Speaker 1: We've got a lot of big stuff today. I want
Speaker 1: to talk about Number one, the economy numbers came out
Speaker 1: Consumer price index rose eight point two percent in September.
Speaker 1: That compare with a year earlier. This is an administration
Speaker 1: that refuses to admit there's any problems with the economy
Speaker 1: at all. Then you've got another screw up on top
Speaker 1: of this, which is now the Saudi's have basically thrown
Speaker 1: our president Joe Biden under the bus with a quid
Speaker 1: pro quo. They say, came over hat in hand, begged
Speaker 1: them to produce more oil. They pretty much laughed at him,
Speaker 1: and then they said we're gonna cut. He said, please,
Speaker 1: don't cut until after the midterms. Just give me one
Speaker 1: more month. I want you to look at this clip
Speaker 1: and tell me what you think. Let's get straight why
Speaker 1: I went. I didn't go to about oil. I want
Speaker 1: about making sure that we made sure that we weren't
Speaker 1: going to walk away from the Middle East and what
Speaker 1: was going on. And by the way, today I just
Speaker 1: got off the telephone with the President of I got
Speaker 1: off the with the Prime Minister of Israel and the
Speaker 1: President of Lebanon. They've worked out a deal. They've been
Speaker 1: at war, declared war with one another for a long time.
Speaker 1: They've worked out a body relationship along the eastern Mediterranean
Speaker 1: for oil, and then they're going to make an agreement
Speaker 1: that is historic. We also got over flights for Israeli
Speaker 1: planes over Saudi Arabia. We got movement in terms of
Speaker 1: how we would deal in the Middle East with aggression
Speaker 1: from Iran. But it wasn't you know, the eight other
Speaker 1: there are eight other parties there. It wasn't about It
Speaker 1: wasn't about oil, all right. So he averted war four
Speaker 1: right because we're at war war three right now from
Speaker 1: last week his comments and then he says, well, all right,
Speaker 1: we're sorry the gas prices are gonna be high, but
Speaker 1: I didn't go over there to talk about oil production.
Speaker 1: They've clearly come out saying, yeah, you did, and you
Speaker 1: begged us to stop at least until after the mid terms.
Speaker 1: I think, if I remember the media correctly, they used
Speaker 1: to call this a quid pro quo, and I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure they try to impeach a president of the United
Speaker 1: States of America for exactly what he just did with
Speaker 1: a foreign leader with Ukraine. His name was Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Your thoughts, look every word Biden just said there is inaccurate.
Speaker 1: Most of it's a flat outlie. Let's start backwards. Let's
Speaker 1: start with the second thing. He says, Oh, there's an
Speaker 1: historic deal between Israel and Lebanon. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: what's going on there. Israel and Lebanon have been having
Speaker 1: a dispute over water rights where there are significant natural
Speaker 1: gas reserves, and Israel has been demanding for years that
Speaker 1: it deserves a percentage of it. What Biden just did
Speaker 1: is strong armed our friend and ally, Israel to give
Speaker 1: one hundred percent of the rights to that natural gas
Speaker 1: to Lebanon and Hezbollah to give it to terrorists. And
Speaker 1: this is the Biden patterns, screw your friends and help
Speaker 1: our enemies. And it is disgraceful that Biden is strong
Speaker 1: arming Israel to undermine its own security, its own energy,
Speaker 1: secure its own national security, to flood cash to terrorists
Speaker 1: who will then use that cash to build rockets to
Speaker 1: murder israelis. Now, let's take the first part. He says,
Speaker 1: I went to Saudi Arabia, but it wasn't for oil.
Speaker 1: I'm reminded of two letters, the first of whiches be
Speaker 1: the second, which is s. And since this is a
Speaker 1: family friendly, family friendly show. Will leave it at the abbreviation.
Speaker 1: But what like, like, how did lightning not strike him
Speaker 1: when he said that he went there to grovel on
Speaker 1: oil prices. And the stunning thing is what has happened subsequently,
Speaker 1: which is the Saudi's put out a formal statement and
Speaker 1: the form and this was amazing, by the way, because
Speaker 1: I think what it says is not only was Saudi
Speaker 1: Arabia not willing to quit pro quo and play games,
Speaker 1: they wanted to stick it to him and show the
Speaker 1: rest of the world. I think, really, how weak amer kids,
Speaker 1: And that's bad for all of us. I've always said this,
Speaker 1: I always root for American national defense and foreign policy
Speaker 1: to be strong, and what they're doing is literally mocking
Speaker 1: us and saying your presence a liar in the process
Speaker 1: of putting this a letter out, well, and let me
Speaker 1: let me hit this point. But then I want to
Speaker 1: step back and give a little bit of a foreign
Speaker 1: policy framework for how we should be thinking about this.
Speaker 1: But let me just read from the from Saudi Arabia's
Speaker 1: official I'm you know, I'm holding like this is you know,
Speaker 1: you know, the Government of Saudi Arabia on letter classified
Speaker 1: document everybody, Just so you know, it is not classified.
Speaker 1: It it I did get it from Hillary Clinton's email server.
Speaker 1: But but all right, so so here's here is one
Speaker 1: portion there says the Government of the Kingdom clarified through
Speaker 1: its continuous communication with the US administration that all economic
Speaker 1: analysis indicate that postponing the OPEC plus decision for a month,
Speaker 1: according to what has been suggested, would have had negative
Speaker 1: economic consequences. Now what does that mean? Number one, it
Speaker 1: meant Biden was there begging for them to try to
Speaker 1: keep oil prices low. But number two, what is really damning?
Speaker 1: He wasn't there advocating on behalf of US consumers. Hey,
Speaker 1: you know mom is hurting right now when she takes
Speaker 1: the kids to school and fills up her minivan. Hey,
Speaker 1: working Americans are getting killed when they're paying a hundred
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty bucks to fill up their truck. He
Speaker 1: didn't care about that at all. He said, can I
Speaker 1: have one month? Can I have? Oh, let me pick
Speaker 1: a date till November eighth. The thing to understand, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and every Democrat in Congress, they want your gasoline
Speaker 1: prices not as high as they are now. They want
Speaker 1: them much much higher, and what he was there was
Speaker 1: begging for a campaign contribution. Let's be clear what that was.
Speaker 1: And the biggest one you can get your hands on
Speaker 1: literally billions of dollars people winning and losing. The Democrats.
Speaker 1: He's over there saying, I need you to help me
Speaker 1: have something good on election day, where at least we
Speaker 1: maybe hold the set or of the House, because he
Speaker 1: knows this is the last card he's got to play
Speaker 1: and it's for one month, so he wants to deceive
Speaker 1: the American people. And the thing to understand, let me
Speaker 1: take it at a couple of different levels. Number one,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, when he was campaigning for president, he repeatedly
Speaker 1: promised that he was going to shut down US oil
Speaker 1: and gas production, shut down drilling on federal lands on shore,
Speaker 1: shutdown drilling on federal lands offshore. And he's followed through
Speaker 1: with that. So you know, when Joe Biden was sworn
Speaker 1: in as president, the average price of gasoline was two
Speaker 1: dollars and nine cents a gallon. It spiked all the
Speaker 1: way up to four dollars and forty eight cents a gallon,
Speaker 1: more than doubling. It's now dropped slightly. The current average
Speaker 1: today is three dollars and ninety one cents a gallon. Now,
Speaker 1: if you look at what happened between two o eight
Speaker 1: and where we are now, the first day in office,
Speaker 1: January twentieth, Biden shuts down the Keystone Pipeline. Then on
Speaker 1: January twenty seven, seven days later, Biden halt's new oil
Speaker 1: and gas leases on federal land. Then on February nineteenth,
Speaker 1: Biden rejoins the Paris Climate Agreement. And by the way,
Speaker 1: if you can see the chart here, you can see
Speaker 1: gas prices are going up at each decision. May seventh,
Speaker 1: Biden takes thirty percent of land and makes it off
Speaker 1: limit to oil and gas thirty percent of federal land.
Speaker 1: Boom gone no longer in the market. Then on June one,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, Biden halts drilling in an Noir, the
Speaker 1: incredibly petroleum rich section of Alaska. Then on June thirtieth,
Speaker 1: Congress reverses Trump's natural gas regulations, which made it easier
Speaker 1: to drill for natural gas. Then on October seventh, you
Speaker 1: can see the price came still going up the entire time.
Speaker 1: Every American's been filling this in the pump the entire time.
Speaker 1: October seventh, Biden reverses Trump's NIPA regulations, which again made
Speaker 1: it easier to explore. On October twenty ninth, the Interior
Speaker 1: begins imposing as a regulation the quote social cost of
Speaker 1: carbon to make it more expensive for Americans to drill
Speaker 1: for oil and gas than. On November fifteenth, Biden issues
Speaker 1: a moratorium on oil drilling in Chaco Canyon. Then on
Speaker 1: February twenty fifth is when Russian invades Ukraine. Now, if
Speaker 1: you happen to be watching, you can see from here
Speaker 1: to here that entire increase was from the Biden regulatory policies. Now,
Speaker 1: to be sure, when Russian invaded Ukraine and we're not,
Speaker 1: gas prices went up some more, but it had gone
Speaker 1: up the vast bulk of that before that. Russian invades Ukraine.
Speaker 1: But then what happens. On March first, Biden begins releasing
Speaker 1: oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. On March twenty first,
Speaker 1: the sec the Securities in Exchange Commission, proposes an anti
Speaker 1: oil ruled cut off equity financing for oil expiy. On
Speaker 1: May twelfth of twenty twenty two, Biden cancels yet more
Speaker 1: lease sales. The effect of all of this. There are
Speaker 1: literally over twenty regulatory decisions they put in place designed
Speaker 1: to drive the cost of gasoline hired. Mark my words,
Speaker 1: if Joe Biden and Schumer and Pelosi get their way,
Speaker 1: gasoline is not going to be four dollars a Gallot's
Speaker 1: not going to be five or six or seven as
Speaker 1: it is in California. It is going to be ten,
Speaker 1: and then it's going to be twelve, and then it's
Speaker 1: going to be twenty. I gotta go back in history
Speaker 1: and you'll remember this, and I think people need to understand.
Speaker 1: When he was the vice president, Barack Obama and his
Speaker 1: energy leaders in his administration said quote, we need to
Speaker 1: get oil prices gas price in America the same way
Speaker 1: as they are in Europe to force people into green
Speaker 1: and alternative energy, electric cars, solar, the list goes on
Speaker 1: and on. And when they said that back when Obama
Speaker 1: is present, that would have put American gas at five
Speaker 1: dollars plus a gallon. My point being that was years ago, now,
Speaker 1: a decade ago, when this was said, and that was
Speaker 1: their policy because they sell by the leader over in Europe,
Speaker 1: not by the gallon, And if you did the math,
Speaker 1: then it was like five eighty to six dollars a
Speaker 1: gallon in Europe when they said that statement, that means
Speaker 1: what you're saying now, it's spot on it. They want
Speaker 1: eight dollars, nine dollars ten dollars a gallon gas and
Speaker 1: go to this election day. If you think it's bad, now,
Speaker 1: it's going to be really bad because number one, they're
Speaker 1: shutting down the extra millions of barrels up from the
Speaker 1: strategic oal reserves they're supposed to be that's going to
Speaker 1: be cut off. And you have OPEC reducing their production
Speaker 1: by two million barrels a day. What does this look
Speaker 1: like for the average American? You understand this stuff better
Speaker 1: than anybody, especially when it comes to our strategic oal reserves,
Speaker 1: because we're gonna have to actually now go on the
Speaker 1: marketplace and buy stuff. Yeah, so let me give you
Speaker 1: some amazing stats. So we have strategic petroleum reserves, and
Speaker 1: that's oil, not gasoline, oil that we keep underground, and
Speaker 1: it's designed if we go to war, if we're in
Speaker 1: a crisis and suddenly our energy is cut off. We
Speaker 1: don't want the American economy to shut down. And that's
Speaker 1: why Congress funded it and why we have it so
Speaker 1: that so that America has this reservoir. When Biden was
Speaker 1: sworn into office, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve was six hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty eight million, eighty five thousand barrels of oil.
Speaker 1: That's a lot of oil. Six hundred thirty eight million. Today,
Speaker 1: you know what it is. What is it now? Four
Speaker 1: hundred and sixteen million barrels of oil as of September thirtieth.
Speaker 1: He has depleted the supply by thirty five percent. Now
Speaker 1: let me tell you something else. Amazing. All right. When
Speaker 1: Trump was president, remember oil prices cratered, they went incredibly low.
Speaker 1: Trump proposed, hey, this is a great opportunity. Let's fill
Speaker 1: the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the cheat with oil prices that
Speaker 1: are incredibly low. You know what happened. Democrats and Congress
Speaker 1: blocked it. They said, no, no, no, no, do not
Speaker 1: buy oil cheap for the United States of America. We
Speaker 1: don't want it, and they blocked it. Chuck Schumer blocked
Speaker 1: it and filibustered it. Biden as part of this deal
Speaker 1: with Saudi Arabia, here's what he told Saudi Arabia, Hey,
Speaker 1: if you produce a bunch of oil between now an
Speaker 1: election day, for one month, I will promise that if
Speaker 1: oil hits seventy five dollars, a barrel will fill this
Speaker 1: spro with it. In other words, he cut a deal.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go raid the US taxpayers to pay the
Speaker 1: Saudi's a crap ton of money in order to try
Speaker 1: to buy political deception. The thing to understand, listen, the
Speaker 1: reason Biden and Schumer and every Democrat in Congress wants
Speaker 1: high gasoline prices is they think the American consumers are morons.
Speaker 1: They don't like the choices that people make. They don't
Speaker 1: like that that. I don't know. What do you? What
Speaker 1: do you drive? I have a four door Porsche Panamera. Okay,
Speaker 1: so here you drive fast. Listen. It's got one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand miles on it. But I'm a fast You're failing,
Speaker 1: you know. I'm a very common man Porsche driver. Look. Look,
Speaker 1: I saw sixteen candles. I saw the kid leading on
Speaker 1: his poor So you don't This is you and I
Speaker 1: get to know each other. Laugh. I literally bought a
Speaker 1: pors nine four four in high school and redid it
Speaker 1: for twenty eight hundred dollars and fell in love with it. Now,
Speaker 1: the car. When I bought it, the guy I bought
Speaker 1: it from was angry because he had a brand new
Speaker 1: German shepherd who ripped the seats up while I went
Speaker 1: to Kroger, and he pulled up and I taught. I
Speaker 1: taught tennis, and so I was literally fifteen, about to
Speaker 1: be sixteen when happened. And I love this car. He
Speaker 1: played for the Cowboys. It was his first car he
Speaker 1: ever bought in nineteen eighty five eighty six, and so
Speaker 1: it was his baby. And he came up. He was furious.
Speaker 1: He comes yelling at He's like Ferguson. He goes how
Speaker 1: much money you have? And I was like on me,
Speaker 1: He was like, no, in your bank account. I was like,
Speaker 1: I have thirty one hundred dollars. He's like, bring twenty
Speaker 1: one hundred dollars in my house at Cheers And I
Speaker 1: showed up and the seats had just been ripped to
Speaker 1: shreds by a brand new car. That was my second car.
Speaker 1: My first was a Honda Prelude with one hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty seven thousand miles on it that didn't have a
Speaker 1: C and I paid twenty two hundred for that, and
Speaker 1: I was proud of it. My friend so Sam a
Speaker 1: commoner when it comes to cars. So back to Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 1: What Biden wants because they're mad that lots of Americans
Speaker 1: like suburbans, lots of Americans like pickup trucks, lots of
Speaker 1: Americans like minivans. They don't like the choices you're making. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and so their strategy is, let's make it so god
Speaker 1: awful painful that it's just miserable that you can't afford.
Speaker 1: You can't afford to go to work, you can't afford
Speaker 1: to take your kids to school, and they're going to
Speaker 1: force you to get a little prius and obey. And
Speaker 1: really what they'd like to do is take your car
Speaker 1: away and force you to be on on some subway
Speaker 1: or train, some electric trains somewhere. But they're gonna take
Speaker 1: and mind you, they're going to fly private jets while
Speaker 1: they try to make your life miserable and take away
Speaker 1: the car you choose. So this is all deliberate, But
Speaker 1: I got to say what Biden did here, I actually
Speaker 1: find really offensive that you go and negotiate and say
Speaker 1: give me one months as a political stunt. Sure, and
Speaker 1: I mentioned I wanted to give some sort of broader
Speaker 1: political overview. So I've talked about in foreign policy. I
Speaker 1: divide the country, the world into into four different groups.
Speaker 1: We have friends, we have allies. We have friends, we
Speaker 1: have enemies, we have competitors, and then we have what
Speaker 1: I call problematic allies. Now what is a problematic ally
Speaker 1: the main countries that fall into that are Saudi Arabia,
Speaker 1: Turkey and Pakistan. Now those three countries, all of them
Speaker 1: are allies. We want to be friends with them. It's
Speaker 1: important to be friends with them. Their geopolitical reasons, economic
Speaker 1: reasons to be friends with them. But they've got real challenges.
Speaker 1: Their leadership is problematic, their human rights records are problematic,
Speaker 1: they do things to undermine us interest and so they're
Speaker 1: they're allies with significant issues. Now the Saudis, you got
Speaker 1: to understand what Biden has done. Biden and the Democrats
Speaker 1: hate the Saudis. Why do they hate the Saudis because
Speaker 1: they love Iran. It's bizarre. Biden's top foreign policy objective
Speaker 1: is to cut a nuclear deal with a Ran. Saudi
Speaker 1: is Iran's major counterbalance. And so look, I think we
Speaker 1: want to be friends and allies with the Saudi's, principally
Speaker 1: because Saudi Arabia is a major counter check to Iran,
Speaker 1: and Iran is led by an Ayatol who wants to
Speaker 1: murder us, and so I want the one thing they're
Speaker 1: consistent on, it's death to America. Does it bother you?
Speaker 1: And it bothered me when I saw this. Let her
Speaker 1: come out from the Saudis from a standpoint that they
Speaker 1: played him. Yeah, and he should have known going in
Speaker 1: that they were going to play him. Does that concern
Speaker 1: you that he's making decisions because it's obvious they said
Speaker 1: we're gonna play you, and we're gonna mock you, we're
Speaker 1: gonna embarrass you. And that's exactly what they did. Because
Speaker 1: I don't like it when we lose on the as
Speaker 1: I said earlier on the foreign stage on saying that's important,
Speaker 1: but it wasn't just they said no to him. It's
Speaker 1: that they literally said, we're gonna embarrass the United States
Speaker 1: of America in the process. When the commander in chief
Speaker 1: is weak, it's bad for America. And this commander in
Speaker 1: chief is the weakest we've ever seen. I mean, I mean,
Speaker 1: he's unfortunately a laughing stock. And ideologically, what this White
Speaker 1: House has decided to do literally so foreign policy, they
Speaker 1: don't have a foreign policy. They view it as a
Speaker 1: projection of domestic policy. So they divide countries into red
Speaker 1: countries and blue countries. Sure, and red countries or every
Speaker 1: country that was friends with US when Trump was president,
Speaker 1: and blue countries are every countries that was any enemies
Speaker 1: of US. So they view as red countries Israel, so
Speaker 1: they screw Israel every chance they get. The United Kingdom,
Speaker 1: so they screw the UK every chance they get Guatemala, Colombia,
Speaker 1: which used to have a pro American, strong free market presidency.
Speaker 1: What did they do? They win in and undermined it
Speaker 1: and ended up electing a leftist, anti American former terrorist
Speaker 1: to be the new leader of Columbia. India the largest
Speaker 1: democracy on Earth, pivoting very directly to the United States,
Speaker 1: enormously good for our interest. What is Biden doing threatening
Speaker 1: to sanction India? It is idiotic. Like every country we
Speaker 1: want to be leaning towards US, they're trying to drive
Speaker 1: away and there Saudi Arabia falls into that camp. And
Speaker 1: so they Biden on the campaign trail promise, said I'm
Speaker 1: going to make Saudi Arabia a pariah. He flew to
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia, groveled before the leadership, but also insulted them
Speaker 1: and ridiculed them to their face. It's not surprising that
Speaker 1: when you go and you treat people like crap, this
Speaker 1: is what you get. They reciprocate and the flip side.
Speaker 1: You look at our enemies, you look at countries like
Speaker 1: Iran and North Korea and Venezuela and Cuba. Biden bends
Speaker 1: over backwards to give them billions of dollars. Now, let
Speaker 1: me give you a different story about Saudi Arabia. Trump
Speaker 1: is president, the economy's booming, but then we hit COVID.
Speaker 1: Global demand drops and you may remember oil prices plummeted. Yeah,
Speaker 1: in fact, they fell negative at one point. It's something
Speaker 1: we may never seen the rest of our life. You
Speaker 1: couldn't give away oil during that moment in time. It
Speaker 1: was the weirdest thing I've ever seen. So at that time,
Speaker 1: the Saudis joined with Russia and they decided to flood
Speaker 1: the world market with oil to drive prices crushingly low.
Speaker 1: So I joined with ten other senators in condemning the Saudis,
Speaker 1: and I actually got on the phone with a Saudi
Speaker 1: foreign minister and the Saudi ambassador and chewed them out.
Speaker 1: And the eleven of US were all pro oil and
Speaker 1: gas senators who are big believers in American energy independence.
Speaker 1: And look the problem with what they were doing. Why
Speaker 1: were they flooding the market because they wanted to bankrupt
Speaker 1: every American producer. They wanted to put America out of
Speaker 1: the business of oil and gas so they could corner
Speaker 1: the market and be the only producers left. And so
Speaker 1: people understand, in America, there's a certain price. If you
Speaker 1: drop below that, you start basically losing money. And then
Speaker 1: if you go even lower than that, you start shutting
Speaker 1: down production in America exactly. And then when you start
Speaker 1: shutting down, it costs millions even to go back online
Speaker 1: and to start reproducing. And that's what OPEC was at
Speaker 1: the time that you're mentioning is they basically said, Okay,
Speaker 1: we don't like this American energy independence policy of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: We sure as hell don't like the fact that we're
Speaker 1: making less money because they're producing and now we're communing.
Speaker 1: You know, we're competing. So if we flood the market,
Speaker 1: they'll start losing money, they'll shut down their production, they'll
Speaker 1: shut down everything the domestic production in America, and then
Speaker 1: we'll eventually win. That's why you were yelling at the
Speaker 1: yes and the way the economics work. If oil prices
Speaker 1: are between say fifty and sixty dollars a barrel, or
Speaker 1: maybe fifty and sixty five dollars a barrel, US producers,
Speaker 1: with the technology we have, can produce, can be profitable.
Speaker 1: And that's what produces two dollars gallon gasol. Right is
Speaker 1: at that level everything's great in the world. It's America
Speaker 1: is the world's energy superpower. When oil is fifty sixty
Speaker 1: sixty five dollars a barrel. What the Saudis and Russians
Speaker 1: saw is when demand was plummeting, they wanted to crash
Speaker 1: the market, to make everyone go bankrupt so they'd be
Speaker 1: the only ones left in the market. And I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you. I got on the phone and lit them up,
Speaker 1: and I said, look, we have been the strongest friends
Speaker 1: of Saudi Arabia. In the United States Senate, the Democrats
Speaker 1: already hate you. If you want to drive us away
Speaker 1: and be alone, you're in real trouble. And I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: Trump called him and shoot him out, and they change
Speaker 1: course that they pulled back when he said I'm going
Speaker 1: to fight back. He wasn't bluffing but when you treat
Speaker 1: people decently, when they behave badly, you can call him
Speaker 1: to account when you've done as Biden has done, which
Speaker 1: is undermine them from day one. Look, the Saudis are
Speaker 1: screwing Joe Biden. They want to screw Joe Biden. But
Speaker 1: let's be clear. He wasn't asking them do something the
Speaker 1: American people's interest and make gasoline affordable to people who
Speaker 1: are struggling. He was saying, give me thirty days of
Speaker 1: a fake artificial price drop, because he thinks the voters
Speaker 1: are really stupid and that they won't notice that if
Speaker 1: gasoline dropped fifty cents. His useful idiots will say, look,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, achieve this, and then the day after election day,
Speaker 1: get ready for five to six, seven, eight, nine, ten
Speaker 1: dollars a gallon gasoline. This brings me back to another
Speaker 1: clip I want you to listen to, and that is
Speaker 1: the Present saying he still believes that we're not going
Speaker 1: to have this recession. Take a listen to this. There's
Speaker 1: no guarantee that you're going to I don't think there
Speaker 1: will be a recession. If it is, it will be
Speaker 1: a very slight recession, that is, will move down slightly.
Speaker 1: I'm not rooting for a recession, right, but you got
Speaker 1: to look at the facts, and the facts say, if
Speaker 1: you look at what we've always said, the traditional definition
Speaker 1: of a recession is center we're in it right now.
Speaker 1: Everybody on Wall Street saying we're in it right now.
Speaker 1: The only people they're actually it's not happening are these idiots.
Speaker 1: And He's sitting there going, I don't think it's going
Speaker 1: to happen. I mean, you know we're in a recession.
Speaker 1: I think everybody else knows it. So look, you and
Speaker 1: I in college, we both took economics one on one.
Speaker 1: When you take econ one on one, they give you
Speaker 1: the definition of a recession. The dea an issue for recession.
Speaker 1: For as long as we've been alist has never changed
Speaker 1: is two consecutive quarters of negative economic growth. That defines
Speaker 1: a recession. We have had two consecutive quarters of negative
Speaker 1: economic growth. If we were dealing with the English language,
Speaker 1: if we were dealing with the planet Earth, everyone would
Speaker 1: say we are in a recession right now. The Biden
Speaker 1: White House realizes, wait a second, saying that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: became president, we went into a recession. That's kind of bad. Politically.
Speaker 1: So they brought a few economists together to literally redefine
Speaker 1: the word recession. They said, no longer means that. They said,
Speaker 1: recession now means whatever this panel of economists and the
Speaker 1: government says it does. And they haven't said this is
Speaker 1: a recession and it is, George Orwell will be proud.
Speaker 1: They simply define the word that it's not recession. It's happy,
Speaker 1: feel good bunny rabbits is what they call it. And
Speaker 1: so Biden says we're not in a recession. Why because
Speaker 1: I paid people to say we're not. Never mind the facts. Look,
Speaker 1: you know, as you know, I'm doing this bus tour
Speaker 1: all across the country, and so I was doing a
Speaker 1: bunch of radio interviews yesterday. We're going to be in
Speaker 1: Kansas City on Friday, and one of the hosts there said, well,
Speaker 1: what should the people of Missouri know about about why
Speaker 1: they should vote Republican in November? I said, it ain't complicated.
Speaker 1: It's pretty simple. Ask yourself the question, is your family
Speaker 1: better off now than they were before Biden became president?
Speaker 1: And for just about every family in America, the answers
Speaker 1: not just no, it's hell no. Like every aspect of
Speaker 1: life from inflation, the cost of everything has gone up, crime,
Speaker 1: illegal immigration, the mess of it is across the board,
Speaker 1: and they know that. And what they're counting on is
Speaker 1: the dishonest corporate media to lie on their behalf and
Speaker 1: to accept we're not in a recession because Biden said
Speaker 1: they are. You know, it's like obi wan Kenobe, these
Speaker 1: are not the droids you're looking for, and the corporate
Speaker 1: media is more than happy decos. I think seniors are
Speaker 1: going to be a really big issue in the selection.
Speaker 1: I had a caller that called end of the day.
Speaker 1: He's on a fixed income, he only makes X summer dollars.
Speaker 1: He knows this planning for retirement so important. And he
Speaker 1: said he met with his financial advice of the day.
Speaker 1: He was six months away when Trumps left office from retirement.
Speaker 1: They now told the other day's gonna have to work
Speaker 1: probably another five years. That is taking away someone's holy
Speaker 1: grail part of life, retirement. And he said, I will
Speaker 1: show up, he said, but he said this, He said,
Speaker 1: but Ben, it's not just me. It is everybody I
Speaker 1: work with, it's on a fixed income that are saying
Speaker 1: we will show up in the mid terms. And I
Speaker 1: know you've seen this on the road because you just
Speaker 1: took away five years of my life. Well, and let
Speaker 1: me say that guy is pissed, and he's a right
Speaker 1: to be pissed, but he's actually lucky because he's still
Speaker 1: working a group that's getting hit even harder, or seniors
Speaker 1: have already retired. Let's say you've made a decision. You
Speaker 1: worked for thirty forty years, you've saved, you've been responsible,
Speaker 1: you've got a four oh one K, you've got an IRA,
Speaker 1: you've got retirement saving. Joe Biden and the Democrats take over,
Speaker 1: and your four oh one K has dropped what twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five percent, thirty maybe forty percent, depending on how
Speaker 1: you were invested. So the nest egg that was going
Speaker 1: to keep you through your your golden years is worth
Speaker 1: a ton less. And at the same time, every single
Speaker 1: one of your costs has skyrocketed, whether it's electricity or healthcare,
Speaker 1: or rent or mortgages or lumber, gasling, everything has gone up.
Speaker 1: That combination, if you're seventy five years old and retired
Speaker 1: and you're looking at your four oh one case saying, okay,
Speaker 1: how do we last another? I don't know how long
Speaker 1: are we gonna live? Five ten, twenty years. Those folks
Speaker 1: are scared and they're pissed, and despite Biden's best effort,
Speaker 1: they know who's responsible for it. Center. I want to
Speaker 1: switch gears to another story that I think is a
Speaker 1: really important one and it came out of court this week,
Speaker 1: and I just want people, I want to make sure
Speaker 1: I get this right. The four or the FBI offered
Speaker 1: former British spy Christopher Steele up to a million bucks
Speaker 1: if he could prove the claims that his infamous dotsier
Speaker 1: paid for by literally Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic
Speaker 1: National Committee was you know, and their words quote original
Speaker 1: and legitimate. Now he couldn't do it. And there's an
Speaker 1: interestingt tweet I want you to look at here that
Speaker 1: I also thought was something that's important. The Steel FBI
Speaker 1: meeting was on October the third, twenty sixteen. Now pay
Speaker 1: attention to these dates, everybody, because this is telling you
Speaker 1: how corrupt the FBI was at the highest levels. The
Speaker 1: FBI's first surveillance warrant on Carter Page, the spy on
Speaker 1: him and by defaulty Trump campaign, was then filed on
Speaker 1: October the twenty first. This means that after the FBI
Speaker 1: offered Steele one million to prove as Dalcia was authentic. Right,
Speaker 1: he couldn't do it. The FBI still forward filed a
Speaker 1: surveillance horn't based on the dossier anyway, and even see
Speaker 1: it in They are even saying this in their own tweets.
Speaker 1: Shortly before the twenty sixteen election, the FBI offered retired
Speaker 1: British spy Christopher Steel up to one million to prove
Speaker 1: the explosive allegations in his dossier about Donald Trump. A
Speaker 1: senior FBI analyst didn't leak this center he testified it.
Speaker 1: I was in shock by this because they knew that
Speaker 1: this was a lie, and they still used the lie
Speaker 1: to go spy on not only Carter Page but the
Speaker 1: entire basically anyone he talked to in the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: So there are a couple of things that are really
Speaker 1: stunning on this. Number one, the hard left wing partisans
Speaker 1: who burrowed into the career positions at the FBI. They
Speaker 1: hated Trump so much that they were willing to pay
Speaker 1: literally a million dollars, I mean, holy cal a million
Speaker 1: bucks of tax dollar money, of tax dollar money to
Speaker 1: dig up dirt on him and Christopher Steele. This guy
Speaker 1: was dishonest. He was discredited. The FBI had previously fired him.
Speaker 1: As you know, my next book comes out next week.
Speaker 1: It is on this topic. The book is Justice Corrupted,
Speaker 1: How the Left has weaponized the legal system. By the way,
Speaker 1: please go to Amazon or wherever you buy your books
Speaker 1: and pre order Justice Corrupted. Preorder it right now. I
Speaker 1: describe in death. We've got an entire chapter that goes
Speaker 1: into Christopher Steele goes into the fact that Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: and the DNC paid over a million dollars to create
Speaker 1: these lies, to create something with no basis whatsoever. The
Speaker 1: FBI knew it. Senior officials of the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: knew that that this was being paid for by Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton in the middle of a presidential race, their oppo researcher.
Speaker 1: They basically turned the FBI into the oppo research team.
Speaker 1: For them to offer a million bucks for it is stunning.
Speaker 1: But then the second lot of money, Yes, And the
Speaker 1: reason why I'm asking is that a lot of money
Speaker 1: is we know we have FBI informants, Okay, but you
Speaker 1: know a lot more about this. I have than ever
Speaker 1: heard of an informant being offered a billion bucks. That
Speaker 1: is what I want to know, because it's almost like bribery.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, if that's an abnormal amount of money,
Speaker 1: it's like they're begging him to please give them something
Speaker 1: that can credit verify his entire report that they knew
Speaker 1: was crap. So so I'll confess I don't know what
Speaker 1: the typical amounts that are given to informants are. That
Speaker 1: has not been I've worked in law enforcement a lot,
Speaker 1: but I haven't worked in that aspect of law enforcement.
Speaker 1: That is a perfect topic for when we get a
Speaker 1: Republican majority in the House and Senate. I think the
Speaker 1: Senate Judiciary Committee needs to haul Christopher Ray's ass in
Speaker 1: front of the committee and force him to answer the question.
Speaker 1: I want to get a report on every single classified
Speaker 1: informant and what they paid him them to give the identities.
Speaker 1: But I want to know how much they're paying them,
Speaker 1: because my suspicion is that one million dollars is wildly
Speaker 1: out of bounds, that it's not even close If I'm wrong.
Speaker 1: If they're routinely given million dollars checks, that may be
Speaker 1: a different level of inquiry. Yeah, but how are you
Speaker 1: spending all this money and we all are paying for
Speaker 1: it as taxpayers. Look, my suspicion is you're dealing with
Speaker 1: a thousand dollars or five thousand dollars or ten thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: And then suddenly they hire at the FBI doctor Evil,
Speaker 1: who sticks his pinky at his mouth and goes one
Speaker 1: million dollars. So that shows how committed they are. But
Speaker 1: then the second piece of the tweet that you laid
Speaker 1: out is the timeline that they offer steal a million
Speaker 1: bucks to corroborated. He can't because it was all lies.
Speaker 1: And they nonetheless use the lies that they now know
Speaker 1: or lies because he would have taken his million bucks
Speaker 1: if he could roberate it. And they go to the
Speaker 1: FISA court, a federal court, and they rely on those
Speaker 1: lies to get a warrant to wire tap Carter Page,
Speaker 1: who was an informal foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: Now there's another element that's not included in this, but
Speaker 1: Michael Horowitz is the Inspector General of the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: He's been there a long time. He did a long
Speaker 1: report on everything that they did wrong in this investigation
Speaker 1: and persecution of Donald Trump, and he outlined I think
Speaker 1: it was seventeen different major errors. Major like everything they
Speaker 1: screwed up but one of the most dramatic is so
Speaker 1: they're looking at carter Page and trying to determine whether
Speaker 1: to go after him. And so the FBI sends an
Speaker 1: email to the CIA, and they asked, Hey, was carter
Speaker 1: Page a source for you? In other words, was he
Speaker 1: working for you? Now, remember the basis that they wanted
Speaker 1: to spy on carter Page is he's talking to some
Speaker 1: really shady Russians right now. If he's talking to shady
Speaker 1: Russians on behalf of the CIA, if he's helping the
Speaker 1: US government by talking shady Russians, then maybe we shouldn't
Speaker 1: be intercepting his communications and spying on him because he's
Speaker 1: actually being a patriot in helping America. So the FBI says,
Speaker 1: the CIA, is this guy a source for you? The
Speaker 1: CIA responds in writing says, yes, carter Page is a
Speaker 1: source for us. In other words, don't be surprised he's
Speaker 1: talking to shady Russians and leave him alone. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: want him to he's helping they're asking him too. So
Speaker 1: the Assistant General Counsel at the FBI takes that email
Speaker 1: from the CIA, alters it and literally deletes the phrase
Speaker 1: was a source and changes it too, was not a source.
Speaker 1: He reverses it one hundred and eighty degrees to say
Speaker 1: the opposite of what the CIA's just to keep the
Speaker 1: FISA warrant, oh going. And then he submits that fraudulent document,
Speaker 1: that counterfeit document that he created to a federal court,
Speaker 1: which is a criminal offense. I mean, that's how bad
Speaker 1: these guys wanted to get Donald Trump, that they were
Speaker 1: willing to create fraudulent documents. They knew Steel couldn't back
Speaker 1: it up. He didn't collect his million bucks. This was
Speaker 1: absolute politicization of the Department of Justice in the FBI.
Speaker 1: You look at this and you look at the other
Speaker 1: story that came out, and I think it shows clearly
Speaker 1: a pattern. You have these two FBI agents that went
Speaker 1: to warn big Tech Facebook about the story, the laptop
Speaker 1: story with Hunter Biden. We find out they gave donations
Speaker 1: during the same election cycle to Democrats and liberal democrats.
Speaker 1: I know, and you ran for president, right, you have
Speaker 1: themes when you run. One of the themes that clearly
Speaker 1: caught on was drained the swamp right. That was a
Speaker 1: theme of Trump. That was a very good theme that
Speaker 1: worked well. Did you ever imagine though, that it was
Speaker 1: as bad as it is now. I don't think he
Speaker 1: could have imagined this knowing that you got people changing emails,
Speaker 1: knowing you got people like Peter Struck and Lisa Page
Speaker 1: out there doing what they were doing, knowing that you're
Speaker 1: lying to the files of court, and now knowing that
Speaker 1: you gave him a million dollars if you could just
Speaker 1: corroborate his claims his own dossier. But again I have
Speaker 1: to go back. This was paid for and created by
Speaker 1: the Democrat National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign and Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton's lawyers. No one's got in trouble for this. So
Speaker 1: this is what my book talk about talks about. My
Speaker 1: book starts with Richard Nixon, and Richard Nixon tried to
Speaker 1: use the machinery of government to go after his political enemies.
Speaker 1: He tried to use the Department of Justice, he tried
Speaker 1: to use the FBI, he tried to use the irs,
Speaker 1: and by and large the system worked. By and large,
Speaker 1: the system pressed back. So the first chapter of the book,
Speaker 1: I do a deep dive into Nixon's corruption and it's
Speaker 1: it's a little stunning. Look, you and I were not
Speaker 1: around when Nixon was doing this stuff. So doing the
Speaker 1: research for the book was fascinating the degree to which
Speaker 1: these guys were. Nixon rightly resigned in disgrace. I am
Speaker 1: not a fan of Nixon. I think he was thoroughly corrupted.
Speaker 1: I think he was surrounded by thoroughly corrupt cronies. But
Speaker 1: the institutions of America pressed back and said, we're not
Speaker 1: a weapon to target your political enemies. We went through
Speaker 1: a period after Nixon, we're both Democrats and Republican largely
Speaker 1: refrained from trying to do that. That the Watergate stink
Speaker 1: was enough that everyone was nervous, and they buy and
Speaker 1: large didn't do it until a law professor from Chicago
Speaker 1: became President, Barack Obama, and the media had told him
Speaker 1: he could do no wrong, and so he began blatantly
Speaker 1: abusing government and abusing the institutions of government to go
Speaker 1: after his enemies. And the difference is the Irs told
Speaker 1: Nixon no. Under Obama, they were perfectly happy to do it.
Speaker 1: They targeted conservatives, they targeted tea party groups. Yeah that
Speaker 1: was and people may forget that, but you had the
Speaker 1: Irs and people at with a Lois Learner In't that right? Yes,
Speaker 1: she was in charge of the of the group that
Speaker 1: was within the CII excuse me, within the IRS that
Speaker 1: literally said tea party groups five three's, you're want this,
Speaker 1: watch this, We're coming after you. Probably the weaponized it,
Speaker 1: pro life groups, pro Israel groups. Some of the terms
Speaker 1: that they said were warning signs for a group, Constitution,
Speaker 1: Patriot Bill of Rights. Literally, if you're defending the Constitution
Speaker 1: and Bill of rights, the IRS said that made you
Speaker 1: suspect we're going to target you. Now. The reason this
Speaker 1: connects back to what we were just saying as you
Speaker 1: were talking about how Biden sent the FBI agents to
Speaker 1: warn big tech who were Democratic donors. When the IRS
Speaker 1: scandal broke, Barack Obama held a press conference and he
Speaker 1: said he was angry, and the American people have a
Speaker 1: right to be angry. He faked indignance. Well, Eric Holder's
Speaker 1: attorney general put in charge of that investigation, a long
Speaker 1: time Democrat donor, a partisan Democrat who had given I
Speaker 1: think six thousand dollars to Obama and the DNC. She
Speaker 1: was in charge of it. I pressed Eric Holder. I
Speaker 1: called on them to appoint a special counsel who was
Speaker 1: not a major donor to the Democrats. And of course
Speaker 1: what did she do? She buried the whole thing. They
Speaker 1: refused to do it. It was brazen, and Obama developed
Speaker 1: the pattern of let's turn these institutions into our stormtroopers.
Speaker 1: And in particular, when Obama left all of those partisans,
Speaker 1: they burrowed into the senior leadership positions below, the political appointments,
Speaker 1: the career positions, they filled them with hard partisans. All
Speaker 1: of that has now metastasized under Joe Biden, and it
Speaker 1: is much worse than it's If you want to know
Speaker 1: what the legacy is of Barack Obama, it is what
Speaker 1: we currently have. Yes, I think at these institutions, yes,
Speaker 1: And I give my political adversaries credit when credits due.
Speaker 1: He was a brilliant guy that understood I want to
Speaker 1: go around Congress, saw going through executive orders for anything
Speaker 1: I want to do. And if I get busted, I'm
Speaker 1: such a likable guy. I'll just walk out there and
Speaker 1: act like I'm upset or angry that this is happening
Speaker 1: that should never happen in America. The media will lie
Speaker 1: for me, and they will lie and protect me, and
Speaker 1: they never call them out once for any of this.
Speaker 1: One of the other big lies. And this is an
Speaker 1: issue that I know you being obviously from Texas was
Speaker 1: one when you saw this lie about the border patrol
Speaker 1: agents who were on the horses and they were attacked,
Speaker 1: and we have a montage I want you to listen
Speaker 1: to of what the media did to these border patrol
Speaker 1: agents who are on horseback. And now there's more to
Speaker 1: the story that's come out, but first let me remind
Speaker 1: everybody what the media was saying instantly without knowing any background,
Speaker 1: without knowing anything, from a picture, not a video, a
Speaker 1: picture here. It is images that make you think of
Speaker 1: how enslaved people were treated. Border agents using some kind
Speaker 1: of whips around migrants at the border. At least one
Speaker 1: border patrol agent using a whip and was effectively trying
Speaker 1: to lasso some of the migrants whipping. I don't care
Speaker 1: what anyone says, Yes it's the rain, but nonetheless it
Speaker 1: was whipping that happened. Border patrol agents using rains against migrants.
Speaker 1: Basically that this looks like slavery. They say that this
Speaker 1: is cruel, that it's inhumane. I was not aware that whips,
Speaker 1: which come from the slave era, slavery era, were part
Speaker 1: of the package that we shoe to any sort of
Speaker 1: law enforcement in twenty one. Seeing whips and being them
Speaker 1: corralled on horses was just a sickening and dehumanizing image.
Speaker 1: When you start whipping people, you want to split hairs
Speaker 1: between reins and whips. You look at that. They didn't
Speaker 1: know if anyone had been whipped. They saw a picture.
Speaker 1: It was a lie. You tweeted out this week a
Speaker 1: very interesting tweet on this story, calling out marchers still
Speaker 1: to this day for not defending these men that were
Speaker 1: doing their job. They weren't whipping anyone, and no one
Speaker 1: has apologized them yet and the government has still not
Speaker 1: really backed them up. Yeah, it's even worse than that.
Speaker 1: So you had border patrol agents who are in rough
Speaker 1: terrain and they're riding horses, and they're using their reins,
Speaker 1: and it is a photograph of they're using their reins
Speaker 1: to steer the horses and they're not whipping anyone. They're
Speaker 1: not striking anyone, They're they're steering the horses with the reins.
Speaker 1: And that picture number one. The useful idiots in the
Speaker 1: media all repeated the same talking point. No, it's almost
Speaker 1: word for word, whipping the migrants, whipping the Migrrits whipping
Speaker 1: the migrants. That was the talking point and then immediately
Speaker 1: moved a race, and none of them cared about the
Speaker 1: truth or falsity of it. None of them cared what
Speaker 1: the truth was. Those border patrol agents were doing their jobs,
Speaker 1: trying to protect the country. But it gets even worse.
Speaker 1: So this week it broke that Alejandro may Orchis, who's
Speaker 1: the Homeland Security Secretary, received that day an email from
Speaker 1: a subordinate that said the photographer who took the picture,
Speaker 1: the picture that everyone is claiming saying this is the
Speaker 1: border patrol agents whipping people. Said, no, no, nobody whipped anyone.
Speaker 1: That's not what the picture shows. That that's a misunderstanding.
Speaker 1: So he knew that day one, and a couple hours
Speaker 1: later he went and did a press conference. We've got
Speaker 1: that press conference. Let's play it, and I want to
Speaker 1: play this because I want people to understand this. Get
Speaker 1: his eyes. This was a pre planned moment. This was
Speaker 1: a moment where they could justify an open border. It
Speaker 1: was a moment where they could attack the people protecting
Speaker 1: the border, and it was a moment they could seize
Speaker 1: to say, look at these evil people down there in
Speaker 1: law enforcement. We don't back them, we don't stand behind them.
Speaker 1: You should never listen to anything they say about the
Speaker 1: fetno or anything else coming across the border, or the
Speaker 1: death or destruction that's happening at the border, or even
Speaker 1: in humane conditions that were happening at the border. And
Speaker 1: you could see, and I call this a setup. And
Speaker 1: that's why I want to make sure I say pay
Speaker 1: attention everybody, because he couldn't wait knowing that what he
Speaker 1: was says a lie to push this political bs. Look,
Speaker 1: that is something that is something that horrified us all.
Speaker 1: And you know, this morning I was on radio and
Speaker 1: the interviewer said that it was it troubled very profoundly
Speaker 1: black in the African American community. And I said one thing,
Speaker 1: and this should be clear. Those are not the only
Speaker 1: communities that it qualified. Those are not the only communities
Speaker 1: that he concerned. Of course, that concern might be most
Speaker 1: acute given the history in this country and in other
Speaker 1: parts of the world, but all of America is horrified
Speaker 1: to see what those images suggest. You expose this. He
Speaker 1: knew in the moment he was saying that that everything
Speaker 1: he was saying was a lie, and he basically decided
Speaker 1: to take the full power of the White House podium
Speaker 1: to slander our border patrol agents and to turn them
Speaker 1: into the worst people in the world. So he had
Speaker 1: a choice. He's been given a very important responsibility. He's
Speaker 1: the Secretary of Homeland Security. He is one of the
Speaker 1: top He and the Attorney General are the top two
Speaker 1: law enforcement officials in the United States of America. He
Speaker 1: has tens of thousands of law enforcement officers who report
Speaker 1: to him. The border patrol agents report to him, Ice
Speaker 1: reports to him. He had a choice. He could do
Speaker 1: what an honorable leader would do, which is defend your people,
Speaker 1: which is tell the truth. He knew at the time.
Speaker 1: He knew he'd been informed in writing that his agents
Speaker 1: were being slandered, that what all of the chattering voices
Speaker 1: an MSNBC was saying was a lie. He knew that
Speaker 1: that's not what the picture showed, because he knew that
Speaker 1: the photographer who took it said they weren't whipping anyone.
Speaker 1: And anyone who was honorable, anyone who actually cared about
Speaker 1: your job would support your men and women, would tell
Speaker 1: the truth, and frankly would be indignant. Someone who had
Speaker 1: integrity would stand up and say, let me tell you
Speaker 1: about these border patrol agents they risk there's the boss.
Speaker 1: He is literally their boss, and he's throwing his own
Speaker 1: employees under the bus, and he deliberately lied about it.
Speaker 1: That clip there, you are listening to someone who is lying,
Speaker 1: who knows he is lying, and he's doing it for
Speaker 1: one reason, which is to curry favor with the Biden
Speaker 1: White House. He knows the Biden White House likes this story.
Speaker 1: They like telling look, they can't defend their open borders
Speaker 1: in the chaos of the southern border. So the left
Speaker 1: has one card they play over and over again in
Speaker 1: the race card, and they want to say, well, look,
Speaker 1: anyone's securing the border, they're just evil slaveholders whipping people,
Speaker 1: which they knew was a lie. But anyone they dislike
Speaker 1: they call a klansman. By the way, it's worth noting
Speaker 1: just this week the what is it the chairman or
Speaker 1: president of the Los Angeles City Council, a Democrat, a
Speaker 1: hard leftist, a big advocate of abolishing the police, resigned
Speaker 1: in disgrace because she and three others were caught on
Speaker 1: tape with virulently racist attacks attacking African Americans, attacking a
Speaker 1: white colleague of hers who had adopted an African American child,
Speaker 1: and adopting other Hispanics from Wahaka and Mexico, saying they
Speaker 1: were dark skinned and ugly. And look, when it comes
Speaker 1: to virulent racism, to be fair, neither party has a
Speaker 1: monopoly on it. There are racists across the political spectrum,
Speaker 1: but the Democratic Party normalizes and welcomes this. And and
Speaker 1: it is fitting when you're willing to do what Mayorcus
Speaker 1: is willing to do. There you are trafficking and deliberate
Speaker 1: lies and deception, and those officers those job huh loses job.
Speaker 1: Absolutely yes. And I believe one of the very first
Speaker 1: things we should do when we have a majority next
Speaker 1: year is that we should impeach him. Now, what does
Speaker 1: that mean for the House to impeach him? Takes a majority.
Speaker 1: We're going to have a majority in the House. I
Speaker 1: think that will happen. I actually have a pretty high
Speaker 1: level of confidence that within the first couple of months,
Speaker 1: the House will impeach Mayorcus. And that's a big deal
Speaker 1: because it doesn't happen very often. It is a big,
Speaker 1: big deal, and a reasonable person could say, well, why
Speaker 1: would you do that? Because impeaching, as you know, is
Speaker 1: bringing formal charges against an official that takes the majority.
Speaker 1: It then goes to the Senate to remove someone from
Speaker 1: office takes two thirds. Sadly, the Democrats, with Donald Trump
Speaker 1: educated all of America about that, the chances that any
Speaker 1: Senate Democrat are that enough Senate Democrats would be willing
Speaker 1: to vote to remove Mayorcus are essentially zero. These guys,
Speaker 1: none of them care. Every one of them has voted
Speaker 1: in favor of open borders over and over and over
Speaker 1: and over and over again. There's not a single moderate
Speaker 1: on this issue. All of the Democrats are running pretending
Speaker 1: to be moderates, but every one of them, when given
Speaker 1: a chance to vote, votes in favor of open borders,
Speaker 1: So they're not going to vote to remove Mayorcus. The
Speaker 1: reason we need to do this is we need to
Speaker 1: have a trial on the floor of the Senate, and
Speaker 1: it needs to be an extended two week trial where
Speaker 1: we put on evidence systematically explaining the chaos, the suffering,
Speaker 1: the children abused, the women who are raped, the dead bodies,
Speaker 1: the fentanol overdoses, all of the misery that is caused
Speaker 1: by our open borders. And the reason we need to
Speaker 1: do that is those same useful idiots that you just
Speaker 1: played on the media that are telling Democrat talking points.
Speaker 1: They refuse to report on what's actually happening on the border.
Speaker 1: That's how this administration gets away with it. If if
Speaker 1: it's not even just about impeaching him, it's really about saying,
Speaker 1: here's the reality of what's happening at the border. This
Speaker 1: is how bad is this is the human suffering? Yes, right,
Speaker 1: I go back to AOC the kids in cages. Right,
Speaker 1: you know, well, guess what who bought and paid for him?
Speaker 1: The Obama Biden administration, who use them for years. They're
Speaker 1: the ones that use them for years. You go back
Speaker 1: to that. But you look at all the suffering, You
Speaker 1: look at the human struggling, You look at the money
Speaker 1: tied to every human being. There's every human being is
Speaker 1: worth money to these smugg orders, and they'll use them
Speaker 1: billions higher way, Yes it is. And to be clear,
Speaker 1: when it comes to the cages, Obama built the cages,
Speaker 1: and they are bigger and more in humane under Joe
Speaker 1: Biden than they ever have been. And I've been to
Speaker 1: the pages. I've been to the cages under Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: I've been to the cages under Donald Trump, and I've
Speaker 1: been to the cages under Joe Biden. The Democrats only
Speaker 1: go under Trump. When it was Obama and Biden, they
Speaker 1: ignore it. Nothing to see here, personal sidebt over under
Speaker 1: You think the woman who's in charge of the border,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, will ever actually go to the border. No,
Speaker 1: And there's a reason. It's not even that she doesn't
Speaker 1: want to see it, although she doesn't want to see it.
Speaker 1: It's that she knows if she comes, the TV cameras
Speaker 1: will follow her. That's the same reason Joe Biden hasn't
Speaker 1: been to the border. Because their strategy it is so bad.
Speaker 1: You cannot defend this like if you see, if you
Speaker 1: see the children suffering, if you see the disease, if
Speaker 1: you see the crime. This is modern day slavery. And
Speaker 1: so their only defense is make it disappear. And the
Speaker 1: way they make it disappear is with a complicity of
Speaker 1: every hack in the media who refuses to cover it.
Speaker 1: And the bizarre thing is, look, if you are someone
Speaker 1: who watches Let's say you watch CNN and you think
Speaker 1: you're a middle of the road person. You think, sir,
Speaker 1: I'm not a partisan Democrat. You've been on CNN a bunch,
Speaker 1: you know, worse, seven years of my life. Yes, thank you,
Speaker 1: for bringing that up. I'm still in therapy for it. Well.
Speaker 1: To be honest, they didn't used to be as horrible
Speaker 1: as they are. But if you watch MSNBC or for
Speaker 1: that matter, ABC, CBS, NBC, you don't know that there's
Speaker 1: a border crisis. It doesn't exist. I had a border
Speaker 1: patrol agent who said to me, he called into my
Speaker 1: show one night and he said, I never thought I'd
Speaker 1: see a third world country be created within the United
Speaker 1: States America. And that's how he described with the word.
Speaker 1: He say, it's the third world country conditions, the living conditions,
Speaker 1: the humanitarian crisis, what they're interacting with. It's coming across
Speaker 1: the border. It is, he said, of that scale. So
Speaker 1: I had dinner with some friends last night who one
Speaker 1: of the folks her sister owns a ranch down in
Speaker 1: South Texas, down by Eagle Pass. She said her sister's
Speaker 1: ranch has a thousand illegal aliens crossing it every week,
Speaker 1: every single week. A thousand. Now, that's enough to declare
Speaker 1: national's disaster. In New York City, by the way, at
Speaker 1: the hands of the mayor, there fifty in Martha's vineyards,
Speaker 1: they declared an emergency and brought in ad was one
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty National guardsmen to deal with fifty people.
Speaker 1: Imagine being that ranch owner a thousand a week. I
Speaker 1: was talking with another ranch owner who has a farm
Speaker 1: down there, who bought a farm, and he wanted to
Speaker 1: grow organic crops. He can't grow organic crops because the
Speaker 1: USDA has a rule when you have illegal aliens crossing,
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to sell the produce you produced because
Speaker 1: their disease is carried. And so he can't grow on
Speaker 1: his land because the volume is just constant. He's asked
Speaker 1: the National Guard to come in. He's asked Texas to
Speaker 1: come in and and and and build build the wall
Speaker 1: there because he literally cannot grow anymore on his farm
Speaker 1: because the volume is so much that it is illegal
Speaker 1: to sell the produce that has grown there. And by
Speaker 1: the way, the refuse, he told me, like scattered their
Speaker 1: clothes and diapers and trash, I mean just truckloads of
Speaker 1: garbage being brought. When you have four point four million
Speaker 1: people crossing the border illegally in a year and a half,
Speaker 1: the damage and devastation it brings, that's what we need
Speaker 1: to have a trial on the Senate floor is make
Speaker 1: people see that. I'll tell you something we need to
Speaker 1: show them, and this is I'm going to apologize it's
Speaker 1: a little graphic, but it's true. When I was last
Speaker 1: at the southern border, I brought a group of two
Speaker 1: times ago. Actually I brought a group of seven senators
Speaker 1: down there and met with border patrol and law enforcement
Speaker 1: and they told me about a new phenomenon that they've
Speaker 1: just started seeing, which is that the human traffickers take
Speaker 1: women across the border into the United States and they
Speaker 1: rape them and they then hang their undergarments in a tree.
Speaker 1: And what law enforcement and border patrol is finding is
Speaker 1: trees with ten twenty thirty women's underwear hanging in it,
Speaker 1: and they call them rape trees now, and the cartels
Speaker 1: are bragging, they're flaunting to the law enforcement, you cannot
Speaker 1: stop me while we commit these atrocities. That's what Joe
Speaker 1: Biden has done, That's what Kamala Harris has done. And
Speaker 1: that's what we need on the Senate floor is for
Speaker 1: people to see the rape trees that are the result
Speaker 1: of the people to understand this multiple this is now
Speaker 1: become a new thing. It's a way of giving the
Speaker 1: middle finger to America, to our leadership, to our board
Speaker 1: of troll bass saying, you guys have no power over us,
Speaker 1: and this is how brazen we become. Exactly. Lastly, and
Speaker 1: I want to get into a subject, but there is
Speaker 1: a issue that is happening and it's in the medical community.
Speaker 1: And I want to play this video and then I
Speaker 1: want you to explain this is an actual, real moment happening.
Speaker 1: I think it's University of Minnesota, correct, where you have
Speaker 1: medical students that are actually having to recite this. Listen carefully, folks,
Speaker 1: because this is what's happening in medical schools in this country.
Speaker 1: Our institution is located on Dakota Land. Today, many Indigenous
Speaker 1: people throughout the state called the Twin Cities home. We
Speaker 1: commit to uprooting the legacy and perpetuation of structural violence
Speaker 1: deeply embedded within the healthcare system. We recognize inequities built
Speaker 1: by past and present traumas rooted in white supremacy, colonialism,
Speaker 1: the gender binary, ableism, and all forms of oppression be
Speaker 1: pledged to honor all Indigenous ways of healing that have
Speaker 1: been historically marginalized by Western medicine. It's maybe the creepiest
Speaker 1: thing I've ever seen, but I also you may be
Speaker 1: like me when you do what you do for a living,
Speaker 1: you always have in the back of your head when
Speaker 1: you're picking someone to take care of you medical you
Speaker 1: want to make sure they're friendly. I watched that and
Speaker 1: the fact that this is happening and somehow legal to
Speaker 1: have that be recited, to mandate that and doctrinate doctors
Speaker 1: this way after what we just saw with doctors being
Speaker 1: also their careers being threatened if they didn't do the
Speaker 1: exactly what they were told to do with COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: can't do ivermect and can't talk about this. You saw
Speaker 1: this and you tweeted about this, because this is a
Speaker 1: moment that needs to be stopped now in America. So look,
Speaker 1: anyone who listens to that, or even worse, if you
Speaker 1: watch the video, and I encourage you watch the video.
Speaker 1: It looks like a cult. It looks like the branch Davidians.
Speaker 1: You expect David Koresh to be at the front of it.
Speaker 1: They are. This is a medical school, University of Minnesota
Speaker 1: Medical School. This is all of their students or some
Speaker 1: subset of their students, I don't know which, but they're
Speaker 1: forced to stand up. They're all reading pieces of paper.
Speaker 1: The school is the church, like they're a church and
Speaker 1: they're giving a pledge. Now, a medical school is supposed
Speaker 1: to teach you how to be a doctor. It's supposed
Speaker 1: to teach you signs. This is all politics, this is woke.
Speaker 1: Later in that pledge, they pledge their commitment to anti racism.
Speaker 1: We didn't play that segment, but that's a little bit
Speaker 1: later in their pledge, it is hardcore Marxist. So they
Speaker 1: pledge to be opposed to the gender binary, to fight against.
Speaker 1: In other words, every one of these ostensible doctors is
Speaker 1: pledging against the notion that there is such a thing
Speaker 1: as a woman and they're such a thing as a man.
Speaker 1: That that is oppressive. And number one, what the hell
Speaker 1: are medical schools engaged in political indoctrination? Number two, this
Speaker 1: is not a private medical school. This is the University
Speaker 1: of Minnesota. This is paid for by Minnesota taxpayers who
Speaker 1: are paying to indoctrinate their doctors. You know what, if
Speaker 1: I go to a doctor, I'd like to know how
Speaker 1: to get better from whatever's ailing me. And you know this,
Speaker 1: we pledge to treat all indigenous forms the same as
Speaker 1: modern medicine. You know, if I've got cancer, I don't
Speaker 1: want them to tell me to smoke peyote. I want
Speaker 1: them to tell me how to cure the Fragan cancer.
Speaker 1: And it is it's a top I also want you
Speaker 1: to understand this. This is a top medical school. This
Speaker 1: is not some like online university. This is at the
Speaker 1: highest levels. You add this into what just happened at Vanderbilt,
Speaker 1: and let me ask you something. Let's suppose instead of
Speaker 1: becoming a world famous podcaster, you decided you wanted to
Speaker 1: be a doctor. And let's suppose you studied hard, did
Speaker 1: well in the MCAT, you got into the University of
Speaker 1: Minnesota medic school. It's good school, big deal. Imagine you're
Speaker 1: one of those students and you're standing there, what do
Speaker 1: you do well If it's your lifelong dream to be
Speaker 1: a doctor and I understand this, and let's pay your
Speaker 1: two years into it, or to raise your hand and
Speaker 1: say I'm not doing this, You're gonna sit down and
Speaker 1: protest and get kicked out of medical school. And because
Speaker 1: they own you at that point, right your entire life's
Speaker 1: work is happening. They own you. You have to finish.
Speaker 1: And if you don't finish, what's your next career? Like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you can be a whistle blower in a sense, but
Speaker 1: you're ruined, You're done. By the way the guy leading
Speaker 1: that chant, the David Koresh I was reading his background.
Speaker 1: He's got a medical degree from Yale. He's got a
Speaker 1: degree I think from Johns Hopkins. He did his residency
Speaker 1: at Harvard. I mean, it's a gold plated medical resume.
Speaker 1: And he is now a Marxist indoctrinator, like like, that's
Speaker 1: not medicine, that's not science. That is politics, and it's
Speaker 1: dishonest and bad politics it is. Is there any way
Speaker 1: to stop it? Because it's it's humming real. And I'll
Speaker 1: end with this question because we had friends that just
Speaker 1: had a baby. She is going into the hospital with contractions.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is that see now the movie that
Speaker 1: everybody has right the water's broken, And they actually had
Speaker 1: to spend time as she's actually in doing contractions and
Speaker 1: filling out paperwork. And one of the things was do
Speaker 1: you identify as a man or woman? She's pregnant, she's
Speaker 1: about to have a child. And it says literally they're
Speaker 1: asking her as they're checking her in, are you a
Speaker 1: man or a woman? I'm a woman. I'm pregnant. And
Speaker 1: these are the people we're supposed to trust with your life,
Speaker 1: in your baby's life. If there's any complications, this is
Speaker 1: the institution. So my point is they're winning because you're
Speaker 1: getting those questions asked, tells you they're winning. Vanderbilt what
Speaker 1: happened there? They're winning this, They're winning. How do we
Speaker 1: Is there a way to correct this? So? Look, you
Speaker 1: and I are both dads. You know I was there
Speaker 1: when both our girls were born. Can you imagine walk
Speaker 1: into the hospital with your wife nine months pregnant and
Speaker 1: labor and the doctor's saying, sir, which one of you
Speaker 1: is giving birth? Right? Mister Ferguson, can we put you
Speaker 1: up in stirrups? You know, Hey, no, I want a
Speaker 1: different hospital. Well, you people are nuts if you can't
Speaker 1: figure out which person has a baby. Yeah, we got
Speaker 1: bigger problems here. So look, they're winning and they're not.
Speaker 1: The cultural Marxists have taken over the institutions of much
Speaker 1: of our society. University of Minnesota Medical School is apparently
Speaker 1: altogether lost. But here's the good news. Most of America
Speaker 1: has common sense. They've gone too far. I think there's
Speaker 1: a big pushback. By the way you look at this election,
Speaker 1: the Hispanic community is moving to Republicans and massive numbers.
Speaker 1: This kind of idiotcy is a big part of it.
Speaker 1: You look at suburban women moms Virginia that went from
Speaker 1: ten points going for Joe Biden to a year later
Speaker 1: electing a Republican governor. It was moms who were ticked
Speaker 1: off at this kind of garbage. So I do think
Speaker 1: the left has gone They've jumped the shark. They gone
Speaker 1: so crazy that there is a large supermajority of Americans
Speaker 1: that think it's nutty. If you say birthing people and
Speaker 1: not moms, you're feah, we're not going to be friends. Now.
Speaker 1: I will say, I think there are a lot of
Speaker 1: people who think that's nutty, but a lot of them
Speaker 1: are scared to say it. I mean it, they're now.
Speaker 1: I think they're quietly going into the voting booth and
Speaker 1: they're pulling the lever the other direction. But it is
Speaker 1: the left operates by fear and intimidation and destructure that
Speaker 1: they go after you. So so if you happen to
Speaker 1: believe that women exist, look, jk Rowling, who is a
Speaker 1: throw and through leftist, has been utterly tarred and feathered
Speaker 1: because she actually believes women exist, and if you or
Speaker 1: I decided tomorrow I feel pretty, I'm a woman. She's like, well, dude,
Speaker 1: no you're not. You can do that you want, you know, dressing,
Speaker 1: you can dress as a woman. You can go get
Speaker 1: out of surgery and chop it all off. But that's
Speaker 1: doesn't suddenly make you a woman. We could knock yourself
Speaker 1: out if that's what you want to do, But don't
Speaker 1: ask me to insist that there is nothing about women
Speaker 1: that has any meaning whatsoever. She is the idiot actors
Speaker 1: on Harry Potter. Don't invite her to Harry Potter reunions,
Speaker 1: Like how stupid is that? It's welcome to the insanity
Speaker 1: of the world right now center. It's fun. This is
Speaker 1: gonna be a lot of fun for everyone listening. Remind
Speaker 1: you and watching. We're doing this three days a week.
Speaker 1: Two of them are going to be audio only. One
Speaker 1: is gonna be video as well. You can watch on YouTube.
Speaker 1: I ask people this all the time. Two things, Please
Speaker 1: share the podcast with your family and friends if you're
Speaker 1: if you're listening, and you can see that little forward arrow,
Speaker 1: share it. Number two. Write us a five star review,
Speaker 1: because lord knows, the lefties love to write you one
Speaker 1: star reviews, so help us combat that, and tell your
Speaker 1: family and friends, and I'll see you in a couple
Speaker 1: of days.