WEBVTT - French Market Volatility, EV Forecast

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Effo card Playing and broyd Otto with the

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>The Bloomberg Dollar Index is that the highs of the

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>year so far. You're a dollar is one oh seven.

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You have, Yes, the year is a little bit stronger

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>against the dollar. But man, it was a really tough

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>week over the last week with the turmoil in French politics.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Luckily we have an expert with us. Marcus Ashworth is

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>joining us. He is from Bloomberg Opinion. I haven't talked

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to you Marcus in I don't know ten months.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's been ages too long, too long.

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>It is so good to hear your voice. Okay. We

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>love about you is because you have opinions. What do

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you make of what's unfolding in France right now?

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Such a shy retiring title on it.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 4>How what do I make of it?

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, it's not a crisis yet anyway. I

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 3>think it's a problem which was three years out in

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>the future in twenty seven. Whoever's going to replace mac Rol,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>he's just rolled the dice and brought it forward by

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 3>three years. It's trying to solve for probably a bigger

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:25.279
<v Speaker 3>problem now earlier and getting a better result, perhaps he hopes.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>What it has highlighted is that there's been a long,

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>deep seated, ever growing fiscal problem in France where they've

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 3>they've hidden essentially, I mean, not how to get away

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>with it for ages and ages. First, we had a

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Fitch down grade in October, we got a S and

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>P down grade in the end of May, and we've

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 3>got Moodies now having a sort of little think about

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 3>really do do they genuinely think France is worth a

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 3>double A two? So that's because the fiscal deaths in

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>France has risen to five point five percent of GDP,

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>and more importantly, it's debt g UP is starting to rise.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 5>It again.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>They had this been great hope of this downward glide

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 3>path of both France and Italy. That's not happening. It

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 3>hadn't done happen at all last year when quite the

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 3>other way, and doesn't look like it's going to get

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>better for least down for this twenty twenty seventh period.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>So no one thinks that even the current situation would

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 3>own seen any physical improvement with potential of a non

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Macron sort of controlled prime minister and government. That means

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 3>that quite the reverse is going to get even worse,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and that isn't great use for France, isn't great use

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 3>to the European Union. They hate political volitility. They get

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 3>very spooky, particularly of a potentially eurosceptic or you know,

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 3>pro leaving the European Unions it once worked party might

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>get into some form of power. They get very antsy.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>So that's why you're best to sell or get that

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>or stay out of France until it settles down. June

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>seventh will get the June July seventh, Sorry, we'll get

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the second round final results the parliamentary elections. Macron's staying

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 3>around with other three years.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 6>I love the whole snap election thing. I like because

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 6>we're over here in the US, We're going month after

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 6>month year just to get to November. So I kind

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 6>of like this whole snap election thing here. But what's

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 6>behind Marcus? Do you think that the rise of Marine

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 6>le pen and the far right? Is it what we're

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 6>seeing just around the world. Is it political, is it economical?

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 7>What's kind of really dru.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think you can call her far right.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 3>To my mind, she's a socialist. She's pretty hard left, okay,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that she's a national so called champion,

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and that's what she wants to push, you know, French

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>pension rights, welfare rights, she's very pro union. So in

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>some senses, I know it's easy to label them far right.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 3>But the point here is is that you know what

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>clearly she's standing for. It is a sense of enough

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>already from the French people on mass immigrant This is

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>happening in Italy, this has definitely happened in the UK,

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>It's happening ever in Europe, and it's happening in the US.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 3>So look, this is a global problem. Isn't going to

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 3>get solved anytime soon, but you know you're going to

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>get Look what's happened in the UK. We're getting Richie

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Sinak going to get bounced out because he's failed to

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>live up to anything he said he would do. But

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>we're having similar across the European elections, where the results

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 3>tended to favor the more should we say, anti immigration

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 3>parties whether some of them are left or right is

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 3>a subjective point. But look, it's this is just bad

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 3>fiscal situations getting worse combined with you know, that awful

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>thing that European politics really doesn't like is that fear

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that the European Union, that euro project might come under question.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's when investors, which you believe very much in

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>this whole France German bedrock and that eving has been

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 3>calmed down. We've got the EU isshing bonds by the

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 3>gazillion in the middle, lots of pandemic programs spraying money everywhere,

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>and yet it isn't enough. And that's a little bit

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 3>of a worry. I personally, I see it as a

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 3>little reality check and maybe in the long run this

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 3>might be better for Europe if they can get their

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 3>act together. I don't see it as a proper euro

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 3>crisis or anything like it.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Have you noticed or are you hearing flows coming out

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>of Europe into the US because of the political issues there.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have our own mess.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 3>But what we do have is Convidiot, Alex, you've got

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 3>it all already. What more do you want? You can't

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>want more of our money?

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes I do, I want all of your money.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Everyone in Europe is already already over the way in

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 3>the US. Look I mean, I would say it's more

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 3>like the US investors who might have been tempted to

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>get out of the US and diversified long last, coming

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 3>up to your elections, may have been tempted to sort

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>of go into Europe and have a little sniff, particularly

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>around banks and things like that. That's why the worst

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>performance so far being French banks. They're being able to

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 3>He's spanked. For the reason why I've been spank is

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>because I think there's a very popular situation for US

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 3>investors looking to play the old rebound there, and that

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 3>I think is what we've seen. We've seen some fast

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 3>money exit stays left. I don't think European investors are

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 3>going to go anywhere. I think Japanese had already long

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>thought very carefully about the so called budden plus strategy,

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 3>where you bought French bonds, you locked him like with Germany,

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 3>you've got in an extra bit of yield that works

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago, not so much anymore, but yeah,

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 3>there may be a little bit. And so I was saying,

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>is I just don't think any new money is going

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 3>to come in until July seventh. Why would it. It's

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>crazy to take more risks you need to, and you've

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 3>got no visibility on the outcome. There's likely to be

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 3>one or two more bumps in the road before we

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.799
<v Speaker 3>have a clear idea of the way the French system works.

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>You have this first round on June the thirtieth, and

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 3>then and only then you get it clear out clarity

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of what who goes forward into the second round and

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 3>you can work out which personalities are going to be

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 3>doing probably better or worse with more accurate polling. But

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>that will come clearer as it days go by. I

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>know that this afternoon actually France has thunder a little

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>bit better against Germany. French yels have actually gone nowhere

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>in the last week of a bit. It's just the

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>German yields have fallen hard because they're following, Yes, you've

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 3>got Alex, they're following the US deals lower. It's all

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>about the US.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 7>Seem told you told you, hey, Marcus.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 6>It was just a few weeks ago when mister maccron

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 6>hosted a basically come back to France conference where David

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 6>Solomon Goldman Sachs was there and mister moynihand.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 5>From Bank of America.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, is France open for business? Are people investing in?

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.239
<v Speaker 3>They're still mark the spot. This is where Jamie Diamond stood.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Now we have a little competition. Funnily off, the first

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>thing that a labor government, almost certain in the UK,

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>are going to do is good, do exactly this. Come

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>to the UK. Everything's brilliant, come back to your business.

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So that part has been very good at this and

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>definitely there's been some signs that not so much that

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the city's losing jobs, but that France is attracting more

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>financial jobs. It's quite great tax breaks to go there.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, clearly they want to promote all

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 3>foreign direct investment and arguably financial big movers you know, Silhadel,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan, Back of American et cetera. Are responding a

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit to the challenge. And one interesting thing is

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that Macromo is going to relax a bit

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 3>on the how much that severance pay has to be

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 3>in France. Whi's one of the big things that the

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 3>banks don't like is that the cost of actually losing

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 3>people and they change their minds on their expansion plans.

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>But for the moment, Yeah, I think they've done a

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 3>good job in France and probably outside of London. Paris

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 3>is the logical place for the most financial companies and

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 3>banks are particularly to go. But you know, again they

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 3>don't need this att of published It's not very good

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>for them.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Mark's always a pleasure. It was so good to chat

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 2>with you. Definitely miss all your commentary. Marcus Ashworth of

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion, And I have to say my Father's Day

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>dinner last night, for some reason, doing business in France

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>came up in the conversation and about unions and I

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 2>was like, what does this mean? Like are are we

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a peak union? Like what is the significance of regular

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>people on the upper West side talking about.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean again, we had that conference, you know,

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 6>in Paris or in France a few weeks ago, and

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 6>again all the big heavyweight from Wall Street Global Wall

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 6>Street were there and it just said basically we were

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 6>open for business. And you know a lot of the

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 6>big financial firms have moved some jobs out of London

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 6>into Paris in additions to other European capitals. But you

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 6>just think about the taxes and some of the social

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 6>programs and is it really open for business, and can

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 6>they attract significant foreign global investment into that country?

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Or is it like the open more open? It's going

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>to be versus other countries, right, like the cleaner shirt.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 7>And I'm saying now it's everything's on hold until July.

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we get that vote.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast catch us live weekdays

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android Auto

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live on

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just say

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg. Eleven thirty.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>One stock that's doing some stuff is Micron. It got

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>some price targets raised, it's going to report earnings next week,

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>and it is just having an awesome day and an

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>awesome ride. Let's get to take care from Kim Forrest.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>She is founder in CIO Book of Capital Partners. She

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>joins us, Now, hey, Kim, Micron, what do you think

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 2>about it?

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 8>I absolutely love it, but maybe not at an entry

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 8>point right now. It goes up and it goes down.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 8>This is a very volatile stock, but it's certainly one

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 8>to keep your eye on. And you can ask me

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 8>why why. I have two letters for you.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>AI okay, but why like to tell me more? Tell

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 2>me more?

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Because of AI? This company makes the device is that

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 4>build out data center memory? Okay? Or you know where

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 4>data lives.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 8>And if there's one thing I know about AI, it's

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 8>that it eats data like you wouldn't believe. So if

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 8>you believe in AI, you should believe in the makers

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 8>of nand and de ram memory devices.

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 4>So there you go. That's why I like it, he kim.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 6>At a cocktail party, so many comes up to you

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 6>and says, how do I invest in AI?

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 7>Where do you steer them?

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Or you're at the wrong cocktail party? But go ahead?

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 8>Yes, actually you know I try to go incognito at

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 8>cocktail parties.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 4>But that's okay.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 8>Well, I always say invest carefully and I have a

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 8>reasonable timeline. And I think those are the two things

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 8>that people right now are probably forgetting by I don't know,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 8>making in video go up by thirty percent since the split?

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Does that seem right to you? I'm thinking no? But whatever.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 8>So what you really have to look for is the

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 8>chain of areas that AI touches. And again, one of

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 8>them is in Nvidia the tip that drives the models,

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 8>and that's certainly important, but there's going to be a

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 8>whole lot more infrastructure around it, and even things like

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 8>I know this could be a big irol, but Telecom

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 8>is probably going to have to markedly increase its capacity

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 8>for wireless consumers because we're going to be consuming a

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 8>lot more data, storing a lot more data, and these models,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 8>as I say, use a ton of data. So anything

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 8>in that chain is fair game right now for investing

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 8>in AI.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>We would never irol you for saying Telecom, but based

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>on the fact that you say, you know Micron can

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>be really volatile, you don't want to buy at these levels.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>You want to buy on dips. Are you noticing a

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>lack of dips a our dips becoming less frequent at

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 2>this point?

0:12:59.240 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 8>And I think it's because you know, we're what are

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 8>we thirty six months into discovering chat or not even

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 8>that long, eighteen months into discovering chat, GPT, something like that,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 8>So people are really still looking for how do I

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 8>how do I.

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Invest in that? You can't buy open AI.

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 8>You can buy in video, but that feels a little stretched,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 8>So where else do you look? And I say, and

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 8>AMD is also fair for this because they're going to

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 8>not only be a competitor for Nvidia, but also make

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 8>some of the products that go on an end device.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 8>We keep forgetting, like the user has to be able

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 8>to connect to these models, and that's really important in

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 8>your search for where the outsized growth may be.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 6>So, Kim, what is NetApp and why do you like it?

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 6>Other than the fact that it's up forty one percent

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 6>year to date.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean that's really helpful, right, but all joshing aside,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, the nerdiest. I mean, it's almost like a

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 8>math joke, right, like a finance joke.

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 4>But I digress. No, seriously, it's back to storage, storage

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 4>of data. Now.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 8>Net app makes enterprise storage devices, and I think the

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 8>enterprise is going to have to store a whole lot

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 8>more data to be made to make AI work for it.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 8>So that's why we really like net app, and just

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 8>the trends in the world becoming more digitized. Businesses need

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 8>to have stable, safe and reliable storage appliances and that's

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 8>what net app provides.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Kim, what else do you like aside from the AI trend? Like,

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>if that's a nice trend, you got the momentum, you know,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 2>you got to find your levels et cetera. Aside from that,

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 2>if I wanted to buy stuff.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Where would it be, buy stuff in tech or not?

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 2>No, outside of tech.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 8>Outside of tech, well, I'm kind of loving because I

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 8>like to buy low and sell high. I'm looking at

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 8>energy and I like Exxon Mobile because it has just

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 8>bought some land in the Permian base through its recent acquisition,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 8>so that's good. And I'm somebody that believes in giving

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 8>yourself some margin, some room for error.

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 4>And we might like.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 8>Ev cars, but it's unclear that, you know, automobiles and

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 8>trucks are going to go away immediately, so I think

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 8>the timeline for energy is much longer. And the big

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 8>energy companies are also investing heavily in alternative energy as well.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 8>So we're going to always need energy. We like our

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 8>things that use it. Yeah, so I like to invest

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 8>in that as well.

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you have the gross yield three point five percent,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 2>so you're still getting something there, Kim. I'm wondering, though,

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>in energy, do you feel like you can own more

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>than one stock, because in talking to people on the street,

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 2>it feels like part of the reason behind all the

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 2>consolidation that's not fundamental is that portfolio managers just can

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of them. So those companies need to

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 2>make themselves very attractive people like you to be like,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna pull the trigger on this guy right now.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 8>I don't feel like I want to have a huge

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 8>overweight to it. We run a sector neutral model for

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 8>our flagship product, and what we do is we have

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 8>one energy pick because I like concentrated positions, so we

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 8>enter a position around three percent. And that's why I

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 8>always try to go for best in class because this

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 8>is a commodity. You're not going to be able to

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 8>catch the wave on buying low and selling high because

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 8>you know oil is doing whatever it's doing. So I

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 8>just try to go for the very best company with

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 8>the widest range of products. And that to me is

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 8>excellent because it takes everything from getting it out of

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 8>the ground into your truck, into your car. But also

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 8>they do chemicals as well, so they have a very

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 8>large product suite that addresses a lot of needs.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 4>That's why I like it.

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 6>Kim, how do you feel about just valuation kind of

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 6>across the market here? I mean a lot of folks

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 6>are saying this is the market's rally really hard over

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 6>the last you know, call it nine twelve months, we've

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 6>seen good earnings growths, you know, certainly, but has the

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 6>earnings growth has been good enough to kind of keep

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 6>pace with where we are?

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 7>So how do you think about valuation?

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the valuation.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 8>You can talk yourself into things being barely or even

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 8>a little bit below valuation if you believe, and this

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 8>is a big if the Feed is going to cut rates.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 8>And this is the math part of the segment here.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 8>Once we have lower rates, we get higher multiples. It's

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 8>just how it works because we discount those cash flows

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 8>back at a lower interest rate, not a higher interest rate,

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 8>and you have to accept higher multiples.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's part of.

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 8>This game in this market right now is just about

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 8>every last person, retail investor and institutional investors are all

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 8>assuming the fed's going to cut sooner rather than later.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 2>When the FED cuts, what then looks interesting in a

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>way that it doesn't look now like is that when

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 2>small caps finally get some action.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 4>I hope so.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 8>I love small caps, and I think you should be

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 8>invested in small caps regardless of what the FED is doing.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 8>It was awfully hard when the FED was raising rates

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 8>and being into small caps, but good things happen to small, highly.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 4>High quality companies.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 8>And what I mean by that is they either grow

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 8>into big companies because they have what it takes to

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 8>satisfy customers and grow, or they get bought by larger companies.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 8>And both of those things are going to happen when

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 8>rates decrease. That is, companies being more willing to buy

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 8>to acquire product life or companies that they want to

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 8>add to their portfolio, or just growth in general should

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 8>start going once that rate cut happened. So all good

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 8>things come from rate cuts, apparently.

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 6>Kim Farrest, founder and chief investment officer, Capital Partners, located

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 6>in Pittsburgh. Kim Forest, Founder, chief investment officer there. So, uh,

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 6>there's another investor loving the AI trade. M And you know,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 6>I guess it's not just the chips. You can go

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 6>software places, whether it's Microsoft or somebody else.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, some of the sele exactly we seed.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 7>Some hardware companies call it out.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>So the telecom angle that you had, the energy angle, which.

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 6>We have the energy angle on utilities and in the

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 6>power trade, it just seems like you can bend this

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 6>thing any way you like to.

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:54.719
<v Speaker 7>Support where you are.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like The theory is that you know,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 2>at some point we'll come back down to earth. But

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 2>then you have Julian and Manual all upgrading. His forecast

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 2>is six thousand, being like the A I trade. It's

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 2>just it's it's too sticky. Yep, and that I feel

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>like you're finally seeing that analyst capitulation at the end

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 2>of the day to the broader market angle.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, And we look at the markets today for Lisa

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 6>Bromwo's listening.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 7>Who hates this term punched on the SMP five hundred.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 6>Nothing happening near the Dallas AF fifty nine points, nastas

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 6>off one point.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 7>Not a lot of happening out there on the e greyfront,

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 7>but that's okay.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Focarplay and Android Auto

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 7>We're just talking about AI. Let's siguius.

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 6>Tom Keen would say right to some more AI discussioner

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Mark Bergan. He is a technology reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 6>joining us from zoom from London. Which is a technology

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 6>how we all know. Mark, thanks so much for joining

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 6>us here Google Ai. What's their strategy?

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for having me. I think you know the good

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 9>way put their their strategy in some ways is they're

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 9>trying to longer be in their back foot, right. I

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 9>think that with the past two years, and that our

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 9>story this morning looks at how Google and deep Mind

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 9>really set the infrastructure and then the base layer for

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 9>this sort of AI boom that we've had, and then

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 9>Chat Gebt kind of took all the glory in some ways,

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 9>and so in their playing ketchup in you'd say, not

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 9>necessarily on the technical side, but there's certainly now you know,

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 9>Chat Schebt and all iterations from the different companies building

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 9>language models like Anthropic and cohere, they're all sort of

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 9>threatening Google Search in a way that really hasn't happened

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 9>in almost two decades. And so their their strategy is

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 9>I would say defensive at this point.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 2>How does it get on the offense? What does it

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 2>need to do to sort of change that narrative?

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think you know, the story we looked at

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 9>today was a lot about this mergers that they've Google

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 9>put in place a year ago. So they've had out

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 9>here in London is deep Mind, which can widely consider

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 9>like the world's leading AI lab and has for the

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 9>past decade effectively been the best funded university running in

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 9>the world. They basically been a research lab. They put

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 9>out some great breakthroughs like alpha Go alpha fold around

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 9>protein folding, but they're not and it haven't been deeply

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 9>integrated and connected with kind of Google's commercial and profit center,

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 9>Google Brain, which was the competing AI lab or that

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 9>they also had in California that was a little bit

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 9>more tied to a lot of the popular Google services,

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 9>and they've been merged that for the past year under

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 9>Demosacipus here who runs all of Google AI. It's had

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 9>kind of a bumby road so far, but I think

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 9>their their plan is to continue to ship things like

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 9>Gemini their big foundational model, tweak that and start kind

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 9>of integrating a lot of this research directly into commercial services.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 6>Mark What does Google say about that chat GPT and

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 6>just as as a fundamental all threat to the core

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 6>Google search business, what do they how do they respond

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 6>to that?

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you know, Google publicly is is great about

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 9>never is talking about their rivals by name. I said anyways,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 9>they say nothing, and I think I think that that's

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 9>something they've talked about for a long time. Is that

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 9>sort of their their token phrase that soon the butcha

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 9>uses that the search is the last kind of biggest

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 9>moonshot for Google. I think they are thinking, and you know,

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 9>they're thinking a lot about what that search interface looks like.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 9>You know, how they're going to adapt to if consumers

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 9>move to things like chat, GPT and and Gemini, what

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 9>is in what does that mean for Google Search ads business,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 9>which is still the line's share of its revenue. They've

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 9>had some some clear mishaps, the pretty ugly snaff foosh

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 9>and since the launch of of Gemini this year, right

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 9>like there was that kind of famous incidents where they

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 9>were some of the responses were encouraging people to put

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 9>glue on pizza, right, there were these They described this

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 9>as sort of like this is kind of early stage

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 9>in this technology and some some some stumbles that they've had,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 9>but you know, they are the world's leaders in search,

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 9>and this is something where you know, they have a

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 9>lot of deep they have a lot of deep responsibility

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 9>to get this right, not just for their business but

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 9>for people's trust in using Google.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what's so difficult, right, It's like all the

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 2>technology is changing so fast, but you still need to

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 2>like do it. So it's it's you're like we're watching

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>it in real time. Paul and I were just talking

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 2>about a Washington Post article that was on the weekend

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 2>and talked about how all the AI models cannot answer

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it who won the presidential election in the US in

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, And I'm just wondering, like how these advanced

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 2>technologies solve for problems that they're using these large language models,

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 2>which is basically like, you know, me and Paul talking

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 2>are regular people talking? Does that also mess them up?

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 9>I think you know this is it reminds me a

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 9>little bit of It's a slightly different technology obviously, but

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, they're in twenty sixteen, have this big mess

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 9>where if there was there was a popular or there's

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 9>a blog or this kind of fringe blog that said

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 9>that if I remember this correctly, it's been a long time,

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 9>but it was that that Hillary Clinton won the election

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 9>in twenty sixteen, right, and that was at the top

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 9>of for briefly and momentarily top of Google News results.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 9>And they've dealt with this sort of problem around misinformation,

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 9>around totally not credible sources being at the top of

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 9>Google Search. You're singing problems that are now dealing with.

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 9>I saw a story today about Google images and like

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 9>consensual porn. I mean, these these problems I think are

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 9>being multiplied because with these tools of that generative a

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 9>I do, which Google talks a lot of as being revolutionary,

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 9>it also just makes content production so much easier. And

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 9>so there's this multitude of content now and and Google

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 9>has been this sort of their primary services to organize this,

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 9>and that has a lot of messy problems, especially when

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 9>open Ai has kind of forced in Microsoft. This forced

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 9>Google is to move a lot faster than they have

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 9>been in years past, and we've seen some clear stumbles

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 9>from that.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 6>So mark that that does Google feel like they can

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 6>just solve this problem or makeup ground simply by spending more,

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 6>because certainly they have plenty of cash to spend.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 4>I think that's right.

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 9>I think, you know, I would say that they have

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 9>the capax to be able to do that. I mean,

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 9>so so does Microsoft. I think you know, Google's logic

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 9>here is twofold, right, they have They clearly have a

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 9>lot of engineering talent and and a lot of experience

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 9>on this, right, Like they there I said earlier that

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 9>they have to launch this paper. They wrote this paper

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 9>that launched this entire generative AI boom. They have decades

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 9>of experience of actually like doing cutting a JI and

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 9>and I think they also have proprietary data that a

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 9>lot of companies don't have, right, Like they have not

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 9>just the main services you know, Google, Maps, YouTube, search, Gmail, Right,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 9>just like that corpus of data they have that's able

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 9>to sort of train AI services. That's something that really

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 9>know other company has. I think the question has always

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 9>been for them, you can they translate that into something

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 9>like for their cloud business right where they're in third place? Now,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 9>this that actual that data set advantages that translate into

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 9>commercial sales not necessarily clear, but I think that's sort

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 9>of what they always point to, is is we have

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 9>the talent and we have the sort of the big

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 9>this infrastructure in place that's been in there for decades.

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a really good piece. You guys should all

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 2>check it out. It was in Bloomberg BusinessWeek today. What

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 2>are you working on next? Now?

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 9>Well it's summer here in Europe, so nothing to say that,

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 9>I'll tell the story for tomorrow. I think there's, you know,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 9>one thing that was we mentioned briefly in this this story.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 9>There's I think it's really interesting is a lot of

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 9>applications in AI are moving not just from kind of

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 9>generating images and texts and chatbots, but into the material sciences.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 9>That's something that the DeepMind is working on a lot.

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a tension we talk about in the

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 9>story today between you know, whether or not the company

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 9>should be how much time that allocates to working on

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 9>Gemini competing with open AI versus working on something that

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 9>would kind of push the envelope and working to say

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 9>that biology or pharmaceutical industry and Deep mind Googles shifted

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 9>more research towards towards the sort of open AI competition.

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 9>I think that's created this way for a lot of

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 9>new companies moving into biology and chemistry and applying AI

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 9>to the lab. I think that's really interesting.

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I think we saw that in cancer research too, Like

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 2>you're basically can be copilots. So you still need doctors,

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 2>you still need all the researchers, but they can be copilots.

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>And that idea of thinking about that was quite interesting. Hey, Mark,

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate it. Look forward tomorrow's article as well. Mark Bergan,

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology reporter joining us from the UK.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I still don't get it.

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, just to ask a person what practical application

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 6>of AI, and I don't get a nice.

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Consistent It's just that's a cool thing about it all

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 2>developing at once, but it doesn't make it easier for

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>people like Layman's like us to understand.

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 6>Again, if you just roll back three, four or five

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 6>years ago, I think this was big data. We called

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 6>it big data, and to me, this is just the

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 6>next iteration of making smarter, smarter analysis of all the data,

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 6>structured data and unstructured data. You think the Internet, all

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 6>that unstructured data, chats you know, you know, all those

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 6>types of emails and all that kind of stuff, and

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 6>what is that data? How can you use that data

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 6>to become more efficient?

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 6>That's a long way of answering. If you can't do

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 6>it in like twenty words or less, you don't understand it.

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 7>Right, I'm in that camp.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecard Play and Android

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Thirty AM Alex Deal alongside Paul Sweeney is a Boomberg

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and Tell Just Radio. We bring you all the top

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 2>news and business and finance through our lens of our

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence analysts. They cover two thousand companies in one

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries worldwide. I also get to bring

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>in some of my oil CEOs and I get to,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, ale explain to Paul like oil stuff, which

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I always appreciate, and joining us in the studio. I

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>have a very special guest for us. It's president and

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Weatherford Greech Salagram. Weatherford is an oil services company.

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 2>It does international, it does domestic, It does onshore, it

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>does offshore. It also has a leg in the energy transition.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>What makes this company unique is that it went bankrupt

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen. Greiche took over in twenty twenty, and

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the stock has crushed this year. It's up by the

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 2>whole over the last year. It's up ninety percent. It's

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>beaten all of its peers, it's beaten the Oil Services Index,

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and even one analyst over at City said that the

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>turnaround at Weatherford post pandemic has been nothing short of remarkable.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 2>And these analysts don't hand out that kind of compliment

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>very often. Greece. It's so good to see you. Thank

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>you for stopping by.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 10>Alex, great to see you again, and Paul is great

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 10>to meet you. Thank you so much for having me.

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>So how's it going?

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 5>Like what?

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So, it's been quite a four years for you. You

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 2>came in the bankruptcy, Yeah, to turn it around. Where

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 2>are you in this turnaround? What more do you think

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 2>you still have to go?

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Etc?

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 10>No, A great question. Look, it's been a terrific four years.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 10>The team's done an incredible job. I think very few

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 10>people could have dreamt where it would be today and

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 10>what was possible.

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 10>The way I think about it is, the turnaround's mostly done.

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've gotten the company out of the ditch,

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 10>we have stabilized everything, we've fixed the balance sheet. So

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 10>the journey so far has been from broken to good.

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 10>The next phase of the journey is really the good

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 10>to great journey, and that's what I'm actually very excited

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 10>about because if we've been able to do all of

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 10>the things that we've done over the past four years

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 10>with a lot of constraints, a lot of shackles, you know,

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 10>the exciting part is what we can do without that.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So when you go from good to great, does that

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>mean like a lot of buybacks and dividends?

0:31:58.640 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Does that mean?

0:31:59.280 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:31:59.440 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 11>What is that?

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 10>Look, it's a lot of different things, but ultimately it

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 10>is creation of value, and it's creational value for our customers,

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 10>for our employees, and most of all for our shareholders.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 10>But it's doing that with continued focus on greater cash generation,

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 10>which comes from better margins, better improvement in the way

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 10>we manage our networking capital, but also ultimately better investments.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 10>So our real goal is to make sure that we've

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 10>got world classes that are done on invested capital.

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 6>Now that I see as an outsider to the energy industry,

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 6>I see a lot of M and A activity there,

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 6>and being a former banker myself, that's what hits my

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 6>radar screen. How do you guys think about M and

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 6>A for your business now that you are on maybe

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 6>firmer footing correct?

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 10>You know, for the first three years, MNA was a

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 10>bad word. You know, Weatherford actually grew up on a

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 10>built up on a series of acquisitions and a lot

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 10>of issues with that, especially around the lack of integration.

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 10>So the first three years that I've been in the role,

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 10>we really focused on the organic capabilities of the company,

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 10>building out the portfolio, making sure fix the operating intensity

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 10>and the rigor around the company. But we have now

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 10>gotten to a point where M and A has become

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 10>a very important salient topic. We actually just exercise that

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 10>muscle for the first time. We announced three small acquisitions

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 10>back in February, so two in the wireline technology space,

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 10>one in a very exciting space, and Intervention, which really

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 10>gives us capability in slaughter recovery and plug an abandonment,

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 10>which is a very key part of that energy transition.

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 10>So we have started to do that and I think

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 10>there will be more to come because we've now got

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 10>a balance sheet that allows us to do that, and

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 10>more importantly, a team that understands the importance of integration

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 10>and is learning how to build that into the opening

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 10>cadence of the company.

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And just to give our listeners a sense, your services

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 2>are the life site, like, how do your services differ

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 2>than say, one of your competitors, and how do you

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of invest for the life cycle of a welfare customer.

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 10>Sure, so in oil field services, there's a lot of

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 10>companies that do a lot of things similarly. So we've

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 10>got what ferentiates us. We've got a portfolio that provides

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 10>core ofs services, so everything from drilling services to wireline

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 10>et cetera. But we're also able to complement that with

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 10>what we call specialty services, things like managed pressure drilling,

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 10>tubular running services, intervention services, et cetera that very few,

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 10>if anyone, has. So that combination of broad based services

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 10>that allow us to go toe to toe with the

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 10>larger peers in the sector as well as then these

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 10>specialty products and specialty services give us that differentiation and

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 10>also allow us to have higher margins.

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 6>You know, I keep joking to alex with oil at

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 6>eighty dollars a barrel, I'm going to drive down to

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 6>Texas and start drilling some holes. I mean, isn't the

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 6>cost like forty bucks in eighty dollars. I can make

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 6>some money there, but I don't see a whole lot

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 6>of drilling activity. What's going to take it for the

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 6>industry to take advantage of these prices here.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 10>Look, I think the industry has really really embraced this

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 10>concept of delivering returns for shareholders, and so I think

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of discipline, especially around managing capital within

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 10>the industry's it's further exacerbated by the wave of M

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 10>and A that's happening, which again goes back to driving

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.919
<v Speaker 10>higher returns. So I don't think in the US there's

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 10>going to be necessarily a sea change at the range

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 10>of oil prices that we are seeing right now, which

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 10>I think in the long term is actually good for

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 10>our sector, especially it creates a balance versus the seesaw

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 10>effect that you see in the cyclicality that we've seen

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 10>in the past. We also have a very robust international market.

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 10>So for Weatherford, less than twenty percent of our revenues

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 10>come from North America. The bulk of it is really

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 10>an international orientation, international leverage. So we see a very

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 10>healthy market. Now the US is still the largest market

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 10>in the world. We see a lot of activity, but

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 10>it is something that is driven by capital discipline by

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 10>our customers, which is a good thing.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And we have M and A too. Does that eventually

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>lead into less business for oral services companies because in theory,

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe an Exxon pioneer going to drill ten wells rather

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 2>than twenty.

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. I think, look, we are seeing a lot of

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 10>drilling efficiencies, we are seeing the recount go down. But

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 10>I think it all comes down to differentiation. As long

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 10>as companies can differentiate and deliver value to allow our

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 10>customers to make greater headway on their efficiencies to generate

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 10>higher returns, I think they'll always be business.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 4>Again.

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 10>It is the largest market still.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean I'm looking at your income savent I mean

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 6>roughly half your revenue Eastern Hemisphere, half Western Hemisphere. It

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 6>gives the economics of both of those, your domestic markets

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 6>versus your international Yeah.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, historically North America was a very profitably challenged

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 10>or challenged market for us on a profitability basis. Yeah, right,

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 10>So our team's done a fabulous job over the past

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 10>few years really changing the way we run the North

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 10>America business. So today the profitability across all of our geographies,

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 10>all of our regions is pretty much imbalance. So and

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 10>I think, you know, I've always said the litmus test

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 10>of our turnaround has been what's happened in the North

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 10>America market. Over the past year, we've seen revenues decline

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 10>in North America, but the profitability has actually gone up.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 10>So that's a real testament to what we've been able

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 10>to do at Weatherford and the opening rigor the opening

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 10>intensity that the team is put in.

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing on the energy transition space? Where

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 2>do you play in that?

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah? So, first of all, Alex, for US, it starts

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 10>with this whole space of plug in abandonment. We think

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 10>that's going to be what does that actually mean? Yeah,

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 10>so what that is is the responsible decommissioning of mature

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 10>oil and gas well So as oil and gas fields

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 10>stop producing, customers want to make sure that those wells

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 10>are plugged properly so that you don't have any risk

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 10>of leaks from them and you don't have any environmental damage.

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 10>So we play a big role in that, and we've

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 10>both sterted our portfolio with the acquisition that I just

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 10>talked about earlier this year. So that's a huge space

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 10>and we think that'll be something that will play out

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 10>over several years. So you know, that's number one. The

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 10>second element for US is geothermal energy. We've been a

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 10>leader in geothermal for over two decades, mostly driven by

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 10>our capability in high temperature tools. We've had a capability

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 10>leading to very high differentiation in high temperature, which, as

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 10>you can imagine, is important in geothermal. But we're now

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 10>extending that beyond just drilling, so multiple aspects of the

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:09.919
<v Speaker 10>geothermal loop. We've got partnerships with organizations like Seraphie with Ever,

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 10>which is a Canadian company doing some very novel work

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 10>in geothermal. As geothermal shifts from this whole notion if

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 10>you've got to be somewhere near a volcanic region to

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 10>now in multiple parts of the world, you know, in

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 10>cities as well. I was in Hamburg about a year

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 10>ago where they're brilling wells in the middle of the

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 10>city itself, you know, providing district heating, et cetera. So

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 10>geothermal is a big platform for us. The next one

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 10>is CCUS. Now, CCUS is a huge ecosystem.

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Carbon capture utilizations nice.

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's a huge, huge ecosystem. We don't play in

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 10>a lot of it, but where we do places in

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 10>the storage and monitoring aspect of it. So again this

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 10>is where our technological capabilities lend themselves more directly. So

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 10>that's a huge space for us sort of leading to

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 10>that or away from that, but somewhat tied is whole

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 10>emissions management and emissions monitoring. We recently just announced a

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 10>agreement and MoU that we signed with Honeywell in this

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 10>whole methane emissions management which brings Honeywell state of the

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 10>art technological capability, especially around sensing our access to our

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 10>customers oil fields. We're also the only ofs player to

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 10>have its own SCARA system, a data acquisitions system built

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 10>on top of our production optimization platform. So that's an

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 10>area that I'm very excited about. And last but not least,

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 10>solutions mining, so that's a big area for us.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Garrise, we really appreciate it. Thank you so much for

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 2>stopping by. It's so good to get your perspective and

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 2>it's good to get started chatting again and all the

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 2>opportunities there and like I said, Wetherford really autperforming all

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>of its peers in the last year. Garish Salaground, President

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 2>and CEO of Weatherford International.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.959
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and androud

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Outo with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Thirty Alex Deal here with Carl Sweeney. This is Bloomberg

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Radio. We bring you all the news and business

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and economics through a lens of our Bloomberg Intelligence analysts.

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 2>We also every Monday at this time tap Bloomberg ne EF.

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Their research covers commodities, power, transport, industry, buildings, AG sectors, technology,

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 2>anything that we need to know as we kind of

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 2>transition our energy and security and energy transition throughout the world.

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 2>And I should point out that every time they release

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 2>their EV Global Outlook, it is the thing that is

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 2>quoted by Wall Street analysts. You go to Wall Street

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Analysts and they are using BNF's data from evs to

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 2>model their own opinion. So we wanted to dig a

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 2>little deeper the release. The report was released last week.

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Corey Kanter is BNF lead US Electric Vehicle analyst. Corey,

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 2>thank you for joining. What was your overall takeaway like, okay,

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 2>EV growth will be x and then what was it

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 2>for the US?

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? No, thanks for having me, Alex.

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 11>Great to be back here with you and Paul I

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 11>think the big takeaway is that EV sales growth is

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 11>happening on evenly across different regions in the world. Maybe

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 11>not a surprising finding if you're following EV's on a

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 11>day to day basis, but moving forward, we expect that

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 11>to be a bit of the same. To give you

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 11>a sense of where we see things going, we basically

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 11>have both the near term out look and a long

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 11>term out look. The near turnout look ends in twenty

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:34.280
<v Speaker 11>twenty seven, and so what we expect is by twenty

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 11>twenty seven, global passenger EV sales will be about thirty

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 11>million in our base case called the economic transition scenario,

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 11>and a probably better metric of that is thinking about

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 11>EV share a passenger vehicle sale. So we'll move from

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 11>a world where one in five cars sold is electric

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 11>to a world where one and three is about thirty

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 11>three percent, up from eighteen percent last year. By twenty forty,

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 11>we expect that about seventy three percent of all new

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 11>car sales will be electric. But there's a long way

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 11>to go. And then on the US question, always good

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 11>to compare it. I think to China and Europe, US

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 11>passenger EV's SHAREFF sale last year was around ten percent.

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 11>We expect the next two years to see a bit

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 11>of a slower growth, So only about twelve percent of

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 11>new car sales should be electric this year, rising to

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 11>about twenty nine percent by twenty twenty seven. Seems pretty good,

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 11>but if you look at Europe in China, it's going

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 11>to be much higher there. So by twenty twenty seven

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 11>we expect about sixty percent of new car sales to

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 11>be electric in China and forty one percent in Europe.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:33.919
<v Speaker 11>And when we talk about passenger evs at B and EF,

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 11>that's both battery electric and plug in hybrid electric vehicles.

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 6>So plug and talk to us about those plug in hybrids.

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 6>It it feels like a lot of folks are suggesting

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 6>that might be a very vital interim step for at

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 6>least in the US.

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 7>In terms of the transition to EV. Is that how

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 7>you think about it?

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 5>Paul? A really good question. I also co wrote the

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 5>plug and Hybrid section of the report.

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 11>We do a kind of deep dive which we do

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 11>with a few different deep dives every year, and what

0:42:58.760 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 11>we call thematic highlights.

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 5>I think around p haves the question.

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.919
<v Speaker 7>Really is pheabs Yeah, Phea, plug again?

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Hybrids?

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Okay, plug in hybrids, Okay, is how good are they

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 5>going to be?

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 11>If you look at the plug and hybrids in China,

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 11>they're all electric mode, meaning they're kind of electric mileage

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 11>they get before they have to turn on that gas

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 11>engine is about twice as high in China currently as

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 11>it is in the US.

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.720
<v Speaker 5>So quite simply, China is making not only.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 11>Better fully electric vehicles, but better plug and hybrids. We

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 11>still think that there is some role for p havebs

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 11>to play this decade in markets like the US in Japan.

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 11>But what I've been big on pushing on is the

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 11>product that we're getting today is not necessarily as good

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:42.879
<v Speaker 11>as it should be. So when you hear automakers say, oh, well,

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 11>maybe we'll do more hybrids or do more plug and

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 11>hybrids instead of fully electric vehicles, I think a fair

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 11>response would be to say, well, in Europe and China

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 11>they're getting far more all electric mileage than here, so

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 11>can you deliver some of that more.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 5>High quality product.

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 11>Ultimately, we do a bunch of different scenario analysis in

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 11>the full report, and one downside of plug in hybrids

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:03.720
<v Speaker 11>is that if you go down that route and people

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 11>aren't charging them enough, which is harder to do. Because

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 11>of the lower all electric range, you could end up

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 11>in a scenario where you're having a lot higher oil

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 11>demand use than if you just switch to fully electric vehicles,

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 11>and that would not be good for your climate targets.

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 2>When do you think the tipping point is when EV's

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.839
<v Speaker 2>become more of mass adoption here in the US.

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 11>So what we've pointed that historically is this idea of

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 11>upfront price parody. We're seeing total cost of ownership parody,

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 11>including fueling already being hit in many different regions in

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 11>terms of upfront costs. It really depends if you're comparing

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 11>apples to apples, right, you see a lot more evs

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 11>in that kind of low forty thousand dollars price range

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 11>now high thirties. I think once you get to the

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 11>low thirty thousand dollars price point, Really, according to our analysis,

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 11>when we're looking at kind of a generic BEV versus

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 11>a generic ice vehicle, we see it happening in the

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 11>US over let's say the next three to four years,

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 11>really twenty twenty six to twenty twenty eight. But really,

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 11>if you're comparing a Tesla model Y to towards a

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 11>lot of its competitor vehicles or model three.

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 5>You're getting pretty close.

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 11>But that's where you start to see I think higher

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 11>adoption where you won't have to necessarily have a premium

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:10.439
<v Speaker 11>and price.

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 5>You also get a lot of good leasing deals today

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 5>on EV's but.

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 11>It's a bit messier to kind of figure that out

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 11>because you've got dealer markups, you've got different rates.

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 5>But big picture, that upfront price parity.

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.240
<v Speaker 7>How about the charging infrastructure in the United States?

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 6>To what extent is that been holding back the adoption

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:27.720
<v Speaker 6>of evs here and kind of how do we expect

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:28.280
<v Speaker 6>that to evolve?

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think that's the biggest difference between Europe and China.

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 11>Our EVY Outlook for folks who aren't familiar has whole

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 11>sections on charging infrastructure, how much investment is going to

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.879
<v Speaker 11>be needed moving forward, But really just taking a base

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:46.479
<v Speaker 11>level stat TESLA remains the number one provider of charging

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 11>infrastructure here in the US in terms of reliability, in

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 11>terms of number of fast charging stations, and then there

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 11>isn't really a clear cut number two, three, four, five.

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 11>My colleague Ryan Fisher does a bunch of great presentations

0:45:57.800 --> 0:45:59.879
<v Speaker 11>on this, and one of actually the most impressive find

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 11>is US and Europe actually have a similar amount of

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 11>chargers between the top six kind of charging infratructure operators,

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 11>but Europe has an additional five hundred operators after that

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 11>that really supply the bulk of the market.

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 5>So again, we want to see more of that infrastructure

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 5>built out.

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 11>There's been a lot of reporting around the federal funds

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 11>rolling out really slowly because they've had to go through

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 11>state RFPs. But yeah, that's the number one issue holding

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 11>back probably the US market, maybe even moving past the

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 11>upfront cost issue.

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:30.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh we only about a minute left. But at least

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>with my ic car, right, I can trade it in

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and I can get value for it. Do we know

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 2>how this market evolves for evs?

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 11>I mean I did a residual value note with the

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 11>team at BADF maybe about two years ago, and the

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 11>market looks so different than that's when Tesla prices were

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 11>going ten to fifteen percent above their kind of selling price.

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 11>And so now you've seen because Tesla brought its prices

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 11>down that residuals for a lot.

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 5>Of evs have crashed.

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 11>I think it's going to be something that continues to

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 11>develop to find out how long batteries are going to last.

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 2>I do I know that yet?

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 5>It varies.

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 11>I mean, we don't have I think any research here

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 11>where we've said that this is what we find amongst

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 11>all the kind of evs in the market. But right,

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 11>if your battery holds up longer than people expect, you'd

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 11>expect to see maybe more residual value. If not, you know,

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 11>you could see more of an issue. But yeah, it's

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 11>an outstanding question, like so much of the space. But

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 11>to your point, Alex, that's why you want to see more,

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 11>you know, look into battery life over time.

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. I think that's gonna be really interesting. All right, Corey,

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Lott. We really appreciated Corey kant be enough lead

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 2>you as electric vehicle analysts joining us on their new report.

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Definitely check it out. It's what all the it's what

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 2>all the street winds up quoting as we sort of

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 2>go through this energy transition with the questions that we

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 2>all have. I don't know how long have you had

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 2>your phone?

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 7>I can burying battery life just five years?

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe five years? Okay, so let's just say five years.

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming a car battery is gonna be a lot

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 2>better than your phone battery. I don't know, But I

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you're forced to, like, if you're forced

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 2>to re up your car because of the battery, I

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 2>know that feels different. That feels different than like, Oh,

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I just got to replace my brakes and welco into

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the Apple Store. Maybe I'm wrong, Yeah, exactly.

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence. Happy Monday, everybody.

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal