WEBVTT - Apple Unveils iPhone 14 and Satellite Capabilities

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Collie

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily changing Coopertino and this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>We are alive from Apple's campus where the company just

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>unveiled its next generation of devices and upgrades to new iPhones, watches,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and AirPods, focusing on health, safety and satellite connectivity. And

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>there was one big surprise the price of the bottom

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>of the line iPhone unchanged despite the worst inflation in decades.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>We are going to give you the full download, but

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>first I want to get a look with Apple bringing

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Milan as of creative Strategies. Who's here with me

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>at Apple headquarters inside the Steve jobs the for the

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>first time in a few years. Actually, um, how significant

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think these upgrades are? And key are people

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>going to buy these new devices with increasing inflation higher

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>than you know it's been in forty years. I think

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been interesting to see that the focus today has

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>been on real pain points that consumer have and also

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>hit on the key drivers that you see consumer talk

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more and more about. Which is better life, is a

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>better display, is a better camera with low light conditions.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You saw that, and you saw out Tim Cook opened

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>devent today talking about the value of each product and

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>then the magic that the three products that we were

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>here for today bring together. And I think that's what

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you have when you're thinking about upgrading. You might have

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one of these products that are older than another and

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to get into the cycle so that you

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>can take better advantage of the new features, but also

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>feel that magic that Cook was talking about. Well, I

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>wonder if the most significant announcement was the price of

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that you know, lowest tier iPhone fourteen and it being

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the same as the iPhone thirteen was last year. Yeah,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the price are the same is a good and depending

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>where you're looking at it right that we have seen

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>some of the consumer electronic companies bringing their prices up

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year because of the inflation. Others we

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>kept on the same. I think what was interesting to

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe sweeten a little bit that price point is the

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>deals for the trade ins that you've seen Apple mentioned

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>through the careers in the US and directly from Apple

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred two thou dollars depending on what model you've

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>traded in. So let's talk about the the other things.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Satellite connectivity. I know that was a really big deal

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and how significant is that going to be in terms

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of driving more people to buy these phones. I don't

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>know that the satellite is necessarily a purchased driver per se,

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think is that extra peace of mind the

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>same way as you think about insurance, Right, you have it,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you have to purchase it. You hope you'll never use it,

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know that is bear in case you need it.

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>And it's the same with the feature of car crash

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>detection as an example piece of mind for you know,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>parents with new drivers coming on feature that is both

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>on the watch end, on the phone all the way

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to the you know, throughout the portfolio. So the safety

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>was an extra, if you like, pillar on what Apple

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>built today across the portfolio. All right, let's talk about

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Watch. Ultra significant pricing news there as well,

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>very much undercutting garment at the high end on the market.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>They called this watch your dive computer. It can go

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>forty below the surface of the ocean. I mean, it

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty cool, but how big a market is there

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for a niche rugged smart watch. The reality is that

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you have the core people that would have a garment,

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and then you have the wanna be and the market

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>for the wanna be, you know, the ones that wish

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but it could do an iron then, but they can't.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It's considerable, right, And I think what was smart about

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the design is that despite the size that is so large,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is very lightweight and so you know, I have a

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>small risk like you do, and and it looks humongous

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on the risk, but it's not heavy. So I think

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they've done a good job in trying from a style

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>perspective to appeal to a broader market. And they could

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have price if they wanted to, but they did not.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>So what are you looking for in terms of the numbers.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with Tim Cook at the end of earnings

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>last quarter and he said they do expect revenue to

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>accelerate in the September quarter. Of course, we know that

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>new iPhones are going to go on sale a week

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>before the quarter end, so they can get some additional

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>uh boost there. You know, how much of a difference

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is that going to make? And could it give the

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the global economy kind of a little morale boost? If

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple is able to you know, beat or even meet expectations,

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I think you have three lines that will contribute to

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that boost. Right, you have the iPhone, and it's interesting

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that they picked at different times of the release for

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone getting into October as well, so you have

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that caring through to the next quarter. But you also

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>have something like Airport Airports Pro that at two fifty

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>World drive a lot of upgrades, so there's a lot

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of different price point there that will help the bottom line.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Um and as I said, is the magic of the

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>three coming together. The air pads were kind of a

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sleeper hit when they came out, and it's been a

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>long time. A lot of people have been waiting for

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>an upgrade, you know. Was also said today that a

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people lose the air parts as they're gonna

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>spend two hundred fifty dollars on something that is, yes, beloved,

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but also easy to misplace. Well, uh speak for an experience.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I've a teenager that always loses them, so I feel

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel that pain. It made it easier about to

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>find them today, fair enough, right, so you can find

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the case and you can find each individual AirPod in

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>an easier way. And I think the silly thing of

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the emoji engraving speaks also to that popularity where you

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>have households, where you have multiple airports that lived together,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and that will make it easier for the consumers to

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>spot which one is mine. And again with all of

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>these products, we talked about new chips faster, clearly you know,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>big tech upgrades, even though we might not necessarily see

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>them as as consumers at Carolina Milan as of creative strategies.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, thanks for joining us. Good to

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>see all right coming up? Apple seems to have supply

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>chain issues under control. Will that keep up through the

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>holiday rash? M it's rising global tensions? We will discuss

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. Apple seems to have managed supply bottleneckt

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>spirt by the pandemic, but now it has to navigate

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chips Act and a new policy designed to boost

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>US production of tech product that includes approval for certain

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor exports to countries of concern, including China. I want

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring in CFRE, a equity analyst, Angelo Zeno. Now

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for more so, Angela. First of all, let's talk about

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain management for this new slate of products.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Is Apple going to be able to get all of

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>these new iPhones and watches and air pods to people

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>who want them in time for the holidays. I mean,

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>as far as getting it in time for the holidays, yes,

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we think so. Um. Yeah, I think it's interesting that

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>clearly the timing of this event clearly being on September seven,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and the actual UM launch of the phones, right, I

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>mean you were talking September six, case, I believe is

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>when shipman start um pretty much a week earlier than

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we had previously anticipated. To be honest with you, UM,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that in itself should tell you that they're

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely managing the supply constraints that you know, maybe they

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>had to content with more severely earlier that year, in

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a much better situation, so they should be better positioned

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>here over the next couple of months, um than others

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>out there. Now, I will say this, um, as far

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as UM these phones are concerned, I mean, it is

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>more supplied driven than demand driven. In terms of expectations

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for the September quarter. We do expect them to be

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>supplied constraints to some extent here over the next couple

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. And I think it's really interesting with how

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they kind of land, uh kind of uh put the

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>launch of these phones right. So, we have the phone

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>four phones four devices will be available UM at the

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>end of next week, where the other one will be

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>UM in October. So that will help them also better

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>navigate the constraints and put more emphasis on those pro devices,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>which of course our higher price and better margins. So interestingly,

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the Apple website and the shipping times,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those times have come down, which is

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of our gauge of you know, how much trouble

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are they having, you know, making all of these products

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and getting them to customers. The iPhone, mac iPad, you know,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>all pretty much coming you know, when you want them

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>to come. One of the biggest pain points going to

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>be though over the next few months. I mean, we've

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>seen various chip companies continuing to struggle as we look

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at their earnings, and you know, what is it about

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple if they're not having these issues? Yeah, well so

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>i'd say as far as you know issue, I'd say

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they they're much better position than others out there. And

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest reason is, you know, they are the largest

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of UM you know, purchaser of semiconductor UM goods

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>out there on kind of a pure play basis, right,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, if you take out samsull and which kind

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of UM you know, utilize this kind of their own

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>semi can you know, their own smartphones demands to kind

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of feed their own business. That's not necessarily the taste

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>here UM with Apple. Apple kind of outsources all their

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>semi conductor needs out there, so they have significant needs

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>out there and because of that, UM, they definitely get

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of their first in line in order to kind

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of get those good UM. At the end of the day, though,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we kind of look ahead here in terms of where

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the supply constraints continue to be most er. It's definitely

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>at this more trailing edge technology node. It's more yer

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of UM you know, your microprocessors, that are your

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>micro controllers and what have you of the world. Then UM,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Apple does need to purchase those type of UM components.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But UM again they are in better position than others

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>out there to UM get those orders fulfilled. Obviously, we

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>know how interconnected Apple supply chain is with China. They've

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they've been trying to diversify that and it likely won't

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be so intertwined in years to come, but that's still

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the case for now. How will rising global tension impact Apple?

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>How will the Chips Act come into play. So, you know,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I think longer term, you know, clearly Apple does want

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to further diversified its supply chain, and they clearly are

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>looking to do so. We think kind of, um, their

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>emphasis is absolutely going to be more so in India

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>than other regions of the world. Rightfully so, because when

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you actually think about where the demand upside could potentially

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>come from from Apple here over the next decade, I

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>think India is a big reason. Um, if you are

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a bowl on apple from the natural natural wealth effect

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>that will take place in India over the next ten

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. So it makes takes a lot of sense

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>for Apple to start kind of um expanding into that

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>geographic region. But that being said, Apple remains very well

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>positioned within China. We don't necessarily actually expect them to um,

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, shut down any type of production out there,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, as more and more chips

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>companies out there kind of evolved within China, exactly a

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>possibility um where Apple could potentially use their local semiconduct

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>their manufacturing industry as well. But that's being said, I mean,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we do expect them to continue to um look for

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to expand and further diversify outside of China, but

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>India will be the key there. I don't know how

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>much of an impact kind of the chip sacks will

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have um within the US, but I think only time

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>will help. The big question remains how many people are

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>going to upgrade these upgrade their devices in the middle

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of a downturn, when they're already paying more for everything else.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>How significant do you think the pricing that we heard

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>today the Apple Watch Ultra seven nine, the new iPhone

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>fourteen at seven the same price it was last year

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as the iPhone thirteen, that that seems to be pretty significant. Yes,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it looks that. I actually I thought there

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>was a possibility they could have raised the prices on

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>some of those pro devices, but I'm kind of happy

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't, to be honest with you, when you

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of look um an Apple here. First off, our

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>forecast for the upcoming cycle here in terms of the

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>iPhone fourteen cycle is actually no growth in terms on

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the unit side of things. However, we do expect average

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>selling prices to increase about three at least recent and

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going to just be the actual improving mix. I mean,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly they're ditching the the mini out there UM adding

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the six point seven inch um plub device, and then

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know just just what they've been now on the

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>pro side of things relative to what they've done with

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the two standard devices. I think that's a big enough

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>gaps where you could potentially seem more consumers kind of

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>gravitate out there UM towards the pro devices. At least

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>for the September quarter and December quarter. UM, we remain

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>very optimistic in terms of UM units. We were about

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>two to three percent above the street. We do get

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more concerned on the macro side of

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>things as we go with some marching tune quarters and

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the Psycolosten. All right, Angelo's you know, c fr, I

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for giving us the big picture of you

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Shairs on Twitter jumping in Wednesday session after

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a Delaware judge told Elon Musk, no, we can't delay

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this trial with Twitter. Of course, Ellen trying to walk

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>away from that forty four billion dollar deal. Bloomberg's at

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Ludlow here with all the deep tales and kind of

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a big loss for Musk here, meaning he won't have

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>as much time to pull together some additional discovery. What

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is this signal from the judge? Yeah, best day for

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter shares since mid July. The idea being that a

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Brisker schedule timeline for trial favors Twitter. Most analysts, including

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Intelligence litigation team, would say that that Brisker said,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll boost the odds that Twitter will be able to

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>enforce the original deal terms, which is, you know, m

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a fifty four twenty centers share valuing Twitter at fort

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>four billion. And Judge Kathleen st Jude McCormick basically said

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that she couldn't delay the trial by even four weeks.

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember must team, we're asking for December because if she did,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>then it could bring harm to Twitter's business that she

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't justify. So one win for Elon Musk is that

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>he can use the complaints of this whistleblower, which recently

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>emerge to an extent explain. Yeah. So this is Peter Zako,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>who filed a whistleblower complaint on auguste basically saying that

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter had security deficiencies making its platform vulnerable to hackers,

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and in this complaint that he'd been told by a

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>senior Twitter executive that there was a spots issue that Now,

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what the judge is saying is that incrementally the must

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>team can go out as part of discovery ahead of

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>trial to include some of that information that was in

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the August whistle blur filing in their legal armory, so

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to speak. But again it all comes down to Musk

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>having to prove the same impact, the same legal point

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that he has had to all along, which is material

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>adverse effect. And again Street analysts, Bloomberg Intelligence, this Gation

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>analysts see this being a Twitter's favorite at this point.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, lad blow, thank you Meantime, on Tuesday night,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet's CEO Sundar Pachai defended the company in response to

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>claims that it is anti competitive. At the CODE conference.

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He also commented on Google's decision to remove former President

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump's truth social app from the app store. Bloom looks

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Alex Barnka was in the room for Purchi's remarks. She

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>joins us, Now, so Alex, let's start on the anti

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>competitive accusations. You know, not a surprise that he defended

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet and Google's position there, But what do you make

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of how he did it? Yeah, Emily, he brought it

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>up at basically every turn sendor was on stage for

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>about forty five minutes, and whether he was talking about

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the ad market, about commerce, about competition with TikTok, he

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>brought it back to this argument that their company, that

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet is not anti competitive, that in fact, there is

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of competition on the market now. It is

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a timely argument for him to be making. Just last month,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>our colleagues reported, based on their sourcing that the d

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>o J maybe bringing another anti competition suit against Google

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on their ad business. You'll remember that there's already a

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>suit out there from the d J alleging the company

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>dominates the search market. So it seems like anti trust

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is definitely on the mind of Alphabet CEO, and he

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to remind us that, you know, they have

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>rivals out there in the market as well. Meantime, he

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gave some detail, more detail and I think we would

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>expect about their decision to remove Trump's Truth social app

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 1>from the Google Play Store. Tell us what I had

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, Yeah, that's right, he pointing to kind of

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>what it's coming down to for removing it right now,

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>which is content moderation. He kind of talked at length

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Google play Store has standards for what they

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>expect the apps on UM on that platform to kind

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of participate in when it comes to content moderation, and

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>said that it seems like they are looking at that

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>more closely. He also pointed out that the Google play

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Store did bring on Parlor recently, so UM, there has

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>been movement there for some of these platforms that seem

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to be friendlier to Trump or allow Trump on the

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>platform in terms of getting them into the play Store,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>but for truth social that content moderation peace and making

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that they can kind of abide by the standards

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that Google expects seems to be the breaking point at

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Meantime, he talked about his goal to make

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Google more productive, which is really significant given how massive

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that company is. Does that mean layoffs? Uh potentially um,

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like yesterday he talked about UM finding kind

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of product productivity games. He gave some examples UM past

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>examples like having multiple music applications on different sides of

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>alphabets platforms and combining those into one. He also talked

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about things like teams that have perhaps three managers as

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the decision maker UH when there should only be one,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and that slows things down, so perhaps you don't need

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>that many people. But for Google, look, they are struggling

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like the rest of the ad driven businesses out there

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in big tech, so he's absolutely looking to efficiencies and

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like right now, um, they're going through kind

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of a holistic process of figuring out where they have

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>duplications in the business that they can narrow down and

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>where perhaps the business should be moving faster with fewer

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>voices to make sure that it is hitting those productivity goals.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Alex Barnka for us, I know you'll be

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>back at code later tonight, only looking for your dispatches.

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Little More Technology. I'm emily changing Coppuccino

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>where Apple just unveiled a new line of products. Let's

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about it all with Marabel Lopez, founder and principal

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>analyst of Lopez Research. Good to see you back here

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in person. You know, I thought it was interesting. They

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>obviously unveiled you know, a ton of new things today,

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>some features geared for everyone and some geared towards more

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>niche users, whether it's you know, an outdoor enthusiast or

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there was also a focus on um women's health. What

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>stood outmost to you. What I thought was interesting is

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we're at a real mature state of the market right now.

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>We have to do some things that are definitely for

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a niche market, like the outdoor enthusiasts, But you still

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted every release to make sure that there's something for everybody.

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So we had crash detection in the watch, We had

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>temperature sensors for women's health. We had satellite which is

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in all of the iPhone fourteen so that anybody can

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>have emergency calling. So it was really that balance of

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>things that were very specific, like you can have a

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>dive computer on your watch. That word multiple times dive

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>computer cycle. I mean, what arrange? How let's talk about

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the every day that and you know women are half

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the population. How compelling are some of these women's health

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>features in terms of convincing a new audience to upgrade.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>We want this watch to be for everything, right, if

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to wear this every day, then you wanted

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to really do things of matter in your life. And

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing is more important to women at certain points in

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>their life than being able to understand what's happening with

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>their menstrual cycles. So I think that they really hit

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a curve that that makes sense for a broad percentage

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of the populace. They also double down on the privacy

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>features there, because obviously we're talking about really personal information.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Privacy has been Apple and Tim Cook's big thing. You know,

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they've continually said, you know, we are doing this better

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>than anyone else. We are protecting you and your data.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>How important is that in terms of the marketing. I

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that we're seeing is really

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a bifurcation of those that care about privacy and those

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that don't. Does have monetize you with your data? And

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>those that are saying, O, hey, this is really about

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>you buying the product and it's your information. And I

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think no one is excelling at that message better than

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple right now. But Apple is also building out its

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>own advertising business, right is there some will I? Um,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know yet, is the short answer, because we

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what type of data they're going to

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>collect with, what they're gonna do with it, or what

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the privacy constraints are around it. But it's clear that

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants advertising dollars. So let's talk about the outdoor

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasts and and and I mean, first of all the

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>video was just absolutely amazing and all the different deserts

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, snow covered mountaintops. They went to

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>um But how how how big a driver do you

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>think this this will be? I mean, they obviously did

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>undercut the garment watched, the high end garment watch significantly. Absolutely.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I look at this very similar to how the Mac

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was theoretically designed for creatives. The watch is now also

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>an outdoor enthusiast specialty. You don't need a dive computer,

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't need a garment watch if you are a

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>triathlete or anybody frankly that just really wanted all day

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>battery life and to be out there and to know

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it was going to work. I think they struck a chord.

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>These were complaints that had been in the marketplace, and

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>now they've addressed them. So, you know, let's talk about

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>what this means over the longer term, because you know,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple's revenue now comes from the iPhone. But you're not

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>going to buy an Apple watch or AirPods if you

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have an iPhone. So are you seeing Apple becoming

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>even more reliant on the iPhone or still less reliant

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on the iPhone? I think the world is reliant on smartphones,

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>so that iPhone absolutely has to have features that sell

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it because it drags the entire ecosystem with it and

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to change. So what are you look

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at when you when you look out over the holidays

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, potentially a very busy quarter, but customers

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>under pressure. You know, they're paying more for gas and

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>groceries and literally everything, though you know, iPhone staying at

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the same price. Thank you Apple, um are what do

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you think this upgrade cycle is really going to look

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>like in a downturn? I think the grade cycle is

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be contentious and people have to make choices

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>between what they're going to buy. You know, in some

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>cases this is going to be are you gonna have eater?

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you're gonna have an iPhone? But having said that,

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that's morphone is so critical to what people do in

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>their lives that they'll choose a smartphone oversight a PC something.

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there's still great opportunity for the

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter to be a great quarter for Apple. Alright,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Maria Lopez Lopez Research, good to have you back here

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Than thank you for stopping by. Let

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you cool off, all right, coming up, we're gonna talk

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about those satellites and just how

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>game changing that new technology can potentially be. The ability

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to send s O S messages without cell service details next,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. Unlike stationary cell towers, communications satellites are

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of miles above the Earth and flying it over

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand miles per hour. To connect to these satellites

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>need to be outside with a clear view of the

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sky and the band with all limited that even sending

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a text message is a technical challenge. Typically, the only

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>way to tap into such a network is with an

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive device that uses a bulky external antenna. We knew

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that approach just wouldn't work for iPhone, so we invented

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>another way. We designed and build custom components and specific

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>software so that iPhone fourteen antennas can connect with satellite's

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>unique frequencies. There's one stock that went wild during the

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>iPhone fourteen unveiling, and it was an Apple Blue works

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>at Ludlow back now with a look at global Star,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>very important partner at global Star Global staff. Fifty minutes

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>into the Apple presentation, global Star is down six and

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the stock is halted pending News on stage in Cubatino,

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>where you r M they discussing the satellite text capabilities

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of the latest generation of iPhone. A few minutes later,

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the stop begins training again. You see that on the

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>right hand side of your screen it jumps from a

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>decline of six to a gain of forty one before

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately closing down one point to Now. There have been

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>rumors for almost a year the Global Star war partner

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>with Apple to be the satellite operator, which is confirmed

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>now in that regulatory filing. Apple is going to pay

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Global Star fees to provide this service. But a Global

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Star this is a big win. This is a tiny

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>company three point seven billion dollar market cap, sales in

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the hundreds and millions of dollars each year. But for them,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a really big win. Big win Indean and

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>putting a lot of speculation to resk. Thank you, and

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk more about Apple's new satellite connectivity

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>um and bring in Chris Quality, the founder of Quilty Analytics,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>which works exclusively in the satellite and space industry. This

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is something because I know that you've been following for

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, and on stage today Apple talked

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>about how this took years to put to practice hardware, software,

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure innovation. Just how significant is it that Apple um

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>says they can now pull this off. Well, I think

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a good innovation form. I think it's also a

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>first step. The services was announced today is a fairly limited,

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, worst case scenario. Good to have as

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a background technology. But if you've been watching the broader

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:28.959
<v Speaker 1>industry landscape, there's lots of things happening with satellite phone connectivity,

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and other companies including SpaceX and T Mobile just last

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>week or two weeks ago that announced the service. That's

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a substantially more viable service. Companies like a Ridium that

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are working with handset manufacturers A S T Space Mobile

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Link and supposedly Android and Google are coming out with

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>satellite phone connectivity also. So let's talk about the T

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Mobile and SpaceX example. What do they offer that Apple

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>does not. Well, the fundamental difference here that really matters

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is the spectrum. In the case of the Apple announcement,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they are using dedicated satellite only spectrum, which means Apple

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>has to put, as they said, specific hardware, antennas and

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>chips to work with that satellite only hardware. Uh spectrum

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Global what SpaceX is doing the

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>T mobile or a s T working with Vota Phone

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and a T and T. They're actually using the carrier spectrum,

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so there's no change that needs to be made made

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to the device itself. All the work will be done

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>by the satellite. In the case of a company like

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a s T, they're building one of the largest satellites,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly one of the most powerful satellites out there, in

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>order to do the work that the handset can't because

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the handset has no modifications made to it. So if

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a good first step, as you say, what

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>do you imagine the second and third step might be. Yeah.

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So clearly this is an opening salvo by Apple. It

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>provides a basic level of service, can probably draw some

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>extra interest in the iPhone fourteen. But I think given

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the broader landscape, if Apple is serious

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about this, they would have to look at potentially building

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a satellite constellation of their own. Perhaps not a surprise

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that Global Star does have a filing for over three

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand satellites to potentially launch, and they'd have to build

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>satellites unlike the current second gen or recently ordered third

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>gen satellites that have a much bigger antenna, much more power,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and are optimized for working with that consumer handset. So

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>let's play this out a little bit. Do you imagine

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that someday Apple might be interested in building a competitor

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to starlink for example, UM, I would say not exactly Starlink.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Starlink's main purpose is broadband, and uh, you know that's

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>non Apple's game, at least potentially here in the neryor term.

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason that they partnered with Global Star,

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they're probably one of the weaker players in terms of

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>their current revenue and their their customer profile within the

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>satellite mobile satellite spectrum industry. What they do have is

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a very good spectrum position, and uh if they eventually

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>use the full aspect of that spectrum. But there is

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a potential to offer a higher data rate service. Certainly

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing that would compare with the Starlink service, but you know,

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think of it as a three G, four G, maybe

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>even up to a low level five G type service

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in the longer term. All Right, I'm fascinating to look

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.959
<v Speaker 1>that far out, if you will. To play on Apples onwards,

0:30:49.000 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Chris Quality Quilty Analytics Co. Founder. Thank you. These incredible

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>products each offers so many great capabilities and work seamlessly

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>together in a way that only Apple can deliver. Making

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that are so from Apple CEO Tim Cook. There before

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we go, I want to recap the day's event. I

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>am joined now by Bloomberg's Mark German, our resident Apple expert,

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and Juliasca forrest Or Research, Vice president of Principal Analysts.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>The're going to see you, Julie Marcot. Want to start

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with you because obviously you previewed so many of the

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>things that we saw today, but there must have been

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>some surprises what stood out most to you? You know,

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the to the event, there were a

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of analysts who were expecting iPhone price likes, particularly

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>on the iPhone Fortune, Prome Pro Max line. I had

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>never heard that was happening, so I didn't believe it

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was happening. In little do we know be announced today

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with no price likes. Very interesting in light of inflation

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>price increases you're seeing from Meta, from Samsung and from

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>other companies. However, there are so inflationary related price increases

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in Europe, in India. But if you want

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone fourteen pro it's going to be that same now,

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I will not. If you look at the fine print

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at some of the carrier deals this year, they're not

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>as aggressive as last year. Right, So last year you

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>were able to upgrade from a twelve prom Max to

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a thirteen Promax and get like fifty bucks cash back

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>on top of getting that new phone. This year, that

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>same upgrade from a thirteen Promax to a fourteen Promax,

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to cost most people between three hundred and

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>six d dollars. So the carrier deals not as aggressive,

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Julie, it's almost a given every year the

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>price of the iPhone goes out, we get a new

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>one and the price goes out. What do you make

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of Apple's play here? Is this genius or not? Well?

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a nod to the economic headwinds that

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we feel like a lot of consumers are facing. So

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was very smart not only keeping the

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>prices relatively flat, but you also heard Tin Coxie the

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>word essential a lot. It's essential, it's essential, and it's

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>only essential, but now it's essential to our health and

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a set to our safety. So I think it's it's

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>smart marketing mark when it comes to the technology. You know,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>as you reported, we're seeing more significant upgrades than we

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>saw last year. But to some people, they might still

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>look at this phone and saying looks like basically the

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.719
<v Speaker 1>same phone. But you know, those technological upgrades that go

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>into you know, a new chip, thinner, faster, longer, bat

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>battery life are so hard to do. Can you talk

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to us about the significance of of the inside changes

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that we can't see? Sure? I mean, if you're looking

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>at the jump from the thirteen to the four team,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about the Pro models. I think I

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>can sit here today and safely tell you that there

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely no reason for you to upgrade. There's no

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>faster processor, the battery life is about the same. In

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the camera enhancements going from the thirteen to the fourteen

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>are not that significant. But when you get to the

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Pro models, you are seeing major changes. Right that new

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>notch cut out. They really turned something that's an ugly

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>portion of the iPhone into something that quite frankly looks awesome. Right,

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>changing the notch into a software area where you can

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>see when your ubers arriving, you could see your music playback,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>And that technology is something They've spent years developing the

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch Pro. We first wrote about that about two

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>years ago. This thing has been in development, probably in

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>some way or another since the original Apple Watch launched

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago. Talk let's talk about the car crash feature. Right,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that required them to actually do car crash testing. They

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>showed a video of that. That takes years, Right, they

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>need to get this right. That's years of data collection

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and the links they go to for testing and development

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>in terms of features like that probably go beyond what

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>any other company in the space goes through. Right, you know,

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I've dropped my phone so many times. How are they

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>going to know that's not a car crash, Julie While

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you weren't going sixty miles per hour. So there's that.

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>You're probably just standing But you know, what do you

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>agree with there? And and what would you pick a

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bone with of what Mark had to say. Yes, so

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the tech theological advancements are pretty substantial, But

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing is for a lot of consumers,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's subtle, you know, And it's one of

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>those things if you're just going from a thirteen to

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen, you're like, Okay, it's a little bit better.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you're going from like an eleven or twelve

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to a fourteen, you can't really articulate it as a consumer.

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>But at some point you're like, oh, my goodness, that's

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so much better. It's so much brighter. The pictures are

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>so much better. I had no idea. So there's a

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of things I think that are to subtle. I

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the other things they did they

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>added sensors, right, So when you add sensors, you get

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>more data, you get more precise data. They can model

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>more activities. Uh. Like my favorite, as I told you,

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is being able to track my kicksets in the pool. Right.

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>They can do that with these kinds of sensors. Uh.

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>There's other really subtle things about managing the battery, like

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>dimming the phone. Uh, you know, the transparency, the spatial audio.

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of things that are just really subtle.

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that are hard to communicate to consumers, but

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>when consumers experience, they just have a wow effect. What's

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>your sense of how a cult supply chain issues are

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be to manage over the next six months.

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know. I would say, not being an

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>expert in the supply chain, and you know, it seems

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to be impacting the world economy. But somehow Apple seems

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to be doing okay, and Mark you would agree with that, right,

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you look at the lead times on

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>these various products, they're not that bad, YEA. So far

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Apple which Ultra, what we're seeing is only

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the three variations is already shipping at the

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>end of October, whereas you still get first day September

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three availability for two of the bands. Now, the

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the impact seems to be on the bands themselves, not

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the Watch Ultra. So if you're trying to get a

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>watch Watch Ultra on launch day, my recommendation for you

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>would buy any band combination just to get that watch

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and then worry about buying the band you want later.

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So clearly in terms of the production process for those bands,

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out which bands are going to be

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>more popular, uh, that's going to be you know, tougher

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for Apple. Also, the Watch Ultra is one skew right

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on color, one finish, one screen size right, much less

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>complex to produce when you have fear excuse, So I

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna be okay on that I also think

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be just fine on iPhone production. Uh.

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The issues they had with iPad and mac supply, Uh,

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>those seem, based on my research, probably resolved. We'll see

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>what happens in October November when they launch new variations

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Mac UH and the iPad Pro. Now, one

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 1>thing we didn't hear much about is the mixed reality

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>headset that you've of course been reporting on. I know

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you're expecting it to come next year. Unless there were

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>some Easter eggs today that I didn't see. Did you

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>hear anything Mark that can any more clues as to

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what this headset will look like. No, no easter eggs today.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I know in power On we wrote the other day

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>there would be no uh you know, reveal of this

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>mixed reality had set. I'm not expecting them to announce

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that until next year, and I think will be the

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 1>year of they are and VR for Apple. Uh. No

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 1>new augmented reality features on the iPhone. Nothing are related

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to the watch. There are some new transparency modes and

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>some cool new audio features for the AirPods pro too

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>announced today. It's plausible that some of that functionality will

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>make their way into the speaker system. On the reality Probe,

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>which is I believe will be the name of the

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>headset next year. But I think we're still a few

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>months away before seeing that headset come to fruition. And

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what about the M word, Julie, the metaverse, what's apples

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 1>play going to be today? Need one? Well, there's there

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is no metaverse, so Apple is not late yet, No,

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you know. More seriously, I think Apple is

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>really good at timing the market, and what we're seeing

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>now are some metaverse precursors, which means we've got some

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>luxury brands selling you a Groucci purse for your avatar

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>and roadblocks, which is probably something more that your children play. Right,

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's some things that I prefer a real Gucci

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>at this point, but not a real Gucci at this point. No,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think you also, I think the you know,

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the notion these augmented reality glasses like we did, We're

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just not there with the technology yet where we can

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>get a comfortable headset on consumers that's going to allow

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>them with the great use case at the right pripes point.

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, I agree with Mark. We

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>may see some kind of a pro version announced in

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years. But I believe Apple will

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>come into the market when they feel the markets ready

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and they feel consumers ready. There's a good use case,

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think Apples just generally very good at timing

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the market. And I think it's still too early. And Mark,

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you've reported that they're still working through you know, hardware

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>software issues with that forthcoming headset. I want to end

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>with you on comments that Tim Cook made to me

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>around the last earnings call, uh, you know, which which

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>aligned with your reporting that Apple is going to be

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>spending through the downturn. That's something that they've always done.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>He feels like it's made them stronger on the other side,

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>but also that they're going to be deliberate about that spending.

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any sense of wear Apple we'll pull back, uh,

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and not quickly. Yeah. I mean, I think that you're

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing budget cuts across the company. I don't think you're

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing that happen to core areas. I think that they

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>have enough people to launch the products they want to launch.

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see a slow down and hiring.

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they are doing slow down and hiring. It's

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>very difficult right now to get hiring approval of Apple. Uh,

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see them spend probably about the same

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>on research and development for the next year or so.

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So just no growth there, Okay, but I'm not alarmed

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about the company's prospects because of this. All right, Bloomberg

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>spark German juliosc a Forester Research. Thank you both. Couldn't

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:30.439
<v Speaker 1>think of a better way to end the show. Um,

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and thank you all for watching this special edition of

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology from Apple headquarters in Cupertino. Thursday. We've got

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>a fun show coming up. Golden State Warriors. Andre Iguadala

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>will be with us. If you're an Iggy fan, you

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss it. This is Bloomberg