America over the

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 2>next ten years by immigrants. You want to stop that process.

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 2>For all the people who run businesses in the audience,

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm just focusing on the economic thing. Are you prepared

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 2>to say, Look, it's fine to have a slightly smaller

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 2>economy in exchange for having the immigration controls.

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 3>A simple answer. I want a lot of people to

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 3>come into our country, but I want them to come

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:03.839
<v Speaker 3>in legally. I don't want to have.

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 2>But that means that means you will have. That means

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 2>you will have to You know, you are talking about

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 2>deposting eleven million people. That is a lot of people's

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:17.239
<v Speaker 2>take out.

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 3>It came out last week that four hundred and twenty

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 3>five thousand people are horrible criminals at the highest level,

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 3>But it came out that thirteen thousand and ninety nine

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:34.399
<v Speaker 3>were let in during their administration they tried to say

0:55:34.480 --> 0:55:37.680
<v Speaker 3>longer wrong. During the Over the last three and a

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 3>half years, thirteen thousand plus people came in. Murderers, they're

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 3>in jail for murder. Some were having the death penalty.

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 3>They were all released into our country. Thirteen thousand and

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine people were released into our country. We had

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 3>drug dealers released, we had street gangs released. Look at

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in a A. But now I don't have

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 3>to go with Aurora anymore. Look at what happened yesterday

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:10.400
<v Speaker 3>last night in Times Square where rough migrants from all

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:13.840
<v Speaker 3>over the place. You know, it's not just South America.

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 3>We have people coming in from the Congo, large numbers

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 3>from the Congo in Africa. They came in as of

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 3>last night, I was speaking to Tom Homan one hundred

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 3>and eighty countries. People came in. They came from prisons

0:56:29.520 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and jails. They came from mental institutions and insantus ALM's

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:37.719
<v Speaker 3>a step above. They came from the terrorists. We had

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 3>large numbers of terrorists come in. When I was present,

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 3>we had the strongest border in the history of a country.

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I built hundreds of miles of wall, and wall's work.

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:48.319
<v Speaker 3>By the way, hundreds of miles. We had the best

0:56:48.400 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 3>numbers we've ever had. Now we have the worst numbers.

0:56:51.960 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 3>And here's the problem. We have some of the worst

0:56:55.120 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 3>criminals in the world coming in now Venezuela. There time

0:57:00.280 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 3>has gone down at levels that nobody's ever seen before

0:57:03.760 --> 0:57:07.400
<v Speaker 3>because they've taken their street gangs and their drug dealers,

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 3>and they've emptied their prisons, not fully because they can't

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 3>get enough buses. They've emptied their prisons. They load up

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the buses and they drive them into the United States

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 3>and they're dropping their prisoners into our country. Their crime

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 3>is down. Their numbers are are crazy how low it drops.

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 3>I heard seventy two, seventy four percent. They've taken their

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 3>they've taken their gangs, they've taken their criminals off the street.

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 3>They've taken their people out of mental institutions, which costs

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 3>them a fortune, and they've taken them and dropped them

0:57:42.840 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 3>into the United States of America. Those people have to

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:50.080
<v Speaker 3>be returned. We can't live with thousands of murderers.

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And the issue I asked you about was the idea

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 2>that if you reduce immigration. Every economist will tell you,

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 2>if you have fewer people, there is a smaller economy.

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't I like immigration, but it's they've got to

0:58:04.680 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 3>come in legally.

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Okay, Well let's let's finish on two too.

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to make sure. Look, I don't want to

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:12.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to have people that have killed nine

0:58:12.400 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 3>people and they're you know, a sadistic, crazy nutshup. We

0:58:16.240 --> 0:58:19.640
<v Speaker 3>have to have people that that can love our country,

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 3>that can you know, that will obey the laws of

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 3>everything else. You have hundreds of thousands of criminals being

0:58:26.680 --> 0:58:29.120
<v Speaker 3>dropped in and then as well as one country.

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Look at what they have done though in Aurora.

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 3>They've taken over apartment complexes, They've taken they've gone into

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the real estate business. See, they're like us, except they've

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 3>done it with MK whatever the hell they're called, right,

0:58:42.080 --> 0:58:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean they have they have taken they have weapons

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 3>that are so sophisticated our military doesn't happen. They've taken

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 3>over parts of of cities in Colorado. You have a

0:58:55.320 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 3>place called beautiful Aurora. Take a look at what's happened

0:58:58.640 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 3>to Springfield, Ohio, where they dropped thirty thousand people into

0:59:04.000 --> 0:59:08.320
<v Speaker 3>a community of fifty thousand people and it's total bedlam.

0:59:08.800 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 3>The hospitals can't be used anymore by the residents. The

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:14.919
<v Speaker 3>schools can't be used by the children that were there

0:59:15.040 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 3>last year because other people that don't even speak the langage.

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 2>The issue I asked you about. Many companies here have

0:59:20.600 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 2>a shortage of labor.

0:59:21.800 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's good to take care of that. We're going

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:26.440
<v Speaker 3>to get people in here rapidly, and they're going to

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:28.040
<v Speaker 3>be people that want to be in here, and they're

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be people that can love our country and

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 3>won't kill people because they have because they don't like

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the way they look.

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:35.920
<v Speaker 2>These are killing me.

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 3>These some of these killers are among the most evil killers.

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 3>They will look at you down the beautiful woman there,

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 3>They'll look at you and they will kill you. These

0:59:47.880 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 3>are seriously sick people. And no, I don't want them

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:54.640
<v Speaker 3>in our country. And they are in our country right now,

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 3>and they're in there because Kamala Harris, who's our borders are,

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 3>isn't incompetent present.

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 2>For the records. As you know, the crime rate is lower.

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Can I finish with two questions. The first you've just

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>said it. You don't do old you own and run businesses.

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Would you appoint a CEO who was seventy eight. You

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't give you up.

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, what it depends on I made people like

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Biden who's in bad shape. I wouldn't appoint him he's

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 3>eighty one or eighty two. He's four years older. But

1:00:26.520 --> 1:00:29.600
<v Speaker 3>at a point, I know some of the smartest people

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I know. I know man that made all of his

1:00:33.000 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 3>money from the time he was eighty to ninety, and

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:38.480
<v Speaker 3>he was a failure all his life. He was in

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the drinks business.

1:00:40.480 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>The strange stranger. You didn't bring this up when but

1:00:43.000 --> 1:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>you were running against Joe Biden.

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:47.240
<v Speaker 3>No, I never attacked him for his age. In fact,

1:00:47.240 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I used to defend him on his age. I think

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:50.800
<v Speaker 3>I attacked him for his lack of competence.

1:00:51.640 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I asked you, I've asked you all these questions.

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Just because I think it's important, and I know you

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:02.680
<v Speaker 3>do too. I know so many people in their eighties

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>that are among Bernie Marcus is ninety five, a founder

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 3>of Home Deeople. You have the conversation with him. He's

1:01:10.080 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>just as sharp as he mentally, he's just as sharp

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>as you have was he's ninety five. I could tell

1:01:17.160 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>you that in the nineties. I don't want to get

1:01:18.880 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 3>into the ninety staff. But you know what, I know

1:01:22.000 --> 1:01:24.680
<v Speaker 3>many people in their eighties. I know guys in their

1:01:24.680 --> 1:01:28.240
<v Speaker 3>eighties that won't leave the company, like family companies where

1:01:28.240 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>they don't want the kids to take government because they're

1:01:30.080 --> 1:01:32.480
<v Speaker 3>much more competent than their kids. I know them both, right,

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:35.320
<v Speaker 3>So no, I would have no problem. And you do

1:01:35.400 --> 1:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>have another factor.

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, we've had some of our great on the

1:01:38.480 --> 1:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Cool.

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>You just said some of our great world leaders are

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>in the eighties, and if you look throughout history, some

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:48.360
<v Speaker 3>of our greatest world leaders were in their eighties. No,

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 3>that would bother me. But you know, I took two

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 3>cognitive tests and I aced them both. I think that, frankly,

1:01:56.120 --> 1:02:01.560
<v Speaker 3>people regardless should take if they're fifty or forty or

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 3>I think people should take cognitive tests, not because of

1:02:05.480 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the age, but because of something else. Now here's the problem.

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>They say it's unconstitutional, Okay, but I would love to

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:14.920
<v Speaker 3>see cognitive tests. I don't think she could pass a

1:02:14.960 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>cognitive test. I mean I've watched I don't think she

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>could pass a cognitive test.

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:23.640
<v Speaker 2>President Trump, You're gone over many issues on this. I

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>asked you, I asked you many questions about things. One

1:02:26.760 --> 1:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>thing I am asked at all about is the state

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of the race. Yeah, I had a question for you

1:02:31.680 --> 1:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>on election night? Which state would you look at first?

1:02:35.560 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Which state do you think this race is going to

1:02:37.320 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 2>be decided by?

1:02:39.480 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 3>So they say Pennsylvania, I would say most. I think

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:47.040
<v Speaker 3>we're doing very well there. I think you look at

1:02:47.080 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Michigan too, and I'm doing very well there. You know,

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>we don't have to look necessarily. The votes are starting

1:02:53.920 --> 1:02:56.800
<v Speaker 3>to come in now, so you look at poles, but

1:02:56.840 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>you can also look at the votes that are being

1:02:59.160 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>cast right now. People get a pretty good indication. And

1:03:02.600 --> 1:03:05.640
<v Speaker 3>based as we discussed backstage, you know, based on the

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:07.960
<v Speaker 3>votes that are coming in so far, we're doing very well.

1:03:08.000 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean we're way up in Pennsylvania, We're way up

1:03:10.200 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>in Michigan. We're doing very well in Arizona. So Arizona.

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>In fact, somebody said they're going to pull the plug

1:03:16.600 --> 1:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>in Arizona. They're going to give it up because it

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 3>looks like we're quite quite a ways ahead. I think

1:03:21.200 --> 1:03:25.960
<v Speaker 3>we're doing well. Look, this is a party, the Republican

1:03:26.040 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Party of common Sense. I forget about conservative liberal. We're

1:03:31.480 --> 1:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>let's say conservative, but we're really a party of we

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:37.960
<v Speaker 3>need borders. We need fair elections. We don't want men

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:42.640
<v Speaker 3>playing in women's sports. We don't want transgender operations without

1:03:42.680 --> 1:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>parental consent. You know, it's there's so many things, but

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>it's ninety nine point nine is common sense. It really

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>is common sense. And I like to say it. I

1:03:53.920 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know if anyone said it in the past, but

1:03:56.400 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I say, we're really a party of common sense, and

1:03:59.760 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 3>we want to have great people in our country. I

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:04.200
<v Speaker 3>want to have a lot of people come in so

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 3>that you have your choice and so that they have choice.

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I want to you know, I have a good heart.

1:04:08.320 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I have a heart where I want people to be

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 3>taken care of. But I don't want to take in

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:17.680
<v Speaker 3>people where they millions of people, twenty one million people

1:04:17.680 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 3>at least have come in in the last three and

1:04:19.720 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>a half years, unvetted, unchecked. We don't know anything about him.

1:04:25.600 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 3>We don't How about this Gavin Newscomb, he's the governor

1:04:29.520 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>of California. He signed Newscomb.

1:04:32.600 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Like but do you think he connected he correctly? There

1:04:37.800 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>is the first time i've there are CEOs out here.

1:04:40.560 --> 1:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>If they said those sort of things about a rival CEO,

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:44.320
<v Speaker 2>they would be signed to be signed.

1:04:44.360 --> 1:04:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you think but they don't have to survive like me.

1:04:46.680 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>They don't have to go through what I have to

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:51.240
<v Speaker 3>go through. There has never been a president that's been

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>treated like me, So I have to fight my own way.

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>You made, you made a You've made a very good

1:04:57.960 --> 1:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>you made a very good job.

1:04:58.960 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>And he signed bill in California two days ago that

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>you don't even have the right to ask a person

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>for voter ID. And if you ask a person for

1:05:09.760 --> 1:05:12.760
<v Speaker 3>voter ID, of course you have to show voter ID.

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>The only reason you wouldn't do because they want to achieve.

1:05:16.120 --> 1:05:19.600
<v Speaker 3>The bill says you cannot. It's against the law for

1:05:19.680 --> 1:05:22.360
<v Speaker 3>you to ask a person map, please see your voter

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>ID when her votes. What is our country coming to?

1:05:26.880 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've given us a tool de reason of where

1:05:29.520 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that country might be going to. Thank you very much

1:05:31.760 --> 1:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>for much you. Thanks you for the conversation.

1:05:42.560 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 6>More than an hour long conversation between former President Donald

1:05:46.160 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 6>Trump and Bloomberg editor in chief John Micklethwaite in partnership

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:53.520
<v Speaker 6>with the Economic Club of Chicago, a conversation that rains

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 6>from tax and tariffs and technology to immigration and the

1:05:57.000 --> 1:06:00.080
<v Speaker 6>Federal Reserve. Welcome Back to Special Coverage, A special edition

1:06:00.360 --> 1:06:02.920
<v Speaker 6>a Balance of Power here on Bloomberg TV and Radio.

1:06:02.960 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm Kaylee Lines alongside Joe Matthew. We are about to

1:06:06.600 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 6>break down exactly what we heard there from Donald Trump

1:06:09.680 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 6>in terms of his economic policy, including the pushback he

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 6>gave on what a number of economists or majority of

1:06:15.560 --> 1:06:20.200
<v Speaker 6>economists would suggest or potential inflationary and detrimental impacts of

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:23.480
<v Speaker 6>the policy, pushing back on the idea Joe that tax

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:26.200
<v Speaker 6>cuts will add to the deficit, that tariffs will lead

1:06:26.240 --> 1:06:29.120
<v Speaker 6>to higher costs for the American people, even that it

1:06:29.160 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 6>could influence ultimately the dominance of the dollar as the

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 6>world's reserve currency. We should point out a lot of

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:37.520
<v Speaker 6>those things were fact check in real time by John.

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:39.600
<v Speaker 7>Nicklefwayth Yeah, we have a lot to unpack here, and

1:06:39.640 --> 1:06:42.920
<v Speaker 7>that was quite an exchange. Sometimes interviews take different forms.

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:44.720
<v Speaker 7>With Donald Trump, that was a real back and forth,

1:06:44.720 --> 1:06:46.760
<v Speaker 7>and I think we all learned a lot by listening

1:06:46.760 --> 1:06:50.920
<v Speaker 7>to it. John started by citing his very first question

1:06:51.040 --> 1:06:53.600
<v Speaker 7>research from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, that

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 7>if you wonk out with us here on a daily

1:06:55.600 --> 1:06:58.680
<v Speaker 7>basis on balance of power, you're pretty familiar with seven

1:06:58.720 --> 1:07:01.920
<v Speaker 7>point eight to fifteen. I believe trillion dollars was the

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 7>estimate that unless there's something we're not understanding about how

1:07:05.200 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 7>to pay for the tax cuts and exemptions that Donald

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:10.200
<v Speaker 7>Trump has put forth, that is what it would add

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:14.600
<v Speaker 7>to the deficit. Donald Trump wasn't having any of that, Kayley,

1:07:14.680 --> 1:07:16.360
<v Speaker 7>And that's nothing new in this case.

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:19.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, continually pushing back on again what the majority of

1:07:19.360 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 6>economists would agree would be the economic impact of his policies.

1:07:23.440 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 6>So we want to turn now to an economist Bloomberg

1:07:25.920 --> 1:07:28.720
<v Speaker 6>Economics is Anna Wong, who leads our US economic coverage,

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:31.959
<v Speaker 6>is here with us in our Washington, DC studio. So Anna,

1:07:32.040 --> 1:07:34.440
<v Speaker 6>you of course have done analysis on what the policies

1:07:34.440 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 6>of not just Donald Trump a Kamala Harris could mean

1:07:37.080 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 6>for the US economy. When he says things like we're

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:43.360
<v Speaker 6>all about growth, that companies will only be protected by

1:07:43.400 --> 1:07:46.800
<v Speaker 6>stronger tariffs, is that really how it's going to translate

1:07:47.160 --> 1:07:49.080
<v Speaker 6>economically if these things become reality.

1:07:49.280 --> 1:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think he simplified his own policy impact

1:07:53.080 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So if we looked at his tax policies,

1:07:56.160 --> 1:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>which is all about tax cuts, lowering a corporate tax cut,

1:08:00.000 --> 1:08:03.479
<v Speaker 1>but of course those would be all economic models would

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>say generally in the short term it would boost growth.

1:08:06.560 --> 1:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>That would be where the growth enhancing would come from.

1:08:09.760 --> 1:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's a cost to be paid for that, and

1:08:13.240 --> 1:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>which is that over the long term, with higher physical

1:08:16.200 --> 1:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>debt to GDP ratio, that would raise interest rates and

1:08:20.120 --> 1:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in ten years those benefits which you see in the

1:08:22.920 --> 1:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>first two or three years would dissipate. Also, in terms

1:08:27.200 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of tariff policy, he mentioned a lot about how tariffs

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 1>would bring back jobs to the country, and that's per growth.

1:08:34.760 --> 1:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's important to know that it's true

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>economists were wrong in his first administration, that all the

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>inflationary impact economists estimated were overblown. But you know, the

1:08:48.800 --> 1:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>economy adjusted to tariff in two ways, either through higher

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>prices if firms can pass through those prices, or through

1:08:56.640 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>lower investment and lower growth. And in his first administration

1:09:00.560 --> 1:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what happened was it didn't translate into higher prices. However,

1:09:04.160 --> 1:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it did translate into lower growth due to trade policy uncertainty.

1:09:08.000 --> 1:09:10.719
<v Speaker 7>We've had conversations on this program, in fact quite recently today.

1:09:10.760 --> 1:09:11.640
<v Speaker 8>Joelvornia was on.

1:09:11.720 --> 1:09:14.840
<v Speaker 7>Before that interview, Scott Bessont was on a couple of

1:09:14.960 --> 1:09:18.280
<v Speaker 7>days ago. They returned to the theme of looking at

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:21.720
<v Speaker 7>this as a whole, that each proposal taken in a

1:09:21.840 --> 1:09:23.920
<v Speaker 7>vacuum is not going to add up to what the

1:09:23.960 --> 1:09:26.680
<v Speaker 7>former president is seeing here when you actually do that,

1:09:26.760 --> 1:09:30.920
<v Speaker 7>when you combine the tariffs with the tax proposals and

1:09:31.040 --> 1:09:34.760
<v Speaker 7>drill Baby, drill his idea of lowering energy costs to

1:09:35.120 --> 1:09:37.080
<v Speaker 7>lower inflation across the board.

1:09:37.400 --> 1:09:38.599
<v Speaker 8>Do you see it any differently?

1:09:38.960 --> 1:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that if you take it holistically, and

1:09:42.120 --> 1:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe LaVarne, you're completely right. You have growth enhancing trade

1:09:46.520 --> 1:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean tax policy in the short term, but growth

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>reducing trade policy in the short term. I think in

1:09:52.280 --> 1:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the first two or three years that will about wash out.

1:09:55.800 --> 1:10:00.479
<v Speaker 1>The effect will be slightly negative over a ten years period.

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:03.720
<v Speaker 7>And thank you so much for being with us Bloomberg Economics,

1:10:03.880 --> 1:10:06.160
<v Speaker 7>Anna Wong, keeping us honest on some of the issues

1:10:06.200 --> 1:10:07.639
<v Speaker 7>that we talked about here. And we want to turn

1:10:07.640 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 7>from the economy to politics. Of course, it's pretty hard

1:10:10.240 --> 1:10:12.719
<v Speaker 7>to remove the suicid. We'll do both with our signature panel.

1:10:12.760 --> 1:10:16.479
<v Speaker 7>Rick Davis, Partner at Stone Court Capital, alongside Genie Shanzano,

1:10:16.560 --> 1:10:20.599
<v Speaker 7>political science professor at Iona University, Senior Democracy Fellow at

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:23.920
<v Speaker 7>the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress, Rick,

1:10:24.000 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 7>you said this was going to be a spirited conversation,

1:10:26.360 --> 1:10:29.200
<v Speaker 7>that this might be the most challenging interview that Donald

1:10:29.240 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 7>Trump would have for the rest of the cycle.

1:10:31.080 --> 1:10:31.920
<v Speaker 8>I think you might be right.

1:10:32.320 --> 1:10:34.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, And I think one of the more sober and

1:10:34.240 --> 1:10:38.240
<v Speaker 9>serious conversations. I thought John Michols Waite did a fantastic

1:10:38.360 --> 1:10:41.360
<v Speaker 9>job of keeping focused on the issues that he was

1:10:41.439 --> 1:10:44.000
<v Speaker 9>asking about, trying to do the follow up that he

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 9>was requiring. And look, I mean, you know, you got

1:10:47.280 --> 1:10:49.320
<v Speaker 9>to give Trump credit. He hung in there. He told

1:10:49.360 --> 1:10:53.599
<v Speaker 9>lots of stories that exemplified, you know, his policy points.

1:10:53.640 --> 1:10:57.519
<v Speaker 9>And I think as a communicator, we underestimate Donald Trump's

1:10:57.520 --> 1:11:01.360
<v Speaker 9>ability to sort of package his argument events in these

1:11:01.520 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 9>kinds of storytelling that are easy for people to digest.

1:11:05.040 --> 1:11:08.640
<v Speaker 9>So his audience wasn't the Chicago Economic Club sitting in

1:11:08.680 --> 1:11:12.120
<v Speaker 9>the room and dining on rubber chicken. His audience were,

1:11:12.520 --> 1:11:16.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, blue collar workers in Michigan and Pennsylvania and

1:11:16.680 --> 1:11:22.120
<v Speaker 9>Wisconsin who they hear these stories. They can actually understand

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 9>the economic points that he's making.

1:11:23.880 --> 1:11:26.639
<v Speaker 6>But if part of his audience here Jeanie was in Michigan,

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:29.400
<v Speaker 6>he again attacked Detroit, as we saw him do in

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:31.640
<v Speaker 6>Detroit just a few days ago. He's going to be

1:11:31.720 --> 1:11:34.000
<v Speaker 6>back there later on this week. He called it horrible,

1:11:34.320 --> 1:11:36.680
<v Speaker 6>talking about how it hasn't recovered. Of course, it did

1:11:36.680 --> 1:11:39.400
<v Speaker 6>declare bankruptcy back in twenty thirteen, but it has seen

1:11:39.720 --> 1:11:42.719
<v Speaker 6>a recovery since then. In fact, the city just announced

1:11:42.720 --> 1:11:45.800
<v Speaker 6>earlier this year it grew in population between twenty twenty

1:11:45.800 --> 1:11:47.960
<v Speaker 6>two and twenty twenty three for the first time since

1:11:48.040 --> 1:11:51.840
<v Speaker 6>nineteen fifty seven. How does that play in a state

1:11:51.880 --> 1:11:54.320
<v Speaker 6>which ultimately could have a hand in deciding this election.

1:11:54.720 --> 1:11:56.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, this is something we've heard Trump do over and

1:11:56.840 --> 1:12:02.120
<v Speaker 10>over again, attack cities from Milton and Detroit and of

1:12:02.160 --> 1:12:05.559
<v Speaker 10>course New York City, And of course factually there's no

1:12:05.640 --> 1:12:07.920
<v Speaker 10>basis for it. We know, violent crime, for instance, in

1:12:08.000 --> 1:12:10.799
<v Speaker 10>Detroit is down to levels we haven't seen since nineteen

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 10>ninety six. And I think, you know, as I watched

1:12:13.880 --> 1:12:18.839
<v Speaker 10>this entire interview, which I agree was so important, Donald

1:12:18.880 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 10>Trump missed an opportunity here in my mind, he ended

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:27.480
<v Speaker 10>up talking about what defending January sixth, talking about Venezuela

1:12:27.560 --> 1:12:31.479
<v Speaker 10>and Maduro, this strong man, this autocrat, this dictator as well,

1:12:31.479 --> 1:12:33.720
<v Speaker 10>what a great job he has done cutting down on

1:12:33.840 --> 1:12:36.240
<v Speaker 10>violence with the use of a police state. He is

1:12:36.280 --> 1:12:40.479
<v Speaker 10>making certainly things that Republican leaders at the state and

1:12:40.520 --> 1:12:44.160
<v Speaker 10>local level have pushed back against. As it refers to Aurora,

1:12:44.200 --> 1:12:47.519
<v Speaker 10>as it refers to Springfield. The list goes on and on,

1:12:47.840 --> 1:12:51.040
<v Speaker 10>and John Micklesoet was trying to have a sober, serious

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:54.920
<v Speaker 10>conversation on his economic policies. And I can bet that

1:12:55.040 --> 1:12:58.840
<v Speaker 10>is not where Donald Trump's campaign wanted him to go

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:01.680
<v Speaker 10>to sit there and say those kinds of things. The

1:13:01.800 --> 1:13:05.240
<v Speaker 10>attacks were all over the place. They were on everybody,

1:13:05.280 --> 1:13:09.960
<v Speaker 10>from the press to two people who are running these

1:13:09.960 --> 1:13:13.760
<v Speaker 10>cities and states, two immigrants. They were as no fact

1:13:13.880 --> 1:13:16.400
<v Speaker 10>checking that he was going to abide by, and it

1:13:16.560 --> 1:13:19.720
<v Speaker 10>was off the rails in true Donald Trump's style. And

1:13:19.760 --> 1:13:22.519
<v Speaker 10>that is a problem for Donald Trump because I know

1:13:22.680 --> 1:13:25.240
<v Speaker 10>he wants to double down in his base. Rick is right,

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:28.439
<v Speaker 10>but he's got to reach sober minded people in the

1:13:28.479 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 10>middle who like his policies first term, but are very

1:13:32.120 --> 1:13:34.240
<v Speaker 10>concerned about this rhetoric. And I don't think he did

1:13:34.320 --> 1:13:37.519
<v Speaker 10>himself any favors on that front. And of course, top

1:13:37.560 --> 1:13:40.439
<v Speaker 10>of the list there is tariffs. He had absolutely no

1:13:40.600 --> 1:13:44.400
<v Speaker 10>answer to the very serious economic questions about raising tariffs.

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:46.759
<v Speaker 10>He said sometimes two hundred five hundred percent.

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:51.719
<v Speaker 7>All right, Genie Shanzino and Rick Davis with their Clutch

1:13:51.760 --> 1:13:53.680
<v Speaker 7>analysis coming out of the interview, they're going to be

1:13:53.680 --> 1:13:55.160
<v Speaker 7>sticking with us for the rest of the hour. We

1:13:55.200 --> 1:13:57.599
<v Speaker 7>thank you both our signature panel here on an important

1:13:57.680 --> 1:13:59.800
<v Speaker 7>day as we go into overtime here on our special

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:04.640
<v Speaker 7>live from Washington. Following Bloomberg's interview with Donald Trump, the

1:14:04.680 --> 1:14:07.760
<v Speaker 7>former president talked about tariff's quite a bit today in

1:14:07.880 --> 1:14:10.880
<v Speaker 7>policies he'd like to pursue if elected. In the conversation

1:14:10.960 --> 1:14:13.280
<v Speaker 7>we just brought to you in partnership with the Economic

1:14:13.280 --> 1:14:14.519
<v Speaker 7>Club of Chicago, Let's.

1:14:14.320 --> 1:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Listen to me. The most beautiful word in the dictionary

1:14:18.439 --> 1:14:21.880
<v Speaker 3>is tariff and it's my favorite word. It needs a

1:14:22.000 --> 1:14:27.520
<v Speaker 3>public relations firm.

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:30.360
<v Speaker 7>Joining us now for more here on Bloomberg TV and Radio.

1:14:30.439 --> 1:14:34.880
<v Speaker 7>Anna Ashton, founder of Ashton Analytics, former China analyst for

1:14:34.960 --> 1:14:37.400
<v Speaker 7>the US Department of Defense, and it's great to see you.

1:14:37.439 --> 1:14:40.599
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for joining us here. Following this conversation, Donald Trump

1:14:40.880 --> 1:14:43.439
<v Speaker 7>pushed back pretty hard on the issue of tariff's.

1:14:43.720 --> 1:14:44.840
<v Speaker 8>He called tariff's his.

1:14:45.680 --> 1:14:49.679
<v Speaker 7>Favorite word, the most beautiful word in the dictionary. Did

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:52.040
<v Speaker 7>he change the way you look at this in his

1:14:52.120 --> 1:14:53.879
<v Speaker 7>conversation today with John Mickelfway.

1:14:55.479 --> 1:14:58.040
<v Speaker 11>Well, no, and thank you for having me on. It

1:14:58.080 --> 1:15:00.920
<v Speaker 11>was interesting to listen to his remarks. I think we

1:15:01.040 --> 1:15:05.519
<v Speaker 11>can all be pretty assured of where he wants to

1:15:05.560 --> 1:15:08.599
<v Speaker 11>go with tariff policy, that he wants to raise tariffs,

1:15:08.640 --> 1:15:10.720
<v Speaker 11>and not just on China. You spend a lot of

1:15:10.760 --> 1:15:14.200
<v Speaker 11>time talking about Mexico, for example, and he said that,

1:15:14.320 --> 1:15:17.120
<v Speaker 11>you know, our allies have been more problematic than our enemies,

1:15:17.160 --> 1:15:19.080
<v Speaker 11>so the EU, Japan.

1:15:21.479 --> 1:15:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, Anna, as you mentioned Mexico. According to FactCheck dot org,

1:15:24.360 --> 1:15:27.479
<v Speaker 6>there is only one small Chinese car manufacturing plant in

1:15:27.520 --> 1:15:30.400
<v Speaker 6>Mexico right now. But something else we heard from Donald

1:15:30.400 --> 1:15:33.200
<v Speaker 6>Trump was the suggestion, if you make the tariffs high enough,

1:15:33.520 --> 1:15:37.360
<v Speaker 6>to quote him, so high, so horrible, so obnoxious, they'll

1:15:37.400 --> 1:15:40.160
<v Speaker 6>come right away, meaning they will come and make things

1:15:40.160 --> 1:15:44.240
<v Speaker 6>in the US instead. What is the realistic chance that

1:15:44.600 --> 1:15:47.280
<v Speaker 6>manufacturers in China are going to be able to suddenly

1:15:47.360 --> 1:15:49.960
<v Speaker 6>up and move all that business to the United States

1:15:50.000 --> 1:15:53.240
<v Speaker 6>and have supply come out of there. How does that

1:15:53.320 --> 1:15:54.839
<v Speaker 6>actually translate in reality?

1:15:55.880 --> 1:15:57.720
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know, I think it's going to be really

1:15:57.800 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 11>interesting to see if this is you know, a sign

1:16:01.120 --> 1:16:05.200
<v Speaker 11>of Trump kind of evolving his perspective on China and

1:16:05.240 --> 1:16:08.759
<v Speaker 11>what he wants from the relationship, because he certainly wasn't

1:16:08.800 --> 1:16:12.799
<v Speaker 11>really gung ho about inviting Chinese investment into the United

1:16:12.800 --> 1:16:17.559
<v Speaker 11>States in his first term, and if second term would

1:16:17.560 --> 1:16:19.880
<v Speaker 11>he be It sort of sounds like it. It sort

1:16:19.880 --> 1:16:22.439
<v Speaker 11>of sounds like he sees tariffs as a way to

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:25.639
<v Speaker 11>bring foreign investment into the United States to create jobs,

1:16:26.160 --> 1:16:27.600
<v Speaker 11>and I think a lot of people can get on

1:16:27.640 --> 1:16:29.520
<v Speaker 11>board with that from an economic standpoint.

1:16:29.840 --> 1:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>However, there are.

1:16:30.960 --> 1:16:33.320
<v Speaker 11>Many many people in Washington and both parties who are

1:16:33.320 --> 1:16:36.960
<v Speaker 11>not particularly enthusiastic about Chinese investment in the United States.

1:16:36.960 --> 1:16:39.599
<v Speaker 11>And not just in Washington, there are governors all over

1:16:39.680 --> 1:16:42.320
<v Speaker 11>the country who also are not keen on that. So

1:16:42.360 --> 1:16:46.360
<v Speaker 11>I'm not sure that it's within Trump's power to change

1:16:46.360 --> 1:16:47.760
<v Speaker 11>hearts and minds domestically.

1:16:49.520 --> 1:16:51.679
<v Speaker 7>I want to ask you about what the former president

1:16:51.720 --> 1:16:54.080
<v Speaker 7>said about Taiwan Ana. He was asked whether he would

1:16:54.120 --> 1:16:57.400
<v Speaker 7>send American troops to defend Taiwan in the event of

1:16:57.439 --> 1:17:00.720
<v Speaker 7>an invasion or a blockade by China. He didn't really

1:17:00.760 --> 1:17:03.080
<v Speaker 7>answer that directly. He said, quote, I have a very

1:17:03.120 --> 1:17:07.320
<v Speaker 7>good relationship with President she is his relationship good enough

1:17:07.360 --> 1:17:09.799
<v Speaker 7>to avoid that scenario if you were re elected.

1:17:11.200 --> 1:17:13.440
<v Speaker 11>I think it's less about whether or not his relationship

1:17:13.479 --> 1:17:16.439
<v Speaker 11>with President she is good enough, and more about the

1:17:16.479 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 11>fact that he is a confirmed He does not want

1:17:22.720 --> 1:17:27.520
<v Speaker 11>to have American forces fighting foreign wars, and he's indicated

1:17:27.520 --> 1:17:32.799
<v Speaker 11>in other interviews that he's not particularly interested in sending

1:17:32.840 --> 1:17:35.840
<v Speaker 11>troops to Taiwan unless Taiwan is going to pay more

1:17:36.040 --> 1:17:38.880
<v Speaker 11>for US defense. He wants more of a quid pro

1:17:39.000 --> 1:17:42.240
<v Speaker 11>quo relationship than he believes we have right now. But again,

1:17:42.320 --> 1:17:46.519
<v Speaker 11>this is where Trump diverges from the majority of minds

1:17:46.560 --> 1:17:51.160
<v Speaker 11>that are shaping policy in DC, both Republican and Democrat.

1:17:51.439 --> 1:17:55.439
<v Speaker 11>I don't think that his own party is particularly aligned

1:17:55.479 --> 1:17:57.760
<v Speaker 11>behind that idea well.

1:17:57.760 --> 1:18:00.439
<v Speaker 6>And perhaps the divergence that matters most, at least with

1:18:00.520 --> 1:18:03.000
<v Speaker 6>three weeks to go and tell election Diana, is how

1:18:03.280 --> 1:18:06.559
<v Speaker 6>his policy diverges from the policy that Kamala Harris has

1:18:06.560 --> 1:18:09.759
<v Speaker 6>suggested she pursued. Keeping in mind, she has been attached

1:18:09.760 --> 1:18:12.360
<v Speaker 6>to this administration that has left intact and in many

1:18:12.400 --> 1:18:15.280
<v Speaker 6>ways actually in many instances expanded the tariffs put into

1:18:15.280 --> 1:18:17.880
<v Speaker 6>place under the first Trump administration. Harris, who has also

1:18:17.920 --> 1:18:21.040
<v Speaker 6>talked about making sure the US is leading the technology

1:18:21.040 --> 1:18:24.719
<v Speaker 6>war against China. How realistically are we going to see

1:18:24.760 --> 1:18:28.360
<v Speaker 6>differences in approach here, and is it just a matter

1:18:28.640 --> 1:18:31.200
<v Speaker 6>of scale, if you will, Maybe not tariffs of the

1:18:31.280 --> 1:18:33.799
<v Speaker 6>kind Donald Trump is talking about, but tariffs all the same.

1:18:35.240 --> 1:18:37.519
<v Speaker 11>I certainly think we're going to see tariffs all the same.

1:18:38.360 --> 1:18:42.679
<v Speaker 11>But you know, the Biden administration has, with its increase

1:18:42.880 --> 1:18:46.600
<v Speaker 11>of select tariffs in the last month, made clear that

1:18:47.320 --> 1:18:50.040
<v Speaker 11>they're interested in taking a more targeted approach, and you

1:18:50.040 --> 1:18:54.240
<v Speaker 11>know that that is overall the impression I'm getting from

1:18:54.479 --> 1:18:58.240
<v Speaker 11>Harris's talking points. So I think that, you know, Yanes,

1:18:58.320 --> 1:19:01.200
<v Speaker 11>we will see continued tariffs. We will see a continued

1:19:01.240 --> 1:19:04.640
<v Speaker 11>emphasis on industrial policy as part of the effort to

1:19:04.640 --> 1:19:07.799
<v Speaker 11>make the United States more competitive with China and ensure

1:19:08.000 --> 1:19:12.120
<v Speaker 11>US competitiveness going forward. But I don't think that a

1:19:12.160 --> 1:19:15.439
<v Speaker 11>Harris administration would be interested in the kind of across

1:19:15.439 --> 1:19:19.000
<v Speaker 11>the board tariffs on everything from China and things from

1:19:19.040 --> 1:19:22.679
<v Speaker 11>everywhere else that Trump seems to be enthusiastic about.

1:19:24.000 --> 1:19:25.680
<v Speaker 8>Great to have you with us today, Anna, Thank you.

1:19:25.720 --> 1:19:29.240
<v Speaker 7>Anna Ashton is founder of Ashton Analytics, former China analysts

1:19:29.240 --> 1:19:30.559
<v Speaker 7>for the US Department of Defense.

1:19:30.640 --> 1:19:32.439
<v Speaker 8>Just the voice we needed today. We thank you again.

1:19:32.479 --> 1:19:36.880
<v Speaker 7>And joining us now is Democratic Congressman Sean Caston of Illinois.

1:19:36.960 --> 1:19:40.160
<v Speaker 7>He serves on the House Financial Services Committee and brings

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:43.560
<v Speaker 7>the voice of a Democrat to the table here. Congressman,

1:19:43.680 --> 1:19:46.360
<v Speaker 7>it's good to see you. Welcome back to Bloomberg TV

1:19:46.520 --> 1:19:49.559
<v Speaker 7>and Radio. What you just heard today from Donald Trump

1:19:49.600 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 7>is the most complete explanation and most complete presentation we

1:19:54.000 --> 1:19:57.599
<v Speaker 7>have heard of his economic proposals, making the Trump tax

1:19:57.680 --> 1:20:01.080
<v Speaker 7>cuts permanent, a series of exemption on things like tips

1:20:01.080 --> 1:20:04.439
<v Speaker 7>over time, social Security, and others that we might not

1:20:04.520 --> 1:20:07.839
<v Speaker 7>even have time to list here today. And an overall

1:20:07.880 --> 1:20:12.439
<v Speaker 7>approach to inflation that starts with energy. Drill, Baby drill,

1:20:12.520 --> 1:20:14.960
<v Speaker 7>he says, will bring down prices across the board.

1:20:15.479 --> 1:20:16.679
<v Speaker 8>Are you on board?

1:20:17.880 --> 1:20:20.599
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, it's hard to follow a lot of that

1:20:20.640 --> 1:20:23.120
<v Speaker 12>because so much of his representations of the economy were

1:20:23.160 --> 1:20:26.679
<v Speaker 12>just flat wrong. We've seen surges and foreign direct investment

1:20:26.720 --> 1:20:29.240
<v Speaker 12>over the last four years. We've seen almost a doubling

1:20:29.240 --> 1:20:31.439
<v Speaker 12>and manufacturing investment in the United States over the last

1:20:31.479 --> 1:20:33.880
<v Speaker 12>four years. Yes, there's been inflation, but slower than all

1:20:33.920 --> 1:20:36.679
<v Speaker 12>the other countries in the OECD. We've had record setting

1:20:36.720 --> 1:20:39.400
<v Speaker 12>job creation. This is an economy to celebrate, and he

1:20:39.479 --> 1:20:41.439
<v Speaker 12>seemed to be focused on bad mouthing it. But I

1:20:41.439 --> 1:20:44.040
<v Speaker 12>want to just talk about the energy piece for a moment.

1:20:44.840 --> 1:20:49.000
<v Speaker 12>In April of twenty twenty, under Donald Trump, the price

1:20:49.000 --> 1:20:53.160
<v Speaker 12>of oil collapsed because of COVID. Trump responded by calling

1:20:53.160 --> 1:20:56.200
<v Speaker 12>the Saudis and threatening to pull all military aid out

1:20:56.240 --> 1:21:00.720
<v Speaker 12>of Saudi Arabia unless they curtailed production to raise the

1:21:00.760 --> 1:21:04.599
<v Speaker 12>price of oil to protect US oil producers. He has

1:21:04.720 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 12>always put the interest of producers over the interests of consumers.

1:21:08.720 --> 1:21:11.200
<v Speaker 12>And you know, when you're talking about drill, baby, drill,

1:21:11.439 --> 1:21:14.120
<v Speaker 12>we are using a lot less cold than we used

1:21:14.120 --> 1:21:15.800
<v Speaker 12>to in the United States. We're using a lot we're

1:21:15.880 --> 1:21:18.960
<v Speaker 12>using We've had basically no growth in oil. That's because

1:21:18.960 --> 1:21:22.040
<v Speaker 12>we've invested in efficiency. We've invested in renewables. The person

1:21:22.040 --> 1:21:23.599
<v Speaker 12>with a solar panel on the roof is not paying

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:27.519
<v Speaker 12>for electricity anymore. What Trump is pushing for is not

1:21:27.720 --> 1:21:30.840
<v Speaker 12>lowering costs for consumers on energy, but raising prices to

1:21:30.960 --> 1:21:34.639
<v Speaker 12>energy producers. He's done that consistently, and let's not pretend

1:21:34.680 --> 1:21:35.400
<v Speaker 12>it's something else.

1:21:36.960 --> 1:21:40.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, Congressman, is we consider this is a plan he

1:21:40.320 --> 1:21:43.439
<v Speaker 6>says ultimately will lead to lower inflation. Let's talk about

1:21:43.439 --> 1:21:46.120
<v Speaker 6>inflation and who all has a role in combating that,

1:21:46.240 --> 1:21:49.639
<v Speaker 6>because obviously the Federal Reserve is part of that game too.

1:21:49.880 --> 1:21:52.200
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump was actually asked about the FED and the

1:21:52.240 --> 1:21:55.200
<v Speaker 6>influence the president should have on it in this conversation.

1:21:55.280 --> 1:21:57.320
<v Speaker 6>Let's remind ourselves of what he said.

1:21:58.880 --> 1:22:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that if you are a very good president

1:22:02.080 --> 1:22:05.240
<v Speaker 3>with good sense, you should be able to at least

1:22:05.439 --> 1:22:07.840
<v Speaker 3>talk to him. I don't say make the decision at all.

1:22:10.080 --> 1:22:11.519
<v Speaker 6>Congressman, what's your response to that?

1:22:13.600 --> 1:22:15.400
<v Speaker 12>I guess you have to really love the economy of

1:22:15.400 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 12>the eighteen nineties to want a non independent FED and

1:22:18.160 --> 1:22:19.519
<v Speaker 12>a massive tariff policy.

1:22:20.840 --> 1:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>J Powell.

1:22:21.680 --> 1:22:23.599
<v Speaker 12>You know, I don't agree with J. Powell on everything,

1:22:24.200 --> 1:22:27.360
<v Speaker 12>but J. Powell has done a masterful job, as he should,

1:22:27.479 --> 1:22:30.040
<v Speaker 12>of staying above politics. You know, the idea of an

1:22:30.080 --> 1:22:33.840
<v Speaker 12>independent FED is, as your viewers know well, right you,

1:22:34.439 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 12>sometimes it's not politically wise to do the right thing

1:22:37.080 --> 1:22:41.920
<v Speaker 12>for the economy. Interfering with that is a really really

1:22:42.000 --> 1:22:44.439
<v Speaker 12>dangerous path to go, and we've been there in our past,

1:22:44.600 --> 1:22:46.519
<v Speaker 12>right you know, there was a point when we didn't

1:22:46.520 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 12>have an independent FED. Those weren't good times for the

1:22:50.200 --> 1:22:50.919
<v Speaker 12>US economy.

1:22:53.479 --> 1:22:56.200
<v Speaker 7>Well, with that said, where is the economy going to

1:22:56.280 --> 1:22:59.240
<v Speaker 7>be here in your view, when the next president takes off.

1:22:59.240 --> 1:23:01.160
<v Speaker 7>As congressman, this is something that we ask a lot

1:23:01.200 --> 1:23:04.120
<v Speaker 7>of lawmakers and economists here, knowing that we're seeing, or

1:23:04.120 --> 1:23:08.760
<v Speaker 7>at least feeling, some concerns tied to a slowdown here. Obviously,

1:23:08.840 --> 1:23:11.160
<v Speaker 7>interest rate cuts are part of the picture, which some

1:23:11.200 --> 1:23:14.400
<v Speaker 7>could suggest benefit the incumbent in this case, I guess

1:23:14.400 --> 1:23:17.840
<v Speaker 7>we could call that incumbent Kamala Harris. But what's your

1:23:17.920 --> 1:23:20.200
<v Speaker 7>view about where we're going to be in January when

1:23:20.200 --> 1:23:21.360
<v Speaker 7>you come back to Washington.

1:23:22.880 --> 1:23:25.559
<v Speaker 12>You know, I suppose prognostication is a fool's game, but

1:23:25.640 --> 1:23:27.559
<v Speaker 12>I think you know some of the metrics that we've

1:23:27.560 --> 1:23:31.240
<v Speaker 12>been watching closely in the economy. We've seen this surge

1:23:31.240 --> 1:23:34.200
<v Speaker 12>of investment for the last four years. Really, for the

1:23:34.200 --> 1:23:39.519
<v Speaker 12>first time in decades, we've consistently seen job creation out

1:23:39.560 --> 1:23:44.760
<v Speaker 12>posting worker creation. Our workforce has not been growing as

1:23:44.760 --> 1:23:48.439
<v Speaker 12>fast as the jobs have. That was creating some upward

1:23:48.479 --> 1:23:51.400
<v Speaker 12>pressure on inflation. Was certainly contributing to it. It's a

1:23:51.439 --> 1:23:53.599
<v Speaker 12>good problem to have, right because there were so much

1:23:53.640 --> 1:23:56.639
<v Speaker 12>investments going on in the United States. We have seen

1:23:56.880 --> 1:24:00.640
<v Speaker 12>some of that pressure easing. Frankly, thanks to inflation. And

1:24:00.680 --> 1:24:03.080
<v Speaker 12>one of the concerns that I have personally is that

1:24:03.120 --> 1:24:08.120
<v Speaker 12>it has become so bipartisan to demonize an immigration, and

1:24:08.120 --> 1:24:09.880
<v Speaker 12>I think we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that

1:24:09.920 --> 1:24:13.679
<v Speaker 12>immigration is substantially what's allowing our economy to create jobs

1:24:13.680 --> 1:24:17.880
<v Speaker 12>so quickly and not have upward pressure on inflation inflations

1:24:17.920 --> 1:24:21.720
<v Speaker 12>come down. I do get concerned about that xenophobia and

1:24:21.720 --> 1:24:24.559
<v Speaker 12>where that might push us, But on balance, I feel

1:24:24.560 --> 1:24:26.479
<v Speaker 12>pretty good about where the economy is right now. We're

1:24:26.479 --> 1:24:29.320
<v Speaker 12>still staying in a four four point two percent unemployment,

1:24:29.320 --> 1:24:32.600
<v Speaker 12>which is pretty good. The job revisions such as they are,

1:24:32.680 --> 1:24:34.800
<v Speaker 12>and moving in the right direction, and you know, let's

1:24:34.880 --> 1:24:36.040
<v Speaker 12>keep a steady hand on the tiller.

1:24:37.640 --> 1:24:39.840
<v Speaker 6>Congressman, we just have a minute left here. But it

1:24:39.880 --> 1:24:41.880
<v Speaker 6>was brought up in this interview and again in our

1:24:41.920 --> 1:24:46.799
<v Speaker 6>conversations afterward, the deficit impact potentially of Donald Trump's plans

1:24:46.840 --> 1:24:48.400
<v Speaker 6>and the media and estimate from the Committee for a

1:24:48.400 --> 1:24:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Responsible Federal Budget it's seven and a half trillion dollars.

1:24:51.400 --> 1:24:54.719
<v Speaker 6>Harris's is lower. Yes, three and a half trillion dollars

1:24:54.840 --> 1:24:58.120
<v Speaker 6>is their base case, but that still does add to

1:24:58.160 --> 1:25:00.559
<v Speaker 6>the United States is burden. How do you offend some

1:25:00.600 --> 1:25:03.200
<v Speaker 6>of those policy ideas knowing the fiscal impact they could have.

1:25:04.200 --> 1:25:06.280
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Like, I think it's a real concern for all

1:25:06.320 --> 1:25:08.680
<v Speaker 12>of us that these that the deficits keep growing up.

1:25:10.360 --> 1:25:13.559
<v Speaker 12>Any serious conversation about the deficits, you know, has to

1:25:13.600 --> 1:25:16.640
<v Speaker 12>talk about you know, we have Social Security, Medicare, in

1:25:16.640 --> 1:25:20.880
<v Speaker 12>the military's that's the overwhelming majority of what's there. And

1:25:21.160 --> 1:25:23.920
<v Speaker 12>if we decide politically we don't want to touch those three,

1:25:23.960 --> 1:25:25.760
<v Speaker 12>then we have to talk about the revenue side of

1:25:25.800 --> 1:25:29.400
<v Speaker 12>the equation. What is the single most important thing we

1:25:29.479 --> 1:25:31.719
<v Speaker 12>can do that still gives people the dignity they deserve

1:25:31.760 --> 1:25:34.120
<v Speaker 12>in retirement and kill still keeps the United States as

1:25:34.160 --> 1:25:36.760
<v Speaker 12>the leader of the free world, is to fully fund

1:25:36.760 --> 1:25:39.760
<v Speaker 12>the IRS. The head of the Trump IRS told us

1:25:39.800 --> 1:25:43.240
<v Speaker 12>that the under collection of taxes, taxes that are due

1:25:43.240 --> 1:25:46.840
<v Speaker 12>but not collected, reaches almost a trillion dollars a year.

1:25:47.720 --> 1:25:49.600
<v Speaker 12>You can go a long way towards cleaning that up

1:25:49.640 --> 1:25:52.040
<v Speaker 12>if we get there. Trump is not wild about that.

1:25:52.120 --> 1:25:54.920
<v Speaker 12>He's a guy who's obviously been found guilty of tax fraud.

1:25:55.400 --> 1:25:58.639
<v Speaker 12>But we have to We have to fund the police, right,

1:25:58.880 --> 1:26:00.720
<v Speaker 12>We have to fund the IRS ability to go out

1:26:00.720 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 12>and make sure that we collect, and if we do that,

1:26:04.120 --> 1:26:06.200
<v Speaker 12>we create a ton more headroom. And I think then

1:26:06.240 --> 1:26:08.400
<v Speaker 12>we can have a conversation around well, if we tweak

1:26:08.400 --> 1:26:10.240
<v Speaker 12>this tax this way or this tax this way. But

1:26:10.320 --> 1:26:12.719
<v Speaker 12>it's a purely academic conversation if we're not actually collecting

1:26:12.720 --> 1:26:15.519
<v Speaker 12>the taxes anyway. And remember, these things are over ten years.

1:26:15.560 --> 1:26:17.800
<v Speaker 12>When the CBO does these forecasts, at trillion dollars a

1:26:17.840 --> 1:26:20.600
<v Speaker 12>year is ten trillion dollars over a ten year forecast.

1:26:21.560 --> 1:26:24.120
<v Speaker 12>Let's get it done, all.

1:26:24.080 --> 1:26:27.040
<v Speaker 6>Right, Congressman, appreciate your time this afternoon that as Democratic

1:26:27.040 --> 1:26:30.120
<v Speaker 6>Congressman Sean Caston of Illinois, member of the House Financial

1:26:30.200 --> 1:26:34.000
<v Speaker 6>Services Committee, we appreciate it. We're continuing to analyze Trump's

1:26:34.040 --> 1:26:36.479
<v Speaker 6>comments made just moments ago during an interview with Bloomberg

1:26:36.560 --> 1:26:40.280
<v Speaker 6>editor in chief John Mickelthwaite. We should note, as John noted,

1:26:40.400 --> 1:26:44.640
<v Speaker 6>Kamala Harris has been invited to participate in a similar conversation.

1:26:44.760 --> 1:26:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Back with us now for final thoughts. Is our signature

1:26:47.040 --> 1:26:49.880
<v Speaker 6>political panel, Rick Davis of stone Core Capital and Janie

1:26:49.920 --> 1:26:52.640
<v Speaker 6>Shanzano of the Center for the Study of the Presidency

1:26:53.040 --> 1:26:57.480
<v Speaker 6>and Congress. I don't know how many more interviews opportunities

1:26:57.680 --> 1:26:59.719
<v Speaker 6>like this there will be in the next three weeks,

1:27:00.120 --> 1:27:02.160
<v Speaker 6>because that's all the time that is left. How many

1:27:02.160 --> 1:27:04.720
<v Speaker 6>more conversations do you expect Donald Trump to take part

1:27:04.760 --> 1:27:07.400
<v Speaker 6>of through traditional media means like this when he's been

1:27:07.439 --> 1:27:11.200
<v Speaker 6>going on podcasts, as has Kamala Harris other means of

1:27:11.240 --> 1:27:12.440
<v Speaker 6>reaching out to voters.

1:27:12.600 --> 1:27:14.639
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think they've both been in the bubble, right,

1:27:14.720 --> 1:27:18.599
<v Speaker 9>so they'll do interviews with friendly outlets. And Donald Trump

1:27:18.680 --> 1:27:22.479
<v Speaker 9>has been more aggressive in spending time on his friendly

1:27:22.560 --> 1:27:26.400
<v Speaker 9>outlets than Kamala Harris has. But as we talked earlier

1:27:26.439 --> 1:27:28.759
<v Speaker 9>in the show, Kamala Harris has a very big interview

1:27:28.800 --> 1:27:31.479
<v Speaker 9>tomorrow with Brett Baar on Fox taking herself out of

1:27:31.479 --> 1:27:35.280
<v Speaker 9>the bubble, putting herself in an environment frankly, probably the

1:27:35.320 --> 1:27:38.680
<v Speaker 9>equivalent of what we just saw today at the Chicago

1:27:38.920 --> 1:27:41.439
<v Speaker 9>Economic Club, And so I don't think you're going to

1:27:41.479 --> 1:27:43.960
<v Speaker 9>see much more of that. I would be surprised if

1:27:43.960 --> 1:27:46.000
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump wants to re up on another deal like

1:27:46.040 --> 1:27:50.880
<v Speaker 9>he did today. And at the same time, without these

1:27:50.920 --> 1:27:54.560
<v Speaker 9>presidential debates, we don't really have any way of scoring

1:27:55.000 --> 1:27:58.080
<v Speaker 9>where we think the president presidential candidates are right now,

1:27:58.120 --> 1:28:00.720
<v Speaker 9>and this is the time when and a lot of

1:28:00.760 --> 1:28:05.439
<v Speaker 9>American voters are making up their minds in the last instance,

1:28:05.479 --> 1:28:07.920
<v Speaker 9>in other words, I'm ready to vote, now who's it

1:28:07.960 --> 1:28:10.120
<v Speaker 9>going to be? And there are still I know, it's

1:28:10.160 --> 1:28:12.519
<v Speaker 9>hard to believe after the long slog we've been through,

1:28:12.840 --> 1:28:15.679
<v Speaker 9>there are still voters trying to figure out who they want.

1:28:15.840 --> 1:28:18.840
<v Speaker 9>And I think these kind of events help dictate that.

1:28:19.000 --> 1:28:21.439
<v Speaker 7>Remembering, of course, and you remind us of this a lot, Rick,

1:28:22.040 --> 1:28:25.360
<v Speaker 7>some people are already voting and have already voted, with

1:28:25.560 --> 1:28:28.960
<v Speaker 7>early voting and absentee ballots in the mix here, Genie,

1:28:29.040 --> 1:28:31.000
<v Speaker 7>what do you think about what Rick just said. Does

1:28:31.080 --> 1:28:34.439
<v Speaker 7>Kamala Harris need to respond to what Donald Trump said today?

1:28:35.240 --> 1:28:37.840
<v Speaker 10>I think she should, you know, I think these are

1:28:37.880 --> 1:28:40.559
<v Speaker 10>exactly the kind of forums I agree with Rick in

1:28:40.600 --> 1:28:43.320
<v Speaker 10>which we need to hear from these candidates and both

1:28:43.360 --> 1:28:45.559
<v Speaker 10>of them. And I give Donald Trump a lot of

1:28:45.640 --> 1:28:48.480
<v Speaker 10>credit for sitting down with a one on one interview

1:28:48.840 --> 1:28:51.960
<v Speaker 10>and taking some tough questions, and I think people should

1:28:52.000 --> 1:28:55.200
<v Speaker 10>go back and listen carefully to what he said. I mean,

1:28:55.400 --> 1:28:59.240
<v Speaker 10>he talked about everything from not wanting to appoint judges

1:28:59.280 --> 1:29:01.639
<v Speaker 10>who were too old, and when John asked him, well,

1:29:01.680 --> 1:29:04.080
<v Speaker 10>you're seventy eight, he said, no, no, no, no, no,

1:29:04.120 --> 1:29:06.920
<v Speaker 10>that was Justice's right. He talked at the end about

1:29:07.080 --> 1:29:10.759
<v Speaker 10>Republicans himself being a party of common sense, and yet

1:29:10.800 --> 1:29:15.320
<v Speaker 10>common sense questions like if you in, if you decrease

1:29:15.439 --> 1:29:18.679
<v Speaker 10>taxes and you don't cut spending, how do you pay

1:29:18.720 --> 1:29:21.360
<v Speaker 10>for that? He sort of pooh poohed a lot of that,

1:29:21.560 --> 1:29:23.920
<v Speaker 10>to use a very formal word. So, you know, I

1:29:23.960 --> 1:29:26.679
<v Speaker 10>think people should go and listen to what he had

1:29:26.720 --> 1:29:29.960
<v Speaker 10>to say. You know, he talked about how he weaves,

1:29:30.320 --> 1:29:33.880
<v Speaker 10>and he certainly weaved a lot today, And the one

1:29:33.920 --> 1:29:36.559
<v Speaker 10>that really sticks with me is the one about the FED.

1:29:36.880 --> 1:29:40.400
<v Speaker 10>For anybody who wants Donald Trump to have some voice

1:29:40.400 --> 1:29:43.080
<v Speaker 10>in the FED, then think about would you want that

1:29:43.160 --> 1:29:47.479
<v Speaker 10>if it was a Democrat, because historically that is very

1:29:47.479 --> 1:29:49.520
<v Speaker 10>problematic for democratic economies.

1:29:51.120 --> 1:29:54.880
<v Speaker 7>That's Genny Shanzino alongside Rick Davis, our signature panel today.

1:29:54.880 --> 1:29:57.040
<v Speaker 7>Thanks both of you for being with us as part

1:29:57.080 --> 1:30:02.000
<v Speaker 7>of our special coverage here on Bloomberg TV and radio.