WEBVTT - Ben Weingarten Defends The Freedom Hut

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:08.120
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Magnorma stake America, You're a great American. Again, the buck

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show begins. Analyst, remember the d This is the

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show, and this is Ben Weinegarden in four

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton here on a snowy night in Manhattan. A

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>four four nine zero zero Buck. That's eight four nine

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>zero zero two eight two five. Again, this is Ben Weinegarden,

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>pinch hitting for Buck. And even though it is spring training,

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit that that analogy sort of pains

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>me as a Mets fan after what occurred yesterday, which

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to talk about a thirteen year, three hundred

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and thirty million dollar deal in our division. Well, Ben,

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you do know that I'm a huge Phillies fan. Well, yeah,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to get into it before this, and

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>now I expect the show to be sabotage. So this

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>should be an interesting few hours here live from New York.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, this is Ben Winegarden. If you haven't

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>heard me before, I'm a senior contributor at The Federalist,

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.639
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can follow me on Twitter at bh wine Garden,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>where I do talk about baseball at night. During the

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>day it's all business. Most of the baseball tweets have

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>been as neurotic and upset as you might expect as

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>a New York Mets fan blowing our window, blowing our window.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, if you're not a baseball fan, I will

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>spare you with my sorrow here as the guys behind

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the glass laugh at my dismay. I want to open

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>tonight first by thanking Buck because he does a vital

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>job here, and that is to articulate the values and

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>principles that we all share and then are not well represented.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know they're not well represented when you see

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what the loyal adversary, the Democratic Party does on a

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>daily basis. And we're going to start tonight by talking

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>about Democrats, and we're gonna close by talking about Republicans

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and conservatism and what the future holds. So this week,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, the big story was Cohen Kabuki theater. Michael Cohen,

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the least credible person, a person who perjured himself in

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>front of Congress. Now the red carpet is rolled out

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>for him in Congress, of course, you know, just happening

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to coincide with the highest level nuclear negotiations with the

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>North Koreans that you could possibly have. By the way,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>there were some other big stories as well. Robert Whiteheiser

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was on Capitol Hill and he dropped some important information

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese trade deal that there would actually be

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>an enforcement mechanism, and there was news but the fact

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that incremental tariffs would not be levied on the Chinese

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>as part of ongoing negotiations. We have the collapse of

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a socialist regime happening in our own hemisphere. We have

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>India Pakistan squabbles which are highly dangerous and potentially threatened

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>many US national interests in that part of the world.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But the media focus was on the least credible person

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you could possibly have. That was the media's focus. Oh

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, he was coached, it seems or

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 1>at least had communications with dubious representative Adam Schiff. Oh yeah,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and speaking of Russia, by the way, this week it

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>was revealed the Trump administration engaged in a cyber attack

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to completely take offline a Russian troll farm that was

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>attempting another shoddy effort to post some garbage and influenced

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote the twenty eighteen midterm election worst collusion ever,

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>worst collusion ever, folks. Where Michael Cohen is important is

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not because of anything Michael Cohen said, although what he

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>did show is that there is no collusion, once again

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>for the million of time, after two committees showed it,

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>after all the weeks from the Muller Special Council showed it.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Not that Cohen has any credibility, but at this point

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he has nothing to lose. He's going to jail. Essentially,

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>no collusion, not one iota. This person who is so

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>close to the president, this person who could read his

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mind based upon his testimony, Cohen isn't what's important. What

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Cohen represents is important, and that is that he is

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a precursor to what's coming for the next two years

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of every of endless coverage of every last iota of

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's life being investigated by his worst enemies. So

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Axios's lead article this morning, which is sort of a

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>good proxy for where the left establishment sees the world going,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>they write, whether or not Mueller is sitting on a

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>grand finale, Democrats are picking up the Baton with a

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>vast probe that already involves a half dozen committees. That's

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>great use of taxpayered dollars and will include public hearings

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>starring reluctant witnesses. So who are these witnesses they want?

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats want to call Trump family members with subpoenas

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>if necessary. The investigation will touch Trump's businesses, his foundation,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because after all, his businesses and his foundation are so

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>relevant into his presidency right now, and then they want

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about his presidency. Oh and it could extend

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty. Top Democrats tell axios by coincidence. Besides Russia,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>topics include conflicts of interest, money laundering, and Jared Kushner's

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>security clearance and other White House clearances. Rep. Jamie Raskin,

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat from Maryland who's on the House Oversight Committee,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>says that the committee is zeroing in on the Moscow project. Yes,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the famous Moscow building project which never got off the ground,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>where there were never any high level conversations which had

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>no impact whatsoever on anything relating to this presidency, the

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Russia connection and the influence of oh other foreign actors

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like Saudi Arabia. They've teased that for a while that

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>they're going to look at basically every foreign connection because

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>after all, we found so much collusion already, Am I

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong again? So many of these actions actually occurred before

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the presidency, so they're really irrelevant in context of anything

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>resembling impeachment, which is what they ultimately want to get to.

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So and let's continue a little bit down that road.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll quote here from a Wall Street Journal article titled

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>House Committee's planned to interview Trump organizations, CFO and others.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Congressional investigators don't want to cross wires with mister Muller's

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>probe into Russian interference in the twenty sixteen presidential election,

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>which is expected to end soon, among other matters. Mister

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Muller's investigative, mister Trump, are members of the campaign concluded

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Russians? And if the President has obstructed the

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>progress of the inquiry by firing a subordinate By the way,

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 1>they didn't put that in the article, but that's the reality.

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Firing a subordinate somehow, obstruction potentially declassifying documents somehow an

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>impeachable offense. The article continues, mister Trump has repeatedly denied

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wrongdoing and call the investigation of which hunt. Some Democrats

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>are concerned that not all of the findings from those

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>investigations will become public. By the way, if there is

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>no indictment, then it should not become public. You're supposed

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to protect the innocent. Justice Department policy prevents the indictment

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of a sitting president, most legal experts say, and Democrats

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>fear that evidence against that it may not be released

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>if it isn't in an indictment. I thought this was

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be the party of criminal justice, but apparently

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>not so. Then there's a quote from Representative Raja Krishna Morti,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from a Democrat from Illinois and a member of the

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>House Oversight and House Intelligence Committee quote, we should just

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>assume the worst and that we're never going to find

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>out what any of these investigations reveal if they don't

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>lead to an indictment. That's the worst. We're talking about

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a member of the House of Representative, someone who is

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to at least feign interest in justice. And what

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is he saying. He's saying we have to assume the worst. Ie,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to get information that we can use

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to attack a president if it isn't used to indict someone.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the worst, you know, if they want everything that

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Mueller did exposed. Congressman noonez today during SEPAK said something interesting.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>He said, and I agree with him. If this is

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, if we're really going to go down

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this road, Let's see every communication of the Mueller Special Council.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's see every last shred of evidence. Let's see it all.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's see all the personnel. Let's see the background checks

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that were done into the personnel who comprised the special counsel.

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's have it all hashed out, and then let's declassify

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>every last document associated with any investigation or President Trump.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the investigators want us to look at

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the information that they use for their investigations. I want

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to go back and take a trip down memory land

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>with a quip here. And I'm not going to tell

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you when this clip occurred or who said it, but

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>let's roll clip one. The effective impeachment is to overturn

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the popular will of the voters. We must not overturn

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>an election and remove a president from office except to

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>defend our system of government or our constitutional liberties against

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the dire threat. And we must not do so without

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>an overwhelming consensus of the American people. There must never

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>be a narrowly voted impeachment, or an impeachment supported by

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one of our major political parties and opposed by the other.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Such an impeachment will produce the divisiveness and bitterness in

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>our politics for years to come, and we'll call into

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>question the very legitimacy of our political institutions. You may

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>have the votes, you may have the muscle, but you

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>do not have the legitimacy of a national consensus or

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of a constitutional imperative. This partisan coupe data will go

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>down in infamy in the history of this nation. I'll

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>give you a second to write down on a piece

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of paper who you think it was that made those

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>comments and when those comments were made. All right, are

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you listening? That was Gerald Nadwer in nineteen ninety eight.

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You might remember Gerald Nadwer, Democrat from New York. He's

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>still in the House today. Back then and today he

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>would be the person, as the chair of the House

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee who would oversee impeachment proceedings. Back then, he

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>was defending Bill Quinton against impeachment. Isn't it amazing how

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that exact argument could be applied today, but you will

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>never see the left apply because it doesn't suit them,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't support their political interests, because they aren't actually principled.

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know what impeachment itself is actually besides the point. Yes,

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Democrats would love to impeach and remove if they could,

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be able to get to the removal.

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, they recognize some of them, at least the

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>more sober ones, the old guard, if you will, and

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about the old Guard versus the Young Turks

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit later. The old Guard recognizes that impeachment is

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>a weapon that can lead to self destruction. They saw

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans do it, and with some of the folks,

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the more progressive folks in the Democratic House right now,

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>they could be in big trouble if they actually go

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>down that path. But impeachment, again is besides the point.

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not about that act. The goal of these investigations

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is to continue to create the appearance of smoke, but

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there's never any fire. There has never been a smoking gun.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>There is no fire. You've had people who loathe the

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>president take unpressed in an action to look into communications

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>private documents, take away boxes and boxes full of the

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>most private communicators with lawyers of the president and others.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no there there, But the momentum is such that

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they can't stop. They have to feed their base, and

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they are wedded to this narrative. And so again, it's

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about creating the appearance of smoke for as long as possible,

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to mean into twenty twenty and through

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the election. Clearly. Now the question is does that actually

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>move the needle with you, the American people, And I

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>would suggest that it won't. Those who believe this is

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially a hoax, we're gonna believe it's a hoax. Those

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>who are on the other side and believe it's a

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Russian spy, they're gonna believe what they're gonna believe. The

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>people in the middle, those old Reagan Democrats turned Trump Republicans,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that this is gonna play well with them.

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I really don't. But that said, you can bet the

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>House committees are going to leave no stone unturned because

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they need to create a constant hysteria. This isn't about oversight.

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a political conviction in search of the appearance

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>at least of crimes. It's an investigation in search of

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a crime, and in a worst case scenario for the investigators,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the process itself is the punishment. The process is the punishment.

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>The whole purpose of this, this whole effort that started

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>well before Donald Trump was elected president and we're talking

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>June and maybe even earlier in twenty sixteen, the whole

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>purpose was to sabotage and paralyze a presidency. And that's

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>why we have four years of quote unquote investigation. This

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is Ben Winegarden in four buck Sexton. Lines are open.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Eight four four nine zero zero buck. That's eight four

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>four two eight two five. Will be right back. Welcome

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>back to the buck Sexton Show. This is Ben Weinarten

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>in four buck Sexton. Thanks for joining us on this

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Friday night. Eight four four nine zero zero buck. That's

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>eight four four nine zero zero two eight two five.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Before the break, I was talking about process as punishment

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to all of the investigations, first in

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>both the Senate and House Intelligence committees, the Molar Special

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Council investigations that preceded them. I want to kind of

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>summarize what has transpired because I continue to believe that

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the biggest scandal in American history, and

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>only a small fraction of so called journalists are the

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>ones covering this. And that's a travesty. It's a travesty

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not because we care about media, but because we care

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.599
<v Speaker 1>about truth. And thank god we have the Internet. We

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>would not have an informed citizenry without the ability of

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone potentially to be a journalist. So the intent, first

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of all, when it comes to every step back, when

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when the President talks about while Jim Comey

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>assured him he's not a target, the president was always

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the target from probably even before or investigations or dossiers

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>or anything else started. We're talking in earlier in twenty sixteen,

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>when he was popular and it actually looked like, wow,

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy is going to be competitive. So the first

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>attempt was, let's destroy him during the press in the

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>run up to in the elections in the primary season

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>even but then as it advanced, let's start investigations as

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an insurance policy, you know, just in case the point

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>zero zero one percent chance this guy actually triumphs over

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton, then what's spy on his associates? And let's

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>use informants to try and entrap them in Russian collusion

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>premised on a selacious and unverified dossier paid for by

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Hillary in the DNC and collected from shady Russian sources.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting way to try to and affect frame

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>someone that's very It doesn't get any more Clintonian, really,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it really doesn't get any more Quintonian than that. So

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he gets elected before he's even elected. There are approaches,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>there's recordings of conversations, and does the intent of this

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to take out two people who were vital to the president?

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Number one, the Attorney General Jeff Sessions has to recuse

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>himself because of Russia from the very start. So, in

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>other words, the law enforcement bodies, FBI, Department of Justice,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the person at the top who might be able to

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>control them, taken off the board. The national security advisor,

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>who actually agrees with overturning what the foreign policy and

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>national security establishment have done for decades, taken off the board.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So two vital cogs pulled out immediately, taken off the

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>playing field. Later on, as they're continuing these investigations, they

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>use a firing letter that's drafted by one of their own,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>dag Rosenstein, to try to create a case of obstruction.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>See Rosenstein wrote the letter on behalf of the President.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>The President fires Jim Comey. But isn't that interesting? It

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a trap in some way. It's kind

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of it'd be interesting to actually it will. Of course,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Congress can interview Rosens because he's running out the clock.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>He's talking to favorable media offline, getting them to write

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>favorable things about him in a war that he is

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>having with McCabe. But Congress doesn't get to have any

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>oversight over something that really matters Dad Rosenstein. All of

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this is happening while Congress is throwing the president's agenda,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's on a bipartisan basis. Courts are holding up

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>policies under assinine universal injunctions. And then you have a

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>molar Special Council which is not only squeezing anyone close

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to Trump but toxifying anyone around him, trying to get

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>them to cough up something anything that will stick. So

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's part of it. But then the other purposes to

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>cover up the needed investigation of the investigators. How do

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a team and not just their political inclinations

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that they were all pretty much pro

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Hillary people, but how do you have people who are

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the establishment of the establishment as the ones who are

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be independent. If you are a part of

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the deep state, quote unquote, you can't be dependent. If

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>your career was made, if you spent decades in these bureaucracies,

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>in these institutions, your independent special counsel in name only.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Many of the folks involved with wrongdoing which was never

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>investigated the investigators probably very closely. No Robert Mueller. They

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>might have gotten promotions from him at certain points during

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>their career. He was the FBI director. How can it

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>possibly be independent? Oh yeah. And then in the middle

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of all this we find out about you know, perspective

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Kuda taz twenty fifth Amendment, literally deposing a president that

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>is the stuff of police states. So who are the

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>ones destroying the institutions? Who were the ones acting in

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>true Russian if not Soviet fashion. You know, Vladimir Putin

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is probably smirking about this whole thing. I have to say,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And what is going on in Congress right now is

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>merely the extension of one big, never ending effort to

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>create the appearance of illegitimacy of crime. Tis said, even

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>if President Trump isn't taken out by Congress, the voters

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>will do their bidding, or very worst, he'll be a

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>president not even able to stand on one leg, but

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe standing on a pinky toe. You know, the gravest

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>national emergency of all has been the rolling effort to

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fram the president as a national emergency that requires regime change,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>or maybe there never was truly a regime change in practice,

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the first peaceful non transfer of power in American history.

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>This has been one garden in for Buck Sexton on

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>The Buck Sexton Show eight four four nine zero zero

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Buck A four four zero two eight two five. Why

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>pay your hard earned money to join an organization that

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fought tooth and nail for a government run healthcare system?

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Well in that scripted portions of White House speeches behind

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>closed doors to ensure the passage of the Affordable Care Act,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the organization that stood against tax cuts for middle class

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Americans and small business owners. You know that's AA. Or

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>join AMAC instead. The conservative alternative AMAC offers the same

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of money saving benefits of AARP without the liberal agenda.

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Become an AMAC member right now at AMAC dot us

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>slash buck. AMAC fights for your values, protecting our borders

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.239
<v Speaker 1>by enforcing common sense immigration laws, supporting small business, and

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>standing up for your individual God given freedoms. AMAC is

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the way to go. Stand with AMAC as they fight

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the good fight. By becoming a member today. The benefits

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are great, but the cause is even greater. Join right

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>now at AMAC dot us slash buck. That's am AC

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>dot us slash buck. AMAC is better, better for you,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Better for America. This is the Buck Sexton Show, and

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this is Ben Weinegarden in for Buck Sexton. Phone lines

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are open eight four four nine zero zero. Buck. That's

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>eight four four nine zero zero to eight two five,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and let's go to the phones, and let's go to

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>first to Charlie in Maryland earlier on the Box Sex

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and Show. This is Ben Weingarten. Hey, thanks for thaying McCall. Ben.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been following this Mueller thing for some time now,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I am mad at the politicians for only one reason.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>They don't run this country. The bureaucrats run it, and

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>they are openly about it. They are committing treason against

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this president and nobody is really saying much. I just

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>find it absolutely amazing that we let just go. Charlie,

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for the call and you know,

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. This really comes down to the

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>administrative state. At the end of the day, regimes change,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>our administrations change, control of the House, control of the

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Senate fluctuates, but the bureaucrats are forever. They are always there,

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and many of them are almost possible to fire. In fact,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>if you actually look at the government's internal ratings of

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>government employees, everyone gets like an A plus plus. It's

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>almost impossible to get downgraded. Probably the more corrupt or

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>political acts that you make, you probably rank higher sad

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>way in many agencies. And this has been reported and documented,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>though obviously not bandied about frequently by the political class.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Not to say, of course that there aren't rank and

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>file folks who do a great job. But if you're

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in a political bureaucracy and you are not political, it's

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>very tough to rise in advance. That's why someone like

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a Mike Flint, incidentally, was so amazing that he rose

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to the position as the head of the DA under

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>President Obama. Amazing that he ended up at that point,

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>given how impolitic he was. But it really does come

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>down to the bureaucracy, the administrative state, and incidentally, Congress,

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Congress has seeded power to these agencies. These agencies technically

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>fall under the executive branch, but it's clear they are

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a fourth branch of government. I wrote a lengthy piece

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about this actually, and I just tweeted it out where

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I talk about the fact that we have created a

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>fourth branch of government that is unelected, unaccountable, and it

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>molds the powers of all three branches. So actually, if

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at how a federal agency works, literally, federal

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>agencies play judge, jury, prosecutor executioner. So if you are

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>involved in some sort of legal action when it comes

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to an agency, you have a business, Your business is

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>regulated by an agency. You flatter regulation. You want to

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>litigate against that agency, you have to go in front

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of an administrative judge. So it's a government judge. You

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have a more rigged playing field. There's a great quote.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I urge you to look it up. Look up Gary Lawson.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a law professor who's written about the administrative state

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and shows you that the administrative state is tyranny. If

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you have all three branches of government in one subset

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>action of the executive branch, that's tyranny. The whole purpose

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of separation of powers was that you didn't have executive, legislative,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and judicial functions all under one roof. That's why this

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is much bigger than any one particular president. It's much

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>bigger than these last two years and maybe the six

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>years succumb It's fundamentally about who rules. We the people rule,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>or de bureaucrats rule. Congress has ceded its power to

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>these agencies. They've delegated their own powers away. Sham on

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Congress for doing it. And it also allows Congress to

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>never take responsibility for anything. And we wonder why does

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>every pivotal decision end up at the Supreme Court. Well,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's because Congress is completely derelict in its duty. It's

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>out to lunch. There's no courage among Congress to actually

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>do its job, which is to legislate. One other quote

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that I would urge you to look up and i'll

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>paraphrase it here is from Harry Truman. Harry Truman talks

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about the fact and again here we're talking now seventy

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago, almost sixty seventy years ago, Harry Truman talked

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>about the fact he thought he had power as president

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>until he met the bureaucrats. He says something like, except

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for those damn bureaucrats, they run the show. That's a president.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So imagine, now you know, we're almost seventy years on

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>from Truman, how much more entrenched and powerful government is,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>which is already so big and already has literally stacks.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the Federal Register, we're talking hundreds

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of pages. And then when you look at

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the rules and the regulations, which is really where laws

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>are written, it's not written by a congresshman. A congressman says,

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>here's sort of the broad policy, and it might be

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a thousand or three thousand page bill, but then every

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>single part of that bill, all of the rules and

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>regulations are then delegated out to these agencies. So the

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>real laws come down to a bureaucrat. And by the way,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>if you're one of those bureaucrats and you want to

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>go to the private sector, you might you might yourself

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>take it upon yourself to draft the rules. That they're

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>really complicated and only you, as a regulator, know how

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>to interpret them. So what do you do. You go

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>work then in the industry that you were regulating, and

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you do there? You consult on the most

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>complex regulations ever that you yourself drafted because you're the

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>only one who can help that company avoid getting in

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>trouble with a particular agency. And you make x times

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as you made while you were working in

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the public sector. So it's a really perverse incentive system,

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's a perversion of limited government consent of the governed.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>They run the show, You don't run the show. All right,

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>let's go to another call. Let's go to Bill in

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia. Bill, you are on the Buck Sexton Show.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for taking McCall. Hey, I believe in fighting fire

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>with fireing at and they've been hounding Trump with over

0:25:55.520 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen East election and he's had no, no

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>proven collusion and buy him with the Russians in it.

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the twenty eighteen election should be investigated because

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats seem to want to keep the border open,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and Trump and Republicans should call for an investigation of

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats and in any possible collusion that they're using

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to aid the Mexican drug cartels by wanting to keep

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the borders open. Thanks for the call, Bell, And you

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>know it's interesting they never want to talk about foreign

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>influence when the foreign influence might actually help democrats. But

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the facts. I've talked about this on

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a prior episode where we went really deep into the

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>weeds on the census citizenship question. What's that all about. Well,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>non citizens, including illegal aliens, get counted in the census.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>The census, the population numbers count everyone citizens and non citizens.

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>So that includes the you know, the kind of range

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of ten to twenty million illegal aliens or maybe more

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>in America as households are counted in the census. And

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>what are those census numbers used for? Total population is

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>used to determine the apportionment of seats in Congress and

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>local seats as well. In other words, those places that

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>have more illegal aliens, they get more political power than

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>those places that don't have a lot of illegal aliens.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And naturally, the places that are magnets for illegal aliens, well,

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of course they're naturally blue places, sanctuary jurisdictions. And then

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars of federal funds are dulled

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>out based upon population numbers from the census, population numbers

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>inflated by illegal aliens. So you want to talk about

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:41.479
<v Speaker 1>foreign influence in Meadowing. It's right there. Democrats encourage it,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>they incentivize it, they protect illegal aliens. They probably give

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>illegal aliens in some ways more rights than you have

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as a US citizen. That's foreign influence in Meadowing. And

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not even to mention, by the way, a little

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>tidbit that Democrats are loath to talk about. And we'll

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>get to this a little bit later tonight. Chinese foreign influence.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>According to Vice President Pence in a landmark speech that

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he gave at the Hudson Institute last year, the Chinese

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>were running ads, for example, in Midwestern states that were

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>impacted by the tariffs the Trump administration put on them

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to essentially try and lobby against those tariffs and also

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>use them against the Republican Party for their own political interest.

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>That's foreign influence. And it's not just then. If you

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>look in the papers today, Huawei, massive Chinese tech company

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>which the US government has been clamping down on, telling

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>our allies in Europe and elsewhere, don't use Huawei technology

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for five G because it's going to create a backdoor

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and allow the Chinese to spy on you. Guess what

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they are running marketing literature lobbying American citizens in our

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>newspapers today telling you how great a company Huawei is,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and they don't pose a threat and they come in peace.

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So you want to talk about foreign influence, that's foreign influence.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is not even to get into if we

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>applied the same logic applied to Donald Trump, to Barack Obama,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and Victor Davis Hanson has written a great piece on this,

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I urge you to read, well, would we start looking

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>at Iranian influence? How could a president ever make those

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>sorts of decisions towards the Iranians? The appeasement of all appeasement,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Neville Chamberlain. Peace in our time? What if we started

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>looking into that? If we're going to make decisions, investigatory

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>decisions on the basis of hunt, these policies are kind

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of sketchy, and maybe they're helping our adversaries or not,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as the case may be. In this case. Actually, when

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Trump, the foreign policy establishment has scuttled

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to reach out to Russia, to split off

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Russia from China. And oh, by the way, our own

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>intelligence services have now said Russia and China are closer

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>than they've been in decades to our great detriment. But

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>what if we applied that foreign collusion meadowing standard to

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone else. I don't think it's a road we want

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to go down, but the genie is out of the bottle.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break. This is Ben wine Garden

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in four buck sexton eight four four nine ers or

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a buck eight four four zero zero two eight two five.

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show. This is Ben

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Weingarten in four buck Sexton eight four four nine zero

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>zero buck. That's eight four four nine zero zero two

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>eight two five. We were just talking a bit before

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the break about foreign influence meadowing, the broader scope of

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>all this, and the broader context for all of this,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>which comes down to legitimacy of our government, whether there's

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>consent of the governed, whether the investigators themselves need to

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be the ones who are investigated. And this is in

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>some sense and elaborate cover up of a plan that

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they never expected would be revealed because they never thought

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump would win. But let's look ahead to twenty twenty

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and I noticed an article. It didn't get a lot

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of press, but I think it's gonna be the first

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>data point that we may be able to point to

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trying to delegitimize at the very beginning

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a potential Trump win in twenty twenty. So Politico had

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>an article came out on the twentieth titled sustaind an

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>ongoing disinformation assault targets dem presidential candidates. A coordinated barrage

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of social media attacks suggests the involvement of foreign state actors.

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And I want to read a little bit from this

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's critical to note that they are getting this

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>information out now, that foreign powers are using social media

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to try and destroy democratic candidates. So it starts A wide,

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>raging disinformation campaign aimed at Democratic twenty twenty candidates is

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>already underway on social media, with signs that foreign state

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>actors are driving at least some of the activity. The

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>main targets Senators Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders,

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and former Representative Beto Cultural Appropriation O'Rourke, four of the

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>most prominent announced or prospective candidates for presidents. A political

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>review of recent data extracted from Twitter and from other platforms,

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as interviews with data scientists and digital campaign strategists,

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>suggests that the goal of The coordinated barrage appears to

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be undermining the nascent candidacies through the dissemination of memes, hashtags, misinformation,

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and distortions of their positions, But the divisive nature of

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>many of the posts also hints at a broader effort

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to sew discord and chaos within the Democratic presidential primary.

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Where have we heard this narrative before, dissemination of memes, hashtags, misinformation,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and distortions of their positions. Well, if that's going to

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>swing the election, why didn't we lose the Cold War

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.479
<v Speaker 1>like sixty years ago? I mean, if it was just

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>literally let's put out some memes, hashtags, misinformation and distortions.

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, wouldn't the Soviet Union of one? They could

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have flooded Aerican news with all sorts of memes and hashtags.

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>This isn't to discount the fact that foreign adversaries use

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>misinformation and disinformation for their ends. They absolutely do. If

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to see that, look no further than the

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Kashogi caper. Look at how they created this narrative about

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Kashogi that actually has completely influenced US foreign policy,

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing us away from the Saudi is trying to attempt

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to undermine a block against Iran, the number one threat

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in that region of the world. Foreign influence is real.

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Misinformation and disinformations are a fact of life, and they

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are massively powerful because when you change people's minds, you

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately change their activities. And in politics it's obviously paramount.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But let's put in context what Russia did last election.

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the they spend a few hundred

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars on some crappy social media ads that, yeah,

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>there may have been several million impressions, But do you

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>think that anyone changed their mind based upon any of

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the garbage that was put out by the Russians? You

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that caused discord and influence the election and

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>swung votes. There was never any proof that anything that

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the Russians did swung votes. In fact, if you look back,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>if you even look back at the DNC emails that

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>were leaked, the poll numbers didn't really shift after that leak.

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk about influence, swinging elections, leaking emails,

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that could be devastating, obviously, But memes, hashtags, misinformation and distortions.

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>If you have people that are making videos where they're

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>making it seem like candidates are saying things and they're

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fake videos, and the technology is there to do that

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Yes, that could certainly swing things. It

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>could certainly cause discord. And if you're an evil actor

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that wants to do America harm, you can come up

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>with some pretty substantive ways to cause a lot of

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>casks in our system, especially with the media that we have,

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>which is willing to run with this stuff and rarely

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>does their homework, but memes, hashtags, misinformation, and distortions. And

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's only the Democratic Party that's been subject to this.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So it continues. The cyberpropaganda, which frequently picks at the

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>ross most sensitive issues in public discourse, is being pushed

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>across a variety of platforms and with a more insidious

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>approach than the twenty sixteen presidential election, when online attacks

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>designed to polarize and mislead voters first surfaced on massive scale.

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Recent posts of widespread dissemination include racially inflammatory memes and

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>messaging involving Harris Arooric and Warren and Warren's case, and

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes on and on, and they say not all

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the activities organized. Much of it appears to be

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>organic or reflection of the politically polarizing nature of some

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of the candidates. And on, guess what, the candidates are

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>going to destroy themselves by themselves. It doesn't take social

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>media memes and hashtags. You know, only Democrats think that

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>hashtags can defeat evil adversaries. I mean, come on, come on,

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a kid in their basement could do this again. But

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when real influence operations actually impact us, the media hoaxes,

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the Kashogie caper, the Jesse Smollette story, Russia Gate, confucious institutes,

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>as we'll talk about a little bit later. What is

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this really about again? Number one, delegitimizing a potential Donald

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump victory in advance and propagating the narrative the meme

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of foreign influence boogeyman. But two, ultimately, this is about

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>hyperregulating political speech, which means killing conservative speech on social media.

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>The left wants to have a monopoly on political thought,

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's traditional media, social media, academia, the whole bureaucracy.

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the reality. This is ultimately going to be about

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>regulating political speech, and regulating political speech is not going

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to be to the benefit of protecting all First Amendment speech.

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Political speech of which is the most important and conservative speech,

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, which is quite valuable. This has been onegar

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>in for Buck sex in eight four four two eight

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>two five will be right back, And I read it

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, you know what, I don't care anymore.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't care anymore because again, I'm at least trying

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're not. So the power isn't the person who's trying,

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the success. If you're trying, you've got all

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the power. You're driving the agenda, you're doing all this

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like I just introduced Green New Deal two weeks ago,

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's creating all of this conversation. Why because no

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one else has even tried. Because no one else has

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>even tried. So people are like, oh it's unrealistic. Oh

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>it's vague, Oh it doesn't address this little minute thing.

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, you try, you do it right, because

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not because you're not. So until you do it,

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm the boss. How about without in respect to miss Ocasio, qute,

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>she's not the boss on this program. This has Ben

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Weingerten in four Buck Sexon on the Buck Sexon program,

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez saying that she

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is the boss, although I think Nancy Pelosi would beg

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to differ. But it brings up an important point, and

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that is that when Democrats aren't warring to try to

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>bring down Donald Trump, there's a war going on, a

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Democrat civil war. You know, we've heard for years Republican

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>civil war. There is a Democrat civil civil war for

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the soul of their party. It's the old Guard versus

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the young Turks, because now we live in a world

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>where the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Diane Feinstein they aren't sufficiently radical. And that video of

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Finstein with the kids, I don't even know where to

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>start with that, except to say that it is scary

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that progressives start that young. And we've talked about this before.

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Their whole idea is to indoctrinate from day one so

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that everyone is woke. I think you're going to see

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 1>though the Dems. The Dems cannot get out of their

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>own way, whether it's the Green New Deal, fake fake rollout,

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>actually the Rio rollouts where we're talking about slaughtering cows

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and no more air travel and transcontinental railroads and the like,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>a cross oceans, railroads, high speed fout in California, or

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:25.959
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Congresswoman Omar's anti semitism, where basically every

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>single week she racks up another point on the anti semiboard,

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or Rashida tayeb insinuating Mark Meadows as a racist. It

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>was pretty blatent by the way she was calling him

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a racist. Mark Meadows is a better man than I

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because he apparently went up to her and hugged her

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>after the fact and forgave her. But while the left

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 1>is going to overreach, and I think you're gonna see

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>in these hearings that they're gonna be clown themselves. They're

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to help themselves. Because for

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the younger ones, the more impressionable ones, the more naive ones,

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the ones you don't know about how Washington works, they

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are so energized and animated. Their trumped arrangement syndrome is

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so deep it's gonna shine through and people aren't gonna

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like what they're gonna see. And then for the others,

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have to tag along because if all

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the energy is with the progressives, you need to take

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>up the most progressive causes possible because that's votes, that's fundraising,

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that's media airtime. I mean, look Acasio Cortez and media darling.

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>They like her not just because she says insane things,

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but because the media actually agrees with a lot of

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>those things. Democrats right now, if you look at the

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidates, and we're going to go through a little

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of the horse race and just a bit, it's

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a party of infanticide. It's a party of socialism, including

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>socialized medicine. It's a party of the mass slaughter of

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>cows and the grounding of all plans. As I mentioned,

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a party of abolish ice. It's a party of

0:40:56.239 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>border walls are immoral. It's a party of anti Israel,

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>pro Iran deal. Orange man Bad is one of the

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>only things that unites all of them. I would suggest

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that they've failed to learn something from Barack Obama, who

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think agrees with all of these progressives, and he's

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of their leader, even though he's been very quiet

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because he's making millions of dollars at Netflix and elsewhere,

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but I guarantee you he's playing a role in this election.

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats, the progressives have regressive progressives. I like to

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>call him regressives, We'll see if that catches on. They

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>failed to learn from Barack Obama that, to paraphrase Van Jones,

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 1>you have to drop the radical pose to achieve the

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>radical ends. What does that mean. It means you need

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to wrap your radicalism in a non threatening, non offensive,

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>non left wing, tinfoil hat wearing sort of robe garb.

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is why if you look back to the

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.959
<v Speaker 1>original regressive progressives, the Angela davis Is of the world,

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>or the Bill Airs of the or the radicals of

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, they stopped throwing bombs and they started fighting

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>wars for the minds of young people. They put on suits,

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>some of them, at least most of them, shaved and showered,

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and they went into the institutions. They became teachers, they

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>became bureaucrats. They needed to drop the radical pose to

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>achieve the radical ends. And Barack Obama did the exact

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing. He covered the radical leftism in a seemingly

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>non threatening, common sense, every American, every man kind of way.

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It did shine through at times, but not enough to

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>imperil his eight years. Although Democrats did lose at every

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>level because people actually hated the policies they liked the person.

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So while on the one hand, Democrats are being shifted

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to the left, far to the left, and the Overton

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>window perhaps itself is shifting as they stake out the

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>most radical positions, and those positions over time become more

0:42:55.760 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>mainstream because political shifts happened faster over a wider birth

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>than they ever have. If you look at what was

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>considered radical five or ten years ago, that becomes routine

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>now in a lot of respects, unthinkable things become the norm.

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, hundreds of years of human history and teaching

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and practice have become overturned in recent years. But there's

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a whipsaw effect that's occurring because while on the one

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>hand there's the impeach and remove at any costs caucus,

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 1>they're also so called moderates in hotly contested seats going

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>into twenty twenty, folks in purple district districts that you know,

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we're probably suburban, middle upper middle class. You might even

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>have Republican majorities, but they don't like Trump, and Republicans,

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to their credit for once, are actually playing political hardball.

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>So you have Republicans in the House that are making

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>amendments to legislation and forcing Democrats to actually take hard votes.

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>So here's the latest one. There was gun legislation that

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>came out in the House. And what did Republicans do. Well.

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a bill to expand federal background checks for

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>gun purchases. This is out, It's described in the Washington Post.

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going with the left interpretation of what happened here,

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and they write, twenty six moderate Democrats join Republicans in

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>amending the legislation, adding a provision requiring that ICE be

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>notified if an illegal immigrant seeks to purchase a gun.

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Talk about a poison pill. Democrats can't vote for that. Well, actually,

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty six so called moderates did. This not only incensed

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the Occasio Cortezes of the world, it actually incensed Nancy

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi too, because her job is to keep order within

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>her party and make sure they all stick together. So again,

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I give Republicans credit. They actually played hardball once. Amazing.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>They should do it more often. They should do one

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we care about. So what is

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the reaction of Speaker Pelosi and the Occasi zero Cortezes

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the world. When we come back from this break,

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go through the sort of gulag politics

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're about to see from the left. This is

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben Winegarden in for Buck Sexon on the Buck Sexon Show.

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain what I mean by gulag politics in just

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Eight four four nine zero zero Buck. That's

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.319
<v Speaker 1>eight four four nine zero zero two eight two five.

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Weinegarden in four Buck Sexton. Phone lines are open eight

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>four four nine zero zero Buck. That's eight four four

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.919
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero two eight two five. During the break,

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I was scanning my Twitter feed and came across this

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>great tidbit that sort of exemplifies exactly what we were

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier when it comes to bureaucrats. This is

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>exhibit a of bureaucrats cashing in. And I believe this

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is from Politico Annals of Speculation. I'll quote from this

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>one on't note. How much could Robert mull Or make

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>if he decides to head to a law firm as

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he wraps up his investigation as special counsel washington Ians

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Marissa Kashino asked around quote as high a number as

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the market has available, says Jeffrey Lowe. The Washington managing

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>partner of legal recruiting firm Major Lindsay in Africa, quote

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>firms that can pay five million dollars while for five

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. If they can pay between five million dollars

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and ten million dollars, that can be the number two unquote.

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, this is Politico writing. We're talking about

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 1>annual compensation, so five to ten million bucks a year.

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Another quote five million. I think that's the starting point,

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>says the McCormick Group's Stephen Nelson. At least several millions,

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>says Garrison and Sissons Dan Binstock, though he adds it

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 1>could be significantly higher at certain firms exhibit A of

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrats cashing in. But let's actually look at the more

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>substantive point, which is if Politico is writing right now,

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and I believe it's Poetico about how much Mueller stands

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to make in the private sector before the report is

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>even delivered, this really must be a nothing burger of

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a report. I mean, you're talking about compensation for Robert

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Mueller before this report that we've been waiting for with

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>these breathless bombshow report after bombshow report, day in, day out,

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>every news cycle. Now the story that they want to

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on is how much Robert Moore is going to

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>make when the Special Council concludes. Let's go back to

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>what I was talking about before, which is the Democratic

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>civil war and the sort of AOC versus Speaker Pelosi,

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.399
<v Speaker 1>old guard versus young Turk split. Well, in this case,

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>AOC and Pelosi are standing together against their so called

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>moderates in their party, who of course are a minority

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>within their party. So the Washington Post headline is House

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats explode in recriminations as liberal as lash out at moderates.

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of surprised that the article didn't read Republicans

0:47:56.840 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>pounce on House Democrats explode in recriminations as liberals lash out. Well,

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll probably do it now. So that article says, and

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>remember this is dealing with legislation that twenty six moderate

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in the House went along with Republicans on where

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in expanding federal background checks for gun purchases, Republicans added

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a provision requiring that ice be notified if an illegal

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>immigrant seeks to purchase a gun. Democrats hate that. Now,

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's absurd that they hate that, But Democrats hate that

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>so the article reads in part and I quote in

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a closed door session, a frustrated speaker Nancy Pelosi lashed

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 1>out at about two dozen moderates and pressured them to

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get on board. Quote, we are either a team or

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not, and we have to make that decision unquote,

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi said, according to people present but not authorized to

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>discuss the remarks publicly. But Ocasio Cortez, the unquestioned media

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>superstar of the freshman class. That's aw. Let's see when

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a Republican is described as an unquestioned media superstar in

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a supposed we straight news article on the Washington Post,

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the unquestioned media superstar of the freshman class up the

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>anti admonishing the moderates and indicating she would help liberal

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>activists unseat them in the twenty twenty election. So Kazio Cortes,

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this twenty nine year old with no power in Congress whatsoever,

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 1>but a massive social media following and a press that

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>loves her. Clearly self evidently she's talking about primarying moderates.

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Trent, a spokesman for a Kazio Cortez, said she

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 1>told her colleagues that Democrats who side with Republicans quote

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>unquote are putting themselves on a list. You're on a

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>list if you cross Alexandra Kazio Cortes. So now we're

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about blacklisting within the Democratic Party. Isn't that fascinating?

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Who are the ones acting like authoritarians? So Corbyn Trent,

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this spokesman goes on. She said that when activists ask

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>her why she had to vote for a gun safety

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.320
<v Speaker 1>bill that also further empowers an agency that forcibly injects

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>kids with psychotropic drugs. You seriously can't make this stuff up.

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:57.399
<v Speaker 1>They're going to want a list of names, and she's

0:49:57.440 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 1>going to give it to them, Trent said, referring to

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>US Immigration and custom Enforcement. You're on a list, you're

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a moderate, you vote your conscience, you vote probably in

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>line with what you're moderate. Supposedly constituency says, you're on

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a list, and you'll get primaried. Now, I encourage Acazio

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Quartz to try to primary these people, because if they

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>get primaried and they're quote unquote moderate districts, that means

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are going to sweep those districts. Queen I'll be

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>back in a majority in the House. But seriously, that

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>takes some nerve. First of all, again, who is Alexandro

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Acazio Quartz to be the one coming up with these

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>litmus tests? But then, even more importantly, Democrats are drawing lists.

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm just I'm reminded of the Seine Fight

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>episode where a land Venice. You know, she's on the list.

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>She can't get the Chinese food. She's been blacklisted by

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party. So when I talk about Gulag politics,

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where I'm going. You're on a list, You're out.

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a Kazio Quarte as his way or the highway.

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that where the Democrats want to be. They want

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>to systematically pick off anyone who dares dissent from what

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>progressivism demands. Again, please do that, Representative Acazio Quartz, Please,

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I beg of you, name and shame every single moderate

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>who votes along with the Republican on something rational. Illegal

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>aliens going to buy a gun? H Maybe that should

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 1>concern us a little bit. In fact, it's an issue

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in her home state. MS thirteen runs rampant here. Acazio

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Cortes knows full well who they are. What if you're

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a law abiding citizen in one of these places, What

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>does a Kazio Quartes say to you when a kid

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:49.839
<v Speaker 1>is out playing in the street and illegal alien buys

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a gun, kid gets shot, accidentally buy a gang member,

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:57.399
<v Speaker 1>What does she say to those parents? You know, being

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a leftist means never having to grapple with the consequences

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of your policies, Republicans. When the policies work out, Democrats

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>will say, well they didn't work out well enough, or

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll try to find the anti silver lining, the fool's

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 1>goal of lining in it. Democrats, it's all about feelings,

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>what feels good, what seems compassionate. It's never about getting

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thrown off your healthcare plan. It's never about never being

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>able to see the doctor that you liked for your

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 1>entire life. It's never about being freed from joblock quote unquote, ie,

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>let's celebrate people getting fired because now you can go

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:43.840
<v Speaker 1>find better benefits somewhere else. AOC never has to grapple

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with the reality of anything that she says, because the

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 1>media will never Where are the fact checkers going line

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>by line, word by word through every last thing that

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Alexandrea Kazio Cortez says. And I hate to harp on

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>her because on the one hand, she's a side show.

0:52:57.239 --> 0:53:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of embarrassing. On the other hand, though she

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is a representative of where her party is going at

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the very least ideologically. I'm sure there are going to

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be more seasoned people that are going to follow in

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 1>her footsteps, although of course Democrats might not like someone

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.760
<v Speaker 1>who's more season They think that she's authentic quote unquote,

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>she's a bartender quote unquote. In fact, I would say

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that AOC is just the new age version of Bernie Sanders.

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:27.919
<v Speaker 1>And look where Bernie Sanders is. Bernie Sanders would would

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have been dismissed as a total kuk socialist, goes on

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:33.919
<v Speaker 1>his honeymoon to the Soviet Union, and if you haven't

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 1>seen those videos, you have to see the videos of

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 1>him celebrating, looking like the useful idiot that he is,

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>taking shots of vodka in the Soviet Union in the

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Cold War, celebrating with these folks. But that guy would

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have been competitive in a general election last time around,

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's one of the favorites in the Democratic primary

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this time around. In fact, if it hadn't really been

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:58.879
<v Speaker 1>rigged on the Democratic side with the super teligates last

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>time around, he probably beats Hillary Clinton. Acazio Cortez is

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 1>just an inexperienced version of Bernie Sanders. So we can

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 1>dismiss her, we can mock her, we can ride her.

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:15.880
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is she has built up a following

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the public, and not only that, she has shifted

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the Overton window. I said it before. These policies they

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>may seem nuts, and they are nuts, and they are disastrous,

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can look at world experience, example after example,

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but the lesson has to be constantly retaught. That's what

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Reagan taught us, freedom never being more than one generation away.

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>What democrats are talking about right now are the worst

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 1>possible ideas, the most regressive ideas you could ever have.

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:44.359
<v Speaker 1>They've been tried over and over again. Look at East

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and West Germany, look at North Korea and South Korea.

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Examples are plentiful. They need to be taken seriously, and

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>they need to be fought day in and day out.

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a little about that democratic field and

0:54:57.560 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what is to come. This has Ben Wagaran in for

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sex and on the Buck Sexton Show. A four

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>four zero two eight two five. That's a four four

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero two A two five we'll be right

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back talking the horse race, democratic radicalism, Overton Window and

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 1>much more. Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show. This

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is ben Wine Garden in four buck Sexton. In just

0:55:21.120 --> 0:55:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a short while, we're going to pivot to what's going

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:26.719
<v Speaker 1>on in international affairs and we'll talk a little bit

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>about China and North Korea. And you know, in some

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>ways it's funny to talk about the left and then

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about China and North Korea and these other

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>places where that's where the socialist dream is. And you know,

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe the best depiction of it is you look at

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a world map of different places at night, and then

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>during the day, North Korea is just dark. There's no activity,

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no commerce. It's a very telling thing when there

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is no light, and literally you have a gulag nation.

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And I go back to again East Germany and West Germany.

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 1>If you ever look, that is maybe the greatest controlled

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:04.600
<v Speaker 1>experiment of all time in terms of here you have

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the same people they started out, the same infrastructure, the

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>same level of talent, the same traditions, values, principles, literally

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the same families. Look at where East Germany and West

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Germany were at the end of the Cold War, and

0:56:21.400 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 1>even today if you look at many measures, East Germany

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is still behind West Germany in a lot of economic

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:30.720
<v Speaker 1>measures and other measures as well. That is the human

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 1>toll of terrible ideas, terrible ideas that there may be

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 1>claims of good intentions behind, but imposing your view of

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what's moral and just, which requires mass wealth redistribution and

0:56:43.719 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>dramatically altering the way that you conduct your lives. That's tyranny,

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>even if it ended up with good outcomes, quote unquote,

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it's tyranny. And none of the socialistens in anyway will

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 1>ever explain how it is that the stuff will be

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>created that they then redistribute. Under a system where there's

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>only reading distribution, who's going to create in that system?

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:06.320
<v Speaker 1>You're just going to be sharing a shrinking, shriveling, dying

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:10.160
<v Speaker 1>pie with everyone because there's no incentive to create, to

0:57:10.280 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>be dynamic, to pursue your dreams. If you look at

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:15.759
<v Speaker 1>what the Soviet Union was like, and you wonder in

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 1>part today, why is the Soviet Union? If you look

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>at the alcoholism rates, they're just off the charts. I

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>would pause it that one of the reasons probably is

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 1>human capital was destroyed by socialism and you're still seeing

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the effects of it today, Which brings me to the

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats twenty twenty. Field. I see a major challenge for

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats in twenty twenty. And it isn't just that

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Trump is going to have a great agenda

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to run on, or perhaps that the economy is going

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to be continue to be rip roaring, and financial markets

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and all the other things that all the pundits always

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 1>say or what people vote on. To be the Democrat

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that wins your nomination, you have to be sufficiently woke.

0:57:55.640 --> 0:57:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to demonstrate social justice, warriordom to the death.

0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You also have to check the identity politics boxes. And

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 1>then you still have to attempt to win a state

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like a Florida, arn Ohio, or a Pennsylvania or a Michigan. Now,

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>while they won't make the same mistake as Hillary Clinton

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of not campaigning in a place like a Michigan, it

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is very tough to try to sweep out in a

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>primary where everyone is so far left and everyone is

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:28.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to outdo each other on the left, and then

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:32.880
<v Speaker 1>seem reasonable enough to win in those places where that

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are completely intolerable of that insane leftism. So I just

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 1>want to take off the names. These were kind of

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>my initial thoughts on a handful of names today. Okay,

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, what has Joe Biden been running on? Well,

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he took back a nice comment that he had for

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Mike Pence on social media because he got

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>attacked by social justice warrior and failed candidate in New York,

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia Nixon. Took back his nice words for Mike Pence

0:58:58.080 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>because god forbid, you're actually ennuy towards someone of the

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>other party. Oh yeah, and Uncle Joe went overseas in

0:59:06.160 --> 0:59:08.120
<v Speaker 1>front of a European audience in the last couple of

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks and badmouth America. One of the first rules of

0:59:10.920 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the seminal rules of politics that a quote

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 1>unquote elder statesman like a Joe Biden would acknowledge always

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is you don't go overseas and attack America. You just

0:59:19.920 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>don't do that, period full stop. Okay, we have Spartacus.

0:59:26.160 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Spartacus kicked off his campaign by violating rules in Congress

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 1>while grand standing during the shameful Kavanaugh hearings, and go

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 1>look up his friend t Bone. That's a laugher. Elizabeth warned,

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 1>what Folcahontas is the defining aspect of her career. Kamala Harris,

0:59:41.080 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>her own paramour, admitted how she made her way to

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the top in San Francisco politics. Hint it wasn't based

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on merit. She called for abolishing private insurance compared eyes

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to the KKK, lied about her drug usage and attempting

0:59:53.000 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to quense the fact that she's now pro drug after

0:59:55.160 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 1>being anti drug as a prosecutor. Lied about the music

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>she was listening to while smoking pots. So was she

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lying about the pot usage? Was she lying about the

1:00:04.280 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>music she was listening to? Was she lying about her

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>position altogether? Beto is the Robert Francis O'Rourke, I should say,

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is the cultural appropriation candidate and sort of the EMO candidate.

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He's also a white male and tries, he might to

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>call himself Beto. White male is a dangerous thing to

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be in the Democratic Party, doesn't check off the identity

1:00:26.520 --> 1:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>politics box, try as he might, and of course frames

1:00:29.000 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>himself as Beto when he's running against somewhat of actual

1:00:31.520 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Cuban descent. But let's leave that aside. Amy Quobachar I

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that Amy Quobachar could potentially be competitive because she

1:00:39.640 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes off as you know, reasonable. She had

1:00:41.880 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all these moderate Republicans fawning over her in articles, but

1:00:45.440 --> 1:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you cross Amy Quobachar and she'll throw a stapore at

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>your head. I mean literally, it's like a character and

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>office space, like a violent Milton or you know, her

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ridge is more than Hillary Clinton's rage at Bill Clinton

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>based upon the descriptions that we've seen. And then today

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we had the announcement that Washington Governor Jay Insley would

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be running, and he is running as the climate change candidate,

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>fighting the climate. So his platform when we talk about

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>fighting climate change is let's massively reorganize our daily lives

1:01:21.240 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>over a hypothetical issue where the scientists have been persistently wrong.

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>And oh, by the way, their funding is generally tied

1:01:27.040 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to proving the consensus is what they claim the consensus

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is about global warming that justifies all manner of wealth redistribution.

1:01:34.880 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And oh, by the way, the worst offenders in the

1:01:36.920 --> 1:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>world won't go along with whatever their scheme is anyway,

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to sacrifice our position as the pre

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>eminent capitalist world power. But China and all the rest

1:01:44.360 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of the countries are going to keep trucking along. I

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>would say the field is set tremendously for Donald Trump

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways. But long term, the Woke

1:01:52.280 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>crew is going to triumph over the Democratic Party again.

1:01:57.000 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Overton window is shifting. The most radical

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>positions have now been put out there by multiple candidates.

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>They're all signed off on the Green New Deal. I'm

1:02:05.000 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about that in a second. They are

1:02:09.840 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>directionally where the party is going. They may have staked

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>out the positions too orally. Those positions may be losers

1:02:15.360 --> 1:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, they might even be losers in twenty

1:02:17.640 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. But where's the country going? Well, their view,

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the progressive view, is the view that dominates in popular culture,

1:02:23.600 --> 1:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in our schools, everywhere in the bureaucracy itself in a

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, and worth noting. Incidentally, Democrats are out

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>there working to kill the electoral college right now. Colorado

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was the most recent state to enter an interstate compact

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that needs a majority. It needs I think two hundred

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and seventy electoral votes for this legislation to pass, where

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially you would have a national popular vote that determines

1:02:53.880 --> 1:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>where all the electoral votes in a given state go

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>so a state might vote Republican, but if the country

1:02:58.960 --> 1:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>majority votes Democrat, all those states electors go Democrat. And

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it appears, at least right now that it's constitutional. You

1:03:06.280 --> 1:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have twelve states and the District of Columbia. I forget

1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if they're included in the twelve over they're incremento to

1:03:11.160 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the twelve states one hundred and seventy two electoral votes

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>by the latest count covered here. See, they want to

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>actually have direct democracy, which is tyranny. All of these

1:03:22.240 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>politicians love to talk about democracy the greatest thing ever.

1:03:25.160 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>The Founders hated democracy. The Founders talk about democracy as

1:03:29.120 --> 1:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>tyranny of the majority, where fifty percent plus one vote

1:03:32.720 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>can vote away the rights of everyone else. Just because

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you have free voting doesn't mean you'll end it up

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in tyranny. And let me just say why the Greens,

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>why are they going with green Jay Insley the most

1:03:46.680 --> 1:03:48.439
<v Speaker 1>recent one, and the Green New Deal and the rest

1:03:48.480 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. I would suggest that it's because science is

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the only way that they can justify socialism. The Green

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>movement is socialism masquerading as science. They have to create

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a crisis they can justify by something that is unimpeachable,

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that you cannot argue against or your anti science. So

1:04:07.120 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if the science demands the totalitarian response, only a Neanderthal

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>could oppose it. Worst case, if the green agenda fails,

1:04:16.320 --> 1:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they get their friends rich through chronyism. We have cylindras

1:04:20.360 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>add infinitum, in perpetuity forever. That's what the green thing

1:04:24.600 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is really about. It's about they can't win based upon

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the actual evidence, so they need to go science. Aha.

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Winegarden in for Buck Sexton on the

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. A four four nine zero zero two

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>eight two five A four four nine zero zero two

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>eight two five. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Weinegarden in four Buck Sexton eight four

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>four nine zero zero Buck. That's eight four four nine

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>zero zero two eight two five. All right. In a

1:04:53.160 --> 1:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>past episode of this program, I went into great detail

1:04:57.440 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>into what I think is the most vital, underestimated, underappreciate it,

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and potentially most significant of all policies that the Trump

1:05:06.280 --> 1:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>administration has undertaken, and of course not gotten nearly the

1:05:09.640 --> 1:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>credit it deserves for it, in part because it is

1:05:12.520 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in some way as a rebuke of everything the experts

1:05:15.600 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote have told us for almost fifty years, and

1:05:18.680 --> 1:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that is the fact that China is a competitor more

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>than that it's an adversary. And while the administration may

1:05:25.320 --> 1:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>catch its terms somewhat diplomatically at times, it's very clear

1:05:28.720 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that there has been a market change. Now, why should

1:05:32.280 --> 1:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we care about China as a major geopolitical competitor beyond

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's a world's second biggest economy, it

1:05:39.520 --> 1:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>has nuclear weapons, it's a massive population and landmass, massive

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>natural resources, and all the other knock on effects of

1:05:47.600 --> 1:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>having this behemoth that's adversarial with the communist run government

1:05:52.280 --> 1:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>facing US in a vitally important strategic region of the world.

1:05:56.320 --> 1:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I always go back to the question why should we care?

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>How does this actually our daily life? And the first

1:06:02.280 --> 1:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>thing right off the bat is, besides trade that we

1:06:05.640 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have with China, there's also the fact that literally trillions

1:06:09.080 --> 1:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of dollars worth of goods traffic through areas seas that

1:06:14.080 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>are in China's sort of near abroad. And if that

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>were to change, if that relationship were to somehow fundamentally change,

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>or those seas were not to be able to be

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>patrolled freely by the US, you can imagine the economic

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>calamity that would occur if China actually took aggressive measures there.

1:06:29.360 --> 1:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the Chinese military has threatened US

1:06:32.800 --> 1:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>ships in this region. So this is a real threat

1:06:35.480 --> 1:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and it really does impact actually the day to day

1:06:38.200 --> 1:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're not just talking stock prices, but we're talking

1:06:40.560 --> 1:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>about costs of goods when you go down to your

1:06:43.000 --> 1:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>local Walmart or any other store in America for that matter,

1:06:47.920 --> 1:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>overshadowed in what I've termed sort of the kabuki theater

1:06:52.720 --> 1:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Cohen hearing and all the rest that we're

1:06:55.600 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about to see over the next couple of years. Over

1:06:57.440 --> 1:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, there were three major development, three

1:07:00.800 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>major stories relating to China that have nothing to do

1:07:04.520 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with the trade deal that may or may not ultimately

1:07:07.480 --> 1:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>end up being negotiated. What are those three stories. Well,

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>one of them starts in all places in Cincinnati, Ohio.

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I doubt that you saw this story. A local news

1:07:17.680 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>source there, WCPO nine Cincinnati, a local television station I believe,

1:07:23.080 --> 1:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>wrote an article the titled Chinese spies covet Cincinnati's corporate

1:07:26.600 --> 1:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>secrets was October arrest an isolated incident. And here's how

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that article starts. It says, to anyone who has startled

1:07:32.600 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>when an alleged Chinese spy who targeted ge aviation was

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>arrested in October twenty eighteen, here's an even more alarming fact.

1:07:40.000 --> 1:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't an isolated incident. Cincinnati companies are regular targets

1:07:44.200 --> 1:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese spies, hackers, counterfeiters, and business partners. This news

1:07:48.400 --> 1:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>source has learned from court documents, government records, and interviews

1:07:51.240 --> 1:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with business and federal law enforcement officials. And then they

1:07:54.000 --> 1:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>go on to quote a US attorney for the Southern

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:59.919
<v Speaker 1>District of Ohio, quote, economic espionage is a very significant threat,

1:08:00.280 --> 1:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>said Benjamin Glassman. It could cost people their jobs, It

1:08:03.520 --> 1:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>could destroy companies. With the destruction of companies comes the

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>destruction of communities and really a radically different place for

1:08:10.080 --> 1:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States in the world. And the article goes

1:08:13.000 --> 1:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>on to talk about all the sorts of economic espionage

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that has involved companies just in Cincinnati, Ohio alone, and

1:08:19.600 --> 1:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you can bet that their investigations into this sort of

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>espionage everywhere, because, as the article laighs out, there have

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:28.519
<v Speaker 1>been indictments, numerous indictments that the Trump administration under this

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>FBI and Department of Justice have ramped up to bring

1:08:32.120 --> 1:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese nationals to justice, and in the particular case when

1:08:36.280 --> 1:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to ge aviation and involved what's termed the

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>first Chinese intelligence officer to be extradited to the US

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:45.479
<v Speaker 1>for prosecution. And by the way, he's not the only one.

1:08:45.760 --> 1:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>News broke just before we came on tonight that Canada

1:08:48.960 --> 1:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is set to begin proceeding as the will allow Huawei

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>CFO Manguanzo to be extradited to the US per an

1:08:54.920 --> 1:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>announcement from the Canadian Department of Justice on Friday. So

1:08:58.080 --> 1:09:01.479
<v Speaker 1>this is ramping up. We are starting to ring Chinese

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:06.919
<v Speaker 1>actors who violate sanctions, potentially allegedly or engage in economic espionage.

1:09:07.160 --> 1:09:10.599
<v Speaker 1>We're actually taking the fight to them. We are applying justice.

1:09:10.640 --> 1:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We are not acting fearful in our response and proving

1:09:14.040 --> 1:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're a paper tiger, as the Chinese may have

1:09:16.240 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>assumed for say the last eight years, and really probably

1:09:19.080 --> 1:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty eight or thirty eight or forty eight years.

1:09:22.640 --> 1:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It's one story Cincinnati. Another story. A report out from

1:09:28.320 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the US Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship that's

1:09:32.080 --> 1:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>chaired by Senator Marco Rubio, who has come out as

1:09:34.840 --> 1:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>one of these staunchest China Hawks joining the Trump administration

1:09:38.200 --> 1:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and encouraging the Trump administration's actions against the Chinese. His

1:09:42.560 --> 1:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>committee put out a report called MAIDE in China twenty

1:09:45.520 --> 1:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and the Future of American Industry. A MAIDE

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in China twenty twenty five is all about Chinese dominance

1:09:51.080 --> 1:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>in manufacturing and industry. And of course the way they

1:09:53.520 --> 1:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>do that is, in part is by cheating when it

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to trade, is by economic espionage, is by enforcing terms.

1:09:59.360 --> 1:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to our dealings with them, they're completely

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one sided and go in their direction. And what this

1:10:04.560 --> 1:10:06.479
<v Speaker 1>report lays out, and I'll quote in part from it,

1:10:06.600 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is the MAIDE in China twenty twenty five Industrial Plan

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>targets ten high value industrial sectors for global dominance, demonstrates

1:10:13.479 --> 1:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese government is doing more than merely breaking

1:10:15.600 --> 1:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the rules. It is seeking to set new terms for

1:10:18.400 --> 1:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>international economic competition. Evaluating the MAIDE in China twenty twenty

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>five Plans should contribute to the American policy framework in

1:10:25.760 --> 1:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>two ways. First, assessing the plan's particular goals and progress

1:10:29.479 --> 1:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>toward them can identify areas for defensive action. Second, comparing

1:10:33.160 --> 1:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>areas of China success to America's relative decline can help

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>identify areas for creative reform. China has a direction that

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going when it comes to manufacturing and industry. We're

1:10:42.280 --> 1:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>playing defense right now. We're just starting to identify the

1:10:45.800 --> 1:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>scale of these Chinese efforts and their intent, which is

1:10:48.920 --> 1:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>ultimately to undermine us. Last point I'll point out, Senate

1:10:52.760 --> 1:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations just released a report that I

1:10:55.960 --> 1:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>urge you to look at. It's called China's Impact on

1:10:58.200 --> 1:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the US Education System and represents perhaps the most extensive

1:11:01.600 --> 1:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>investigation to date of confucious institutes. What are confucious institutes?

1:11:06.240 --> 1:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Will their Communist Party backed educational so called cross cultural

1:11:10.640 --> 1:11:15.519
<v Speaker 1>exchange programs, backed with Chinese money, oftentimes with Chinese Communist

1:11:15.560 --> 1:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Party approved professors who go to US universities and they teach,

1:11:19.760 --> 1:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course, naturally, when you look at what they teach,

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a completely one sided pro Chinese Communist curriculum. And

1:11:26.280 --> 1:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>actually FBI Director Ray has indicated that there may be

1:11:29.200 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>espionage associated with these so called educational programs, including spying

1:11:32.920 --> 1:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese nationals who are here. So it's not just

1:11:35.560 --> 1:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily collecting information that might be useful from US universities,

1:11:39.479 --> 1:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's even inspiring on what they consider their own

1:11:42.080 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people and threatening them. And this report goes into great

1:11:45.160 --> 1:11:47.799
<v Speaker 1>detail about the size, scope and sale of these activities.

1:11:47.920 --> 1:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're talking hundreds of these across the US. We're

1:11:51.120 --> 1:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>also talking hundreds of millions of dollars that China has

1:11:53.320 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>put into this. This is real foreign influence. This is

1:11:56.960 --> 1:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign meadowing in US society when you have a foreign path,

1:12:00.000 --> 1:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>our adversarial putting millions of hours into our academic institutions

1:12:04.120 --> 1:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to advocate for literally the party line, the Chinese Communist

1:12:08.120 --> 1:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>party line. When we come back, we'll talk with Stephen

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yates about China, North Korea, and a whole bunch of

1:12:14.280 --> 1:12:16.639
<v Speaker 1>other goings on in the region. This has been weangarten

1:12:16.760 --> 1:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in four Buck Sex and eight four four nine zero

1:12:19.160 --> 1:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>zero Buck. That's eight four zero zero two eight two five.

1:12:26.000 --> 1:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we

1:12:30.880 --> 1:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do that. They were willing to denuke a large

1:12:35.160 --> 1:12:38.599
<v Speaker 1>portion of the errors that we wanted, but we couldn't

1:12:38.720 --> 1:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>give up all of the sanctions for that. So we

1:12:41.280 --> 1:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to work and we'll see, but we had to

1:12:44.479 --> 1:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>walk away from that. I think we'll end up being

1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:50.479
<v Speaker 1>very good friends with Chairman Kim and with North Korea.

1:12:50.479 --> 1:12:52.519
<v Speaker 1>And I think they have tremendous potential. I've been telling

1:12:52.560 --> 1:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody they have tremendous potential, unbelievable potential. But we're going

1:12:57.800 --> 1:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to see. But it was about sanctions. I mean, they

1:13:00.120 --> 1:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted sanctions lifted, but they weren't willing to do an

1:13:03.000 --> 1:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>area that we want. That was President Trump talking about

1:13:07.200 --> 1:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>his negotiations with North Korean leader Kim Jong un, and

1:13:11.960 --> 1:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly to the disappointment of many in the media who

1:13:14.439 --> 1:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say that Trump made a horrendous deal, as

1:13:16.720 --> 1:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sad as it is to say, but you could see

1:13:18.320 --> 1:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that in their reactions. Trump, in my view, rightly walked

1:13:21.960 --> 1:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>away from the table from a horrible deal when it

1:13:25.280 --> 1:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to the US national interest. Today, we're going to

1:13:28.120 --> 1:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>speak with Steve Yates about both North Korea trade negotiations

1:13:32.680 --> 1:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and more broadly, the Trump administration's China policy. And Steve

1:13:36.080 --> 1:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>joins US now. He's an expert on Asian politics, geopolitics,

1:13:39.400 --> 1:13:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps most notably, the former deputy National Security advisor

1:13:42.720 --> 1:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to Vice President Dick Cheney from two thousand and one

1:13:45.120 --> 1:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and five. You can follow him on

1:13:46.600 --> 1:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Yates d CIA. Steve, thanks so much for

1:13:49.760 --> 1:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us. A pleasure to be with you. Well, let's

1:13:54.000 --> 1:13:57.479
<v Speaker 1>start in North Korea. And the vital question when it

1:13:57.560 --> 1:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to all of these negotiations is what does Kim

1:14:01.040 --> 1:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Jong un actually want to achieve? So I asked that

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>question to you, what does he want? It's a fair question,

1:14:09.120 --> 1:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think before you even get to that, I

1:14:11.040 --> 1:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>think there's a couple of things that are long term

1:14:13.680 --> 1:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>issues where people are experts, pundits and sometimes foreign leader's mistake,

1:14:18.760 --> 1:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>where our president thinks he wants to go and how

1:14:21.400 --> 1:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he's going to get there. And I think we've seen

1:14:24.200 --> 1:14:28.439
<v Speaker 1>in this instance another example of people making long term

1:14:28.479 --> 1:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>assumptions based on short term tactics by our president, and

1:14:32.439 --> 1:14:34.479
<v Speaker 1>just as they have been in for several years now,

1:14:34.600 --> 1:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they're likely to be wrong. And so the on again,

1:14:37.360 --> 1:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>off again summits and walking away from the table. It's

1:14:41.240 --> 1:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>part of what this president does in his negotiations, and

1:14:45.720 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>sooner or later people will figure it out. North Korea,

1:14:50.840 --> 1:14:52.519
<v Speaker 1>the best we can tell, this is one of the

1:14:52.600 --> 1:14:56.719
<v Speaker 1>most isolated parts of the planet. It wants some sense

1:14:57.080 --> 1:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of connection with the outside world, but too much in

1:15:00.720 --> 1:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>its own country, still has total control, and it wants

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:09.639
<v Speaker 1>easing of sanctions which affect its ruling class more than

1:15:09.840 --> 1:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>its people. And it wants the US to remove its

1:15:15.160 --> 1:15:18.479
<v Speaker 1>forces from the Korean Peninsula, somewhat lessening the security threat

1:15:18.560 --> 1:15:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it perceives. So those have been basic elements that they've

1:15:21.479 --> 1:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>been talking about for three two term US presidents of Clinton,

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Bush and Obama in different ways, and all of those

1:15:31.560 --> 1:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>conventional approaches to diplomacy, and those administrations failed to change

1:15:35.880 --> 1:15:38.519
<v Speaker 1>the direction North Korea was going. Hence we have it

1:15:38.600 --> 1:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and a different approach to these talks. Kim

1:15:41.960 --> 1:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Jong UN's predecessor, his father, Kim Jong il, left a

1:15:45.680 --> 1:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>last will and testament, at least parts of which have

1:15:48.640 --> 1:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>been disseminated publicly. And in that last will and testament,

1:15:52.479 --> 1:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he laid out a strategy to essentially use nuclear weapons

1:15:56.400 --> 1:15:59.599
<v Speaker 1>as in some sense a bargaining chip, with the ultimate

1:15:59.680 --> 1:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>goal of reunification of the Korean Peninsula, presumably under communist role,

1:16:04.280 --> 1:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So a Korean peninsula where North Korea is the dominant

1:16:07.439 --> 1:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>power there. Obviously, in South Korea we have an administration

1:16:11.200 --> 1:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>which is somewhat more favorably disposed towards the North Koreans

1:16:15.080 --> 1:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>than those in the past. Do you think that Kim

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Jong un ultimately wants reunification as his number one goal?

1:16:22.280 --> 1:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that is their dream, and I think in

1:16:24.240 --> 1:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the North Korean propaganda world, they believe their dream, but

1:16:28.880 --> 1:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it only takes a few seconds of awareness of what

1:16:33.560 --> 1:16:38.519
<v Speaker 1>reality is in North Korea. Even some skeptical journalists have

1:16:38.640 --> 1:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>been able to go from time to time, and some

1:16:42.880 --> 1:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>health ministries like the Graham Ministries have been able to

1:16:45.800 --> 1:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>go to hospitals get a glimpse, and it's so different.

1:16:49.960 --> 1:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the most pulverized polity on the planet. There's no

1:16:53.880 --> 1:16:56.439
<v Speaker 1>way there's going to be any meaningful unification like East

1:16:56.439 --> 1:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>and West Germany at the end of the Cold War

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. And so they do have that dream. They

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do see themselves as on the winning side of this,

1:17:06.479 --> 1:17:09.559
<v Speaker 1>and South Koreans, for the most part, they for many

1:17:09.640 --> 1:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>decades had the same dream, but with them on top

1:17:12.000 --> 1:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of it, and in recent decades they've kind of come

1:17:14.920 --> 1:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion of this would be extremely costly, extremely risky,

1:17:19.720 --> 1:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and just because we're technically all Koreans were totally different

1:17:23.880 --> 1:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>than these people now. And so I think there's been

1:17:27.040 --> 1:17:29.559
<v Speaker 1>this desire to give piece a chance on the South,

1:17:30.000 --> 1:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but not necessarily wanting unification and having to deal with

1:17:34.960 --> 1:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the cultural and economic deadweight that North Korea would be

1:17:39.360 --> 1:17:43.759
<v Speaker 1>for them. Absent the credible threat of a real imminent

1:17:43.840 --> 1:17:47.759
<v Speaker 1>attack to Kim Jong Gun's regime or a sanctions regime

1:17:48.040 --> 1:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that is so airtight that it is literally completely starved

1:17:52.800 --> 1:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for capital, how are we not to assume that Kim

1:17:56.360 --> 1:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Jong gun will continue to try to play us off

1:17:58.840 --> 1:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>with negotiations and bite his time because he knows the

1:18:02.520 --> 1:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>reality that at most Donald Trump has six years left,

1:18:05.479 --> 1:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>whereas Kim Jong gun is leader for life absent some

1:18:09.080 --> 1:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of coup. Well, I think there's a heavy, heavy

1:18:13.040 --> 1:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>reality in what you described, and you know, sort of.

1:18:16.920 --> 1:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>When I first went into government, I was told that

1:18:20.160 --> 1:18:24.519
<v Speaker 1>the easiest answer for a government lawyer to give when

1:18:24.560 --> 1:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>asked the question is no, and the easiest assumption when

1:18:28.960 --> 1:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>wondering about changes in fundamental policy or direction of the

1:18:32.760 --> 1:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>countries is also know that these regimes linger longer than

1:18:39.360 --> 1:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone would like, and sometimes are even forecast. In the

1:18:43.200 --> 1:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties, I was on the receiving end of some

1:18:46.160 --> 1:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>public but also some internal government reports that forecast the

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>imminent collapse of North Korea. Tons of evidence, very high confidence,

1:18:55.920 --> 1:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and obviously we're two decades later and they're still there.

1:18:59.280 --> 1:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think the odds are he stays in this,

1:19:02.920 --> 1:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and so I think somewhat rationally, the president's strategy is

1:19:07.520 --> 1:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to do what is necessary to mitigate the threats that

1:19:11.360 --> 1:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>get beyond the peninsula. So his approach to this, whether

1:19:15.920 --> 1:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>by coincidence, dumb luck, designed, whatever it is, have resulted

1:19:20.120 --> 1:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in many viewers. In other words, none of the provocations

1:19:24.160 --> 1:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that occurred during the Obama administration when they were not

1:19:26.760 --> 1:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>engaging in talks, and he's still avoided the major concessions

1:19:31.040 --> 1:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of money and other kinds of changes

1:19:33.760 --> 1:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that were put forward under the Clinton and Bush administrations.

1:19:37.040 --> 1:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So for now I think he's been threading that needle.

1:19:39.560 --> 1:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's been a mistake to try to

1:19:42.720 --> 1:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hold out the Vietnam economic development model as something for

1:19:47.439 --> 1:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a North Korean to possibly understand and maybe aspire to,

1:19:51.120 --> 1:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>because they're not going to become sole They could march

1:19:54.040 --> 1:19:58.479
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of a reformed communist economy, and that's

1:19:58.520 --> 1:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what Vietnam has been. If you accept the premise that

1:20:02.479 --> 1:20:05.599
<v Speaker 1>North Korea is in some sense a proxy of China

1:20:06.080 --> 1:20:09.559
<v Speaker 1>and probably does not make any major decision without serious

1:20:09.680 --> 1:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>consultation with Shia's regime. Given that background, do we believe

1:20:16.640 --> 1:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that stepping away from the table impacts talks with China

1:20:20.240 --> 1:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and She? I believe it does. But I also believe

1:20:25.000 --> 1:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that was the president's intent. It was conspicuous that he

1:20:28.920 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>made direct mention of the trade talks and the fact

1:20:32.479 --> 1:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that what he was doing and annoy by getting together

1:20:36.080 --> 1:20:38.599
<v Speaker 1>and meeting and putting cards space up on the table,

1:20:39.479 --> 1:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>saying publicly how much positive rapport there are is between

1:20:43.160 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the two leaders, and yet they had demands that we

1:20:46.479 --> 1:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't accept and so it's a bad deal. I'm going

1:20:48.960 --> 1:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to walk away. And he made a direct reference to

1:20:52.600 --> 1:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the coming conversation with Shijingping that is supposed to be

1:20:56.080 --> 1:20:59.559
<v Speaker 1>at Mara Lago soon and that he would be prepared

1:20:59.560 --> 1:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to take this same approach. She's got fabulous rapport, was

1:21:02.880 --> 1:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>she temping? Supposedly something that I find hard to understand,

1:21:06.360 --> 1:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>given that I don't believe that communist leaders have a

1:21:08.880 --> 1:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>soul with which to have rapport, But the President is

1:21:13.200 --> 1:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>playing that part, and I think it was a strong

1:21:17.320 --> 1:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>positive signal. Now we have to see what he does.

1:21:19.840 --> 1:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But best I can tell, the administration is looking for

1:21:22.880 --> 1:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a framework for long term negotiations on trade, not believing

1:21:27.600 --> 1:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to get a quick hit on China

1:21:30.120 --> 1:21:32.519
<v Speaker 1>trade that's going to solve the problem. And in that regard,

1:21:32.880 --> 1:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the same as North Korea goes without saying how

1:21:36.240 --> 1:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>vital trade is between the US, the number one economic

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>power in the world, and China at number two. Do

1:21:43.000 --> 1:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>you see the trade negotiations as I do, as one part,

1:21:46.840 --> 1:21:49.479
<v Speaker 1>one facet, albeit a very big one, of a much

1:21:49.560 --> 1:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>more comprehensive pushback in some sense, overturning almost fifty years

1:21:54.479 --> 1:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of US policy visa each China pushing back on both

1:21:58.640 --> 1:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to law enforcement, and that is indictments

1:22:01.600 --> 1:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>over espionage and other malign acts of the Chinese in

1:22:04.439 --> 1:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the US, a military build up, rhetorical and then also

1:22:08.080 --> 1:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>substantive policy issues where we are comprehensively pushing back. Is

1:22:12.600 --> 1:22:15.479
<v Speaker 1>trade just one facet of a comprehensive plan in your view?

1:22:16.760 --> 1:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So I deeply hold that view that the trade negotiations

1:22:19.800 --> 1:22:23.479
<v Speaker 1>are very important. They're fundamentally much much more important to

1:22:23.600 --> 1:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>China than the art of the United States, And I

1:22:26.000 --> 1:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>think we might have the first administration in my lifetime

1:22:29.960 --> 1:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that fully understands that, or at least partially understands that.

1:22:34.120 --> 1:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But China's economic dependence on the United States is a

1:22:38.479 --> 1:22:42.599
<v Speaker 1>sizable proportion of its total GDP. For the United States,

1:22:42.800 --> 1:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>our interaction with China is like half a percent of GDP,

1:22:48.000 --> 1:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we don't want to lose that. Willy nilly,

1:22:51.120 --> 1:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a change matters. It will be felt,

1:22:53.640 --> 1:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's far from fundamental. And so we have a

1:22:57.560 --> 1:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>negotiating position of strength, and it's good that we have

1:23:00.960 --> 1:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>some sense of that and engage in the conversation. But

1:23:04.000 --> 1:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's beginning with Vice President Pence's speech at the

1:23:06.960 --> 1:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Hudson Institute last October, but I've had interactions with Australian

1:23:11.520 --> 1:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>senior leaders and Japanese senior leaders, and even some European

1:23:15.080 --> 1:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>senior leaders, and now even our friends in the Great

1:23:18.200 --> 1:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>White North in Canada. There's a fundamentally different conversation about

1:23:22.920 --> 1:23:25.759
<v Speaker 1>China today because we don't just look at the threats

1:23:25.760 --> 1:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>that are happening inside their country or international relations, but they,

1:23:30.800 --> 1:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>under the Communist Party's rule, are interfering with the fundamental

1:23:34.200 --> 1:23:39.479
<v Speaker 1>institutions of our nations. Our education, systems, our media, and

1:23:39.640 --> 1:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>our political systems, and I think for the first time

1:23:43.240 --> 1:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in most of my career, they're not getting a complete pass.

1:23:46.920 --> 1:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Nothing big has really been done to change it. Yet

1:23:49.560 --> 1:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they've been called out on the Huawei technology issues and

1:23:54.320 --> 1:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>five G and sanctions busting when it comes to Iran.

1:23:58.360 --> 1:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're at the beginning of this law conversation, and

1:24:01.479 --> 1:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm very very heartened that the conversation is taking place

1:24:05.520 --> 1:24:09.759
<v Speaker 1>beyond just the usual lobbying halls about trade or no trade.

1:24:10.040 --> 1:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a bigger strategic issue, and it's kind of bothered

1:24:14.280 --> 1:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>me that people have talked about the Cold War being

1:24:16.439 --> 1:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>over in the early nineteen nineties when a very large

1:24:20.400 --> 1:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>communist party plays a furious role in global strategy. Today,

1:24:25.000 --> 1:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a substantial challenge for the administration, which is that

1:24:28.960 --> 1:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>long term, China, I think clearly does represent the biggest

1:24:31.880 --> 1:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical threat to America, But in the short term, financial

1:24:35.200 --> 1:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>markets and many in the business community hit the sort

1:24:38.360 --> 1:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of punitive policy that the Trump administration has taken to

1:24:41.320 --> 1:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>develop the leverage to actually have hopefully beneficial negotiations. If

1:24:45.880 --> 1:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you were counseling the president, how would you suggest that

1:24:48.760 --> 1:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>he deals with the competing tensions of needing to keep

1:24:51.520 --> 1:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the pressure on China, which has had real impact internally

1:24:54.960 --> 1:24:57.599
<v Speaker 1>in China, but also dealing with the fact that financial

1:24:57.680 --> 1:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>markets don't necessarily like it, and he's going to be

1:25:00.080 --> 1:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the ballot in two years, you know. I think that

1:25:03.720 --> 1:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the administration's team at the at the highest levels are

1:25:07.520 --> 1:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive to this and very aware of it. Now.

1:25:11.360 --> 1:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't mislead to say that I have been brought

1:25:14.320 --> 1:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>into multiple inside conversations and this is what I hear

1:25:18.240 --> 1:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>firsthand in those multiple conversations. But but my dealings with them,

1:25:23.200 --> 1:25:27.519
<v Speaker 1>uh indicate that they that they basically have somewhat of

1:25:27.600 --> 1:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a divide and conquer communications strategy, which is hard in

1:25:30.439 --> 1:25:32.759
<v Speaker 1>this day and age that everything goes out into different

1:25:32.800 --> 1:25:36.479
<v Speaker 1>medium and blurs together. But they've been They've been messaging

1:25:36.520 --> 1:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street their intent, which they mean to try

1:25:41.120 --> 1:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to make some real progress and rebalancing the US China

1:25:44.160 --> 1:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>economic relationship. And I think that they have worked into

1:25:48.920 --> 1:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>their communications somewhat an element that I believe strongly in

1:25:53.600 --> 1:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that I have a great respect for the history of

1:25:56.600 --> 1:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>China and for the people of China. Don't think that

1:26:00.920 --> 1:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the policies we stand for, our anti China. That's what

1:26:03.960 --> 1:26:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party wants to parlay out there to keep

1:26:07.560 --> 1:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>us from being able to do anything to protect our

1:26:09.280 --> 1:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>own interests. It's the Communist Party that's the problem. That's

1:26:12.720 --> 1:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the one percent of China that dominates the ninety nine

1:26:16.680 --> 1:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>percent of the rest of the Chinese. And that one

1:26:18.720 --> 1:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>percent is the one that has denied their culture and

1:26:21.880 --> 1:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>their heritage and broken their fundamental institutions of family and

1:26:25.120 --> 1:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>faith and other things that were valuable parts of the

1:26:28.560 --> 1:26:32.519
<v Speaker 1>historical Chinese experience. And so well, that's a big nugget

1:26:32.640 --> 1:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to get out there in the public. There are elements,

1:26:35.200 --> 1:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I think of the administrations. They understand this. So they

1:26:37.800 --> 1:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>speak to the Wall Street which they're familiar with, and

1:26:41.920 --> 1:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they have people on the team that talk every day

1:26:44.720 --> 1:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with leading influencers up there to try to make sure

1:26:48.080 --> 1:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>that they understand we are going to try for outcomes.

1:26:50.479 --> 1:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>This isn't just an all out war for the sake

1:26:53.280 --> 1:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of war. When it comes to talk of trade, it's

1:26:56.439 --> 1:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a rebalancing with a purpose, and we should benefit from it,

1:26:59.280 --> 1:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and so should the Chinese people. It's done right. And secondarily,

1:27:03.760 --> 1:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they so far have remained committed to keeping elements of

1:27:08.160 --> 1:27:10.719
<v Speaker 1>pressure in place. There's some of you know, they've delayed

1:27:11.200 --> 1:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the escalation of earths from from ten and fifteen percent

1:27:16.000 --> 1:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up to twenty five. But that's for a time and

1:27:20.080 --> 1:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think if as the President has to walk away

1:27:21.920 --> 1:27:24.599
<v Speaker 1>from the next round of talks about meaningful progress, those

1:27:24.600 --> 1:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>things will come into play and he'll keep the leverage

1:27:27.720 --> 1:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>going into the election cycle. He can't afford to go

1:27:31.080 --> 1:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>soft on this, in my estimation, and hold the electoral

1:27:34.200 --> 1:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>college coalition he had in the rust belt states. That

1:27:37.320 --> 1:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was a big change in twenty sixteen and it made

1:27:39.760 --> 1:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a strategic difference politically. Steve, we're gonna have to leave

1:27:42.360 --> 1:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it right there. Thank you so much for coming on.

1:27:44.280 --> 1:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>We've been speaking with Steve Yates. You can follow on

1:27:46.280 --> 1:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Yates DCIA. Thanks so much for coming on,

1:27:49.560 --> 1:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure. Thank you. This is Ben Weingarten in for

1:27:54.920 --> 1:27:57.519
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Show. Eight four four

1:27:57.680 --> 1:28:00.559
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero. Buck, that's eight four four nine zero

1:28:00.720 --> 1:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>zero to eight to five. Lines are open, all right.

1:28:04.680 --> 1:28:08.559
<v Speaker 1>We just spoke with Steve Yates, former deputy National Security

1:28:08.560 --> 1:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney and someone who I

1:28:11.160 --> 1:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>would say has a tremendous grasp on the situation in Asia,

1:28:17.280 --> 1:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this battle that's going on right now between the Chinese

1:28:20.400 --> 1:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and their proxies, namely North Korea and then all of

1:28:23.439 --> 1:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the other nations, and the US has been working to

1:28:25.720 --> 1:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>align itself with these other nations and start to comprehensively

1:28:29.800 --> 1:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>counter China. And you know, for years, for decades and decades,

1:28:34.640 --> 1:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we were told about China's peaceful rise. This relationship was

1:28:39.080 --> 1:28:42.519
<v Speaker 1>open with Richard Nixon back in the seventies, and the

1:28:42.600 --> 1:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>idea was that China would get rich alongside the US.

1:28:47.040 --> 1:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>This would be in both of our interest. Economic liberalization

1:28:51.400 --> 1:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote would lead to political liberalization. Well, everything that

1:28:57.080 --> 1:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen since Tianamen Square in nineteen eighty nine proves

1:29:00.439 --> 1:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that that was pure folly. And guess what, the Chinese

1:29:03.400 --> 1:29:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party doesn't necessarily want to be a peaceful trade partner. Essentially,

1:29:07.920 --> 1:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what we have helped to do is build China's economy.

1:29:10.960 --> 1:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just through anything resembling free trade or

1:29:14.840 --> 1:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>fair trade. It's through stolen intellectual property and the parts

1:29:18.120 --> 1:29:22.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese. It's your economic espionage, it's unfair trade dealings,

1:29:23.280 --> 1:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it's your cyber attacks, it's through them killing out our

1:29:26.120 --> 1:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligence officers, literally, it's through the biggest attack in US history,

1:29:32.120 --> 1:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>cyber attack in US history, the Office of Personnel and Management,

1:29:36.080 --> 1:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>where essentially China stole the files of more than twenty

1:29:39.600 --> 1:29:45.879
<v Speaker 1>million supposedly government employees, the most sensitive information, the documents

1:29:45.960 --> 1:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they fill out to try to get a government job

1:29:47.920 --> 1:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>when there's a national security implication, there's an investigation, a

1:29:52.120 --> 1:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>substantial background check, and we're talking hundred plus pages background check.

1:29:57.000 --> 1:29:59.759
<v Speaker 1>China hack that information and it gave them a tremendous advantage.

1:30:00.280 --> 1:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump has challenged this notion of China's peaceful rise. It's

1:30:04.880 --> 1:30:08.879
<v Speaker 1>said in his National Security Strategy in twenty seventeen economic

1:30:08.960 --> 1:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>liberalization has not led to political liberalization. We're actually a

1:30:12.240 --> 1:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>strategic competitor of China, and it's maybe even more ramped

1:30:15.479 --> 1:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>up than that. And we've seen a comprehensive effort by

1:30:18.280 --> 1:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration to start to push back on this.

1:30:21.120 --> 1:30:23.559
<v Speaker 1>And with my next guest, we'll talk about some more

1:30:23.720 --> 1:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>things that the Trump administration has pointed out about the

1:30:26.560 --> 1:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>failure of our elites and how detrimental it's been to

1:30:29.880 --> 1:30:32.479
<v Speaker 1>our national interest. This is Ben Weingarten in for Buck

1:30:32.560 --> 1:30:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Sexon on The Buck Sexton Show eight four four nine

1:30:35.600 --> 1:30:38.599
<v Speaker 1>zero zero Buck. That's eight four four nine zero zero

1:30:38.800 --> 1:30:44.599
<v Speaker 1>two eight two five Back in just a moment, Welcome

1:30:44.600 --> 1:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben Weinegarten

1:30:47.160 --> 1:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in four buck Sexton lines are open eight four four

1:30:50.120 --> 1:30:52.559
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero Buck. That's eight four four nine zero

1:30:52.680 --> 1:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>zero two eight two five. Or We've talked a lot

1:30:55.800 --> 1:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this evening, in particular an hour one about the deficiencies

1:31:00.040 --> 1:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Democratic side, both ideologically and tactically, but at

1:31:05.280 --> 1:31:07.519
<v Speaker 1>the same time the world is in some ways also

1:31:07.760 --> 1:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>going their way now. In January, Tucker Carlson set the

1:31:12.080 --> 1:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican intellectual world ablaze by articulating in a sense why

1:31:16.479 --> 1:31:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Trump won, namely that he called out a failed intellectual elite,

1:31:21.080 --> 1:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a failed ruling class, starting with Mitt Romney, and this

1:31:24.080 --> 1:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was in response in part to Mitt Romney's anti Trump

1:31:27.080 --> 1:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>editorial in the Washington Post, and what Tucker rays were

1:31:30.320 --> 1:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>many failings of the elite, starting with the fact that

1:31:34.040 --> 1:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not really ruling for the common good anymore so

1:31:36.840 --> 1:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>much as the good of third world nations or feel

1:31:39.880 --> 1:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>good policies that make them feel as if they're virtuous

1:31:43.280 --> 1:31:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and compassionate people, regardless of the outcomes for their supposed

1:31:46.640 --> 1:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>beneficiaries while they continue to enrich themselves and a crew

1:31:50.040 --> 1:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>more power. Doctor Matt Peterson has written extensively about this.

1:31:54.160 --> 1:31:56.679
<v Speaker 1>He's the vice president of Education at the Claremont Institute

1:31:56.680 --> 1:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and editor of the American Mind, and he wrote the

1:31:59.080 --> 1:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>piece at that new website, The American Mind, where he

1:32:01.840 --> 1:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>argues Tucker Carlson is right now. Full disclosure before we

1:32:05.400 --> 1:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>jump in. I'm a publious fellow at the Cremin Institute,

1:32:07.960 --> 1:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and I continue to do work with them because I

1:32:09.800 --> 1:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think they're a great institution that's doing God's work and

1:32:12.720 --> 1:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to restore America's founding principles. Doctor Peterson, thanks so

1:32:16.439 --> 1:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Thank you so much for that introduction.

1:32:19.880 --> 1:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Then thanks well, it's my pleasure and thank you for

1:32:22.920 --> 1:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>writing this piece. Let's start at the highest level, which

1:32:26.200 --> 1:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is how, in your view, have our elites found us?

1:32:31.640 --> 1:32:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, so there's so many ways. I mean, I

1:32:33.479 --> 1:32:37.759
<v Speaker 1>would start, though, with a misunderstanding of American principles and purpose.

1:32:38.800 --> 1:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>The first failing you'd have to talk about is that

1:32:41.720 --> 1:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the education of our elites fails to understand and distinguish

1:32:46.240 --> 1:32:49.799
<v Speaker 1>what is distinctive about America and what American the American

1:32:49.840 --> 1:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>principles of government aren't therefore what we ought to be

1:32:52.200 --> 1:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>aiming at. What's the purpose? And so what you have

1:32:55.400 --> 1:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>what you see in elite society is an unwillingness or

1:33:00.840 --> 1:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>an aura culture that is very reluctant to embrace something

1:33:05.960 --> 1:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>distinctly American. And it's much more apt to say what's

1:33:09.320 --> 1:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong with America? Right, And it's the suspicious of patriotism.

1:33:15.000 --> 1:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I would start there. And then the problem is that

1:33:17.880 --> 1:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>outside of that, if you don't have a way to

1:33:21.200 --> 1:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>be a patriotic elite, or you're not taught what the

1:33:24.000 --> 1:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>principles and purposes of your government are, you then descend

1:33:27.240 --> 1:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to self interest. Right. The only other thing you have

1:33:30.000 --> 1:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in the academy is self interest or some form of

1:33:33.200 --> 1:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>then social justice woke doctrine. Right. So this is an

1:33:37.920 --> 1:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>enormous problem. It's been going on for a long time.

1:33:40.760 --> 1:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It's been building for a long time. But what you

1:33:43.080 --> 1:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>see now are people like Tucker talking about it explicitly

1:33:46.520 --> 1:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on the right in ways that really no one has

1:33:49.800 --> 1:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>for some time. There's a political element, of course, but

1:33:53.840 --> 1:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>if you believe that politics is downstream from the culture,

1:33:57.280 --> 1:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>part of what comes out of our elites are sort

1:33:59.720 --> 1:34:02.639
<v Speaker 1>of norms governing practices for how to live your life,

1:34:02.680 --> 1:34:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and that comes well before we talk about policies. Charles Murray,

1:34:06.640 --> 1:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>whose work I'm sure you're very well familiar with, talks

1:34:09.400 --> 1:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about in one of his books the idea that the

1:34:12.320 --> 1:34:15.439
<v Speaker 1>elites don't preach what they practice. In other words, they

1:34:16.040 --> 1:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of promote and anything goes progressive utopic sort of

1:34:20.000 --> 1:34:24.439
<v Speaker 1>worldview where they reject the traditional values and principles on

1:34:24.560 --> 1:34:27.439
<v Speaker 1>which our entire civilization is based. But then in their

1:34:27.479 --> 1:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>own wives they live very conventionally and they really do

1:34:30.640 --> 1:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a disservice when they exhibit certain behavior in their rhetoric

1:34:35.080 --> 1:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and other behavior in their private life. Do you think

1:34:37.240 --> 1:34:39.519
<v Speaker 1>that factors into the sort of Tucker thesis and your

1:34:39.600 --> 1:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>view as well. Oh? Absolutely, I think Tucker is one

1:34:43.320 --> 1:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent writer about this, And obviously Charles Murray has

1:34:47.280 --> 1:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>spearheaded that the proof of this in very real and

1:34:51.360 --> 1:34:55.240
<v Speaker 1>damning social science. So what you see is that when

1:34:55.320 --> 1:34:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you are a member of the elite, you're reluctant to

1:34:58.120 --> 1:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>adopt any policy that actively promotes the health of the family.

1:35:03.479 --> 1:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>At the same time that you know, because of your station,

1:35:07.600 --> 1:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that getting married is a good idea of

1:35:10.160 --> 1:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>staying married is a good idea. Marriage is much healthier

1:35:13.960 --> 1:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>among elites than it is among the rest of society.

1:35:17.160 --> 1:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And so this is where Tucker really made his mark.

1:35:20.560 --> 1:35:25.519
<v Speaker 1>This is why Tucker's monologue resignated throughout the country. What

1:35:25.680 --> 1:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>he said was this is quote, culture and economics are

1:35:28.960 --> 1:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>inseparably intertwined. Certain economic systems allow families to thrive, and

1:35:34.240 --> 1:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>thriving families make market economies possible. That's what he said.

1:35:38.680 --> 1:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And so what he did is do something different. He said, no, no, no,

1:35:42.040 --> 1:35:45.639
<v Speaker 1>you can't just treat policy is is it's separate from

1:35:45.720 --> 1:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the promotion or the denigration of the family. Economics is

1:35:49.840 --> 1:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it used to be called used called political economy. Economics

1:35:53.560 --> 1:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is necessarily tied to morality and to promote certain kinds

1:36:00.880 --> 1:36:04.519
<v Speaker 1>of behavior and rewarding it and punishing other kinds of

1:36:04.600 --> 1:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>behavior or discouraging it. And I don't really think that

1:36:08.000 --> 1:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this should be controversial, but unfortunately a lot of rhetoric

1:36:11.960 --> 1:36:14.559
<v Speaker 1>on the right that we're just used to, that we've

1:36:14.600 --> 1:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>adopted over the last few decades, makes it controversial to

1:36:17.880 --> 1:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>say these things. I think it's kind of a truism

1:36:20.760 --> 1:36:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that an economy derives from a culture and Embedded in that,

1:36:24.840 --> 1:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to your point, is the idea that morality matters, and

1:36:28.160 --> 1:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it clearly functions in a free market, and a capitalist

1:36:31.280 --> 1:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>system doesn't just arise out of nowhere otherwise, you know,

1:36:34.400 --> 1:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the people who had claimed that China, for example, would

1:36:36.880 --> 1:36:40.679
<v Speaker 1>become economic would become politically liberal and socially liberal because

1:36:40.680 --> 1:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it's economically liberal, they would have been proven right if

1:36:43.160 --> 1:36:45.439
<v Speaker 1>it was that economics decided. But actually it's the other

1:36:45.479 --> 1:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>way around, and it starts with people and their own

1:36:48.000 --> 1:36:51.760
<v Speaker 1>voluntary actions. Now, the criticism of Tucker's piece, and you

1:36:51.920 --> 1:36:54.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with this in your piece as well, is that

1:36:55.280 --> 1:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if the free market leads to certain disasters in society,

1:36:59.280 --> 1:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>creative destruction implies both not only creation but also destruction,

1:37:03.640 --> 1:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's real societal costs to that. Then is Tucker arguing,

1:37:07.000 --> 1:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and are folks like you who support his argument then

1:37:09.400 --> 1:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>arguing that we should sort of rebel against the free

1:37:11.960 --> 1:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>market in some ways because there are societal losses in

1:37:15.200 --> 1:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>free market systems as well. I think it's a matter

1:37:20.040 --> 1:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of priority. I think I think the best way to

1:37:22.760 --> 1:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>understand it is that even make sure it does desire

1:37:29.760 --> 1:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a free market in a sense that we do have

1:37:32.640 --> 1:37:35.599
<v Speaker 1>a drive within us right to be creative, to take

1:37:35.680 --> 1:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>initiative to buy and sell things amongst ourselves, the fourth

1:37:40.240 --> 1:37:42.479
<v Speaker 1>and so on. But in order to do that, we

1:37:42.720 --> 1:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>need a governmental structure around it some way, but that

1:37:46.479 --> 1:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the establishes kind of rules of the game and points

1:37:50.479 --> 1:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>us in certain directions as opposed to others. So let

1:37:52.720 --> 1:37:56.280
<v Speaker 1>me give an example, because I understand absolutely why many

1:37:56.320 --> 1:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>people might be listening saying I'm not sure what this

1:37:58.320 --> 1:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>guy's talking about, or I don't know if I quite

1:38:01.200 --> 1:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with Tucker. This sounds like, you know, some kind

1:38:03.360 --> 1:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of socialism kind of you know, great society typed out,

1:38:07.280 --> 1:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is not what we're talking about. It's not

1:38:09.680 --> 1:38:13.439
<v Speaker 1>what Tucker's got talking about. Carlson said that our leaders

1:38:13.439 --> 1:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>should speak out against the ugliest parts of our financial

1:38:16.160 --> 1:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>system because not all commerce is good. Uh, some commerce

1:38:20.120 --> 1:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is in fact harmful. And so what are the questions

1:38:23.800 --> 1:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>he asked, was why is it why is it defensible

1:38:26.280 --> 1:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to loan people money, poor people money that they can't

1:38:29.479 --> 1:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>possibly repay, So take payday loan outlets and poor neighborhoods, right,

1:38:34.160 --> 1:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>four hundred percent annual interests. This is this is this

1:38:38.200 --> 1:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is a practice where you might raise a question mark

1:38:40.840 --> 1:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>might I say, why is this commerce good? And in fact,

1:38:43.240 --> 1:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in American history, Abraham Lincoln, when he first ran for office, said,

1:38:47.680 --> 1:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, loaning money to poor people at exorbitant rates

1:38:51.000 --> 1:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of interest. In that idea, Noah Webster during the ratification debate, said, look,

1:38:56.320 --> 1:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't separate the morals of the people from the

1:38:59.080 --> 1:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>influence of money on men's sense of justice and moral obligation.

1:39:03.560 --> 1:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>The law, you know, influences our habit, and we should

1:39:06.200 --> 1:39:09.559
<v Speaker 1>restrict credit to people who won't be able to pay

1:39:09.640 --> 1:39:13.559
<v Speaker 1>money back in order really to encourage them to save

1:39:13.960 --> 1:39:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and to be responsible. Now, I think that's a matter

1:39:17.320 --> 1:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of common sense. But when you when you have a

1:39:21.080 --> 1:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a brittle conservative rhetoric, it really is libertarian

1:39:25.280 --> 1:39:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way, right, that says, well, there's no connection.

1:39:28.040 --> 1:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's why people were upset with what

1:39:30.920 --> 1:39:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Tucker was saying. But I think no Webster was right.

1:39:33.960 --> 1:39:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Right laws to credit the poor people, they help encourage

1:39:37.479 --> 1:39:41.599
<v Speaker 1>good behavior. So that that leads to a fundamental question,

1:39:41.800 --> 1:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which is is it government's job in some way to

1:39:45.439 --> 1:39:49.280
<v Speaker 1>promote virtue. People instantly sort of recoil when you talk

1:39:49.320 --> 1:39:52.439
<v Speaker 1>about should government be promoting certain moral as values and

1:39:52.520 --> 1:39:55.320
<v Speaker 1>principles and not others. Do you believe that it is

1:39:55.360 --> 1:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental job of government to do so well? I

1:40:02.160 --> 1:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>think that the first instinctual reaction of many older conservatives

1:40:06.120 --> 1:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>would be to say, what are you talking about? The

1:40:08.720 --> 1:40:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Taliban had a department of virtue and vice, and the

1:40:11.400 --> 1:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>last thing we do is last thing we want is

1:40:14.040 --> 1:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to increase the power of the administrative state. And there

1:40:18.120 --> 1:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are certainly a lot of truth to that. In a way,

1:40:20.680 --> 1:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that one hundred percent. At the same time,

1:40:23.520 --> 1:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>we can't neglect what law is. And here the American

1:40:27.840 --> 1:40:30.519
<v Speaker 1>founders can help us out because they did not promote

1:40:30.560 --> 1:40:33.639
<v Speaker 1>a kind of great society where government interfered in every

1:40:33.680 --> 1:40:36.240
<v Speaker 1>part of people's lives. On the other hand, they did

1:40:36.320 --> 1:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not lie to themselves and think that law and policy

1:40:40.160 --> 1:40:43.439
<v Speaker 1>on matters of numbers, right on matters of economic policy,

1:40:44.160 --> 1:40:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we're just kind of morally neutral. They knew that law

1:40:47.920 --> 1:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>either encourages or discourages certain kinds of habit and certain

1:40:52.320 --> 1:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of kinds of behavior, and they didn't pretend otherwise.

1:40:55.520 --> 1:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>So the way I put it is, of course government

1:40:58.760 --> 1:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and law can't reach inside people and make them virtuous.

1:41:02.840 --> 1:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>That certainly is not something that law him do directly.

1:41:06.880 --> 1:41:10.599
<v Speaker 1>In fact, other institutions to be doing that much more

1:41:10.640 --> 1:41:15.679
<v Speaker 1>directly than government. On hand, I mean to reward certain

1:41:15.760 --> 1:41:18.519
<v Speaker 1>kinds of behavior and encourage it right, certain kinds of

1:41:18.640 --> 1:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>habits and ways of life, And it is to discourage

1:41:21.360 --> 1:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of habits and ways of life, and to

1:41:24.040 --> 1:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>pretend otherwise, I think is very dangerous. Where does Trump

1:41:29.680 --> 1:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>factor in in this thesis? I mentioned in my open

1:41:35.040 --> 1:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that in some sense what Tucker was explaining as why

1:41:38.240 --> 1:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump won while the elites failed, he called them out

1:41:40.960 --> 1:41:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on it. What is the takeaway in terms of what

1:41:43.439 --> 1:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the future of conservatism looks like? Is there something within

1:41:47.000 --> 1:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump that recognizes the problem and you can say, here

1:41:50.120 --> 1:41:52.280
<v Speaker 1>are the sorts of policies that we might want to

1:41:52.320 --> 1:41:54.879
<v Speaker 1>push for based upon what he saw in the electorate.

1:41:54.960 --> 1:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So I guess one question, what does the future of

1:41:57.080 --> 1:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>conservatism look like? Too? Well, the Republican rank and file

1:42:00.520 --> 1:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>simply reject this out of hand and take the sort

1:42:03.880 --> 1:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of view that, well, look, this was a blip in

1:42:06.320 --> 1:42:10.519
<v Speaker 1>US history. This president actually rejected everything that we show

1:42:10.560 --> 1:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it in our twenty twelve autopsy of why Mitt Romney

1:42:13.439 --> 1:42:18.479
<v Speaker 1>lost and the status quo will ultimately prevail again, well,

1:42:18.640 --> 1:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I certainly have the view that even though there are

1:42:21.120 --> 1:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>many people in Washington and elsewhere in power, you President Trump.

1:42:29.080 --> 1:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they think that once President Trump leaves the scene,

1:42:34.160 --> 1:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course they hope to force him out off

1:42:36.760 --> 1:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the scene, force him off the stage, they hope that

1:42:40.479 --> 1:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>things will go back to the way they were. And

1:42:42.120 --> 1:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a dangerous delusion as well. I

1:42:44.720 --> 1:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think things are going to go back to the

1:42:47.120 --> 1:42:49.880
<v Speaker 1>way they were. I think that what we're having is,

1:42:50.000 --> 1:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or what we should be having, is a very serious

1:42:52.000 --> 1:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>debate about what is a matter of principle and what's

1:42:55.040 --> 1:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a matter of policy. So principles should be the things

1:42:58.080 --> 1:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that don't change, right, that that dictate what kind of

1:43:01.400 --> 1:43:05.559
<v Speaker 1>policy we should propose given the circumstances. But policy changes

1:43:05.600 --> 1:43:09.479
<v Speaker 1>over time because we find ourselves in different circumstances. So,

1:43:10.320 --> 1:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, to give an example of I think what

1:43:12.720 --> 1:43:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump understands and what Trump can actually teach us, the

1:43:18.400 --> 1:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>federalis papers. Let's go all the way back to the

1:43:20.240 --> 1:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the ratification of the US Constitution. Our founders

1:43:23.760 --> 1:43:26.599
<v Speaker 1>are very clear about this. Justice is the end of government.

1:43:26.960 --> 1:43:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And Charles Kessler, the editor of the Claremont Review Books

1:43:30.200 --> 1:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>warned of this twenty years ago. He said, conservatives avoid

1:43:33.400 --> 1:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>arguing about questions of justice whenever possible, And by then

1:43:37.000 --> 1:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he meant, you know, they like to argue

1:43:38.400 --> 1:43:43.240
<v Speaker 1>about numbers in GDP and utilitarian kind of arguments of efficiency,

1:43:43.240 --> 1:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and they don't want to argue about justice. In the meantime,

1:43:45.479 --> 1:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the last talked about justice all the time, right, Social

1:43:48.040 --> 1:43:51.519
<v Speaker 1>justice is their mantra. And so if we avoid arguing

1:43:51.720 --> 1:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>about questions, of arguing about political questions and talking about justice,

1:43:56.800 --> 1:44:00.439
<v Speaker 1>we really are are essuing politics. Kessler said, a central

1:44:00.520 --> 1:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>issue is justice, and that's the problem. So the example

1:44:04.240 --> 1:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I would give is a matter of rhetoric when it

1:44:05.840 --> 1:44:09.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to economic policy. Whatever the policy should be, we

1:44:09.400 --> 1:44:11.879
<v Speaker 1>can debate about. We can debate about right with evidence

1:44:12.160 --> 1:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if we if we know Paris as an example, will

1:44:15.080 --> 1:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this lead to the ends that we will think about

1:44:19.040 --> 1:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the arguments that are going to win that resonate with people.

1:44:23.160 --> 1:44:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Trump's argument economically, over and over again is I care

1:44:26.560 --> 1:44:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about our people. My purpose is to make their lives better.

1:44:31.360 --> 1:44:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And he's very clear about that. He's very very simple

1:44:34.520 --> 1:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and stark language. Whereas conservatives are still in a way

1:44:38.200 --> 1:44:40.479
<v Speaker 1>fighting the Cold War in their Mind. You know they're

1:44:40.640 --> 1:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>fighting is the Soviet Union, and they'll say things like, well,

1:44:43.240 --> 1:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you know this is good because it's it's free, it

1:44:45.760 --> 1:44:48.760
<v Speaker 1>leads to freedom and it's part of the free market. Well,

1:44:48.840 --> 1:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>freedom is good, right, but freedom needs to be justified

1:44:52.280 --> 1:44:57.760
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately justice is the end of government. The name

1:44:57.800 --> 1:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the piece is Tucker Carlson is right. You can

1:45:00.960 --> 1:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>find it at the American Mind and we've been speaking

1:45:03.439 --> 1:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with its author, my friend, doctor Matt Peterson, vice president

1:45:06.240 --> 1:45:09.360
<v Speaker 1>at the Clermont Institute and also the editor of the

1:45:09.439 --> 1:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>new website, The American Mind. Doctor Peterson, thanks so much

1:45:12.080 --> 1:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thank you so much for having me,

1:45:15.400 --> 1:45:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be right back. This is Ben Winegarden in

1:45:17.360 --> 1:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sex and on the Buck sexon Show eight

1:45:19.320 --> 1:45:21.599
<v Speaker 1>four four nine zero zero buck. That's eight four four

1:45:21.840 --> 1:45:27.519
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero two eight two five. All right, So

1:45:27.600 --> 1:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we're about to round out our three here on the

1:45:29.680 --> 1:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sex and Show. And this has been Ben Winegarden

1:45:32.160 --> 1:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in four Buck Sex and follow me on Twitter at

1:45:34.200 --> 1:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>bh Winegarden. Check on my website at ben Winegarden dot com.

1:45:37.640 --> 1:45:40.240
<v Speaker 1>In our last interview, we spoke about one thing that

1:45:40.360 --> 1:45:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was very fundamental and it extends beyond any single presidency.

1:45:44.880 --> 1:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It's bigger than Donald Trump. It's bigger than Democrats and Republicans. Really,

1:45:49.160 --> 1:45:52.439
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the fact that our elites have failed us,

1:45:52.479 --> 1:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>our ruling class has failed us, and that extends beyond

1:45:55.920 --> 1:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>any one party. This outrage, this resistance, it extends beyond

1:46:00.120 --> 1:46:03.280
<v Speaker 1>any one party, because really, what Donald Trump represents is

1:46:03.320 --> 1:46:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a threat to the power of that failed, largely progressive,

1:46:07.040 --> 1:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan elite and a representation of what the American people

1:46:10.320 --> 1:46:12.800
<v Speaker 1>want and the American people being fed up with a

1:46:12.920 --> 1:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so called group of representatives that don't actually represent them.

1:46:16.240 --> 1:46:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So Trump, in my view, is a living, breathing symbol

1:46:19.479 --> 1:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that they've failed. He's constructed a massive Trump Tower in

1:46:23.200 --> 1:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>their collective heads. Again, this goes beyond any one presidency,

1:46:27.120 --> 1:46:29.519
<v Speaker 1>and it goes to the core of what our nation

1:46:29.680 --> 1:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is built on, and that is the idea of consent

1:46:32.840 --> 1:46:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the governed. That is how our republic works. The resistance,

1:46:37.040 --> 1:46:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the outrage, the intransigence of our political class is in

1:46:40.920 --> 1:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>direct proportion to how strong his punchback has been against them.

1:46:46.200 --> 1:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They hate him, they hate what he represents, because he

1:46:48.680 --> 1:46:53.880
<v Speaker 1>represents their failure, and he represents you, you, deplorable Americans,

1:46:54.320 --> 1:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>anyone who doesn't agree, anyone who dissents from the prevailing

1:46:57.960 --> 1:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>progressive orthodoxy. Finally, I just want to thank Buck sex

1:47:01.760 --> 1:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and for having me on tonight. It's been a real

1:47:03.880 --> 1:47:06.479
<v Speaker 1>honor and privilege. Hope you have a great weekend. Again,

1:47:06.560 --> 1:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this is Ben Weegarten. Follow me on Twitter at Bhwinegarden

1:47:09.520 --> 1:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and online at Benwegarden dot com. Thank you so much

1:47:12.040 --> 1:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and have a great weekend.