Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here,
Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of
Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election.
Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade
Speaker 2: the studio ad staff, give you, guys, the best independent.
Speaker 3: Coverage that is possible.
Speaker 2: If you like what we're all about, it just means
Speaker 2: the absolute world to have your support.
Speaker 3: But enough with that, let's get to the show.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is independent presidential candidate Robert Francis Kennedy Junior.
Speaker 2: And well, it is a pleasure to have him back
Speaker 2: on the show. It's great to see you.
Speaker 4: Sir Suger.
Speaker 2: Thanks for having me absolutely so. You know, we watched
Speaker 2: your real debate. It was garnered views by millions of people.
Speaker 2: We have some video from that actually, and we wanted
Speaker 2: to talk to you a little bit about your decision
Speaker 2: to participate and to hold this event which happened outside
Speaker 2: of the mainstream media system, which consequent Quentley was still
Speaker 2: watched by millions, and what it was like to be
Speaker 2: excluded then from the CNA debate and what you why
Speaker 2: you decided to throw that independent event.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, there was seventy one percent of the
Speaker 1: American people wanted me on that debate stage, and and
Speaker 1: I qualified for the debate by the right here, I
Speaker 1: qualified better than any other candidate, let me put it
Speaker 1: that way, by the criteria that CNN established. We think
Speaker 1: that that debate was an illegal campaign contribution by CNN
Speaker 1: to those two candidates. I don't know if the FEC
Speaker 1: will hold them responsible or not, since it's dominated by
Speaker 1: those two parties, but we thought Americans deserve another another choice,
Speaker 1: and uh, you know, and and a view of the
Speaker 1: of the issues that really should be talked about, the
Speaker 1: issues that those that these two candidates will never talk about.
Speaker 1: The debate vision in our country which is tearing our
Speaker 1: country apart, which they can't address because they're feeding on
Speaker 1: it and they're products of it. This huge budget deficit
Speaker 1: that the two of them, thirty four trillion dollars that
Speaker 1: it is now threatening its existential threat for our country.
Speaker 1: Within five years, fifty cents out of every dollar that
Speaker 1: we collect in taxes is going to go to servicing
Speaker 1: the dead within ten years, one hundred percent. And these
Speaker 1: two candidates can't talk about it because both of them
Speaker 1: promised to balance the budget and both of them ran
Speaker 1: up the biggest deficits in history. They can't talk about
Speaker 1: winding down the wars because both of them are feeding
Speaker 1: into them. They can't talk about the chronic disease epidemic,
Speaker 1: which it is now absorbing five times our military budget
Speaker 1: and has affected sixty percent of our kids. We're the
Speaker 1: sickest country in the world, and they presided over it. Oh,
Speaker 1: they can't talk about ending the corrupt merger of state
Speaker 1: and corporate or because both of them are part of
Speaker 1: the part of the swamp. And they can't talk about
Speaker 1: making government honest again. And you know, I said this
Speaker 1: Sagre during the debate that the day I get into office,
Speaker 1: I'm going to issue an executive order that any federal
Speaker 1: official who lies to the American people will immediately lose
Speaker 1: their job. President Drum can't do that. They were both
Speaker 1: up there telling lies. So I thought the Americans deserved
Speaker 1: something other than the debate they were going to get
Speaker 1: from CNN. And by the way, CNN during COVID, which
Speaker 1: was the most momentous and consequential political decision over the
Speaker 1: past many decades, the lockdowns that shut down all of
Speaker 1: our businesses, shut down our schools, et cetera. CNN was
Speaker 1: the biggest cheerleader for that. So I don't think Jake
Speaker 1: Tapper is really capable of confronting these candidates on terrible
Speaker 1: consequences that those decisions had on the American playlic.
Speaker 2: Bobby, one of the things that we do, I mean,
Speaker 2: I appreciate and obviously we what genuinely wanted you to
Speaker 2: be on the debate stage, which we said in our
Speaker 2: coverage as well. I do think it was a very
Speaker 2: consequential decision to exclude you, given.
Speaker 3: The fallout from that.
Speaker 2: I'm curious to get your reaction to President Biden's performance.
Speaker 2: I mean, do you think that he's currently fit to
Speaker 2: serve as president after the performance that he gave.
Speaker 4: I don't think he's fit to serve as president.
Speaker 1: I think, you know, the thing that frightens me's sake
Speaker 1: or is if we are if we're in a situation
Speaker 1: where he gets that call at three o'clock in the
Speaker 1: morning and he's woken up, He's got six minutes to
Speaker 1: make the decision about whether to retaliate and to unleash
Speaker 1: our nuclear power on the Russians the Chinese. During that
Speaker 1: six minutes, he's been pushed down corridors and tunnels under
Speaker 1: the White House and the bunker by five or six
Speaker 1: Secret Service, and I just I don't, you know, he's
Speaker 1: got to make a decision that's going to affect the
Speaker 1: lives of our children, that's going to affect the welfare
Speaker 1: of all of humanity, right, and I want somebody who's
Speaker 1: on the ball making that decision. I don't know, you know,
Speaker 1: even I'll say this theater and I don't want to
Speaker 1: make this personal about me, but I've known Joe Biden
Speaker 1: for forty years and he's just a completely different person now.
Speaker 1: And even this little decision of him not providing me
Speaker 1: with the Secret Service protection, I don't think that Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: I knew, would do that. I don't believe he's making
Speaker 1: that decision. I believe he probably doesn't even know about it,
Speaker 1: because I think he seems unaware. And I know that,
Speaker 1: you know, Joe Biden has has a bus my father
Speaker 1: sitting behind him at the Oval office. He knew what
Speaker 1: he knows what happened to my dad, And you know,
Speaker 1: he was the person I knew that Joe Biden, I
Speaker 1: knew was a decent man. He would not make this
Speaker 1: kind of decisions. So what I think is there's you know,
Speaker 1: there's somebody sitting there, some kid in a lanyard, some
Speaker 1: anonymous man in a lanyard was sitting with his feet
Speaker 1: up on the desk of the Oval office saying, I'm
Speaker 1: the real president. Nobody knows about it, but there is
Speaker 1: somebody else. I just believe that there's somebody else making
Speaker 1: these decisions because I think that Joe Biden, I know,
Speaker 1: would not be making that kind of decision.
Speaker 4: A whole bunch of them right.
Speaker 2: Well, but since you were the highest polling Democrat in
Speaker 2: the race other than Joe Biden before you decided to
Speaker 2: run as an independent, have any Democrats or major donors
Speaker 2: reached out to you to ask you to become standard
Speaker 2: bearer and replace him.
Speaker 1: We haven't heard from anybody yet. I'm sure they're looking
Speaker 1: at polls, and you know the polls. We did this
Speaker 1: Zugby pole, which is the biggest pole ever taken in
Speaker 1: this race, one of the biggest poles ever taken. Twenty
Speaker 1: six thousand people. So the typical poll Sayer has about
Speaker 1: by twinnipeac or Harvard Harris or Gallup has one thousand to.
Speaker 4: Twenty two hundred people in it.
Speaker 1: This was a poll of twenty six thousand, and it
Speaker 1: shows clearly that I'm the only person who can beat
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, including President Biden. If I'm in the race,
Speaker 1: President Biden loses. If I'm out of the race, he
Speaker 1: loves even worse. And I had to have me against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, I win. And it had to have me
Speaker 1: against President Biden. I went in a landslide. I win
Speaker 1: thirty nine states. He only wins eleven. My numbers. I'm
Speaker 1: the only candidate who can take who can cut it
Speaker 1: into Donald Trump's base, and if they want to, if
Speaker 1: they're if the objective, which I think is true. There's
Speaker 1: two parts of the Democratic Party. There's the Donor Glass,
Speaker 1: which I think would would like to keep me out
Speaker 1: of the would rather have.
Speaker 4: Donald Trump than me in office, okay.
Speaker 1: And then there's the rank and file Democrats who are
Speaker 1: so terrified of Donald Trump that they would much rather
Speaker 1: have me as their candidate because I'm the only one
Speaker 1: who can win.
Speaker 2: Is it something you would even consider, Bobby at this point,
Speaker 2: you've run as an independent, You've picked your vice president.
Speaker 2: Would you even consider running for the nomination at the
Speaker 2: DNC if they were offering me.
Speaker 1: I think that that because me running is an independent
Speaker 1: is going to cut away from you know, from from
Speaker 1: votes or the Democratic and Republican Party. So the clearest
Speaker 1: path for me to the White House is through the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. I don't have to do that, but I
Speaker 1: think that would be probably the best choice for everybody,
Speaker 1: and it's certainly something that I would consider.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm curious to then find out, because one of
Speaker 2: the things that you're often accused of is being a
Speaker 2: Maga sympathizer or some sort of agent for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: What did you disagree with about Trump most on the
Speaker 2: debate stage.
Speaker 1: Oh, you know, I think Donald Trump was a terrible president.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of the things he talks about.
Speaker 1: He talks about winding down the military industrial complex, but
Speaker 1: he didn't do that. He gave the first billion and
Speaker 1: a half to Ukraine to buy for the first time
Speaker 1: offensive weapons. He was the one who sent Pompeo over
Speaker 1: there in twenty nineteen and said, you know, we're going
Speaker 1: to mix Ato into U Graine. And he walked away
Speaker 1: from intermediate nuclear weapons, treated unilaterally with the Russians. And
Speaker 1: if you look at the way he governed, he said
Speaker 1: he was going to train this one. He brought a
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical industry lobby is in to run a JHS. He
Speaker 1: brought out oil obbyous in to run the Interior Department.
Speaker 1: He bought an old lobbyist into run the e BA.
Speaker 1: He bought a Verizon executive in to run the FCC
Speaker 1: he ran, he brought a banker in to run the
Speaker 1: Treasury Department, and and so you know. And he brought
Speaker 1: John Bolton and to run the NSA. And he bought
Speaker 1: an oil executive and to run the State Department. So
Speaker 1: these are swamp creatures. He wasn't training the swamp. He
Speaker 1: was turning the government over to corporate pirates, and and
Speaker 1: so everything he did in governing in that way. I
Speaker 1: think a lot of the rhetoric that he talks about
Speaker 1: I agree with. I think we need to wind down,
Speaker 1: you know, the swamp. But he wasn't doing that. I
Speaker 1: don't think he's capable of governing, of meeting the expectations
Speaker 1: and fulfilling the promises that he raises with his rhetoric.
Speaker 2: Returning then to the possibility of running as a Democrat,
Speaker 2: do you still think that well? I mean, one of
Speaker 2: the criticisms I've seen is that you're too far apart
Speaker 2: from the Democratic Party. Do you think that you're in
Speaker 2: line with the majority of Democrats, you know on several
Speaker 2: of these issues.
Speaker 1: I think that I am the classic Democrat. I'm the
Speaker 1: you know, I'm Kennedy Democrat. If you go down all
Speaker 1: of a checklist of all of the important priorities for
Speaker 1: my father, my uncle, I would check off everyone, you know,
Speaker 1: protecting our Constitution, protecting our Bill of Rights, decoupling corporate
Speaker 1: control from our from our regulatory agencies, which should become
Speaker 1: sock puppets for the industries they're supposed to regulate, winding
Speaker 1: down the war machine using diplomacy instead of war, all
Speaker 1: of the things personal freedoms, medical ausmotomy, bodily at autonomy,
Speaker 1: all the things that the Democratic Party has traditionally represented
Speaker 1: and fought for. Those are the issues that you know
Speaker 1: that are my priorities.
Speaker 2: Bobby, what did you make of the Supreme Court decision
Speaker 2: yesterday on presidential immunities?
Speaker 3: It something you agreed with or disagreed with.
Speaker 1: I think it's horrifying, I think, and I you know,
Speaker 1: I'm not partisan about this. It helped Donald Trump, but
Speaker 1: that's not what I care about. I care about the
Speaker 1: fact that we now you know, the executive now has
Speaker 1: this enormous power that I don't think was contemplated by
Speaker 1: the framers of our constitution, and I think it in
Speaker 1: the hands of Democrats or Republicans. At some point our
Speaker 1: country is going to land in the hand there's going
Speaker 1: to be a demagogue who is occupying the Oval office,
Speaker 1: and the and the tools and the weapons that the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court have now put at that person's disposal are
Speaker 1: are They're breathtaking, And I don't think and I think
Speaker 1: it would be it would be challenging for our democracy
Speaker 1: to survive. And it's in any form that we recognize
Speaker 1: if those you know, every power that an executive is
Speaker 1: given will ultimately be abused in the maximum of percent possible.
Speaker 1: And I think, you know, I think we all have
Speaker 1: to contemplate what happens when you unleash executive power to
Speaker 1: that extent. And I think it's very, very alarming.
Speaker 2: What will your criteria be for appointing a Scotis Justice.
Speaker 2: I don't believe I've seen you expound on that before, Like,
Speaker 2: what would you look at in terms of Roe versus weight,
Speaker 2: let's say, in terms of Chevron this immunity case and others?
Speaker 2: How would you evaluate considering that the next president is
Speaker 2: likely to appoint at least two Supreme Court justices.
Speaker 4: To the court. Yeah, I mean saying it's hard.
Speaker 1: You know, I would really Vlleyway based upon character and
Speaker 1: a commitment to the Constitution. Chevron cuts both. My Chevron
Speaker 1: was really you know, I spent forty years in the
Speaker 1: trenches fighting both you know, assuing administrative agencies right and
Speaker 1: also suing large corporations. And Chevron was an important weapon
Speaker 1: for us because it gave the the regulatory agency the
Speaker 1: capacity to fill the kind of interstitial places in the
Speaker 1: statutes that Congress just will never answer.
Speaker 4: And now that.
Speaker 1: Has gone and every decision by the regulatory agency can
Speaker 1: now be litigated, which is going to enormously weaken the
Speaker 1: regulatory agencies. Chevron did was a two edge stord because
Speaker 1: when the regulatory agency becomes captured by corporations, it also
Speaker 1: functions to widen corporate power. So I unfortunately, I think
Speaker 1: we're in a place in American history where, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm kind of I'm kind of neutral on the Chevron
Speaker 1: issue because I see, you know, the really good things
Speaker 1: that it did in the past, but I also see
Speaker 1: the very bad potential that it has right now where
Speaker 1: we're living in a situation where our regulatory agencies are
Speaker 1: just indentured sermons and really subsidiaries of the corporations that
Speaker 1: they're supposed to regulate.
Speaker 2: Returning to the campaign issue, if the Democrats do swap
Speaker 2: out Joe Biden for somebody else, would there be a criteria?
Speaker 2: What would your decision making process be? Would you possibly
Speaker 2: drop out of the race? Are you going to stay
Speaker 2: in this race no matter what unless it's you? How
Speaker 2: would you evaluate that scenario?
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm going to stay in the race, I think,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean unless unless they appointed to somebody
Speaker 1: who was who shared exactly, you know, all of my
Speaker 1: ambitions for the men and for dismantling.
Speaker 2: Is there anyone not you that you could point to
Speaker 2: that represents somebody like that.
Speaker 1: And not among the not among the contenders, you know,
Speaker 1: I think I think we all know who the contenders are,
Speaker 1: and there's six or seven people who they could pick,
Speaker 1: and I think among those people there is nobody that
Speaker 1: would lead me to drop out of the race.
Speaker 2: Let's say that they I'm probably the most likely is
Speaker 2: the current Vice president Kamala Harris. If you were up
Speaker 2: against her, what would your campaign message be as to
Speaker 2: why you're better than Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: I think Amala has the same issues that President Biden
Speaker 1: has without the.
Speaker 4: Of cognitive issues. Is that she's very pro war.
Speaker 1: She is she's supported censorship, she supported this, you know,
Speaker 1: this unpresident assault on our constitution where they close all
Speaker 1: the churches for a year without without regulatory process, without
Speaker 1: scientific citation, without you know, public hearings or notice and
Speaker 1: comment rulemaking or environmental impact statements or anything, and all
Speaker 1: of the other issues, shutting down jury trials, the Seventh Amendment,
Speaker 1: closing three point three million businesses with no due process,
Speaker 1: no just compensation. You know, the Constitution is critically important
Speaker 1: right now, particularly SEG because you have the rise of
Speaker 1: all these very intrusive surveillance technologies like AI facial recognition systems,
Speaker 1: like low altitude satellites that can look at every inch
Speaker 1: of the world every day, digital currencies, all these things
Speaker 1: that can be used number one, by corporations to maximize
Speaker 1: their profits and to commoditize it's all and commoditize everything
Speaker 1: we think or do or say to each other every interaction.
Speaker 1: But also they can be used by government to surveil
Speaker 1: and control the populations and to actually with AI to
Speaker 1: alter our reality and really control ultimately control our minds.
Speaker 1: I think it's really critically important at this point in
Speaker 1: the history to raise the blow works, the bar areas
Speaker 1: of the Constitution and the Bill of Price to make
Speaker 1: them impervious and impermeable. And I don't think that that's
Speaker 1: something that Kamela really grasps.
Speaker 2: What's your plan for the next ABC News debate scheduled
Speaker 2: in September. I'm sure you've looked at the qualifications, any
Speaker 2: legal you know, ways that you be able to get
Speaker 2: on the ballot, perhaps by suing ABC. Have you've been
Speaker 2: in contact tell us about that, because that possibly could
Speaker 2: be even more important than the previous debate that we
Speaker 2: just saw.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, we're hoping that they let me on
Speaker 1: the debate stage as time. So you know, I think
Speaker 1: I'm going to qualify by all the traditional I will
Speaker 1: be on the ballot in every state at that point,
Speaker 1: and my poll numbers are good enough. Any I think
Speaker 1: if the Presidential Debating Commission, if they were still running it,
Speaker 1: I would definitely be on the stage. So you know,
Speaker 1: I need to look at their criteria and how that
Speaker 1: was selected, and then you know, make a decision about
Speaker 1: what to do. Unfortunately, you say, are the FEC Federal
Speaker 1: Election Commission is a very weak agency. It's unresponsive, it
Speaker 1: doesn't is captured by the political parties. Oh, it is
Speaker 1: another captured agency and the parties that's supposed to regulate. Interestingly,
Speaker 1: the Gallup poll came out this week that show that
Speaker 1: independent voters are now by far the biggest political demographic
Speaker 1: in our country. Fifty of Americans self identified as independent
Speaker 1: is only twenty three percent say they are Democrats, twenty
Speaker 1: five percent say they are Republicans. So you have these
Speaker 1: two minority parties who are running our whole political system,
Speaker 1: and most Americans do not feel like those parties represent
Speaker 1: their interests. I'm doing better among independence than either President
Speaker 1: Biden or President Trump, and it's kind of a it's
Speaker 1: kind of a joke to say that those voices should
Speaker 1: not be represented in the national stage, and I think
Speaker 1: we have to make that point. I'm grateful to you
Speaker 1: and to this show for giving you an alternative narrative
Speaker 1: that is, I think the closest to the truth of
Speaker 1: you know, what's happening in our political system right now.
Speaker 1: Because the mainstream media is also you know, has been
Speaker 1: captured by the Democratic.
Speaker 3: Oh, we appreciate that.
Speaker 2: It's very obviously ridiculous, you know, not to have one
Speaker 2: of the highest pulling independent candidates in decades not on
Speaker 2: the stage. And I think it genuinely could have change history.
Speaker 2: Ryan grim made that point on our show, because you
Speaker 2: would have been the contrast to President Biden as opposed
Speaker 2: to just President Trump. This does matter though in the
Speaker 2: ballot context. So as of six days ago, for your
Speaker 2: campaign said you're on the ballot in eight separate states.
Speaker 2: So you said you're going to be on the ballot
Speaker 2: in all or No, you have an account for only
Speaker 2: one hundred and thirty eight electoral votes that's currently but
Speaker 2: you said just now you're going to be on the
Speaker 2: ballot all fifty by September. Can you assure us of that,
Speaker 2: because as I understand it, there have been some ballot
Speaker 2: challenges and others. Tell us about that process as it's
Speaker 2: arguably the biggest obstacle to your campaign right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean they people say we're only about I
Speaker 1: think in eight or nine of the stage, which it's true,
Speaker 1: but we have enough signatures to get on the ballot
Speaker 1: in more than half the states.
Speaker 4: Already and they're all the hard states.
Speaker 1: So the easy states that you know, are the ones
Speaker 1: that are left, and we will be on all those
Speaker 1: ballots by the end of this month. They we're not
Speaker 1: going to let me let me edit that remarks. We
Speaker 1: won't be on the ballot because there are many of
Speaker 1: these states where the state will not let you get
Speaker 1: on the ballot even if you have all the signatures.
Speaker 1: They won't process your application until the end of August.
Speaker 1: We have in most states, we have two to three
Speaker 1: times the number of signatures that we need and they're
Speaker 1: you know, these are not going to be susceptible to
Speaker 1: any authentic challenge. The d n C is probably going
Speaker 1: to make frivolous challenges to us in every state. So far,
Speaker 1: we've won every single one of their those lawsuits. We
Speaker 1: have a now awar chest to fight those lawsuits against
Speaker 1: the d n C, and we're going to fight them all.
Speaker 1: But we will have all the ballot signatures that we
Speaker 1: need by as I said, by by the end of
Speaker 1: June or the end of July or the I mean
Speaker 1: the end of June or the first week of the end. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I'm getting mixed up about what month time I think
Speaker 1: it was in three weeks, Okay, the third week of Jill,
Speaker 1: I will be on the ballot. We'll have enough signature,
Speaker 1: just again on the ballot in every state.
Speaker 2: And this is critical because, as I understand, this is
Speaker 2: part of the way that CNN excluded you from the
Speaker 2: debate is even though you had the ballots to qualify,
Speaker 2: even though you technically weren't on the ballot, they were
Speaker 2: saying that you didn't even though, as you pointed out,
Speaker 2: President Biden and Trump, neither of them were officially on
Speaker 2: the ballot either, because neither of them actually been nominated.
Speaker 2: So that was a real view I think into the
Speaker 2: way that the current process is rigged. I'm curious on
Speaker 2: your fundraising numbers. Have you seen a major increase? I
Speaker 2: believe your campaign just said you've raised will fit at
Speaker 2: forty six million dollars currently about ten million dollars of
Speaker 2: that from your vice president. Can you give us any
Speaker 2: insight into post debate considering the amount of political interest
Speaker 2: that spiked in this country?
Speaker 1: Since I don't, I honestly don't know numbers, I do
Speaker 1: know this that on the day of the debate that
Speaker 1: we had a record day fundraising. So and I've heard,
Speaker 1: but I can't guarantee you this. I've heard that the
Speaker 1: fundraising has been very very good since the since of
Speaker 1: the debate. Okay, all right, well, and I think and
Speaker 1: the other thing is that you know, the political parties
Speaker 1: can raise over a million dollars per donor and we're
Speaker 1: only we're restricted to sixty six hundred dollars per donor.
Speaker 1: But because we are now on the ballot for existing
Speaker 1: political parties, with the Natural Law Party, with the People Party,
Speaker 1: or it gives us now the capacity to raise that
Speaker 1: limit to forty seven I think it's forty seven dollars
Speaker 1: and maybe forty three thousand dollars per donor. So it
Speaker 1: allows us note now to go back to our donors
Speaker 1: and our maximum donors and tell them that you know,
Speaker 1: there's a new maximum. And so I think our fundraising
Speaker 1: is going to is going to be fine.
Speaker 4: All right.
Speaker 2: Last question for you, sir, because I know that you're
Speaker 2: running on a short time. Vanity Fair came out with
Speaker 2: a major profile today. I want to give you a
Speaker 2: chance to respond to this. There's a photo circulating, I believe,
Speaker 2: of you posing uh with what looks like a dog
Speaker 2: and also in a barbecue dog I'm not going to
Speaker 2: show the picture as a dog lover. I know you
Speaker 2: have pets yourself, and also a sexual assault allegation from
Speaker 2: one of your former nannies.
Speaker 3: So I want to give you a chance to respond
Speaker 3: to that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, you know the article is it is
Speaker 1: a lot of garbage. The picture that they said is
Speaker 1: of me eating a dog. It's actually me eating a
Speaker 1: goat in Patagonia and on a whitewater.
Speaker 4: Trip many years ago on the fudal A food River.
Speaker 1: They say there's an expert, they have an expert that
Speaker 1: has identified that as a dog carcass. Yeah, it's just
Speaker 1: not true. Oh and you know, in terms of the
Speaker 1: the other allegations, I listen, I've said this from the beginning.
Speaker 1: I am not a church boy. I am not running
Speaker 1: like that. I said it in my I had a
Speaker 1: very very rambunctious youth. I said in my announcement speech
Speaker 1: that I have I have if I have so many
Speaker 1: skeletons in my closet that if that, if they could
Speaker 1: all vote, I could run for a gig of the world.
Speaker 1: So you know, there is vanity Fair is recycling the
Speaker 1: thirty year old stories and I'm not you know, going
Speaker 1: to comment on the details of any of them.
Speaker 4: But it's you know, I am, I am.
Speaker 2: You're talking there about the nanny situation. I mean I
Speaker 2: do have to ask her. I mean you're denying it or.
Speaker 4: Not, I'm not going to comment on it.
Speaker 2: All right, Well, I gave you the opportunity, and officially
Speaker 2: it's a goat.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: I don't I didn't know necessarily about what What did
Speaker 2: they say is a spare rib of a canine.
Speaker 3: I think that's what they said for their identification. But
Speaker 3: we've got it from you.
Speaker 2: I'll let the anatomy experts be the ones who can
Speaker 2: determine that. Sir, I very much appreciate you joining us
Speaker 2: for these questions. It's been a big interview for us,
Speaker 2: and we wish to see you on all fifty ballots
Speaker 2: and including on the debate stage, because that's what the
Speaker 2: American people deserve.
Speaker 4: So thank you, Thank you very much. Segar absolutely