WEBVTT - The Biophilia Hypothesis

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuffworks

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, welcome to stuff to Blow your mind.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick and Robert.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Not too long ago we were talking about ticks, about

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>how it turns out you can get a tick on

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>your eyeball sucking the juice from within straight through the conjunctiva.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It turns out you can get all kinds of acquired

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>diseases from ticks, like the acquired meat allergy syndrome, or

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the of course lime disease. We all know about all

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>these other diseases. Of course, the woods are full of

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>not just small animals that can hurt you, but in fact,

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go up to the Northwest or

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>somewhere like that, there might be bears that could be

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a threat to you. And yet people want to go

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to the woods. Well they're lovely, dark and deep, that's

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I mean. I like to go to the woods,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and yet there's nothing in the wood that materially benefits me.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no food there, there's no like mating opportunity there.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of an odd thing to say, but

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no in a biological sense of the word.

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Nothing there for me really except an experience, and yet

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I seek that experience. I love going hiking in the woods. Yeah.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I find the same situation with with my family. We

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>go out in these these little hikes, you know, in

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta area, and yeah, we're not we're not foraging

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>for berries or mushrooms or are hunting small prey. We're

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>just going out there and kind of breathing air, getting

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a little exercise. And um, yeah, I mean you can

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you could break it down into those tangibles and say, well,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting some fresh air, I'm getting some exercise, I'm

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm occupying myself for the morning, I'm getting

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>away from my phone or something like this. But yeah,

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of these like evolved needs, these basic

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>biological needs, they're not they're not necessarily being fulfilled. Yeah,

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the woods, for some reason seem to give you pleasure.

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It the thing you're seeking out, even though there's not

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a really direct that. There might be indirect explanations, but

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there's not a really direct explanation for why your body

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>would be sending you there. Here's another question, why do

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we like pets? Oh yeah, I mean this is a question.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>My wife and I ask a lot about our cat

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>because she's kind of a nightmare. But we so we

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>always have these discussions where like parasites. Yeah, there, she's

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>living in our house, eating our food. Uh, and what

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>does she give back? Like, she's not she's not keeping

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>mice out of our our grain or anything. She's just

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>laying around and frequently attacking my feet and sometimes barfing

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. But then but we still love her

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, She's still enriches our lives somehow. Our dog, Charlie,

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is an absolute parasite. He sometimes can be so annoying,

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but we love this dog. This dog. He brings me

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so much pleasure. I'm so happy to have this dog,

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>even when he's barking at me to take him on

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a walk while I'm trying to work on something, or

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or just eating a bunch of food that we have

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay for. I mean, from a strict material point

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of view, there's not really a reason to want to

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have this thing in my house except that I love him. Yeah. Uh.

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and I bet a lot of people

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>out there right now are thinking, well, I'm not a

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>dog person, I'm not a cat person. I don't like

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to go into the woods. I would I would invite

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you to expand these definitions because I feel like there

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are certainly individuals out there who really don't want to

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>go into the you know, the North Georgia wilderness, but

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they might be very attractive to, say, you know, the

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>desert environments of Arizona, or to other national parks, or

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to the beach or you know, or to tropical islands

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like some. So if your local outdoor environment doesn't call you,

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if specific outdoor environments don't don't call to you, then

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>there have to be there are probably other natural world

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>environments that that do ring your bell. I got one

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>more for you, Robert. Why do people plant flowers in

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>their backyard? Yeah? I mean what maybe you could say, okay,

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>planning flowers in the front yard could be some kind

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of social thing where you're trying to demonstrate your I

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know, wealth and leisure time or something like that.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>People plant flowers in their backyard people nobody can see

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>them except you, and so again it's there there appears

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to they're getting some kind of pleasure from having these

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>plants that are growing, that they're taking care of, and

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the plants don't provide food. They don't provide any material

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>benefit except that you look at them and it makes

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you feel good. Unless you're growing edible flowers. Well you know,

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but wait, is that a thing? I thought? Edible flowers?

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You can buy them at Healthful. You can seriously get

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>a whole container of edible flowers for like, you know,

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen pocks or something. Wait, people eat squash blossoms stuff. True,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they squash blossom, but yeah, a lot of people that

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>do grow flowers you're just growing them to look at

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>them or to appreciate, say the butterflies that are attracted

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and buy them the or the various pollinating insects. Yeah.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So we have all these weird relationships with light forms

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and natural landscapes, with pet animals, with vegetation. And if

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>not a dog or a cat, you think of fish, think, oh, yeah,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, snakes, reptiles, Yeah, the reptiles, whatever your fancy is,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>even a even a weird pet like a scorpion or

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a tarantula. And uh and you know, I'm not calling

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you a weirdo if you have those, but you're probably

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>into the weirdness of it. If you do own a

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>pet scorpion, a tarantula. What about if you own pet ticks, well,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>then you're probably what a A A a partially mythological

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Eastern warlord. Right as you call back to our ticks episode,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>that would be great to have a pit of ticks

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in your house for when, you know, just to threaten

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the children when they're being too unruly, or you just

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have them as pets. And people are like, whoa, you

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have a pit full of ticks. That's horrible, And you're like, no,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't feed anybody to the ticks. I

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just keep them around. I'll have to watch these little

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>guys crawl around. So we're presented with a question here.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>And the humans seek out all kinds of activities and

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>get pleasure from all kinds of activities that don't appear

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to have any erect material benefit, yet we we just

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like them. And so one reason for this could be

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's some kind of cultural thing that we, you know,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we grow up being taught to like walking in the

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>woods or to like looking at flowers, and that's possible answer.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But also many of these things seem very universal, like

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>across different cultures, people have some kind of companion animal

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>relationship or they enjoy certain natural landscapes, they enjoy being

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by certain types of plants, and so another way

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of looking at this, apart from just cultural learning, could

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>be that there's some kind of biological instinct that connects

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>us to other forms of life, even forms of life

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that aren't directly benefiting us by say, providing food or

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>providing shelter or something like that. And this brings us

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to the topic of today's episode, which is a hypothesis

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>that's been around in biology and evolutionary psychology for a

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>few decades now, known as the biophilia hypothesis. And this

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is mainly attributed to the work that there have been

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple people working in this field now, but it's mainly

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>attributed to the work of the American biologist Edward O.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Wilson also known as EO. Wilson. Now, Robert, you recently

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>went to like the E. O. Wilson Center. Is this

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a place, uh from his hometown? Um, it's it's definitely

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>down from his stomping grounds, because Edward O. Wilson is

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it was out Alabama, born in the nineteen nine and

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he grew up in various Florida and Alabama towns. So

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this is very much in his his stomping grounds. The

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Edward Wilson Center is in Freeport, Florida, and um, I

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and my family visited it earlier this month. Uh. And

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's named in honor of Wilson, and it echoes his

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>ideas and values. And he's he's been there, he's done,

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>he's he's visited the center, so he's he's he's very

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>much a part of it's it's ethos. I guess, I

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>guess you would say, so, what's this place like? It's wonderful.

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So my family was vacationing at greaton Each which is

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>close to Destin. But if you need a broader idea

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of where it is, we're talking roughly halfway along the

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>coast between Pensacola and Panama City. And I know that

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>at times, if one is visiting Florida, you're not a

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Floridian yourself. There's sometimes a hesitancy to uh to backtrack

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>away from the beach too much. But there there are

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>some I mean, far from from just this one location,

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>there's some wonderful outdoor. Uh, you know, things to see

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in the States, So so don't be afraid to explore

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Uh. No, I know exactly what you're talking about.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Some people really love the beach. I really love the swamp. Yeah.

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite places that have been to a

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>few times now is uh Coula Springs State Park in Florida.

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>This is where you have this wonderful deep natural spring.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>You have manateees coming in this rich um estuary environment

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>with protected regions. Is this where you saw the leaping fish.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>When we jumping off the leaping fish, they were just

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>leaping around like it was a Disney movie. It was fabulous.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't caught that episode, that's from I guess

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a year so ago. Yeah, but yeah, I go back

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and check out our episode about jumping fish. That was

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a more interesting topic than I expected. Yeah, that one

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and and at times deadly. I'll make sure we linked

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to that one on the landing page for this episode

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. But the

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Edward O. Wilson Center, Yeah, so it's a wonderful indoor

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>outdoor educational center and it really does an excellent job

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of relating biology to two young people. Most of the time,

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>during the course of the year it's it's only open

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to school groups and whatnot. But during the summer June

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and July. It's open to the public on Thursdays and Fridays.

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>If you want to learn more about it, you can

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>go that E. O. Wilson Center dot org. Uh. But yeah,

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's wonderful. There's a giant bird when you first walk

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the door. They're giant animals to crawl on. There's

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a there's an observable bee colony honey Bees. You can

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>check out and try and find the Queen. So if

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it's the Edward Wilson Center, I would expect there to

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be ants there right. There are ants. Yes, there's a

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>huge display on ants, a giant ant that you can

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>crawl on. Yeah. So it's it's it's really wonderful stuff.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I recommend going like honey, I shrunk the kids scale. Yes. Well,

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>so before we get into the biophilia hypothesis, we I

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>guess we should talk about Edward Wilson himself because one

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of the so he's got this book from nineteen eight four,

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe is from the nineteen eighties called Biophelia, where

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he first articulates this idea. Now he would explore it

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>more in a later book. Um, but this book Biophelia

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is a is a book I've read, and it's a

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyable scientific memoir. A lot of what he talks

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>about is like his research on ants and his field

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>work in places like Surinam and Papua New Guinea. And

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so he weaves together these themes from his life and

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>from his work and science and his thoughts about what

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the role of science and society is. The the idea

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that ties this all together is this idea of biophelia

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are innate affiliation with or desire to focus on other

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>living life forms and natural landscapes or lifelike processes. Now,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some ambiguity in there, and we can address that

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>ambiguity later and any problems that might cause for this

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as a hypothesis. But he definitely has a personal way

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of expressing his feelings about this idea, right. It very

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>much connects back to stories throughout his life. Yeah, so

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note that Edward O. Wilson is he's

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the real deal here. He is. He's he is an

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>acclaimed scientist, uh specifically and entomologist, and he is a

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and he is a very accomplished author. Like he he

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>officially retired in but he's just continued to write books,

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>uh like almost every year. I mean, his bibliography is

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>incredible and his books are good. He's one of those

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>science writers who is actually a very very good writer.

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>He's expressive and poetic, but he also gets to the

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>point I think he's one of the better scientists slash

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>science writers in America. Yeah, and then, and he's also

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>very relatable, especially when you see him, you know, in

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>person or a video or a Ted talk. He's he's

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Alabama born, He's very folksy, and he describes himself as

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>being essentially still a child at heart, and he has

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that kind of enthusiasm for nature. So I mentioned he

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was born in an earlier biographical detail that often comes

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>up and he attributes to being what sort of steered

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>him into studying ants is that he was seven years

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>old and he blinded himself in one eye during a

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>fishing accident. You know what. He pulled up a fish

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and the finn got him right, and a spiny finn

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>got him in the eye and blinded him. And so

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he this led him to focus more, he says, on

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>little things, things that he could actually get up, you know,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>get up close to with an eyeglass. So he turned

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to ants entomology, there's a game is key area of research.

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>He attended the University of Alabama and earned his bachelor's

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and masters in biology, and he identified fire ants as

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>an invasive species and reported on the first US colony

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of fire ants. That was while he was in college.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>In college, the early days for him. Um, and this

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is we were just talking about this before we went

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on the air. Here there's a video on YouTube and

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>it was I believe it. It is aligned with the E. O.

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Center. But it starts off narrated by Harrison Ford

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and then and then Attenborough comes in and talks about

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>how how how amazing Edward o' wilson is. So this

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this video is weird for multiple reasons, and one of

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>them is that you hear Harrison Ford trying to sound

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>enthusiastic about something which I don't know if I've ever

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>heard before. The most chronically bored and unenthusiastic actor in

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the history of cinema. And we love him for it.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But he's he's talking about the greatness of the work

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of Edward Wilson, and he still kind of has that

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that lake onic, sad, not very excited edge in his voice. Yeah,

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>even though this is this is clearly like he's clearly

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>passionate about it, like you did this for a reason.

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>But later on in the video, you're following Edward o'wilson,

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like recent Edward O Wilson, Old Edward O. Wilson wandering

0:13:55.720 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>around in the Florida wilderness, coming up to a fire

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ant colony. He reaches down with his bare hand, stirs

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>them up, like scrapes the nest, and they all begin

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to swarm. And then he sticks his hand in the

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>nest and lets them crawl in his hand and lets

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>them begin to uh to attack his hand and uh

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>and then he brushes them off. But it really demonstrates

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>his man his devotion to connecting with the natural world

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and his fascination with the with these insects. Well, it's

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>almost deranged because he's he's like smiling gleefully as they're

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>all stinging and attacking the back of his hand. He's

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>got these hundreds of ants on his skin and he's

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>like each one of these bites is like a hot needle.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But it it just shows you how, you know, how

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>fascinated he is with them like that he would have

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this really kind of a holy moment, Like I kept

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking of St. Francis with the animals. Only instead of

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>touching a you know, petting a lamb, he's petting fire ants.

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>If lambs could sting. Yes, so Edward O. Wilson. Uh So,

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he moved onto Harvard in nine and he joined the

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>faculty there and again he retired in uh. But but

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he remains on as an honorary curator in entomology, and

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>he's during the course of his career again, he's written

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>numerous books. He's received more awards than we can list

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in this podcast, including the Pulitzer Prize, which he I

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>believe received at least twice. Uh. He's received the Ted

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Prize and the U S National Medal of Science again

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>just to name a few. Now, a lot of Wilson's

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>efforts outside of his scientific research over the years have

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>been focused on the idea of conservation and preservation of nature. Yes,

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that we have this rich biodiversity. Everything is connected, and

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to preserve it because if you start, you

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>start pulling things out, you start allowing things to go

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>dark in this epic grid of by a biodiverse um life,

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna have cascading collapses, and you're going to

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to risk tremendous damage to our ecosystem. He

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of reminds me of the influence of somebody who

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed talking about last year in our summer reading episode,

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the early ecologist Alexander von Humboldt, sort of

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the idea of ecology, both focusing on the

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>inner connections between things in nature. How an organism doesn't

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>No organism is an island, It doesn't stand on its own,

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and they all have connected inner dependencies. And we we

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we threaten natural life forms at our own peril. And

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he frames this in two ways. He says,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, destroying natural habitats and destroying organisms that may

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact be some kind of keystone species in a

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>natural ecology that threatens us materially, like these can have

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>negative effects on our health, that can lead to the

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>spread of new diseases, It can make resources harder to get,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>It can cause all kinds of problems for us materially.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But he also emphasizes a lot just just the feeling

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of pleasure we get from nature and how important it

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is to our sense of well being and happiness to

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have intact natural ecologies around us, and this is sort

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of how he gets to the biophilia hypothesis. Alright, we're

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>we will dive into the biophilia hypothesis and discuss what

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's saying. Uh and also some eventually we also get

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to some criticism about it. Thank alright, we're back. So

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Wilson proposed this term biophilia meaning the love of life

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in uh, the short publication back in biophilia the human

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>bond with other species, and he defined this as humanities

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that innate tendency to focus on living things as opposed

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to the inanimate and in effect, he argued for in

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>innate love of nature. Now there you already see some

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>tension in the definitions, right, because in one statement there

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it's talking about focusing on other life forms and lifelike processes,

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and in the other statement it's saying that we naturally

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>love nature. Now, focusing on things and loving them are different.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to be. One of the problems

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>people have raised with the biophilia hypothesis is um that

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it may not be exactly pinned down on exactly what

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis is saying, but for now, we we should

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just try to explain the way it's usually expressed by

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are in favor of the biofilia hypothesis, and

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>they tend to go with the focus idea, right, that

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's that we focus on other living things and lifelike processes,

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>where for some reason we're way more interested in trees

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>than we are in rocks. Now, I should also add

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that the term biofilia itself was used earlier in the

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>nineties sixties by the German social psychologist Eric from to

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>denote a psychological orientation tour nature. But uh, it was

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>really a Wilson who then took it and tweaked the

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.239
<v Speaker 1>meaning and really led to its primary usage today. Well,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should read a passage from Wilson to see

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>what what he has to say about the concept. He says,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the object of my reflection can be summarized by a

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>single word biophilia, which I will be so bold as

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to define as the innate tendency to focus on life

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and lifelike processes. From infancy, we concentrate happily on ourselves

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and other organisms. We learned to distinguish life from the

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>inanimate and move toward it like moths to a porch. Light, novelty,

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and diversity are particularly esteemed. The mere mention of the

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>word extraterrestrial evokes reveries about still unexplored life, displacing the

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>old and once potent exotic that drew earlier generations to

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>remote islands and jungled interiors. That much is immediately clear,

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>but a great deal more needs to be added. I

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>will make the case that to explore and affiliate with

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>life is a deep and complicated process in mental development,

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to an extent, still undervalued and philosophy and religion, our

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>our existence depends on this propensity. Our spirit is woven

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>from it. Hope rises on its currents. Yeah, I like that,

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and so I like that he's he's situating biophilia as

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a sort as a hypothesis to explain something about our nature.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>But it also, I think for him takes on a

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of propulsive meaning about like how we should act.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>That if we act in accordance with with these natural

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>urges to affiliate with nature, we can sort of shed

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 1>this man conquers nature mentality that was present in a

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of human history. And you might wonder, like, Okay,

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so if throughout a lot of human history, we've had

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.479
<v Speaker 1>this mentality of you know, we've got to tame the

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>beast of nature, We've got to make it bend to

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>our will and defeat our predatory adversaries. Wild Is that?

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that tendency throughout human history a challenge to the

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>biophilia hypothesis. I don't know what do you think, Robert, Well,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss this a little bit more as as we go.

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do find it interesting that even in environmental circles,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>even in um, in environmental movements, you see them, you

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>see individuals evoke this idea of mastery over nature. You know,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it becomes this idea of saving the planet, positioning man,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is this as as not completely uh, you know, dishonestly,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>but positioning us as individuals with power over nature, and

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>therefore we should use our power over nature to rain

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>things in and gain control over the situation. I like

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the way you put it there with about the idea

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of saving the planet, Like why do what does it

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>mean when you talk about saving the whales versus not

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>hurting the whales? I mean essentially you're you're saying the

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>same thing, but they're starting with different assumptions. When if

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you're say save the whales, it almost says like, you know,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we have two fates on a scale that we control,

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and we can press one side down or press the

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>other side down, save them or kill them. But really

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that on their own they'd be fine.

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>We are doing things to them to kill them, you know,

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not like they were naturally going extinct when we

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>found them. Yeah, so you could have you can have

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>one person that's saying save the whales, and the other

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>person could say let's live in harmony with the whales.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately they may be arguing for the same thing, but

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that but each argument cast humanity and its role with

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>nature in a slightly different light. Yeah, and so I

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think the the stop harming the environment as opposed to

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>save the environment might be better because it better emphasizes

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we we live alongside all the other

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>organisms in the environment and we need them. They're not

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like pets that we're deciding what to do with. Of course,

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>then again, messaging is aimed at at the listener, and

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be certain groups, certain individuals that

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to react more strongly to son two different

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>arguments and say hey, you have the power to say

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>some whales. Don't want to say some whales. Yeah, that

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>made me feel really good. But if you say, hey, man,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>stop killing the whales, stop hurting the whale, stop wrecking

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>our environment. You know that puts sometimes a negative spin

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>on it that is not going to be as embraced

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>by an individual or group. Yeah. I guess it's the

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>superhero mentality. You want to be the superhero and save

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the bus full of children. It's not all that exciting

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to say that you wouldn't harm a bus full of children. Yeah.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I have one more quote from Wilson I want to

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>read before we move forward. He just because this is

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>just another example of his his beautiful ability to to

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>sum up so many of these environmental ideas. He says,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the living environment is what really sustains us. The living

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>environment creates the soil, creates most of the atmosphere. It

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is not just something out there. The biosphere is a membrane,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a very thin membrane of living organism. Now it's important

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to point out that as a scientific hypothesis, if biophelia

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>has anything to say, it should have something to say,

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>meaning that it shouldn't just be you know, people love nature, right,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because we that's sort of obvious. People do generally tend

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to love nature in one way or another. Even if

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not really an outdoors person, you probably have some

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of preference for natural shapes, for plant environments, for

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>things like that over dead, dry, uninhabited landscapes. I mean,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>think about picture the surface of the Moon or Mars

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Does that look like a place

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to live? No, But at the same time

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is an environment, right. I Mean we

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about Arabia Mountain yesterday, which is a

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>local hiking area in the Atlanta area, and we were saying, oh,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's great, It's like walking on another planet. It's like

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 1>being on the moon. Yeah, it's cool for a couple hours.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not a place that I would want to live,

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, because well, even though there are some plants

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on it, the thing about Arabia Mountain is it's placed

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>near Atlanta where it's this this outcropping of mostly bald

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>stone that has no soil, It has no plants. There

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are a few little groves on it that have trees

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and bushes growing up out of them, but mostly it's

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>just bare rock, and while I'm there, it's cool, but

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's cool for exactly the reason that it's not a

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>place i'd want to stay. Does that makes sense? But

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about the desert? I like the desert,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>but the desert is full of life. I don't know

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>how i'd feel about, well, the desert I've been to.

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, I've been to the Chihuahua Desert and

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>it's full of life. It's fascinating. And the life in

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the desert when you come to like a place where

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a river flowing through a desert and there's green

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>radiating out away from it, the life you see becomes

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all the more precious because of how scarce the greenery

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and things are in other places around Now. A place

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that's just pure sand dunes with no life forms at all,

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's cool to look out for a

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>few minutes, but I don't know if i'd want to

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>stay there. Okay, uh yeah, I guess it's gonna vary

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>from from person to person, but I would love to

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>hear from anyone out there is listening who's like, yes,

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>build me a cabin in a out on the sand

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>dunes and then be happy. Uh, you might have might

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to put a make a stronger argument for it.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Now to your point about this being a hypothesis too

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and about it being scientific scientifically grounded, is that on

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>one hand, yes, biophilia involves an ethos and uh and

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of just commentary on what it is to

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be human and the human experience. But then there is

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>also the the idea that there's at least in part

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a genetically and involved, that this is something that is

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>going to go deeper than just uh, you know how

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we're nurtured, but it's going to get down to our

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>core biological nature. Yeah, this would make it biologically testable.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>It's say, it's that our tendency to affiliate with nature,

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or tendency to focus on life and life like processes

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is somehow determined by our genes, or at least it's

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>primed by our genes, you know, gene primed learning is

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the thing that they often emphasize. So that should in

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>theory be testable in some way if you're clear enough

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about what it is you're looking for. So maybe we

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>should talk about some of the commonly cited evidence by

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>biophilia theorists. What do, they say, are good reasons to

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>think that we have this innate, in inherited tendency to

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>affiliate with other life forms? All right, well, here's some

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of the here's some of the anecdotal evidence. All right. Um, so,

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>first of all, universal appreciation for nature across human cultures.

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Now we've already touched on this a little bit, but

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it's just the idea that would no matter where you go,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be nature and natural elements wrapped up

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>in that culture. And uh, one example that I really

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like is people in very different cultures all over the

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>world tend to like a particular kind of landscape, a

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>landscape that just happens to be similar to the Pleistocene savannas. Uh,

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that we evolved to thrive in the ideal savannah. Yeah,

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and this is related to a concept to known and

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary psychology is the environment of evolutionary adapted nous or

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the e A, which is basically the idea that animals

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to be adapted not to live anywhere on Earth,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>but for a particular landscape or type of environment that

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>shaped their genes. And if that's the case, you've sort

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of like put your chips down on being the kind

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of organism that thrives in this kind of place, and

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>as such, you should have some kind of mechanisms in

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.719
<v Speaker 1>your brain that tell you seek out that kind of

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>place where you play best. Yes, now this I love this.

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh this this theory in this idea about art though,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>because if you spend any time in museums, you run

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 1>across the landscapes and sometimes I'm not I'm not too

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>much of a landscape guy. I tend to walk by

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them. Less there's something really cool going on,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>such as uh, we were just in the last episode

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about or one of previous episodes talking about landscape

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>with the fall of chorus by Uh was it Bosha

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Brugle I can't and uh yeah, So you have one

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>detail of a following mythological figure, but then also just

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a natural landscape with human activity and nature going on.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you do, when you look at a lot

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of these these works of landscape art, you find open

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>spaces of low grasses interspersed with the copses of trees.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>The trees tend to fork near the ground, which is

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to say, if they're tree, their trees you could scramble

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>up into if you needed to get away from something. Uh,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's water close by or in the distance, so you

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like you're going to necessarily dry up or

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you or you'd be able to take a

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>swim if you got overheated, or there's there indications of

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 1>animal life maybe birds in the distance, as well as

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>diverse greenery. And finally, get this, a path or a road,

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a river bank or a shoreline that extends into

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the distance, almost inviting you to follow it m hm.

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And this type of landscape is generally regarded as beautiful,

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>even by people in countries that don't have it. You know,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like your your culture might not have a lot of

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>landscape art, but you're gonna there's a very good chance

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to encounter another culture's landscape art and you're

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get it. You know, you can be completely you

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>could have never seen any you know, say Chinese or

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Japanese landscape art, and then you would view it and

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, yeah, I totally get it, and you're

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just drawn into it. You you want to crawl into

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the painting and run around with the trees. Okay. So

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this is commonly cited anecdotal evidence about the kinds of

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>art and imagery people prefer. Now, I would say, as

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a counter example, as long as we're sticking with anecdotal

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for now, and when we're not claiming to have some

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of strong empirical case, I'd say, just personally, when

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I think about landscape images, I like the most. I

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like mountain images. Yeah, well, you know, one of these

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>things is that to what is often going on in

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a mountain image. I mean, you're gonna have some somebody

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>or something standing at a peak looking out just having

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, mastery over the landscape, being able to survey

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>everything around you and see predators approaching you from a distance.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You could very much argue that that's an evolutionary adaptation

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, because exactly having having the higher ground

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>gives you the ability to see what's coming in in

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>multiple directions. But of course that isn't exactly biophelia, because

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's talking about landscapes, but it's not really talking

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about organisms or lifelike processes. Though. One thing I will

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>point out is that in some of the biophilia literature

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be sometimes a kind of blurry

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>nous or fuzziness about whether we're talking still just about

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>natural organisms or whether this is turning into a preference

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for natural types of landscapes as opposed to I don't

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>know what cities or something like that. Yeah. Now, and

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>another example that comes up is the fact that some

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest human art works are the the various

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>cave paintings that show you know, realistic animals, realistic um

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>human beings and uh and uh, and also just decorative

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>motifs that are clearly inspired by natural world organisms. Totally. Yeah,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you see these these ancient reverent images, and they tend

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to be what they tend to be animals, Yeah, especially

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>prey animals that you might be hunting. Yeah, exactly. And

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, these date back thirty two thousand years in

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the case of some of the French cave paintings that

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, and if you if you consider shell necklaces

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot, which might be stretching the argument a little bit,

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but that can take you back a good hundred thousand years. Now.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Beyond that, there are other anecdotal examples, like landscape architecture

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is full of of of examples of this. I ran

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>across some some material by Bill Brown and Keith Bowers

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and Carol Franklin, all of them landscape architects, and uh,

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and they point out that you're just freakuently going to

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>encounter actual nature inside of of a building. You're gonna

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>counter fish, tanks and plants. You're gonna encounter, uh, you know,

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>ornaments and patterns that read like nature. So it might

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be you say you're in Florida and then you go

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>into a beach resort. But is there going to be

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>some sort of pineapple design, you know, on the pillars

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or on the wallpaper. Uh, you have to take that

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>into account. And uh and oh and then that opened

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Savannah that we crave, well, you could argue that we

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>also create it to some extent in our golf courses.

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>You're right, golf courses. In a way, it's it's a

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>weird combination, like the ultimate mastery over nature. You and

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you enslave nature and just turn it into your own

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>yard game then and bend it to your will. But

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>still you're you're evoking certain natural motifs, you know. Yeah,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I'm so impressed by that. You

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you've golf courses. You just blew my

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Savannah hypothesis. Skepticism out of the water. And uh, I

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>mean it does go to show that the idea you

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have biophilia, there's like overt biophilia and then biophilia in

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that you didn't even realize you were, you were,

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, employing it. Like. Another example of that is

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the symbolic use of nature and human language. Oh yeah,

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all our metaphors are nature metaphors. Yeah, you know a

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of them are very over you know,

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>blind as a bat. Wise is it now pretty as

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.439
<v Speaker 1>a peacock, crazy as a rat, as an outhouse rat? Um, whoa,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>whoa what real expression like that? As crazy as an

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>outhouse rat. And then there's crazy as a rat and

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a coffee Can I love a good crazy rat? Uh?

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Analogy there? But how about a bull in a China shop.

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>A bull in a china shop is good too. Of course,

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>china shops are not very uh, very much part of

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>our revolutionary adapted landscape. But but but the bull is

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the bull, the bull and various other animals as a

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>way to evoke personality, you know. And the thing is

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>these are these are just some of the obvious ones,

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 1>but it gets a lot more elegant, to the point

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're not always aware that you're invoking animal imagery

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>in your language, but it's there. Oh and then I

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>mean we could go on forever here about about spiritual

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>reverence for nature across cultures totally. Yeah, think of all

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the sacred places in global myth, from Edenic gardens to

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 1>sacred mountains to primordial oceans like we discussed in our

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>recent episode about creating a universe. Yeah, I agree with that, though,

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>yet again there were somewhat blurring the original definition. If

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis is supposed to be about organisms, Wait a minute,

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about landscapes or just organisms? Well, let's

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about organisms. Let's look at all those gods and

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>demigods that we have rolling about, uh how much. I mean,

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly there are examples of very anthropomorphic deities that are

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>just pretty much just tall bearded people. But yet even

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in even say Abrahamic tradition, you have what you have

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>winged angels that's invoking uh like you know, hybrid or

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or chimerical imagery. And then you have just straight up

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, you have the world serpents. You have celestial

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>draft wagons in a Chinese mythology that are themselves composites

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of all these various animal motifs, and of course you

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the pantheon of the Hindu deities and you

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>see all of these wonderful animal forms. Now, Wilson himself

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is very much into the idea of serpent imagery throughout

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>human culture. As one example of that, he sites of biophelia.

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But this goes into Wilson's broader definition of biophilia because

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as some people employ the term, they think that it

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>just means like love of other organisms or love of nature.

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Wilson goes with that focus on that our attention is

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>naturally drawn to and stuck on other organisms, especially organisms

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that have some kind of evolutionary relevance for us. And

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples is the widespread biophobia of snakes.

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So for Wilson, biophobia is actually a subset of biophilia.

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got this relationship with other organisms, and so the

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>serpent human mind relationship is something that that he really

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>focuses on. He talks about how common snake dreams are

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>across human cultures, how common snake imagery is in religions

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on all all parts of the planet, how common snake

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>imagery is an art that they're just snakes everywhere. We

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>apparently can't get them off the brain. And then he

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>also compares this to the way that other primates seem

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to react to snakes with with greater alarm and magnitude

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of activity than they would too many other types of

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>animals of comparable size. Oh yeah, I mean, and and

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes beyond beyond that into our various pet animals.

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:41.399
<v Speaker 1>If anyone's ever conducted the cucumber test with a cat,

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>replace the cucumber on the the of the floor behind

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>them when they're not looking. No, they'll turn around, and

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>if they glimpse the cucumber, they'll jump. Whoa, um, I've

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>had I have not had a lot of luck with

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this experiment with my own cat, granted how many times

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he tried. Only when I'm holding a cucumber in the

0:37:58.080 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>kitchen and I looked down and see the cat facing

0:37:59.920 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the other way. So maybe you need longer cucumbers, yeah,

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or just more you know, I should, I should plan

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 1>more in my cat experiments. But then, of course, anyone

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>who's in who's ever in go involved themselves with horses

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>knows you know, how a horse can behave if it

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>sees a snake. I mean, and and I'm not even

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sure about dogs. I assume dogs have strong reactions to

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>serpents as well. Yeah, I'd imagine just the other day

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>my dog Charlie tried to eat a dead one. Oh well,

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we're out walking. It's there on the sidewalk, belly up,

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 1>rotting a little bit and he he saw a snack.

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Do yank him away? You have to get in there. Now.

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Back to the idea of religion and UH in biophilia,

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I also think that that heavily nature a

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>line faiths illustrate this as well, such as like Shinto

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind, you know, the Japanese uh mentality that

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there is uh. You know, there's a there's a spiritual

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>energy and all things. And granted some of that includes

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>rocks but in statues, but it can, you know, certainly

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>include natural forms as well and organisms. Uh. And there's

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>actually an excellent article in the New York Times from

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>this week. By the time you hear it, it it will

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be like a couple of weeks old, I guess. But

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>it's about resurgent religious faith in China and the environmental

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>activism that is coming with it. And it's hardly an

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>underground thing. President Ji jin Ping has a champion to

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>return to interest in Chinese culture and particularly Taoism and Confusism.

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>So and part of this is countering Western influences, but

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he's called for China to return to its roots as

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>a quote, ecological civilization. Now, the article also points out

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that the movement as vote motivating Chinese Buddhists, Christians and

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Muslims as well. And you know, it's it's always I

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think worth reminding everyone that the China is is home

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to fifty five distinct ethnic groups, even if Han is

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the majority there, uh, and they are also numerous religious faiths. Now,

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how this initiative plays into the Chinese government's

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>enabling of heavy polluting industry. I mean, of course they're

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not unique in governments to enable that. But no, no,

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a a fair fair criticism, and I

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's certainly a conflict in uh in China uh

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>presently um. And you know, there are other motivations as well,

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>such as with you know, the u s sort of

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>taking a a lesser role in the environmental leadership, that

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a place for someone like China to step up

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and assume power so there's power here as well. Uh,

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that's that's at stake. But as this article by Javiira

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Sea Hernandez points out, there's there's more of an emphasis

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 1>in these resulting environmental movements on living in harmony with

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 1>nature rather than what is perceived as a Western take

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>on saving the Earth. To come back to the distinction

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about earlier, so it's don't kill the whales,

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>not save the whales, right, Yeah, And I think this

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is interesting in light of by affiliate, because I think

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's very in keeping with the message of stewardship understanding biodiversity.

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time time, we see that that

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:06.280
<v Speaker 1>very savior message, uh, you know, invoked in materials promoting

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Edward Wilson and biophilia that like that Harrison Ford video

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. He describes that quote as an epic

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>battle to save our planet and it will involve swords

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and magic staves. And then you know there are some

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 1>people will actually bring a technology into this argument as well.

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Wilson himself said that the more we understand organisms through science,

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the closer we become to them. Uh. And while technology

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.399
<v Speaker 1>can arguably distance ourselves from nature as well, it can

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>bring us closer. Molecular biology and genetic engineering, for example,

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bring us closer to nature because is a greater understanding.

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And you can even argue that the search for extraterrestrial

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>life too is a biophilic endeavor. Oh, I mean, the

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>CT is almost perfect example of biophilia, if there is

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>any merit to the idea, because like, there are millions

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 1>of planet it's out there that we could be interested in,

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and what are we interested in? We're interested in the

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 1>ones that have life on them. Now that could you

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>could say that there there's just sort of like a

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>cognitively recognized self preservation instinct right that we we say, okay,

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if there's another planet with life on it out there

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>could be a threat to us, could help us so

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 1>that we have motivations based in our cognitive capacities to

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>understand that life has this this value out there. But

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not the only kind of life we're interested in.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>People have been looking for microbes in the soil of

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Mars for decades. Now, you know, we scoop up the

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>soil of Mars and we want to see things alive

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in it. Why do we care so much about that?

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and that's not just scientists who care. I

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.399
<v Speaker 1>understand why scientists care, because it's part of their life's work.

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>But the average person really does care. Usually whether there's

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>life on Mars, that's an interesting question to them. Why. Well,

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>because the answer ends up saying I mean, ends up

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>saying something about ourselves and about life itself, you know.

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But but also I think just because life is interesting. Yeah,

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the presence of life somewhere makes that place so much

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 1>more fascinating than an otherwise dead rock covered in loose

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>soil and stones. This makes me want to see more

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of darkly Edward Wilson type characters and some of

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>our sci fi horror. You know, someone who's gonna really

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>just reach out and touch the xenomorphs and love them.

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess we do see characters like that in the

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>various alien films that Brad Dwarf comes to mind in

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the Alien Resurrection. I can't speak any anything positive by

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the Alien Resurrection. Let's move on al right, Well, let's

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>move on to day. Let's take one more quick break,

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back we'll get into measurable bio

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>biological evidence for biophilia as well as some evidence against it. Alright,

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So so far, we've been talking not super

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>rigorously about science. We've been talking about general anecdotal observations

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about people's behavior, about culture, about our own feelings. And

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but that's not going to prove a scientific

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis and make it a workable theory, right. And and

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Edward Wilson has has been pretty clear throughout his career

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with this that like, there's not strong evidence for it,

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>that there I think he more recently said, yeah, there's

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>stronger evidence for it, but he's not He realizes that

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the evidence is not there yet. A lot of more

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 1>research is required. But some of the measurable evidence that's

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>out there. We've already touched on this a little bit,

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but measurable physiological responses and humans that are exposed to

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just images of snakes or spiders. Right, there has

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>been actual empirical research on this, and and it's comparing

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>our responses as humans to the responses especially of other primates,

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, like, is there some inherited, uh genetic component

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to our reactions to these animals that's not just culturally learned. Yes,

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that in a way, there's just like there's there's awareness,

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>there's an important like cognitive awareness, you know. And to

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:06.359
<v Speaker 1>go back to the the idea of biophobia, this would

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>be a biophobia that Wilson would include underneath his definition

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of biophilia. It would be a natural focus or attention

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that we give to certain types of organisms. Now, another

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:19.919
<v Speaker 1>big area and this is this is certainly an area

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>where there's been a number of of studies over the years,

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and we could easily do a whole episode on it.

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But the importance of sunlight on mood and productivity. Mm hmm,

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Now how would that because obviously the sunlight is not

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like an organism, so right, but it's it's I believe

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the argument is that you're getting into the idea that

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like being being outdoors, being in nature, there are there

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are aspects of nature that yes aren't directly aligned with

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 1>organisms but aren't, but is responsible for organisms that we're

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have this innate connection with. So this is

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>expanding the definition. And I have seen this done and

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>some people who talk about the subject expanding the definition

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to say that it's not just the desire to affiliate

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:05.919
<v Speaker 1>with organisms, but with natural environments, like when people talk

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about how it's people want to seek out water, being

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 1>by the water, or something like that. And that's you know,

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily being by a pool, but being by a

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>natural river or lake or something like that. Uh, that

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>could be yeah, I guess that could be a peripheral

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>or related type of idea. Now another area of measurable

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>effect here ties in with the study by Roger Yuruk

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which found that patients recovering from surgery actually recovered much

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>more effectively, uh if they were viewing trees and shrubs

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to those that would just had a view

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 1>out their window of a brick wall. They also ended

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>up taking half the painkillers and made half the nursing calls.

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So there was like a change in their behavior and

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 1>not just in their reported affect but in what they

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>actually did. If they could see some vegetation, Yeah, if

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they just if they could just see some trees and

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you know, presumably maybe some squirrelding birds

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in there as well. So this is part of a

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>broader body of literature on the benefits of vegetative environments.

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of research like this, some of

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it also associated with the same guy, uh, Roger Ulric

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and across different studies. People have this positive aesthetic reaction

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 1>to plant filled environments, and these environments are usually found

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to have some kind of stress reducing effect or somehow

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this otherwise restorative effect on mood and on behavior. And

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:35.239
<v Speaker 1>this goes beyond vegetation as well. For example, people tend

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to report reductions in stress or show fewer stress behaviors

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in the presence of an aquarium that has live fish

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in it. Or how about the often report. I mean,

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to tell you about all of the

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>tons of studies that report the health benefits and mood

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>benefits of exposure to pets, companion animals, you know, lowering

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>your blood pressure and all, you know, all the stuff

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like that over the years. Yeah. I think it's one

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that you you you have these hospital

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:04.280
<v Speaker 1>animals that make the rounds and just meet in Greek people, uh,

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>just the idea being that this will this will improve

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>their their condition at least in you know, a small sense,

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>but a measurable sense. One other thing I've read about

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this interesting is the idea of humans preference for certain

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>geometric patterns. For example, uh, so, geometric patterns can be

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>expressed in terms of what are called fractal patterns. That

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 1>are repeating patterns that are often said to resemble designs

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>found in biological organisms and in nature. So if you

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>look down at surfaces of the earth from above, say

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 1>winding rivers through a plain or how mountain, how you know,

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the drainage areas in mountains form these these spiky patterns

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>looking down from above, Or if you look at the

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>branches of trees, or of ferns, or of the spirals

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and flowering plants. I mean, it gets into the golden ratio, right,

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean the idea that if you if you do

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:02.760
<v Speaker 1>any image editing out there, you you know, you often

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>bring in one of these overlays. Even sometimes like I

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>use the rule of thirds one a lot, which is

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a very inorganic way of of breaking up your photo.

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But you can also bring in essentially a snail shell,

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so you can see this curve. Because so you end

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 1>up with situations where people are like, they may not

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>be actually thinking this, but essentially they're looking at an

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.240
<v Speaker 1>image and saying, oh, this this photograph of race cars

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is great, but I'd love it a little bit more.

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:31.919
<v Speaker 1>It evoked an image of a snail shell. You know. Now, yeah,

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't think it consciously but people do. In

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>some studies show preferences for fractal patterns, geometric fractal patterns

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>at certain levels of of density branching, and these basically

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are said to correspond to the most common patterns seen

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in natural organisms. So if you're thinking about branching trees

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:56.359
<v Speaker 1>or mangrove roots or things like that, these are geometric

0:49:56.440 --> 0:50:00.399
<v Speaker 1>patterns that are brains seem to prefer looking at. Now.

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, one question about that is if we're responding

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:07.919
<v Speaker 1>to geometric patterns through some innate preference in our brain.

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not just culturally learned, but we we've got these

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:15.240
<v Speaker 1>inherited genetic preferences for things that spike at this angle

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>this many times. One wonder is if that means you

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>could trick your brain into satisfying any kind of biophilic

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>impulse to whatever extent that is real, just by looking

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>at dead geometric patterns or things like that that simulate

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is we notice in nature that we like, Yeah,

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think here we get we get down to

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this situation where biophilia it's kind of like the echoes

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of biophilia throughout our our life and our culture and

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 1>our creations. Even things that don't you know, aren't overtly

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a statue of an animal or the the the avocation

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of of an animal's form. Uh, there's still aspects of

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it there that are resonating through most of what we do. Now.

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time to talk about some criticisms of

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea, because as if you if you can't tell,

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got some reservations about biophilia. At the same time

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that I find it strongly intuitively persuasive, I also recognize

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that the idea it's got some problems. So I wanted

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk about one study I read that was published

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>INN and the General Environmental Values, which is a peer

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 1>reviewed environmental ethics journal by the author's joy and to

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Block called Nature and I are to a critical examination

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 1>of the biophilia hypothesis. And like I said, while I

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I intuitively respond to a lot of what Wilson and

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:36.359
<v Speaker 1>people like him have said, I think this article makes

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>some good points. So they're arguing against the biophilia hypothesis.

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And they don't argue that we don't have natural inherited

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>tendencies to focus on living things. But they're more talking

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 1>about whether biophilia as a commonly understood idea is a

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>coherent scientific construct. So this is the author's take. Biophilia

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is presented as a hypotheists and they say, okay, that's fine,

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>because when you're at the hypothesis stage in science, you're

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>not saying this is a proven theory or something like that.

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:09.719
<v Speaker 1>You're just saying, we're speculating about something that appears to

0:52:09.760 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>be the case. Let's do some experiments and find out

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's true. That would be fine. But there's one

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>key criterion for a hypothesis, and that's that it needs

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to be falsifiable. Now, this is buying into one particular

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:26.839
<v Speaker 1>theory about the demarcation problem separating science from pseudoscience. We've

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about that before, but this is a very commonly

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>accepted solution of the demarcation problem. A hypothesis should be

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a statement that you can come up with some kind

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>of way of showing whether it's true or false, that

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you could prove it false. Now, they turned to the

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>biophelia definition that's often offered by EO. Wilson, which is

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>quote the innate tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes,

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and they break that into three key parts, which is

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a the innate tendency be to focus and see on

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>life for lifelike processes. So they start by talking about

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>life or lifelike processes, and this is a good point,

0:53:05.800 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they say, Okay, so how is life like defined? The

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis is often expanded to include things like, we've been

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about natural landscapes water features as the object of biophilia.

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So is a waterfall an object of biophilia? Obviously a

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>waterfall is not alive, but biophilia theorists sometimes assert that

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>moving water features and other things are lifelike enough that

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 1>they can be grouped under the biophilia rubric. And on

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what basis do we conclude that? Like what gets ruled in?

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And do people looking at a waterfall really start thinking

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of it in the same way they would think of

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>an organism. I'm not sure that there's strong evidence for that. Well,

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, if you take the waterfall and

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you just think about flowing water, I mean, flowing waters

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is a habitat for organisms. Uh, And then you know,

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in any place where there's some sort of a dynamic

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 1>with flowing water, there's a potential for the the capture

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and consumption of set organisms. Yeah, I see that but

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that that almost begs a greater expansion of the statement

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of the hypothesis. Right, it seems like that would make

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it an innate tendency to focus on life or lifelike

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>processes or environments that could sustain life or lifelike processes. Okay,

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But then you can also come back and say, what

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is a what is a branching uh, waterway, but a

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of branching vein through a body, Like there's the

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:33.960
<v Speaker 1>form of the flowing water. Evoke the flow of blood

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>through an organism or the you know, the chambers inside

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 1>a plant. I mean, that's a good point, but I

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 1>guess I guess the question would be are people really

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing it that way? Like, is that is that entering

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 1>their minds or are they just responding to water because

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you get thirsty, yeah, or it's just really loud,

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:56.759
<v Speaker 1>or they just like these moving features, or there's some

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 1>other thing about it that's yeah. So I think that's

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a decent point to raise. The next thing they focus

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on is the idea of focusing. So in that definition,

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:10.399
<v Speaker 1>there's some wishy washing us about what the human who

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:14.840
<v Speaker 1>experiences biophilia does, Like sometimes biophilia is treated as the

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:18.719
<v Speaker 1>desire to quote affiliate with other organisms. And to me

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that means we would assume it to mean that you

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>want to be near them, you want to look at them,

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:26.399
<v Speaker 1>you want to touch them, you want to interact with them.

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But other times there's this more neutral word focus used.

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And and because of our biophilia, the ideas we focus

0:55:34.480 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on living organisms, they sort of command our attention living

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>organisms or lifelike processes. But they point out that there's

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 1>there's not necessarily consistency here. Ulric seems to define biophilia

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as a positive affiliation with life forms. Wilson himself includes

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>biophobia within the definition of biophilia, and one of his

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 1>primary examples, as we talked about, is this nearly universal

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 1>mental obsession with snakes and frightening snake imagery. Um, so

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they say that, you know, this part of the definition

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:06.840
<v Speaker 1>really does need to be more specific. We need to

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:09.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out what we're talking about here. Is it just

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>what we like or is it what gets our attention

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or what is going on? Well, and this raises questions too,

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it makes me think about about deer hunters,

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, which you can relate to. Having grown up

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:24.359
<v Speaker 1>in the South in Tennessee. It was not a deer

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:27.239
<v Speaker 1>hunter myself, but nor I have known many. Yeah, and

0:56:27.360 --> 0:56:30.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a it's sometimes tricky, I think for for people

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 1>who aren't affiliated with that culture or haven't really given

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it much thought to understand. But there is a love

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.279
<v Speaker 1>for nature, and you're gonna love for deer, I think

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>with with a lot of maybe even most, maybe all

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 1>deer hunters. You know, there's a and there's this, at

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 1>times kind of difficult to understand reverence for the deer.

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see like deer stickers on people's car

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and the trophies of their heads, um, you know, hung

0:56:55.360 --> 0:56:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in their homes, almost with a like a religious zeal,

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 1>almost like it's some some shent uh you know antler god, Well,

0:57:02.600 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it mimics the behavior of our ancient ancestors.

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Who would you who might, in some kind of religious

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>way take pieces of an animal that they had killed

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>primarily for material resources. You know, you'd want its meat,

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd want its hide for clothing or something like that.

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But what do you do with the antlers? They become

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:25.480
<v Speaker 1>some kind of religious artifact, your tools? Yeah, all right,

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Well what about part A that innate part? Right? Then

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this is another important part. So this means that biophelic

0:57:31.880 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>tendencies are are not learned through culture, but they're inherited biologically,

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and this would generally be accepted to mean that they

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 1>had adaptive value in the past. Right, they served us

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>some purpose and so we adapted to favor them. And

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>there's not always agreement on what form these adaptive mechanisms take,

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what whether they stem from the same general mechanism, or

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what their relative importance is. So the authors reformulate the

0:57:57.880 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis to fit all the nuances as they've just brought in,

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes there is a set of genetic predispositions

0:58:05.680 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of different strength, involving different sorts of affective states toward

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of lifelike things. You can see the problem here, right,

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is becoming so broad as to accommodate almost anything,

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes really hard to falsify since there's just

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>so much wiggle room in that in that definition of

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the proposition, and it creeps more towards just a pure

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>ethos or philosophy as opposed to something you can scientifically

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>test for. Right uh now, To be fair to the

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>biophilia theorists, the authors point out that this could be

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a sort of unreasonably broad definition. Uh, that's an artifact

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that they're trying to synthesize the work

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of different researchers working within the biophelia framework, and that

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's possible for one individual scientist maybe to have a tighter, sturdier,

0:58:52.480 --> 0:58:55.840
<v Speaker 1>more testable version of the hypothesis. Though the authors don't

0:58:55.880 --> 0:58:58.919
<v Speaker 1>really seem to favor any of the particular ones they've

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>come across. But if so, I think what they're thinking

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen is that biophilia theorists should identify the leaner,

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>more specific hypothesis and unify their experiments underneath it. They

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 1>also they attack some of the specific evidence given for

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the common legs of the biophilia hypothesis, For example, the

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 1>savannah preference hypothesis, the idea of us a loving companion

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>animals and are quote vegetated settings. You know that we

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>surround ourselves with potted plants and things like that, even

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>though there's no apparent material reason or benefit for doing so.

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And whether or not these criticisms of the lines of

0:59:37.240 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 1>supporting evidence are correct, I'm somewhat persuaded by their criticism

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the biophilia framework definition. Uh, And at the same time,

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I still feel persuaded by something about the general idea

0:59:49.240 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>um Like I, I do feel this urge to connect

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with nature in some sense, and in the same way

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about Mars. Obviously, I think life commands

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>our attention in a way that non living matter really

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>does not seem to, even if it's not of immediate

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>relevance to our survival or something like that. But I

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe this could be culturally learned. I'm open

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to that possibility. So I'm somewhere in the middle on biophilia.

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I find it intuitively persuasive, but I also recognize that

1:00:19.800 --> 1:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there could be a lot of problems with how it's

1:00:22.080 --> 1:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>framed as a scientific proposition, and maybe it needs to

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be narrowed down and made more specific and more falsifiable. Yeah,

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on a rational um level, I'm I'm I'm, I think

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm right there with you. But then if I if

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I look at it more emotionally, you know, and uh,

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, philosophically, I guess I tend to decide with biophilia,

1:00:45.800 --> 1:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>especially since I my son is so biophilic, you know,

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he's just he loves animals. So much like he's not

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in cars or trucks or superheroes, but it's just

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just animals. He wants to draw animal as he

1:01:00.360 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to his the toys he has are generally animal related.

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>He needs to see animals. And and I do pick

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that apart. I think, well, how much of this is,

1:01:09.800 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, something that we have have nurtured in him?

1:01:12.280 --> 1:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>How much of this is just you know, has to

1:01:15.000 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>do with his you know, with with nature itself and

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>something out of our hands. Um, yeah, Like where does

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it come from? Is it? Is it biophilic and just

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a mirror like learnable sense or is it something deeper,

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>something that that does have an origin in his genes?

1:01:33.600 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So here's the real question. The thing we need to

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>test for is we need to completely remove some human

1:01:39.280 --> 1:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>test subjects from all culture and put them on another

1:01:43.400 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>planet and never communicate them with them at all, except

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we put some hidden cameras in and we give them

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to either live in a in a in

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a sterile environment that satisfies all their material needs and

1:01:57.000 --> 1:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>gives them uh, food and entertainment and stuff like that,

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>or an environment that's full of house plants and cats.

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And dogs and uh and gardens and flowers and access

1:02:09.160 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to walks in the woods. If they would go for

1:02:12.480 --> 1:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the ladder, it does raise the question why do they

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>want that? What what is telling them to do that

1:02:19.240 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>instead of just go to the place that meets all

1:02:21.320 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>their material needs. You know, in discussing like sci fi scenarios, here,

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't help but look back on the fabulous Bruce

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>den movie Silent Running. Oh yeah, where he's trying to

1:02:34.520 --> 1:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>save the plants. Yeah, and he's yeah, this is the

1:02:37.160 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>situation in this movie. It's a great movie. See if

1:02:39.440 --> 1:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you haven't, But Bruce Dern basically plays

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like the the last biophilic human in our civilization. Like

1:02:47.960 --> 1:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the forests of Earth are gone, and they're only maintained

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>within these giant biospheres aboard a series of they're not spaces,

1:02:56.640 --> 1:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they're space ships, but they're kind of just in orbit.

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And and then the the ruling comes up, the orders

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>come up that they need to jettison and detonate all

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of the forests. Bruce Durn's character goes rogue and uh

1:03:08.560 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, takes off towards Saturn with the last

1:03:11.760 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>forests of Earth. It's the adult version of the lorax

1:03:15.880 --> 1:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>he speaks for the trees um. But yeah, it in

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that case, like he is the that's a vision of

1:03:23.440 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a humanity that has lost its biophilia, that has drifted

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>so far from it that they no longer feel and

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>any attachment, and they no longer recognize the value of

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the natural world. Concrete, plastic, and steel environments are good enough. Yeah, yeah,

1:03:37.440 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like cubes of food as opposed to the stuff that

1:03:39.600 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Durn's character is growing. I mean, that's part of

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>my intuition. I just can't see us ever being cool

1:03:45.000 --> 1:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>with that. I just can't. But you know, maybe it's

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to it's hard to do an experiment to really

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>test that. But maybe somebody will come up with a

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>good way. So my my outlook on biophilia now is

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I recognize their problems with the a work, but but

1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it could be salvaged. I think people could

1:04:03.880 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>come up with a with a leaner, more falsifiable version

1:04:07.600 --> 1:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the hypothesis and test the dickens out of it. All. Right, Well,

1:04:12.320 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>there you have it, biophilia. Hopefully we provided a nice

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>introduction to this if you weren't familiar with it, uh

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and and and if you're familiar with it, we uh

1:04:22.200 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we helped remind you about some of the I think

1:04:24.760 --> 1:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the important tenants of it. You know, certainly

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the potential problems with it, but also I

1:04:30.360 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>think the overall positive message of biophilia as a you know,

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>bio diversity focused view of humans humanity's interaction with nature. Now,

1:04:41.840 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>take your dog out in the woods and get some ticks. Yeah,

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>get out there, all right. Hey, If you want to uh,

1:04:48.280 --> 1:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>check out more episodes of stuff about your Mind, head

1:04:50.600 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on over to stuff to a Boil your Mind dot com.

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the mother ship where you will find uh all

1:04:55.080 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts attached in wonderful biospheres and you can

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to everything back to the very beginning.

1:05:02.720 --> 1:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>You can check out blog post videos as well as

1:05:05.880 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>links out to our various social media accounts so as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Humbler,

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and who knows what else. And if you want to

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us directly, you can email us

1:05:15.680 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot com

1:05:29.520 --> 1:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics. Does

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff works dot com