WEBVTT - Michael Saylor, the CEO Who Turned a Software Company Into a Bitcoin Company

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy all Away. So, Tracy, um,

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's still no bitcoin e t F, as

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, for years people have been trying

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to float one. Still that one, But there are various

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>some publicly listed instruments that have exposure to Bitcoin that

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime people are buying and selling to uh, yeah,

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>basically find a way to get exposure to the asset

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>class or whatever you want to call it through a

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>listed equity. Yeah, that's right. And I know we've been

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about the possibility of a Bitcoin e t F

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>for many many years now, it's kind of surprising that

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't happened just yet. But you're right, there are

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a number of public companies that are now a play

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin, and they kind of range from the more

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say outrageous or unusual to um,

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the more traditional. So at one end of the spectrum

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a grayscale Bitcoin Trust, which is sort of

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to replicate the e t F structure without explicitly

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>being in e t F. And then at the other

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>end you have remember all those companies like Long Island

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Iced Tea that changed their name to include blockchain and

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>just sort of jumped on the bandwagon, and those have

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>been going up this year along with the bitcoin price

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. And then of course you have everything in between,

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>right is exactly right. So some companies are very tangentially

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>related to crypto, or they're like, oh, we're suddenly a

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>blockchain company, even though we used to sell iced tea um.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Or some companies they're like, oh, we bought some bitcoin

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>mining rigs and we're going to do something like that.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So there is a range of exposures. But over the

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>last several months, um, really since this summer, i'd say

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>one company has sort of really jumped out from the

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the pack in the degree to which people

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>view it as kind of a bitcoin play or a

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>real sort of a direct exposure to fluctuations in the

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>coin itself. Yeah, I think that's fair to say. And

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that company is of course micro Strategy. We've seen them

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>buy up a bunch of bitcoin, so basically using their

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>cash reserves to buy bitcoin, So instead of holding a

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of government bonds in their sort of corporate treasury function,

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they hold something like bitcoin or instead of holding bonds

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and stocks and gold, they hold bitcoin. And it's been

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting development because it's actually meant that the

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>company's share price is basically tracking the price of Krypto. Now, yeah,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So, uh and it was a really well

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>timed I mean, I think it was like the middle

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the summer, maybe it was August. I think they

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>announced that they were going to buy some bitcoin, a

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty good chunk of it, and then they announced that

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to buy some more. They recently even UM

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sold a convertible note to buy more bitcoin. At the

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>same time, the price of bitcoin is skyrocketed over the

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>last two or three months, shares of micro Strategy have

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>skyrocketed in a concert and so they've really become the

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the publicly listed bitcoin exposed company. I guess

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you could say that people are talking about this year

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and the company has already also become like legendary. All

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin hardcore bitcoin maximalism fanboys love this company now

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because they see it as UM sort of paving the

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>way and maybe leading to more companies having bitcoin exposure

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in their in their treasury. Yeah, and we should know

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that micro Strategy is also led by Michael Sailor, and

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>he's become a big, big name in the bitcoin community.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Baron's called him Bitcoin's most important proselytizer, So

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that gives you some indication of the regard that he

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>has within uh crypta exactly right. Every all the bitcoin

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>people I follow on Twitter absolutely love it. They love him,

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited that Michael Sailor, the CEO and founder

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of micro Strategy, is joining us today. So Michael, thank

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining us. Tracy Joe, thanks for

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>having me. Happy to be here. So what is micro Strategy?

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like a lot of people probably

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>first heard about the company this summer when you announced

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to be putting some of your holdings

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>into bitcoin, but you've been around a long time. What

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is what is micro Strategy? What does it do? What's

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the story? Micro Strategy is the world's largest publicly traded

0:04:55.440 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>business intelligence software company. We got started in nine and

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineties we um invented an approach for

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>doing analytics against large relational databases. So if you had

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>billions of rows of data your McDonald's or your target

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and you needed to extract insight like market basket analysis

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>or marketing uplift. If you're a big bank and you

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do credit analytics against the portfolio of hundreds

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of millions of accounts, you needed to do complicated analytics

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on a large relational database. Nobody in the world knew

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>how to do it, and we invented an approach and

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>created this software platform too to build those apps, and

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that was that was our early breakthrough, and we grew

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on that platform, became public and uh we competed against

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting companies like Crystal and Business Objects and old app

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>companies like Hyperion and s base. And they're probably a

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred different business intelligence companies that came and went, some

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>went out of business, any of them merge, many were amalgamated. Eventually,

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>our largest competitors were merged into were bought up by IBM,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>s a P, Salesforce, Oracle, and today we're the pure

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>play business intelligence company and we compete against business intelligence

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>divisions at IBM and Oracle and s A P and like,

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and so it's enterprise software. We saw it everywhere in

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>the world. We have about four thousand very large customers,

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>big hotel chains, airlines, governments, retailers, big tech companies, most

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>of the major banks, and uh, we're about two thousand

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>people in twenty seven countries. That's what we do. So

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>unlike many of your competitors, you came through the tech

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>bubble intact. And as you mentioned, you you've grown since then.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>What inspired you too by bitcoin? Rather something like what

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>was the thought process that went into it? Because as

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Joe and I mentioned, it is quite unusual to see

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a company buying bitcoy in this way. Well, I mean,

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we ran a very responsible business. We were profitable, We

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>generated a lot of cash. We uh, we spent hundreds

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of millions of dollars over the past few years buying

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>our stock back and we and we came into the

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>year with about five hundred million dollars in excess cash

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and our treasury and we kept it for a rainy day.

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>We thought, let's have no debt, let's save the cash,

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>let's run the business. And and we were running a

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>business where we were we were hiring people and spending

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>heavily on sales and marketing and services activities and um,

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and then March hit and when the pandemic and by way,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we didn't think much about my view of cash was

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I invested in short term treasuries, and by way, those

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>short term treasuries yielded five percent interest in two thousand

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and ten, and then ancient history. I'm old enough to

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>remember when you could get five and a half percent

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>interest on overnight money, Joe, right, you know. So, so

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I watched that interest rate whittled down until it became

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly nothing, you know, down to like twenty basis points

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or something, and uh, I kind of stealed myself just

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to accept that. And we started thinking, well, what are

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we gonna do with the money. But then March came

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and COVID hit and there were lockdowns and you couldn't

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>fly and you couldn't go to hotel and all and

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>all of our marketing events got canceled, and all the

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional ways of doing things changed, and we encountered what

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll call a virtual wave in essence, all of our

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>sales and marketing and services that could be virtualized over

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>zoom or turned into streaming videos became virtualized. And and first,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, first we were you know, unhappy and more

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to hide, right because everybody's mortified in March what's going

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to happen? And then we realized that our value proposition

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was intact, everybody wanted our software. We only do business

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with you know, mega corporations and mega governments, so they're

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>all fine. They wanted the software more than ever. But

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the cost of doing business decreased because now even if

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to spend millions of dollars on marketing events,

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't. And and at that point we realized that

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a we didn't really need the five million dollars to

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>sell and market and grow the business because you couldn't

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 1>throw money at the problem anymore. You're just going to

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>post videos and you're gonna zoom everywhere at the speed

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of light and then be We realized that we were

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>going to generate a lot more cash in the future

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>than we had in the past because we had thirty

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>or forty million dollars of costs fall out of our business.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And so all of a sudden, we go from thinking, well,

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got a good treasury. It's responsible to keep the

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cash and save it for a rainy day in case

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>we need to spend it. Two, we have more money

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>than we need. Our stock is in the tank, our

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>investors don't value the cash. At one point, we were

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>valued at one time's revenue plus the cash or two

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>times revenue, and the cash was worth nothing. And the

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>investors literally told me to my face, they said, we

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>don't value the money is worth anything. And so that's

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>one dilemma. And the other dilemma is we're gonna generate

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>five million more dollars than we thought we were going

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to generate. And then there's a third and that's not

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>a dilemma, that's a that's a development because the virtual wave.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And then we watched as the Federal Reserve and the

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>EU Central Bank started printing money, and we realized that

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there was massive rampant hyper inflation in assets. There's no

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation and consumer goods that do not include food and

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>energy and assets but like there's no inflation, and YouTube

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>streaming videos and Netflix, you're never gonna get inflation, and

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that you've got inflation in the ten year bond, the

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty year bond, Hampton's real estate Apple shares doubled, even

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>though the EPs was constant. All the assets and the

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the energy rich products inflated at a rapid rate and

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a k shape recovery. And that's when I

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>started looking at the world differently and what I realized

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>was the money supply the end two money supply that

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>had been expanding at about five percent a year for

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the past decade was now expanding percent a year. And

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>any reasonable person would expect that the money supply is

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>going to expand by ten to fifteen percent a year

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>every year for the next four to five years. And

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>then I realized we have rampant asset inflation. And another

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>way to say that is the purchasing power of the

0:11:55.600 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>cash is being degraded. The Federal Reserve is devaluing the

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>currency at fifteen percent a year. And so what that

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>means is if you're sitting on cash, you can expect

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to lose half your purchasing power in thirty six to

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>forty eight months, guaranteed. And so I went from thinking

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I needed the cash and I might get a yield

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe maybe there's a two percent inflation rate to

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the real inflation rate is like been running six percent,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but now it's about to run And so my cash

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is a melting ice cube and it's a it's really

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a violation of my fiduciary duties to watch the cash

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>burn away, like if someone came into your backyard and

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>started stealing your money every year. I mean, how many

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>years would you wait before you took the cash out

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of the backyard. So that that's the dilemma, and that's

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>where we went in March when we went down this journey. Well, yeah,

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so you made the decision to put a big chunk

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of that into coin. Why not do another possibility of um,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a special one time dividend or something

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.479
<v Speaker 1>like that, so that the shareholders could in theory allocate

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the cash however they wanted. That is a good question.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>First of all our choices where we could just give

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it all back to the shareholders, right, we could divdated

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it out or do a massive stock buy back. Or

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>the second choices, we could do a big acquisition of

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>another company, which a lot of times people do to

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>try to grow our top line. And the third choices,

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>we could invest it in something liquid as a treasury asset,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>which was going to appreciate and price faster than the

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rate at which the central bank printed money. So those

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>are the three logical choices. So so what did we do? Well,

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we actually went right down the middle. What's the problem

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>with just giving all the money back? Well, Joe, if

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I give all the money back I decapitalized the company,

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and then if we have a negative event, were insolvent, Like,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>why doesn't Harvard give all the money back of the endowment, right?

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>And why don't you take all the money in your

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>bank account and give it to the needy? Right? The

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>answer is because Harvard wants an endowment, and because you

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>want to have money in case your family needs it,

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And why doesn't a company might give all of its

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>money back to its shareholders because they might actually have

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to make good on a contract with a vendor, or

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>pay an employee, or like if I, you know, all

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>my customers are expecting me to be in business for

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty years, so if I drained my treasury,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they might lose confidence in me. So you know, giving

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it all back is decapitalizing the business, and you might

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as well drain the endowment of every institution on earth.

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It does. It doesn't make a lot of sense to

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do that completely. Having said that, what we actually decided

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to do was embark on a program where we agreed

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy back to spend half of it to buy

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>back stock and the other half to invest in alternative assets.

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And we decided we would go look for some kind

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of inflation hedge, and we put this out on the wire.

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>We announced it to our shareholders because we wanted them

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to digest that news. And then we

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>went on a pretty intense search, and we considered everything

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we might invest in our endowment, in our treasury, in

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and we considered buying real estate, and we considered buying bonds,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and we considered buying stocks. And the problem is, you

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>can't buy any other currency because they're all debasing as

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>fast as the dollar or faster against heart assets. You

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>can't buy bonds because no bond is going to yield

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a coupon of more than fifteen percent a year. And

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the only way your bond is gonna hold its value

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is if it's not yielding fift interest is if the

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rates keep clicking down to go negative. And so

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>if you don't believe interest rates are going negative, bonds

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely won't hold their value. And it looks like bonds

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>got to the to the line when the thirty year

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>got to seventy two basis points or the fit you know,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the ten years got the fifty basis points or whatever

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they got to. So bonds don't work. Then real estate

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work because commercial real estate trades like a bond.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And and how are you going to grow your rents

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>by fifteen percent? The cost of capital literally went from

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>five percent to fifteen percent. So real estate is not

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>going to hold his value, nor is it gonna have

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a cash yield of fifteen percent. And by the way,

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>half of it's impaired. And I mean, how do you

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>pick unimpaired real estate, you know, going through the time

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. So now you've got to go to stocks.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got to buy a portfolio of stocks. Well, stocks

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are fiat instruments that are valued based upon the discounted

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>value of the cash flows over time. If the monetary

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>supply is expanding at five percent a year, then Google

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook and Amazon work because they're growing twenty percent

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a year. But if you've got a business it's only

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>growing five percent a year, you have to leverage up.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to borrow money short the dollar, buy your

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>stock back to leverage up your cash flow per share

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in order to beat the hurdle rate. That's almost possible

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>at five hurdle rate. It's impossible at hurdle rate for

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>just about anybody. And again the problem is the you know,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I can leverage up a corporation, and they've been leveraging up.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But with interest rates pegged at zero or near zero,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you can't go negative. So it's the end of the

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>line for leverage equity. So we dismissed all three of

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>those and we went to gold. And the problem with

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>gold is the gold miners produced two percent more gold

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>every year, and gold is centrally controlled and corruptible, and

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>then people print gold derivatives that aren't fully bound by

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the gold, and so you can expect a two to

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>four percent dedegradation of gold over time over a hundred years.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>That means you're gonna lose nine of your value. If

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you invest in gold over a hundred years, you're gonna

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>losecent of your values. You invest in the US dollar

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>increasing at five percent, are expanding at five percent a year,

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and of course the real the real likelihood as you

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>lose nine percent of your value because most of the

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.959
<v Speaker 1>currencies collapse over a hundred years. So that took us

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to crypto, and we got to crypto. We looked at

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>six thousand, five hundred cryptos and we found that bitcoin

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:22.479
<v Speaker 1>is the dominant crypto asset network. It's times bigger than

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the next closest thing that looks like it, and it

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>had more than two hundred billion dollars of monetary energy

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in it. Bitcoin is an essence Facebook for money or

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Google for money. Uh. It's and this is the nuance

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>most people haven't realized yet. What you have is a

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>dominant digital network that's been engineered to host a safe

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>haven treasury reserve assets superior to gold in all respects.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It's pharmaceutical grade gold. If God gold as a treasury

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>reserve asset to hold for a hundred years, he would

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>create twenty one million gold coins. He'd make it impossible

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to make anymore. He would make it possible to audit

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>it anywhere on Earth from any node every ten minutes.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>He would make it. He would make it unhackable and uh.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And he would make it an open architecture that's programmable,

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so you could build it into an iPhone or Square

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or PayPal or any other exchange without permission. And he

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>would distribute it everywhere on Earth with these with these

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto shaw to fifty six miners, so that no company

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>controls it, no ceo controls it, no country controls it,

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>no regulator controls it. So that's kind of the perfect

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>synthetic safe haven asset, and that's what we found in

0:19:44.080 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>our search. So you touched on this earlier. But corporate

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>treasuries are generally supposed to be full of liquid assets because,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, you don't know when the company might

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>experience some sort of emergency event where it actually needs

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>cash on hand. How liquid is bitcoin? And also how

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>did you go about buying it? Because again, as we mentioned,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you built up a pretty big position, So I'm curious, like,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>buying it up, what was that like? And then in

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>your mind, what would selling it all in an emergency

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>scenario be? Like? Well, I mean it's a good point.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is the best treasury reserve asset on earth for

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody at our scale. It might not be the ideal

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>asset for someone that needs to store a hundred billion

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars at a shot, like a like Apple or maybe

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a nation state, but for a billion dollar company or

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a multibillion dollar company where you're going to move ten

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred million, two hundreds of millions at a time,

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it's ideal. How liquid is it? It trades seven three

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty five every minute in every country, in every language,

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and nearly every currency pair over Thanksgiving, Apple Stock, Amazon Stock,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>most all the all the US capital markets shut down

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at four pm on Wednesday. They traded nine thirty am

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to one pm on Friday. They didn't reopen again until

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>nine thirty am the following Monday. That means over one

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirteen point five hours US capital markets function

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Three and a half hours three point one percent of

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the time was the banking and the capital market system

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>working for treasury. Bitcoin was functioning all one hundred thirteen

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>point five hours trading, mark the markets, every country, every currency.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really it is the global asset of choice. If

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>what you unted was transparency, marked the market and liquidity.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>On average, uh, it normally trades about two billion dollars

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a day. UH. Sometimes it trades a bit harder than

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that three billion. You could reasonably liquid a hundred million

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars over a few hours on a Saturday afternoon. During weekdays,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the volume increases and you could probably do it faster.

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So in that size or scale, it's fine. I mean,

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if again, if you wanted to liquidate fifty billion dollars

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>worth of stuff, it's a little bit too small because

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the network is about three or fifty billion dollars right now. Liquidity.

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But you put your finger on an important point, which

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is the value of bitcoin is to serve up liquidity.

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>As the price goes up, the liquidity goes up, the

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>value the use case goes up. The value and use

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>goes up. When bitcoin goes up by a factor of ten,

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it will be ten times better, and when it goes

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>up by a hundred, it will be a hundred times better.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>And so you have a positive feedback loop as a

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>treasury asset. And what you see right now is people

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>are starting to adopt it and plug their treasuries into

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this network. It starts with small, mid size, then high

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>net worth individuals, small mid size companies, and it will

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>roll to larger and larger institutions over time as people

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>start to discover it and as the network is bigger.

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me ask you a question. I wanna

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wanna sort of said to the sort

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of bigger strategy in a second, but I want to

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>press you on one thing. And you're talking about fifteen

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>percent inflation or degradation of the dollar value. But just

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I mean your costs. I mean you

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>run a business, and so you have salary and computer

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, technological infrastructure, spend and rent for your offices,

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>uh travel when travel exists, those class haven't been surging

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteent of years. So when you say that, it's not

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>actually consumption, right, you're talking about financial assets rising, not

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>actually purchasing power of day to day business needs. You know,

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be fairly brutal about this. I'm gonna say

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that everybody on Earth, all three hundred trillion dollars worth

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of investors, are going to lose half their wealth in

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the next forty eight months due to the currency collapse.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's in the that's in the Western world and

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>US and Europe. It's much worse. It's loss. If you

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Nigeria, South Africa, Turkey, Lebanon

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and the like, there's a billion people where the currency

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is literally collapsing. Everybody in the Western world is just

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose half their wealth if they don't start paying attention. Now,

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>let me, I just want to say now to our producer,

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely rebooking Michael for December fIF team uh two

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that, all right, So keep going, keep going.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But I just want to make sure that we follow up. Okay,

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make another important point. Inflation is an irrelevant

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>metric as defined by the central banks, central banks and

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the FED, and most of the mainstream media refers to

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation incessantly and laments the lack of inflation, and their

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>definition of inflation is a market basket of goods and

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>services that do not include the highly volatile food and energy.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And then nobody ever questions that in mainstream media, or

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at least they don't really think hard about it. But

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there is no planet where anybody can

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>live without food and energy, and so tracking a metric

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that does not track food and energy is entertainment, but

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant when you're contemplating the future of the economy or

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>an investment. My second point, if you added food and

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>energy such that you did not starve to death, it

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>still wouldn't be the proper metric to track. If you're

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>actually an investor, the appropriate metric to track would be

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>cost a capital or asset inflation, which is the rate

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>at which a market basket of assets that are desirable

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>by rational people, or the rate at which goods and

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>services that are desirable by rational people go up in price.

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>And if you were to actually put into that basket

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>things like early retirement or social security. How about how

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>about a stipend to live, you know, for the rest

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of your life on fifty thousand a year. That used

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>to cost a million dollars when bonds yielded five percent,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and then it costs two million dollars when bonds yielded

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>two and a percent, And today that would cost you

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>four or five million dollars when bonds or yielding that

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it would cost you six million dollars with a ten

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>year bond yielding ninety bases points. So there's definitely rampant

0:26:56.080 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>hyper inflation and annuities, and there's hyper inflation and other assets.

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the last decade, the cost of

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>capital is about five and a half percent. That's the

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>end to money money supply expansion. And it turns out

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the S and P was was appreciating

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it about seven to eight percent. And you you will

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 1>look and see the cost of the cost of buying

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:28.239
<v Speaker 1>labor intensive highly desirable things people want is going up

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>faster than one or two percent. For example, none of

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>my employees are willing to keep working for me if

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>their salaries increased by one percent a year on average,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's about a seven percent increase in costs to keep

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to keep talented people from quitting your company. And so

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're tracking technical labor, that's about the rate at

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>which the prices go up. If you look at the

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>chap would index prices go up across the board undesirable things.

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Real estate in the Hampton's went up in sixteen weeks

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, sixteen weeks. Look at any desirable real estate.

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Look at any scarce asset that the FED can't print,

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>anything that is not if it's energy intensive, if it's

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>labor intensive, or if it's if it's a true financial instrument.

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>It's inflating somewhere in the last decade, easily at seven

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>percent a year or so. And the problem is it's

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>just doubled or tripled because the FED is is pumping

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>so much more currency into the economy. If you double

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the amount of currency and you keep the goods and

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>services constant ergo, it goes to reason that things that

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are scarce and desirable will double in price. The things

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that won't double in price. Our YouTube streaming videos, information

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>rich things with the variable cost of electricity or one

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to five variable cost, or maybe if you've got if

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got a high fixed cost, like I spend two

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to design the iPhone twelve and I stamp

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>out you know, a hundred million of them the fixed

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>cost or are high, the variable cost or low. You

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>typically don't track inflation on those things. You're gonna track

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation on energy intensive goods and services. And where are

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you going to see the real inflation is. You're gonna

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>see it on scarce assets. For example, Bitcoin is up

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy in twelve months. Okay, let that

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>sink in. It's the ultimate scarce asset. Gold is up,

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the SNP is up six, Apple stock is doubled, and

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>yet EPs of Apple is not doubled. The the P

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>T E ratios are blowing out. If you calculate the

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>number of hours you have to work, the amount of

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>labor you have to actually perform in order to buy

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a share of the SNP five, it's doubling. If you

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>calculate the number of hours you have to work to

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>buy real estate or residential real estate, and Tokyo. Since

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the central Bank started printing money very rapidly, you realize

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that that ordinary people can't ever make enough to buy

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>these things, So you won't get any inflation on on

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>low variable cost information rich items. In fact, you will

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>get deflation. You're going to get inflation and assets. And

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the basis of the k shape recovery. So

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>let's come back to my fighter siay responsibility as a CEO.

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But the answer is, I have five million dollars. It

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>will go to zero and be worth nothing and buy nothing,

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>or I can find a way to invest it in

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to appreciate against the dollar, and if

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it appreciates more than against the dollar, then my purchasing

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>power will stay at parody. If it appreciates faster than that,

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>then my purchasing power will outstrip the dollar and I

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and I will appreciate and therefore I will create shareholder value.

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So this entire exercises how do I actually grow my

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet or grow my cash flows faster than the

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>rate at which the money supply is expanding? Amazon, Facebook,

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and Google. This is why all those stocks performed so

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>well in the last decade, their top lines growing, their

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>cash flows are growing. The FED is printing money at

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent a year, they're creating at more than the

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>risk free cost to capital, and they're effectively monopolies. And

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so if you're holding something like that, you're good. The

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>problem is that, you know, but the FED, if they

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>triple the cost to capital, the companies can't beat that.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to see it illustrated in a

0:31:55.760 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>more brutal fashion, go imagine yourself starting a company in Argentine,

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>where the paso traded with dollar to a peso, then

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it went ten dollar ten pacos to the dollar, then

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it went twenty pasos to the dollar. We rolled into

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this year, it said the forty paces to the dollar.

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's eighty paces to the dollar. And by the way,

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the black market rate is a hundred and forty paces

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to the dollar. You know, there's no way you can

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>grow a company fast enough. And by the way, it's

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty paces to the dollar and the

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar is only worth half as much against scarce assets.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>The same story is true in Mexico. You can't. Mexico

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>went from ten pacos to the dollar to twenty paces

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to the dollar. The dollar lost half of its asset

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>value against scarce assets, so you lost of your wealth.

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump in here because you mentioned fiduciary duty,

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know you were going to get to it earlier,

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is an important point. But what

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>did your discussions with investors actually look like? Because I

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine for the vast majority of them, they put our

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>money in a business intelligence firm, a software firm, they're

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily expecting that firm to go out and buy

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin in this way. That's true. So let's let's put

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the put the dilemma here. I have a company that's

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>may be able to grow five percent a year. It's

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>cash flows. It can generate fifty to seventy five million

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars in cash flow. It's got five million in in

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in cash. The US Federal Reserve is debasing my treasury

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>at the same rate as my company as a creating

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. So in essence, all of the work of

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the company is for not and then they triple they

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>triple the cost the capital. So it's imp it's impossible,

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>reasonably speaking, to grow the cash flows a year without

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>taking excessive risk in a competitive marketplace. So we're struck

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with the dilemma, what are my choices? Well, I can

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>attempt to grow faster than the rate at which the

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Fed prints money, and I will probably fail and they'll

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>suffocate me to death or choke me to death. Or

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I can simply invest in a monitoring network that's appreciating

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it or more against the dollar and go about my business.

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>And so those are the two choices. One of them

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>well and bye. This is the choice that every business faces,

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is the choice that every individual faces, and

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can see one of them is like, you

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>continue to do your work in Venezuela, working harder as

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the currency collapses, or in Argentina. The other choice is

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you invest in a treasury asset that's going to go

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>up a hundred percent a year. It's easy to say, well,

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>why don't you just give the money back to the investors.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>What the answer is, We're still going to suffocate. We're

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>still going to choke to death. You've got to consider

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody on the planet is going to freeze to death

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>or suffocate if we keep sucking the oxygen out of

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the room as as we monetary value out of the currency.

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It's creating a life or death situation for everybody. Now

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>let me come back to your point, because you ask

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>me a question, I want to answer. What I did

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was I went to the investors and I said, we

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>believe we have to have a treasury. We're going to

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>invest it in some asset that will actually appreciate faster

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>than the rate of the mind of the currency collapse,

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the rate of collapse of the dollar inflation rate, the

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>asset inflation rate. And then I also said, and we're

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna start buying the stock back. One week later, we

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>tendered for two or fifty million dollars worth of stock.

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Our our stock was trading about one, and we did

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.919
<v Speaker 1>a Dutch auction and we offered to buy back two

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars worth of the stock at a premium

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>up to one. And so we also then announced we

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>bought two fifty million dollars worth the bitcoin. Why because

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the best performing asset of the decade, the last

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>five years, the last two years, the last one year,

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the last three months, it's up four thousand in five years,

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it's up a one year. Because it's the best treasury

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>reserve asset that you could buy. So that's why we

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>did that. We tendered, We waited twenty days. The stock

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>traded up first below the tender, then above the tender price.

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Anybody that didn't like bitcoin was able to sell their

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>stock between one forty and one fifty one. They all

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>got a premium if they didn't want to take that risk.

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Then some people tender their stock. We had sixty millions

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>share our sixty million dollars tendered. We bought all that stock,

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and then the stock of the company started trading north

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of the tender price because we had rotated our shareholder

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 1>base from people that had invested in an enterprise off

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a company, two people that understood that it was wise

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for us to invest our treasury in an asset like bitcoin,

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and they were comfortable with it. And from there the

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>stock traded to one sixty two hundred twenty to fifty

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>two eighty three hundred and above three hundred because there

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are there are a lot of people that agree with

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>me and they like the idea of investing. By the way,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>would you rather invest in a company that's growing its

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>cash flows a percent a year or growing its cash

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>flows five a year? Because what we did was invest

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of cash in an asset that has traditionally,

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade grown faster than a hundred percent

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a year. You can see that's what we did, and

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the investor base we had when we finished

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that exercise. You know, absolutely, So looking at your chart,

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously the stock has done phenomenally well, you know,

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, you know, going back to this jill

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in July, it was just over a hundred dollars to

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>share one twenty share. It recently peaked around three forty share.

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 1>It's come back a little bit. But um, how does

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>your You have over two thousand employees who up until

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago, we're working in for a business

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>intelligence company sort of standard uh cloud, Uh, you know,

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>software company, who now have in some sense their fates,

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the fates of these over two thousand people tied in

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what is kind of a sort of a levered play

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin. And so I'm curious, Um, you know it's

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 1>worked out well because bitcoin has really rallied over the

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>last few months. What are the internal communications like a

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of all the employees sort of realizing that the

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fortunes of their company is a typed to bitcoin. And two,

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you obviously as the CEO, you spend a

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of time focus on bitcoin. You talk about on Twitter,

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you have some amazing uh sort of analogies that you use.

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I think called it the hive or something like that,

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the electric hive. How do the what's the internal feeling?

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Like all these people suddenly their careers associated with a

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>levered bitcoin play all of a sudden. Let's start with

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>one observation. It's not a levered bitcoin play until last week.

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Last week we did a convertible debt offering which added

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>some leverage to it. It was an unleveraged treasury decision

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>until last week. And um, by the way, it's the

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>same reaction your family would have if they were all

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>going bankrupt and going to starve to death because the

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>currency was collapsing, and then use in Argentina or Nigeria

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>or Brazil or even in the US. If you know,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.240
<v Speaker 1>if your family said, we're gonna lose half our stuff

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and be bankrupt, and if you said, I invested it

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin, and by the way, we just doubled our

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>money and now we're rich, Like, how would your family react.

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like we we had we had five third million

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars that was going to zero, and now we have

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred million worth of bitcoin which has been appreciating

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent a year. So first of all, there's

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a collective side of relief. Now we have an endowment

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>which is actually appreciating faster than the rate of currency collapse.

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good thing. Second, the stocks up, a

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of the shareholders, a lot of them have options.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course they're delighted about that. Third, the you know,

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the company had a massive jolta of electricity shot into it.

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is hope. If you're living in a country Nigeria, Argentina, Brazil, wherever,

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>and the currency is collapsing and you're going bankrupt and

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going to start to death, they're you're hopeless. And

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>so the ability to actually buy a liquid asset which

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to appreciate and protect you against the currency collapse.

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like getting on an art right. We say bitcoin

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is like an arc against you know, to avoid drowning

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>in a currency flood. Right, It's like wouldn't you like

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a life raft? I mean, it's pretty motivational to know

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to drown when the macro economy is collapsing,

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you might you know, there's a certain

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>set of people that own stocks in this in this

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>country and they think it's all fine, but there's a

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that aren't really owning all those assets

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that have bounced into k shape recovery, and it's not

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>fine for them. Right, There's a there's a quite a

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:35.720
<v Speaker 1>macro economic dilemma right now around the world, and seven

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>point eight billion people have collapsing currencies. The best they're

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>collapsing at ten to fifteen percent a year. The worst

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>are collapsing faster. Every investor has a problem. So my employees.

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>The employees are happy because stocks up. The awareness of

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the company is up by a factor of ten thousand, right,

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody is aware of what we're doing. We've

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>had million, million, millions of hours of video on YouTube.

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>People know the company, they know about micro strategy, business intelligence.

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Our customers like it. You know. By the way, every

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>company with a treasury has the same problem. Guys like

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you can you can paint me as like this crazy

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>guy taking a risk. But on the other hand, it's

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>not a risk if I told you you're going to

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>freeze to death in forty eight months, it's not a

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>risk to step out of your house and try something new.

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And so every company that we do business with is

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking about these things. So we've actually taken a leadership

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:45.240
<v Speaker 1>position with our customers, are partners, are vendors, are employees.

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>The brand has been created, everybody knows more about the brand,

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>They know more about the stock, they know more about

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the product, and everybody, you know, how do you think

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>employees at Tesla field? They like working at Tesla, They

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>like working on a for a company that's doing progressive

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>things that are going to improve the planet. Everybody likes

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the mission. And so micro Strategy was a very focused

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>business intelligence company. In February, we were faced with a

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>challenge our challenges. We could either basically decapitalize the company

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and struggle against a currency collapse, or we could craft

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>ourselves a bitcoin sale, turn our ship into you know,

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>into the wind, catch the wind, and start sailing. And

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so what we did is a transformation on the balance

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>sheet of the company in order to instead of suffering

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>from the devaluation of the currency, we wanted to benefit

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:52.399
<v Speaker 1>from the devaluation of the currency and uh and that's

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>been very motivational for everybody, and it's it's providing us

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>with lots of opportunities on the business side too. So

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's generally been quite positively received. So

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned at the outset of this conversation that somewhat surprisingly,

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a bitcoin e t F in existence just yet.

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Some people have been saying that your company, now given

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin holding resembles and E t F on bitcoin,

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>or at least to play on on on bitcoin. What

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>do you say in response, because I saw you tweeting

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this recently, but what's your response

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 1>to people who say that micro Strategy is now just

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a Bitcoin e t F. We're not a bitcoin e

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:55.320
<v Speaker 1>t F. And E t F is an investment company

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>per the forty Securities Act, and and that means it

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:03.359
<v Speaker 1>has the whole securities and it's a company that's fashioned

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to hold securities like stocks or bonds. First of all,

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not an investment company. We're an operating company. Second

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, bitcoin is not a security. I mean, Jake

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Clayton just went on TV two weeks ago it was

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>very emphatic about that bitcoin is property. It's like owning

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>land in Texas. You cannot it's it's it's property. You

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>can own land without being uh an e t F.

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So we have a treasury. We could own cash. We

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>chose to actually invest our treasury in in some property

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that we thought was scarce that would appreciate faster than

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>uh than the rate of monetary inflation. So that does

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>mean that if you invest in micro strategy, you have

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>some exposure to bitcoin. But again we're not an E

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>T F, right, I mean, those are very special purpose vehicles.

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>People are you know, you're buying gold shares of i

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>AU and you're hoping that the company will balance you know,

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the assets under management to the share account and we're

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>not engaged at anything like that. Is there any regulatory

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>limit like to how much you could lever up do

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of? Does there get to be a point where

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the company lawyers get concerned that maybe a regulator could

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>view you as an e t P that or an

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>E t N or an e t F that's not

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>filed properly, Like does that potentially create any risks? Now

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted this out and you can see my tweets.

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to clarify it. It's quite It's quite clear,

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, an E t P and an E t

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>F our investment companies. They're very special vehicles defined defined

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>precisely by the Securities Act of forty. Bitcoin is not

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>a security nor nor is it a commodity under the

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>definition of the E t P. It's just property, and

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you and own as much of property as you want

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as an operating company. You know, you don't trip these

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>things until your owning security security as a share of

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>stock or a bond or something. So that's a different thing.

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted, uh, if you wanted to review all

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the literature on it, you know, I could send you

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>some stuff, but I think you the digging, you'll find

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it's quite black and white. Right. We're not a a

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>t F. We're not an a t P. There's no limit, right,

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean people see to think like I'm getting away

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 1>with something because what because I'm not losing money, Like

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because I happen to own a lot of assets, right,

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a company that owns assets. You know,

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>presumably if we owned a million acres of land in Texas,

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't make us an E t F or an

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a t P either, right, we would just have assets

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on the balance sheet. This is this is a piece

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of property that our treasury is invested. And so one

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>thing I'm really curious about um, and I remember there

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of discussion about this among retail investors

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin when we had some of the earlier pops

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in price. But how do you actually go about paying

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>taxes on on bitcoin gains? Because I imagine for a

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>company it might be different, or it might be um

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>even more difficult to calculate that tax. Right, Bitcoin is property,

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So you buy it, there is no tax on it

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>until you sell it, and if you sell it, you

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>pay the short term or long term capital gains tax,

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the holding period. So for a treasury asset

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>like this our use cases, we simply buy it, we

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>put it in cold storage, and we hold it likely forever, right,

0:48:53.280 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean highly likely we never sell it. This is

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the ultimate long duration safe haven treasure reserve asset.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You're buying it. You're buying it to hold for a

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. Now when under what circumstances would you sell it?

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably never because you don't want to generate a taxable event.

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people hold a block of real estate in

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:15.240
<v Speaker 1>New York City for a hundred years in their family

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and they never sell it. Right, what if you needed cash?

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 1>If you needed cash, you borrow against it, right, I

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it's just like if I have a billion dollars

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of assets and I needed twenty million dollars, I would

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>go and borrow against the asset, you know, at the

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>best rate that I could get, like any other asset.

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's no tax on a borrowing. It's just it's

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.759
<v Speaker 1>just a loan, right, So if you were to sell it,

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you would pay capital gains tax based on the period,

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:47.840
<v Speaker 1>just like another asset. But otherwise, you know, it just

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sits on your balance sheet. So you referenced this already,

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>but you recently went to market with a convertible debt

0:49:56.840 --> 0:50:01.800
<v Speaker 1>offering explicitly to raise cash and to buy more bitcoin.

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So a I'm curious, um, what that conversation was like

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>actually getting people to lend you money to buy bitcoin.

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, can you just talk a little bit

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>about the mechanics of the trade, because it's how smooth

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it was to buy several hundred million dollars of bitcoin

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>without front running yourself by making the announcement without creating

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>too much of a ripple, and the price how sophisticated

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is the trading aspect of it, or the acquisition, so

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that you're not driving the price up like crazy as

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you move cash into bitcoin. Okay, So if you want

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy bitcoin, and if you want to buy it

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and stize like you would, you would line up an

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>institutional broker and there there are a bunch of good

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>institutional brokerages that you could go to and uh, you

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.760
<v Speaker 1>would do your diligence and pick the one you like. Generally,

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they all have trading algorithms and you can have a

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>computer sit there and trade every three seconds for you

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for two days in a row. You'll just put a

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>time weighted algorithm out there and it'll just sit and

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it'll run across every market seven three subject to your order.

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's programmatic acquisition. You know, there are other ways

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to buy and sell it, but but the logical way,

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:20.799
<v Speaker 1>the way that Square did it, the way that we

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:24.280
<v Speaker 1>did it, is just on a t WAP algorithm over time,

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's not that hard. You just have to you

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>just have to choose, uh, your broker that you're going

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to use. By the way, Square and PayPal are using

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:36.279
<v Speaker 1>something similar to that to sell bitcoin to people that

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>use Square in cash or Paypals mobile wallet, and they're

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:43.720
<v Speaker 1>buying billions of dollars of it. I think Square about

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:45.839
<v Speaker 1>one point seven billion in the last quarter, So they're

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:47.879
<v Speaker 1>buying a hundred million a week or two hundred million

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a week of this stuff and they're just running it

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>via computer algorithms. So that's not terribly difficult. With regard

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to the second question, there are different pools of capital.

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:04.799
<v Speaker 1>So one pool of capital are progressive, forward thinking companies

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and high net worth individuals and family offices and hedge

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:12.879
<v Speaker 1>funds that want to buy bitcoin directly, and so they

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:17.240
<v Speaker 1>would go and set up those custodian and institutional relationships,

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, with night Egg or coin base or Genesis

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or or gray Scale, and they would buy it. They

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would either buy the underlying asset or they would buy

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a fund like gray Scale and buy into the funder.

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:33.919
<v Speaker 1>And and they have those choices. Um. The second pool

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of capital are are people that have just you know,

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>raised money to invest in in uh US equities or

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>equities in general. Right, they can buy a nastac or

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a nice listed stock. They can't buy bitcoin is not

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in their charter, their limited partners would never allow them.

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:54.400
<v Speaker 1>They can't buy bonds. They can buy stocks. Sometimes they

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>can only buy tech stocks, right, I mean whatever, So

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of pool of capital there for those people.

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>They can buy ms tr right, So our company is

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is one thing they can buy. They you know, in theory,

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they could also buy GBTC, right, they could buy the

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>gray scale thing they might buy as other PayPal and

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Square people been buying them. PayPal stock traded up after

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:23.279
<v Speaker 1>they announced their bitcoin strategy, for example. So so there

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are some companies that are on the bitcoin network. Right.

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is a monetary network. You can plug into it.

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We plugged in our treasury to it, but Square and

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:36.399
<v Speaker 1>PayPal plugged in their mobile apps to it. And then

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Square plugged in fifty million of their treasury to it. Googgenheim,

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, they plugged in there, you know, part of

0:53:43.760 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>their asset fund to it. So so that's one way

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you can plug into it. And uh, and there are

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a few public toy traded companies that are plugging in

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the network right now, and I think that will grow

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:58.319
<v Speaker 1>over time. Now, let's go to converts and the bond market. Well,

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of funds that the raised convert bonds.

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 1>There are convert funds there either convertible arbitrage, and they

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>exist to arbitrage convertible debt versus equity, and that's their

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 1>strategy and that's all they do. And they're good at

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it and they have models. And there are other people

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that have convert long funds. It's like we would we

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 1>will invest in a company, but we want to buy

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the convert we don't buy the underlying comment three types

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of volatility, right and risk. I can buy the bitcoin,

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but that's hard to buy, and I've got to change

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>my charter, and I got security issues. I'm you know,

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>how do I secure it in the custodian And I

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta work through that issue. We figured all that out.

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:46.120
<v Speaker 1>There's another set of companies. They're gonna buy the equity,

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but the equity might go up, they might equity might

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:54.239
<v Speaker 1>go down. That's another risk reward idea. And then convert, well,

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe I go convert long and like I buy the

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:00.919
<v Speaker 1>convertible bond. Like if you were to buy the micro

0:55:00.960 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Strategy convertible bond, you have a bond with the security

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of an enterprise software company with reliable cash flows okay,

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and a long tenure history. So we in essence borrowed

0:55:15.280 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 1>against an enterprise software company that's stable, has good cash flow,

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that's low growth, and we then we then also had

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred million dollars of extra liquidity in the form

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin and cash. So someone wants to loan US

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million dollars and we've got eight hundred million liquidity,

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that would be a loan to value of thirty three

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>against our liquid assets. Plus we're gonna generate four hundred

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:44.440
<v Speaker 1>million in cash flow over time. So that's that's the

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>second credit benefit. And then the third is you have

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:50.919
<v Speaker 1>first lean against an entire software company with no other

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 1>debt on it. Right, So if you're if you're a

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 1>debt a bond holder, you're thinking, okay, that's three forms

0:55:56.360 --> 0:56:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of downside protection. And then your upside is the company

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 1>makes a creative investment. If I borrow money at one

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 1>percent and I invest in something that yields a or

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ten percent or right, it's a creative that's good. Or

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:16.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe um I get benefit and MSTR stock because

0:56:17.000 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>people like the stock better because we become even more

0:56:19.800 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 1>prominent in the bitcoin world because we have more exposure.

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>If you like the bitcoin before, now we're gonna have

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 1>double that exposure or more whatever the number is, depending

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on what we buy. And then the third is we're

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 1>carving a channel between the convertible debt market and the

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:40.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin market. This is a bitcoin convert which means that's

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a creative to bitcoin. We were making bitcoin and investment

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 1>great asset. If you like the bitcoin, By the way,

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you could buy a convertible bond where the downside is

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 1>protected by an enterprise software company and just have the

0:56:55.120 --> 0:56:59.840
<v Speaker 1>upside right like you know, under certain circumstances. I joked,

0:56:59.880 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know, guys, if I was on the

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:03.359
<v Speaker 1>other side of the table, I'd buy the entire thing.

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I would club everybody over the head and take it.

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Because where do you get to buy a bitcoin and

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>have downside protection at the same time. Now that's the

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:16.200
<v Speaker 1>convert longs. If you're a convertible arbitrage player, they're what

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is they simply want to buy the convert

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and then they want to short the common and as

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 1>long as the common stock has volatility and it goes

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:26.439
<v Speaker 1>up and down, they make money. That's their strategy. They're

0:57:26.440 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not they're not expressing a pause, a short or a

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 1>long sentiment. There is arbitraging the volatility against the bond.

0:57:33.000 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So they need a bond to arbitrage against the stock.

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And now guess what what, How do arbitragers make the

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 1>most money? They need volatility what creates volatility Bitcoin. Okay,

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so if you plug a high volatility asset, and if

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna say we hate bitcoin is highly volatible, Well

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 1>tell me who in the world wants volatility more than

0:57:55.480 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a bond arbitrager, right, that's actually a volatility engine for them.

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So what we did was we went to the market

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and we offered we offered UH investors in common stock

0:58:11.280 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a company which had bitcoin exposure, you know, after going

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 1>through our tender offer and after all these announcements and

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we we were able to attract new capital the believed

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin and liked that idea. And then we went

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to the debt market and we offered the debt markets

0:58:28.120 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 1>an instrument and convertible debt that offered them exposure to

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and and the credit worthiness of a responsibly run

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 1>enterprise software company. And we were rewarded with an over subscription.

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We were going to raise fourn million. We had massive demand,

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and so we upsized the deal to five fifty million,

0:58:49.840 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and we had a green shoe, and then we executed

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the green shoe the next day and it became a

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>six fifty million dollar deal. Because because this is the

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>only UH convert doable debt instrument in the market in

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the world where you could actually have the upside bitcoin,

0:59:07.280 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the volatility a bitcoin, and the downside protection of a

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 1>credit worthy company that's got like double or triple collateral coverage,

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and so like, why wouldn't you like that deal? I mean,

0:59:19.600 --> 0:59:22.680
<v Speaker 1>people say, they're like, well, who would blown your money

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at seventy five basis points because that was the coupon.

0:59:25.680 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is, well, it's got great volatility, it's

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>got it's got warrants with great upside opportunity, and it's

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:35.880
<v Speaker 1>got good downside protection. And what are their choices? Can

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I jump in here and ask, because we've been talking

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for I think a little over an hour now and

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been entirely focused on bitcoin, I'm curious, how do

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you feel about other cryptocurrencies and would you consider an

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 1>investment in non bitcoin something else. Look, I think bitcoin

0:59:54.960 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is the investment grade, long duration safe haven asset. It's

1:00:01.640 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the best purest synthetic treasury asset invented in the history

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Now what does it take for it

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to be that good? Well, it needs to be the

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>dominant network, so it needs to be fifty times bigger

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>than the next thing, and it is. It's fifty times

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>bigger than bitcoin cash or bitcoins. To total vision, it

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>needs to go through ten years without changing the architecture

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to be Lendy secure, and it is. It needs to be.

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It needs to have a history of not being hacked.

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be adopted with a political contingent, a senator,

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a congressional caucus. It needs the endorsement of the I

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>R S D SEC right when, for example, when J

1:00:39.360 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Clayton was on television, he said bitcoin and ethereum are property,

1:00:45.440 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not securities. He was silent on every other crypto.

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So you understand where I'm coming here. Every other crypto

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>may or may not be a security and and uh,

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know. I'm not an expert. But what

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say is, if you wanted to say segment

1:01:00.400 --> 1:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the market of crypto, you have one asset which is

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>three or fifty billion dollar guerrilla juggernaut, dominant digital network,

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the monetary network, the most powerful thing that I've ever seen,

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a hundred times more valuable than Facebook, a hundred times

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>more valuable than Google. It's the money network, right, that's

1:01:22.120 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin in the world doesn't understand it. Everybody needs it.

1:01:27.480 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the solution to everybody's problem on Earth. Everybody needs

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to not lose their wealth and not have the economic

1:01:34.440 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>energy sucked out of their currency and all their investments.

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>That's bitcoin. There is no comparable asset. You have another category,

1:01:43.840 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>call it unicorns. I put a theoryum in there. It's

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a unicorn, like an Airbnb or you know, or an uber.

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a big it's like fifty six billion in market cap.

1:01:56.560 --> 1:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>People are excited about it. It's it's complicated, it's compelling.

1:02:01.560 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of people enthusiastic about it. And

1:02:04.200 --> 1:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>then after that, you've got a bunch of venture capital investments,

1:02:07.240 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of crypto networks doing different things, very exciting.

1:02:10.720 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be a high failure rate. There's like

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand cryptos launched right, so it's like who's gonna

1:02:17.560 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>be Instagram, who's gonna be What's Up? Who's gonna be Facebook?

1:02:20.600 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And then what are the other ten thousand? And maybe

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>one of them will become Snapchat and then maybe them

1:02:28.160 --> 1:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>will go away. I don't know. I would bucket your

1:02:31.880 --> 1:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>money into this is my treasury reserve asset. Massachusetts Mutual

1:02:36.440 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>will put a hundred million in a bitcoin it's a

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>treasury reserve asset. It's institutional grade asset. I would bet

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>five million on this. The next thing, you know, soft

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bank may buy a big piece of of a theory. Um,

1:02:50.520 --> 1:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they buy a big piece of Uber Airbnb. You know

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, we were right, that's a soft bank play.

1:02:56.320 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And the last is venture capital. You know, you bet

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>venture capital. You expect massive gains. You except risk. It's

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's all uncertain and complicated. And that's how I feel

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>about the crypto space. Let me, you know, wrap up soon,

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but let me ask you. You know, I mentioned you

1:03:13.200 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>tweet a lot about bitcoin. Uh, extremely compelling case for it.

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>How much of your sort of like mental, sort of

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like capacity is focused on it? And are you still

1:03:25.720 --> 1:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>active in the sort of day to day business intelligence

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>business of micro strategy, Because bitcoin, I mean, it definitely

1:03:34.160 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>takes over people's minds and I see it. I know

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who are intuited. Becomes their thing.

1:03:39.880 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It becomes like the main focus of their energy, it

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes their obsession. You're clearly very into it, um are

1:03:48.800 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>do you are you also like running the sort of

1:03:52.440 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the software company. Let's say I'm kind of at the

1:03:54.560 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Larry Ellison stage, where Larry was responsible for technology, he

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>delegated sales and services and marketing to to the president.

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So fond Lee is the president of the company and

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>sales and services and marketing that he's running the day

1:04:13.200 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to day operations of the business. I'm the CEO and

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the chairman. About half of my time is spent on

1:04:19.800 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>business matters, technology initiatives, corporate initiatives, other business things. Probably

1:04:25.560 --> 1:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>half of my time is spent on on corporate marketing,

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate balance sheet and communication of around bitcoin and the like.

1:04:36.080 --> 1:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'd say fifty percent of it is balance sheets

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff which is increasingly macroeconomics and bitcoin. Other is, you know,

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>being the CEO, but I'm not day to day running

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>every deal and running every operation. Fong does that and

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he does it very well. Could you see yourself, could

1:04:56.040 --> 1:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you see micro Strategy starting a a bitcoin related or

1:05:02.120 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin specific business in the future. Are there, for instance,

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>software opportunities that you could provide for crypto, bitcoins and

1:05:09.800 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>monetary network and everybody figures out how plug into it? Right?

1:05:13.120 --> 1:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So in our case, all of our assets are around

1:05:16.240 --> 1:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>business intelligence. So we've been exploring how we might bring

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin intelligence, uh to the to the bitcoin space and

1:05:25.920 --> 1:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>blockchain intelligence, and and we're looking at different options. And

1:05:29.720 --> 1:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>if we find a way to plug the plug the

1:05:32.960 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and bitcoin related things into micro strategy, then we

1:05:38.600 --> 1:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>will release that. We're we're going to release some some

1:05:42.680 --> 1:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>cool analytics um to the community to help them evaluate

1:05:48.080 --> 1:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>alternative investments and all and to make treasury decisions. But

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more of a marketing benefit to us.

1:05:56.760 --> 1:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So we'll get marketing benefits, we get some QA benefits.

1:06:00.120 --> 1:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>We might release some some software that does blockchain analytics,

1:06:05.400 --> 1:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't really determined that yet. We're really kicking

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the tires in an R and D stage there, Like

1:06:10.760 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to go into bitcoin mining just I mean,

1:06:13.440 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just people think because you buy bitcoin, that means you're

1:06:15.720 --> 1:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna love everything bitcoin. But you know, if you run

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>data centers and you have free electricity and you own electricity,

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you should think about mining. But if you

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have free electricity, and if you don't own data

1:06:26.840 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>centers and that's not your thing, you know, it for

1:06:29.920 --> 1:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>PayPal and Square to plug their mobile payment apps and

1:06:32.760 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin totally rational. They have mobile payment businesses, right,

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't I won't go into that business. Every you know,

1:06:40.080 --> 1:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>if you run an investment fund, it makes sense for

1:06:42.960 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you to create a bitcoin investment fund and marketed institutions

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's your business. So everybody finds they're part of

1:06:50.000 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy. It's very competitive. It's the most competitive economy

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine, because anybody can compete in cyberspace from

1:06:58.480 --> 1:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere on Earth, and so you better be the best

1:07:01.240 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world at whatever you decide to bring to market.

1:07:05.440 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So so I would say, we're looking at it. But

1:07:08.320 --> 1:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to change your product offering or your

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>service offering to plug into the network. You can plug

1:07:14.560 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>your treasury. If you're a dentist, you can still be

1:07:18.680 --> 1:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a dentist. But what I would tell you is the

1:07:21.000 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>value of your cash flows for being a dentist. You're

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down ten percent a year every year for

1:07:25.920 --> 1:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the next decade, and so you might want to sweep

1:07:28.320 --> 1:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>those cash flows into treasury, put that in bitcoin, so

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they go up a dent a year, so that you

1:07:33.960 --> 1:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>are a wealthy dentist in a decade instead of being

1:07:37.080 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a poor, starving dentist in a decade. So that the

1:07:40.360 --> 1:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>easiest way for most people to plug into bitcoin is

1:07:43.880 --> 1:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to plug their treasuries into bitcoin. It's a monetary network.

1:07:47.280 --> 1:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a straightforward thing before we go. I mean,

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you say you're never the goal is never have to sell.

1:07:54.400 --> 1:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It could be something that micro strategy holds for a

1:07:57.120 --> 1:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. But if bitcoin go is to a hundred thousand,

1:08:01.800 --> 1:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna throw a wild party or what? I

1:08:04.400 --> 1:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>will throw a wild party. I agreed to do that

1:08:06.480 --> 1:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for John Wallace. You know, he hit me up. He

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>said the Hornets won a party at a hundred thousand

1:08:10.880 --> 1:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>where you host. So I feel like I have that

1:08:14.280 --> 1:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>obligation that I've committed to and so yeah, okay, and

1:08:19.200 --> 1:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you're invited. I was just gonna I was just gonna say,

1:08:22.280 --> 1:08:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Tracy and Tracy and I are very excited about joining

1:08:26.840 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you at your party. I'd love to have you and

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you on your show today. Yeah that was great,

1:08:33.760 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this is We appreciate you joining us. Said fantastic conversation,

1:08:38.400 --> 1:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and I wish you the best of luck. Thanks same

1:08:41.920 --> 1:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to you by Tracy, by Joe. Thanks Michael, Thank you

1:08:46.960 --> 1:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>really appreciated that. Thanks Michael. That was great. Yeah, that

1:08:50.360 --> 1:09:20.639
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of fun. Take care. Oh well, here's

1:09:20.680 --> 1:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a very uh energetic prose would say, I think that's

1:09:25.880 --> 1:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a fair characters trying to figure out exactly the right

1:09:28.160 --> 1:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. I'm kind of thinking what the

1:09:29.600 --> 1:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>party would be like, but you know, a lot of

1:09:32.160 --> 1:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>fun I imagine um and a lot of talking as

1:09:35.000 --> 1:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>well about bitcoin. Um. Okay, here's one thing that I

1:09:38.439 --> 1:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was thinking at the beginning of the conversation, which is

1:09:41.200 --> 1:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I I hadn't necessarily thought about what So I've been

1:09:45.439 --> 1:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking a long time about low economic growth, and uh,

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what that means for companies, and this idea

1:09:51.600 --> 1:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that in an environment of sluggish economic growth, you kind

1:09:54.400 --> 1:09:58.519
<v Speaker 1>of have to engineer profit growth in one way or another.

1:09:58.600 --> 1:10:00.479
<v Speaker 1>So lots of companies have done that through M and

1:10:00.560 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>A deals. Others have done that through buybacks and dividends.

1:10:04.160 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But the theme overall is that a lot of companies

1:10:07.000 --> 1:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of cash. I hadn't really considered that

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>that problem has grown more stark in the COVID area

1:10:15.000 --> 1:10:19.519
<v Speaker 1>era and Michael laid out a really interesting description of it.

1:10:19.600 --> 1:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>This idea that you know, sales are still going to

1:10:21.880 --> 1:10:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the through the roof for a software company, but at

1:10:24.640 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time, expenses are down quite a lot, and

1:10:28.120 --> 1:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>so they're swimming in cash at the moment, and you

1:10:30.600 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 1>get back to the age old problem of what to

1:10:32.560 --> 1:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>do with all that corporate cash. Yeah, I mean, you know,

1:10:37.760 --> 1:10:42.599
<v Speaker 1>some companies obviously will reinvest it and their businesses are

1:10:42.680 --> 1:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>just going so strong. I mean, if you're like, you know,

1:10:46.360 --> 1:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>some of these really hot you know, if you're like

1:10:48.560 --> 1:10:51.799
<v Speaker 1>a snowflake or one of these like really hot enterprise

1:10:51.800 --> 1:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>software companies that people are crazy about, there's probably kinds

1:10:55.120 --> 1:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of reinvestment opportunities, fast growth. You know, a business intelligence

1:10:59.280 --> 1:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>company has been a round like what they say, like

1:11:01.600 --> 1:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>almost thirty years, maybe not as many opportunities to do that.

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You know. I would just say, like I I disagree

1:11:09.840 --> 1:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I would say with maybe some of

1:11:12.880 --> 1:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael's characterization of the macro economy and the FED or

1:11:18.439 --> 1:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>measuring inflation or the value of the dollar. But you know,

1:11:21.479 --> 1:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>who knows, We'll be back here in four years and

1:11:23.439 --> 1:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>forty eight months to see if the dollar has collapsed.

1:11:27.040 --> 1:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, I think he is on ironically,

1:11:32.640 --> 1:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>genuinely a very good articulator of many of the bull

1:11:37.200 --> 1:11:42.519
<v Speaker 1>cases for bitcoin, the characterizations property, the network effects, the

1:11:42.640 --> 1:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>always on nous of it, the increasing liquidity, the flywheels

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:49.879
<v Speaker 1>such that the more the market value grows, the easier

1:11:49.920 --> 1:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it is to transact in it. There were a lot

1:11:52.280 --> 1:11:54.599
<v Speaker 1>of like sort of like big ideas that when he

1:11:54.760 --> 1:11:57.519
<v Speaker 1>puts it sort of some of the macro and fetch

1:11:57.520 --> 1:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff aside I found compelling. Well, my mind, it gets

1:12:00.840 --> 1:12:03.479
<v Speaker 1>back to that growth point, which is one of the

1:12:03.520 --> 1:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>ways to achieve growth in the current environment is to

1:12:06.720 --> 1:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>try to select the asset that's not going to I

1:12:12.080 --> 1:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>guess he would say be debased in the future, right,

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But I guess what I'm getting at is like there's

1:12:17.760 --> 1:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money out there at the moment, and

1:12:19.600 --> 1:12:23.479
<v Speaker 1>they're all chasing a pool of assets, and to some extent,

1:12:23.720 --> 1:12:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the value of those assets is being driven by flows, right,

1:12:26.560 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So identifying the asset with the most flows and the

1:12:30.439 --> 1:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>most potential for upside makes some sense in the current environment.

1:12:35.160 --> 1:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Although I think a lot of people in the traditional

1:12:37.600 --> 1:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>investment community are still wrapping their heads around bitcoin and

1:12:40.600 --> 1:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily see bitcoin as the asset um that's

1:12:44.280 --> 1:12:46.519
<v Speaker 1>going to be the most successful. But for sure you

1:12:46.560 --> 1:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>can see it getting those flows at the moment. And

1:12:49.520 --> 1:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'll just say that it's like there's

1:12:51.880 --> 1:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>people like me and other people although like not technically

1:12:56.320 --> 1:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the definition of inflation or you know, it's like what ever,

1:13:00.640 --> 1:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, to some extent the future crypto aside,

1:13:04.880 --> 1:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin of side, the future belongs to people that are

1:13:08.240 --> 1:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>really excited about a story. And the people who say, like, well,

1:13:13.040 --> 1:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's technically not how inflation are measured, they're like, you know,

1:13:16.560 --> 1:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they do podcasts, tweet and stuff, and their journalists for

1:13:19.640 --> 1:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a living. So I risk, even if I like would

1:13:23.120 --> 1:13:26.519
<v Speaker 1>poke some holes in his view, I actually think probably

1:13:26.560 --> 1:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like the long term winners are more people like that

1:13:29.080 --> 1:13:31.479
<v Speaker 1>than people like me. Does that make sense? Do you

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>get what I'm saying? No, it does. I think this

1:13:34.360 --> 1:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>story about hopes and dreams and fixing the world is

1:13:38.840 --> 1:13:42.599
<v Speaker 1>definitely more compelling than the story about actually you should

1:13:42.600 --> 1:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think about inflation in this way and and here's how

1:13:46.040 --> 1:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we construct an inflation that's not technically debate. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:13:52.280 --> 1:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>The future does not belong to people who did pick

1:13:54.720 --> 1:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about inflation index construction. Um, so we leave it there,

1:14:00.520 --> 1:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, Yeah, let's leave it there. This has been

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

1:14:06.120 --> 1:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Allowa. I'm Joe,

1:14:09.400 --> 1:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>why Isn't All? You can follow me on Twitter at

1:14:11.840 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>The Stalwart. Follow our guest Michael Sailor on Twitter. He's

1:14:15.640 --> 1:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>at Michael Underscore Sailor. Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's

1:14:20.400 --> 1:14:23.639
<v Speaker 1>at Laura, I'm Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast

1:14:23.680 --> 1:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, and check out all of

1:14:28.040 --> 1:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. Thanks

1:14:32.040 --> 1:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening.