WEBVTT - China Urges Local Firms to Avoid Nvidia H20 Chips

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and ever though in San Francisco.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Beijing urges local companies to avoid using Nvidia's H twenty processors.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Plas e Lo Musk accuses Apple of favoring Open Ai

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 4>above other AI companies in.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 3>Its app store and stable coin issue a Circle's revenue

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>jump fifty three percent just two months after a splashy

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 3>public debut.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll discuss with the CEO.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 4>First, we return to the public markets, not just Circle.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 5>But the broader indices. They're at record.

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Highs, the Nasdaq one hundred, the NASDAK, the S and

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred.

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 5>We're up six.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 4>It's been volatile trade as we digest the CPI number.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 4>All importantly consumer price inflation coming in where the market anticipated.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 4>It looks as if the market thinks still the Fed

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 4>has room to cut ed. But you are looking once

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 4>again at the semiconductor story.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Nvidia and AMD are off session lows. What happened

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 3>this morning was the Information reported that China's Internet regulator

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 3>had demanded that specific companies including Ali, Barba and ten

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Cent cancel orders for H twenty. There's a lot to

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 3>unpack there, because, in particular, it is different from.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 2>What Bloomberg reported.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg reported that Chinese authorities had urged various Chinese entities

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 3>to hold off on ordering the technology.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a difference of severity.

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>They're hot on the heels of a big story twenty

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 3>four hours ago where the President cut a deal with

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia ANDAMD to do a revenue split on a accelerator

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>sales in China.

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's get out to DC Carriac.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's get that White House perspective. Josh Wingrove is

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 4>in the bowels of the White House as we speak,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 4>and we thank you for joining us.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Josh.

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Just what do you think the Teta tet means here

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 4>for the White House to see China's response in terms

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 4>of pushing back against age twenties.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, thank you for having me. This is the glamour

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 6>of the press tows here at the White House. So

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 6>just in case you think it's it's all sunshine and

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 6>lollipop's down here, you know, we're we're in it. We're

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 6>in it, We're surviving. This is sort of I guess,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 6>a tightening of the screws, and the sort of back

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 6>and forth between them, right, this question of will the

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 6>h twenties go at all? And then the report that

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 6>prom saying he asked for a twenty percent cut and

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 6>then Nvidian him settle at fifteen percent. And now that's

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 6>China saying, well, maybe we don't want those ships in

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 6>the first place. And you know, there's a few questions

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 6>swirling here. One of those is will the administration try

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 6>to do this on other products, whether chips or otherwise,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 6>try to you know, leverage export controls for new government revenues.

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 6>It's unclear. They've been silent about it. Sure scene like

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 6>this is the model that Trump would like, So you know,

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 6>this sort of seems like it would be on the

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 6>table for things that, you know, where the working market

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 6>would bear it. Another one is, of course, whether companies

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 6>do actually heed what we're reporting, is the warning from

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 6>China or the request I guess from China to avoid

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 6>using these ships. Is that the big question is what

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 6>would ultimately the demand fall to if Chinese demand were

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 6>to fall on this. And then there's a question of, well,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 6>what about the other chips? Right, Trump mused about even

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 6>selling more advanced chips, but a peared down version of them.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 6>No one really knows what that would look like. Anyway,

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 6>might be open to that, again, it would seem with

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 6>some sort of cut. But a lot of analysts have said, well,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 6>if you're just charging you know, premiums to send even

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 6>more advanced stuff to other nations, I mean that opens

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 6>the door to all kinds of things, including like, you know,

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 6>military sales or what have you. And so we're really

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 6>an uncharted territory here right now in a lot of

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 6>ways on this. But the bottom line is Trump likes

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 6>the idea of these chips moving, in part because he's

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 6>calling them obsolete. Of course they're not quite obsolete, but

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 6>it's so long as the US government is getting a cut.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 7>S in Prince.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 6>We don't know who actually is getting a cut. We

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 6>don't know if there's gone to general revenue or if

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 6>the Commerce Department was steered this summer.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 7>It's all so unclear.

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I think what the President was alluding to was Jensen

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 3>one coming to a meeting with him to talk about

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a lower power version of Blackwell, which the market has

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>speculated is called B thirty, and Nvidia has never said

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 3>anything about the analyst community looked at this Chinese reaction

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 3>and said, it's a tactic in the broader US trade negotiations.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 3>You've had a busy twenty four hours because Intel CEO

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Bhutan also came to see the president.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 2>What's the latest there, Yeah, they.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 6>Had their meeting here yesterday. Trump sometimes calls in reporters

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 6>to these meetings that didn't happen yesterday. You know, there's

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 6>been a lot of to and fro between them of

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 6>whether that is sort of a soured relationship and whether

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 6>some would put pressure for a swap of leadership there.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 6>They've been sort of positive signs out of it. Trump

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 6>saying that they had a good meeting is sort of

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 6>teeing up future meetings with his cabinet, and so the

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 6>pressure seems to be off a little bit on that

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 6>one for now. But we all know the President can

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 6>be mercurial on these things, and so it's sort of

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 6>a time will tell situation. There's a briefing here in

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 6>a couple of hours. We make it a little more

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 6>detail on what they spoke of in that meeting. Trump

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 6>has been taking sort of a lot a lot of these,

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 6>but his focus seems to be elsewhere. Today he's teeing

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 6>off on Goldman and threatening to sue J Powell.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 7>So it's a big day.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 6>Here at Bluemberg, you know, for when it comes to

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 6>the light of stuff. But right now I think it

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 6>seems like they're out of the woods a little bit.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 7>If you're Intel Josh.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Wing Grove, we thank you for the perspective, at least

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 4>on the tech executives. Let's deep dive a little bit

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 4>more with an investor take on the global chip sector.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Scott Landers here in the studio Horizon Investment cio.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 5>How do you navigate.

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 4>The president's impact on certain companies, whether it's about them

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 4>doing business or who leaves their businesses?

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean this is the question of the day today,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 8>at least having to do with Trump, and I think

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 8>currently what we have to understand is that Trump at

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 8>his heart is a commercial guy. And so you know,

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 8>what we're what we're trying to figure out is like

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 8>what are the rules of the game that are acceptable

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 8>to him in order to actually run our.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 7>Businesses and in order to in order to sort of

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 7>move forward.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 8>And so I think sort of the discovery process of

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 8>figuring out, like what are the deals that are acceptable

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 8>to him in terms of like what do we have

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 8>to give in order to let him sort of leave

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 8>us alone to someone to actually run our businesses. You know,

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 8>that discovery process, I think is what the economy is

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 8>really and here it's specifically the chip makers are really

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 8>sort of going through right now, and I think they're

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 8>getting to a place that they understand the rules of

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 8>the game. So that's actually an acceptable landing spot, I think.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 4>But the game of Ping Pong, for the likes of

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Lisa Su and indeed of Jenson Wang, has been hard

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 4>when it's accessing China, and already maybe we see the

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 4>ramifications of that pullback of their pair down chips. The

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>fact that China is saying we don't even want them,

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 4>is that a concern for you? The lack of access,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 4>the lack of demand potentially the longer term, so sophisticated

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 4>chips from China.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think it has to be.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 8>And so because you know, this is like one of,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 8>if not the largest chip market in the world, that

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 8>they're having to sort of jump through hoops in order

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 8>to actually build access and cut special deals in orders

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 8>in order to build access, and so that's you know,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 8>again once we can finally understand what the rules of

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 8>the game are going to end up being for how

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 8>do we sell chips into this very large Chinese market,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 8>the better off we're going to be. But in the meantime,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 8>these CEOs are having to go around and try to

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 8>try to cut these deals and try to understand you know,

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 8>what is it that I'd actually need to do outside

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 8>of just running my business and outside of doing all

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 8>the innovation that I have to do in order to

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 8>make good chips. Okay, what do I have to do

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 8>on the political front to actually access the second largest

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 8>ship market in the world.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Scott from the CIO's perspective, the president of the United

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 3>States cutting an ad hoc deal where they get a

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 3>share of revenue in exchange for an export license. Did

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>you see that coming? And do you expect it to

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 3>be replicated to other parts of the technology industry and

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>how do you model for it?

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 8>Well that I'm not sure that you do really model

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 8>for this. I think I think we're in a more

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 8>of a read and react situation with Trump and that's

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 8>and that's franctly how you do have to deal with

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 8>Trump on some of these policies.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean it is.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 8>It is not a forecasting exercise, is a read and

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 8>react exercise, and so you know that that that you

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 8>know that I think that's just how we have to

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 8>sort of think about it.

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Scott, What does read and react exercise look like at

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Horizon Investments? What did it like this morning in the

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>last twenty four hours?

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, I think it means to some extent

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 8>like figuring out are the things that we're facing in

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 8>terms of some of these some of these hurdles that

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 8>are that are new as of you know, the last

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 8>twenty four hours, are these really game changes for some

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 8>of the more in the medium and the longer term

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 8>themes that we think are going to really be important

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 8>in terms of what's what's driving some of these names

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 8>and what's what's driving some of the some of this

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 8>productivity shifts, we don't think they are. And again I think,

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.599
<v Speaker 8>you know, I think because we understand that he's a

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 8>commercial guy, and he wants to cut deals like he

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 8>wants deals to get done.

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 7>He doesn't want deals not to get done.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>He wants deals to get done.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 8>And so if that if that is sort of your

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 8>starting place, and these deals are somewhat acceptable, and we

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 8>understand what what they're going to look like. It doesn't

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 8>really change the medium term look is this is the

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.599
<v Speaker 8>most important technology in a generation, and you've got to

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 8>be on board with it.

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll jump in here and just think about you've got

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 4>to be on board.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>You've got to read and react.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 4>Does this change the ultimate tailwinds of generative AI from

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 4>your perspective for names at AMD, for names like nin

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 4>Video More broadly, the valuations that we've garnered have been

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 4>a global opportunity. But if we cut off China off,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 4>China moves away and they want to go domestic, does

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 4>that impact your desire to get into these names?

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 8>It does on the margin, I'm sure. I mean, I

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 8>don't know that it has to. It sort of has to.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 8>It has to on the margin, But it doesn't really

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 8>change the long term story. We haven't seen anything today

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 8>or the new cycle the last twenty four hours out

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 8>of some of these actions that really change what we

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 8>think about about that medium term and about some of

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 8>these access issues. Is it going to make it more expensive, Yes,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 8>to make it more complicated, of course, But it doesn't

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 8>really change some of the more fundamental narrative in terms

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 8>of do we want to be in these names, Absolutely.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 7>We do.

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 5>Do you want to be an Intel?

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 8>Intel's a little bit a little more complicated because we

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 8>don't know that they've got leadership in place that can

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 8>get them to that next stage and get them into

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 8>the right types of chips. It's not just can you

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 8>produce chips? Can you produce the right types? And that's

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 8>that's the big question overring Intel right now.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 3>God, can we go a little deeper on that? I

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 3>guess what you're hinting at is that lit Bhutan's visit

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to the White House doesn't necessarily solve the tension that's

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 3>they're based on the President's post last week.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, look, Trump doesn't like to be to be wrong.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't like to admit and admit that he's wrong.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 8>And so if if he calls for somebody to be fired,

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 8>and it's it's a pretty high hurdle to get him

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 8>to back off of something like that.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 7>But I'm not saying it's impossible.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 8>But but but in terms of you know, the the

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 8>future leadership an Intel, it would be a lot easier

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 8>for Intel to h to make a change like that

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 8>rather than to try to sort of fight against the stream,

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, and sort of against the river. That is

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 8>that is the Trump truth post, and so that you

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 8>know that that you know that being said, I don't

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 8>know what they end up doing, but but it does

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 8>make things, you know, infinitely more complicated in an already

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 8>infinitely complicated situation for Intel from a corporate structuring standpoint

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 8>or from an innovation standpoint.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 7>That's the Martians. The market is already obviously questioning.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 3>Scott Ladanam of Horizon Investments, Thank you very much. Now

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 3>coming up on Bloomberg Tech, Nancy Tengla joins to talk

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>to some more on Nvidia on China, but also Apple

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 3>now in the crosshairs of Elon Musk an Xai.

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 2>That's coming up next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk lashed out against Apple's app store practices in

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>a post late on Monday, accusing the iPhone maker of

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 3>favoring open Ai, saying Apple makes it impossible for anyone

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 3>other than open Ai to reach the top of the

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 3>app store charts. Bloombo's Kirkwagner joins us now for more.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 3>In fact, it was several posts on x throughout the

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 3>time I went to bed last night here in London

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 3>and the time I woke up in aggregate. What's at

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 3>the core of Musk's complaint.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, he is claiming antitrust behavior by Apple, saying that

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 9>the company, is you point out ed, is favoring open Ai.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 9>It's putting open Ai in more prominent positions on the

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 9>App Store, you know, artificially in his mind, putting them

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 9>higher on rankings lists. Now, of course, some of those

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 9>rankings lists are editorially curated by Apple employees.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>That's been the case for.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 9>Years, and it's always been a challenge for developers to

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 9>try and get onto those lists, to try and get

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 9>that sort of publicity that way. But again, a lot

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 9>of this is also just based on rankings which apps

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 9>are downloaded the most frequently, and in some cases open

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 9>ai and chat gybtr are the top of those lists.

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 4>And you use X's own community notes and they point

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 4>out that it hasn't always been open Ai and the

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 4>top of the pile when it comes to other generative

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 4>AI chatbots. Others have eclipsed it, even since the open

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Ai and Apple deal cut.

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 5>But also some Almand weighed in a little bit too.

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 7>He did he.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 9>Had some sharp words for elon Musk, pointing out that

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 9>it was sort of rich for Elon Musk to complain

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 9>about this when, in Sam Altman's words, you know, he's

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 9>putting his thumb on the scale on the X algorithm, right,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 9>He's changing the things that you can see on X

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 9>to reflect Elon's view of the world or Elon's favorite topics.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 9>And so that was sort of the throwback that Altman

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 9>had for Musk there, and the two of them obviously

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 9>have a long history Caroline, as we've talked.

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 2>About repeatedly on the show.

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 9>So for those who have followed, this is sort of

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 9>just the latest in that saga.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 3>So Apple has not responded to requests for comment on this,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 3>but like you, I went through all the documents available

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 3>when Apple explains the methodology behind the rankings, but Elon

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Musk is also complaining that open ai and Apple were

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 3>technology partners and for that reason they have a bias

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>toward them.

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Can you explain that that. Yeah, So last year.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 9>At WWDC, Apple announced a partnership with chat GPT that

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 9>it was going to integrate some of open AI's technology

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 9>into the iPhone, And so he's claiming, you know, and

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 9>this is the reason in Elon Musk's mind that open

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 9>ai is sort of getting this favorable treatment. Now, I

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 9>have to point out that Elon Musk is not the

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 9>first person to kind of go after Apple over the

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 9>years for making things difficult on developers they might compete with. Right,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 9>Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are the top of the list

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 9>in terms of being in the drum about Apple being

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 9>anti competitive over the last several years with the app

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 9>store fees that they take and other things. So Elon

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 9>Musk is not alone and sort of his view on

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 9>this now, whether that view is simply formed in any

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 9>actual real fact or just opinion, I think is.

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 7>The challenge here.

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 9>And clearly he's very upset with open AI's relationship right

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 9>now with Apple.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, bluebos Kurt Wagner, And as Kurt said, Elon Musk

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 3>has threatened Apple with litigation in the antitrust context. Will

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 3>bring more as we get it. Let's bring in Apple

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and Tesla investor to talk a bit more about it.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Nancy Tengler, CEO and CIO for Laffatengler Investments. And you know,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 3>like you have exposure to Apple, I think you've added

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 3>to it recently. You know the Tesla story, but also

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Elon Ink's story really well when it comes to AI,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>how concerned are you about this situation with Elon Musk,

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, essentially going off to Apple.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 10>I ed listen. I think everybody's acting to script.

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 11>So you know, Elon will describe himself as someone who's

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 11>who's programmed for war. This is one way for him

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 11>to gain shelf space, is to raise awareness, to claim

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 11>foul and then hopefully get some concessions from Apple. In

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 11>terms of the effect on Apple, I don't think it's

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 11>going to be long standing. I think there will be

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 11>some sort of behind the scenes handshake.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 10>But it always matters where you get into these stocks.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 11>And so we were adding to Tesla at two forty

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 11>during the tariff tantrums. You know, at three thirty three,

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 11>I'm pretty happy with the holdings. And then we added

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 11>to Apple last Tuesday. That was just sheer luck. And

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, we picked it off at two hundred and two,

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 11>and we can wait around.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 10>For things to write size.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 11>But I don't think this is the end of the

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 11>app store, and I don't think it's going to be

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 11>a big headache. You know, he's filed a lot of

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 11>lawsuits that have gone into the Elon Musk lawsuit black hole,

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 11>so I think we'll get some resolution.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 5>He kinks Floyd is busy.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 4>That's for sure, about one point ten percent if you're

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 4>looking at Apple's share price soon.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 5>No one too worried, Nancy.

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 4>But just love tell a little bit of the AI

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 4>opportunity within Tesla and why you're not adding to it

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 4>at the moment. Because there's been much about made about

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 4>whether they'd invest more broadly in xai itself.

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of cross pollination that goes on.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think the.

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 11>Cross pollination would be good. I'd love to see Tesla

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 11>absorb XAI. I use rock religiously, and there's I just

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 11>think it. I just happened to think it's the best solution,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 11>so you know, I'd love to see more people utilize

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 11>it and see the company continue to go deeper into

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 11>the AI portions of their business and have it benefit

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 11>Tesla's shareholders. We'll see when we get the shareholder vote

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 11>where you know, where the shareholders come down in terms

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 11>of investing further.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 10>But I like the ecosystem.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 11>We're building out a strategy that focuses on all these

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:07.719
<v Speaker 11>new frontier you know, opportunities, quantum nuclear robotics, jen AI,

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 11>and in that we will have front and center.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 10>One of our largest holdings will be Tesla.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Nancy I broke the story last week that Elon Musk

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 3>requested that the Dojo project be shut down, and he

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 3>confirmed it on Sunday in a post on X and

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I reported today a lot of that engineering talent's been

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 3>reassigned across their other chip efforts. How central was Dojo

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 3>to your thesis with Tesla? Did you pay attention to

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 3>that one?

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and congrats on on the story, ed, Yes, and no.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 11>I mean it was so so nascent in.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 10>Its origins that we were watching it.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 11>We are certainly focused on quantum computing and the elements

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 11>that will drive it, but we didn't we didn't have

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 11>it in our expectations for future earning Scrows. And I

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 11>think that's a lot of what you have to do

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 11>with with.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 10>Tesla and Elon.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 11>He's always thinking, trying and then restarting, and so you know,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 11>we wait to see what's sustainable and where we think

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 11>the direction of the firm is going. And you know,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 11>Caroline asks why or mentioned we haven't added to it recently,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 11>I mean we will again.

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 10>It's a pretty it's a pretty significant.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 11>Holding in our growth strategy not a member of our

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 11>twelve Best Ideas because I can't handle the elon volatility

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 11>and the twelve Best Ideas portfolio.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 10>But I think I think they'll figure it out.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 11>They'll either partner as it looks like they're going to,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 11>or they'll they'll restart.

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 4>I love going back to that frontier fundamental analysis you're

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 4>doing as well, Nancy, when you're looking at the opportunities

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 4>in general to AI, whether it's quantum, some of the

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 4>more forward thinking things and here and now when you

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 4>own a Nvidia and I know you're even exit TAMD,

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 4>but when you're thinking about what the administration means for

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 4>the future business, what China's owned demand for chips means

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 4>the future business, how are you thinking about that story?

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this story is a little bit complicated, and you're

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 11>probably going to get the cranky side of me. I

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 11>think the precedent set by an administration that you know

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 11>is pay for playing isn't unseemly at best. I get

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 11>why Jensen made the deal. I would have too, but

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 11>for the President to say at a press conference, you know,

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 11>I told them you're going to have to pay us

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 11>for you pay us something for this that that may

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 11>have gone on behind the scenes. We probably had it

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 11>in the last administration with Meta, but it was different,

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 11>and I don't think it's I just don't think it's

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 11>the way we want to conduct business in the United States.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 11>That said we had written off China investors had not.

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 11>So very long ago the company took Nvidia, that is,

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 11>took an eight billion dollar charge, and then.

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 10>You know, the Middle East opened up. So I don't

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 10>think this is going to be the death now.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 11>I think China did exactly what you would have expected.

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 10>Them to do.

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 11>Come out, you know, in response to Jensen saying keep

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 11>China hooked on our products, They're going to come out

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 11>and say, no, we don't, we don't need your product.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 11>So it'll settle somewhere in the middle, and we'll get

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 11>incremental revenue news and a little hit to Margins.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Very quickly, China responded in some form, how much do

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 3>you think they're trying to protect their own domestic chip names?

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 11>Just very quick I think they are, of course ed,

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 11>and I also think they're trying to get a better

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 11>deal always out of the US, So stay tuned.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 10>I think we'll end up somewhere again in the middle.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Nancy Tegler of Lafetenglo Investments giving us your cranky side,

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>which we appreciate, thank you very much. Now coming up,

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 3>GM looks to resurrect its autonomous ambitions, that story and

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>so much more.

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Next this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 4>Time now for Talking tech and first up, GM is

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 4>looking to restart development of new driver's cars now Colling

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 4>to sources, it's looking to lull back ex employees of

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 4>its former autonomous cruise operations. The project is said to

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>be focused on autonomous vehicles for personal use, with the

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 4>ultimate goal being a car that can drive with no

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 4>one at the wheels. GitHub CEO Thomas Donker is stepping

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 4>down now the coding platform executive is set to remain

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 4>through the end of the year and will leave to

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 4>become a founder. GitHub, which was acquired by Microsoft back

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 4>in twenty eighteen, will become part of the company's core

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 4>AI team, and ESPN is hoping to lure that customers

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 4>with a new app now. The service costs thirty dollars

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 4>a month and it'll include live games, fantasy sports, highlights,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 4>original programming look. This marks the first time ESPN's complete

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 4>sports lineup will be available to viewers without cable satellite

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 4>subscription ed.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 3>All right, coming up circle, CEO Jeremy joins to talk

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 3>about the company's first earnings since going public. Markets reacting

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 3>pretty positively to those results.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have a lot more on that next.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I still feel like the story of the day is

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 3>one of volatility in those two chip names, and video

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 3>is modestly high in our AMD up eight tens of

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 3>one percent. But there was an information report that basically

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 3>said China has ordered tech company to stop ordering chips

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>from those US names, different to Bloomberg saying that regulators

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 3>and authorities had urged those tech companies in China to

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 3>stop placing the orders. The stocks bounced around over the place.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 3>There's so much newsflow and we work more on it

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>throughout this hour. From London this week and also New

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 3>York City. That's what your index level looks like. This

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Markets have

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 3>just closed in Europe and in London where I'm sat,

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 3>and therefore I'm looking at these three names across Europe's

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 3>software names have been under pressure today. The concern for

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 3>these software names is that AR is going to kill software.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Such an interesting concept. In fact, there is a note

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 3>from RBC Capital Markets and List Matthew Hebberg which says, quote,

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>there is from a valuation perspective, death of software due

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 3>to AI. These are companies that in Europe are seeing

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 3>like really strong revenue growth, but the idea is that

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 3>AI elsewhere just renders their software offerings obsolete. It's not

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 3>saying we've talked about much, particularly from this geography Carro,

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 3>but serious declines and in Europe a lot of weakness

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>in those software names today. And this is something a

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of people have clicked on this Tuesday, which also

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>took me a bit by surprise.

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 5>Significant moves.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Look, and let's pivot back to another stock that's moving

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 4>on the higher side this morning as well. We're focusing

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 4>in on the stable coin network Operator, up six and

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 4>a half percent of this circle. The company reporting second

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 4>quarter revenue jumping fifty three percent, six and fifty.

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Eight million dollars.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Now it's the issue of stable coins, and it's its

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 4>first earnings release since it went public back in June.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Circle CEO Jeremy Elaire joins us. Now, Jeremy, just that

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 4>bump and revenue. We know how ultimately you make a

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 4>lot of your money, and that comes from treasuries, it

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 4>comes from other yielding assets there holding versus USDC. What

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 4>about the other revenue growth that you want to see?

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 4>How do you think about that pipeline?

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, a couple quick things.

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 12>I think first, you know that bump in revenue is

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 12>driven by growth. We saw a ninety percent year over

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 12>year growth in USDC in circulation on our network, which

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 12>is significant, and that growth is obviously a driver even

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 12>where we see rates decline, that growth is really driving

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 12>our overall top line revenue growth. We're also seeing growth

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 12>in our other revenue and so you know, again as

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 12>you think about Circle and our business, we have our

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 12>stable coin network, we have money that flows on that network,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 12>and we're adding new services, subscriptions and services fees, transaction

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 12>fees for a wide array of different things. We're building

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 12>an application layer through Circle Payments network. And actually we

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 12>just announced a new blockchain network ARC today and so

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 12>those also grew two hundred and fifty percent year on year.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 12>And you know, obviously have a slightly different margin profile,

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 12>a higher margin profile. So that actually added a couple

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 12>hundred basis points to our margins, which obviously translated as

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 12>well on the aggregate into you know, our even to

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 12>growth adjusted growth to growth of fifty two percent with

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 12>a fifty percent kind of adjusted EBIT to margin.

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Let's just dive more into the new products into ARC

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 4>that you reference into your payments network. How close the

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 4>competition does it put you in with players like Stripe

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 4>out there already for example, how does it continue to

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 4>make you market neutral when it comes to an infrastructure player.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 12>Well, when we think about Circle, we think about ourselves

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 12>as an internet platform and network utility company, and we

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 12>want to make sure that we can provide the full

0:25:55.720 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 12>stack that's needed for financial institutions and leading enterprises around

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 12>the world to take advantage of stable cooin finance and

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 12>ARC as a blockchain network is purpose built for stable

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 12>coin finance. The transaction fees are paid in USDC and

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 12>potentially other stable coins. The network infrastructure is designed around

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 12>what's called deterministic settlement finality. That's key bank regulators want

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 12>to know that transactions and settlement are final. It's a

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 12>key characteristic of a prudential grade of financial infrastructure. So

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 12>we're building this, you know, very much in the you know,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 12>in the view of what's coming all of these major

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 12>institutions that now want to build on stable coins, really

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 12>making sure that we have the right infrastructure at play,

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 12>but at the same time broad interoperability for our stablecoin network.

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 12>We're interoperable across twenty four different blockchain networks. We're fundamental

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 12>dollar liquidity on those networks, and we're going to continue

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 12>to do that, and in fact, ARC is going to

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 12>become a very powerful way to even greater provide even

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 12>greater support for liquidity and interoperability on these networks.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Jeremy, there's a lot of interest in the other revenues

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 3>opportunity with you to get a better understanding of the

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 3>cool business. I have the Bloomberg story about your writing

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 3>is report in front of me, and the AI summary

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 3>is the majority of cycles revenue comes from US treasuries

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 3>and other yield bearing instruments that support the value of

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 3>USDC tokens. Just to the uninitiated or the layman, could

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 3>you just explain the basics of that.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 12>So Circle operates the largest regulated stable coin network in

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 12>the world, and that network reaches over six hundred million

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 12>people who can reach in their pocket and access and

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 12>use USDC. There's tens of thousands of products and services

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 12>that are integrated to the network that provide ways for

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 12>people to store and make transactions and payments or investments

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 12>using USDC. So we have this really large network and

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 12>there's demand for these digital dollars, and that those digital dollars,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, are essentially purchased using existing money and then

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 12>issued is digital currency and are in free circulation on

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 12>the Internet. And so that money stock on the network

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 12>that's moving around. And we also noted we saw a

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 12>tremendous growth the amount of transactions on the network, six

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 12>trillion dollars of transactions in Q two and seeing that

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.239
<v Speaker 12>accelerate into Q three as well. So we have this

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 12>very high velocity, high transaction money on the network and

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 12>we monetize that through the reserve returns. And so, you know,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 12>what we really focused on on this part of the

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 12>business is growing that money stock. And there are a

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 12>lot of different views as to how fast stable pin

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 12>money supply is going to grow. There's an optimistic view

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 12>of a ninety percent kagger for the next five years,

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 12>There's a you know, the lowest view is a twenty

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 12>five percent kager over several years, and so we tend

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 12>to be on the more conservative side when we think

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 12>about that from a kind of outlook perspective. But you know,

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 12>we grew ninety percent year every year. That obviously drives

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 12>top line as well. And year to date we've grown

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 12>forty nine percent as of August tenth, which is very

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 12>strong growth, and that again driving and supporting that top line,

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 12>while we also build out all of these new products

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 12>with new revenue streams in subscriptions and services and in

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 12>transaction fees, and so we're continuing to build those out

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 12>as well.

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 3>You go through going public, you go through your first

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 3>call through as a public company, and the first thing

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the market's going to ask you is about inorganic growth.

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 3>What's your M and a strategy, Jeremy.

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 12>I mean, look, we are a technology company. We're very

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 12>focused on software powered innovation. That's really the heritage, that

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 12>my heritage and the rest, and so virtually everything that

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 12>we've done here has been organic. We love building software

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 12>and software technology, and we have done acquisitions. We've actually

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 12>done three acquisitions this year. One was a product and

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 12>technology that's allowed us to accelerate our entry into the

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 12>bearing token space with us y C.

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 7>We had some big news with that in.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 12>The quarter as well, and then too, what you know,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 12>our teams and intellectual property acquisitions, both of which supported

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 12>our efforts to launch ARC. And so where we find

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 12>great intellectual property or technology and great people, we see

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 12>that as a very natural thing to do to kind

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 12>of augment and bring speed and velocity to our product

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 12>development initiatives. But you know, we're not really here to

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 12>like go do huge acquisitions and try and try and

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 12>roll things up.

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 7>That's not really our approach.

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 12>So we'll look at things and of course continue to

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 12>make acquisitions where it makes sense.

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 7>But this is not an m and a play in

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 7>the sense that people.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Understand Jeremy Anna taking us across the business. We thank

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 4>you Holt on the heels of your earnings a circle CEO. Now,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 4>we just want to return to some breaking news more

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 4>broadly about financial markets, not just stable coins, but about data,

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 4>in particular labor statistics. Blueme Megg Inter National Economics Policy

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 4>Editor Michael McKee joins us now supporting done by Fox

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 4>about well, the person who's going to be potentially taking

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 4>over labor statistics in the United States and his view

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 4>on how often they should be just break down the.

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 13>News for us, Well, it's kind of a strange situation

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 13>because he'd made these comments before the President announced that

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 13>he was going to nominate him. He did an interview

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 13>with Fox and apparently they didn't run it until now,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 13>but he said, maybe, given the poor jobs report that

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 13>we had, maybe we should suspend the jobs report each

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 13>month until we can get the numbers fixed. It's the

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 13>president who thinks that the numbers are wrong, not the statisticians,

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 13>and that I'm not sure why you would do that, right,

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 13>because this would mean that Wall Street would have nothing

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 13>to trade on in terms of jobs reports, and I

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 13>would think that would not go over well.

0:31:57.680 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Michael McKee.

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 3>If you're not sure, then I'm read because I and

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of thousands rely on you for economic data. The

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 3>jobs print is key to what we do when it

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 3>comes out. Why does the market rely on it so much?

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 13>It's a great signal of what's happening in the economy

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 13>because when people have jobs, they spend money. When people

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 13>are losing jobs, they don't spend money. And if people

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 13>are spending money, then companies hire more people and profits

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 13>go up. So it's sort of the lynchpin indicator that

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 13>the Fed uses, and a lot of people on Wall

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 13>Street use to tell us in general how the economy

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 13>is going. And it's the data are delayed, as we know,

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 13>and they get revised, but it is the best kind

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 13>of numbers that we have on a regular basis, on

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 13>a monthly basis. So the idea of suspending it, I

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 13>think would get no traction at all. I'm not sure

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 13>that the BLS commissioner would have that ability anyway.

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm just riffing here a little bit carro

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 3>But you know, in terms of manufacturing data, I've been

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 3>thinking a lot about whether humanoid robots are coming on not.

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Michael McKee with some interesting news. We have some

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 3>breaking news crossing the Bloomberg terminal. Perplexity says that they've

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 3>made an unsolicited bid to Google today offering thirty four

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 3>point five billion dollars to purchase it's Chrome browser. I'm

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 3>going to repeat that Perplexity has sent says it's sent

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:27.479
<v Speaker 3>an unsolicited bid to Google this Tuesday, thirty four zero

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 3>point five billion dollars for the Google Chrome browser. That's

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 3>a significant and interesting piece of news. We're going to

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 3>get the shares of Alphabet, the parent of Google, up

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 3>very soon, and we're going to talk to Bloomberg Seth Figureman,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 3>who's one of our technology and AI editors out in

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 3>New York City. The details with the stock of alphabet

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 3>now up a percentage point, please, Seth.

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's an eyepopping offer. As a point, it's also

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 14>very much a long shot. But there's a lot of

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 14>caveats here. Google has not actually put Chrome up for

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 14>sale far as we know. It's largely in response to

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 14>the US government wanting a judge to order Google to

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 14>sell off Chrome. The judge has not actually put out

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 14>a ruling on that yet. And then on the offer itself,

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 14>Perplexity is offering thirty four point five billion dollars. That's

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 14>nearly double what Perplexity is valued at and far more

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 14>than the more than one billion that Perplexity has raised

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 14>a date. Perplexity is saying that they have investment funds

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 14>that are willing to support this big info. But again,

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.479
<v Speaker 14>this is a long shot offer as of now.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 4>They've made long shot offers before, whether or not they've

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 4>been as formal as this one. But they threw their

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 4>name in the ring when it came to TikTok I, remember,

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 4>but the US part of TikTok numbers aside.

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 5>The browser bit.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, they've already been building their own browsers, so why

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 4>make this purchase and ultimately, how would it beef up

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 4>their offering and take away from that of Google's.

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's a great question. You know, they have been

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 14>working on a browser called Comet, but it's one thing

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 14>to try to build your own browser from scratch and

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 14>another to acquire a browser that reaches billions of people

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 14>around the world. The idea here seems to be that

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 14>they want to inject their AI agent capabilities into the

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 14>interface that we all use on the web every single

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 14>day and getting in front of far more people. This

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 14>would give them a major headstart on that front. But again,

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 14>this is a lot of money that we don't think

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 14>they currently have.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean, I'm reading the story and you'll

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 3>forgive me, seth, I'm just reading it in real time.

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Perplexity says it's going to invest three billion dollars over

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the next two years in Chrome and Chromium right, which

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 3>is the underlying open source coding that supports a number

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 3>of browsers, and also that they're going to extend a

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 3>substantial offer to Chrome talent. I mean, I'll leave some

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 3>of the details to you. But what do we make

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 3>of that? What else are we reporting?

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean again, I think they're trying to show

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 14>that there'll be a good steward for a platform that's

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 14>used by billions of people around the world, while continuing

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 14>to move forward with their own venture and injecting AI

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 14>capabilities into key Internet functionality.

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're expecting that ruling from Judge am it Meta

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 4>in coming days on the rent is that they want

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 4>to see to prevent what it sees as Alphabet and

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Google being some sort of monopoly when it comes to

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 4>search in the United States. Bloomberg Seth Figeman the breakdown

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 4>of perplexities offer for Google Chrome. Let's just return to

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 4>the overarching geopolitical story of US and China right now.

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 4>We've been talking a lot about how China is urging

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 4>it's domestic firms AI firms not to use in Videa's

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 4>H twenty chips. This after the US agreed to revenue

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 4>split for allowing a semi conductors from video from AMD

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 4>to re enter China. Now, Bloomberg Opinion Economist Daily wrote

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 4>about this yesterday, about the decision by the White House

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 4>and also what it would cost the US in terms

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 4>of ANAI advantage.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 5>The story moves on continually.

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 4>But what's so striking about your story was, Look, if

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 4>there's a fifteen percent cut taken by the US government

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 4>to allow AMD and Vidia to sell into China, the

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 4>winners are in VideA, maybe less.

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 5>So now, but China.

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Why would China clearly seeming to push ahead in terms

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 4>of its own a semi conductor offerings.

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 15>Well, one of the things I used to empty chip

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 15>would allow more quickly as scale, right, I mean, one

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 15>of the things this chip is good at compared to

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 15>what China's capabilities are now is it can do more inference,

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 15>so it can run the applications that AI is built for.

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 15>That's something that we don't think domestically they could catch

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 15>up on for it for a couple of years. And

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 15>so look, this doesn't change China's aggression in trying to

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 15>build its own chips as quickly as possible, But what

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 15>it does do is kind of feel the interim there

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 15>to allow them to start integrating AI into all aspects

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 15>of Chinese life and therefore, you know, continue to make

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 15>it a global player. Question is and where the story

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 15>has moved on since I wrote those words. Is China

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 15>now going to look to sort of almost stop tavrom

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 15>happening in order to protect this domestic supply? How is

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 15>it going to balance trying to make sure AI is

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 15>used as often as much as it can in China

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 15>whilst making sure that it's homegrown effort is still built

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 15>upon us as quickly as possible.

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 3>So Dave on your piece, and I appreciate a lot

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 3>actually in twenty four hours. Just take mine and Carrow's

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 3>word for it. It's been a nightmare doing this for

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty four hours. But you actually your final

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 3>point is that there are two winners here in Vidia

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 3>and China. But you don't say the United States is

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 3>a winner. If you get what I mean. You know,

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 3>Trump is supposed to be the deal maker. But your

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 3>conclusion seems to be actually good deal for Nvidia, but

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 3>America in aggregate, that's what I want to get from you.

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 15>I mean, look, if the concern over exporting these chips

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 15>existed this time last week, I don't think the fifteen

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 15>percent revenue cut changes that calculation. It doesn't seem like

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 15>a good enough change to warrant what's essentially quite a

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 15>dramatic change in national security policy. That would be my

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 15>sort of overarching question here on why the US would

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 15>go forward with this. I guess one of the dynamics

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 15>that we're just starting to learn now is what this

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 15>might mean for other parts of the trade deal between

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 15>the US and China. We're hearing about rare earth metals

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 15>being at being a concern, and there's other types of

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 15>chips that could be use his leverages as well. I mean, look,

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 15>this is becoming a hugely complex piece of negotiation between

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 15>the two countries. I worry that China has a position

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 15>now of sort of saying to in Video, well, look,

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 15>you might have got your permission from your masters over

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 15>there in the US, but we also hold many cards

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 15>as well, and unless we get more of what we

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 15>want in these trade deals, then we may not allow

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 15>the sale of these chips in the country. And look

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 15>for in video, China is a very very important part

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 15>of his business. It's billions of dollars revenue could be

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 15>billions of dollars more. They had to write off billions

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 15>of dollars when the restrictions on the age twenty were

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 15>going to put in place. So I think it really

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 15>matters to in Vidia to please both countries, and that

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.879
<v Speaker 15>to me just seems incredibly difficult at this point.

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Opinions, davely did, good job, Thank you very much.

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more on what we can expect from China's

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 3>policy response here. Amanda Shaw is a director in the

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 3>China practice of the Raisor Group Geopolitical Risk consulting firm,

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 3>and Dave raises a point of chronology. Back when we

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 3>were stopping the flow of chips to China, it was

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 3>America's national concerity concern about how China would use those

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 3>chips in the military context. The development twenty four hours

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 3>later after the President cut that deal is China saying

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 3>we have national security concerns and we want to champion

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 3>our own domestic names. Who has the upper hand in

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 3>this negotiation, Well, I.

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 16>Think that for China a lot of this signaling that

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 16>it has been engaged in is largely performative. We know

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 16>that the Chinese continue to lack the capabilities that the

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 16>video Age twenty chips offer, and so to some degree

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 16>there will be strong demand from the Chinese for the

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 16>use of the Age twenty chips.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 10>But of course, as was.

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 16>Pointed out previously, the Chinese, of course, do want to

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 16>continue to strengthen its domestic chips building capacity, and you know,

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 16>included in that is really providing support to national champions

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 16>like Huawei. But on the other hand, when we think

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 16>about where China is headed, China also wants to be

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 16>supporting national champions like deep Seek, and of course deep

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 16>Seek deep Seek's.

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 10>AI models are run on in Nvidia chips.

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 16>So I think for the Chinese there are boat sort

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 16>of economic considerations, but there's also security ones. So I

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 16>don't see the Chinese outright banning the use or purchase

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 16>of H twenty chips in the near term.

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 4>Interesting that the information we reported that there was a

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of full on stop being asked for the likes

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:46.919
<v Speaker 4>of byte Dance or the likes of ten Cent.

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 5>But for now you're thinking that there.

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Wouldn't be some sort of ban because it'd invocate the

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 4>users of chips. But what's so interesting is Cambra con

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Technologies and Huawei, of course, we have seen a market

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 4>impact of the idea that they'd support their homegrown talent.

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 4>What else have we seen from the Chinese government to

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 4>really foster the building of semiconductors that rival that at

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 4>the age twenty.

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 16>Right, Well, the Chinese have really poured a lot of

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 16>money into its effort to develop a home grown you know,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 16>HILP industry, and we know that this is very much

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 16>in line with the top leaders vision for the country

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 16>that Chinese development and rise to national rejuvenation, as the

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 16>Chinese would put it. A key to that is technological

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 16>development and being able to rival the US in terms

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 16>of technology and AI.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 10>So, you know, the Chinese have really made it very clear.

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 17>That this has been a priority and this will continue

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 17>to be a priority in terms of its economic development.

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.800
<v Speaker 17>But nevertheless, the capabilities that they have at home remain

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 17>short of what USAI chips can provide.

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 4>And briefly, where they do have the and outsized power

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 4>is where else.

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Is that part of the bargaining ship, if at all.

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:07.959
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we've seen that.

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 16>Really the Chinese themselves have been I think a bit

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 16>surprised by how potent of a weapon the rare Earth's

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 16>controls have been in these trade negotiations. Now, I think

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 16>it's important to point out that the lifting of the

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 16>sales of H twenty chips on the part of the

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 16>Trump administration does not seem to have been linked to

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 16>some sort of deal or concession from the Chinese side.

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 17>The Chinese in fact issued a statement saying that it

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 17>was not made as part of the deal, to make

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 17>clear really to an audience that they did not offer

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 17>any concessions for this. But in terms of rare earths

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 17>and its role in the larger US China trade negotiations, absolutely,

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 17>it's been very important, I think for the Chinese and

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 17>realizing that they have this key piece of leverage, and

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 17>I think for the Trump administration as well, and realizing

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 17>that the US will remain dependent on Chinese rots and

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 17>wrote earths processing technology.

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Amanda Schau from the Eurasia Group, thank you very much

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 4>for joining today.

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 5>Coming up a bit of a pivot, Tayta Swift.

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 4>It turns across the internet with a surprise album announcement.

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 5>That's next, there's a Bloomberg Tech.

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 10>So I wanted to show you something.

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 7>Okay, what do we got? We got a briefcase.

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 10>Yep, Mick Green, Yep.

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 16>This is my brand new album, The Life of a

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 16>Show Girl.

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 10>So I wanted to show you something.

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, Swifties worldwide got a surprise from Taylor Swift, who

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.879
<v Speaker 3>announced her new album The Life of a show goal

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 3>during a sneak peek of her appearance on the New

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Heights podcast with boyfriend Travis Kelce for more on the

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 3>power of podcasting and the astonishing sights before My eyes

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Lucas Shaw, who leads screens on coverage. This has

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 3>dominated Google trending, by the way, and most other social

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 3>platforms for most of the time I've been awake. This

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 3>is big. Tell me more.

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 7>Could you sleep last night?

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 18>Were you able to or were you just so excited

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 18>that you had to stay up thinking about Taylor?

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.479
<v Speaker 2>That was Elon Musk related. Let's stick with Taylor please, thanks.

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 18>I mean, look, she's the biggest pop star in the world.

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 18>It's not even really close. She just wrapped her Era's tour,

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 18>which is the best selling concert in music industry history,

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 18>less than a year ago. I think there's a lot

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 18>of debate speculation as to whether she would finally take

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 18>a break, go away for a year or two, as

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 18>some artists have been known to do, or if she

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 18>would just keep going because she's been on kind of

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 18>this crazy treadmill over the last five or six years,

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 18>where it feels like she's got new music every year,

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 18>if not more often than that she just had that

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 18>big tour and here she is ready less than a

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 18>year later, with a new album that I'm sure will

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 18>break all types of records. And I do think it's

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 18>interesting that she did it on her boyfriend's podcast.

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so who wins here, Lucas the podcast underlying owner,

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 4>but also the music labels that she's affiliated with.

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 18>Well, that's actually a little bit of a complicated question

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 18>because her music is released by Republic Records, which is

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 18>a division of Universal Music Group. It's the biggest owner

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 18>of all these different music companies.

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 7>In the world.

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 18>But from what we understand about her deal, she's definitely

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 18>the big winner, right, she owns the ultimate copyright, She

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 18>is the IP owner. Universal gets fees and revenue shares

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 18>for releasing it, and so it's good for them, but

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 18>it's not the same as when you have someone that

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:36.720
<v Speaker 18>you fully control and own.

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, we'll see how this one unfolds, and we're going

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 4>to be able to all access it. Lucas Shaw, We

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 4>thank you very much coming live for us on the news. Meanwhile,

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 4>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech Ed.

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 4>You're not going to get any sleep tonight. Maybe, whether

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 4>it's Elon or whether it's Taylor.

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Just like astonishing news flows, so much of it actually

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 3>playing out on social media in the Internet as well,

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot to recap. Check out the podcast you

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 3>know where to find it on the Bloomberg terminal as

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 3>well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart from samarn

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh from London.

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I just to say, in New York City, this is

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech