1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,320 Speaker 1: Our guest is Larry Who, head of China Economics at 2 00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: McQuary Group. Larry, lots of time to talk about China 3 00:00:06,920 --> 00:00:09,040 Speaker 1: and the Asia Pacific, but I do want to ask 4 00:00:09,080 --> 00:00:11,680 Speaker 1: you about these comments from FED officials. And I don't 5 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:13,360 Speaker 1: think we want to make too much of it, but 6 00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:16,759 Speaker 1: they're talking about, you know, being somewhat concerned about what's 7 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 1: happening globally, and they also, uh you know, are saying 8 00:00:21,239 --> 00:00:25,599 Speaker 1: that they they're concerned about financial conditions. Could there be 9 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:27,520 Speaker 1: one reason why we're seeing a little bit of a 10 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:32,080 Speaker 1: let up in some of the risk off tone in markets. Yes, 11 00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:35,479 Speaker 1: I definitely I think now, you know, as a as 12 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:39,879 Speaker 1: Antina economist, you know, for China faced a lot of uncertainties, 13 00:00:40,040 --> 00:00:44,680 Speaker 1: but of course on the FED hiking cycle under the Titan, 14 00:00:44,800 --> 00:00:47,960 Speaker 1: the financial condition globally definitely is a head wind of 15 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:50,879 Speaker 1: faced by China today, which gonna you know, I want 16 00:00:50,920 --> 00:00:54,160 Speaker 1: hand the impact the market, the risk epetite. Also you're 17 00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 1: not going to impact China exports later on. What is 18 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:00,560 Speaker 1: happening to is this very strong dull and that is 19 00:01:00,600 --> 00:01:03,200 Speaker 1: fading through into Asian currencies. We got do you want there? 20 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:07,240 Speaker 1: A fourteen year low inviting more aggressive pushback from authorities 21 00:01:07,240 --> 00:01:09,840 Speaker 1: in China. What are you expecting to say from the 22 00:01:09,880 --> 00:01:13,679 Speaker 1: central bank? Uh? Well, you know, I would say so 23 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:17,600 Speaker 1: far that intervention has been pretty mild because the weakness 24 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:21,560 Speaker 1: of UN is mainly driven by the strong dollar. If 25 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:25,040 Speaker 1: you look at the UN against a basket of currency, 26 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:29,000 Speaker 1: it has remained pretty steady so far this year. But 27 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:31,440 Speaker 1: of course, you know, if you are in the UN 28 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 1: continue to weaken, we're probably going to see more intervention, 29 00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:40,240 Speaker 1: more powerful intervention from policy makers. You know. For for instance, 30 00:01:40,959 --> 00:01:44,039 Speaker 1: they can roll out, they can use the so called 31 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: counter cyclical factor, which means that you know, fixing because 32 00:01:48,680 --> 00:01:52,160 Speaker 1: the daily fixing a bitter stronger than usual to send 33 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:56,120 Speaker 1: the market a very strong signal that PBOC one uh 34 00:01:56,360 --> 00:02:00,480 Speaker 1: no a step a stable UN instead of a sharper depreitiation. 35 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:03,720 Speaker 1: So this has been a really strong risk off market. 36 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:06,920 Speaker 1: There's a couple of huge pivots that are out there, 37 00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:09,640 Speaker 1: um that will happen at some point, but when we 38 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:14,400 Speaker 1: don't know. One is China perhaps easing up on COVID zero. 39 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 1: Maybe the experiment that we see in Hong Kong is 40 00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:21,640 Speaker 1: is a forerunner to that. And the second big pivot 41 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:24,399 Speaker 1: would be that the Fed says, Okay, we can take 42 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 1: a pause here. Which of those two do you think 43 00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:31,679 Speaker 1: happens first? And about when? Well, that's a that's a 44 00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:35,880 Speaker 1: very hard to connect. The vailability is pretty it is 45 00:02:35,919 --> 00:02:40,320 Speaker 1: pretty low. But our house view is that um, the 46 00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 1: FED probably gonna pause um in first quarter next year 47 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:49,200 Speaker 1: and probably you know, given the US economy slow down quickly. 48 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 1: On the for China side, my base case is that 49 00:02:52,880 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 1: we're going to see some gradually losing in zero COE 50 00:02:56,280 --> 00:03:00,520 Speaker 1: policy after the Party Congress. Uh no China and likely 51 00:03:00,560 --> 00:03:04,800 Speaker 1: to live with the COVID overnight. Which but but I 52 00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:08,200 Speaker 1: think they still can you know, losing a beta on 53 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:11,919 Speaker 1: the margin, you know, regarding the current zero COVID policy. 54 00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:15,040 Speaker 1: And I actually I think there there is a certain 55 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:18,080 Speaker 1: payor could happen, which means that the China could China 56 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:22,200 Speaker 1: policy action means policy easy and could have been more decisive. Larry, 57 00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:24,679 Speaker 1: we've been talking about a lot of the headwinds that 58 00:03:24,760 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 1: the China economy is facing. And we know about property, 59 00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:30,240 Speaker 1: we know about COVID. You're also saying the population and 60 00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 1: the aging population is something we should be watching closely. Uh, Well, 61 00:03:35,240 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 1: that's more about the long term structural thing, right, so 62 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:42,320 Speaker 1: I would say the long term structural easier for China 63 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:45,920 Speaker 1: is I think the two biggest one is that, as 64 00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 1: you said, one is the aging population and the other 65 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:51,920 Speaker 1: is where the China could have moved into a new 66 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 1: growth model which less driven by investment. Right. But I 67 00:03:56,160 --> 00:03:59,640 Speaker 1: would say the cyclical part, as you mentioned, mainly from 68 00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 1: the zero COVID side. On property side, Larry, we talked 69 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:06,200 Speaker 1: about the Macau opening a little bit yesterday. Yeah, it's 70 00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:10,000 Speaker 1: not a huge thing, but announcing that group tours would 71 00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:14,040 Speaker 1: be um would be facilitated as soon as November, and 72 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:18,600 Speaker 1: although it may not affect the casino names themselves, so 73 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 1: those stocks rebounded. So I know you're an economist. I 74 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 1: only mentioned that because it shows you that people, investors, 75 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:28,760 Speaker 1: everybody is waiting on some sign that we're going to 76 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:32,360 Speaker 1: get some loosening. Now. I know that you're thinking that 77 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:35,160 Speaker 1: COVID zero it's impossible for them to change that. They 78 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 1: can do other things like they did with Macau. Are 79 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: you looking for other measures to really increase the animal 80 00:04:41,160 --> 00:04:45,279 Speaker 1: spirits in China? Yeah, definitely. I would say that I 81 00:04:45,320 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 1: think that they're gonna change zero COVID one day, but 82 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:51,080 Speaker 1: they're just in a gradual way, right, in the sense 83 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:52,680 Speaker 1: that the Chinese is not going to live with the 84 00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:56,360 Speaker 1: COVID overnight because it takes a lot of more to 85 00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:59,000 Speaker 1: towards that, for instance at the East, and there's some 86 00:04:59,200 --> 00:05:02,080 Speaker 1: changing p and the tone, right, But I do think 87 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:05,719 Speaker 1: that you know, as you said, um, some loosening in 88 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:09,719 Speaker 1: zero COVID is very important to the animal spirit because 89 00:05:09,760 --> 00:05:13,039 Speaker 1: that's closely related to the consumption side in China, and 90 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:17,200 Speaker 1: you know, consumption accounts for fifty of China economy. That's 91 00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:19,920 Speaker 1: a big and so far this year it has no growth. Right, 92 00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:22,680 Speaker 1: that's a big drag to the Chinese economy. That's not 93 00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 1: likely to really change the needle until next year, though, 94 00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 1: what are your forecast for three when we see the 95 00:05:27,480 --> 00:05:33,160 Speaker 1: likes of Goldman slashing there forecasts for China's growth, Well, 96 00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:36,920 Speaker 1: at this moment, I expect trying to grow fivepon five 97 00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:40,200 Speaker 1: percent for next year. I think in large part because 98 00:05:40,480 --> 00:05:44,279 Speaker 1: the base this year is very low, and I think 99 00:05:44,279 --> 00:05:46,760 Speaker 1: of trying to could do more in losing zero COVID 100 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:50,159 Speaker 1: policy to boost the consumption and do more to support 101 00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:53,279 Speaker 1: the property sector. But of course for next year, the 102 00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:55,920 Speaker 1: vliability is pretty low. It really depends on what are 103 00:05:55,920 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: they gonna do after the Party Congress. Yeah, the Party 104 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:02,839 Speaker 1: Congress coming up, and a story that we haven't really 105 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:05,440 Speaker 1: talked about too much, but I think it's something we 106 00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 1: need to at least raise today and perhaps with you 107 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 1: as best. She jumping hasn't been seen in public for 108 00:06:11,640 --> 00:06:15,320 Speaker 1: about ten days or so. Any significance at all, Well, 109 00:06:15,400 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 1: I don't have strong in insight sound on this cue, 110 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:22,600 Speaker 1: and we're probably we're going to continue to watch why 111 00:06:22,800 --> 00:06:27,839 Speaker 1: he gonna appear again and looking to to the Party Congress. 112 00:06:27,880 --> 00:06:30,600 Speaker 1: I mean you've mentioned what you think could potentially be 113 00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:32,520 Speaker 1: a little bit of an easy in some of those 114 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:35,919 Speaker 1: dynamic zero COVID zero policies. What else is is really 115 00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 1: needed in terms of a tangible move here we mentioned 116 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:41,600 Speaker 1: the property sector, but just really trying to bring the 117 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:46,760 Speaker 1: economy up. Well, I think what what really needed at 118 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:49,159 Speaker 1: this moment of two things. Why is zero COE policy 119 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:53,200 Speaker 1: which related to consumption, and the other is I will 120 00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 1: say probably an escalation of policy stimulus from here right 121 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:01,200 Speaker 1: so far this year you will give the downward pressure 122 00:07:01,720 --> 00:07:04,440 Speaker 1: we do see. You know, China policy makers throw out 123 00:07:04,440 --> 00:07:06,760 Speaker 1: the more and the more policy easing, but so far 124 00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:11,119 Speaker 1: they have largely played catch up instead of be pretty 125 00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:15,640 Speaker 1: very proactive. It's it's pretty it's a bit different from 126 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 1: what they did in the past, right So I so, 127 00:07:18,760 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 1: so I would think that after the Party Congress, probably 128 00:07:22,760 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 1: they're going to have the time under the freedom and 129 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 1: to do more in terms of policy easing from here. Yeah. 130 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:32,440 Speaker 1: We even our headline from Bloomberg Intelligence is that the 131 00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 1: Communist Party Congress is limited a little bit by the FEDS. 132 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:36,920 Speaker 1: So let me ask you a question I posed before 133 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:41,000 Speaker 1: the break. What's the FED going to break next? Uh? 134 00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:45,800 Speaker 1: Give you three choices? Okay, Basically what's looming is corporate 135 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:49,840 Speaker 1: earnings and secondly jobs and then the U. S economy itself. 136 00:07:51,040 --> 00:07:53,600 Speaker 1: Uh well, no, I don't. I don't really have no 137 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:56,640 Speaker 1: strong insights on the US economy, so probably I cannot 138 00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 1: give you the exact an answer. But for me, I 139 00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:03,000 Speaker 1: think of for China probably under the main impact is 140 00:08:03,040 --> 00:08:05,000 Speaker 1: on exports. So I think in the next six to 141 00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:08,520 Speaker 1: twelve months, is Tchina exports going to continue to trend down? Alright? 142 00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: Great to have you with us. Larry Larry who head 143 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:13,200 Speaker 1: of China Economics at McQuary Group in our Hong Kong 144 00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:14,360 Speaker 1: studio alongside Brian