1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. 2 00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:14,480 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Bloomberg day Break Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. 3 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 2: Our top story this morning, Bloomberg has learned Chinese officials 4 00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:22,639 Speaker 2: are evaluating the possible sale of TikTok's US operations to 5 00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:26,840 Speaker 2: Elon Musk. We are told it's one option being explored 6 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 2: if TikTok were to fail to fend off a ban 7 00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:33,040 Speaker 2: here in the US. Plus a look at broader markets 8 00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:36,320 Speaker 2: with David Waddell. He is the CEO and chief investment 9 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:40,440 Speaker 2: strategist at Waddell and Associates. But we begin in Hong Kong. 10 00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 2: Joining me now to unpack the latest news on TikTok 11 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:47,320 Speaker 2: is Annabel Jewelers, who covers Asia Tech for Bloomberg News. 12 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:49,199 Speaker 2: Thank you for making time. I'm sure it's been a 13 00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 2: busy day for you. This is kind of an interesting story. 14 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 2: Just help me understand where we are at the moment. 15 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:57,720 Speaker 3: Well, I think in the bigger picture, I mean, we 16 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 3: had the US Supreme Court that had the here last week, 17 00:01:01,240 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 3: and it was really a chance at that point for 18 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,360 Speaker 3: representatives from both the US government and also from TikTok 19 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:10,080 Speaker 3: to present their sides and what we got out of 20 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 3: that on Friday was that it does very much seem 21 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:15,640 Speaker 3: to be the case that TikTok will be forced to 22 00:01:15,680 --> 00:01:19,240 Speaker 3: go so called dark in the US after January nineteen. 23 00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 3: That would have been the deadline that would have needed 24 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 3: to have divested its operations. 25 00:01:22,840 --> 00:01:25,120 Speaker 2: There, unless it finds a buyer right. 26 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 3: Exactly, And that's the big bloomberg scoop this morning. So 27 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 3: what we're hearing is that, you know, this is something 28 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 3: that the Chinese government is thinking about as well, and 29 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:35,840 Speaker 3: in terms of the possible options, we do need to 30 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:40,560 Speaker 3: emphasize their priority is that ByteDance continues to keep its 31 00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:43,840 Speaker 3: US app and to retain ownership of that. But of 32 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 3: the other possibilities, one of those is for Elon Musk 33 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:49,960 Speaker 3: to acquire the US app, and that would be through 34 00:01:50,280 --> 00:01:53,760 Speaker 3: x The two companies could work alongside each other. Of course, 35 00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:55,960 Speaker 3: for x it could pick up a lot of advertiser 36 00:01:56,040 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 3: revenue from TikTok. It's XAI, that's the AI artificial intelligence 37 00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 3: company that Musk also started. It could also benefit as 38 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:06,240 Speaker 3: well in terms of the amount of content that's been 39 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:09,520 Speaker 3: created by TikTok, but a lot is really still not 40 00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 3: clear how we would finance it. The scope the way 41 00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:14,760 Speaker 3: it would happen. But yes, as I said, that's one 42 00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:16,119 Speaker 3: of the possibilities we're hearing about. 43 00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 2: Anytime I've had a conversation about TikTok, the thing that 44 00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:23,600 Speaker 2: comes up is the algorithm. That's really the gold here. Right, 45 00:02:24,040 --> 00:02:28,519 Speaker 2: Would a sale necessarily force ByteDance to surrender the algorithms? 46 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:31,640 Speaker 3: Well, that's it, and that's really the big talking point. 47 00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 3: I mean, TikTok's algorithm is sort of the prize, or 48 00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:37,760 Speaker 3: one of the prizes out of all of this, and 49 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:41,880 Speaker 3: in terms of the sale, that's what Beijing also really 50 00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:44,440 Speaker 3: wants it to be able to retain. You've got to remember, 51 00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:47,760 Speaker 3: of course, that even if by Dance wants to sell 52 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:51,480 Speaker 3: its US app, it still needs to get approval from China, 53 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:55,240 Speaker 3: and China's got export rules in place that prevent Chinese 54 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:59,079 Speaker 3: companies from selling their software algorithms like the one at TikTok, 55 00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:03,400 Speaker 3: and so so it does really underscore just how much 56 00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:05,760 Speaker 3: of a role that the government could end up playing 57 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:07,360 Speaker 3: in what happens next. 58 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:10,359 Speaker 2: There's no way that that could change even if Beijing 59 00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:13,840 Speaker 2: wanted to curry favor with the incoming Trump administration, Right. 60 00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:17,680 Speaker 3: I mean, look, I think that part is too hard 61 00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:20,840 Speaker 3: to tell. I was speaking yesterday with Showminglu from Eurasia Group, 62 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:24,000 Speaker 3: and she was saying that, you know, out of all 63 00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 3: of the issues that are between the US and Chinese 64 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:30,040 Speaker 3: governments right now, actually TikTok is sort of maybe one 65 00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:34,079 Speaker 3: of the priorities that's lower down the list. What has 66 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:37,440 Speaker 3: been also interesting I've been discussing with colleagues this morning 67 00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:40,360 Speaker 3: as well as just this possibility that going forward, if 68 00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:43,280 Speaker 3: we do see an explosion of apps, because what's interesting 69 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 3: actually to note that the users that are leaving TikTok, 70 00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:48,960 Speaker 3: they're actually going in the US to other Chinese apps 71 00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:52,200 Speaker 3: like Shaohongshu that's read. Note there's also Lemonde that's owned 72 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:56,000 Speaker 3: by ByteDance. If you do see these Chinese social media 73 00:03:56,040 --> 00:03:58,280 Speaker 3: giants really blow up and become a lot more popular, 74 00:03:58,680 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 3: maybe it becomes a question of well as to how 75 00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 3: they're splitting their data and do they need to have 76 00:04:04,320 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 3: separate data centers in different regions. 77 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:09,480 Speaker 2: My recollection correct me if I'm wrong here, is that 78 00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:14,040 Speaker 2: the law in China essentially forces any Chinese based firm 79 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:17,280 Speaker 2: to share data with the government. Right, so if it's 80 00:04:17,320 --> 00:04:20,240 Speaker 2: not TikTok, if it's another Chinese based app the law 81 00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:21,000 Speaker 2: still applies. 82 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:23,719 Speaker 3: Well, that's it, I mean, and that's something else that 83 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:26,240 Speaker 3: we've been discussing as well, and that is sort of 84 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:29,080 Speaker 3: the level of clarity that we're sort of not clear 85 00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:33,880 Speaker 3: on just yet. I mean, yes, Hiaohongshu isn't specifically named 86 00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:38,920 Speaker 3: in Protecting Americans from Foreign Advisory Controlled Applications Act. That's 87 00:04:38,960 --> 00:04:41,680 Speaker 3: the actor that the Supreme Court's currently considering, and that's 88 00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 3: what could result on the ban on TikTok. But there 89 00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:48,680 Speaker 3: is certainly no guarantee that companies like Hiaohongshu will read 90 00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:52,120 Speaker 3: node aren't going to sort of follow in TikTok's footsteps 91 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:55,120 Speaker 3: either by being blocked by the US government. So if 92 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:57,320 Speaker 3: it's not TikTok, I guess, as you can say, what 93 00:04:57,440 --> 00:04:59,839 Speaker 3: else could also fall into the crosshairs? 94 00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:03,239 Speaker 2: So talk to me about price. If a deal gets 95 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:06,600 Speaker 2: done that would allow mister Musk to control this and 96 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:10,440 Speaker 2: maybe merge it with his platform X. Is there a 97 00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:12,200 Speaker 2: value that we can assign TikTok. 98 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,719 Speaker 3: Yes, there has been one that's been floated. This is 99 00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 3: coming from Bloomberg Intelligence. It was done last year, but 100 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:23,960 Speaker 3: they're saying up to around forty to fifty billion dollars, 101 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,640 Speaker 3: so it's a substantial amount of money. Of course, you're 102 00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:29,719 Speaker 3: talking about the richest man in the world, so maybe 103 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:33,039 Speaker 3: it's not quite as substantial to him. But it's still 104 00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:35,800 Speaker 3: very much unclear how Elon Musk would be able to 105 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 3: sort of even pull off a transaction of that size. 106 00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:41,600 Speaker 3: Would it, for instance, mean that he needs to sell 107 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:44,520 Speaker 3: or sell other holdings? Is the US government going to 108 00:05:44,520 --> 00:05:48,080 Speaker 3: be approving it. He paid forty four billion dollars for 109 00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:50,720 Speaker 3: Twitter a couple of years ago. He's still paying off 110 00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:51,720 Speaker 3: those loans as well. 111 00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 2: One of the interesting things you were talking about other 112 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:58,720 Speaker 2: Chinese based apps becoming popular in the US. I don't 113 00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:02,640 Speaker 2: know whether they are as a fisticated as the TikTok algorithm, 114 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:07,159 Speaker 2: but imagine a world where the algorithm doesn't transfer with 115 00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:10,839 Speaker 2: the sale, and the app maybe is not functioning at 116 00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:14,440 Speaker 2: the same level that it functions now that risk users 117 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:15,880 Speaker 2: leaving the platform, does it not? 118 00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:19,520 Speaker 3: Yes, definitely. I mean, the algorithm is sort of considered 119 00:06:19,520 --> 00:06:22,479 Speaker 3: to be sort of the secret source of TikTok, and 120 00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:26,120 Speaker 3: that is what's so highly prized and probably plays a 121 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,279 Speaker 3: large part into that valuation. I mean, but it's not 122 00:06:29,560 --> 00:06:33,120 Speaker 3: just sort of that's not the primary concern either from 123 00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:36,039 Speaker 3: the US government. Yes, they're concerned about the algorithm. They're 124 00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:38,719 Speaker 3: also concerned about how much data is being created as well. 125 00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:41,400 Speaker 3: But I guess underscoring all of that is also the 126 00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:44,000 Speaker 3: concern about sort of propaganda campaigns and the way that 127 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:47,320 Speaker 3: it could be used to have sort of covert or 128 00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:49,760 Speaker 3: what they would say would be covert manipulation campaigns. 129 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,919 Speaker 2: So what are you hearing from the Hong Kong perspective? 130 00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 2: What are people in the tech world saying about the 131 00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:57,560 Speaker 2: news story that we're talking about today. 132 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:00,359 Speaker 3: Actually this has been a really big talking point, not 133 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 3: so much in Hong Kong, though of course it is. 134 00:07:02,279 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 3: I mean, I think sometimes in Hong Kong people wish that, 135 00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:06,800 Speaker 3: you know, the tensions would be tamed down. This is 136 00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:09,880 Speaker 3: supposed to be sort of one of the leading or 137 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:13,000 Speaker 3: pre eminent financial hubs in the world, so obviously Hong 138 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:15,800 Speaker 3: Kong prefers to not have these sort of tensions between 139 00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:18,680 Speaker 3: the US and China. But just in you know, weed 140 00:07:18,760 --> 00:07:20,960 Speaker 3: chat and for people that aren't familiar, weed Chat is 141 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:24,239 Speaker 3: the equivalent to WhatsApp that's also used in mainland China. 142 00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 3: This has been the leading chat this morning for me 143 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:32,200 Speaker 3: with people that are working at a lot of different 144 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:35,480 Speaker 3: Chinese tech companies and they're all putting up different images 145 00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 3: in it. I'm just looking through it now, but talking 146 00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:41,280 Speaker 3: about how they're red hook books or their their jhaohong 147 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:44,720 Speaker 3: Sshoo pages are basically going mad, going crazy. A lot 148 00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 3: of people are getting involved with this, and so called 149 00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 3: TikTok refugees are starting to flood the platform as well. 150 00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:53,280 Speaker 3: But just to underscore that, and to note, I was 151 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:56,360 Speaker 3: actually looking at the US app Store this morning for 152 00:07:56,440 --> 00:07:59,440 Speaker 3: Apple on the iPhone downloads and number one right now 153 00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:03,600 Speaker 3: is Jahangshou and it's followed by Lemonade. So there is 154 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 3: a clear trend that we're seeing. Whether that lasts, but 155 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:10,640 Speaker 3: certainly people are really exploring the alternatives and for a 156 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 3: long time we'll be thinking that it would be you know, 157 00:08:13,760 --> 00:08:17,440 Speaker 3: Meadow or Facebook and Instagram, you know the meta names. 158 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:21,360 Speaker 3: But right now it seems like it's that trend from TikTok, 159 00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:23,520 Speaker 3: but still keeping it within China. 160 00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:27,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, such an interesting story, particularly now that we've got 161 00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:30,760 Speaker 2: Elon Musk's name involved. Annabel, thank you so much for 162 00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 2: being with us. Bloomberg's Anabel Drollers covering the tech story 163 00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:37,440 Speaker 2: for us in Asia from our bureau in Hong Kong. 164 00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:48,000 Speaker 2: Joining us here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back 165 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:51,120 Speaker 2: to the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Prisoner. So we 166 00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:53,320 Speaker 2: want to take a look at the broader market right now, 167 00:08:53,360 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 2: and we'll do that with the help of David Wardell. 168 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 2: He is the CEO and chief investment strategist at Wardell 169 00:08:59,400 --> 00:09:02,440 Speaker 2: and Associate. David, thank you for joining us. Can we 170 00:09:02,520 --> 00:09:06,680 Speaker 2: begin with your overview of markets for twenty twenty five. 171 00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:09,200 Speaker 2: I'd like your expectations for the price action? 172 00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,800 Speaker 1: Well, thanks for having me. You know, it started off 173 00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:16,400 Speaker 1: with the vis up here around twenty so you know, 174 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:19,200 Speaker 1: there's plenty of confusion out there, some of which I share. 175 00:09:20,360 --> 00:09:24,000 Speaker 1: But I think that the Trump agenda is such a 176 00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:29,560 Speaker 1: big component of all of this that until we see 177 00:09:29,600 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 1: that reconciliation bill, a lot of it is unknowable. But 178 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 1: I can tell you kind of my guests before we 179 00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:38,320 Speaker 1: see the details on that. First, you know, we ended 180 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 1: the year with a whole lot of expectations. We had 181 00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:46,080 Speaker 1: hindsight bias after two twenty percent plus years in the SMP, 182 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:49,720 Speaker 1: and so the market needed to cool off a little bit. 183 00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:52,800 Speaker 1: There was a major rally in stocks once the betting 184 00:09:52,840 --> 00:09:57,200 Speaker 1: markets forecasted a Trump victory, and then those started to 185 00:09:57,200 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 1: go sideways and sell off a bit as the rest 186 00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:01,560 Speaker 1: of the market it's caught up. So there have been 187 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:05,960 Speaker 1: major rallies obviously in interest rates, major rallies in oil, 188 00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:09,800 Speaker 1: major rallies in the US dollar, and I don't know 189 00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:12,600 Speaker 1: if this is axiomatic, but the SMP doesn't tend to 190 00:10:12,679 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 1: rally when those three do. So I think we've been 191 00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:17,920 Speaker 1: in a bit of a digestion phase and I'm not 192 00:10:17,960 --> 00:10:21,400 Speaker 1: really afraid of that, but just to put some numbers 193 00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:23,320 Speaker 1: around it, and this is kind of where my thinking's 194 00:10:23,400 --> 00:10:25,720 Speaker 1: going for the year. You know, we had two years 195 00:10:25,800 --> 00:10:30,760 Speaker 1: where earnings and valuations both expanded. I'm not sure that 196 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:35,040 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five we will see valuations expand. So 197 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:37,880 Speaker 1: we ended the end of twenty four at twenty two 198 00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:42,240 Speaker 1: times earnings, but the yield on the ten year was was, 199 00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:45,600 Speaker 1: you know, half a percent lower. Now we're at four 200 00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:50,080 Speaker 1: zero point seventy five, which would support twenty one times 201 00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:53,640 Speaker 1: pe multiple. And the difference between twenty two and twenty 202 00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:55,839 Speaker 1: one is about five percent, which is the drawdown that 203 00:10:55,880 --> 00:10:58,440 Speaker 1: we've had so far on the SMP. So if you 204 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:01,199 Speaker 1: think that rates can go to five to five and 205 00:11:01,240 --> 00:11:04,560 Speaker 1: a quarter because we are in an environment of higher 206 00:11:04,600 --> 00:11:09,079 Speaker 1: structural nominal GDP and the Trump agenda will pass through 207 00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:14,040 Speaker 1: the system. Then you also have to forecast pees that 208 00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:18,560 Speaker 1: are one to two points lower, which means you could 209 00:11:18,679 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 1: lose altitude of ten to fifteen percent just from pe compression. 210 00:11:23,600 --> 00:11:27,800 Speaker 1: Now that sounds daunting, but if earnings go up fifteen percent, 211 00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:31,080 Speaker 1: it's a wash, okay, And then you have to look 212 00:11:31,080 --> 00:11:34,160 Speaker 1: into twenty twenty six. So I think it's tougher sledding 213 00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:39,680 Speaker 1: this year because there are valuation headwinds which we didn't 214 00:11:39,679 --> 00:11:40,920 Speaker 1: have up until this point. 215 00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:44,400 Speaker 2: So in terms of economic policies from the incoming administration, 216 00:11:44,559 --> 00:11:48,240 Speaker 2: we know tariffs have really become the centerpiece. And we 217 00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:50,560 Speaker 2: were talking earlier in the day here in New York 218 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:55,359 Speaker 2: about members of the Trump economic team discussing a gradual 219 00:11:55,400 --> 00:11:58,240 Speaker 2: approach to these tariffs, and one idea that we are 220 00:11:58,280 --> 00:12:01,840 Speaker 2: told would be to increase them by about two percent 221 00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:05,720 Speaker 2: to five percent per months. So we are understanding the 222 00:12:05,760 --> 00:12:07,800 Speaker 2: aim here is to get a little bit of negotiating 223 00:12:07,880 --> 00:12:10,800 Speaker 2: leverage and at the same time to avoid a spike 224 00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:14,360 Speaker 2: in inflation. So if you get that as kind of 225 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:18,679 Speaker 2: the underpinnings for them push into applying tariffs. Does that 226 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:20,600 Speaker 2: give you any comfort at all? 227 00:12:21,080 --> 00:12:26,120 Speaker 1: No, because that story changes daily. So the purpose of 228 00:12:26,160 --> 00:12:28,839 Speaker 1: the tariffs, the reason, and I am a little nervous 229 00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:31,520 Speaker 1: about this, but the purpose of the tariffs is that 230 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:34,559 Speaker 1: Trump wants to ship away at the budget deficit, which 231 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:38,720 Speaker 1: is six point six percent of GDP. Right last time 232 00:12:38,760 --> 00:12:41,600 Speaker 1: he came in pre COVID, he expanded the budget deficit 233 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:44,280 Speaker 1: about one point five percent of GDP. So he's a 234 00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 1: stimulative kind of guy obviously, So how are you going 235 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 1: to cut the budget deficit while you know, trying to 236 00:12:53,160 --> 00:12:55,520 Speaker 1: stimulate the economy the same way. Well, the only way 237 00:12:55,559 --> 00:12:59,000 Speaker 1: to do that is to have the foreigners finance the spending, 238 00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:02,959 Speaker 1: and not just through the treasury market, but also through 239 00:13:03,080 --> 00:13:07,120 Speaker 1: tax receipts. So I know that in the modeling they've done, 240 00:13:07,520 --> 00:13:10,560 Speaker 1: what they've forecast out is that they can come up with, 241 00:13:10,880 --> 00:13:13,839 Speaker 1: you know, a good deal more called two hundred and 242 00:13:13,880 --> 00:13:17,280 Speaker 1: fifty three hundred, four hundred billion dollars worth of subsidy 243 00:13:17,320 --> 00:13:20,839 Speaker 1: for the deficit from foreign entities. Is that possible? 244 00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:21,400 Speaker 2: Yes? 245 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:25,520 Speaker 1: How disruptive will it be? Unknown? I don't think we're 246 00:13:25,559 --> 00:13:29,000 Speaker 1: in a smooth, holly kind of moment. But you know 247 00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:33,120 Speaker 1: today there was conversation with Canada about maybe they just 248 00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 1: won't ship us the four million barrels of oil or 249 00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:40,000 Speaker 1: whatever they send us every day to retaliate against the tariffs. 250 00:13:40,040 --> 00:13:41,880 Speaker 1: That would be bad. You know, that probably has something 251 00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:44,240 Speaker 1: to do with white oils floating around eighty bucks again. 252 00:13:44,360 --> 00:13:47,800 Speaker 1: So I don't know where those policies end up. And 253 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:51,640 Speaker 1: you know, you can sterilize that with some currency appreciation. 254 00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:55,199 Speaker 1: We've seen that as well, but I just don't think 255 00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:58,640 Speaker 1: it's going to be easy. And Trump also advocates for 256 00:13:58,720 --> 00:14:02,719 Speaker 1: a lower dollar, tear US argue against that. If you 257 00:14:02,760 --> 00:14:06,760 Speaker 1: want to lower dollar, you tax foreigners on interest income 258 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:10,760 Speaker 1: that they receive, and you disincentivize investing in the US. 259 00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:14,960 Speaker 1: So it's really complicated to figure out how to subsidize 260 00:14:14,960 --> 00:14:17,079 Speaker 1: your government with foreign taxes. 261 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:19,600 Speaker 2: You were talking a moment ago about that twenty percent 262 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:21,920 Speaker 2: plus gain for the S and P in twenty twenty four. 263 00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:24,560 Speaker 2: A large portion of that was built on the back 264 00:14:24,640 --> 00:14:28,520 Speaker 2: of artificial intelligence in the rally and those names like 265 00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:31,720 Speaker 2: in Nvidia. It was interesting today to see the weakness 266 00:14:31,760 --> 00:14:34,800 Speaker 2: in the stock in Nvidia, shares down about two percent. 267 00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:39,320 Speaker 2: We had a report in the publication The Information suggesting 268 00:14:39,360 --> 00:14:43,000 Speaker 2: that some of Nvidia's biggest customers are now dialing back 269 00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:46,800 Speaker 2: on orders for the latest black quilled chips. How are 270 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:50,680 Speaker 2: you feeling about the AI trade in twenty twenty five. 271 00:14:51,160 --> 00:14:54,560 Speaker 1: I think it's broader, you know. I think that Trump 272 00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:58,040 Speaker 1: agenda really should benefit the laggards more than the previous leaders. 273 00:14:58,400 --> 00:15:01,560 Speaker 1: So I think it's time for the to broaden out. 274 00:15:01,600 --> 00:15:03,680 Speaker 1: You know, earnings this year for the SMP could be 275 00:15:03,800 --> 00:15:07,960 Speaker 1: fourteen percent something like that. Earnings for the MAG seven 276 00:15:07,960 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: are projected to be something like nineteen. The MAG seven 277 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:13,400 Speaker 1: trades at thirty times, you know, the S and P 278 00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:17,360 Speaker 1: trades x MAG seven around twenty. So it seems to 279 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:20,320 Speaker 1: me like the premium that they've received in the past 280 00:15:20,520 --> 00:15:23,720 Speaker 1: likely isn't the premium they'll receive in the future. And also, 281 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:27,480 Speaker 1: if you look at the earnings expectations across sectors for 282 00:15:27,600 --> 00:15:32,440 Speaker 1: this year, each sector is supposed to be higher in 283 00:15:32,520 --> 00:15:33,880 Speaker 1: terms of earnings by the end of the year. We 284 00:15:33,880 --> 00:15:36,560 Speaker 1: did not see that last year. It's also supposed to 285 00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:39,360 Speaker 1: be the case next year. So you know, to me, 286 00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:43,440 Speaker 1: I'd rather own say the MDY, the S and P 287 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:47,680 Speaker 1: MidCap than the large cap or the mag seven because 288 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:51,480 Speaker 1: I can get almost as much earnings growth at a 289 00:15:51,560 --> 00:15:55,080 Speaker 1: fraction of the valuation. And I just think people are 290 00:15:55,080 --> 00:15:58,320 Speaker 1: going to be more fundamentally focused this year in the 291 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:01,640 Speaker 1: in the contest between earnings and valuations. 292 00:16:01,680 --> 00:16:05,560 Speaker 2: You were talking a moment ago about your expectations on 293 00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:07,800 Speaker 2: the FED maybe moving at a slower rate. I think 294 00:16:07,840 --> 00:16:12,840 Speaker 2: the market welcomes that, given the stubborn signs on inflation. 295 00:16:13,640 --> 00:16:16,120 Speaker 2: Does that necessarily mean there are opportunities that we should 296 00:16:16,120 --> 00:16:17,440 Speaker 2: talk about in the bond market? 297 00:16:18,640 --> 00:16:21,280 Speaker 1: You know, people who play the price action is not 298 00:16:21,400 --> 00:16:23,800 Speaker 1: really our core client base. The question is what can 299 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:26,880 Speaker 1: you get out of fixed income? And if you look 300 00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:29,400 Speaker 1: at I guess the AG year to date, it's down 301 00:16:29,440 --> 00:16:31,920 Speaker 1: a percent or so. But if you're picking up a 302 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:35,920 Speaker 1: five and a half percent yield a six percent on 303 00:16:36,040 --> 00:16:40,480 Speaker 1: high grade corporates, then that becomes a structural component of 304 00:16:40,520 --> 00:16:42,760 Speaker 1: the portfolio. So I know a lot of people say 305 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:47,160 Speaker 1: the acid allocation trades are dead and sixty forties dead, 306 00:16:47,160 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 1: et cetera. But if forty percent of your portfolio can 307 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:52,600 Speaker 1: generate a yield of six percent, that ain't too bad. 308 00:16:53,400 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: So I think there's benefit to investors for these yields. 309 00:16:59,200 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 1: It's headwind to stocks to a certain extent. But let's 310 00:17:02,960 --> 00:17:05,560 Speaker 1: not forget the average yield going back, you know, fifty 311 00:17:05,640 --> 00:17:07,879 Speaker 1: years or so is five percent, not two and a 312 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:10,880 Speaker 1: half percent. So to me, if we can be an 313 00:17:10,960 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 1: environment of true structural growth reel of three percent penomenal 314 00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:21,639 Speaker 1: of five percent, then the bond yields make sense and 315 00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:26,440 Speaker 1: you can still grow earnings, especially with the utilization of technologies, 316 00:17:26,560 --> 00:17:29,960 Speaker 1: less regulation, maybe some tax cuts. So I still think 317 00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:32,600 Speaker 1: we're in a pretty good environment both for stock and 318 00:17:32,840 --> 00:17:36,480 Speaker 1: bond investors. But I would encourage bond investors to think 319 00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:38,639 Speaker 1: about coupons and not play price. 320 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:43,080 Speaker 2: So if yields do remain somewhat elevated, I'm wondering whether 321 00:17:43,160 --> 00:17:45,159 Speaker 2: or not it's time to look at the financials a 322 00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:46,240 Speaker 2: little bit more closely. 323 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:48,520 Speaker 1: Well, I mean, good thing you brought that up, because 324 00:17:48,520 --> 00:17:49,879 Speaker 1: we're going to learn a whole lot about them. On 325 00:17:49,920 --> 00:17:53,919 Speaker 1: Wednesday is earning season shows up, and they obviously had 326 00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:56,240 Speaker 1: great price action today, and so I thought, what was 327 00:17:56,240 --> 00:17:58,400 Speaker 1: interesting about today is we got to see what people 328 00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:01,800 Speaker 1: are going to buy. They've done some tax laws selling, 329 00:18:02,240 --> 00:18:07,280 Speaker 1: and obviously the financials had a really good day, you know, 330 00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:11,639 Speaker 1: seventy to basis points or so, while the sp is 331 00:18:11,680 --> 00:18:13,879 Speaker 1: a fraction of that. So I think people are buying 332 00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:17,400 Speaker 1: the financials and I think we'll learn more about it. 333 00:18:17,480 --> 00:18:21,760 Speaker 1: But the highest Ernie's growth expectation for this year's is 334 00:18:22,200 --> 00:18:24,160 Speaker 1: the financials more so than tech. 335 00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:27,080 Speaker 2: David, thank you so much. Some great insights there from 336 00:18:27,160 --> 00:18:32,040 Speaker 2: David Waddell, CEO and chief investment strategist at Waddell and Associates. 337 00:18:32,359 --> 00:18:37,159 Speaker 2: Joining us here on the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Thanks for 338 00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:41,840 Speaker 2: listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. 339 00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 2: Each weekday, we look at the story shaping markets, finance, 340 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:48,760 Speaker 2: and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You can find us 341 00:18:48,760 --> 00:18:53,000 Speaker 2: on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere 342 00:18:53,000 --> 00:18:56,080 Speaker 2: else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for insight on 343 00:18:56,119 --> 00:19:00,240 Speaker 2: the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore and Austrilall you, 344 00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:03,160 Speaker 2: I'm Doug Prisoner and this is Bloomberg 345 00:19:04,920 --> 00:19:10,679 Speaker 3: M HM.