WEBVTT - Ditch the Pitch

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm off my game today. No, you're not. People are

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start making better content. I think

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about this for a long time.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.159
<v Speaker 1>When you program for everyone, you program for no one.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a word purpose driven platform, like we're

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to substance. How was that? Are you

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>happy with that? This is marketing therapy right now? It

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>really is? What's up? I'm Laura Currnty and I'm Alexa Kristen.

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Atlantia. Coming to you from spring break

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>and sunny Arizona. Hi, Laura, Hi, I miss you know

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we should be down here. We thought we would use

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this week to bring in one of our friends from Adwik,

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dernberg, who is the tech editor of that trade publication,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>coming and talk to us about some of the things

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>um that he's seeing from his vantage point, not just

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>from a signal in the noise trend perspective, but also

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ways in which we think that we can bring the

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>industry tighter together to actually move it forward. Yeah. I

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>think that the conversation really is more about what can

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we do to kind of change the PR marketing advertising

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>agency relationship. And I think that a lot of people

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have been saying what he's saying. He's very clear, and

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I like his currently dystopian. He likes to say he's

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>a pragmatist and a realist, but I think it's a

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhat like dystopian kind of perspective of where we are

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>today in this relationship between the press and and the

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 1>agency side and the client side. I think that there's

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot to be said in terms of the trades

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and I and I'm hoping we talked to him about this,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot to be said about getting into

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>where the trades are going and the trade publications role

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in actually driving change in the industry versus just maybe

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>reporting on it. So I'm excited to talk to Josh.

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to bring him in the studio and we'll

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>be back with him right after this. Yeah, we're back

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in the studio with Josh Sternberg, the tech editor of

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>ad Week. Welcome to the show, Josh, Welcome does the show, Josh,

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me so, Mr Josh Sternberg. Similar

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to our friends or Fisher, you've been on kind of

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the world. Um, tell us about where

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you came from, what You've done both on the paid

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sign Brandon Content and now over ad week. What are

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you doing? Yeah? So I'm here because I'm a failed musician.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this about yeah, aren't we all? Yeah?

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I um. I was in a rock jazz improv band

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and clearly there's not a market

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>for that. So I went to graduate school and really

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed academia. So I became a professor for a few years.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Then I met a girl, wound up in New York

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>where it was not economically viable for me to cross

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>two rivers back into New Jersey to continue teaching. So

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I need to find a job, and I landed in

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>PR and it was fine. I got a good understanding

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of how companies and brands communicate, but at the same

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>time I still enjoyed writing. Wound up at digit A,

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>writing covering media and the ongoing transition that publishers face,

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>moving from a legacy print analog world to a fun

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>digital world. How many years ago is that now? So

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that was about That was six years ago, two thousands twelve,

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was a digit A for about two and

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a half years. I got a call from the chief

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>revenue officer at the Washington Post who called me up

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, we're doing this brand studio thing. You've

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>been covering it, you know, the playbook of what people

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are doing. Seemed to have a good head on your shoulders.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you What do you say? So I said sure,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>um did that for about a year and a half

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>or so. Then NBC News came calling. And while I'm

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing at NBC News and got laid

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>off in March of this is on the digital side

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>doing Brandon content. Uh yeah, yeah. When I got laid off,

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, well, I really don't want to go

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>back into the business side, all the glitz and glamor

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of it all. I really missed reporting. I missed being

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in a news room, I missed the intellectual curiosity of reporters.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And I ended up at that week. So I've been

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>here now for about four months and it's phenomenal. So

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you've been covering a lot of what's on everybody's mind

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, the Facebook, Google, do appoly and for many

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners who obviously are in the industry, this

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>has become mainstream news as opposed to just industry news.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us some background on the state of

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with Facebook and Google. So I think

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the one of the interesting things about all of this

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.119
<v Speaker 1>is that this is not something that happened overnight, and

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that is necessarily company lead users, advertisers, marketers.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>We allowed this to happen by continuing to use these

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>products and these websites without really paying attention. Um. You know,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about the doopoly, it's more on the

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>ad revenue side, right where five or eighty six cents

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of every digital dollar goes to one of those two companies,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, And we're going to start to see Amazon

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>take a little piece here and there. On the odd side,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the Internet is for all times of purposes for a

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, Google and Facebook, so that attention, those

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs are there. So, you know, I'll throw that back

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. Is you know, media and marketing folks,

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>when you see a plan and you're looking for scale

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and reach, what are you looking for? It's it's a

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>good question, and I think we think about things very

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>strategically in terms of what is the big idea, how

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>do we come across and drive impact and attention in

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the market. When you hear it some statistic and don't

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>quote me on this, but it's something over fift of

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>impressions are viewed by bots not loading on a page. UM.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>That's concerning, and that's not something that's new. Those are

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>not new facts, UM. And I think we very early

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>decided some of the work that we've done, and certainly

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>work that I've done with other clients, that we put

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>content in an environment where it wasn't skippable, where it

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was integrated within other content that was editorially driven. And

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something that we we tend to forget

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about that that doesn't happen by pressing a button and

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>running through a programmatic buy Right. That's many nights of

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>having drinks and dinners with the sales rep. And that's

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>many nights of that sales rep trying to figure out

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>how am I going to get this account to do

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>these things? And there's often that a disconnect because most

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>people are not Most buyers are not like you. We

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have a box to check, we have a spreadsheet to

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>fill out, and let's just keep the ball moving forward. UM.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And the sales rep they're looking at they've got a

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>quarily number to hit, they're looking at what's in front

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of their face. But that sales rep who's trying to

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>do something big, trying to do something creative, will often

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>have to walk back those ideas either a because no

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>one's buying, be because they have a hard time articulating

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what that thing could be. And then when it does

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>get sold, the execution is really bad because no one

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>actually thought it through. And I'm sure that pisses you

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>guys off on that certainly, And I think that's a

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>large part of what's wrong, you know, and why many

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago we walked away from the RFP process and

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we want the value. There was no value right, There

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was no value in it anymore because at the end

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the day one, we weren't looking for off the

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>shelf kind of stuff. Um. We also, and this is

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>something that I talked to other client side folks about

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time, like, you should know what the Washington

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Post is really good at, and you should know what

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>their road map is, and you should know how you

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>know what the New York Times is really good at

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>and what's the differentiator And you start going to those

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>people specifically because you have an idea, not the other

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>way around. Can I tell you the story, tell us

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the story. But I want to ask you a question

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>before we get too far away from it. What is

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the trade media's role in changing this conversation? So there

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of ways of looking at this. Trade

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>journalism works well when you are able to explain something

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to practitioners who are doing this every day that might

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have their clients on. So if I am writing about

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>how a particular company is doing something, so you know,

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>let's say the Washington Post, how the Washington Post is

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>operating their programmatic strategy, it's a process story. It's here's

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>how this one company is doing this one thing, and

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>here how you reader can take away knowledge of what

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this company is doing and how you might be able

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to use those practices in your day to day job. Um,

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>there's another side of trade journalism that can shine a

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>light on some of the shady stuff that happens in

0:09:54.160 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>the industry that we talk about in different settings. We

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>go out for drinks, you guys tell me stuff that

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't tell me when I'm calling to talk about

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a story. It's in a way, no, no, it's not

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not you specifically. Let's yes, you guys. You guys do

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not give me any dirt ever. But you know, going

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going out to drinks with sources, going out to coffee

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>or launch and just talking with people, you can find

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>stories of companies doing bad things, people doing bad things,

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you report and you shine a light to

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>hopefully show others, hey, don't do this, this is dumb. Uh.

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>There is a growing trend not just within trade journalism um,

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but within the tangentials of trade journalisms. So it doesn't

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>quite seep into the mainstream, but it does get into

0:10:54.080 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>publications that cover media or advertising on the side um

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>where they look for the salacious and for the dirt

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of salaciousness and dirt. So can we

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>park that part there? Because I want to come back

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to the center. One of the main reasons we created

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at Landia was how do we shape the conversation, poke

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>holes and ask questions about legacy models, the traditional way

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>of doing things when in fact technology and the consumer

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>have moved tenfold away from the way this this industry

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>acts and behaves and and goes to market. So when

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I got to add week, part of my pitch for

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>them to hire me was that I wanted to build

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a desk that looks at basically how every single decision

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>that the media landscape has made over the last twenty

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>years has been wrong, and it has created problem, which

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>has created more problems, which has created more problems. And

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that we are at a point with technology becoming better,

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>becoming stronger, becoming faster, where through the lens of trade

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>journalism as educator, as explicator, that we can help brands, publishers, agencies, platforms,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>even ad tech vendors make better decisions. So that way,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>when we figure out how to make VR headsets not

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>look as silly as they look and make a use

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>case for people to actually put them on, we're not

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>getting served display ads or pop ups or banner ads, right, um,

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think to your point, the way that we

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>can do that is to write stories and cover the

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>industry with that perspective of look, here's what doesn't make sense,

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what makes sense, Here's what's working for this company

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and why, and what can you take out of it

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that you might be able to help with your job.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So Alex and I have talked to, obviously Sara Fisher

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>who's a reporter, and Sarah made a really good UM

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>point at the end of the episode talking about how

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between the industry and the trade press can

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>afford to get tighter in the sense of shaping those

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>narratives and helping journalists who might not have been practitioners.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>You and Sarah were both in interesting situations and that

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you were a practitioner at one point. How can the

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>industry help Josh Sternberg, How can the industry help Sarah

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>fisher Um and others like you or those that have

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>no background in our in what we do, tell those

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>stories or explain them in a way that's going to

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>actually create change versus swirl. Yeah, the thing that comes

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to mind immediately is don't lie, don't bullshit, don't obfu, skate,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Just tell us it's okay that you don't know something.

0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>It's okay that you tried something and it failed. Not

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>everything is going to be successful. Not everything. Actually, pretty

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>much nothing that you do is going to be revolutionary

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or game changing or whatever buzzword. Getting every single press

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>release or pitch be honest. And I think that's where

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>trade journalism can excel is if we focus on the honesty.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The trick to that, though, is that a lot of

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>people within the industry, especially on the business side, it's

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not in their best perspective to be honest. I mean

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's so funny because like I would never say, like

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually wouldn't think about honesty is the first thing

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but or the most important thing, because to me, that's

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>like table stakes. Right. Um, what I think you're saying

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that is making me want a different model is like

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>how do we start incentivizing a different relationship? Like how

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>do you incent a different model here? It's interesting, Like

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking over the work that we've done together,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and I could see your point in terms of the

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>business side coming to you when it's a best in

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>class case study that they want to promote. But how

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>many pitches have you sent maybe you're your peers have

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sent out to a publisher saying we want something that's

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>never been done before. Of course, right, it's like, but

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>don't do that, because if you're setting that bar, there's

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>nothing that hasn't never been done before. To use multiple negatives.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So we had the privilege of having you at our

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>first I R Element at Landy a live sound served

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>over sound and Um, you and I talked that night.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the things you said to me that resonated

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so much. I think you said, there's like basically a

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>malaise in the industry that just creates mediocrity. That's my

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>version of what you said. You said in a much

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>better headline. I just said, you know, the industries mediocrity

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>by necessity, where the output of what we do is

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>based off of not trying to do the best. But

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's too again to your point that that laziness, that

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>malaise of all right, I gotta check that box. I

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>got to make sure that all the way up and

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>down the chain that my ass is covered. It's cover

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>your ass syndrome, right, and media on the business side

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is really good at that. Yeah. I think what's really

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting here, though, is that, like you're talking about getting

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>briefs that basically say, do something that's never been done before.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Innovate is not a checkbox? Is that a check box?

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's phenomenal that those are the things that you

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that you guys on the on the editorial side see.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's it's innovate with a pedestrian eye. When

0:16:54.960 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>someone asks me what is the best piece of answered content,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I've seen brand branded content, native advertising content. So that's

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>also part of the problem, right, what is this thing? Right?

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, you know, I always think to the g

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>E Capital Bus road show that was done with Slate

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for Growth. Yeah, bringing that was Laura, That was LA

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because that was that was it was interesting, right, It

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>was taking the idea of you know what, we've got

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this message, and we want to take this message to

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>particular people in particular areas, and then we can create

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>all of this editorial content as well as sponsored or

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>branded or whatever content and do it in a way

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense for the reader. The biggest problem that

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I have with our industry is we don't take off

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>our hat in whatever that hat maybe um you know,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you might call me cynical, and I don't take off

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 1>my reporter's hat. But at the same time, sometimes, you know,

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I cannot take off my marketer hat. And on the

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>business side, that's all too prevalent where I've been in

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>meetings where the sales rep and the agency and the

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>brand are thinking in terms of the hat that they're

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>wearing and not they're human being hat. And when you

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>put on the stress test of if you're a normal

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>person and you're waiting in line at any grocery store

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're skimming through or scrolling through a website, are

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you going to click on that piece of sponsored content?

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>What are you going to click on? And we don't

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>think about that, or if we do, that doesn't get

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>pushed down stream to twenty four year old media buyer

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>or the media planner. Um. So, if you can take

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>off your industry hat and put on your human being hat,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I think some of these challenges that the industry faces

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>will just now actually fade away. I was talking to

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>someone last night, UM, and I'm saying, why can't people

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>see beyond what their business does? It's so fun? And

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>then what you're saying, I'm taking to like like a

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>very just basic level. So people say, I am a

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>data company that does X right and I see it

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I'm like, no, no, no, no,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>your your capabilities are this, and if you applied it

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>over here, which is something you're not even thinking about,

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>your company becomes totally different. And I think that so

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>going beyond like the industry hat and the junior media buyer,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I also think that we have like really senior, senior

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>level people on the client side who also aren't thinking

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>about what they do really really well and putting that

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in places that are just very simply valuable, And that's

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. Right at the end of the day,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I think to your point, there are still too many

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>UM brand marketers, UM and agency folks who are evaluating

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the success of campaigns based on impressions and things that

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>do not reflect the engagement, meaningful engagement and qualification of

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the audience that they're reaching. Right, what does the consumer

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 1>care about? And these briefs that go out, you see them,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they're very one way, very push versus pull in terms

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of here's my brand story and needs to show up

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and needs to target these people. But what happens when

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>it gets to those people, it's it's out of their hands,

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>right like it, It gets just pushed along. So when

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I was on the business side, and I would get

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>an RFP, and it would say, we want these three

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>concepts to come through in the sponsored content, and I

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and and and my team we put together these what

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought were really smart content strategies and content plans

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and distribution mechanisms and all of these levers that we

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>can pull to get the content in front of the

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>right people. And invariably I get nose from buyers and

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I get nose from brands because I didn't use those

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>three specific words in the content. What what words whatever word? Right,

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So I learned that in order to win the account,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>all I needed to do was parent back the brief

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in a semi cogent way and then when we would

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>win the account, put together content that was mediocre by necessity.

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So so because I think this is a really important

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>point as you're talking about that process that you were

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time willing to power it back, and I

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>know that you're not the only person who does this

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>to win business because you have a number and hit

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's how you're incentivized. On the ad cell side. Well,

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly I didn't do that good of a job by design,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>by design um, But can we talk about just going

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the earlier question, how can we as an industry,

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>how can we as agency people and brand marketers work

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>better with the Josh Sternberg's and journalists of the industry

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to change this conversation. So I think this is part

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of it, right, having these types of conversations on the record,

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>where one of the things that I try to do

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is talk to as many people as possible up and

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>down the food chain. And I know that if I

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>talked to the CEO and the CMO. I'm going to

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>get a slightly more refined message than if I talked

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to the VP, then when I talked to the director,

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>than when I talked to the manager. So I try

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk to everybody so I can kind of get

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>a better sense of what is real and what is not.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I look at more in terms of war, maybe because

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it sounds like it's like look like this.

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>The CEO is the head of the army, right, and

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the CEO is getting his or her information from his

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>or her lieutenants, who's getting their information from the grunts

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and the sales jups and the agency

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>reps who are going out for dinner and drinks and

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>gene parties and apple picking. Are the ones in the

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>trenches who are trying to give the information up to

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>their respective generals, and those messages often get conflated, destroyed,

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>um misconstrued. Can I can I say something? Of course,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if if marketing became this is a druma, I'd beat

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But if marketing became more at the center

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of true business, do you think that there would be

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>onions to peel back? Do you think there will be

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>stories to spin or would you be talking about real

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>ship that's moving real needles, that's changing real consumer relationships,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that's doing real things. And is that and is that coming?

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. And this is very naive and very stupid,

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and they understand this, but for me, the the bottom

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>line is do you sell ship? Do people buy the

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>product or the service that you are advertising and marketing

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and if so, then it's working. Right. Yeah, but I'm

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about like marketing building products. And this is a

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>hard concept. Right when marketing actually starts becoming part of

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>creating the products and creating the business versus just going

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>out and messaging that business and bringing in sales, it

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>will always do that. I mean, I I think of

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs and Apple, right, the product was built in conjunction

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with jobs, thinking of marketing. Yeah, but he wasn't thinking

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>about marketing. He wasn't thinking about marketing. It's thinking about

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a product. And you know what I mean, that's what

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that is what we're talking about, and it's real and

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like Steve Jobs, sorry I'm excited in Arizona. It's only

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>seven in the morning. But like Steve Jobs, Steve Jobs

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like I'm going to go and think about marketing.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He knew that that was his strong suit. He knew

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>he was a seller, but he wasn't just selling. But

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>he also, if I may designed with the consumer in mind,

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>he built for the consumer, which is if you look

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>as competition, nobody there is. They're thinking about the utility,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but not necessarily the end consumer. They had their tech

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>teams building ship and then they didn't have the right

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>marketers on top of it. And so one of the

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>biggest problems is they like, look at Yahoo tech teams

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and then separated marketers. Look at Microsoft and Microsoft and

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Sati has done an amazing job with Microsoft, but I'm

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>going to tell you, like still tech teams building things

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>for consumers. That's why some of their Windows products didn't work.

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 1>It's clear, it's clear, but but I guess that's my

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that's my big sticking point. If we start, if marketers

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>stopped just thinking about the cell and Laura and I

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about this all the time, and and start thinking

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about the context, right, And what I talk that was

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>back to take off your hat. And I think you

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>guys are in the position to actually change that, right.

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. Well, actually I would argue that because as

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting here, you know, in my head brainstorming, and

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and Alexa will probably be able to finish the sentence.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>But I actually see the role. I don't think the

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 1>word journalists in a trade function actually does it justice anymore.

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually see you being the conduit or the liaison

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>between these agencies and these publishers and these brands to

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>start connecting dots that they're not seeing because everybody is

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so in the rabbit hole you said, having blinders on

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>focused on the thing that they're selling, that they're making,

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're creating, that they're not leveraging the best practices

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or lessons learned or failures of their peers to learn

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>from cree and move forward. I also think they can't

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>see the signals, Like when you're drinking your own bathwater,

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and we all do it to a certain extent, you

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>cannot see the signals in the noise. And that's what

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 1>we built this platform on. That's what we built this right,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I would love to see more folks

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on our side of the table. Use you, Josh Stebergain,

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and I use the word use loosely, but partner with

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you on to start thinking about how we I don't

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>want to. And this is a practice I'm going to

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>take away from this conversation. I'm no longer going to

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>call you and say, hey, I'm doing this insane thing,

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's not for innovation for innovation sake. There's

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a strategic purpose. But I'm gonna call you and say, hey,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm wondering about this thing. What's going on in

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. Is there a conversation we can have with

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>somebody else that you're talking to that's exactly right. So

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the stories that I will look at more closely as

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a reporter are the stories that someone comes to me

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and it says, I'm not selling a product, I'm not

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>selling the new thing. I'm interested in what I'm seeing,

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and I need you as that conduit to go find

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>other people that are doing this and we're not. We're

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not doing it. We're not doing it exactly, or am

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I not. One of the things. One of the things,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>if I can to out my own company for a second,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that I really enjoy about ad Week is over the

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>last year and a half or two years, the company

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>has been shaping itself to service as a place for

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that community. And not to say that there's no skepticism

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or you know, you might call it cynicism or negativity.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I call it pragmatism and realism. Um. But the idea

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that CEO and CMOS read us to understand what's happening,

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and when they can connect dots and we can help

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>connect dots, it makes for better decision making on the

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>business side. At least that's the theory. And I'm excited

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>over the coming months and years to continue to develop

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this community because I think the idea of agencies and

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>brands and publishers talking to each other as opposed to

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>pitching each other needs to happen to make better decisions.

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Partnership is happening right now. So it's time killed by

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>d I Y. And we know that you have the

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>best tweets in the trade pub games. So we're hoping

0:29:52.720 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>your answers are just as exciting. Yeah real okay, yeah,

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So Josh, what would you kill in the industry? Oh? God, everything,

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>burn it all down? Um. Not a cynic no, no.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we're working on is

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to be skeptical but not cynical, which is fair. It's

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to do that. Um. What would I kill? Um?

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>From the reporter perspective. I would kill press releases. There's

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>no reason for a press release. I'm never going to

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>cover your press release because you're sending it to me

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're sending it to five thousand other people. There's

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing interesting in a press release. That's why it's a

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>press release. What would you buy? What would I buy?

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I would buy the New York Yankees? Would you buy

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>them as is? Yeah? I love the Baby Bombers. Yeah. Um.

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>What would you do yourself? I'd be a musician. I

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>hear like tears, Yeah, I mean that's that's like. I

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>am the most comfortable when I'm on stage with the

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>guitar slinged around my shoulder. So why don't we figure

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>out how we do in Atlantia at week event that

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you can play at done one of my colleagues, Marty Swant,

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>he's also a guitar player, and when I was coming

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>over to ad Week, we were kind of kicking around

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea of starting a band called the c p MS.

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I will see myself out on that one the next

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>start over time. Josh, thank you so much for coming.

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Where can people call you to partner with you to

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about stories? No phone calls. Do not call me.

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You can email me Josh dot Sternberg at at week

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or you can follow my brain farts on

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at at Josh Sternberg. Josh, thank you so much

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for coming to Atlantia. Always a pleasure to hang out

0:31:55.120 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>with you. So I think Josh poses some interesting challenges

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to our side of the business, and I think that

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>there's ways to really start thinking about UM partnering with

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>journalists in a way that doesn't just report out. And

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got this plea from him on press

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>releases and pitch stories, but really thinking about how we

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>can change the narrative and work together to learn from

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>one another, and that really I think changes the role

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that the trade publications play and trade organizations at large

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in our industry. Wouldn't you say? We agree? And I'm

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like really into this challenge he put out there to

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>marketers and agencies and said, Okay, we'll kind of kill

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea and reporting on kind of short termism and

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>delacious stories if marketers and agencies are willing to come

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and talk more openly about failures and really work with

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>us on concepts and ideas versus things and campaigns like

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>tactics and nextic you shift, um, and I think that

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>every marketer out there should kind of take that challenge

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and gives Josh a call and say here, I'll give

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you something to report on. Let's let's change the industry. Yeah.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's totally the same way we think about

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>urfping versus integrating and and collaborating and so UM. I

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think that those are behavioral shifts that the industry is

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>um beginning to engage in. And I think we can

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>only go up from here. So with that, big ups

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for our producer, Cameron Drews. Thanks Cam, And we have

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a new producer in the house who is joining our

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>team another Laura. Welcome to the show, Laura. Um, she's

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>smiling from behind the booth. What am I gonna do

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to Laura's such a problem. I don't know. I think

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty bit badass. Cam. We love you that we're

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>adding another woman to the to the team. Yeah, it's

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>not you, it's us, Cam, we know. Um. Anyhow, Thank

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you to Andy Bower's, Matt Turk, Jacob Weisberg, all our

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>friends and family at Panable. We will be back in

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Enjoy spring break at Landia. Full disclosure. Our

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>opinions are our own.