Speaker 1: It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.
Speaker 1: Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's me Joey p
Speaker 1: Joe Piezapia, and today we're gonna take a little tour
Speaker 1: of Tory Pines. That's right, because we've got some golf
Speaker 1: to talk about today, and we've got another major right
Speaker 1: on the precipice. And there's nobody better to talk about
Speaker 1: golf with than my good friend. He's back on the show.
Speaker 1: He's made time for us, despite moving, despite figuring out
Speaker 1: his new studio. It's very difficult to be famous, but
Speaker 1: somehow he always gets by. And the us open here
Speaker 1: is going to be broken down by our goodpal, the one,
Speaker 1: the only, Pat Mayo. Pat, Welcome back to the show,
Speaker 1: my friend. How are you? How's how's the transitional studio
Speaker 1: life treating you these days?
Speaker 2: I don't like working from my house is the main
Speaker 2: thing that I figured out when you have two kids
Speaker 2: running around and my wife just thinks that now that
Speaker 2: I'm at home, that you know everything, that when I'm
Speaker 2: at the office, i'm working, And it doesn't feel that
Speaker 2: way when you work inside your house.
Speaker 1: As someone who works inside their house with two kids
Speaker 1: for their entire career. I can assure you I understand
Speaker 1: what you're talking about. Mine or older, though you still
Speaker 1: got the little guys, so a little bit of a
Speaker 1: different scenario, a lot more needy mineor kind of off
Speaker 1: on their own doing their things. But someday you'll get
Speaker 1: there someday. But yes, it's time to get to business,
Speaker 1: and you're right. Before I even do this, I just
Speaker 1: want to it's been a while since we chatted, so
Speaker 1: I just want to get your take on the Phil
Speaker 1: Micholson win of the PGA a couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 1: because that was certainly a crazy story. I don't think
Speaker 1: anybody saw coming, and I just wanted to kind of
Speaker 1: get your feel for it. Was this good for golf
Speaker 1: in that sense that you got the old standby name
Speaker 1: brand guy coming out of nowhere and winning that, or
Speaker 1: was a bad in a way because you know, we're
Speaker 1: still trying to manufacture stars at the same level of
Speaker 1: Phil Nicholson.
Speaker 2: Coming out of nowhere is never a good thing unless
Speaker 2: you're the most marketable star who's left in the game
Speaker 2: that's not named Tiger Woods. But he's not in the
Speaker 2: game right now. So because it's Phil is actually a
Speaker 2: great thing for golf. The problem is when you watch
Speaker 2: the CBS coverage, like they could have been showing like
Speaker 2: nine or ten guys who weren't necessarily going to win,
Speaker 2: but like someone like Harry Higgs, for example, one of
Speaker 2: the most could be marketable players, but no one knows
Speaker 2: who he is. He needed to finish inside the top
Speaker 2: five at the PGA Championship in order to get a
Speaker 2: secure spot in the Masters next year, a tournament which
Speaker 2: he has never played and would not qualify for unless
Speaker 2: he won a tournament or he ended up elevating himself
Speaker 2: to a certain part of the world rankings, which he
Speaker 2: just probably isn't going to do. And he did qualify
Speaker 2: for the Masters, but the broadcast didn't even touch on it.
Speaker 2: We wanted to see Phil chewing gum walking down the fairway.
Speaker 2: I get that's how they've always done it, But when
Speaker 2: we talk about creating new stars, how didn't feel like
Speaker 2: the ratings were through the roof because Phil was involved.
Speaker 2: It was like Tiger at the Masters. Tiger, Oh my god,
Speaker 2: Tiger's in the lead at the Masters. Everyone is tuning
Speaker 2: into that, and that becomes the perfect recipe in order
Speaker 2: to create these new stars, because if it's Brooks running
Speaker 2: away with it against like Brendan Grace, who was also
Speaker 2: up on the top of the leader board, like that's
Speaker 2: not a ratings drop by any means. Like people are
Speaker 2: familiar with Brooks, but no one really cares. People cared
Speaker 2: that Phil was going to win. So what the broadcast
Speaker 2: could have done was used that spotlight with all these
Speaker 2: new eyes tuning into the PGA Championship to elevate some
Speaker 2: of your guys like Patrick Kantley was making a run
Speaker 2: at it early on, just guys that were moving themselves
Speaker 2: up the leaderboard that are the future stars of the
Speaker 2: PGA Tour. They just CBS was like, screw it, we
Speaker 2: don't want to give you any pointing time. Sorry.
Speaker 1: I think that's a phenomenal point and I think it's
Speaker 1: a huge miss. By then you're absolutely right, and you know,
Speaker 1: just for fun, we'll get this out of the way.
Speaker 1: Phil's anywhere from fifty to seventy to one. Can the
Speaker 1: old man do it again? I know you're shaking your head.
Speaker 1: I'm just throwing it out there because people can ask.
Speaker 1: They're gonna ask me that question when they would do
Speaker 1: the show, ask Pat if he thinks Phil has one
Speaker 1: more in him because he's played well this year.
Speaker 2: I mean, I didn't think he had one more in
Speaker 2: him when he won last time, so I know. But
Speaker 2: the fact that he was three hundred to one to
Speaker 2: win the PGA Championship was probably an accurate reflection of
Speaker 2: his odds. The fact that he's between fifty and seventy
Speaker 2: to one, like there's real players who are between seventy
Speaker 2: and fifty to one, like Fella should be three hundred
Speaker 2: to one again.
Speaker 1: All right, well, let's get into the US Open here
Speaker 1: and some of the odds and some of the people
Speaker 1: that are clearly at the top of those odds, John Rahm, Bryson,
Speaker 1: des Chambau, Dustin Johnson, kind of usual suspects up at
Speaker 1: the top. You're getting Rom somewhere around plus ten to fifty,
Speaker 1: like over on DraftKings, Bryson des Chambeau at plus fifteen hundred,
Speaker 1: same with Dustin Johnson. There's a few other guys towards
Speaker 1: his top. Koepka's up around that area as well. So
Speaker 1: in your opinion, when you look at the top, if
Speaker 1: you wanted to go ahead and bet winners, and I
Speaker 1: know we've talked a lot about throwing different things out
Speaker 1: there and how to make money doing this. But let's
Speaker 1: start with the winners. Is there a favorite with this
Speaker 1: course in your opinion? How it plays for the style
Speaker 1: of golfer that we have here towards the top of
Speaker 1: these wagering lines.
Speaker 2: Well, it's funny when you think about all the guys
Speaker 2: and even essentially inside the top ten of the highest
Speaker 2: odds for the lowest odds players or highest odds players. Yes,
Speaker 2: that's the proper termin well bombers at us Open style
Speaker 2: tracks with the way that they have the USGA has
Speaker 2: set up these courses over the past five years. Just
Speaker 2: it's driving distance, driving distance, driving distance. Speak one in
Speaker 2: twenty fifteen at Chambers Bay, but the next nine guys
Speaker 2: on the leaderboard, we're all dominating in terms of driving distance.
Speaker 2: So you have your outliers in speed to someone who
Speaker 2: can accomplish that, Patrick Reid web Simpson, I think all
Speaker 2: follow into that category. Is they are good enough justin
Speaker 2: Thomas even at the same time as well, if they're
Speaker 2: so well rounded at the other parts of their game
Speaker 2: that they can most definitely win. It's just their path.
Speaker 2: The victory is so much more difficult than the guys
Speaker 2: at average three twenty five plus off the tee. So
Speaker 2: I'm just crossing those guys off. The path is too
Speaker 2: hard for them, especially if one of the Bombers actually
Speaker 2: plays well, then they're going to win. I don't like
Speaker 2: ramz Odds, especially coming off with COVID. It's of course
Speaker 2: where he's one before, obviously, but he's never won a major.
Speaker 2: He has one top ten is sorry, two top tens
Speaker 2: at US Opens, but not a great track record overall,
Speaker 2: and he is the bet prohibitive betting. Then he dropped
Speaker 2: down to Dustin who's not playing well. All right, we're
Speaker 2: going to cross him off because you can only take
Speaker 2: one or two of these guys at the top if
Speaker 2: that's how you rant help this week. So it really
Speaker 2: boils down to three guys for me, Rory, Brooks and Bryson.
Speaker 2: Two of those three guys are how you should attack
Speaker 2: this week on DraftKings where I am playing multiple lineups,
Speaker 2: all my lineups will probably start with two of those
Speaker 2: three guys and rotat them through. Obviously, in the betting market,
Speaker 2: you can't really do that. I've already bet on Brooks
Speaker 2: at eighteen to one. I just think he is most
Speaker 2: suited for all US Opens. Just look at his track
Speaker 2: record at the last three win, win, second. It did
Speaker 2: somewhat telling that he thrives under these conditions. He missed
Speaker 2: the cut last week at the Palmetto Championship, but it
Speaker 2: had nothing to do with his driving or his irons.
Speaker 2: He couldn't chip or putt, usually a sign of Brooks
Speaker 2: not caring how he finishes in a tournament. So realistically,
Speaker 2: just better news. He didn't have to stick around the weekend.
Speaker 2: He got over to San Diego. He's acclimated with the
Speaker 2: time zone, he can get some reps in up the course,
Speaker 2: and he's striking the ball as well as anyone right now.
Speaker 2: And when he decides to show up. He was injured
Speaker 2: at the MAP. I was on him then, and then
Speaker 2: it caused me not to take him at the PGA Championship,
Speaker 2: where he came second place. But just look at how
Speaker 2: he's done. PGA Championship second, the WGC at Concession earlier
Speaker 2: this year, second place, Phoenix earlier this year, first place.
Speaker 2: When he decides to show up, he is a legitimate
Speaker 2: threat to win every single time. And he is the
Speaker 2: fifth or sixth in the betting market right now. So
Speaker 2: Brooks is most definitely on the list in terms of betting,
Speaker 2: so that leads me between Rory and Bryson. Now, normally
Speaker 2: I would just say Bryson, Let's go with Bryson, but
Speaker 2: Rory's numbers down in the twenties, and I just maybe
Speaker 2: it's too big of a trap for me to fall into.
Speaker 2: I think Bryson is the safer play. I think Bryson
Speaker 2: has more win equity. But if they're separated by four
Speaker 2: points in terms of the betting market, from like sixteen
Speaker 2: hundred to from sixteen hundred to two thousand, I mean
Speaker 2: those four points are a lot. With the amount that
Speaker 2: you have to bet on guys at the very top
Speaker 2: of the boar, Like it's not the same as someone
Speaker 2: being sixty six to one to seventy to one. The
Speaker 2: amount of your wager just isn't that high at sixty
Speaker 2: to one and seventy seven to one and things like
Speaker 2: that versus sixteen to twenty to one like that, that's
Speaker 2: a big boy wager if you're gonna go in on them,
Speaker 2: especially if you're gonna take two guys from the very top,
Speaker 2: so you need to trim it down. It's gonna be
Speaker 2: Brooks for sure for me in the betting market and
Speaker 2: probably gonna end up being Bryson, you can find them
Speaker 2: as deep as nineteen to one in some spots, and
Speaker 2: that's probably the magic number for me with Bryson, because
Speaker 2: I think, like Brooks, he is very well tailored to
Speaker 2: take on Tory Pines and this complete rough and narrow
Speaker 2: fairway setup.
Speaker 1: And if you are looking for the best odds and
Speaker 1: some of the golfers that Pat sockoo, make sure you
Speaker 1: head over to Betting Pros and get the app as well,
Speaker 1: and you can see the different betting houses where you
Speaker 1: can get those best odds. So if those are the
Speaker 1: favorite guys, we're the ones that might be the long
Speaker 1: shots that might be fun to throw some chips on.
Speaker 1: Is it some young guys like Victor Howland who seems
Speaker 1: like a very well liked fellow these days, or is
Speaker 1: there some other young golfers that might really, you know,
Speaker 1: kind of take advantage of the moment here. Maybe they
Speaker 1: do hit those big long drives you're talking about that
Speaker 1: are the difference maker in this specific tournament, that might
Speaker 1: be able to kind of carve out a niche and
Speaker 1: if they have a good first day or two all
Speaker 1: of a sudden they start to get a little bit
Speaker 1: momentum going into the weekend.
Speaker 2: I think that that entire like twenty to forty, twenty
Speaker 2: to one to forty to one tier is very live
Speaker 2: to win this tournament. The issue is with how I've
Speaker 2: structured my betting card. If I'm going with Brooks and
Speaker 2: one of Rory and Bryce, and I can't afford to
Speaker 2: have any of these guys. You can't just spend all
Speaker 2: the favorites then even if they lose money, And people
Speaker 2: don't seem to realize that when you structure a betting
Speaker 2: card for a golf event. It's not like football. These
Speaker 2: guys pay pretty deep odds in order to win, but
Speaker 2: you don't want to overload yourself at the top. So
Speaker 2: Xander can't lay hovelin few Burger. They're all in this range.
Speaker 2: They're all more than capable of winning this event. They
Speaker 2: will not be making my betting sheet because I've gone
Speaker 2: with two guys around twenty to one, I need to
Speaker 2: go down the list. The Shane Lowry at eighty to
Speaker 2: one is actually the next guy on my betting card.
Speaker 2: We've seen him win an Open championship, so he has
Speaker 2: that major experience. He's won most of his events in
Speaker 2: his career, whether it be in America or overseas, at long,
Speaker 2: difficult courses. He just led the PGA Championship and strokes
Speaker 2: gained off the tee. He's magic around the greens. The
Speaker 2: butter you know that comes and goes. That's why he's
Speaker 2: eighty to one. But his irons right now are firing
Speaker 2: at the best rate of his career on a consistent basis,
Speaker 2: even better than he won the British Open two years ago.
Speaker 2: So I look at himy as three top tens in
Speaker 2: his past four starts. This is the sort of lead
Speaker 2: in form that he had when he won over in
Speaker 2: Northern Ireland two years ago. I think that eighty to
Speaker 2: one is just too big of a number for a
Speaker 2: guy of this class.
Speaker 1: All right, So pivoting off of the winners, and obviously
Speaker 1: that is a much harder thing to do. Let's talk
Speaker 1: about finishing. Let's talk about top twenty, top thirties. That's
Speaker 1: something you tend to put any investment into whill you
Speaker 1: see opportunities where all of a sudden, maybe you see
Speaker 1: somebody a good golfer that you really like, that you think,
Speaker 1: you know what they might play better than you think
Speaker 1: in this one. Maybe you can make some plus money
Speaker 1: on there. Because there's certainly like even on DK where
Speaker 1: you're talking about too. We just talked about Hovlin being
Speaker 1: a plus one ten to finish in the top twenty.
Speaker 1: The Shane Lowry is at plus one thirty five hatt
Speaker 1: and at plus one thirty eight. So there's a lot
Speaker 1: of you know, folks around there in that range where
Speaker 1: maybe it's a little simpler, maybe less less dangerous in
Speaker 1: terms of well, it's all or nothing, but maybe you
Speaker 1: just get somebody that you think is going to play
Speaker 1: well enough to finish at the top twenty or thirty.
Speaker 1: Is that a viable wager for folks who maybe you
Speaker 1: don't want to put all their eggs into a winner basket.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's cowardly way to play.
Speaker 1: What do you really think, Pat, No, I'll just kid
Speaker 1: put threw it out there because that I think people
Speaker 1: look at that board and they go, oh, it's so
Speaker 1: hard to pick out the one winner. Maybe I do that,
Speaker 1: but I want to hedge and have some more skin
Speaker 1: in the game too and do some other things too,
Speaker 1: and that might be a way to maybe make back
Speaker 1: some of the money potentially too.
Speaker 2: I listen, I'm not opposed to top twenties or top tens.
Speaker 2: I do play them almost every single week, but I
Speaker 2: played them with long shots. I'm not looking to bet.
Speaker 2: Like if Victor Hobblin's twenty five to one to win,
Speaker 2: there's really no value in his top twenty plus one
Speaker 2: twenty five like right as, you're basically better if you
Speaker 2: put a big number down. Well, yeah, you have to
Speaker 2: put a big It's you're essentially betting on a football
Speaker 2: game at that point, and that's not what I do.
Speaker 2: That's not how I like to bet on golf. If
Speaker 2: I'm going to be looking at let's say I'm looking
Speaker 2: at the top thirty market right now, what I prefer
Speaker 2: to do. But me being in Canada a lot different
Speaker 2: than being in the United States, and we have I
Speaker 2: mean in Britain it's even better, but we have placement wagers.
Speaker 2: So for example, like I play a lot of each
Speaker 2: way betting on long shots. So there's a bunch of
Speaker 2: guys down the board that I really like this week,
Speaker 2: and it's essentially trying to grab their top eight. So
Speaker 2: that's the placement that's offered. So if I was to
Speaker 2: bet twenty dollars on Let's say Taylor Pendrith, who I
Speaker 2: really like this week. He's five hundred to one to
Speaker 2: win this event. So if I bet twenty dollars on
Speaker 2: him with the each way, what that means is that
Speaker 2: ten dollars would be allocated towards the five hundred to
Speaker 2: one if he won, and then another ten dollars would
Speaker 2: be allocated towards his top eight, which is one fifth
Speaker 2: of the odds of the five hundred, so it would
Speaker 2: be one hundred to one for him to come inside
Speaker 2: the top eight. Now, the reason that I do that
Speaker 2: is because I want to look at his top ten odds,
Speaker 2: and his top ten odds are thirty three to one.
Speaker 2: So essentially I'm losing two placement points but gaining over
Speaker 2: triple the odds in terms of what it actually pays out.
Speaker 2: Plus I still have the upside of him winning, which
Speaker 2: he's not going to win, but he could finish seventh
Speaker 2: or something like that out of the realm. So that's
Speaker 2: why I structure my bets that way. I think that
Speaker 2: there's just more value to spread up your money instead
Speaker 2: of putting twenty dollars on the thirty three to one
Speaker 2: to win six hundred. If I go ten and ten,
Speaker 2: I mean, if my guy wins, I win five thousand bucks.
Speaker 2: If becomes inside the top eight, I win five hundred bucks.
Speaker 2: So that's a better way for me to structure, at
Speaker 2: least in my mind. That's what I'm telling myself is
Speaker 2: the way that I want to approach this, because I
Speaker 2: do like that upside Listen, I'm betting on golf for
Speaker 2: huge payouts. If I can hit a five hundred to
Speaker 2: one winner, it can happen in golf. It's unlike any
Speaker 2: other sports in that way. So there's a bunch of
Speaker 2: guys down the list. If you just want to play
Speaker 2: top tens or top twenties on them, I don't mind that,
Speaker 2: But I don't want to take a favorite at a
Speaker 2: top twenty, because then you're just betting even money. You're
Speaker 2: basically betting on a coin flip in terms of OZ
Speaker 2: and it's probably not even that good, especially at a
Speaker 2: course as difficult as Tory Pines in a tournament set
Speaker 2: up as difficult as the US Open. So if you're
Speaker 2: looking down the list, I would recommend Matt Wallace and
Speaker 2: I have outright wagers on all these guys. So Matt
Speaker 2: Wallace at one hundred and fifty to one, Taylor Pendrith
Speaker 2: at five hundred to one, wyndhom Clark at seven hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty to one, and Cameron Young at three hundred
Speaker 2: to one are probably my four favorite guys from beyond
Speaker 2: one hundred to one in the outright market. Now, if
Speaker 2: you want to play a top thirty on them, a
Speaker 2: top twenty, bet them outright, you can deal with that
Speaker 2: with what you want. I played the outright win with
Speaker 2: the each way in the top eight finishing places. On
Speaker 2: one of those guys finishes inside the top eight, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna make a lot of money this week, even if
Speaker 2: I lose every other bet.
Speaker 1: Now, talk to me about some of the other possible
Speaker 1: wagers too. We've got, obviously the groups you've got, you know,
Speaker 1: there's so many things now you can literally wager on everything.
Speaker 1: But you've got different setups where you've got tournament props,
Speaker 1: you've got make miss cut, you've got all kinds of
Speaker 1: things you can get in on. What else, Even for
Speaker 1: the novice wager going out there this weekend and looking
Speaker 1: at this tournament, do you think is a good path
Speaker 1: where you say, you know what this particular prop or
Speaker 1: this particular wager kind of makes sense to me with
Speaker 1: this player that you actually are high on as well
Speaker 1: that you would advise, or is this something where you
Speaker 1: stay away just focus on some of the things that
Speaker 1: you talked about, which is, hey, it's a big, all
Speaker 1: or nothing kind of thing. That's the nature of the game.
Speaker 2: I tend to be all or nothing type of better
Speaker 2: when it comes to golf because when I win, I
Speaker 2: went really big, and when I lose, I get wiped
Speaker 2: out for the week. That's just the game that I
Speaker 2: like to play. If you want to head yourself and
Speaker 2: you know you have one hundred dollars to invest, do
Speaker 2: I invest a little bit here, invest a little bit there.
Speaker 2: That's a perfectly reasonable way to go about it. It's
Speaker 2: just not the strategy that I end up taking. So
Speaker 2: if you were like looking at props, most of them
Speaker 2: like aren't lined properly. And I hate to throw shade it.
Speaker 2: You know, my favorite sports book in the world, drafting
Speaker 2: sports book. But I'm seeing Taylor Pendrith right now at
Speaker 2: plus four fifty to be top Canadian. I bet him
Speaker 2: at plus eight hundred at another place yesterday and that
Speaker 2: number is still hanging out there, so you shopping around
Speaker 2: finding the best value. I think that's an actual value bet,
Speaker 2: like Corey Connors in terms of the top Canadian market,
Speaker 2: is like minus one twenty or even minus one fifty
Speaker 2: at some spots. And the way that you need to
Speaker 2: think about is this is technically a four ball. It's
Speaker 2: one guy versus three other guys. And you'll see three
Speaker 2: balls get launched every single day and almost no one
Speaker 2: is ever a minus one fifty. And now he has
Speaker 2: to be three other people. He is not. He's better
Speaker 2: than these guys, but he's not significantly better to be
Speaker 2: a minus money favorite against three other players. I just
Speaker 2: see Pendrith. No one knows who he is. He plays
Speaker 2: on the corn Ferry Tour, but he is a massive bomber.
Speaker 2: He is. He has great touch around the greens and
Speaker 2: he's pretty good putters. Irons are absolutely horrible. But he's
Speaker 2: played in two US Opens in his life, the last
Speaker 2: two he's made the cut in both. That's better than
Speaker 2: all the other Canadians, So why not.
Speaker 1: I love it. I love that you could bet guys
Speaker 1: from the countries too. It's just a fun thing to do,
Speaker 1: all right. So if that is the wagering side of things.
Speaker 1: Let's switch gears a little bit and just touch on
Speaker 1: real quick the DFS world of golf. And you have
Speaker 1: really taken us through, I know last time you were
Speaker 1: on a few weeks back, you really kind of took
Speaker 1: us to your thought process on that and how you
Speaker 1: approach that and the reasons why. So now with the
Speaker 1: mix of golfers this specific course, the way you've laid
Speaker 1: it out, what does the roster construction, if you will,
Speaker 1: look like in your mind that you think these guys
Speaker 1: are good investments at the number they're at.
Speaker 2: Essentially, what I did was go to Fantasy National dot
Speaker 2: Com and I created my custom model within the site system.
Speaker 2: By the way, Fantasy National dot Com slash Mayo for
Speaker 2: twenty percent off. Go try it out.
Speaker 1: If you go try that, Pat Mayo's giving you free coupons, guys,
Speaker 1: go get it.
Speaker 2: Listen, you get a weekly membership to Fantasy National with
Speaker 2: the discount at seven bucks, you're probably gonna play far
Speaker 2: more than that and draftings, lineups or betting this week,
Speaker 2: so you might a lot the best tools available to
Speaker 2: help you out. So I just put in the inputs
Speaker 2: that I wanted, massively putting on driving distance with a
Speaker 2: bit of approach, a bit of putting, a bit of
Speaker 2: around the green, but really waiting driving distance, and just
Speaker 2: went to the top and see who I wanted to get. Now,
Speaker 2: the very top players in the world, I mean Speeth excluded,
Speaker 2: but you have rom DJ Bryson, Rory and Brooks. They
Speaker 2: all mash it off the tee. Xander does as well.
Speaker 2: Justin Thomas is a little bit behind him, so it
Speaker 2: is more a Kawa. He's more of a fairway finder
Speaker 2: than anything else. But I just decided Rory, Bryson and
Speaker 2: Brooks are the best values. They're the best price of
Speaker 2: those very top guys, so I'm just going to mix
Speaker 2: and match with them. Where it really did help me
Speaker 2: was down the list. That's how I end up on Pendrith,
Speaker 2: So I ended up on Wyndham Clark, and how I
Speaker 2: ended up on Cameron Young, another guy coming out from
Speaker 2: the corn Ferry Tours. Won twice on the corn Ferry
Speaker 2: Tour in the past month. Most people just don't know that,
Speaker 2: and they're just out in the six thousand dollars area,
Speaker 2: and you have to think about the construct of this tournament.
Speaker 2: Is the hardest cutting golf to make there's one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty six players in this tournament. Only the top
Speaker 2: sixty in ties are going to play the weekend. So
Speaker 2: if you can squeeze a six of six through with
Speaker 2: your very top end guys, and what have we seen
Speaker 2: at the US Open outside of Gary Woodland who fits
Speaker 2: the bomber mold is not the elite bomber mold. It's
Speaker 2: been Brooks, it's been Bryson, it's been Speef, it's been
Speaker 2: all of the best players who end up winning. So
Speaker 2: the more best players you can jam into a lineup
Speaker 2: if you feel good at the very bottom end, is
Speaker 2: the approach that I want to take. I think you're
Speaker 2: going to see a lot of people play as balanced
Speaker 2: of a lineup as possible, and that could be the
Speaker 2: right path this week. You could be looking at a
Speaker 2: situation where you start your teams with Xander at ninety
Speaker 2: three hundred dollars and take Can't Light and take Feena
Speaker 2: and load up with guys in the high sevens or
Speaker 2: the mid eights, and that's just the way you roll
Speaker 2: it out. I think I'm going to be a bit
Speaker 2: more risky this week and go with two of my
Speaker 2: studs in the ten thousand dollars Range or Rory at
Speaker 2: nine to nine, drop to Coke Racker Lowry in the
Speaker 2: mid sevens and then take two guys in the sixes
Speaker 2: and see what I'm left over and try to construct
Speaker 2: a lineup that way.
Speaker 1: There you have it. He is the one, the only
Speaker 1: Pat Mayo you fall him on Twitter at dpme's the
Speaker 1: host of the Pat Mayo Experience, and it's always a
Speaker 1: great experience to have Pat Mayo on the show. Pat,
Speaker 1: What's going on with you?
Speaker 2: Right now?
Speaker 1: We have cooking over at the Experience.
Speaker 2: Every day golf for now and then it quickly transitions
Speaker 2: back over into football. Start Thursday, so Ceely and I
Speaker 2: are going to be talking about the AFC West player
Speaker 2: by player breakdown for fantasy for the upcoming season, plus
Speaker 2: all the future odds on the teams. We've already done
Speaker 2: NFC East, AFC East and NFC West, so we're getting
Speaker 2: through all the divisions. I also have if you check
Speaker 2: out my Twitter right now at the PME, I have
Speaker 2: giveaways for fifty Millionaire Maker tickets this week, so you
Speaker 2: probably want to jump onto mass That expires Wednesday at
Speaker 2: noon Eastern. I am also doing a live chat at
Speaker 2: noon Eastern time on Mayo Media Networks YouTube page if
Speaker 2: you do have fantasy golf questions for the US Open,
Speaker 2: and I'm giving away some scott Fishbowl entries too, so
Speaker 2: you can check out my Twitter for that. If you're
Speaker 2: keen on competing in the scott Fishbowl this.
Speaker 1: Year, well I will be there. I will be part
Speaker 1: of the scott Fishball. I am every year, and hopefully
Speaker 1: we'll get to talk some NFL. I was love coming
Speaker 1: on with you. I think last time it was Meani,
Speaker 1: myself and you just having a crazy few hours of
Speaker 1: what we'd record like four shows I think in one day.
Speaker 1: I think something like that, so you could go on vacation.
Speaker 2: Right, is that is the Pat? It always seems like
Speaker 2: I am in the two shows every single day, but
Speaker 2: some days I sit there and record four in one day,
Speaker 2: so I can take four days to do well anytime.
Speaker 1: Baby. It's always a pleasure. And thank you for enlightening
Speaker 1: us with all the great content on the golf side today.
Speaker 1: Hope everybody enjoys the US Opening. Like Pat said, go
Speaker 1: over and follow him and go get some free stuff
Speaker 1: and use that code he talked about as well in
Speaker 1: the site. Again at the PM's where you get all
Speaker 1: the information from Pat. Hit him up on Twitter too.
Speaker 1: He's always a great follow, not just for golf, but
Speaker 1: obviously for all the sports that he covers. You are
Speaker 1: a good follow in terms of content because you put
Speaker 1: out quality. Everybody has to have these stupid questions all
Speaker 1: the time, what do you think is gonna be the best?
Speaker 1: Like it's such Twitter fodder, like please make the algorithm
Speaker 1: go up some more people follow me? No, I need
Speaker 1: people like you. Put out great content and then step
Speaker 1: away and go to lunch. That's what you do, and
Speaker 1: I appreciate it.
Speaker 2: I mean I didn't even do that, scheduled tweets for
Speaker 2: three days in advance and walk essentially a account.
Speaker 1: But again, when the content drops, it's good. So if
Speaker 1: you give me good content, who cares?
Speaker 2: You know? I answer people's questions to you, do you do?
Speaker 2: I do well? Well.
Speaker 1: I Again, we don't want to set the standard too high.
Speaker 1: We don't want to get ahead of ourselves. So that's
Speaker 1: Pat Mayo. Everybody, enjoy the golf this weekend. We'll be
Speaker 1: back again next time. We were betting pros. I want
Speaker 1: to remind you to go over and download that app
Speaker 1: for betting pros and head tobttingpros dot com, so you
Speaker 1: get all of those consensus lines when you're looking at
Speaker 1: all the stuff for this weekend's action. That'll do it
Speaker 1: for me. We'll be back again next time. We'll see
Speaker 1: that cot kids