WEBVTT - Is democracy impossible?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>learn the stuff they don't want you to know. Hello,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the show. My name is Matt. They

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>call me Ben. Our compatriot Knell is away for the moment,

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but never fear. Our super producer Paul Decont is here.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Most importantly, you're here, and you are you that makes

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff they don't want you to know. Now, you

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>may recall our very first episode ever on a gentleman

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>named Edward Berney's one of the most important and uh

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>slightly obscure, at least until our episode came out thinkers

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in history right, Yes, the the man commonly known as

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the father of public relations, the most famous, the most

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>famous relative of Sigmund Freud in our modern age. Both

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of those things are true. If you're a fan of

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this show and you haven't listened to that episode of

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, it is one of the few that Matt

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Nike had agorically recommend you listen to and share with

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your friends, family, and colleagues. Without going too far into

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens in that episode, Let's put it this way.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Edward Bernets is the reason that you and your loved ones,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>as well as your enemies to probably practice several things

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that seem normal today seem normal, Yeah, because you know

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that very very quickly. It's insane how quickly people can

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>become accustomed to something, something that is not normal, and

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden becomes normal to the average individual,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to an our community perhaps or even civilization as a whole,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>something that was never done before and now it's normal. Right. Yeah,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's likewise astonishing how rarely we question bizarre things. So

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>often we hide behind the idea of tradition as a species,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, or so often we uh, we don't ask

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>fundamental questions about why something has framed the way it

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is or presented the way it is. For instance, why

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>do we eat bacon for breakfast? This was not the

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>case for the vast majority of human eras on this planet.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Why are we actually at war with a particular country

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at any given time? And one that I always go

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>back to as as a strange example here is Matt,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>why why do people wear ties like neck ties? Oh? Well,

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it's because of the form. It's all about form, not

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>so much function. Uh yeah, it just looks really good

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to have that line going down the chest. Someone's read

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of fashion guides. I see, yes, make it work.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So there, Yeah, that's that's a good point. We did

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier on a different show that we've worked within the

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>past called brain Stuff. We looked at the origin of

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>where neckties come from. And Matt, you are spot on correct.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It serves no function. It's not I was talking from

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that took us. It's not a it's not a functional thing.

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>That took us is more functional than an actie. So

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>leading to this, why why does a country work a

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>certain way? Folks think about the government in the country

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that you live in today or the governments in countries

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>used to live in. Right, how closely does the government

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in practice adhere to the theory of government as outlined

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in your country's constitution or other documents? Yeah, wres this?

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You know? Getting it right? For some of the most part, well,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>most people, regardless of where they live, will generally agree

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that there is at least some degree of difference between

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the government on paper and the government in practice. Right,

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases this can seem like a relatively

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>obscure difference, right, or it can seem like a matter

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of persnickety, nitpicking interpretation. But speaking of obscure, today's episode

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>focuses on another figure, sort of like bern As, another

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>profoundly important, equally obscure historical figure, Walter Lippmann. Now when

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we say he's obscure, we mean to the public, to

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the every day Joe and Jane walking around. Uh, they

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>probably don't know who Walter Lippan is. I did not

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>know who this person was until we started thinking about

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this episode and reading some of the materials. Um just

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>like Edward Berne. But but these gentlemen were very much

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>well known within circles of the powerful. I think we

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>should at least like put that out there right like

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they were. They were the guy. Yeah, yeah, the we were.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because before Paul, Matt and I went on

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>air today, I brought in a a fancy glass for

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>my typical coffee because we are talking about the elite,

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like an absentthe glass. Gotta be honest

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with you, Well, I'll tell you what it is. Truth

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be told. Not as convenient as the regular mug or

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>cup that I would typically use, but you know tradition.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So so here are the facts. About Walter Lippmann. As

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we said nowadays, Walter Lippman is, let's say, obscure enough

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that were you to walk on a on the average

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>city street and ask someone you know identify the following figures, say,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you know Neil Armstrong, probably know that, No, he's some

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of astronaut. Maybe at the least identify you know,

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the big current or past presidents. They probably probably at

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>least recognized the name of past presidents, right. Uh. But

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>if you said, who's Walter Lippman, they would say does

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he Does he on the grocery store? I don't know, unless,

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, you were asking someone in Harvard, and then

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the answer might very well be I think that's a

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>building on campus. I'm pretty building. But as you said, Matt,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>in his day, this man was profoundly influential and remains so,

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>so let's get to know him a little bit. Walter

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Lippman was born on September eight nine, eighteen eighty nine,

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in New York. He was a child of privilege. He

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>attended the Sacks School for Boys before matriculating into Harvard.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Now Sacks by the way, s A C. H. S.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You might recognize that name somewhere with a goldman in

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>front of it, like golden sax yes um. And this

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is where he studied at Harvard under the famous philosopher

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and novelist George Santayana, who was a teacher of numerous

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>other numerous other people who went on to become literary lions.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, T. S. Eliott would be one of the

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>most famous examples. Then in May of nineteen ten, he

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>began his career in journalism as a cub reporter with

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the Boston Common after he dropped out of his the

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>master's course that he was taking at Harvard University. And

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this this is interesting because we found a couple of

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>different things in the research. Will find many biographies to

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>say he graduated right in nineteen ten, and then you'll

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>find other writers who say that he dropped out. Yeah,

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so either way, he did go to Harvard. At some

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>point he was assistant to the philosopher novelist George Santiana. Uh.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen thirteen, Lippman co founded a paper called The

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>New Republic. It's a liberal American magazine. The published articles

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on politics and and the arts and UH. In that

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>same year he published a book called A Preface to

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Politics and his writing, his philosophy at this time, in

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this early phase, garnered the attention of one Woodrow Wilson.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Just a little side note there about the New Republic

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time when he founded it, in quite for

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>quite some time afterwards, it had a fairly small readership

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of only you know, ten to twenty thousand people. But

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the people reading that magazine were the important people, right,

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the bankers, the professors, the jurists. And in nineteen fourteen

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Lippman was appointed as an advisor to President Wilson Woodrow Wilson,

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and during this time he helped the president draft a

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>famous speech about World War One and was called the

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Fourteen Points. You can read it in full online today.

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So Lippman was at this point an interventionist in a

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>largely isolationist society. And what what we mean by that

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the majority of the US public did not

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:49.479
<v Speaker 1>support foreign intervention because there was this feeling that, well, one,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>why should we get involved, right, It's it's imperialist on

0:09:53.920 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>some level. And two we're separated by oceans, right, and

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no imminent threat at this point in this isolationist society,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Lippman was an interventionist. He was one of the people

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>who argued that it was both rational and advantageous for

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the United States to enter into World War One in

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>some capacity or another. He wrote propaganda that was meant

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to sway the needle on public support. Right, because in

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>a representative democracy, the theory goes that the voters must

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>support a large scale government action, or at least the

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>majority of voters must support something for it to occur. Yes,

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>because the representative part of that government, the the people's

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the government in Congress, they are the ones

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that actually declare war in an act war, especially at

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>this time for World War One. So you had to

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>get the voters and the people's voice to say, yes,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>let's do this. And so Lippman and Edward Bernese both

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>worked for what was called the Committee on Public Information.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I love that name, the Committee on Public Information. And

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>this was a wartime propaganda institution built to do two things. First,

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to spread or propagate pro intervention, pro war literature, art, music,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>anything in pop culture, as well as academic arguments for

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>intervention on the part of the US. And then the

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>second task was to suppress, discredit, or destroy anything that

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>was anti war. So if you uh, just pulling an

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>example out of thin air, right, and one way in

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>which something like this might occur still happens today, it

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>happened for decades after, uh, would be Let's say there

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>are two there are two art galleries in a town,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and one of them has has a featured artist who

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is glorifying the moral duty or imperative to save people

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in another country. And this this gallery is filled with

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this one artist work. And then in the other gallery, uh,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there's someone who has a exhibits about imperialism and the

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>unintentional tyranny of intervening, whatever your intentions, in a culture

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't understand and a civilization that never asked for

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>nor needed your help. What this sort of operation would

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>do would not be to have the government openly shot

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>them down. You would have critics from newspapers praising whichever side,

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter what side we're talking about. We have

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>critics praising the interventionist if they want to intervene, or

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>praising the isolationists, and then you would have them also

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>dismissing or ignoring the other side of that cultural argument.

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's like it's almost this um uh soft aggression

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tactic that that is employed by this stuff, and in

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a weird way, it's it's not fully going after a

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of times, at least from what I was reading

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this research, the the Committee on Public Information wouldn't necessarily

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>physically go after anyone, but they would use the media to,

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>like you said, ben, completely ignore or just trash something

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't agree with. Right, yes, exactly. And the

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>most important part of that is in these sorts of operations,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know the ultimate force behind this trend. It

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>would appear to be and this is the most important part,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it would appear to be an organic consensus arrived at

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>by every Jane John and Jimmy Smith in America, just

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to pick I don't know, ridiculous. It's almost like the

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>rotten tomato score. If the tomato score is at a

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>certain height, or you know, if it's in the eighties,

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, man, okay, I'm gonna go see that.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have to read the stuff about it.

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>If it's in like the thirties or twenties, and then oh,

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm never probably not gonna go see that trash because

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't have time usually if you're the average person

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to go through and read every single review now you

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>want the bottom line the best news, Explain it to

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>me now, because I'm almost off the elevator, right or

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the light almost turned green, as the case would be

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>from any communities, only have twenty bucks to spend, and

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I gotta choose where I'm gonna spend it. Even better,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Lippman also traveled the world and wrote extensively, prolifically. That's

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that's such a fantastic dream life. You know. I think,

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>here I am in Vienna, and here was my thoughts

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Viennese. Oh, man, you want to be Anthony

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Boordain so badly, don't you? Lippin know you? Oh you

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>know what? You know what? Uh? A little food centric?

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, Yeah, I think he's doing a great job

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>being Anthony boording Okay, but but I appreciate it. Yeah,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd love Who wouldn't love to travel the world and write?

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Yeah, I can't think of anyone. So

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Lippman was no exception to that, that rule that we

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>have arbitrarily decided as almost universal. So then on September eight,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>n Lippman's column for The New York Herald, which was

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>called Today and Tomorrow. I love that title. It first appeared,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and eventually this was syndicated to more than two and

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty newspapers within the United States and then another twenty

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>five other nations. And then it also won two Pulitzer Prizes,

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>one in ninety eight and another in nineteen sixty two.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So in his day, Walter Lippman was a world famous

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>columnist for the New York Times and other papers of note,

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and overall the world held his opinion in tremendously high regard.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>He lived amid New York's elite and therefore a a

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the world's elite. He dined with presidents, he

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>would write speeches for them, He advised them in formal

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and informal capacities. He was a true man behind the curtain.

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what he truly believed in. Right, Yeah,

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this so well and good? But why why is he

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the subject of today's episode? Uh? Is he them? Is

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>he that? They? And stuff? They don't want you to know.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>What did he actually leave? We'll tell you after a

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>word from our sponsor. So let's bring the rubber to

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the road. Matt Walter Lippman is responsible for creating, popularizing,

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>coining several terms that you have almost certainly used at

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>some point in your life, friends and neighbors. The first

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>one is the well let's let's do let's do one

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that's little us specific first, that's the Cold War. He

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is the person who popularized the term Cold war with

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a series of articles Inn called the Cold War right

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. When you title something, it's probably gonna stick. Uh.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>In those articles, he was speaking out against President Truman's

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>policy of containment. Uh. And the more popular term that

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you have you have obviously heard. There's no one who

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>has not heard this, this term, at least no one

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that speaks English has not heard this term. And that

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is stereotype. Yes. One of his works, Public Opinion, It

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>begins with the world outside and the Pictures in our heads.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the chapter that introduced his idea of a stereotype,

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what what a stereotype is? And Uh. It explained how

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>public opinion was formed and how it was manipulated because

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of what we trust as what he called an authentic messenger. So,

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned before, Littman was working um with the

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Committee on Public Information also called the Creole Committee, and

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>they were influencing public opinion by censoring information that was

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>anti war they're also producing thousands of these pro war

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>pamphlets and cartoons and magazines, movies, all kinds of media. Also,

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the USA enter World War One or World War let's say,

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seventeen it wasn't a one at the time, nobody,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>nobody was waiting for the sequel. But the whole idea

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the United States said it was not going

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to enter World War One no matter what, and this

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>committee is sitting there actively trying to make it happen. Right. So, this,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>this idea of a stereotype, the picture in our heads

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>versus the world outside is is the subject of a

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>great deal thought in public opinion in the Lippman book.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>In this work, he attempts to explain how these pictures

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that arise almost spontaneously in people's minds. He was hoping

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to explain how those come about. The most simple way

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to say it would be that, according to Lippman, we

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>all live in these second hand worlds, and we live

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this way because we are aware of much more than

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we have ever personally experienced. You know, we like Neil Armstrong,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>we know that astronauts exist, but many people have never

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>met and we'll never meet one we know that billionaires exist,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but many people have never met and will never meet.

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>When we know that what Reddit loves this joke about

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this town in Germany that everyone says doesn't exist. Maybe

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a better example would be Bhutan. You know, the nation

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of Bhutan exists, but many people will never go there.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>According to this, Lipman's argument is that our own personal

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>experience is primarily second hand, primarily indirect. We read about things,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>we watch things about things, and hope that the people

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>who have experienced it directly are telling us something objective, rational,

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and accurate. Yeah, in other words, the truth. That's why

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>when you get Mermaids on Discovery Channel, you're like, what,

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, sorry, I think enough time has passed for

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>us to tell people we've talked about it before. So

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>here's another aspect. What did he think of democracy? Because

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you see, Lippmann wouldn't have considered himself just a journalist.

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he considered himself a public philosopher, and most

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of his work centered around the concept of democracy in

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>all its forms, representative democracy, so on. So what did

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you think of it? Unfortunately it's a terrifying question. Early

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on he was optimistic about this American US flavor of democracy.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>He embraced what we will call a Jeffersonian perspective. He

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>believed that the American public would become intellectually engaged in

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>political world issues and that they would fulfill the ultimate

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>role of the public right, which is to be an

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>educated electorate. Not only does everyone vote, but everyone understands

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the issues of play and why they're voting the way

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that they do. If you ask them who the h

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>if you ask them who the county commissioner is going

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to be and why, they would know. If you ask

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>them about humanitarians spending in you know, Yemen or in

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Mauritania or something, not only would they know their position

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>on it, but they would know why, Yeah, do you

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>support engaging Germany and defending Poland or you know, some

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>something to that effect. And you would hope that the

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>person would come back with a reasoned argument about why

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>or why not. That would be nice. Sure, well that

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>was that That's the optimistic view. But with the rule

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of industrialization weighing heavy in his mind the events leading

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to World War Two and the spread of totalitarianism, Lippman

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>came to reject this view. Instead, he felt that nobody

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>was questioning fundamental assumptions of democracy. Yeah, he didn't believe

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>democracy as we understand it was working at all, And specifically,

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>he didn't believe that the average citizen was in any

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>way qualified to have any kind of input in the

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>rebel of politics or in the actions of the state,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and basically that the public was being led around like

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 1>this pack of animals by journalists and the media and

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>people who reported what the government was saying. Right. During

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties, Lippman published two more books which were

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>criticisms indictments of humanity. They were, in the parlance of

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>our time, they were distracts, right mix like hot mixtape distracts.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>One was called Criticizing Democracy, one was called Public Opinion,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and the other was called The Phantom Public. The American voter,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Lippman claimed, was not capable of acting out of any

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>rational collective self interest or even fully considering the issues

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>at hand in a rational way, not only not having

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>an answer to a question, but not understanding the question. Instead,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>he said, the average voter was ill informed, my opic,

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and prone to fits of enthusiasm. So in his disillusionment,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if we were to put it in a modern context,

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>would be something along the lines of, hey, you are

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to vote in every election based on your aggregate calculation,

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>whenever that might be of who becomes the best candidate, right,

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or why you think a certain local law shoot or

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>should not be in place. When he says that a

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>voter is ill informed, he means that they He means

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't know what they're talking about, right, they don't

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>understand the issue for one reason or another. And when

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>he says biopic, he means that they might be what's

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>often called a single issue voter, someone who says, well,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I will typically vote, you know, for a certain ideological

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>standpoint or a certain party line, but the only thing

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I really care about is, you know, the the the

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>illegality of owning a will to beast. I think it

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>should be illegal. I think that, you know, the country's

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>going to hell in a handbasket if one more person

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>can own a will to beast. Well, yeah, and that's

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what I vote on. That's it. And that's that's

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>where you get some of the more social issues becoming

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the most prominent things that are spoken about in the media.

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Shoure you think about stances on abortion or stances on

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment rights, things that aren't necessarily the most important

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>things to be focusing on, but they become the one

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>thing that the voter will latch onto. And that's the

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>craziest part because essentially it makes this an exercise in

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>mad lib in a very dangerous way. Uh. I hope

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody has had the wonderful opportunity to play mad lib

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>on a road trip or something growing up. But mad

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>lib is a game wherein you ask talking to people

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like they don't know what mad libs are. I feel

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like we can't make assumptions. I guess, so, yeah, you're right,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>what are you? Let's let's tell people what mad lives are.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You do it, but do it in the voice, okay? Uh?

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Mad lives you, guys, is where you got a bunch

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of blanks in a sentence, a long set of sentences perhaps,

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and you fill those blanks in with nouns and adjectives, adverbs,

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you read the whole thing and you've got

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>this jumble whacked noodle sentence. I feel like you are

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>unfairly criticizeing v I I don't know, not everybody, okay

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it maybe maybe everybody knows what bath libs are. You

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think they do I don't know. I think you're I

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>think we're somewhere in the middle. Some people don't know

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>what they are, but people who are listening to this podcast,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>yeah probably do. Okay, all right, okay, right in conspiracy

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and how stuff works, that come you know what a

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>mad lib is. So so the reason I'm setting that up, Matt,

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>is because the it's it's a fundamental assumption that you

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and I are making. That absolutely right, people would all

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know what a mad lib is and how it functions. Right,

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea of fits of enthusiasm, right, that's

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the last the last piece of his his primary criticism there. Uh,

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the idea of fits of enthusiasm would be the best

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>explained today by social media. Right, So you see a

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>post and it's shared over and over. Look at all

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>these assholes buying wilde beast, you know what I mean?

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>This has to stop. And then all of a sudden,

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>somebody who ordinarily would never vote whenever, you know, go

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to a protest or maybe even isn't that active, uh,

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and their social media. Right, then all of a sudden

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the most important thing, you know. And we we've

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about the really uh, really depressing,

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>borderline disgusting news cycle that occurs not just in mass media,

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>broadcast media, but also in social media, where where you

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>see a tragedy, a real, genuine tragedy occur and then

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>two weeks later, the people who were incredibly incensed about

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it have completely forgotten because now, god forbid, someone wears

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>something stupid at an award show, which I know it

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds brutal, but that that's the fact of the matter.

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I think he's talking about when he

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>says fits of enthusiasts. I think you're absolutely right. And

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>another thing that you could kind of lop into that

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>would be the sloganism that has occurred at least in

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the past two elections, and it occurs throughout American elections.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But having yes we can chanted by people and then

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>put on bumper stickers and then that's that single sentimentality

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of yes we can do it, becoming this moving force

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for voters and then make America great again as well.

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Just something that encapsulates the enthusiasm of the people who

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you are trying to get behind you oh yeah, I

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, or or denigrades the the value of the

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>perception of people are institutions that are against what you

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>want to have happen, right, like dirty wilde beasters. I

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm just gonna ride this wilde beeste comparison

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to the ground. Oh boy, yeah, we ah, we could.

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I should have Oh there we go. I should have

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>picked a better I should have picked a better animal.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think will be so great. I'm actually I'm learning

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>about wilde beast. Uh for an unrelated thing happens to

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the best of us. Sounds a little sketchy, but it's

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a it's a true story, right in, let us know

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>about your experiences with wilde beast. So this this idea

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that voters will tend to not know what's going on,

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>will tend to focus on only one thing, and will

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to uh impulsively lash out and sporadic burst or

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>impulsively participate in sporadic first rather than continually exercising the

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>rights and responsibilities of citizenship. Uh. This, he argued, was

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>being used to insidious advantage by other forces in play. Yeah,

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>he thought other parts of the government perfected the art

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of manipulating the public. It's this idea of manufacturing consent.

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You might recognize that phrase from some of Noam Chomsky's work.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>He took it directly from Walter Littman, and he stated

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that before, um, like, you know, it's this idea of right,

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we've always been at war with East Asia? Oh man, Right,

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought we had always been at war with Oceana.

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Another one of Littman's beliefs was that the American people's

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>increasing obsession with consumerism was causing them to have a

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>decreased awareness and concern for pressing public issues. So basically,

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they were being distracted by constantly wanting to buy new things,

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>upgrade at this point, their house, upgrade, their lives, um

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and the things around them, rather than the larger issues

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that were looming overhead. Okay, I see, So that the

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>idea then that keeping up with the Joneses becomes one

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of the number one policy issues for a household. Well yeah, yeah,

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just the You're absolutely right. The policy issue is now

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>within the home and the clothes that you're wearing and

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the food that you're eating. And it's just it doesn't

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>matter if there's something going on in Europe. Right, I

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>see all these people posting these high minded, sanctimonious arguments

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>about owning wild animals, But did they even have a refrigerator,

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>did they even have cable? And where are they posting them?

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And then like a bulletin board. That's what it is,

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the community bulletin board. Yeah, at the corners at the

0:32:54.440 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>general store. Yeah, good call. Though Matt so he felt

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that journalism was partially to blame for this because it

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was not fulfilling what he saw as its correct duties,

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>which again in theory on paper, would be providing rational,

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>accurate information. And one big issue for him in this

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>regard was what was known as muckraking or what we

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>call investigative journalism. If we want to put a necktie

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on it, uh, And he he objected to this because

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>he saw as a means to foment distrust of public

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>institutions and officials. And then Flipman wondered, you know what,

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>why should someone who isn't a physicist have a voice

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in conversations about physics? And you know that makes sense,

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>right if the if the physicists of the world are

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>all one room and they're arguing about the the latest

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>theory and physics, right, and and what we can learn

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the future rushes towards us infinite in its promise, and

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's danger. And then there's one guy who's not a physicist.

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He's just like in the room, he's a psychiatrist. Okay,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sure he's qualified in something else. Maybe he's a psychiatrist.

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>What what can he lend to this conversation. I happen

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to think psychiatrist would be able to lend a lot

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of insight into a conversation with physicist. Yeah, he just

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>he's he can't spell very well. So he saw the

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>sign on the door coman physicist, and he thought he

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>was in the right place. There we go. That seems

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sense right on some level. So Lippman, if

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine him scratching his chin for a second

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>here and thinks, yeah, that checks out. So how is

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the world of politics any different? And we'll explore Lehman's

0:34:54.480 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>thought on that right after this. This is the dangerous part.

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>No single individual, Lippmann thought, could easily understand the complexity

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of the modern world. There's just too much stuff going on. Furthermore,

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he believed that the idea of an authentic public opinion,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>meaning a consensus or agreement formed by people who were

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable about public affairs and interested in public affairs. He

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>believed this was mainly a myth. This was a unicorn,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this was winning the lottery seventeen times in two weeks.

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess it could happen. Yeah, you would have to

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of things go perfectly right in order

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to achieve that state. I think so. I think perhaps

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Littman might be on the right track there, But he's

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit polarizing about he's just one way or the

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>other way. He proposed that the most effective form of

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 1>governance would be a world in which the elite, the cognocenti. Oh,

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the cognisenti. That's uh, those who are in the know,

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>just like you listening out there. Um, he thought they

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>would have. If these people had all of the authoritative agency,

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>then they could make these benevolent, indisputable decisions for all

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of us, the unwashed masses, right, the hoi poloi, the peasants,

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the uneducated. That that's actually you and me and Ben

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>according to them, but not Paul. Paul is one of

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the Gosh, you can just see the eliteness on his face.

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>He wears a tuxedo to work every day. Oh it

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>does look nice though, And I have to say, Paul,

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I respect you because I notice it's always a different tuxedo.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:51.280
<v Speaker 1>You're not phoning it in. So away from tuxedos and

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and back to the elite. Lippman is essentially arguing that

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the informed public does not exist, that the public is,

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>despite what is on paper about democracy, inherently incapable of

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>doing what is right, doing what is smart, doing what

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is good for lack of a better word, So instead

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 1>he pictures this sort of technocracy, this uh, this leadership

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>of scientists and longtime politicos who will be able to

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>make the decisions on behalf of all the other people

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in a country. And this this means that not only

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>would you as a voter not have a say in

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>something like a it is something like a law about

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>pollution or a law about regulation and deregulation, which you

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>also wouldn't have knowledge of what was going on. So

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's as idea that the control of information, both gathering

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it and distributing it, would be in the hands of

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this technocracy that would be trusted to use scientific methods

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what was really going on and make

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>good decisions not just about what's happening, but about who

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>should receive specific messages. He wanted to establish a semi

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>governmental or quasi governmental intelligence bureau that would evaluate information,

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 1>supply it to other elites to make decisions. And this

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>bureau could also determine which pieces of information should be

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 1>transmitted through the mass media to the public and which

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>pieces of information people were better off not knowing. And

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>he would have he would have gotten away with it

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't for those dastardly kids coming up with

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the old Internet thing. Absolutely absolutely, and a Scooby Doo

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>moment is appropriate here. We should say that Walter Lippman

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>later stepped away, retreated from this latest argument to a degree,

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but that idea remains massively influential and not too unfamiliar

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>historically when we consider the past governments of earlier civilizations. Right,

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a king and all the people that the king's

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ancestors slept with, and they're in charge. That's just the

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>way it is, especially if they have divinity about them

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that God has somehow chosen them. Right, Or there's a chieftain,

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>same thing, or there's a you know, there's religious leader,

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:43.919
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Here's where it gets crazy. Not only did

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Lippman think that democracy was more or less impossible in

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 1>its current form, but more and more people seem to

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>impractice agree with him. Today they do, And this is

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've spoken about already on the show. Critics of

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>both the theoretical function of the current government and the

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>practical function of the government seemed to often agree that

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the average voter, you and me and everybody else doesn't

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>know much but is instead ruled by emotion and is

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>prone to impulsive irrational decisions. Now are irrational here would

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>mean voter decisions um are actually working against the voters

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>self interest. What you would you should be voting for,

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you can There are a lot of examples with that,

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>especially when you talk about tax reform, and then you know,

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the voters, especially in the lower to

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle class, you know, not seeing the benefits that

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>may perhaps people in the upper classes would see. Um,

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and you have more voters in that lower class, but

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you're still going to get a popular consent a lot

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of times, right of course. And this is not something

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that is in any way exclusive to a political party,

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>no a genre of a political party, or an issue

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>or an issue. Yeah, this is a This is a

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tendency that Lipman sees and that the current people in

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>charge whatever that time is and whatever, uh really, whatever

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>post Lippman ideology you wanna you wanna grasp at, this

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>is typically what people in power will believe, and we

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>can see this in action. There's an interesting tendency here

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>because later critics such as William F. Buckley on the

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>on the right side of American politics were Noam Chomsky

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on the left side, both saw a special interest as

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate decision makers in too many political discussions. Of course, uh,

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>these these two fellows, these two guys would not agree

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with each other, and I'm sure they would disagree on

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly which organizations they considered tyrannical special interest groups. But

0:41:53.719 --> 0:42:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the point remains. In Chomsky's arguments, in particular, the media

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>is seen as acting as a street enforcer for what

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>he sees as special interests. This inextricably entwined system of

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>government officials, heads of businesses, large corporations, these powers behind

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the throne too often are seeing as the real voters.

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's unfortunately a common thread that you will here

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>discussed more and more in recent years. These critics would

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.800
<v Speaker 1>argue these special interest whatever they may be in special

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>interest itself is sort of an umbrella term, sort of

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>a thought uh thought, terminating cliche, right, special interest it's

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a boogeyman. But these are the forces

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing the public in one direction or another, framing issues

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in a way that benefits their own internal aims, regardless

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of their effect on the common good. For the majority

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of U. S citizens, if their common aime aligns with

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the common good, then great, fine, bully for us, Go team,

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>We've vultron together. We've done our Captain Planet thing. This

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>law made the world a better place. But the problem

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>is that even if it acts against the public interests,

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>then okay, great for us, go team, We've vultron together,

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and profits are going to rise. Jeezs. Optimists once imagined

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that the age of information was going to be one

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of unending elucidation, a world in which every single person

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 1>had equal access to knowledge and equal ability to act

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on that knowledge in a smart way toward a common good.

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But you can ask people from the entire gamut of

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>fields social scientists, statisticians, political pundits. They are often now

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>convinced this is not the case. Yeah, right now we're

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the sea change, some kind of paradigm shift in

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the world of news cover. You've got broadcast in print

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>falling behind as online news sources begin their rise or

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to rise um including the news aggregators like the

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>reddits of the world. Social media platforms are on the rise,

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:17.399
<v Speaker 1>where people are getting most of their information, even news information,

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>from these sources. The the increasing likelihood of the so

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>called search bubble, where you get stuck in and inside

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>this world of news and algorithms that just reinforce the

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>views that you've already shared or liked or you know,

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>submitted as your preferences. And the emphasis then is not

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on critical thought but rather on the enjoyment of it all, right,

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Like the goal is not to inform you so much

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>as it is to continue your time on the device,

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on the platform, right, just stay here longer. It's mentally

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or psychologically, it's similar to some of the tricks casinos use.

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very very similar to that, so that this

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>idea is dangerous. And there's there's another point like that

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ad here on on the concept of whether or not

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.919
<v Speaker 1>democracy is impossible. And it's something that you and I, Matt,

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>have talked about at length before. I think we mentioned

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on air, but we talked about off air often off air.

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Often it's the concept of Dunbar's number. The gist is

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that human brains seem to be hardwired to accept only

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of other human beings around about a

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty as other humans. The rest the other

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>billions of people in the world are either functions or

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>grouped into broad categories. You don't know a Canadian person.

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>That's not what your one fifty we guess what everyone

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>who lives there is just one of the Canadians to you,

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe divided by what you see as their gender or

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>what you see as their job. Right. The problems here

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are readily apparent. If you are a propagandist like Lippman

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or Bernese or so many other people working today, you

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>only have to convince the victim of your propaganda to

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>stop thinking of some people as individuals, make them think

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>of people as categories. Convince them that whatever decision you'd

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>like them to make, whatever protests you'd like them to attend,

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever vote you want them to cast, or whatever products

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>you want them to boycott, just convince them it's in

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the best interest not of the world, not of the country,

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but of the one hundred and fifty people that they

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>think of as real people. So the game is is

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit smaller and not as difficult as it

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>might appear. And for the leader of a country or

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, some political arm uh. This shows us that

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>after a certain population size, it becomes very difficult for

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>any individual to function as a genuine representative of the

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>people they leed. Because if the Unbar's number turns out

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to be true, and there should be more research on it,

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but if Dunbar's number holds holds up, then these leaders

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 1>are incapable of recognizing their constituents as human beings. Yikes.

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 1>And just to that end, if we want to analyze

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps what what Walter Littman's Dunbar number would be if

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we're sticking with one fifty uh. He was a member

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of this place called the Metropolitan Club of the City

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of Washington. There are Metropolitan Clubs in several other places,

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but this one is very particular because it is in Washington,

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>d C. It's a private social club in close proximity

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to the White House. I'm going to read you a

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>quote here from their website. The Metropolitan Club is one

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of Washington's oldest and most valued private institutions since its

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:52.800
<v Speaker 1>founding in eighteen sixty three at the height of the

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Civil War, by six Treasury Department officials. It has pursued

0:47:56.600 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>its primary goal of furthering literary improvement, mutual movement, and

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>social purposes, whatever that means. Other members of this social

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 1>club included influential journalists, policy makers, and quote nearly every

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 1>US president since Abraham Lincoln. Now, this is the kind

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of place where you pay an exorbitant amount of money

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>every year and you get to go there and just

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>talk with your your people. Who are you know, at

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>your stature, I guess, at your place in life. And

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this is where he would spend a lot of his time.

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And you can imagine that if these are your one

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and fifty people, because there were I think active members

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>around the time, twelve members. I mean, you can't go

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:45.879
<v Speaker 1>much higher than that. Sure, And then it seems from

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a biographical note there, it seems pretty logical that he

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know, who should be in charge the

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>people I know, the people from the Metropolitan Club. It's

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>not that different from most human reasoning. Who should be

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in charge of the people that you know and the

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>people that you like that you have experienced firsthand? Right,

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>So we have to ask ourselves when we feel like

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we are making a decision, especially if we're making a

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>decision on something that would affect the course of our government,

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the course of our community. Whatever. It doesn't have to

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be I know this has been heavy on the political

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>aspects because of Lippman's background, but it doesn't have to

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>be that. You have to ask yourself how much if

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>your mind and your actions are a car, how much

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.360
<v Speaker 1>time are you at the wheel? And how much time

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are you writing shotgun? And when you are not driving?

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Who is? This appears to be the stuff mass media

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:56.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want you to know, at least according to Walter Lippman.

0:49:56.480 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And again, he may seem obscure today, but like berness is,

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>legacy remains relevant today. And to conclude today's episode, we

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have to ask you, where is democracy as a concept going? What?

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>What trends do we see? Is the age of spontaneous

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>almost endless information helping or hurting what so many people

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have praised and criticized for centuries now? And where is

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the American public going? And specific Yeah, do you think

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we are all distracted and disinterested to the point of

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 1>not being able to make decisions informed or otherwise for ourselves? Um,

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just maybe you personally. Do you feel that way? I

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:47.919
<v Speaker 1>know sometimes I feel that way depending on the day.

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can find us

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:53.319
<v Speaker 1>on social media where we are conspiracy Stuff and most

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the places Facebook and Twitter we are conspiracy Stuff,

0:50:56.200 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 1>show on Instagram, and if you don't want to do

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>any of the social media stuff off, just send us

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a good old fashioned email. We are conspiracy at how

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com, m