WEBVTT - BREAKING: White Sox TRADE for RHP Luis Castillo | Episode 129

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Sucks on thirty fifth is next doors open on the left.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>How's it going, everybody? This is a wonderful evening production

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Socks on thirdyfif podcast, a live reaction podcast

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 2>to the latest trade of Luis Castia to the White Sox.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm joined by Nick Awen Brett Haffner. Gentlemen, I will

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 2>let you to talk. Well, I figure out what's going

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>on with this livestream right now. Gentlemen, how are we?

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Doing good? I appreciate you taking care of that day.

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>We're good.

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Nice, that was easy.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, obviously we're excited to discuss the trade. Lots

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 3>of I've been reading a lot of opinions about it

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 3>in the left half hour, however long it's been since

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 3>it came out, lots of really polarizing viewpoints on it.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 3>So I'm excited to hear what you guys think.

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I've been at a family party for the majority of this,

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and I will just start by saying, I am surprised.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to give I know it's a live, instant

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>reaction show, but you want to give it some time

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to marinate. And I always appreciate Nick your thoughts. You're

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.199
<v Speaker 2>usually a lot more levelheaded than either Douk or Eye

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 2>usually on the show. But I think exciting is a

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>good word to start for how I'm feeling. But from

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>there I think there are other things to consider and

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 2>talk about. But before we get too far into this,

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 2>I do got to do the usual promotion of be

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 2>sure to subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, YouTube,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>especially wherever else you get your podcasts. Be sure to

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>follow us on social media at sex on thirty fifth, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram,

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>you know where to find us, and sax on thirty

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>fifth dot com as the website with more details on

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>this trade and many other things.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 4>So I will start with this.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>The full trade is Luis Castillo for Sir Anthony Dominguez,

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Nolan Jones and Boston Smith, and the White Sex will

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 2>be taking on the full salary for both twenty twenty

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>six remaining for Castille as well as twenty twenty seven.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>He's owed twenty two point seven five million dollars. Next year,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Sir Anthony Dimingez his entire salary of ten million dollars

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>goes to Seattle, and that leaves Nolan Jones and Boston

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Smith as.

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>The other two pieces. That's the that's the trade.

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Deal.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 2>I guess Nick, you were the Boston Smith guy. I

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much we talked about it on the show,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 2>but there was a lot of back and forth about,

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether or not you'd actually like to trade

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 2>on I on, we had Michael Swerro on here a

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit while or not, what about a week ago

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to kind of talk about some of the trade pieces,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 2>and his name came up.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 4>We'll start with your reactions and go from there.

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so my take on Boston Smith was I did

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>not want the White Sauce to trade him if it

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>was for a rental. I mean, anyone I would prefer

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 3>that didn't trade in period, but especially if it was

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>for Freddy Peralta or somebody like that who's not on

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 3>the team past this season. So at least with Castillo,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>they're getting someone who's still under team control for twenty

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven and also a vesting option for twenty twenty

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 3>eight if he throws one hundred and eighty or more

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 3>innings in twenty twenty seven. That being said, it's not

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 3>as big of a positive as I'm making it out

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>to be because obviously Castillo's having a down year. I mean,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 3>that's the elephant in the room, I suppose, So there

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>is a world where him having that extra team control,

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 3>even though it's it's nice to have those years, but

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like twenty two million, for example, for his salary,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>So he's not a cheap player. So if he remains

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 3>the player he is right now, it's not going to

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>be great. So the calculated risk that gets in the

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 3>White start taking is that they can unlock something in

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>him that makes in the picture he was from twenty

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>seventeen to twenty twenty five rather than the twenty twenty

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>six version. And that's where we kind of just have

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>to wait and see. I mean, I look through all

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of his metrics, as I know Brett was as well.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>We were talking about that before he went on and

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of looking for things like what could what could

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>you do differently, what's changed between this year and last

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 3>and all that. Brett start off with that talk because

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>he had more thoughts than me. But overall it's one

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>of those trades where I'm mostly okay with it because

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the prospect package we gave up wasn't that much, even

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 3>though I was a huge Boston Smith fan. But at

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the same time, that's what smart organizations do. They get

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 3>guys like Boston Smith and they quickly flip them for

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 3>better assets, like they're doing right here. So even though

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>it's a little bittersweek, given how productive he has been,

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I at least understand the vision.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I will say this about the trade in general, like

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>in a vacuum, It's fine, right like that that was

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>my initial thought. I was excited by it. Obviously, It's

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 2>nice to be in a world where the White Sox

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>are buyers, and I think that's one thing that primarily

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to keep in mind, Like, at the end

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 2>of the day, it's cool that they are buyers. I

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>look at it from two avenues. Number one is you're

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>taking a guy who was making twenty two million technically

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 2>is only going to make twelve. It's only twelve million

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 2>additional your taste, so you're kind of getting to steal

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 2>for twelve million next season. That's fine given his pedigree,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>in which you would probably have to pay for some

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 2>one of his caliber. So, like, the money thing isn't

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a concern to me. What does become a concern to

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>me is if this is the only thing the White

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Sox du like. That's where I say, like in a vacuum,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a good move, right, But if this is the

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 2>only thing they do, I'm not personally sure how I

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>feel about taking on the twelve million and getting a

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 2>guy who's had mixed results to say the least this season.

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 3>So after looking into a couple things, I mean, I

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>honestly hadn't been paying much attention to how he was

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 3>doing this year. One thing I noticed was I kind

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 3>of went and looked at all, right, is there some

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>like are we seeing a decrease in vlo? And actually

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 3>his fastball is like half a tick up, so there's

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 3>no concern about you know, oh, there's a big drop

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 3>off in Filo. The one thing that I am a

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.119
<v Speaker 3>low concerned with though, is that he is putting away

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>hitters a lot less this year than in previous years,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 3>so the strikeout percentage is a bit down from the

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 3>past couple of years. The one thing that I do

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 3>like coming into this organization though, at that even with

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 3>a down year, he's still not walking the world, because

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I know that we do have some pitchers who really

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>struggle with that in this org So I'm glad that

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 3>there's that kind of like you know, I know, Nick,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 3>you're a big Boston Smith guy. But we got to

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 3>remember we got Boston Smith only earlier this year for

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Curtis Meade, and that's one of those things that sure

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 3>we were able to unlock some things that potentially do that,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>but at the end of the day, we didn't have

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>to give up multiple prospects. I've seen some people incorrectly

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 3>called Nolan Jones still a prospect, but that man has

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 3>been shipped between multiple MLB franchises at this point, between

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 3>uh Colorado and Cleveland. So at the end of the day,

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 3>only giving up one prospect for a non rental starter

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>who has major durability. If you look at his Baseball

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Reference He's pitched thirty plus starts a lot of his career,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>and at the end of the day, we need someone

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 3>with playoff experience. He's got a two two five ERA

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs and having that experience in kind of

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 3>another veteran presence in that rotation from successful franchises.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually really I really like this trade so far.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the real quick before you go, Nick, I

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 2>will say there are a couple for folks who are

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 2>listening ione want to drop your thoughts in the chat.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>We will read those out and kind of answer questions

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>from there. I will just say that for anyone listening

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to drop him in there and we can get to him.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>But Nick ahead, I'm sorry.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>No, it's okay.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to say that before we get too

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>deep on the Castillo question, like what's he doing row?

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>What can be fixed?

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I do also just want to mention that, I mean,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe this whole age poorly, but I was saying to

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>somebody today when washing the game, I kind of feel like,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Sir Anthony Dominga's head has fixed, well whatever his issue was,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Like he's had like three or four outings in a

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>row now where I actually though he looked pretty good today.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I was it was like he only threw a couple

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 3>of balls. I think it was pretty much all on

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the zone. And I'm not saying this means he was

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be perfect the rest of the season, but

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I was like, Okay, this is nice because now you

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 3>have Taylor and Hicks as your really dependable right handed

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>high leverage you guys, but ingas as well. It can

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>be like sixth seventh inning and someone you can trust.

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 3>This is gonna be really nice for the playoffs. And

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 3>then we trade him later that day, so I'm not

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 3>saying that it would have continued. I know he's been

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>very inconsistent, but just want to put that out there.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm not convinced that he's as bad as he was

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>in the last you know, one or two months. So

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>that's that's one thought I had when I saw his

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 3>name as part of the trade. I was like, oh,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I actually kind of liked him now, but whatever, it's

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>too little, too late.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>It's inconsistent results, right Like it's again, if you look

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 2>just purely strike our rate, walk rate, home run number,

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>of thinks like this is that that is who Diminas

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>is and that's going to lead to some really nice outings,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's going to lead to some really terrible addings.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's what the White Sox ultimately kind

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>of had to fight against. My other point, as you

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>brought it up, is the lack of a reliever in

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the bullpen and baseball tossed in the chat was kind

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>of mentioning exactly that, And it's wonder if McDougal comes

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>up for the Boston I it almost seems to me

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>that the White Socks are put wishing it in their

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>chips on McDougall and Smith Hagen Smith and possibly even

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Shane Smith why know is still starting, but at least

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>those two we're going to make them relievers for this team,

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and that's how we're planning to address the bullpen. And

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>if we have to trade a piece cool we needed

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 2>deming As more, I guess instead of talking like the

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 2>White Sex, the White Sex feel like they needed deming

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>As more when they originally signed him versus now because

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you had Taylor step up and Brian Hudson step up,

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 2>and now you have the flexibility to add McDougall and Smith.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And does it make sense long term? Probably because you

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>don't really need a relieve her more than you need

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>a starting pitcher, right.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas Baker in the chat also mentioned because he has

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a great teammate and great dude, and that's certainly been

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 2>the based on his profile ood he looks like a

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Mariners fan, so I think he's speaking from experience there,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>but also is what I've heard from around just reading

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>from fans, like he's a well liked baseball player with

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Brett to your point, a lot of playoff experience.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've got one one other thing that Carter Lawler

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of hints that a little bit. One thing the

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Mariners had going on a little bit that they had

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 3>to kind of get creative with was they have I

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 3>believe they had six starters up in the rotation. And

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Castillo actually expressed a little bit of frustration earlier in

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 3>the season with the idea of the piggybacking that was

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 3>happening before the all start break. And obviously we just

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, mentioned that, you know, Castillo has been a

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 3>well liked, you know, Mariner for quite a long time

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 3>now the time he's done with the ORG.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And I will say though that, you know, Carter Lawler

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>make a great point in the.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Chat like this could be a great change of scenery too,

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 3>because we are in a situation where hey, Luis, we're

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 3>giving you the ball every fifth day.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You are going to get there, You're going to get

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 1>your innings. You're going to be a.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Guy who we probably consider our sp three right now,

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Like there is going to be a level importance that

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>we are placing on him where perhaps in the Mariners org,

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe you know, because they have a really

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 3>talented group of Brian wu George Kirby, Emerson, Hancock, you

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 3>can name them all. He was probably at the bottom

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 3>of that rotation right now, where he is going to

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 3>get promptly placed based on his caliber and based on

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 3>his check record, kind of right in the middle right now.

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 3>So I think that potential change of scenery, and I'm

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 3>very curious to see what Bob and Banister. I'm curious

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 3>to see what they decide and what they want to

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 3>tinker and experiment with him. Just maybe they try something

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 3>with his pitch mix a little bit, or just to sequencing.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm very curious here.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 2>So this is the first time in his career where

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>he's thrown again. I'm slowly getting my information together. He

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>tends to throw when you talk about things like pitchmicks,

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>he tends to throw the syncer more than the slider.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>There were a couple of years in there where he

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 2>threw the slider more than the sinker, including this one.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 2>But it's the greatest discrepancy between those two pitches of

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 2>about ten percentage points in difference in terms of how

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>frequently he throws them. Obviously pretty known as a not sidewinder,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 2>but a low three quarter slot where the sinker change

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 2>up combination has long been effective for him. So I

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 2>wonder if they try and get back to some of that.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I hesitate to say they need to make too many

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 2>changes because it wasn't that long ago as in last

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 2>season to where he was truly very effective. But again

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 2>it comes down to for me personally, it's like I

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>get being willing to take this risk. I'm surprised they were,

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to be honest with you, but I get it. Like

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 2>when you look at some of the other rentals, it's

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>not like they were without warts. Like Kevin Gosman was

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 2>a common name. I mean, if you want to talk

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to the controllable guys, read Debt Meers. I think people

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>fell in love with for reasons. I'm still trying to

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>figure out. I know he's good, but the level of

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>prospect good that they might have needed to give up.

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 2>And you can just go down the list Stephen, Robbie Ray,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>some of us splits away from home, and I don't

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 2>know you can find warts with any guy at this deadline.

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of the point. You don't get.

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>The best of the best at the deadline. But to

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 2>get a guy like Castillo who has ace like potential

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>in him and has shown it. Yes, he's thirty three,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty four years old, but let's see if they can

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 2>capture it.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a couple of things.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>No, there's a couple of things you guys brought up

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>that I wanted to just quickly touch on one of them.

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>There was a game forre Brett was saying about how

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 3>they had too many pitchers in the rotation. There was

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 3>a game against the White Sox in May. I very

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 3>vividly remember watching those game. It was a huge win

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>for the White Sox. They brought Castillo on to get

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 3>like a three or four inning save. In the ninth inning,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>he walked Murakami. I want to say, maybe walk somebody else.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Then they brought in Munyo, was their actual closer, and

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>then somebody was like Ben and Tendy and mydraws way

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 3>back to back, like kind of cheap RBI singles. They

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 3>won the game two to one. Taylor got the save

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>in the bottom. It was a great game, and Mariners

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 3>fans after the game were just enraged by the fact

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 3>that Castillo was being used as a long reliever essentially

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 3>and a closer, and they were saying, this is not

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>his role, Why is he doing this. He complained about

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>it too, like Brett said, so maybe there is something

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 3>to the fact that we can't find that much in

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>this data that this much has changed about him as

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>a pitcher. So maybe it's true that just the change

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of scene we're getting him in a new rotation, like

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Carter was saying, might actually have a big impact. And

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>then to what Jordan was saying, Jordan's correct that he's

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 3>using his slider more than his sinker this season, pretty

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 3>drastically compared to how it was last year when I

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 3>was a reverse And the reason I bringing that up

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>is because Castillo has a career low ground ball rate,

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>meaning he's allowing fewer ground balls than ever and more

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>flyballs than ever. The inverse would be true there. So

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's as simple as, hey, you're using your sinker

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 3>sixteen percent of the time I staid of twenty eight percent.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, of course you're allowing all these flyballs and

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 3>not getting as many grounders. I mean, I'm probably oversimplifying it.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 3>There's I'm sure there's a reason, but that's my main

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 3>thought is when you talk about pitch mix, maybe it

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>is just bringing the sinker back a little bit more. Yeah,

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>and I guess, hey, outside of you know what we've

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 3>seen in that, maybe he could do what he did

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>against the White Sox in twenty twenty three, he could

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 3>throw forty seven straight fastballs and maybe get something to work.

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Remember that game Jordan twenty twenty three. He threw forty

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>seven consecutive fastballs against that team.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's the twenty three White Sox. I probably could

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>have thrown a few in there and we would have

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>been fine. Now, I think for me it's I do

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about a little bit where we go

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>from here, But I do think it's a calculated risk

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to take. Right Like, I get why they wanted to

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>have a controllable player, right like I get I get

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>now wanting to move rentals for this group. Just yet, I,

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 2>as much as it feels weird, I do think it's

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the correct. That being said, you better be sure that

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna you're gonna fix this, otherwise this isn't This

0:15:59.920 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>is an expensive twelve million. Now, this is an expensive

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 2>but it's expensive in the sense that this is the

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>guy you're hoping is your game three starter. Right now,

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 2>you have Sean Burke, Davis, Martin, Luis Castile in some

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 2>order your third starter, I guess is kind of what

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean to say.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 4>You can put them in whatever order.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>You better hope you're right and that there's something that's fixable.

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>That that's on Banister, that's on Bow, that's on everyone

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 2>else in the organization who made that call. I don't

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>hate it in a vacuum, but and this is where

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I kind of want to talk about what's next. You

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 2>have to do something else, So this is the only

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>thing they end up doing. Now we really got to consider,

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>all right, what was the point of that and why

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>couldn't anything else come together? But quite a few people

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 2>have asked this in the chat, where do you go

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>from here?

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Like, what do you target next?

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Based on the quality And there haven't been that many trades,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 2>so I don't want to set you guys up for

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>failure with this question. But based on the quality of

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 2>players going back and forth and trade so far, who

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 2>are guys you might see that White Sox move next

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to accomplish other needs?

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean one that comes to mind, and the

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 3>welding back up. Actually, yesterday that rumor came out that

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox had discussed Freddy Peralta with the Mets

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 3>and the package would have been Boston Smith and George

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 3>wolcal So. The fact that Boston. Mitch just got traded,

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 3>might mean that George Bocal is someone who would also

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 3>potentially get traded, and he doesn't have as much trade value.

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think as Smith. Just given Smith as more

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 3>advanced as a hitter, or he's in double A, not

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 3>high A, et cetera, but he could still probably get

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 3>you a rental or headline of package to say for

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 3>a rental, not somebody with control and not somebody would

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 3>have massive impacts. So I wouldn't be surprised to see

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 3>him go. But in terms of what I'm looking for,

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's also part of the reason that I

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 3>haven't really given a strong opinion in terms of I like,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, love hate this move or whatever, in part

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>because it just happened that I'm still processing, but also

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 3>because I expect Gets to do a lot more, to

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 3>be honest, and I've seen a lot of comments from

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 3>people the last couple of days saying they have a

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 3>bad feeling it's going to be like a pretty quiet

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 3>deadline for the White Sox. I've had the opposite feeling.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>I thought they might be doing like a little bit

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 3>too much, just because Gets, as a former player, knows

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 3>what it's like to be fighting at the deadline and

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>being a good team that just needs a little bit

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 3>more to maybe get over the hump. And he just

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 3>said he's on record as saying he owes it to

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 3>this clubhouse to get them reinforcements. So I expect to catcher,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Tyler Stevenson or Lurie Torrens from the Mets

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 3>or probably not like a Hunter good min Natalie Ruchmand,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 3>probably you know, lower tier than that. I expect to

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 3>catcher for sure, And to be honest, I also I

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 3>know Jordan listened off like Debt Mers and some guys

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 3>I kind of still wouldn't be surprised if they got

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 3>another starting pitcher, maybe not a Redebt version, maybe not

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 3>that high caliber, but somebody like in between Castillo and

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 3>like a Kevin Gosman, like somebody that you can say

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 3>might be an upgrade over in Eric Fetti, but is

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 3>not somebody who's gonna or a playoff get necessarily just

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>to help you get to that endpoint of the season

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>with having guys like Burke and Martin still being fresh

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 3>where they're not throwing too many innings in their last

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 3>start to September. So I wouldn't be surprised to see that.

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 3>But overall, Catcher one hundred percent expect and then another

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>picture of some sort. I have a good feeling that

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 3>we'll do something. I just don't know for sure if

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 3>it'll be like a starter or reliever or whatever it

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 3>might be. Yeah, And to kind of piggyback off debt

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 3>Meer's Nick, the one thing that I've been seeing a

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>lot about him is that apparently the asking price is

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 3>astronomical for net Meers. So, honestly, Nick, when you say

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 3>that you're looking for an in between between read det

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Meers and Castillo, you know the name it comes to mind,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Joise Sorriano, because it's been reported that they're asking, they're

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 3>not the det Mever's price is way up there, Sriana

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 3>a little less. I don't know how i'd feel about that.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm another curious one, but I still like the idea

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 3>of trying to go after like a Clay Holmes type

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 3>or even Kevin Gosman. Kevin Gosmin did start today. I

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 3>know that there was the potential for him to get scratched.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I know for Pearls to got scratched yesterday. So I

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>was thinking that but honestly, I think I'd rather prioritize

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 3>the catcher first, even though I will say kudos to

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Edward Carroll. He did have a really nice game today,

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a couple good ads challenges, a couple hits, But.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 4>The bar's low Jenner's name.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 3>The bar is kind of in hell right now, so

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 3>there's not a whole lot. There's not a whole lot

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 3>to work with, and I think that for the In

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>the case of Stevenson, he actually has a great track

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 3>record with Castile when they were back on the Reds, I.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 4>Have been a huge Stevenson.

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised I kind of threw it out there once

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 2>steal got hurt and I'm like, oh, I actually like

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 2>this way more than when I was just randomly tweeting

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 2>about it too. I think he does things well with

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox lag. He's a right handed bat, he

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 2>has some pop behind it. Again, he's not great defensively,

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 2>but we're given Caro credit for a couple of decent

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 2>abs challenges, and I I'm on record saying I'd rather

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>have Romo than Carroll because I don't think he's not

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 2>bad like the bar's low, and I think we have

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to acknowledge that at a certain point, if the Socks

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 2>are going to get another start, I would like to

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>be a guy who is more of a true dominant

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 2>strikeout starter. What I mean by that is a Sean

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Burke North South type pitcher. It's got a lot of

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 2>pitch to contact guys. They got a lot of groundball guys.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Davis Martin is not your typical strikeout guy. Anthony k isn't,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Eric Fetti fe sticks around, isn't. Noah Schultz isn't there yet,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and Luis Castillo, even when he's at his best, is not.

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Your prototypical strikeout guy.

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I would have thrown personally, like, I don't think they're

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna get another controllable one. I think I know, I

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 2>say all those things about wanting a North South starter,

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna throwt an East West name in Dustin May.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that just gives you a little bit more insurance,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 2>because I don't think they're gonna pay the Clay Holmes

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 2>price or the Robbie Ray price. I just I would need

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a It would just need to be a lower price

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 2>at this point in my opinion, just because I don't

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>know what they're gonna do with the innings.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 4>To be honest with you, the cutcher has to be

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 4>the priority.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Though.

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>I think the one thing that I mentioned, I know

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I've mentioned like three times, so I'm gonna plug my

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 2>own do some self promo here. I put on like

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 2>a mock trade deadline article. I did say I didn't

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 2>think they trade for Luis Castillo, so I take my

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 2>words with a grain of salt. But at the same time,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I do think an outfield bat needs to be more

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of a priority than I think it's been talked about.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, Tristan Peters, it's been about a sixty at

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 2>bat slump now and at a certain point he can't

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>be this bad forever. But any advanced metric told you

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that he wasn't going to be as good as the

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 2>start to his season either. I don't know if I

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 2>would be willing to wait around for ever Sin Praira

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>to figure it out. And I think Randall Gritchick and

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Austin Hayes, whichever one they decide to choose, essentially do

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. But you need a late pinch hit

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>at bat and you're running Edgar Carrow out there, or

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>like today, you're running Randall Gritchick out there. I just

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 2>you're showing up and you're not You're not fighting your

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 2>best fight by doing it that way.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 4>So I do think.

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to add more some sort of impact back,

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>like a Joe Adell type. Like I'm not talking like

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 2>a super controllable quality bad it's just someone who's going

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to go out there and swing for the fences and

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really do anything else.

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 4>That's fine.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 2>You can deal with that, even if it's that, even

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>if that's limited in value, but still as a step

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>up from the grit Chicks and the Hazes and things

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>like that. So I don't know, but to saw center

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>field though, would be a little bit more difficult. It's

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>why I'm hoping Peters figures it out.

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And he had some I think two today and

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 3>one yesterday. He had a couple at bats where he

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 3>either got a barrel on the ball or still had like,

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, one hundred plus mile an hour line drive.

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>They all happened to.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Go right to outfield or so that Peter's maybe is

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 3>on the verge of breaking back out a little bit.

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>But I do agree that Pereira has been disappointing since

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 3>returning from injury. And you know, maybe what they end

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 3>up doing is if Peter's really a slumping that bad.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Bradon Montgomery can handle centerfield, at least I

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>think he can. You can always move him there and

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 3>bring up Austin Hayes to play right. And I understand

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of redundant Luke Ritchard, but maybe that's what

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 3>we have to do. But given what they just did,

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 3>given that they traded Sir Anthony Domingez, which I don't

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 3>think anyone really expected to happen, I would not be

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 3>surprised to your point, Jordan, if there is some sort

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 3>of out of left field kind of move right that

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>we don't really see coming, whether it's trading somebody currently

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>on the major league roster that not like you know,

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 3>not like an Antonouge in my draft. I'm talking more

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 3>like a reliever or something like that, or like a

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 3>fatty or k something that we just like are not

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 3>expecting at all, or like you said, Jordan's something that

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 3>just addresses a whole that is not fully there yet.

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Like I wouldn't call centerfield a hole. It's just that

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 3>he's slumping, and it's a little scary because metrics whenever

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 3>that great to begin with, even when.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>He was paying well for Peters.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think that's why, again, why I'm reluctant

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>to say, like I give this trade like a C

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 3>plus or anything like that. That's not what I would give it,

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 3>by the way, just because I don't know what's going

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 3>to happen next. I want to judge the whole deadline

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 3>after it happens and see what they've done. But really,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 3>just thinking about this trade, I mean, yeah, it's not

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>giving up a ton. I suppose the biggest issue with it,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 3>other than my being a Boston Smith fan, is just

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 3>that you're paying the full salary for Castillo next year.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I know, you're getting rid of Domingos, so

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 3>it's like a net gain of twelve million, but it's still,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 3>you know, twelve million is nothing to scoff at, especially

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 3>for the White Sox historically. So it's a good sign

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 3>that they're comfortable taking on that money and that they didn't,

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, make Seattle eat half of it and then

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 3>give up even more prospects. That would have been very annoying.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 3>But it also leads me to believe that maybe they

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 3>do have more flexibility to make a surprise move or

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 3>something that we're not expecting going forward. Can I just

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 3>add one thing about the Castillo contract that has a

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 3>unique kind of quirk to it. There is a twenty

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight vesting option. If he hits one hundred and

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 3>eighty innings next year.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's not hitting that. They're not gonna let him

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 4>hit that.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>There's even be enough baseball played to have a picture

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 3>hit one hundred and eighty innings.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So but that's a topic.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 3>But you know, if if he misses time due to

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 3>a UCL injury one hundred and thirty days, twenty twenty

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 3>eight becomes a five million dollar team option. So there

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 3>are some avenues written in.

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's it's a risk, right. I think there

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 2>are two camps that people kind of fall into with this.

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 2>The first camp is it's awesome, gamer has been there before.

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 2>I love it and I get that. The second camp is,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, guys running a five v R this year

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and he's thirty three, you know, did you actually get

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>any better? You didn't have to give up a lot,

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>but did you get any better? And you know, I've

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>talked at nauseum this year about you know, some of

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 2>my frustrations with pitching development things like that, mostly at

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the minor league level, right Like, to be fair, this

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a quick turnaround for Zach Bob

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and the major league development staff to figure out what

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 2>this is for KSTO, because if they can't get this

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>ship right in, how much better is he than Eric Fetti?

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Right Like, at a certain point they're doing the same things,

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 2>and Fetti happens to be doing it a little bit

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 2>better this year. So it's that is a concern for me. Again,

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to grade it till I see the

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 2>totality of the trade deadline. If this is the only

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 2>pitcher they pick up, I think when we're talking about

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>grading it, the grade will be lower than it is

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 2>right now if they add another piece and kind of

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 2>reshuffle the chair the deck a little bit from a

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 2>bullpen perspective.

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Five.

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know it. I have to balance that.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 2>But part of it for me, like, hey, a true

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>gamer who is a great teammate, great clubhouse guy, will

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 2>probably appreciate being able to come here and fight for

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 2>a playoff spot more than he probably was doing in

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Seattle and will probably be a lot more appreciated than

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 2>he probably felt like he was in Seattle when he

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>was they were doing that piggybacking thing, like you got

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 2>to have a special crew to do that correct. So

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>we'll see, I don't know, just taking a look at

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 2>a couple before we head out here rather soon. A

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>couple folks from the chat and a very similar opinion.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Jamie Lewis don't love it or hate it. He can

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>eat inning has a track record. We'll kind of see

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>where it goes. Thatcher kind of said the same thing.

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 2>He's kind of all right with it. But the peripheral standout.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody's kind of in a very similar place

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 2>as of right now. But gentlemen, I will give you

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 2>kind of your final thoughts.

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm just curious. This can be a real quick answer

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 3>from you guys. But and heck, even Andoah Schultz to

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 3>start like today could potentially slay your opinion. But with

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the rotation we have right now, removes in the future

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 3>are going to make this different for sure.

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you do with the rotation right now? With

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this group?

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Nick, you can start on that one, because I want

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to see if my initial thoughts are an overreaction.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 4>I do have thoughts.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, so the issue I have with Schultz

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 3>is he actually was you know, he looked pretty good today,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 3>but his name's the limit. I don't know what his

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 3>limit is, but he's basically at his career high ending.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 3>He's already he probably doesn't have that much left in

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the tank to start every star the rest of the year,

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 3>so he might have been like a bullpen kind of

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>guy anyway for the second half of the year, or

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess the last two months of the year. So

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the way I would do it, it would be obviously

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 3>you would keep Burke and Martin and Castillo as like

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 3>those like your three guys are in cement, Anthony kay,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's not anything to deserve to deserve

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 3>not being a starter to this point, so I'd keep

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 3>him as my four. Then the five spot, I mean

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Fetti is he was impressive against Tampa last night, but

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 3>his peripherals are bad, Like he is really outperforming a

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of his peripherals and metrics, kind of like the

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 3>pitching version of Christin Peters, and I wouldn't be surprised

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 3>if that caught up to him at some points. I

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.479
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't mind using Fetti and like the Tyler Schweitzer role,

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of like long relief guy. But then for a

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 3>fifth starter, I mean, you would keep rolling with Sheltz

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 3>until you can't anymore from an Ink standpoint, and maybe

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 3>at that point that's when you use somebody like Maceon

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Adams or David Sandlin somebody else. But that's kind of

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 3>my issue to with your question, Brett, Like, no problem

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 3>with you're asking it, but I wish we had another

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 3>picture starting Pitcher coming in to avoid having to rely

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 3>on somebody like Adams or Sandler.

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Having to do that sort of the way that you

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 2>have to do it right there, I feel like the

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>door is very much open for them to still add

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a more reliable arm if not. My personal opinion is

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 2>you decide what your limit is for Schultz this season

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and kind of back your way into it. I am

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 2>blown away that it took them this long to be like, hey,

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe an opener's a good idea for this kid. Like

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 2>you made Burke do it, you made k do it,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You've made Fetti do it all year, and you just

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 2>let this kid come up here and run a six

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>er for a couple of months and they're like you know,

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>let's try this opener thing. I thought that was ridiculous,

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and I know I've said it on here before. So

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 2>with that being said, if you want to try a

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 2>piggyback thing with Fetti and Schultz, potentially maybe have an

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 2>opener for both of them, or let Fetti start games

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and let one go one time through the order, the

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>next go next time through the order, and then by

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 2>that time, hopefully you're at through five innings by that

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 2>or maybe even six if you're really lucky, or you're

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 2>in the sixth inning by the time that happens, and

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of mix and match from there. I think that

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>could be interesting, and it wouldn't force guys too far

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 2>out of the situations they've been in so far, but

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 2>it opens the door to really say, this team probably

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>still needs one more arm.

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 3>And I hope that in a day or two from

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 3>now we are back on a podcast talking about how

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 3>we need to reconstruct the rotation once again. I think

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 3>that'd be a great problem to have. The only other

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 3>addition that I would add is that Drew Thorpe's kind

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 3>of an interesting case right now of building up innings

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 3>and having some good results, but it is a very

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 3>small sample, but I am very just intrigued to see

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 3>what they decide to do with him, if they really

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 3>feel like he is going to be a piece of

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the major league team in.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Late August, early September. I don't know.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Probably depends a lot on what happens before Monday at

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 3>three pm. That and.

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I've never been I know what.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna say, I just pat still ninety one or whatever.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's exactly it.

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Like, is this fastball still ninety one ninety two?

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>If it is, we've already seen.

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 2>This story, right, Like, I don't know, Like he can

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 2>be effective maybe, but for how long how often?

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I'm going to remain skeptical just because

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 4>I know it.

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't like to be like, oh, with fastball or nothing,

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 2>because like that's not that's not the end all, be all,

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 2>end all, but at times it is too right, So

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>it has to be at least a consideration. Thorpe could

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>be interesting. Mason Adams, you brought up that name too,

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 2>rep It's kind of interesting to me just because they

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 2>did use him out of a relief role. So I

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they're considering that or they're trying to

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 2>showcase him to other teams and kind of sell them

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 2>as that piece.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't know it they have.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 2>The thing is, they have options, but you have to

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 2>be And it's not that Venable wouldn't be good at

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 2>this or they haven't been good at this, but you

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 2>have to be so conscious of matchups and moves and

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 2>things like that and sending eyes up, putting them down,

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 2>things like that, that if you have too many options now,

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 2>it's almost like I've got too much going on versus

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 2>just having a fifth got to be like, let's go

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 2>throw them out there, call it a day, and go

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>from there. So options are good, and I don't think

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the Socks lack them, it's just more so the more

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 2>options you have. It's kind of like it's not the

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 2>same thing. But I think of like the old adage

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 2>where if you have two quarterbacks, you don't have any,

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 2>right like, if you have too many options, all of

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, you don't have a good one, right like.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>So baseball is different. Obviously it's not a perfect example,

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 2>but I don't want it to be a situation where

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you have to overanalyze every situation to pick the matchups perfectly.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 2>As fun as that sounds for a nerd, like that's

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 2>just not how baseball always works necessarily.

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, between the names we just talked about, like Thorpe,

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Sandlin Adams, Shane Smith, Jose Arcady, they just they Urchaitie.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 3>They just got him from whatever. The pirates like, they

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of guys who could just slot in

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 3>as like a sixth starter, like a depth option if

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 3>somebody gets hurt or you need a spot starter. But

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the problem is they don't have somebody who's head and

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 3>shoulders above that. And the hope is Castillo can be

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that guy, of course, if he's better than what he's

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 3>shown this year. But to me, just kind of my

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 3>closing thought, I guess, or my own impression of this

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 3>trade the more I think about it is it's not

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 3>that crazy, I think to have a net gain of

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 3>twelve million dollars to have Castillo on your roster for

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 3>next year. Over to Manga's like, given that he's a

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 3>starter and they as the track word that he does,

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's super offensive or anything like some

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.919
<v Speaker 3>of the negative reaction of reading about the trade. It's

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 3>just I'll have to get over to the Boston Smith then,

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm fine with taking on Castillo's money. I like

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 3>that they're doing that to reduce prospect costs, but I'm

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 3>surprised that the headline prospect was Boston smith I'm surprised

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't like, I don't know, like a Colby Shelton,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>like somebody is more like a twenty to thirty range

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 3>prospect than a ten to twenty in the system. I'll

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 3>get over it, and it's like it's kind of splitting

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 3>hairs just because I like Boston Smiths so much. But

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that's my closing thought was like, if he's his contract

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 3>is seen as net negative Castillo at this point, and

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, Mariners fans, from what I'm reading, seem pretty

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 3>happy to have gotten rid of it. So I'm just

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of wishing that the prospect cost was a little

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 3>bit less. But I really hope I look back at

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 3>this in October or something, I think, wow, like I

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 3>was I was picking like a Steele shoved in the

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 3>playoffs or something like that.

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's obviously everyone's hope, Brett.

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 4>Any final parting thoughts.

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris gets You're on the clock for more, Let's see

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>what happens.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 4>That is fair.

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 2>I will say two things number one. Yeah, I I

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. The more I think about it, the

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 2>more I read comments, and I appreciate people both on

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 2>social media and in the check kind of giving their

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 2>thoughts the peripheral's piece. And I think the common thing

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of people have said, if you have

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 2>more negative feelings about this trade is you know, you're

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>not certain the socks got better today, and that's that

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely fair. I am not sure the White Sox

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 2>got better with this trade.

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 4>In a vacuum.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 2>I like taking the chance on it, but again, if

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't do anything else, yeah, I just I don't know.

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. He would have to, he would have

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to be his oldest form. And I think that's my

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 2>biggest thing.

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Boston Smith.

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I go back and forth on I like selling high

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 2>on guys, and I think they were absolutely doing that

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 2>for a guy who's had two hundred and fifty plate

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>appearances in the minors and who came over and this

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 2>is his first full professional season. Like, I like how

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 2>how that ended up working for them, And I would

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 2>be a critical to say that I don't like when

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the White Sacks do that because I wish they had

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 2>done that more in the past. I think depends on

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 2>who you ask. If the Sacks guy better today, I

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 2>feel like the consensus for now, it seems like people

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 2>do believe that, and it seems like you two were

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 2>kind of on the fence with that, but probably air

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 2>more that ways.

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we'll have to wait and see and before we

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 3>fully sign off, the chat has alerted us and my

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 3>phone lighting up was alerting me to the fact that

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Schooble just got created the Dodgers, so that is interesting

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 3>and might secure their threepeat.

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>We might also secure lockout. Yeah it might.

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, that just of all the teams, just I

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:52.439
<v Speaker 3>didn't want that one.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Here's my thought on that.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I first of all, you gotta win it, right, I

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 2>thought the last thing Major League Baseball wants right now

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 2>is for this to happen and then have like a

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 2>Brewer's White Sox World Series, Like, how are you gonna

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 2>make a parody problem argument? When that happens, that's the

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 2>funniest potential outcome.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I'm it just felt so.

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Obvious that that's what was going to happen that I

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 2>just numbed to it. I like seeing the Tigers selling off,

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 2>even if it's just a piece. I like that another

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 2>team has kind of given up because I think the

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 2>one thing we didn't really talk about that I like

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to maybe mention briefly, and I've said six times we're

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>signing off, but maybe we talked for two seconds about

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 2>this is the Twins have decided not to. Granted they

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 2>haven't done the most impactful moves ever with Mentor and Cramer,

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 2>but they're three games back too, and they decided that

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 2>that was.

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 4>Good enough for them.

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if either of you have initial thoughts

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 2>on that or how much they bother you. Certainly things

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 2>we can talk about more next time, but what would

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 2>be curious as we're talking about some of the things

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 2>already going down.

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the I've been I've said a few

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 3>times that the Tigers scaring more than the Guardians. Obviously,

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 3>now a scoopl gone, they're probably going to sell more,

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that's no longer true.

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>But the Twins and.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Guardians I kind of see in the same light, like, yeah,

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 3>there's a world where they passed the Socks and win

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the division. But at the same time, I look at

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the at the Twins roster and maybe people feel this

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 3>way about us, but I look at their roster, and

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I struggle to see how they win as many games

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 3>as they do. Like, yeah, they have Buston and Joe

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Ryan and a good bullpenal that they have pieces, but

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 3>they're not when the White Socks are playing them. I

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 3>just feel this season, of course, I just feel that

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox are the more talented and more well

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 3>rounded team. So I kind of like that they're buying

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 3>because I don't see them as a huge threat, so

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I want them to get rid of their prospects and whatever.

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, we have to take them

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 3>seriously because they're tied with Cleveland now and that Cleveland's

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 3>been pretty much the only team we've been talking about

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 3>for the last couple of months. So it's a three

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 3>seam race for sure. I would have said four if

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 3>not for the Tigers selling. So a lot of games

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 3>with the Twins coming up to I think we have

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 3>at least six, if not nine, So there's going to

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 3>be it's going to come down to the wire potentially.

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 3>But I don't really fear them. I suppose it's the

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 3>simple way to put it. I mean, I can just

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, with the Twins, like they're having a lot

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 3>of like I don't want to say like double magic,

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 3>but like kind of a little bit of that, just

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 3>because the roster is not that, you know, like it's

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:44.919
<v Speaker 3>not that on paper is very great up and down.

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Buxton is now back on the aisle. Joe

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Ryan's actually had a couple stinkers in a row. Now

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 3>they just happen to be in a really advantageous position

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 3>for the talent on that roster. But the thing is

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 3>is that, you know, I still think the stench of

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 3>the Guardians, no matter who is on their roster, will

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 3>always scare me more just because they are able to

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.880
<v Speaker 3>find a way year in and year out. In this

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 3>current modern era, they just always find a way, and

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that stench just freaks me out.

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 1>A little bit.

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 4>But if the Tigers also decide to go sell, I.

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Believe Casey Miyes, I think, yeah, if they decide to

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 3>sell Miz as well, then they're going to be in

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 3>a position where they really flip the script and are

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 3>probably leaning towards one potential outcome. But their their batting

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 3>lineup is still very talented. I mean Max Clark, as

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.959
<v Speaker 3>we were recording this podcast, hit his first career home run.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 3>So they are definitely finding ways with Dingler McGonagall Clark

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 3>like that era of Tigers is going to be pretty

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 3>pretty scary. And now you add on Depaula from the Dodgers.

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I hear Hope River Ryan, you know, those are the

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 3>prospects that were sent over. So they're going to have

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 3>a pretty good team coming forward. But maybe with twenty

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty six, perhaps we might not be thinking about them

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 3>as much.

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be a frustrating team to deal with. Still

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 2>you gotta win games against them. I do like that,

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 2>as I know there was a period there where I

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 2>feel like the whole thing was about the Twins, where

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the team everybody hated the most. It's always been Cleveland

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 2>for me, so I'm glad we're kind of riding that

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 2>wave back to that because that's how it's always been

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 2>for me With Cleveland. They always find a way. And

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota can hit. That's the big thing.

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 4>They can hit.

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:28.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how, because I watched that Mariners Twins

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 2>game less time I look at that line of I'm like,

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 2>what is But also I'm sure a lot of people

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 2>say that about a White Sox line up every now

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 2>and again. So credit to the Twins for being able.

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 4>To do that, but they don't scare me as much.

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:44.919
<v Speaker 4>I agree.

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the pitch from the pitching perspective that

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 2>if the best they're going to do is Dean Kremmer,

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 2>then we'll see. But we do have a couple of

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 2>days still to go for the trade deadline, and like

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 2>every college student ever, every baseball team is waiting till

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the last minute to get their assignment done before to

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 2>do on August third. I certainly know nothing about that.

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 2>I know so much about that. But anyway, we'll have

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:14.720
<v Speaker 2>obviously hopefully more to talk about for the White Sox

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.280
<v Speaker 2>for our next show. It'll be August third, on Monday,

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 2>after the deadline, so I'll probably try and go live

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 2>around six o'clock, So be on the lookout for that. Hopefully,

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 2>I said, hopefully there's some white sex moves to talk about.

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 2>If not, I'm sure there will be other moves around

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the league to discuss. So Brett Nick, thank you for

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 2>joining us chat. Thank you for joining us. It's always

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a pleasure to have all you guys in there. Any

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 2>final thoughts for either of you.

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, go get a catcher.

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>That's my final blot. Go get a Catcher and Let's

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>win as serious.

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:55.399
<v Speaker 4>Tomorrow aimen to both of those things, so again, thank

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 4>you both.

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Be sure to subscribe to the podcast Apple, Spotify, YouTube,

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 2>wherever else you get your podcast. If you haven't liked

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.840
<v Speaker 2>and subscribed to this shows or liked this show specifically

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and then subscribe from there, please do so. It helps

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 2>us out a ton and we appreciate that support. Also,

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 2>be sure to follow us on social media at socks

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 2>on thirty fifth, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, same handle. You know

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 2>where to find us socks on thirty fifth dot com,

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 2>as the website will keep you up to date on

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 2>all of the major things to know as the White

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Sox can continue to hopefully make moves. So but for now,

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 2>for Nick Gower and Brett Haffner, this is Jordan Lesowski

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 2>signing off on this emergency podcast episode.

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 4>The White Sox have Luis castile and we'll see that.

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully they go on from there and continue to add,

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 2>but if not, at least for now, the White Sox

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 2>are buyers and we can be very happy about that

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and see what happens from there. So thank you everyone,

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 2>thanks for the support as always, and go White Sox

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Coase Socks Go socks get a catcher.