WEBVTT - 5/7, Part 2: Love for Bauer, RIP Vince Velasquez, and more... 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079 and type in you guessed Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find 0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480 us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're 0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.920 listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Let me just 0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:53.360 become best friends. Fantasy best friends forever, our number two 0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:58.320 Fantasy best friends forever. Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Sen Frank's 0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.560 stampile hanging out with you and we're joined to day 0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.120 as we are, almost ease every day. But the Closer, 0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.600 what's up, guys, how are you doing? It's your boy, 0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:13.880 the Closer Chris Ventre here and we've Paddock last night. Amazing, 0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:20.319 amazing guy. All those guys that declined the trade of 0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.280 Tommy fam and Chris Paddock for Chris Arthro or Jack 0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:29.160 Flaherty up because nobody trees and they all got declined. 0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.120 I was giving them a great offer. They still decline it. 0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.920 That's what it comes down to. And that was right now, 0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.520 they'd be you know, very happy. What again, Tommy fam 0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.959 also had a monster day yesterday. He's having a monster 0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.320 season overall. He's one of the best style fielders in 0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.720 the league right now. Um is that a keeper league 0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:47.960 is a keeper league. I think you have to hold 0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:49.680 Paddock then, So we talked about this a little bit 0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.080 in the first hour. If you played in a re 0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.200 draft league, at what point do you kind of poy 0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.760 with the idea of selling Paddock because of the innings 0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.200 limit or do you just ride it out and say, 0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.440 are you even if I only get a hundred innings, 0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.600 they're gonna be really good a hundred forty innings. I'm 0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.960 just gonna keep him. See in like a league where 0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.359 where we're playing in the pit league where E R 0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.880 A and whip matters more, and uh, the innings don't 0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:15.920 matter as much. Have to head categories league yet, right, 0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.400 you don't need to I think you hold. You don't 0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.520 need to trade him because the innings limit isn't really 0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.360 gonna affect you as much. Whereas you're in the points league, 0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.040 innings mean a lot. And I think in a redraft 0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.239 points league, I would consider selling. He's at an absolute 0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.359 high top twenties starting pitcher. You get something really good 0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.920 for him right now? What is it I would have 0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.120 to do to pop into my head immediately? Greg Jack Flaherty. 0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.880 I think I would do that. I would give up 0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.359 Paddock to get Jack Flaherty. I watched Jack Flaherty pitch 0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.880 multiple times this year. He's got filthy he so he 0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:57.919 struggled on the road so far this year. His home 0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.040 road splits are very bad, and he's had something of 0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.840 matchups again. He faced the Brewers I think three times already. 0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.000 His underlying numbers are really good, though, if you can 0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.520 make that happen, I know it's hard to part with 0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.080 Paddock in the pit League. I traded away Pete Alonzo 0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.320 to get Steven Strossberg. It was hard for me to 0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.320 do because I've loved watching Pete Alonzo play. He's been awesome. 0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.480 I didn't want to trade him but to get back 0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.760 a starting picture. And and before I even made the trade, um, 0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:25.640 James Paxson had gotten hurt too, so I kind of 0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.360 needed a starting picture. I had to do it. So 0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.239 sometimes you just you kind of even if you really 0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.280 like a player, you kind of just gotta swallow your 0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:33.880 pride and whatever. Let me see what I could get 0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.960 for this guy. But if you're thinking about it logically, 0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.240 as as much as it pains me to say, I 0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.520 think Paddock is awesome, but if you do have concerns 0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.720 about the endings limit at some point in a redraft, 0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.760 especially like a points league, I would throw him out there, 0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:47.800 and I think you might be able to get a 0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.560 top twenty starting picture and return. I like Jack Flaherty 0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.840 a lot many No I do too. I agree. I 0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.400 tried to that. That's one of the things I tried 0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.080 to do, was a Paddock and fan for for Flaherty declined. 0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.960 If I did Paddock and you could do, there's people 0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.000 out there who will accept that trade, but it's hard. Now, 0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.080 you're right, I like that deal you made with Strasburg. 0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.600 Starting pictures are just super valuable, especially ones that are 0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.280 that good. Especially in our league. We're in a fourteen 0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.240 team league with nine pictures starting in our lineup. There's 0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.599 nine starting pictures every day. We gotta plug in. In 0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.479 a fourteen league, you're throwing scrubs out there, then, you 0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:22.600 know what I mean. There's a lot of teams that 0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.839 are throwing just scrubs out there. So to get a 0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:26.800 picture like that in return for Pete Alonzo, which you 0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.119 could get from you know, you get a similar season 0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.720 maybe from a Christian Walker, maybe not, but at least 0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.440 maybe a little less, whereas you're gaining so much in 0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.279 the Strasburg, especially after the injury you just got. I 0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.719 think that's a great deal. Getting pitching is just hard 0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.920 to do. It's hard to trade for pitching right now. Right, 0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:44.880 just to let you inside the mind of some of 0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.720 the listeners and watchers and how they feel about Chris Paddock. 0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:54.960 William Friedman, no effing way a moving Paddock, and I 0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.800 think that's how most people would feel but think. But 0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.040 it's also when you react that way, there's no better 0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.520 time because that everyone feels that way about Everybody wants 0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.200 Paddock right now. I'm just throwing it out there. I 0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.880 wouldn't want again. I understand how funny is to watch. 0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:12.520 You also have to remember it's not even just the 0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.000 way he's pitching, right, it's the feeling of fantasy owners 0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.880 that they got it right, that they nailed this young 0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.560 guy was gonna be the guy. They got him in 0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.839 the middle rounds of their draft and they nailed it. 0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.240 You have that as well. It's like an ego boost 0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.640 a little bit. But here's the thing. The best fantasy 0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.320 owners are going to be the smart ones that sell 0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.040 because you can't have attachments to these guys. The best 0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.080 fantasy players don't have attachments to these guys. And when 0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:39.560 you have like this personal attachment, I don't want to 0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.479 let him go. I picked him right, and you know, 0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.760 I'm just gonna ride him out. It might work, but 0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.760 you have you know that innings cap is there, and 0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.000 the and the logical and the smart thing to do 0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.520 is to sell him at some point, And now is 0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.520 the time you're gonna get the most out of him. 0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.040 I mean, who knows. Maybe you get a little more 0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.440 in a couple of weeks, maybe as another two great starts. 0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.960 Now he's had an all time high, you know value. 0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.279 But how much more value you gonna get out of 0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.000 him than what you're getting right now? You know what 0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:05.799 I mean? I don't know that it's ever gonna be higher. 0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.200 Like he's got a one ar a. I don't want 0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:09.760 to be the bearer of bad news. I feel like 0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.360 a Chris Paddock fan clubs about to barge in here, 0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.160 like throw tomatoes at me or something. He's got a 0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.840 five year A, he's got a three three X fit, 0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.400 he's got a one seventy six badbit against right now. Yea, 0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.480 even if he's the best picture for baseball, there's gonna 0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.240 be some regression. I'm storing out there without down. He's 0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.600 he's awesome, he's really fun to watch. But I'll just 0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.600 I'll throw it out there. It's almost impossible to sustain 0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.440 a rookie to sustain one five five r a one 0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.440 point seven whit like that's that's Clayton Kershore in his prime, 0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.560 Like you know, getting that. You know, do you know 0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.400 what team he came for, Greg? And what the trade was? 0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:51.039 I saw this last night. Yes, I'll ask Ventraventra, do 0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.480 you know what team Chris Paddick came from before the Padres? 0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.839 Was it the Red Sox? It wasn't It was the 0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:06.600 Miami Marlins. And for who Fernando Rodney like five years ago? 0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.640 Straight up. Now, I don't know what if there was 0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.600 anything else involved, but and you know what, I started 0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.680 instantly thinking about this, Greig. This is the same Padres 0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.680 organization that traded James Shields away to get Fernando Tatis Jr. 0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:24.240 The Padres are crushing it right now. Yeah, and then 0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.120 let's let's take this once up step further the Marlins. 0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.280 And look, it was the ownership group before Jeter that 0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.160 made a lot of these trades and the general managers whatever. 0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.960 But they are also the same team that traded away 0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:47.240 Luis Castillo to get Dan Straley Padres Marlins. Well, to 0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:52.240 be fair, that that that got reversed over here, that well, 0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.720 Luis Castio tree got got reversed with the Podres because 0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.960 a J. Pelor lied to the to the Marlins. Wait, 0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.520 so was Luis Casti originally be part of he was 0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:07.000 was originally traded to the Padres in the this what 0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.440 was the what was the deal? Remember this now? It 0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.320 was for a bunch of players and Louis Castillo. That 0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.520 trade got reversed because the Padres had lied about their 0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.640 players being hurt. They traded the Marlins. It was and 0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.760 I remember it was some starting pitcher like failed the 0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.000 physical or something like that. It was Andrew Cashner. Wasn't 0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:29.160 it was Andrew Cashner trade? I want to say, yeah, yeah, 0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.160 it was Colin It was Colin Ria. Yes, it was CoA, Yes, 0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.480 it was the Andrew Cashner trade. Though yeah, right now, 0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.839 it was Louise Castiolan just didn't want anything to do 0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.440 with Louise Castio. Huh, they did not want this guy. 0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.680 No injured reliever card to Caps was involved, Cass he 0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.520 was good for a second. Remember is going to be 0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.760 the next big clos right along with Kevin Quackenbush. Jared 0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.600 Cosart was another one involved that who was also highly 0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:01.200 crowded too. Yeah, so oh Mike in this the Fernando 0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.240 Rodney trade was actually straight up Chris Paddock for Fernando 0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.360 Marlin's Marlin. Man, Oh my goodness, gracious to me. Honestly, 0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.240 I don't even remember Rodney on the Marlins, Like I 0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.480 remember when it was half a season. I don't remember. 0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.240 They don't even remember one of the Marlins. It was 0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.959 like it was him and um it was the guy 0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.600 A j. Ramos were and they were kind of making 0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.440 a run that year. Here Brad Ziegler might have even 0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.760 been on that they were they were kind of making 0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.120 a run. Um it was you know, Stanton was hot. 0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.360 The outfielders, it was Haim Mozuna yellow and like everyone 0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.440 was kind of jelly d Gordon. That might have been 0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:40.959 a year or one of the years that he had 0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.480 like the batting title. But we can't bash the Mallins 0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.600 too much. I know this ever is bad, but they 0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.359 also won two World Series there a very young franchise 0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.920 technically because they haven't been around that long, and they 0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.160 won the World Series where no money they got these 0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:56.640 guys and they gave him all away the year after 0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.840 both those world series, so the team completely fell up. 0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.480 But they still won two old series in like a 0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.520 decade span, so that's pretty good. It's not good. You 0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.679 haven't been out in the playoffs since the teams that 0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.319 haven't even won the haven't been to a World Series. No, 0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.440 I understand that half the Marlins way of operating. He's 0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.200 not good. It hasn't been good. You just don't have money. 0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.280 As much as we're crossing them to like you have money. 0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.240 That's not sure. They have money. That's bessy. Every team 0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.760 has money to spend. There was true, and they're also 0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:24.640 money is also not a small mine. Is also not 0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.120 a small market. That's that's just afforded to sign every 0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.400 single team, every single team. They don't get, uh, they 0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.440 don't get anybody watch the games and stuff like, they 0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.400 don't make money from that. I mean, I know, any 0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.400 owner could spend any money they want, like you know, 0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.440 there's no cap, so you could do what you want realistically. 0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.120 But these small market teams, it is hard to try 0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.120 to figure out different ways, Like Oakland tries to figure 0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.439 out what you know with literally bean ball and all 0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.719 that stuff money ball, like you know, you try to 0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.120 figure out different ways. I don't know. I like the 0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:53.960 moll I like how the Mallins won two World Series 0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:58.040 in that time. Can you name every team Fernando Ruddy 0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.319 has played for? Definitely out, but I can try you want, 0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.319 you want to try? Sure, Tampa Bay and ten of them, 0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:12.840 Bamba Bay, Miami, Oakland, Arizona, Minnesota at some point last 0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:21.080 year is either last year? Yes, gosh, um you're you're rising, 0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.120 the only you're rising. The first two teams he played for, 0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.040 um and who was he on back in the day, 0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.960 and you're rising? Two others he was on. We got 0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.880 six You're you're missing four out of the first five 0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.839 clubs he played for Detroit's that's the first thing he 0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.280 played for. Oh yeah, it was him. And who was 0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.720 it do with the big Beard? Was Valverde No, No No, 0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:47.640 not him. Zumaya was a nut job He also heard 0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:53.400 himself playing guitar hero. So that's bad. That's something I 0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:59.600 can imagine, like game doing. Yeah, rope, he plays real 0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.880 good time. Are you we got seven? We got seven 0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.880 out of ten? Yeah? There don't remember. I feel like 0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.120 he played. One of them is really gettable. The other 0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.679 two are tough. One of them that one of them hard. 0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:18.360 If it's for Baltimore Seattle, that's correct, alright, Seattle was gettable. 0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.400 I thought he's either two are impossible. One of them 0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.440 is really tough. I don't think the other one is. 0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:31.199 I give up. So after the Tigers, they traded. He 0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.200 said was a free agent for two years eleven million 0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.920 dollars with the Los Angeles Angels of Ada. I was 0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.240 gonna say Angels. I thought that. I thought about that too. 0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.640 He was in a red jersey at some point outside 0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.240 of Arizona. The Mariners ultimately cut him, and he was 0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.559 then traded for cash considerations. This is the one that 0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:51.920 I had no recollection though. The Chicago Cups, I don't 0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.679 remember that. I do remember that. I don't remember that 0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.240 it was a short How long was he there for? 0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.559 Not long? Right? Like? How many appearances any making a 0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.959 cub uniform? Greg that's a really good question. You just 0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:07.679 had like his fan grabs page. Oh my goodness, and Rodney, 0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.920 what an interesting career. You don't say what you want 0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:11.800 about the guy. He's done it for a long time. Man, 0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.560 He's been one of He had some really good closer years. 0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.280 And I brought this question up before the end of 0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.520 the hour. Someone askeds on Twitter at to night Nick 0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.520 Luciano on Twitter rank and this is gonna be tough 0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.719 for you. There's a few guys on this list that 0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:31.360 you really like him Anderson, Elvis Andrews, Ory Polanco, Fernando 0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:36.679 Tatis Jr. Jonathan VR. Five shortstops who were you know, 0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.760 maybe Jonathan VR wasn't undervalued during draft because he was 0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.640 drafted highly because of his stolen basis, slightly because he 0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.080 also he's in Baltimore. But Elvis Andrews was a guy 0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.640 who was undervalued, Horry Polanco, Fernando Tatis. Obviously, once we 0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.199 knew he was gonna start the year in the majors, 0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.720 he climbed up forts but before that undervalued. And then 0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.599 Tim Anderson. We spoke about that a lot, and we 0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.520 did our shortstop preview how he was undervalued too. So 0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:05.960 how would ranking's guy you name five, right, Polanco, Tim Anderson, Andrews, Polanco, Tatis, 0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.080 Johnny VR So. I think number one for me would 0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:15.439 be Tim Anderson. I agree with you. I agree as well. 0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.880 Uh number two I would go with, right now, Polanco. 0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.480 I actually just picked up Polanco Frank Lank Polanco last, 0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.200 did you well, he's probably doing it from a points 0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.280 leak perspective. If that's true, I would put Polanco second. 0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.360 He's absolutely killing and point lead right. UM three would 0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.320 be We'll do it from a points league and then 0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.840 I'll do it from a RODO For me would be 0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.239 I think Tatis, who's the okay seen we had Andrews's 0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.840 Andrews VR Yeah, so I would say Tatis three, uh 0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:52.960 VR four, Andrewses last for me? Okay, from a roto perspective, 0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.080 I put Tim Anderson first as well. Then I would 0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:06.320 put mm hmm. I would put Andrews is killing it though, yeah, 0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:12.200 he's really good man. I would put Andrews second in RODO, 0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:18.760 and then I would put the R Tatis man. I 0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.080 don't want to put Polanco last. I like Polanco a 0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.480 lot patting average is awesome. He's basically he's gonna hill 0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.160 three categories. He's gonna give you batting average, he's gonna 0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.080 give you home runs, he's gonna give you run scored. 0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.320 The RBIs might not be there because he's gonna lead 0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.520 off or be at the top of the lineup, and 0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.760 he's not really gonna give you stolen basis. So he's 0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.600 a three category player. They're all really good, though, Man, 0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.240 I don't want to rank him last. I really don't 0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.720 want to. They're all, you know, Tim Anderson first, Andrews second. 0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.640 You know, I would put Tatis last on this list, 0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.560 and redraft just because he does strike out a lot. 0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.520 I think there'll be some regression into batting average. This 0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.280 is a great group, though, man, I mean would be 0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.280 happy to have any of them. To be honest, I 0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.440 would be happy to have any of them. Elvis Andrews 0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.040 completely proving people wrong. Year in a year out his 0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:08.800 stack cast numbers. I was just looking at it during 0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:10.720 the break. His sprint speed is not good. It's like 0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.280 in the fifty three percentile. He still has six stolen 0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.360 bases on the year. Elvis andres and he hits in 0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.560 the middle of the lineup in a really good lineup 0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.160 in Texas, we didn't think it was gonna be that good. 0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.680 It's been pretty good, better than with the Great Ballpark 0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.960 to hidden. He's hidden third, so he's gonna give you 0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.120 r BIS two and runs because he's got you know, 0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.720 Shoy Gallow behind him. I get you probably fifteen home 0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:40.240 runs and stolen bases. Give you the Homer's man. I 0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.760 feel like the Homers are like. I like like this 0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.720 group a lot. I like this group of shortstops a lot. 0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:50.240 But yeah, I would put Tim Anderson first, UM and yeah, 0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:55.080 I probably put put Polanco let's say, fourth, and put 0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.480 fifth fifth and re draft because I think there's gonna 0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.680 be some he strikes out a lot, there's gonna be 0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.680 some batting average regression a little bit for him. He's 0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:04.879 got to come back from the injury. I want to 0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.200 see how he responds to that too. Right now, on 0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.760 May seven, with him on the IL, i'll rank him one. 0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.840 We'll take a break here. When we come back, I 0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.200 want to mention what ve alaska Is didn't didn't do 0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.240 last night, and his opponent Miles Nicholas, and what he 0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.280 did as well. We're also gonna chat about Trevor Bower's 0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.840 night here. It's a fantasy best friends forever a fantasy 0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:33.160 sports were you know louse weight Now got a fat 0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.520 dot com bluse that unwanted belly fat today and get 0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.200 free information at fat one dot com. Fit in the 0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.159 dress or pets or bathing suits you've always wanted to 0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.520 go to fat dot com. Lose ten, twenty or more 0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.520 pounds immediately go to fat one dot com for free 0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.520 information on how you can lose weight. Go to fat 0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.760 dot com, fat dot com. That's fat one red dot com. 0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.840 What's your I R S problem? Do you owe back taxes? 0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.399 Is there a lean placed on your property? Have your 0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.520 bank accounts been frozen or seized? Have your wages been garnished? 0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.199 Are you being audited by the I R S? Are 0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.160 they sending you letters that demand actions and have urgent 0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.960 due dates? Well. Solving your tax problems is as easy 0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.639 as calling Taxes three to one. The I R S 0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.920 is the largest collection agency in the world. You need 0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.320 the best representation to give you peace of mind. You 0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.760 need experienced professionals that can cut through the red tape 0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.000 and stop the collection process. If you have a serious 0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.600 problem with the I R S, called the Taxes three 0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.000 to one network today, We'll get them off your back 0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.640 eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one, eight 0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.720 hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one, eight hundred 0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.760 nine six one thirty six thirty one eight hundred nine 0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:05.840 six one three six three one full time Fantasy Nick 0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.960 Senzel is now playing in the outfield, but in the 0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.240 minor leagues people know him as a second baseman. Well, 0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.040 he also was a third baseman, so I'm sure a 0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.479 lot of leagues right now it's on what's his position? 0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.600 Why don't we make it so complicated? In fantasy baseball? 0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.399 The reds nowhere nick Senzel plays? Why don't lead commissioners, 0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.240 Why don't leagues? Why doesn't he ESPN? Why doesn't Yahoo? 0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.960 Why doesn't CBS? Why doesn't everybody know he's an outfielder? 0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.120 How hard is this? Week days to the four pm 0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.479 Eastern on the Fantasy Sports Network and on your popular 0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:47.560 podcast providers, Fantasy BFS, Fantasy Sports Radio Network Ventra standfell 0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.720 all hanging out and I meagined before I wanted to 0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.920 get Intovincent velasque is and what he did last night, 0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.840 what he didn't do. What he did do was be terrible. 0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.199 What he didn't do it would be good. Velaska has 0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.840 when four innings, four hits, five runs, five walks. He 0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:03.920 struck out of three, allowed three home runs. On the 0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.560 other side, Miles Micholas was excellent seven and things, three hits, 0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.560 no runs, allowed, five strikeouts. We said before, we said 0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.800 it last week too. Despite the ear A being under four, 0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.200 you can certainly drop Vinny Velasquez at this point. Miles 0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.560 Michelis needed a good start. His ear A still hovers 0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.680 around four, but he got a good start against a 0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.119 tough offense here. Frank, Yeah, Miles Michaelas has been bouncing 0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.240 back his past couple of starts, so it was good 0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.000 to see this, especially against a pretty good Phillies line 0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.520 up here, very tough one for a right handed picture navigating. 0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.120 He was just outstanding. Seven shut out innings, three hits, 0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.280 zero walks is exactly what you want to see from 0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.400 Miles Mikolas. And after his really really rough started getting 0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.520 the ear right down to four point zero two, and 0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.240 I think it's going to continue to climb, to continue 0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.200 to fall a little bit lower than this. He's not 0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:51.760 gonna pitch to the sub three ear a that he 0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.720 had last year, but I think he is a picture 0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.119 that ken pits two amid three z r A. I 0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:58.399 think he could be in that range. I know a 0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.639 lot of people like to flock to or its pictures 0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.800 who gets strikeouts. And I understand why because the more 0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.080 you have a picture that allows balls in play, the 0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.720 more things can go wrong. Obviously, but we've seen guys 0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.680 make a career out of it. What about Dallas Kiko 0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.280 the past couple of years, he's been able to make 0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.159 a career out of the young guy who gets a 0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.920 lot of groundballs and pitches to contact. Miles miekle Loss, 0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.520 I think is a guy based on his stuff too, 0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.800 Like he doesn't have bad stuff, he doesn't have swinging 0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.520 miss stuff, but he knows how to pitch, and he 0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.320 knows how to induce soft contact. And he's got like 0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.600 a you know, a load of mid nineties fastball. He's 0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.439 got a pretty wicked slider. Two. It just doesn't translate 0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.080 to strikeouts for whatever reason when it comes to Michael Uss. 0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.560