WEBVTT - Part Two: How The Liberal Media Helped Fascism Win

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Hashtag never again when we do this.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast hashtag never again. We're never going to do this podcast.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>That's where we're going with.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 2>We're done, We're done forever. Anyway, Welcome back to the Bastards,

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>a podcast where I just carried out a cunning power

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>play against my producer, Sophie Lifterman. She was not ready

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>for it at all. It came down upon her like

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>like the tanks of Operation Barbarossa on Michael Robert.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>How does it feel? How does it feel?

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Dad? It feels? You know, this is this is my

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>ensurgiment of Kiev, you know, perfect beautiful Michael, I feel

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 2>like a god.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Great, unstopped. That's the goal.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I really, I really want to cut off the feed.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you probably should. I am now comparing myself to

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>the fair Mack.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's not going to Daniel Malcolm.

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Could you just shut him off?

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Just replace me with an AI version asking Michael, Michael,

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>how are you doing today? I hear you've got a novel.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, Oh we're doing the plug right at the top.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 3>That's great.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 2>We're in the p zone. Michael.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I've had long had a fantasy of founding the

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Sokel low kel kel zone zone. But that's neither here

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>nor there. Robert, thank you for the opportunity to push

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>my novel. I really really mean it. From the bottom

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of my plug bag. I released my debut novel. It's

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 3>a sci fi fantasy, magical realist memoir in the sense

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>that you'll barely know that it's about my life because

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 3>there's robots and spells and shit, but it is. So

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>if you're interested in someone who.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Knows you, there's a lot of robots and wizards around

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>you at any gain.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Yeah, that is. If you're interested in like

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>alcoholism or my time at Cracks, that's in there too.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 3>In a sense, it's called the Climb. There will be

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 3>a free three hour sample coming out, probably out by

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the time this drops on the small Beans feed, which

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 3>is my own podcast network. You can find that just

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>by pointing your podcast app at small Beans and looking

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 3>for the Climb, or you can get the whole thing

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>over at patreon dot com slash Smallbeans slash shop, where

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>you can find the audiobook version, which I imagine most

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>people will want, but there's also a pdf version and

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>an e reader version and all that good stuff.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Awesome, yeah, excellent, excellent stuff.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Check it out.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Michael. You and I worked at a website called cracked

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>dot com back in the day, and I've.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Never heard that word, and I don't know what you're

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about.

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 2>We worked with a guy named Tom Ryman who did

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a great video once about how in the movie Jaws,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the shark is alcoholism. Right, there's no your shark. Everything

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 2>in that is explicable as a bunch of drunk people

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 2>by the ocean, like get fucking up and destroying their

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>own boat and whatnot. I always like that interpretation, and

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I do now always watch movies with an eye for like,

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 2>what what thing in this could represent alcoholism, which has

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>made the Star Wars series a lot more energy.

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 3>Just gotta say that episode also made me realize which

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they touch upon, even the famous shark death.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 3>It's like, yeah, you put a bottle in your mouth,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 3>you die. Yeah, it's alcoholism.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 2>It's all alcoholism anyway. You know what's not alcoholism? Michael,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>is there already? Really that is sometimes alcoholism? God willing

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.119
<v Speaker 2>if we get that. The Big jim Bean sponsors Sophy's

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>been clamoring for.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, it sounds like me, Yeah.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 2>What's like alcoholism? Is the addiction that the liberal own

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>of mainstream newspapers in the United States had with trying

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to normalize and support the growth of fascism in Europe.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 2>That is a kind of addiction. Oh that yeah, uh

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>huh uh huh. That is the that's the liquor of

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 2>fools is thinking that you can make a deal with

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 2>the fascists. Speaking of fools, you're all fools for not

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 2>knowing that this was the cold open and it's the

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>hot open. We're back, Michael. Are you toasty? Are you

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>burning up?

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm offended by being called a fool, but I'll get

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 3>it in time.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Have question, how do you think those people that were

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>supposed to go to space for eight days feel about

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>being stuck there? And definitely I keep saying I keep

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about them, and I'm like, I imagine.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I imagine if you're if you get into space, it's

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>because your whole life has been geared towards.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Letting you spa sweet I would say, until it gets

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>to like three four months, I'd be sweet. Bonus.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 2>This is what it's about, dope. This has been what

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 2>my whole life is for. But I don't know these people.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they're miserable. I don't care. Wow, you go to space,

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>you have to accept that you're going to space. It's

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 2>dangerous up there. We're not supposed to be in space.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a bad place to be, and it's going to

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>be unpleasant.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 3>You know that space's whole thing.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if somebody offered you a trip to space, would

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you go absolutely?

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, yeah, question I'm a novel seeker.

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course, but I would not enjoy it while

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I was there. Right, it would be a life changing experience,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 2>but it's supposed to I'm sure it's deeply uncomfortable and

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 2>physically just a nightmare.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>They were supposed to go for eight days, and they're

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they're saying it could be twenty twenty five.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe, Yeah, I mean, okay, that's that's what I'm saying.

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>That sounds yeah, there's there's you know, you know, the

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>only thing less trustworthy than fascist governments in Europe in

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen thirties is the Boeing Corporation today.

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So oh, I thought you were going to say it

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>was like, let's killing us, let's maybe try to do

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know some podcasts about some bad guys.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 3>You'll never say that.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>We're still here fuck them. So in some ways, the

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>US media responded to the rise of Hitler and Mussolini

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 2>worse than the German or Italian media had done. This

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 2>was due in a degree to simple distance. Fascism was

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 2>seen by a lot of these guys. It's a foreign ideology.

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 2>So whatever they're saying about killing journalists and whatnot, that's

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to hurt us over here in the United

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 2>States because we're not Europe right now. That wasn't the

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 2>only reason why so much of the media was sympathetic

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to Hitler and Mussolini a lot. In a lot of cases,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>it was because the rich men who owned those media

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>organs were fascists, or at least fasci philo fascists, right.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>They liked the fascists. Many of the wealthy men who

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 2>owned large published in houses saw communism as a rising

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 2>threat in Italy as a bulwark against the USSR, which,

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>if you just think about the military capabilities that Italy

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>evinced during World War Two, is extremely funny. The idea

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>of Italy trying to fight the Red Army, it's just yeah,

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>well last in about fourteen minutes. Anyway. Within days of

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the March on Rome, the Birmingham Age Herald, a major

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Alabama paper, described Mussolini as looking like a movie star. Wow,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>he's really got a movie star. Good looks this fascist

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 2>who's remade the government in his own image. What a

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 2>hot guy.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Hey, that Putin looks good with his top off. Though

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 3>you got it too.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they never stopped falling for it. Much was made

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>of the fact that actual movie stars found Mussolini magnetic.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 2>In February of nineteen twenty seven, and Motion Picture Magazine

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>published a photo of Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks, both

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>movie stars, doing a fascist salute in honor of their

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>new friend Mussolini they met the year before. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>doug Old Doug Fairbanks doing the Mussolini salute for his

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>new friend. Benito. Rudolph Valentino, an Italian born star born

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 2>star known as the Great Lover by Hollywood press, was

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 2>often compared positively to Il Duce Right, Like, Wow, Valentino

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and the dictator of Italy are very similar. You know,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 2>good looking guys. I bet Mussolini fucks. That's journalism.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to hear that sentence.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you know, Mussolini fucked Sophie.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>You know that's I don't need to hear it though.

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Look that's what the US media argued, So that's the

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 3>cold open, and we got.

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 2>It's never a cold open with Musset.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 2>The early obsession many Americans had from Mussolini, which transferred

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to Hitler in substantial degree, was due to several interlocking causes.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Katie Hole, a lecturer in American studies at the University

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 2>of Amsterdam, argues that these reasons were the Italian corporate

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>state's ability to project the image that they had solved

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the problems of democracy, combined with Mussolini's personal masculine magnetism

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and the belief that fascism offered a solution to the

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Great Depression. We can see a lot of the same

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>factors at work today in right wing idolization of strong

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>men like Erdowin and support for profoundly anti democratic solutions

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to problems, best embodied by the coup attempt on January sixth.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 2>The reality was that Mussolini's government was incompetent, a fact

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>that would soon be made evident with their disastrous invasion

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 2>of Ethiopia and incompetent handling of World War Two. But

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 2>many mainstream reporters in the US took the fascist government's

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>claims about its own success at face value. They believe

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the trains ran on time because the fascist said, we've

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 2>got the trains working, even though the trains did not

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>run on time. That was not a real thing.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I love when history is the exact opposite. Like I

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 3>recently learned that Lizzie Borden almost certainly didn't kill her parents,

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 3>and the media just shat on her until that became

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the history so interesting.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and as a result, you know, they really put

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a black mark on all of us who have killed

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 2>people with axes, and it's just not very fair, to

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>be honest, you know, Like we're like, axe murder is

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 2>a legitimate American pastime, and I just.

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Only a few steps away from criminalizing the machete. And

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 3>then obviously this show.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's always wrong to cut people up into pieces

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 2>because you're angry.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I just want to point it You've gifted me both

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>those things, which is so funny, I know.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because Morny whatever.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm a patriotic, red blooded American Sophie, and I think

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 2>that everyone deserves the right to partake in this country's

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>great traditions, you know, And that's where I am that's

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 2>great acts. The Saturday Evening Post published Mussolini's autobiography as

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>a serial starting in nineteen twenty eight. They described the

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 2>FASCISTI movement as rough in its methods, but praised it

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>for halting the radical left. That's the Saturday Evening Post.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 2>They're a little rough, but at least they dealt with

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>those radical workers trying to get fair wages. Similar tributes

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>came in from the Chicago Tribune. The New York Times

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 2>credited fascism with bringing Italy back to a state of normalcy.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>In his study Mussolini and Fascism, The View from America,

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>John Patrick Diggins notes that out of one hundred and

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty articles that mentioned Mussolini and new US newspapers from

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty five to nineteen thirty two, the majority had

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 2>either a neutral or a amused positive tone. Right, there

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>was no sort of fear about this guy, you know.

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 2>He was just kind of exciting and look he dealt

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>with those men old commis, right, these evil anarchists. One

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>of the relatively few journalists to write objectively on Mussolini

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 2>for American papers in this early portion of his reign

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>was John Gunther, who profiled him for Harper's and his

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 2>piece is an interesting historical document for its takes on Mussolini,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 2>but it's absolutely critical for its insights into the way

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 2>the international press functioned around Mussolini, right Gunther. Because he's

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 2>a guy who gets to interview in profile, Mussolini is

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>familiar with the process, and he sees what happens to

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 2>other journalists, the guys who are writing all of these

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 2>fawning articles that are turning Mussolini into a celebrity back

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 2>in the US. Quote interviews, Mussolini knows are the best

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>of all possible forms of propaganda. Thus he is so

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>lavish with them. Most newspapermen and their editors cannot resist

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 2>the flattery of conversation with a dictator or head of state.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Once they have been received by Mussolini or Hitler, they

0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>feel a sense of obligation, which warps their objectivity. Is

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 2>very difficult for the average correspondent to write unfavorably about

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a busy and important man who has just donated him

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a friendly hour of conversation. I think it's a critical

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 2>revelation not just about how the media, even up to today,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>reports on dictators and fascists, but how they report On

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 2>like guys like Peter Teel, very wealthy billionaires, guys like

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk. Right, they're so odd to be in the

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>presence of a celebrity and a man of power who

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 2>is dedicating time that makes them feel so important that

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 2>they become warmer and less objective towards the subject of

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>the interview.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 3>And if you happen to form any kind of personal connection,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>like my own window into this is working for IGN

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 3>and reviewing games, and they're constantly accused of and I

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 3>think you have to be really rigorous with yourself to

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 3>avoid being like, well, the game sucked, but they all

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 3>seem so nice, and they gave me access to their

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 3>time and their work. I can't just give them a

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>four or whatever. And that's just video game reviews. So

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine being like, I'm gonna come out against

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the president actually after meeting him and shaking his hand

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 3>and all that.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a real problem, one that has not gotten

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to be any less of a problem.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that's somewhat propinquity. Good.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that is a good word. Speaking of propinquity,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 2>someone interested in drawing more modern parallels here might bring

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>up the case of Maggie Haberman. Her work for The

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>New York Times reporting on the Trump White House was

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>praised by many liberals, even though Trump's people saw her

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>as providing positive pr Haberman was criticized back in twenty

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty two when she finally published a much ballyhooed book

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>about the Trump administration, which included a she quoted the

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 2>former president as promising not to leave office after his

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>defeat in twenty twenty. Now, Haberman didn't report on this

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>at the time, and a lot of people were, like,

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the president said in front of you

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>that he would refuse to leave office after losing an

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 2>election was probably something the American people immediately needed access to.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>As a journalist, you had an ethical responsibility to tell

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 2>them right away. But Haberman, a lot of people will allege,

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>wanted to withhold this information because if she put it out,

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>she would have lost her access to Trump, and she

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 2>wanted to stick with him because she wanted to get

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>more stuff to put in her books so that she

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>would get more money for it. Right The argument here

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the criticism of Maggie is that she held off on

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 2>reporting crucial information about a threat to democracy for her

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>own personal financial enrichment right now. Haberman's people, for their part,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>claim she shared this fact with her editors, and her

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>editors at the time were like, no, the fact that

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the president has refused to leave office is not newsworthy,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>which I do believe editors at the time would make

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 2>that call. But that's a bad unethical call, right, Like what.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Is dimentionally He'll say it to a bunch of evangelicals

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 3>on camera, so it'll be fine.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 3>It'll come out, thank you.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't worry. January's right around the corner. Something's gonna happen.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Back in the thirties, New York Times correspondents made equally

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>problematic judgments in their coverage of our friend of the Pod,

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Adolf Hitler. Perhaps the most sinister example of this was

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the case of New York Times correspondent Frederick Birschell. Prior

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>to Nazism's final victory over by Our Democracy, Birchill had

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 2>followed Hans Schaeffer in what was called the caged Hitler theory.

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>This was the idea that if Hitler got into power,

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>decent conservatives and government would moderate his behavior, and so

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>letting Hitler win was not disastrous, right, Like it was

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 2>a brilliant plan to weigh the Nazi leader down with

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 2>busy work that would stop him from doing any damage. Right,

0:16:55.760 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 2>perfect strategy. Yeah, that's gonna work. Great, thank god, Yeah, yeah,

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 2>thank god. We've got this. We've got the plan. Speaking

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of plans, Michael, I have a plan to sell you

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>some of these products and services. We're back, Michael. I

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>hope you have enjoyed purchasing.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I bought them all.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You bought them all?

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I bought them all purely to support the economy

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 3>and therefore the state.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you got lasick for parts of your body that

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 2>aren't even your eyes. You just use the lasers at you.

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I said, how much laser can this buy me? And

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 3>slap my wallet on the count.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right, That's right. Yeah, they love They just love lasering.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, any any god fearing American does really anyway

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 2>back to a non god fearing American. What are you

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about, Sophie, I'm just talking about our our man

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>who thinks that he's he's going to stop Hitler by

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>giving Hitler everything he wants.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Burchell was one of a few New York Times Berlin

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Bureau correspondents who stayed on after the Nazis took power.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>He had a major influence on how Americans perceived the

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>coming regime, and so it had an impact when he claimed,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>in writing for The New York Times, there will be

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 2>quote no extreme persecution of Nazi opponents under Hitler's regime,

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 2>and he said the Nazis aren't going to be mean

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 2>to anybody who opposed them because quote, there would be

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 2>no advantage to the government in unsettling Germany's social structure. Yeah.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>You really got the pulse of the Nazis there, Burchill.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 3>What would they have to game killing all the Jews?

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 3>That would be Meanwhile, he's doing speeches like we must

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 3>give Yeah, no, here's the deal. We let him, when

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 3>we fee let him, you know, take more rope, more rope, bring.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Him down, the whole thing, a rope over to him,

0:18:58.200 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and then leave.

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, we see the wire. This is a five

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 3>year process.

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, So the Enabling Act of March nineteen thirty

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 2>three brought the Nazis pretty much total power. Many Americans

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.959
<v Speaker 2>did find this deeply unsettling, and so with the Times

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 2>a consent, Burchell took to the airwaves on CBS radio,

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>he avoided any mention of the anti Semitic violence that

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Nazis had already been engaging in since Hitler's ascension, and

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.959
<v Speaker 2>instead toward told millions of Americans there was quote no

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 2>cause for general alarm. He advised his audience to dismiss

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 2>from their minds any thought that there would be in

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Germany any slaughter of the National Socialist Government's enemies or

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>racial oppression in any vital degree. The wrongest a man

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 2>has ever been, like powerful Jaco Tapper. Energy out of

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 2>this guy, just like the Nazis aren't going to kill anyone.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Why would you think that, calm down, everything's gonna be fine.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Quote me on that. It's almost like someone torturously trying

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 3>to figure out an opposite day sentence. Yeah, quickly, the

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 3>Nazis will spare all the Christians. This dude's wrong or lying.

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 3>This is not coming together.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, while Birchall was optimistic about the Hitler regime

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 2>in public, he knew that he couldn't actually like, he

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 2>knew that because he's reporting from Berlin. He knows the

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Nazis are actively at the moment murdering Jews and Communists, right,

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 2>He knew that what he was saying was indefensible, but

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 2>he justified lying to make Hitler seem safe to his publisher,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Arthur Sulzberger. By informing Soulsburger, I conceived of the notion

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of making the broadcast a bait for a real live

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 2>interview with Hitler, one which I have been vainly seeking.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>He was lying to the American people about Hitler not

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>wanting to murder anyone, so that he could get an

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 2>interview with Hitler.

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Great, and presumably the interview is him going like

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I want to murder everybody, you know, it's just disseminating

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 3>his view. So it was.

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like the most poisonous access journalism has ever been.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Is this right here?

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Yep?

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 3>And now this is officially the point in this two

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 3>episode story arc where I'm going, Okay, I see where

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 3>you're going with this in terms of modern day Yeah,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 3>like Israeli coming to Coman.

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Not just that, Honestly, like I wrote this before, you

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 2>know that had reached the global fashion. Yeah, yeah, it's

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of things. You know, we've been seeing this.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>This has been very evident and clear for a long time.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Although you are right, like that's part of why I

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 2>felt the need to rejigger this article in light of

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 2>what's been happening in goz It, right, is that like, oh,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.239
<v Speaker 2>I think there's actually a moral responsibility to draw that

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 2>comparison and make it much clearer. There was an immediate

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and a massive backlash to whatchual was doing with The Times,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 2>and it was led with particular fervor by a number

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>of Jewish papers. Now, none of these because these are

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>like small community papers, right, because you know you've got

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 2>this is still a period in which there are neighborhoods

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 2>that are like, this is the Jewish neighborhood in this

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>city or whatever, and so they'll have their paper. None

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 2>of these have the clout or the reach of The Times, though,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 2>so none of them are able to speak to a

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 2>national audience. Really, they are rightfully yelling about what Hitler's doing,

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 2>but they just don't have the kind of mouthpiece that

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.719
<v Speaker 2>The Times is. And for the next ten years, The

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>New York Times failed utterly to hire any men of

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 2>serious skill to work at Berlin Bureau. Much of this

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 2>can be traced to the owner of the paper, Adolph Ox,

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>who wanted his reporters to conduct themselves like quote, an

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 2>order of monks. One result of Ox's commitment to impartial journalism,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>as he saw it, was that most reports from Berlin

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>during Hitler's rise and the early years of the regime

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>we're little more than a collection of quotes from various

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>German newspapers. This began became a problem when the Nazis

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 2>started banning opposition papers from taking control and taking control

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>of Jewish own publishing houses like Olstein. So the Nazis

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>run the papers, and Ox is like, we should just

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 2>most of our coverage, should just be reporting on what complications.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right, It's now also amazing because it isn't one

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 3>of their stupid arguments for killing everyone that the Jews

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 3>run the media. It's like, yeah, the projection thing. It's like, no,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you run the media.

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well they've taken over now. But like, what's interesting

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 2>to me Ox, this guy who's like, you know, we

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 2>should mostly just be reporting what the German press is saying,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 2>not being critical to the Nazis.

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>It's transparents, it's fair and balanced to just transparently pass

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 3>things along.

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, yes, and he is he is he is Jewish.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Ox is a Jewish Man, right, But he disliked the

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>idea that the Times might be he's so obsessed with objectivity.

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>His big fear is not we're going to let a

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>genocide happen. It's if we're seen as sympathetic to Jews

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>in Germany, people might consider us an activist paper. And

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing worse for.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 3>A personal mistake. And I'm that Yeah.

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like these people are disgusted by the concept of activism.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Arthur Hayes Solsburger, effectively Ox's air as publisher of The Times,

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 2>admitted privately that he didn't have any sympathy. Again, Sulzburger

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>is also Jewish. He had no sympathy for Jews suffering

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 2>under Nazism because and he this is literally what he writes,

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 2>he was quote too fortunately born right. In other words,

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Sulzburg admitted, I just don't care about poor Jews suffering

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 2>in Germany because I'm a rich, urban Jewish man in

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the United States. Why would I be sympathetic to poor, uneducated,

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>rural Jews fleeing from Eastern Europe? Right, he got too.

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Seinfeld on Bill Maher spoken Cigars, saying Trump is not

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 3>it's funny how Trump won't really affect me. Yeah, no shit, dude,

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 3>of course, awareness beyond that.

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's and it's just very clear. Solsburger found these

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 2>people almost like these poor refugees from Eastern Europe who

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>had run and flooded in the Germany as a result

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>of you know, pagrams during the Russian Civil War. He

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>found them as gross as the Nazis did, right, because

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 2>they're like poor and dirty. You know, that's this guy's attitude, right.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that about them, but like, that's clearly

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 2>what Solsburger thinks. As early as the eighteen nineties, Solzberger

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and Ox had embarked on a quest to, in their

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 2>words again their words, de jewify The New York Times.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 2>The current publisher of The New York Times, by the way,

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 2>is Arthur Greg Sulzberger. On a related note, here's a

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>tweet from climate reporter Kendri Pierre Lewis about the conversation

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 2>she had with a quote top New York Times editor.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I wonder who it was. I think about a lot

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 2>about the top New York Times editor who I told

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 2>that his story. Urians were warning, we're in a similar

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 2>period to the ramp up to the Holocaust, and maybe

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 2>we could look back and see what the New York

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Times had done wrong to not repeat mistakes. He shrugged,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times didn't really cover the Holocaust, and

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 2>that's true. I don't know if she was talking to Soulsburger,

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 2>but whoever she was talking to at the Times had

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 2>the same attitude that Sulsberger had to the Holocaust, which

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>is that's not our business.

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I haven't thought that far. I don't care.

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Is it good to cover genocide? Impossible to say? What

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 2>do you have to be unbiased to do so?

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 3>Is it perhaps why Early Man created the concept of

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 3>impartial journalism to whotos about genocides?

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, huts tutsis have different opinions on machetes. Like, it's just.

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>That he's like, my families own this paper since, like

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, eighteen ninety six or whatever, I'm not

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>going to go against the family because I'm a rich guy,

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we do.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's it's they're so rich and so these

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 2>people have are generations removed from any kind of normal life. Right,

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 2>they can't feel fear, right, the only fear they can

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 2>feel is the fear that mean old socialists are going

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 2>to take some of their money. That is the only

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 2>thing that stirs any.

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Sort of their dolls eyes dead.

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is how I would describe souls burger black

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 2>eyes like a doll's eye.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Someone is coming for your money. That's the only thing

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 3>that can get get our eyes out.

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>That's all these motherfuckers, right. That's why newspapers should be

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a public good funded by taxes. I don't know, it's

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 2>not perfect, there's flaws with that, but it'll you know,

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 2>we've seen how our system works very well over the

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 2>course of the Second World War. The Times did it,

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>in fact cover the Holocaust, though it is fair to

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 2>say not well. One thing that's often to defend the

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Times people when they they published around two one hundred

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>articles about the mass murder of Jews and undesirable groups

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 2>by the Nazis. Shape you know, that's state that's three

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 2>or four a week leading up to the war years

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and that sounds good, right, you know, Given this, one

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 2>might conclude that Kindra is being unfair, but I don't

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 2>think she is. And I'm going to read a quote

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>from the History News Network to elucidate why at the

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 2>end of the war and for decades afterward, Americans claimed

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they did not know about the Holocaust as it was happening.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>How was it possible for so much information to be

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 2>available in the mass media, yet simultaneously for the public

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>to be ignorant. The reason is that the American media

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>in general, in the New York Times in particular, never

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>treated the Holocaust as an important news story. From the

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>start of the war in Europe to its end nearly

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 2>six years later. The story of the Holocaust made the

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 2>front page made the Times front page only twenty six

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 2>times out of twenty four thousand front page stories, and

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 2>most of these stories referred to the victims as refugees

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 2>or persecuted minorities. In only six of those stories where

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Jews identified on page one as the primary victims while

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the Holocaust was happening. Out of twenty four thousand front

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>page stories during the period of the Holocaust, six times

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 2>were their front page articles that identified the Jews as

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>a victim of Nazi violence.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Wow one per million.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, about one per million. Nor did the story

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 2>lead the paper, appearing in the right hand column, reserved

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>for the day's most important news, not even when the

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>concentration camps were liberated at the end of the war.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>In addition, the Times intermittently and timidly editorialized about the

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 2>extermination of the Jews, and the paper rarely highlighted it

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 2>in either the week in review or the magazine section. Now,

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm focusing a lot on The Times here, and my

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>focus on them is rooted in the fact that The

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Times was and is dull today our nation's chief paper

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of record, and as a result, we have a lot

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of detail as to how its journalists and editors saw

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the problem of rising Nazi power. Now, I don't think

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 2>that tells the whole story, because there are a lot

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 2>of there. Not only are there a lot of individual

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 2>journalists at the Times who did care about reporting on

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the Holocaust, just as by the way, the Times visual

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>investigation desk has done crucial reporting on what's been being

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.479
<v Speaker 2>done in Gaza. Right, you know, there are good people

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 2>at the Times, the editors and owners of the paper,

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 2>while the editors are a mixed bag and the ownership

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of the paper is fucking terrible. Right. That's my stance

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>on the matter. It's also worth noting that again, many

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 2>local US papers, and particularly smaller Jewish papers, did a

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 2>marvelous job of spreading detailed information about the first Nazi crimes. Likewise,

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 2>there were marvelous foreign correspondence in Germany who did dogged

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 2>and courageous work exposing early Nazi atrocities. The problem was

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 2>that for years, influential papers like The Times refused to

0:30:55.240 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 2>take their work seriously. The fear was, as always bias.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the best sources on early Nazi violence was

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the Jewish Telegraph Agency, which had been founded by an

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Austrian and provided early evidence of mass violence against German Jews.

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>The Times refused to report on its reporting like they

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>like they were doing. They refused to do what they

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 2>were doing with like German papers right and cover like

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>what the JTA was saying, because it was not neutral. Right,

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a Jewish paper, so it can't neutrally report on

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>violence against Jews. So we're not going to cover that

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>at all.

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 3>But as we talked about in the first episode, nothing

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 3>is neutral. That's boy never has neutral point of view

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 3>over the other. Yeah.

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Now they didn't actively, they didn't reject all stories

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 2>from the JTA out of hand. When the agency happened

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to interview a source, the Times considered it credible because

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>they were famous in this case Albert Einstein. The Times

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 2>was happy to carry a JTA wire story. Now, Einstein

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most popular public in a lie

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 2>actuals of the early twentieth century. When the JTA asked

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 2>him for his thoughts on the nineteen thirty German elections,

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>he stated that the quote Hitler vote is only a

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 2>symptom not necessarily of anti Jewish hatred, but of momentary

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 2>resentment caused by economic misery and unemployment within the ranks

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>of the German youth. Now Einstein was extremely wrong there, right,

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>The Hitler vote was absolutely a symptom of anti Jewish hatred.

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Emotionally driven. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Now that said, I will note Einstein was a consistent

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>opponent of the Nazis, and you can find quotes from

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>him that are much more direct and sensible in their

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 2>opposition to Hitler. So I think we can forgive the

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 2>statement from Einstein as a single lapse of judgment, right, Like,

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to shit on the man's attitude towards

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the Nazis, but he was wrong in this. And it's

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>interesting though that this was the thing the time that

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 2>like the Times chose to take a JTA story. This time,

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 2>when Einstein is saying don't be a The Nazis aren't racist,

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you know. Even as the war years began, the Times

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>continued to avoid reportage on attacks by Nazi street gangs

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 2>against Jewish Germans. When the Warsaw Ghetto uprising occurred, the

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 2>story was buried on page ten. Even coverage of the

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 2>liberation of Auschwitz tended to avoid mentioning that the vast

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 2>majority of victims were Jewish.

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just in the leisure In the leisure section, they're like,

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 3>don't vacation there right now, but we won't say why.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't summer in Auschwitz this year?

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Jesus.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>This is where things get a little complicated, because it

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>is probably fair to say that non Jewish victims of

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the Holocaust are forgotten or not sufficiently discussed, due in

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 2>part to an understandable desire to compensate for the poor

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>coverage Sulzburger and his colleagues put out during the genocide itself.

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>In his Cambridge Press study about the burying the Times

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 2>did of the Holocaust, Laurel Left notes that the primary

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 2>reason Sulzberger refused to change his initial reaction towards reporting

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 2>on Nazi violence against Jews was an unspoken fear that

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 2>he would risk his own position in American society, often

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 2>framed as part of a broader fear that Jewish assimilation

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 2>in the US would be harmed if too much attention

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 2>was paid to the suffering of Eastern European Jews under fascism,

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Johnson writes in an article for commentary dot org.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Above all, he was wary of any new influx of

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 2>European Jews into the United States. Assimilation, for Sulzberger was

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 2>a prize for which he was prepared to let other

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Jews make any sacrifice that's good. Yeah, yeah, just a

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 2>nice little reminder of like what human evil is.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not just these Nazis wanting to exterminate people. It's

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 2>this guy going like I could help maybe save lives,

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 2>but you know that might endanger me being able to

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 2>go to the best parties. So let's just not do that.

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's just not cover this, you know.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that maybe the most discouraging thing for

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.240
<v Speaker 3>your soul that you can witness is extreme It's like, okay,

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 3>extreme violence and cruelty is bad enough, but spectators who

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 3>laugh or yeah, treat it like it's fine, and you're

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 3>like Damn, the human being can really get dark Jesus.

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, when people just aren't concerned, don't care about,

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's happening, what's being done to people, right,

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Like I this has always been like my frustration talking

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to like some of my members, members my family who

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 2>supported the Iraq War about like stuff I saw in Iraq,

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 2>and like they they they're so bored of it, of

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 2>being taught, of talking about the damage that they helped

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to do. It just absolutely no interest in thinking about

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 2>it and talking about it.

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>That's what the Republican Party has tried to move on to,

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>being like, you know, fuck the Iraq War, like like

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 2>they weren't the ones who did it, right, you know,

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 2>not that they were the only ones who did it.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty of Democrats who voted for it, but like

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you guys, it was you're a thing, like you don't

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 2>get to fucking escape it because you don't want to

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>talk about it anymore.

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 3>And the ring of their world, as far as those

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 3>people are terrorists, is a narrative that's still foundational to

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 3>what's going on now.

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and I yeah, the way in which it's

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me because like I think I do actually

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 2>talk about terrorism in a way that's unbiased, because, like

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm very sympathetic to the aims of the PKK, which

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>is a Kurdish terrorist organization, right the fact that they

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 2>have and I'm not supportive of terrorism, but I think

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that oftentimes in history there are groups that find themselves

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>resorting to that and their broad aims are still justified. Right.

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I feel the same way about the anc right. Nelson

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Mandela was not just tarred as a terrorist because of

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:57.439
<v Speaker 2>a political campaign by the apartheid government. Nelson Mandela went

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 2>into hiding and established the arm wing of the A

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 2>and C, which bombed civilians, right like he was a terrorist.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, like terrorism, you can you can objectively say

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 2>all of these things are terrorism, and that doesn't mean

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that like you support it when the cause is good.

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 2>It just means that you acknowledge there are terrorists sometimes

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 2>whose overall cause is justified. It's like looking at the IRA,

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 2>do I think, like, do I think it was evil

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 2>to like throw a bomb in a pub? Yeah, that

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 2>is evil. It's bad to bomb a pub, But that

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean the overall fight was evil, right, like you

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 2>It's just everyone everyone agrees that terrorism is fine in

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 2>certain circumstances. I don't see any moral difference.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 3>And they're like, this is the good kind. So we

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 3>picked a different word because this is the approved form

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 3>of domestic terrorism. We're okay with.

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the the bombing of Western Europe by the Allies

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 2>during World War Two was one of the largest acts

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of terrorism in history. It is the deliberate targeting of

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 2>civilians to frighten them and break their will. There's no

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 2>other way to describe it but terrorism. That's what it

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>fucking was, right, And you know, I would argue that,

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 2>like it actually didn't work. You can't really bomb people's

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 2>will to fight away. But I don't think actually in

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 2>World War Two we were wrong to have tried it

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 2>for a period of time because the situation was fucking

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 2>desperate and you're going to you're going to try everything

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 2>at that point, right, Like, it's just how people react

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 2>in the situations like this. Everyone does it, Every side

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 2>does it. I think that's actually reporting on it objectively,

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 2>you know. But the tie.

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Remember you were very pro Maquis and anti Kardassian when that.

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I am extremely supportive of Maki a do I like

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 2>chacote No as an actor. I dislike it. Sure, yeah,

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I look, I support uh insurgent attacks against Cardassian infrastructure

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 2>and I always have. Yeah, but the falthy carties yeah, whoa, whoa, Michael,

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 2>we don't got to get all Miles O'Brien in here.

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, let's go down this tangent.

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of Miles O'Brien, A lot of people would argue

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the Miles O'Brien of physics was Albert Einstein, and Einstein

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 2>reached out to Sulzberger to try to help him, you know,

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of after this point. He reaches out to Sulzburg

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 2>at one point because there's a Berlin theater critic named

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Alfred Kerherr who is obviously carries a Jewish Man, and

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 2>the Nazis want him dead. They have a real thing

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>against critics. So Einstein reaches out to Sulzburgers with like, hey,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 2>you have a lot of poll and power. Can you

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 2>help us get this guy out of Germany and into

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 2>the United States so he doesn't get murdered, And Solsburger

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 2>yells at Einstein. He says, I am disassociated from any

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>movement which springs from the oppression of Jews in Germany.

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Only in this way can the unprejudiced and unbiased portion

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Times be understood. What an insane thing to say,

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I am. I will refuse to pay attention to the

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 2>oppression of Jews in Germany because that's the only way

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 2>that we can be unbiased is this isn't happening.

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 3>That's the neutral stance is pretend.

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not happening.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 3>You know. Wow.

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 2>So that statement is particularly ironic when we return again

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 2>to how The Times has recently covered protests against the

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 2>genocide and Gaza. I read an article recently on drop

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 2>site news by Arvind Dilawar, a freelance journalist who had

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 2>worked for The Times, reporting on an article about an

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 2>anti Zionist protest in New Jersey. The precise focus of

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the protest was Israeli realtors holding an event to auction

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 2>off a legally seized Palestinian land arvand writes quote amid

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Israel's ongoing genocide and the Gaza strip. The Times article

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>described the protest as contributing to escalating fear intention in

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 2>the otherwise peaceable t Neck as a pivotal example of

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 2>alleged anti Semitic activity in the area. My co author

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 2>John Leland, a Time staff reporter quoted township council member

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Goldberg, who claimed her home had been broken into

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 2>as part of a string of abuse in response to

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 2>her vocal support of Israel and her Jewish background. I

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 2>have been threatened. I had a box truck with my

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.959
<v Speaker 2>picture on it and the words liar, liar, driven around town.

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 2>My house has been broken into. I have received anti

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Semitic messages, Goldberg told Leland, adding I have never felt

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.919
<v Speaker 2>so afraid to be Jewish as now. And hey, look,

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 2>if protests had been were corresponding to surges in violence

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 2>towards Jewish people, you know that's worth reporting. But in

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 2>this case, the claim by Hillary is, so far as

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 2>we can tell, untrue. Arvind filed a record's request, and

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the records he received from the police showed that police

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>concluded no break d was attempted at her property, right

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that no crime at all had been attempted against Goldberg.

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 2>They had found no evidence of it. There were no

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 2>signs of forced entry. She calls them a dozen times

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 2>for follow up checks on her home, and at no

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 2>point do the police find anything indicating her claims were true.

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Arvind goes on to write, believing a correction to the

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 2>time story was an order, or at least an update

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 2>to give readers a fuller picture. I shared the police

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 2>reports with Leland, who told me he had already gotten

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 2>them and despite the explicit contradictions, no correction would be issued.

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 2>When presented with the police reports, Management at the Times

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 2>also declined to reconcile them with its coverage. Instead, Managing

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 2>director of external Communications, Charlie Stadelander said in a statement

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that the article was thoroughly reported, fact checked and edited

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and we stand behind its publication. Goldberg did not respond

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 2>to multiple requests for comment.

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 3>The cops are like there was a truck going around

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:54.760
<v Speaker 3>her house with her face that said truth teller truth. Yeah,

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 3>everything's the opposite of what you're saying it.

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Is yea, and look again, I don't want to pretend. Obviously,

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 2>there has been a surge in anti Semitism, and some

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 2>of it is tied. I don't blame the fact that

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 2>people are protesting against a genocide for it, but those

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 2>protests have provided cover for Nazis. Right. You can find

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 2>evidence of that, and there is evidence that likes aspects

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 2>of like far right propag anti Jewish propaganda have been

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 2>adopted by some.

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Folks, they're like anything to say antiges.

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, of course, I yeah, exactly. That is a thing

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 2>that happens. It's a thing you have to guard against happening, right,

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a thing you have to be aware of. But

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 2>The Times is deliberately refusing to like correct their reporting.

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 2>That makes the problem look much worse than it is.

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's because their narrative that they want to portray

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 2>about these protests is helped by that inaccurate reporting, right,

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's to them neutrality cool stuff. Back to the

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirties over in France, excellent work was done La Humanity,

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the paper of the French Communist Party, which wrote unsparingly

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 2>about Nazi violence towards Jews and other targeted groups. This

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 2>reporting was ignored by the American press because it was

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a communist paper. Now there's a great book about all this, Berlin,

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirty three, written by French media critic Daniel Schneiderman.

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I found an interview with Schneiderman in The New Yorker

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 2>for back in twenty nineteen that contains a fascinating quote

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 2>on what he called activist journalism, which he argues was

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the only journalism that responded ethically to the rise of fascism.

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Activist journalism, Schneidermann writes, journalism that subordinates the quest for

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.720
<v Speaker 2>truth to the quest for a truth that is useful

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 2>to its cause is the only journalism that today doesn't

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 2>have to feel ashamed about what it produced. Everything reasonable, scrupulous, balanced,

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, contributed to lulling the crowd to sleep.

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 2>If I had been a reader at the time, though,

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I probably would have quickly stopped reading after a few days,

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 2>dissuaded by the bludgeting. So Schneiderman saying, like, the only

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 2>only these activist papers that had a clear angle angle

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 2>are the ones who accurately described the danger of the Nazis.

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 2>But I think if I had been reading them at

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the time, I wouldn't have paid much attention because it's

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 2>just kind of exhausting to get that sort of ideological bludgeting.

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 2>And I find this compelling. I think it's actually kind

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 2>of courageous that he admits that, right, that's an evidence

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:27.839
<v Speaker 2>of an honest thinker who was like, I can see

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that these people were the only ones who did the

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 2>right thing, and I don't think I would have listened

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to them at the time. I actually respect being able

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 2>to say that about yourself quite a lot.

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it definitely bums me out though through the climate

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 3>change lens, because a similar analog would be we're gonna die,

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 3>We're all gonna die, We're all gonna die, and eventually

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 3>you're like, look, I know, but I'm sick of hearing it.

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:53.879
<v Speaker 3>It's really depressed they are, though, Or did you not

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 3>like this? This really is that level of problem?

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:02.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's uh. Yeah, Again, I like Schneiderman a lot

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 2>because he's he's kind of able to acknowledge that about

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 2>himself and all of us, like you, like, no matter

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 2>what you think, you do this about something you kind

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 2>of have to to survive, right, But that's part of

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 2>where these guys, how these guys thrive, these monsters thrive. Yeah,

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 2>now it is uh, you know, I find this all

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 2>especially worth pointing out because the next period in Sophie,

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 2>did we do a second ad break? Nope? You know

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 2>what the next period for all of us, Michael is

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be to cut to ads. So have a

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 2>little have a little ad, you know, shovel some ads

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 2>into your face, you know, ads are as a great writer.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:50.720
<v Speaker 2>William Shakespeare once said the oatmeal of art, So enjoy

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 2>some oatmeal while we get ready to do more art.

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 2>We're back, Michael Maestro sway, are your fingers ready to

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 2>tap the ivories of talking about.

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 3>My keyboard as easily? Google William Shakespeare oatmeal and try

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 3>to figure out what the fuck that was about.

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like to think he knew about oatmeal because

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 2>as a British person.

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Teeth, why not oatmeal? Yeah?

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Did he quin crocodile?

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 3>He did?

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 2>What a cool guy?

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Billy shakes where I'm sure it's based on a

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Greek root or something, but I like to think that

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 3>he's just saw one and he's like.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a fucking crocodile. It is one of those

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's some animals like you look at a

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 2>fucking uh a marmoset, right, and like that it's not

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 2>obviously a marmoset. Other names could have worked for a marmoset.

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 2>You'll get a crocodile and you're like, yeah, that's a

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:58.760
<v Speaker 2>fucking crocodile.

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Where you're like, you are a top That is totally Yeah.

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 2>For sure. Every Todd I've seen has been a Todd anyway.

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 2>So the next period of American journalism regarding the fascists,

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the one that occurred from the late thirties

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 2>up to the start of the war. Things got a

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:20.440
<v Speaker 2>little better, you know, quite a bit better by the end.

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 2>The rapid change in American attitudes towards isolationism in World

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 2>War Two is some evidence of this. But we also

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 2>see it in the response of the populace and the

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:32.760
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media to domestic fascist groups like the Silver Shirts

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and the German American bund. Here, at least, the outright

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 2>sympathy of the Italian liberal press and the frightened tremulousness

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Weimar media were less present. When the Booned

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 2>famously rallied in Madison Square Garden in nineteen thirty nine.

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Reporters on scene for Booned clashes with anti fascists wrote

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:54.400
<v Speaker 2>articles with titles like Nazi advocacy of Roosevelt's death charged

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and seven are injured at Nazi rally and that's like,

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 2>you know good. In an article several days after the rally,

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 2>even The Times argued that Bundists were quote determined to

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.440
<v Speaker 2>destroy our democracy. The paper's editor later released a statement

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 2>saying the boone went to set up an American Hitler,

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and this the Times was at least following in the

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 2>footsteps of the American people, who by this point had

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 2>started taking the warnings of reporters who were quite biased

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 2>against Nazis seriously. And I might argue that they only,

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Times only jumps on the bandwagon of

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 2>doing that when it becomes clear that there are Nazis

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 2>in the US who might threaten them even more than

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 2>being sympathetic to Jews in Germany would. As US entry

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:40.360
<v Speaker 2>to World War Two grew closer, the most influential reporting

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 2>on the Nazis came not from the unbiased, monklike reporters

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 2>valued by AUX but from foreign correspondents like William Schier

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and Dorothy Thompson. Thompson's most influential article, and today this

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most influential things anyone will ever

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:58.919
<v Speaker 2>write about Fascism, was published in August of nineteen forty

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 2>one for Harper's Me magazine. It had the evocative title

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Who Goes Nazi? And, rather than purporting to be even

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 2>handed journalism, it presents the reader with a series of

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 2>fictional characters from various backgrounds, all conversing at a dinner

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:16.280
<v Speaker 2>party and it asks the reader to predict which ones

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 2>might go Nazi. I take some enjoyment in the fact

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 2>that Thompson included a character in her article who was

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:27.359
<v Speaker 2>almost certainly based on mister Soulsberger. Right on the head

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 2>editor at the Times quote, mister Jay over there is

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 2>a Jew. Mister Jay is a very important man. He

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 2>is immensely rich. He has made a fortune through a

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.880
<v Speaker 2>dozen directorates in various companies, through a fabulous marriage, through

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:42.800
<v Speaker 2>a speculative flare, and through a native gift for money

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and a native love of power. He is intelligent and arrogant.

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 2>He seldom associates with Jews. He deploys any mention of

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the Jewish question. He believes that Hitler should not be

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 2>judged from the standpoint of anti Semitism. He thinks that

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the Jews should be reserved on all political questions. He

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 2>considers Roosevelt an enemy of business. He thinks it was

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 2>a serious blow to the Jews that Frankfurter should have

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 2>been appointed to the Supreme Court. The saturnine mister c

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the real Nazi in the room, engages him in a

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 2>flatteringly attentive conversation. Mister Jay agrees with mister C. Holy,

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 2>mister J is definitely attracted by mister C. He goes

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 2>out of his way to ask his name. They have

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 2>never met before. A very intelligent man, he says. And

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Thompson's article today still draws a lot of hatred from

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 2>conservatives who find it very unfair and unbiased. And it

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 2>was Dorothy understood that fairness and objectivity don't fight fascism.

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 2>There's a good chance her pros will make you feel uncomfortable,

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and it ought to. But I promise if you read

0:51:44.520 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 2>her article, you will at least feel something. Now, I'm

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:49.760
<v Speaker 2>not half the writer Dorothy was, so rather than attempt

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to wrap this piece up myself, Michael, I'm going to

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:56.240
<v Speaker 2>leave you with one last quote from that essay. It's fun,

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 2>a Macabs sort of fun, this parlor game of who

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 2>goes Nazi? And it simplifies things asking the question in

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 2>regard to specific personalities. Kind, good, happy, gentlemanly, secure people

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:11.439
<v Speaker 2>never go Nazi. They may be the gentle philosopher whose

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:13.400
<v Speaker 2>name is in the blue book or bill from City

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:16.319
<v Speaker 2>College to whom democracy gave a chance to design airplanes.

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:19.719
<v Speaker 2>You'll never make Nazis out of them. But the frustrated

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 2>and humiliated intellectual, the rich and scared speculator, the spoiled son,

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the labor tyrant, the fellow who has achieved success by

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 2>smelling out the wind of success. They would all go

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Nazi in a crisis. Believe me, nice people don't go Nazi.

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Their race, color, creed, or social condition is not the criterion.

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It is something in them. Those who haven't anything in

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 2>them to tell them what they like and what they don't,

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 2>whether it is breeding or happiness, or wisdom or a

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 2>code however old fashion or however modern, go Nazi. It's

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 2>an amusing game. Try it at the next big party

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you go to.

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, accuse everyone, you did say, agree earth, Yeah. I

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 3>think it gets at the base of something that people

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:08.919
<v Speaker 3>are wielding to great effect right now, which is it's

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 3>weird to hate people for no reason. They're weird little guys.

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Yes, And I think that recognition that, like, you

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:22.839
<v Speaker 2>become a Nazi when there's nothing inside you but the

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 2>love of and need for wealth and power, right when

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 2>that's the only thing you've got. That's that like, it's

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally a product of insecurity. And so the way to

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 2>fight these people, as we're starting to see with like

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 2>vance here is to make them feel more insecure, right

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 2>when you when you frame them, when you when you

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 2>either talk of them as like, well, these are just

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 2>common sult of the earth people with legitimate grievances, or

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:49.280
<v Speaker 2>when you do what I think a lot of liberals

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 2>started to do with Trump, which is why you've got

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 2>this weird chunk of people who like, don't think he

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 2>could have been shot just like honestly as part of

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 2>an assassination attempt. You know, people treat them like almost

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 2>a supernatural enemy, right, like they're you know, they're they're

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:09.279
<v Speaker 2>this kind of like uh like evil demonic force as

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:15.359
<v Speaker 2>opposed to no, these are sad, insecure, sick little weirdos, right,

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:19.319
<v Speaker 2>and when you when you shine that light on them,

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 2>when you make that clear. However you do it, if

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:24.840
<v Speaker 2>you do it through just objective reporting, which you can do,

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:28.239
<v Speaker 2>or if you do it through satire, right, whatever you

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 2>have to do, you have to find their points of

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 2>insecurity and stick a thumb in them, right. That is

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 2>how you That is how you fight these people without

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:42.480
<v Speaker 2>pulling out guns. Right if you want to avoid that,

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and I sure do, that's how you do it.

0:54:45.560 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 3>That's how you get kicked out of Tenacious Da.

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, god.

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:56.359
<v Speaker 3>It is. It sucks. It's such a oh bro cod

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 3>come on man, man.

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah no, but I don't know who wouldn't who wouldn't

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 2>sacrifice a thirty year friendship for the bliss that is

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 2>getting to be in the what's that fucking video game

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 2>movie that Jack Black's about to be in?

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Borderlands?

0:55:12.920 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Border Lands?

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Why God considered fucking terrible? There's already known.

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, no, nothing more valuable than getting to

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 2>be in the Borderlance movie.

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Because of an off the cuff joke that no offense.

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Literally everyone thought in their head, like there's no it's whatever. Anyway, Yeah,

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it speaks to what we're saying in terms of, yes,

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 3>in a vacuum, violence is always shocking and feels unnatural

0:55:41.760 --> 0:55:46.439
<v Speaker 3>in a way. But remember that the one context where

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 3>it kind of makes sense is like, yeah, but if

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 3>someone's been beating the shit out of you for eight hours, like,

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a point, there's a point.

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 2>There's there's a point, right, uh. And that point was

0:55:57.520 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 2>for us in the political sense of like getting dirty.

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 2>That point was like six years ago, like six to

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 2>eight years ago.

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:09.200
<v Speaker 3>And all right, we've held ourselves back long enough.

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, anyway, Michael, speaking of fighting back, you know what,

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you can fight back against your boredom by reading Michael's novel.

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 2>That's right, will make you entertained and happy.

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 3>It's true I plugged it at the top, but I'll

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:32.239
<v Speaker 3>mention again. It's called The Climb. You can get a

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 3>free sample by checking out the small Beans podcast feed,

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 3>or check out the small Beans Patreon page and click

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:41.439
<v Speaker 3>the shop tab. If you end up wanting the whole thing,

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 3>it's an audiobook and a book book. You can get

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 3>either flavor. Now, anyway, we got thank you so much.

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We got two things to plug at the end here.

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Robert, Yeah, do it so.

0:56:57.280 --> 0:56:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the first one if you do the second one.

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Deal. Okay, it's clearly forgot the plug, sohi, no.

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember by the time we get there. I think

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the first one is we have a new podcast that

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:12.040
<v Speaker 1>cools on media, hosted by Molly Conger. It's called Weird

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Little Guys and shows like that relate to episodes like this.

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I Stell's plugged it earlier. If I know.

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I caught that and I was like, wow, swam really

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:25.960
<v Speaker 1>really calling it good.

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm loving it so far.

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh, thank you. Molly's amazing. And the other thing, Robert is.

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 2>What is the other thing? Sophie, I don't know.

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking and to Robert and we go, I'm looking

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at you. Other people can look at.

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 2>You, you know what, Sophie, let me explain to you.

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 2>So about like one hundred and fifty or so years ago,

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 2>some I'm guessing they were frenchmen figured out that if

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 2>you like, put a hole in a box and run

0:57:56.960 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 2>light through it, you can kind of get images to

0:58:01.960 --> 0:58:04.600
<v Speaker 2>print essentially onto pieces of paper.

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 2>This led to the creation of what we're called photographs

0:58:08.440 --> 0:58:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and cameras, and eventually people recognize that if you take

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these still images and you run them

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 2>in sequence, you can create the illusion of movement. And

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 2>now we at cool Zone have joined this glorious tradition

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 2>by pivoting to video ourselves, because that's never.

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Bad YouTube dot com slash at behind the.

0:58:31.160 --> 0:58:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Back, masterfully stretched.

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you, Michael, thank you, and thank you.

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's the episode, bye, is it? I mean,

0:58:42.600 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>do you have anything else you'd like to add?

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Michael, It's nice to talk No, I was just saying

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 2>it's nice to talk to you. That's what I want

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 2>to know. Yeah, yeah, yeah did you?

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Did you?

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:57.880
<v Speaker 2>The recent news came out that Tim Walls is a

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:01.440
<v Speaker 2>second Dreamcast player. I think this might be what cinches

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the election.

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, can we do another hour on that perfect blue.

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And he's a monster.

0:59:08.000 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh we have different attitudes, so good dude.

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to say Crazy Taxi was on the Dreamcast.

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 3>One of the launch titles. I believe Dreamcast Day.

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 2>It was really the refer yeah, the precursor to that

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 2>good GTA three energy.

0:59:24.400 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah for real. I was just thinking about Crazy Taxi.

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And there was the Simpsons rip off of Crazy tax

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It was pretty good too. Hit and Run, Yeah, hit

0:59:34.640 --> 0:59:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and Run, great game anyway, think about the Simpsons. Now,

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:46.040
<v Speaker 2>folks to wear some screen huh you? Well bye.

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Behind the Bastards is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 4>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:59:57.000 --> 0:59:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Eight