WEBVTT - Microsoft Sinks, Alphabet Spikes, Meta Next to Report

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation, money and power. Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Ed Ludlove.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heinder Bloomberg's World. I Callders in New York.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Ed Ludlow He's back tomorrow. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Full earnings coverage ahead from Google to Microsoft a snap,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>we have got you covered. Plus we'll take a deep

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>dive into the current state of social media as Elon

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Muskun veils his grand vision to turn Twitter into x

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>into a one stop shop for financial services. Plus we'll

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>stick with social media and push your head to Meta's

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>earnings out after the bell today. How have those cost

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>cutting initiatives impacted the bottom line? We'll discuss it all first. Alphabet, Microsoft,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>some key movers on the benchmarks today. Dive into each

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>micro picture and please to say that Daniel Newman of

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the Future and Group is here with our CEO and

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Dania's always great to have some time with you. And

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>let's dig into Alphabet first, because it was a good

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>set of numbers. Is this a relief rally or is

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>this actually signs of progress? And really AI is starting

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to work in their favor.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think there was a lot of concern when

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft first hit with chat, GPT open AI being is

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 3>this going to start taking market share away from where

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Google makes its money and so Cloud, you know, was

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 3>starting to make a little money and all of a

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>sudden people are like, ooh, Cloud's starting to make money,

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>but his search.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden getting get hit.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>I think we saw with what they were able to

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 3>do with deep mind and brain getting their palm model,

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>getting you know, uh, you know, the search generative search

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 3>into market Caroline that effectively they're going to be stable.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>And now you can see what happens today is people

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 3>are looking at Microsoft and saying, was the first move

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>truly giving them an advantage?

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Interesting. I mean we understand there's reports even that

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Segei Brin's come back into the fold much more, helping

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>drive the AI focus for over at Alphabet, But talk

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to us about market share, particularly around cloud, because it

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>feels as though azure is the area that everyone's slightly

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>worried about. With Microsoft that ramp up the double digits

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 2>rule got so used to just cooling down a little bit.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Is Alphabet taking any of that.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, they're taking a little bit because you saw they

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 3>had about a twenty eight percent growth this quarter. Microsoft

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>was just a little bit less than that, and anytime

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 3>that Google outpaces Microsoft, it means small bits of micro

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 3>market share. Now, having said that, there's a lot of

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>large numbers, Azure did reveal some of its size, said

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 3>about one hundred and ten billion in cloud, about half

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>of that being Azure I believe were the numbers they

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>put out, So they finally revealed a little bit of

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>what their cloud market looks like. I mean, Google's you know,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 3>sub ten tennich billion dollars this quarter in revenue for

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 3>the cloud business, so it's still a bit smaller.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, remember when AWUS was growing. They're

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>up to eighty.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Billion dollars in revenue at plus annually. These differences are

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 3>hard to make up, so when you're young and you're

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 3>growing fast care line. Having said that, I think Googles

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>has some momentum. I think their AI play is really

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 3>starting to pay off. So they came in late. But

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 3>people are saying, well, you didn't have to be early

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 3>in this case, because we're seeing how quick things are.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Catching up and whether they were technically late or whether

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>they were just being more cautious about a rollout, realizing

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the power that they ultimately have in the in the community,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 2>their size, their scale. I'm interested in AI more broadly.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting here in New York today. I think AWS

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>is showing off its AI prowess. How much is AI

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>going to drive cloud ad option more broadly, Well.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be significant across the board. We saw

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Azure and then Microsoft with Dynamics three sixty five rollout,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 3>some pricing companies like SAP, companies like Salesforce, they're all saying,

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 3>you want our best AI features, You're going to have

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 3>to use our services in the cloud. And so different

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 3>companies like in SAP, you don't have a hyperscale cloud,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 3>so you have to use an Azure, or you have

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>to use an AWS Salesforce. You have to use their

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>service to get the best AI options. And we're seeing

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the market. You know, we've done some recent market forecasting Carolina.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>We see this market growing by about threefold over the

0:03:58.960 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 3>next five years.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>What exact market we're talking cloud adoption market head.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing the AI market.

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>So we see about a sixty billion dollar market right now.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Our future and forecast for five years out twenty twenty

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 3>seven shows almost one hundred and eighty billion. This is

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 3>in hardware, platforms software, So this is you know, a

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty two percent or so growth rate, which is big,

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 3>but for how much AI.

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's going to be quite a bit bigger.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think some of this forecast is there's still

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 3>a bit of conservatism. I think people are a little

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 3>bit past the hype. Are they using the services? You know,

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I was using barred like crazy, I was using GPT

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and I found myself carrying over the last you know,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks to month, almost like I'm not

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>using them quite as much, so has a luster worn off?

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Or now we're starting to see it applied into tools,

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 3>and that's where it's going to really start to pay

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.679
<v Speaker 3>off in our CRM, in our search when we're actually

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>using these things for business and enterprise purposes.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Dan, can you when you're looking at modeling that out

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>for the next five years, what are you using as

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>price points? And we're only starting to see what a

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft would charge if you're going to adopt some of

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>their overall being AI within the enterprise thirty bucks a month. Additional,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 2>how are you seeing companies charge for this, and how

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 2>do you forecast that forward?

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, so here's the thing.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 3>The MODELINGUE is incredibly complicated because you have the modeling

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 3>of things like hardware, where we have quite a bit

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 3>of clarity whether it's an Nvidia, Intel AWS selling infrastructure.

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 3>And then you have software. We have companies that are

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of saying, hey, we're going to give this away.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're going to.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Just include this because it's how we protect our moat.

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>And then you had Salesforce that showed a really rich

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 3>pricing and said we have a ton of features across

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 3>service marketing, sales Cloud, and you're going to pay a lot,

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 3>but it's going to be very, very feature rich, and

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be incremental. I think where Microsoft has

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 3>a good play here is that they're going to be

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 3>able to put all these copilots into every part of

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>their business. And they charged twenty thirty, but remember they

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.799
<v Speaker 3>have hundreds of millions of users, so even small incremental

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 3>gains across their product portfolio are going to drive it north.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 3>So I think the reaction today, I mean if I

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 3>was an investor and I was looking at the reaction today,

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 3>I would say it's a little bit of an overreaction.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 3>But look at how which these companies have run and

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're resetting. We're saying this AI thing was

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of hype. It's not only hype. It is

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be real. But in the long run, the

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 3>way this rebalances companies incremental revenue is going to take

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 3>a little more time to play out.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 2>And when you looked at that five year forecast, when

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking of what was it one hundred and eighty

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>billion being added? Does that vindicate the sort of valuation

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>increases that we have seen so far, or do you

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 2>think they've got ahead of themselves.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the market is early, but it's very indicative

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 3>of where we're going. You can't possibly see tools like

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 3>supply chain management tools HR and hiring tools and see

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 3>how AI could help us get to the right candidate,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, streamline getting product into market. Everything here is

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 3>about productivity gains. And when you think about productivity gains,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 3>you think about earnings increases, and you think about what

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the market is driven by. It's driven by can a

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 3>company make more money in the future. All these tech

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 3>companies have big bets on AI and we're seeing kind

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>of the winners get separated. The companies that are going

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>to lag in industries like real estate and oil and gas,

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>that's what we're seeing from an AIU standpoint, are going

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>to be the ones that are going to be harder

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 3>to invest in. So in every field, what investors need

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 3>to really be looking for is which companies are going

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 3>to see these incremental and then exponential gains because they're

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to put AI to use.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>And is it from Microsoft, from Alphabet, from Amazon that

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 2>those sectors adopt from or is it more bespoke focused

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>AI tools. So we're actually seeing more fun and in

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the venture space right now.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's going to be partnerships.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>So I think you've seen Jensen Wong of Nvidia out

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 3>announcing partnerships with pretty much every tech company. You see

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>him out in healthcare, you see him talking with financials,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 3>and then of course he's partnering with Hyperscale.

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Cloud providers, SaaS providers.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 3>You know him and Bill McDermott, we're on stage together

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>at the Service Now event.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of collaboration.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I do think vertical specific AI turnline is going to

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 3>be tremendously opportunistic because knowing real estate.

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Knowing retail, you're going to have to build solutions.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>There's too many options, too much optionality of how to

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>build an AI solution. People are going to want it

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 3>in a box, just like we wanted CRM or HR

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 3>management solutions. They're not going to want to try to

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>build it from scratch, and we've seen that change in

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 3>just a couple of months.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Dan, great to get some mos of tees. Thank you

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>running on over here in a very hot New York.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Damn newman of the future and group. Great to have

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 2>him on site. Mean, while coming up, look Snap plunging

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>after its sales forecast disappoints. We're going to have much

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>more next with jument Emburg of Insider Intelligence. Plus, I mean,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 2>we've got to talk more broadly about the social media space,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the giant that is Meta reporting earnings after the bell today. Yes,

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>there's been the hype about threads, but what about the

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>reality of their financial discipline, what about the clampdown on costs?

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology. Let's talk product now. Samsung unveiling

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 2>it fifth generation of foldable smartphones today, seeking to counter

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a sluggish market for devices and outcoming rival products coming

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>from Apple. Some Sung's executive vice president and head of

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Customer Experience Officer Mobile Experience Business. It's quite a long titled.

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>As Patrick Truman, he's work exclusively Bluemang News in Seul.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 2>Just take a listen.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Before these designed for productivities, we enlarge the ecosystem with

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 4>a range of new application developers in the productivity domain.

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 4>And the multitasking has improved with the taskbar, and that

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 4>is because we have this incredible performance and AI capability

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 4>with the new processor.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Some Song has this open collaboration environment where like a

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 5>culture for Galaxy, and like Google is part of it,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 5>and Microsoft and Meta and like they all have some

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 5>kind of agendas to have their own generative AI tools.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 5>And now that Apple is joining the race, is there

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 5>any like some songs efforts to do it.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 4>So there is a lot of intelligence and AI at

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 4>play already in many parts of our devices. As said,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 4>we are working with Google on the partnership for a

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 4>long time and we have a culture to foster the

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>innovation together.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 5>Chinese smartphonemakers like I'm Shoo, me Opo and o'hawe, they're

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 5>all rolling out their own version of voldoble phones with

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 5>cheaper prices. Is there any chance that someone would like

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 5>to provide more foldable prices for foldable users, let's say

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 5>in India or China in the near future.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Some analysts predict the market to grow beyond one hundred

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 4>million units by twenty twenty seven. In the next three years,

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 4>we really expect to capture a large part of the growth.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Right now, I can say it's a growing category and

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 4>what dies the appeal the pool is actually quality. It's

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 4>quality and innovation.

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 5>And is there a chance that you're going to add

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 5>more feature about the flip after the fifth generation.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 4>On the software on the xperiancede, we continue to improve

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 4>many mini experiances with are intelligions coming in more so

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 4>there it's just the beginning. I would say we are

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 4>still at the beginning of a new ar and we

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 4>are very excited about.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 2>The potent voldable phones now about five percent of the market.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 2>We understand Samsung's executive vice president and the head of

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>customer Experience, that's Patrick Trumman. The Bloomberg's Sue Kim. Let's

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>return now to where AI has perhaps been taking away

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 2>a little bit from the bottom line. We're going to

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 2>talk snap right now, tumbling today, after the social media

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 2>company reported well second quored results that gave revenue outlooks

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 2>a little bit weaker than expected, even as it continues

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to invest in new ways you can be advertising on

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the platform. Let's talk about the earnings, and we're broadly

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>about social media landscape. Jasmine mbugs with us lead coverage

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>of influencer marketing and social commerce and insider intelligence. Of

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>course you look at Snapchat, you also look at TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter,

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 2>now x Facebook will get onto all of them. But jusmin,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean Snap always does this. It feels like it

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>has pretty volatile reaction to earnings and often to the downside.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Is there hope that in the forward looking future we

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 2>will start to see well benefits of the investments they made.

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, Snap is clearly not out of its revenue

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 6>slump yet, and prior to earnings yesterday, I had said

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 6>that its ad business wouldn't start to turn around until

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 6>at least the second half of this year, and now

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 6>it's looking like Q four at the earliest. But despite

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 6>the weak guidance for Q three, there were plenty of

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 6>bright spots to look to, and its earnings, Snap made

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 6>all of the right moves. During Q two, it worked

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 6>to strengthen its user base, diversify its revenue streams, and

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 6>improve on its ad platform. We saw a couple of

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 6>positive signs already from those efforts, including in the number

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 6>of active advertisers as well as advertiser retention. There's clearly

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 6>still a lot of work to do, and efforts to

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 6>diversify its revenue streams through Snapchat Plus, for example, will

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 6>take time to actually have an impact on its bottom line.

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 6>And my AI is where I'm most hopeful for Snap's

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 6>business in the future, because it really does or has

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 6>the potential, to give Snapchat access to first party data

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 6>that it can use to serve more relevant content and

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 6>advertising across its surfaces, and actually making up for some

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 6>of those lost signals from Apple's privacy changes.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Interesting that, of course, a subscription model therefore still to

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>bear fruit. What's interesting is well, other companies have started

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to do subscription models, and we think of the way

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>in which Twitter now X is trying to monetize, trying

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>to make up for some advertising weakness, to the tune

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 2>of fifty percent, what have you been making of social media?

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, the competition, the fact that everyone seems to

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>be on each other's toes. Can you just talk about

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>X and the rebrand for a moment, What do you

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 2>make of it?

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, I mean, first of all, there is a ton

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 6>of competition in social media. That's another reason, of course

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 6>why Snap continues to struggle. But with X and the rebrand,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it was a massive moment for social media.

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 6>It really truly is the end of an era. I mean,

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 6>Twitter is an incredibly recognizable brand. The word tweet is

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 6>part of the public consciousness, but the rating was also

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 6>on the wall here. I mean, Musk has been very

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 6>vocal about transforming Twitter into X. I think the timing

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 6>in some ways was right. You know, Musk is a

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 6>master of media, and he may have wanted his news

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 6>cycle back, but that that's not to say that this

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 6>wasn't coming. The question now is, though, you know, there's

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 6>obviously a vision for X, but what is the strategy

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 6>behind it?

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Does he truly have one?

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 6>Because super apps, of course, are unproven in most of

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 6>the Western world, including in the.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>US, Can you tell us a little bit about super apps?

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 2>It feels like maybe everyone's trying to build them right now.

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, of course, in the past what's interesting about

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 2>X is there's a real focus on payments that are

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 2>going forward, and we know that, you know, Musk, that's

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>where it's made a fortune to begin with this PayPal,

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 2>But PayPal can never quite make the cross that rubicon

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>in terms of actual banking services. You look at how

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 2>meta originally Facebook was looking at its own payments infrastructure

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 2>and wipe that away. And then it feels like TikTok

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>is starting to get in on the text based communication

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 2>as well. Is everyone eventually going to try and go

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 2>for some sort of we chat model.

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, it looks like everybody wants to do a little

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 6>bit of everything, right, but with the we chat model

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 6>in particular, I mean that is one that Musk has

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 6>pointed to for you know, over a year now. And

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 6>the reason why super apps really haven't taken off in

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 6>the US is one, you know, we have established habits,

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 6>We are used to doing different activities in different apps,

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 6>and it is incredibly difficult to change consumer behavior. There's

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 6>also a lot of privacy concerns, especially when you move

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 6>into things like payments and financial services. People have to

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 6>hand over a lot of personal and payment information and

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 6>they're not necessarily willing to do that, especially on a

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 6>social media platform. In some ways, I understand the rebranding

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 6>as Musk is trying to move towards this exhivision of

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 6>a super app, because it does distance the company from,

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, the problem that did exist at Twitter before.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 6>But there's a lack of trust and Musk itself himself too.

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 6>And X of course is a new company or a

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 6>new brand that really doesn't have that same kind of recognition.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>But they do actually have a CEO who's very well

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>known within the spending market area, and Lindi Akarino doing

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 2>her best to navigate X as Zeno Musk does appear

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>from the outside looking in very much still calling the shots.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 2>How much do you think, just in general, were at

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>some sort of bottom when it comes to advertising sentiment

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 2>here because I asked report at that of Alphabet and

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>she didn't really want to make any sort of call there.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, one of the biggest challenges Linda Yakarino was always

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 6>going to have was balancing Musk's vision for the platform

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 6>with what Twitter users and advertisers want. You know, it

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 6>was never going to be an easy job, even for

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 6>somebody with as much experiences as Yakarino. I think that

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 6>early optimism that you know a lot of people had,

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 6>including myself after her appointment, has faded and is mostly gone.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 6>At this point, we can tell that, you know, Elon

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 6>Musk is very much still calling the shots, and publicly

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 6>she hasn't said much more than applaud many of these

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 6>changes and his vision. Of course, you know, the Twitter's

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 6>ad revenue struggles are very very well documented and there

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 6>hasn't been much movement in a more positive direction, and

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be even more difficult to do so now.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>In Cider Intelligence, principal analyst Jasmine Enberg, it is such

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 2>a busy space and you're always so clear thinking and

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 2>click out about it. We appreciate it a lot. From

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 2>New York.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 8>It's a blue meg technology.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 9>I've always been a person who's just been attracted to hair.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 9>I like to sit and think and theorize how I

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 9>can manifest these visions that I have for braiding, and

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 9>how I can take something that may seem like it's

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 9>a line drawing in my mind and apply that to

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 9>someone's scalp.

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 10>We are the only culture that has hair that grows

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 10>out of our head the way that it does anyone

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 10>from the African diaspora is born with this amazingly curly

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 10>hair that can be shaped into a variety of different

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 10>ways of expression.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 9>I want Black people to love themselves for how they

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 9>naturally appear, and also to appreciate the cultural practices such

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 9>as braiding, that our ancestors have practiced for centuries.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 2>It's time now for work shifting, where we look at

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 2>the changing landscape for the labor market amid advances in technology,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 2>and we therefore to look at how the head of

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 2>the largest US private sector union, Teamsters is turning his

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 2>attention to e commerce giant Amazon.

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 11>Amazon's definitely going to be a target to organize. We're

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 11>going to take this historic agreement and use it as

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 11>a temple to show the Amazon workers what they will

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 11>receive when they join the team Stite union and we

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 11>organize them.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Of course, this comes just hours after reaching a tentative

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>deal to boost pay and benefits for hundreds of thousands

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 2>of UPS workers. Brilliant plus, Google, the Microsoft, and Open

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Ai are launching a safety model for artificial intelligence. The effort,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>called the Frontier Model Forum, aims to consolidate the expertise

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 2>and member companies and create new AI industry standards meanwhile,

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and is planning a restructuring now. The jackmar backed company

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>is looking to break off its blockchain and overseas units

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.959
<v Speaker 2>to pave a way for its revival of an initial

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 2>public offering, and that's likely to be down out of

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong rather than that duel listing that was initially

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 2>targeted in Shanghai and Hong Kong. That of course comes

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 2>over after a change of ownership that prevents them doing

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>that in Shanghai for at least three years. Meanwhile, coming up,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>part of the Elon Musk grand vision to rebrand Twitter

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>into an everything app includes pushing into financial services. We're

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 2>just talking about with Jasmine Enburg, but let's talk about

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 2>whether he can really succeed where some other tech giants

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 2>have failed to really bring on board the banking services

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 2>within a social media company. Plus, watching shares at teledoc,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 2>this shares absolutely surging well a quarter for their entire

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 2>market cap today, best move since February twenty twenty. The

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>virtual healthcare provider is raising the bottom end of its

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 2>revenue forecast range for the full year. Annaly is saying

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 2>that that burns control over its costs because bearing fruit

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 2>even as it faces a tough backdrop, so much more

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>on earnings to come from New York.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 8>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bluebg Technology. I'm Caarenhid in New York.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Quick check on the markets because the day is a

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 2>day of macro data and decision making. You've got to

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 2>be focused in on what happening with the Fed. Of course,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 2>most anticipating there will be some sort of rate hike.

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>The question is will there be signal for rate hike

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>comes September two? Many feeling that that shouldn't be taken

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>off the table in terms of an option, even as

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.239
<v Speaker 2>we do see inflation starts. Cool Naza currently off by

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 2>four ten percent and large part on the back of

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 2>key earnings. Microsoft just pulling us a little bit lower

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 2>the Dow I show it only because it's on his

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>best run since nineteen eighty seven. Folks, thirteen straight days

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>of games. Bitcoin does have about two tens percent, but

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 2>it looks we're still languishing around thirty thousand. In fact,

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>volumes are the lowest in thirty months in terms of

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 2>spot Bitcoin training. We understand moving on and we go

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 2>to some in particular earnings that maybe we've missed out.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 12>So far.

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we haven't missed Outabet just leading the pack

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the outperformance on benchmarks today up

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>almost six percent. Remember new role being expanded for with

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>poorat as she looks for a new CFO but takes

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 2>the reins of CIO and indeed president. But most notably

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 2>this is a company that's managing to show advertising coming

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>back five percent increase in particular on that advertising juggernaut.

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at eBay just up three tens of percent

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 2>results of all some software is merchandise maybe was being anticipated,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>but we keep an eye on what's happening in terms

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 2>of eBay and then look ahead to its own earnings

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 2>coming a little bit later. We look at targets being

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 2>raised ahead of them to fifty dollars by Jeffreys in fact,

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 2>that came yesterday. I'm looking at what's happening with in

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 2>terms of Micron. We're up to and a quarter of

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 2>a percent now. Micron actually getting some strong talk coming

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 2>from video moves in terms of its memory chips could

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 2>be advantageous. We understand some analysts signaling that this is

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 2>looking brighter for Micron, particularly in its application to artificial intelligence.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 2>We're up to and a quarter percent, unlike the rest

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>of the chip sector after Texas Instruments. Now let's move

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>away from earnings and go back to the billion billionaire

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, known for you know, dabbling in different sectors aerospace,

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>electric cars, course more recently social media and AI. But

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>he's rebranded Twitter to X. Musk is buying to actually

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 2>got back to his previous role as a banker. Re

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Magni's Finance Reports of Jenny Strain has a great piece out,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 2>what are you thinking about the tough task X has

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>to into wee've financial transactions, maybe even banking. This is

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 2>all about becoming a super app. But it's a tough

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 2>space to get into. Yeah, I mean that's exactly right.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 12>We've seen many, many tech giants go before him, and

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 12>we really haven't seen much traction. You know, you have

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 12>the likes of the Facebook or Google, even Amazon. You

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 12>know where they've gone this path. It really hasn't been

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 12>as successful as they you know, might have hoped when

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 12>they first set out. And it's just because banking is

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 12>a really hard space. It's highly regulated. The relationships that

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 12>big banks have with their consumers are extremely sticky and

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 12>hard to disintermediate. So Elon's got some high hopes here

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 12>and it'll be a really tough road duho to to

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 12>you know, get to where.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>He wants to get, because ultimately we've not only seen,

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 2>as you say, the likes of Alphabet sort of drop

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>all plans to eventually odd banking services. We saw, of course,

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>what happened with liber and the long road it took

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to get crypto interwoven within now Meta and that didn't

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>pull off. But PayPal, I mean what ultimately Elon is

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>original x dot com became they couldn't even offer banking

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 2>service as a wealth management ride. It's still a transaction company. Yeah, no,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly right.

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 12>So it was about two years ago actually where PayPal

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 12>had set out on this big journey where they wanted

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 12>to be that super app and they had a big,

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 12>ambitious goal that they would have seven hundred and fifty

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 12>million users and they were going to be kind of

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 12>the one stop financial spot for consumers. And two years on,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 12>you know, they have seen their s thoughts tank, they've

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 12>had to really retrench, they've had to focus on that

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 12>core checkout but and that kind of everyone knows PayPal for.

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 12>So it really just shows that even when you already

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 12>have a background in finance, you know, it's really hard

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 12>to kind of push that envelope and go into that

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 12>next step. And really a lot of these folks just

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 12>end up having to stick to their knitting.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Here, and as our resident fintech expert, as our banking expert,

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you'll know more than anyone that it's ulto many trust

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 2>that they have to build. Not everyone at the moment

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 2>feels all that trusting of whatever you know Musk is

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 2>doing in social media. Yeah, I think that's such a

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>great point. You know, especially in the US.

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 12>We're a very different market than say China, where super

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 12>aps have actually taken off, and consumers have shown this

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 12>really big willingness to bank and do shopping and do

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 12>their social media all with one company. We've seen it

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 12>with Ali pay, We've seen it with WeChat pay. They

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 12>haven't had that same willingness here in the US. They

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 12>seem to really like the fact that they get their

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 12>banking services from a bank, and they get their social

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 12>media services from a social media company, and they get

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 12>their commerce from an Amazon.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Or a retailer.

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 12>So there's that trust piece, and there's this really that

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 12>willingness not to kind of cross those borders. They like

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 12>those things to be very segmented. And to your point,

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 12>you know, Elon's on a name they know in banking.

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 12>They know him as Tesla, they know him as Bacex.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 12>So it would be kind of interesting to see if

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 12>you can bridge that gap, because it's hasn't been done

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 12>before really successfully here in the US.

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 2>With an Indigaco couldn't do that as well, Who, if anyone,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 2>would be the most to lose if X could crack

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 2>this from like a wealth management? Is it the online

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 2>wealth managers? Is it the banks lose out? Who really hurts?

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 12>He seems really keen on payments, and so I mean

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 12>I think PayPal, I think an Apple pay, I think

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 12>the credit card companies. So I think payment seems to

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 12>be what he's most interested in. It makes sense. It's

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 12>the piece of finance that consumers touch every day. And

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 12>so when you look at a tech company that just

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 12>really wants to gen up usage, payments makes the most sense.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 12>And so you know in that it's a very hotly

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 12>competitive field, and so I think you'd see lots of

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 12>pressure on different players, whether it's a bank or even

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 12>a payments company like a PayPal.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, many have learned that to their detriment to bet

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 2>against you, Muss. So we'll see whether you can cross

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 2>this particular vercon. Thank you, Jenny Surine Go check out

0:27:52.920 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 2>her story. It's brilliant time now for our VC Spotlight

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 2>prime Mover's lab. Well, it's plays two hundred and forty

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 2>five million dollars to back young startups working on some

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>unconventional ranges of technologies. The firm specializers in making investments

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of at the edge what's technically possible, including brain implants,

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>psychedelics related therapies, space infrastructure, new funding rings its total

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 2>assets under management to more than one point two billion dollars.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more on well, the state of venture capital

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>and some exits finally occurring. Rebecca Lynn, the co founder

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and general partner of Canvas Ventures, is a firm specializing

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 2>in fintech in artificial intelligence, among other things. And Rebecca,

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 2>what you've got eight hundred and thirty five millions in

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 2>assets under management and just now one of your portfolio

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 2>company's case texts it's an AI legal assistant. It looks

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 2>like it's just been acquired by Thompson Reuters for a

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>cool sum of cash. Tell Us a little bit about

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 2>why now we saw this sort of exit.

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean, it's really exciting to have sort of

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 13>their first and largest our cash exit in this recent

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 13>wave of AI, and it's been really exciting. I mean,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 13>kse Tex has been a company at the forefront of

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 13>AI since we invested about six years ago, and was

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 13>working heavily on it even before that. And they had

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 13>developed some really incredible technology even prior to GPT four

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 13>involving parallel search technology that earned them a customer base

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 13>of over ten thousand people. So because of that, they

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 13>were invited to be in the sandbox very early on

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 13>GPT four with open Ai, and they launched this new

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 13>product called co Council in March and within forty five

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 13>days they added another thousand plus customers using this new product.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 13>So you know, we've seen we've seen AI come a

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 13>long way in a very short period of time. The

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 13>delta from GPT three point five to GPT four was

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 13>pretty incredible.

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 2>So case Text actually tried to pass.

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 13>The bar with GPT three point five and they scored

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 13>sort of a measly ten percent on the California state bar.

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I took the bar years ago.

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 13>I'm a lawyer as well, and I probably could still

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 13>do ten percent, I hope.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And then when they.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 13>Launched their new co council product using the fully featured

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 13>GPT four, they actually scored ninety four percent on the

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 13>California State Bar, which essentially means that this product could

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.239
<v Speaker 13>stand in the shoes of a full legal associate in

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 13>many ways.

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>It was Chat GPT three point five and four that

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>got the whole world suddenly ignited and excited about artificial intelligence.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>But you have been investing in it for a long time.

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 2>This is a company you're backed years ago and continue

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to then see its trajectory. Will Are we in a

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 2>hype cycle or is it necessary that that had to

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 2>happen to get this sort of level of sudden application

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>of a case text for example right now.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 13>I don't think we're necessarily in a hype cycle. I

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 13>think the technology just came up the curve to that

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 13>last increment very very quickly. So we've been investing in AI,

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 13>you know, since I've been an a venture at Morgenthaler.

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 13>We were the first institutional investors in Siri, and just

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 13>to see the evolution of how good AI has become

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 13>since then, I remember, you know, product testing Siri in

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 13>the early days, and it could understand you know, very

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 13>little initially. And then we came into figure eight, which

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 13>was really the picks and shovels for AI, and that

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 13>company was acquired by a public company called Appen, and

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 13>then we did Luminar, and Luminar, you know, has AI

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 13>at its core. They're an autonomous driving company and they

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 13>reinvented the entire light our stack and the AI software

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 13>to go with it. Right, So I think AI just

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 13>suddenly had a leap forward in its capabilities. As we

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 13>saw from the leap forward from GPT three five to four.

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 2>How many public companies, so how many ultimately big companies

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 2>A desperate to stop buying in this space was Dojo

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 2>is the only one out there who was wanting to

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 2>buy case text.

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 13>You know, I can't comment exactly on the on the

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 13>other possible acquirers. I can say that the company has

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 13>you know, more than their fair share of venture term

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 13>sheets they could have chosen from if they wanted to

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 13>go ahead and take an equity round. And then you know,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 13>Thompson Reuters was just the logical acquisition partner for this company.

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk therefore about the venture equity that still wants

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to get into AI, and more broadly, in the space,

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 2>what does it look like, what are terms? What devaluations appear?

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 2>To you as someone who's looked at AI before, it

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of got frothy.

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so overall, you know, valuations are down, but for

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 13>AI right so AI is I would say, the most

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 13>heavily invested, you know sector right now. However, I think

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 13>it's really hard to imagine an AI company starting from

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 13>scratch right now and becoming a big entity.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean what we like to see.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 13>I actually love sort of Series B companies, right so,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 13>companies that are late A or early Series B. And

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 13>what that means is they have some semblance of product

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 13>market fit. They're actually solving a real problem, and then

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 13>AI can come in and really supercharge that initiative. And so,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 13>you know, for me, I think the bigger opportunities leveraging

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 13>a technology like AI are companies that have a unique

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 13>data set that already have a client base that they

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 13>understand the use cases for quite well, and now they

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 13>can come in and solve the problem in a much

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 13>more robust and interesting way. So we're focusing a lot

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 13>on that sector and we're seeing it in our own

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 13>portfolio even how this new technology is really helping to

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 13>I guess, supercharge our current customers, including companies like Skyflow

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 13>and offer fit in Connecticut that are all really benefiting

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 13>from this new technology.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm not going to say which of your portfolio

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>companies aren't managing to cross that AI void, but all

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 2>of their companies out there that are going to ultimately

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>become obsolete. How are vcs in particular trying to ensure

0:33:53.720 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 2>that they're founders, their companies already backed, can pivot when necessary.

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 13>I think you just they need to stay ahead of

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 13>the curve. And so anyone who kind of got the

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 13>press release on open Ai and now thought they should

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 13>do something or our GPT four is behind right, And

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 13>so you know, the companies and the good companies that

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 13>are out there have already been thinking about this and

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 13>been incorporating the benefits and the and the and the

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 13>advantages of you know, GPT four and have been way

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 13>ahead of it. And we were just lucky to be

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 13>sort of part of that, you know, having seen kind

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 13>of what was coming they were going to release with

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 13>GPT four.

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 2>What about venture more broadly, like, obviously you've had the

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 2>benefit of the odd exit just now, but IPO still

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 2>remains pretty much shot for many people. People are feeling

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 2>that there's a regulatory hurdle of big companies buying smaller ones.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 2>At the moment, how does your industry look? How is

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 2>it thriving or not?

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 13>I have never been more excited about our industry since

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 13>I came into venture really in O eight. I entered

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 13>a venture right when Lehman crashed, which I thought was

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 13>probably the best time I possibly could have entered adventure.

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 13>I think these kind of dislocations bring an incredible amount

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 13>of opportunity and that come I mean, I'm a fairly

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 13>contrarian investor, I believe. But we are seeing early stage

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.720
<v Speaker 13>funding down probably about forty to fifty percent. We're seeing

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 13>late stage funding down even more, and probably the most

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 13>exciting thing for me is we're seeing the Series b's,

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 13>which are always the hardest round for a company to raise,

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 13>taking longer than they have in twelve years to get

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 13>their funding. So the time span from like a Series

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 13>A to a Series B investing round is about thirty

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 13>one months right now, which is longer than you know,

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.359
<v Speaker 13>really I can remember on record. And on top of that,

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 13>when you look really under the covers of what's happening.

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 13>About forty percent of the Series A and B rounds

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 13>happening that are happening right now after taking thirty one months,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 13>are actually being led by insiders, so people that are

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 13>already investors in the company that are trying to support

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 13>the valuation that they currently have, which in many cases

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 13>is too high. And so for us, what that means,

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 13>you know, we're because of where we invest, we have

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 13>a lot of time to look at the companies and

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 13>to make our choices, which is ideal.

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 2>What about coming in as a new investor, So if

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 2>you're not just as some of many just being the

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 2>insider that backs the company that's already in your portfolio,

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>but wanting to come in and write checks to new companies,

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 2>what are the terms look like? How much control do

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 2>you have when you're that person looking from the outside

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 2>to get in.

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 13>I think right now, when you're it's definitely a buyer's market.

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 13>Right when you're looking at the outside to get in,

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 13>you have more time for diligence because of just it's

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 13>the time that it's taking and you can pretty much

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 13>set the terms. We are beginning to see something we

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 13>haven't seen in a long time, which is down rounds.

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 13>Right when I did a lending club and the depth

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 13>to the credit crisis in Q one of nine, it

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 13>was actually a down round which which ended up quite good.

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 13>It was the largest US tech IPO of twenty fourteen. Right,

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 13>but in that climate that most of those companies that

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 13>were being funded were actually down rounds. We're seeing companies

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 13>being recapitalized, so in other words, the new investor coming

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 13>in and really cleaning up the cap table and funding

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 13>that company for the go forward. So you know, it's

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 13>a tough market when companies are raising rounds.

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Right now, I would say camas Bench's co founder, general

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 2>partner of Rebecca Lyn and talk about the tough but

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 2>also the opportunities and indeed, congratulations on one of the

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 2>exits just now, thank you for joining us. Meanwhile, coming

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 2>up a more tech earnings, we're going back to the

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 2>public market. We're getting into meta results that's coming after

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the closing boll more, what to expect from Mark Zuckerberg's

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Empire mid cost cutting efforts, and of course the lords

0:37:53.800 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 2>threads from New York. This is really big technology.

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 7>We are making sure we develop and deploy AI technology

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 7>responsibly so that everyone can benefit. Last week, we signed

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 7>on to joint commitments with other leading AI companies at

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 7>the White House, building on the principles that have guided

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 7>our work for many years. To take advantage of the

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 7>AI opportunities ahead, we've been sharpening our focus as a company,

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 7>investing responsibly with great discipline, and finding areas where we

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 7>can operate more cost effectively.

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Alfa bet CEOs no picture there on the company's earning

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 2>school discussing AI, the responsibility there from not only driving

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 2>revenue but ultimately building it ethically. There's another company that's

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 2>about to go viral, and it's Meta out with its

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 2>second quarter results after the market close, and expert in

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 2>covers that social media more broadly for us. And I

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>remember last time on earnings, you're really showing how much

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 2>time basically Mark sokobad to talk about ALI rather than

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the metaverse. Are we thinking the same thing again?

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 14>It was six minutes last time on AI height and

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 14>thirty seconds on the metaverse.

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I expect that.

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 14>Might be the same. But what I think the street

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 14>will actually be paying a lot of attention to is

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 14>the health of the core business, the social media businesses.

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 14>Maybe not the bright shiny objects of AI, the metaverse,

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 14>or perhaps even threads.

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 2>But how is Instagram? How is Facebook doing?

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:30.800
<v Speaker 14>And can this company actually come back to revenue growth?

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 14>You'll recall that last year Meta actually posted its first

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 14>ever year of revenue declines. Growth was around two percent

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 14>last quarter, an let's expect about eight percent of revenue

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 14>growth this quarter. When does that change? When did those

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 14>double digits come back? I think that's what the stock

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 14>will move on, though I'm sure the executives would love

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 14>you to focus on the big ticket spending items like

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 14>AIAI infrastructure and the excitement around threads.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean it feels like pretty optimacy. I'm looking at

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the am function on the Bloomberg right now, and they're

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing double digits and revenue growth back so their fiscal

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 2>third quarters, so we only have to wait one more.

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 2>But to that point, how much are we seeing perhaps

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 2>talk of an advertising balsom at the moment. I mean,

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Snap was ugly, but Alphabet showing much more resilience when

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it comes to people wanting to spend on search.

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 14>And I think Meta will probably fall somewhere in the middle.

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 14>So Snap was ugly and they typically do brand ads

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 14>where brands are talking about kind of their brand name,

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 14>their upper funnel ads. Search ads where Alphabet is really strong.

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 14>Those are ads that are really high intent. A user

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.919
<v Speaker 14>goes to search for something, then they buy something. There's

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 14>a direct impact on the marketer's bottom line.

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Meta kind of falls.

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 14>Somewhere in the middle and has a bit of both,

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 14>so that's where we kind of expect.

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 2>It to fall.

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 14>Stabilization has kind of been the name of the game

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 14>across a lot of the digital ad industry. Meta tends

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 14>to move a little bit closer with Alphabet because they

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 14>are the two kind of duopolistic giants and digital ads.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 14>So if there is stabilization, and if that if we

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 14>see any kind of guidance like analysts are expecting toward

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 14>double digit growth into the third quarter, that will be

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 14>a really exciting move. But if we get more bearish

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:15.399
<v Speaker 14>signals from Meta's executive team, perhaps on the call, then

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 14>investors could have a little bit of frustration with some

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 14>of the more fun things that Meta has been talking

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 14>about lately.

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Like Lama too, whether that's ever going to drive revenue

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 2>certainly not, and well threads when they start to turn

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 2>on any advertising around that Alex Barinka, brilliant as ever.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you ahead of those all important earnings. And while

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that does it so this edition of Bloomberg Technology, do

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 2>not forget to check out our podcasts. Do not forget

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.439
<v Speaker 2>to tune in when the earnings come at four pm.

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll be there with the meta numbers. But of course

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.240
<v Speaker 2>go for our podcast in the interim on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 2>and iHeart from New York. This is Bloomberg Technology.