1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:15,400 Speaker 1: It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros. 2 00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:18,640 Speaker 1: Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's me Joey p 3 00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:22,160 Speaker 1: Joe Piezapia, and today we're gonna take a little tour 4 00:00:22,280 --> 00:00:25,600 Speaker 1: of Tory Pines. That's right, because we've got some golf 5 00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:29,080 Speaker 1: to talk about today, and we've got another major right 6 00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,200 Speaker 1: on the precipice. And there's nobody better to talk about 7 00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:35,160 Speaker 1: golf with than my good friend. He's back on the show. 8 00:00:35,159 --> 00:00:39,160 Speaker 1: He's made time for us, despite moving, despite figuring out 9 00:00:39,159 --> 00:00:41,800 Speaker 1: his new studio. It's very difficult to be famous, but 10 00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:44,840 Speaker 1: somehow he always gets by. And the us open here 11 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 1: is going to be broken down by our goodpal, the one, 12 00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:49,840 Speaker 1: the only, Pat Mayo. Pat, Welcome back to the show, 13 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:53,000 Speaker 1: my friend. How are you? How's how's the transitional studio 14 00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:54,360 Speaker 1: life treating you these days? 15 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 2: I don't like working from my house is the main 16 00:00:57,240 --> 00:00:59,080 Speaker 2: thing that I figured out when you have two kids 17 00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 2: running around and my wife just thinks that now that 18 00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:04,640 Speaker 2: I'm at home, that you know everything, that when I'm 19 00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:07,000 Speaker 2: at the office, i'm working, And it doesn't feel that 20 00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:08,399 Speaker 2: way when you work inside your house. 21 00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:11,680 Speaker 1: As someone who works inside their house with two kids 22 00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:15,319 Speaker 1: for their entire career. I can assure you I understand 23 00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:17,720 Speaker 1: what you're talking about. Mine or older, though you still 24 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:19,480 Speaker 1: got the little guys, so a little bit of a 25 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:22,560 Speaker 1: different scenario, a lot more needy mineor kind of off 26 00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:24,360 Speaker 1: on their own doing their things. But someday you'll get 27 00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:26,800 Speaker 1: there someday. But yes, it's time to get to business, 28 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 1: and you're right. Before I even do this, I just 29 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:30,399 Speaker 1: want to it's been a while since we chatted, so 30 00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:31,960 Speaker 1: I just want to get your take on the Phil 31 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:34,119 Speaker 1: Micholson win of the PGA a couple of weeks ago, 32 00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:36,720 Speaker 1: because that was certainly a crazy story. I don't think 33 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 1: anybody saw coming, and I just wanted to kind of 34 00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:41,680 Speaker 1: get your feel for it. Was this good for golf 35 00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:44,679 Speaker 1: in that sense that you got the old standby name 36 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 1: brand guy coming out of nowhere and winning that, or 37 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:49,240 Speaker 1: was a bad in a way because you know, we're 38 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:51,400 Speaker 1: still trying to manufacture stars at the same level of 39 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:52,440 Speaker 1: Phil Nicholson. 40 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 2: Coming out of nowhere is never a good thing unless 41 00:01:56,880 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 2: you're the most marketable star who's left in the game 42 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:01,760 Speaker 2: that's not named Tiger Woods. But he's not in the 43 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:05,000 Speaker 2: game right now. So because it's Phil is actually a 44 00:02:05,040 --> 00:02:08,959 Speaker 2: great thing for golf. The problem is when you watch 45 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 2: the CBS coverage, like they could have been showing like 46 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:14,839 Speaker 2: nine or ten guys who weren't necessarily going to win, 47 00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:16,679 Speaker 2: but like someone like Harry Higgs, for example, one of 48 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 2: the most could be marketable players, but no one knows 49 00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 2: who he is. He needed to finish inside the top 50 00:02:21,360 --> 00:02:23,799 Speaker 2: five at the PGA Championship in order to get a 51 00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:26,160 Speaker 2: secure spot in the Masters next year, a tournament which 52 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 2: he has never played and would not qualify for unless 53 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:32,160 Speaker 2: he won a tournament or he ended up elevating himself 54 00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:34,320 Speaker 2: to a certain part of the world rankings, which he 55 00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:37,080 Speaker 2: just probably isn't going to do. And he did qualify 56 00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:39,600 Speaker 2: for the Masters, but the broadcast didn't even touch on it. 57 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:42,320 Speaker 2: We wanted to see Phil chewing gum walking down the fairway. 58 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:44,440 Speaker 2: I get that's how they've always done it, But when 59 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 2: we talk about creating new stars, how didn't feel like 60 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 2: the ratings were through the roof because Phil was involved. 61 00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 2: It was like Tiger at the Masters. Tiger, Oh my god, 62 00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:54,239 Speaker 2: Tiger's in the lead at the Masters. Everyone is tuning 63 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 2: into that, and that becomes the perfect recipe in order 64 00:02:57,120 --> 00:02:59,520 Speaker 2: to create these new stars, because if it's Brooks running 65 00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 2: away with it against like Brendan Grace, who was also 66 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 2: up on the top of the leader board, like that's 67 00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:06,600 Speaker 2: not a ratings drop by any means. Like people are 68 00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 2: familiar with Brooks, but no one really cares. People cared 69 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:12,720 Speaker 2: that Phil was going to win. So what the broadcast 70 00:03:12,760 --> 00:03:15,720 Speaker 2: could have done was used that spotlight with all these 71 00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:19,080 Speaker 2: new eyes tuning into the PGA Championship to elevate some 72 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:21,040 Speaker 2: of your guys like Patrick Kantley was making a run 73 00:03:21,080 --> 00:03:23,480 Speaker 2: at it early on, just guys that were moving themselves 74 00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:26,480 Speaker 2: up the leaderboard that are the future stars of the 75 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:28,480 Speaker 2: PGA Tour. They just CBS was like, screw it, we 76 00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:30,040 Speaker 2: don't want to give you any pointing time. Sorry. 77 00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 1: I think that's a phenomenal point and I think it's 78 00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 1: a huge miss. By then you're absolutely right, and you know, 79 00:03:35,240 --> 00:03:36,800 Speaker 1: just for fun, we'll get this out of the way. 80 00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:40,440 Speaker 1: Phil's anywhere from fifty to seventy to one. Can the 81 00:03:40,440 --> 00:03:43,040 Speaker 1: old man do it again? I know you're shaking your head. 82 00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 1: I'm just throwing it out there because people can ask. 83 00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:46,760 Speaker 1: They're gonna ask me that question when they would do 84 00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 1: the show, ask Pat if he thinks Phil has one 85 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:50,480 Speaker 1: more in him because he's played well this year. 86 00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:51,840 Speaker 2: I mean, I didn't think he had one more in 87 00:03:51,880 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 2: him when he won last time, so I know. But 88 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 2: the fact that he was three hundred to one to 89 00:03:57,400 --> 00:04:00,680 Speaker 2: win the PGA Championship was probably an accurate reflection of 90 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:03,400 Speaker 2: his odds. The fact that he's between fifty and seventy 91 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:05,800 Speaker 2: to one, like there's real players who are between seventy 92 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 2: and fifty to one, like Fella should be three hundred 93 00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 2: to one again. 94 00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:12,440 Speaker 1: All right, well, let's get into the US Open here 95 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:14,120 Speaker 1: and some of the odds and some of the people 96 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:18,040 Speaker 1: that are clearly at the top of those odds, John Rahm, Bryson, 97 00:04:18,080 --> 00:04:20,599 Speaker 1: des Chambau, Dustin Johnson, kind of usual suspects up at 98 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 1: the top. You're getting Rom somewhere around plus ten to fifty, 99 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:28,359 Speaker 1: like over on DraftKings, Bryson des Chambeau at plus fifteen hundred, 100 00:04:28,400 --> 00:04:30,799 Speaker 1: same with Dustin Johnson. There's a few other guys towards 101 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:33,240 Speaker 1: his top. Koepka's up around that area as well. So 102 00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:35,000 Speaker 1: in your opinion, when you look at the top, if 103 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:36,640 Speaker 1: you wanted to go ahead and bet winners, and I 104 00:04:36,680 --> 00:04:39,160 Speaker 1: know we've talked a lot about throwing different things out 105 00:04:39,160 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 1: there and how to make money doing this. But let's 106 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:43,359 Speaker 1: start with the winners. Is there a favorite with this 107 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:45,839 Speaker 1: course in your opinion? How it plays for the style 108 00:04:46,200 --> 00:04:48,560 Speaker 1: of golfer that we have here towards the top of 109 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:49,640 Speaker 1: these wagering lines. 110 00:04:50,120 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 2: Well, it's funny when you think about all the guys 111 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:55,839 Speaker 2: and even essentially inside the top ten of the highest 112 00:04:55,880 --> 00:04:58,839 Speaker 2: odds for the lowest odds players or highest odds players. Yes, 113 00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:03,039 Speaker 2: that's the proper termin well bombers at us Open style 114 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:05,160 Speaker 2: tracks with the way that they have the USGA has 115 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:07,400 Speaker 2: set up these courses over the past five years. Just 116 00:05:07,440 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 2: it's driving distance, driving distance, driving distance. Speak one in 117 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:14,919 Speaker 2: twenty fifteen at Chambers Bay, but the next nine guys 118 00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:18,360 Speaker 2: on the leaderboard, we're all dominating in terms of driving distance. 119 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:21,080 Speaker 2: So you have your outliers in speed to someone who 120 00:05:21,080 --> 00:05:24,400 Speaker 2: can accomplish that, Patrick Reid web Simpson, I think all 121 00:05:24,400 --> 00:05:26,920 Speaker 2: follow into that category. Is they are good enough justin 122 00:05:26,960 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 2: Thomas even at the same time as well, if they're 123 00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:31,000 Speaker 2: so well rounded at the other parts of their game 124 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 2: that they can most definitely win. It's just their path. 125 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:36,919 Speaker 2: The victory is so much more difficult than the guys 126 00:05:36,920 --> 00:05:39,279 Speaker 2: at average three twenty five plus off the tee. So 127 00:05:39,640 --> 00:05:41,760 Speaker 2: I'm just crossing those guys off. The path is too 128 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:43,880 Speaker 2: hard for them, especially if one of the Bombers actually 129 00:05:43,880 --> 00:05:46,480 Speaker 2: plays well, then they're going to win. I don't like 130 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:49,160 Speaker 2: ramz Odds, especially coming off with COVID. It's of course 131 00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:51,599 Speaker 2: where he's one before, obviously, but he's never won a major. 132 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,799 Speaker 2: He has one top ten is sorry, two top tens 133 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:57,840 Speaker 2: at US Opens, but not a great track record overall, 134 00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 2: and he is the bet prohibitive betting. Then he dropped 135 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:03,080 Speaker 2: down to Dustin who's not playing well. All right, we're 136 00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:05,280 Speaker 2: going to cross him off because you can only take 137 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:07,080 Speaker 2: one or two of these guys at the top if 138 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:08,920 Speaker 2: that's how you rant help this week. So it really 139 00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:12,160 Speaker 2: boils down to three guys for me, Rory, Brooks and Bryson. 140 00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:14,440 Speaker 2: Two of those three guys are how you should attack 141 00:06:14,480 --> 00:06:17,240 Speaker 2: this week on DraftKings where I am playing multiple lineups, 142 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:19,920 Speaker 2: all my lineups will probably start with two of those 143 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:22,919 Speaker 2: three guys and rotat them through. Obviously, in the betting market, 144 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:25,040 Speaker 2: you can't really do that. I've already bet on Brooks 145 00:06:25,040 --> 00:06:28,120 Speaker 2: at eighteen to one. I just think he is most 146 00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:31,440 Speaker 2: suited for all US Opens. Just look at his track 147 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:34,560 Speaker 2: record at the last three win, win, second. It did 148 00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:37,360 Speaker 2: somewhat telling that he thrives under these conditions. He missed 149 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:40,200 Speaker 2: the cut last week at the Palmetto Championship, but it 150 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:42,279 Speaker 2: had nothing to do with his driving or his irons. 151 00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 2: He couldn't chip or putt, usually a sign of Brooks 152 00:06:45,040 --> 00:06:48,360 Speaker 2: not caring how he finishes in a tournament. So realistically, 153 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:50,400 Speaker 2: just better news. He didn't have to stick around the weekend. 154 00:06:50,440 --> 00:06:52,960 Speaker 2: He got over to San Diego. He's acclimated with the 155 00:06:53,000 --> 00:06:54,880 Speaker 2: time zone, he can get some reps in up the course, 156 00:06:54,920 --> 00:06:57,440 Speaker 2: and he's striking the ball as well as anyone right now. 157 00:06:57,680 --> 00:06:59,599 Speaker 2: And when he decides to show up. He was injured 158 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:02,400 Speaker 2: at the MAP. I was on him then, and then 159 00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 2: it caused me not to take him at the PGA Championship, 160 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:06,520 Speaker 2: where he came second place. But just look at how 161 00:07:06,520 --> 00:07:10,680 Speaker 2: he's done. PGA Championship second, the WGC at Concession earlier 162 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:14,240 Speaker 2: this year, second place, Phoenix earlier this year, first place. 163 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 2: When he decides to show up, he is a legitimate 164 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 2: threat to win every single time. And he is the 165 00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,320 Speaker 2: fifth or sixth in the betting market right now. So 166 00:07:21,520 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 2: Brooks is most definitely on the list in terms of betting, 167 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:27,119 Speaker 2: so that leads me between Rory and Bryson. Now, normally 168 00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:29,560 Speaker 2: I would just say Bryson, Let's go with Bryson, but 169 00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:32,559 Speaker 2: Rory's numbers down in the twenties, and I just maybe 170 00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:34,680 Speaker 2: it's too big of a trap for me to fall into. 171 00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:36,680 Speaker 2: I think Bryson is the safer play. I think Bryson 172 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:39,239 Speaker 2: has more win equity. But if they're separated by four 173 00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:42,040 Speaker 2: points in terms of the betting market, from like sixteen 174 00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:45,520 Speaker 2: hundred to from sixteen hundred to two thousand, I mean 175 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:47,480 Speaker 2: those four points are a lot. With the amount that 176 00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 2: you have to bet on guys at the very top 177 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:51,239 Speaker 2: of the boar, Like it's not the same as someone 178 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:53,600 Speaker 2: being sixty six to one to seventy to one. The 179 00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:56,560 Speaker 2: amount of your wager just isn't that high at sixty 180 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 2: to one and seventy seven to one and things like 181 00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:01,400 Speaker 2: that versus sixteen to twenty to one like that, that's 182 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:03,400 Speaker 2: a big boy wager if you're gonna go in on them, 183 00:08:03,480 --> 00:08:05,880 Speaker 2: especially if you're gonna take two guys from the very top, 184 00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 2: so you need to trim it down. It's gonna be 185 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 2: Brooks for sure for me in the betting market and 186 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,360 Speaker 2: probably gonna end up being Bryson, you can find them 187 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:14,720 Speaker 2: as deep as nineteen to one in some spots, and 188 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,800 Speaker 2: that's probably the magic number for me with Bryson, because 189 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:20,240 Speaker 2: I think, like Brooks, he is very well tailored to 190 00:08:20,320 --> 00:08:23,760 Speaker 2: take on Tory Pines and this complete rough and narrow 191 00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 2: fairway setup. 192 00:08:25,160 --> 00:08:26,920 Speaker 1: And if you are looking for the best odds and 193 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:28,880 Speaker 1: some of the golfers that Pat sockoo, make sure you 194 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 1: head over to Betting Pros and get the app as well, 195 00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:32,800 Speaker 1: and you can see the different betting houses where you 196 00:08:32,840 --> 00:08:34,480 Speaker 1: can get those best odds. So if those are the 197 00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:37,080 Speaker 1: favorite guys, we're the ones that might be the long 198 00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:39,200 Speaker 1: shots that might be fun to throw some chips on. 199 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 1: Is it some young guys like Victor Howland who seems 200 00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:44,679 Speaker 1: like a very well liked fellow these days, or is 201 00:08:44,720 --> 00:08:47,200 Speaker 1: there some other young golfers that might really, you know, 202 00:08:47,520 --> 00:08:50,640 Speaker 1: kind of take advantage of the moment here. Maybe they 203 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:53,160 Speaker 1: do hit those big long drives you're talking about that 204 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:56,200 Speaker 1: are the difference maker in this specific tournament, that might 205 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:57,760 Speaker 1: be able to kind of carve out a niche and 206 00:08:57,760 --> 00:09:00,000 Speaker 1: if they have a good first day or two all 207 00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:01,440 Speaker 1: of a sudden they start to get a little bit 208 00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:03,160 Speaker 1: momentum going into the weekend. 209 00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:06,720 Speaker 2: I think that that entire like twenty to forty, twenty 210 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:08,640 Speaker 2: to one to forty to one tier is very live 211 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:10,679 Speaker 2: to win this tournament. The issue is with how I've 212 00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:13,160 Speaker 2: structured my betting card. If I'm going with Brooks and 213 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:14,960 Speaker 2: one of Rory and Bryce, and I can't afford to 214 00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:16,839 Speaker 2: have any of these guys. You can't just spend all 215 00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:20,120 Speaker 2: the favorites then even if they lose money, And people 216 00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:22,600 Speaker 2: don't seem to realize that when you structure a betting 217 00:09:22,600 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 2: card for a golf event. It's not like football. These 218 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:28,040 Speaker 2: guys pay pretty deep odds in order to win, but 219 00:09:28,080 --> 00:09:30,000 Speaker 2: you don't want to overload yourself at the top. So 220 00:09:30,559 --> 00:09:35,600 Speaker 2: Xander can't lay hovelin few Burger. They're all in this range. 221 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:38,400 Speaker 2: They're all more than capable of winning this event. They 222 00:09:38,440 --> 00:09:40,320 Speaker 2: will not be making my betting sheet because I've gone 223 00:09:40,320 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 2: with two guys around twenty to one, I need to 224 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:44,840 Speaker 2: go down the list. The Shane Lowry at eighty to 225 00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:48,240 Speaker 2: one is actually the next guy on my betting card. 226 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:50,840 Speaker 2: We've seen him win an Open championship, so he has 227 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:53,200 Speaker 2: that major experience. He's won most of his events in 228 00:09:53,240 --> 00:09:56,560 Speaker 2: his career, whether it be in America or overseas, at long, 229 00:09:56,840 --> 00:10:00,240 Speaker 2: difficult courses. He just led the PGA Championship and strokes 230 00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:02,640 Speaker 2: gained off the tee. He's magic around the greens. The 231 00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:04,640 Speaker 2: butter you know that comes and goes. That's why he's 232 00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:07,720 Speaker 2: eighty to one. But his irons right now are firing 233 00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:10,840 Speaker 2: at the best rate of his career on a consistent basis, 234 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 2: even better than he won the British Open two years ago. 235 00:10:13,920 --> 00:10:15,679 Speaker 2: So I look at himy as three top tens in 236 00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:17,800 Speaker 2: his past four starts. This is the sort of lead 237 00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:20,280 Speaker 2: in form that he had when he won over in 238 00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:22,960 Speaker 2: Northern Ireland two years ago. I think that eighty to 239 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:24,280 Speaker 2: one is just too big of a number for a 240 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 2: guy of this class. 241 00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:28,720 Speaker 1: All right, So pivoting off of the winners, and obviously 242 00:10:28,760 --> 00:10:30,400 Speaker 1: that is a much harder thing to do. Let's talk 243 00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:32,920 Speaker 1: about finishing. Let's talk about top twenty, top thirties. That's 244 00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:35,840 Speaker 1: something you tend to put any investment into whill you 245 00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:37,960 Speaker 1: see opportunities where all of a sudden, maybe you see 246 00:10:37,960 --> 00:10:40,600 Speaker 1: somebody a good golfer that you really like, that you think, 247 00:10:40,640 --> 00:10:42,280 Speaker 1: you know what they might play better than you think 248 00:10:42,280 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 1: in this one. Maybe you can make some plus money 249 00:10:44,360 --> 00:10:46,680 Speaker 1: on there. Because there's certainly like even on DK where 250 00:10:46,679 --> 00:10:48,440 Speaker 1: you're talking about too. We just talked about Hovlin being 251 00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:50,320 Speaker 1: a plus one ten to finish in the top twenty. 252 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:53,440 Speaker 1: The Shane Lowry is at plus one thirty five hatt 253 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:54,959 Speaker 1: and at plus one thirty eight. So there's a lot 254 00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:57,320 Speaker 1: of you know, folks around there in that range where 255 00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:00,800 Speaker 1: maybe it's a little simpler, maybe less less dangerous in 256 00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:02,840 Speaker 1: terms of well, it's all or nothing, but maybe you 257 00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:04,679 Speaker 1: just get somebody that you think is going to play 258 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: well enough to finish at the top twenty or thirty. 259 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:09,079 Speaker 1: Is that a viable wager for folks who maybe you 260 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:11,199 Speaker 1: don't want to put all their eggs into a winner basket. 261 00:11:11,480 --> 00:11:12,920 Speaker 2: I mean, it's cowardly way to play. 262 00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:16,760 Speaker 1: What do you really think, Pat, No, I'll just kid 263 00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:19,280 Speaker 1: put threw it out there because that I think people 264 00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:20,560 Speaker 1: look at that board and they go, oh, it's so 265 00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:22,760 Speaker 1: hard to pick out the one winner. Maybe I do that, 266 00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:24,959 Speaker 1: but I want to hedge and have some more skin 267 00:11:25,040 --> 00:11:27,199 Speaker 1: in the game too and do some other things too, 268 00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:28,800 Speaker 1: and that might be a way to maybe make back 269 00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:30,080 Speaker 1: some of the money potentially too. 270 00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:32,839 Speaker 2: I listen, I'm not opposed to top twenties or top tens. 271 00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:34,719 Speaker 2: I do play them almost every single week, but I 272 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:36,880 Speaker 2: played them with long shots. I'm not looking to bet. 273 00:11:37,040 --> 00:11:39,280 Speaker 2: Like if Victor Hobblin's twenty five to one to win, 274 00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:41,959 Speaker 2: there's really no value in his top twenty plus one 275 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,920 Speaker 2: twenty five like right as, you're basically better if you 276 00:11:44,960 --> 00:11:46,800 Speaker 2: put a big number down. Well, yeah, you have to 277 00:11:46,800 --> 00:11:48,760 Speaker 2: put a big It's you're essentially betting on a football 278 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,719 Speaker 2: game at that point, and that's not what I do. 279 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:54,080 Speaker 2: That's not how I like to bet on golf. If 280 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 2: I'm going to be looking at let's say I'm looking 281 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:58,320 Speaker 2: at the top thirty market right now, what I prefer 282 00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:00,520 Speaker 2: to do. But me being in Canada a lot different 283 00:12:00,520 --> 00:12:02,400 Speaker 2: than being in the United States, and we have I 284 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:05,160 Speaker 2: mean in Britain it's even better, but we have placement wagers. 285 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:08,160 Speaker 2: So for example, like I play a lot of each 286 00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:10,199 Speaker 2: way betting on long shots. So there's a bunch of 287 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:12,120 Speaker 2: guys down the board that I really like this week, 288 00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:14,600 Speaker 2: and it's essentially trying to grab their top eight. So 289 00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:17,280 Speaker 2: that's the placement that's offered. So if I was to 290 00:12:17,320 --> 00:12:19,679 Speaker 2: bet twenty dollars on Let's say Taylor Pendrith, who I 291 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:21,880 Speaker 2: really like this week. He's five hundred to one to 292 00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:24,680 Speaker 2: win this event. So if I bet twenty dollars on 293 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:27,040 Speaker 2: him with the each way, what that means is that 294 00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:29,800 Speaker 2: ten dollars would be allocated towards the five hundred to 295 00:12:29,840 --> 00:12:32,520 Speaker 2: one if he won, and then another ten dollars would 296 00:12:32,559 --> 00:12:36,440 Speaker 2: be allocated towards his top eight, which is one fifth 297 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 2: of the odds of the five hundred, so it would 298 00:12:38,520 --> 00:12:40,640 Speaker 2: be one hundred to one for him to come inside 299 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:42,640 Speaker 2: the top eight. Now, the reason that I do that 300 00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:44,959 Speaker 2: is because I want to look at his top ten odds, 301 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:47,040 Speaker 2: and his top ten odds are thirty three to one. 302 00:12:47,320 --> 00:12:50,240 Speaker 2: So essentially I'm losing two placement points but gaining over 303 00:12:50,520 --> 00:12:53,559 Speaker 2: triple the odds in terms of what it actually pays out. 304 00:12:53,600 --> 00:12:56,800 Speaker 2: Plus I still have the upside of him winning, which 305 00:12:56,800 --> 00:12:58,800 Speaker 2: he's not going to win, but he could finish seventh 306 00:12:58,880 --> 00:13:01,920 Speaker 2: or something like that out of the realm. So that's 307 00:13:01,920 --> 00:13:03,720 Speaker 2: why I structure my bets that way. I think that 308 00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:05,839 Speaker 2: there's just more value to spread up your money instead 309 00:13:05,840 --> 00:13:08,200 Speaker 2: of putting twenty dollars on the thirty three to one 310 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:10,160 Speaker 2: to win six hundred. If I go ten and ten, 311 00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 2: I mean, if my guy wins, I win five thousand bucks. 312 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:14,760 Speaker 2: If becomes inside the top eight, I win five hundred bucks. 313 00:13:15,080 --> 00:13:17,800 Speaker 2: So that's a better way for me to structure, at 314 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:20,439 Speaker 2: least in my mind. That's what I'm telling myself is 315 00:13:20,480 --> 00:13:22,440 Speaker 2: the way that I want to approach this, because I 316 00:13:22,440 --> 00:13:24,959 Speaker 2: do like that upside Listen, I'm betting on golf for 317 00:13:25,040 --> 00:13:27,040 Speaker 2: huge payouts. If I can hit a five hundred to 318 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:29,840 Speaker 2: one winner, it can happen in golf. It's unlike any 319 00:13:29,880 --> 00:13:32,000 Speaker 2: other sports in that way. So there's a bunch of 320 00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:33,280 Speaker 2: guys down the list. If you just want to play 321 00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:35,800 Speaker 2: top tens or top twenties on them, I don't mind that, 322 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:37,320 Speaker 2: But I don't want to take a favorite at a 323 00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:40,360 Speaker 2: top twenty, because then you're just betting even money. You're 324 00:13:40,360 --> 00:13:42,800 Speaker 2: basically betting on a coin flip in terms of OZ 325 00:13:42,800 --> 00:13:44,680 Speaker 2: and it's probably not even that good, especially at a 326 00:13:44,720 --> 00:13:47,559 Speaker 2: course as difficult as Tory Pines in a tournament set 327 00:13:47,640 --> 00:13:49,840 Speaker 2: up as difficult as the US Open. So if you're 328 00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:53,440 Speaker 2: looking down the list, I would recommend Matt Wallace and 329 00:13:53,480 --> 00:13:55,880 Speaker 2: I have outright wagers on all these guys. So Matt 330 00:13:55,880 --> 00:13:58,480 Speaker 2: Wallace at one hundred and fifty to one, Taylor Pendrith 331 00:13:58,520 --> 00:14:00,840 Speaker 2: at five hundred to one, wyndhom Clark at seven hundred 332 00:14:00,840 --> 00:14:03,319 Speaker 2: and fifty to one, and Cameron Young at three hundred 333 00:14:03,360 --> 00:14:06,160 Speaker 2: to one are probably my four favorite guys from beyond 334 00:14:06,160 --> 00:14:08,000 Speaker 2: one hundred to one in the outright market. Now, if 335 00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 2: you want to play a top thirty on them, a 336 00:14:09,920 --> 00:14:12,320 Speaker 2: top twenty, bet them outright, you can deal with that 337 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:14,520 Speaker 2: with what you want. I played the outright win with 338 00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:16,960 Speaker 2: the each way in the top eight finishing places. On 339 00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:19,760 Speaker 2: one of those guys finishes inside the top eight, I'm 340 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:21,160 Speaker 2: gonna make a lot of money this week, even if 341 00:14:21,200 --> 00:14:22,280 Speaker 2: I lose every other bet. 342 00:14:22,760 --> 00:14:25,400 Speaker 1: Now, talk to me about some of the other possible 343 00:14:25,440 --> 00:14:28,320 Speaker 1: wagers too. We've got, obviously the groups you've got, you know, 344 00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 1: there's so many things now you can literally wager on everything. 345 00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:33,720 Speaker 1: But you've got different setups where you've got tournament props, 346 00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:35,760 Speaker 1: you've got make miss cut, you've got all kinds of 347 00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:37,920 Speaker 1: things you can get in on. What else, Even for 348 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:41,400 Speaker 1: the novice wager going out there this weekend and looking 349 00:14:41,440 --> 00:14:44,240 Speaker 1: at this tournament, do you think is a good path 350 00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:46,360 Speaker 1: where you say, you know what this particular prop or 351 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:48,760 Speaker 1: this particular wager kind of makes sense to me with 352 00:14:48,800 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 1: this player that you actually are high on as well 353 00:14:51,080 --> 00:14:53,040 Speaker 1: that you would advise, or is this something where you 354 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 1: stay away just focus on some of the things that 355 00:14:54,600 --> 00:14:56,600 Speaker 1: you talked about, which is, hey, it's a big, all 356 00:14:56,680 --> 00:14:58,680 Speaker 1: or nothing kind of thing. That's the nature of the game. 357 00:14:59,320 --> 00:15:01,440 Speaker 2: I tend to be all or nothing type of better 358 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:03,200 Speaker 2: when it comes to golf because when I win, I 359 00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:05,320 Speaker 2: went really big, and when I lose, I get wiped 360 00:15:05,320 --> 00:15:07,000 Speaker 2: out for the week. That's just the game that I 361 00:15:07,080 --> 00:15:08,840 Speaker 2: like to play. If you want to head yourself and 362 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:10,800 Speaker 2: you know you have one hundred dollars to invest, do 363 00:15:10,880 --> 00:15:12,880 Speaker 2: I invest a little bit here, invest a little bit there. 364 00:15:13,120 --> 00:15:15,160 Speaker 2: That's a perfectly reasonable way to go about it. It's 365 00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:18,520 Speaker 2: just not the strategy that I end up taking. So 366 00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 2: if you were like looking at props, most of them 367 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:23,400 Speaker 2: like aren't lined properly. And I hate to throw shade it. 368 00:15:23,480 --> 00:15:25,760 Speaker 2: You know, my favorite sports book in the world, drafting 369 00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:28,320 Speaker 2: sports book. But I'm seeing Taylor Pendrith right now at 370 00:15:28,320 --> 00:15:31,160 Speaker 2: plus four fifty to be top Canadian. I bet him 371 00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:34,920 Speaker 2: at plus eight hundred at another place yesterday and that 372 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 2: number is still hanging out there, so you shopping around 373 00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 2: finding the best value. I think that's an actual value bet, 374 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:43,240 Speaker 2: like Corey Connors in terms of the top Canadian market, 375 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:45,600 Speaker 2: is like minus one twenty or even minus one fifty 376 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:47,280 Speaker 2: at some spots. And the way that you need to 377 00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:50,000 Speaker 2: think about is this is technically a four ball. It's 378 00:15:50,200 --> 00:15:52,560 Speaker 2: one guy versus three other guys. And you'll see three 379 00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:56,360 Speaker 2: balls get launched every single day and almost no one 380 00:15:56,440 --> 00:15:58,440 Speaker 2: is ever a minus one fifty. And now he has 381 00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:00,960 Speaker 2: to be three other people. He is not. He's better 382 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:03,440 Speaker 2: than these guys, but he's not significantly better to be 383 00:16:03,480 --> 00:16:06,720 Speaker 2: a minus money favorite against three other players. I just 384 00:16:06,760 --> 00:16:08,480 Speaker 2: see Pendrith. No one knows who he is. He plays 385 00:16:08,520 --> 00:16:10,960 Speaker 2: on the corn Ferry Tour, but he is a massive bomber. 386 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:13,720 Speaker 2: He is. He has great touch around the greens and 387 00:16:13,720 --> 00:16:17,160 Speaker 2: he's pretty good putters. Irons are absolutely horrible. But he's 388 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:19,080 Speaker 2: played in two US Opens in his life, the last 389 00:16:19,080 --> 00:16:21,120 Speaker 2: two he's made the cut in both. That's better than 390 00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:22,960 Speaker 2: all the other Canadians, So why not. 391 00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:25,280 Speaker 1: I love it. I love that you could bet guys 392 00:16:25,280 --> 00:16:27,360 Speaker 1: from the countries too. It's just a fun thing to do, 393 00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:30,120 Speaker 1: all right. So if that is the wagering side of things. 394 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:31,960 Speaker 1: Let's switch gears a little bit and just touch on 395 00:16:32,000 --> 00:16:36,320 Speaker 1: real quick the DFS world of golf. And you have 396 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:38,000 Speaker 1: really taken us through, I know last time you were 397 00:16:38,040 --> 00:16:39,840 Speaker 1: on a few weeks back, you really kind of took 398 00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:41,800 Speaker 1: us to your thought process on that and how you 399 00:16:41,840 --> 00:16:44,800 Speaker 1: approach that and the reasons why. So now with the 400 00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:47,240 Speaker 1: mix of golfers this specific course, the way you've laid 401 00:16:47,240 --> 00:16:50,160 Speaker 1: it out, what does the roster construction, if you will, 402 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:52,320 Speaker 1: look like in your mind that you think these guys 403 00:16:52,320 --> 00:16:54,080 Speaker 1: are good investments at the number they're at. 404 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:58,160 Speaker 2: Essentially, what I did was go to Fantasy National dot 405 00:16:58,200 --> 00:17:01,520 Speaker 2: Com and I created my custom model within the site system. 406 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:03,840 Speaker 2: By the way, Fantasy National dot Com slash Mayo for 407 00:17:03,880 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 2: twenty percent off. Go try it out. 408 00:17:05,280 --> 00:17:08,080 Speaker 1: If you go try that, Pat Mayo's giving you free coupons, guys, 409 00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:08,600 Speaker 1: go get it. 410 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:11,040 Speaker 2: Listen, you get a weekly membership to Fantasy National with 411 00:17:11,080 --> 00:17:13,880 Speaker 2: the discount at seven bucks, you're probably gonna play far 412 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,240 Speaker 2: more than that and draftings, lineups or betting this week, 413 00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:18,919 Speaker 2: so you might a lot the best tools available to 414 00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:21,200 Speaker 2: help you out. So I just put in the inputs 415 00:17:21,200 --> 00:17:24,520 Speaker 2: that I wanted, massively putting on driving distance with a 416 00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:26,040 Speaker 2: bit of approach, a bit of putting, a bit of 417 00:17:26,080 --> 00:17:28,879 Speaker 2: around the green, but really waiting driving distance, and just 418 00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:31,240 Speaker 2: went to the top and see who I wanted to get. Now, 419 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,440 Speaker 2: the very top players in the world, I mean Speeth excluded, 420 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:37,520 Speaker 2: but you have rom DJ Bryson, Rory and Brooks. They 421 00:17:37,560 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 2: all mash it off the tee. Xander does as well. 422 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:42,399 Speaker 2: Justin Thomas is a little bit behind him, so it 423 00:17:42,440 --> 00:17:45,040 Speaker 2: is more a Kawa. He's more of a fairway finder 424 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:50,240 Speaker 2: than anything else. But I just decided Rory, Bryson and 425 00:17:50,280 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 2: Brooks are the best values. They're the best price of 426 00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:55,120 Speaker 2: those very top guys, so I'm just going to mix 427 00:17:55,119 --> 00:17:57,119 Speaker 2: and match with them. Where it really did help me 428 00:17:57,240 --> 00:17:59,760 Speaker 2: was down the list. That's how I end up on Pendrith, 429 00:18:00,200 --> 00:18:02,119 Speaker 2: So I ended up on Wyndham Clark, and how I 430 00:18:02,200 --> 00:18:04,840 Speaker 2: ended up on Cameron Young, another guy coming out from 431 00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:07,000 Speaker 2: the corn Ferry Tours. Won twice on the corn Ferry 432 00:18:07,040 --> 00:18:09,440 Speaker 2: Tour in the past month. Most people just don't know that, 433 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:11,840 Speaker 2: and they're just out in the six thousand dollars area, 434 00:18:11,880 --> 00:18:13,960 Speaker 2: and you have to think about the construct of this tournament. 435 00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:16,480 Speaker 2: Is the hardest cutting golf to make there's one hundred 436 00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:18,359 Speaker 2: and fifty six players in this tournament. Only the top 437 00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:21,600 Speaker 2: sixty in ties are going to play the weekend. So 438 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:23,560 Speaker 2: if you can squeeze a six of six through with 439 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:25,800 Speaker 2: your very top end guys, and what have we seen 440 00:18:25,840 --> 00:18:28,480 Speaker 2: at the US Open outside of Gary Woodland who fits 441 00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:31,320 Speaker 2: the bomber mold is not the elite bomber mold. It's 442 00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:34,800 Speaker 2: been Brooks, it's been Bryson, it's been Speef, it's been 443 00:18:34,880 --> 00:18:37,000 Speaker 2: all of the best players who end up winning. So 444 00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:39,240 Speaker 2: the more best players you can jam into a lineup 445 00:18:39,280 --> 00:18:41,439 Speaker 2: if you feel good at the very bottom end, is 446 00:18:41,480 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 2: the approach that I want to take. I think you're 447 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:45,720 Speaker 2: going to see a lot of people play as balanced 448 00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:47,520 Speaker 2: of a lineup as possible, and that could be the 449 00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:50,119 Speaker 2: right path this week. You could be looking at a 450 00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:53,520 Speaker 2: situation where you start your teams with Xander at ninety 451 00:18:53,560 --> 00:18:56,119 Speaker 2: three hundred dollars and take Can't Light and take Feena 452 00:18:56,480 --> 00:18:58,359 Speaker 2: and load up with guys in the high sevens or 453 00:18:58,400 --> 00:19:00,360 Speaker 2: the mid eights, and that's just the way you roll 454 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:02,240 Speaker 2: it out. I think I'm going to be a bit 455 00:19:02,320 --> 00:19:04,560 Speaker 2: more risky this week and go with two of my 456 00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:06,960 Speaker 2: studs in the ten thousand dollars Range or Rory at 457 00:19:07,000 --> 00:19:09,480 Speaker 2: nine to nine, drop to Coke Racker Lowry in the 458 00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:12,320 Speaker 2: mid sevens and then take two guys in the sixes 459 00:19:12,359 --> 00:19:14,359 Speaker 2: and see what I'm left over and try to construct 460 00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:15,120 Speaker 2: a lineup that way. 461 00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:17,600 Speaker 1: There you have it. He is the one, the only 462 00:19:17,680 --> 00:19:20,159 Speaker 1: Pat Mayo you fall him on Twitter at dpme's the 463 00:19:20,200 --> 00:19:22,600 Speaker 1: host of the Pat Mayo Experience, and it's always a 464 00:19:22,600 --> 00:19:24,840 Speaker 1: great experience to have Pat Mayo on the show. Pat, 465 00:19:25,119 --> 00:19:25,960 Speaker 1: What's going on with you? 466 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:26,359 Speaker 2: Right now? 467 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:28,720 Speaker 1: We have cooking over at the Experience. 468 00:19:28,800 --> 00:19:31,600 Speaker 2: Every day golf for now and then it quickly transitions 469 00:19:31,640 --> 00:19:36,639 Speaker 2: back over into football. Start Thursday, so Ceely and I 470 00:19:36,640 --> 00:19:39,520 Speaker 2: are going to be talking about the AFC West player 471 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:43,000 Speaker 2: by player breakdown for fantasy for the upcoming season, plus 472 00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:45,560 Speaker 2: all the future odds on the teams. We've already done 473 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:48,840 Speaker 2: NFC East, AFC East and NFC West, so we're getting 474 00:19:48,880 --> 00:19:51,000 Speaker 2: through all the divisions. I also have if you check 475 00:19:51,040 --> 00:19:54,159 Speaker 2: out my Twitter right now at the PME, I have 476 00:19:54,240 --> 00:19:57,040 Speaker 2: giveaways for fifty Millionaire Maker tickets this week, so you 477 00:19:57,160 --> 00:20:01,240 Speaker 2: probably want to jump onto mass That expires Wednesday at 478 00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:04,359 Speaker 2: noon Eastern. I am also doing a live chat at 479 00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:07,800 Speaker 2: noon Eastern time on Mayo Media Networks YouTube page if 480 00:20:07,840 --> 00:20:10,440 Speaker 2: you do have fantasy golf questions for the US Open, 481 00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:13,399 Speaker 2: and I'm giving away some scott Fishbowl entries too, so 482 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:15,240 Speaker 2: you can check out my Twitter for that. If you're 483 00:20:15,320 --> 00:20:18,000 Speaker 2: keen on competing in the scott Fishbowl this. 484 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:20,280 Speaker 1: Year, well I will be there. I will be part 485 00:20:20,320 --> 00:20:22,280 Speaker 1: of the scott Fishball. I am every year, and hopefully 486 00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:24,560 Speaker 1: we'll get to talk some NFL. I was love coming 487 00:20:24,600 --> 00:20:26,240 Speaker 1: on with you. I think last time it was Meani, 488 00:20:26,320 --> 00:20:29,399 Speaker 1: myself and you just having a crazy few hours of 489 00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:31,720 Speaker 1: what we'd record like four shows I think in one day. 490 00:20:31,760 --> 00:20:33,920 Speaker 1: I think something like that, so you could go on vacation. 491 00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:36,520 Speaker 2: Right, is that is the Pat? It always seems like 492 00:20:36,600 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 2: I am in the two shows every single day, but 493 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:42,360 Speaker 2: some days I sit there and record four in one day, 494 00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:45,320 Speaker 2: so I can take four days to do well anytime. 495 00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:47,440 Speaker 1: Baby. It's always a pleasure. And thank you for enlightening 496 00:20:47,480 --> 00:20:49,720 Speaker 1: us with all the great content on the golf side today. 497 00:20:49,800 --> 00:20:52,280 Speaker 1: Hope everybody enjoys the US Opening. Like Pat said, go 498 00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:54,680 Speaker 1: over and follow him and go get some free stuff 499 00:20:54,720 --> 00:20:56,320 Speaker 1: and use that code he talked about as well in 500 00:20:56,320 --> 00:20:58,560 Speaker 1: the site. Again at the PM's where you get all 501 00:20:58,560 --> 00:21:00,639 Speaker 1: the information from Pat. Hit him up on Twitter too. 502 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:02,840 Speaker 1: He's always a great follow, not just for golf, but 503 00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:09,080 Speaker 1: obviously for all the sports that he covers. You are 504 00:21:09,119 --> 00:21:11,640 Speaker 1: a good follow in terms of content because you put 505 00:21:11,640 --> 00:21:14,879 Speaker 1: out quality. Everybody has to have these stupid questions all 506 00:21:14,920 --> 00:21:16,920 Speaker 1: the time, what do you think is gonna be the best? 507 00:21:16,920 --> 00:21:19,960 Speaker 1: Like it's such Twitter fodder, like please make the algorithm 508 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:21,800 Speaker 1: go up some more people follow me? No, I need 509 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:24,200 Speaker 1: people like you. Put out great content and then step 510 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:26,119 Speaker 1: away and go to lunch. That's what you do, and 511 00:21:26,160 --> 00:21:26,960 Speaker 1: I appreciate it. 512 00:21:27,240 --> 00:21:29,280 Speaker 2: I mean I didn't even do that, scheduled tweets for 513 00:21:29,280 --> 00:21:32,320 Speaker 2: three days in advance and walk essentially a account. 514 00:21:35,240 --> 00:21:38,080 Speaker 1: But again, when the content drops, it's good. So if 515 00:21:38,119 --> 00:21:39,639 Speaker 1: you give me good content, who cares? 516 00:21:39,720 --> 00:21:45,000 Speaker 2: You know? I answer people's questions to you, do you do? 517 00:21:46,119 --> 00:21:47,320 Speaker 2: I do well? Well. 518 00:21:47,440 --> 00:21:49,320 Speaker 1: I Again, we don't want to set the standard too high. 519 00:21:49,320 --> 00:21:50,960 Speaker 1: We don't want to get ahead of ourselves. So that's 520 00:21:50,960 --> 00:21:54,399 Speaker 1: Pat Mayo. Everybody, enjoy the golf this weekend. We'll be 521 00:21:54,440 --> 00:21:56,239 Speaker 1: back again next time. We were betting pros. I want 522 00:21:56,240 --> 00:21:58,919 Speaker 1: to remind you to go over and download that app 523 00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:01,159 Speaker 1: for betting pros and head tobttingpros dot com, so you 524 00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:03,560 Speaker 1: get all of those consensus lines when you're looking at 525 00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:05,919 Speaker 1: all the stuff for this weekend's action. That'll do it 526 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:08,560 Speaker 1: for me. We'll be back again next time. We'll see 527 00:22:08,560 --> 00:22:09,240 Speaker 1: that cot kids