WEBVTT - Brandel Chamblee

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball in a frid Egg

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg, the dreaded Friday Egg, Friday, Frida Frida Egg

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bride Egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off the

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>golf course.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg Podcast. Today, I'm joined by Kyle Nathan and

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>we'd like to welcome on Golf Channel personality former PGA

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Tour winner and author of The Anatomy of Greatness, Brandal

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Chamblie Brandle. How's it going today, I'm fabulous. Nice to

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>join you guys, Kyle Andy. I follow you guys on Twitter.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I enjoy your work, So it's nice sit down and

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>talk a little golf with you guys.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, thanks for stopping by.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, real pleasure. I'm sure you're happy to get out

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago and come up here to the PGA Merchandise

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Show this week. It's like the whole world of golf

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is descended upon this spot. So it's a it's a

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an entertaining and vibrant week.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's there's an eclectic group of people out on

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 2>that floor.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there is everybody from last year when I went.

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, you run into every sort of entrepreneur you

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you could you could imagine, you know, and they'd all

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have some gadget that they'd spent ten years on, and

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you try it and you're like, yeah, there's

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely validity to this. You know, you know a way

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to go and you know, next thing, you know, ten

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of a merchant house, and the next thing ten just like,

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, I wouldn't have time to try all

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>these things out. But it's there's so much energy there

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and you realize that, you know, the world of golf,

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's so much invested in it, time, resources, money, passion,

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and everybody with any sort of pass is here this week.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It's there's two places where the world of golf really congregates,

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe three here this week, PGA Merchandise Show, Augusta and

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the Open Championship. Seems like everybody in the world goes

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to those three events.

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I think something that is often overlooked with golf, and

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 2>it is shown here through all like these gadgets, is

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>that golf's unlike any other sport where you have an

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>inverse relationship between like PGA Tour fans. So you figure

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>there's probably like three million, four million people that regularly

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>watch the PGA Tour, but twenty five million golfers. But

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the NBA, you have hundreds of

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>millions of fans and there's probably only about a million

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 2>people that actually play basketball regularly.

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good point. You know, same thing is

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>probably true with football. I mean, who plays football once

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you get out of high school? And yet you know

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, as they said in the movie, that

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got a day of the week. You know, golf

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is different. You know, to play it is is wonderful

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because you get to get outdoors and you get to

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>know people, even your own family, in a way you

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't befoor. But to watch it on TV, well it's

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not loud, nobody's running into each other, it's not violent.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I've fallen asleep more times than you know,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>watching golf telecast is what I do not anymore because

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to pay attention to it and to talk

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically about it. But you go home, you put the

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>golf on, you'd fall asleep somewhere in the front nine.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>You'd wake up when they're on fourteen or fifteen, you

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>go get a play to nachos, and you come back

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and watch the end of it. It was like, what was

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>better than that? You know, you can't fall asleep to

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a football game.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 2>That's something I always say. It's one of my favorite

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 2>things is how you can just fall asleep on the

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 2>couch and wake back up and you're.

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Like, are they're still make three birdies? Exactly? But now

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>now I can go back and see how they made it.

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Before I go, I have no idea. I've been asleep

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for an hour and a half. How the hell that

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>guy make three birdies in a row? Now you know,

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I have shot link on my computer, So I go back.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh god, he did, so where is that shot?

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I got to see it? Then of course you can

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>go to Twitter and find it because somebody will post it.

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So to kick things off, we had a big

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>week on professional golf with three big name Euros winning

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and would love to if the Ryder Cup was played today,

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>who would you pick to win?

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was played today in Paris, I'd probably pick Europe. Ye.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I was driving around the other day and you know,

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>something came on the radio about the US was going

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to dominate, and look, I mean, they've got an unprecedented

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>number of young players. But you start to think about Europe,

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>John Rahm and Tommy Fleetwood and Roy mackerel and Sergio Garcia,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>John Peters, mean Rose, justin Rose. It looks like Paul

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Casey's going to play on that, you know, I mean,

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody would be surprised if Paul Casey made the team.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>And I mean those are just off the top of

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>our head, you know. If you start to go down

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a little further, like, oh gosh, she's the hell of

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.559
<v Speaker 1>a player, and you think they're going to be in Paris,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they haven't won there since. They have won on four

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and solo of the US since nineteen ninety three. So

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd pick Europe, you know, I would, you know, I

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think it's a borgone conclusion that

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the competition is over. I don't even know where those

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>thoughts come from. I think they're preposterous.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I tend to agree with you. I would think I

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.119
<v Speaker 3>give him the choice. Personally, I would take Europe today,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and you know, one of their leaders is obviously going

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 3>to be John Rahm, who Andy has been a personal

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 3>fan favorite of for about a year now. How long

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 3>until we start talking about John Rahm as the best

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 3>player in the world.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's it's coming. You know, I can't imagine that

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going to topple Dustin Johnson off at the top

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>spot for a while. But John Rom's in his early twenties.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Johnson is sneaking up to his mid thirties, so

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he has a sort of a shelf life there.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>His skills will start to deteriorate soon. You know, within

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a year or two, he'll he'll lose a little something

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>off his fastball, and you know, it's just happens. And

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>John ram is, you know, he's got another decade in

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>his prime and he's got everything. You know, he really does.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>He's got everything. He's got the sort of savoy fair

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got the the arrogance which is so important, and

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment doesn't freeze him. You know, he didn't need

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an apprenticeship in the game of golf, which is so rare.

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems like we're getting more and more of that though.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, Jordan Speth didn't need an apprenticeship. Roy McRoy

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't need an apprenticeship. Those are you know, that's three

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last seven years that have just come out

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere and immediately looked like they were world class players.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's that's rare. Those players don't come along

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>very often. That's why we were blown away at Tiger

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and Phil. So John Romill be the number one player

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in the world at some point would surprise nobody.

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Andy and I talked about yesterday about the level of

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 3>consistency he's played with, which I mean he's in the

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 3>top ten fifteen literally every single week, and who the

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>last player to be as consistent as he has been,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>And the only name we really could come up with

0:06:58.800 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 3>was Tiger.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Well that's about right. Yeah, I mean if you look

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>at if you look at his ascendency to where he's

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at in the world rankings. It's of course when you

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>start out, you don't have points falling off because you

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't played any so you're just gaining them in the

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>world rankings. But yeah, you're right, I mean, not like Tiger,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody like Tiger, but more like Tiger than Justin Thomas,

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, even just Thomas was a heck

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of a player, but nobody. You just don't see someone

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>come along like a John Rahm. Yeah, you know. I

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>always look at what intrigues me is where these players

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>come from and how they play. It's not so much

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what they do, it's how they do it. And so

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>when I look at Saya John Rahm and you think,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>how did he get here? How did he arrive on

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the on the scene with such it's not unprecedented. It's

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>precocious really, because you're just not supposed to do those things.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw it come up with Tiger, but generally you're

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just not supposed to do those things. There's been thirty

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one players that have ascended to the number one spot

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I am in the rankings, every one

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of them. You'd look at them and you go wow.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. I go back and I've read about every

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those players, every single one of them. The

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>very first one was Richie Ramsey back in two thousand

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and seven. And you go back and you read and there,

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>can't miss, can't miss, He's number one of the world.

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Can't miss, no way he's going to miss. But of

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>those thirty one, there are only nine that have managed

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to win PGA Tour events. Roy McRoy, Jordan Speth, Ricky Fowler,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Danny Willett, Michael Thompson, Danny Lee, Hadeki Matsiyama, Patrick Cantley,

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and John Rumm. Now, of those nine, most of them,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of Danny Willett, well, all of them,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of Danny Willett, were either taught themselves

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to play, or they learned to play with just some

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>local teacher around their area, and they never deviated from that.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So and I'm not saying, and here's the fine point

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of it, I'm not saying that the information that everybody

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>else is getting is bad at all. It's good information.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I go back and I look at it, and I

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>read it. It's good information. But we're in an age

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>where there is so much information that it blows the

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>circuits of players. I was involved in the very very

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing. I see it. I see a player, he

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>comes out, he's the best player in the world, and

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got all this information, he got all this access.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He changes coaches, he changes coaches, he changes coaches, he

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>changes coaches, and the next thing you know, they're nowhere

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>near the player that they were. So here's John Rohm.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>No one would teach that golf swing. No one just

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>came out of nowhere, and he doesn't play with the

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of timidity that somebody does who's constantly looking at

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a screen and feeling like he needs to change something.

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So there is you know that I pay attention to that.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>That matters to me because how do you get the

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>best out of an athlete? How do they play their best?

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it with information or is it with freedom? More

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>times than not, it's with freedom.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting. It sounds like feel and I think

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe the ability to adapt because you know your own

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 3>swing so well sounds so important.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Well that's true, but you know, if you're think about it,

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. You pick the player. We go look

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>at a video screen. With the exception of Adam Scott,

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you can find a fault in their golf swing very quickly.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter wherever they're at. You'll find a fault

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with their grip, their takeaway, some point in their backswing,

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>their transition. I can pick it apart, so can every

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>other teacher. Okay, we can pick it apart. We can

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>find fault with it. Now, if you're looking for perfection, swing, perfection, everything,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>perf we're gonna get perfect. There's this, there's this, there's this,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and you sit there and you're like, well, you're not

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>quite there yet. You're not quite there yet. And every

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>time you look at that video, you're reminded of something

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's inadequate about your move. In time, that timidity grows,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you lose your confidence and you're seeking, you know, perfection.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>If when you see perfection, you're literally seeking something that

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>does not exist. You're chasing something that doesn't exist. John

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Ram is not chasing perfection. He's chasing wins. He's going

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhere with his game. A lot of people are trying

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to go somewhere with their golf swing. And that's the

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>fine point of it.

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>So in your own golf game, I know you're, you know,

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>about as knowledgeable about the swing as anybody. Did you

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 3>find yourself trying to perfect the swing too much?

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I did? You know? I was a great player in college,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the two or three best players in the country.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was extraordinary. I could hit it far,

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I could hit it long, high, straight, curve it any direction.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I was amazing. But when I, for whatever reason, when

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I got out onto where, all of a sudden, you're

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by people that have great knowledge of the golf swing,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and and they're just there, They're around you constantly, and

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>inevitably you start talking to them, and then what they

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>say makes sense. You know, that makes sense, So you

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>try it, and then you try it and it doesn't work,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>or it does work, and then you try it and

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the next thing, you know, the golf swing I played

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on the tour with for a better part of fifteen

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>years looked nothing like the swing I had in college.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I didn't even I go back now. I

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>look at my swing in college, and I look at

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the swing I was playing on the tour with them,

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like they're not even the same person. I'm I now

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>swing like I did in college, and I swing that

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>way only because I know now that that is the

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>way to swing a golf club. That all the things

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that I was being taught were wrong. I mean, if

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they were doctors, they should be sued from malpractice. They

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>were just wrong, out of their minds wrong. So I

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I lived it. You know, I went

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to many of the top one hundred teachers, there's many

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of them, studied their ideas and then took them out

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and tried to make them work. And I'm I was

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>an athlete. I could do anything. I could make anything work.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I see. If you get out on tour,

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're good enough to get out on tour, you're extraordinary.

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You're an extraordinary athlete. You can do anything. You take

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>me to a fair, we walk away with all the

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>big toys, you know, and every tour players that way.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>They can throw balls, they can catch balls, they can

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>move any So I can make anything work, and so

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>can tour players. So you know, you're convinced through your

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>own athleticism and your ability to do things, that there

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>might be merit to whatever it is you're trying. You know,

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with me, it was rotate the face, keep the club

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>head outside your hands, resist with the turn, squat down

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in the right leg, feel the tension in the right leg,

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, snap, drag the club on the way back,

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and then quickly change direction. All these things. Next thing,

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd go play with my buddies and they'd say, well,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>you're a change of direction is quick. Your backswing's not

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>as long. Slow it down, And You're like, well, yeah, yeah,

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is because I'm not turning, because I'm

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>being told time and time again that I can hit

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it further without a turn because I build tension, you

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>know that. And that's why I wrote and continue to

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>write about that topic, is because it still pervades in

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the game of golf. It's still everywhere in the game

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of golf. I watched TV and I just see players

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>restricting their turns, and I think it's just at some

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>point they'll figure it out in their lives. It's wrong,

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but the thought still pervades the game of golf.

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>It's funny. I'm not really I don't think about my

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>golf swing that much. But since I started going to

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 2>an instructor like eight years ago. He's a young guy,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 2>he's a buddy of a buddy, and I go there.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I see him like a couple times a year. But

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>we've got just a few things we work on. I

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 2>never look at my swing on video and I'm playing

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the best golf of my life.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Well that I mean that. That is a great teacher,

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they're don't get me wrong. There are

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great teachers out there, a lot and

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the genius of a great teachers that they can take

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>everything they know and boil it down to something very simple,

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like you go get a lesson. They're not trying to

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>show you how smart they are. They're just trying to

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>help you become a better golfer. And you know, it

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>can be as simple as you know, fill your hands

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>on your right shoulder going back and on your left

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>shoulder going to That could do it. You know, it's

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>just as simple as that. Anything. You know, they don't

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to elaborate anymore. And then they certainly

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>don't need to put your golf swing on video. Hank

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Haney told me the entire time he worked with Tiger Woods,

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I was had from two thousand and four to six

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>seven years, six years, he only put his golf swing

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on the video. A handful of times they didn't. They

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't use video as a general rule. They would just

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about shots, you know, and and having a fluency

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of what Hank calls the nine shots.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>It's uh, do you think that track man has you know,

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>diminished the naturalness of golf?

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, track Man is is interesting. I have

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it in the past, called it a toy, and you know,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the more accurate word is a luxury. It was a luxury.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say it came about. You know, it started

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>being pervasive on the PGA Tour in two thousand and six,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's gone from being a luxury to being a necessity,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, like your computer and your cell phone in

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a microwave and a TV. Initially they were luxuries, luxuries

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and now they're necessities. And I get it. If you're

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>building equipment, there's a need for precision, the precision that

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you get from track Man, and I get it from

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a scientific standpoint of trying to understand exactly what's going on.

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That precision is needed. You need that, okay, and track

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Man gives you that. But the disconnect starts to happen

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when what is what a teacher needs it for precision

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in understanding what's happening in the golf swing, but it's

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>not essential to a player. It has not been demonstrated

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to me that it has improved play on the PGA

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Tour if you go back and look in two thousand

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and six, when track Man first arrived on the PGA

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Tour twenty seventeen, so over a decade, players are more

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>inaccurate off of the tee. They hit it further away

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>from the hull. You know, scoring average has improved point

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>two percent of a shot, so two tents of a shot.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But most of that improvement, almost all of it is

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>from their improvement on the greens. It's not from what

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the agronomy exactly. You're breeding my mind and better strokes agronomy.

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But what they're doing tee to green is not better,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's worse. They are hitting it further, no question about that.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's due to the observation that launch angle,

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>optimizing launch angle and spin rate, and the idea that

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>when you get on track man, people will talk about

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>maximizing your length. Say to maximize your link, you have

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to hit up on it. Okay, that's in any video

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll watch on track Man, they'll talk to They'll say,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>in order to maximize your link, you need to hit

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on it. And I think that's important to amateur golfers,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. You know most of them can

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>hit up on it and pick up ten twenty thirty

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>yards just like that. But in professional golf, you won't

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>hear anybody say to maximize accuracy, you need to hit

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>down on it slightly with your driver. Nobody will say that.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>They won't go there. But if one is true, shouldn't

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the opposite hold true. So, and the reason they won't

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is because there's no doubt on that they don't know.

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>They don't know if hitting one degree down on or

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>two degrees down on it actually does make you hit

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>it straighter. But in my mind it does. So I

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>think across the board you have people trying to hit

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it as far as they can by hitting it high

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>with little spin. So they're three yards longer over a decade,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but they hit it more in the rough, a fair

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>amount rough, and they're further away from the hole, so

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not It's not essential that a player use it

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to get better because it hasn't made them better. Yeah,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking we're not talking about one or two years.

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Here were over a decade. Four hundred professionals are carrying

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>track man's with them right now. Four hundred carried around

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with them, and you know, it's not clear that it's

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>made them better.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Matt Fitzpatrick was on the No Laying Up podcast last

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 2>week and he actually talked about how in the middle

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of last year he was chasing, trying to really get

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 2>the most out of his distance, and the performance like

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 2>he had a string of bad, really bad performances and

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 2>he went back to, you know, hitting fairways. He realized

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>how important it was for him to hit faaraways. And

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's something that gets overlooked with guys that

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>aren't mega long, is it's so important for them to

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 2>hit fairaways because that's they get there's such a disadvantage

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 2>in the rough they missed the fairway.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So true, and you know, a fine point there for

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody is that when you get on track man inevitably

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the video goes, well you could hit it further if

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you hit it higher, Well, how do you hit it higher?

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>You can just move the ball up a little bit.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But inevitably it goes with either leaning your hips towards

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, moving your hips towards the target and changing

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>your acess tilt where your you know, your your upper

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>body leans backwards, or you change your release pattern. Either

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>way you're changing something for a few extra yards. And

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have the power to hit it three ten,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>three twenty, it's very important. And Matthew Fitzpatrick doesn't need

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.959
<v Speaker 1>you need to find fairways. Again, you don't hear I

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>don't hear many people and I go online and I

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>watch them all. I watch their lessons. All these teachers,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I just click on their lessons and I watch them

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and I listen to them, and I take notes, and

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't hear them talking about maximizing accuracy. I hear

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>them talking a lot about maximizing distance, and then you know,

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>obsessing about path and face angle. And they they will say,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you go listen to them. They'll say, these are new

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>ball flight laws. Like nobody knew this stuff before. Paul

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Runyon was a heck of a player back in the

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>thirties and forties. He wrote a book and in that

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>book he talks about if the club's going down the

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>path is to the right, if the club's going up

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>path is to the left. He knew it eighty years ago.

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>He wrote about it eighty years ago. You know, I

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>don't need to spend twenty five thousand dollars on a

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>machine that's going to tell me that if I'm descending,

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>my path is going to the right. You know what

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I used to do when I hit punch shots, I

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>aimed left. I aimed left because when I hit punches

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they would go to the right. I've pretty much figured

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that because I was steeper hitting a punch shot, the

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>path was to the right, so I aimed left. Do

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>you know why most golfers in the history of the

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour have aimed left off of the t because

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>they're hitting one degree down on it. Generally speaking, a

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are hitting it, hitting more up on

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it now for distance, but they were hitting down on it,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and they knew that they were hitting down on it.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe they didn't use those words, but they

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>knew that when they tried to aim straight, the ball

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>would start right, so they just opened up.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I remember watching a pregame show where you said most

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 2>of the great ball strikers and golf aimed left off

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the tee especially, and it's always stuck with me. And

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 2>since I started aiming left, I've driven the ball a

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 2>lot better.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Well. Aim and left is it allows you to do

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>so many things. You know, it allows you to build

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a nice brace into your right side going back and

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>push off you know, your right leg, but it also

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>allows you to clear faster and open up, which which

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>holds off your release, and it gives you a more

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>stable release through the ball. But all those things tor

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pros used to do instinctively.

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 3>So speaking of technology and track man, obviously technology is

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>a hot topic, not only this we in Orlando, but

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 3>all across the PGA Tour. Where do you see the

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 3>game evolving from here and with you know, obviously the

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 3>golf ball and the clubs getting stronger and more powerful.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Will PGA Tour courses be able to hold up over

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the testimony?

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, the line in the sand has been drawn. You know,

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>there's something known as the rebound effect in the face.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>The drivers, you guys would know what it's called. Cor

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that line is drawn, you cannot have a face with

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>any more rebound in it going forward. The volume of

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a head, the line in the sand is drawn, it

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>can't get any bigger than four to sixty ccs. The

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>moi then can't get any more. The moment of inertia

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can't get anymore. The length of a driver can't get anymore,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the speed of a golf ball can't get any more. So,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for the first time ever in the history of golf,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the parameters for distance have been set. They're set in

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>stone and they're not going to change. So, for the

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>first time ever, any improvements in driving distance or accuracy,

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or greens and regulation or score can be rightly attributed

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to the athlete. You know, for the last twenty thirty years,

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>every single time someone hit it further or there was

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a better scoring and it was always the equipment. Blame

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the ball, blame the clubs. And now you can actually

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>look at the athlete and go wow. You know, I

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think since nineteen eighty to now, tour pros are thirty

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>six yards longer thirty six yards, and there's a lot

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that makes up that thirty six yards. It's not just

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball. It's the rebound effect in the driver. It's

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the length of the driver, it's the forgiveness in the

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>head which encourage you to just swing harder. It's the agronomy.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And then finally it's the athlete. You know, you look

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at them, I mean they look like you know, Olympic athletes.

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>They used to look like plumbers, and you know, they

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball further because of it. A lot of

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>those factors. So now going forward, we're going to see

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>cool stuff. They're going to have to figure out how

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize the face. Taylor mate's got a new driver,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Calloway's got a new driver. You look at them and

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>there's arts for both of them. They're really cool, but

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not about speed. They're about strength or about accuracy. More.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you say the PGA tour folded tomorrow and you

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 2>are the commissioner of a brand new tour, what would

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 2>equipment look like?

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I wouldn't. I wouldn't change equipment. I wouldn't at all.

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't roll back the equipment. I wouldn't roll back

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I'm you know. The the thing that was

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>missed in equipment was originally there was supposed to be

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>no rebound in the face, but drivers were made in

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties with rebound and the USGA didn't call

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>kings X on the deal, and so the horse literally

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was out of the barn. And because they got a

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>nice run, they felt like, for whatever reason, they weren't

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna retroactively disallow them. So I'm quite happy. But if

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I were the one thing I would do, if I

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>were the commissioner of the PGA tours, I would implore

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the u s GA or rewrite the anchoring rule. You know,

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very vague, it is poorly applied, and it's caused

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of acrimony, and you know, it's it's it's

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not fun to watch. So I would definitely have

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that I would either allow it or disallow it properly,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>with proper language.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like the I use the arm locked for a while,

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and I know Bryson uses it, Kutre uses it. How

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 2>is that different than using like a belly putter.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I mean I hear that, you know. You know,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>my my response to that would be, is that the

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>butt end of the club when you when you use

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a belly putter, you've you've created a folk rum when

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you when you lock your putter against your arm. Yeah,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there is benefits to that, no question about it, but

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you you haven't created a full crumble. What I would

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.719
<v Speaker 1>argue is that and you know, look, I don't know.

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the answer is is that is that you have

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>to have both hands on the club. You know, you

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have to have both hands on the putter. But then again,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I've seen people put one handed, you know. Have you

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>seen all these schnyder Dans do that? Have you seen him,

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean takes it back with two hands, hits it

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>with one hand. You know, Mike Hulbert putted one handed

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>for a while on the PGA tour. So you know,

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely address and talk to all the governing

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bodies about the clearing up the ambiguity and big Euwey

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous nature. Excuse me of the ruling on the anchored putter.

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 3>So there's no question in your mind right now that

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 3>there are people that are anchoring.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's no question in my mind that they look

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like they're answered. You know, what they're doing is legal

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 1>because you know they've looked quite closely at it, and

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>those that are doing it explain it to those that

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>are looking closely at it, and those that are in

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>charge of making the rules say there is you know,

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong here. It just looks like there is.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, and I do argue, that if it

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>touches your shirt, that that provides a soft anchor, it's

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>well within the rules. So what they're doing is legal.

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's not. But in my mind, if

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you touch your shirt, then I have some spatial awareness

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of where the fulcrum is, and I think personally that's

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. Billy Casper did the same thing. You know,

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he touched his left leg when he putt it. You know,

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't illegal then nobody even talked about it. It

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was just a stroke that was peculiar to him, and

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>he was one of the great putters of all time.

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm writing a book right now on short game and putting,

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and Billy Casper will certainly be in it, no question

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about it, you know, because I love the way his

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>putter had worked. But you know, at various times he

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>touched his left leg with his putter, and to you

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>know that that gives you spatial awareness where the full

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>crum is. And it's difficult to write a rule that

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>disallows somebody touching their clothes because at some point when

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you swing, say, if you've got a jacket on, it's

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>going to touch your clothes, right if it's windy. I

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>get the difficulty in the language and the ambiguity with

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the language. I get that, but I would make it

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a priority and then try to figure out how to

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know, in my mind it does provide a

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>soft anchor, and that's what I call it. Again, they're

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>well within their rules to do it. I tell the

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>players that are doing it, it's clearly it's legal. Keep

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on at it. But if I were the commission of

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the tour, I would change that.

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I've definitely seen more close up of Longer's chest that

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I need to see for a whole.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Right. It's like, you know, we've got this bizarre right,

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's because of the rule. We shouldn't be focusing

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.959
<v Speaker 1>on that. But the whole world of golf is because

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>anytime you see you know, there's several players out there,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not just Langer that are doing that. Your attention

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>goes right to that spot and it takes away from

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing otherwise.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>So if you could take any of today's great players

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>and pit them against a player of another generation, for

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 2>like in their prime, for a live TV match, who

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 2>what would the match be?

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's pretty easy.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Tiger two thousand against Jack sixty.

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Five today, player today, Oh.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Player today right now against somebody? Oh well, Jordan Speaeth

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen against Tiger two thousand.

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, do you think that's comparable.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>No, there'll never be another Tiger ever. Tiger was shakes beer.

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, five hundred years from now, for the species survives,

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll be talking about Tiger Woods. You know, as the

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>by far the greatest golfer of all time. You know,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no bigger Jack Nicholas fan in the world than me,

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not only as a father and a the way he

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>handled himself in the game and the way he played it.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I never thought i'd see anything like him. But from

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>just a purely golf standpoint, when I'm around people that

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>say Jack was the better player, I'm like, well, you

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>really haven't looked at it. Then Tiger's win percentage was double,

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>his average margin of victory was double. You know, his

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>wins five shots or more was a double. You know,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you start running up against this at double twice as good.

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>That's twice as good as Jack. A lot. When you

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>start looking at Tiger and Jack twice as good, twice

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>as good, twice as good, it pops up over and

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>over and over.

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 3>It And what we mentioned the athletes have you know,

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>evolved for time to be better?

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I mean Jack was one hell of an athlete,

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. And Jack is and that look

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's you say you can't compare errors. I hear it

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time. It's like, no, everybody does. You can.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It's inconvenient because somebody's general gets demoted to corporal, you know,

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know you can. And I think it's important

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to study the best because it's like whatever worked is

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what does work? You know, what did Tiger did? What

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.239
<v Speaker 1>made him so good. I'd love to see that, you know,

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Rory McRoy at his best against Tiger or Jack or Hogan,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you know, I'd love to see Tiger

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at his best, you know, Tiger two thousand against Hogan

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty three. You know, I'd give anything to see that,

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, or the best would be you know,

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Jones in thirty, Jack sixty five or seventy two.

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Take your pick, Hogan fifty three, Tiger two thousand. You

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>get those four, and that's that's the greatest golf that's

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ever been played. You know, there are a lot of

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>good players in the game right now, but we were

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>blessed to have been able to watch Tiger Woods. Absolutely. Yeah.

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of some of the you know, great classic swings,

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 3>who's on your mount rushmore of golf swings.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, Sam Snead, you know, there's you know, there are

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different ways to do that. I'm writing

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a book right now in the short game, but I'm

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>halfway through a book that'll come out right after that.

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>The third book, all right, is just the one hundred

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>greatest swings of all time? Who had it, what they did?

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And so when you discuss that. Is it from an

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic standpoint? Is it from a success standpoint? You know

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what makes a great golf swing. But Calvin Pete will

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly be in there. You know, Calvin Pete is the

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>straightest hitters ever played the game. And you know, I

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>hear it over and over again when I say Calvin

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Pete's the straightest hitters ever play the game, and people

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are like, yeah because of his broken left arm, Like no, no,

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it is so quick. It doesn't matter. You choose a player,

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't matter who it is, John Day, Bubba Watson.

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>The way the world dismisses what they do is by

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>calling them a freak or attributing their success to some

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>idio secrecy, because I don't know why. People are just

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable dealing with the move. The move they made is

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>what made him a straight hitter. And Calvin Pete's move

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was very similar to Ben Hogan's. Now if we if

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they had statistics back then, I have no doubt that

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Ben Hogan would have hit it. You know, he'd have

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>been in Calvin Pete's neighborhood, very very similar body motions.

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Hogan would have been longer because Hogan was a phenomenal athlete,

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>so Ben Hogan, Sam's need Tiger Woods two thousand. You know,

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>those those are the Mount Rushmore of golf swings.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 3>We have a golf gambling at game at all. You know,

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the guy in the middle plays the guy on the

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 3>left and the guy on the right, and we call

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 3>it the Calvin Peak game.

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, no kidding, Yeah, well, I mean, I'm just I'm

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>amazed at how little people talk about his golf swing.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You think about it. I'm around people all the time

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about golf swings, and they'll never ever bring up

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Pete's golf swing. Here's a guy that led driving

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>accuracy ten years in a row. Whoever led driving accuracy

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, I'm trying to remember who it was. Anyway,

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>whoever it was, I wrote it down, I forgot it.

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But they won't lead it this year, you know. And

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>whoever let it five years ago didn't lead it the

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>next year. You know. You know, Fred Funk had a

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>nice run in there, Jerry Kelly, Joe Durant, Mike Read.

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they very straight hitters, no question about it.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But only one person to ten years in a row,

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>ten in a row, and also led greens and regulation.

0:35:59.280 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you look at his golf swing. If

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I put it face to face right and I put

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben Hogan right beside him and they start to make

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>their move into the backswing, you will see that they

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>both they both move right. They both very early straighten

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the right leg and it's not rigid. It's not locked,

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that, but it straightens. It's straight in

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to where when you're looking at it face on, it

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like a ruler straight and then they turn their

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>hips against that and then they use that pressure to

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>push into their left side and they move latterly and

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>then they extend and they rotate, and that move is

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not resisting with the lower body. It's not keeping flexing

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the right leg. But you go out on a range

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>right now and there'll be somebody out there teaching keep

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the flexing the right leg and resist lower body. Meanwhile,

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the person who had it straighter and anybody ever has

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>ever didn't do that, and nor did Ben Hogan.

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 2>So with today's game, in the last two years, we've

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>seen and the a correlation between driving distance and the

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 2>top fifteen twenty players in the world, and players like

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Zach Johnson Jim Furrea, Kluke Donald tumble down in the

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 2>world rankings. Are we in an era where distance is

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 2>becoming almost a prerequisite for greatness?

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think so. You know, it's always been

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that way. If you go back and you look at

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the players that have won the Varden Trophy more times

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>than not, they were, you know, costly long off the tee.

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, now, cal Pete did win the Varden Trophy,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>but Byron Nelson. You know, Jack would have won it

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 1>almost every year he played. He just didn't play enough events.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>So I count Jack lowest scoring average, Ben Hogan. You

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know Tiger Woods, you know, you go back, and distance

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.399
<v Speaker 1>had something to do with it. There was an era,

0:37:56.239 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that where we had dominant with short hitters.

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Nick Faldo wasn't a long hitter. He had

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>some dominant Certainly, Lee Trevino had some success. He wasn't

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>a long hitter. But Tom Watson was long, very very long.

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Jack was long, Miller was long, Wisecoff was long, Palmer

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>was long. You know, Gary player was certainly not short,

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, and he's still long. He's still long, right,

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>guy hits it further than I do, you know, he's uh,

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I watch him and I think, God, you

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>know that is you know a lot of people have

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>probably rolled their eyes at Gary over the years. You know,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>his his incessant chirping about fitness. But wouldn't you all,

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we would all love to be him when

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we're eighty some odd years old. The guy just lit

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>up like a Roman candle. And when he comes on TV. Yeah,

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, every eighty year old man is entitled to

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>just drone on about something ridiculous that is is is

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of interest to them. But but my god, and shouldn't

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we all have that kind of passion at eighty plus

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>years of age? And he and his wife they just

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>celebrated their sixty first wedding anniversary. They met when they

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>were both teenagers. And I mean, the story's amazing. And

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>he's a I mean, look, he's eighty seven years old.

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a good looking man. I mean, he looks like

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he could be in he could be He's like George

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Clooney of eighty year old men. He's just you know,

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>he looks like he could be a movie star. So

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I have my marvel at Gary. Uh, you know, and

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>in this era we've had let's see. You know, Matt

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Coocher tremendous success, not a long hitter, Jordan Speed, you know,

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeorge Speth is he's.

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Above average though he's in the top half of the

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour. What I'm saying is like, yeah, is are

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 2>we going to see a world number one that's not

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 2>in the top half of the PGA Tour and driving?

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, we're in a I mean, it's gonna

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be tough because there are so many good athletes. Now

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's you know, Luke Donald did it. You know,

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he got to be number one, and Luke didn't hit

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it long, and he didn't hit it particularly streight. But Luke, Luke,

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had a phenomenal year that with a

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.399
<v Speaker 1>year of desirons, No question, his irons were great. But

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Luke is you know, we marveled at Ben Hogan his

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>ability to hit a golf ball, But Luke Donald is

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben Hogan of the short game. You know, I mean,

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in the same way we marveled Ben, we should be

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>marveling at Luke Donald and Steve Stricker. You know, the

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>way they chipped the ball, pitch the ball, hit bunker

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 1>shots and putt. You know, Luke Donald was able to

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>overcome disadvantages of not being long or straight. For crying

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>out loud that I mean, then you can't eve get

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on tour one long or straight and he became a

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>number one player. Well, I love watching Luke Donald play

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the game.

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And we so we've talked about Faldo before and I'm curious.

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's won six majors, six six would he

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 3>be able to win a major in today's Oh?

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely. You know the things that made Nick great,

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, look, Nick was playing against longer hitters,

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Greg Norman. You know he schooled Norman. Norman was much

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>much longer than him. You know, he played against Nick Price.

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Nick Price was only Ian Woosno, Ian Woos was really long.

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.919
<v Speaker 2>So a question is what about the technology has completely changed?

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 2>The ball doesn't spend as much. Could that have a factor?

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, you say it doesn't spend. I mean,

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the average driving distance is two hundred and

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.879
<v Speaker 1>ninety plus yards. You know, guys are not hitting long

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>clubs into greens anymore. Doesn't spin as much, but it

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lands at a much steeper angle. You know, distance is

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>always going to be a huge advantage. It always has

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>been it always. You start to look at the players

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that have dominated, you know, top ten of all time.

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>There's not a short hitter in there, you know, I

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>mean there's not. I mean Bobby Jones long, Tiger Woods long,

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>crazy long, Nicholas crazy long, Byron Nelson, you know, he

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't he wasn't Sam Sneed long, but he was long.

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Walter Hagen. You know, you go down the list and

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.479
<v Speaker 1>you'd get to Gene Saracen. But if you ever watched

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Geene saras and hit a golf well, no, he wasn't

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the longest, but he wasn't short. You know, Palmer long.

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, distance has always dominated, and the hardest thing

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to do in golf is hit it long and straight.

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's the thing that interests me the most. So

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm always on the lookout for any any player, any method,

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 1>any idea that demonstrates an ability to hit the ball

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>long and straight. That's what keeps me up at night,

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, is who hits it the furthest and who

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>hits it the straightest.

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 2>So who's your favorite player or like, who are you

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 2>most bullish on of a player that's outside the top

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 2>fifty in the world rankings right now, if you had

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 2>to pick one, Oh, I don't know.

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Dylan, for Telly is amazing. You know, what he's been

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>able to do in the game so quickly certainly gets

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>my attention. There's no question about that. You know. He

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>pops up and you're like, oh geez, this kid is

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, consistently winning. This The kid that's number one

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world right now in the amateur rankings, Neeman Newman.

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I think he just ran He's hat sixty three in

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 2>the LA the Latin America right right.

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, he's from Chile. You know, I'm amazed.

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the most amazing you know, we're

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about men's golf, but one of the most amazing

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 1>things in the last fifteen years of golf is the

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>number of good players to come from South Korea and

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>good good golf swings. I was talking to a coach

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>from Korea yesterday and I, you know, I asked him

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that question because I spent a lot of time thinking

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about that question, and there are no teaching academies in Korea.

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>There's really no there's no teaching so it's like a

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>hold on a second what's going on here. And you know,

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>golf is a pastime over there. Kids have clubs in

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 1>their hands by the time they're four, and they're out swinging,

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the playgrounds, and you know they're they're

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>coming to these the game early when your ability to

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>imitate is you know, at its peak, and they you know,

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they bring a work ethic to the game. But there's

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:07.879
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of instruction in South Korea. And yet

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we see great swing after great swing because they're going

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, they're watching and they're imitating.

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing. That speaks to your homegrown you know.

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:18.399
<v Speaker 1>You know who's the best swing of golf right now?

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Adam Scott. Yeah, okay, you know Adam Scott's teacher is

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Adam Scott. Who's the greatest swing of all time? Sam Sneat.

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You know who Sam Sneed's teacher was, Sam Snead. Ben Hogan.

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>You know who Ben Hogan's teacher was, Ben Hogan. So

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, now, Tiger and Jack were taught by teachers.

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that teachers don't have their place. They do.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I I'm not I'm not at all insinuation, and I'm

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just saying that you are quite capable on your own

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>of creating a great move, you know, and if you're

0:44:53.880 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>lucky enough to find a good instructor, then well fortunate.

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>You're fortunate because there are far more tragedies and instruction

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>at the professional rank than there is successes.

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 2>So Tiger recently announced he's, you know, he's splitting with

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Como and he's kind of going with just himself. Where's

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Tiger going to end the year ranked in the world rankings.

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. Probably close to the top fifty,

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is you know, I didn't think that

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Tiger would come back with a golf swing like that.

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think he'd come back with speed like that. So,

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he and I I, you know, I was

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>asked about it obviously a lot, and I said, you know,

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm wrong, and I'm happy to be wrong.

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, he'll still have to get over and find

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.839
<v Speaker 1>a way around his short game woes, because those are

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>not gone by any stretch of the imagination. But golf

0:45:57.160 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>swing wise, I think, you know, he's got a good enough,

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>good enough golf swing and enough speed to go out

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:05.240
<v Speaker 1>there and contend.

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Something we were talking about last night with short game

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 2>is how long rough around the greens we were saying,

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 2>compared to short grass around the greens actually is.

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Good for Oh yeah, absolutely. If you've got some wiggle

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>room underneath the ball, then you don't have to be

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:29.839
<v Speaker 1>so precise and it you know, you can move it up,

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you can move it back. You've got wiggle room under

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the ball. But when you've got a tight lie and

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a straightforward pitch shot, you know, the

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>need to be precise is there. And when you've hit

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as many bad chips as we've seen Tiger Woods hit

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>over the last four or five years, you think about it.

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Their foremost in our mind. I promise you, they're foremost

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in his right and he has to chisel through a

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>wall of doubt before every single chip shot he hits.

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Everyone and his competitors are walking up to a chip

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:06.399
<v Speaker 1>shot with you know, blood in their eyes. You know

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're trying to hold it and and that's

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the difference. And people, you know, every time Tiger

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:16.359
<v Speaker 1>hits a good chip, I'll get a tweet from somebody saying,

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>see he doesn't have the yips, or actually I'll get

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred, you know, or a thousand and uh, you know,

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you idiot, and and and then and then and then

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:31.240
<v Speaker 1>two three holes later when he chunks one, my Twitter

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>feed will go silent. You know, It's like I'm like, yeah,

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, where are you chirpers now? Uh? And I

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, I hope he figures it out, but

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anybody figure the chippy yips out. There

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was a player from Australia by the name of Brett

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Ogle who was a hell of a player, won very

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 1>quickly on the PGA Tour Pebble Beach in the early

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>nineties and long and straight and just you know at everything.

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was abrasive in the right ways. You

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 1>know how he got the chippy nips and he was

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>off the tour and gone and in a year. I've

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>never seen anybody recover from them. So you know, Tiger

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.760
<v Speaker 1>took two chips to get on the green seven times

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Hero seven times, it took him two chips

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to green it. If there had been shot link that week,

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>he would have been dead last. In the statistic that

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I look at is it's arg it's how close you chip.

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you hit a chip shot on average,

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>how close does it finish next to the hole. That

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is the truest measure of who's the best chipper. And

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 1>every year, you know, I mean very rarely where you

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 1>see somebody get below six feet, that person will lead

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>all around. That's that's Steve Stricker, That's that's who does that.

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom will be around eight feet on average.

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>They're going to chip at a feet. A huge percentage

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>difference between how many six footers you make and how

0:48:56.239 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>many eight footers you make. And you know, the last

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the last top ten the Tiger had on the tour

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was Wyndham. Was that twenty fifteen and he finished tenth.

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>He averaged thirteen feet seven inches on his chip shots

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that week to the whole thirteen feet last on the

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>tour is eight feet, so best is six feet, so

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>twice as bad as the best, considerably worse than the worst.

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You know that a big difference between putting an a

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 1>footer and a thirteen footer percentage wise.

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 2>So the Aaron Hills last year got maligned by yeah

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.720
<v Speaker 2>because of scoring, but one of the things I loved

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 2>about it was all the short grass around the greens,

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and like I think the round that really showcased that

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 2>was Patrick Reid's third round where he hit I think

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 2>eleven greens and shot sixty five right, and he continually

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 2>fired at flags and he short sighted himself, but he

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 2>relied on what he's best at. Yeah, do you think

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 2>more tour setups should have more short grass around?

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't. You know, Look, we already have

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that major is called Augusta National, and we kind of

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have it at the Open Championship. What I love about

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Open or the US Open, what I used to

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>love about it was the draconian setups, penal, you know, intimidating.

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>And I mean this, I don't mean any disrespect. I

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>was a player once. I was the person bitching about

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 1>course setups. But it always occurred to me that they

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:25.879
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't listen to me, that I'm just blowing steam off

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the last people used to be listening to. Of course

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 1>set up the tour players, you know, they're always going

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to argue for graduated, rough, wider fair ways, however they

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 1>want to do it. Someone's going to do to the player.

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 1>They will be arguing about their strength, what they like,

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>what they want to see, what they think will bring

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:46.399
<v Speaker 1>out the best in them. None of them are going

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to argue from an equitable standpoint. They're going to be

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>arguing from whatever it is that they think brings out

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the best in them. Now, I've listened to arguments about

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 1>mowing the grass around the green. It gives them more shots,

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's more interesting. It's not just the flop shot. And

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but the name of the game, at least

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>as I see it. Look, we already have Augusta National,

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and Augusta is meant to bring out the artist in

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a golfer, make them create shots, bring out the ingenuity

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 1>around the greens. It's bold. You're meant to slay the

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 1>dragon there, right, But at the US Open, the dragon

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to slay you. You know, you're supposed to

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>be intimidated by the setup. If you miss the fairway,

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. If you miss it by a foot,

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you pay a penalty for it. If you miss the green,

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. You know about fairness. I'm talking about

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>if if you miss the green, your target is hitting

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the green. If you miss the green, I'm all for

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>nasty rough around the green, all for it. I want

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to see a guy to chip. I want to see

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it because that's what I want to see. At that

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>major championship, flare at augusta intimidation at the US Open,

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>mother nature at the Open, and then the elements. Unfortunately,

0:51:57.520 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 1>with the PGA Championship being played in the heat of

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the summer, they're a slave to whatever mother nature will

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:05.240
<v Speaker 1>allow them to do with a golf course.

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:06.399
<v Speaker 2>This year is gonna be tough.

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I mean that's gonna be one hundred and

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent humidity. It's just gonna be nasty, and

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so there. You know, I don't necessarily think you should

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be punishing people to the extent that you do at

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the US Open, because you know, the physical nature of

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>it is punishing enough. Uh So they have to keep

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the golf course softer and understandably so. But I you

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 1>know who won wing Foot nineteen seventy four, Heller when

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he shot seven over par. Heller, when proved to be

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary player. He won the three more you know,

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he won two more Opens, he won three US Open.

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:46.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I love to see. You know, we're all

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about strokes gained, right, Strokes gain is a measure of

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how you do against everybody else. Sure, okay, I get

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that metric, I use it, but I always go back

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to did you hit the fairway or did you not?

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Did you hit the green or did you not? Because

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody stands on the tee with very few exceptions and goes, eh,

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm better off I missed this fairway. Yeah, I mean,

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay if I missed this fairway. You're aiming for

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the fairway. Did you hit it or did you not?

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Nobody stands in the fairway and goes, I'm okay if

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I missed this green or you're not. You're trying to

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:21.759
<v Speaker 1>hit the green? Did you hit it or did you not?

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:26.720
<v Speaker 1>That that you know? People? Will you know this? Whole

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 1>strokes gain obsessive. I'm a big fan of Mark Brody

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and I use it and I look at it and

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, but I still look at can you hit

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the fairway? Can you hit the green? And the US

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Open was that? And if it went back to it,

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I would be standing on top of my car applauding

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>them because I want to see a tour player agitated, angry,

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:55.320
<v Speaker 1>pissed off about setup, and then I want to see

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 1>who it is that hits the shots. Did you hit

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:01.160
<v Speaker 1>them or did you not? Could you hit them? That's

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 1>cool to me, you know, that is the game really

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>should be about control. It should be, and if it

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>were about control, tour players that week would be forced

0:54:10.640 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to use a ball that spins more. They'd consider going

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to a driver with less MOI. They would think about

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:18.880
<v Speaker 1>all these things they'd be forced to because they're like, well,

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:20.719
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, I don't want to hit a ball

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that's flying straight up in the air with no spin

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on it. You don't have as much control over it.

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>If I miss this fairly, I'm screwed, even if I

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>miss it by a foot. So heit I want to

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>spin this ball more. I want to cut it more,

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to draw it more. So it would make

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>them reconsider their bad configuration and their shot selection.

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I would love to see that. I really I want

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:43.959
<v Speaker 3>to see carnage at the US Open.

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I do.

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:49.839
<v Speaker 2>I think it's something you speak of. I'm a big

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 2>proponent of WITH. Yeah, I'm an architecture guy. Oh yeah,

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm a nut, But I'm a big proponent of WITH.

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 2>But also like one of the things I love about

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 2>golf courses inside the golf courses, variety. But speaking what

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:08.839
<v Speaker 2>you talked about was variety among setups. So I had

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Bill Kooran a couple of months ago and he we

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 2>started talking about Trenny Forrest and he said that he

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted it. The way he wants to test tour players,

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:21.839
<v Speaker 2>and he thinks you should test tour players is by

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 2>making courses shorter and wider and forcing them to pick

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a line and hit it at a certain distance. What

0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:31.280
<v Speaker 2>do you think about shorter and wider?

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I love it, you know, I you know this is

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I do love variety, and I love Bill Korkrinshaw golf courses,

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and when I play them, that thought is you can

0:55:41.520 --> 0:55:43.479
<v Speaker 1>feel it. You know, when you play the golf course,

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know you'll drive it down, be right next to

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a green. But if you don't have the right angle,

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got some awkward, inconvenient ridge to get over, and

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know you could spit on the green and you

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can't chip it on the green because you're in a

0:55:56.520 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 1>bad spot. So golf is meant to be fun. With

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the exception of the US Open one week of year,

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not meant to be fun. Augusta's fun. The Open

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is fun. Okay, the PGA, because you're battling the elements

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:11.839
<v Speaker 1>may not be so fun. But but golf is meant

0:56:11.880 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to be fun and Krins, Shaw and Corp get that.

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 1>You know that the the the penal setups. Uh that

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I love at the US Open. I hate everywhere else.

0:56:24.840 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't want to play golf courses that

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:30.839
<v Speaker 1>are that are you know, you either hit it here

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:33.320
<v Speaker 1>or you don't, you know, I mean, I like the

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>recovery shot, you know. I like the ability to recover,

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and I like the ability to bombs away and get

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>down there and realize, well, I did hit the fairway,

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'd be way better off I hit it over there.

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>That's strategic, it's interesting, it's you know, my favorite course

0:56:47.680 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world is a course in San Antonio by

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the name of Oak Hills Country Club. It was designed

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 1>by Tilling Hast. Its integrity has never really been touched.

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been spruced up time or two by Weisskoff and J.

0:56:58.239 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Morrish and whatnot, but it's the same way. It's only

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand yards long. But every day I finished it,

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, it was such an interesting round.

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had a bad lie here because I

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>drove in the wrong side of the fairway. I had

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:14.839
<v Speaker 1>a three iron from a hanging lie there and nine

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:18.440
<v Speaker 1>iron from an uphill side hill, lie little bitty greens

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and it peaks your curiosity. Crenshaw Corps do that. The

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Trinity Fours golf Course in Dallas, by all accounts, is amazing.

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the field will be much much better there.

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I think players will be intrigued by that. That course.

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I spent like three days just walking around studying the course.

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a couple of spots where I mean there. It's

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be very interesting to see the comments that

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 2>come from it. Yeah, it's going to rub some people

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:49.919
<v Speaker 2>the wrong way.

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely. And you know Gil hans redid draw and

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the first hole he made it. You know, it's a

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:01.240
<v Speaker 1>par five, but if you if you're second shot drifts

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 1>right of center, it'll catch the slope and it'll go

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the water. And I think JB. Holmes was leading

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there after two rounds and he drove it and he

0:58:09.920 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>had a six iron to the green if memory serves

0:58:12.560 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>me correctly, and his six iron landed from the left

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>side of the fairway I believe, hit the sort of

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the right side of the green and it went the water.

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And he was angry and he thinking, I think he

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>had some critical things to say. I think it was JB.

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Holmes and Gil Hans was up on the set that night,

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know I could tell that it. I could

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>tell it bothered him a little bit. You know, he's

0:58:33.360 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>getting and I and I was thinking, well, I mean

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been there. I've been the tour player and you think,

0:58:38.400 --> 0:58:40.560
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, when you hit the shot and it

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't turn out the way you want, you were like,

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:46.960
<v Speaker 1>what idiot designed this golf course? And if you philosophically

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:50.080
<v Speaker 1>look at it, though it's a it's a par five,

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:54.160
<v Speaker 1>there has to be some risk reward. You know, if

0:58:54.200 --> 0:58:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you get it going right at thirteen at augusta a

0:58:57.320 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit with your second shot, it goes in the water,

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It come up shore, roll in the water. You know,

0:59:01.680 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>if you don't quite catch it perfect at fifteen, it'll

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:06.000
<v Speaker 1>hit in the front third and come back in the water.

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are all design elements that are intended to intimidate.

0:59:11.240 --> 0:59:15.640
<v Speaker 1>They're intended to make you create and reward great creativity

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and boldness. And you shouldn't get a pass with a

0:59:19.400 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 1>shot that's just not quite right. With a six iron

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to a par five, you should pay dearly for it. Mentally,

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there should be some stress. I love that

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of architecture. And that's one of the things I

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 1>love about Crenshaw Core is that they design with that

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in mind. Fun but also they want you to have fun,

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but they also want you to pay a small price

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for a strategic mistake.

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I love death biangle.

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Ah that's great, Great, I'm stealing that death bi angle.

0:59:49.000 --> 0:59:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you full credit at some point trade market

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>death by angle. Yeah yeah.

0:59:54.360 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 2>And you think you're okay, and then you get up

0:59:56.000 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 2>there and you say, ah sh.

0:59:57.680 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, death biangle, And then and then and then

1:00:03.840 --> 1:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>holy grail, you know, is the opposite of that, you know,

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>reward by angle, you know, And and that's we spend

1:00:09.240 --> 1:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>more time talking about angles at Augusta National than any

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>other golf course. You know, angles are important. You know,

1:00:15.360 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you drive it down the left side, and

1:00:17.840 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you know, if you find the fairway

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>balls above your feet, but you know you you want

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to hit towards the right center of that green. You know,

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you drive it down the left side at thirteen, you know,

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>take that risk and then you've got a flatter lie.

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:35.959
<v Speaker 1>But you want now you want to hit a cut

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>into that green. And we talk so much about shot

1:00:39.080 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>shape and angles and where you want to drive it

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and we don't do that very often.

1:00:44.520 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That's because the architect those things were important to him. Yeah,

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what's your favorite course?

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh, sand Hills, Nebraska.

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, everybody, I hear that a lot. I've never played it,

1:00:54.440 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but I hear that a lot. To get out yeah

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I did.

1:00:56.640 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>That's if you leave Sandhills without a grasp at least

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a grasp of strategic what strategic golf? No kidding you are,

1:01:06.040 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>you're pretty a napped if you all right without it?

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:08.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, but.

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>It's I mean, everything's about angles and and you get

1:01:12.840 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the elements out there in the sand in Nebraska. I mean,

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>it'll be blown thirty miles an hour from one direction

1:01:19.920 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 2>for your front nine, and it'll switch on the back nine.

1:01:22.000 --> 1:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>These holes play remarkably different day in day out. I mean,

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean it is a special place.

1:01:27.840 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I got to get out there. You know, my wife

1:01:29.160 --> 1:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is a heck of a golfer. She loves to play

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and and she's always after me to take a golf

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trip here or there. And I haven't thought about sand Hills,

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's got to get out there.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a cool place. It's in the middle of nowhere.

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Though, right, Yeah, well, I think we found out that

1:01:46.400 --> 1:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know that that adage about you know, if you

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>build it, they'll come bandon? Do is prove that correct

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty much? Area Cabot Links prove that to be correct.

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we went to Cabot Links, my wife and

1:01:57.000 --> 1:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I last summer on a break, and you know, it

1:02:01.320 --> 1:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>was it's like reading a great book. You know, you

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>want to read it, but you really want to take

1:02:05.760 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>your time, you know, because you're enjoying it so much.

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't want to finish. I didn't want to

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>stop every day, you know, every hole. I was like,

1:02:13.080 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want to walk slow, you know, I don't

1:02:15.360 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>want to hurry and finish this round. It's too perfect.

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean in Abandon Dune's Cabot those things wouldn't

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:25.919
<v Speaker 2>have happened without sand Hills because that was that first, right,

1:02:26.120 --> 1:02:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the first real minimalist core crunchhaw where it was all

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 2>about the golf. So sand Hills was ninety five. It

1:02:32.600 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>was a little bit after Kapalua and sand Hills. I mean,

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Mike Kaiser's remember it at sand Hills, Like, yeah, I'm

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>certain that if sand Hills hadn't have worked, you wouldn't

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 2>have bandon dunes, you wouldn't have how about that cabot

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>clips and links?

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't heard anybody connect the dots like that.

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I like that you to golf swings as meat up.

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, now I have a nice source for architecture. I

1:02:58.880 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that, Andy.

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>So Overrated Underrated is our regular segment of the podcast.

1:03:05.600 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to just throw some stuff at you

1:03:07.680 --> 1:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>and say are these things overrated? Underrated?

1:03:11.280 --> 1:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, We're going.

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 2>To start with the city of Orlando.

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Overrated or underrated? Underrated if you're under eighteen overrated. Otherwise,

1:03:23.160 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the traffic here has leaves a little to be desired.

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The Interstate four will give the four h five in

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>LA to a side for chaotic conditions at all hours

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Yesterday was today today's Tuesday, Sunday. My

1:03:41.440 --> 1:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>wife and I wanted to go play golf. It's twenty

1:03:43.680 --> 1:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>minutes to my club, and we hit rush hour traffic

1:03:46.240 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at eleven o'clock on Sunday and it took me an

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>hour to get over there for no reason, no discernible reason.

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>So yes, that question was spawned from an explet of

1:03:55.400 --> 1:03:58.800
<v Speaker 3>laden conversation we had actually driving over here today.

1:03:59.000 --> 1:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You feel my pain. So don't just think that you're

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>here and it's gone. And every day I'm here, those

1:04:05.560 --> 1:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>expletives are in my head as I drive around this town.

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like, where are the city planners? You know? I

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>want to you know, yes, I want to have a

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>talk with them.

1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>If your if your job and you know, regular work

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>wasn't here, what city would you live in?

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City? Probably? You know it's the energy of

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that place. Uh, you know, the talent that people have

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>everywhere there. You know, you go to a show, you

1:04:33.640 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>go to a restaurant, you know, you go to a museum.

1:04:37.040 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You see, my goodness, you know, the the confluence of

1:04:42.760 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>energy of that city is magnetic.

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:51.919
<v Speaker 3>How about overrated underrated stacking tilt.

1:04:53.360 --> 1:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You guys? You guys, I uh over it underrated stack.

1:05:01.280 --> 1:05:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Until because stack until tendencies in this way? Yeah?

1:05:06.560 --> 1:05:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Where these brought about? Because you do you decided that,

1:05:09.600 --> 1:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, to go down that way purposely or it

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just happened. It just happened.

1:05:12.680 --> 1:05:14.720
<v Speaker 3>And it's funny because like five or six years ago,

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:17.439
<v Speaker 3>when stack untilt was in right, people were like, oh man,

1:05:17.560 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>love your golf swing. You naturally stack in tilt that's awesome.

1:05:20.400 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 3>And now it's like, oh god, dude, you're stacking in

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>tilting right, fix that.

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, you're stacking in tilting. Well, look, I I don't

1:05:29.840 --> 1:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>believe they had any mal intent these guys at all.

1:05:32.920 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, they they they they had good intentions. I

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think they purposely wanted to harm anybody. But I

1:05:42.840 --> 1:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>don't find any value in it, you know, I I

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>see validity for it when somebody can't move, you know,

1:05:50.760 --> 1:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if if somebody doesn't have the ability to transfer their weight,

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the right or to the left, staying

1:05:57.840 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same place gives you some consistency. So as

1:06:02.720 --> 1:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a philosophy to help poor players with very limited mobility,

1:06:08.760 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I see utility in the idea. But for better players,

1:06:13.520 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'd be like giving training wheels to Lance Armstrong.

1:06:16.880 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're you know, these guys can move. And

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>every great player moved off of the ball, every single

1:06:25.600 --> 1:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>one of them, every single one of them male or female.

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>They did not have a stationary head. They moved to

1:06:34.160 --> 1:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the right, they moved up, and they transfer their way

1:06:36.640 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to the right. Every athletic endeavor involves a weight transfer,

1:06:40.280 --> 1:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>loading and unloading. So you know, those guys. You know,

1:06:45.280 --> 1:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I've Plumber and Bennett. I think they're smart guys, you

1:06:50.440 --> 1:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>know I do. I think they're well intentioned, and clearly

1:06:54.680 --> 1:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people thought there was validity to their ideas.

1:06:57.680 --> 1:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't have an agree with them. I'll just

1:06:59.400 --> 1:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>say this though again, if they were sitting right here,

1:07:01.480 --> 1:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'd have a pleasant conversation. I don't agree

1:07:05.360 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with the teaching philosophies all the way through of Hank Haney.

1:07:08.760 --> 1:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to play in the member guest with Hank

1:07:10.320 --> 1:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Haney at his club. I don't agree with the teaching

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>philosophies of Butch Harmon. You know, I don't think you

1:07:14.680 --> 1:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>should squat into your right leg or restrict or short

1:07:17.400 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in your back swing. I'd like to think Butch and

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>our friends and we talk about golf swing a lot,

1:07:22.480 --> 1:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, wherever you're at. If I'm doing a panel

1:07:25.160 --> 1:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>open form tonight with a bunch of teachers, every one

1:07:29.520 --> 1:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of those teachers, to the person to the right of

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>them and the person who the left with them, they

1:07:32.440 --> 1:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>do not agree with what they teach, but they're all

1:07:36.280 --> 1:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to do the right thing. So I'll say this

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>about Plumber and Bennett I'm well intentioned. They're smart guys.

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I just don't happen to agree with their philosophies.

1:07:45.160 --> 1:07:49.120
<v Speaker 2>So I really appreciate the time. No, you got to

1:07:49.120 --> 1:07:50.880
<v Speaker 2>get out of here. You gotta get to that panel.

1:07:51.520 --> 1:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I'm actually going to meet I had arranged

1:07:54.880 --> 1:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the lunch meeting with when I was very early in golf,

1:07:58.680 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>professional golf. Uh, you know, trying to qualify for the tour.

1:08:02.600 --> 1:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got all this quallity, a little section

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>only reading or whatever. You know, that's life or death

1:08:07.360 --> 1:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>every shot. And I used to travel with a fellow

1:08:09.960 --> 1:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys that he's traveled with, a fellow,

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>n Evan Schiller. Evan now has become a foremost photographer.

1:08:16.280 --> 1:08:18.679
<v Speaker 1>And Evan is in town this week, and he'd asked

1:08:18.680 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>me to lunch. Uh, and we're you know, we're just

1:08:20.920 --> 1:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>going right across the street here. I haven't seen Evan

1:08:23.240 --> 1:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the last time I saw him. You know, we were

1:08:25.640 --> 1:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>living and dying with every golf shot. And so one

1:08:28.280 --> 1:08:30.639
<v Speaker 1>of the things about social media is you just keep

1:08:30.680 --> 1:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>track of people's lives. And I see his photography, I'm like,

1:08:32.960 --> 1:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>good gosh, you've turned into this phenomenal photographer. So I'm

1:08:36.280 --> 1:08:38.519
<v Speaker 1>going to meet Evan for lunch and catch up before

1:08:38.560 --> 1:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I dive into the panel tonight. You guys are gonna

1:08:41.960 --> 1:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be there.

1:08:42.920 --> 1:08:45.519
<v Speaker 2>We are not We're gonna We're gonna go see it

1:08:45.600 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 2>up for nine week winter Park. I'm a Chicago Well

1:08:48.880 --> 1:08:49.680
<v Speaker 2>there you go, right.

1:08:50.040 --> 1:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Winter Park is my producer at our golf Channel's name

1:08:55.360 --> 1:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is Matt Haggerty. Yeah, I know Matt. You know Matt.

1:08:58.080 --> 1:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt lives in winter Park and he had a lot

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to do with getting the architects. He picked them, found them,

1:09:04.680 --> 1:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>coerced them into doing that project on a shoe string budget.

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>And my wife and I for you know, giggles. You know,

1:09:10.479 --> 1:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it cost twelve dollars to go over there and play golf.

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's a fabulous golf course and it's right in

1:09:15.040 --> 1:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the city. It's like Scotland. You go

1:09:17.120 --> 1:09:19.519
<v Speaker 1>over there, play play nine holes, go have a drink. Yeah.

1:09:19.560 --> 1:09:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Andy told me to play there like a month or

1:09:21.320 --> 1:09:22.840
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months ago, and I got there and

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I was like, what the hell is this place? And

1:09:24.200 --> 1:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>then I got done playing, I'm like, God, I gotta

1:09:25.800 --> 1:09:26.400
<v Speaker 3>go play again.

1:09:26.640 --> 1:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, It's terrific. You guys have fun. You guys.

1:09:29.160 --> 1:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm jealous. I wish I was over there with you guys.

1:09:31.200 --> 1:09:33.519
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to get together and play sometime. Really nice

1:09:33.520 --> 1:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to meet you guys. You know put it. You know. Look,

1:09:36.040 --> 1:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you get on Twitter and there's a whole lot of

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>snark on Twitter, and you guys, you guys don't do that.

1:09:40.560 --> 1:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're all about the betterment of this game,

1:09:42.800 --> 1:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and you put out great content. So it's really nice

1:09:45.760 --> 1:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to put faces with Twitter handles. So for sure, Well,

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:50.479
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much again. Yeah, I look forward to

1:09:50.439 --> 1:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>it anytime. I appreciate that. I appreciate it. Yeah, cheers. Yep,

1:09:55.760 --> 1:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you've been listening to the fried Egg podcast. We do

1:09:59.120 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the digging for you.