WEBVTT - Elon Musk and President Trump Feud Impacts Tesla, SpaceX

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Live Prince San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Tesla in the crosshairs after the Trump Musk blow up

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 2>led to one hundred and fifty billion dollar route.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Plus what can it mean for space x elon Musk

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 3>backpedaling after threatening to pull Dragon spacecraft from NASA missions?

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 2>And is it the fastest growing software startup of all time?

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 4>The company behind coding.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Assistant Cursor cashes in on the AI frenzy with a

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>close to ten billion dollar valuation. The first we check

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>in on the stock of the moment, we were bound

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>some We recoup about fifty billion dollars on the day,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 2>but over the course of the week we've lost one

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty billion dollars in market cap for Tesla

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 2>is now sub one trillion dollars. It is his worst

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 2>week since February of twenty twenty five, right.

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>And at one point in the session, the worst week

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>going back to October of twenty twenty three.

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 5>We need to talk more about what is happening.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to DC to discuss it with Bloomberg's Balance

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>of Power hosts Katie Lines. The latest reporting, Kaylee, is

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>that in the whirlwind of the last twenty four hours,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>there will not be a conversation or phone call between

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk and the President today.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that is what White House officials are signaling to Bloomberg.

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 6>And despite the fact that there was reporting that some

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 6>kind of call must happen, and there's been signaling from

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk that he is willing to lower the temperature here.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 6>After someone posted on X at him yesterday that they

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 6>should call off for a few days. He said that

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 6>was good advice. And when Bill Ackman said that Trump

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 6>and must need to make peace for the good of

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 6>the country, Elon Musk responded, You're not wrong. So it

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 6>does seem on at least one side, there is a

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 6>willingness to lower the temperature here. It's unclear though, whether

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 6>or not President Trump feels the same way as that

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 6>same White House official that indicated no call would happen

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 6>today also said that Trump is considering selling the Tesla

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 6>that he purchased in that flashy White House event just

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 6>months ago when these two were still incredibly tight. So

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 6>if they can't fully mend fence this here, obviously, there

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 6>are some major implications we have to consider. There is

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 6>the political implication of whether or not Elon Musk will

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 6>continue to attack what is supposed to be President Trump's

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 6>landmark legislative accomplishment in his second term, this one big,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 6>beautiful bill. Well, Elon Musk's criticism may not actually change

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 6>the odds of the legislation getting through Congress. At the

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 6>very least, him broadcasting his views to hundreds of millions

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 6>of people does damage Republican messaging around the deficit impact

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 6>of this legislation. There's also Elon Musk's money to consider.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 6>He of course deployed some two hundred and ninety million

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 6>dollars in the twenty twenty four election cycle, a lot

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 6>of that toward the effort of getting President Trump re elected.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 6>But Republicans have to consider whether or not Elon might

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 6>deploy that money to primary challengers. For example, if he

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 6>decides he would like to punish those who go ahead

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 6>and vote for this legislation, that will, of course, in

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 6>addition to raising the deficit, lead to the rollback of

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 6>ev credits that Tesla benefits from There's national security implications too,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 6>given that Musk and those working for him in DOGE

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 6>were given access to government systems. It's unclear how far

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 6>that access winter whe whether or not access for some

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 6>of those individuals is going to be revoked. And then

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 6>you get into, of course, the business implications as to

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 6>whether or not government contracts, as President Trump threatened yesterday

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 6>that Elon Musk's companies from SpaceX to others could actually do,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 6>actually benefit from need will actually go away. So there

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 6>are many different layers to this.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 4>And while there is.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 6>A signal that maybe things have cooled down for now

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 6>after what was an incredibly wild day yesterday, or this

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 6>escalated very quickly, there's really no telling where this goes

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 6>from here.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 2>What a thorough round up, Kaylie Lines. We appreciate it

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>from Washington. Let's now bring in Bluemeg's Max Afkin from

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the Elon Inc. Team and Max, I just want to

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>get your perspective here.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 5>Ron.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>We know how tough the president can be when he

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>holds a grudge. Harvard's experienced it, universities have experienced it.

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 4>But what about Elon.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.679
<v Speaker 2>He's still got that vote going on on X about

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 2>whether a new political party needs to be formed. Do

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>we really think he's going to cool down from here?

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 7>I think it would be in his interest to cool down.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 7>And I think the stock chart that you showed reflects

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 7>that there is no universe that I can imagine anyway.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 5>Where Elon Musk maintaining this.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 7>Position where he's, you know, this kind of maximalist. We

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 7>should impeach Donald Trump, start a new political party, you know,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 7>yesterday accusing Trump of being associated with Jeffrey Epstein. You know,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 7>like this, this is a point where he's going to

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 7>start alienating MAGA aligned customers. And unfortunately for Tesla that

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 7>is now an important contingent of their customer base because

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk has already alienated the left leaning customers. So

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 7>you're in this situation that is difficult.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 5>Now. Musk has cards to play, right.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 7>He has the money that he can donate, as we

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 7>just heard. He also has this aerospace company, which you know,

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 7>the US Trump can threaten to cancel contracts, but you know,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 7>as the Pentagon is construction constructed right now, and as

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 7>NASA is constructed, they are depending on SpaceX for rocket launches.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 7>So he has cards to play, But I don't see

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 7>how he can kind of maintain this pose without watching

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 7>Tesla's stock decline further, without watching sales fall further. I mean,

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 7>this is the most self destructive.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 5>I've covered Elon Musk for a very long time.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 7>This is the most self destructive that I have ever

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 7>seen Elon musk Okay.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Tesla says are up more than six percent in the session,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 3>but we remind ourselves that the stock fell fourteen percent

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 3>as of yesterday's close. And while all of this was happening,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 3>something you mentioned was the core story President Trump's threat

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 3>to cancel government tracks.

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 5>And if you look at it from the Elon Inc.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Lens Max, Tesla is the publicly traded proxy for sentiment

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 3>towards Elon wright But since two thousands, Tesla SpaceX in

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 3>aggregate have benefited from more than twenty billion dollars in grants, subsidies,

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and direct contracts. Explain that landscape to us, and what's

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>at stake here if the President were to carry.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 5>Through with that threat.

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 7>You know, That's why I'm reacting the way I'm reacting,

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.559
<v Speaker 7>and why I think there are a lot of people

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 7>who still kind of expect, you know, maybe some reconciliation

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 7>because Elon Musk has over the course of his career,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 7>as you just said, Ed, he has been really really

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 7>effective at basically getting the federal government to give him money.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 7>And I think what we have been seeing and you

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 7>saw this frustration coming out a little bit in the

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 7>wake of the departure of Jared Isaacman, the person who

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 7>Musk had hoped would be the NASA noominee, as well

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 7>as the discussion around the ev tax credit, which is

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 7>part of this tax bill that the Republicans are trying

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 7>to pass. You saw a little bit of frustration I

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 7>think from Elon Musk that although he's had tremendous influence

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 7>and although he's begune to all the parties he's been

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 7>in Mara Lago, Trump has led him, you know, basically

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 7>it seems to do whatever he wants with DOJE, he

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 7>hasn't actually been able to get the business priorities, and

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.239
<v Speaker 7>now of course is going to get harder.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 7>Like I said, I don't think the government is just

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 7>going to unilaterally cancel SpaceX contracts, but the government has

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 7>leverage over Elon Musk, and Trump is signaling that he's

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 7>wanting to use it.

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>What I reported with our DC colleagues is that Isaacsman's

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>nomination was canceled because of his relationship with Elon Musk

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>and a White House official called Sergio Gore who did

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>not like Elon Musk.

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 5>And that's in copy on Bloomberg dot com.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloomers. Max Chafickin of Elon Inc. Fantastic, Thank you very much.

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I want to go to Nancy Tengler. She's CEO and

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Laffer. Tengler investments about one half billion dollars

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>in assets, but a significant holding of Tesla Sheff Nancy.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Is what we saw in Tesla's stock yesterday Thursday, the

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 3>drop in fourteen percent. Is it the market betting against

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Musk himself as opposed to whatever they feel about the

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 3>long term thesis of Tesla.

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, Ed, I thanks for having me. I

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 8>think part of what we saw yesterday is what we

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 8>always see in the short term, and that is that

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 8>the algorithms read the headlines, then the shorts jump in,

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 8>and this is the stock and the guy that everyone

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 8>loves to short. So I mean, I'm not saying I

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 8>think this was well advised what Elon did, but I

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 8>do think the fundamentals ultimately will trump this issue if

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 8>you will no pun And that's important because this might

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 8>be a great entry point we had, you know, we'd

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 8>bought in at it again to our holdings on March tenth.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 8>And I think the stock was training about two forty

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 8>that looked really smart until yesterday. But that's a and

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 8>I think you do want to add it on in

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 8>the volatile periods because Musk has a habit of teetering

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 8>on the edge of destruction and then pulling himself back

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 8>in the nick of time. He has said himself he's

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 8>wired for war, and he often shoots himself in the foot,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 8>and clearly he's not wrong about that.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 4>The shooting in the foot.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>How prolific could that get in terms of getting robotaxis

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 2>and a cybercab on the road and implicating that long

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 2>term thesis that so many people hold.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't think it will. I mean, Caroline, I

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 8>don't know. But because President Trump's equally unpredictable. I was

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 8>reading a story about one of his previous advisers who

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 8>had given him all the judicial nominees in his first term,

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 8>and he called him a sleezebag who hates America. So

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 8>he has a habit too of embracing people and then

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 8>disengaging and not only disengaging, but saying some pretty rough

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 8>things about him. So, but that said, I do think

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 8>that what the administration understands is they do need productivity

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 8>driven growth to make this tax bill work, and a

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 8>good portion of that is pointed at Elon Musk and

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 8>his efforts and initiatives, including Robotaxi. I expect that next week,

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 8>after the Robotaxi announcement, unless something ridiculous happens, that we

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 8>will be talking about something else as it relates to Tesla.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is we're talking about something else that relates

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>to Elon. We're going to talk more about the space

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>part of the equation later in the show, Nancy. But

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting that there's some debt being shocked by Walgan

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Stanley right now for Xai, and it went on for

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 2>sale basically yesterday. We wonder what the sentiment is like

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 2>in terms of shift. Would you want to be adding

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>at this point? You said, maybe it's smart, but would

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you want to be adding exposure to all things Elon

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 2>at this moment?

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 8>So we have a pretty full position, and there's a

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 8>reason this stock is not in our twelve Best Ideas portfolio, Caroline,

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 8>because it is inherently bald, and a lot of it

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 8>has to do with Elon, So I would say if

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 8>you don't own it. And we have some clients who

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 8>have asked us to buy positions for them today, which

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 8>we will do in their non managed accounts, but effectively,

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 8>I'm going to wait and if we see what we

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 8>need to see next week and the stock doesn't bounce,

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 8>then we may actually add to it, just discreetly, not

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 8>in a big way, because it's a four percent position

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 8>or it was yesterday, so call it three and a

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 8>half today, and that's about as much as we want

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 8>to own of this stock in our growth portfolio.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.239
<v Speaker 5>Let's go back to Robotaxi.

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>This is the thesis from Bloomberg Intelligence, our in house

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>analysts about what the events of the last twenty four

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 3>hours mean, and they argue specifically that it will result

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 3>in a protracted rollout of Robotaxi, because the whole trade

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>was based on the idea that Musk's proximity to the

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 3>President would result in favorable legislation or federal level policy

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 3>that would help Robotaxi.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Where do you stand on that, Nancy.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, And I think that's that's that's the risk, and

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 8>that's that's one of the reasons that we're not jumping

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 8>in here the regulatory environment. But I would also point out,

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, all the tech CEOs sort of did their

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 8>homage to the administration and to the President in particular,

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 8>and it hasn't really resulted in much good news from

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 8>a regulatory standpoint. In fact, you could argue it's resultant

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 8>in none Apple Google Meta. So I think that I'm

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 8>hopeful that cooler heads will prevail, that the technology will

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 8>be seen for what it is. And you know, if

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 8>you look out that the Robotaxi would be the lowest

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 8>cost per mile provider, there's only two way MO and

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 8>it comes in significantly below And so I think there's

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 8>a lot of reasons to support this technology. But you

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 8>know that these are two unique individuals.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important to pull out point out that

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 3>actually Musk was quite consistent over a number.

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 5>Of months that he would be fine if EV subsidies

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 5>were killed or cut.

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>He said it in July, he said it in December,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>he said it more recently, and Trump said it at

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 3>March's Cabinet meeting. Does that factor in for you his

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 3>position on that, Yeah, yes.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean I thought that was disingenuous of the President

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 8>yesterday to say that he saw that the ev mandates

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 8>were gone, and that's what drove him crazy. I think

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 8>that was the direct quote. He has been consistent. I

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 8>agree with his position on that it supports the weaker manufacturers.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't necessarily support the industry leader. The Tesla buyer

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 8>is really not influenced by the mandate, and most don't

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 8>qualify because of the income limitation. So I think Elon

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 8>is a smart businessman, and what really frustrated him was

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 8>the fact that the government is not run like a business.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 8>So you make the logical, you have the logical discussions,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 8>and then the government goes on this giant snowball rolling

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 8>down a hill. So I'm hopeful that we will see

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 8>things settle down and that next week I'm hoping we'll

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 8>be talking about Robotaxi and how amazing it is. I

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 8>live in Weymo Land. It's pretty exciting what's going on

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 8>and what Amazon is doing with robots delivering packages. They

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 8>could be getting out of a robotaxi for all I know.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's just go to sentiment on buying a Tesla though, Nancy,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>because this I think is what's caught many off guard.

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Europeans are incredibly angry about some of the political leanings

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>that Elil Musk has had, and it's affected sales.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 4>It would seem it hasn't.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Just been the production hole and the wait for a

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>new model. Why missing that borne out in may numbers.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 2>So will this implicate who buys Tesla's going forward?

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 8>That's a great question, Caroline. You know it's interesting is

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 8>that by D has been taken to task by the

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 8>Communist Party for lowering prices because they're in an inflationary environment,

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 8>and so I find that super interesting. Will that open

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 8>up some space for Tesla again in China? It could.

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean they've called it rat race competition at the

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>Communist Party, calling out the CEO. So we may see another,

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 8>you know, another instance where the public market is invaded

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 8>by the Communist Party, and that may help. But I

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 8>don't think people are going to get over this soon.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 8>I think they will eventually get over it. But he

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 8>needs to dial down the rhetoric and the drama and

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 8>get back to the business of you know, optimists and

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 8>robotaxi and full self driving. That is what people own

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 8>the stock for, and for his brilliance and genius, of course,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 8>but not for the historyonics.

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>And therefore, do you think you're going to get enough

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 2>of his attention, particularly on the humanoid robot side of

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the equation.

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean, what Tesla has said is that they're going

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 8>to have thousands in their factories coming up. That would

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 8>be a good thing, Caroline, because you know, we have

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 8>fought as much as the President talks about bringing manufacturing

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 8>back to America, we have five hundred thousand manufacturing jobs

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 8>that have gone unfilled. It's hard to turn that one

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 8>around when for years we were shrinking the manufacturing base.

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 8>The solution is robots, not across the board, but in

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 8>a good instance, and they are a very productive way

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 8>of producing things. So just as AI is writing AI code,

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 8>I think the robots will build the robots, and we'll

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 8>see manufacturing plants use more and more robotics. That's a

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 8>good thing, and I think Tesla will be at the

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 8>center of that, as well as energy storage.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 3>If anything's come out of the events of the last

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hours, it's to remind us of the deficit.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Nancy listened to this.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 4>We can debate.

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 9>He didn't get his trillion, he or probably one hundred

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 9>billion or so in terms of cuts, but he worked.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 9>He was part of Doorge. It was right after the inauguration.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 4>We had do it.

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think I think some of this is as

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 9>he's looking at this one big beautiful bill seeing that

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.959
<v Speaker 9>really the tax cuts are temporary. So is Musk trying

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 9>to highlight the deficit issue again.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Remember this was all about the big beautiful bill, That's

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 3>where it started. Is Musk putting the emphasis back on

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the deficit helpful?

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 5>Nancy?

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 8>I actually think it is. I think a lot of

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 8>what he's done has changed the narrative, whether you support

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 8>dose or not. It's shine a light on the profligate

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 8>spending in Washington. And I think what most Americans took away,

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 8>And just like if you just start with Harvard, why

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 8>is the government giving an educational or institution that has

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 8>a endowment sorry of fourteen billion dollars, whatever it is,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 8>Why are we giving them hundreds and millions of dollars

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 8>every year? Those are good debates to have, and there

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 8>may be a very good reason, But I don't think

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 8>most people think that the government is efficient with their

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 8>tax dollars, and so to change to start that debate,

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 8>then to see it, you know, do the work, see

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 8>it unwound. Really with this tax bill which is long,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 8>un spending, I don't like it either. I don't think

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 8>it's a very good bill. I think that they could

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 8>have done better. They obviously don't think they could have.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 8>I'm not there, but I think that's that's really what

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 8>he's focusing on, and that's important. Thirty seven trillion dollars

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 8>is debt is nothing short of suicidal in my view.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Last sort of posts from you know Musco are about

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 2>a slim, beautiful bill and Nancy Tangl We appreciate it.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 2>CEO and CIO of Leffetengra Investments, Happy weekend to you.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up Anisphere.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 2>It's the maker of the popular AI coding assistant Cursor.

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 4>You've got to have heard of it. You might have

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 4>used it.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 2>It's got a new valuation a nine point nine billion

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars to swing with the CEO Michael Truell. Next, this

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 2>is a blue Bow Technology.

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 3>The company behind the popular AI coding assistant Cursor has

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 3>a new valuation nine point nine billion, just three years

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 3>after it was launched and says it's bringing in five

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollars in annualized revenue. Michael Truel is any

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Sphe's CEO, and he joins us. Now your name comes

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 3>up a lot all the time, not just here in Silicon.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 5>Valley, everywhere.

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 3>The growth that you've seen in the platform has been rapid.

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 5>This is a finance story, you know.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a funding, it's a access to capital. But what

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask you is what the true motivation

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 3>behind it was. Did you need the money or was

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 3>it just because of the interest.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 5>In you from the outside.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 10>Well, the goal for us with building Cursor is to

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 10>invent a very new way to build software, right and

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 10>I think that the product that we built today is

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 10>just the very start of that. I think that over

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 10>the next five years we have a chance to invent

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 10>a style of programming that looks very different from how

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 10>you build software today, one that's much higher level and

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 10>more productive. And it's just still down to defining what

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 10>you want to show up on the computer and how

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 10>you want the.

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 5>Software to work.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 10>And we have a long way to go there, and

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of research and development to do to

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 10>get there. And so we took on this capital to

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 10>invest in frontier AI coding research.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 3>What is unique about Cursor, how it was written relative

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 3>to what Claude is offering with their similar tool, Windsurf

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>and other similar platforms.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, the EPI models created by folks like Anthropic and

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 10>Gemini and open Ai are fantastic and our big parts

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 10>of Cursor and the power the technology under the hood,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 10>alongside custom models that we developed to that are specifically

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 10>very good at parts of programming. And so at this point,

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 10>Cursor is powered by an ensemble of models. Some of

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 10>them are API, a lot of them are custom, and

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 10>we do over half a billion model claus per day

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 10>on our customer models.

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 5>And it's that ensemble of models.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 10>Under the hood that separates a useful AI product from

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 10>one that's just a demo. And it's that ensemble of

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 10>models that gives you the speed, instability and performance that

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 10>you need to be really useful vibe coding.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 4>That is something that's come into our lexicon.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I just want to be shining a light on who's

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 2>been using Cursor for that very reason.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 4>So no a pitchy.

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Just take a listen to what you said a couple

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 2>of days ago at the Blombag Tech Summit.

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 10>I wish I could, I could do more, but you know,

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 10>I've just been messing around beat either with cursor or you.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Know, I wipe coded with replet.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 10>Compared to the early days of coding, things have come

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 10>a long way.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 2>How's it feel that the CEO of Alphabet is using

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 2>what you've made and only the last few years.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, it means a lot, and we're honored, and we're

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 10>big fans of the technology and the company that you know,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 10>he and the people working with him have created.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 4>I will say that.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 10>Our target market, the person we're really building for, are

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 10>folks who build software for a living, professional software developers,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 10>and our goal is to raise the ceiling. But by

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 10>doing that you do raise the floor too, I mean

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 10>lower the floor. And it's been awesome to see folks

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 10>that are less technical executives, designers, product folks also experimenting

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 10>with building software and to end and.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 4>The money is through subscriptions.

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>It's made you many would claim to be the fastest

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>growing software startup ever.

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 4>And I'm interested.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Is the pivot to enterprise really what drives your growth

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 2>from here? Because you have been about individuals, but you're

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 2>selling forty dollars subscriptions for the business is.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 4>That the growth trajectory.

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 5>We have a very healthy upmarket motion.

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 10>A lot of our growth comes from serving larger and

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 10>larger companies, and we're happy to announce as part of

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 10>the funding that we're serving over half the Fortune five

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 10>hundred and companies like in Nvidia and Adobia and uper

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 10>and we're very happy to be serving those folks missions.

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 3>The question is posed all the time if a larger

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 3>entity will try and acquire you, has a larger entity

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>tried to acquire you? And when I say a larger entity,

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean a company that is of open AI scale,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 3>XAI scale and thropic scale.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, we can't comment on anything like that here.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 5>Actually we just stay in age. You can go ahead.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 10>I will say that we would like to build an

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 10>independent company.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, the founding team and I.

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 10>Feel like we were bid for this opportunity and we're

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 10>really energized by the product Jurney that we have had

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 10>of us, and we would like to do that.

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Tocandal one Michael Trull, CEO of Anisphere, of course, maker Cursor,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a joy.

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 5>Take you for grabbing me. Thank you.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Now we've got some breaking news regarding rare Earth and

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 2>supply chain. Let's just take a look how China is

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 2>granting rare earth permits to some US auto suppliers.

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 4>This is currently, of course being.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Discussed by Reuters as we stand reported by Reuters up

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>three tens percent on General Motors.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 4>The other well auto.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Companies have been training higher in the session. China granting

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 2>rare Earth's permits to some US auto suppliers.

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 4>According to router s.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Ed Okay, coming up on the show, the feud between

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 3>President Trump and Elon must maybe calling off, and the

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 3>future of US space has some thing to do with it.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 5>We're going to talk.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>About the rocket man and the President of the United States.

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Next from San Francisco, this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology.

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Karen Hyde right here in San Francisco.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, for the final day this week, and I'm ed Lovelow.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 5>What are you looking at.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a check on these market said, because actually

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 2>despite the sell off in one particular name that we've

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>seen a couple of days, then as at one hundred

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 2>has had a nice week.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 4>We're up almost two percent.

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 2>As it stands now, we're currently seeing what the best

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 2>week since all of last week, but it's two straight

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 2>weeks of games. We're up two percentage points. If you're

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 2>looking at points contributors on the day in videos up

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 2>there Apples there, Amazon's there, so too is Tesla. Let's

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>look at Tesla though over the last five days. Yes,

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>it claws back some of its market capitalization erosion that

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 2>we saw yesterday hard and fast.

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 4>But over the course of the.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Week we are down by one hundred and forty billion

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>dollars in terms of market cap. All of this as

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Elon goes versus well the most powerful person in politics,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 2>President Trump.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's recap from romance to breakup and now maybe a truce.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 3>It's started with Musk slamming Trump's tax bill. Trump's response, disappointment.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 8>I've always liked Dylan and as times we very surprised.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 11>You saw the words he had for me, the words,

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 11>and yes, I said, any thing about me that's bad,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 11>I'd rather have been printed serves me than the bill,

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 11>because the bill is incredible.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Trump claimed that Musk was mad about ev incentive cuts,

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 3>must denied it, noted he's long opposed to subsidies.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 5>Then it turned personal.

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump called Musk crazy and claimed he kicked him out

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 3>of the administration.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 5>Musk fired back. Tesla shares dropped.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Investors had hoped must ties to Trump might fast track

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 3>ROBOTAXI rules. Then Trump threatened to end Musk's federal contracts,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 3>a direct hit to SpaceX. Musk said he'd pulled Dragon

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 3>spacecraft from national missions and then he walked it back.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 3>So what happens now for space policy? And Musk Blooma's

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Lauren Grush joins us, Now we're focused on Dragon, which

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 3>is the capsule that sits atop the SpaceX rocket that

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 3>takes humans and cargo to and from the.

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 5>International Space Station.

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Musk said that he would decommission the program and then

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 3>walked it back.

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 5>Explain why that was so important.

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's hard to over state just how dependent NASA

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 12>has become.

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 8>On SpaceX and the Dragon spacecraft.

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 12>It is kind of the It is the primary way

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 12>that the NASA sends humans to.

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 8>The International Space Station, and it.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 12>Is probably the biggest supplier of food and supplies to

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 12>the ISS. So without it, we can't stall have the

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 12>space station very well, and we can't send.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 8>Food there for the astronauts to eat.

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 12>So we do have some other options, but none are

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 12>as prolific as the Falcon nine and the Dragon combo,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 12>so it really would bring the operations at the ISS

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 12>to a standstill.

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>That's the pain point for NASA for astronauts, But what

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 2>about the pain point for SpaceX? How dependent is it

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 2>on the United States.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 12>Right, So it's no secret that in order for SpaceX

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 12>to become this behemoth company that it has become, it

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 12>has really lever NASA and government contracts to get help

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 12>develop its Falcon nine rocket, to develop the.

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 8>Dragon capsule, which it uses.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 12>For commercial purposes. It's not just a government spacecraft. They

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 12>have used it to send tourists into orbit and for

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 12>private citizens to visit the International Space Station, so they

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 12>have actually used it for services outside of the government.

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 8>Of course, you know, SpaceX does have a diversified revenue stream.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 12>A lot of that comes from Starlink now, which is

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 12>it uses to you know, provide broadband coverage to Earth

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 12>and to customers. So that has definitely supplemented a lot

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 12>of their incoming revenue. But NASA and the Defense Department

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 12>are very big customers and it would definitely be a

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 12>major hit to their incoming you know, money if they

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 12>were to just cancel all of their government contracts without explanation.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 2>And gosh, a great roundup, thank you so much on

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>old sides of SpaceX, but for more on the broad

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>impact of this feud. In indeed, it has cooled down.

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Anna Rathman's with US Global Market Strategists. Anna, your perspective

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 2>on yesterday's market moves on the back of what seemed

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 2>to be online warfare between Trump and Musk.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it was an unfortunate and very unnecessary spat between

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 13>two very powerful individuals who have the potential to move markets.

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 13>And we really saw that and felt that yesterday. At

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 13>the end of the day, the question really was like

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 13>who holds more power because that seemed to be the

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 13>trajectory of the spat. Where we settled for the time

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 13>being is that mister Trump seems to have won it.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 13>And you really saw that because of the potential impact

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 13>for cash flow. If SpaceX had been a publicly traded company,

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 13>you might have seen something similar for that particular name

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 13>as well.

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 8>But frankly, they need each.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 13>Other and so I'm really glad to see them toning

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 13>down rhetoric and taking a little pause to cool down,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 13>because the government needs that public private partnership in order

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 13>to make this country great.

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 8>And also, you know, TESLA needs.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 13>Better regulations or friendly regulations, and space X needs the

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 13>government as well, so they're going to have to work together,

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 13>whether they like it or not.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 3>We focused a lot on Elon Musk, and the Elon

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Musk proportion of what's been happening. Is there still an

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 3>element of headwind risk uncertainty for the technology investor in

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 3>the market from the president.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 13>So this takes us to the tariff question, right And

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 13>just recently you were just reporting about rare earth minerals

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 13>from China and making it available to automakers, and that's

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 13>really great news. And after at the heels of the

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 13>she Trump conversation yesterday, which was a step in the

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.959
<v Speaker 13>right direction, I think this is an olive branch to

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 13>take the conversation further. We may expect to see maybe

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 13>mister Trump going to China or Cgpin coming into the

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 13>United States, and that would be a huge step. But

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.719
<v Speaker 13>we do need to make headway because we are at

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 13>a daktant.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 8>I do think that.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 13>The Trump administration has undermined the difficulty of negotiating with

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 13>people who may not just respond to threats. You know,

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 13>they call their bluff one hundred and forty five percent tariffs,

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 13>and they didn't blink right. In fact, they told us

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 13>they wouldn't respond at all. So I think it's going

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 13>to take a lot more nuanced negotiations, and I would

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 13>look at this rare earth mineral's news as an opening

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 13>for a good faith negotiation.

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 3>There are people I've spoken to who would say, I

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 3>look at the rare earth situation and wonder what the

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 3>United States can do in the context of a trade negotiation.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 3>One idea is a quid pro quo where rare earth

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>access on favorable terms would be exchanged for semiconductor act

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>access that's codified in the AI context. That sounds messy,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't it.

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 13>It sounds very messy, and I'm very skeptical. So the

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 13>question is who holds the cards. China certainly holds the

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 13>cards on rare earths, but in many ways that is

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 13>the only thing that they have the cards on where

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 13>we absolutely need it. We hold the cards on the

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 13>massive consumer base and also influence on other countries as well,

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 13>as we've seen through all of this negotiation process.

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 5>So even though Jensen Wang.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 13>Would love for US to lower the export controls on AI, chips.

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 13>I just don't see that happening, because if we make

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 13>it available to them, it still doesn't guarantee that China

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 13>isn't going to be making a strides and creating their

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 13>own chips and designing them. So I don't see us

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 13>giving up on it, And that takes.

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Me to one.

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 13>May the solution actually.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 8>Look like at the end?

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 13>Well, if we're at a daytime and China is a

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 13>national security issue, then what.

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 8>Are we willing to compromise?

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Probably not much, in.

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 13>Which case we may actually end up in a similar

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 13>place where we started, where nobody is giving up on anything.

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 13>And that's to borrow Shakespeare's words, much ado about nothing

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 13>for all of this drama.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 2>All of this drama involves other people than President Trump

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and Il Musk, and there are some very focused technology

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 2>experts advising the White House.

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 4>One of them is David Sachs.

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot of concern about what the ripple

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>effects of this feud might have on him. But thus

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>far AI policy, crypto policy more broadly hasn't been in

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the right direction from your perspective.

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 13>I think in the right direction in terms of doing

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 13>that much about it. Yes, I do think that on

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 13>the hardware side, yeah, there's going to be some questions

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 13>about making certain ships available, but on the software side,

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 13>we have to be continuing to develop because at the

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 13>end of the day, that's where the race is right now.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 13>It's not just then the chips. The chips were very

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 13>excited about, data centers were very excited about, but it's

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 13>really the going beyond the proof of concepts and making

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 13>it more productive for not only American citizens but global

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 13>citizens around the world. Taking that step is the race,

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 13>and I think they just need to be left alone

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 13>in some ways so that they can continue to innovate.

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 13>And also that innovation will come with being able to

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 13>protect from the bad actors because ultimately that rounds out

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 13>the national security issue.

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 3>And a wrapan global market strategists, thank you very much.

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up will break down one of the splashiest

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 3>public debuts in years that have stable coin firm Circle

0:34:51.200 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 3>This next, this is Bloomberg Technology.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 11>We really do think that major technology firms, major financial institutions,

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 11>major commerce firms are going to go to the stable

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 11>point route, and we think that they're going to look

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 11>to partner with the leading platforms and the leading infrastructure

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 11>that can bring the technology the scale, the network effects,

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 11>and really the broad regulatory footprint like Circle has provided.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 2>That was Circle CEO Jeremy Lair. Following the stable coin

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Firms IPO. That was yesterday's Circle shows are still surging

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 2>after the company and its shareholders raised nearly one point

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 2>one billion dollars in an upsized offering. Stock was holded

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 2>several times of volatility on the first day. Let's bring

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in Matt Ugu's Venture Science founding partner and a Circle investor.

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Look, I have to ask the.

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Question, was too much money left on the table? It's

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 2>now trading a one hundred and nine. Did the bankers

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 2>get the price just too low?

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 5>Here?

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 14>Well, thank you for having me, but look, nobody knows

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 14>how some of these stocks will play out after the bell.

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 14>So the important thing was for the IPO to be

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 14>sold essentially the night before, and I think it was

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 14>significantly oversubscribe, maybe twenty five times oversubscribed. So the companies

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 14>do get paid ahead of time, and that's all locked

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 14>in and after the bell rings.

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Where the direction takes.

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 14>Obviously, this much of an increase is a pleasant surprise

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 14>to all of us involved, but that's kind of how

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 14>it happened.

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Let's go back a few years. Why did you first

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 5>get into Circle.

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, that's a great question. I remember, I think about

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 14>seven or eight years ago here and here not too

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 14>far from these offices here where our offices are actually,

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 14>I attended a dinner with a number of people from

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 14>the regulatory side, people from I think some crypto experts,

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 14>even from the Federal Reserve. And during that dinner, anytime

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 14>Circle's name came up, the sentiment was quite positive. So,

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 14>you know, obviously cryptocurrency, blocked chain, these subjects carry a

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 14>certain nuance with them. But one of the things that

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:09.479
<v Speaker 14>we noticed was essentially Circle was sort of the grown

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 14>up in the room and being on the positive side

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 14>of you know, regulatory things and compliance. Obviously a US

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 14>based company now, that was quite positive. But not to

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 14>mention the technology that they're developing. Circle has some of

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 14>the best blockchain cryptocurrency engineers in the world, along with

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 14>some you know, maybe I have to mention Ripple as well,

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 14>because we're Ripple shareholder also, but these are best the

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 14>best engineers in the world working on amazing cutting edge technology.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 14>And so the two things combined, along with of course

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 14>we're a quant driven firm. A number of other factors

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 14>that we considered led us to that decision.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 2>And now it feels as though that grown up in

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the room is bearing dividends when you're looking at the

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Genius act coming into play, when you're thinking about the

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 2>finally some support for stable coins written large when it

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 2>comes from a government perspective, that must have helped the

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>moon music for Yuipo.

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 14>Now and that absolutely absolutely you're right. And of course,

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 14>you know, all the positive signs that I mentioned before

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 14>were really the writing on the wall.

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.959
<v Speaker 14>Of course, nobody knew how the numbers would exactly play out.

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 14>And again this is a pleasant surprise, and the stock's

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 14>doing very well today.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 5>This is liquidity event for you.

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 3>This is a great moment to celebrate a return for

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 3>you and shareholders, or you keep holding, we keep holding.

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 14>We're a different firm. We participate both in the equity

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 14>capital markets offerings as well as the private positions that

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 14>we carry, and so we're holding on to both for now.

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Matt Agus Venture Science founding partner, thank you very much.

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 3>Peloton CEO Peter Stern says he has no interest in

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 3>selling the business while he works on its turnaround. He

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 3>made those comments at the Bloomberg Tech Summit in San

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Francisco yesterday, where Stern outlined his vision for reviving the

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 3>fitness giant. Here he is alongside Bloomberg's Mark German.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.919
<v Speaker 15>My predecessor took a lot of the really hard step

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 15>to right size the company and set us up so

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 15>that now we can execute on the strategy of empowering

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 15>people to live fit, strong, long and happy. And we're

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 15>doing that for six million members in multiple countries. We're

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 15>in a really good place now to build on that

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 15>really strong foundation that was established by my predecessors.

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 5>So what is the strategy?

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 16>What is Peter Stern's strategy for Peloton? Are you going

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 16>to keep it a hardware software services company? Have you

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 16>thought about spinning out the hardware and focusing just on

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 16>the app.

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 15>Yes, we're an equipment company plus amazing software plus human

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 15>coaching with community.

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:39.959
<v Speaker 4>We are not Our future.

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 15>Is not to try to scale the app at the

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 15>expense of that equipment business. We have reignited the innovation

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 15>engine for us as a company, and so focusing on

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 15>the products and the experiences that we're going to offer

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 15>over the next few months is absolutely my number one.

0:39:57.840 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 15>Another one that I think is really important that We're

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 15>focused on is how we use AI to deliver personal

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 15>experiences for our members. That that is another one that

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:10.439
<v Speaker 15>I'm spending an enormous amount of time on, so huge

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 15>priority for us.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 16>Last question for you, Peloton standalone business for years to come?

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 16>Is it potentially an acquisition target for a larger company?

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 5>What do you see as the you know?

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 15>I mean, I was not hired to sell this company.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 15>I was hired to bring this company back to growth,

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 15>to reinvigorate it, and it is happening.

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 4>So there is we are.

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 15>We are a standalone company for years to come.

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Allison ceop to stand there alongside Bloomberg's Mark gum And

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 2>at the tech summit coming up. The Nintendo Switch to

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 2>It has finally been released. We can be breaking down

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 2>what the biggest consumer tech product release of the year

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 2>really means. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 17>Hard to overstate how important the switch is for Nintendo.

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 17>Almost all of its revenue comes from this one product

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 17>or the exclusive games the company develops for it. Its

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 17>popularity since twenty seventeen has driven Nintendo's share price to

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 17>an all time high, and everything's riding on the switch

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 17>to keeping that trend going.

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 4>The stakes were very high.

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Nintendo is us the most successful point in its history.

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 17>And here's why. The Nintendo DS one hundred and fifty

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 17>four million sold, the follow up three DS seventy six million,

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 17>the Wei one hundred and two million sold, the follow

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 17>up We You, Oh Dear, and the Nintendo Switch almost

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 17>the best selling console of all time one hundred and

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 17>fifty two million sold.

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 9>No pressure then, Switch one created a very high hurdle

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 9>for the future consoles to serve us.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 17>So Nintendo's breaking new ground with some subtle shovels.

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 7>It's the first console on Nintendo's history that is kind

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 7>of the same thing, but just.

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 4>A little bit bigger and a little bit better.

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 17>That strategy belies decades of corporate lessons learned sometimes the

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 17>hardest way. But this time the stakes are just too

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 17>high for history to repeat itself.

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 4>It's a cool.

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 2>And now it is here Legions and Gamment is now

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>unboxing trying the new four hundred and fifty dollars gaming

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 2>console for the very first time, removes Cecilia Denistasio joins us,

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 2>now does it live up to the hype?

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 18>The console definitely lives up to the hype. It is bigger,

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 18>It's got better graphics. It's launching with a game, Mario

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 18>Kart World that everybody is so excited for. Gamers were

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 18>lined up around blocks and blocks outside of the Game

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 18>Stop stores in Manhattan and Nintendo New York.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 5>So in San Francisco, Cara, I forgot to tell you this.

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 3>So I was driving to our event Wednesday night in

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.280
<v Speaker 3>June fourth, the night before June fifth, and in Union Square,

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco, Cecilia, people were lining up and I was thinking,

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 3>like they got the date wrong. But I guess it's

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 3>like one of those iPhone moments where people, I guess

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 3>are holding their spot.

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 5>In line overnight. Or is that the level of enthusiasm

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 5>we're talking.

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 4>About, not just overnight.

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 18>I talked to one customer who was waiting outside of

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 18>the Nintendo New York store since April. He had people

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 18>holding his spots wait was bringing him pizza. Yeah, shout

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 18>out to Chicken Dog. He got the first switch to

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 18>at the Nintendo New York store, given to him by

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.800
<v Speaker 18>Nintendo of America president Doug Bowser.

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I hope he got some accolades for standing in line

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 2>for that time.

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.240
<v Speaker 4>That's an extraordinary story and therefore the rewards to chicken

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 4>dog who stood there for how many days and months?

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Is how high fidelity were talking how much we likely

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to see the games come into their own because we

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 2>saw a lot of Mario Kart just then, But there's

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 2>plenty of other zeldas that you can be getting the

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 2>action on.

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so the Switch Too launched with a lot of

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 18>sort of refreshed versions of very popular games from the

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 18>original Switch console. There are a couple of games that

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 18>people are really excited about going forward, including a new

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 18>Donkey Kong game. But people I spoke to, while they

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 18>are very excited about Mario Kart, some people feel a

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 18>little bit disappointed with the launch slate of games. It's

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 18>not quite so big. Nintendo should be filling that out

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 18>over the next year or so.

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Sceire, I think it's important for you to explain to

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 3>audience that this is like a completely different console to

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 3>the original Switch. I have a Switch and I'm always

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 3>remarking on like its performance or lack of performance. But

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 3>inside Switch Too is a really important GPU.

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 18>That's right, So there's a custom and video chip inside

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 18>of the new Switch Too. I'm not sure I would

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 18>say it's a completely different console. I think the form

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 18>factor is very similar. It's capitalizing on the switches innovation,

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 18>being you know, both portable and having a Doctor TV mode.

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 18>It has these detachable controllers called joy cons. You know,

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 18>it's not quite as big a leap as past console

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 18>generations were for Nintendo. A lot of people think it's

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:59.879
<v Speaker 18>playing pretty safe right now, which is a good bet.

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 18>And so the games industry has been having a lot

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 18>of difficulties for the last couple of years.

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:05.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay, go check on that guy that was in line

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 3>since April and we'll make sure he's okay. Bloomberg, Cecilia Dianastasio,

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.359
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much. That does it for this edition

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Technology Real quick. Tesla Right, there was some

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 3>buoyancy in Friday session, Caro, but the main point is

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 3>that on the week, this was the worst week for

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Tesla since February, and in aggregate this is a huge story.

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this one that's going to play out over

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the course of the weekend. Watch for shots fired or

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Not and pulled back on social media of your choice.

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to check out our podcast recap on the

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 2>feud that was. You can check it out online on Apple, Spotify,

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and iHeart this is Bloomberg Technology