WEBVTT - Credit Suisse, Markets, Lobster, And Housing (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'll tell you the

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>big take story today is awesome. I used to work

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>with Credit Swiss, so I had an interest in it.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Um and the story is just fascinating. Um. You think

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>about these Russian billionaire oligarchs and their super yachts and

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>owning you know, football clubs in London and so on

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. There's gotta be some bankers to those folks,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough, Credit Swiss found. Can you believe? There

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland? Shock. Marion Hofftemeyer, also in Switzerland, she's a

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>finance reporter for Bloomberg News, brings us this story. Mary

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>talked to us about Credit Swiss and the business it

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>had built has built in Russia and kind of where

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we are today with the sanctions and so on. Yes,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sure so, Credits WECE actually is one of the earliest

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>banks to have a big presence in Russia. They came

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.919
<v Speaker 1>in post you know, sore Week, Soviet Union UM, and

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they really started to connect with a lot of these

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>individuals who are gaining UM access to privatization and gaining

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>wealth from that. And so you know, a lot of

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the money started supporting and then the first place you

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think of when you're looking for with private banking or

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>for private banking in Switzerland, it's it's got an expertise

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>in it, so you know, you end up having this

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this man but like Desmalsci, who was in a position

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to really receive these individuals who needed, you know, advice

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on how to buy companies, where to invest their money,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, how to how to structure different transactions they

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do. And so that's where Credits really

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>played a NSI and of course other banks have also

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>been present in this space, but Credit seems to have

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more UM exposure and connection to the Marion.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I once heard a story and I don't know if

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it's true, so you can correct me if I'm off base,

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>but I want to just share it to illustrate UM.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>The perception of Swiss bankers in the Second World war,

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Nazis were killing Jews and taking the gold from

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>their teeth and storing it in Swiss banks, and these

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>bankers knew what they were taking, right, There's this perception

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Swiss are willing to be bankers to the

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>most evil people on the planet. UM. Is that that

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is that is a perception. UM. It's a perception that

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>stems from some truth, obviously, but but it's it's not

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're choosing to bank with the you know, the

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>most horrible people of the world. It's just Swiss banking

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>has traditionally UM welcomed money UM and hasn't asked as

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>many questions as as other jurisdictions have. And they've they've

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>been really entrenched in this idea of banking secrecy UM

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to protect wealth. And you know, with that you bring

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that example up, they were they were actually also protecting

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>many Jewish families wealth UM, avoiding avoiding that wealth from

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>being taken by the Nazis. So there's both sides to it, UM.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And so there have been you know, long debates and

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>court cases around this UM. But it's difficult, it is

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a difficult area to operate in. Now, of course, we

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>have the fall of banking secrecy. So there's a lot

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of accordance with other countries and tax you know, agreements,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot less secrecy around it than

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>historically has been well, and there must be some reputational

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>um concern on uh the executive level. Right. They don't

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be seen as the banker to Kim Jong un.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to be seen as the banker to

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin? Do they? No? No, I mean definitely not.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And in banks in general, I mean especially so thanks

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for other banks as well. I have have in recent

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>years with k y C anti money laundering or you know,

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the extra restrictions are being put in place have avoided

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>some of these individuals, these politically exposed individuals, because precisely,

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the person, the person could be fine

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for now, but who knows, you know, in a couple

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of years from now, what that person might get involved

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with that might paint you know, the bank and then

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>alienate their other clients who don't want to be associated

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with the bank, who you know is banking people you

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to associate with. So it's a difficult lyne

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to walk. But at one point, I mean a lot

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>of these clients were not sanctioned. They were just regular businessmen. Yes,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>they made their money in the post plutin opposed to

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Soviet era um privatization process, but they were, you know,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not untouchable. These were regular clients, and now they'd be

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they've become untouchable. So it's with many banks, it's a

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a problem about assessing, you know, what what level

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of risk, what level of probability are these clients going

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to be untouchable? You know that you're reporting is just

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>rich in detail here. I really love your news item

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>here that you and Hugo Miller, your colleague put together.

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>The numbers are just amazing. At one point, Credit Swiss

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>managed more than sixty billion dollars belonging to rich Russians

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and that brought in to Credit Swiss five hundred six

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in revenue per year. What's happened to that

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>business with all these sanctions? Here? This business is gone,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it's dead. It's dead. And and and those aren't necessarily

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>my words, those are the words of the bank. Um.

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, it started when you have you know, the

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>annexation of Crimea and some things just came out, Um

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's started to show the bank you know,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this might not be an area of growth for us anymore. Um,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but that was sort of a limited uh downfalls to

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>speaker decrease in revenues. Now we've really seen basically businesses

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's dead. It's it's all, there's nothing left. All they're

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>doing is basically managing money that's in frozen accounts. But

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they can't do deals anymore. They can't transact, they can't

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>trade for their clients, and that's really where they're making

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the most banks of their book. Yeah, there's a you

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>have a quote from Gotstein in here, the CEO, saying

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>you basically can't touch them. We don't have any business

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with Russian clients at all. Yep. It's interesting thing. So yeah,

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and you have some great photos in your uh in

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>story as well. In terms of Alisher's MS super yacht

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>named Bill Barr, it's undercovers at the Bloom and Voss

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>dockyard in Hamburg in March, and so it seems like

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody's trying to get their hands on those Russian Allegar yachts.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's an exercise and excess though, I mean,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>you have to have at least two helicopters on your Yeah, yeah, no,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>no question. All right, Marian, thank you so much for that.

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Marion Hofmeyer, financial reporter for Bloomberg News. She is based

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland. That's a great thing about Bloomberg News. We've

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>got people all over the place. If there's news anyone

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>who's planet, we're going to find it. Let's go right

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to our next guest, Kevin Nicholson, Global Fixed Income Co

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>c i O, CO head of Investment Committee at Riverfront

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Investment Group. Kevin, I look at the corporate bond Total

0:06:55.120 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Return Index year to date down. What happened? Well, it's

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>been a year had everything has gone down. I mean

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at the treasury market, treasuries, you know, senior

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>treasuries up a hundred and twenty five basis points from

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>where it started the year. And uh, you know, corporate

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>spreads have widened. So that's where why you've seen these

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>negative returns in the fixed income market. And you know

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>corporations are not uh you know, are not immune um

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>from football out and so uh, you know you're going

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to continue to see yields rise in my opinion, across

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the board as the FED continues. It's tightening cycle. Um.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But if we expect the FED to go to three, um,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they're almost there. It doesn't it become priced in at

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>some point? I mean, uh, don't you start buying bonds

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for the yield? Oh? Yeah, I mean I think that

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bonds are attractive at this point in the cycle. Uh.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things that I've been kind

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of preaching to our clients is that you know, you've

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>taken the long term excuse me, the short term pain

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to get the long term gain. Uh. You know, when

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you're purchasing bonds, obviously the starting yield that you purchase

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>them at is going to most likely be your return UM,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And so you want to make sure that you know,

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>at these current yields, you're going to actually have some

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>room or yields to go higher without the price depreciation

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming the annual income generation. And so that's why we

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>are focused at the front end of the curve, because

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you're getting more yield per unit of duration, and so

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to have a larger cushion for if

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>yields wise, that you're not going to have that depreciation

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmed that income. Whereas if you go to the long

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the curve. You're not getting paid for that

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>extra duration, and uh, you have a lot less cushion

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>about half as much. Kevin, how concerned are you in

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>your team there riverfront about this federal reserve and its

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ability too? I know, engineer kind of a soft landing

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>visa the rising interest rates and having a policy risk

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe going too far, too fast and pushing us into

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession. How do you guys think about that? Well,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, about a couple of weeks ago, we went

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>through the exercise because we looked at the beds UM

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>target for the end of the year of CORPC of

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>four point one percent, and we were like, how did

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we get there by a year in um and have

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing? So they speak um and over the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months, CORPC has averaged about UM forty two

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>basis points per month, and so therefore, in order for

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the BED to hit their rates target by the end

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of the year, that means that corp c a PC

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>must average about thirty three basis points. So you're gonna

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>have per month, So you're gonna have a huge slowdown.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't see the inflation cooling that fast, and so

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>therefore we continue to believe that you know, yields are

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be materially higher by the end of the year.

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>And so that's why we maintain um that you know,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a shorter duration. And we don't think that

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the FED is going to have a soft landing. We

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>think that they're going to overtighten and push us into

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>recession ultimately. And uh, do they then turn around and

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>cut I mean, I know, now we're going pretty far

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>out and it's hard enough to forecast you know, the

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>next twelve months, But do you expect the Fed to

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>uh try and fix a mistake? Well? I think the

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>big thing here is that the FED wants to get

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 1>rates normalized UM, so that if they do over uh,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if they overtighten, they have the ability to have some

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>room to be able to lower rate um. You know,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>but at current you know, at current levels, even if

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we were to if they were to stop let's just

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>say here or you know, a rate or two hikes more, UM,

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be enough to give them dry

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>powder going forward. So I think that that if they

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do overtighten the economy, um, they will they will make

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that a the inflation is under wraps at this

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>point I think inflation is the most important thing for

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>them to fight, and so for the FED, if they

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>send us in the recession and inflation is still high,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>then I don't think that they're going to stop there. Um,

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, because the FED poot is gone, and so

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>now it's really about trying to get inflation under control.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Where you where are you? You're off? You're off? Where

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are you putting money to work? Kevin? Given your backshop,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty darn didn't I would say, you know,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of a dark outlook. Yeah, I mean,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's only dark in the in the short term,

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to be quite honest. I mean we're looking at opportunities

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and from a fixed income standpoint, we're

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>still looking at bank loans and UH and high yield UH.

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>In the equity markets, UM, you are wanting to get

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>paid to wait, so we're looking um for dividend paying stocks.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at covered cost strategies UM. And combine that

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>with our high yell UH and bank loan approach. That's

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of you know, getting paid to weight. And

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>so we think that we're going to you know, we're

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be okay. It's just that the markets. As we

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>all talk about all the time, uncertainty, and right now

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we're in an uncertain time and it just I just

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like markets are going to be ranged bound. I'm

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>not saying that it's harm again, I don't believe that.

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Um I think that, you know, if we go into recession,

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be until late twenty three into

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>so we have some time on our side. It's just

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a matter of being selective, all right, Kevin, good, good stuff.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate getting your thoughts and your perspective there. Kevin Nicholson.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a global fixed income co c i O and

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>co head of Investment Committee at Riverfront Investment Group in

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the lovely city of Richmond, Virginia, where I spent a

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of time back in the day. All Right, for

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>my good friend Renny and I, we look at the

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>summer as the Triple Crown, and this weekend is a

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>first leg of the triple Crown. Memorial Day then of

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>course you've got four and then Labor Day. So when

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we get to the first leg of the triple Crown,

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking about seafood and laps to Mark Morrell.

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>He does he does this lobster thing full time. He's

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a founder and CEO of Get Main Lobster Mark. Thanks

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. A lot of folks

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>are starting to think more and more about getting those

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.239
<v Speaker 1>fresh lobsters. Talk to us about the lobster market today.

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we see inflation everywhere return. How is it

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>with the lobster guys. Yeah, it's insane right because fuel,

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they labor, you know, everything is up. So the lobster

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>men are feeling. It's the warf owners are feeling at

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the processors my company, so because then you have to

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>calculate what was the market there, and the market understands

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, so they know they're paying a little

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more, and the die hard lobster lovers um you know,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>are still buying. So it's an interesting time for sure. Yeah,

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering about the demand. I mean for me. Also,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the summer is marked in July and August by the

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Lobster Party, by the place I go to, the beach

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>place I go in the summer. We have the Lobster

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Party one each month and it's like the party to

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>go to um. But as we're all sort of tightening

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>our belts here because of six dollar a gallon gas

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, um groceries that are all of a

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sudden costing of our paychecks rather than ten to fifteen

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>do we still reach for the lobster demands? Has not

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>waned as much as I thought it would. Uh, really

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting and um, I mean one of the things lobster

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is very celebratory, so not something people eat every day,

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but if they want a special event to be that

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>much more special than lobsters could go to. By the way,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is lobster still the best? I mean I think of

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>main lobster as the pinnacle right caught in some freezing

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>cold waters by a guy with a sick accent in

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a sweet trawler like But um, is it still the

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>only way? Are there lobster farms? Are their genetically engineered lobsters?

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the story? Yeah? I think lab lobsters are in

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the future. I haven't heard of anything now here and

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>me and the only thing I fell was wild caught

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>by hand by an individual typically generational lobsters man or woman.

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty cool, big heritage here and the process

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't changed much. I mean, how have the the

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>lobster people in Maine, in New England, how have they

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>fared over the past few years with the pandemic, How's

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>their business changed, how have they evolved? Because you know,

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>whenever we talked to people that are in different parts

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, I was like to get a sense

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of kind of how their life, how their business has changed. Yeah,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it was different for everyone during the pandemic, and a

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't understand in the lobster industry itself,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>when the shutdown occurred, you got rid of casinos, cruise ships,

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in a bunch of restaurants. Those are big, big suppliers

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of lobster that people don't realize. So when you have

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>large purveyors that have tanks and freezers filled with lobster

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and nowhere for it to go, they rely on businesses

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like mine, where are online direct consumer. We shipped the

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>product so um. It was really interesting. Typically the price

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>goes up and down throughout the year depending upon supply

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and demand. But demand was super duper high and supply

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was super duper high. Uh, and then supply started to

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>get low um, and we had an entire year of

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>not much price change. Um and then suddenly I've never

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>seen lobster prices as high as they got recently it

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>was it was wild and because demand was still really

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>high but supply was low. But it would the uncertainty

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>what is this supply like, you know, is it a

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what is this lobsters? You know, natural lobsters? Is it?

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it on the rebound? Is it good? Is it endangered? Um? No,

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So main super sustainable and by designed by the lobster

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>men and women themselves. So we're never going to have

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>any supply issues from what is in the ocean. Um.

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's great news. Um. You know other markets from

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the overly privy too. I don't study the Canadian on

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I have to buy Canadian but I don't, you know,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>study elsewhere. But we don't catch anything below a pound

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and nothing above four pounds, so that we can let

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>them grow. And then the big ones, you know, we

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>want to keep them around because they're you know, they're breathing.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I will point out there have been you know, during

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the lockdown, Maine started selling recreational weed. I don't know

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>if that has anything to do with the demand. I

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that influences the demand picture or slows

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>down supply a little bit. But um, but you're moving

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>into a new era and I mean, like you said,

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>everything's still done traditionally in sustainable ways and it's an

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>incredible heritage. But now you're selling an n f T.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>What's that all about? What you got to tell us

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>about it? It's crazy. So back in November, um, I

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>discovered a beautiful one million rare lobster that lobs. I'm

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna work with Billy or Smith harvested and we have

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a relationship where I acquire a of his catch. So

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>um it was. Her name is Hattie Cotton colored cotton

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>candy colored lobsters. She's like blues and paints. If you

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>google or Hattie cotton candy lobster. I'm on it, and

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm on it right now. Yeah, I mean, mother nature

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>created something epic. Um So I was inspired by her,

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to do some cool projects. One was

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>created an I P A with shipyard called Hattie's Happy

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I p a UM And then the n f T project,

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>which I'm super pumped about, is Hattie's Bay Club. And

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's this Web two or a Web two business

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>jumping into Web three, and we're bringing what it's called

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in real life utility to the Web three world. Typically

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>an n f T gives you access to an exclusive

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>group of people. It may give you if you stake

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it and make you earned down the road. For us,

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>we want to use lobster in the web three world

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and say hey, you get this n f T, and

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we're doing monthly giveaways. We're giving tempercent fact and marine conservation.

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Those that collect and hold rare n f T get

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>access to potentially lobster for a year and just a

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of fun, uh fun things. And we're actually launching

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a merchandise website called b Hattie dot com and of

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the profits are going to token holders, So if you

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hold an n f T, you're gonna get the profits

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>on this apparel website that was inspired by by the

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>way I'm looking at pictures of this lobster and she

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. One of a million chances of finding she

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.479
<v Speaker 1>still alive? Is how he still alive? Yeah? Yes, right,

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Sea coastein Center in Ryan, New Hampshire, and she's alive

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and well, all right, Mark, awesome, awesome stuff. Best a

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>lot to you and Hattie. Mark Morrell, founder and CEO

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of Get Main Lobster. All right, let's talk real estate,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>because I the peak of real estate when Matt bought

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>his home. I'm going to call that the peak. We

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>got interest rates rising here, so I'm just wondering what

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the impact is on not just residential, a commercial real

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>estate as well. Has some Naji, President and CEO of

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Marcus and Millichap joins us Hassan, thanks so much for

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Has real estate peaked here? I mean,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's been such a great asset class during the pandemic,

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but has it peaked? Good morning, Thanks for having me

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on the program. Their market is definitely going through a

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>transition when you have interest rates at zero and now

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>having to move up to what is really considered normal

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Three year on the ten year treasury yield

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or even frankly three and a half or four yield

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on the pin your treasury is not high interest rate

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>by historical standards. We're going from zero and going rapidly

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>because the Fed now has to react to the inflation

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>threat or these inflation reality. I should say it is

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>causing a market transition, especially on the for sale housing

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation, because prices are up so much

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>since the prior to the pandemic, and now you have

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates moving people into apartment rentals. On the

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>commercial side, the lack of overbuilding and really strong fundamentals

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>prior to the pandemic and still today is really the

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>safety net on top of renk Walks rank well for

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate is coming back extremely strongly. And that's

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>why commercial real state is an inflation well cause has

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>some We have columnists here Cameron Cries who wrote a

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>piece today about housing the housing market saying that's not pretty,

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but it isn't two thousand six. This isn't going to

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>be a repeat of the bubble bursts that caused the

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Recession, because a great financial crisis, because um,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the rising supply that you did. We've

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>seen these incredible UH price increases and in fact, if

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the average median you know, on the

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>residential side, the average median home, um, the mortgage payment

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>has gone up more than fifty percent UM. But you

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have the overproduction that you had back then, and

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's the same on the commercial side.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. On top of the lack of overbuilding

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for all those estates, housing and commercial, you also had

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>lenders that stayed very disciplined during this last cycle. Unlike

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>oh five, oh six, oh seven, where there was so

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>much leverage in the system, underwriting standards had loosened so much,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and there was a lot of non performing loans when

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the O A O nine recession hit. That is extremely

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>different from what we're experiencing now. As lenders did stay disciplined.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a six bank system, we don't have

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of loans about to go into default, and

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so all of that provides really good sort of a

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>safety net on valuations. But prices are adjusting. Obviously. When

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates go from you know, three or three and

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a half percent on your average apartment loan to four

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent, you know in a matter of

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a few months, that's going to create some pricing pressure. Uh.

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Same with the office buildings, who are suffering even more

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because the demand side on office is much more questionable

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>than apartments, storage units, even retail that is now seeing

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a revolution of the use of brick and

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>mortar retail creating a lot of investment opportunities. So I

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think fundamentals are going to prevent a wholesale price correction,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but we're seeing pockets where a lot of appreciation has

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>led to record pricing, those are adjusting a little bit.

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'll say it again, rank growth is the key

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>apartment rents nationwide. Of for the first quarter of this year,

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we're up more than year earlier, and people have nowhere

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>else to live, So that rank growth is going to

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>continue at a healthy place. Maybe not quite as as

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>hot as this then, but definitely in the double digit range.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Hassam talked to us about supply of residential housing. You know,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the themes that I've picked up

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last several years, if not longer, was when

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the builders build stuff, they're building the McMansions, the stuff

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>where they've got a really nice profit margin, and not

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily building the entry level home. And that's part of

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the big problem we're seeing in in rents, for example,

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>is that changing at all our builders trying to cater

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to some of the entry level. The design has really

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>changed in the last ten years, from mega mansions to

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>more of the median affordable, you know, three to four

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>bedroom homes that that families can actually afford. The change, though,

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that land prices have skyrocketed, supply material

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>costs have gone way up, and labor costs have gone

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>way up, so it's become a lot harder to build,

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's become a lot more expensive to build. And we're

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>also seeing a new phenomenon of institutional capital coming into

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the built for rent single family market, where a lot

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the inventory that's being built is being built to

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>be rented, not to be sold. So if you look

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>at this various trans affecting for sale housing, that's a

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty important one in which is really evolved over the

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>last five years. What do you expect from the Fed here?

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Some I mean, um, you know, a huge portion of

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the price increase I think uh. Cameron Cries wrote earlier

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know of the increase in monthly payments over

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the last year has come from the Fed's efforts to

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>curb inflation. So does that continue into we see mortgage

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>rates continuing to rise and does it infect effect commercial

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as well? Yeah, I think the set is gonna have

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to stay aggressive. They can't back off. Now. I don't

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna have to go overboard. But the remainder

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of this year I believe will bring significant successive interest

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>rate increases, and it is to be expected. The inflation

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon is something that was not predicted and it's really

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 1>a function of recovering from this terrible pandemic and the

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>liquidity that was pumped into the system. You could argue

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that they overdid it, but better to have overdone it

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>than undershot and have us being a deflationary environment, which,

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 1>as you know, it's much harder to fight. I think

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going to be on the rise, but I,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>unlike many, I don't expect it to get out of hand.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the market can absorb another fifty It is

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis points two three and a half percent

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>on the tenure, and we'll be fine, all right, Some

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We really appreciate it. As some

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Nagy President and ce Oh of Marcus and Millichip getting

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a latest on real estate. Thanks for listening to the

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Yet on

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ball Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.