WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 6 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Check it out man Down. Then Thursday morning, October ten

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>up beating the book podcast Megapod week number what is it? Six?

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Week six? National Football League. It's Gil Alexander on the

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>show today. The staples is always from Circus Sports, Derek

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Stephen's conciliary, the vice president of operations at Circus Sports,

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and Gentlemen's Mike Palum, Good morning, Michael, good morning,

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>and guests indeed Todd Wishnev of course the other staple

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on the show. To my left Todd from his uh

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>palatial Grace Land somewhere next to the South Point Hotel casino. Todd,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what is your record now in Circle? What is it?

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's sixteen and nine, but thanks for drinxing

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.319
<v Speaker 1>me sixteen and nine. Todd and I both went four

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and won the first week of the new quarterly A Circle. Uh,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they're fifty five and oh's last week and two D

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>four and one's interested. We are behind the eight ball.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>See if we have a Thursday pick coming up, and

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>our guest today on the heels of Michael Lombardi and

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ford and Ball Leases and Gentlemen's producing number five

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>from the Visa Show and numbers game, and he hosts

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>his own show called market Watch Monday through Fridays UH

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>four to six Pacific, seven to nine Eastern evenings at Visa.

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It's Jeff Parl's Good morning, Jeffrey, good morning, Gil. It's uh,

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a great honor to be on with you.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a great honor to be on with Mike Palm,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's a great honor to be with the guy

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of eaton tennis. The other day, well, easy on the

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>last one, which would be Todd Wishneff in the first

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>annual Las Vegas Invitational tournament, although a rules committee came

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>down on Twitter and said that in fact, it is

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>your responsibility to move that ball that was on the court,

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore the point should be Todds. That changes everything.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Todd hitting a drop shot that managed to hit a

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>ball that was laying on Jeff's side of the court.

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course he did. We gave the point Jeff should

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>have been Todds. And then I go pay the guy

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this morning and try to give him a hundred dollar

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>bill because I own like forty six dollars because he

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>hit a plus one thirty against me, and he gives

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>me a hard time, like I'm giving him a hard

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>time for giving him a month. I didn't. I didn't

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>know if I had changed, Todd. It's a it's a

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>big deal if I don't have changed that. This gentleman

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>pulled a groin while playing Charging to the Net Mike

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Palm Mike Circus Sports update mentioned fifty five and oh's

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and two four and once. What is the leader of

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing at right now? Twenty wins, four losses

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in one tie, so twenty and a half points. Todd

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Wish snaps, it's only four and a half points back lead. Wow.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>For those of us who are in this quarterly thing

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>now after one week of four in October, we want

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to know what the number is on this in New

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>England Thursday night game? Do we have those out yet?

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>As we record this on Thursday morning? Here the week

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>six point spreads. The Patriots are seventeen over that giant

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in the circle con seventeen. Okay, so Todd, Then the

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>question becomes, and we can start with a Thursday game here, gentlemen,

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>the the thought becomes, you know, normally I don't play

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>any Thursday games. This is awfully tempting tonight with the

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and seventeen point favorites. Thursday games are squarely, but

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Giants are basically punting on this game. There's no

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>sae Quon Barkley, there's no Galman, there's no Shepherd, there's

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>no Ingram. Are they going to score enough points here

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to prevent New England from covering this? Todd? Are you

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>playing this at all? I'm not gonna play it. If

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I did, I would, I would, I would lean to

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, But I'm not gonna play it. Jeff, I

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like New England the laying sixteen and a half or seventeen,

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>regardless of of where it is right now. There's some

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and a half's out there as well, But I'm

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>looking Giants team total, I said earlier today on the

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers game. I liked it even under ten and a half.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>There our twelve and a half's out there. How are

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the Giants gonna score more than twice in this game?

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, Todd and I got burned on a on

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a jet team total against New England a few weeks

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ago on Purechcanary, But I kind of like that under

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve and a half Giant team total and uh at

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>minus one. Mike, you know I actually lean Giants getting seventeen.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But I don't like this weather. Yes, good point. I

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think the weather is a big factor tonight, Gil and

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>H Daniel Jones playing in the A C C and

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so far only in the fall. Uh in New York

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has not seen any weather like this. Brady is so

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>used to these conditions. I think this really leans Patriots

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>with weather. I am so tempted to play the Patriots

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and play a Thursday game. Foxboro temperature right now fifty

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>two degrees tonight, expected to have fifty precipitation, chance of

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>precipitation fifteen miles per hour wind. I just don't know

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if I want to get locked into the other four picks,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>but I am tempted by a Thursday night game in

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the way that I have not been thus far this year.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's the Thursday night game. Let us begin with

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>best bets. By the way, how do we do last week? Todd?

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's recap? First of all, Oh yeah, we should recap.

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe that you guys, both all of us went

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>two and one on the picks, which would move me

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to nine and six, Mike would move to eight, six

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and one, and you would move to six and nine.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Six and nine because I put together one and two

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is every other week. What happens if I win Circa

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>October after that performance, that will be the poster child

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of why Circa did these quarterlies? Someone who could be

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as bad as me the first month and then turn

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it around. So that's what I'm playing for. It could happen.

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It could happen. By the way, if this weren't a

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>football show, I could brag about baseball. But since it's

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>not a baseball show, there's nothing really talk about. Gnatitude, Baby,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it, all right? Raised the Night. You

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>should just say, how about that? Davy Roberts. If you've

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>been listening to a numbers game on visa, just a

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>windfall of cash. Yesterday, Cardinals Gnats Nats series, both wild

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>card games. We hit multiple games in the division series.

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we missed twice the entire time so far.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Got the raised to night plus to forty going against

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>our futures bets on the Astros. We shall see. All right,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>let's do football picks. Let's try to do better. Mike.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We start with you. What do you got. I'm gonna

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>take a total for my first best bet, We'll go

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>with old Fannie pack Vic hosting the Tennessee Titans. I

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thought this number would come back thirty seven, thirty seven

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half. We've actually seen it take up to forty.

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go under forty and Denver um I think

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you will. You will see this game played in the teens.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Mariota won't turn the ball over to keep the game close.

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But look at last week, even in San Diego, neither

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>team moved the ball, the Chargers or the Broncos. Flacco

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>is just like you know, a statue back there. I

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think Tennessee will put some pressure on him. They'll be

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>able to sack him a couple of times. And I

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think the first team just to a seventeen wins this game.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>So we'll go under forty in Denver. Under forty and Denver.

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna jump in because if you listen to guessing

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lines this week, one of the picks that I had

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the long team favorite in is this one. I thought

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee should be favorite. They are not. Denver is a

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.119
<v Speaker 1>two and a half point favorite in this ball game.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I think forty and a half is

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>more consisdered. We give Mike an extra half point for

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it is under all right. If that's consensus, that's consensus.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the Denver line is too. I'm taking Tennessee.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Here is my best bet, first best bet of the week,

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee plus the two points. For some of the reasons

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael just stated in one of which was Marcus Mariota

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do a lot right. I've been a critic of

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>his for many years. But the one thing he does

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>do well, and we'll have him, you know, in this

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>league for many years to come, he doesn't turn the

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>ball over. As Mike said, this is one of these

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>games where I think that particular skill is at a premium.

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Mariota and the Titans, now with their new kicker.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, no more Cairo Santos and miss four

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>field goes last week, three missed, one blocked. It is,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in fact Cody Parkey. I think Cody Parkey, Marcus Mariota

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Titans go in. I'm not gonna be influenced

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>by what I saw from the Broncos one week. Last week. Uh,

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they finally forced to take away did the Broncos after

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>not having done so the first four weeks of the season.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Came up with three last week, but that was the

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Chargers doing Chargers things. I'm not gonna count on the

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Broncos having that kind of a turnover lead in this one,

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>or a turnover victory in terms of the turnover differentials.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going Tennessee plus the two points. I think

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee should be favored. Todd Um, I'm gonna go with

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the under in the Dallas cow Girls versus the New

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>York Jets under forty four and a half um. And

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>here's why I always love playing Dallas under. I think

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they're just a great under team because they love to

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. They're not that explosive offensively, and I

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think their defense is pretty good. Now, last week it

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>would have gone under. I had under against the Package.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>It was seventeen nothing at the half, and it got

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>out of control because the Packers got ahead by so

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>much went into the pre event and that killed the under.

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That may not be the case this week. I think

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys were all talking about darn Old is going

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>to be back this week, it seems like. But even

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>with them back, how I don't see the Jets getting

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>more than fourteen points, maybe seventeen, So you know, fourteen

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>fourteen fourteen still gets even even thirty to fourteen gets

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you under the forty four and a half. So I'm

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go under the forty four and a half in

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas, New York Jets game and hope for the

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>collaborate to run the ball forty four and a half,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>which is one of four afternoon games on Sunday. Thank

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you that they're not ten and two this week. Remember

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a London game six thirty am Pacific, nine

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty am Eastern, then six games at the ten am

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>one pm time slote, and then four games in the

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>afternoon in the Dallas Jets game. One of those four, Jeff,

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we usually start with our guests with picks, so I'm

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna snake this. You get your best bet, and then

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you can follow it up with your second best bet.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Here to start things off second round for us. Very

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>nice going the full fantasy football style here, Gilt. Yes,

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll start off with one of those late afternoon games.

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the Rams minus three, laying the points

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Niners. Now, of course, the last two samples

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from this team, these two teams of San

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Francisco absolutely pummeling Cleveland on Monday night. The Rams losing

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a tight game and really a game they should have won.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Zero line usually money on kicks at the end of games,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Mrs the forty four yard field goal. It's a scenario

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>here for the Rams. It's a good spot. They're back

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>at home the Niners on a short week. If the

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Rams lose this game, they're gonna be three and three,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the Niners would be five and oh. It would be

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where the Rams are two and a half

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>back without the tiebreak against San Francisco, and if Seattle

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>were to win in Cleveland, they would be two back

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle with Seattle having the tiebreak. It feels like

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a good spot for the Rams to get right, even

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with how good San Francisco has looked. I'll lay the

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>three with the l a Rams at the Coliseum against

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners. That's my first best bet of the week.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Gill Yeah, Niners on short rest here Rams. Last week,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Golf filled up the statue one touchdown to Pick Everett

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and Cup his biggest target seven for Everett, nine for one,

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>seventeen touchdown for Cup. Girly fifteen carries for fifty one

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>yards to touchdowns just fifteen carries, but Jeff taking the

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>rams for all the reasons stated giving the field goal

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>as his best bet. Numero Uno, what's number two? Number two?

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to arrow Head. I know the Chiefs

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>are banged up. I know Patrick Mahomes is banged up,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>but I like over fifty five in this game. This

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>feels again another good spot for Kansas City to get

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>right after a lackluster offensive performance against a really good

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis team. Hey, and I lost Indie took two weeks

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.599
<v Speaker 1>ago to Oakland. Might just be the fact that the

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Raiders are pretty damn good themselves, but I like over

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty five. I'm not sure how Kansas City slows down Houston.

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Houston can run the ball well. They obviously have an

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>explosive passing game when things are right. But I see

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this game both teams in the thirties actually, so I'm

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>going over fifty five. Casey's offense gets right, Houston's offense,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>off of a humongous league last week against Atlanta, continues

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to roll against a not very good Casey defense. What

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about fifty five and a half? That's consensus? Over fifty

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. Yeah, I'll still go over fifty

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. This the guildes this feels something

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in the pocket of thirty five thirty one. That still

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>gets me over that fifty five and a half. All Right,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what version of Deshaun Watson in the Texas offense.

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>We get Deshaun Watson who was clean, perfect passerrating last week,

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but prior to that was just getting sacked left and right. Uh.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>He had a streak of eight straight games with at

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>least four times being sacked, and he got sacked twice,

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and he got sacked like six times before. He was

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>clean last week in Houston's win over Atlanta, but that,

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of course was Atlanta Houston at Kansas City. Jeff going

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>over fifty five and a half. Todd pick number two.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the fighting gardner men shoes and

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the jack Backsonville Jaguars giving one point to New Orleans. Now,

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, why are the Jags giving one point to

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans? And most people are gonna be like, well,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans are is really good. They've got Bridgewater playing well.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's the regular Saints not so fast. In my opinion,

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I really like what I've seen from Gardner Minshew on

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the road played extremely well against Carolina last week. They

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>could have won that game had they not given up

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a sack fumble for a touchdown. UM. I also liked

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>what they did against Denver on the road as well. Uh,

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>now they're coming home Teddy Bridgewater, while he seems to

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>be getting things under control with the Saints, it's still

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>not Drew Brees. So it's still not let's let's call

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it sevent of New Orleans offense. And now you're going

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>into Jacksonville against the team that a couple of years

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>ago was a great defense. I don't know necessarily they're

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a great defense anymore, but they're probably pretty good on defense.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And um, I just think that New Orleans in that

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>road game against Seattle, they won because of you know,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>defensive touchdowns and turnovers and stuff like that. Now you're

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>asking Teddy bridge Water to go on the road against

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a pretty decent team in Jacksonville. I think Jacksonville feels like, hey,

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>they might have found something here at quarterback. And all

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I gotta do is win the game by one point.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna go with the Jacksonville Jaguars minus the

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>one what do you think about New Orleans though as

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to New Orleans. Do you still think Jacksonville wins

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a game against New Orleans? Well, no, I gotta change

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>my pick if it's New Orleans. But because I was

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>making my bed based on New Orleans. All right, we're

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sneaking this, so it's my turn now. I'm I'm sneaking

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Mike right here. I'm gonna go to London

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>against my better judgment, Going to London for a squirrely

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>six thirty am Pacific, nine thirty am Eastern State side

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>London game between the Panthers and the Buccaneers, A very

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>early rematch to the season division battle. Already playing game

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>number two. Cam Newton played in the first game for

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. Tampa Bay won that on the road at

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Carolina fourteen. A lot of love for Carolina here. Christian

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey lighting up the stat sheet and rightfully so that

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of love for Christian McCaffrey. Nineteen carries

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred seventy six last week for two touchdowns, then

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>through the air six catches sixty one and a touchdown,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>averaging nine point three yards per carry last week and

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the fourth time this season that they had at least

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred seventy five yards from scrimmage. However, they use

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a single back inside zone run that piled up two

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty five yards rushing three touchdowns against your Jacksonville Jaguars

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Todd last week for their third grade win, first victory

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>at home. By the way, I just think there's a

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of problems with that one. They run that play

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at nauseum, and I think the Tampa Bay coaches are

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>smart enough to realize, all right, let's take that away

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>from them. Let's make Kyle Allen beat us. And Kyle

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Allen puts the ball on the ground a lot, and

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten mass have the Panthers performance by a lot

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of Kyle Allen fumbles that have ended up back in

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers hands. Uh. And I think Tampa Bay meanwhile,

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>every single week they come out, they can throw up

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty forty points on anybody. Mike Evans didn't get the

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ball at all last week in a very strange outlying

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thing where he was an intended receiver just three times,

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a catch for Tampa Bay. I think they

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>make a point to go to Mike Evans. I think

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they go to Mike Evans time and time again. I

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think Godwin does this thing. I think Jami's has a

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>big day. And I think Tampa Bay is the wrong

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the wrong team is favorite here. Carolina is

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>two and a half point favorite. We'll call it two

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>now two and a half. Somewhere in that pocket. I'm

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>taking the Buccaneers as technically home dogs, even though they're

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>not really a home team, but technically home dogs at

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>London Tottenham. So what are we what are we grading

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that as? Plus? What Tampa Bay plus? I I see

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>more two and a half? So two and a half

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>plus two and a half Todd bushnev keeping score keeping

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the grades, Mike Palmiery, Ladies and gentlemen from the Circle operation,

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you got, Mike? What's number two and number three?

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll stay in London with you, gil uh and and

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>go back to the fact that these two teams played

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>each other already this season, familiar with each other. I

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>think Todd Bowles is doing an underrated job with the

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>defense in Tampa Bay and the improvements they've made there.

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh And then you look at you look at Ron

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Rivere and his defense in in Carolina, which is is

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>never a slouch. These two teams played to a total

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of thirty four earlier in the year, and it's come

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>back at a forty eight. I think that's too high,

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm gonna go under forty eight in London

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>as my second pick. I see forty seven and a half. Well,

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you see him? I see forty eight. Okay, what do

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you see, Gil? I see forty seven and a half. Todd,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. Do you still want it? Mike? That's

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult question. Now that's a very it's a

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>very key number. I wanted to push it to scoreless overtime.

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll stay with and a half. All right, what's number three?

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Smarty Pansy. I'm gonna I'm gonna go back to a

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>game that that Todd, that Todd picked, and I'm gonna

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>play it over in this uh Jacksonville, New Orleans game.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I love Menshoe, I don't. I don't think they can

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>hold Menshoe down. And I think that now that we've

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>taken we've taken the training wheels off Bridgewater, as he's

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten more experience, I thought this total came back low.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing? I see forty four? What are

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you seeing I've set three and a half three and

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a half as well. Well, okay, we made up the

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>half point there over forty three and a half. I

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like it should be decent weather in Jacksonville. I was

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>very each week I get more and more impressed with

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Menshoe and his ability to move the ball up and

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>down the field. So I think this game is gonna

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>be a very good competitive game played in the upper twenties.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So over for that one. By the way, the the

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tactics that Mike Palm is using to get an extra

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>half point we affectionately know as hoops Peterson in it

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast today, that's the tactic hoops Peterson in it. Well,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that's really low. I'm sorry. I want to mention Gil.

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention you know they say you're affectionately

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>known as Dr Gail and all this, But what a

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>week for visa. I mean, you had a Mall's Shaw

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>lecturing at the at the Tommy News from School of

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Media at USC. You had Gregg's Hoops Peterson being flown

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to the West Coast to teach Bill Walton about basketball,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and then I know there's no footage of this, but

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I was told that Maddie Humans gave the commencement address

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a keynote speech about brand loyalty in front of over

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>forty thousand graduating clowns at Jack Murphy Stadium at the

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>commencement address for Ronald McDonald University. Wow, it's a big week,

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>big week for visa. I did not know, Geez. I

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>thought the Las Vegas invitation was big enough. By the way,

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>how is your growing? You're growing? Okay? You know. I

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>stopped feeling my groin because all I can feel are

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>my hamstrings and halfs now that are so sorry. I

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>can barely walk. I think the only way to really

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>remedy this is for Todd and I to play again

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow morning. So we're on for nine am. Oh nice.

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>The line will be on bookmaker around. I'm not sure

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>what the installation is yet, but we will be getting

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>back to everyone. It's all based on how how I

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>hit around with Todd before the match. Give Give Give,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Give me Palm plus the games again. That's all I'll say. Yeah,

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we we made a bit of a fortune betting against

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wishnev's ridiculous lines that he created, which propped him

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>up to be Novak Djokovic look lines will be adjusted

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and this time there will be no mistaken calls to

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>rob me. I mean, I lose the earthquakes, I lose

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the incredible bad beats, and I lose the incredible bad calls,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's unbelievable. Todd. I have to tell you that

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>your uh description of your drop shot that barely went

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>over the net and hit the winner clear fantasy. He's

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>got the best words, doesn't he? I felt. I felt

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as if I wasn't Ziff, he was watching a totally

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>never match. Anyway, we should charge admission to these. Someone

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>should film these, by the way, I Gil gil Gil.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say there was a intent interest from the

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the behind the scenes crew and visa of of the

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas Invitational that I'm sure there is. All right,

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's my third pick here, and I am

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>torn every which way on this because I can't decide

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>if I want to go New England, if I want

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to go Seattle, if I want to go Kansas City,

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>if I want to go Washington, Atlanta, Dallas. So many

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>games that I kind of like Green Bay. In the end,

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going with what feels like almost a

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>contrarian pick right now, which is the Kansas City Omaha

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs giving four at home to the Houston tech Sens.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I believe Tyreek Hill is gonna show up for this game,

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think the four is a major overreaction to

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>what we saw last week. Listen, Kansas City's defense is

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>not good at football. I get it, but the Houston

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Texans are a sieve on that offensive line. Don't let

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>last week's game fool you. This is Andy Reid against

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien. I have said on the numbers game many times,

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and if there's just one handicapping tenant that you should

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have in the NFL, let's say you could only have one.

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It's power ranking these coaches and betting accordingly. This is

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid versus Bill O'Brien. I don't trust the Texans

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>from week to week. I do trust the Kansas City

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs to be able to overcome four at home. What

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 1>was the look ahead on this? The look ahead had

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to be way more than this. Give me the Chiefs

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>minus the four at home Sunday morning against the Texans.

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>That's picked number three from me. Tot or it did?

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>It did open seven and a half, so it's it

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>seemed like the entire world is on Houston, and and

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that usually means the entire world is gonna get burned

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna win. Go No, you know what that means.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope, So I hope. So that's I mean, I

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>feel good about that pick. We you know, Now, here's

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing. All it's gonna take is one more bad

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>performance by the Chiefs defense for me to completely never

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>bet them again. But I'll go with him here giving

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the four because I do think this is way too short.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I will take I'm really torn here as well. I

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how I'm gonna come up with five circuit picks.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>This week just looks incredibly difficult, you know what, I'm

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go with my gut. I like Tennessee plus

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the two points. I think at the Fangio versus v Abel,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Rabel every time. Uh, Tennessee really could be

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>four and one if they had a kicker that could

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>make some kicks. Uh. And you know, it's not like

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a team that goes on the road and wins

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>all the time. They're very well coached. They're getting to

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we could easily see this being a seventeen sixteen game

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or ninth, you know, twenty and nineteen game. This game

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>just feels like it's gonna be tight. Tennessee is gonna

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, They're gonna play good defense, Hopefully the

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Cody Park you won't hit it off the crossbar too

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>many times, and somehow Tennessee with getting the points, somehow

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>gets there. I also like the fact that Denver one

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, in a game which they were trying to

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>give away desperately. It was Chargers versus Denver, that the

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.239
<v Speaker 1>game that no one wants to win, and so you know,

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Denver finally got to win. Time for them to you know,

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>roll back to their typical Denvernus. And let's go with that.

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee plus the two their typical Denvernus. What's your last one?

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to Sunday Night on this one, and

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the seven points that the Pittsburgh Steelers

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>are getting. Now you're you're probably thinking, jeff are you, Jeffrey,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have Devlin Hodges as your quarterback here to

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday night? Back up. The backup to Devlin Hodges

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is Slimy Goldstein at Mount Is she the state. It's

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it's actually Todd. I believe it's actually one, the one

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that only packs them a lynch. And I'm not making

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that up here. But look, the Chargers are a complete

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>mess and Gil we we've talked about it on a

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers game. The Chargers won so many close games last

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>year that it's regressing back to the mean this year

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the way of the Chargers looking like the Chargers

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of a hole. And I don't I don't care if

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it was Craig Hodges playing quarterback this week for Pittsburgh.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna find a way to keep this game tight.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I like Pittsburgh's defense, especially recently. They played well enough

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>against Baltimore. They were great against Cincinnati. I know the

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Bengals are terrible, but they look good in that game.

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think Denver's gonna be Excuse me, I think

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's gonna hang in this game. I think that game

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>against Denver last week for the Chargers showed what they

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>really are this year. They're fraudulent, they're gonna miss the playoffs,

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna make this Sunday night game that looks

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>awful on paper a tight game because they are the

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>los Angeles Chargers. I like the Steelers getting the seven.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Would love to see Craig Hodges in his full Chicago

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Bulls uniform behind center for the gil Hodges I was,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of another Hodges couldn't come up with one, alright,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>So Pittsburgh your final pick going the old Anthony Lynn

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>fade here for Parley on a Sunday night sport for

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>today's Beating the Book podcast comes as always from our

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>friends at Bookmaker dot eu. I have been saying it

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>all season long, I will continue to say it. The

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot eu as an industry leader for close to

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, you should know that by now pro players

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>consider them a must because their first to post dots,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they take the highest limits, and most importantly, pride themselves

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on never having kicked out a winning player. That is

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>huge in this day and age. Bookmakers a high volume

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>sports book best suited for not only the sophisticated player

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>who understands sports betting, but also the large recreational players

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. And their motto is where the lines originate,

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>because chances are the sports book at which you've been

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>betting all along follows their lines. And right now, if

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you visit bookmaker dot eu slash gill. That's bookmaker dot

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>you slash g I l L. You can claim an

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>exclusive welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars. Once again,

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's bookmaker dot eu slash gill g I l L.

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>To join and claim you're welcome bonus of up to

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars right now, don't miss out all Right,

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>teaser time, Mike Palm, Let's start with you. What's your

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>teaser of the week? Oh, gil Uh, I'm gonna go

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with the game you guys like and take take tease

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the Titans up to eight at Denver as the first play,

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm gonna take and tease the Cowboys down

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to one. I like that. I am doing the Titans

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Bucks taking two dogs that I think should

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be favorites, teasing them through the three through the seven.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's Titans and the Buccaneers for me, my two

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>team six point teaser wish nev Oh wow, Um, I'm

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>going to go with the Cleveland Brownies at home. Uh

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland plus what am I getting? Eight as well? So

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>leveland plus the eight through the uh through the juicy

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>three and seven and now I need to put it

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>with somebody else, and I'm going to put it with

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the It's almost as if you're deciding this on the spot.

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I am. I'm deciding it on the fly here because

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it's so difficult. I'm gonna go with the Dallas Cowboys.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys minus one. I mean, how can the Dallas

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys lose to the New York Jets. Yeah, although it

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is Sam Donald off the mono and when last we

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>saw Sam Donald, they built up a big lead against

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills back in Week one, only to squander itself. Yi,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you do know that that UM teams that are having

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a monon nucleosis quarterback in the last thirty five years

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>coming off a double digit loss on games of less

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>than fifty seven degree weather with a chance of humidity

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of over are ten and four. Wait a minute, Wait

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a minute, there's a subset to that. Also, when the

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>wind has blown five to seven miles an hour, they're

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>six and one. Mike, whatever you do, don't tell people

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>where you've got that information from. I know will never up. Yeah.

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Sam Donald does not play defense the Jets.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You ready for this parlay? This is our numbers game

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thing this week? The Jets have given up a score

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>when their opponent is inside the red zone on fifty

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>four consecutive possessions fifty four consecutive possessions by an opponent

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>inside the red zone in which the Jets have given

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>up a score. In other words, no stoppage on downs, uh,

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>no interception, no fumble recoveries, no ability to make field goals,

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not go through the uprights fifty four. The Jets have

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>scored two touchdowns in four games on offense. You're New

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>York Jets, Jeff Parlay. There, they're there, work of Art Gill.

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>They truly are a work of ar Are you teasing

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas too? No, I'm not. I'm not touching that game.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Um on a teaser or actually, I know we'll have

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a question later like that, but uh, it's in consideration

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for that answer a teaser. Wise, here, Gil, I'm with

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys on the Titans. How is Denver winning this game?

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>By Morden's more more than a touchdown? Tease? Tennessee up

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to the eighth. I like that a whole lot. And

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this one I'm gonna go away from Pittsburgh obviously, and

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I would see him as the obvious one since I

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>liked them getting seven. I'm gonna go to uh, I

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>can't believe I'm doing this, but I'm gonna take the bet.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Put push the Bengals up to seventeen and a half

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>against the Baltimore Ravens. At some point pride has to

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>come in for Cincinnati. And I'm not buying Baltimore at all, Gil.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they're pretty fraudulent. This is the second time

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that Cincinnati has seen Lamar Jacksson as well, and Lamar

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Jackson has struggled the second time around the league. So

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll put Cincinnati all the way through seventeen, up to

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and a half. So Titans plus eight and Bengals

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>plus seventeen in the half, well, we can only give

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you six, so that would be seventeen on the button,

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and we still do it that. I'm I'm I'm seeing

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven and a half. I'm not saying that, Jeff Paul's

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll still take it. I'll still take it up to seventeen.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. Once again, Hoops Peter sending your way through

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this podcast here, everybody. Here's my thing with that. I've

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>been on Cincinnati twice on the road a t s.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>They've come through each time. I totally get what you're saying.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a bad play at all. In Cincinnati.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I asked this of a Lombardi earlier in the week

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on Visa on a numbers game series sex Channel two

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>four Michael Lombardi, who has worked with the greats Bill Parcels,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick, Bill Walsh, Al Davis, and I said to him,

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I go, have you ever seen a coach talking about

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Zach Taylor now the Bengals who looks more lost and

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>more helpless on the sideline than he does. It is

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so hard to watch that guy. And Lombardi, who you

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>who has no problem piling on on these kinds of things.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>He also was very sympathetic Zach Taylor. He just looks lost.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You feel terrible for this guy. But you're teasing that

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>with uh with Tennessee? Was that the other one that

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you had? Tennessee? That's right? Yeah? No, I think all

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of us like Tennessee. Gilt. You know what that means.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, So we all picked Tennessee. And the teaser

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is that right? Mike went Tennessee. Will no, No, Todd

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>did not. Todd did not. Yeah, Mike went Tennessee. And Cowboys.

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You went Tennessee and Bucks, and um Jeff went Tennessee,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and since I went Cleveland and Dallas. Yes, you're you're

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>well thought out, heavily researched teaser that we all heard

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from you when you came up with it. Alright, final

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.959
<v Speaker 1>two questions, gentlemen, Each and every megapod ends with these

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>two questions. First of which is which of the big

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>favorites do you believe is the most likely to lose?

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Out right? Let's go through these. I think we have

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>enough candidates. I might have to fudge this obviously. Thursday

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>night in New England. Seventeen boy favorites tonight against the

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>New York Football Giants. Baltimore leven point favorites against the

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bunglesta, we gotta go down an ultimately afternoon games

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Dallas seven point favorites on the road against the Jets.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Charge will throw that in there. Six and a half

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home against the Pittsburgh Steelers. Which of

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that group, which is the big favorites, is the most

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose? Outright? Mikey Chargers, Anthony Lynn, period, I

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>will say the exact same thing, and it's not that

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult of a choice, Todd, I guess, uh, I guess

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to go with the Chargers. I mean, who's

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose Dallas. I don't see Dallas losing. Um, you know,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I gotta I guess I could. I

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta stay with you guys on this one. Dallas I

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose, Baltimore gonna lose to Cincinnati. Maybe division game, maybe,

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly not New England. The problem is that I'd like

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to include more games in this, but once you get

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>past the Chargers, it dips all the way down to

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>four as the biggest spread other than that. So those

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 1>are your only candidates, Jeff, same thing, Chargers. Yeah, I

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to be the Chargers. Uh. I

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>would say Dallas is the second most likely to lose

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if if the Jets had had C. J. Mosley this week.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But Mosley is gonna be out, Mosleys out. It's it's

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>got to be the Chargers. That's really the only choice.

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Mosley is a big deal because, as we call that

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>game that I talked about week one, that entire Bills

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Jets game changed when Mosley left the game for the

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Jets and the Jets squandered a sixteen to nothing lead,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing seventeen to sixteen Week one against the Bills.

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, final question. Then, let's say we live in

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a bizarrow world where we had to make we were

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>forced to make a pick on the side, and each

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and every one of these NFL games, every damn one

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of them, but you were allowed one free pass one

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>game where you looking at the matchup, You're like, I

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. What's gonna happen here, Mike Palm, which

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is the game you want no part of. I'm gonna

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the game with the organization too dysfunctional to

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>win against the organization trying to lose. I want no

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>part of Redskins Dolphins. Easy choice. Although I'll be honest

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>with you, I actually considered the Redskins for one of

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>my picks, and circa I did it is case Keenum.

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But I hear what you're saying, No no problem with

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>that pick, I will say for me, and I hadn't.

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually hadn't thought about this in advance. But for me,

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I think the one that I want absolutely no part

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of is maybe the best matchup on the board, which

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is Philadelphia at Minnesota. So I'll go the exact opposite

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of what you're saying, which is clearly the worst matchup.

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington Miami. I think Philadelphiat Minnesota. The spread is three

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>from Minnesota. Just have no idea who's gonna come out

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 1>on top. I could see Minnesota beating him. I could

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>see Philadelphia beating him. It's like a Kirk Cousins referendum game, Todd,

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you want no part of I don't want

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>any part of this. Atlanta Falcons, Arizona Diamondback Cardinal Team

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it's playing over there Atlanta. I just can't

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>stand them. I don't know. I made a bet on

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>them last week. That might have been my worst end

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.280
<v Speaker 1>game bet of my entire life, other than taking myself

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.919
<v Speaker 1>plus two and a half games against Mike palm uh

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in the initial minus two an F. Yeah, that was

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just a bad line. So Atlanta Falcons, who who? What

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is this team? I give me a break already. I mean,

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they're just ridiculous. And then Arizona I don't even know

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>what to think because you know, sometimes they look at

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray and I think, Okay, yeah, he's really talented.

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>He can do things, and then he can run around

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>other times, I'm like, well, this team just stinks. So

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I I just don't know what I'm getting in this

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Atlanta game. And and can I just say Matt

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Ryan is not good. I'm just tired of this. Matt

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryan is good, nonsense, He's not good. The Kyler Murray

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>thing is interesting too, because I think through five weeks

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of the season, we have impressions of all these other quarterbacks,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like you have a you have an opinion formed of

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Gardner Minshows of the world. You might even have

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>opinions formed of other quarterbacks. But the number one pick

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, Kyler Murray, I'm not sure I have

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>one right, Like sometimes Okay, make some plays, the height

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:45.439
<v Speaker 1>still bothers me. I don't know if he's any good

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>in the end, I really don't like he a sustainable,

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>good NFL quarterback. I'm not sure he is. Jeff game,

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you want no part of the game. I want no

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>part of is the exact one that Todd wish and

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 1>have just brought up. I don't know how you can

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>handicap that game between Atlanta and Arizona because Atlanta's teams

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to have given up. It's only week six and it's

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>not like Arizona is any good despite their win last

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.479
<v Speaker 1>week in Cincinnati. I want nothing to do with that game.

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And in Glendale Arizona, I think both the teams stink.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It's quite possible, it's one way. It's quite possible that

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they tie thirty eight. I want nothing to do with

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this game at all. I'll tell you how confused I

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>am with what Circa picks to make this week to

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 1>come up with five that I actually considered Atlanta here

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for a bit because it's sort of like the thinking

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>about Minnesota versus the Giants last week in Minnesota is

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>one of my correct picks last week in Cerca. It's like,

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're any good at football, Atlanta Falcons, you have

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to win this football game, right, Like there's no way. Well,

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's why I'm not picking it in

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the end, but I considered it for a second for

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that for that reason, right because it's like, Okay, you're

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you're you should Julio Jones should be able to go crazy,

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not betting it. I'm not touching it, not

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>even including it. One of my picks is a tough week, Todd,

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you you have trouble coming up with your five too,

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>huh I I am. I am terrified this week. I

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I every week I look at it and I go,

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, it's so hard. And this week I

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>just think I'm just overwhelmed with how hard it is.

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know what to pick. Sixteen and nine.

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wishing at four and a half out of the lead,

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>could be a millionaire at the end of the season.

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Could be by the way, how pumped would all of

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>us be if Todd Wishing have won? Circle is there?

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>If it wasn't you, And I'm like, palm, you're not eligible.

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But if it weren't you, Jeff Parl's, who on earth

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>would you like to win this more than anybody? My

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>answer would be Todd Wish. Now I would agree. It

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>would also be the greatest comeback story in the history

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of sports gambling if Todd managed to pull it off.

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, Gil, What's what's so good about this first week, though,

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is that with so many people five and oh and

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>four and one, how excited everybody is going into week two?

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I personally, no, I personally no four people

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>uh that are five and oh? And I was getting

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>texts Monday night and they're all excited, and you know,

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>until they see fifty other people. But it creates so

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>much buzz and and forethought into this that even a

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>better idea than I thought it was going in. And

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know this. This consensus picks were three

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and two last week, and I think they're I think

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they're eleven, uh eleven nine or ten nine and one

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>now so far the consensus picks meaning the picks that

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there were most picked, the five most picked games in

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>circle is what I'm saying. And I think this week

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>this would be a great prop bet. What will the

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>consensus picks be over or under two and a half?

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Obviously two and a half is where is the is

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the demarcation point. I'm gonna guess this week is gonna

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>have under two and a half on the consensus under

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a total underweek. I echo what you said, Mike.

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's as great as you probably thought it was with

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the quarterlies. It's better than ever. You mentioned that you

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>might have a Survivor type contest next year. Is that correct?

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That's correct? Yeah, Derek one. We didn't have time to

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>roll it out this year with the short eat up

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>because of opening June one. But in addition to the

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>circule million, a survivor, a survivor of football contest as

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>well as a different option. I love it. I take

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>back what I said about Todd winning circuit because I

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 1>just thought about what he would actually be like if

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he won this, and he would be unbearable. Absolutely, I

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think the word is unbearable, would be incordible. I

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think I think I think to my to your question

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>what I would answer, And obviously I don't want one

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to win more than the other. But the better result

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for a person who would be more humble if they

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>won than then Todd. And it's a person that went

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>five and oh this this past week would be Paul Howard. Well,

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul Howard deserves credit for the five and oh. By

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, I say every week on the show that

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>if you think you're you're the one doing well at

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>football and you think it's your handicapping, because I totally

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>marked down, I'm like baseball and tennis is a cerebral

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>betting activity. Anybody who thinks the Roxy Roxburgh, the great

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Roxy Roxburgh said to me goes gil. No one wins

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, nobody that's from the Sages wisest guy

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And what he means by that is

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you can win for a week, you can win for

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a month, maybe even a year. But if you think

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it's you doing this overtime, like, if you think it's

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you winning this, if you hit, you're getting a lot

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of breaks in the process. And so uh, I think

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I would have a lot of humility about it too.

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>If I won the monthly this this month, by the way,

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I would be the most humble human being ever because

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I would I would talk about what a joke it

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is that I wanted given my last month's performance. I

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>just feel like there's so much up in the air

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. I just want to circumillions. I can get

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that jacket and just wear that jacket. We were all

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the time. Well you'll have you'll have enough money to

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>get it altered. We end on that Mike Palm from Circa,

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Todd wishnef from Action and uh Numbers Game. On Wednesday

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.240
<v Speaker 1>at Visa, Jeff Parls producing number five on a Numbers

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Game and his own show market Watch on Visa Serious

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>XM Channel two or four. Thank you, Jeff appreciated, hope

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't too painful. For you, thank you for having me.

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, a great honor to make it on

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the Mega. Well, thank you for that. Skype works so

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>well that it's a pleasure for all of us. I

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>think we all can can agree on that. Thank you

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>all for listening. Good luck with all your Week six

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>bets in the National Football League.