WEBVTT - Why This Coming American Summit May Blow Up for Biden

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>We come here to begin a new era, an era

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 1>of real promise. In this meeting, for these days, we

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have put our people first, and we have thought about tomorrow.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>We are bound together by geography, by history, by culture,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but most important now by shared values. We have tried

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to give life to these values at this summit by

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>agreeing to create a free trade area throughout our hemisphere,

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to bring together our nations, to improve the quality of

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>life for our peoples, and to strengthen and make permanent

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the march of democracy. This is more than words. This

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>is a commitment to deeds. Hello, and welcome to Stephaniel.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the podcast that brings the global economy to you.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And that was President Bill Clinton at the closing ceremony

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the First Summit of the America's which he convened

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. As you heard there, it was supposed to

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>mark the beginning of a new era of cooperation across

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the America's. In fact, all it started was a tradition

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of holding these summits every few years, which generally didn't

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>achieve much. That free trade area of the America's that

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:32.639
<v Speaker 1>went nowhere, and the US hasn't hosted another one until now.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>With President Biden holding his own summ into the America's

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in just a few days time in Los Angeles. The

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.919
<v Speaker 1>guest list, though, is still in doubt to be honest.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So are those shared values President Clinton talked about back

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in ninety four. I'm going to talk about all that

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>later with Juan Bablo Spinetto, who runs all of Bloomberg's

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>economic and government coverage in Latin America. After that, we

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>also have a chat with one of the authors of

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a major new report about where we get our human

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>capital from. It's not where you might think, it turns out.

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>But first, here's our Mexico City based reports, admire Ather

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>buch To explain why plans for this summit are in

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>such a mess. Episode is in momento. The it's in momento.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>The initial in lais the America. You are said only

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>him Blomundo. That was Andress Manuel Lopez Brador, also known

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>as Amlo, the popular and populous President of Mexico, expressing

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>his support for a new era of cooperation throughout the America's.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>In fact, improving relations across the region is a key

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>objective for President Joe Biden too. He needs the support

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico and its Latin American neighbors to prevent the

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>persistent of rival of migrants at the US's southern border

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>from becoming a political problem. However, a meeting of the

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>region's leaders next week in Los Angeles is looking less

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like an opportunity to men defences and more like a

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>political fiasco. The US is hosting the Summit of the

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>America's for the first time since the summits founding in

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and on the eve of the event, not all of

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the would be participants have accepted their invitations. At the

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the list of holdouts is am Loo, who

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>has threatened to boycott the event unless the US also

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>invites Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba. For now, inviting the heads

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of those three nations is a non starter for the

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden and illustration. The standoff is exposing the fault lines

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>across the America's, including a desire by leaders in the

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>region for the US to stop imposing its political vision.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's Andres Rosenthal, a Mexican career diplomat. The history goes

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>back to four when the US decided to convene the

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>first Summit of the America's basically with the clear intention

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of trying to gauge interest in the region for an integration,

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a economic integration of the America's somewhat similar to the

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>European Union. UH. It was not successful. There were too

0:04:55.160 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>many differing views regarding the possibility of integration, as I'm

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>sure they still there still are today. It's the first

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>time that the United States hosts the Summit of the

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>America since it was clear to my mind at least

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that this was an attempt by President Biden to reaffirm

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>US interest in the region, uh, notwithstanding all of the

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>other distractions going on, and to be able to bring

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the leadership of the region to Los Angeles in order

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to discuss issues such as migration, economic competitiveness, climate change.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't even gotten to the part where leaders

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>can discuss crucial issues. First, Latin America's leaders need to

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>show up. Almost says if Biden does not treat all

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>countries equally, he will send his foreign affairs men as

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>or to the summit, but the Mexican president himself will

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>stay home. Meanwhile, other countries have said they refused to go.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Qubas president said he would not go even if he

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>did get an invite. Guatemala has made a fuss over

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.679
<v Speaker 1>US criticism of its justice system, and Honduras as president

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>said she would not go if other leaders were left out.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>The question for Biden is whether a lackluster turnout is

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>enough or if the boycott by some nations is one

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>snub too many. Guala Lupea Cabrera, a political scientist and

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>migration scholar at George Mason University, says the hubbub is

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a sign of the loss of US influence in the

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>region and it comes at a tricky time for the

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. The u s midterm elections are in November,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and they will determine whether Biden's Democratic Party retains its

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>majority in Congress. The US is concerned in Latin America's

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>whether Mexico and its neighbors will help block migration and

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>boost trade. But almost he's standing up to Biden as

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a winning political strategy that could help his own party

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming Mexican regional elections and later on. The

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>current administration is thinking about a midterm elections and also

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>UH stability in terms of diplomacy and a hemispheric stability.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It's important for for the Democrats in a very complicated

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>electoral process that will probably not result in big in

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a big victory for them. On the contrary, so at

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this point also migration, it's it's at the center probably

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of the discussion, considering that a number of people from

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the world start a journey in different

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>parts of South America, and we have the problems in

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Central America that have been magnified because of COVID nineteen pandemic.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic has been a time of big change in

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Latin America and many of the leaders who have been

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>invited to the summit I have never met one another

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in these two years. Chile elected at three five year

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>old leftist Colombians voted in a first round election for

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a Garia fighter turned mayor, and Brazil lost its love

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for the conservative and brash Yeah Tonto Honduras, his former president,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>got extradited to the US on drug trafficking charges, a

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>huge fall from Grace, and Mexicans cemented their support for Amlo,

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>who has frequently criticized the US for its intervention in

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Mexico security and energy affairs, while calling for more US

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>investment at a time when economic recovery has been too slow. Rosenthal,

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the diplomat says the embarrassing debate over whether or not

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to attend the summit could have been avoided. The US government,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>the White House has mismanaged this issue because they should

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>have foreseen this from the very beginning, and they should

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have made whatever efforts needed to be made, either not

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to hold the summit if they weren't going to invite

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the countries of the region, or to find

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>some solution before they it became a political heart patago.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>The Biden administration's objection to hosting Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>centers on its characterization of those countries as undemocratic. To

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>be sure, though the US has negotiated with the countries

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on its no fly list in the past. Vanessa Rubio Marquez,

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>who once worked in Mexico's Foreign Affairs ministry, remembers what

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it looked like when the United States was just another participant.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I was in that very historic moment in which a

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>President Castro shook hands with back then President Obama. I

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was in twenty in Panama at another summit of the

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>America's So I guess what what a president man had

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in mind was the possibility of having once again all

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of the countries of the Amisphere invited to the stummits.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But of course, in the context of this very divided

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, what has been happening is that countries have

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>cited one way or the other. So we can get

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.119
<v Speaker 1>a bit more context now. From Juan Pablo spinetto Bloomberg

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Managing editor for Economics and Government, Maya's boss JP, thanks

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for coming on, Stephanomics. We've had some of the history

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in that piece. But the plasmo the guest list for

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>these summits has always been a problem, hasn't it always?

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for the invitation, Stephanie. Um. You know, the

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>issue of Cuba has been for decades, very sensitive, obviously,

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and you have guessed that the White House thought about

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it before, but it didn't and uh show up and

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>exploded when I'm law decided to play politics and say, okay,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>if you don't invite these guys Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaraga,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm basically not going to go to this meeting, which

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>put the White House in a very tough position. When

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I was looking back at some of the sort of

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>colorful history of some of these meetings that even before

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Summit of the America's There was a There was

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a North South summit in Cancoon in Mexico in nineteen one,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>which which famously also caused all the same issues around

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Castro could come. So remind me what

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>happened there exactly. It happened the same as you know now.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That was forty years ago. Ronald Reagan was going to Cancun.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>That put Mexico in a tight spot because they needed

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to decide what to do with Cuba. Mexico has always

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>been very friendly to to Cuba during the p r

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I years, and so the solution they came up was, Okay,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna invite Fidel Castro, but we're gonna in

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>white team. A few days before to a meeting in Costmel,

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So the president at the time, Lopes Potio, called Fidel

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to make the invitation and he traveled by ship by

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a navy yacht from the island to Costomel, which is

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>also an island in the Caribbean. Cost of Mexico held

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a meeting. Cosmo is actually rather nice than Cancoon. Fantastic,

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>fantastic place. And I actually I think they met a

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>few times there in Costumel and um and they had

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a meeting there. So Mexico has always been doing that

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>balance right, knowing that they can get on a fight

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with the US, but at the same time, you know,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>making their point, their stands and showing that they are

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>allies with the Cuban regime. And coming back to today,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>when you think of sort of more broadly among Latin

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>American leaders, do they think this summit by President Biden

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is entirely politically motivated and to do with the u

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>s midterms or do you think they give him some

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt that he wants to support integration

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>across the region. I think it's a bit confusing the

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>message that the US is sending, because obviously it's nice

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to be invited, but we haven't seen a strong agenda

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>so far. There were we reported, you know, the interests

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of the White House to focus on trade, but you

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>need deliverables, right. One of the reasons why the the

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Brazilian presidents didn't want to go to la had nothing

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to do with Cuba, obviously, but because of his internal reasons,

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and he is fighting a very tough re election campaign

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and his point was what it is for me to

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>go to l A, which is twelve hours away from

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Brazilia to meet with Biden who never pick up the

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>phone and talk to me until now. And we're not

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna get anything, but you know, a photoshop. Um. So

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the Origion expects, uh, you know, more concrete steps and

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>not just to be you know, lecture about migration. Basically,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>you and I were in I mean I was in

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Mexico with you a couple of weeks ago and we

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about this. You know, if when you don't spend

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>time there, you don't realize quite how strange in some

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>ways the President Amlo is. You know, he's not a

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of tradition he's a populist, but he's not traditionally

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>left wing. He had a very tight fiscal policy, didn't

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot during COVID. He's very dedicated to these

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of big projects, quite old fashioned projects, like building

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a big new petrol refinery. Do you think the Americans

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>even sort of know what to make of Amlo or

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do they understand what makes his government tick or does

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone understand what makes his government take I think you know,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they do in a way, um, in the sense of

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they have been very respectful, to be honest of of

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Mexico's autonomy and that's something that even Amlow recognized and

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>he's very um grateful for. Uh. He always talked about this,

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is very important to any Mexican president right

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the the the appearance of negotiating as a as as

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>spears and not a not as being imposed by the

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>US right now, it's a very difficult negotiation because in

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a way for the US, the only thing that matters

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>right now is migration, and especially not having a migration

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>crisis during the midterm. So uh that you know, on

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>one side, um prevents the development of other projects, but

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time gives some a lot more leeway

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to play his own cards, right knowing that by containing migration, uh,

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the Americans will be happy. I mean, if we step back,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that we probably talked about even more

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>when we were in Mexico, it was not anything to

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>do with the summit. Anything that's going to happen in

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles is but what's happening in Washington and

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>precisely what's happening inside the Federal Reserve. I mean this Historically,

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a period of rising US interest rates has been bad

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>news for many countries. In Latin America, and certainly we

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>saw in the eighties and in the mid nineties when

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the US was increasing interest rates making money more expensive,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a lot of countries in Latin America that

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>ended up paying a heavy price for that. So is

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that How worried are people in Mexico and around the

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>region about that possibility? Now? Of course? Uh, you know

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>here something very interesting happening, which is the Latin Riican

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>central banks were the first ones to move. Brasil started

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to increase the interest rates um in March last year,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so and the tightening cycle has been very aggressive so far.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So by the time they these years started to move,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Latin America already created a cushion that you know, you

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>can see it basically in stronger exchange rates. Uh, that

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the same time prevented the capital outflows

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that tend to generate those crises UM as we saw

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Now, to me, the answer here, the

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>main point is how far the fat is ready to go.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I think if we if the titaning cycle in the

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>US is something reasonable and we start to see inflation

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>coming down, even even if it's not getting to two

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>percent anytime soon, Latin America will be uh in as

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>safe as safer place than you have imagined, um, considering

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the scope of this cycle now, and that's interesting to

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>be may not of course people's radar that actually that

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the many of the major central banks in Latin America,

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly in Mexico, had raised interest rates long before the FATS,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And we're ahead of the game when we spend time

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>criticizing the FED for having got behind the curb. So finally, JP,

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've you know, you've been around the block

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a few times, if I may say that, you've seen

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these summits come and go. Do you think

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's salable, salvageable? Do you think that the Mexican president

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>in the end will go to l A? What do

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you think he may not go? I mean, it's funny

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, he may design next week on

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the spot, and he's not very far from l A,

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so he it's a flexible ticket. He even joke up stuff.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>He even joke about flying to Tijuana and taking a car.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think it's salvageable in the sense

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of it's going to happen. The president who will be

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there if I'm not doesn't go, it will be mostly

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>his mistake or he's you know, he will be losing out.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think in the end if everybody else go, I

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're gonna see a lot of the little

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bubbles um that's the main thing. But we're gonna have

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>a meeting, We're going to have a photo and you know,

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>somebody laterals and that's always interesting and well. It certainly

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>goes along with the long tradition of photo ops that

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>these of these summits, but not a lot of deliverable

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as well for those people who are waiting in tenter

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>hooks to see how this summit of the America's goes down.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>We will potentially be talking to Maya from l A

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>next week. But Juan Pablo Spinda, thank you very much.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I'm not a person I caught up with

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in devils. The other day was Spen Smid, the director

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and chair of the McKinsey Global Institute. And the institute

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>puts out reports which usually draw on enormous amounts of

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>data and experience to say something interesting about the world.

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And they've just published a big one about human capital

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and the value of experience. It's based on the careers

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of four million workers in several countries. Human capital is

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those phrases that politicians talk about a lot.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I started by asking Spen what was so special about

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>this report. They looked at how much of that skill

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is also built inside the job called through the accumulation

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 1>of experience. And what we find is that about half

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the human capital, which is two thirds of the

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>humans wealth creation is actually coming from experience, which is

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>basically what you get after you're born and your endowment

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of birth. But so it's lifetime earnings as well. So

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we significate as an approximation. So basically you look at

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>how much does subbody to make in its total life

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you take you come in and that would

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be your starting salary. Let's they continued, with no additional experience,

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>no additional job gains or something like that, you would

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be at half of what you would make as what

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you gain through experience. And that we're not the earnings

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is a proxy for that capital. It's it's not the

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fundamental metric. This is the one that we found it

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>best to measure it. And just to go back a

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit, so what what were you what were you

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>using to draw these conclusions? What data did you use.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We lose twenty years of profiles big data, four million

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>people's profiles from different countries US India, and we basically

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>knew what people had at formal education, what they got

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as their starting salaries, and how they then progress for

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty years through their jobs where they then ended up.

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And we followed their job moves inside the companies that

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>they worked at and also rotating to other companies and

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially coming back if you want. And so we learned

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>not only that experience was to have, but there were

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a few other surprising results. One thing that surprised me

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>probably the most, is that the increase in human capital

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>due to experience is the most for the people who

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have the least incoming. So the progression through experience is

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the highest for counter workers stone Mason's crafts people. So

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have a lot of formal education, you've

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>got you can have a much You actually keep relations

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>of skills and and so somehow they make more steps,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you come in as a dentist, you stay

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a dentist. And then with the second surprise for us,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>where there is a group of people about a third

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in the US a quarter in India, if you take

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that spectrum that just moves more so they accumulate their

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>experience faster by going from job to job inside the company,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes rotating through other companies, and as a result, they

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have a much faster experience game, which I think is

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>also draws an implication for what companies need to do

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how they develop their people. Yeah, I

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>mean it's interesting. So McKenzie. They're obviously your clients are

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>usually businesses, and a lot of your reports tend to

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>focus on lessons for businesses and to some extent and

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>governments because you also work for governments. But this was

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>one that I read thinking, actually, it has a lot

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of takeaways for individuals. You know, what are the sort

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of broader lessons. It sounds like you should move around

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I actually think these learnings are vestiprocal for

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>individual and the companies because the company doesn't that doesn't

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>allow their people to make steps and as a result,

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>basically going to deep end again and then learn again,

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't help to further the human capital of their people,

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, they're not helping furthering their company.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But if you are an individual and you say I'm

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of comfortable at what I'm doing, and you don't

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>try yourself in the deep end, or at least try

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>to persuade your company that you work for to be

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>thrown to be deep end again and pick up an

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>next set of learnings. Um, then you're basically also not

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>making that development. So it's both responsibility the companies to

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>say we should be thinking about that, because you know,

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>it's easy for a company to say, let's keep the

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>person in the role they have because they do it well.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to step up your own human capital,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>if you know it would be on the balance sheet

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of a company, then the best way to manage the

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet is to keep moving the people to the

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>next step where they again accumulate the next step of capital.

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Who is talking about what you can do as an

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>individual or certainly as an employer to invest in yourself

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in a given company. But I guess one of the

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>slightly hard even harder conclusions from this report is that

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you should be letting people go and work for other

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>companies and other places. I mean, I'm someone who has

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>moved around a lot, but I'm conscious now that I

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have people, you know, as part of a big team

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg. You know, I don't part of me wants

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to tell them go and get new jobs, but as

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a business, we've not always been very comfortable with that. Yes,

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not sure you should sort of proactively send

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you the way. But if the best thing for a

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>person is to go, that doesn't mean they can't come back.

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And in a way you should expect if you can

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>celebrate an experience game that is relevant to the return,

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>why would you not have that return? And I do

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think there is a group of people that just feel

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable to go into an experienced curve inside a

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>single company, and people that like that rotation and maybe

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>even develop skills faster. But why would you then say

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't come back? Although one of the awkward conclusions

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm reading right that if you want to actually,

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want to maximize your income, and not everybody

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>wants to do that, then you are better off moving around.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Balder moves inside the company and balder moves across are

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for the individual probably the best maximizing, at least for

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that ball that we looked at. It's not so, it's

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not it's a small group that actually doing that. We

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>think a lot these days about social mobility, And this

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>in a way is about micro social mobility. How do

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>people move up through jobs? And you say, you know

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's actually you're going to really struggle if you start

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>off as a cashier. There's a lip, probably a limit.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Will be very few people who will be able to

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>rise right to the top of an industry. But if

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but you can do better by by moving and by

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>taking risks. I mean obviously a lot of people less advantage, people,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>people with less education, will feel financially constrained from moving jobs,

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from from taking risks, taking a job that they don't

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have the skills for. So just from that social

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>mobility perspective, were there are there any conclusions here about

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>how should we address training, how should we make it

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>easier for people to move around? Well, the first point

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I would make is when we say the experience gained

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for the cashier is bigger than for the dentist, what

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is that actually? So just if you look at it,

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the cashier becomes departmental leader in the store, and if

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they're really good, they might even be store leader. That's

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>how far they might not become the CEO of the company.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>But that is two very big steps that the cashier

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can make if you're starting point as a cashier, and

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we should think about how do we celebrate that.

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't only celebrate the person who came in from

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>university and became the CEO. Why don't we also have

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>narrative that this is significant progress and people make as

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>as you say, they gain more than their incoming earnings,

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's not because they stay cashier. And you can

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>take that from the counter to chef, from sus chef,

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>as you come in as a sus chef and you

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>become chef. It's these paths that have quite some brange

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that we should celebrate. And it's not all high school, university,

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>n b A. And so you know, that's of course

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>where the elites will spend their time thinking. But I

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think for a large group of people, these steps are

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>very important and we should find ways to celebrate them,

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>create narratives around them, and we should celebrate them equally.

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Then you know some of you who came and CEO story,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and then I think that will provide a little bit

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>more context to people, because otherwise people say, I've become

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a sou chef and that's what I am, But the

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>su chef many actually move up. Many move up, and

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what this data suggest spend. Thank you very much. Well,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that's it for this episode of Stephanomics. Will be back

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>next week, but in the meantime to please rate the

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>show if you like it, and check out the Bloomberg

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Terminal and News website for more economic news and views

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on the global economy. You can also follow at economics

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. This episode was produced by Magnus Hendrickson, with

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>special thanks to Maya Ava Book, Juan Pablo Spinetto, and

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Sven Smith. Mike Sasso is executive producer of Stephanomics and

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the head of Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesco Levi.