WEBVTT - Episode 56: PLD Custom (Feat. Alex Webb)

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>The guys from Ping.

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 2>They've kind of showed me how much the equipment matters.

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I just love that I can hit any shot.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I kind of want.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna be able to tell some fun stories about

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 3>what goes on here to help golfers play better golf.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey, everybody, welcome back to another episode of the Ping

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Proving Grounds Podcast. I'm Shane Bak and joined us always

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 4>by Marty Jerts and Marty. We've got a YouTube video

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 4>out right now, competitive YouTube golf. Are we now YouTube golfers?

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Is that where we live?

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Are?

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? No, I think we're up there with some of

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the you know, the view counts going up. Shane and

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about you, but I've had a lot

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 3>of feedback from some friends that have really enjoyed the content,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I don't want to we don't want

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to tease what happens at the end there, but let's

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 3>just say we had quite a competitive match out there

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 3>at Estancia earlier this year.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, shout out to James and the team. They did

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 4>a great job of shooting it and the drone footage.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Astoncia is one of the great desert golf

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 4>courses in the world, not just in the state of Arizona.

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 4>It's one of my favorite courses, if not my favoravorite

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>course in the state of Arizona. And let me just

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 4>say it photographs well and it drones well.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>It does. Yeah, it is. It is also the number

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>one ranked course in Arizona, just head of Force Highlands Canyon,

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 3>which is more of a more of a tree line

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>course up north. But Stancy is quite a treat. That

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 3>was a fun battle and for those of you that

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 3>haven't watched it, i'd suggest going on there on there

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and watching it on YouTube.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's on the paying YouTube page. We'll add a

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 4>link in the notes for this episode as well, so

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 4>you could check that out. Today, Marty, we're gonna talk

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 4>about Putters, which I think is the most excited I've

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 4>been about talking about a golf club in the existence

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 4>of this podcast. And we've got somebody awesome to chat

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 4>with us, Marty. I'll give you the opportunity to introduce him.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, mister Alex Web Alex, thanks for coming on the pod.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Super excited to have you and talk about PLD Putters.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I think what's what I'm very excited about what we've

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 3>done with PLD over the last three, four or five years,

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Shane and Alex. You know, we'll deep dive on this topic.

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Is you know, we've kind of prided ourselves at Ping

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 3>of making everything that the tour player can get access

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>to available to the everyday golfer, and that's a big

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 3>part of what we've done with PLD PLD custom is

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to pass along that personalization, that custom fitting aspect and

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 3>making it available to everyday golfer. Alex been on our

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 3>team as a fitter for quite some time and really

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 3>hunkered down in going super deep on putter fitting, so

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 3>he handles all of our PLD custom fittings that we

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 3>do with his colleagues here at the Ping Proving Grounds. Alex,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the podcast and look forward to having a

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>good chat with you.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Awesome guys. Thank you so much for having me. Super

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>excited to be here. Can't wait to talk about.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Putters, Alex.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to start with this, can you give people

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.839
<v Speaker 4>that don't know the history of PLD, because I think

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Ping putters in its history have been talked about a

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 4>lot on this podcast, but I'm not sure people to

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 4>grasp maybe how new PLD is to the world.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure yeah, absolutely.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So PLD started around twenty and sixteen when Bubba Watson

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 2>came to us wanting to design a custom, fully machined

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>answer putter for himself, so he worked with our team,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 2>He worked with Tony Serrano to really get down to

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the specifics of exactly what he wanted to see out

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>of this answer putter. So that was kind of the

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>birth of PLD. From there, over the years, we worked

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>with all the tour players or most of the tour

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>players that were coming through to really hone into what

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 2>we want PLD to be, and it's fully machined putters,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>really really focusing on the fine details of these putters,

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and it all started at the tour level, and then

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 2>probably twenty twenty twenty one time period is when we

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>started to really think about, hey, we should offer this

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>two consumers, ramp up to provide these putters to consumers,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and then all of this was in preparation for March

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two, and that's when we launched to the

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>general public.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>PLD Custom awesome and Alex, just your own personal story

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 3>on the fitting side. I mean, you came into ping

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 3>as a fitter, and we trained our fitters and you

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>have experience fitting all clubs in the bag. What was

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>your gravity towards the putter space and the putter category?

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 3>What makes you so interested and passionate about putters above

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and beyond all the other clubs in the bag?

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, growing up, I was always one of those gearheads.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I always liked.

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 2>The tinker, always liked to build different clubs, but putters

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 2>was always special to my heart, pink putters especially. I

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 2>had quite a few pink putters growing up, and I

0:04:54.440 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>collected putters growing up as well, So putting, just in

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the sense of that was what I was most interested in.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 2>It's the club that's most used in the bag, and

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>why not fit the club that's most used in the bag?

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 3>Alex?

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 4>What's the collection like now? I mean, you know, obviously

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I think you could. You probably get them for free.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you can, maybe, you know, put a couple

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 4>in the car to go home and work through the process.

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 4>What's your collection looking like these days?

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I probably have fifty to sixty putters on hand at

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 2>any time. I do a lot of testing, but the

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>majority of the PLD customs stay in house other than

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a couple that are my own. But yeah, yeah, it's

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 2>a cycle. But I'm always big on sticking with one

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>specific putter, one type of putter that fits my stroke,

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>fits my game, and that's what I stick to.

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Alex. So, PLD, I think folks may have heard of PLD,

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>which stands for Putting Lab Design. They've seen our logo

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 3>out there, they've seen beautiful machine putters used by our

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>tour players. Paint a little picture of the different, you know,

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>variants of PLD. So you know PLD Custom, PLD milled,

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Special Edition, PLD. Can you give a little overview of

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>the entire program and more folks can can go to

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 3>get access to these different tiers of PLD.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, So let's start with PLD milled. PLD milled is

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be the putters that you can just purchase

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>off the rack. You can go into your local golf shop,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>you can order it through any authorized ping account. Your

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>big box stores are going to have PLD milled putters.

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>These these are our.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Retail putters that we have to offer, and from there

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll kind of branch into PLD milled Plus, we branch

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 2>into the special editions, we branch into PLD Custom, But

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 2>PLD milled Plus is kind of that next tier that

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>next step up from PLD milled. They're also available at

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>retail through authorized Ping retailers, and it kind of bridges

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 2>that gap between PLD milled and PLD Custom. So PLD

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>milled Plus we have five specific models that start blank.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>The head start blank. From an alignment standpoint, you can

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>add all kinds of different alignment features. You can do

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 2>engraving on some of the putters, you can do some

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>lasering on the putters as well, So it's kind of

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>jumps into that custom tier without going fully custom, which

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 2>PLD Custom is. From PLD milled Plus, we go into

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>PLD Special Edition or PLD milt Special Edition, which these

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 2>are drop ins that we'll do to our accounts, so

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>specific accounts will get these limited edition or special edition putters,

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>will mill out a certain amount of them. This past

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 2>year we did the Answer thirty. We did a hobby

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>version of the Special Ed and so those are also

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>available in a limited amount to our accounts or to

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>purchase through our accounts. And then from there, next tier

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>up is this PLD Custom, So PLD Custom is a

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 2>fully customizable putter. First thing you do with that is

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 2>you book on Ping pld dot com. Top right hand

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>corner of pin pld dot com.

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a spot.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Where you can dive into what ping pld custom actually

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>is and to book appointments. So we do virtual and

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>in person appointments for ping pld custom.

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Alex, buddy of mine Mike, did the custom fitting on

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 4>the app and we played in rain the other day

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 4>and he brought a backup putter out because he didn't

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 4>want is his custom PILDD deal with. He was like,

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 4>this is going to be my backup. It was a

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 4>pin putter as well, but he said, my custom PLD

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 4>is perfect condition putter. Like that's how much he loves

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 4>his custom putter and how much he appreciates it.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome, very very cool.

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so PLD customer, Alex, that's where you can do

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 3>literally kind of whatever you want, right, And let's let's

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 3>talk a little bit about that experience. So somebody could

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>come into the lab and why don't you just start

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 3>there talking about a little bit of the difference in

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 3>the process what somebody will go through whether they come

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 3>into the proving grounds into the lab here to go

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 3>through their fitting experience and work directly with you, Colton

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 3>and the team, versus what does that experience look like remotely,

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 3>if somebody can't make it into Phoenix, how do we

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 3>service them and provide some great service during that PLD

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>custom experience.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Awesome?

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so PINGPLD dot com. You book on the website,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>you can book virtual or you can book in person.

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>So the in person you get the full experience.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So we we.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Pride ourselves on treating you like a tour pro, going

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 2>through the same exact process that a tour.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Pro is going to go through. So we start in.

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 2>The putting lab, will collect some data, will take some video,

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and we usually try to start with the player's gamer putter.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 2>If they have the ability to bring their gamer putter,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 2>that gives us a baseline for that. So we're using

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 2>ipin two point zero to collect data, which is a

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>proprietary app that we designed in house. It's measuring the forces,

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the torques, the accelerations that the player's applying to the putter.

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It kicks back a lot of data to us.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 2>A PGA pro, LPGA Cornferry, any of the pros that

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>come through go through the same thing. We put them

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>on Iping two point zero as well. We take the

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>video work to kind of hone in on iline on

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 2>link the putter to make sure that li angle's good

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 2>on that. So we'll start by collecting the data or

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the club data using ipling two point zero. From there

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>we'll transition to Quintech. Quintech's a ball data system that

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.359
<v Speaker 2>we use where we can collect ball data to analyze

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the role of the ball. And then we do a

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of work outside as well. We have a green outside.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 2>After we've kind of dialed in in the putting lab,

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 2>will transition to the outside experience and really fine tuned

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the loft, the lie on the putter, look at people's

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>breaking putts, you know if they have or if they

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>have struggles with right to left, left, the right potts,

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>really taking a look at that speed control. And that's

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the process with the in person is you get the

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>full go the tour experience. We're diving into everything that

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 2>we possibly can as far as the virtual fitting goes.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 2>You sign up for the virtual fitting. When you sign

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>up for the virtual fitting, you get a zoom link,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 2>so it's a zoo link for the customer that's linked

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to my personal or Colden Tunnel. He's our other PLD

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Master fitter two hour calendars and that triggers the welcome

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>kit process. So what we do from there is we'll

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>send out a welcome kit to the consumer. This kit

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>goes out approximately ten to twelve days before they're virtual fitting.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Inside the welcome kit's going to be an iPod touch,

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 2>a pin cradle, so an iPod cradle, and a putting disc.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Once you power that iPod touch on, it's going to

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>walk you through the process. We have a different version

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 2>of iping that's built into these iPod touches that's extremely

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 2>streamlined and it just walks you through the process. So

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>from there, the person is going to clip it to

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 2>their putter. They're going to go through three sessions of

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>five put seeds, so they'll take fifteen total putts, and

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 2>at the very end of those three sessions, it's going

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to be submit to ping. It says submit to ping.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 2>It comes directly two hour inbox. So we have that

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>data and from there we can create a really nice

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 2>presentation where we can go over all of that data

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 2>with the consumers. We can talk about the forces, the torques,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the accelerations that they're applying to the putter. We spend

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the first half of the virtual fitting doing that. The

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 2>second half we go through the putters that we have available,

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 2>and we're mentioning the best putters that that we think

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>that fit their stroke based off of the data that's collected.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Marty is is ping, Like, does ping run ninety five

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 4>percent of the iPod touches in the world now.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I think we do.

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I just want to I'm wondering what other business still

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 4>uses iPod touches. I did Virtual Alex probably a year

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 4>and a half ago, and it popped in that it

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 4>came out of the box of like the iPod Touch. Man,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen one of these couple of years.

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 3>It was kind of like a throwback.

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, I like, I've done both Alex, I've

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 4>done virtual, I've done in person, and you get similar data.

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 4>You get similar numbers if you do it at home

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 4>yourself or obviously if you get a chance to come in.

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 4>You've talked a little bit about what you're looking at

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 4>when you're diving into a player's stroke, Can you just

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 4>expand a little bit more on that, Like what's the

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 4>data you're pulling from, you know, the thirty minutes or

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 4>an hour you're spending with the player?

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely so.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Ipaying measures five different metrics The first one's closing angle

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>was just just the amount of rotation that the player's

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>applying from the top of their backstroke to impact, So

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 2>that's really going to help us diagnose what type of

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>stroke type we need to fit a player into. The

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>next metric is impact angle. This is just a relative

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>measurement from where they are at set up with the

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 2>putter face versus where they are at impact with the

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>putter face. So this really lets us know where the

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>face is is relative to where they set up, and

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 2>this can let us know how a player aims the

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>putter and that can also lead into further conversations once

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 2>we get deeper into the process about alignment as well.

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Next one would be tempo, So that's just measuring the

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>backstroke time divided by the forward stroke time it kicks

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>back a ratio kicks back an overall stroke time as well.

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Tempo really helps us dive into the.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Headweight of a putter.

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Everybody has different has a different tempo, and if everybody

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 2>has a different tempo, then we can kind of target

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 2>different headweights with those different individuals. From there, we're looking

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>at the impact li angle, So this is just measuring

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the li angle. The putter at impact, and that kind

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of helps us diagnose whether we need to take a

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>putter flatter, we need to take it more upright, or.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>If it's just good to go.

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>And then the last category that we look at, or

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the last metric that we look at, is going to

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>be shaft clean at impact. So this is if somebody

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>has the shaft clean forward, hands forward, de lofting the putter,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>it's back adding additional loft.

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Or if you're neutral.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 2>What this does is this really helps us dial in

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the loft or the dynamic loft of a putter for

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that player. So we're looking at those key five metrics,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>and then with the virtual process, it's a conversation as well.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>We're getting to know these players. We're asking them about

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>their tendencies of their game, of their putting stroke, and

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>then that can kind of help us get to the

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>end goal of having a putter that's perfectly fit or

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>very very close to be perfectly fit for them.

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think that what's fun OLEX is that the

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 3>folks going through PLD custom at home, we are it's

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, I've seen some other fitting processes where you

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 3>just take a video of your stroke or do something

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>like that, right, we're actually taking these It's kind of

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 3>like getting a live m on your putting stroke, right,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 3>so that that face angle or stroke type that we

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 3>have in there is a proxy for how much torque

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 3>somebody or twisting about the shaft that somebody's putting on

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 3>that putter. Right. And then you talked about tempo and

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>total time. I think these are a couple things that

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 3>even the most astute fitter has a hard time seeing

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 3>with the naked eye, right. So, I think a big

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 3>challenge in putter fitting, club fitting in general is when

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 3>do you need to bring in some outside technology to

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 3>measure these things that you could not other that you

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 3>might be misleading if you look at them with the

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 3>naked eye. Right. So, Alex, talk a little bit about,

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, what any trends you've seen there on the

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>tempo side and total time? You know, have you seen

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 3>folks that have a fast total time but a slow

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>tempo ratio or a slow total time and a fast

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 3>tempo ratio? What have you seen in that little nuance

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 3>and and how does that inform where you go with

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>that player from a headwaight or other putter characteristic standpoint.

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, so Ipin kicks back a ratio. We'll start

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 2>with the ratio average ratio, and iping is one point

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 2>eight to two point two if we meet right in

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the middle two point zero, so a two to one ratio.

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 2>So that can kind of help us diagnose whether that

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>player is maybe slightly more abrupt or slightly more deliberate

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 2>with their stroke. But another thing iping also provides us

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>is total time. It provides us total time but also

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>their backstroke and forward stroke time. So we usually try

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>to use about one thousand to one thousand and fifty

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>milliseconds as a baseline. That's a standard stroke time. It's neutral,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 2>its average, it's not fast, it's not slow. And let's

0:18:55.680 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 2>say ipin kicks back a two point four ratioh and

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>a twelve hundred on the overall stroke time. Well, what

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 2>that's letting us know is now that player has a

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>slightly slower or more deliberate stroke, and we see that

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>in the data. And if we see that in the data,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 2>we now know that like, hey, okay, they have a

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>slightly slower, more deliberate stroke, we probably need to go

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 2>with something maybe slightly heavier for stability purposes, or let's

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>say it's the exact opposite to where it kicks back

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 2>one point seven, one point eight ratio, something a little

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 2>bit on the faster side. The overall stroke time is

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred and fifty nine hundred milliseconds. Well, now we

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 2>know that that player has a slightly faster or more

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 2>abrupt stroke, and I'm probably not leaning towards a heavy

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>mallet with that style of player.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaning toward wide.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Body, blade blade style, something lighter.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's super interesting because I think of some golfers

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>may have heard, or even fitters out there may have heard.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, two to one is two or average. Therefore

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I need to try to get my player to two

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to one tempo ratio. From a teaching or instruction standpoint,

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 3>but from a fitting and fitting science standpoint, we were

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 3>using total time and tempo ratio to really match players

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 3>to the specific headway. Alex, what about face angle? So

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 3>we have a delivered face angle, So that's like where

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 3>the face is delivered relative to the setup is a

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 3>metric in iping? Are we trying to get players to

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 3>be zeroed out like so to aim and also deliver

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the face at zero or have you've seen good players

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 3>have a consistent open or closed bias and if so,

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 3>by how much.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 2>So, this is definitely not a category where we're trying

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to zero out a player. I tell everybody this when

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>they come in, and if you're negative, if you're positive,

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 2>if you're zeroed out. The biggest thing with this is

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm focusing on consistency. If you're going to be negative

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 2>seven tenths of a degree closed at impact, I want you.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>To do it over and over and over again. I

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>want it to be consistent.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Typically for a right handed player, if we see a

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>negative number, it kind of leads us to believe that

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 2>that right handed player could be a touch of a

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 2>right aimer, and then to get back to square at impact,

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 2>they have to come in slightly closed and then opposite

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>for the positive number as well. If it's positive point

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 2>five or plus zero point five on the impact angle,

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>it usually lets us know that that player is potentially

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a left aimer. But we tell

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 2>everybody we're not trying to zero you out with this.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>It's consistency. The majority of the pros that come through,

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 2>the majority of the pros that we work with, or

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 2>plus or minus something. It is pretty rare to be

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 2>zeroed doubt on this and whether we do it consciously

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>or unconsciously, the stroke is going to correct foreign aim

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 2>bias one way or the other.

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Alex, is anybody zero like you mentioned, few people are

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 4>zeroed out? Is there anybody on staff that gets to zero?

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 4>Like anybody that you know is consistently on that number?

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Not that I can think of off the top of

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>my head, Marty.

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I try to be I'm always striving for it.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking for that Alex when you're when you're fitting someone.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I think about this a lot with fitting in general.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 4>But when you're fitting somebody for a putter, they're aiming right,

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 4>they're aiming left, They're doing little things that you guys

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 4>are finding out either by the eye or by this test.

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 4>How much are you leaning on putting them in the

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 4>right putter versus maybe letting them know something they're doing

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 4>wrong because you're not in it necessarily, an you're not

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 4>in their instructor, you're not their teacher, right, but there

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 4>are little things you can help correct them when you

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 4>see all this data come back your ways. So how

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 4>do you balance that? It seems like it'd be a

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 4>tough thing to kind of balance an obvious. It takes

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 4>years of experience to get really comfortable in.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>That sure and that's one of those things where you

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 2>have to skate that fine line of teaching and fitting.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>The majority of the people that are coming in they're

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 2>looking for a fitting, and it's my goal to fit

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 2>them into the best putter possible for the stroke that

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 2>they're bringing. Now, we see from time to time where

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 2>somebody might have a significant amount of ford shaft line,

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 2>and at that point, the first thing I'm doing is

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>taking a look at.

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Their ball position.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>They might be too far back in the stands and okay,

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 2>now we have a lot of ford shaft lien. Hey,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>let's kick that ball up, you know, a ball, a

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 2>ball and a half forward in the stands, and let's

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 2>see what that does to the shaft lien. Not always

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the case that it's going to automatically change it, but

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll make small little tweaks or small little suggestions from

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 2>a setup standpoint that can potentially get this player to

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a better spot or have a more consistent stroke.

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Alex, I want to kind of shift gears a

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 3>little bit to alignment markings. Right, So we talked about aim.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 3>We're not necessarily trying to get folks to get the

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 3>face back zeroed out relative to where they aim. We've

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 3>seen good players, players of all different skill levels, maybe

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 3>aim a little off and their stroke kind of gets

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 3>it back to get that putter face online to their

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 3>intended start line. What about alignment markings, We have a

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of offerings. If we look at PLD custom you

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 3>can kind of do whatever you want. If you look

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 3>at mill plus you have some customizations options there with

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 3>the alignment markings. You know, what type of player finds

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 3>themselves in a dot on the top rail, no alignment

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 3>marking at all on an answer putter versus lines that

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 3>frame the ball versus a line in the cavity. What

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 3>does that process look like and what trends are you

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 3>seeing from that perspective? And do you use how a

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 3>player or maybe what golf ball and ballmarking they use

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to inform that process?

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Absolutely so.

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 2>The first thing I always ask when we start talking

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 2>about alignment is how do they line their put up?

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Do they have a line on the ball, do they

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>use the markings on the ball. Are they pointing that

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>line or are they pointing that marking at a target?

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Are they pointing it at the whole. It's just trying

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>to figure out the tendencies of this player, how they align.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 2>And we'll see a lot of times where people might

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 2>be spot aimers. It's like, Okay, I'm aiming to a

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 2>spot that's three foot in front of the ball, and

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I line that line up to that. Well, that's where

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 2>it could be beneficial to have a top rail line

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>because now that top rail line acts as an extension

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 2>from the line on the ball, and now we can

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 2>point that top rail line at our target. Same thing

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 2>with flange line as well. It's just you have that

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 2>slight separation the two. But then we'll get a lot

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>of players that are face aimers versus people who are

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>aiming alignment lines, who are aiming the logos on the

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 2>ball at the target. So for the face aimer players,

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 2>usually that's where I'll lean more towards the dot or

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>even the top rail line, just because that gives us

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a centering point. We have a centering point with the

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>back of the ball. Now we can aim the face

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>at that centering point, and ball with features can.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Really help out with that as well.

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>So if you have a potter that has really nice

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 2>ball with features that are built into it.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Whether we've cut.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Ball with lines or not, we have that dot on

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 2>the top and we just have a lot of things

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that can help us frame the ball center with the

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.479
<v Speaker 2>back of the ball, and from there we're just aiming

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the face at the target that we've picked out.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Marty, this is such a big part of

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 4>modern golf is the you know, you think about the

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 4>golf balls that have come out over the last few years.

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Right on You've gone from the original pro v that

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think had lines on it, to then having lines,

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 4>and then now the golf balls have triple tracks. You know,

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 4>there's so much alignment out there for the player. And

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.959
<v Speaker 4>I'm a player that doesn't like the lines.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm a guy that I like to set it up

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 4>where I see the name of the golf ball kind

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 4>of facing me straight up because I get a little

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 4>too technical when I'm trying to get the line of

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 4>my putter on the line of the golf ball and

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 4>then I'm trying to hit. I almost feel like I'm

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 4>trying to hit the perfect putt versus like letting my

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 4>feel take over. I think this is something that people

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 4>have to figure out almost before they even do a

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 4>fitting is how best do I see a putt? How

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 4>much does the putt make sense to me when I'm

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 4>thinking about where to aim? How far out to go?

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Am I a feel putter?

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these are things that I think are important

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 4>to kind of go over yourself.

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 3>It's almost party.

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 4>It's your MRI analogy you made earlier. It's like people

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 4>get nervous about AMRI. They get nervous about fitting at

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 4>times as well. But it's going over some of the

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 4>things you can go over your before you go into

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 4>the process, so you can actually answer some of these questions.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, I think how you mark your golf ball,

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 3>what works good for you, and we and we could

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 3>sort of as part of PLD will will help evaluate

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 3>that for you. You know, maybe somebody struggles with start

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 3>line on short puts only start line is more important

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.239
<v Speaker 3>than speed on short putts. Maybe you want to use

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 3>a line on your ball on short putts and have

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 3>a model that can help you with that there. But

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 3>let you be more speed speed focus feel focus on

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the longer puts because that priority of speed to face

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 3>angle kind of changes depending on the putts. So that's

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 3>I think a big part of what Alex and his

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 3>team does is understand that if you're a golfer that

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 3>keeps diligent stats on your putting, maybe through Arcos or

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 3>another stats tracking tool or your own little system, certainly

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 3>bring those into the putting putter fitting process because we're

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna want to understand that, you know, not not only

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 3>does your memory think maybe your recency by think that

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>you struggle on longer putts because you just three putted

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the last hole you know they was an important match

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 3>or something, but is that persistent over time? You know?

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's something really fun. We get access

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 3>to in the shot Link data from the tour players,

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 3>but we want to be able to pass that level

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 3>of service to the to the everyday golfer. And yeah,

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 3>it's been fun to see all the different markings on

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 3>golf balls. And speaking of golf balls, we in the

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Lab Alex have pretty much every majority of the most

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 3>popular golf balls out there because part of Balnamic Shane

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 3>that you know, is we ask for your feel sound

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 3>preference with the golf ball on short game. You know,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 3>we've we've both hit balls that you can barely hear

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 3>them when you putt, and the others that are louder

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>and clickier. Now, a big part of the nuance of

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 3>the perfect putter, which appeld custom is all about, is

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 3>getting the acoustics dialed in. So, Alex, let's dive into

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 3>sound feel, how a player's golf ball might inform that

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 3>and what are some of the tech chniques we can

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 3>use with milling patterns, et cetera to inform and influence

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 3>that through the POD process. Yeah.

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, So it's we always ask the player what golf

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 2>ball they're playing, and we you're right, we keep a

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 2>quite a few of the most popular brands in the lab,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 2>different covers, whether it's something softer, something firmer, and if

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>we don't ad the ball after the fact, we usually

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>go out and get it.

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but Alex, you can't ask Marty that question, by

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:34.719
<v Speaker 4>the way, it be like a twenty minute answer if

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 4>you said, Marty, golf ball play to go? What month

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 4>is it?

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 3>What the wind? But uh, go ahead out. Yeah.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's the first thing we always ask when they

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 2>come in the lab is what golf ball are you playing?

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Because that's going to dictate or help us determine what

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 2>milling pattern.

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We need to do.

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>On the face of the butter or what milling pattern

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the player might like on the face, and the butter

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 2>feel and sound is extremely important and putting, and we

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>have different milling patterns, different milling depths that we can

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 2>achieve on these PLD custom putters to help provide positive acoustics,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 2>positive feedback to the players and what they want to hear.

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So the smoother you.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Go on the face, the clickier the sound's going to be,

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the more feedback you're going to get. And then we

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 2>offer smooth, shallow, deep milling. We also have some horizontal

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 2>milling that we can do on the faces as well.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 2>But if we're looking at just the smooth face, completely

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 2>smooth firnest off the face, the most feedback, so the

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 2>most click.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>As we get to the.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Shallow mill, it's a little bit softer.

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Than your smooth face.

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit of a more muted sound to it,

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 2>but you still get feedback, you still get some click

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 2>to it. As we start to transition into that deeper milling,

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that more aggressive milling on the face, it's a little

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 2>bit softer off the face. But the thing that most

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 2>players notice is the sound difference, because sound and feel

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 2>go hand in hand. With the deeper milling, it tends

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>to be a little bit more of a thuddier sound,

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 2>so a little bit deeper sound. If we hear something

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that's a little bit deeper or something that's a little

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 2>bit thuddier, we're automatically going to think that it's a

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit softer off the face as well. And one

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 2>thing with the milling pattern, and this is something that

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>we've tested over time, is there's not necessarily a performance

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>difference between smooth and deep. From a rollout perspective, they're

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>very very similar. A lot of this is just going

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to be player preference. So if you prefer to hear

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 2>something more muted, feel something a little bit softer, that's

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>when we go with more of that deeper or more

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 2>aggressive milling. But if you're somebody that likes to hear

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of feedback or wants to hear here's some

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>click sound, that's when we start to move more towards

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 2>the shallow or the smooth face.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Alex, you talked earlier on about Bubba being kind of

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the origin of the PLD journey for us, and which

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 3>one of the milling patterns that we use do we

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 3>call the Bubba groove. That's what we've always called it

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 3>for slang here, right.

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 2>So the Bubba groove would be a horizontal milling, and

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a couple different versions of this. Hovelin has the

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>same thing. So Hovelin has a ball with horizontal milling

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>on the face. It's about four to five thousands deep

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 2>on the face. And if you're comparing that to the

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 2>circular milling that we offer, circular milling, the shallow mill

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>is going to be four thousands deep on the face.

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 2>So those feel and sound very very similar. Same thing

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 2>with the Bubba groove. The Bubba groove's going to be

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>about that four to five thousands deep on the face,

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and his are full face horizontal.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we can use that ball with milling for

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 3>a golfer who's either left eye dominant, depend on how

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 3>they set up. They can see the loft on the face,

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>see the face a little bit, and that can help

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 3>them frame the golf ball a little bit as well.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Alex correct.

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, we always ask eye dominance as well, whether somebody's

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 2>right or left eye dominant.

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of.

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 2>A gray area for us, but there is some of

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 2>it that plays into it, especially from an alignment and

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.280
<v Speaker 2>an offset standpoint.

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Alex, are we talking millions of options in terms of customization?

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, is it infinite? Like, do you have an

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 4>idea of what the number be in terms of how

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 4>much you could customize your PLD.

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot. We try to provide as much as possible.

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 2>And if it's something that we haven't done before, I'm

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna ask about it. Okay, So if a customer wants

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 2>this type of alignment versus this type of milling versus

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 2>this type of engraving, and we haven't done it before, absolutely,

0:34:58.320 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm going.

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:00.919
<v Speaker 1>To inquire about it. If we can do it, We're

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>going to do it.

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Alex, tell us about a time, you know, you know,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 3>you Colton and in our team here at the proving grounds,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 3>it's work with players day in and day out on

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 3>these most nuanced topics and preferences. Tell us about a

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 3>time where we've identified maybe a gap in our product offerings. Right,

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 3>so you're seeing a certain trend or tendency or something

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 3>in the lab that we've kind of turned into a

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 3>product offering. You know, where we've seen a gap in

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 3>one of these attributes. It's so important to putter performance.

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we actually noticed something within the past couple

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of years and introduced to special edition putter this past

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 2>year to fill this gap. So if we're looking at

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 2>iping data, we have millions and millions of data points

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 2>in ipaying, so we're able to identify what's the most

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the most closing angle, the least amount of closing angle,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>how many people fit into certain types of closing angles.

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 2>And we notice that with the slight arc category that

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 2>we had the answer potter, which is going to hang

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 2>or have forty forty three forty two degrees of toehang

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to it. And then from there we go down to

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 2>face balance options or a double bend shaft with a

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 2>slight amount of toe hag.

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's a gap there.

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 2>So we go from zero amount of toe hag all

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the way up to forty plus amount of toe haang

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and where's the in between there? So what we did

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is we created the answer thirty, which sits right in

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 2>between that. So your traditional answer hangs the forty forty

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 2>two to forty three degrees, We go to the face

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 2>balance potter that's at zero, and then we have the

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 2>answer thirty. The reason why we call an answer thirty

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 2>it is because it hangs at thirty degrees.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So if we look.

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 2>At this from a rotation standpoint, and if we're identifying like, okay,

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 2>five point five degrees six degrees of rotation in iping,

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 2>is an answer style putter three point five is to

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.720
<v Speaker 2>cut off for that straight stroke? What about those players

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 2>that sit around four degrees of rotation three point seven

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 2>degrees of rotation? Where do those players fit in? What

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 2>type of putter can we provide to them? And that's

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 2>where the answer thirty came in is because we had

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that gap and we wanted to fill that gap.

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I mean, is that where most models come from,

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Alex the idea of filling a gap because you know, Marty,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 4>Marty's building new drivers. Mary's Marty's leaning into the technology

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 4>to come up with the latest and greatest that's going

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 4>to go a lot, little bit longer, a little bit

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 4>straighter for the player, and he's going to kind of

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 4>test those numbers and test those limits. How does it

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 4>go in terms of introducing new putters. Is it just

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 4>simply we don't have a putter model for this space

0:37:58.160 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 4>and we need one.

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, and yeah absolutely. So with that we had

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 2>a gap there, we needed to fill that gap.

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>We filled that gap.

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Another way that we figure out if we need new models,

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 2>if we need to maybe tweak this model here and there.

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 2>It's just working with our tour players. They're very, very

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 2>valuable to us and what they want to see. Where

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 2>we can go from a design perspective, what gaps need

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to be filled, Like if we have this player. Let's

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 2>take camp Champ for instance, and he's one of the

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 2>reasons why we made the answer thirty putter is because

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 2>he's not in the straight stroke, but he's not full

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 2>slide arc. He has some rotation in his stroke, but

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 2>he kind of floats in between those two. So we

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 2>needed to fill that gap. That's why we created the

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 2>answer thirty. And we get a lot of feedback from

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 2>our tour players what they want to see. The answer

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 2>too deep utter is a fine example or a good

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 2>example of that. We worked with Tony fenw on that putter.

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 2>That putter was designed for him. We made it our

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>goal to design a putter that looked good to his

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>eye but also performed how a tour level putter should perform.

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 2>So we worked hand in hand with Tony to design

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 2>to answer two D. Same thing with Victor Hoblin and

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 2>the DS seventy two putter. That putter was designed for him.

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 2>He worked with our team. He worked with Tony Serrano

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to design this putter. So a lot of it starts

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 2>from the tour level, where we get the feedback from

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the guys out on tour, the tour pros out on tour,

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and then it just kind of filters down from there.

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I remember playing with Victor when he first got that putter.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 3>I got paired with him at the Phoenix Open and

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 3>that putter was brand new. It was like everything's fresh.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 3>The milling right in the middle, Alex is the same

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 3>model he uses now. It was before it really putina

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and got some little dings on him, But that putter's

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 3>served him pretty well, especially a year ago here in

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 3>the in the FedEx Cup, Alex. Let's let's talk a

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit about alternative style putting. Right, We're seeing more

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 3>folks putting with what I like to call mid length

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 3>you know Victor, Yeah, Victor was doing that, you know

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 3>five years ago, four or five years ago now putting

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of mid length style where they grip down on

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 3>the putter. You know, are you seeing folks dabbling with

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 3>armlock a little bit more? Not so much. How about

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 3>folks doing long putters. We're seeing some younger, younger generation

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 3>dabbling in the long putter space. What are you see

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>in amongst the alternative style putting techniques and you know,

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 3>what are some of those typical builds like for an

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 3>armlock or a midlength putter.

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we.

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 2>See a lot of people interested in the mid length putters.

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 2>They're very popular, they're very trendy right now. We have

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 2>quite a few pros that have come through that have

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 2>wanted to dabble with them, have wanted to test them out.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 2>At the top of my head, Seamous Power came through

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 2>earlier this year. We had built him a mid length

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 2>putter and we looked at data with it. Data looked awesome,

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 2>really really good, super super consistent with it. So these

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 2>middlength putters are just providing a lot of stability for

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 2>players who are maybe struggling a little bit with traditional

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 2>putters or they just want to try something completely new.

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And we see a lot of that right now.

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 2>To where they're trying the mid length and usually from

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 2>a typical mid length build, I'm asking that player what

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>they're typically playing from their traditional putter. So let's take Victor,

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 2>for instance, is Victor Hoblin's putter is thirty six inches

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and length he chokes down to thirty four inches. Usually

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of these mid length putters, we like

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to see about two inches to three inches above where

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 2>they're gripping the putter, and that's just to provide the

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 2>additional stability. And we've had some players test out some

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 2>long putters. You know, Marty is big advocate for the

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 2>long putter here, so of course we have to build

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 2>some long putters for our tour pros as well who

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 2>are wanting to test these out. Long putters have been

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 2>around for a long long time and they really haven't

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 2>gone anywhere, but they're starting to have a little bit

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 2>of a reassurgence now and it's exciting to see just

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:33.720
<v Speaker 2>because it's another alternative to potentially help make a player better,

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 2>help them make more putts. Armlock putters, we see some

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 2>armlock putters as well. I would say that the midd

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 2>length putters are more on trend than the armlock putters

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 2>right now, but armlock putters are still a thing, so

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 2>we're still fitting some armlock putters for some of the

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:53.800
<v Speaker 2>players that are coming through.

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Here's the question, Yeah on armlock. On armlock, Shane is

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 3>what's a typical loft you fit a player to an armlock,

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, on average.

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So first thing we look at with armmock is going

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 2>to be the amount of shaft line the player applies

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 2>with armmock. It's anchored into their if there right in

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a player into their left arm. So usually they apply

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 2>a fair amount of ford shaft lin and kind of

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 2>that target loft on that five and a half six

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 2>degrees range is usually where we're targeting, assuming that they

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 2>have a fair amount of a fore shaft line with

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the armmrock style.

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Putter, Alex, what are you rocking? I mean you're the

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 4>you're the putter guy. You know you got the collection.

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 4>What is the what's the gamer look like right now?

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 4>How have you customized it?

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 2>So I don't have a ton of rotation in my stroke,

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 2>more of that straight back, straight through type of stroke.

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 4>So so you're telling us, thank you, that's what.

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 3>You're good. You're good at it.

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, impact tangle looks pretty. I've gravitated towards the Oslo putter.

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I've tried some other putters, some other face balanced style

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 2>or just a touch of toe hang style putters. I

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 2>play a double bind and the Oslo is the bread

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 2>and butter for me. I've built up a few other putters,

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I've tested a couple other putters, and I just always

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 2>go back to this Oslo putter. It's available in pel

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 2>D milled, it's available in PLD milled plus, it's something

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 2>that's available in PLD custom and you can do all

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 2>the different hozzle options with the OSLO head. One thing

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I like about the Oslo is it just sits super flat.

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 2>It sits super square. It doesn't open, it doesn't close.

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 2>With some mallets. You might see that from time to time,

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 2>but this Oslo just sits so square on the ground

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's inspires so much confidence.

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean the PLD program, I mean we talked off

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 4>the top. It's not been around that long. I mean,

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 4>these putters are unbelievable. They look like pieces of art.

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 4>They're exciting to get. I mentioned my buddy Mike Havin

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 4>one my buddy Andrew, I know, was messing around with

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Marty's putter a few months ago and he got himself

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 4>a new PLD and he's been rolling it as good

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 4>as he's ever rolled it. I mean, this is so

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 4>cool to see being such a part of the Pink

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 4>family because again having that final piece, I mean, great wedges,

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 4>great iron players, I mean, ping has been a great

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 4>putter company for so long, but having that next level

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 4>of putter just feels like it pops the bag a

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 4>little bit. And I get so excited, Marty when I

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 4>see PLD putters in players bags because you know they've

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 4>gone through the process to perfect that part of their bag.

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's been fun for me, Shane to see. I mean,

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 3>one thing we haven't talked about a lot is how

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 3>popular PLD has been with our college golfers, our college teams.

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 3>I go to the Mini Tour now, I play in

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the Arizona Open. A few weeks ago. I saw tons

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 3>of PLDs on the putting green, which was really fun

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 3>with our good tournament tournament players. I played with Nico Galletti,

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 3>who's on the your DP World Tour this year, at

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 3>a sweet PLD putter. So it's been fun. But but

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 3>what I love is being again being able to pass

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 3>that level of customization service to the everyday golfer as well.

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.840
<v Speaker 3>And I also love that we're not just only doing

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the customization piece, which which is awesome. You want that

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 3>emotional connection with your putter. Putting is where you're the

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 3>most vulnerable and fragile as a golfer. I aintally so

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 3>having having your your your kids initials, there's something personal

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 3>on the putter is comforting. But we are embracing and

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 3>leaning into that. Every one of our PLDs is custom fit.

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 3>Our pod custom is custom fit. Whether you come here

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 3>or we send you the iPod, we get that data

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:51.720
<v Speaker 3>and we're throwing our full suite of putter fitting science

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 3>at it. That's what I'm super excited about is to

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 3>know that everybody who has a pod custom has literally

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 3>been through you know, and iping fitting, gotten all that

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 3>data to inform him and working with our talented fitters

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:06.879
<v Speaker 3>like Alex and Colton in our team here.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.399
<v Speaker 4>Alex, It's been a great conversation, great chat with you.

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 4>As I said, I was super excited about this because

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.359
<v Speaker 4>I remember getting my first PLD when they first came

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 4>out and taking it back because I wanted a little

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 4>softer and we were adding grooves at the time. And

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 4>to kind of fast forward to the PLD I use now,

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:23.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean I can't.

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 3>It will not leave the bag.

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 4>It is my favorite club in the bag and it

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 4>remains my favorite club in the bag. And my son

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 4>just convinced me to put a Hulk grip on it

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 4>because he got a Spider Man grip on his, So

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 4>it's a slightly different look than what I'm used to

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.280
<v Speaker 4>having right now, I don't know how long it's gonna stay,

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 4>but the putter still remains as beautiful as ever, So Alex,

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 4>we appreciate the time.

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Party.

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Always great to chat with you. Excited to see you soon.

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Make sure you check out that YouTube battle we had.

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 4>It's on the Ping YouTube page if you haven't watched

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 4>it yet. Definitely worth your time. This is the Ping

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:55.280
<v Speaker 4>prooven Grounds podcast