WEBVTT - Again Capital's Kilduff Expects Oil Prices to Fall to $42

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary, smart sized

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. Along with my

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>whether at the grocery store or the trading floor. Find

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Can oil break out of this

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars to fifty five dollars a barrel range? I

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer, but John Kilduff perhaps does. John

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Kilduff he is founding partner of Again Capital who has

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten it right again and again with where at the

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>price of is going? So John, uh, you know where

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>do you see this sort of tenuous truce in the

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Middle East about not producing too much more oil going?

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And do you think that we we could break out

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of this range? Um? Either way? First, good morning, Good morning,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, I think you have to give them certainly

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some credit. The the OPEC and non OPEC producers like

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Russia that came together to try and cut looks like

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they've achieved about eighty five of their efforts. The problem

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is that there's several notable countries not part of the deal, Iraq,

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Iran in particular, and Nigeria and Libya, all of whom

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of written off in terms of not being

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>able to grow their output much more. And it turns

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>out there coming back like gangbusters. Um. Also too, we're

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>heading into now the end of the winter season, which

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>brings a sort of shoulder season demand period to the

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>northern hemisphere globally, which I think is going to complicate

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the picture, uh for these guys, and I think dash

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>their hopes. So to answer your question, I see it's

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>breaking out to the downside here, I think in over

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the course the next couple of weeks. Hey, John, I

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could put that together with the demand

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>picture and maybe just you know, give us the thirty

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand foot few in terms of all right, we're going

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>into the peak driving season will be the summertime in

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the northern hemisphere. Uh, you know what percent of production

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is that going to soak up and so on. Yeah,

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so the demand picture actually has been rather soft, particularly

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for refined fuels over the past several weeks here now,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the US, we've been down on gasoline demand

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>five to seven percent, which is somewhat remarkable. With some

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of that is a drop in exports, but some of

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be consumer response to the relatively higher

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices already. UM And unfortunately for the refiners, UH,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we're we have record inventories of gasoline on the East coast,

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>UM and you know, we're continuing to see this. This

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>lackluster demand sort of hurt them. You saw a STAT

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>oil report today UM as did BP, and they both

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>referenced the refining sector last quarters as being poor, which

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>had been a bright spot. Part of this is being

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>driven by the Chinese who sort of ramped up a

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>mini sort of boom in refining there and which led

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to record exports during much of last year. So the

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>whole world kind of got swamped and refined products. So

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing today gas leaned down about two down under

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a dollar fifty a gallon on then I am X

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Commodity board and UM the downward pressure I think is

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue there. So UM also too, we've

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>seen the biggest slowdown in twenty six years according to

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the latest data out of China for refined product growth

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>demand growth. So there continues to be a lot of

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>issues around the whole complex. John, you said that you

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>do think that we're going to break out to the downside.

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>How low do you think oil prices could go? I

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>think if we can, if we can break the fifty market,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason why we couldn't retrace all the way

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>back down to the lows from November, which was forty

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>two dollars about So I think it's pretty easy for

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>us to make an argument to get back qually back

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>down there. And with a barrel, Which companies would that

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>disrupt the most. It's gonna disrupt the pure play producers,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna it's gonna hurt hess UH companies like Hess,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Occidental Petroleum, UM, some of the shale players, Continental Resources

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>companies like that. Well, we'll we'll take it on the chin.

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>It may actually help the refiners perversely, because there they'll

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have much lower input costs and UM it may spare

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>more demand at the pump again just at the right time.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>As we hit the peak summer travel season. So what

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>works early last year, it looks like it may work

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>again early this year in terms of trying to play

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the energy patch. So all right, John, let's let's just

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>keep this in mind. So we're looking for oil prices

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to go low or for a variety of reasons, right, Okay,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Now is there any value in connecting this to just

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the thought that oil is up about eleven since the

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>November election, that gas is up on nearly twenty since

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the election. Can you knit together a bigger picture for us? Well,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting to me. I mean, obviously, all the

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>entirety of the stock market and a lot of assets

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have risen on on hope for relief and regulation and

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>other pro growth policies. The energy industry gets hurt in

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a big way. To refining industry gets hurt in a

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>big way if this border tax adjustment UH program were

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to be implemented. Um also too, you know, the oil

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>producing oil producers need to be careful of too much

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing, to the extent that they were

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they were to be released hogwild to exploit hundreds of

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>thousands of more acres and produce more and more oil.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It's going to add to the glut and not take

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>away from it, obviously, So you don't think that there

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>will necessarily be as much drilling as perhaps President Trump

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>will allow them to do by opening up federal lands,

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>which is widely expected. Yes, No, because you know a

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of federal land leases went unexploited during the Obama administration.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, the U S producers cut back drastically with

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the price drops. So you know, the US in that

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>regard is really the swing producer as much as Saudi

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Arabia these days, except that our policy is driven by economics,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>whereas the Saudis are trying to uh, you know, dictate

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>price from on high. But no, I think it will

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>be um not as great as land rush as you

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>might think, because prices are going to be challenged more

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and more as we're already seeing the shell players ramp up.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, John, last week we were talking about the

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>solar industry and how the prices for solar energy has

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.799
<v Speaker 1>dropped to the point where it's competitive at least with gas.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is going to increasingly be

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a pressure on the oil industry or is this a

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>nonstarter just because it's so small relatively No, no, very

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>very much. So it's a it's a it's become a

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>big factor. Wind has become even a bigger factor. Um

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>is it's actually considered a conventional energy source now, not

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>even a special sort of case renewable um. But the uh,

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're dealing with here, you've got to keep in

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mind is that it's a bigger pressure really for natural gas,

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because oil still is eight barrel of oil is still

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of that barrel goes into transportation um. And we're still

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not seeing obviously solar cars, although we are starting to

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>see more electric ones and and really ones that are

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>desirable by consumers, like the ones Tesla produces, but for

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>now it's going to be a while. So oil is

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>still the transportation fuel as opposed to what the electrical

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>utility industry is going to have to be dealing with,

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what sort of decentralized power generation prompt solar and now

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>importantly the battery technology that's coming along with it. Thanks

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>very much, John Kilduff, great stuff, founding partner of again Capital.

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's learn more about what to do with your money

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in this market that, as Dave Wilson was earlier describing,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>we could be seeing the SMP five. Tony Dwyers, the

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>chief market strategist that can accord genuity, and he joins us, now, Tony,

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for being with us. Give us your outlook,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe I would throw in with that, give

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>us all the things that could go wrong with your outlook. Okay,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that's that's probably better. Stay to het them. Thanks for

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>having me on and RISA. So we believe that the

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks we're going to see a correction UM

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the market somewhere around five And that doesn't sound

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like a lot, but when you're down a couple of

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>percent in the new kind of trading world that we're in,

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody kind of gets scared that it's going to be

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a ten to fifteen percent correction, and we we want

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to be in a position to really aggressively by that um.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>For the list nurse to make this really super simple, UM,

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you never want to be a net seller or negative

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on stocks until you have a recession in sight, because

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>any correction in the midst of a positive growth backdrop

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>always comes back um and pretty quick form and goes higher.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So the only time you really want to be negative

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is if you can see a recession, and we don't

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>see a recession for at least another couple of years.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Hold on a second, Tony, you said, next couple of

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks you see a five percent pulled back in stocks.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This sort of conflicts with what we hear a lot,

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>which is I can't predict the next few weeks. I

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>can maybe predict the next few years or give a

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of of sort of the trend. But this stands

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>out why such conviction about a time frame that's so

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>near to us. Well, to be fair, I've been making

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the call since mid December, and you know, we turn

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>neutral on the market in mid December because we thought

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the positive um data was already reflected

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>in stocks and you had an extreme overbaught condition. And

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, like, for example, today, if you don't

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have a one percent move, I read on the Bloomberg

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that if you don't have an enter day one percent move,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it will match the longest period without a one percent

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>move in the market for this cycle. So you just

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have been in this period of very very very low

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>volatility and that typically comes to an end in a

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sharp way. And and that doesn't mean that you know,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody should run for the hills because the fundamental backdrop

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is so good you just have to be ready and

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>expect it to happen. Um. So it's not just it's

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>not just the call that I've made today for the

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>next three weeks. It's a call that we've been in

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>since mid December. Hey, Tony, I wonder if you could

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>just bring in the concept of active investments, in other words,

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>people picking stocks. Plus, you're in the earning season and

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if that might have anything to do with

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens to last price, because that's really what we're

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You're not talking about value, talking about how

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>much someone is paying for something in the short term, right,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And the earnings backdrop has been really strong or not,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not right. The earnings backdrop has been significantly

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>improved from where was a year go or even two

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>quarters ago, because you're seeing a recovery in the commodities.

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think the story, guys that that nobody's really

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about is how good the global economy is acting.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>We're so focused on what President Trump is tweeting in

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the legislation. Well, it's interesting because Lisa Brahma, hold on, Tony,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>because Lisa Bramwitz. You mentioned even just last week, the

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>economic performance in Europe is better than many investors believe

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on the surface. Right, So some people are actually going

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>back to an increasing number of hedge funds. But but Tony,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to your point. I mean about

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just because of President Trump and some of his rhetoric.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, dot dot dot. Seth Klarman, who is a

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>very respected hedge fund manager, put out a letter in

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the past few weeks that was quoted in the New

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>York Times, and he was saying, that's important in and

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of itself, when you have a president, a leader who

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>puts who makes volatility his strategy, that could potentially upend

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the order that we've seen in markets.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Markets don't like uncertainty. What do you say to that.

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I think markets don't like uncertainty. But we've been uncertain

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>since the summer of last year, and you have one

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>of the lowest volatility periods on record. So to this

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to this point, Seth is right, it's gonna end up.

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of our correction call. When you have

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>such low volatility in an environment where so much rhetorics

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out, you've got to you've got to believe that

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point it's going to come into play. What's

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing to me and I think Seth and anybody else

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is it hasn't yet. You've had such a narrow trading

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>range of the market despite so many issues being you know,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>um harshly criticized and talked about back and forth. So again,

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what here's what I would urge the listeners to do.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Invest your money based on what you know, not on

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>what you fear. What we know is that even with

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>increases and interest rates in the US monetary policy, meaning

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, credit is in very very good shape, the

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>set is historically accommodatives. On another points higher in you Yeah,

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Tony Dwyer, thank you so much for joining US chief

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>market strategist at can Accord Genuity, P and L is

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by proper Cloth, the leader in men's

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>custom shirts. At proper cloth dot com, ordering custom shirts

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. To create your custom shirt size

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>by answering ten easy questions, select from over five fabrics

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to suit your personal taste. Shirts start from eighty five

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars and are delivered in just two weeks with proper

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Cloths perfect fit guarantee remakes are completely free and expert

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>staff are standing by to help. For premium quality, perfect

0:13:47.840 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>fitting shirts, visit proper cloth dot com custom shirts made Smarter. Uh,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a fascinating story that I really want to

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>highlight that raises the question of the hardware and the

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>integrity of the hardware behind the giants of Apple, Google,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. I want to bring in Jordan Robertson, a

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>technology reporter with Bloomberg News who wrote the story. He

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is coming to us from Washington. Jordan's first, I just

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>want to get a sense of how easily it would

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be to potentially manipulate the hardware that sort of provides

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure for Apple, Google, and Facebook before they even

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>get it. Hi. Sure, Yeah. You know, part of the

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>problem with the supply chain security for these large technology

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>companies is, you know, the way the technology industry has

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>evolved is that most of the code is proprietor for

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>understandable reasons, Companies like Cisco, which make network switches that

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>shuttle data traffic. The very significant parts of these companies networks. Uh,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, their business is selling the code and the hardware,

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and they don't open sources. They don't disclose that code

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. The problem with that is if somebody is

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>able to tamper with the process of creating that code,

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, typically it would be a foreign government

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or even the US government. In some cases, uh you know,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>customers like Facebook or Google or Apple, you know, or

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn or others had no way to check that code

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to to verify the presence are not of a government

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>back door. This has taken out a new life after

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they Edwards Snowden revelations of a few years ago, and

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>companies are now starting to try to create some of

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that network switching code on their own. Hey, Jordan's a

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>great story. Can you just describe a photograph that really

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of highlights what you're talking about? Just describe what's

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in this photograph, where it came from, etcetera. Sure, there's

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a very famous photograph that came out a couple of

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Again, part of the Snowden League was published

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in Glenn Greenwalt's book on the Snowden Leagues, and what

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it shows is, you know, uh u s government officials

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>federal agents intercepting a piece of cisk O network hardware

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>equipment at a transmission a distribution facility, probably a UPS

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or fed X or some other transit point, very carefully

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>opening the box and then taking it to a what

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they call a load station, which is you know, just

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>some a series of laptops on the desk next to

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the the conference table and loading it with you know,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>basically malware with malicious code. And you know, this photo

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>really struck fear in the hearts of network operators throughout

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. Uh. You know, there are lots of things

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in the snow and disclosures that struck fear in the

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>hearts of data center people, but this one especially because

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what it showed them was you know, uh, you know,

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Government and others by extension, you know,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>are able to intercept this hardware. And again when you

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about Cisco and Juniper and network equipment, this is

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>central that the brains of these networks, who they're not

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>just computer servers either as switches that shuttle data traffic

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>around these networks, and they see everything basically either they

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all seeing I and you know, if you're able to

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>interspect this equipment, modify the software code on it, uh

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to maliciously spy on you all the data traffic passing

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>through these switches, you know, you're able to get visibility

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>into an entire network, and that's really scary for operators

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of large data centers because for internet company, their data

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>is their lifeblood. But you know, if they lose control

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, they lose control of the company. Hey, Jordan's

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I think of this in terms of every problem that

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>technology creates. Technology with a heavy dose of experience and

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>funding works to find a solution. Right there are the

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>open compute project snap Route tell us about this, that's right, Yeah,

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's really the crux of the story today

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a company called snap Route out of Tawa, Alto, California.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They've just gotten twenty five million dollars in funding. You know,

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>big ZC announcements seemed to happen every day or every

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>week out in California. But what's interesting about them this

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is a group of former former Apple engineers. Uh, you know,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>they've been designing their own network technology for a while

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for performance and other reasons, but security became a really

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>big focus for them and they said, look, we need

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a hundred percent visibility into our code because

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we just simply can't trust that these proprietary technologies from

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Cisco and Juniper and others. Even if the companies have

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the best of intentions, you know, are not compromised at

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>some point you know, along the way. So what they're

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>saying is we're going to create an open source switch

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>network switch. This is actually a really big deal because

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>open source technology has admitted for a very long time

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in computing, but it hasn't really migrated to the network

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>switch level. And again, these are the brains of these

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>computer networks. It's hard stuff to do. But what the

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>goal is to give network operators at these big Internet

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley companies visibility into what's happening on their network switches.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>What's the likelihood this is going to fundamentally disrupt Cisco's business.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you Cisco is nervous. Cisco very nervous to

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>talk with them for the story. You know, obviously they

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>know Cisco is a huge competitor here. I mean they

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>control over half of the computer networking market. They're not

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere anytime soon. This is a very nascent, very

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>small market right now. It's only the large data center

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>operators up including big banks as well. They're doing this, however,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of value here because you can drop

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the price of this equipment by tens of thousands of

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars if you're willing to kind of take some ownership

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of the management of this stuff. So you could see

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this eventually, you know, evolving from just the data center operators. Uh,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know too, smaller midsize and smaller company. That's the

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>ways off. But I will play Cisco and the other

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>legacy technology vendors are very nervous because there are a

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of advantages to this technology, some downsides to but

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>some big advantages. Thanks very much for being with us

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and shedding light on this topic. Jordan Robertson, technology reporter

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, speaking about open compute projects, snap Root

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and challenges to Cisco. I want to get David Well

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to bring him into the conversation. He's Detroit bureau chief.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>He covers General Motors, and Uh, David, can you give

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.239
<v Speaker 1>us some insight into why such a negative response from

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>stock investors? Well, General Motors is really defied gravity All

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>year long, the market has gotten a little bit softer

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>or it's flattened. You've seen Forward pulled back on their

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>earnings forecast and they've missed some of their numbers, and

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>GM has been able to keep keep pushing. The growth

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>showed weaker margins and they're showing growing inventories, which is

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think giving some investors a little bit of worry

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that maybe even GM is is unable to keep the

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>proper train going with the market that's kind of flattening

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>out a bit, maybe going a little bit soft. David,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the performance of General Motors stock

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>before today. It was up fourteen percent, so you've got

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the dropped today. This is from the election of fourteen percent.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Since the election, the four percent dropped today, So I

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>mean the stock has already had a decent run. Did

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you learn anything today the details of anything like free

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>cash flow or margins in China? What stood out to

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you in today's detailed report. The thing that jumped out

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of me the most was that in the fourth quarter,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>margins in North America. So, and that's really the profit horse.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>China is a real money maker for them. It's about

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.959
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars a year. But then you look at

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the nine to ten billion a year that GM has

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>been making and you know the rest of it, and

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then some comes from North America. So you saw a

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter of stall margins go from ten percent a

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>year ago two I think it was eight and a

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>half percent. Roughly, It's it's not awful, it's a good performance,

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's headed in the wrong direction. Now. GM

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of reasons for this. They're saying that

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they've got a lot of SUVs coming to market later

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this year that will really help margins. So they're in

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>inventor build out right now. Uh, and a lot of

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the cars really still dominate their a lot in terms

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of what they're offering consumers, and cars are out of

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>favor and require a lot of incentives. They're saying, hey,

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the good stuff really isn't on the lot yet. When

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, we're going to make good money. And they

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>did affirm their their guidance that they will again have

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.959
<v Speaker 1>record profits for two thousand seventeen. But I think analysts

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and investors are looking at this and saying, margins North

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>America fell, inventories are higher, incentives are higher, We'll wait

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and see, we'll we'll we'll put our money somewhere else

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and see if they can can show a better first quarter.

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I think some of that is going on David, just quickly,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>is this is the strategy of GM and other automobile makers.

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Is it all based on sub three dollar at gallon gasoline?

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much? Well, let's put it this way. It's based

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on some price of gasoline that doesn't make consumers buy

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what they're buying today. And the reason I say that

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is we've said in the past, oh my god, two

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>dour a gallon gas known to buy a truck Again

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it hit it, and they did all three hour again

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and gas known to buy, and I should be again,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and they did. There's a magic number in there. I'd

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>say it's probably more like three fifty where consumers really

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>start to change. But your point is is basically right,

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if gas gets very expensive than the market prospect passenger cars,

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that's lower margins and that's not good for anybody in

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Dave Wilson, I want to get your sense,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just on a broader level of how much of the

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>response to GM's earnings is being colored by a broader

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>sense that the auto industry is plateau ing at best

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and headed for a slight dip. I mean, are you

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing reactions and shares It kind of gives insight on

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that well, you want to talk about plateau. I mean,

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>GM shares peaked back in December. They've basically been up

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and down since then. So you know, today being a

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>down day, you're really talking about, you know, more fluctuation

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for a stock that has kind of topped out. Uh.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And you look at Forward, I mean, you know, it's

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>come down the last couple of years as OW. I mean,

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like the boom times that we've seen

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the auto industry lately have led to boom times

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>for the shares. So you know, there's the concern about

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>what happens down the road. I mean, certainly they're vulnerable

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to whatever gasoline prices are going to be, and we've

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>seen crude oil pick up in the past several months.

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that, it's really just a matter of how

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.479
<v Speaker 1>long do things keep going. That's as much as anything

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a focus here, David. Can I just get your thoughts

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on some of the other automakers, because I'm looking at

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the shares of Fiat Chrysler and they are down as well,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>down about three and a half percent. Does this do

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>anything to that idea putting Fiat together with GM, Well,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that idea has not really first of GM doesn't want

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it. I think GM shares initially didn't react

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so hot when that idea was floated. And one of

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the reasons is we've seen auto mergers in the past

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>not really work so well. We're no Nissan maybe the

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>lone example, UM, but you know, diam Ward Krysler was

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a big failure. A lot of the joint ventures haven't

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>worked out. And if you look at GM, you know what,

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>once if GM were to take fied Chrysler, you still

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have this passenger car line up. You still have a

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of plants and and redundancy they need to take out,

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you're managing like eleven brands. That was the

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>problem GM had before bankruptcy. And you know that it's

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just it becomes very unwieldy. So you know, I don't

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I've never really uh seen a great case for this,

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>other than from the Fied Chrysler side, which, hey, we

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>need scale and we need investment. We gotta know, we

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>got we gotta go on, we gotta move on. Thanks

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>very much. David Welch, a bureau chief Bloomberg News Smart

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Bureau, Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg p m

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>out there on two are at him Fox. I'm out

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. P

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and L is brought to you by proper Cloth, a

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>leader in men's custom shirts with proprietary smart sized technology

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt has

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to order

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>your first custom shirt today