WEBVTT - BFF 8/14 Hour 2: Frank's Favorites Continued! AFC North and MLB Best Bets

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Carrasco. He has been cleared to begin throwing to

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>live hitters this Friday. Crassco has been out a couple

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of months after being diagnosed with luke kem up for

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the Mats good news and bad news. Brandon Nimo is

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>expected to begin a minor league rehab assignment in the

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>next seven to ten days. He's been out with a

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>neck injury. The bad news Jeff McNeil is most likely

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>to hit the injured list within injured hamstring for the

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Boston Red Sox. Brodoct Hole is away from the Red

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Songs for personal reasons. He left the team on Tuesday.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>He'll not be around at all on Wednesday, but he

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>is expected to be ready for Friday night's series opener

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>back at home against the Orioles and for the New

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>York Yankee c C. Savanthia should be back in the

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>rotation on Sunday. He's been out with a knee injury

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and in the NFL. Stephen Holder of the Indianapolis Star

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>has clarified that Andrew Luck has not been diagnosed with

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the high ankle sprain. It's some confusion currently out of

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the front office in Indianapolis. On Dan Strafford and this

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>has been the Fantasy Sports or Radio Network news Update.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network for more updates.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>At the top of every hour. Ladies and gents, this

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is yeah our number two the BFFs. The Action Hour

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is live. He's Frank Stanville, that's Eric Young. I am

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susman. And because of this, I want you to

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>know I listened um on my way home from work

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday to the Greatest Showman soundtrack. I've never seen the movie.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's probably watch it. You keep talking it up. You

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>would hate it? Shout out to Chris Bavona, though, did

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>make the new intro for the second hour of the program. Here.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Why are you a fan of The Greatest Showman? Yeah?

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>A great movie. Man. Yeah, it's awesome, man, So why

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>would I hate it? You'd hate it? I just got

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>rave reviews from my two best friends forever. Why would

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I hate the movie? Do you like musicals? I don't.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what He's Greece and musical. I like.

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I saw Cats when I was younger. You know they're

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>making a movie or a show. Well, there's been a

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>show for many many years. Cats like the Broadway play

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the show. I think they're making a movie

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about it then, like a movie version of it, And

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the trailer came out recently and everyone was like up

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in arms because it looks crazy, like it looks so weird.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>They had a Showman's about the start of the Circus

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in musical form, starring Hugh Jackman and Zach Efron. I mean,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I like some Hugh Jackman. I'll check it out. I'll

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>screw both of those guys. At Everything can be good,

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>at Everything is the day? Do it for you? The

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>girl Zach everyone's girlfriend in the movie. Oh yeah, I mean,

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you're you're not in Hollywood because you're

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>difficult to look at. Yeah, you're right right she was.

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>She also played the lead in the HBO show Euphoria,

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 1>which is wrapped up Hot Take Greg one of my

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>least favorite movies, I guess obviously a musical as well

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for Johnny Depp is Sweeney Todd. I was not a fan.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Not good. I didn't like it. It also wasn't good.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Really want Going the Chocolate Factory. I never watched it.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>The Johnny Depp version of A Yeah, I didn't. I

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't watch that version very bad. Yeah, I'm pretty sure

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what I heard, and I just didn't watch it.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It's weird, man, a little too weird, and if you're

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>a fan of the original, it is hard to watch

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>correctly exactly the original. I might have those reversed, by

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, great movie. Charlie might be the Johnny Depp version. Really,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Wanta might be the Gene Wilder version. Probably that sounds correct. Actually,

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Willie Wonka is the g Wilder version. Yeah,

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's so good. Yes, you're correct. Really Wanting the Chocolate

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Factory is the o G version? Yeah, so so good.

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Frase favees Charlie really want the

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Chocolate fact one of my favorites. Yeah, we're trying to

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>find the golden ticket. Who is this year's golden ticket

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy football? Greg, Is it Curtis Samuel because I'm

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping so the one of Frank's saves, one of Frank's

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>shaves as well. It seems like it's one of everybody's

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>faves this year when it comes to the fantasy football industry.

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope you were drafting your bastball teams, you know,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for the past month or two, because the discount you

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>were getting on Curtis Samuel before does not exist anymore.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>He has now climbed into the seventh round of a DP.

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You're still getting him at a bit of a discount

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>compared to d J. Moore, who's going in the late

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth early fifth round range. But every single day we're

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>hearing more and more about Curtis Samuel. He's not just

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a gadget player. He's a legit route runner. He's getting

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>behind the defense he has. He has legitimate tools to

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>succeed in the NFL level in terms of his speed

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and his hands and his route running. And last year,

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>once he took over as a starting wide receiver alongside

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore, he actually outperformed DJ Moore from a

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective. He was the wide receiver nineteen over the

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>final I believe its eight weeks or so when he

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>became one of these starting wide receivers. North Turner did

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal job with this Panthers offense a year ago.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>By all intents and purposes, everything we've heard about Cam

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Newton's shoulder, and he had off season shoulder surgery. He's

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>looked good in camp. He's gonna be good. To go

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for the regular season. All of these reasons, Greggy, I

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>have Curtis Samuel inside my top thirty five wide receivers.

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I keep moving them up. Just moved them up again today.

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I just I want to get as much exposure to

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel, and really this Panthers offense, I think that

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do a great job. I moved Curtis

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Samuel up to wide receiver thirty one today, Greg, Curtis

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Samuel for me, it checks in at numbers Samuel in

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>here seven, still the thirty seven You Why where do

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you have Curtis Samuel this season? Well, I'm not gonna

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>count because that's boring having me stare at my I

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>my iPad. It only gives me my overall ranks. So

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got him at eighty two overall, So I'm figuring

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that's probably somewhere in between forty and forty five wide

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver wise. Um and and I am am moving him

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>up because of the drum beats coming out of camp. Uh.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>He seems to be a favorite for all the writers there.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>This is this is the guy d J. Moore I

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>still believe is the number one. But Curtis Samuel could

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>could be a sneaky guy, but he just keeps going

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up and up and up, and at some point he's

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>going to become too high. I mean, like the the

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>hype is going to to make him not valuable enough

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>because I just don't believe there's going to be a

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ton of throws to go around greg Olsen being there,

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore, McCaffrey is a patch pass catching maniac.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>At some point, someone's gonna production is gonna fall off,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think out of those guys, I'm gonna say

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Samuel. You are the d J Moore guy. No, No,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>he was in Maryland. He was in Maryland's by like

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>d J Moore. But like, I'm not sitting here and

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't humped up d J Moore this this season.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I just meant from a Maryland perspective. Apologies, same Alma mater.

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Would it surprise you if Curtis Samuel outperform DJ More

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this year? Wouldn't surprise me either, And you're getting him

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in a two round discount. He talks about that yesterday,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like how how much we're hearing now this summer el

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that possibility and you're still getting a two round discount.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm look, I'm buying in. I hear what you're saying. Why,

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Like there are a lot of mouths to feed in

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this offense. Like it wouldn't surprise me, honestly if Greg

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Olsen just completely fell by the wayside, or you know,

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>if Christian McCaffrey's targets, share or receptions came down a

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit because they are talking about using him a

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit less this season. But you know, look, there's

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not really a third wide receiver to speak of. There's

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>no Chris Hogan. Uh So for me personally, I think

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we see Christian McCaffrey's receiving come back a little bit.

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>He's still going to be awesome. He led all running

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>backs and targets and receptions a year ago, you know,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred receptions from a running backs, just completely ridiculous.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So those two things, combined, the usage of McCaffrey coming

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit and Greg Olsen really being phased out,

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's probably going to be enough to produce,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, two top thirty wide receivers with both Curtis

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Samuel and d J. Moore, albeit might come with some inconsistency.

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg yeah, absolutely, week to week, I don't think we're

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>going to know who's going to leave this team and

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe be very frustrating to fantasy owners, but they want

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to get you know, a guy like her to Samuel

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for that position, not position flexibility, but because what he

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>could do everywhere on the field, whether it's out of

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the backfield or split wide or in the slot. Uh.

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>People are into Carolina in general, liking these weapons with

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>c Mac I've been you know, Cam Newton, d J. Moore,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg Olsen, even we heard from Davis Maddock today and

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel. People like Carolina this year freaky and rightfully.

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So look, it just goes back to the job that

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>North Turner did. He did a phenomenal job last season.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely right, We take a break here when we return,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>or phrase fades stick around. Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast,

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and remember if you want to listen live, download the

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, download the tune and app and

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>just search for Fantasy Sports or Radio network and you

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>could listen to this program live. Also, if you want

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to watch the video of this podcast, check us out

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, all on Twitch, or on Periscope and type

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in you guess it Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find us there.

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. The BFFs is

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>live here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network, of course,

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>all under the Sports Grid umbrella. Why man, I got

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>us an email after this friend? Wasn't an email at

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the best memory, so I'll try. No guarantees.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I just remember that I set something up

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and I didn't email everybody to tell them of

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a new policy, a new policy here at the network.

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you can you tell us about it on the

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>air or sure? Yeah? So for those watching on YouTube,

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we here we have our college shirts on looking spiffy. Yeah,

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So for those on on on YouTube, it's great. This

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy the BFFs. The Fantasy program will be airing

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Network YouTube page. But for all

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of our gambling content, we have a Sports Grade YouTube page.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to start airing that stuff on both

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for the time being, I want to make sure that

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we are doing so okay, So make sure that everyone

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is subscribing to both the Fantasy Sports Network and the

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade YouTube. My job is make sure that the

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>shows themselves are are on both places. Well. I will

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have you know this, Greg, I do not have the

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>log into the sports Grade YouTube account right, but I

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have noticed on our restream where we set up all

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of our streams, the sports Grade YouTube has been activated

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for the past couple of days. I did that, so

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, the shows are streaming there

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are are we are we are we checking it? Are

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we are? We It's good, it's it's it's right now

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we're airing there, so we probably shouldn't be because they're fantasy. Okay,

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that's why I found a no tapp Okay, yeah, well

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>that's fair because I didn't know about it. So now

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>we just talked it out live on the air, and

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I hope people understand there's some more your favorite guys.

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But uh, this should come as no surprise. Um, but

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>he has. It's a man with God in his name.

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>How can you not love him? Chris god That is correct. Look,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody loves Chris Godwin and Curtis Samuel, I get it.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to keep moving him up my rankings, Honestly, Greg,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost at that point. I might move him ahead

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Los Angeles Rams receivers. I might just move

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>him ahead of all of them. As we talked about

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>with Curtis Samuel Versus d J. Moore. I understand how

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>talented Mike Evans is. And this might sound completely insane,

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but I heard someone else brought it up on Twitter.

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>How do we know that Chris Godwin can't outperform Mike

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Evans this year? So I know that it's crazy, but

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy he's not as good. I don't know that

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>that's true, man, I really don't know that that's true.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I look everything that I've seen from this kid, everything

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that I'm watching. I think that he has all the

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>talent in the world, and you look at his usage talent.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Coupled with the situation with the Tampa bay Bucks, Bruce Arians,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>his passing attack, vertical passing attack, their defense still not

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>being good, and they're gonna be playing from behind. They're

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going the past. Volume is going to be there for

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa bay Bucks this upcoming season. I know people

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hear it. The Mike Evans truthers. I'm

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a Mike Evans truther d. I drafted Mike Evans his

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>first year when he was a rookie, and I drafted

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>him every year after that. I love the player. I

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>would gladly take Mike Evans in the second round as well.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna do that. Why would I do that

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>when I could kill Chris Godwin at least around later,

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe two rounds later. I'll take the discount and Chris Godwin.

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm just saying, I don't think that it's crazy.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's within his range of outcomes. Greg, that

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, both guys being healthy, outperforms Mike Evans this year.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm just sipping the kool ai

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>too much, but the talent and coupled with the situation

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa Bay, I just I keep moving him on

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>my rankings. I can't get enough of it. Man. I

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna have a breakout here. I think he's

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be amazing. I think Chris Gogan's gonna be awesome. Greg,

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>do you feel the same way you were? I like

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, But the thing the reality is is like

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the hype has gotten gotten completely out of control. Mike

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Evans is the number one there. Yes, they're going to

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball whole bunch. The defense is going to

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be absolutely terrible. Be where you have to get Chris Godwin.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I don't know if he can produce

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to that level with the other guys going around him.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I like Chris Godwin, I want him on my team,

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but and I don't know it just and he just

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>his ADPD just keeps going up and up and up.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It's getting to the point where it's kind of terrifying.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I always bring up the stats and I've never owned

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans never. I'm sorry, it's pretty fun to own

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans never. Never. There was one year, maybe two

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago where he had a down season, only scored

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns. But even last year but quite a fifteen

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard season. You'll ever see ye never owned him.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You should tie and get some Mike Evans this year.

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>He is awesome, But so is Chris Godwin. I bring

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the stat up a lot. I'll remind you guys once again.

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin lead books receivers all of their players last

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>year in red zone targets with six team despite only

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>playing six the four percent of the snaps, So now

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to imagine that number goes up over of

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the snaps. Bruce arians is talking about using Chris Godwin

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>both in the slot and on the outside. There's a

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>lot to like there, Greg. And the thing is, look,

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to take him ahead of Mike Evans.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying it's within his range of possibilities, range

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of outcomes. You can still get Chris Godwin in that

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth round range of just saying, try your best to

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>get Chris Godwin on your team. He's going to be amazing. Greg,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin, go at. You convinced me because of your

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>love for him, drank him above Kenny Golladay, As I said,

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>one spot. Because Godwin now sneaks in at number seventeen

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>overall rank, is that someone we can target at four

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>two in GSC three. I deal Robert Wood ahead of

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be great. Come on, Greg, let's do We

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>gotta swing for the fences. We gotta go for the upside.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably the problem not being there. I would have this

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>little birdie in the back of my head the entire time.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Like when I was nearing one shoulder

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Floria one shoulder Frank Staffle Mike's icon on the draft,

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought, I think so, I mean, you guys, can

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know face time or whatever call whatever it was?

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Set up the air pod something, I get the air

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>pod work. There you go. I think you should probably

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. You know, have Mike in the loop, you

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>should be in constant communications with more than that. I'm

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>just saying, Look, if I'm not going to be constantly

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in the loop, then somebody should be around there, I

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>mean outside of you. But if I wasn't, we're a

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>three man team. I wasn't there, and you were there.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Floria was there by himself at least call Y. Would

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you say that? Would you say that I need to

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the loup the Florida was there by himself.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course I would say that. Huh. Well, I mean, look,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you're paying for a third of the team. I mean

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you should have some input. I I should agree exactly. So,

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I look, this is a democracy. I paid for a

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>third of team Baseball. It's not my fault that you

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>had a team a draft going on the same day,

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>same time. It's not my fault. That's why the team

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is so good. In fact, the draft guys I hate,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it teams so good. All right, let's

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>move over to the tight end. I was gonna talk

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>about O. J. Howard. I'm honestly, I'm just tired of

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Tampa Bay Bucks, so I'm gonna move

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on to the I'm sure you gotta over man. No,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, I don't actually like the Bucks team.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Just like their offense, I still think that their defense

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be questionable. So I don't love the

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the total there wind total when it comes to the

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Bucks. Because they play in a really tough division.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>They still have to face the Falcon twice. They gotta

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>face the Saints twice and the Panthers twice. It's a

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>really tough division to be in for the Tampa Bay Bucks.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I love o Ja Howard. You guys have

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>heard me talk about him before. I'll give you a

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>late round tight end that you know if you miss

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>out on the top six guys, if you miss out

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>on Jared Cook and Vance McDonald. Vance McDonald another one

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that I do like a lot this season. Reggy, take

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>your headphones off and hold your ears. You're not gonna

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>want to hear this one. Jordan Read is my tight

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>end twelve in the rankings. Right now, We've talked about

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Trey Quinn, You've talked about Josh Doxon. I think there's

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance that Jordan Read actually leads the Washington football

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>team in targets and receiving this upcoming season. It's the

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>first off season where he's been completely healthy. He's part

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of training camp. Uh, you know, Gruden knows, Jay Gruden

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>knows what he has in Jordan Reid. I still think

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that we can. There was times last year where we

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>were starting him, Greg, where we were streaming him and

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>he was actually a good player for PPR leagues. And

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, what was it two years ago

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>when case Keenum was with the Vikings. That was when

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>kyr Roff had one of his best seasons. So I'll

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>just throw the name out there. Look, it's really once

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you get past those top seven or eight tight ends,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you're really just throwing darts anyway. So between guys like

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Eric E. Brown and David and Joku and Austin Hooper

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and Delaney Walker and Greg Olsen and you know a

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of these other old tight ends, Jordan Reid is

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>coming off one of his healthiest off seasons Greg, and

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I still think that, you know, if you pair him

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with an Olsen, if you miss out on all those

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>other tight ends, you can do a lot worse. I

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a strategy that you can actually go

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>with if you miss out on those top eighty, if

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you miss out on the top eight, Greg, who are

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you targeting? It's a really really good question. Is a

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>lot like missing out the top eight kind of justined

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Gleanny Walker? Kind of justined Gleanny Walker. Yeah, but just

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>we continue to poo poo that Titans Passitan. Now you

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>want to Leny Walker, he's always good. We we we

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>as in we in the room, not not so e y.

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Who are some tight ends that you're targeting if you

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>miss out on the top eight or ten or so.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I like the call of Jordan Reed. I've got him

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>quite a ways up there, the stuff out of campus

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>saying that he's looking amazing, better than he's looking in

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two or three years. Um. Mark Andrews is

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I love and a guy that I

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>really think that he failed some people last year and

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>will be drafted very low. Is Trey Burton. Um. I

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>believe in his talent. I believe that he could be

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a top ten tight end. Uh and where he's going,

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a steal. Other big news, Ryan Kendrick will join

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>us for the talk there we go, Ryan on the

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>show Friday. I appreciate the time man. All right, boys,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>from the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rohodo dot Com

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is the place to win millions in daily Fantasy. You

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season long

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for a price of one, or dominate the entire Daily

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports realm. Put the Elite package at month. If

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you use the promo code f n T s Y,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Rodo dot Com, pick your NFL or Elite package,

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n T s Y, and you'll

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Just to prue that we're still learning, there was somebody

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of before. You shouldn't you shouldn't admit

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to this, Greig. Why can't it be honest? Head? Go ahead,

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a shoul be honest with the audience. Go ahead. I

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't know of somebody who the hell is this is?

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>You got this? Okay? And I found out about Alexander Mattinson.

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Like there's no end in his name outside of the

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>end as the last letter of Madison. Madison. Yes, like

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Madison Avenue, not Mattinson. Alexander is the backup to Dalvin

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Cook in Minnesota, and they're talking about him filling the

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Ottavius Murray role from last season. So not only is

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he a handcuff to a running back who was extremely

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>injury prone on a team that wants to run the football,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but he might actually have standalone value as well playing

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>alongside Dalvin Cook this season in that Latavius Murray role.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>He is my RB fifty and I've wrestled with moving

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>him up, But I mean the players right ahead of him,

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I really like to Justice Hill, Matt Brita, Dion Lewis,

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Damien Harris, Klein, Balage. I have some of those players

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>way higher. Okay, as Madison fits in my number sixty

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>right back, Yeah, I have him fifty, just ahead of

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson, Carlos Hide, nine Hines dude like way lowered

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Henderson. Yet, No, why would I Because he's third

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of the depth chart. I don't believe it. He's a

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>better player than Malcolm Brown. He is a better player,

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're actually talking about carving out a role for

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>him in the offense. They're not going to do that

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>with Malcolm Brown. We've seen that before, at least c J.

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Anderson when he filled in last year, he was actually productive.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Whenever we've seen Todd Gurley out and they used Malcolm Brown,

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been terrible. Darryl Henderson was the most explosive, arguably

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the most explosive running back coming out of college. This season,

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they're already talking about using him in a six to

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>eight touch role on the team. I mean, he's probably

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.479
<v Speaker 1>third on the depth chart just because he's a rookie,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>but like Dwayne Haskins is third on the depth chart

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>for Washington. Does that mean he's terrible. No, I'm just

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm not lowering Darryl Henderson. I have him as

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 1>RB thirty six, did up Darrell Henderson all the way

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to R all right, and with Ronald Jones up to

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>number thirty, when Michael Florio's favorite running back ever, Todd

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Gurley goes down, Carl Henderson is going to be a

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>top twenty running back. How petrified are you of us

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>dressing tig Girle? That is my Davanta Freeman from last year,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And remember what happening with Davonta Freeman last year? He

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>played two games that's why we lost. We we bounced back.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Though we bounced back, we made into the playoffs. Just

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of hope this is running back that comes to

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>us in the first round. There is your fine, nothing

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. We're find either way, Greg, We're good.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>We're not for you in your sake, No, what do

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you do? You really have Girly ranked ahead of Dalvin

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Cook and Nick Chubb. I have him one spot higher

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>than Dalvin Cook and Nick Ubb. Yeah, h please please

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>don't do this, guys, don't do this. Please take Dalvin

0:22:55.480 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Cook or Nick Chubb ahead of Todd Early. I can't

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do this. I'm backing out, backing out, backing out. I'm sorry.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I already paid back payment back. You cannot force me

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Look at in a dream scenario, James

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Conner makes it to us at pick ten, so that

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we are not considering it running back in round two.

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>The arguments, what if James Connord is gone, probably gonna

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>take Julio Jones, and then either Dalvin cooker Nick Chubb

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>probably won't be there, probably won't be there. There's no

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>more Duke Johnson, How can you not want Nick chob

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Todd Hay the music man, Dude, do this

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is actually physically painting me? Is this like Destiny's Child

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or something? It's pink, bro, pink. NFL preseason is here

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with another slate of games this weekend. Season long fantas

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>football drafts room full swing and on over the Roadwayfords

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you got the NFL at The three

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty five Fantasy Football package inclus the best math based

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet. Davis

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Madigroto Experts have you covered with Dynasty Season long Investball

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>four maths give you an edge regardless of what type

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of season long fantasy football match you play. Save ten

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>percent off at roto xperts dot com with a promo

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>code f n t s Y. That's percent off with

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>promo code f n T s Y. The NFL three

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty five Fantasy Football Package is available right now only

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.479
<v Speaker 1>at rotor Experts dot com. Frank Great, can you just

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>move those running backs ahead of Todd Gurley in your rankings?

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>If I didn't, you have anything to worry about? Should

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>I just continue to look up reasons why we like

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb and Dalvin Cook and Dalvin Cook, Come on, Grammy,

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Look when it comes to Dalvin cook that, you know

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to run the football under Kevin Stefanski Kirk Cousins.

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Pass attempts so down to twenty seven per game, it's

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>got to mean something, right, Greig, Right, dude, dude, Todd

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Curley only six the snatches here. You don't want to

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>get involved in that, Craig, you don't want to do that.

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>They lost their offensive lineman, they lost Roger Staffold. It's

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to be nearly as good as an offensive line.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>You can also convincedly Mike Floria, if you wanted to,

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna happen. He's already planted his flag on

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley this season. There's no talking about of it,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>no matter how foolish it is. It's all on me.

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You're the wild card here. Greg, like that, like the power.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this. I don't know when the presses

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the button, I don't know what it calls out. The

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>name I'm gonna get. I'm gonna get Florio part of

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the team so that he can press the on because

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>then he's gonna press the button for Girly too. He

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>can't press the button, but man, because I am girl. Fine,

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's an offline draft. I'm gonna no, but there's still

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be somebody in the picks. I put the sticker

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on the board. I was gonna say, I'll find WiFi

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in Poland just so I can press the button.

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>This le not let you guys draft in this league?

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do you want him? All the powers mine? All right, Well,

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll just see when Frank is right once again. If

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't, you know, have a litt knee? Should he

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>number one over all? If you didn't have a little

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>knee issue, everyone's got an issue, Frank, right, speaking of

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chub in front of me. I have some odds

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to the a f C North percentage of bets and

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the handle that's on that would like to play. Let's play.

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Have you come up with a name with this yet?

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Name for this? Let's call the the market manager? Bestly

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>got so far? Alright, we're very big on a literation today,

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Frank's favorites and marketing market manager. All right, so who

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think the favorite is to win the NFC North.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I know the answer to this. It is the Cleveland Brown,

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all right. One of the percentage of the bets coming

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in a Browns at their number of plus one thirty

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>plus one thirty. They are hyped up? So is this

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is this split four ways? Okay? So the percentage of

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the bets, i'll say, is at plus one three? This

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. It's not percentage of money percentage of tickets? Right,

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>what you're asking me? What are we doing? Oh my goodness, gracious,

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I get it, guys. Baker Mayfield, next big thing. Odell

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Beckham plays when he wants to when he doesn't have

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>a thigh injury. Sixty Craig, All right, what is the

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the money that is coming to the Browns?

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>At least I was closer, a much closer. What do

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you think is the second most money coming in and

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the highest percentage of bets? Same same team, Pittsburgh plus

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>one percentage of bets? Is I should have said thirty?

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the handle is there? I'll say

0:27:55.040 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>it's probably something similar forty one percent. Everybody betting on

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the Browns and the Steelers were putting the money on

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the combined there of the tickets. You're right, for a second,

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you're getting some good value on Baltimore. That's pretty good. Well,

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>what is there. Uh, what are their odds to win

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the division? Odds to win the division? Wait? What were

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the Browns were? Plus one thirty? Steelers plus one dealers

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy five? I'll say the Ravens are plus two fifty.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to hear all the Bengals plus one

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred higher? Bob plus two thousand, eight hundred hundred interest you,

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm kind of interested in the Ravens there, throw

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit down on that. Look if I like

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, I like like Greg Roman as the O

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>c Everarld Thomas back there with the safeties? Now why not?

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Why not? Huh? So what's the percentage? I would imagine, Well,

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>there's only fifteen percent left to work with. I'll imagine

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent is on Baltimore persent of the money or

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the bets or the percentage of bets. I'll say whatever

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was left of the what was the fifteen percent left

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the handle? The handle? So I'll say four percent

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on Baltimore, eight percent of the money's on what what

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? More money coming into the Bengals only

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>two percent of bets? Now do you agree with that?

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Man? How do you think this a f c

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>North should I like Cleveland to win the division, so

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't. I don't someone falls apart there. I think

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that the Ravenge are the best bet here. Plus he's

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. There's that about that, because you know the

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>defense is gonna keep them in games and their offense

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is Pittsburgh at plus money is great. Something's gonna go

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the Browns. I agree with you, man. Look,

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we've heard Gabe talk about this a ton on the

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>morning after too. It's Freddy Kitchen's first year head coach.

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>He's already coming out saying, O fire anyone on the

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>spot immediately who leaks information whenever he's trying to, you know,

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>put the hammer down. This our moved for Freddie Kitchens. Look, man,

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got a lot of personalities in that locker room

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to uh to manage right now, from Odell Beckham to

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield. What happens if we go through a two

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>game stretch where where O b J isn't getting the

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ball and the Browns lose a couple of games and

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield starts running in his mouth and Odell Beckham starts,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, why aren't why aren't I getting the ball?

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And he's you know, kicking nets or you know, hitting

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>nets with his helmet and Jarvis Landry, well, oh, I'm

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>used to getting targets. Why aren't I getting targets? And

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot there, man, I agree with you. I

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think something at some point goes wrong with this Cleveland

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Brown team. There's a lot of talent, no doubt in

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>my mind. Like to get Olivier Vernon as well, to

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>pair up with Miles Garrett. It's a great tandem of

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>pass rushers there. You know. I like Denzel Ward the cornerback.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>There's talent up the wazoo here for Cleveland. But I

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, man, something's gonna happen. Wind total is

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half. Are you coming in over under

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that number for Cleveland? It's a good number. I'm probably

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>slightly under. I think they're at probably eight or nine wins.

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You're the majority of bets. You're coming in over under

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that under sixty of the bet and money wise, how

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>much you bets are coming in under how much all

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the money is coming in under percent just confusing to me.

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So the same bettors who are betting the under are

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>not the ones that are betting them to win. The

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>AFC North. Yes, that's that's exaccurate. More action coming up next. Hey,

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you want

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, download

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the tune and app and just search for Fantasy Sports

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>or Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>find this there. Enjoyed the show and thanks for listening.

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Final a few minutes of the week for Frank Snaffle.

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>That's me and you're out of here, exciting me. So

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>excited is all. Last night I was super stressed out because, Hey,

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a thumb affected my basketball play for my local team here,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>local recreational basketball team, so we lost the game. I

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was very frustrated about that. My dinner situation got all

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>screwed up. I had to come home and pack, and

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>by the end of it all, Greg, I just said,

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I need tomorrow to end. I can't wait for tomorrow

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to end. It's always am It's gonna be great. Let's

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>put this in your way because I don't know what

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you have work wise after the program. But for me,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>when I'm going on vacation, especially not like one of

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>those like two day things I've been doing in Chicago,

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but like specifically like a week long, a really nice

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>vacation like you're going on. I always there's always like

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>some major hump I have to get through, you know,

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>like one major thing is going to fall before I

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>can get the hell out of here. Do you feel

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that way about today? Right now? Yeah? I still have

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to film one more white board, the final one of

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the series, and I have to edit it. So that's

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the last, the last of the last that will be

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>picked number seven. What did you do? What did you do?

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I like ten? You did ten already? It just did

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>ten earlier today, right, I gotta check I exported it.

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I still have to upload it to you today. Hold on,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>hold on one second. Reggan is gonna go check out

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the teams that I put together over there for pick ten.

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I went with an interesting strategy. Actually, no, he's just

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>going to uh, he's just gonna bring it over here.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So here you go. If we can, if we could

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>zoom out a little bit here on the ice soo,

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>or just go to the middle shide now yeah, please

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>please gonna go to there's a little bit of a

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>pre So this is so we have Ted pick in

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the draft on Sunday right as I could see. So

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>what I in here, Greg was, I went with two

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>different strategies, one that starts running back heavy RB RB

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and one that starts wide receiver heavy wide receiver. Why

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>she went Connor and Cook on the left, and then

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you found on the third round with Edmund Gallant. It's

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a good team, Frank, I don't think it a lot.

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it would take Allen Robinson that spot.

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I was pretty be fine. We'll look

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 1>at what I did on the other side, probably rather

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like Jared Cook, like did you Westbrig Shawn Watson. It's

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good team, very good, like the team I wouldn't do.

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson just said, all right, So on the other side, Carson,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you did huh Do you know that Andrew Locks not

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a football player? Yeah? M R one right that that

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>seems terrible. No, we can't. What about the wide receivers? Yeah,

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's great, but like all you're doing by

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing this and the wide receiver is great, You're little

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>during the video, Greg I reminded people that there is

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a situation going on with Andrew Luck. I said, if

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to go with Josh Jacobs instead, I don't.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Or if DeVante Freeman falls to you and then, or

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to pull a mark ingram up the board,

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>feel free to do. This is doing is solidifying. I

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>am not going reiver. That's fine. And part of the

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>white Board Series is not only to figure out what

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>to do, it's to figure out what not to do.

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what's so fun about it. That's why I like

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to pick these two different strategies up against each other.

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But as a reminder, as always for these white Board

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Series videos that I make, feel free to combine the

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>teams right, Like that's probably the best team that you

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>end up with. Like for example, if you start Julio

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Jones in the second round, you take Dalvin Cook instead

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of Todd Gurley, that would be a really good team.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>What if there's a closure and you take Nick Chubb.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I see, but I know Ronus like Nick Chubb as well.

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got picked twelve. Oh God, you really need me

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to take a running back early, please, please God, Please God,

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>let James Connor be there, please please, But Julian Edelman.

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the third round, you get behind that, Greig.

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I got a couple of more. Um, should I move

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this out of the way If you want to be seen,

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I have steels win totals, Ravens win totals, dangles win totals.

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You want to go over that you were a baseball

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's just do baseball. How are you doing in baseball?

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You know how you're doing. You just want me to

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>remind you. I want you to remind our listeners. Frank

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Greggy is a blistering three and oh on the week

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>on his best bets. I'm two and two, but we're

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>five and two combined. So if you took all of

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>our picks pretty good three and no this year, this week,

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's correct. Gig keep going, man, Yeah,

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe betting's your thing. Actually I feel pretty good about it.

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you know, just let me make the picks

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on on Sunday. You're gonna be there. You can continue

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to make the best bets here on this way, you're

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be there. I'll find a way. I'll find

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>a way. Greg, I don't want Todd Gurley man all right,

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's t girly brings sexy back. What I just wondering,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what what does that have to do with anything? All right?

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Loss as just Dodgers are still in Miami. Clayton Kershaw

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 1>is going tonight. There was switch rubber ginging out went

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>last night. Frank, Now that one is his Dodgers destroyed

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins. They covered the minus one and a half tonight.

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You can simple minus one and a a half, but it's

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>minus one sight to win the game. These minus three

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred totals eating this game. Yeah, this is a This

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>is a tough one here. Not really much you could

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>do with this Dodgers situation tonight. Clayton Kershaw very very

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fine season eleven and two two point seven seven e

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>r A. On the other side, Hernandez's two and four

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with a four point nine f e r A. The

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers are minus three hundred on the road in Marlins Park.

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 1>The total is eight. I can't touch this total because

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>while I think Clayton Kershaw is gonna perform well, it

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me if the Dodgers once again bomb Elio Hernandez.

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>What do they put up, I don't know, eight runs

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.959
<v Speaker 1>by themselves. I'm staying away from this game, Greg, I agree,

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't do this game. The numbers are just too high.

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Not interested in the total either for Seattle's Marco Gonzalez

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>against Edwin Jackson, who's back got a winning for the

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Tiger's last time out, totals ten. The blast from the past, Greg,

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that is Edwin Jackson is a nine point three five

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>yar a that is not a typo is very bad.

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Marco Gonzalez it's twelve and nine positive record, but has

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a four point to five yar a better earlier. Both

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of these offenses are bad, Greg. So you know what

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do tonight. One of my best bets is

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 1>coming from this game. We're taking the over ten runs

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>tonight with Marco Gonzalez and the Detroit Tigers, which means

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly what both of these guys are gonna throw Jims

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>tonight because last night, when I love you say Cakuchi

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and I love Matt Boyd going up against who two

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>offenses that suck, both of them get bombed because that

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is the way that baseball has been this year with

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this juice ball. So while I like the over tonight,

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it is one of my best bets over ten runs.

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure both of these pictures are gonna randomly throw gems.

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So for Steed mccaution. Uh, Santana by the way, three

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for his last thirty. He's really slowed down in the

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>second half. He has has Danny Santana now taken over

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>as the best d Dot Santana in baseball. Greg, great question.

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Danny said, Tanna's betting like three and hit another home

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>run today. He's been amazing. He has been amazing. What

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>a great fine for the Texas Rangers. Good job by them.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Woodward has actually done a pretty good job this year. Uh,

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Atlanta. Where were you use Zach Wheeler

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>were getting bombed last night? Guess what he sucked again yesterday?

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Did I not tell you that it was going to happen?

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I put out a sat right in the seat and

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>said he's going to get bombed. I put out a

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>great dad joke last night. Did you see it? No?

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, Zach Wheeler more like Zach flat tire. Greg

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 1>just threw his headphones. For those that are not here

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in studio and listening on demand, we we we got

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Zack flat tire last night. Greg, the time you tweeted

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at did you think it was a good joke or

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a dad joke? Uh, a little bit of both. I

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>thought it was like so bad it was John Sterling effect.

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I think I would have blocked you if I saw

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:24.439
<v Speaker 1>it was it was. That's fine. I mean you could

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>block me. It took you forever to follow me anyway,

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>when we worked together for like years. Well, yeah, I'm

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>very particular why I fallout. Yeah, it's not like I,

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, put out great tweets or anything. You clearly don't.

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I had a few other ones, soup, I mean, other

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people liked it. I started getting, Uh, what was the

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>response that you got to that tweet? Matt Boyd more

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like Matt boy I'd love to not take this hit

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to my ear a every start. Someone said that, and

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>then I said, I wondered, I wonder how many of

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>these we could keep coming up with Mendo, Bruce Wading,

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>not with any um any calm. It's about technical issues.

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So that was great. Uh, Brendan m keep those runs

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>off my statuet and I interest you in that Wae

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>right now we're just combining that names. Well, well that

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that was the point. He didn't combine names you.

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>At least he didn't say like flat wheel. You know,

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>come on, I gotta be some sour pus. Come on, dud.

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>He just I understand how bad it is. That's that's

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the point. It wasn't du because you thought it was

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a good joke at the time. I just said that

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it was. It has a John Sterling effect. It's so

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>bad that it's good. But Sterling has been eighty years old.

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:37.919
<v Speaker 1>You're not. It's fine. He is a grandpa did grandpa joke.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 1>But he's been the same for the past thirty years.

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't always eighty, Greg, No, he wasn't. He wasn't

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the same thirty years ago. That's not true, really was

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he not? Did not always have a home run call

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>for somebody that started with Bernie Williams and six burn

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Dady Burne. Okay, well that was I mean that was

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 1>still over twenty years ago. That was twenty three years ago.

0:41:56.000 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That was he had one, all right, And you're not

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>even being such a sour puss, Craig, Gosh, Dallas kid,

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you come up with the all right, come up with

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at the dad joke on the spot right now, Dallas

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Kaigel on the mouth for the Braves more like Houston

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Kaikl facing off against Stephen Matt's. I don't get it there,

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>le cities in Texas, Frank, Dallas and Houston are world

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 1>cities in Texas. I thought you're trying to make a

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>playoff of like he's gonna give a vintage performance from

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>when he was in Houston. I mean, that's what I

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>took away from it, because he pitched for Houston. Dallas

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Kaigel more like San Antonio Kaigel. How's that joke a

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit better? Dallas Kaiko in the Astros minus one

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty four in this game against the New York Mets,

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>who are Wow, surprise, surprise, they're slowing down because they're

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>facing good teams. Who would have thought the total in

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>this one is ten? Can I interest you in anything here, Gregg?

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the over, but that's about it. You know, you

0:42:57.760 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have any faith in Steven Mats He's pitched a

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit better, he has absolutely uh, Dallas guy, I

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>believe he's got rocked his last time out. These two

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>teams are both top ten and weighted on base average

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:09.399
<v Speaker 1>against left handed pitching, so perhaps the over ten year

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>onto something. I'm leaning the over, Okay, none of my

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>best bets are gonna come from this game. Let's move

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on to the Pirates and the Angels. I actually really

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 1>like the Pirates tonight plus one oh eight. And I'm

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not doing the grids of Archers thing. I'm not making

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>my best bet. I'm not relying on him anymore. That scum. Well,

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a little uh, you know, that's a little harsh,

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Greig when it comes to Chris Chris Archer. The Angels

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are the favorite tonight minus one with Dylan Peters on

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the mound going up against Archer. The total is in

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this matchup, and one of my best bets is coming

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>from this game. Greg, You know, I really appreciate what

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you chimed in with their I'm going the other way.

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Angels money line. Uh. The Pittsburgh Pirates are

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in baseball in terms of weighted on

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bass average against left handed pitching. I like Dylan Peters

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.439
<v Speaker 1>as a streamer of the this week, and I'm gonna

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>put my money where my mouth is. You lost Angeles

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Angels money line minus against the Poultry Pirates. One more

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>game to talk about, Frank. It's the Royals and the Cardinals.

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>The Battle of Missouri continues with the Coda Hudson taking

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on Brad What to do it with me? Tella minus

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>one of thirty of the Cardinals plus one fourteens Brad

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Keller nine a half total. Here Brad Keller has pitched

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>better as of late. I don't hate a little underdog

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>special in this one. I don't really like Dakoda Hudson.

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We knew that the fields the wheels were gonna fall

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>off at some point here when it comes to Dakoda Hudson,

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the underlying numbers said that he was pitching way over

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>his head for a long time, and we said that

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. Um. But Brad Killer has actually pitched

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. So I have interest in the

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>underdog special here Greg with the Kansas City Royals. It

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is not one of my best bet st is not

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>one of your best bets. You're sticking just with one

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 1>best bet for the night, and to have the over

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Angels Angels as one of my best bets. I

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>like the over the matters. How here's a lot you

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta make at least one best bet. I know how

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the game works, rank I created it, Um, did you

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I think so? Oh man, this is it's not easy.

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Skipped one a skip the game. It's Camels Austin, Nola.

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Total is nine. The revenge game for Cole Hamil's going

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:29.439
<v Speaker 1>back to Philly, Camels in Philly. So this is interesting. Greg.

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Remember the last time you were at Wrigley you saw

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Cole Hamil's pitching no hitter for the Phillies against the Cubs.

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Right now he's coming back to Philly as a member

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Cubs. The Cups are gonna win this game.

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>To name, I like my best bet of the night.

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over with the Cardinals and the Royals. Why,

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Over nine and a half. It was

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the only night and a half into Kota Hudson sucks.

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what my head was that. Frank, how

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>an amazing time in Poland. Man, Hopefully I'll make it back.

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.320
<v Speaker 1>We hope. We hope for Frank, for Danny, for e Y.

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Have a grade night, everybody, and I will see tomorrow.

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>We know. From the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rohodo

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com is the place to win millions in daily fantasy.

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>long for a price of one nine or dominate the

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>entire Daily Fantasy Sports Realm with the Elite package at month.

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>If you use the promo code f n t s Y,

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Rodo dot com, pick your NFL Elite package,

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.919
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n t s Y, and you'll

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire.

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So what did happen? What did happens? Here's what you

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>missed on the VFS. I will I will give myself

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>more of a chance of defending myself against you for

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>beating you up, rather than I would. Marlon Mack is

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>now my twenty five ranks running back after today? Where

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>have you moved him? Frank? I have him down at

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:57.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, just behind Mark Ingram, Derrick Henry and Chris Carson.

0:46:57.440 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So he's behind all those guys for me. He the

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>other the other two people that he were behind are

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>James White, Sony Michelle, and they also have him behind

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Coleman, my guy. And you know what I should

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>probably also do, Greg and I know you're going to

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>love this. I probably should move Sony Michelle up only

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because Damian Harris is now dealing with a hand injury,

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so he was completely healthy, he'd obviously be dominating Patriots

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>training care probably not speaking of the Patriots, and I

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>said we were to diotism um later round wide receivers.

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We haven't necesarily gotten a chance to do that. Are

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we not high enough? When to kill Harry? I mean potentially.

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I I air on the side of caution when it

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to the New England Patriots outside pass catchers. I

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>really like Edelman. I really like James White this year.

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to Nikkill Harry, I understand he

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 1>has a draft pedigree. They drafted him with the last

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>pick of the first round. But how many times have

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.399
<v Speaker 1>we seen either rookies or players from other teams come

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in and struggle to pick up the Patriots playbook right away?

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is pretty complex. I like Nikill Harry

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for Dynasty, and again, even there, I don't like him

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 1>as much as everybody else does. Because Tom Brady is

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 1>going to retire eventually. People, so you know, we do

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we what is their past game gonna look like once

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady is gone? So you have to take those

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>things into consideration when it comes to Dynasty. I like

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the player Greg But I worry about this year for

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.720
<v Speaker 1>redraft Nikkila Harry Eli. Where is he in your rankings?

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Pretty low? The negative buzz early on in training camp

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>made me slide him way way down. Like I get

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that he was drafted high um and has a good

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>draft pre pedigree, but the reality is is I mean,

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been a great outside receiver for the Patriots

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. And I know part of that

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is having Grounk and Addleman on the team. You're just

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna control the middle of the field and work your

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>way down and those guys are both red zone targets

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:45.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um. But yeah, I mean, and it seems

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's every day or every couple of days, there's

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a new buzz guy for for the Patriots. It's you know,

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it's Jacoby Myers, or it's Nikkio Harry or the attention

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to the name made up names also like mad up

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>made up names. But yeah, I don't know, pay attention

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to the name Jacoby Myers as well, someone who's been

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>flashing in camp so far, more so a slot receiver.

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:07.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the role that Julian Edelman is going to play.

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>But Jacoby Meyers scored two touchdowns in their first preseason game,

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and they have been hyping him up throughout camps, so

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy you brought his name up. E Y. He's

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>someone to pay attention to. I'm not even saying draft him,

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but just pay attention to him and see, you know,

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe he earns one of these starting jobs for the team.

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to follow all our social media at Evan

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>t s Y sports Net and at Evan t s

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio And now I'm tweeting about you, Bra,