WEBVTT - A Closer Look At Tesla And The Housing Market 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. The conversation of the

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>morning certainly for me. Dan Eyves, Mountaging director Equity Research

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>at web Securities, UM, Penn State alum and a bad

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>loss last week Matt, Penn State lost to Illinois. At

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>saw that and I thought of Dan when I saw

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it nine overtimes? I mean, who plays nine overtimes? Anyway?

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dan, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We got Microsoft after the close. I want to get

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts as we go into that, But first let's

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>start with Tesla. I mean, Elon Musk is worth more

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>than you know, pretty much the rest of the stock

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>market at this point here, this stock to me is

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>showing really no signs of concern about rising competence from

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the existing O E M. How do you view that? Look,

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing the biggest transformation to the auto

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>industry since nanteen fifties, and Tesla's leading the way on

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>ev s and it's really been the one to punch

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what we saw on deliveries last week.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Profitability and it hurts is a tipping point. I think

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's an inflection point overall on evs. There's a five

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market and I think this is just sort

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of the middle innings of the street. Further appreciating this

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and ev story, Yeah, I mean, what an amazing story.

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Ordering a hundred thousand Model three Dan As close as

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I can figure, this is basically list price that they're paying. Well,

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's really what sticks out. You know, normally you'll see

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>discount tenss price because right now Tesla, it's Tesla's world.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else paying rent and evs because demands out strip

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>being supplied by about ten per cent. Now you start

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the trajectory out where this could go along with supply

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>coming on with Berlin in Austin million today, this could

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be two million a year, and I think that's what

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>you're started seeing the stock even look, the heaters will

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>heat continue here, but right now, as you're seeing this,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for investors to dismiss this green tide away

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>playing out, And Dan, how do you think this EV

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>market will shake out in ten years time? Well, when

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>assuming everybody who's in anybody will have a full complement,

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a full lineup of electric vehicles, where do you think

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's position will be? Would they kind of be the

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Porsche of the auto industry? Can I just can I

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>just point out, speaking of Porsche, the owner of Porsche

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and Lamborghini, Ducatti, Bentley, Bugatti, um Folkswagen and Audi, they

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.399
<v Speaker 1>have a market cap of a hundred fifty million dollars.

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's billion dollars. Tesla's worth more than a trillion. How

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>does that make any sense? Well, look, it's a great point.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I I've never viewed, and I know we've talked about

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the last decade Tessa as an automotive company. View them

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is the disruptive technology player. But I do think to

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Paul's question, v W for GM and and others is

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>part of this five trillion dollar e V transformation. It's

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not a zero or some game. They're all going

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to benefit. I mean, you put on perspective, you have

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>three million evs in the road globally, have a hundred

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>million cars. I believe that's fifty million the end of

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the decade, and Tessa is going to have a significant

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>market share of that. But but others are going to

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>benefit as well. And that's why this is something you

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the rerating that's going to start to happen

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so or what happened GM forward VW because more and

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>more investors are going to value that disruptive e VPS

0:03:54.280 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>like a technology ps, not traditional automotive. All right, let's

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>switch gears here to our good friends from Seattle, Washington.

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>UM Microsoft all time hyphe poy put up that max

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>chart on your Bloomberg terminal GP go just extraordinary. What

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>do you expect after the close from Microsoft? In I

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think another world series performance by by Nidel and Microsoft,

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean continues out the golden touch on cloud cloud

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Armor is playing out, but Microsoft is gaining more and

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>more share. This is just the growth story still underestimated

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>by the street. So we have a three seventy five

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>price target. I think it's just another sort of beaten

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>raised special coming out of Redmond. And you see that

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for the other tech companies as well. For Alphabet, Oh yeah,

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this is gonna be just a headline week

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.559
<v Speaker 1>for tech across the board Social Media week link because

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing on the Apple privacy, I think Apple,

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see robust coming out despite chip short just

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, demand now stripped and supply by about ten

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>million iPhones. Alphabet as well in digital advertising. I believe

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of the fuel in the tank now

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to get Nazac to our Yarine target of sixteen thousand.

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny day when I look at Microsoft,

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I look at the stock and you know, I'm I've

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been in this market long enough to really kind of

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>follow the Microsoft story from day one. When there's a

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, I lost decade or so for this company,

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like such an Adela it doesn't get

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the do that he has deserved, you know, even like

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe not an Elon Musk but a Tim Cook or

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the other guys from Silicon Valley. The job

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he's done in repositioning this company, I think it's just

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary story. How do you think about it? Nadela

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is in the Hall of Fames. I mean, for any

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>company what you see in the last fifteen years play

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>out what he's done in Microsoft, transforming them into a

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>cloud behemus go back to when he took over stocks

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty and forty, Mini thought that was really just gonna

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>be another mature company playing out. I believe he is

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>up there with the likes of Besos Cooking others in

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of what he's done. Nonetheless, when you look at

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the I mean I look at cop charts all the time, UM,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>which is automatically a five year chart on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And although Microsoft has done better than almost all of

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the mega tech peers. In fact, Microsoft for the last

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>five years done better than Google, Apple, Netflix, Amazon, UM,

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but it just pales in comparison to Tesla. Like this

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>chart is unbelievable to look at. Look it is. I mean,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, you know what what what's really some of

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the most transformational growth they're really ever been witnessed in

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty years. And I think you put these

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>stories on a pedestal Tessa, Amazon, Netflix, of course, Apple

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and others, and I think what you're seeing there is

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that more investors are starting to recognize the transformation that's happening,

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing the stock continue to reread as this

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>all takes place. All right, It's it's a pretty incredible story,

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. And Dan has been at the

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>forefront of this without performs. Yeah, it's it's been amazing

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry about Penn State. I really was thinking

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of Dan. Now. We have to go to Columbus this weekend.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Hope boy, oh, the Ohio State University University. Dan ives

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there from web Bush Morgan. Always great to get a

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of time with him. This is Bloomberg, all right,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in David Harden right now. He's the CEO

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment officer at Summit Global Investments. They have

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>one point eight billion dollars in assets under management. And uh, Dave,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll just ask you what I've been asking everybody today. Um,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we're at an all time high on the S and

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>P five, even though we face so many headwinds and

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there are so many question marks out there as well, Um,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the SMP. It's pretty amazing

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and the markets always had to climb a wall of

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>worry and so definitely, I continue to think this is

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be choppy, but I do think it's higher ahead.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And hey, thanks for having me on your should today.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I'm that's what I see all right, David.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, as Matt was just suggesting here, you know,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with this market at the all time high, a lot

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of valuation concerns in there. That's a big part of

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that wall of worry. But we've had really good earnings

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this third quarter period. Do you think earnings are strong

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to support the valuation here? Well, clearly, and and

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the earnings have been crushing it. And I think that

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the earnings revisions will continue. I think that the earnings

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>will continue to do well. Yes, growth is slowing, and

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that absolutely inflation is out there, and I think that's

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>flattening the yield curve, and I see the tenure going

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to two percent. But I don't see the bubble bursting

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>until the FED becomes negative towards the market. I think

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this thing continues and so choppy trading, but you know,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's still equities ahead and and cautiously optimistic here,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but equities still it's the place to play. What what

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is the FED gonna do? I mean, especially now that

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so many people are talking about the possibility of Chinese

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>growth slowing maybe less than five percent next year, it

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to me difficult for the FED raise rates in

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of situation. Um, and it is and it's

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be difficult, and I think that there's gonna

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't mean that we're going to be

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>straight up forever. The market has cycles and people have

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand. I think that risk management needs to become

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>more central in their investing mindset, and that's one of

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the things we do at s c I is that,

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we focus on managing risk and providing the

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>protection that the clients deserve when they're in those situations

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Because let's face it, the more risk

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>management you put in your portfolio, the more that it

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>will perform how you designed it to do. So you know,

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>there is gonna be a time a time of reckoning,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna and it's gonna be very important to

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>investors that their positioned correctly. Many times we just talked

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>about the next trade and not about the investment long term,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and those are two different conversations. David, you've got to

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>sell on Southwest Airlines. Is that a call on the

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sector or a call on the fact that Southwest Council's

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>flights every day? It's more well the latter, right, I

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think that if you're in this sector UM and and

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>there's still business travels still extremely weak. We know that

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>right and we know that UM with the pandemic with Delta,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>even though maybe the numbers look better than they did

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>last week, so to speak, are we coming out of this?

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>We get scarce all the time, but people are getting

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>their third shot now. So I think the sector. I'm

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>not negative on the sector. But Southwest has continue to

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>have problems. It's had problems in their c suite. We've

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>seen that this year. We can CEO changes and different things.

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>They've had problems now with their computer systems. And what

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to understand what those thousands of cancelations is

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the next time people go to book a flight, do

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they think in their minds, I don't. I don't know,

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe Southwest is going to cancel me. Once that happens,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they booked somewhere else, you lose revenue. So the seventy

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>five million one time charge great, but what about the

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>next flight? That's what I'm worried about with Southwest. I

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of downside volatility here or risk, and

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>so from my standpoint, short term struggles. If you're going

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to be in this sector, avoid Southwest. You do like

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>x On Mobile, and this is a company that I

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people with E s G concerns

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>would have void what draws you to the big oil?

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting we've been doing E s G

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>before e SU was sexting that and and before it

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>was even called that, And so sometimes E s G

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>is not always about not uh, it's it's more about

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>doing what you do really well and avoiding damage. Right. So,

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if Exon was responsible for the oil spill that was

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>off the hunt it'son beach coach coast last two or

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago, that'd be really bad. But they're not,

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're doing really well and you're getting a really

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>well paid yield here. Um, you're getting very manageable risk,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>really good management team. And our call is that oil

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>stays above where it's at, or stays where it's at

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>right now for a longer period of time. And let's

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>face it, at this price of crude, excellent is a

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>really good opportunity and it's a good value play too.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So from my standpoint, energy right now is a really

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 1>good play and I would be increasing my energy exposure

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>if I was a client. Dave, you're salt Lake cities

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at right correct, we're out of Salt Lake with offices

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in Boise, San Francisco, and Tampa. Let's getting the important stuff.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>How's the snow going to be in Utah this year? Well,

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>after a foot of snow last night, nice continued going

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>this morning, and a storm every about three days. Our

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>resorts are opening up sooner than they've ever done before,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it's gonna be a fantastic ski season.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But I love the skis um book. I've already booked

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>two trips out there, so it you know, better keep

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dumping after missing skiing for a couple of years, it's

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great to get back. Boy. We always make

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>plans to do something different, crazy Montana or this or that.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Then again, he screw it. It's flying to Salt Lake.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>We got world class resorts, you know, minutes away. It's

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>just Park City, much easier. Yeah, I know. Awesome, awesome,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>all right. Dave Harden, CEO and Chief investment officer Summit

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Global Investments and our Utah ski man on the ground.

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate that. Markets again trading higher again. Good earnings,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we had some good earnings. We have more big tech

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>after the close today, but as Dave said, earnings doing

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>their part here for this market. Let's bring in Fiona

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Sencata right now, senior financial markets analyst at City Index,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and Fiona as a journalist. We have to try and

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be skeptical. It's not hard right now. Uh, supply chain,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think crisis is a is a too strong

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a word to use. Labor shortages, inflation scares, and yet

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we're trading at basically forty six hundred right now on

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the SMP. That's got to be a game of like

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty year to day what's going on, that's right. I mean,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it does feel that very much, this sort of optionism

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that's coming out of earnings at the moment, which is

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>actually just lifting the stocks. There's very much the shadowing

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that we saw heading into earning seasons that

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the inflation confirms, just to surroundings of the labor market,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of energy crisis and supply chain bottlenecks, all

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be just being overshadowed right now by

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>some some nice strong earnings that we've seen, and I

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're not seeing sort of the reflection yet of

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>those sort of concerns thing really shown through in the

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings from that's something that's helping sort of investors optimism. UM.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Just for example, the as far as supply chain bottlenecks

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>were concern, I think that's very much to see that

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of starting to come through in the following quarter.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's just what we're seeing at the moment,

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is the market or at that sort of happy point

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>where things although we know there are a lot of

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>headwinds coming and there are problems surrounding, the numbers just

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't quite showing that yet. And also we've got sort

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of consumer confidence data came through today much better than

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>expected as well, and so that really helps lift up

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the mood. Adding to that upb we were expecting to

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>meet consumer confidence to come in much lower and to

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>fall for a fourth straight months. It's actually had a

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>surprise jump. So that does bode well in fact for

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the the the economic pick up picture for the start

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the fourth quarter. UM. If you know, we have

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some big techno names reporting earnings after the closed Microsoft

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>alphabet and which I prefer to as Google on old school,

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>how are you thinking about the text base right here? Yes,

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so we've had some good numbers, haven't we I mean,

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we've had as far as the Facebook was concerned,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that was as far as I'm concerned, that came better

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>than we were expecting in the sense that we saw

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that beat on the earning pressure. Revenue was a little

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>bit on the disappointing side, but that perhaps isn't so

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>surprising given what we know about what's happening with Apple

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and the the privacy policy change there, and as far

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>as what we're expecting from from Microsoft to Alphabet, I mean,

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>if we think about how these have rallied over the

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>past six months, I mean Microsoft are up thirty over

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the past six months, Alphabets up year today, So there

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are pretty high expectations for these stocks. But I mean

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with Alphabet, for example, not only Google proved to be

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>resilient as far as sort of advertising revenue concern, we

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>do see it sort of picking up as well from

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that gain in the pickup in travel sector and travel searches,

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>which is going to help it along as well. Microsoft

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>very much been involved with that remote working companies sort

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of increasingly spend on cloud and on digital transformations because

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of that remote working. This is all very supportive of

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector. I think we've still got you know,

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we've seen these stocks trading out record highs and they

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have eased off some of them. I think they could

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>potentially push higher if we get some more solid numbers

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the in terms of next year, what

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>are you expecting, because the consumer confidence numbers, although they

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>were good just now, have been lacking of late, and

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I've heard more and more people use the word recession.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I think recession is quite a strong word sense still,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we we will see a sort of very

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>much a change as we're going into next year. Obviously,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget this year has been very much about recovery, rebounding.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We've had the support from the fiscal support. We've also

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>had military policy support. And those taps are going to

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>be turned off, we know, sort of as far as

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is concerned, will be looking for that for

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the taping in them. Those bond purchases to start happening,

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially as soon as November December, and then

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>as far as interest rates being heiked, that's something that

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>could really start to flow the growth that we're seeing.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I do think recessions a very strong word. I think

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>there are concerns about as far as growth is trying

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to flow, particularly as we see those these supply chain

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>bottom x the energy crisis sort of moves through the

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>market and the markets come to terms with those and

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>moved past them. But I think the as Sara's actually

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>greatest concern, and do you think we'll continue to see growth,

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but just as a much slower pace, And obviously any

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>rising interest rates that bring sort of inslation back under

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>control will just sort of stem that groat a little

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more. You mentioned energy just real quickly, I'm seeing

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>w t I just about eighty five dollars a barrel.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Have I missed the energy stock trade or the energy

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>commodity trade. No, I think there is more here. I mean,

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I get energy, and as far as oil is concerned,

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>it's had a very impressive run I mean we know

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of coal prices and gas prices have absolutely surge,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and w t I has also had a very good

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>run up. Was just in the the gas and the

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>coal prices starting to edge down after we've had that

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>intervention from China, particularly in the coal market. But I

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think as far as oil in this concern, we know

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that demand is still very strong, particularly in the US,

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and then we've also got to very tight supplies from Ope,

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not looking to sort of move so far beyond

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>those four D extra barrels they agreed back into life,

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So so I think there is further to run that

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, Fiana, thank you so much for joining us.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>As always, Fiona and card A, senior financial markets analysts

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for City in next giving her her thoughts on these

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>markets again earnings after the close, Big Tech, this is Bloomberg.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Now we got us new home sales numbers um UH

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>sales of new homes in America increase in September to

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the highest level in six months, underscoring what we already

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>knew was pretty solid underlying demand. Brad Dillman joins us

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, chief economists at Courtland out of Atlanta, And Brad,

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>what do you think I mean? We knew it was

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be hot, but I'm not sure everybody knew

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that purchases of single family homes would grow fourteen percent

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to an annualized eight hundred thousand. It's definitely higher than expectations.

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>The figure I had had in front of me for

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the expectations figure with seven twenty thousand on a seasonally

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>does at annualized basis so it's certainly be what most

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>models have been predicting. You know, one of the things

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>as we think about the housing market bread it's been

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>so consistently strong through this entire economic tumult from the pandemic,

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But when we think about the supply of housing in

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the US, it hasn't been necessarily where it's needed. I'm

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking the entry level home. We haven't seen new home

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>construction really address that market. Uh, Is that changing at all? No, Unfortunately,

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>it's not that. If we look at the price movement

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in what's happened on the new home sales side. For example,

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the median price came in it fo UM. That's up

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>from about eight thousand pre COVID and US. To put

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it an a broader reference, twenty years ago, the price

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for a new home would have been about a hundred

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and sixty eight thousand, So that's a two and a

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>half times increase. So we are definitely seeing those prices

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to take up. Now. I would make the argument

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's in part due to financial conditions, and I

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think part of the reason that housing has been so

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>strong since the onset of the pandemic has been what's

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>gone on and with mortgage rates, which is that they've

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>come down so much and remain quite low. Um. I've

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>talked in the past about the tenure tregury rate being

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>negative in real terms once week factor and inflation and

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>an aspect of this passing through the mortgage rates with

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they're being really low as well. But when we look

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to new homesale too, you know, we had this huge

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>rebound in the wake of the pandemic that it's then

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>cooled a bit. And now I'd say when I look

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>at this figure, I'd say it's it's really resuming its

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>pre COVID trend. So maybe we'll see a continuation of

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that going for what is I mean, it's a very

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>regional market, right The United States is gigantic and um,

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know I realized that even more having lived in

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe for for years. Now, where do you see the

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>strongest growth and where do you see a little bit

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more normalcy? So month to months, the big games have

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>been in the Northeast and the south. Um, I wouldn't

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>really say that we're you know, the other parts of

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the country and again we're talking large regions, you know,

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>are in a bad spot. We gotta remember when we

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the new home sales figure. While it was strong,

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>it actually is still down year to year. And so

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, you know, in the latter half of

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we really saw some strong figures that cooled off a

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>lot in the first part of this year, and we're

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>now seeing them swing back up again and resume that

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>pre COVID trend. Brad, you know, I'm still at a loss.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna follow on my prior question. Why isn't the market,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the housing market more efficient? I e. There's demand at

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the low end, and there's where's the supply to meet

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that demand. I mean, I know the margins on the

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>McMansion are better for builders, but at some point the

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>pricing dynamic has to drive supply of lower end housing. Yeah,

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and I argue to a degree. We have seen, of course,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten years, we've seen supply pick up.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It just hasn't kept pace with our population growth. So

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>there's estimates out there related to our total deficit of housing.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>The The estimate that I have is one point one

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>million housing units. That's to say that we would need

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to build one point one million housing units instantaneously just

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to satisfy what we would need right now. That's nothing

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with sort of a go forward basis, just

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to clean things right now. And so when I look

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>at the last ten years, I see the difficulty for

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>home builders really being in what I would call artificial

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>home price appreciation that came about from the kind of

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>policies that we've set about on to stimulate housing coming

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the Great Recession. If you raise home prices

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to the point that people can't afford them, there's really

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>not a big market into which home builders can build

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and deliver supply. And that's precisely what's happened at the

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>low end. Even though this situation has to a degree

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>uh been solved over the last ten years, as as

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>our total amount of housing completions has in increased, we

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>haven't have we seen UM rentals keep up then with

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the demand for housing. I mean, do people who can

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>afford to buy houses, do they end up renting places instead?

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Has it working out? Yes? So there's been some huge

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>strength in the multifamily space and in the single family

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rental space, and in fact q Tree annual rent growth

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in multi family came in much stronger than expectations UM

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and the occupancy rates and multi family remained very tight. Now,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is during the pandemic, when we saw lots

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of people move out to buy homes, we did see

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that these vacant rental units were back silled by something

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've covered in surveys as first time renters. So

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's something we can see with call it your younger

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>millennials at this point or older gen zers who are

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>able to move out and form their own household as

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>as those units become vacant um. But where that's going

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to be heading going forward. You know, if we if

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we do see mortgage rates take up in the wake

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of a taper, and we see activity in the floor

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>purchase space start to slow down a little bit, maybe

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>in some ae month's time, we may see higher renewal

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>rates again in multi family, something that's already been relatively

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>consistent over the last call it six months or so.

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the same increase in renewal rates in Reynolds. Interesting stuff.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You can always talk real estate lots going on out there.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Brad Dillman, chief economist for Courtland, joining us on the

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>phone there, and again, the real estate market remains very,

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>very strong. We saw that in the in the ECO

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers today coming out of d c UM. So good

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>time to be a seller of a house. Not so

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.479
<v Speaker 1>sure enough already a buyer. But Matt's going to give

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>us some on the ground, real world feedback starting next week.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three pt on Ball Sweeney I'm on

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio