WEBVTT - Examining Labor, Retail, And Renewable Energy Markets

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. My question is where

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>do we go with these markets in I'm gonna spend

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the next you know, some of the next few days

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of you know, getting some free time to maybe read

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>some of those forecasts for an outlooks for Let's check

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in with a professional here, Marked Oubting, Chief Investment Officer,

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Blue Bay Asset Management. Mark, thanks so much for joining

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>us here. Heck of a one, we've still got another

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>month or so ago, but just looking at the equity

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 1>induicries for example, another just stellar year of performance from

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a risk asset perspective. How are you envisioning two at

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this point? Yeah, so it's it's certainly been a strong

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>use for risk assets in one, following on from a

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>very good I guess the concern that I would have

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as we look forward into two is that one of

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the big factors that's been pushing markets up, of course,

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>has been the liquidity coming from global central banks, and

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>with policy now starting to turn, with the FED tapering,

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>with the FED likely to to raise rates, we think

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times in two. We do think it's

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be a much more challenging landscape next year.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of beta returns, a much more subdue

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>market we think in UM and potentially one which is

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a bit more volatile as well as

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>central banks step back, expect to see a bit more

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>volatility and markets. And you mentioned, of course that the

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>risks here is that a lot of the valuations of

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>liquidity driven and we have issues about margins and COVID perhaps,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>but maybe the bullish case, just to be devil's advocate, perhaps,

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is that saying that yeah, there might be peat growth,

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that it's doesn't mean low growth,

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>does it. They're not necessarily the same things, that's correct,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And look, exty markets do love to climb a wall

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of worry, so um, I guess many people have tried

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to to write stocks off before uh and I do

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think we live in a financial sort of landscape where

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>there is inflation in the presence of inflation, it's it's

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult to own cash, it's difficult to own a lot

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of sort of high quality fixed income. So as a

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>allocators haven't got too many places to go. And of

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>course equities do have the protection of the fact that

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings will grow in line with prices, and so from

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that point of view, I still think we're looking at

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>healthy earnings growth in a context of two. And from

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a growth standpoint, I think we can look forward to

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>soon continued recovery of the global economy as we move

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>away from the pandemic. All of these are obviously plus factors.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess the one thing that you would say is

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that the wind which has been blowing on your back

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of given you a boost in terms of

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>liquidity and policies or is now starting to turn, and

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>that that children starting to blow into our faces as

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we moved into two and Mark, you mentioned earnings, and

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know you've just come through a stellar third quarter

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>earnings period, and you know, I guess the question is

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>was it enough? And are the profit outlooks enough to

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>allay valuation concerns that I think a lot of investors

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>do have. Yeah, well, it really was a very good

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>scenes and and we we don't think we're done with

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>good news in terms of earnings. I think the one

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that you would look at, maybe as an equity investor,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is that you're you're looking at long dated bond fules

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>as effectively equities are long duration assets. You're you're discounting

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>cash flows over many years, given the very elevated levels

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of PE. And in that context, if you do see

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a move up in long dated bond yelds, that could

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>be the one thing which could strain those valuations to

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a greater extent. Perhaps could also pumpt a bit of

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a rotation maybe away from growth towards value. Perhaps, So

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>there may be some interesting thematics, but I do think

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that the equity markets will probably take quite a lot

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of their queue not just from what the FED is doing,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but rather than what the long end of the bond

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>market is doing. Yeah, and I think that's interesting because yeah,

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks are expensive when you look at them, perhaps on

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the PE ratios, but then when you compare them to

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>bonds they look a little bit cheaper. So it is

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a confusing time for asset allocators. And in this confusing time,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>how do you allocate Ino, Well, I think, per my

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>my earlier comments, I'll tell you with a degree of caution,

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there has been a time where it wanted

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to be uh sort of position inquired a bullish fashion

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the past eighteen months. I think

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a smart time now to take some risk off,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to take able to to honker down a bit and

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>actually be prepared to buy dips if you do see

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>dips occur in the months ahead, if you buy the

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>thesis that there's going to be volatility, I think maybe

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're you're happy to try and sort of

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>pick your moments to try and sort of add risk,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but otherwise act with a degree of caution. But I

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>guess the one thing that you say about the high

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>quality fixed income is that once upon a time we

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>used to talk about the risk free asset. Well, that

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>risk free asset now looks like more of a return

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>free risk given that rates of a nothing and obviously

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>yields are well below what we see on inflation. So

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in many respects, I think it's hard to be underweight

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks and overweight fixed income. You probably want to remain

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>overweight stocks, but I would perhaps be sort of rotating

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>towards more cautious names, more defensives, more and more valuation players.

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, European banks I think are really cheap and

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>could do pretty well in a rising rate environment. So

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>there will be areas of the market that you say, yes,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>these are ones that we gotta like, but otherwise I

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think more of the cautious stance in twenty two. All right, Mark,

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate getting your thoughts,

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>your perspective on these markets. Marked doubting, Chief investment officer

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.679
<v Speaker 1>for Blue Bay Asset Management, getting a little bit cautious

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>but still constructive and overweight on equities. Okay, you. We

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>had some retailers this morning, Gap and North from disappointing results.

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>They called out supply chain issues and that kind of

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>raises an issue for holiday spending going forward. If in

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>fact I go to a mall, and that is a

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>huge if will there be stuff on the shelf. Let's

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>check in with Elizabeth Ebert see I O advisory partner

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>for CpG Retail and Logistics for Infosis Consulting Influsis is

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>a huge company nine billion dollar market cap to stocks

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>up year to date. So these folks kind of have

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>their finger on the pulse here, Lizaba, thanks so much

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here talk to us about kind of

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>white you're seeing from your retail clients as they try

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to navigate this really unprecedented disruption in the global supply chain. Absolutely,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and and thank you very much for that introduction. After

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, everyone was hoping that this year's Christmas season

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to be, UM, a lot more predictable, we

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to be past covid UH. There was going

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot more certainty and transparency into what

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the season was going to look like. And unfortunately, UM,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely not that. So there's been a convergence really

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of of covid UH. You have to remember, and I

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>think someone just said under the hood. Under the hood

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of what supply chain problems include are are very much

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the workforce issues, and supply chain does not have many

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for working from home, so those roles are being filled.

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Even with this morning's great employment numbers, the supply chain

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>roles are being filled very slowly, and that's very much

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>affecting what we see with retail and retailers are having

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay more UM and the retail experience, what customers

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to see in the stores is going to

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be a bit more fraught. There's going to be more

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>challenges in and getting any associate help, There's going to

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>be inventory gaps, so there's there's really more headaches than

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>opposed to what we're hoping for at the end of

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>last year. UM. The other thing I'd like to point

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>out is that retailers stock and plan based on prior

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>year's performance. So last year was an unusual year, and

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to plan over last year's performance and those trends and

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have this year be completely off the rails in terms

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of expectations. Some of those demand forecasting models are simply

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>broken again, and so there's just a huge amount of

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty and that's going to be reflected really in the

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>customer experience through the holiday season. And of course it's

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday coming up and blee Back intelligence saying that

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are expecting robust holiday sales despite a lot of these

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues that we have a lot of items

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are on the shelves if you go and see tailers

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be prepared. But there are a few special

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>discounts and office this year, uh, and those don't seem

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to be quite as eye catching. Is this all down

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to the supply chain? Absolutely? And I think what is

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the primary motivation with retailers and those promotions and um

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you may have noticed I certainly have in in my

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>email is uh, Black Friday has seemed to be every

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Friday for the past couple of weeks. Cyber Monday just

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>seems to be Monday. Um. But my sense of it

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is is that retailers are simply trying to lock in

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the sales as quickly as possible because as you think

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about that supply chain with all of the different links,

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>those links are going to go right out to FedEx

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>and ups and those deliveries. Uh. Today there's announcements about

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.239
<v Speaker 1>shipping deadlines on December fifteenth for normal, non expedited shipments.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think the the strategic objective with the retailers

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is to move product as quickly as possible and then

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>if things managed to work out, as we're starting to

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>see some of the supply chain issues in the poor workout,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that hopefully that help the enthusiastic US consumer just keeps

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on buying right through the holiday. Let's overall, what do

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you what are your clients telling you about what they

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>expect here? For retail sales during this holiday period this year.

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're feeling very positive and very robust.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They recognize that there's going to be some complexities with

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the inventory management issues. Um what they've done is adapt

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>by maintaining more inventory and their distribution centers versus pushing

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>it out to stores, and that's going to push more

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>e commerce volumes or as a customer is in the

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>store than being to order from the store and ship

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>from from a warehouse. Um. So they're they're expecting robust sales.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Certainly they're expecting, um uh, the the inflation numbers to

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to drive up the total sales numbers just simply because

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>things are a bit more expensive. But they are feeling

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the ability to lighten up on the promotions and even

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>raise prices and still capture those sales. Elizabeth, thank you

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Really appreciate getting your broad

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>perspective of retail sales as we head into this all

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>important holiday shopping season. Elizabeth Ebert, c I, O advisory

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>partner for CpG Retail and Logistics at Infosis Consulting. This

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth was mentioning her clients expecting very strong retail sales

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that we're seeing from the likes of the

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Gap and the Nordstrom is to actually have stuff on

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the shelf to meet that demand. President Biden this week

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>tapped the US oil reserves to try to bring down

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the cost of energy, particularly gas at the pump. What

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>was interesting to a lot of people was, Hey, it

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen very often, and b there was some coordination

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with some other countries out there suggesting that the this

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>could have a little bit more bite. But it kind

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of goes to the whole issue of managing energy. Transitioning

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to renewable energy, how is that going to play out

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in a global economy. Let's check in with Nick blitters Wike,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer and founder of UGE International. UG distributes

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>renewables to address the world's energy and environmental challenges. Nick,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Where are we?

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess in this transition to renewables, it seems like

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we kind of had a little bit of a hiccup

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>here because boy, we still need the fossil fuels houses

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>playing out. Yeah, good morning. Um, Well, I think you know, globally,

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the US now is number two to China in terms

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>of solo that's being deployed. I think the stat a

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people wouldn't fully appreciated that the last couple

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of years U asked about of all the energy being

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>is told is solars. So solar is coming quick. Um,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna get pent right away, but um, but

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it definitely it's it's coming quick. Here. Um, we saw

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a COP twenty six that there's still big divisions between

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>countries in terms of meeting targets. Uh. For instance we

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>saw with India and China, and also you know there

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>was no agreement on cobb impermits and what more do

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you think needs to be done so that everybody is

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>more aligned? Yeah, it's a good question. You know, it's

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>funny you mentioned China and India, which are number one

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and number three in terms of amount of solar being

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>installed these days. So you know, I think, Um, politically,

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, the world's at a point where it's

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>having a difficult time coming together on some of these

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>big picture of policies. But you know, I think on

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the ground, what we're seeing as solar, it's projected to

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be eight percent of all new energy by the end

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of this decade, and so I'm hopeful as people start

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>to realize that this decade really does belong to renewable

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>energy UM becoming the main source of energy, Hopefully people

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>will start to realize that UM, it's it doesn't need

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to be as hard as some people maybe think, and

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we can get together and set those set those priorities.

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Is the US the leader in transitioning to renewables or not?

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Or not? UM? Well, of course the US has always

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>had a great technology advantage, in an entrepreneurship advantage, I

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>would say, UM, and so on that basis, you do

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of innovation from American companies, UM. And

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I like to think of you g as as being

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>right within that right UM. And so you know, US

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>leads the world that I would say in a number

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of aspects. Within solar UM. You know, I will say

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>though that China's installing about three times as much solar

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>as the US right now. So we do have a

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>long way to go. And in that transition period that

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about towards renewable energies, there's also that question

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of affordability for the likes of solar, for the likes

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of wind, and how we get around that given those

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>cost issues well, you say cost issues, I would I

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>would take offense to had to be honest. You know,

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time, solar has become the cheapest

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>source of energy and more and more places. Um, you know,

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the use cases are are increasing quite quickly here.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, a number of years back now,

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>residential solar became cost effective to a number of people,

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but not everyone can install solar on their rooftop. UM

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and so where we come in as we developed community

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>solar projects and in essence making it as easy for

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone to get solar energy, just just like signing up

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for Netflix and um. And so what we do is

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the installed projects and then distribute that energy to subscribers

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>within a community, which typically tends to be utility zone.

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And and our model is has been for years providing

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>cheaper energy to two people that we uh we sign

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>up Bloomberg. We actually have a partnership with Bloomberg. If

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we announced back in the summer, or Bloomberg employees can

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>sign up and save ten percent on their energy bill

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. So you know, solar and of course we're

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we're focused and the cost here has come down so

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>much over the last decade that it is cost effective

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for for many many people around the world. Now, Nick,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we've had a lot of UM fiscal stimulus. UM, We've

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>got the Build Back Better UH legislation coming through Congress

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>here give us a sense of kind of where the U. S.

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Government is in terms of supporting UH, this transition to

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy. Yeah, well, I would say that right now,

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the the benefits of the fine administration winning for our

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sector are finally kind of coming to fruition here. So

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, we had the bipartisan Infrastructure Built signed into

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>law last week that includes about seventy three billion for

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>upgrades to the electric grid, which will have some knock

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on benefits to renewable energy. But the Build Back Betteract

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>really is what focuses on the movement towards renewable energy. So,

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, for solar, it provides a ten year extension

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of the investment tax credit, something that was initially put

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in place by by by President Bush Um but but

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's something that would give us a long term certainty

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and there are some other benefits there as well. And

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we've also seen a nice switch in terms

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of UM, the US government's approach to trade UM. You know,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we've in the industry called it the solar coaster here

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years because it's been a bit

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of a target I think from different different governments in

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the US and elsewhere. But it is the last two

0:16:55.920 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks we've had three different trade uh things go through

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that have made it probably cheaper for US to import

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>import solar panels um in the next in right year

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and years to come here as well. All right, Nick,

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>very exciting, very interesting. Nick Blitterswike, chief executive officer and

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>founder of u g E International that is a publicly

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>traded company. U g E is the symbol trades in

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Canada's got a market cap about sixty million dollars uh,

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So very interesting there as they manage and distribute renewable

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>energy across the communities. And again it is a trend

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that the folks of Nick Blitzwike have believe will be

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a long term trend. This, folks, is the Conversation of

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the morning. Mark Mahaney you know him as the senior

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>managing director and head of Internet Research Forever Core I

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>s I. I consider him to be one of the

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>best most thoughtful analysts out there on Wall Street. Discover

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Internet names for you know, twenty plus years since

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this whole thing we call the Internet.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>He has also got a new book out entitled Nothing

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but Net ten Timeless stock picking Lessons from Front of

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street's top tech Analysts. Hey, Mark, thanks so much

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. To really appreciate you taking the time.

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm really fascinated to read this book as I was

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>an analyst for twenty years. I managed analysts for ten years,

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>so I can't wait to get a look at this thing.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the key lessons you learned in

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>your career picking stocks? Okay, well, thanks for the setup,

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and I very much appreciate the opportunity to talk about it.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a new book, but it's also my only book. Uh,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. It's kind of a culmination of twenty five

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>years of looking at tech stocks, and one of the

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>single simplest but most important lessons is that the fundamentals

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>really do matter. I've seen cases where stocks and fundamentals

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to be divorced near term, you know, for a couple

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of months, but a long term there's no doubt in

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>my mind that stocks follow fundamentals. So that's stronger the

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth, the larger the profit pools, the higher the

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>stock price. You find a company that can be materially

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>bigger three years down the road, and almost always its

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>stock price is going to be materially higher. So that's

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of this one most important takeaway. And then in

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of the the advice, and I try to really

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>feel through the initially of the successes and the failures

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in in the Internet space, both my own stockpics. It's

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>also just the doxyconominally well, the Amazons and the Netflix

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and the one that didn't eBay and Yahoo and uh

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and grub Hub, names like that. UM. I tried to

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>draw some lessons and at the end of it, I

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>really had people try to focus on d h ds

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>dislocated high quality companies. I tried to describe what high

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>quality companies are and when to get them when they're dislocated.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's the one thing to keep in mind from

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the book. It's that hunt for d h ds, well Mark,

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>if you look at valuations right now that they were

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>sky high, so earnings this isn't really going to need

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to keep up, So how does that play into your

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>outlook as well? Well? UM One of the lessons I

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>also learned is that they have a title called evaluation

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>is in the eye of the tech stockholder. Valuation is,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of course an important factor, but I think it actually

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>should be one of the last factors you really want

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to focus on finding high quality companies WE really that

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>really had platform potential, and then you know, when they

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>show that they've got an excellent track record or product innovation,

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that they face large slams total addressable markets. I don't

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>want to say that valuation takes care of itself, but

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and oftentimes can companies that can really scale, that can

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>maintain super premium growth called plus revenue growth for multiple

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>years from a position of scale, I think the market

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>generally ends up undervaluing those names. I think for many

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>years Netflix was undervalued, Amazon was undervalued because people weren't

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>able to appreciate just how they're how large their market

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunities were, and how well they could execute against those

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and sustain that premium growth. So that valuation is important,

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it should be the most important

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>factor when it comes to picking text stocks. Hey, Mark,

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about management, Like I always thought of

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>my career that you know, management really does matter, or

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>even if you've got a great technology. I really need

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to get in there and spend time with the management.

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about that as you kind of

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>look at companies that you're going to cover. Yeah, if

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you do, you you prefaced it perfectly. My factor is

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>actually called management matters UM and uh so it's one

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of the most important criteriaon and determine what a high

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>quality companies. I'm not sure you can get a high

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>quality company that doesn't have an excellent management. So what

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>are you looking for? You're looking for companies that are

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>long term oriented management teams that are long term oriented.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I've always had a bias for founder led companies. I

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>just think that they're able to make a decisive decisions

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in ways that professional managers just don't just don't have

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the ability, the gravitas in order to do that division.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>In order to do that, I love to see companies

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>with great vision. I think about Read Hastings and Netflix,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and I've always been struck by the fact that Read

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Hastings started Netflix, and and the name itself conjures up

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>some sort of idea of Flix or movies film coming

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>over the internet. But it was a d D by

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>mail business for the next ten years. But Read absolutely

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>new retastings. Absolutely knew that the future was in streaming,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that we just needed the infrastructure and home WiFi systems

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to be set up. But to have somebody who could

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>look out, you know that we had that kind of

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>basi in five or ten years and realize where home

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>entertainment was going. That was truly impressive. So you find

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>people like that who can kind of call correctly industry

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>pivots the new generation, the development of a new generation

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of industries. That's really impressive. It's extremely rare. But if

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you find those people, you want to stick with them.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And Mark, speaking of pivots in the industry. In the

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>future of tech, we've all been talking about meta metaverse

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>seems to be all the rage, even though it is

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially years away. Even semi stocks have been rallying on

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>just the mention of this. Uh So, is that something

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you think investors want to be thinking about getting mettos into.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I think it's going to be a Ritica.

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be more options value, you know,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for theinic several years. Uh And you know, I think

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna we're gonna be We're gonna I think it's

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>five to ten years before we really know what miniverse

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. Like, I do think when you

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>find these large tech platforms, you want them to have

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>some sort of option value. You want them to have

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>some sort of long term investment um priority. Whether it's

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>alternaty and closing Google, whether it's robotics with them it

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is not, whether it's metaverse with with Facebook. I think

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it just makes the underlying asset more valuable. I also

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think that in a way Facebook needs to invest in

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse um because if there's something, if there's something

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going to change our social networks and then they're

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>going to become what's called verse sold in they are today,

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that could create systemic risk for Facebook. So

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's mostly an offensive investment, but there's a

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of defensivelopment to uh to it. I think

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that given the amount of effort and energy and resources

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars that are going into the metaverse, I would probably

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm long the concept the winner is aren't going to

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>be determined. Cur five to tend is I think Facebooks

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in a decent position, but that it's one to mark

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what's your best idea for I like these dislocated. Um uh,

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, high quality companies. And so there's three names

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I think in megacap that are reasonably dislocated here. One

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is Uber, which I still still think it's a great

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>recovery play. There's their racturing business is still below pre

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>COVID level, So I think there's a lot of recovery

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>juice in that stock. And I think it's a high

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>quality asset. It's not Founder let go. That's the one negative.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But but I think the rest of the huge end

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>markets really compelling value proposition. I still like Amazon and

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook, I think, and I look at Amazon and Facebook,

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>both is reasonably dislocated stocks, high quality assets. When they

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>get dislocated, you should be adding or binding those Mark,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us today. I really appreciate

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you taking the time. Mark Mahaney, he's a senior managing

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>director and head of Internet Research forever Core. I s

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I he's got a book out now, is a new book.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>It is his first book. As Mark said, it is

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>entitled nothing but net ten Timeless stock picking lessons from

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>one of Wall Street's top tech animals. And again, as

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I can say, having been in this business for thirty years,

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Mark absolutely is one of the top annials out there,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>not just for tech but just in general. Very thoughtful

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in his analysis and his approach to looking at stocks

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and picking stocks. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.959
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Pet On Fall Sweeney

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.