WEBVTT - Working with the Large Hadron Collider

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to Tech Stuff.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works in I heart radio and I love

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>all things tech, and today we have a very special

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>guest on our show, someone who has worked on really

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting problems. Is a rare occasion that I get to

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to someone who has experienced in high energy particle physics.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>So I want to introduce to all of you, if

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you haven't listened to his amazing podcast yet, Daniel Whitson.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Dr Daniel Whitson that Welcome to the show. Hi, thanks

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot for having me on. I am so glad

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to have you here now. Daniel, you are one half

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast team of Daniel and Jorge Explained the Universe,

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for taking time away from explaining the

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>universe to grace my humble show with your presence. I

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate it. Well, thanks a lot for having me on.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You guys talk about really fascinating stuff, so it's a

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to be here. It's been a pleasure listening to

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>your show. We'll talk a little bit more about that

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the episode, but just so that

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>my listeners kind of understand where you you're coming from

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>before we get into work with the Large Hadron Collider

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and CERN and particle physics. Tell us a bit about yourself,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, I'm devastatingly good looking, which is why

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a podcast, and m familiar my my. The

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>most important thing to know about me in this context,

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, is that I am a high energy physicist,

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>which means that I'm interested in studying the universe at

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the smallest scale, and I do so by smashing stuff

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>together at the highest energy. It's like, you know, you

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>want to understand how things work, take them apart, and

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that basically what we do is we try to take

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe apart and understand how it works. So

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a professor at the University of California at Irvine

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that's in Orange County and m I work there, and

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I work also at the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 1>where the actual collider is, and we have a big

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>team of people smashing particles together and trying to figure

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>out what is the smallest bit of matter and how

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>does it all fit together? And where, how did everything start?

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And how is it going to end? And we basically

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>try to tackle those really big sexy questions. Yeah, I

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I love the way you describe that, the idea of

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>taking apart the very basic particles that make up stuff

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and finding out what makes that work. It's

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.279
<v Speaker 1>very relatable to all the stories of the various innovators

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>who got their start taking apart the various pieces of

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>technology they have, often to the detriment of their family,

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and then learning how it works and then hopefully being

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>able to put it back together again. Except we're looking

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at reality here, how the the very fabric that makes

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>up existence works. And uh I also I watched a

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>great presentation that you and Jorge gave in which you

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about your book and you talked about the gaps

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and scientific knowledge, and that also made me feel like

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I am all a smart person, only because in the

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>past I have described our understanding of the universe like

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 1>we're staring through a key hole and we can only

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit of the illuminated room that's beyond

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the keyhole, and there's stuff and shadows, So there are

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>things that we don't really see, and there are elements

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that are out of you and to us. That's that's

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of the universe. We only see a very

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>narrow band of what really exists out there, and our

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>goal is to expand that over time. That's right, and

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the most amazing thing in my perspective is that we've

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>only recently disc covered that we are looking through the keyhole.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for a long time we thought we were

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>saying everything. We thought, well, we've seen the way the

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>universe is now, we just need to figure out how

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to explain it. We made a lot of progress and

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the last fifty year, in the last twenty or fifty years,

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we've discovered that there's a lot of stuff out there

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have any understanding of, dark matter, dark energy,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>huge chunks of the universe which completely defy our our explanation.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean it can't be explained. You don't have

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to go to like weird woo woo crystal energy stuff.

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It just means that there's a lot more science left

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to do. And for me, those are wonderful moments in

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the history of science when you you know, you pull

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>back a layer of reality and discover, oh my gosh, wow,

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>things are totally different from what we expected, or you know,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it turns out we were only studying the the tail

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of the elephant, and we need to look at the

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. And and that's exciting. Not because the

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>science is humbled and realizing that we don't understand everything,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a wonderful experience. It's exciting because it means

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there are discoveries left to come, right. I mean that

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of the most dramatic, most insightful realizations about

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the universe might still be ahead of us.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I like thinking about how in the future and a

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred years people might look back with great knowledge of

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>how the universe works and wonder what it was like

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to be us when we lived in such ignorance, right

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>when we didn't know so many things about so many

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>basic things about the universe. Um and what you said

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier really resonate with me about trying to figure things

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>out by taking them apart. I think that there's an

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>innate curiosity and being human. I mean, that's what makes

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>being human fun, it makes being being alive worth It

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is that we are driven by this desire to know

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand the things around us. So if you're the

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of person who's like, how does a blender work?

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me take it apart, or you know, how does

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>this thing in my car work? Let me look under

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the hood and poke around. Then you're basically a physicist.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You're the kind of person who wants to understand things

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>by taking them apart, by boiling them down to the

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>most essential elements, and using that to explain your car,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>and then also your blender, and then other things you

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen. But for right, it's about learning generalizable, universal truths. Yeah,

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and and I would also argue that the history of

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of humanity has been one in which we have attempted

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to explain the why things are the way they are

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>for for all of our history, and the as we

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>eliminate gaps piece by piece, and knowing that we still

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>have enormous gaps left to fill in, we start to

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really hone in on that over time we're able to

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>replace things where we had the explanation of a uh.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.119
<v Speaker 1>Well though, that that's the gods battling it out in Olympus,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's where the thunder comes from. To know now

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a deeper understanding to the point now where

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we even are able to get a grasp on the

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>idea that as humans, as as we are the way

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we have evolved, we have limitations in our perception. There

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>are things that we are capable of perceiving because we

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have evolved. It is advantageous, it made sense in our environment,

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that's everything there is out there,

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>which kind of leads into discussions that I've heard about,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the various dimensions that we were capable of perceiving.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of those obviously we can we can observe the

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>physical dimensions, and then once you start figuring that out,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you say, well, it may be a leap to you

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to think there are so many more dimensions or potentially

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more dimensions than the ones we can perceive. But we

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>also know that we can't see things in the infrared

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>or ultra violet UH wave forms. But with technology, we

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>can convert that into light that we can see. And

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>once you start looking at things like that level where

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you say, oh, yeah, I guess we have developed tools

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that let us go beyond our limitations in our perception,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>then it kind of opens up your mind into the

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of now I kind of understand how there can

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be things like dark energy and dark matter that are

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond our current capability of detecting it, because it took

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years for us to get to the point

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>where we could, uh could even indirectly observe stuff like

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>being for red in the ultraviolet. So that's sort of

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the approach I take with people as well, the idea

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that it feels like you're taking a big leap when

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you start going into things like particle physics, when you

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>start talking about quantum quantum effects, because everything seems so strange.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't it doesn't work the way the classical physics work,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's it feels like you're asking people to take

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a leap of faith. But once you start to build

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on those blocks, they say, okay, all right, now I'm

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with you. Now I got it. And that kind of

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>brings us over to the work that we see over

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>at at CERN and the large Hey drunk collider. Now,

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing I like to remind people about as well

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>before we get there. I thinks he's touched on a

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>really interesting topic there. You know, Um, I think people

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>have been thinking about mysteries for a long time, right,

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And for a long time, the world was really mysterious.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It was obvious that there were mysteries. You could just

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>go outside and there were things you didn't understand. What

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is lightning? Right? Um? And it's sort of it was

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a common feeling that the world was mysterious, you know,

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like there are more things in the heavens and earth

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>than are dreamt of in your philosophy. Right, it's it's

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>even in literature. But we've sort of lost that. I

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people these days when they walk around,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they mostly understand stuff, like, yeah, we

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>know how weather works. Maybe we can't predict it exactly,

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>but we understand the mechanism of it and gravity we

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have an understanding of that. And the sense of experiencing

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>mystery on a daily basis is sort of gone because

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>science has made so much progress in explaining the various

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>bits around us. And I want to remind people that

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the bigger questions, the larger questions questions we're asking ourselves,

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like why are we here? How should we live? How?

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>What is the history of everything? Those questions are still

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>totally unanswered. And uh, And as you said, I think

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is really insightful about how we don't even know what

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, because there's a lot of things that

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we've only recently discovered. We don't we we didn't understand

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>right that there's things happening around us that we're not

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>aware of, various kinds of particles moving, and even different

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of light that's invisible to us, as you said,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's really no limit on how much of that

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>there can be, right, I mean, we know certain things.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>We know dark matter is invisible, we know neutrinos are invisible.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>There could be other things out there that are also

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>invisible that we just haven't even yet discovered that they're

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there through some sort of very slight hints. Right. So

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the amount of discoveries left remaining in the future is enormous,

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the kind of thing that gets me all excited. Yeah,

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I I have a feeling, Well, first of all, I

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling I'm gonna need to fly out to

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>California and have have like just maybe a four hour

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>long conversation with you, because I haven't feeling that's exactly

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be needed, because I this is the

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>source of stuff I love to talk about, just to

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>anyone who will, you know, be patient enough to let

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>me chatter at them, let me ask you a question

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that you you mentioned about how we used to explain

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>things in terms of gods, and I think that makes

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense because humans are good at like

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>identifying agency and willfulness in places where there aren't any, Right.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But there's another element to that, which is the sort

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of the narrative. Right, These gods don't just have personalities

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and wheels that had stories that reasons why they were

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>doing what they were doing. And I feel like storytelling

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of who we are as a species.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's still even though we're not explaining things in

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of God's it still drives our science. Like you know,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if you asked me, um, what would you do if

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you knew the final answer to particle physics, Like if

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you could explain the whole universe in terms of one particle, Um,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that, I would say, then we would want

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to tell a story, right, We want to tell a

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>story about what that means about the universe and why

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe? Why is the universe this way and not

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the other way? First we have to figure out what

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>way is the universe, and then we want to know,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like why that way. In the end, we're still telling

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>stories to ourselves about how the universe came to be

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and what it means and how we should live our lives.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very human endeavor. Well, certainly, I mean,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we we call it matter, and we know about anti matter,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but we chose the optimist route right when we describe,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>when we describe these things that are antithetical to one another,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and they they annihilate one another when they come into contact.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And for some reason that we don't fully understand, we

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>had slightly more matter than we had antimatter, and therefore

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got stuff. I mean, if we had been pessimists,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we would call the stuff we have the antimatter, right,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So clearly there's a narrative issue there. So here, seriously,

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>here's the question. Then the question is do you think

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>if we met an alien species of physicists, do you

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think they would be asking the same questions or would

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they be satisfied with our answers, or do you think

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the kind of questions we're asking are inherently human in

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>some way that we don't even understand? What an excellent question. Now, obviously,

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>from the scientific perspective, I have to tell you that

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a very small sample size of intelligent life

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>forms that I can work from. I only have the one. Really, you,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you mean you're the only intelligent life form, you know,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean of entire I'm talking about entire species. I

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm not not only. I mean, I could get

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>super nihilistic and and and very egotistical and say, well,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I can only experience my own experience, and therefore I

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>know I'm intelligence. But I'm just granting everybody else that consideration. Um,

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that's very this This gets into philosophy and then, which

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I also fascinated by. But I'm a pragmatist, so eventually

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I get very irritated. Um, that's an excellent question, and

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, the it's one that I haven't given a

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of consideration too, largely because I have accepted the fact,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least accepted the notion that any sufficiently intelligent

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>species that may exist somewhere else could be so very

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>different from what we experience that that the word alien

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>only begins to describe how we would uh define such

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a species, And that perhaps their approach to understanding and

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>explaining the universe to themselves would be very different. But

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it would follow a similar pattern but

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I say that only because that's what that's what has

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>happened here. I don't have anywhere else to draw any

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>conclusions from. So, um, it's so hard to imagine outside

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of your experience, right, It's it's very, very difficult. Yet

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in science, when we discover something new, we're always describing

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of the things we know. Like we

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>want to know what is light? Is it a little particle?

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it a little way? Because of the things we know? Right,

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>when we find something that's totally new and different, we

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>don't even really have the words to describe it. So

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>imagining what it's like to be an alien scientist, I

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's an impossible question. So yeah, and that's that's

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>why I posed it to you. It's why it's why

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I while I find science fiction endlessly entertaining, I love

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>science fiction. I also always I roll my eyes a

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit when I see the star Trek approach of

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>every alien race is a humanoid with slightly different bumps

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on their head, and they speak English the same way. Yeah,

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the Universal Translator has no problem picking up what their

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>speech patterns are. So that like, even when you use

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Universal translator, uh, the you know, d o Sex

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Macina coming in and saying, oh, yeah, this is going

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to translate everything magically. You think you kind of need

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a sample size, don't you, before you really get a

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>grasp on it. But I mean, we have a hard

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>enough trouble, hard enough time even on Earth sometimes understanding

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>human cultures from around the globe, you know, so understanding

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>how to interact with aliens. I think it's gonna be helpless.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Like if we ever heard a message from aliens, and

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, even decoding it would be a huge problem

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>if you could even get past that. I have challenges

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding some of my relatives, and we all speak the

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>same language and arguably come from the same culture. Are

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you sure they all come from Earth? I mean, that

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>might be an explanation. I got an uncle that's questionable,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but pretty much everyone else I got a pretty good

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>handle on. This is This is great. This is gonna

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be an eighteen partner. Guys, I'm just gonna sit here

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and and and and monopolized annuals. Time for the rest

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of you. Want to talk about the large Adran Collider

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>rather than philosophy of alien civilization, I wouldn't say. Rather,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say that my questions were about, well, you know,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>there's one topic which connects them um, which is the

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>one way we might discover an alien civilization is by

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>first detecting their particle physicists. I have not heard this.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It might be if somebody's if aliens are building like

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>enormous particle colliders like the size of a solar system,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and we might eventually like sweep through the essentially the

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>pollution from that part from that particle accelerator and discover

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>them in that way. That would be pretty crazy way

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to find an alien species, But that would be awesome

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>because it would it would tell us that, hey, look,

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>particle physics is not just a human thing, it's a

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>universal thing. Everyone wants to know what the universe is

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>made out of, and everyone's figuring it out by smashing

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff together. So that would be pretty exciting discovery. It

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is interesting I had not heard about that particul are

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a kind of an idea. I've heard of, of course,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>enormous constructs that could especially when you talk about things

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Kardashov scale and you're thinking about like the

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>dice and sphere and that kind of stuff. These hypothetical

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>UM machines that would need to exist in order to

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of, say, an entire solar system's energy output,

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which would be necessary to reach those higher levels of

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>civilization that we've heard about. But I hadn't heard about.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't thought about a particle accelery the size of

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a solar system. To be perfectly honest, the large Hadron

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>collider is is a big enough beast for me to

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>try and get my mind wrapped around. I mean, they're

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about pretty expensive. So yeah, the solar system sized

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>collider is going to take another level of civilization before

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we can afford that kind of equipment. Yeah. Hey, guys,

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Jonathan from the Future just breaking into Jonathan

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from the past to explain that we're going to take

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>a quick break with our conversation with Daniel Whiteson to

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thank our sponsor. So getting to the large Hadron Collider. Uh,

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that would you know? And CERN as well. A lot

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of people think of of CERN is just because the

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Large Hadron Collider got so much press a few years

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ago when it was when they were preparing to bring

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>it up online and they were starting to stub up

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the energy levels. I think a lot of people just

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>associated those two as being. Uh, the only real like

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they CERN is just that's the agency to oversee the

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Large Hadron Collider. I like to remind people that CERN

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is also the organization where because CERN exists, we have

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a worldwide web. I mean the web started from Tim

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>berners Lee, who was working for CERTAIN at the time. So, uh,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I like to remind people that it's beyond that. But

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a bit so. So CERN is a European agency.

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That UM is a scientifically oriented agency looking into things

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>like these, these high energy reactions. And the large Hadron

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Collider is a particle accelerator. Uh, can I give us

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>an overview of what the LHC is for for someone

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>who has heard the term but they don't really get

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't grock it entirely, alright, Sure, UM, the large

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>hay Droun Collider. The basic idea is, let's figure out

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>what's inside matter. Let's figure out what's inside matter, and

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>let's do that by smashing particles together. So what you

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>do with the large Hadron collider the word large it

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously just means it's really big. Hadron is a kind

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of particle, and proton is the example of it. So

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you could also call it the Large Proton Collider. UM.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And we take protons, which are essentially just the nucleus

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of hydrogen. So you start with hydrogen gas which is

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>easy to get, heat it up, so the electrons boil off,

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and you left with just the nucleus, which is protons.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And what we do is we give those protons a kick.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>We use electromagnetic waves to push them, and we push

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>them faster and faster and faster and faster until they're

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>going about in ninety niono the speed of light. And

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>then we smash them into each other. And the idea is,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>see what comes out, See what kind of weird mysterious

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical magic happens to give you new kinds of

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>matter and new weird particles. Um. But as you said,

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the Large Hadron Collider is so to the flagship property

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>flagship Experimenter, but certain is much broader than that. It's

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a it's a European organization, but it's also international. I mean,

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I've I've been there many summers and you sit at

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a table at the restaurant and there's people speaking all

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sorts of languages. You know, this Italian at this table

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and Russian at that table and tie at the other table,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and Chinese over here, and you meet people from hundreds

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of countries, well not hundreds, but more than a hundred countries,

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a super international place, which is

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>really wonderful, and right now it really is the center

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the world and the Solar System, and you know,

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe the galaxy in terms of particle physics. But we

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do more than just the Large Hadron Collider. We also

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>have experiments studying the mysterious particle called the new trino.

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Neutrinos are produced by the Sun and the surface of

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Earth is just bombarded with neutrinos, but they're mostly

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.239
<v Speaker 1>invisible to us. They don't interact with us, but they

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of really interesting properties that we don't understand.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So CERTAIN does a lot of neutrino physics as well.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Um they do cosmic ray physics, looking at weird particles

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>from space. They do a big variety of particle physics.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And CERTAIN has played a big role in politics as well.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're aware, but Certain was founded

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>after World War Two, the idea being let's get all

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the scientists of Europe to work together on projects rather

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>than hiding in their own labs and hating each other

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and sort of like using science as this common human bridge,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like let's get connected. Let's not have our own like

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>individual weapons projects. Let's find something we can all work

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>together on in a positive way. And I think it's

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>really credited with tying European science together in a way

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that's made it more effective. And you know, building harmonies

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>between nations is also good, and I know that personally

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at certain I've eaten a lot of weird food from

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>different countries and that's helped me understand, you know, um,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>why the Belgians is like horse meat and why the

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese eat these weird things. And it's a fun cultural

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>experience as well as scientific. Well yeah, and and uh,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting into some of the fun stuff. Well

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about later. But I love reading about, uh,

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>things that remind us that scientists are also human. I

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's easy to kind of forget from a

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>layman perspective. You you hear about science, and you hear

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about scientists, and it tends to almost be another For

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are not necessarily involved in science, or are

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not they don't work with scientists, and so they start

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to think of that as their own category of living thing.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a scientist kind of like doctors. There's doctors, they're scientists,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's like that time that you meet your

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>middle school science teacher at the grocery store buying cereal

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, what you know, breakfast, this is not.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>This is not. Scientists have families and ambitions and disappointments

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and and rock rock groups, as it turns out, in

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>rock groups, and you know, ankle injuries and all the

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>same sort of things that people have. Absolutely, so what

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>experiment at the LHC did you are you working with? Specifically,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they're different because they're different ones that are associated with

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>different points along the LHC. As I understand it, where

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's different essentially collision points that are looking at very

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>specific uh, byproducts of these high energy collisions. That's right.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So we have two beams of protons um, one going

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>one way around the circle and the other going the

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>other way. And if somebody out there is wondering, well,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>why is it a circle? The reason is the circle

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is that it takes a while to get protons up

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to high enough speed. That's what we want to do,

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is we want to reuse those little boosters. The circle

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a string of little boosters. Each one gives

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a little kick and gets it going faster and faster.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>And so if you can spin it around multiple times,

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can get it going faster and faster. It's

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>like when your kids on the merry go round or

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing merry around. What is that thing called the at

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the playground that spins around? Yeah, I know what you're

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I honestly don't know the name of that either.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>The vominator the vominator um uh and and you put

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>them on there and you spend it, you keep pushing,

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it goes faster and faster. So that's why it goes

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in a circle. Um. And in order to bend them

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in a circle, we have these really strong magnets. So

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the way the collider works is it's a kick to

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>make it faster and then a magnet to bend it

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to go in a circle. And because we want to

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>collide the protons, we actually have two of these. We

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>have one going one way and other than protons going

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the other way, and so four places around the ring

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we cross those beams, right, we try to collide them.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And and also it's not individual proton. It's not like

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we put one proton in the in one beam and

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>another proton the other beam, and we zoomed around. We

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>smashed one proton. It's really hard to get protons to

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 1>hit each other because they're so small um, and so

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we actually have like a little gas of protons. It's

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a we call it a technical term, is a bunch

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of protons, and it's in tend to some number of

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>protons that we passed through another gas of protons hoping

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to get some collisions. And so there's four places around

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the ring that this happens, and each one is surrounded

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>by a massive set of detectors um to observe what happens.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Think of it like a really big digital camera. And

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I work on one of those. And the name of

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the detector is the Atlas detector, which has like which

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>sets the record from maybe the worst scientific acronym ever,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>because it has an acronym inside. I think Atlas stands

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for a large toroidal LHC apparatus. It's the most tortured

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>acronym ever. Anyway, Atlas surrounds one of the collision points

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and we smash the protons together there and that's where

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the magic happens. And you might be thinking, uh, you know,

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>if you smash protons together, all you can learn about

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is what's inside protons, right the way, if you take

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>your blender apart, you can learn about what's inside blenders.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That's true, and we can learn about what's inside blenders,

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but as what's inside protons um. But we can also

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 1>do something else because of the magic of quantum mechanics.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>What happens when you collide a proton and another proton

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>is that the particles inside them interact. So inside a

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>proton we have quirks of quirks and down corks, and

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>those quirks can interact and they can actually annihilate, which

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>means that they convert from mass from little bits of

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff flying through the particle collider into energy. Okay, so

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the particles are gone, the stuff that made them up

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is destroyed. It's turned into energy, and then that energy

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>gets turned back into mass because a little blob of

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>energy is very unstable, doesn't like they hang out very long,

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it turns back into mass and it doesn't

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>have to turn back into the same kind of stuff

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's started from. So you can turn for example,

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>two up corks. You can annihilate them together, turn them

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>into a ball of energy, and then they can turn

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>into muans or electrons or other weird kinds of particles,

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not required that it's made of the same

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff because the stuff has disappeared, it's been annihilated. So

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it really is like modern day alchemy. You know, we're

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>turning one kind of stuff into another kind of stuff,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's magical because it means we can create any

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff that's sort of on the universe's menu.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to know it's there in advance. We

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just pour enough energy into the collisions and eventually all

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of stuff will pop out. So it's it's

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>really like an exploration machine. It's like saying, what's out there,

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>what's on Nature's list of particles? What can we make

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>if we put enough energy into the collider. And so

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how we smash protons together to try to figure

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>out what is the list of particles that the universe

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>has on the list of sort of allowed states. And

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what we're doing to try to get inside

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>into this question of what is the universe made out of?

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>That's incredibly cool, like I've never heard it described that way.

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>So too, the thought of of smashing these protons together

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at incredibly high energies and then you end up as

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>part of that uh at almost like the proto energy

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that can convert into various different types of things based

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on possibly criteria that we don't fully understand, I mean obviously,

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And those are the laws we're trying to figure out,

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're trying to write down mathematical equations that

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.719
<v Speaker 1>predict how often you'll see this kind of particle, how

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>often you see that kind of particle, And the kinds

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of particles that we've studied, you know, electrons and muance whatever.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We understand how those are made, and we can calculate

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>very precisely how often we should see them and uh

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and what energies, and so that's the kind of thing

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we study. We we understand in pretty and pretty good

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>detail why some particles are made and when and how often.

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>What we're looking for is the weird stuff, the stuff

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we haven't predicted, or the stuff we hadn't anticipated, or

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the things that people have predicted but we

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen yet. And those things tend to be more rare,

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>which is why we smash the particles together so often.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We do it every twenty five nanoseconds, all day, all

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>year long. And the reason is most of the stuff

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that happens is boring. We've seen it before. Occasionally, very rarely,

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>something weird will happen and that will give us a

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>clue about maybe a new kind of rare particle. So

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I imagine if you're doing this that frequently with that

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>many protons, knowing not that all of them are are colliding,

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but still a good amount of them are UM and

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you have these four different points where they're all gathering

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>data that you're you're getting getting a few zeros and

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ones out of there. There's a lot I'm guessing a

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of information gets generated all the time through these experiments.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a tidal wave of data. Every time

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we have a collision, we read out the whole detector,

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>which has a hundred million different detector channels. So it's

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a massive basically digital image of the detector every every

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>every twenty five nanoseconds UM and so that's pretty it's

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty large volume of data UM and we it's

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so big that we can't even save it all, right.

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We if we saved it all, it would take huge

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of resource, says, and we wouldn't have no time

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to go through it. So what we and most of

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it is not very interesting. Of what happens is just

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like two protons come in, they kind of bounce off

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>each other, two protons come out. You know, it's rare

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that you actually have them, like a deep collision that

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>interacts with the particles inside that makes something weird. And

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so what we do is we have this system we

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>call it the trigger, that makes a keep or kill

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>decision on the fly, and it says was it interesting

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to save? If so, then shunt it down the

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>down the view the wires towards the disk. If no,

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>throw it away. And so we have to make these

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>keep or kill decisions every twenty five nanoseconds. And when

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gone, it's gone. It's not like it's saved to

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>back up and you can go through it another time.

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just we just toss it out. And so that's

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a really vital system. That's actually the part that my

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>group works on. Is this trigger system interesting? Yeah? I

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>always thought when I was learning more about this, I

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote an article about how the large Hadron collider works

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>as part of my work for how stuff works, And

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>while I was working on it, it struck me just

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>how amazing the actual apparatus is of creating these beams

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and steering them and creating the collision points. And then

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it occurred to me that as challenging as it is,

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much learning and engineering and all the

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>expertise that would be required to make such a thing happen.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>As impressive as that is, it's it's also incredibly impressive

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to think about how do you deal with the information

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that you generate from such a thing. It's so large,

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and the ability to differentiate between what is interesting versus

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what has already been known and therefore like this is

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>something that we don't necessarily need to consider because it's

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this is this is like we might as well have

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this etched on the side of a mountain already. We're good,

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>let's just concentrate this other stuff. Um. And as you

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>start to look at the challenges that people have with

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>big data in general, which is orders of magnitude smaller

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>than one is being generated at the LHC. But you

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>look at those challenges just like businesses who are saying like,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know what what data we have at

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>this point, and you think, well, that's troubling. Then you realize, well,

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if we're having trouble with that, imagine the challenge of

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sifting through all that information to find these gems, these

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>these indications of something unknown or not fully understood. And

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it boggled my mind. So to me, that is one

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the the huge achievements was not just the incredible

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>technological triumph of building a particle accelerator as large and

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>as powerful as the LHC, but then creating the way

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the information that's generated as a result.

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of people don't necessarily appreciate

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that or understand that because they're just thinking of, uh,

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>there's probably conceptualizing. You know, these these particles hitting each

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>other really at high speed, and then there's maybe a

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>flash of light or something, and then there's a little

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>squiggly line that goes off into the distance and you think, oh,

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a cork, right. It's it's because these are

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so far outside the normal experience, it's hard to think of, well,

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>i'll tell you some details about it. That's actually the

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>part of it that I'm most interested in UM. But

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>first of the human side of it is that this

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>apparatus is so complex that everybody who participates and it's

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, tens of thousands of scientists all working together.

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Certainly not my project by myself. Everybody who participates only

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>does a little bit. You know, the people who specialize

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in getting the beams to go really high speed, and

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>people who specialize in focusing the beams, and people who

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>specialize in building the detectors that surround the beam, and

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>people who specialize in um in the trigger, and people

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>who specialize in analyzing the data. And one of the

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>cool things is that you can specialize. You can say

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I really like climbing around the detector with a wrench

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and I want to spend my days doing that, or

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you can say, oh, I'm really interested in the data

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>reduction problem. And so we sort of get to attract

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>all types and people who are good at different things,

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and everybod gets to do the part they want rather

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>than having to do all of it by themselves. UM.

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's really fun. And the part that

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm most interested in is exactly what you were just mentioning,

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is how do you go from this huge pile of

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>data to saying things about the universe right to say,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I've got all these zeros and ones. How do I

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>then say, oh, look, we have the Higgs boson, we

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>know it exists, or we found dark matter or something

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. And and one of the problems is that

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't create these particles and then like have them

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in a jar. It's not like we're producing a pile

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of higgs bosons and we can point them to them

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>and say, look, these are higgs bosons. You can tell

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you can touch them, or they have some weird property

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>or something right the way, like in condensed matter, they

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>can make new kinds of goo and then they can

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>show it to you. And then, as with strange effects

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>or something, the higgs bosons that we produce only last

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for like ten to the minus twenty something seconds. So

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this this picture I told you where the corks collide,

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they turned into something um some energy. Then they turned

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>into a new particle. That's true, but that new particle

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>might only last for a really really short amount of

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>time because a lot of these particles are very heavy

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and unstable, and they don't like to live very long,

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>unlike you know, electrons or protons which can last for

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>billions or trillions of years. We don't even know. Some

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of these particles are inherently unstable and they turn into

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>other particles, and so what we see in our detector

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is never direct proof of that new particle. Instead, it's

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>always indirect evidence. It's like, um, you came to a um,

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>it came to an intersection, and you see, you know,

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>shards in the ground. You see glass over here, and

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you see steel over there, and there's a dead body

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>over here, and you have to figure out what happened.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>It's always like that that we're we're looking at what

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>came out of the collision and trying to figure out

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the middle. And so a lot of

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>what we do is is really complicated statistical inference. We say,

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>given the data that we saw, which theory of the

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>universe is more likely in the theory with the Eggs

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>boson or without the Higgs boson. So most of the

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>actual work involved is in constructing those two hypotheses and

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>comparing them to the data, saying how can we analyze

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the data, how can we um you know, plow through

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the data in a way so that these two hypotheses

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>give different predictions. Like in the case of the search

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>for the Higgs boson, we were looking for collisions that

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 1>had to photons coming out. So two protons come in,

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>two photons come out, right, two little beams of light.

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's because the higgs boson um sometimes turns into

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 1>two photons, So we're looking for two photons. The problem

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is there are other things that also turned into two photons,

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>lots of ways to make two photons that aren't the

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson. But if you did make the Higgs boson

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and it turned into two photons, then it would turn

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>into two photons with a certain amount of energy, and

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that amount of energy is connected to how much mass

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is in the higgs boson. So we did is we

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>just said, let's look at all the collisions that turned

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>into two photons, and let's just compare, and we made

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of a plot where we said, on the X

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>axis is the amount of energy and the collisions, and

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>then why excess is the number. So if you're envisioning this,

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>we have one theory that says there should be a

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>smooth distribution, and then what the theory with the Higgs

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>boson says, well, there should be a smooth distribution, but

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>then you should you should get a bump, You should

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>get an enhancement around the mass of the Higgs. So

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>one theory is there is no Higgs boson, and you

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>should get a bunch of just random collisions with two photons,

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>no special energy levels. And the other theory is you

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>have a Higgs boson, which means you get extra production

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of two photon events and they should cluster and they

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.439
<v Speaker 1>should all have a similar energy. So if you make

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this uh this plot, you should get a bump near

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the mass of the Higgs. And so essentially we have

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>two hypotheses. We say no Higgs boson or Higgs boson,

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and then we look at the data. So we've done

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the hard work of constructing two possible ideas and figuring

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>out what question to ask the data. That's always the

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.919
<v Speaker 1>crucial thing. It's a question are you asking the data?

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And we've composed the question in a way that we

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>hope the data can answer it. And that's how we

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>discover the Higgs boson. Is the data followed one curve,

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the curve with a bump in it, and not the

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>smooth curve, the curve that had no Higgs boson. So

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the work we do is involved in

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in analyzing that data, and because it's such a big project,

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>we have people specializing in these areas, and this is

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>my area specialty is analyzing this data. And one of

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>my other interests is in computer science and artificial intelligence.

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And in the last five years we've been borrowing really

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>heavily from computer science all these new tools they've developed

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to do really fantastical artificial intelligence to recognize patterns. We

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>found ways to take those tools and apply them to

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>these questions to say to artificial intelligence tools, can you

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>find patterns in this data? Can you learn to find

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Higgs bosons in these ones and zeros um and separate

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>them from things that are not higgs bosons but look

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like them. So we've a lot of fun bringing in

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>ideas from other fields. We don't invent a lot of

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this stuff by ourselves. We sort of you know, we

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have a nail and we sift around for somebody nearby

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>who might have a hammer. M h. Well, that to

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>me is always a fascinating thing as well. It's it's

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a different level of innovation where you are thinking rather

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 1>than let's let's invent a brand new tool to do

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this thing. You say, well, do we have any tools

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps are not currently being used to do this thing,

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but with some some work, we could repurpose them for

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:35.879
<v Speaker 1>this thing. Um to that, Usually it's a happy discovery. Yeah.

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember going over to the computer science department it

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>was like two thousand twelve and describing this project and saying, look,

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.720
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem we have. We don't have a tool

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that can solve this problem. What do you have? And

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 1>they said, oh, my gosh, we have the perfect tool.

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Currently we're using it to solve this other problem. And

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, what problem are you solving and

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>they said, oh, we're trying to figure out how to

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>answer the question is there a cat in this Internet video? Right?

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Which is like the perfect example of how of a

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hard but relevant problem. Like it's not easy to say,

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>here's a video, can you tell me if there's a cadet?

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the kind of thing it's easy for a person,

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's really hard for a computer program. Right, how

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>do you define a cat? And then it's moving through

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the videos on different colors of cats, cats, of different behaviors.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a difficult problem and it's one where there's a

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of data available. So the computer scientists latched onto

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this problem not because it was important or particularly interesting

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>or useful, but just because it was hard and they

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of data. So when I came to

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>them with another problem that was hard, where we had

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data but actually had some like scientific

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>value and and sounded cool, they were very excited. So

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they're excited to get to use their tool and something

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that was actually relevant to society into physics and to science.

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>And we were excited, of course to use their awesome tool,

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.359
<v Speaker 1>which worked really, really well. So it's usually a sort

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>of a peanut butter and chocolate situation when you can

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>find this sort of crossovers nice. I like, I like

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the peanut ab her chocolate analogy. And of course, uh,

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the neat thing to me about the machine learning process

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that you were talking about with with identifying cats and

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>videos taking an approach like that, where again seemingly if

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>you if you explain that to someone, they sound they say, well,

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like it's trivial. It's I mean, it may

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>be a hard computer problem, but what's the purpose. And

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>my argument to them has always been, well, a human

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>can immediately tell if the computer was right or wrong

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>when it or the machine was right or wrong when

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to its conclusion, and therefore go in and

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 1>tweak the waitings of the various decision points. That if

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you're using an our official neural network, you change the

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>waitings of the the various values so that it can

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>slowly hone in on what is it to be a

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>cat and and understand what catness really is, not not

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the character from Hunger Games, but what catness really is.

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:59.479
<v Speaker 1>And that once you do that, yes, exactly, that's that's

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you want to do. Right If you're trying

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>to create a tool like this, you want to pick

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a goal where a human can say, yes, the the

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>computer has managed to hit that goal, or no, the

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>computer has not. So that way, once you've perfected the

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>approach and you can then start to apply it to

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>things where uh, we don't have as full of an understanding.

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's the difference between supervised learning with machine

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>learning and unsupervised learning, and and to me, that's a

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating area of study. I've talked about that a

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>lot on tech stuff as well, and uh, it also

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>gets into other issues that I won't. I won't dive

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>into here, things like the the need for transparency for

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>these kind of systems so that we understand how they

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get to their conclusions and it's not just a black box, etcetera, etcetera.

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But I digress. How does it know what a cat? Exactly? Exactly? Yeah,

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>interpreting these networks is very important. Yeah. If you get

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to a point where you watch a video and you say, oh,

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see a cat in there, but the computer

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>says there's a cat in there. The computer says, no,

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there absolutely as a cat in there. Just because you

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it doesn't mean it's not there. And then

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you start to get a little worried, just thinking are

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we are we heading toward how territory here? Let's uh,

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:09.879
<v Speaker 1>let's pump the brakes a little bit and find out

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>how you got to this happened to seed to the

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>computers the job of determining whether is the cat in

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the video? They're better than I am. You say that,

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but I find cat video so cathartic. Um. So this

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing I wanted to to touch on just briefly, um,

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And that might be difficult to do. But yeah, we

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Higgs boson quite a quite a bit. And uh,

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>how would you describe what the Higgs boson is to

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>someone who's interested in it but doesn't have that background

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in in physics. Yeah, so the Higgs boson is fascinating

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>little particle, and it's a sort of part of the

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>answer to the question what is stuff? You know, we

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>want to understand what are things made out of? But

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>part of that is understanding like what am I made

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>out of? What is the substance of me? And you

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine that if you take yourself apart, you're made out

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 1>of molecules. Those molecules are made out of atoms. Those

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>atoms are made out of protons and electrons and neutrons,

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and the protons are made out of quarks. So at

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>this point we can describe everything that you're made out

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of in terms of quarks and electrons um. But what

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we still don't know is what are those made out of?

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Like do they get a little scoop of universe stuff?

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's some sort of basic matter unit, and

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand like how do they have mass? Where

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>does their mass come from? And it's a mystery because

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in our theory, these particles are not little balls. Like

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>when I say a particle, you're probably imagining like a

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>little spinning beach ball, right, a tiny little dot of

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>actual stuff, but something with extent to it, something with size. Well,

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in our current theory, these particles don't have any size.

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Their dots their points in space, which means where is

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the stuff to them? Right? Where is the mass? Where

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>does the mass come from? Um, there's no room for

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>any mass in a point. Right. If there's mass, there

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>have infinite density, which makes no sense at all. You

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have like all these tiny black holes. So the Higgs

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>boson is in a way that is a way to

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>answer that. What it does is it says that the

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 1>mass the particles have doesn't come from a little scoop

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of universe stuff that they got. Instead, you have to

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>think of it's sort of like a charge. Like when

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I tell you an electron has a negative charge, that

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:26.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't bother you. But what if I told you electron

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is a point particle there's no room for it. Would

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you ask where does the negative charge go? Or is

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>there room for the negative charge? You just think of

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>negative charge is sort of like a label, something that

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you can apply to a tiny dot. We should think

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of mass the same way. Mass is not a little

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>serving of universe stuff. It's like a charge, and a

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>charge of something that tells us how things interact. So

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>an electron has a negative charge, which means it, you know,

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>um gets repelled from positive stuff, and they can interact

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>with photons and things like that. Um particles that have mass.

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Um those particles that have mass us they have mass,

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a charge. It tells us how it interacts

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>with the higgs boson. So the Higgs boson is the

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that gives these that that interacts with these particles

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and makes them move as if they had mass. So

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>they have some of the label on them, and the

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 1>higgs boson interacts with them if you have if you

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of mass, higgs boson interacts with them

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and that's what gives them inertia. It makes

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>makes it hard for them to speed up or hard

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for them to slow down. Right, And so that's what

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs boson does, is it gives mass to these

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>particles or explains how a tiny little particle can have

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>any mass at all. And the fascinating thing is that

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea, who has been around for decades before we

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>actually found it. Some theorist was looking at the list

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>of particles and the math behind them and saying, this

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really make sense, like how do these particles? How

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can these particles have mass? There's no way to give

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>them mass in our theory. Like, we have a really

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.720
<v Speaker 1>beautiful theory that would work perfectly if all the particles

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the universe had no mass, But the particles have mass,

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and when you try to add mass in various ways,

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't work mathematically. It breaks all sorts of

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>other rules. So he came up with a way to

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>give mass to these particles by having them interact with

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this other new particle we've never seen before. And the

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>thing I love about that is that it's it's purely aesthetic.

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 1>It's like philosophical. It's like saying, I'm looking at all

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>these puzzle pieces and it seems to be one missing.

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>This whole story, right, this move back to the idea

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of a story. This whole story would make much more

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>sense if there was one more character in it. You

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>would just click together, would be symmetric, would be beautiful,

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it would mathematically look pretty. And so he said, well,

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe there is one, right, So let's go look for it,

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and it was so compelling an idea that we spent

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>decades and billions of dollars looking for it and then

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>actually found it. Right. What a triumph for theoretical physics

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, just in my mind, I can think about

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the patterns of the universe and predict what else is

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:54.959
<v Speaker 1>out there that we've never seen. To me, that's incredible. Yeah,

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I love that. Uh it's a story where we take

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>a look at uh, an idea that's that's largely fleshed out,

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and then we think, there's this would work so great

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>if only there was this thing. You know what, I'm

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>just gonna I'm going to create the mathematics here. I'm

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna figure out mathematically how this thing could

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>exist if everything else we've assumed is more or less right,

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 1>And then, wow, that looks really nice. Boy, it would

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>be great if that thing exists. We should find out

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>if that thing exists, and then and then a lot

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of time and thought is put to it. Not obviously

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm trivializing and I'm very much generalizing, but to me,

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just it is beautiful. But it's also there's like

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a level there's a level of beautiful absurdity to it

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that I find interesting from my perspective of not being

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a physicist right where to me, it's it's no, you

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sound like you kind of are an amateur physicist. I

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>mean you think about these ways like a physicist. You know,

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:57.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not all about the mathematical training. It's so sort

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about the front, the way you think, and the way

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.479
<v Speaker 1>you ask questions. So I'm happy to bestow you upon

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you the dubious honor of being a deputized amateur physicist. Excellent.

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I cannot I cannot wait to abuse my authority certificate

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the mail pretty soon. Yeah, you'll see me walking

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>into restaurants saying, give me a good table. I am

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>an honorary physicist, and they'll say do you Yeah. No,

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work for for podcast celebrity either. I can

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you from ten years of experience. Uh. Yeah, it's

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the I have the level of fame that is almost

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:33.359
<v Speaker 1>but not quite completely useless, and honestly I'm okay with that.

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Um well, let me let me shift this a little bit.

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll kind of uh get toward the end of our

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation here to talk about some more silly fun stuff.

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I think a lot of people

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>heard about when the LHC was, you know, still powering up.

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a very long process. In fact, it was

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>longer than we had anticipated because there were some problems

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:56.799
<v Speaker 1>that we encountered along the way. I say we, as

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:58.840
<v Speaker 1>if I had anything to do with it. You're an

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>honorary physicist. Now you to say we they're excellent. It's

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's so good to join the collective. But

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the there were there were some issues, and it also

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>led to a lot of speculation, much of it completely

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>baseless from people who had uh, little to no understanding

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>of what was happening, but apparently access to wonderful platforms

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>from which they could espouse these these baseless claims. But

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we had everything from people saying this is going to

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 1>create black holes without really one understanding what a black

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>hole is, to understanding if that were in fact to happen.

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:41.320
<v Speaker 1>The time frame we're talking about, and the size the

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the UH of it, and and what energy level we'd

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be talking about less than what a mosquito generates when

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 1>it flaps its wings, for example, and at a at

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a at a time that's so small that is impossible

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:57.799
<v Speaker 1>for us to think of it. We can we could

0:50:57.880 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>look at a measurement. We could look at a number

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with a whole bunch of zeros, you know, a dot,

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of zeros, and then a one after it,

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and think, oh, that's how long it is based on

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, point zero, zero, zero, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, one seconds.

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But you can't by the time you think that, so

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a countless number of those have passed. And so to me,

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that was one of those things that I found funny

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and infuriating at the same time, this sort of misconception about, oh,

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the LHC is a doomsday device that is going to

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>end all life because we're going to create a black

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>hole that will suck up the entire universe. There's even,

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:40.879
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, there's a website that had a very funny,

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:46.280
<v Speaker 1>very immateurish gift of a picture supposedly from a security

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>camera outside the LHC just getting sucked in to to

0:51:50.520 --> 0:51:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a single point as if a black hole had been created,

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, wow, that's amazing. That's amazing connection to

0:51:56.560 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>be able to continue to broadcast while spaghetti location is happening. Now,

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>my favorite website is called has the Large Hadron Collider

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>destroyed the world yet dot com as we promised as

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>physicist to always keep up to date, right, So if

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you go to that website and it says yes, then

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, yeah, you might wanna, you might want to,

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, might make some plans. Um, But yeah, this

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is a this is a common thing that's raised, and

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's reasonable for people to wonder, like our

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>physicists going to trigger some sort of universal apocalypse which

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:33.320
<v Speaker 1>ends society as we know it. It's a fair question, um,

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>But it's also reasonable for us to lean on physicists

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>expertise and answering the question. In this case, I think

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Serain has done an excellent job of taking this concern seriously.

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 1>So for those who don't know, there there really is

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a theory that we could be creating miniature black holes

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Large Hadron Collider. The idea is that gravity

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>might be very very power. Gravity, which is the weakest force,

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.439
<v Speaker 1>might actually be very very powerful if you bring things

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>really close together, like the close the size you know,

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the width of a proton is sort of close together.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you smash these protons together really high energy,

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:08.839
<v Speaker 1>they might get close enough where the gravity gets really

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:11.959
<v Speaker 1>really strong, and meaning you could create black holes, because

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.720
<v Speaker 1>black holes are essentially displaces where gravity gets really strong.

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, those black holes, if they

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:20.839
<v Speaker 1>last long enough, could sit there and sort of swallow matter.

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's lots of reasons not to be

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>worried about that. First of all, we think if these

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>black holes are created, they wouldn't last very long. They

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>would radiate into nothing using Hawking radiation. And if they

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and and we believe that collisions have been happening for

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>a long long time, like we've been being hit by

0:53:38.280 --> 0:53:43.320
<v Speaker 1>particles from space forever basically, and those particles are traveling

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 1>much faster than the particles at the large age On collider.

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So if collisions of particles were going to cause Earth

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>destroying black holes, it would have happened already. And so

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty in depth analysis of this um And

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing that's funny about it is sort

0:53:57.680 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 1>of the social aspect of it. Like if you ask

0:53:59.880 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of is this, is it possible for the LHC to

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>destroy the universe, to destroy the Earth, The answer is technically, yes,

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. You don't want to talk about exactly, but

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a difference between you know, a scientific answer and

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a public relations answer where it's possible,

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but not to the level where it's really worth talking about.

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Like it's possible for me to disappear in quantum mechanically

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>appear in Paris. Sure it's not impossible, but it's the

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>real The odds are so remote nobody should factor that

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>into their plans. And that's really what people are asking about, Like,

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is this possible at the level where we need to

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>worry about it and make policy changes or you know,

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>use it to base decisions on And the answer is no. Um.

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we as humans are pretty bad about

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 1>thinking about dangers and making decisions based on that. You know,

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I should worry about being struck by lightning or being

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 1>eaten by sharks, but we don't worry too much about

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 1>handgun safety this kind of stuff. So as human as

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we we have our policies upside down. Or even you know,

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of getting in even a minor accident in

0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a car, I mean, that's incredibly likely compared to these

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>other things. But these other things because they I think

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:12.399
<v Speaker 1>largely because they and they tap into that same part

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of our brains that finds fascination in the unknown. There's

0:55:16.640 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>there's that related element, the fear of the unknown. The

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>two are very close, and the less you know about something,

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the more likely you are to fear it um. And paradoxically,

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>also the more you know about something, depending on what

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it is, the more you might start to fear it um.

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a really interesting Oh boy, being human

0:55:35.880 --> 0:55:39.320
<v Speaker 1>sure is great um. But in the end, it's all about,

0:55:39.520 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to answer these questions and exploring the unknown,

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and to me, that's always worth it. The guys who

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 1>jumped in a ship and sailed into the ocean not

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>knowing what they were going to find, you know, they

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 1>were part of that. It's a it's a long legacy

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of exploration and to me, that's one of the most

0:55:52.640 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 1>exciting things we can do as a species. Daniel, thank

0:55:55.719 --> 0:55:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining our show. Please can you

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about your podcast and why

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>everyone needs to listen to it? Sure? Our podcast is

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:08.520
<v Speaker 1>called Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe. I'm one half

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. The other half is Jorge Chom, the internet

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:15.479
<v Speaker 1>famous cartoons behind PhD Comics, and we do a fun

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.799
<v Speaker 1>chat about philosophy and science and try to explain things

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>about the universe and the idea there is to take

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:23.799
<v Speaker 1>big topics and break them up into pieces that are

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:26.360
<v Speaker 1>actually understandable, not just so you hear a lot of

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>fancy words and you don't really understand, but so that

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:30.759
<v Speaker 1>you come away with a pretty good grasp of what

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 1>these topics are. And we cover things like the Big

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Bang and teleportation and fasten the light travel and history

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the universe and the future of the universe. And

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so check it out. It's a lot of fun. It's

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:45.040
<v Speaker 1>called Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe. Yeah, it's fantastic, guys.

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>If you have not listened, you need to check it out.

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I very much enjoyed it's I consider it sort of

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:56.239
<v Speaker 1>a spiritual cousin to text stuff and and and it

0:56:56.239 --> 0:56:58.239
<v Speaker 1>makes me. It makes me long for the day when

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I can I can get a co host who I

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 1>can bounce stuff off of, and they can bounce stuff

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>off of me. Right now, I'm playing tennis with myself,

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so that is always a challenge. Daniel, thank you so

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>much for joining the show. We greatly appreciate it. Thanks

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 1>very much for having me on. And hello to all

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 1>your listeners. Hey, guys, Jonathan from the future again. It's

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome. They're flying cars and everything. Anyway, uh, I

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was just here to tell you we're going to take

0:57:24.760 --> 0:57:35.320
<v Speaker 1>another quick break to thank our sponsor. That was a

0:57:35.320 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal conversation, or at least I had a ton of fun.

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys enjoyed it. Daniel Whiteson is really

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 1>great at communicating science, not just someone who practices it,

0:57:47.240 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's very good at explaining the wonder behind science.

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So definitely check out that podcast. If you guys have

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>any suggestions for future topics for tech Stuff, whether it's

0:57:56.840 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a technology, a company, maybe there's someone else I should

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 1>interview on the show, let me know. Send me an email.

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 1>The addresses tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or you can visit our website that is tech Stuff

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:12.400
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com. There you're going to find links to

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 1>all of our social media as well as to our

0:58:15.600 --> 0:58:19.080
<v Speaker 1>store that's over at t public dot com slash tech Stuff.

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Every purchase you make goes to help the show, and

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we greatly appreciate it, and I'll talk to you again

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>really soon for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that how stuff works dot com,