WEBVTT - Luka Magic, NFC Juggernauts, and Saint Nick’s NBA Gifts

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States Savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois, Welcome.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>In episode one hundred and ten, what Dright with Nick Right?

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>In the podcast and YouTube show We're All We're gonna

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 2>have a bit of a call to action here is

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>we're live on YouTube. We had someone at a Nebraska

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.959
<v Speaker 2>furniture mart, which does not exist where I live now,

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 2>but did exist where I lived in Kansas City, and

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>it's where I outfitted all of my first few apartments too.

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>And if you haven't lived in the Midwest, you don't understand.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>It's like, imagine a place three times the size of

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the biggest ikea you've ever been to that has everything.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 2>They put the What's Right Show on their one hundred

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>inch TV. We had someone at an airport bar at

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Lax put us on there. So if you're in control

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of a smart TV at a business somewhere, throw up

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 2>our podcast and then tweet it, tweet it out and

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>at me, I might not see it. At Demand's ay,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>he should definitely see it. And at What's Right Show,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really cool to see this Dufus in

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>his brand new shorts and sweats soup combo. Who got

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>you for that for Christmas? Buddy?

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>You did you know what?

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 2>I folded my hand. I found out Demand was right

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that the sweatshirt shorts combo not only is a popular

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>it's such a popular clothing item that they have matching

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>outfits together. I got to that at Scotch and.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Soda, one of your favorite stories.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite stores. I'm actually also wearing a

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Scotch and Soda sweats. I'm going with the more traditional

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>sweatpants with sweatshirt. So if you're just listening to the

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>pod you can't see our sartorial looks at the moment.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>You can do that by watching on YouTube. Here's what

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 2>is not on what you roll your eyes because it said, sartorial,

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>just get toss. Okay, let's get to what miss, no problem,

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>JJ Watt announcing his retirement. I crushed Demons's hopes and

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>dreams and our rematch of Madden and Airport Madness in

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the United States, which, by the way, if you are

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 2>stuck in an airport, maybe they'll be as nice as

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the people at LAX were to put the What's Right

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 2>show on the Airport television.

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Airport.

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>It is wild. I don't know what terminal is in,

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>but it's pretty cool. By the way, Demonsee didn't know

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>we were playing for real stakes in that Madden game.

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>He's about to find out, however, because uh, you know

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the wonderful people that own the ice cream shop next door. Yeah,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you know their three wonderful children. Yeah, well they're all

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>spending the night at the house tonight. That's fine, but

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 2>they're also getting dropped off to the house about three

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 2>point thirty and your sister's joking. I'm not joking. Your

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>sister's not home, your mom's gonna be working at this

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 2>very store, and my show's still going to be going on.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So for about ninety minutes, you and those three wonderful well,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Sorryddy, I'm sorry. There's nothing I can do about it.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>I found out this morning. So it's gonna be old

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>mister babysitter Demanse for about ninety minutes. I hope they

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 2>enjoy watching Call of Duty. All right, time now for

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the show. We just talked about what one of my

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>son's plans for today is. Let's sorry about what my

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>other son did a couple of days ago. De Monsey.

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>You must be the proudest father. Oh you have no idea. Luka.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Doncice put up one of the wildest stat lines NBA

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 4>history with sixty twenty one and ten against the Knicks

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 4>on Tuesday.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, real quick, before we even get to it,

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 2>when I texted you that screenshot of his box score.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Could you believe it? No, it's a I mean.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 4>That was wild, and I think especially seeing the the

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 4>the missed free throw buzzer well not a buzzer beater,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 4>but a buzzer beater.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, So we'll get into that right now.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead.

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 4>You said this game needs to be talked about in

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 4>the same vein as will two hundred point game.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.679
<v Speaker 3>In Kobe's eighty one point game. I'm sure we're gonna.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah tweet, yeah, but yeah, there we go. I'm greatest

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 2>regular season performance is in NBA history, alongside Will's hundred

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 2>and Kobe's eighty one. Go ahead, what's the question?

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 3>And what world is this even close to those?

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's better than kobe'sh have twenty rebounds or ten assists.

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so here's my argument.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>We're either of those game and a loss Kobe's eighty

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 3>one point game.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 2>But this wasn't a loss either.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 3>No, I know you.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I was saying, no, they weren't in a loss. So

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the best regular season performances ever are in

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 2>this order, Wilt's one hundred, what Luca did two days ago,

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Kobe's eighty one point gameron No Jordan Jordan had sixty nine,

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>eighteen and six in an overtime win against the Cavs

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety, a game that gets forgotten, but by

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Basketball Reference game score that's actually the best game ever

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 2>by their game score metric. So here's why I Kobe's

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>eighty one point game is more iconic. This was harder,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 2>and it was harder for a number of reasons. First

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of all, let me ask you this demonse, do you

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:01.559
<v Speaker 2>think in the next decade, some one else will score

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>eighty because I do. We saw Devin Bookers score seventy.

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 2>We saw Klay Thompson score sixty without playing the fourth quarter.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>We have seen James Harden score sixty without playing the

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter. We saw Kyrie score sixty while barely playing

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth quarter. We also saw Kobe before the

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 2>eighty one point game, score sixty two against the MAVs

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 2>without playing the fourth quarter. Meaning we have seen guys

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 2>come within the realm of an eighty point game if

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that's what they were gunning for, right, Okay, the sixty

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>to twenty ten no one has ever approached it, including Wilt.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>It's an impossible status.

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I think about considering will have this body frame that

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>he did well.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 2>It's and it's crazy. Almost every NBA individual game record,

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>it's the first player to do X since Wilt, who

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>did it fourteen times like Wilt is his own record book.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Wilt never did this, so sixty points in and of

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 2>itself is wild. Twenty rebounds, for the context of that,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Lebron playoffs or a regular season has never had a

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty rebound game. Jordan never had a twenty rebound game.

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh what about my guy Jokic.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Jokic absolutely has had multiple twenty rebound games. Jokic getting

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the sixty points seems highly unlikely. So Jokic, Jokic, I

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>think would be the guy you'd say, maybe Jokic could

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>do this. I'll believe it when I see it. Sixty

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 2>is a tough number, as James Harden, who has a

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 2>sixty point triple double in his career, the only other

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>one in NBA history, has never had a twenty rebound

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 2>game playoffs for a regular season, So I don't think

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 2>this will ever be done again unless Luca does it again.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>So that's first of all. Second of all, they were

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>down nine with thirty seconds left. They won the game.

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Play by play data goes back twenty at least twenty years.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>In the last twenty years thirteen prior to this game,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>thirteen thousand, eight hundred and eighty four teams had been

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>down nine or more I guess with or No. Nine

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 2>with thirty seconds left. How many of those thirteen thousand,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred and eighty four do you think won the game?

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>One or zero or zero? So it was an unprecedented comeback.

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Then there is the intentional missed free throw get the rebound,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 2>make the putback aspect of it incredibly hard to execute,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 2>and then the victory in overtime. All of that, and

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 2>he did it on sixty eight percent shooting. All of

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>that to me makes it more impressive than Kobe's eighty one.

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 2>It is not. Again, there's a difference between what is

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 2>more iconic and what is more impressive. What is more

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 2>as far as when NBA fans think of and Kobe's

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>a more iconic player, and Kobe was on such a

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 2>historic scoring run that season that it culminating in the

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>eighty point game is unbelievable. This was harder, and this

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 2>was by definition more unprecedented. I know we're splitting hairs here,

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 2>but scoring eighty one at a basketball game had been

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 2>done before one time by Wilt Ten had never been

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>done before. So for all those reasons, I think Kobe's

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>eighty one point game, it's dropped one. Yeah, is third.

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And Luca just had the greatest game in the regular

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 2>season that was ever televised because Wilt's game famously was

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 2>on on. We got a lot of fans in here

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 2>that disagree with that a lot. Okay, well, here's the thing.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>They don't it's not that much that disagrees who had

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 2>the best all time game? Fifty three percent say Will.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Question's not the who had the hardest, well most impressive. No, no, no,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 2>this is fine. But I agree it's Wilt. I have

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Wilt at number one. So twenty seven percent say Kobe,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>nineteen percent say Luca. So more people disagree with me

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 2>than agree with me. But it's not it's not a route.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>And I listen, Wilt's one hundred point game stands on

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>its own. It's it's one hundred points. It's one hundred points.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 3>We have no video of it.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I know wasn't on TV.

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of strange if you ask me.

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Demont's conspiracy corner.

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, all right, the NFC clearly has three

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 3>top dogs. Sorry Vikings, Yeah, I agree with that.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 4>The Cowboys look strong after taking down the Eagles, and

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 4>despite Philly's loss, they stuffed the best record in the

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 4>NFL at thirteen and two, and the forty nine ers

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 4>are rolling with Rockport Party in of won eight straight. Yeah,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 4>we still got a lot of holidays spirit left in us.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 4>So let's play a game with these teams. Okay, this

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 4>week is when you can return presence you don't like.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 4>So if these teams were gifts, who are you keeping

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 4>and who are you regifting and who are you returning?

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'm keeping the Niners? Okay, then are this is

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 2>not just because I picked them before the season to

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 2>go to the Super Bowl. The Niners have been dominant

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>for two months. The Chiefs crushed them, and since then

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>they have been absolutely rolling. And they've done it despite

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they have a rookie seventh rounder at quarterback.

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I am regifting the Cowboys. I think the Cowboys right

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>now are very dangerous and getting healthy at the right time.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm returning Philly. Listen, the two most important players

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>on Philly's offense are their quarterback and their right tackle,

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Lane Johnson. Lane Johnson is done, they say us for

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the regular season. They hope for having back in the playoffs.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm skeptical. And their quarterback. His injury is to his

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>throwing shoulder. The idea that he is going to come

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 2>back and just be the guy he was before is

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to me overly optimistic, especially because so here's so, I'm

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>glad you mentioned that Demise. I would be incredibly nervous

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 2>if I were Philly with my designed runs with him

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that you know what I mean? So it's it's it's

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>just the worst case scenario that your quarterback, who was

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>in some people's minds the league MVP, has an injury

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to his throwing shoulder. They are the most effective third

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and one and fourth in one team. Why because they

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>do that rugby scrum where he runs into the line

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 2>of scrimmage and gets pushed by his own teammates. Are

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 2>you gonna be comfortable doing that with this guy? So

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the injury you suffered to your shoulder is an ac

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>joint spring. He suffered what's called an sc joint strain,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>which means sterno clovicular. So I'm obviously not doctor, but

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the sternum and you're clavigal that area that concerns me. Man.

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>So their secondary is banged up, their right tackle is out,

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 2>they're quarterbacks currently. They have no playoff experience with this

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>roster and this coach except for one game last year

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>when they got crushed. I think Philly is the peak

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 2>too early team, unlucky injury team. I'd be very nervous if.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I were them. What would we do with the vikings?

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Sorry if you no you're fine, go ahead. What are

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>we gonna do with the Vikings? We throw them away?

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Vikings are tough because here's how I see it going.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 3>For the Vikings. It's very simple.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the Vikings in the first round of the

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>playoffs are playing either the Giants, Washington, Detroit whomever should

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>win that game. Then they play San franciscoing round two

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>and get annihilated. That's what I think is gonna happen

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>with the Vikings. And by the way, the Giants just

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>played them as close as you can play a team.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 2>They beat the Giants in Minnesota on a sixty one

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 2>yard field goal at the gun. So I don't think

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings are a lock if they play the Giants.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Are the Lions for that matter, to win in round one?

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I would pick them to win, but I

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>don't think they're a lot is But I think they're

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>dead to the Niners.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead. Is Rock Purty quarterback come playoff time? Well?

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I believe so. I mean, listen, Jimmy is still hurt,

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 2>but with Purty playing the way he's been playing, even

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>if Jimmy got healthy, I think I'd roll with Brock Purty.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 2>But right now he's their only quarterback option. Josh Johnson

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>is their backup.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 4>So if say, in a crazy world, the Vikings beat

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 4>the Niners because Rock Purty is nervous in the playoffs

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 4>or something that.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Could happen, go ahead, you can't see that.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>No, Well, listen, if they get past the Niners, then yeah,

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 2>then absolutely, you've got to open up a possibility they

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>go to the Super Bowl. I don't think they could

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>get past the Niners, all right, I just don't. I

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>think that Niners defense is too good.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Next, there's no poll for that one, or at least

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 4>If there is no all right Down in Tampa, Tom

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Brady didn't even let the ink the ink on his

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 4>obituaries drive before he pulled off another comeback in overtime

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 4>and after beating Miami.

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>On Christmas, Aaron Rodgers and Green Bay are.

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Still very alive. Did you foolishly write off Rogers and

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the Packers too early? And if they both make it,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 3>who has the better shot to lead a deep playoff

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>from the Bucks? Yeah?

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>So, Rogers has not played well all year, and during

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 2>this winning streak, he's been worse than he was the

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 2>previous dozen games. During the winning streak where they have

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>beaten the Bears, who can't beat anyone, the Rams, and

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 2>then a good win against Miami, but they didn't play

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 2>that well. Tua just melted down in that game. Rogers

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>has three total touchdowns, two picks, and an eighty five

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 2>FASc rating. It'd be one thing if the Packers all

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, were alive because Rogers turned a corner.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 2>But that is not what has happened. Rogers has turned

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>no corner. He's been mediocre all year. And Christian Watson,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 2>who's been huge for them, absolutely huge for them, has

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a hip injury and that is highly concerning. He's going

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 2>to be able to play this week or not. And

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>so listen, I think the Packers lose this week, but

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>if they were to get in, I don't believe in them.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 2>The Bucks. Listen, the Bucks in round one would play

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys. I'd be picking the Cowboys. However, the Bucks

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 2>did beat the Cowboys nineteen to three earlier this year.

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 2>And if the Bucks were to beat Dallas, would I

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>give them a shot to go to Philadelphia? With all

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the injuries we're talking about, Tampa would by definition be

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 2>coming off its biggest win of the year.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Let me say one other weird thing about the NFL's

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 2>playoff formatic. If the Bucks win Sunday against Carolina, okay,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 2>they lock up the division. Because if you win your division,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 2>you're guaranteed a home playoff game and a top four seed.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 2>If the Bucks win, they will be eight to eight

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and have locked up the four spot. I'm saying I

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>want to I'm ninety nine percent sure I'm correct on that.

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Let me make sure, just double check. If they win, Yes,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 2>if they win on Sunday, they win the division. So

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 2>here's why that's relevant. The Bucks, having been mediocre all

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 2>year long, can give themselves a buye they win Sunday,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 2>they are They can't fall below the four line, they

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 2>can't raise above the four line. Week eighteen becomes totally

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>meaningless for them, and all of a sudden, you can

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>give Brady and Mike Evans and your defense and everybody

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a week off in Week eighteen, even though you have

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>not earned a bye. You will be locked into your

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 2>playoff seed, playing for nothing, and can go into the

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>postseason rested in healthy. Dallas, on the other hand, if

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 2>they win this week and Philly loses, Dallas will have

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>to play everyone in week eighteen. Why because they will

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 2>still be alive for the one seed and the division.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's a weird spot where Tampa, despite being mediocre

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 2>or bad all year, if they win Sunday, can just

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>rest in week eighteen.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>The who will go further in the playoffs? Twenty eight

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>percent on our poll question for people watching live on YouTube,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>No forget to put your questions and comments in the comments.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to them at the end of the show.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Twenty eight percent say the Packers. Seventy two percent say

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks.

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 4>Last, the Broncos finally ripped off the band aid with

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 4>nad Hackett. Yeah, turns out you're right about Denver and

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 4>also about Russ this entire time.

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Yep. Oh, yeah, let's not gloss over that. Let's not

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 2>gloss over the fact that I had to listen to

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 2>people tell me, Oh, Nick, oh, you're hating on the

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>bron Goes because you're afraid demons the you're Oh, you

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 2>can't actually think the Broncos aren't gonna be good? How

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 2>could they not be good? They added? Russell Wilson. Oh,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 2>it's the toughest division ever.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Supposed to know, Russell Wilson would be this bad.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Listen to your boy, listen to me. I tried to

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>warn everybody.

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, go ahead, fair enough, all right.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 2>As a reward, you get to watch.

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes and the Chiefs feast on the remains.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that was a good time as ever for Mahomes

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 4>to make his MVP MVP statement game and lock up

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 4>the one point two five million dollar bonus.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even know he had that he gets. He

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 2>gets one point two five million for one of the

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 2>League MVP. So it's not like the same thing as

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 2>like the clause with Kyler Murray and like the studying

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Like no, well, I mean it's it's not the same thing,

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 2>but it's similar. It's like in addendum to the contract. Yeah,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>there you go, it's like a two ko Yeah, there

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 2>you go exactly, except it's League MVP and it's one

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and a quarter million bucks. It actually, so here's a

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 2>weird thing. And then I'll let you get to your questions.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 2>It's minuscule against the cap, so it's not a big deal.

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>It's low key, though a tiny bit bad for the Chiefs.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So the way you put contract incentives in into contracts

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 2>in salary cap sports is there's likely to be earned

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and not likely to be earned.

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>The reason you have to have those is likely to

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:33.479
<v Speaker 2>be earned. Incentives count against the cap before you earn them.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Not likely to be earned count against the cap retroactively.

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 2>So here's let me give you an example. You sign up.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's just say you sign Tyreek Kill with the Dolphins.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 2>If they say you get an extra million bucks if

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>you get fifty catches, that million dollars automatically instantly counts

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>against the cap because he gets fifty catches every year.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 2>If you put on there, if you are if you

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>lead the league in touchdown catches, you get a million bucks.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 2>That's unlikely to be earned because he's never done it. Right.

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>So anything that is win the super Bowl you get X,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>win League MVP you get X is considered unlikely to

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>be earned because only one guy does it, only one

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>team does it right. But then once you earn it,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>it counts against the cap. So Mahomes winning League MVP

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 2>takes one point two to five million away from the

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs cap for next season. Not a big deal, and

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>he's earned it, but it is a little interesting nuance,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 2>at least interesting to me. Might be boring to other people.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>What's your question?

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 4>The more you know, Yeah, is Mahomes prime to win

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 4>back his place in your heart from Luca with a

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 4>performance for the Ages this week in Arrowhead?

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I don't want a Mahomes performance for the Ages.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't flatly. I just want the Chiefs to get

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>out of these next two weeks help. So, sometimes injuries

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 2>are a combination of skill, coaching, and luck. Some injuries

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 2>are just bad luck. And sometimes teams clearly coach with

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 2>injuries in mind and call plays with injuries in mind.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>And the Chiefs are in a position where, while the

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Eagles are getting banged up and the Bills are getting

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 2>banged up and the Bengals just lost their right tackle,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs quietly have been incredibly healthy the last few weeks.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>They're getting McCole Hardman back. They're about to get Clyde Edwards,

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a lair back, which I don't really care so much about,

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 2>his third best running back on the team. They are

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be super conservative in their play calling and

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>how their style of offense these next two weeks to

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>try to make sure most notably Kelsey and Mahomes stay healthy.

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And so I don't expect there to be a lot

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>of deep downfield over the middle passing. I don't expect

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Patrick to be running a lot. I expect them to

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 2>be three step drops, get the ball out of his hands,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 2>run the football, get out.

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Of here with victories.

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>And the Raiders did the Chiefs a solid here by

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 2>conceding their seasons over going to Jared Stidham. What I

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 2>was a little nervous about was the Raiders would stick

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 2>with Carr, win this week, have like a two percent

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>chance at the playoffs going into Week eighteen, and be

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, a kitchen sink type of game. Instead, they're done.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 2>They benched Car, they went to Sidham, they lose this

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 2>week and it's over. And so now the Chiefs just

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 2>need to stay healthy because they're not going to be

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 2>able to rest everybody in Week eighteen because the one

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 2>seed is still in play, so they're only the The

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>other thing that's really weird is for the Chiefs if

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.479
<v Speaker 2>they win their final two and the Bills lose one

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>of their two games, either the Bengals or to the Patriots,

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs are the one seed. They get a buye.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 2>If the Chiefs lose one of these games, they will

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 2>fall potentially to the three seeds not get a BUYE

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 2>have a very tough Round one game, probably against Baltimore,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and then be going to Buffalo or Cincinnati in Round

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 2>two be disaster as opposed to being at home and

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>being in a position where Buffalo and Cincinnati you only

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 2>have to play one of them, and it's after they've

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>played each other, assuming they both win Round one. So

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a very, you know, small needle the Chiefs are

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to thread. I think it's gonna work. And I

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 2>think the fact that the Broncos the Broncos firing that Hacket,

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe they'll have a bit of a booze. But the

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 2>replacement coach is the dude Nat Hackett hired mid season

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to run the clock forum. Jerry Rossberg has never been

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 2>an NFL coach. I'm not worried about the Broncos. I'm

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 2>not worried about the Raiders. I just need the Bengals

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 2>to beat the Bills on Monday Night. Coaching shortage, man, Yeah,

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 2>it it's hard. They need to pull. I'll tell you

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 2>this much. Six more months, demanse of you playing Madden

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 2>as often as you've been playing.

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Lately, I'll be able to surpass net Hackett as far

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 3>as coaching.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've already surpassed him as far as clock management.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Not coaching, but clock management. Six more months of Madden,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>You'll be better than eighty percent of coaches in the NFL.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Take quick Break, Break play some games. Re live on

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 2>YouTube with episode one ten of wa Trait Show.

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblasts, who defined every expectation

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion. And Unstoppable, a new

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studio director William Goldenberg, evoking

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 5>the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and thrilling

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 5>wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast including

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and Bobby Canavali.

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 5>Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in Let me send out this link for

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>episode one ten of What's Right Show for our Twitter audience.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 2>There we go, so hopefully more people join us on YouTube.

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>We're just short of ninety one thousand subscribers on YouTube.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 2>We are going to extend the bonus period. We were

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 2>said by January first. We're not gonna get to one

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand by January first. We're gonna extend it through

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the super Bowl. So if we can get another nine thousand,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 2>three hundred YouTube subscribers between now and the Super Bowl,

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Demanse will get a thousand dollars bonus, which would be

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>very useful us. Demanse's is getting ready to move cross

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 2>country move to Los Angeles. We're gonna have some podcast.

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have to figure out what we're doing podcast

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>wise when Demanse moves. We got a lot of potential possibilities.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>We haven't really discussed it yet. What might have to

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>hire somebody? Oh well, I'm talking more about what we're

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna do as far as how we're gonna do the

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>co hosting. You mean, as far as setting up.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh yeah, I mean I just can't see you

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 3>doing that.

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 6>I understand, I get that, you know what, de Monte.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 6>The more I think about it, I can't see myself

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 6>doing it either. So yeah, we might have to we

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 6>might have to bring in some outside help.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 2>I gotta tell you, you mean, you don't see me

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 2>every day getting here a little early, putting cameras together

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>then putting them away afterwards. You don't see that being

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>on brand for me these days. I've gotta tell you.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Got something in the works. Though Victor might be coming

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 3>out here. I probably shouldn't have said.

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>That Victor might be coming out here. Let's let's keep

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 2>that off the area. Victor's running from the law or something.

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 3>What you're doing.

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh, but no, we'll figure it out. There's a lot

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of Listen, there's a lot of people that would love

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to be, you know, a contracted employee for the Blue

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Duck Media in Buyer.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 3>I got Joe.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I don't know who Joe is.

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Say I didn't do anything for you, Joe, Okay, who's Joe?

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 3>My friend?

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 4>It's like my only friend that whenever I tell you

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm going out with Joe and his girlfriend, it's like, oh.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Your friends in New York. Yeah, oh Demante out here.

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's a big fan of you, and I never

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 4>I didn't tell him that you were my dad. Oh

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 4>really all the podcast one day? Yeah, Oh that's funny.

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>It's a big fan.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>He'd like to But okay, we'll figure it out. Listen,

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 2>We'll figure it out. Or it'll just we'll just go

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>back to doing it for my house. We've built this

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>whole studio. I don't know. I just know that it's good.

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>But but it's not the point. The point is subscribe

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube, hit the bell so you find out when

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 2>we go live. And by the way, apologies Monday for

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 2>not being on the air. Colin Gowherd got marooned as

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>half the country did seemingly traveling and couldn't get to

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the couldn't get to La in time to host The Herd,

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>so I had to host The Herd on Monday, or

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I got to host her on Monday. I should say

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 2>it's ton of fun. It's always honor feeling for Colin.

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 2>But because of that, we had to do it the

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 2>last minute. Cancel. What's right. It wasn't because we were

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 2>taking the day off. It wasn't because the holidays. Was

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 2>just because I had television obligations. Does that set up

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 2>his own cameras and lights? Now, I'm gonna say Colin

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 2>does not do that. I'm gonna say Colin Colin sits

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and has the microphone. I don't even know who turns

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 2>on his own microphone. But you know, when you're the

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 2>greatest sports radio guy ever. You've earned that type of dispensation.

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's play a game. What are we doing, Demante?

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 4>With twenty twenty two come into an inn, we thought

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 4>we'd have our very own Nick Sture, dominant soussayer of

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 4>sport look into the future to tell us.

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 3>What twenty twenty three holds for. That's a great quarterback.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I like that. Go ahead, his awesome.

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Zach and Mac in the AFC East seem to both

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 4>be on their way out. You hinted you think Derek

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Carr could be heading east. The Rams and forty nine

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 4>ers have serious quarterback though it was with Stafford and

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Baker in La for now Jim Lanton Brock in San Francisco.

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Lamar and Tua both are dealing with uncertain futures with

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 4>those injuries. Yep, and Russ. We all know about Russ.

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Not to mention Bryce Young, c J. Stroud and will

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Live Levis and the draft. Dick, Sir Damis, use your

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 4>powers to predict where the dominoes will fall.

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think Derek Carr is gonna play for the

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Jets next year. Okay, Zach Wilson's done. Maybe they trade

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 2>him for a sixth round pick or something. He's done.

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Mike White's a nice story. They're not going into a

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 2>season with Mike White as the starting quarterback.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 3>They're just not.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna sign Derek Carr, and they're gonna

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>be very happy with Derek Carr. I also think Derek

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Carr coming available hurts Jimmy G because Jimmy G was

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be the best available quarterback. Take Brady out

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of it, because Brady's in his own category. But now

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I think most people think Car is better than Jimmy G.

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I do so.

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the Jets will go after Carr. I think

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Washington goes after Jimmy G. Now, maybe Carson Wentz goes

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 2>on a magical run the next few weeks. That's not

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen. They've already soured on Wins, even though they're

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 2>going back to him. They wanted Jimmy G last year.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 2>He then had surgery because he didn't want to go there.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they offer him money. I think Washington goes

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 2>after Jimmy G. I think Mac Jones is the quarterback

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 2>for the Patriots next year. I think it's dumb. I

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 2>think Bailey Zappi gives them a better option, but they're

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>stuck and screwed either way. So I think Zach Wilson's

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 2>gone with the Jets and Derek Carr goes there. I

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 2>think Mac Jones is the quarterback for the Patriots. I

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 2>think Jimmy Garoppolo. The Niners are not re signing Jimmy

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the Niners, though. I think Brady goes to either the

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Niners or the Raiders. I think that the Raiders with

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Josh mcdan, or the Niners, which is home for him

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 2>his childhood. All. Now, if Brock Purdy wins the Super Bowl,

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>obviously they're gonna roll with him. But bringing in Brady

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 2>for a year when Trey Lance hasn't shown you anything yet,

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 2>and my guess is at some point Purdy looks like

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the seventh round rookie that he is, I ain't that

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 2>might be too attractive for both sides to pass on

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 2>while having Purdy and Lance under contract. So I think

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Brady to the Niners. I think the Raiders are might be,

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, left without a seat in musical chairs. Now,

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe they make a run at Jimmy Garoppolo. Maybe that's

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>why they're moving on from car to make a run

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 2>at Jimmy themselves. Josh McDaniels obviously has the history with Jimmy.

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 2>But I if you're the Raiders, if Derek Carr is

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 2>not good enough, why would Jimmy Garoppolo be good enough? Tua,

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna be the quarterback for the Dolphins

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 2>next year. I don't know if he's gonna play again

0:33:58.240 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 2>this year. I think's gonna be the quarterback for them

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>next year. Lamar. I think the Ravens just gonna franchise

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 2>tag him again and we'll see if he holds out.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't be holding out if they franchise tag him,

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 2>but if he refuses to sign it. But I think

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Lamar stays with the Ravens. I think Tua stays with

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins. Le Broncos have no choice but to stay

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 2>with Ross, no choice whatsoever. Bryce Young is gonna be

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the number one pick of the draft and go to Houston.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure about the others. If I'm the Bears,

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 2>you're obviously not drafting a quarterback, but you can trade

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 2>that pick to a team that needs a quarterback, And

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I thought the Jets might make a godfather offer for

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Lamar would the Raiders make a Godfather offer for Lamar? Maybe.

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Ravens are gonna let Lamar go.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think the Ravens are gonna try to work something.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Out with Lamar.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Lamar is a flawed player, but they don't want to

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 2>start over at that position, and he's been great for them,

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 2>especially given that he was the final pick of the

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 2>first round. I think Lamar stays with the Ravens. Cut this, mark,

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 2>this whole thing down, and remind me in five months.

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll see how I do on all of it. My

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 2>predictions are that Zach's done in New York and they

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 2>get Derek Carr. Mac Jones stays with the Patriots, Jimmy

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Garoppolo goes to Washington, Brady goes to San Francisco or

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders. Lamar stays with the Ravens. Russ obviously stays

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 2>with the Broncos. Tua's the Week one starter for the

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins next year. All right, what are we doing now?

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 2>All right here, it's a new game.

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 4>Time for a new game, Okay called Saint Nick. I'm

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 4>gonna have some fun photoshops in here, Okay, fun, All right?

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 3>We got another new no, No, we have another new

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 3>holiday theme game. And got we just said that.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there it goes, lily fast. We have a new

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 2>holiday themed game. Yeah, because I had already said it,

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I understand, so I would try to repeating it.

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Just because Christmas is over doesn't mean that we're done

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 3>handing out presence yet. Yeah.

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 4>In this game, I'll be suggesting some gifts for you

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 4>to give to some of the stars from the NBA

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Christmas Games. Okay, Luckily, Saint Nick knows just what to

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 4>get for guys who already have everything. So let me

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 4>know if I got it right. Okay, if you have

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a better idea. Okay, first off, we will start with

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 4>your favorite Slovenian son. Yeah, Luca needs some help taking

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 4>the edge off after carrying his team night in and

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 4>night out. He said he wanted a beer after his

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 4>sixty point triple doubles.

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Such a legend.

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 3>But we all know what he really wants, and that's

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 3>a cigarette.

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 2>So what are we getting him? Some cigarettes? Okay, look

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 2>at that is a funny photoshop. I Lucas shouldn't be

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 2>smoking during the season.

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's proven that he can.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 4>I Well, we're not gonna act like he's not smoking

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 4>cigarettes throughout the season.

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he is or not. It'd be

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of legendary if he were. I love that he's

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 2>a different recovery beer. Also, have you seen Luca lately

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 2>with the Dunks. Yeah, he had a couple of hammers

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 2>lately that I didn't know he could do. A carton

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 2>of cigarettes seems a little ambitious, Luca. Do you think

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Luca does what I do, which is the one cigarette

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 2>a day thing? I smoke one. I shouldn't do this,

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 2>and it's not every day, but most days when I

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 2>get home from work, when I walk the dog, I

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 2>smoke one Cigarette's my one cigarette a day. I think

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Luca after a game, this one heater rewards himself.

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I think got a cigarette and a beer after that game.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 2>You do? What a legend? I think he's such a legend.

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Next next we got Lebron. Yeah what, Andrey Davis said

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 4>to miss significant time. The Lakers are back where they started, unfortunately, HM.

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 4>At this point, Lebron is really on chasing records and

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 4>building his legacy, so let's help him out.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 3>We saw Dirt get his statue in Dallas over the weekend,

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 3>so let's get ahead of it and give your greatest

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 3>player of the last fifty years a statue outside of

0:37:58.400 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the crypt.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think I think Lebron deserves statues

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 2>outside three arenas three Well, Cleveland, there's no question, of course.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And the statue in Cleveland should be the Block. It

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 2>should be the block on Iguidala to win the title,

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 2>that should be a statue in Cleveland. Miami, it should

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>be the dunk the Wade, Yes, the Wade Lob Dunk.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Miami will give him a statue.

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 2>Wade's gonna get a statue because I don't say Wade

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know if he'll get one.

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he should.

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I the Wade is the most iconic player in the

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 2>history of their franchise. Lebron's the best, and you.

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Get one in LA though, what'd you say? I get

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 3>one in LA?

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:54.479
<v Speaker 2>Why you won a title?

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 3>A bubble title? Okay, stop that, I am the fans.

0:38:59.400 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Stop that.

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 3>And I think the image.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 2>That he should have in LA is whatever he's doing

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:16.399
<v Speaker 2>to break Kareem's record. When he breaks Kareem's scoring records, like, yeah,

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 2>whatever that is. Now knowing Lebron, he might try to

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 2>break Kareem's scoring record while doing a skyhook. Kareem's you

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean, Like if it's uh, if he

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 2>knows he's a point away and it's not at the

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 2>end of the game, maybe he'll try to like, you know,

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 2>try to see it. But if and if that's the case,

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 2>then it can't be that because Kareem's statue is the

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 2>skyhook and that is when you live. When you were

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 2>in LA, did you ever go to what was Staples

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 2>is now the Crypt and see the statues?

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm pretty sure. I think I went to a

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 4>game with you there. I don't think it might have

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 4>been a Clippers game, but it's.

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Same or same stadium.

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, it's so cool.

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Shacks hanging on the rim and Magic was out there,

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>right magic Kareem. It's so cool.

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Lebron should get a statue there, and also

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 2>he might win another title with the Lakers at some point,

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 2>but depends. Lebron said after the game yesterday he was

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 2>asked about playing another seven years. He's like, yeah, I

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know why not, So like, as long as I

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 2>keep my mind in it, I'll keep my body in it.

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 2>He's playing at a super high level, so we'll see

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 2>they're not gonna win it.

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 3>You're having a silent contest.

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Clearly, none, no, clearly.

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 3>All right. Next, Yannis may be the most gifted athlete

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 3>in the world, but we all know he struggles from

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 3>the charity straight.

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 4>He's shooting worse than he has in five years from

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the free throw line, throwing ladders after games. By the way, yeah,

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 4>let's send him on an all expenses paid trip to

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 4>basketball summer camp where he could work on his fundamentally.

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm not gonna deal with this insults to

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Yanni's the best player in the world.

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 3>It's our best one.

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yet that is a good faking I like that photoshop Yannis.

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 2>What was he to win his fifty point game to

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 2>win the title seventeen of nineteen from the free throw line? Hey,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it was something like that. It was the what what

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 2>are you rolling your eyes about? I guess yeah, I

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 2>mean I think it was seventeen nineteen for the free

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 2>throw line. I'm not gonna criticize Giannis for the one

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 2>slight flaw in his game, which is the lack of

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 2>a consistent jump. We didn't do this to Shack exactly

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 2>what we kind of did you well, but Shack sometimes

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 2>would be taken out of games at the end because

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the free throw shooting was so bad. Jiannis is not

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 2>like that. Jiannis didn't fifty from the line, and like

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I said, to win the title, he was nails from

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 2>the line. So I'm not insulting Yiannis like that. Next,

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>hold on, I guess Oh, cheer guy.

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's get that, okay for now, all right? Next up,

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 3>got my boys in Boston, Jason Tatum and Jalen Brown.

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Gift that is long overdue.

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:50.320
<v Speaker 4>With Anthony Davis out for who knows how long the

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 4>debate is over, I'm giving them the official title of

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 4>best duo in the league.

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that's fair. Look at that. Oh look at you. Yep, Uh,

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 2>that's fair. You know who's sneaky, just very brief, like

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 2>just the last few weeks is and this one pains me,

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but he is making an argument for best. We go

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of their games. Oh yeah, Katie and Kyrie.

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Katie is playing out of his mind and

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie has been really good lately. I got any credit

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 2>words due I don't exception of the game that we

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 2>went to, the game that we went to he wasn't.

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 2>But I mean the game against you're talking about. We've

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 2>been to a bunch of the games you're talking about.

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 3>The one, the last one that I went to was

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 3>against the Bucks.

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Against the Bucks on a couple of days before Christmas. Uh.

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Tatum and Brown are the best duo in

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 2>basketball right now. With Anthony gave us out. With Ad

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 2>playing the way he was, it was Ad and Lebron

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 2>and the Lakers still weren't that good. But Tatum right

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 2>now is the favorite, uh in Vegas for League MVP.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.919
<v Speaker 2>It's a wild MVP race because Tatum has a strong case.

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Durant has a strong case, Luca has a strong case.

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 2>And the guy we're about to talk about, Nicolao.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 4>With Kyrie is his case not strong because of the

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 4>games that he missed with his little stint for MVP.

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, because the second best guy on his own team. Okay,

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 2>same reason Jayon Brown can't be MVP. You know what

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean. I mean, they're really good players, but the

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 2>second best guy on their own team.

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 3>All right. Next, Hey, if you're watching on YouTube, give

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 3>us a few more gift suggestions. We'll try to hit

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 3>a couple of your questions. Next.

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, cool, So next we got your favorite? What to

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 4>get the reigning back to back MVP your respect? No,

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:44.439
<v Speaker 4>that's clearly impossible. Huh, considering Jokic has proved he's still

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 4>by far the most valuable player in the league so

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 4>far this year, Let's just give him what he's owed,

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 4>a third straight MVP and his second straight Michael Jordan

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 4>MVP Trophy, the redesign one named after the Goat, and

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 4>we'll throw in a slide of your tears.

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Look at the goat.

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Look at the picture with me crying.

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 2>So here's the thing. Three. I wouldn't have a problem

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 2>with Jokic being MVP this year if his team, Yeah,

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:15.879
<v Speaker 2>if he didn't win the previous two. This year, he's

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 2>doing what we have asked every MVP other than him

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 2>to do, put up those numbers while leading a team

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 2>that could win the title. We made an exception for

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Russell Westbrook, and then we made back to back exceptions

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 2>for Jokics that I did not like this year, But

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:41.320
<v Speaker 2>and at all, the NBA media acted like I was

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 2>so far out of line because two years ago I

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.959
<v Speaker 2>said the MVP was Chris Paul should be worth noting

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Chris Paul then played Jokic in the playoffs, beat him

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 2>and made the finals. Last year, I said the MVP

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 2>was Luca Luka with a very similar supporting cast two Jokic's.

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Jokic went out in round one, Luca went to the

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 2>conference finals. But last year, my big argument was the

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 2>guys who have won back to back MVPs are Russell

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Wilt Kareem Moses, Larry Magic, Michael Duncan, Steve Nash, Lebron Jannis.

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.399
<v Speaker 2>That was the list, okay, And I said the Nash

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 2>one looked bad and Yoki shouldn't get it, and all

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 2>NBA media was like, that's not how this reward works.

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 2>It's about this year and this year. Only watch that

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 2>same media not vote for Jokics this year because they

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>don't want him to win three straight, exact same thing

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 2>they did with Nash, which Nash won back to back

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 2>the third year. His team was the best it's been

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and he was the best he has been and he

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>got one vote or no, I don't know him getting

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 2>one vote accurate actually, but he didn't win it because

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 2>people were like, he's not gonna win three straight. Also,

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:09.720
<v Speaker 2>by the way, Jannis won back to back before winning

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a title. The next year, because he hadn't done in

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, he got one vote because people were like,

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 2>we're not giving him another MVP until he shows it

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs. So Yo Kic. In a just world,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 2>two years ago, Chris Paul would have been League MVP,

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 2>last year Luca would have been League MVP, and this

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 2>year Jokic would be the leading candidate. Instead, Jokic won

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 2>each of the last two and this year, when he's

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 2>having his best season, Nuggets are the best team they've been.

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 2>He's not gonna come close. But that's because nobody listens

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 2>to me on the MVP stuff. It's all right, History

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 2>smiles fondly upon my indelible perfect record of MVP opinions.

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.279
<v Speaker 2>We answer your questions in the chat next What's Right?

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in episode one ten live on YouTube, and

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 2>we are now going to read your questions and comments

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:09.320
<v Speaker 2>from the YouTube's comments section, as we always do to

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:13.280
<v Speaker 2>wrap up these shows. Don't forget tomorrow our Week seventeen

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:17.760
<v Speaker 2>NFL gambling show, coming off a brutally unlucky Week sixteen.

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Those were good picks. They deserved better than the one

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and four record. We'll discuss that on the Gambling Show tomorrow. Demons,

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 2>what do we got today? From the comments?

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 4>All right, Jameel Warren said, I need this question answer

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 4>because it sounds crazy, but it just might work. Okay,

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 4>trade Lamar for Justin Fields and a first and second

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:37.720
<v Speaker 4>from the upcoming draft.

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Who says no?

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 2>And why the Bears say no? The Bears absolutely say no.

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 2>First of Justin Fields, though they love Justin Fields. He's

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 2>incredibly cheap, which matters a lot. And you've got to

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 2>say right now, I think Justin Fields has slightly more

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:58.240
<v Speaker 2>upside than Lamar.

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 4>He's definitely beating him in the mobile. I think that

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 4>he's a better mobile quarterback.

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you think he's a better runner, then he's

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 2>just then he definitely has more upside because he's an

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 2>unrefined passer, but he has more room to grow. I

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 2>don't think you said trade Lamar for Justin Fields and

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a first and second. I don't think the Bears would

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 2>trade Lamar or Justin Fields for Lamar straight up, much

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 2>less throw in draft picks that Lamar is about to.

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 2>If you trade for Lamar, you gotta pay him fifty

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 2>million a year. Justin Fields has two more years of

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 2>basically being free than a fifty Like no, sorry, Jameel,

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 2>but the Bears are not interested.

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Next, Murphy Berger asked which potential four seed is more

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 4>likely to make some noise in the playoffs, Jacksonville or Tampa.

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Back, I think Jacksonville is gonna win their first playoff game.

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Jacksonville is gonna beat the Chargers in round one.

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 2>It's in the argument is it's in Jacksonville. Now, obviously

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 2>it would be in Tampa as well. Staley has no

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 2>playoff experience, Herbert has no playoff experience. Trevor has no

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 2>playoff experience on Jacksonville side, but Doug Peterson has a

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.839
<v Speaker 2>ton It's won a Super Bowl, and Jacksonville will be hot.

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 2>They're able to I just now again, Jacksonville's got a

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:21.399
<v Speaker 2>win in Week eighteen to get there.

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 3>I think they will.

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I think Jacksonville's more likely jackson Let me put it

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.399
<v Speaker 2>like this, Jacksonville is more likely to win a game.

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 2>But if you were to say one of them is

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 2>going to win two games and make the conference championship,

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 2>that would be Tampa. Like, I think that Tampa is

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 2>more likely to go on a magical run because Jacksonville

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 2>if they If they win that first game, they then

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 2>are probably gonna have to beat either Kansaity, Buffalo or Cincinnati.

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they could do that, but I do

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 2>think they can beat the Chargers in round one.

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Next. All right, man Deep saying he who would you

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.919
<v Speaker 3>rather have have to start a team? Prime? Who would

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:01.160
<v Speaker 3>you rather have to start a time team? Prime? Aaron

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:01.879
<v Speaker 3>Rodgers are prime?

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Peyton Manning, Peyton Manner, Peyton Manning is? I how do

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 2>I Peyton Manning? There are arguments to be made, He's

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the most technically perfect quarterback ever. They both got a

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:25.280
<v Speaker 2>little worse in the postseason, and Manning was more durable

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 2>than Rogers. Manning did it over a longer period of

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 2>time than Rogers. To me, it's peateon Peyton is. I

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 2>think is a very very strong case his second greatest

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 2>quarterback ever, with respect to Joe Montana and respect other guys.

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I think Peyton has a very strong case second greatest

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:46.840
<v Speaker 2>quarterback ever. And so to me, it's not even a

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 2>question like Rogers all time great. Peyton's in a tier

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 2>above him in my opinion. Peyton also went to four

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowls, one to two. Rogers has been to one,

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 2>one to one. Now, the second Super Bowl Peyton won.

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 2>He was not good that year. But even if you

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 2>take that out, then went to three super Bowls one

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 2>one to me.

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 3>It's Peyton next, all right, Kira asked Nick, what do

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:11.280
<v Speaker 3>you think of Lebron's comments aimed at the Lakers front office.

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I angle Lebron. Lebron's an interestant comments yesterday about

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 2>wanting to compete for championships and about how long he

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 2>thinks he can play a angle. Lebron's been actually on

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 2>pretty damn good behavior as far as not subtweeting the

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Lakers or being mad that they're not making any moves,

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 2>all of these things. And I think it is because

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 2>he believes he's going to be continuing to play at

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 2>a very high level for multiple years to come, and

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 2>so he doesn't look at this as like his last

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 2>chance to win a championship. I mean, he said, I

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 2>forget who it was. One of his teammates said that,

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 2>he said he was playing and played till lost forty five.

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 2>That seems crazy. He turns thirty eight tomorrow and we'll

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, him playing another six years seems crazy. But

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 2>in playing another three or four years does not. All right,

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 2>last one, all right.

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 4>We'll kick two said that crying picture edit is going

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:08.279
<v Speaker 4>to be a Twitter response to you all the time.

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Now, yeah, I know that's what the are. Okay, Now

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna put it big on the screen. It looks

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 2>like I don't think they understand our producers that people

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 2>then screenshot these things and use them against me.

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I see them all the time.

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 2>You see them all the time. So it's well done.

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind it. It's it's well done. I'm trying

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 2>to remember what I was even you they call you

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 2>this bump with my eyes, all right?

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 3>That is.

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:41.720
<v Speaker 2>That is one of the reasons that uh, you should

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 2>watch us on YouTube, not just listen to the podcast.

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Demanse excellent show. Nice fit wearing the Christmas present. I

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 2>love it. We will be back tomorrow with episode one

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 2>eleven our week seventeen gambling show. Also, please tweet to

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Demanse babysitting tips or a nine year old girl, a

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 2>six year old girl, and a four year old boy.

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.439
<v Speaker 2>As Demonse is gonna be doing that this afternoon until

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I get off with the TV show.

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna set up the game of Monopoly for him

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 3>and just leave them.

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 2>They can't play monopoly and they can't know. Maybe maybe sorry,

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe they ca sorry, You're gonna have to. By the way,

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 2>they're all scared of the dog, so you're gonna have to.

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 2>You got a lot going on, so Demanday's got a

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 2>busy day. He's gotta break all this equipment down. He's

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 2>got to make sure the shop looks good for when

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Danielle opens. He's got to do all his work for Fox, which,

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:37.279
<v Speaker 2>by the way, today I do believe two days of

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 2>ratings come out. So you have a lot to do

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and you're gonna have to babysit, so good luck, enjoy.

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk to you guys. Oh, Danna will be there.

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Dana will help out. So there you go to work

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the babysitting stream. Oh live twitch the babysitting. We'll talk

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:54.280
<v Speaker 2>to you guys tomorrow.

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 3>What's right,