WEBVTT - 2019 Week 13 Preview 

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Be Around the NFL podcast is the new whole of

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. Well, welcome to another edition of the Around

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL podcast, presented by the United States Marine Corps.

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>My name is Dan Hansons. I'm joining room. I'm just

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>uh filled with heroes, Mark Seessler, Chris Wesley, Greg ros

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with thought. What is up? Boys? Hey dude, I just

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>had an amazing conversation with a very famous X Raiders

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>employee over the phone. Who was Amy Trask's first story

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>working on Wow j Work, Little journal work. What's the story?

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not what. I'm not ready to reveal what the

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>story is about yet, but it's going to be explosive,

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what. It has been revealed. I do want

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to say thank you to the listeners who said they

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we are on episode today. It was double confirmed, and

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's enough. One more Yeah, a

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>few more people check it out. But if that's true,

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that would in our thousand episode. Would be sometime in

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the off season April or May. I could figure it out,

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we won't do that right now. And

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we're already in the works of maybe doing some big

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>time plans. Even the Shadowy League figures don't know about this.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna present this idea to them of what we

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>want to do, but thank you. I'm sure it will

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>be met with a shrug and a yeah, let's do

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a follow up meeting about this, and then it will

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>be September in week one. That that's just a guess,

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>but maybe I'll be proven wrong. Some of the lesser

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>enthusiastic Shadowys have been vaulted out of the company's hemisphere.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Some of them vaulted themselves out of the hemisphere West.

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>I imagine after yesterday's huge announcement that the Paramour is

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>with Child, what a life changing experience that will be

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for you that you got a lot of feedback from

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the general general populace. I did, and I'd like to

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thank all of them for the messages on Twitter, the mes,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>sages on Instagram, text messages. Thank you all. Keisha and

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I are over the moon West and I had a

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of drinks of the Cozy Classy moved by the

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Zeuster after the move and I played baby Boy by

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>John Lennon on the jukebox and then uh, Lukisha came

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in and I said, Lukisha, this is actually kind of

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>more like a Me and West moment. So that's the

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>way to handle your way to have the Christmas lights

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>up there to celebrate what. No, but the woman behind

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the bar, which I'm sure you know her well, Mark

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the woman behind the bar, her husband puts up the

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>lights every year for the past like twenty five years.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And he's doing it tomorrow, I believe, or not tomorrow

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the day after thanks you. Oh so that's when they

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>why don't pick stuff what we can get? It makes sense,

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. He's so that put the nails in the

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>coffin for where we're going out. Cos he has been

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>eliminated because there was a big, huge controversy over UM

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a text chain about the NFL media gathering for tonight

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 1>UH to have some drinks on the EVA Thanksgiving a

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Newish tradition, and I had thrown out the cozy because

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we hadn't been there a lot lately, and Lakisha was

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing back and I didn't know what it was all about.

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>There was some more misinformation because Colleen was, you know,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>an agent of chaos without even realizing it during the

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>planning process, planning the event with two people and then

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 1>not connecting the dots. UM but Ultimately, when I found

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>out Lakisha is pregnant, there's you know, the cozy is

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a workingman's bar, that's a blue collar bar, that's

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a third shifter bar, and there a lot of guys

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>smoking outside, and she was worried about worried about secondhand

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 1>smoke wafting in. So am I gonna pound the table

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>about the cozy with a pregnant lady? No, we found

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>out all the theories out there in the second guessing

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>about whether the smoke factor was a little overplayed. It's real.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Keisha even yesterday spent most of the time there with

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>her shirt over her nose, and the late period of

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson waft of smoke every couple of seconds. Although I

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>do love the smell of secondhand smoke and realizab we

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have a younger time when your buddies would be smoking

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>around you. I I don't smoke. I never was a smoker,

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but I do like like the social aspect of people

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>smoking and drinking. In theory, that's what I used to think.

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But then I also remember in college all my clothes

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>smelled like smoke at all times. You would in every

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>bar in New Orleans, And so that's that's an egg.

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a little nostalgic, but I don't know. Lukisha also

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that there was no food options at the cozy.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Not true. I do believe they have that like big

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>jar of like eggs and framale hyde that had been

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>there late seventies. Picks going to college in New England.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>You would go back to the dorms and you'd see

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone's jackets being hung out the window in the middle

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the winter. Did you get aired out from all

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the smoke? Uh? Anyway, memories, memories, memories should be a

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>good night Okay you coming? I am. Yeah. I was

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the one that suggested the place that we're actually gonna

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>end up going. Okay, good So you played peacemaker look

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>at you of course? Yeah? Remember you said, I all

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden changed my tune and you were like, oh,

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Lakisha must have put a knife in your tire. And

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wow, something something something that. What what

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>are the odds that in the end something else comes up?

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>For it just doesn't happen, you don't show up. I

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>can see that personally. No, I've I've been planning on

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>it because especially now nothing better to do. No, I

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot. I have a lot to do, so

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a stop. It's it's stop. It's not the full

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>night we can get. Yeah, thank you, But I would say,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're just making it a stop, you get less

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>say in the organization. I don't think she would agree

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>with that concept, though, I like, I know what the

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>people want and guess where we're going. Where I suggested

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>all right doesn't sit with me. Well, Dan, stop by, Dan,

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going you guys are we're starting at like eight

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>o'clock like I don't normally go out to the generation.

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Shut up? All right, Okay, let's get it, let's get

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to work. It is the show's a day earlier because

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Thanksgiving holiday. The week thirteen previews upon us.

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh tomorrow, no excuse me, Friday, you will hear the

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>recap of the three Thanksgiving games that we previewed on

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.239
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's show. Mark and I will be handling those duties.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>But until then, we have uh more games to get to.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's over for the buys. There's no more buys.

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Mixed feelings about that. Thirty two teams, three games Thursday.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks sorry to right to thirteen to talk about correct

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>or incorrect that's correct, I fag I've had a pretty

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>good math season. Yeah. I mean you've done that specific

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>problem before, probably seventy you had to slip up in

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>London when you couldn't divide thirty eight by two while

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>we were playing darts. I think you made it into

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen. That's actually a tough that's a tough one.

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's put you on the two. Ah, what it's kind,

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. Wait was something about it? I mean that

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is fair. You had enough time? Was well? I wasn't

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>listening before study up or else. Your coworkers can make

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>fun of you twenty years late. Greg, are you coming tonight?

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You get off the off the hook? No, I am gonna,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna come. I'm no. I have not made any

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>opinions made because I know my arrival time is uh

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in flux and my my family that's gonna come first,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But then then I'll come afterwards. So I'm happy to

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>go wherever you guys have to be be at that

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>point on this a little late arrival. This threat has

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>been raging for like six or seven days, and I

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think Greg and I've made a large impact on it. Um,

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's get into it draft style. The order

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be interesting. The order is West, Dan, Mark, Greg.

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We have the game of the year on the schedule.

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>We have the biggest Browns game, and so I remember

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with this. We have a lot cooking. Mark,

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you pick third, West, Uh, you pick first, So get

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>us going. I mean it seems to me an obvious

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick pick, but perhaps not well. I

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>thought about skipping that game just to see if the

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>game being the Ravens and forty Niners, because there were

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of promises and posturing going on Sunday between

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you and Mark about what might happen between the Jets games.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking a little chaos, see what happens between Mark

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and Dan. But then Greg came in with a pretty

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>strong trade offer. What he got it would be changing

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>slots and um, which would give me back to back picks.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I would only have to cover two games as well.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And Greg also threw in if I have to write

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>what we learned, he would write it for me. So

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to turn him down. That's the best

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>part for two reasons, one beyond his control both of them. One,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm not writing what we learned, So that's attempting. Part

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the offer. Would have maybe thrown in something else.

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought you guys were But okay, no, there's nothing

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you could have done, Greg, because you have analyzed this

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>draft in the same way I have, and you know

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is a three game draft. I just want

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that first game. I didn't analyze anything beyond it that

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to give you what I could. Yeah, it's like, oh,

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to watch forty Niners Ravens, but here

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>can we We can put you in a nice Titans

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>cult today. Nor well, so you are you going with

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the game we all expect, all right, very good? The

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners at the Ravens ten and one against nine

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>into the Ravens, the hottest team in football and west

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it's in the early window. A disgrace. It's all Patriots

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>through and everything that they didn't want to move the

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Pats at a prime time on Sunday night football. Uh

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So instead of flexing in the best game of the year,

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>a portion of this country, we won't even get to

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>watch this game that doesn't see doesn't pass the smell

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>testamate and and and you want to hear something else

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that was Cynthia Freeland made uh this point uh this

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>morning on our Power Ranking show. This isn't even the

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe Buck Troy Aikman game. If you believe that they

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>are not covering this game. It is the number two team.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall who they are at the top of

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>my head. Uh. So you have Davis Kevin Burkard. Nice team,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a very nice team. But you have the number

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>two team in the early time slot for the best

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>game of the year. Maybe they don't trust it will

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be close. Well, this is as Greg talked about on

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on yesterday's podcast. This Ravens team is probably the closest

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thing we've seen to two thousand Patriots, two thousand seven

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriots over the last two months. What they're doing to teams,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the margin of victory, the convincing style in which they're

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>beating good teams and great quarterbacks. And the forty Niners

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>past defense is historically great too. It's right up there

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Patriots this year. Maybe not quite as good,

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but where is The Patriots secondary is awesome, The forty

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Niners front line is awesome. It's a good matchup and um,

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>another Greg statement, styles make fights. This is a good

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>one more two different styles. It might be the most

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>important first quarter of the year because both teams are

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>so good playing with the lead, less because of their

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>how good they're running the ball, you know, we know that,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but more just because they played to their past defense.

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>I think the Ravens maybe you could run on them,

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure the forty Niners are gonna try. And

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>then the forty Niners especially love to get ahead because

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>then they can send that defensive line wild uh and

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>shut you down. In their secondary is very good. I

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>mean they're deep. Sherman's playing great, their safeties are playing great,

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Mosley plays great. If there's ever a game where Lamar

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Jackson is going to struggle throwing the ball, this is

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the chance. Like if they if they put up forty

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>points on the forty Niners and their passing game is

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as efficient and he's as accurate as it's been, It's like,

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who's gonna stop him like this. This

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is the team that you would think could make them

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a little one dimensional and have a chance to slow

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:02.599
<v Speaker 1>it down. And I don't think this is gonna be

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a blow. I have too much respect for the forty nine. Well,

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>I think losing Matt Scurrow your center is an issue

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for Baltimore, and that was sort of drowned out in

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>the hoop. Love that evening it. There was a game

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>when Cleveland beat Baltimore and you had Myles Garrett and

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Olivier Vernon coming in off the edges. That was a

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>game where Lamar Jackson was not very productive through the

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>air and he was sloppy, and there were issues with

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>their offense from wire to wire that day. But I

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's tough even if you have a great pass

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>rush to just sort of as they say, pen your

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>eyears back whatever that means, and fly towards Lamar Jackson

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's a magician. He's suddenly seven yards to the right,

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>galloping up field and a dog thing pen years back. Yes,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I just figured that out. They do that, do no, no,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I I dogs theirs get pinned back. Well that's that's

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a nice thing for dogs. I guess, I don't know,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is it. I love this. I mean something else hidden

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in that last game for the dog and like painfall

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, But I don't like it. Yeah,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly good things for dogs is what was on the

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>show when Mark said, I don't like it. He winked,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>so he does like it. I don't. I'm largely like

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm largely don't think about dogs, but I wish them well.

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown, Hollywood Brown has been awesome. And the le future.

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell you one little one, another little

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>thing I think I love about the Ravens, so I

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>believe it tapped into like a higher power. At this point,

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they now have like pat Rickard their fullback. Did you

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>see the clip of him taking the Rams player and

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>moving him like fifteen yards off the ball, like the

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>whole play went somewhere else. And he is a vicious,

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>rumbling wild man and they call it Project Pat. He

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>goes out there and just punishes people. I'm gonna say,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for the third week in a row, everyone's like, this

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is the week the Ravens are gonna be They are

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>not going to be tested. This game will not be close.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll be wrong. At some point, I don't think they nut.

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>You cannot convince me the Niners, who are a great

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>team or anywhere close to the Ravens. I just don't

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>know how you'd convinced me of that at this Here's

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a good stat that kind of backs your thought on

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit. So I saw this on Twitter

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>at forty Niners passer rating allowed verse eight pocket passers.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a tick below fifty two, which is terrible. They

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>were great for the Niners versus Russell Wilson and Kyler

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Murray this year. Guys that move around and make plays

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like Lamar Jackson. Only Lamar Jackson's better than both those

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>guys doing that. The rating shoots up to one oh four.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps Lamar Jackson, who's a bad match up for everybody,

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but especially potentially against this front seven of the Niners.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Yours use of the research pack that was nice was

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>like packet I got it off Twitter, having haven't had

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of research packet pop this year, but they've

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>been loved that research. Jeff Reholts, the whole team, they

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>kill it. It's a large team now. Something that people

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>very hard to measure in stats is tackling, and I

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>think that was a great point that Collinsworth made on

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday Night game, is that this might be the

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>best tackling team in the league. The forty Niners defense,

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>which is very similar to the Seahawks teams over the years.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh they teach tackling in a certain way. They don't

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>give up a lot of yards after contact, and that's

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what the Ravens do better than anyone. A lot of

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Ingram and Jackson in the tight ends, a lot of

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their yards are after contact, especially in the running game.

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And if they can tackle well and you have George

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Kittle on the field, it's a different team. And I

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's some crazy mis mismatch. You would never

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>give Kittle the m v P but for non quarterbacks,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and I know he doesn't have the numbers. It just

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>reminds me so much of Gronk that when he's on

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the field, they are a completely different, more dangerous team.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And he is gonna be on the field. This is

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like the football head, this is their dream matchup. Like,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know enough to say if this is true,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to me you have the number one

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>scheming team run game wise versus the number one scheming

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>team pass game wise with the forty Niners. Kyle Shanahan

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is scheming receivers open all the time. Pro Football Reference

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>had a great stat sorry and um that they the

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are the first team since the fifty nine Colts

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to have two thousand rushing and two thousand passing yards

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>through eleven weeks. They actually have twenty three hundred of each.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's the first team in NFL history to do that.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So when people talk about balance, it's just like there's

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>never been a team like we're seeing something very specially

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Ravens. And that's why I have so and

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody does. But a lot of respect with the Niners

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>been able to do this season. I just don't see

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>how you could pick the Niners in this game. I

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think this the Ravens are on a special run that

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna remember. I think for a long time. Um,

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>we all got the Ravens in it. I do, but

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I I picked the forty Niners to keep it closer

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>than the desert. You know, the Ravens are a heavy

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>favor in this game. I think it will be a good,

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>good late, you know, fourth quarter type of game. West.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>What Jamal Adams didn't understand during that trade deadline situation was, yeah,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you have the note that you have to pick. You

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have this beautiful game. But if some it's calling you

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>pick up the phone. You need to hear what people

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>are saying to you. You're not doing your job. Otherwise,

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So I thought you did the right move. You didn't count.

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>You didn't give me any other offer. Who knows that

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe I would have raised it. There was no counter.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It just got to the point where I looked at

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the four and five seeds on my board and didn't

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>want anything to do with them. Greg's eleven it open

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that like maybe VENMO could have been. Yeah, how desperate

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was Greg for that game? Oh? I strategized. I waited

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>till like about half an hour before the show. I

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what you guys are doing behind the scenes.

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>They thought i'd I'd hit him right at the last second. Well,

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the same guy who predicted a couple of weeks ago

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that you'd be watching whatever game it was anyway, tweeted

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>again that he's doubling down that Greg says he's gonna

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>watch this game. I'm not. You can't. It depends on

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>how many games are in the morning, and I think

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I didn't realize you could trade into the

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>spot of the person with two games. I would have

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>been dropping hundred dollar bills on you all season for

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that option. I didn't. I'm gonna get stuck with three

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one for the eighth time and around. You don't even

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>have to run about him all used to do us

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about I don't know. All right, Mark, let's do

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>some business because I'm picking two overall, and I know

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>you want the biggest one, the biggest Browns game in

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a decade, decades, decades for me. So I think I

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have what a very fair trade offer that I think

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'll find appetizing. We swap the two and three picks. Okay,

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll take your third, you move up to two, and

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in return, we flip second round picks, so I moved

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>one spot ahead of you in the next round. Uh,

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and a conditional pick. And the conditional pick is if

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I um, if this Brown's game goes to overtime, I

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get your first round pick next week and you get

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>my last round pick. So this front office operates in

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>its own way, and I'm not looking. I don't do

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.239
<v Speaker 1>this to just grab some game that I'm fetishizing over

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>all week and must watch on television in our news room,

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>which is impossible to con and trade anyways. So I

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>will take it because all I really want is to

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>watch the Cleveland versus Pittsburgh game. And if if you

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>were going to go The other thing when we talked

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about this, and we'll be I'll be brief, was you

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>were going to take the Browns game, and I was

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the Jets game. We're gonna sit a foot

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>away from each other. Total annoyance move. And I don't

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like that either, So I will take your trade. I

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have the chart. I don't even see what happens

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>down the road. You have to approved by the league office.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I got lost in the conditions. Yeah, I'm very confused.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't unfair, and I thank you for not calling

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 1>my bluff because I wouldn't have done it to you anyway.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's been filed with a league office. So Mark,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you pick second, alright, So I'm gonna pick Jets Bengals.

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I am gonna obviously go Brown Steelers. And you could

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.959
<v Speaker 1>argue that there have been bigger games, like in two

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven when they had a chance to beat Cincinnati

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and essentially take that division or go to the playoffs

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with it, and they lost. Pittsburgh's a difference situation in Cincinnati, though,

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>because the Browns Steelers rivalry essentially has not been one

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for a long, long long time. The Browns have not swept.

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Where were you in n I was in Pearl River,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in the cold Town. I was a third grader. That

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is the last time when you were in third grade

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Browns swept the Steelers in a season. Utterly absurd.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It is ridiculous. It is ridiculous, and this is going

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to require the Browns. I thought against Miami, you know

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>we all watched that by now, I would imagine played

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the best game they've had all year on offense, because

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought against the Ravens and Greg, you noted this

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>first thing. You're write that it was big plays that

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>happen against Baltimore, It wasn't. Uh, you know, can drive

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>after drive. The Browns went a little flat against Miami

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the second half, but they used all their weapons for

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the first time I've seen really this whole season. I

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think Kareem Hunt makes a big difference in that backfield,

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>but they cannot afford to make some of the mistakes

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>they made in that game. There was a hideous moment

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>where a show pot guns snap flew by Baker Mayfield.

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>They had a trick play that even had Freddie Kitchens

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>giggling on the sideline because it was such a bust

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and went so wrong, and they had they did have penalties,

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and they did for a quarter plus go totally silent

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and allow Miami to control the game. In Miami nearly

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>came back. You can't do that in Pittsburgh. I don't

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>care if it's Duck Hodges or Joe Beats playing quarterbacks.

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>It is a totally tough environment, and after what happened

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago, the Steelers are gonna be hyper motivated.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I truly think the key player to the game on

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>defense is Joe Schobert, who has four picks in two weeks.

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>He's been the He's not someone that gets talked about

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He was correctly named the a f C

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player of the Week, and he's been the spiritual

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>leader of that side of the ball post Myles Garrett

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>go in, I mean, I don't want to hear anything

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about that. You know, Pittsburgh is a tough place to play.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>They got a great Devin You know that's all true.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>If the Browns are anywhere near being the type of

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>team we thought they could be, and I think they've

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>shown progress over the asked him to be in a

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>dangerous offense. If you can't beat Duck Hodges with Jude

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Juice Smith Schuster and James Conner both looking like they're

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss this game too. We won't know until Sunday,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's not trending in the right direction. Give me

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a break. This is a very winnable game. I don't

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>care that Myles Garrett isn't there. Good offense should beat good.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, Nick Chubb, Kareem Hunt, Odell Beckham, Jarvis Landry.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>That's that's an all star team and they're playing Hodges,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuels, Deonte Johnson, Tevin Jones. It's no competing the

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>old Dr Jack style. Tale of the tape come on,

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and he had to. He did what he had to do,

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tomlin by keeping Mason Rudolph on the bench. Uh.

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It also eliminates a distraction with the um, you know,

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Myles Garrett fiasco around that game coming. That would I

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>think it just would have been a talking point around

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. Uh. Hodges made one big throw and that

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was one more than Mason Runoff had made in several weeks.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So he's the right guy to go to. I just

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>wonder if this is going to be It's amazing and

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>we talked about earlier in the season, Greg with this defense,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>what a shame it is if you're a Steelers fan

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that if you still had Big Ben uh And and

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe you have a little better injury luck, you you're

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>an a f C powerhouse. But we've gotten to the

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>point where the Pittsburgh Steelers are just living and dying

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>on a guy that was undrafted and didn't even get

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>an invite to the Combine. And that's what has come

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to for Pittsburgh. He represents a Hail Mary and all

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they need him to be and pray for him to

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>be is not embarrassing, But you can't rule that out

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>is something that could happen. It's there in his toughest

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>spot as you can imagine, and he's playing without potentially

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>his best wide receiver and his best running back the Brown.

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this should be an easy win for the Brown,

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but we said that about Cleveland. I could still I

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>could see this game should be. It doesn't mean it will.

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it will be. I think it's I

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>could see this being seventeen to sixteen the Steelers is

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not easy, So I respect that they're gonna keep it

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>or try to keep it close. Keep the score down.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But Baker Mayfield too, Like, how are you feeling about

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Baker right now? I mean, this is a game, you know,

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in his maturation process, he's had some ups and downs.

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.959
<v Speaker 1>It's trendy in the right direction, where a really good

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback goes and make sure they win. I feel better.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder if what the coaching is behind the

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>scenes there. It's been a really up and down season

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>for someone who I thought would be an NFL's clear

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>cut star at that position. Right now, all right, let

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>us move on now now this is all strategy. I

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>would not have taken that Browns game anyway, because I

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>know I need to be watching Niners Ravens hopefully will

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>be also watching Jets Raiders, so I gotta keep my

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>TVs open there. Uh So I will go to the

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Lake games and we got a nice late game staring

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at me at Arrowhead, Raiders at Chiefs. I will select

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>a three overall, and I think this is a game.

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me talk about what the desert saying what people expect.

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>After the Raiders lay an absolute stink bomb at the

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>meadow Lands against the Jets, loose third for three, the

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback gets benched in the third quarter, just an embarrassing

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>loss that really completely recalibrates um uh, the ceiling for

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in the eyes of many. But I I

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>hold onto the idea that every team has bad weeks,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and some weeks are worse than others. And and that

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was the Raiders bomb of the year. And I think

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they are going to put up a really good fight

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in this game, because, first of all, the Chiefs have

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not shown shown me this season that they can go

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>out and just kill somebody. Um. They've played a lot

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of close games this season, and the Raiders know full

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>well the stakes here. If the if the Chiefs uh

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>win this game, they're eight and four, the Raiders dropped

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred and six and six in the division

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>is essentially gone. So this is a huge game. I

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>expected to be an extremely close game. Uh. And I'm

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you guys are in the same camp or

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think that this is the pumpkin The Raiders

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have turned back into a pumpkin and the Chiefs are

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>going to blow them out, because I understand that's side

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of it as well. Well. You say the Chiefs aren't

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>really playing dominant games, but these two teams have played

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>before and it was a dominant game by the Chiefs

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in which the Raiders secondary was just blitzed by the

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Chief's offense a long time ago. That was the point

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>second quarter that they had big play after big play

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>after big play, and the Raiders secondary is still not good.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>They're very susceptible to the big play. This is a

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>big play passing offense. Tyreek Hill uh appears that he's

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna play in this game, and he's so key to

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>them that are healthier coming off the by Damian Williams

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>might not play, but I do think it's just a

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>match of problem for them that the Raiders have survived

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>against okay offenses that just don't have enough to blitz.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>They're really talent poor defense overall, and I think Paul

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Gunther and Mike Mayock, uh, you know, added some talent.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Gunther's coached up what's not a super talented defense, and

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so they survive against the teams that aren't explosive. But

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>then you play the Chiefs on the road and uh yeah,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know. I could look in the mirror

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and because to me, this is like a big game.

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But my Vegas test says it says that I couldn't.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think the Chiefs start their steam roll of

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the December and they this is not close, and the Raiders,

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, their their hopes go up and smoke. Yeah.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>My concern for the Raiders is watching that Jets game.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And we can get to the Jets later that there

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of bad drops, obviously, but I thought

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that Oakland was just pushed around by the Jets on

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ball. And you mentioned Greg that

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>they're all The Raiders offensive line hasn't been itself the

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks, and that's a huge concern. And

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>there's too many weapons and they would to me, it

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>would be a devastating loss. If I'm a Chiefs fan,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>if they if they fall at home in this thing,

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I just you they lost this game, they then go

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to Foxboro the next week and all of a sudden,

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all hanging in the balance and they would be

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of trouble. I I don't see that happening,

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but I do. I think the Raiders have surprised this

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>all season. I know they are much better, much better

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>home team, win or lose, They're a great story. I

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be able to move the ball and score

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>some points in this game. They take those long drives though,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and those long drives better. I think that's just tough

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to do against Kansas. That also keeps sating money. They

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have to end in touchdowns though, or else you're just

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>taking these long drives and falling further and further behind. Uh.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the Bengals had some you know,

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not smart enough to understand if they did something

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>schematically their defense really molly whipping the Raiders molly wop

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>molly whopping was one of the most surprising things I

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>saw in terms of he went for it. He said,

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna, by the way, molly whipping when you hit

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>someone this side of the hand bang molly. It feels

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like I'm phrase that probably shouldn't it's probably should be retired.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the background history of it. All that

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>up to see. If it is on my work computer,

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that's okay. I think it was retired until

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg brought it back into the lexicon. You try to

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>give it a more modern tweak. The origin of molly

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>whop if you if you could, Ricky or just give

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it to the listeners to do and they'll handle it

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>by to night. What was your point. I don't even

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>think it matters anywhere. I don't know what the Bengals did.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>They took this Raiders team soul for some reason. It

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was one of the most surprising things I saw season.

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Was their defense really dominating in that game and then

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the and then the Raiders come out with the stink

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bomb again. I don't know if they showed something, but

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not keeping up. According to Urban Dictionary, molly whop

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>verb when a grown man beats another grown man as

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>if he were a girl under the age of ten. Yeah,

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not an appropriate girl under the age. All right,

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>glad that we should move on to my picks for one.

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, Greg, go ahead, I'm just going let's retire

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>molly whop society. It's gone. Sorry, guys, Sorry Molly. I'm

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Rams Cardinals. Yeah, I'm taking Rams Cardinals at

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>four oh five. I like this game. I like I

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>want to like game that that I'm gonna be interested in.

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, there's only three there and this is kind

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of I know the Rams look like their season is done.

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It probably is, but this is the true last Dan

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and if they lose here. It's totally over. And one

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of the more surprising things I think in the NFL

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this year is that the Cardinals offense is right now

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>better than the Rams offense. Who would have thought that

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>going into the year that not only the Cardinal's offense

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is better, but the Cardinals offense, led by Kenyan Drake

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>with David Johnson flat out benched, is better and that

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds is coming back this week. I don't know

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if you know David Johnson, who was a top five

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy pick, is gonna get on the field too much.

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the number two rushing offense, largely because of

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray, and they can throw a lot of creative

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>runs at you, just like the Ravens did on Monday Night.

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a toss up. I I don't totally

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>poured dirt on this Rams team. They should be able

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to score some points against Arizona. I don't have a strong,

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, feel of who's gonna win this game, but

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Arizona has been close in so many games that it

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>really does feel like they're due to have a good

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>win and this would be uh a humbling moment I

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>think for the Rams. If they end up losing this game.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a Todd Gurley run which got lost in

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the blowout loss. It's like a fifteen yard run early

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>second quarter that I thought was the most explosive he's

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>looked all year. And I went back and watched a

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>few times because I was like, that doesn't look like

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley. The last two weeks he's looked pretty good. Yeah,

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think he's starting to finally play like

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we would say earlier in the year. He's not any

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>better than the Malcolm Brown or Darrell Henderson, and I

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>think now you I saw a difference between Gurley and

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown in that game. There was also a long

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>third down run where long third and long, where they

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>gave the ball to Gurley when it looked to me

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>like a clear passing situation, and they they raised the

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>point on the broadcast that does Sean McVeigh really trust? Yes,

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it was on Erica's probably as they dug in on

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this game. That's surprising, did a very nice job with that.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You and m on the wrap up, But dude, that

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.239
<v Speaker 1>does Sean McVeigh trust Jared Goff at this point? That's

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of Sean mcveigh's move even last year when things

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are going well, he calls conservative plates. But I don't

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>outside of that, you shouldn't trust him because I think

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>there was some plays in that game, like there was

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a third and long near the goal line where the

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Ravens blitz and everyone's been killing the Rams o line

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all year. They picked the blitz up perfectly. Goff had

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all the time in the world. He had Cooper Cup

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>one on one, and his timing on the throw the

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>cup was just totally off. And I'm just thinking, like,

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a play they hit eight out of eight times

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, seven out of eight times, and Golf like

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>rushed the throw even though there's no pressure there. I

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>know that's just all on God. Yeah, I think to

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>your question, like I am, I shocked at the Cardinals

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>offenses productive and exciting. That was one of the two

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>things that was going to be that or a big flop.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I felt like it what we just didn't know, and

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the off season questions. It's one

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of the shocks of the league that the Rams are

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as un ooyable to watch as they are. And next

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>offseason what I'm gonna try to spend more time on

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is looking at teams where the offensive line has been shattered,

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>because that seems to be the earmark of you're going

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot more disappointment than you thought, because

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, uh, you know, where we were with

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Shaan McVeigh year ago is that he's a genius, and

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that suddenly changes because the Rams aren't good,

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or that he's not skilled or he's been unmasked nonsense.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>He's a great coach. But like I don't see the

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>adjustments from Super Bowl on. There's just doesn't seem to

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>be the situational adjustments where the Rams come out in

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the second half and fix what we're seeing in the

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>first half. And their off season issues with their draft

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>picks and the fact that you traded for a quarterback

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>who has made about a billion less plays in the

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback you shipped at, cornerback you shipped out of the

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>house is concerning. They have a lot of issues to

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with beyond whether or not they make this playoff

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>party and get wiped out in the first round. We

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>already do that with offensive lines in the off season.

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's really hard to predict right well, and

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you may do it a little more than now I want.

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to the Sessler decides. Could I could

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>not imagine. I could not imagine a task that I'm

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>less I'm more ill fitted for. It's just that it's

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be something I monitor to the best of

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>my abilities. The other team in this matchup is the Cardinals,

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.479
<v Speaker 1>who we said off season has one of the worst

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive lines. We can't trust it. Well, I think their

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter of their quarterback who's not you know, Jerk Goff's

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna scamper around the field the same way Kyler

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Murray is a little bit to do that. You have

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to deal with Kyler mary what he might do on

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>every play scheme can make the old line look a

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>lot better. I think quarterback. I think McVeigh has helped

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>along that line at least in previous years, and I

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>think Kingsbury the Rams were hyper aggressive for multiple years.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Once McVeigh took over in and the sun started shining

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and less need especially going into last season with the

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Sioux signing and moves they would continue to make even

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this year, going to get Jalen Ramsey, all these moves that, um,

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>we're real lee in service of getting over the hump.

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what happens down the back end. And I

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>know that the salary cap keeps going up and that

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 1>that aids in terms of the margin for error for

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a GM. But if Jared Goff is not the guy,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they just signed him to a huge contract. I just

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>looked it up on spot rack Todd Gurley. They can't

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>even get out of that contract. Uh, they don't have

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a potential out until two. That doesn't mean they'll find

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>a way or just take the pill and move on

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>at some point, but they invested a lot of stuff.

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey, they give him a contract, Yeah, he controls

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the promised they wouldn't hold out. Oh yeah, we could

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>trust him on his word. But it's just like, what

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>what is this team going forward? I think it's one

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of the more interesting offseason storylines. I do too, But

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I also think the enjoyment a lot of people have

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>had this week saying that no team is in a

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>worse position long term and that they have so many

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>problems because of the Golf Gurly contract and no flexibility

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and no picks, I think it's overstated. I think teams

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more flexibility than you realize, and teams

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>do change from year to year, you know, good and

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>bad that we've seen, and that they that they can

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>fix something like it's it's like, let's throw up their hands.

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>They're done for four not no team. How about among

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the teams that you'd say have a lot of promise

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of time. I would give them some

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt because they took over a Jeff

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Fisher team and turned into the most consistent winner in

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFC for two years. So yeah, I think they

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>could They could change in the positive ways though, A

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>snakes to you, Well, I'm gonna take the Buccaneers Jaguars

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and h No one expected that. And you know why.

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>It's because this this bozo on the internet is saying, Oh,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I bet Greg's just gonna take something. Watch watch the

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>old Ravens forty niners. That's a good idea. I should

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>just take another game like Bucks Jaguars early and watch

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a little Ravens. You're doing what I like to do, yea. Yeah, look,

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>watch a little Ravens forty niners on the side too. Sorry,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. But I didn't really have that

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>idea until he gave it to me. And as Lucas

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as bad teams go, Bucks Jaguars is absolutely my kind

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of game because, uh, I do enjoy watching the stylings

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of Jamis Winston. I want to see, uh whether win

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>or lose. That kind of curious of what's happening with

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>this Jaguars team, whether they just totally get flushed down

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the toilet or falls has some moments as a as

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a match before and seven teams Go, I'm in. One

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite sound bites of Week twelve was after

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the win over the Falcons and which Winston played well.

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Bruce arians was asked about his optimism level around Jamis Winston,

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>whether he was a half cup, half glass full guy,

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>half glass empty. Here's what he had to say, glass

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is full as hell and it's gonna get real full

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. What does that mean? I think that

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>means he's about to have a nice, big celebration drink.

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna drink. He's optimistic and he's gonna drink, which,

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what, That's definitely what it is. And Bruce

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>likes to have a good time. Why did I My

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>mind went to he was making a p joke. That's weird,

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but he that's the first, That's what

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was the first, like he was like,

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to fill to the brim, Like what at

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in that moment? How else would you feel a cup?

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>He famously tailgates in the parking lot with friends and

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh family after after wins. Not I got

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I got something such a good guy on this podcast

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>he would be great. I got some bad news for

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Bucks fans. Jamis always plays his best in December when

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they're out of the playoffs. Every year. Every year he

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>starts playing great, I think. And then number two if

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you listen to Arians and Jason Light and then also

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>some report in Tampa, I think there's a greater chance

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>than people realize that Jamis will be back because Brucie

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>just says they can talk to themselves into anything filled

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to the brim with optimism, which is crazy to me

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>because Arians has a finite amount of time here. He's

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think sixty seven years old. He's gonna need results

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in year two and you're really going to die on

0:38:57.760 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that hill? Is that where he's gonna go when the

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>games left? Unfortunately, I think those five games will make

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a big determined you know. I by the way, I

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think he will. I think he'll go with somebody else.

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But there are there are options on the market in

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 1>this officer I talked about that. Is he really gonna tie?

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Perhaps his final NFL head coach,

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>his final coaching job, potentially to Jamis Winston, is he's

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>seen enough positives that weigh the negative. It's all. It

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all depends. I think Bruce arians is a veteran quarterback

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of dude. He's good. If anything, he's gonna want.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:30.760
<v Speaker 1>He'd flipped out Jamis Winston for someone you can trust.

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>So we need to see you because the other side

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.959
<v Speaker 1>of this with Nick Foles. And I know it gets

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>too boring to keep talking about Nick Foles over and over,

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>but I thought the thing it could come in and

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>do was help Jacksonville's red zone offense. And his touchdown

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>percentage is two point nine, which is drastically lower than

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Minsho's four point two. Right now, and speaking of keeping

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks or thinking about the quarterback position, are we just

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>stuck with Nick Foles for the rest of the year

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, just because I edit he's a great guy.

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>He's a great locker room glue guy, and he's very

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>good at giving postgame speeches that we all love. And

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>he did great in the Eagles. He want a super Bowl.

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But this is not working to me right now, and

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and so what do you just you just stick it out?

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.359
<v Speaker 1>This offense with him under center. It's not just him,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but this offense is a cure for insomnia. They are

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they are so boring. Leonard Fournette is two thirty pounds

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and he dances too much. Uh, Chris Conley, maybe he'd

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>make plays if he had DJ Shark's hands, but he doesn't.

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Right Like, Foals puts up a nice pass early in

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the game and it goes off of conley shoulder. And

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I watched that game, and I'm granted, I'm biased. I'm

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking Folds is gonna do well. I said that I

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I like watching him play, but I really tried to

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>watch him throw to throw and thought like, is he

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>playing poorly or not? And I didn't think so. I

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thought he played a pretty solid game. I go check PF.

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>He has a plus one on the day because he

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was in third and eight. Every they're down three and

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:56.439
<v Speaker 1>they're going run, run, screen, pass, punt, They're they're they're

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>down you know, at one point four teen three and

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they go run run, like, uh, you know, not not

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a screen pass, but another thing where it's like a

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>short pass and you're trying to set up the blocking

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and he has a couple of throats and it's just

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>like a terrible offense and it's the worst rush defense

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the league. And it just feels like, yes, falls

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is not helped them. I get it. They also didn't

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdown and three of eight Gardner Minshew starts,

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like the quarterback thing is a distraction

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>from what is a territist team. I have to just disagree.

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I that's fine, that's just saying here's here, there's energy,

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 1>here's here. You've been rolling like, yeah, I love here's

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing, here's the here's the stat that he started.

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>He started a game, he played, he played, he played well,

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but I agree that he played really well. But he

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.919
<v Speaker 1>started eight games and three of them they didn't score

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. In two more of them they scored one touchdown.

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's a lot of his starts that their offense

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as a whole was terrible. And and the same as

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>continuing with Nicks, his great starts were great. I think

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the Minshew maniacs. I get it, but there's so much

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the Jaguars right now to point to the

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position and say that's what Because we spent twenty

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>minutes on their run defense on Sunday, I just want

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring up the same exact topics their defense. Absolutely,

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they're not worth any time at all. We

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe we've given them more than enough time on the show.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>My thing is more, are my thing is more between

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>now and the rest of the year. Are we just

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit here and say Nick Foles is the answer

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>because we paid them all this money. I mean, you

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.879
<v Speaker 1>might have to, but I just don't trust Nick Foles

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a long terms. Minshew could be a range linebacker. Also,

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this team is gonna be But you put Dan you

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have to admit that you have been looking for Minshew

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 1>negatives to you. You didn't come in with a totally.

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I have a little annoyed by Minshew. I never bought

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>into him as a savior of the franchise. That but

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't because you guys disagree doesn't make me wrong.

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not. Doesn't make you wrong. But as

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a low as a low round rookie, I think he

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>had one of the more exciting seasons. I am here.

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>See that's where the disc I see that, and I

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 1>respect that for sure. Is any rookie he played, he

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>played better than most rookies you'll see in a giving year,

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree, but better than Baker Mayfield for half the

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>like Falls has looked rusty, especially in his first there.

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I really think if you watch last week's game, it

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't about the quarterback last week. That's all all right,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's move on now. As part of our trademark,

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I will move ahead of you, and let me just

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>make a clear The conditional pick we talked about Steelers

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Browns has to go to overtime on Sunday, and if

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it does, next week your number two pick. You're picking

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>two overall. We swap with my final round pick, number nine,

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>so you would get the ninth pick and I would

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>get your second pick. I don't understand the motivation, but

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in this condition, it just seems like random. It's like

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>throwing a condition in a trade. It's like if Matt Castle,

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, throws two touchdowns in week seven, then we

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>get a fourth round pick. It this doesn't really like

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I got brown Steelers. I'm willing to be totally controlled.

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You can drag me around and do what you want

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with me. For the rest of it, I'm not tracking anything.

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully it's an overtime win, That's what I Overtime win

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns is what we all want on Sunday.

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how it goes. Um All, Right now, the

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:18.240
<v Speaker 1>pick is the Jets at Bengals. Okay, so um, here's

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I'm trying not to get too caught up

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Jets right now. But I I struggle with

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this because I think, by my nature, I'm an optimistic

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>person and that carries over to my fandom, and I

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>tend to see the good with my team more than

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I can see the bad sometimes. Uh, and the Jets

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>are so there was so much bad I couldn't miss

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it earlier in the year. And I killed them earlier

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in their season, just like everyone else. But when you

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>watch them, um over the past three weeks and especially

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.280
<v Speaker 1>less two weeks and especially less week against the Raiders,

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly remarkable to me how they've cleaned up their

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:58.479
<v Speaker 1>deficiencies um so well. And the deficiencies were in three

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>major areas. Quarterback where Sam Donald had been a mess

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for most of you know. Obviously he was dealing with Mono.

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't right Week one, he missed three weeks, he

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>had the good Cowboys game, and then went into a

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>bad place for three weeks stretch. There he is now. Um,

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>not only is he playing largely mistake free football, Uh,

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he is doing the things that kind of made you

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about him last December. Uh, just being a smart quarterback,

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to throw from different arm arm angles, be

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>able to evade the rush, make plays on the move. Uh.

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Basically just look like the guy that Jets fans uh

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>fell in love with at the end of the last season.

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>The next up is the offensive line. Matt Khalil, who

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this was a guy that um that Joe

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Douglas brought in late. Not only was he a guy

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work out, apparently his style of play was

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.760
<v Speaker 1>leading to even more confusion. They now have an offensive

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 1>line that is not star studded, but they are playing

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>really well and they were giving them time to do

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>things like for instance, if you watched the Raiders game,

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Levy on Bell using him, splitting him out and getting

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to do different things. What was happening was the offensive

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>one was such a wreck. They were doing this Max

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Protects set up, which led to Bell being inside blocking often.

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>And what we saw last week was Levy on Bell.

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Not Pittsburgh Steelers Levy on Bell, but a guy that

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was making plays again, so you're seeing it there. And

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>then in the in the back end of the secondary,

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you have two guys and and bless him, Austin Austin

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and Arthur Milette who have all of a sudden turned

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>into real players over the past three weeks. Maybe it's

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just a small sample sized thing, but they have been

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>guys that you would think we would be picked on,

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but instead they have held down the secondary. And then

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Adams, the quote unquote cliche movable chess piece. Uh.

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg Williams has done a good job maximizing his incredible ability.

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>So it's turned the Jets into I think a good

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>bad team. I think they're better than all the bad

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league. And uh, I'm excited about them.

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree more with what you said, because I

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like that Oakland game was the most confident I've

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>ever seen Sam Donald play. And when he is, uh,

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:09.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, when he does have someone in his face,

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>his quick release is a difference maker, and like he

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>his downfield accuracy in that game was uh tangible, and

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason they shouldn't sweep up uh the Bengals,

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>who have played better the last couple of weeks. I mean,

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess, like they say, if you what is that saying,

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:29.839
<v Speaker 1>if you hang around the barbershop long enough, you're gonna

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get a haircut at some point. So maybe the Bengals

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 1>get a win at some point. They're running into the

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Jets the wrong time. Had they run in the Jets

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in week five, maybe difference everything I've just said, And Greg,

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you could talk about your point in a second, because

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I like the one you made downstairs. Everything I just

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 1>said holds true that I'm confident going to Sunday. But

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a historically a typical game where the Jets

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 1>flop and everything gets wiped Away's like you've lost the

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>two winless teams this month and all that stuff. And too,

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I hate that Andy Dalton is now back in the

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>lineup because he gives the bank was a better chance

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to win organizationally. By the way, it's terrible look for Cincinnati.

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought just that they couldn't even do this right

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and give the kid a longer look he's a rookie.

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 1>They move them out and they go back to Dalton

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and Dalton is just being jerked around at this point.

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But your point about Dalton, I thought it was a

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>good one. Yeah, I I put some stock into a point.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was Phil Sims or Dan Fouts.

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Was one of these, you know, color guys to do

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the games. Who who says when you're a starting quarterback

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>after they've been benched and they come back into the

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>lineup at some point, it's like a huge weight has

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>been lifted off your should. You've been a starting quarterback

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>your whole life. Your biggest fear in all of football

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you're gonna get benched from high school to

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 1>college into the pros and you're a franchise quarterback and

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>then it finally happens, like the axe swings on you,

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and it happens, and then you end up starting a

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>few weeks later, and it's like, oh, the world didn't end.

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I got nothing to lose right now, and you you

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>start playing a little freer, a little better, and Andy

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Dalton's a lot better than Ryan Finley, and I don't

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kill the Bengals actually for what they did. It just

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>because they wanted to take a look at Finley and

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they were more optimistic than they should have been,

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and he was clearly not ready. And you still got

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>five games left and oh and sixteen is forever. Go

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:12.839
<v Speaker 1>try to win some games. My problem is you they

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>started listening to the fans. It might be ownership. That's

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the move they made. Is a move from mid December,

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 1>not in October. Totally. Yeah, it's like the Bengals, though

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I could see them. They play the Jets, and let's

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>say if anything ever happened there that Dan would not like.

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They played the Dolphins and I could see them splitting

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>with Cleveland. Suddenly they go three and thirteen, don't get

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the first overall pick, and you're back, potentially with Andy

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Daltons are quarterback next year. It's kind of the most

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Bengal thing ever. But it's that could be Adulton's legacy.

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna be back almost no matter what,

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>although I guess you never know, you're right. I wouldn't

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>say that with them, but they had I think there's

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous game for the Jets because as much as

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with all the good things that Jets

0:49:57.280 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have done. They've played four of the worst five or

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty defense in the league. Uh, And so if they

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're kryptonite is facing a real pass rush.

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure the Bengals actually have one, either, but

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think if, if, when they play a team with

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a real pass rush, then we'll see with the progress.

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, Darnald, Darnald, that's for real. The defense is

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely overachieving. I think if the Bengals, you know, guys upfront, Hubbard,

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>dun Lap, and Atkins have played pretty well the last

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. All right, let us move on now

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to Chris Westling with his second pick. Right, isn't this Mark?

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, Mark Sessler, I'm sorry in my original slot, Mark,

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you're up? All right? Well, I'm taking that four pm

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>East Coast PM West Coast Chargers Broncos. It's a smart, uh,

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a schematic approach. I never thought it would be available

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, So I'm pleasantly surprised. The draft is going

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>very well. Uh, except the game itself, like a guy

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Drew Lock maybe, well, the game itself is is about

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>as depressing as a Charger's Broncos game could be in

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:04.800
<v Speaker 1>early December. The charges have killed themselves and I I

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, it's to me looking at Philip Rivers,

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess the thing. He's seven interceptions over the last

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>two games, and a lot of them have been, you know,

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>not just tips where it's not they've had to do

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with his his lack of ability to peg targets. And

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same Philip Rivers. And I don't like

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>watching quarterbacks that have been in our life for fifteen

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>years playing at the highest level. He's never missed a

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>game starting to show elements of decline. I don't know

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>if he's hurt or there's something else going on. This

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>has happened to Philip Rivers before. He had that one

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>season where everyone thought he's done, and then he was

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 1>comeback Player of the Year the next year. So I

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the future is. But the most ridiculous

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the words ever given, well that was, but but the

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>point is he did he did play us so much

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:49.680
<v Speaker 1>better the next year, Like he came back from the

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>year that he just threw like seven more interceptions. Some

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 1>guy came back from the quadruple a C L M

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>C LPC L there and he's like, what that was

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the year? There was like really legitimately no competition for

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that award, so don't give it out. How about Drown

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 1>James coming back in this game? There there's something that's

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they can watch for. Darrown James is playing football for

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Truelock if it's terrible timing for true luck if he

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 1>does start for dinner. As we're taping there, the Broncos

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 1>are not announcing their starter, but they're saying that they're

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the reps will be split between Drew Lock and Brandon Out,

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a strange one, but usually the idea is

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:33.200
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't announced your starter, that means you're making

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a change, like you never don't announce it when you do.

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:39.839
<v Speaker 1>But if you're, if you're deciding to go with Drew Lock,

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you would give him all the reps, wouldn't you, right?

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what I think, my guess is that he

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to get most of these reps that you know,

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the media doesn't get to see it anyways, and that

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 1>barring him like just you know, being terrible and practiced

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, then that he's a starter. You guys

0:52:56.040 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>want to hear something uncomfortable always. I love ringeworthy radio

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>interviews that go wrong, and uh, this does not involve

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a game or previewing, So I'm just gonna stick it

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in here and bears defensive lineman Achem Hicks on the

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>wattle and still show this week. Let's play that clip

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna be the office level awkward. Here we

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>go off the band wagon. Ride with us. We're down

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>right now, we know that, and we're fighting to get

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 1>back up, So roll with us. We didn't do this

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on purpose. We didn't try to get ourselves in the situation,

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but we're doing everything that we can to climb out

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of this whole, So be supportive. You mean you didn't

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 1>put your arm in between those two raiders and it

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>popped out a joint on purpose? I can't find No,

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm joking, Hey, who, that's a joke. No, that's why

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I said. I'm not that's about somebody's injury. No, no, no, no,

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm perfectly respectful. I'm perfectly respectful. But I'll tell you

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what you will not joke. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:56.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't you have a blessed day. This is the last

0:53:56.920 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>time I'm on this radio station. Are you. Yes, it

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>was the Michael Scott School of cringe comedy right there.

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Then he has like another two and a half hours

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of radio to do. You know what, I would love

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear that the next minute after that, I want

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to see how I'm just like so coming up in

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the next hour we talk about the weird thing is

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and Erica, you brought it up before we started, like

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it might not have been like a good bit, but

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it was. He didn't mean anything, right, it was like, hey,

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you mean to tell me you purposely didn't pop out

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 1>your arm, Like of course people need to support He

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was trying to support his point with something lighthearted, and

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess to to Hicks's point, when you suffer a

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>painful injury on the football field, that's never laughing matter.

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>But also it's like, dude, he didn't mean anything by it,

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>but it was so funny. He could have gone club

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:49.360
<v Speaker 1>direction a million different ways. Not the moment of the

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:52.399
<v Speaker 1>season that devastated this man, you know what I mean,

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and like ruined. He's miserable for months on end because

0:54:56.480 --> 0:55:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of this moment. At the end, he's like, oh key, yeah,

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel good after that. I feel bad that

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to watch like, uh, like I would start

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>documentary about that. Oh, I would never listen to that again.

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I I love that so much and I want I

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>can't wait. It's gonna happen eventually. We don't have a

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 1>ton of guests on the show, but it came somewhat close.

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark back on the A T L Debate Club days

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:19.879
<v Speaker 1>when I called Richard Sherman stinky Davis like, he kind

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of paused for a moment and then he's like, I'm

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna let this nobody. He had also come in and

0:55:24.120 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>read and that was back when a lot of the

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.400
<v Speaker 1>bulk of our work was writing. Richard Sherman ask you know,

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>controversies with other players. So he's like, oh, I've read

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 1>all your articles. So he he clearly had a handler

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that had given him four or five stories each. Here's

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the two clowns. You're about bozos. You're about to sit

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 1>down and chat with and but but he didn't. He

0:55:41.520 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't come after, he didn't walk away. Was gonna happen

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one day with the closest and it wasn't really it

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was just awkward because he wasn't interested in it. Wasn't

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that Sean Jeffreys, the outside Jeffrey where he was on

0:55:52.600 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the phone, and uh, he seemed to be barely paying

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 1>attention to what we were doing, and we were just

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like I had to repeat questions. What was that? Sorry? Man,

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I was trying my shoes. He was like, what it was?

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Five minutes out show? Do you think he was running late?

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually I know what it was, and now I think

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I remember he was gonna be on Total Access. You're

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be in studious in the studio, but he

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was running late. He missed the car, so instead of

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:19.359
<v Speaker 1>coming into the studio to do five minutes with us.

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 1>They're like, we could do on the phone. You could

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:22.920
<v Speaker 1>do them on the phone, run the way to the

0:56:23.160 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL network. And that didn't work out either, because he

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was obviously anyway, one day we'll get our team Hicks moment, Uh,

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and West might die. That's what I've played today, all right,

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>who's up West? I thought this game would go earlier,

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but I realized I'm the only Titans fan in the room,

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Titans. That cool. That's a good game. Though.

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a good pick in this uh, at this juncture. Yeah,

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be stuck with the three early games in

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>New Lakey. I don't know, that's gonna be tough. With

0:56:55.239 --> 0:56:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the game of the year. I know, I see what

0:56:57.320 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys are doing. I don't blame you could have

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:02.879
<v Speaker 1>made that trade, I know. But you know we will

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:05.360
<v Speaker 1>get through this. It'll be all right. Did you know

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the last sixteen game sixteen games going back to last year,

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry has over sixteen hundred yards and eighteen touchdowns,

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:16.960
<v Speaker 1>which is two hundred yards more than Zeke Elliott. I

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:18.920
<v Speaker 1>shared a similar stat last week, and then he had

0:57:18.960 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>another monster week. He's been a stud ten more touchdowns

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>than Zeke Elliott on the ground in that span. Derrick

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Henry is playing awesome and you can see his explosiveness

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>as he runs through the hole and gets to the

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 1>second level. These big plays aren't just miss tackles. They

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are him exploding through holes and out running Pete. There

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are got the best of farm in the game. There

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>are guys that it's proven over the years that they

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have better numbers and they play better late in the season.

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry is one of those guys, and now he's

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on a team. And I don't know if it's Tannehill

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that unlocked it or it's just a little bit of

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>luck for Tannehill and Arthur Smith the coordinator, but they

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of guys who can go to the distance. A. J.

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Brown is an explosive player, Henry is an elusive player.

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Um Corey Davis occasionally can be an explosive player. Johnny

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Smith made some big plays. You know, it's it's just

0:58:08.040 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like one thirty yard play per week, but even that,

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that's big and and it's all happened with

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill that they're kind of a big play type of team,

0:58:16.240 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>which you don't think of when you think of the Titans.

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe we're part of where my Nick Foles

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 1>uh Anti nick Foles takes coming out of the game

0:58:23.720 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>was well, no, it was because of the way Tannehill

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 1>played in that game and the way he's played producing

0:58:28.840 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>big plays in an offense where that all time do

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:33.040
<v Speaker 1>too much. I mean, to his credit, but I will

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 1>give him this, like when he ran for that touchdown

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of way he throws his body around,

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and the color guy in that game was like, that's

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:42.920
<v Speaker 1>how you win over your entire locker room with that

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. And I do think that that the

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Titans have been galvanized by him. It's funny to me

0:58:48.040 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that these two teams at six and five. If this

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 1>were the Cowboys Eagles, it would be treated like the

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>sequel to Titanic, and it's like one of four games

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we have left because I guess there's just not a

0:58:58.000 --> 0:59:01.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of juice around a FC South rivalries in general.

0:59:02.000 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is one of the better games of the week.

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Titanic to Leo, Leo's back from from the water cure

0:59:10.720 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>from the Black Lagoon type figure, like his body was

0:59:13.240 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>frozen and the cryogenical I got it. And then they

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 1>bring him back. He comes back from the dead and

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants revenge on Kate Winslet's character for not Yeah,

0:59:23.000 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because she wouldn't let him on that piece of wood

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and there was plenty of room for him on the

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>piece of wood floating in the icy Atlantic, and he

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:32.040
<v Speaker 1>just floated off. She took the whole piece of wood.

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So he's going to come back for her. Zane. You

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>bring Billy Zane back, you haven't seen him in a while,

0:59:37.960 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>get some revenge on him. That's a very different him

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to that movie Zombie went down. He went he went

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 1>down with as well. Yeah, I mean they were in

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>love as he as they were partying way until she

0:59:48.400 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>broke his heart. We're old enough Erica that I don't

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 1>know if other people here have these memories, but I do.

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember going to another movie the week that or

0:59:56.840 --> 1:00:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the week after Titanic came out. Eventually did see in

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the theater too, and they were just like lines of people. Yeah,

1:00:04.840 --> 1:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the movie had been out for a week or two,

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>lines of people in West Springfield, Massachusetts, you know, waiting

1:00:10.400 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to get into the tight into Titanic for like an hour.

1:00:13.680 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But whatever happened, Yeah, younger like Erica, people your age

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean to be the people your age guy,

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>but like a true monoculture um phenomenon can't I don't

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>think it can happen the way it happened with Titanic,

1:00:28.360 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>where it actually just completely took over society as this

1:00:33.560 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>all incumpassing, encompassing, uh phenomenon that everyone had an opinion on,

1:00:38.440 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people saw multiple times. Nine. I had just a little

1:00:42.120 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like to put you in the moment. That was a

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>senior of high school and my second semester elective course

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>was film study, and it was, you know whatever, it

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was just gonna go watch. I'm sure like a couple

1:00:54.360 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of Hitchcock movies and maybe watch you know, Spielberg movie

1:00:58.400 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever it would have the course, they swapped it out

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and then just made the whole class about Titanic. And

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a class trip to see Titanic. It was

1:01:06.520 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>making a video documentary about Titanic, and we all played

1:01:10.000 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>different characters. That's you feel like the original version. I

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like you had to learn more from the original

1:01:16.480 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>version of the class. I would have preferred that, um,

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's how big Titanic was. And now the way

1:01:23.080 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, things have splintered with the media the way

1:01:26.800 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it is now, I just don't think that ever happens again.

1:01:28.840 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? I waited at midnight to see Twilight.

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Twilight Twile is huge, but it doesn't hold a camp

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to my point, has been completely sideswiped by a South.

1:01:42.600 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Things have happened to it. Sorry. Leading the league in

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>yards per tempt the I got no time for that film,

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and I believe I saw a stat that in four

1:01:53.840 --> 1:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of US five starts, the Titans are top five yards

1:01:56.960 --> 1:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>per play in the entire league. I want to know

1:01:59.440 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what uh t Y Hilton shows up, because when he

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:06.439
<v Speaker 1>was active for that game, against the Texans. I thought

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that swings that game, but he ended up not

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>being the real t Y. Hilton a couple of drops

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and not nearly as explosive, couldn't win one on one

1:02:14.560 --> 1:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't even send him on. Will Fuller was

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was the key to that game. And I just if

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the real t Y, especially a Dorri

1:02:22.360 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Jackson who's playing pretty well lately and matches up with

1:02:24.680 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>him usually, you know, this just isn't the same Colts team.

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I know. We got Jonathan Williams who spice racks guy

1:02:30.840 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield on time. Listeners will remember our friend

1:02:34.480 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Brad Spicer the spice rack. He called Jonathan Williams is

1:02:38.040 --> 1:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>emergence four years ago. It took a little while, but

1:02:40.400 --> 1:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>now he otherwise that appearance was a real iceberg in

1:02:43.160 --> 1:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the way of the ship performance by Spicy, but he

1:02:46.080 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>nailed the Jonathan Williams take years ago. Come back to

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>l a spice rack. Apparently he's been in like Cincinnati

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for two months and no one knew. I invited him

1:02:56.360 --> 1:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for Thanksgiving and he said chance will be in l

1:02:59.280 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>A and then to me a few days later and said,

1:03:01.120 --> 1:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll stick it around with my family in Cincinnati. Well,

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>thanksgivings for family. Yeah, I was surprised that he was

1:03:07.160 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about leaving his family just to come to l A.

1:03:09.600 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>For takes. Happy holidays to spice wreck wherever he is. Yes,

1:03:13.880 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and how about put a little spice on your turkey?

1:03:15.920 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You're you know, the bland bird. That's what we get.

1:03:17.920 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>We get a little uh, we get a spicy turkey.

1:03:20.720 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the way to go. A little

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>smoked spice in there. I have no time for the

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>cliche this time of year. Turkey, it's terrible. I don't

1:03:31.680 --> 1:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>need any on my plate. Get out of here. Agree

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's like anything. That's how you prepare it. If

1:03:36.720 --> 1:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't prepare it, well you're it's on you. About

1:03:39.120 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>West preparing to turkey, I know he can be great.

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh I'm I've got the brine going right now. We're

1:03:44.600 --> 1:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>smoking it tomorrow, we get it all. We're gonna have

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it ready. Damn, that's gonna be good. I'm frying my

1:03:51.400 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>first turkey. Me and Bob in the garage where I

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>do the throwback podcast. We talked about it on the

1:03:55.880 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>pot a lot that I was eventually gonna burn down

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that garage in the rage. This might act really happened

1:04:00.920 --> 1:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow the garage gets burned down in a fried turkey accident. Yeah,

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>don't put it in frozen. It's gonna be raining, so yeah,

1:04:09.920 --> 1:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>but like the garage is gonna smell like grease for

1:04:15.160 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like months and months at good point. Can maybe this

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is where we're doing our follow up pod the day after.

1:04:21.640 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why this seems still workplace. It's pretty

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>much marks nightmare, like a lingering smell of meat twenty

1:04:29.400 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>five minutes of like fried turkey smell. Okay, I like

1:04:32.040 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to do it, lady, all right, West, it snakes to you.

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>West has like nine games, I know, And I thought,

1:04:39.280 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll save the Eagles Dolphins for someone else, because someone's

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to pay close attention to Carson Wentz and

1:04:44.560 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that Eagles offense to break it down. So I'll save

1:04:47.960 --> 1:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that for you guys. I'll take Packers Giants. Wow. Okay,

1:04:52.680 --> 1:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of an upset there. The way you

1:04:54.400 --> 1:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>set it up, it was like only one man can

1:04:56.640 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>watch the tape and really know what's going on, and

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that man is Chris. I would feel irresponsible if my

1:05:01.800 --> 1:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>third game was watching Carson Wesson trying to figure out

1:05:04.520 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what was wrong with him, so it's better off if

1:05:07.120 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>someone else does. And the Giants, I I think I

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>said last week that Daniel Jones doesn't really qualify as

1:05:13.920 --> 1:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>exciting for me, and that's true, but maybe I'm being

1:05:16.720 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a little hard on him considering what's going on with

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that offense. Evan Ingram's not playing. It seems like every

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>other week they have a concust wide receiver. Se Kwon

1:05:25.240 --> 1:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Barkley is nowhere close to what he normally is. He's

1:05:29.800 --> 1:05:32.919
<v Speaker 1>running as if he still has that same explosive jump

1:05:33.000 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>cuts and springy legs, and it's leading to a lot

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of negative plays because he just can't get out of

1:05:38.560 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>those situations he used to get out of. Although I

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>find the sae Quon Barkley conversation strange, like all the

1:05:45.040 --> 1:05:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Giants fans, he's like, well, he he must be hurt.

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>He's not the same guy. But then there's you know,

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy yard runs that he makes, and then there's plays

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>where he ult I get it, but there's some place

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>where he looks pretty great to me, and and he is,

1:06:02.520 --> 1:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, not making yards after contact. I don't know,

1:06:05.920 --> 1:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just like running backs play hurt first of all,

1:06:08.160 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so that's how you get and the ankle sprint can

1:06:10.720 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>ruin a whole season, and maybe that is it. I guess.

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I see some really good plays from him,

1:06:15.680 --> 1:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I get confused. It's like, Okay, on

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that play where he looked amazing, is he that's the play?

1:06:21.200 --> 1:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>He's not injured. It's just that part of it's a little.

1:06:23.640 --> 1:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his yards per attempt last four games three

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>point three seven, dip down to two. He had that

1:06:30.360 --> 1:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>game where he had thirteen rushes for one yard, which

1:06:32.720 --> 1:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>gave him a zero point eight yards per attempt, and

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>then three point four seven. If that were someone not

1:06:38.120 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>named Sequon Barkley, we would I'm not saying what he's

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>jump cuts from even last year. He's just not production

1:06:43.560 --> 1:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>though he was a boomer bus guy that had a

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>ton of negative plays and a ton of one yard games,

1:06:48.320 --> 1:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and and that guy overlooked. It's like a quarterback with

1:06:51.760 --> 1:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a strong arm, like you're a boomer bust quarterback because

1:06:54.840 --> 1:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you play that style, you have the ability to do it.

1:06:57.040 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But he doesn't have the ability right now to get

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the trull well that he used to put

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>himself into for risking the big play. It's a great

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>uh get right matchup for the Packers often too, I'm

1:07:08.800 --> 1:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a little getting a little worried about, but not when

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they're playing the Giants. Yeah, it's not a it's a

1:07:14.040 --> 1:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there's get right games. It feels like get right festival

1:07:17.000 --> 1:07:19.479
<v Speaker 1>and you hope it. But but the Packers also feel

1:07:19.520 --> 1:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to me like fair for getting right. Yeah. Glocklin headlining,

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly about late period Lilith, I'm talking it kind

1:07:28.320 --> 1:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of lost it a little bit. I went either the

1:07:33.280 --> 1:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>first or the second Lilith Cowboys McLaughlin head line. Liz

1:07:39.280 --> 1:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Fair was there. That's that was really my Tory Amos

1:07:43.400 --> 1:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was there Bridge Tori Amos back in the day it

1:07:46.200 --> 1:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was that it was hawkinses Beach, you know, a regular Hawkins,

1:07:52.800 --> 1:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Sophie B. Hawkins. That almost made um our version of

1:07:56.520 --> 1:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the throwback pipe really dating or something? Damn I wish

1:07:59.320 --> 1:08:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I was you know the no what's the different one? As? Okay,

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>four non blonds was there? Yes? What happened to that girlfriend? Greg?

1:08:09.360 --> 1:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Can you isolate West as? Oh? Yes? For future games?

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Concrete blonde? Alright, let's move on West. You really made

1:08:18.200 --> 1:08:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a great point about we're gonna be tied up with Niners.

1:08:21.880 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Ravens Zeusser's whole life is on the line with the Jets.

1:08:25.680 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Do I really want to take that responsibility of letting

1:08:29.400 --> 1:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the people know whether Carson Wentz is broken or fixed?

1:08:31.880 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>People are gonna want to know answers, and I won't

1:08:33.960 --> 1:08:35.599
<v Speaker 1>be able to give it to him. So I'm gonna

1:08:35.600 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and take the Redskins at Panthers and and

1:08:39.920 --> 1:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, be professional about it and keep my

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>eye on the game and read up on it afterwards

1:08:44.640 --> 1:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and then report to give a dispatch come Sunday night. Um,

1:08:49.360 --> 1:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but I just you know, the Eagles and Carson Wentz,

1:08:52.479 --> 1:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that's too big a story in the NFL right now,

1:08:54.080 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot of responsibility. So I'm gonna pass that responsibility

1:08:57.120 --> 1:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>off to someone I trust, which is Mark Sessler. Well,

1:09:00.240 --> 1:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I know we'll be able to focus on that game

1:09:02.720 --> 1:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely well. I mean, here's the way this works. Number one.

1:09:07.240 --> 1:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's are you talking about both these games right now?

1:09:10.080 --> 1:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Let's do it. Obviously get to these good

1:09:12.080 --> 1:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>prime time we can mismatch through them. I mean, I

1:09:14.200 --> 1:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have imagine I'm the last person the listener

1:09:17.040 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>would pick to diagnose quarterback issues among the show or

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>somewhere somewhere close to the bottom. But I'm going to

1:09:24.080 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>do my best and I'm gonna give it my certain

1:09:27.160 --> 1:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>energy and joy for the sport will decide by the

1:09:31.040 --> 1:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>way who comes in last. There we'll find out the

1:09:33.960 --> 1:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>health of the Eagles, though should take anywhere watchable. Now

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:39.519
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a new thing. We're talking both of these

1:09:39.560 --> 1:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>games at once in short order and get into the

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>nice prime time Well you can bring it back to

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>el Sean Jeffrey a little right there there. The Eagles

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are getting healthier. It looks like they're gonna have Alshan Nelson,

1:09:49.360 --> 1:09:54.759
<v Speaker 1>agil Are, Lane Johnson and Brandon Books back Jordan Matthews,

1:09:55.120 --> 1:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>which that's pretty significant. And their defense right now, to me,

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>is playing playoff level defense where they should both lines.

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>They should be able to win a game on their

1:10:03.160 --> 1:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>own in in Miami, even if it's not fun. If

1:10:05.479 --> 1:10:07.599
<v Speaker 1>this game is thirty five nothing Eagles, I'm just gonna

1:10:07.640 --> 1:10:10.479
<v Speaker 1>tell you, Carson Wentz looks good. I think my take

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>on this is that everybody overreacted to Carson Wentz playing

1:10:13.760 --> 1:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in the win two weeks in a row with bad

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:20.519
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, no running game, even with the jadeveon Clowney out,

1:10:20.640 --> 1:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's defensive line dominating up front against the Eagles offensive line,

1:10:25.560 --> 1:10:27.599
<v Speaker 1>and what's going on with that offense is the opposite

1:10:27.640 --> 1:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of symbiotic. It's like each bad group is making the

1:10:30.240 --> 1:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>other group's job way harder because they're all underperforming. And

1:10:34.040 --> 1:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz is now living under a black cloud. Well

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if the Eagles, and I'm super down on them, but West,

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:42.519
<v Speaker 1>you might be right. Maybe it's just a two week

1:10:43.040 --> 1:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>sample size that we need to issues just like but

1:10:47.479 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Eagles general, are they in the league

1:10:49.600 --> 1:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>or something? Right? Are the Eagles done well? They get

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>like we're saying at Miami, Miami's had two really bad

1:10:55.920 --> 1:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>losses back to back, and their two and nine, then

1:10:58.280 --> 1:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they get the Giants at home, the Redskins on the road,

1:11:00.400 --> 1:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys at home, and then at Giants. This season is

1:11:02.960 --> 1:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not broken beyond repair in terms of a chance to

1:11:06.040 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs because the Cowboys have been so unpredictable

1:11:08.439 --> 1:11:10.519
<v Speaker 1>and that's why Jerry Jones should be mad. This division

1:11:10.640 --> 1:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>race should be over and they've right, so the Eagles

1:11:13.120 --> 1:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to hang around and maybe even steal

1:11:15.160 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East If they can just take care of

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:20.479
<v Speaker 1>their business. But the question becomes, is Philadelphia, specifically on

1:11:20.600 --> 1:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>offense broken beyond repair itself, so we'll see. I just

1:11:25.200 --> 1:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're being removed from the story in terms

1:11:27.960 --> 1:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of teams we can trust as being there in late January.

1:11:31.120 --> 1:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>You want to sneak into the playoffs based on this schedule,

1:11:34.200 --> 1:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>have a nice time with Right now is just get

1:11:36.439 --> 1:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to Week sixteen and have that Cowboys game be the

1:11:39.439 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>game that the sides of the division. I think I

1:11:42.200 --> 1:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think they got a chance Tantic to say something about

1:11:45.080 --> 1:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. Kyle Allen isn't as bad as everyone thinks

1:11:49.160 --> 1:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>he is either, I don't. I don't understand that one.

1:11:51.120 --> 1:11:52.599
<v Speaker 1>He gets talked about like he's one of the worst

1:11:52.680 --> 1:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in the league. Their deeps just an average quarterair

1:11:55.080 --> 1:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>defense is quite possibly worse than their offense. I mean,

1:11:58.120 --> 1:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>that's largely because of Christian McCaffrey. But to me, that's

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>why the Panthers are a disappointment. They got Vernon Butler

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and Bruce Irvan coming off the edge. This used to

1:12:05.680 --> 1:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>be a group that, you know, people were excited about.

1:12:07.840 --> 1:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>There also was a news item that dropped just about

1:12:11.160 --> 1:12:13.639
<v Speaker 1>now on the Redskins that Josh Norman will be playing

1:12:13.680 --> 1:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game, but he will not be starting, So

1:12:15.880 --> 1:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill Callahan announced basically they have benched old Josh nor.

1:12:21.080 --> 1:12:23.519
<v Speaker 1>One of the moves Christian McCaffrey put on a linebacker

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>last week, it was like a stutter step in an

1:12:25.840 --> 1:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>explosion into the end zone. It was like, that's the

1:12:27.960 --> 1:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one I called Eric metcaffean on Sunday because it was unbelievable.

1:12:31.720 --> 1:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Their schedule gets a little easier here. He could he

1:12:34.120 --> 1:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>could really go make a run at the yards from

1:12:36.280 --> 1:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>scrimmage record. All I'd say is there like a Joey

1:12:38.960 --> 1:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Sly personal meltdown and a Drew Brees one minute drill

1:12:42.240 --> 1:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>from having beaten the Saints and us thinking about them

1:12:44.520 --> 1:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a little different by slide guy. Slide Guy still has

1:12:47.240 --> 1:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a job too, doesn't he. He was like before that game,

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he was number one in PFF's kicker ranks. I think, well,

1:12:52.160 --> 1:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they brought in another. They brought in some competition to

1:12:55.320 --> 1:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>test out all right to the primetime games. Um, yes,

1:12:58.920 --> 1:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>no Niners, Ravens. We get Patriots Texans, which is a

1:13:03.040 --> 1:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>battle to first place teams. So it's not like we're

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>outing the cold on this should be a very good game.

1:13:07.920 --> 1:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And uh again, and I do like what the schedule

1:13:11.280 --> 1:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>makers are doing this year. Instead of just handing the

1:13:14.320 --> 1:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Patriots these teams on a platter for a blood bath

1:13:17.439 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up in New England, they're putting the Pats on the

1:13:20.080 --> 1:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>road and saying, Hey, you want to go win in primetime,

1:13:22.240 --> 1:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to earn it. And that's what we're

1:13:24.360 --> 1:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get here because the Texans, Uh, they're a team

1:13:28.080 --> 1:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>that listen. Historically, the passive owned the Texans, right, all

1:13:32.479 --> 1:13:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the five and O against Bill all the way. Yeah,

1:13:34.840 --> 1:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>five and oh and the Letterman jacket is the low

1:13:37.160 --> 1:13:40.639
<v Speaker 1>moment of this franchise back in the playoffs about five

1:13:40.720 --> 1:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So there's a lot of history there. But

1:13:43.960 --> 1:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you still have the Shawn Watson who could be a

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>difference maker greg at any against any team. But can

1:13:49.479 --> 1:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he do it against the defense as good as the

1:13:51.600 --> 1:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots. Yes, the skill set to do it,

1:13:53.800 --> 1:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because I when I look at the Patriots defense, I

1:13:56.479 --> 1:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>think the things that can hurt them is an athletic team,

1:14:01.360 --> 1:14:04.519
<v Speaker 1>a fast team, an athletic quarterback, a fast quarterback that's

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson, and then a team that can go deep

1:14:06.960 --> 1:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>because no one tries. You know, the Patriots kind of

1:14:09.200 --> 1:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>set up their defense to prevent teams from even trying

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to go deep, and they're so great at preventing big plays,

1:14:14.439 --> 1:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's like no one even gives it a shot.

1:14:16.360 --> 1:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm afraid of as a Patriots fan. And

1:14:18.640 --> 1:14:20.599
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, who have not been good throwing the ball

1:14:20.680 --> 1:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>deep all year, despite Watson having one of the best,

1:14:23.520 --> 1:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, deep balls in the league were awesome with

1:14:26.280 --> 1:14:28.599
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller back in the lineup, and now that he's healthy,

1:14:28.640 --> 1:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they're a different group. You have Kenny Stills, you have Hopkins,

1:14:31.600 --> 1:14:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and if I'm I'm the Texans, I'm just going bombs

1:14:34.840 --> 1:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>away and seeing what happens. Will Fuller after that, he

1:14:37.479 --> 1:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>had to essentially fifty yard touched a fifth yard receptions

1:14:42.439 --> 1:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday against the Colts, and he does completely change

1:14:45.439 --> 1:14:47.519
<v Speaker 1>what that offense is able to do and opens it up.

1:14:47.720 --> 1:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>He did grab at that hamstring after the second one.

1:14:50.360 --> 1:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>He did then have also the game ice and catch

1:14:52.760 --> 1:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on their final possession, so he stayed on the field.

1:14:54.800 --> 1:14:56.479
<v Speaker 1>You just hope he's able to stay healthy because that's

1:14:56.520 --> 1:14:58.519
<v Speaker 1>been the whole will Fuller thing. He has been as

1:14:58.560 --> 1:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>good as advertised out of the draft when he's on

1:15:00.760 --> 1:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the field, but can he stay on the field, because

1:15:03.040 --> 1:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>when he comes off the field, they become much more

1:15:04.800 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>predictable on offense. He's kind of like the secret key

1:15:07.360 --> 1:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of their offense. Greg has often talked about the people

1:15:10.880 --> 1:15:13.679
<v Speaker 1>who have the best success against the Patriots are former

1:15:13.800 --> 1:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Belichick defensive coordinators like Matt Patricia. Romeo Cornell was the

1:15:18.360 --> 1:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinator for the Texans, and even though they've been

1:15:21.280 --> 1:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>owing five under Bill O'Brien, I remember a shootout with

1:15:24.479 --> 1:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Shawn Watson in Foxborough that was in the thirties

1:15:27.560 --> 1:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>both teams, and I also remember some playoff games, or

1:15:30.320 --> 1:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>at least one where Da Devian Clowney was wrecking Tom

1:15:33.200 --> 1:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Brady's life and making the game a lot closer than

1:15:35.240 --> 1:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it should have been. And I'm gonna lock up the

1:15:38.040 --> 1:15:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Texans in this game with all due respecs. You're a

1:15:45.520 --> 1:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>man of your word, was and I respect that well,

1:15:48.120 --> 1:15:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean, what am I gonna do? Faul even

1:15:49.720 --> 1:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>further into last place? This is bold. This is the

1:15:52.640 --> 1:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff that a team in the locker room rallies around.

1:15:55.080 --> 1:15:57.559
<v Speaker 1>With all due respect to the Patriots defense and coaching

1:15:57.640 --> 1:16:00.559
<v Speaker 1>which is number one and number one. I don't trust

1:16:00.600 --> 1:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>their offense at all right now, and I do trust

1:16:03.320 --> 1:16:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the Texans offense a little bit. I don't trust their

1:16:05.560 --> 1:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>offense either. But if we're gonna look at the Eagles

1:16:08.000 --> 1:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and say they played two games in windy, bad conditions,

1:16:11.200 --> 1:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so did the Patriots. Way, it's you know, and as

1:16:13.240 --> 1:16:15.439
<v Speaker 1>someone who played, I don't know if you remember that

1:16:15.479 --> 1:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I had a pretty productive popcorner career. I played a

1:16:18.280 --> 1:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>game or two in that way, you should maybe like

1:16:19.960 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>setting out a picture of like that's gonna say, did

1:16:22.400 --> 1:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you see that picture? I get that actual team I

1:16:24.960 --> 1:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>did not play. I just simply was put into uniform

1:16:27.400 --> 1:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and they listed my height and weight is much bigger

1:16:29.400 --> 1:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>than actual reality. But I mean, it helps to get

1:16:34.120 --> 1:16:38.599
<v Speaker 1>out of those elements. No more fogged cameras watching Tom Brady,

1:16:38.760 --> 1:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, throw for what fifteen yards and the midway

1:16:41.320 --> 1:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>through the second quarter fast start would be helpful. That

1:16:44.080 --> 1:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is a very fair point about the weather. But this

1:16:46.040 --> 1:16:49.479
<v Speaker 1>offense was struggling mightily even before they started getting weather games.

1:16:49.600 --> 1:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They they're like, we've said, there are a different team,

1:16:51.840 --> 1:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's kind of amazing how they're winning games.

1:16:54.120 --> 1:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it has a lot it's other teams would

1:16:56.400 --> 1:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have a totally different record if they were hamstrung by

1:16:59.400 --> 1:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>their offense to this one has. I do think, first

1:17:01.800 --> 1:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of all, Doorset and Um the news availability is a

1:17:06.280 --> 1:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>huge factor, and I kind of doubt some who's gonna

1:17:09.000 --> 1:17:10.559
<v Speaker 1>play in this game, but you know they would give

1:17:10.560 --> 1:17:12.559
<v Speaker 1>a big boost. I do think that the concern about

1:17:12.560 --> 1:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots offense is just a tad overstated. Wait, they're

1:17:17.760 --> 1:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the worst. They're the worst Patriots offense in a long time,

1:17:21.040 --> 1:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and they are having to be resourceful. But I don't

1:17:23.360 --> 1:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think they're bad offense. I think they're an average too

1:17:26.120 --> 1:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>slightly better than average offense. Their their tenth or twelfth

1:17:28.840 --> 1:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the year in d v o A. They've they've

1:17:31.479 --> 1:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>managed to be efficient, they don't make penalties, they don't

1:17:34.479 --> 1:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>turn the ball over, and they've they haven't been great,

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>but they've also like made a lot of big plays

1:17:40.479 --> 1:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in key spot. It's not a good offense, but I

1:17:42.920 --> 1:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think in in better conditions against some bad opponents like

1:17:46.320 --> 1:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Texans defense, I don't think this is a good

1:17:48.040 --> 1:17:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Technans defense. So I do think we're gonna get a nice,

1:17:51.000 --> 1:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>fun Sunday Night classic that al can enjoy which with

1:17:54.360 --> 1:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot with some points where where people come out

1:17:56.439 --> 1:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of this, whether the Patriots win or losing, saying, okay,

1:17:58.479 --> 1:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Patriots offense turned around, I actually has a Patriots fan

1:18:01.200 --> 1:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about this one. Maybe a little too good.

1:18:04.080 --> 1:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>We could use a Sunday and Monday could have been

1:18:06.680 --> 1:18:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to the best games of the year, and we're both

1:18:08.560 --> 1:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>total splatterfests, so it'd be nice to get like a

1:18:11.920 --> 1:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>SNF banger in a big spot. They were enjoyable in

1:18:14.479 --> 1:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a different way, but it feels like we haven't had

1:18:16.960 --> 1:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of classics that go down to the last

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>minute on these primetime Deshoun Watson coming off, you know,

1:18:22.760 --> 1:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>one of one of his worst games as a pro

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore, and then you know, an up and down

1:18:27.400 --> 1:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>game I would say against Indianapolis where he could have

1:18:29.760 --> 1:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>been picked off three times. Go go after these cornerbacks.

1:18:33.000 --> 1:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Patriots rush five every down. You're gonna

1:18:36.439 --> 1:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have one on one matchups, and I love Jonathan Jones

1:18:39.360 --> 1:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and Jason mccordy and these guys, but man, one they're

1:18:43.000 --> 1:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they're playing one on one so many times. It's like,

1:18:45.560 --> 1:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's see some talented receivers try to make plays

1:18:48.360 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>against him. By the way, I mentioned Belichick talking about

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the Keys to Football on the NFL Picks the One

1:18:56.560 --> 1:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Greatest Players program that's ongoing here. Um, I just want

1:19:00.720 --> 1:19:02.599
<v Speaker 1>to play because it's fun to listen to Bill Belichick talk.

1:19:02.880 --> 1:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Just kind of funny and interesting. You can go all

1:19:05.640 --> 1:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the way back to a few hundred years bc um

1:19:10.120 --> 1:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>san Zoo. The Art of War, attack weaknesses, Utilize strengths

1:19:14.880 --> 1:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and figure out what the strengths are in your team

1:19:17.240 --> 1:19:19.599
<v Speaker 1>or some things you have to protect, find the weaknesses

1:19:19.680 --> 1:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of your opponent an attack. You can't win a war

1:19:22.840 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>by digging a hole. You gotta attack. So you have

1:19:25.120 --> 1:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to figure out where you want to attack, how you

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>want to attack, and that changes week a week. It

1:19:30.720 --> 1:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>bad news. Greg bell O'Brien just transcribed that word for

1:19:33.479 --> 1:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>work that I need to get her recording for that.

1:19:37.280 --> 1:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that talk about something that's going to get

1:19:39.160 --> 1:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you in the mood, you know. Well, I want to

1:19:41.160 --> 1:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>know a little tidbit from the past. Remember that Belichick

1:19:44.360 --> 1:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>letters thing I did. Yeah, I sent Belichick because I

1:19:47.520 --> 1:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>knew he loved that book, like a super expensive version

1:19:50.880 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Art of War for Christmas in nineteen three.

1:19:56.160 --> 1:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was who's money with with mine? I

1:19:58.800 --> 1:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>mean super expensive book. So it was like years old.

1:20:02.280 --> 1:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>How did you have money? I mean, I don't know

1:20:05.240 --> 1:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>how how I came across the mo whatever, the money,

1:20:07.479 --> 1:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Christmas president, whatever it was. It was a strange

1:20:10.120 --> 1:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>use of your limited finance. I don't know what did

1:20:12.760 --> 1:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you get for your brother that year? Right? I have

1:20:15.160 --> 1:20:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to think that saying, I know I got him a

1:20:17.520 --> 1:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>gift to any here's a youth spin doctor c D. No, No,

1:20:22.400 --> 1:20:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I put some thoughts. So what what happened?

1:20:25.800 --> 1:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Did you hear back? Well, you'd go, you know, they

1:20:28.479 --> 1:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>were a little back and fourth things. I think that

1:20:30.280 --> 1:20:32.519
<v Speaker 1>I was again, I was concerned that it was just that,

1:20:32.680 --> 1:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably the you know, I thought his administrative

1:20:34.880 --> 1:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>assistant probably has the book on her bookshelf. But it

1:20:38.120 --> 1:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>did get to him. That was Actually they had been

1:20:39.760 --> 1:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>having a nice exchange, but that was the one that

1:20:41.800 --> 1:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>ended it. It was that might have added this guy

1:20:44.040 --> 1:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>after that, like like, okay, this is a little like

1:20:45.840 --> 1:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this college freshman at Mimmy, Ohio. Is uh a little

1:20:49.240 --> 1:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>bit like the Sessler kid? How old is you know? Nineteen?

1:20:52.080 --> 1:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So all right, let's cut this off. I feel like

1:20:54.400 --> 1:20:56.519
<v Speaker 1>that whole clipp we just heard was the result of

1:20:56.560 --> 1:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Mark sending him that book. Well, I I believe I

1:20:58.960 --> 1:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>knew they didn't have any rings before them. He already

1:21:01.040 --> 1:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>had like that book, I believe, Thank you, Mark, you

1:21:04.080 --> 1:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are well. I hope I didn't create all that that alright.

1:21:09.080 --> 1:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Last game Vikings at Seahawks. Uh, this is a good one,

1:21:14.320 --> 1:21:16.559
<v Speaker 1>although I worry now we can't talk. We gotta stop

1:21:16.600 --> 1:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about it after every time now West, but Kirk

1:21:19.400 --> 1:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Cousins is a prime time on the road against a

1:21:21.120 --> 1:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>good team. Now I will say this, I will talk

1:21:24.120 --> 1:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about it as a thing still though, because but he

1:21:26.800 --> 1:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>did he though, because the Cowboys are kind of you know, yeah,

1:21:31.439 --> 1:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we know though the Seahawks moving the goal post is

1:21:33.800 --> 1:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the number one thing we do with Kirk. Absolutely,

1:21:38.000 --> 1:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>how about now nine in two Seattle, very the loudest

1:21:42.080 --> 1:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>building in the in the game. People of Kansas City

1:21:44.439 --> 1:21:47.519
<v Speaker 1>might disagree. Uh, this is a This is a very

1:21:47.600 --> 1:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>tough spot for any quarterback. And the Vikings, who we know,

1:21:51.439 --> 1:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>kick ass at home where they are I believe five

1:21:53.479 --> 1:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and oh, but they've been the middle of the road

1:21:55.479 --> 1:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>team away from their building. This is a tough assignment.

1:22:00.240 --> 1:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Whereas last week's Monday night matchup was clear to me

1:22:04.160 --> 1:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>going in. It was one dominant team against one very

1:22:07.560 --> 1:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>disappointed overmatch team in the Rams. This is two very good,

1:22:11.479 --> 1:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>legitimate playoff teams getting healthy. Adam feeling is supposed to

1:22:15.479 --> 1:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>be back. According to rap Sheet, there is one issue

1:22:18.000 --> 1:22:21.519
<v Speaker 1>there reading right now actually that he was sideline Wednesday

1:22:21.960 --> 1:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>with a in quotes slight scare incident attached to his

1:22:26.360 --> 1:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>hamstring problem. So if you do it again, if he

1:22:30.720 --> 1:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>hurts it again, he could be done for the season.

1:22:32.479 --> 1:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>That is a tough situation. Rap Sheet is not responsible

1:22:35.040 --> 1:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for set packs that happened during practice or ask uh.

1:22:40.400 --> 1:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the Seahawks, this team we said for the

1:22:43.240 --> 1:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>first ten or eleven weeks no pass rush. They have

1:22:46.840 --> 1:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>nobody over five sacks, they can't get anything going. And

1:22:49.800 --> 1:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>then Clowney have one of the best performance of the

1:22:52.320 --> 1:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>season against the forty niners. And last week, even without Clowney,

1:22:55.800 --> 1:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>they had a really good pass rush against the Eagles.

1:22:58.400 --> 1:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So maybe they have fixed that and they are no

1:23:00.439 --> 1:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>longer a bottom third defense like they were earlier in

1:23:03.920 --> 1:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the year. I I think adding quandary digs and in

1:23:07.000 --> 1:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>their safe group and now their linebackers are. It is

1:23:11.400 --> 1:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting that the Seahawks the last two weeks, the defense,

1:23:15.040 --> 1:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think has played their best two games of the

1:23:16.760 --> 1:23:19.559
<v Speaker 1>year in a row, and the offense maybe has played

1:23:19.640 --> 1:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>their worst two games of the year in a row. Now,

1:23:21.479 --> 1:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>one of them was against the forty niners, and so

1:23:23.840 --> 1:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you you give them a pass, but they were They

1:23:26.520 --> 1:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>were pretty dominated against the Eagles as well. It took

1:23:29.040 --> 1:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a trick play to get the early touchdown. They had

1:23:31.720 --> 1:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>eight first downs in their first eight drives. I think

1:23:34.200 --> 1:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line has been a problem all year. So

1:23:37.960 --> 1:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just a team that's changing. But I've I've learned,

1:23:41.520 --> 1:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not on Seahawks corner, and I've learned,

1:23:43.840 --> 1:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, stop stop looking for logic. I feel like Russ,

1:23:46.960 --> 1:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Russ and petn't about that logic. You just have faith

1:23:50.439 --> 1:23:52.519
<v Speaker 1>in what they do. And if you if you have

1:23:52.720 --> 1:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>faith in belief, d v O A d g A.

1:23:56.040 --> 1:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>F uh. Yeah. I thought, for the first time maybe

1:24:02.120 --> 1:24:04.519
<v Speaker 1>in his career, I thought Rashad Penny showed that he

1:24:04.560 --> 1:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>deserved more carries. He had legitimate juice in the in

1:24:07.960 --> 1:24:11.559
<v Speaker 1>last week's game, and Carson had more fumbling problems. They

1:24:11.640 --> 1:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have sixteen takeaways in the last six games to the

1:24:14.040 --> 1:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks defense. And we saw that against the Niners. We've

1:24:17.000 --> 1:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>seen you know, they they made it real rough on

1:24:19.240 --> 1:24:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles last week in bad weather again, but they're

1:24:22.720 --> 1:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to have the defense start to you know, climb up

1:24:25.680 --> 1:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>this way is a game changer. I I still think

1:24:27.880 --> 1:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they can win this division, and I said yesterday I

1:24:30.160 --> 1:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>do think they will win it. Well, they could be

1:24:31.640 --> 1:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in first place. There have a chance to get in

1:24:33.400 --> 1:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>first place going into it. Well know, the Vikings are

1:24:36.080 --> 1:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a weird team to me because they're kind of like

1:24:38.400 --> 1:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins as a team. They're really good in every area,

1:24:43.360 --> 1:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but nothing about them is great. Like they're they're a

1:24:46.040 --> 1:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good run defense, pretty good past defense, pretty he is,

1:24:50.200 --> 1:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but they're running game overall is it's it's up. It's

1:24:53.360 --> 1:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a little up and down. They've been. They've been shut down.

1:24:55.280 --> 1:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's fair. But they're they're very balanced, but

1:24:58.640 --> 1:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not not like since stational on anything that I picked

1:25:03.080 --> 1:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Seahawks originally on my picks, and then I realized,

1:25:06.280 --> 1:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like why do I keep doing this? I'm going I'm

1:25:08.479 --> 1:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fighting and get it right. At some point, I fighting

1:25:10.280 --> 1:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>against the gods and and then I flipped it at

1:25:11.760 --> 1:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the last second. Now here at the Seahawks corner. We

1:25:16.080 --> 1:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate that. Wait, you're on it too. What I thought?

1:25:20.280 --> 1:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan invited me in to take the spot and jumped

1:25:23.600 --> 1:25:26.559
<v Speaker 1>and he quit Seahawks corner right. I knew that, Yeah,

1:25:26.600 --> 1:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that you were like the one standing

1:25:28.400 --> 1:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>on the corner waving people in for the bit saky

1:25:31.040 --> 1:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is he doesn't actually care. I've been there before. Jadeveon

1:25:34.360 --> 1:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Clowney came to town. I said, Greg, I know you're

1:25:37.040 --> 1:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at this in August and you're seeing a team

1:25:39.000 --> 1:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not that good. They always figure it out, and

1:25:43.479 --> 1:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I will take your spot. You're right, And then I

1:25:45.960 --> 1:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>gave Gregg the opportunity to come join me. But Greg's like, no,

1:25:48.880 --> 1:25:51.519
<v Speaker 1>I I like what I like? So I said, do

1:25:51.640 --> 1:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you want Mark to take Greg's room and board and

1:25:54.960 --> 1:25:58.519
<v Speaker 1>then mark him I stay corrected, apology, I made my

1:25:58.760 --> 1:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I decided forty Niners rams you know it's

1:26:01.920 --> 1:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>not it's not looking good. I reversed the order there, Greg,

1:26:07.280 --> 1:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I just meant that I was thinking more of the

1:26:09.400 --> 1:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game. The forty Niners team was the kind

1:26:12.160 --> 1:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of the one that I'm I'm believing in long term.

1:26:14.200 --> 1:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But although I'm still trying to make sense of that

1:26:16.400 --> 1:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson miss of Jacob Hollister. That was like in

1:26:19.880 --> 1:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Pleasantville when Paul Walker gets told that she won't go

1:26:22.520 --> 1:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>out with him, and then nobody can make a shot

1:26:24.400 --> 1:26:27.599
<v Speaker 1>in the gym anymore. Like it was baffling. I've never

1:26:27.600 --> 1:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>seen Russell Wilson, well, who knows what happened, so robotically

1:26:30.720 --> 1:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful with everything he does on the football. I think

1:26:32.880 --> 1:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it was because he rare motally planning to run that

1:26:35.920 --> 1:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in and he could have, and then he saw

1:26:38.400 --> 1:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>how open Hollister was, and then in that moment he

1:26:41.200 --> 1:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just it was like too easy. It was too easy

1:26:43.360 --> 1:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to throw and he just like it made me seems

1:26:45.040 --> 1:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like the last second decision that went wrong kind of thing.

1:26:47.000 --> 1:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Yet that was also a wind tunnel. It was a

1:26:50.240 --> 1:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>terrible throw. I mean, he made a lot of great

1:26:51.920 --> 1:26:53.759
<v Speaker 1>throws in that game that made me question the world.

1:26:53.840 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wait, WHOA, what's going I mean, I've

1:26:55.479 --> 1:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>seen quarterbacks on on Cleveland that that's there were sort

1:26:58.040 --> 1:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of there line that's how they throw most throws. So

1:27:01.240 --> 1:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you had Russell Wilson, then guy Josh Shaw started a

1:27:05.160 --> 1:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>game or something. Now for the probably I don't remember him,

1:27:10.040 --> 1:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a cornerback safety. All right, that's it. We'll be back tomorrow. No,

1:27:17.640 --> 1:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's Thanksgiving. That's nice. Celebrate it with your family. Listen

1:27:21.400 --> 1:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast first, or if you have a family

1:27:25.280 --> 1:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>dynamic that's unhealthy, are toxic in some way, get your earbuds,

1:27:31.000 --> 1:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>your headphones and put them in your ears when you're

1:27:32.800 --> 1:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>sitting at the table, and just eat the food, which

1:27:36.479 --> 1:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>will probably be what you came for anyway, along to

1:27:39.600 --> 1:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>my story where I'll be putting on stories about my

1:27:42.800 --> 1:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>smoked turkey. Look at that. There you go. We've got

1:27:46.160 --> 1:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>your whole day planned out, and then Friday come back for.

1:27:49.120 --> 1:27:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Then we'll get that up pretty early in the morning

1:27:50.760 --> 1:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. So come back for the Friday recap of

1:27:54.880 --> 1:27:58.519
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday games. All right, that's it. Stand hands and

1:27:58.520 --> 1:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>signing off for a quiet during the mail man the

1:28:00.960 --> 1:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>old Boss Rick Hollywood behind the glass. Happy Thanksgiving everybody

1:28:09.760 --> 1:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>still Friday m