WEBVTT - Press Pass: Frank Reich

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Six sacks of said he was holding onto the ball

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>too long. The old line kind of took the blame

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for it. How did you see is shaping up when

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you looked at the film? You know, we talk about

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we talk about past protection as an offensive unit. It

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>involves all of us quarterback, offensive line, tight ends backs,

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and so when it goes when you go to a

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>game and you have six sacks, we're not internally, we're

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>not looking to point to finger. We're looking at each

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one of us as coaches. Did we help him enough?

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Did we put him in the right protection scheme? Each

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>players looking at his own deal. So, although that gets

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>evaluated on an individual basis in the position rooms, I

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>can tell you usually when you have a game where

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>you have six sacks, it's not one guy, it's not

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>just the offensive line, it's not just it's spread out

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and you go into that environment obviously tougher environment, but

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of trouble running the running back screens,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>which is just one specific play. Why aren't why aren't

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>why aren't they working in wine teams able to blow

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>them up? You know, we hit the one screen for

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>we hit the one screen for fifteen or so yards

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to Sproles. We had the interception, which was a bad play,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, which ended up a bad negative result. Um,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>if you run a number of screens in the year,

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>usually you're gonna end up with one on the year,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>one fluke interception like we ended up. I mean, if

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you run enough screens in sixteen games, that's probably going

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to happen to you. We had three or four other

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>screens called. Two of them were potentially big plays that

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>we just uh, the one, the one their defender made

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a great play. We had it set up to perfection,

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a huge play. There's one guy

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>defender and he slipped a block and and and gotten

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>away of what would have been a big play. And

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>then the other one, Um, we just we just missed

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it. It It was set up nice. But talk about yeah, yeah, Well,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in regards to the elfits of line, I know, you

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>say there's a team unit, there's other factors like holding

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball, getting help in whatever. But Isaac did have

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>a number of one on one blogging opportunities that he

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>just got flat meat at least three or four. So

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>are there any concerns about him going forward? And has

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>there been any consideration toward maybe he's starting somebody else

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants this week. And I think the way

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>we look at it is one thing every player knows

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and every coach knows. You line up in that environment

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>against really good players on the other side of the ball,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna get beat every now and then. And

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, at every position, and not just at guard

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>or at tackle or at center or your corner. You know,

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a receiver getting beat beat up by a corner, it happens.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at stuff like that, when we

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>see you know, when you see an individual get beat

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>once or twice in a game, you don't like it,

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but it happens to literally everybody who suits up and

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>goes out there and play. You know, now, if that

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>happens over six, if that happens over five, six, seven games,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes a problem and you evaluate it. When it happens

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in one game, you say, okay, we take note of it,

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but we got a lot of confidence and we've been

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>working hard. We believe in our guys. So um, whether

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Isaac or whether it's another guy, it happens in

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>this league. We fight to get better and uh, and

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>then you evaluate over the long haul, were there a

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>number of players that Carson would have checked out of

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 1>run calls or was that just the way the game

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>played out? You know, I think it was just the

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>way the game played out. I know that's sometimes said,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we came out, we schemed some things up.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest with you. We schemed some things up

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the past game and hit a few things early

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on a few chunk players that felt good about um

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>try to keep the mix. Of course, then you get

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>late in that game, and I know the ratio was

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>probably a little bit more past than you ideally want,

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, But then you're down fourteen points, and so

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we throw what ten fifteen passes straight at the end

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of the game because we're down by two score wars

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have to throw because we're trying to win.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So even if it was a little bit out of

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>proportion at that point, it gets it ends up looking worse,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and I just my experience is when you look around

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the league, it pretty much happens every week to one

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>team or two teams are going to find themselves in

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of situation three thirteen before they went

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>up fourteen points, So I mean, just throw those last

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>two drives and it was still forty three out of

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty six were past plays. So I mean that is

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>that too much? You know? I mean I think you know,

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. I don't I'm assuming, okay, I assume

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you're right. At halftime, I remember, you know, getting the

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>number at halftime. I think we were eighteen to nine

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>or something like that at halftime when it got the number.

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We go out and we had we hit a couple

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of plays in the passing game. So all I can

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you is as a play caller, you're you're calling

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>what you think is going to get the team down

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the field and in that situation, and so that's what

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we were doing. How do you think you guys did? Um? Yeah,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>there were some good There were some good things in

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the run game. We had a few nice runs and um,

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, darn Darren's Darren. I mean, Darren made some

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>plays and offensive line did a good job at times,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, there were some good flashes. As far

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>as the ratio goes, though, is there something to it?

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Week one took some shots to tore it down

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the field that didn't work, but it helps other aspects

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>because stretches the field sometimes even if the running game

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't as effective, you have to do it, just for instance,

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>to keep Carson upright for sixteen games because driver, I

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>think every play caller, every coaching staff, you know, offensive

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff goes in and says, you know, we have

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to be patient with the running game. I mean, every staff,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you have to be patient with the running game. But

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like I've said in here before, it's like getting

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this is literally the best analogy I can come up

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>with it. It's like a boxing match. You get hit

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a few times, you get in the middle of a

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>fight and you're trying to win the fight, and so

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you call you You're you're dialing up what you think

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is the knockout blow or what you can you know,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the play that you think that will give you the

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>best chance for success. And um, yeah, do you need

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there a balance if you want to keep calling

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>runs even when they don't we're always work, Yes, but

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>there has an asterisk next to it. You know. The

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>overriding factor as the play caller is you're doing what

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you think is best for the team to win the game.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>On that screen that you mentioned with the defensive player,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>So you felt like Isaac couldn't have gotten him on

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a on a screen to Smallwood. It was it was tough.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>The defensive player made a good play, to be honest

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with you, I'm just wondering if yeah, you look at that.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, usually on a screen, the offensive lineman are

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>used to kind of getting out with a little bit

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of with this guy kind of ducked in behind, and

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, he made a very good play, to be

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, And Isaac's athletic enough that sometimes he's

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna he's gonna make that when other guys have no

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>chance of making that play. Um, but that particular one,

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the defender did a really good job. You mentioned his

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>athleticism when he has struggled, particularly in pass pro is

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a is it a mental thing, a physical thing, or

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is it a technical thing? Mean? Yeah, I mean it's

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like any player. When when a player gets beat, it's

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>usually a combination of things. It's hard to boil it

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>down to one thing. Um, it's usually a combination. And

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>within that combination is there's a guy lined up against

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>me that's pretty good. He gets paid a lot of

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>money as well, And so I think it's all those

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>things combine. The decision was made and starting left guard

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the the camp. Why did you go

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in that direction as opposed to have a competition with

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the other guards for a startling experience. Yeah, I think Isaac.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Could you know, Isaac had showed a lot of progress

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways. Isaac is a versatile, smart player. UM,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know who were very high on so um. He

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>had earned a position, he had earned the right to

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of get put in the position. And uh, and

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just proceeding with that from Parson playing deep balls?

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that here's the only one so far? You know,

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think when I when you there hasn't been enough

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in game situations yet to evaluate as much as you want.

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think we did a couple of nice things

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this week, Carson. I like the fact that we hit

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of back shoulder fades that's not necessarily the

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>deep ball, but still kind of go routes that are

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>back shoulders. I thought that was two really good throws

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>by him there. Um. As far as the deep throws

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>down the field, I think when I look at the

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>whole spring, in the whole training camp and early on,

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of confidence in the way we're receivers

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>are running those routes and throwing them. We just got

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep throwing them and then we'll hit our share

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of them enough. Yet, in Carey Clement's past blocking to

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 1>consider using him more. Yeah, I have a lot of

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>confidence in Corey's good good in protection showed that good

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>aptitude for it. U is that the right place blocking

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the right guy and then physically a strong enough to

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>hold up against most of the backers that are that

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.239
<v Speaker 1>are rushing. Right that he's in communication with people upstairs

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as it goes to the run pass ratio in game.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you the person that he's in communication with and

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>how did those conversations go on Sunday? Yeah, I mean

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I've h the people upstairs. I talk to the people

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>upstairs for the most part. As far as that kind

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing, you know, Coach, he's worried about calling the game,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that, managing the defensive side of it, being

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>over that side a little bit, listening to what's going

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on over there. I'm gathering information in between series and

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>then from up top and then I'll talk to Stout

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline as far as a run game here,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>what he's talking to his guys about with the offensive line,

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to Mike row in the past game, h what

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are the receivers saying? Is there one corner that we

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>think we can you know, are we feeling anything down low?

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Trying to get hands on approach? So we would literally

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty thorough process that we kind of go

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>through after each series where I'm talking to the offensive

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>line coach, I'm talk up into the receiver coach, I'm

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>talking to the guys upstairs for the stats, and then

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's my responsibility to filter that information and kind of

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>give coach what I think is necessary for the next drive,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>include the past run ratio. Did you guys have that

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>conversation at all on Sunday? Yeah, I mean that conversation.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have that conversation you know all Yeah,

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean all the time. I mean sometimes the conversation

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is yeah, Sometimes the conversation is a specific number. Sometimes

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the conversation is, hey, here's our runs for the next series.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it varies every time. The first run play of

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the game, you had Lane and Jason out on the

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>left side. Where did that come from? And I know

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that obviously a lot, but is that

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>something you could use again going forward? Yeah? You know,

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's there's just a little changeup, a little

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>changeup that you throw in there, and typically you have

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of play package off of it. But it

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was something that we saw that we thought we could

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically use to attack their defensive front and their scheme

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>third and long an awful lot. Uh the first two games.

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that? You it worked out

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>well against Washington you kept converting third and longs. But

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is that something you can sustain and why does it happened? Well,

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to have to sustain it, for sure,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but the obvious the obvious answer is, you know, just

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>be more productive on first and second down, avoid penalties,

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>avoid negative plays. Looked at the Detroit game, Uh, you

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>know last night against the Giants, it was crazy how

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>they overcame. They were in third and eleven plus something

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>like nine times, I mean, don't somewhere in the northern amount,

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>third and eleven plus last night and they were able

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to overcome it. So as an offense, to win and

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that's all that matters is to win. So you got

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to overcome it. But we got to find a way

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>to stay at a third and long shoulder pass. Carson's

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>been able to throw more successful this year versus last year?

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>What has been the difference there? And I'm sorry the

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>back shoulder passes that he's thrown more of it and

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>themistry feel just keep you gotta keep throwing those. You

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>just gotta keep throwing him. You've got timing, the timing

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and rhythm of it, Um, seeing the leverage of the defender,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>trusting it, trusting the receiver because there's always the option

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to still throw it over the top. It's something that

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to trust that the receivers feeling the same

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that you're feeling. And then the accuracy of the throw.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>How much is that a part of your offense? And

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>would you like to incorporate design runs in addition to

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>its frond us? You know, with the quarterback like Carson,

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>those designed runs are always in your back pocket. Um,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It's I think it's something that every team has to

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think about when they play US. Um. You know, we

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put him in harm's way too many

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>times on designed quarterback runs, but they're always available to us.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And then coach d Filippo is you know, one of

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the things he always preaches the cars and is won

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a game, meaning you know, make one convert one third

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a game with your feet, you know, and uh says

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that to him all the time, and um, you know

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he's got the athleticism to do that. What does the

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Giants defense They Well, I think the Giants defense probably

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.359
<v Speaker 1>has the best or one of the better pressure packages

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that we face. They do a good job of disguising.

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>They do a good job of presenting a similar presentation

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and have multiple looks off of it. Safeties do a

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>very good job of disguising. They'll be all the way

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>down one way and kick back the other way. They

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of things look the same. They'll give

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you a pressure look and bail out. So, I mean,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing that you don't see every week. I just

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>think that that Spags does a particularly good job coaching

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>as guys and having the full complement of pressures that

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>go with the different presentations that he gives you. With

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Windell the games he had success last year or running

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the ball Atlanta Pittsburgh, a Seattle tune extent, he had

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve to fourteen fifteen carries. People talk about the running

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>back getting at a rhythm. Do you feel like a

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>guy like him needs, you know, more than two or

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>three carries to really get an evaluation of where he is. Yeah,

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that not just for running back,

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for a quarterback or an offensive lineman. The more reps

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you get, the better. So I think that's a fair

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>assessment that you know, you wouldn't look at one day

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, he had however many rushes and and

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>his average was down. You know, you need to evaluate

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that over the long haul and there will be some

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks hopefully that he'll get twelve or fourteen carries. I mean,

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way we're doing it. I mean, there's

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a role for all of our backs, and it's a

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>game plan thing, and we attack it week by week

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and coach and we sit down coach this down with

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the offensive staff and we work through what is the

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>plan to utilize our personnel at that position each week