WEBVTT - Executive Disorder: Mail-In Voting Restrictions, Canadian Trade War, Record High ICE Detentions 

0:00:01.850 --> 0:00:02.910
<v Speaker 1>Call zone media.

0:00:07.890 --> 0:00:11.310
<v Speaker 2>This is It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our weekly

0:00:11.350 --> 0:00:14.460
<v Speaker 2>newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world,

0:00:14.570 --> 0:00:17.230
<v Speaker 2>and what this means for you. I'm Garrison Davis. Today

0:00:17.250 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm joined by James Stout, Mia Wong, Robert Evans, and

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.619
<v Speaker 2>special correspondent Carlos Berrios-Pilanco, who we have had on a

0:00:25.660 --> 0:00:30.820
<v Speaker 2>few times for regular episodes. This episode, we are covering

0:00:30.860 --> 0:00:35.820
<v Speaker 2>the week of August 19th through August 26th. Robert, do

0:00:35.979 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 2>you want to start us off with our tribute?

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.380
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So before we get going today, as I'm sure

0:00:40.420 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 3>everyone listening is at least broadly aware, Dolly Rebecca Parton

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.780
<v Speaker 3>Dean passed away the day before we recorded this on

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.989
<v Speaker 3>August 25th, 2026. Dolly Parton was more widely beloved than

0:00:53.250 --> 0:00:56.690
<v Speaker 3>pretty much anyone that was still alive in the United States.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.020
<v Speaker 3>Her death was met by immediate mourning from every side

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.220
<v Speaker 3>of society. And I do mean every side. President Donald

0:01:03.260 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Trump ordered all flags to fly at half staff and

0:01:05.610 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 3>issued at least as genuine a statement of respect as

0:01:08.140 --> 0:01:10.290
<v Speaker 3>he's ever put out about anyone, saying this is a

0:01:10.330 --> 0:01:12.590
<v Speaker 3>true loss for millions of people. There has never been

0:01:12.610 --> 0:01:14.930
<v Speaker 3>anyone like her and never will. It's hard to argue

0:01:14.950 --> 0:01:17.410
<v Speaker 3>with that. The DSA also sent out an official in

0:01:17.430 --> 0:01:20.410
<v Speaker 3>memoriam praising Parton as a hero to the working class.

0:01:20.790 --> 0:01:23.670
<v Speaker 3>And you would find anyone hard pressed to genuinely disagree

0:01:23.709 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>with that statement, too. Dolly was born in a one-room

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.900
<v Speaker 3>cabin in Tennessee, the fourth of 12 children of a

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 3>dirt poor and illiterate sharecropper. She wrote more than 3,000

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 3>songs in her life and had 44 career top 10

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 3>country albums, which is nuts. But I wouldn't be talking

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.660
<v Speaker 3>about Dolly on this show, which does not do obituaries

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 3>as a rule, if she'd just been a rags-to-riches entertainment

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.730
<v Speaker 3>industry success story. Dolly had the good luck to become

0:01:48.830 --> 0:01:51.170
<v Speaker 3>rich and famous, and she would always emphasize that luck

0:01:51.210 --> 0:01:53.010
<v Speaker 3>had a lot to do with it, even though she

0:01:53.070 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 3>worked very hard. And she grew up poor enough that

0:01:55.780 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 3>she never, ever forgot that had things been a little different,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.620
<v Speaker 3>she would have stayed dirt poor. So she dedicated her

0:02:01.660 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 3>life and her fortune to helping the least fortunate in

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.180
<v Speaker 3>our society. Parton established the Dollywood Foundation to improve education

0:02:08.220 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 3>in Sevier County, Tennessee, and in participating classes, the dropout

0:02:11.820 --> 0:02:16.580
<v Speaker 3>rate fell from 35% to 6%. She founded the Imagination Library,

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>her best-known charity, and donated her 100 millionth free book

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.310
<v Speaker 3>to children in 2018. She helped build hospitals and universities

0:02:24.350 --> 0:02:27.150
<v Speaker 3>and was the single highest dollar donor to research that

0:02:27.190 --> 0:02:31.370
<v Speaker 3>created the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. When getting vaccinated became a

0:02:31.430 --> 0:02:35.070
<v Speaker 3>political hot-button issue, Dolly posted a video of herself taking

0:02:35.110 --> 0:02:38.169
<v Speaker 3>the vaccine and performed a cover of her own song, Jolene,

0:02:38.270 --> 0:02:42.170
<v Speaker 3>themed after getting vaccinated. She was also a longtime and

0:02:42.230 --> 0:02:45.829
<v Speaker 3>vocal advocate for queer people. In 1990, The Sun, a

0:02:45.870 --> 0:02:48.740
<v Speaker 3>British magazine, found out that her Hollywood chauffeur was a

0:02:48.790 --> 0:02:51.710
<v Speaker 3>trans man named Jason Pirro. They interviewed him, and he

0:02:51.770 --> 0:02:54.150
<v Speaker 3>told the magazine, Dolly has been good to me. I'm

0:02:54.169 --> 0:02:57.060
<v Speaker 3>not real comfortable talking about myself. Dolly knows all about

0:02:57.100 --> 0:02:59.780
<v Speaker 3>me and is a very nice lady. Even back in

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.300
<v Speaker 3>the 90s, Dolly Parton was comfortable openly supporting trans people

0:03:03.340 --> 0:03:05.860
<v Speaker 3>and the rest of the queer community. Her song Family,

0:03:05.940 --> 0:03:09.220
<v Speaker 3>released in 1991, is probably the first country music song

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.420
<v Speaker 3>to use the word gay, certainly the first to use

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.250
<v Speaker 3>it in like a positive sense of the word. And

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.770
<v Speaker 3>she had queer and trans employees as far back as

0:03:16.810 --> 0:03:20.510
<v Speaker 3>the early 90s and talked openly about that. In 2016,

0:03:20.500 --> 0:03:22.770
<v Speaker 3>she was interviewed by Chris as a party for Pride

0:03:22.810 --> 0:03:25.510
<v Speaker 3>Source and said, I have many gays and lesbians in

0:03:25.550 --> 0:03:27.630
<v Speaker 3>my own family, she revealed to me, and then she

0:03:27.710 --> 0:03:30.370
<v Speaker 3>used a word that stuck with me for a decade now, ours.

0:03:30.790 --> 0:03:33.029
<v Speaker 3>They're ours, and they're who they are, and we know

0:03:33.050 --> 0:03:35.990
<v Speaker 3>they're wonderful, and they're like us. Some relatives back in

0:03:36.010 --> 0:03:38.060
<v Speaker 3>the mountains, she admitted, still weren't quite sure what to

0:03:38.090 --> 0:03:40.300
<v Speaker 3>make of it. She also told me casually, like it

0:03:40.340 --> 0:03:42.540
<v Speaker 3>was nothing, which is exactly how she wanted it treated,

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 3>that she had transgender employees on salary in her own company,

0:03:45.660 --> 0:03:48.140
<v Speaker 3>years before most corporations would say that sentence out loud,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.410
<v Speaker 3>let alone mean it. People came to her the way

0:03:50.430 --> 0:03:52.310
<v Speaker 3>they used to come to her mama, she said, to

0:03:52.330 --> 0:03:54.490
<v Speaker 3>be told it was safe to be honest. You need

0:03:54.510 --> 0:03:56.450
<v Speaker 3>to let people know who you are and you need

0:03:56.490 --> 0:03:58.350
<v Speaker 3>to come on out, she'd tell them. You don't need

0:03:58.390 --> 0:04:02.170
<v Speaker 3>to live your life in darkness. Parton strenuously avoided direct

0:04:02.230 --> 0:04:05.210
<v Speaker 3>political punditry when she could, but after the right-wing moral

0:04:05.250 --> 0:04:08.510
<v Speaker 3>panic over trans rights ignited in the 2020s, she spoke out,

0:04:08.710 --> 0:04:12.130
<v Speaker 3>stating her explicit and direct support for trans people. I

0:04:12.170 --> 0:04:14.430
<v Speaker 3>know how important this is to them. That's who they are,

0:04:14.630 --> 0:04:16.930
<v Speaker 3>she said. They cannot help that any more than I

0:04:16.950 --> 0:04:19.089
<v Speaker 3>can help being Dolly Parton, you know, the way people

0:04:19.130 --> 0:04:21.270
<v Speaker 3>know me. If there's something to be judged, that is

0:04:21.310 --> 0:04:23.870
<v Speaker 3>God's business, but we are all God's children, and how

0:04:23.910 --> 0:04:26.930
<v Speaker 3>we are is who we are. There's so much more

0:04:27.089 --> 0:04:29.750
<v Speaker 3>to who Dolly was and what she did, from reinvesting

0:04:29.790 --> 0:04:32.450
<v Speaker 3>royalties from Whitney Houston's cover of I Will Always Love

0:04:32.470 --> 0:04:34.890
<v Speaker 3>You into the black community, after refusing to license the

0:04:34.930 --> 0:04:37.370
<v Speaker 3>song to Elvis, to starring in The Best Little Whorehouse

0:04:37.410 --> 0:04:40.930
<v Speaker 3>in Texas, arguably the best film about either Texas or whorehouses.

0:04:41.410 --> 0:04:43.740
<v Speaker 3>She did it all in her life. I think the

0:04:43.779 --> 0:04:46.219
<v Speaker 3>loss of Parton hurts so keenly because of the very

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>thing I started with, though. The fact that her loss

0:04:48.460 --> 0:04:51.820
<v Speaker 3>has been mourned across the aisle almost regardless of political stance.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.890
<v Speaker 3>Dolly Parton was the closest thing our culture had to

0:04:54.930 --> 0:04:57.990
<v Speaker 3>a secular saint, a Joshua Norton-like figure who could have

0:04:58.029 --> 0:05:00.589
<v Speaker 3>waded into the middle of a deadly partisan riot and

0:05:00.670 --> 0:05:02.910
<v Speaker 3>parted the fighting with her presence like that baby at

0:05:02.930 --> 0:05:05.100
<v Speaker 3>the end of Children of Men. I might be going

0:05:05.130 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 3>a little bit far with that last one, but in

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.500
<v Speaker 3>my research for this, I came across a recollection of

0:05:09.540 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Dolly by Roger Ebert that I feel I need to share.

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.970
<v Speaker 3>Roger Ebert, if you're on the younger side, was a

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.130
<v Speaker 3>very famous Pulitzer-winning film critic, and this is him talking

0:05:18.170 --> 0:05:20.910
<v Speaker 3>about meetings that he and his partner Gene Siskel had

0:05:20.950 --> 0:05:23.580
<v Speaker 3>with Dolly Parton. In Dallas for the premiere of 9

0:05:23.580 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>to 5, I had an uncanny experience, and on the

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.420
<v Speaker 3>plane home to Chicago, I confessed it to Siskel. I

0:05:28.460 --> 0:05:30.779
<v Speaker 3>had been granted a private half hour with Dolly Parton,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and as we spoke, I was filled with a strange

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.219
<v Speaker 3>ethereal grace. This was not spiritual, nor was it sexual.

0:05:36.380 --> 0:05:39.420
<v Speaker 3>It was healing and comforting. Jean listened and said, Roger,

0:05:39.500 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I felt the exact same thing during my interview with her.

0:05:42.100 --> 0:05:42.860
<v Speaker 1>We looked at each other.

0:05:43.140 --> 0:05:45.460
<v Speaker 3>What did this mean? Neither one of us ever felt

0:05:45.500 --> 0:05:47.990
<v Speaker 3>that feeling again. From time to time, we would refer

0:05:48.020 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 3>to it in wonder. And to close off, I think

0:05:50.779 --> 0:05:53.710
<v Speaker 3>I should give us all some advice courtesy of Dolly Parton.

0:05:54.310 --> 0:05:56.350
<v Speaker 3>Find out who you are and do it on purpose

0:05:56.570 --> 0:05:58.730
<v Speaker 3>and do it with purpose. You got to know who

0:05:58.770 --> 0:06:01.110
<v Speaker 3>you are because so many people try to emulate or

0:06:01.150 --> 0:06:02.190
<v Speaker 3>copy somebody else.

0:06:03.050 --> 0:06:04.790
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I got to say about Dolly.

0:06:05.930 --> 0:06:11.300
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Robert. For some less good. I mean, how

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:11.660
<v Speaker 2>do I say this?

0:06:13.230 --> 0:06:16.089
<v Speaker 1>Some people who are less good than Dolly Parton. There

0:06:16.170 --> 0:06:17.430
<v Speaker 1>are billions of them.

0:06:18.570 --> 0:06:20.790
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with some small things regarding people who are

0:06:20.830 --> 0:06:25.050
<v Speaker 2>not as good as Dolly Parton. Darlene Graham just won

0:06:25.089 --> 0:06:30.190
<v Speaker 2>the runoff election for the Republican Senate nomination in South Carolina.

0:06:31.089 --> 0:06:34.010
<v Speaker 2>Graham won with 52.5% of the vote, dominating in the

0:06:34.029 --> 0:06:36.570
<v Speaker 2>eastern part of the state where Trump campaigned for her

0:06:36.630 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>last Friday in Myrtle Beach. On Wednesday morning, the Department

0:06:42.300 --> 0:06:45.900
<v Speaker 2>of State in partnership with the Department of Treasury, has

0:06:46.060 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>announced the Italy-based autonomous anti-capitalist digital service provider Autostici Inventati,

0:06:52.940 --> 0:06:57.609
<v Speaker 2>or the IA Collective, is now a specially designated global

0:06:57.710 --> 0:07:02.089
<v Speaker 2>terrorist organization. To quote from Treasury, quote, Today, the U.S.

0:07:02.110 --> 0:07:05.670
<v Speaker 2>Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control announced

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.580
<v Speaker 2>took action to counter the growing threat posed by violent

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>far-left terrorist groups by sanctioning the IA Collective, an Italy-based

0:07:14.020 --> 0:07:18.230
<v Speaker 2>entity that supplies specialized digital architecture tools and services for

0:07:18.330 --> 0:07:23.070
<v Speaker 2>Antifa cells and other violent far-left extremists, including the foreign

0:07:23.190 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>terrorist organization Palestine Action. The IA Collective also operates the

0:07:30.180 --> 0:07:37.730
<v Speaker 2>web platform NoBlogs, which hosts many Antifa and anarchist communiques. Though, notably,

0:07:37.750 --> 0:07:43.150
<v Speaker 2>the State Department has repeatedly asserted that Rose City Antifa

0:07:44.130 --> 0:07:48.690
<v Speaker 2>used the NoBlogs platform online, and that is simply not true.

0:07:48.790 --> 0:07:52.130
<v Speaker 2>What they are referring to is Rose City Counter Info,

0:07:52.770 --> 0:07:55.790
<v Speaker 2>a separate website that is not affiliated with Rose City Antifa,

0:07:56.230 --> 0:08:00.570
<v Speaker 2>which is used by local anarchists to make community bulletin

0:08:00.630 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 2>board-style updates. I cannot emphasize enough that these are totally

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:09.540
<v Speaker 2>separate groups with often very different politics. But on both

0:08:09.780 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>social media and official State Department press releases, these two

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 2>groups have been conflated, asserting that Rose City Antifa used

0:08:18.540 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the AI collective tools to organize and incite violent and

0:08:23.060 --> 0:08:26.860
<v Speaker 2>criminal acts. Something else I want to emphasize is that

0:08:27.540 --> 0:08:34.610
<v Speaker 2>Palestine Action, the UK-based organization, is described as a foreign

0:08:34.670 --> 0:08:41.310
<v Speaker 2>terrorist organization in the Treasury Department's announcement about sanctions regarding

0:08:41.429 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the IA Collective. And in that same announcement, sanctions were

0:08:45.179 --> 0:08:50.100
<v Speaker 2>also imposed on Palestine Action, which the Treasury Department accused

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:55.100
<v Speaker 2>of supporting, quote, numerous acts of terrorism. But as of recording...

0:08:55.140 --> 0:08:59.420
<v Speaker 2>Palestine Action has not been officially designated as a foreign

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:00.620
<v Speaker 2>terrorist organization.

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:05.470
<v Speaker 4>And then one thing from me, the Trump administration moved

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.190
<v Speaker 4>ahead this week with its plans to rescind the 2001

0:09:09.190 --> 0:09:13.730
<v Speaker 4>roadless rule, which blocks road building in infantry roadless areas

0:09:13.770 --> 0:09:18.340
<v Speaker 4>of national forests, not in wilderness areas or national parks,

0:09:18.390 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 4>as some people have been reporting.

0:09:20.660 --> 0:09:24.290
<v Speaker 1>And The new rule was proposed on August 18th with

0:09:24.330 --> 0:09:28.050
<v Speaker 1>a public comment period beginning that day. The justification that

0:09:28.070 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're going for with this is it will prevent wildfires.

0:09:32.380 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And I believe they're going for it will allow fuel

0:09:35.420 --> 0:09:38.300
<v Speaker 1>mitigation to prevent wildfires. It's worth noting that there were

0:09:38.380 --> 0:09:43.110
<v Speaker 1>already provisions in the roadless rule to allow for thinning

0:09:43.150 --> 0:09:46.090
<v Speaker 1>of small diameter timber. What they didn't do is add budget.

0:09:46.429 --> 0:09:48.849
<v Speaker 1>to do that, right? So like if they were making

0:09:48.870 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>a serious attempt to do fire mitigation in so much

0:09:52.580 --> 0:09:55.380
<v Speaker 1>as that is something we can prevent, which I don't

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.750
<v Speaker 1>think it is, then they would have added budget, but

0:09:57.770 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 1>they haven't done that. It's just worth pointing out that

0:10:00.059 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the construction of roads will allow people to get into

0:10:02.620 --> 0:10:04.500
<v Speaker 1>areas that were harder for them to get into before.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.590
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that tends to start wildfires is people.

0:10:08.210 --> 0:10:10.750
<v Speaker 1>So people being in these areas will allow people to

0:10:10.809 --> 0:10:13.980
<v Speaker 1>start fires in these areas. I'm going to cover this

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>more in depth on natural causes in a couple of weeks,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to flag it because the comment period

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:23.189
<v Speaker 1>will probably end soon after I do my episode. So

0:10:23.309 --> 0:10:25.390
<v Speaker 1>if you want to comment and so much that matters anymore,

0:10:25.410 --> 0:10:26.949
<v Speaker 1>I'll include a link.

0:10:28.030 --> 0:10:30.750
<v Speaker 5>So in other news that has thus far wound up

0:10:30.910 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 5>not really being news, President Trump has declared, quote, economic

0:10:36.429 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 5>D-Day in his attempt to end the war in Iran,

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.380
<v Speaker 5>win the war in Iran. So in theory, economic D-Day

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.140
<v Speaker 5>is supposed to be a bunch of what are called

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 5>secondary sanctions. Secondary sanctions are not just sanctions on a country,

0:10:52.860 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 5>but are sanctions on any country that does trade with

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.190
<v Speaker 5>the first country, in this case, Iran. The specific focuses

0:11:01.230 --> 0:11:05.809
<v Speaker 5>here are supposed to be, quote, cryptocurrency, technology, gold, aviation,

0:11:05.950 --> 0:11:10.510
<v Speaker 5>and shipping. Now, the issue here is that if you

0:11:10.570 --> 0:11:14.870
<v Speaker 5>are going to do... secondary sanctions against countries that trade

0:11:14.929 --> 0:11:20.010
<v Speaker 5>with Iran. The actual largest target here would be China. Now,

0:11:20.110 --> 0:11:25.750
<v Speaker 5>reporters repeatedly asked Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, who is nominally

0:11:25.770 --> 0:11:28.620
<v Speaker 5>the person supposed to be running these sanctions, if he

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.939
<v Speaker 5>was going to name which countries there were going to

0:11:31.980 --> 0:11:38.460
<v Speaker 5>be secondary sanctions against. Besant refused repeatedly. So these sanctions

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 5>were supposed to begin later this week. But the administration

0:11:43.740 --> 0:11:47.820
<v Speaker 5>has been, I don't know if slow-walking them is the term,

0:11:48.059 --> 0:11:51.330
<v Speaker 5>but they have refused to actually impose any. They are

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.430
<v Speaker 5>claiming that they are not imposing any because they are

0:11:53.450 --> 0:11:58.470
<v Speaker 5>giving countries time to comply voluntarily. But as of Wednesday,

0:11:59.070 --> 0:12:02.890
<v Speaker 5>August 26th, there have been no actual sanctions imposed. Every

0:12:02.950 --> 0:12:06.390
<v Speaker 5>conceivable joke comparing this to D-Day has already been made.

0:12:07.210 --> 0:12:11.020
<v Speaker 5>Many actually, by the press corps, in an unexpected bit

0:12:11.059 --> 0:12:14.220
<v Speaker 5>of bravery, there were several members of the press corps

0:12:14.300 --> 0:12:18.469
<v Speaker 5>in various press conferences asked, hey, so D-Day was a

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.329
<v Speaker 5>surprise and you're announcing this. Can you explain this conflict?

0:12:22.550 --> 0:12:24.189
<v Speaker 5>And they got a bunch of non-answers.

0:12:24.710 --> 0:12:29.309
<v Speaker 1>So... Maybe this is the giant inflatable set of sanctions

0:12:29.630 --> 0:12:32.150
<v Speaker 1>that they are using to draw attention from the actual

0:12:32.190 --> 0:12:32.970
<v Speaker 1>set of sanctions.

0:12:34.350 --> 0:12:38.570
<v Speaker 5>James, you unfortunately know significantly more about D-Day than every

0:12:38.630 --> 0:12:40.590
<v Speaker 5>single person in this illustration can find.

0:12:41.030 --> 0:12:42.290
<v Speaker 2>Oh my God.

0:12:42.350 --> 0:12:44.510
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing that they make you do when you're

0:12:44.530 --> 0:12:45.929
<v Speaker 1>a British man in your 30s.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 5>But if any sanctions actually come from this, we will

0:12:53.100 --> 0:12:53.780
<v Speaker 5>let you know.

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>But as of.

0:12:56.010 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 5>As of Wednesday, August 26th, this is another failed attempt

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.860
<v Speaker 5>to win the war in Iran that seems to have

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.140
<v Speaker 5>been called off before it began. Speaking of tariffs.

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.710
<v Speaker 1>Tariff, don't like it.

0:13:10.750 --> 0:13:11.790
<v Speaker 6>Rocket Casbah.

0:13:11.870 --> 0:13:12.970
<v Speaker 4>Rocket Casbah.

0:13:12.990 --> 0:13:14.230
<v Speaker 6>Tariff, don't like it.

0:13:14.370 --> 0:13:15.510
<v Speaker 1>Rocket Casbah.

0:13:15.570 --> 0:13:16.410
<v Speaker 4>Rocket Casbah.

0:13:25.190 --> 0:13:29.099
<v Speaker 5>So the other big piece of big tariff news is

0:13:29.140 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 5>something that we talked about a few weeks ago, which

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.739
<v Speaker 5>is the US's attempt to impose 50% tariffs on a

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.740
<v Speaker 5>broad swath of Canadian goods. Ever since then, the US

0:13:39.780 --> 0:13:42.790
<v Speaker 5>and Canada have been in trade negotiations over these tariffs,

0:13:42.890 --> 0:13:46.730
<v Speaker 5>and these negotiations have completely fallen apart as Canada has

0:13:46.850 --> 0:13:51.630
<v Speaker 5>walked away from the table. Now, there are a bunch

0:13:51.690 --> 0:13:57.099
<v Speaker 5>of reasons why These specific negotiations broke down completely. I'm

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.620
<v Speaker 5>going to go through some of them. One of the

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 5>big ones is that one of the biggest sources of

0:14:02.620 --> 0:14:05.860
<v Speaker 5>cross-border trade between the U.S. and Canada is the fact

0:14:05.980 --> 0:14:08.340
<v Speaker 5>that in a similar way to the U.S. and Mexico,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:13.190
<v Speaker 5>there is a lot of cross-border trade revolving around U.S.

0:14:13.290 --> 0:14:17.370
<v Speaker 5>auto manufacturing, right? And Canadian auto manufacturing, a lot of Ford,

0:14:17.450 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 5>General Motors, stuff like that. A lot of trucks are

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.690
<v Speaker 5>produced in Canada. The US was negotiating reducing the tariffs

0:14:23.990 --> 0:14:27.290
<v Speaker 5>on Canadian automobiles to 15%, but they were only doing

0:14:27.310 --> 0:14:29.890
<v Speaker 5>this for cars and not trucks. And so they wanted

0:14:29.930 --> 0:14:31.790
<v Speaker 5>to leave the truck rate at 50%. And there were

0:14:31.830 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 5>a whole bunch of very, very fancy trucks that American

0:14:36.740 --> 0:14:40.980
<v Speaker 5>consumers buy and that Canada makes that would still have 50% tariffs.

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 6>Sure. Yeah.

0:14:44.780 --> 0:14:47.900
<v Speaker 5>This is one of the things that normally when these

0:14:47.940 --> 0:14:51.350
<v Speaker 5>kind of Trade battles have happened before. Automotive stuff has

0:14:51.390 --> 0:14:54.290
<v Speaker 5>been written out of them almost immediately because it's terrible

0:14:54.350 --> 0:14:57.590
<v Speaker 5>for a bunch of American companies. But the administration was

0:14:57.630 --> 0:15:01.060
<v Speaker 5>refusing to back down on this. And, you know, the

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 5>Canadians walked out. They have wooden alcohol tariffs that are

0:15:03.900 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 5>already in effect. There are going to be more tariffs

0:15:06.860 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 5>coming on September 8th. More bafflingly, one of the big

0:15:12.380 --> 0:15:15.930
<v Speaker 5>things that Trump has been on is trying to restart

0:15:15.950 --> 0:15:17.270
<v Speaker 5>the Keystone XL pipeline.

0:15:17.710 --> 0:15:17.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:18.930 --> 0:15:21.510
<v Speaker 5>Which Carty is like, no, we're not doing this pipeline

0:15:21.550 --> 0:15:25.340
<v Speaker 5>unless we get a better trade deal. But then in

0:15:25.380 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 5>a truly startling set of proposals, the U.S. wanted to

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 5>be able to set Canadian steel tariff rates?

0:15:34.700 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.180
<v Speaker 5>The nominal argument here is that the U.S. is trying

0:15:39.230 --> 0:15:41.870
<v Speaker 5>to like, quote unquote, stop the import of the flood

0:15:41.910 --> 0:15:45.090
<v Speaker 5>of cheap steel from countries like China and And they

0:15:45.130 --> 0:15:47.359
<v Speaker 5>could only do this if the Canadian steel tariff rate

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 5>matched the American steel tariff rate. But the goal for

0:15:51.500 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 5>this was for the U.S. to be able to review

0:15:54.100 --> 0:15:57.900
<v Speaker 5>and set Canadian tariff rates and make sure that they

0:15:58.110 --> 0:16:02.630
<v Speaker 5>match American tariff rates on other countries. Which, this is

0:16:02.650 --> 0:16:05.750
<v Speaker 5>the kind of stuff you do to a colony? 51st state.

0:16:06.850 --> 0:16:10.380
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. Can confirm. Very colonial thing to do.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Shocking from America.

0:16:12.220 --> 0:16:16.170
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I've never seen a country do this, try to

0:16:16.190 --> 0:16:18.510
<v Speaker 3>do this to another sovereign country like Canada.

0:16:18.550 --> 0:16:18.810
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:16:18.870 --> 0:16:19.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:19.150 --> 0:16:19.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:20.190 --> 0:16:23.110
<v Speaker 5>I don't think we did this to Iraq. I've never

0:16:23.170 --> 0:16:24.390
<v Speaker 5>I've never seen anything like this.

0:16:24.580 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 6>It's it's bizarre.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 3>The insistence that like, yeah, we have any sort of

0:16:29.140 --> 0:16:32.700
<v Speaker 3>say in their international policy is de facto making Canada

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.420
<v Speaker 3>trying to make Canada agree that they're a colony.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:36.220 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. It's very weird the way this is being written

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.510
<v Speaker 5>about in the American press, where they're like, oh, well,

0:16:41.530 --> 0:16:45.850
<v Speaker 5>this is Canadian autonomy and sovereignty has become a political issue.

0:16:45.930 --> 0:16:49.970
<v Speaker 5>And yes, obviously, there's no country on earth that would

0:16:50.010 --> 0:16:50.770
<v Speaker 5>agree to this.

0:16:51.150 --> 0:16:51.530
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:16:51.770 --> 0:16:54.770
<v Speaker 5>Even the staunchest American, like Saudi Arabia, would not agree

0:16:54.820 --> 0:16:58.180
<v Speaker 5>to let the U.S. dictate its tariff policy.

0:16:58.680 --> 0:16:58.859
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:16:59.020 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>It's absurd.

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 5>And this has managed to accomplish the absolutely staggering feat

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:09.730
<v Speaker 5>of uniting... Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney with Doug Ford,

0:17:09.750 --> 0:17:11.650
<v Speaker 5>the right-wing premier of Ontario.

0:17:12.050 --> 0:17:12.869
<v Speaker 2>Jesus Christ.

0:17:13.310 --> 0:17:18.669
<v Speaker 5>And also, because these people just hate winning, I don't

0:17:18.690 --> 0:17:22.460
<v Speaker 5>have another explanation for this other than racism. Canadian negotiators

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.260
<v Speaker 5>claimed that the U.S. was trying to intervene in Canadian

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 5>policy about the digital promotion of French films. Which is

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 5>a direct attack on Quebec.

0:17:33.190 --> 0:17:35.790
<v Speaker 1>On the Quebecois. Yeah.

0:17:37.470 --> 0:17:40.290
<v Speaker 5>And a bunch of very, very important legal protections in

0:17:40.410 --> 0:17:45.740
<v Speaker 5>Quebec about the French language. So they have somehow managed

0:17:45.780 --> 0:17:52.590
<v Speaker 5>to unite a political coalition of Doug Ford, the Quebec separatist.

0:17:54.060 --> 0:17:57.580
<v Speaker 2>And the ruling liberals, all of whom... It's pretty insane.

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:58.620
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable.

0:17:59.460 --> 0:18:04.970
<v Speaker 5>They're just going systematically through every single conceivable political bloc

0:18:05.430 --> 0:18:10.870
<v Speaker 5>in Canada and pissing them off. So these negotiations obviously collapsed. Obviously,

0:18:10.930 --> 0:18:14.310
<v Speaker 5>the Canadians walked away. Obviously, there was almost total support

0:18:14.350 --> 0:18:15.990
<v Speaker 5>in Canadian society for doing this.

0:18:16.010 --> 0:18:17.490
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:18:17.690 --> 0:18:19.970
<v Speaker 2>Canadian nationalism is at an all-time high.

0:18:20.010 --> 0:18:20.310
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:20.810 --> 0:18:23.060
<v Speaker 2>This is really just... carrying over the sort of trends

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:27.580
<v Speaker 2>that we saw in the last Canadian election where Carney

0:18:27.740 --> 0:18:32.100
<v Speaker 2>saved the liberals from like total, total and utter demise

0:18:32.660 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 2>by feeding into this, this sense of like nationalism, like

0:18:37.380 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 2>based on being under threat from Trump. And the guy

0:18:41.140 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>who was running for the conservative prime minister was too

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.820
<v Speaker 2>associated with Trump. And so that, that really hurt them.

0:18:47.180 --> 0:18:50.020
<v Speaker 2>And it, it, it built this really big coalition in

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.869
<v Speaker 2>Canada that, to push back against the conservatives as a

0:18:53.910 --> 0:18:57.629
<v Speaker 2>way of pushing back against Trump and really put forward

0:18:58.130 --> 0:19:02.890
<v Speaker 2>the Liberal Party as this counterforce to Trump's America and

0:19:02.910 --> 0:19:06.430
<v Speaker 2>the attempted incursions into Canadian sovereignty, which Trump is still

0:19:06.450 --> 0:19:10.090
<v Speaker 2>trying to do. And it's impressive how much Carney's been

0:19:10.109 --> 0:19:14.770
<v Speaker 2>able to hold on to that coalition while ruling, because

0:19:14.850 --> 0:19:17.610
<v Speaker 2>it's been over a year now. and stuff like this

0:19:17.650 --> 0:19:22.740
<v Speaker 2>shows that it's, if anything, only gotten stronger in recent

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 2>weeks during these negotiations. Pulling together Doug Ford, the Liberal Party,

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 2>And the Quebecois into one united bloc is like an

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 2>unprecedented piece of like national unity.

0:19:35.310 --> 0:19:38.730
<v Speaker 3>The fact that other Canadians are backing up the Quebecois

0:19:38.910 --> 0:19:41.649
<v Speaker 3>after fucking Trump tried to make restrictions that like the

0:19:41.710 --> 0:19:43.150
<v Speaker 3>French language and can't like that.

0:19:43.190 --> 0:19:43.850
<v Speaker 1>That's nuts.

0:19:44.530 --> 0:19:47.369
<v Speaker 2>The fact that I'm going to be on the side

0:19:47.550 --> 0:19:48.930
<v Speaker 2>as like a Midwest Canadian.

0:19:49.030 --> 0:19:49.450
<v Speaker 1>It's nuts.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.419
<v Speaker 2>Very impressive by Trump.

0:19:52.830 --> 0:19:53.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:53.310 --> 0:19:55.610
<v Speaker 5>And I think what's interesting about this, right, is that like,

0:19:55.630 --> 0:20:00.550
<v Speaker 5>you know, throughout Canadian history, there's been a bipartisan series

0:20:00.590 --> 0:20:03.540
<v Speaker 5>of debates that have cut across You know, like as

0:20:03.580 --> 0:20:05.950
<v Speaker 5>cut across every political party, there have been factions in

0:20:06.050 --> 0:20:08.510
<v Speaker 5>both about whether the extent to which Canada was going

0:20:08.530 --> 0:20:11.590
<v Speaker 5>to be sort of a branch plant economy of of

0:20:11.609 --> 0:20:16.690
<v Speaker 5>the United States. And that's just over. Everyone at this

0:20:16.770 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 5>point has has, you know, sort of unified and saying, no,

0:20:19.780 --> 0:20:22.220
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to continue doing this, you know, to

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 5>sort of cap this off. One of the demands from

0:20:24.900 --> 0:20:28.860
<v Speaker 5>the Trump negotiators were that Canada would end this program.

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:30.950
<v Speaker 5>It's been doing this sort of this sort of by

0:20:31.010 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 5>Canadian program. where they've been doing something that the U.S.

0:20:35.380 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 5>also has been doing for ages of encouraging people and

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.580
<v Speaker 5>encouraging government contracts to go to Canadian companies, which has

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 5>been intensified in response to sort of their– And Canadians

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 5>have refused to do this. And instead, this has been

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.649
<v Speaker 5>intensifying attempts to sort of do whatever is possible to

0:20:59.710 --> 0:21:02.410
<v Speaker 5>try to decouple the US and Canadian economies. Obviously, that's

0:21:02.690 --> 0:21:06.869
<v Speaker 5>not something that's particularly possible in a macro sense, just

0:21:06.910 --> 0:21:10.820
<v Speaker 5>because of the reliance on both, you know, oil exports

0:21:11.140 --> 0:21:14.380
<v Speaker 5>and also the way that the auto sector is intertwined.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 5>But this has become economic policy in a way that

0:21:17.700 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 5>would have been unthinkable even like five years ago.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.900
<v Speaker 2>In specific, like the Buy Canada campaign to push for

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.220
<v Speaker 2>consumers just to buy products made either by Canadian companies

0:21:28.260 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 2>or made in Canada has been a massive success. Yeah.

0:21:31.859 --> 0:21:35.180
<v Speaker 2>Talking with my family in Canada about this, like this

0:21:35.260 --> 0:21:40.030
<v Speaker 2>is penetrated into all parts of the country, including like

0:21:40.050 --> 0:21:43.610
<v Speaker 2>the conservative Alberta province where my family lives, where, yeah,

0:21:43.630 --> 0:21:47.470
<v Speaker 2>this is like a big thing. It's hard to understate

0:21:47.510 --> 0:21:49.550
<v Speaker 2>how much of an impact that has had in the

0:21:49.609 --> 0:21:51.650
<v Speaker 2>country's consuming habits in the past year and a half.

0:21:52.090 --> 0:21:54.770
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Trump has the ability to do this in an

0:21:54.810 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>incredible number of countries, actually. He has created some fantastic alliances.

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:01.969
<v Speaker 1>He's been great for the maple syrup business.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's go on ad break and then return for more news.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Ads for poutine and maple syrup coming up.

0:22:10.260 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 2>From your mouth to Katya's.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.060
<v Speaker 1>Not at the same time. Maybe at the same time now.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:14.900
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's all they have.

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.220
<v Speaker 2>Carlos, welcome.

0:22:30.420 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Hello.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>What is your special segment for us this week on

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Executive Disorder?

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.970
<v Speaker 1>There was an American Colony segue that was hanging right there.

0:22:38.410 --> 0:22:39.530
<v Speaker 6>You know what?

0:22:42.609 --> 0:22:43.109
<v Speaker 2>My bad.

0:22:43.850 --> 0:22:47.930
<v Speaker 6>From the soon-to-be colony of the U.S., Canada, to the

0:22:48.030 --> 0:22:51.690
<v Speaker 6>current colony, Puerto Rico, on Wednesday, the U.S. Department of

0:22:51.790 --> 0:22:55.570
<v Speaker 6>Agriculture declared that 26 out of the 78 municipalities in

0:22:55.609 --> 0:22:59.149
<v Speaker 6>Puerto Rico were undergoing a drought disaster. Per the AP,

0:22:59.210 --> 0:23:02.340
<v Speaker 6>more than 33% of the archipelago is under extreme drought,

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 6>and another 30% is experiencing severe drought. So I should

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 6>say that this emergency declaration has been a long time coming,

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 6>and I wouldn't be surprised if it gets extended to

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 6>other municipalities. Puerto Rico has been experiencing pretty bad water

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.900
<v Speaker 6>problems since forever, but they became particularly acute last year

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.100
<v Speaker 6>when more than half a million people lost water because

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.550
<v Speaker 6>of a broken pipe. Earlier this year, another break caused

0:23:24.590 --> 0:23:27.649
<v Speaker 6>about 300,000 people to lose water, more or less. In

0:23:27.690 --> 0:23:29.909
<v Speaker 6>my area, which is kind of outside of the metro

0:23:29.950 --> 0:23:33.070
<v Speaker 6>where it's been most affecting, we lost water for about

0:23:33.070 --> 0:23:36.129
<v Speaker 6>10 days early in the summer. And now, because of

0:23:36.150 --> 0:23:39.109
<v Speaker 6>a mixture of aging infrastructure that hasn't been fixed and

0:23:39.130 --> 0:23:41.449
<v Speaker 6>a continuing drought, it looks like that might be the

0:23:41.490 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 6>case again soon. At least we're stockpiling as much water

0:23:45.100 --> 0:23:48.250
<v Speaker 6>as we can. So to talk about the infrastructure problems

0:23:48.310 --> 0:23:51.470
<v Speaker 6>real quick, part of it is really due to how

0:23:51.530 --> 0:23:53.950
<v Speaker 6>bad the system is. We lose about 60% of the

0:23:54.010 --> 0:23:56.650
<v Speaker 6>water produced by the local water utility before it gets

0:23:56.690 --> 0:24:00.820
<v Speaker 6>to people's homes, which is... It's become normal to us,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.060
<v Speaker 6>but it's kind of crazy to say to other people,

0:24:03.180 --> 0:24:04.780
<v Speaker 6>at least in my experience when I've talked about it

0:24:04.820 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 6>with others. And quite a few of the reservoirs that

0:24:07.859 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 6>feed us water have not been dredged in years. Yeah,

0:24:12.260 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 6>and part of the reason the drought is going on

0:24:14.260 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 6>is because of the Super El Nino, which has been

0:24:16.940 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 6>causing temperatures across pretty much the whole world to go up.

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 6>So I also want to talk about two pretty big

0:24:23.619 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 6>investigations published by Aura Bogado of Injustice Watch, one in

0:24:27.180 --> 0:24:30.700
<v Speaker 6>collaboration with Wired and the other in collaboration with The Intercept.

0:24:31.310 --> 0:24:33.410
<v Speaker 6>To kind of set the scene, Illinois has this thing

0:24:33.450 --> 0:24:36.230
<v Speaker 6>called the Trust Act, which generally prohibits law enforcement in

0:24:36.690 --> 0:24:41.130
<v Speaker 6>Illinois from participating in immigration enforcement. This includes... not detaining

0:24:41.190 --> 0:24:43.909
<v Speaker 6>or not continuing to detain any person based solely on

0:24:43.930 --> 0:24:47.890
<v Speaker 6>whether they have an immigration detainer. They are not supposed to, quote,

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.780
<v Speaker 6>assist in any capacity with an immigration agent's enforcement operation

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 6>unless required to by a judge's warrant or a federal law.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.859
<v Speaker 6>Several other states have laws like this, essentially making them

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.940
<v Speaker 6>sanctuary states. However, as Bogada writes, this hasn't really stopped

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.990
<v Speaker 6>local officials from collaborating with immigration enforcement. In one case,

0:25:06.050 --> 0:25:08.790
<v Speaker 6>a Riverton police officer ran the name of a 31-year-old

0:25:08.850 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 6>immigrant for a law enforcement database due to a traffic infraction,

0:25:12.500 --> 0:25:15.340
<v Speaker 6>only to get a phone call from the FBI almost immediately.

0:25:15.980 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 6>The FBI agent was trying to see how he could

0:25:18.340 --> 0:25:21.340
<v Speaker 6>help ICE detain the guy, the man who was stopped.

0:25:22.020 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 6>The solution came from an outstanding state warrant the man

0:25:24.810 --> 0:25:28.550
<v Speaker 6>had out for him. The police officer technically was not

0:25:28.590 --> 0:25:31.410
<v Speaker 6>detaining him on an immigration base, but the outcome was

0:25:31.450 --> 0:25:35.490
<v Speaker 6>the same. Per Borgato's reporting, since Trump came into office,

0:25:35.590 --> 0:25:39.169
<v Speaker 6>officials from at least 75 agencies across Illinois have have

0:25:39.230 --> 0:25:42.489
<v Speaker 6>collaborated with immigration officials by feeding them information. This has

0:25:42.550 --> 0:25:45.109
<v Speaker 6>led to at least 150 people being put into the

0:25:45.130 --> 0:25:50.410
<v Speaker 6>immigration system throughout Illinois, even though as a sanctuary state,

0:25:50.470 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 6>it's ostensibly not supposed to do that. In another exchange

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 6>reported by Injustice Watch, a Tinley Park officer was asked

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 6>by an ICE agent for quote-unquote lead data on a

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 6>person the officer had stopped for speeding. The officer responded

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.300
<v Speaker 6>with a bunch of information about the guy, including his

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 6>address and phone number. and also told the ICE agent that, quote,

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.940
<v Speaker 6>his crew is doing work in Tinley Park currently. There

0:26:13.980 --> 0:26:16.350
<v Speaker 6>are several examples of this kind of wink and nod

0:26:16.380 --> 0:26:19.770
<v Speaker 6>collaboration by local officials with immigration enforcement for a variety

0:26:19.790 --> 0:26:23.409
<v Speaker 6>of different ways, including emails or housing detained migrants at

0:26:23.430 --> 0:26:26.590
<v Speaker 6>the request of the U.S. Marshals, then releasing them into

0:26:26.710 --> 0:26:29.690
<v Speaker 6>ICE's hands. The second story published by Bogalo is much

0:26:29.770 --> 0:26:33.230
<v Speaker 6>the same, but focused on county prosecutors' role in enforcing

0:26:33.290 --> 0:26:38.109
<v Speaker 6>immigration law. Per her story, quote, state's attorney's office in

0:26:38.310 --> 0:26:41.190
<v Speaker 6>one out of every six Illinois counties acted as valuable

0:26:41.310 --> 0:26:45.890
<v Speaker 6>assets of federal immigration enforcement, sharing sensitive personal data about

0:26:45.910 --> 0:26:49.270
<v Speaker 6>the people they were prosecuting without criminal warrants, public disclosure,

0:26:49.369 --> 0:26:52.390
<v Speaker 6>or legislative oversight, and with no accounting of how often

0:26:52.430 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 6>it happened or who was affected, end quote. Some of

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.100
<v Speaker 6>this came from simply answering when DHS agents came calling,

0:26:59.140 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 6>while some prosecutors volunteered information of their own volition. In

0:27:02.940 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 6>Marion County, one assistant state's attorney emailed the information of

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.139
<v Speaker 6>a man in a case he was prosecuting only for

0:27:08.220 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 6>ICE to respond, quote, we'll take care of it, and

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 6>detained him three weeks later outside his home, along with

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:18.100
<v Speaker 6>his 17-year-old son. The same prosecutor, per Injustice Watch, emailed

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.659
<v Speaker 6>the same ICE agent within 20 minutes after flagging the

0:27:20.700 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 6>first person, saying, quote, I've got another potential. It's worth

0:27:24.940 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 6>noting that per Bogalo, more than half of Illinois state

0:27:27.619 --> 0:27:32.850
<v Speaker 6>attorney's offices said they had no record of contacts with ICE. However,

0:27:32.910 --> 0:27:35.270
<v Speaker 6>what I wanted to highlight here was that even in

0:27:35.330 --> 0:27:38.990
<v Speaker 6>states people would consider, quote unquote, safe because they're sanctuary

0:27:39.030 --> 0:27:42.490
<v Speaker 6>states or sanctuary cities, the mechanism of the state continues

0:27:42.530 --> 0:27:46.130
<v Speaker 6>to collaborate with immigration enforcement under the table. We've seen

0:27:46.170 --> 0:27:49.140
<v Speaker 6>this in a bunch of places already, mainly for state, local,

0:27:49.180 --> 0:27:51.820
<v Speaker 6>and municipal police officers doing this exact same type of

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.980
<v Speaker 6>thing across the country. But the prosecutor's thing, as far

0:27:55.020 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 6>as I know, is pretty new, especially at this scale

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 6>that Bogado reported on, right?

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Mm-hmm.

0:28:00.930 --> 0:28:04.189
<v Speaker 6>So this kind of wink and nod collaboration is likely

0:28:04.260 --> 0:28:07.260
<v Speaker 6>happening across the board in the United States. And we'll

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.820
<v Speaker 6>be hearing stories like this probably for years to come.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think like. People should be aware, I guess,

0:28:15.060 --> 0:28:17.379
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say really briefly that like sanctuary

0:28:17.540 --> 0:28:21.340
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction laws are not necessarily doing what people think they

0:28:21.380 --> 0:28:21.859
<v Speaker 1>are doing.

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:22.260
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Like cops are going to cop.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:24.780
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.580
<v Speaker 1>And, uh, you see this all the time with like

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>when they put into, well, you know, the, the queries

0:28:28.510 --> 0:28:30.810
<v Speaker 1>they put into flock when people query, look at their

0:28:30.850 --> 0:28:33.810
<v Speaker 1>flock hot list and they just put like investigation or

0:28:33.910 --> 0:28:38.630
<v Speaker 1>crime as the reason why. Like that is what's happening there, right?

0:28:38.650 --> 0:28:40.830
<v Speaker 1>When your jurisdiction tells you that these flock cameras aren't

0:28:40.850 --> 0:28:43.090
<v Speaker 1>going to be used for immigration. When the cop just

0:28:43.110 --> 0:28:45.690
<v Speaker 1>puts in investigation, you have no idea what it's being

0:28:45.790 --> 0:28:46.350
<v Speaker 1>used for, right?

0:28:47.090 --> 0:28:47.230
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:28:47.610 --> 0:28:49.630
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely. And I should also flag that a bunch of

0:28:49.670 --> 0:28:54.350
<v Speaker 6>sanctuary cities have specific ways in which they'll collaborate with

0:28:54.390 --> 0:28:58.060
<v Speaker 6>immigration enforcement. So, for example, a big thing is Operation

0:28:58.100 --> 0:29:01.660
<v Speaker 6>Stone Garden, where they use municipal, state and local cops

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 6>to patrol the border. And sometimes, ostensibly, it's not supposed

0:29:05.140 --> 0:29:08.550
<v Speaker 6>to be for immigration enforcement, but I'm pretty sure that

0:29:08.610 --> 0:29:11.390
<v Speaker 6>it's happened across the US where it's being used to

0:29:11.790 --> 0:29:12.690
<v Speaker 6>enforce immigration.

0:29:12.950 --> 0:29:16.550
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Or like look at NDAs, right? Like that's in

0:29:16.690 --> 0:29:19.490
<v Speaker 1>theory a trespass thing. Top of it being, I guess

0:29:19.530 --> 0:29:22.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a federal trespass in that instance because it's a

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.220
<v Speaker 1>military installation. For a citizen, that would be like a

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>trespass thing.

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:29.140
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:30.540
<v Speaker 1>There are a bunch of these ways or like the

0:29:30.580 --> 0:29:34.370
<v Speaker 1>California Values Act has all these Carve outs in addition

0:29:34.450 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to like, as far as I'm aware, never having led

0:29:36.860 --> 0:29:40.730
<v Speaker 1>to a prosecution, these sanctuary city laws of a cop

0:29:40.810 --> 0:29:43.830
<v Speaker 1>or a prosecutor or sanctuary jurisdiction laws, they don't have teeth.

0:29:44.070 --> 0:29:47.710
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and insofar as sanctuary city laws did anything under

0:29:47.730 --> 0:29:50.340
<v Speaker 5>the first Trump administration, it wasn't because of the laws themselves,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:51.940
<v Speaker 5>it was because of the mass resistance to it.

0:29:52.860 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't fix this with sanctuary laws, and I

0:29:55.060 --> 0:29:57.740
<v Speaker 1>think anyone who's telling you that that is the case

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is either lying to you or unaware.

0:30:00.470 --> 0:30:00.950
<v Speaker 6>Exactly.

0:30:01.910 --> 0:30:05.570
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit about some documents

0:30:05.710 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Deportation Data Project has obtained by Freedom of

0:30:09.980 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Information Act request, and they show us some data about

0:30:13.860 --> 0:30:16.719
<v Speaker 1>ICE detentions. One of the things they show is that

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:18.860
<v Speaker 1>ICE is focusing more and more on people with no

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.630
<v Speaker 1>criminal record rather than, as they claim, focusing on people

0:30:22.690 --> 0:30:26.090
<v Speaker 1>with convictions. As of July, the majority of ICE arrests

0:30:26.110 --> 0:30:29.490
<v Speaker 1>were people with no convictions and no pending charges. This

0:30:29.570 --> 0:30:31.990
<v Speaker 1>comes in the same week as the Fourth Circuit. Post-Chevron

0:30:32.350 --> 0:30:35.270
<v Speaker 1>ruled that if a person's criminal conviction is vacated for

0:30:35.310 --> 0:30:40.180
<v Speaker 1>any reason, that eliminates immigration consequences coming from that conviction.

0:30:40.580 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>That would only be in the Fourth Circuit right now, right?

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 2>It was reported today in a few outlets that July

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:53.500
<v Speaker 2>had the highest number of ICE arrests, almost 50,000.

0:30:53.500 --> 0:30:57.700
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. Yeah, yeah. And it's very interesting. June saw

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.420
<v Speaker 1>the previous record, right? And then July saw an even

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.540
<v Speaker 1>higher record. Specifically, I'm looking at detention bookings there.

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.330
<v Speaker 1>So it is possible that someone could be booked in

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.230
<v Speaker 1>having previously been detained once, right? We can't sum all

0:31:13.250 --> 0:31:16.970
<v Speaker 1>of these months. It's unlikely, but like Flores, right? The

0:31:16.990 --> 0:31:21.050
<v Speaker 1>Flores settlement governs detention of minors. But I don't think

0:31:21.090 --> 0:31:24.450
<v Speaker 1>there's a prohibition on re-detention under Flores, as I understand it.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.660
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, as you said, these are the highest numbers

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in this Trump administration. The data set

0:31:29.860 --> 0:31:31.780
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at goes back to 2022, but I

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.219
<v Speaker 1>would be shocked if there were pre-2022 numbers that were

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:35.980
<v Speaker 1>higher than this. So I think it's probably pretty safe

0:31:36.020 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to say these are the highest numbers ever. It's interesting

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.070
<v Speaker 1>to break it down by state, which I did. A

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.100
<v Speaker 1>lot of that increase came in Texas and Florida. if

0:31:45.140 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you graph the number of bookings by state by month,

0:31:49.740 --> 0:31:53.459
<v Speaker 1>you see huge spikes in Texas and Florida. Texas has

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>always been the highest rate. It's a vast state. It

0:31:55.540 --> 0:31:58.140
<v Speaker 1>has a large migrant population. You have support from local

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:02.010
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement. But the Florida peak was particularly notable, as

0:32:02.110 --> 0:32:07.170
<v Speaker 1>were Arizona and Georgia. California, by contrast, didn't go up

0:32:07.230 --> 0:32:09.550
<v Speaker 1>as much. And I want to get in a little bit.

0:32:09.690 --> 0:32:11.010
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go through some more data and tell

0:32:11.050 --> 0:32:13.010
<v Speaker 1>us more about what this tells us about how ICE

0:32:13.050 --> 0:32:15.940
<v Speaker 1>is going about things now. The number of people in

0:32:15.980 --> 0:32:18.820
<v Speaker 1>detention is lower than its peak of January this year.

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>This is probably due to the all-time high number of

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>book outs from detention in July. The vast majority of

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.070
<v Speaker 1>those were removals. Some of them, people who bonded out,

0:32:28.930 --> 0:32:30.830
<v Speaker 1>the vast bulk of those are going to be removals.

0:32:31.330 --> 0:32:34.710
<v Speaker 1>We can also see certain detention facilities growing in population,

0:32:34.770 --> 0:32:39.660
<v Speaker 1>notably Camp East Montana a few months ago. I reported

0:32:39.700 --> 0:32:43.490
<v Speaker 1>on the GAO report, Government Accountability Office report, which highlighted

0:32:43.530 --> 0:32:46.650
<v Speaker 1>how terrible conditions were there. As far as I know,

0:32:47.130 --> 0:32:50.210
<v Speaker 1>still called Montana, not Montagna. I don't know if that's

0:32:50.230 --> 0:32:53.870
<v Speaker 1>just they don't have the capacity to add accents or

0:32:53.950 --> 0:32:58.030
<v Speaker 1>if maybe they go for something else there. Overall, this

0:32:58.110 --> 0:33:01.470
<v Speaker 1>data shows that the ice surge in July was really huge.

0:33:01.750 --> 0:33:03.250
<v Speaker 1>And it shows us a little bit about this home

0:33:03.290 --> 0:33:06.780
<v Speaker 1>and era approach, right? They're not doing what Bovino did,

0:33:06.820 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>which was gratuitously using violence and crowd control and a

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:15.010
<v Speaker 1>highly visible militarized presence in blue states. They are doing

0:33:15.070 --> 0:33:18.390
<v Speaker 1>this in red states as well, and they're doing it

0:33:18.830 --> 0:33:22.860
<v Speaker 1>in a less sort of confrontational way. Not that it's

0:33:22.900 --> 0:33:25.330
<v Speaker 1>not confrontational to grab someone and tear their family apart.

0:33:25.370 --> 0:33:27.690
<v Speaker 1>Of course it is, right? But Bovino was trying to

0:33:27.750 --> 0:33:32.450
<v Speaker 1>manufacture media moments. Yeah, less of a public spectacle, I guess. Yeah,

0:33:32.530 --> 0:33:35.510
<v Speaker 1>Bovino has been about the spectacle for years, right? Like

0:33:35.530 --> 0:33:38.470
<v Speaker 1>he had in the Biden administration, he had social media

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>people on his payroll in the El Centro sector and

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>video content creators. So like Homan is going about this differently,

0:33:45.980 --> 0:33:49.100
<v Speaker 1>but clearly he is very effective at what he is

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. And it has been harder for people

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to oppose, said Pavino, it's like flood a city with

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:58.140
<v Speaker 1>Border Patrol guys in plague carriers approach. DHS OIG, that's

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.430
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security, has also released a report this month detailing

0:34:03.470 --> 0:34:06.990
<v Speaker 1>how the focus on deportation, so all costs, has impacted

0:34:07.030 --> 0:34:11.350
<v Speaker 1>the fentanyl market. So the report, which looked at how HSI,

0:34:11.370 --> 0:34:17.070
<v Speaker 1>that's Homeland Security Investigations, has used expensive technologies, spoiler, it hasn't,

0:34:17.710 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>concluded that, quote, As ICE shifted priorities towards immigration enforcement,

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>HSI's level of effort on fentanyl declined from fiscal years

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>2024 to 2025. Fentanyl investigations decreased by 24%, investigative hours

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:36.860
<v Speaker 1>spent countering fentanyl decreased by approximately 30%, and fentanyl seizures

0:34:36.950 --> 0:34:42.790
<v Speaker 1>decreased by 39%. Indeed, there are fewer HSI agents doing

0:34:42.870 --> 0:34:46.850
<v Speaker 1>fentanyl investigations now than there were in some years under Biden.

0:34:47.510 --> 0:34:50.339
<v Speaker 1>which is remarkable when you look at how massive the

0:34:50.420 --> 0:34:53.779
<v Speaker 1>budget for DHS is, right? And how aggressively they've been

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>recruiting people.

0:34:54.620 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, James, they have to infiltrate the Sunrise Movement meetings.

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.340
<v Speaker 2>That's more important for national security.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.540
<v Speaker 1>They're sitting in cars outside memorials to Alex Peretti taking pictures.

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>The report also looked at a school called Raven. The

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>N is lowercase, the rest is not. You could ask

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:12.540
<v Speaker 1>me why and I wouldn't be able to tell you.

0:35:13.020 --> 0:35:16.470
<v Speaker 1>It's a group of analytical tools It stated that, quote,

0:35:16.590 --> 0:35:19.970
<v Speaker 1>from fiscal years 2022 to 2025, HSI spent more than

0:35:19.969 --> 0:35:24.489
<v Speaker 1>$ 150 million developing the Raven platform. It was not widely used.

0:35:24.570 --> 0:35:27.860
<v Speaker 1>Most of the offices surveyed abandoned using it altogether and

0:35:27.900 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>complained that it, quote, did not work and, quote, crashed.

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 5>Hell yeah.

0:35:33.540 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to see it. Yeah, it goes into, like,

0:35:36.140 --> 0:35:38.710
<v Speaker 1>I think this is probably something that we're going to

0:35:38.730 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>see more, right, as we continue on. like massively inflating

0:35:42.620 --> 0:35:44.859
<v Speaker 1>the budgets of these agencies that they will just do

0:35:44.900 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>things that end up being like a bridge to nowhere.

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>But their attempt at some like highly sophisticated analytical tool

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.460
<v Speaker 1>platform that would generate leads seems to have completely failed.

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:56.460
<v Speaker 1>They're not using it anymore.

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.100
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. Something I did not mention in yesterday's episode

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 2>about the ICE surveillance in Minnesota is like DHS's use

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:08.259
<v Speaker 2>of Clearview AI to do some like analysis of suspects.

0:36:09.900 --> 0:36:13.890
<v Speaker 2>which identified people with similar names but are different human

0:36:13.950 --> 0:36:16.450
<v Speaker 2>beings in the clear few AI reports when they were

0:36:16.550 --> 0:36:18.549
<v Speaker 2>looking into anti-ice protesters.

0:36:18.810 --> 0:36:22.100
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe this is what led to the famous case

0:36:22.140 --> 0:36:25.100
<v Speaker 1>of Olivia Rodrigo getting detained at the border a few

0:36:25.140 --> 0:36:25.540
<v Speaker 1>years ago.

0:36:25.820 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 5>It used to be humans detaining a second guy named

0:36:29.180 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 5>John Smith on the Do Not Fly list.

0:36:31.940 --> 0:36:36.190
<v Speaker 1>Now it's automated. Yeah, those people have lost their jobs

0:36:36.710 --> 0:36:38.830
<v Speaker 1>and it's very sad. But yeah, they love to use AI, right?

0:36:38.850 --> 0:36:41.770
<v Speaker 1>They use AI in their surveillance at the border. I'm

0:36:41.830 --> 0:36:43.890
<v Speaker 1>sure we'll see a bunch of money thrown at AI

0:36:43.930 --> 0:36:46.350
<v Speaker 1>shit that will end up going nowhere in the next

0:36:46.390 --> 0:36:46.790
<v Speaker 1>two years.

0:36:47.450 --> 0:36:50.090
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I would not be surprised if some of

0:36:51.170 --> 0:36:54.129
<v Speaker 2>the budget increases that they have received might go to

0:36:54.570 --> 0:36:57.890
<v Speaker 2>some of the things that I will discuss in the

0:36:57.989 --> 0:37:14.060
<v Speaker 2>next segment after this ad break. All right, we are back.

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:19.649
<v Speaker 2>Let's return to our show's namesake because there's a big

0:37:19.690 --> 0:37:24.830
<v Speaker 2>update on Trump's March executive order to restrict mail-in voting.

0:37:25.570 --> 0:37:29.340
<v Speaker 2>Earlier this week, the Supreme Court lifted one injunction blocking

0:37:29.500 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 2>parts of this executive order. But as of recording, there

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.700
<v Speaker 2>is another injunction in a separate case that still remains

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:41.130
<v Speaker 2>in place. However, these injunctions relate to different parts of

0:37:41.150 --> 0:37:44.729
<v Speaker 2>the same executive order. So the entirety of the order

0:37:45.250 --> 0:37:47.910
<v Speaker 2>is not blocked by courts, and parts of it may

0:37:48.030 --> 0:37:51.860
<v Speaker 2>now be able to go into effect possibly before the midterms.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:56.930
<v Speaker 2>Let's start by talking about the injunction that the Supreme

0:37:56.950 --> 0:38:00.290
<v Speaker 2>Court just lifted. A group of 23 states sued the

0:38:00.330 --> 0:38:04.250
<v Speaker 2>government over Trump's executive order on mail-in voting for infringing

0:38:04.410 --> 0:38:08.489
<v Speaker 2>on the state's authority to administer elections. A district court

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 2>agreed and blocked the executive order. But on Monday, the

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:17.420
<v Speaker 2>conservative majority ruled 6-3 in a shadow docket, unsigned ruling,

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 2>finding that the states and the lower court lacked the

0:38:21.890 --> 0:38:26.850
<v Speaker 2>legal authority to block the executive order because no harms

0:38:27.310 --> 0:38:32.530
<v Speaker 2>have yet come as a result of the executive order. Basically,

0:38:32.570 --> 0:38:36.589
<v Speaker 2>it was too soon to file a challenge because the

0:38:36.770 --> 0:38:38.940
<v Speaker 2>order hadn't yet gone into effect.

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Jesus Christ.

0:38:40.180 --> 0:38:43.760
<v Speaker 2>And the plaintiffs had yet to suffer any injury.

0:38:44.530 --> 0:38:44.670
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:38:45.010 --> 0:38:48.180
<v Speaker 2>And, like, that's the whole fucking point of the shadow docket.

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. It's based on the idea that the

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:56.700
<v Speaker 2>applicant faces serious, irreparable harm if the emergency order is

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.430
<v Speaker 2>not granted. Like, the main example of this is, like,

0:39:00.469 --> 0:39:03.710
<v Speaker 2>if someone's facing execution on death row. But under the

0:39:03.770 --> 0:39:08.210
<v Speaker 2>logic of the conservative justices in this court ruling, such

0:39:08.250 --> 0:39:11.450
<v Speaker 2>an inmate wouldn't have the grounds to stay their execution

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:16.870
<v Speaker 2>because they haven't died yet. Mm-hmm. It's completely batshit. This

0:39:16.930 --> 0:39:19.890
<v Speaker 2>is not how these rulings usually work. And having this

0:39:19.930 --> 0:39:23.630
<v Speaker 2>ruling on the shadow docket itself is just like insults

0:39:23.670 --> 0:39:29.970
<v Speaker 2>to injury. The majority wrote that the state's supposed concrete injury.

0:39:30.660 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 2>was in fact only a, quote, unduly long chain of inferences.

0:39:36.020 --> 0:39:39.950
<v Speaker 2>So this ruling from the Supreme Court will now allow

0:39:39.969 --> 0:39:44.470
<v Speaker 2>DHS to create and send, quote unquote, state citizenship lists

0:39:45.030 --> 0:39:49.550
<v Speaker 2>to each state 60 days ahead of upcoming federal elections.

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.750
<v Speaker 2>cataloging each person in every state who DHS believes is

0:39:54.870 --> 0:39:58.350
<v Speaker 2>eligible to vote. Now, the Supreme Court does note that, quote,

0:39:58.810 --> 0:40:03.060
<v Speaker 2>states are not required to use the lists, unquote. But

0:40:03.260 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 2>just the existence of these lists and the creation of

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 2>them could be incredibly troubling. Of course, they could be

0:40:09.500 --> 0:40:13.370
<v Speaker 2>used in the future. But as James has discussed, we

0:40:13.410 --> 0:40:18.590
<v Speaker 2>do not have a single list of U.S. citizens. And

0:40:18.630 --> 0:40:21.230
<v Speaker 2>the idea that DHS might be trying to, and in

0:40:21.270 --> 0:40:24.109
<v Speaker 2>fact is now allowed to make such a list for

0:40:24.150 --> 0:40:28.660
<v Speaker 2>a specific purpose, could have a lot of far-reaching ramifications,

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.900
<v Speaker 2>even beyond elections. It's also important to know that as

0:40:33.020 --> 0:40:36.420
<v Speaker 2>of the Supreme Court's new ruling, the Attorney General will now, quote,

0:40:36.780 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 2>prioritize the investigation and, as appropriate, the prosecution. of state

0:40:42.020 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and local officials or any others who issue federal ballots

0:40:45.980 --> 0:40:50.390
<v Speaker 2>to ineligible voters. So even if states are not required

0:40:50.530 --> 0:40:54.390
<v Speaker 2>to use these citizenship lists from DHS, Trump is still

0:40:54.450 --> 0:40:58.569
<v Speaker 2>effectively compelling states to follow these lists or else they

0:40:58.590 --> 0:40:59.629
<v Speaker 2>could face prosecution.

0:40:59.650 --> 0:41:00.290
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:41:00.850 --> 0:41:03.950
<v Speaker 2>In the ruling, the conservative majority wrote that the lower

0:41:04.230 --> 0:41:08.110
<v Speaker 2>court concluded states did suffer a present injury because it

0:41:08.150 --> 0:41:12.030
<v Speaker 2>required them to, quote, begin planning now how to comply

0:41:12.110 --> 0:41:17.110
<v Speaker 2>with the order, unquote. But the Supreme Court stated that states, quote,

0:41:17.739 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 2>cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves based

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:28.980
<v Speaker 2>on their fears of hypothetical future harm that is certainly

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:33.700
<v Speaker 2>not impending. This is wild. This is a wild thing

0:41:33.739 --> 0:41:37.129
<v Speaker 2>to say. That states are only suffering harm because they're

0:41:37.730 --> 0:41:40.310
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out how to comply with the order

0:41:41.050 --> 0:41:43.509
<v Speaker 2>as written. And they're just doing that to themselves as

0:41:43.570 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 2>opposed to that being imposed from the president.

0:41:46.460 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Right. So the suggestion is that they would just be like,

0:41:49.830 --> 0:41:52.650
<v Speaker 1>will not comply, see you in court when this comes in,

0:41:52.710 --> 0:41:56.230
<v Speaker 1>I guess. That will be how they should approach this.

0:41:56.610 --> 0:41:58.830
<v Speaker 2>And that is maybe what they are going to do

0:41:58.910 --> 0:42:01.470
<v Speaker 2>going forward because there is now a new lawsuit, which

0:42:01.489 --> 0:42:04.500
<v Speaker 2>I will discuss in a second, regarding some of these issues.

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:09.060
<v Speaker 2>And again, the whole argument from the conservative court is

0:42:09.100 --> 0:42:12.359
<v Speaker 2>that basically no harm has yet been done, so they

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 2>can't file a challenge. However, because this is a shadow

0:42:15.340 --> 0:42:18.750
<v Speaker 2>docket ruling, the court did find that this injunction was

0:42:19.430 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 2>would cause the government to likely suffer irreparable harm if

0:42:25.980 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the stay isn't granted.

0:42:27.940 --> 0:42:32.420
<v Speaker 5>I love our just, like, cartoon Calvin Ball ruling legal body.

0:42:33.420 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the most cartoon rulings I've looked at.

0:42:36.700 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 2>And we've looked at a lot of cartoon rulings this year.

0:42:39.100 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's almost the only rulings we get anymore.

0:42:41.060 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh, man, yeah.

0:42:42.140 --> 0:42:42.460
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, the court does note, quote, the court's disposition of

0:42:47.940 --> 0:42:51.330
<v Speaker 2>this application... does not mean that any measure taken by

0:42:51.350 --> 0:42:55.430
<v Speaker 2>the government to implement the order will necessarily be lawful.

0:42:56.150 --> 0:42:59.890
<v Speaker 2>On that score, time will tell. But the order itself

0:42:59.969 --> 0:43:03.130
<v Speaker 2>does not harm the states, so the district court lacks

0:43:03.170 --> 0:43:06.870
<v Speaker 2>justification to bar the government from trying to implement it, unquote.

0:43:09.690 --> 0:43:13.290
<v Speaker 2>So they admit that in the implementation of this executive order,

0:43:13.910 --> 0:43:16.950
<v Speaker 2>it might violate the constitution, right? The government, the federal

0:43:16.969 --> 0:43:21.190
<v Speaker 2>government might violate laws. But just the order as written

0:43:21.750 --> 0:43:24.690
<v Speaker 2>can't do anything because it's just text. It can't actually

0:43:24.730 --> 0:43:29.580
<v Speaker 2>do anything. So you can't challenge it. So that's all bad.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.419
<v Speaker 2>But let's talk about kind of the other half of this.

0:43:33.060 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So this ruling did not address the part of the

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.689
<v Speaker 2>executive order requiring the post office to review the eligibility

0:43:40.830 --> 0:43:45.609
<v Speaker 2>of voters before sending them an absentee ballot. And there's

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:49.670
<v Speaker 2>a separate injunction by the same lower court judge blocking

0:43:49.969 --> 0:43:53.850
<v Speaker 2>the Postal Service from implementing their proposed rule change in

0:43:53.910 --> 0:43:57.790
<v Speaker 2>accordance with Trump's executive order. This executive order directed the

0:43:57.830 --> 0:44:03.090
<v Speaker 2>Postal Service to, quote, initiate a proposed rulemaking that includes several, quote, unquote,

0:44:03.130 --> 0:44:07.270
<v Speaker 2>proposed provisions, including a new requirement that outbound absentee ballots

0:44:07.350 --> 0:44:11.670
<v Speaker 2>feature a unique barcode to facilitate tracking. And Trump told

0:44:11.690 --> 0:44:15.069
<v Speaker 2>the Postal Service to not mail any ballots. to people

0:44:15.110 --> 0:44:19.460
<v Speaker 2>who are not on a list of eligible U.S. citizen voters. Now,

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Supreme Court's ruling on that other injunction, the

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:24.700
<v Speaker 2>conservative majority wrote, quote, And, well, well, well, last Friday,

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.899
<v Speaker 2>the Postal Service outlined and published their new final rule. Quote,

0:44:38.250 --> 0:44:42.270
<v Speaker 2>The rule introduces new mail piece preparations requirements and data

0:44:42.310 --> 0:44:46.089
<v Speaker 2>reporting standards for federal ballot mail that must be satisfied

0:44:46.450 --> 0:44:50.610
<v Speaker 2>prior to presenting outbound federal ballot mail for acceptance into

0:44:50.650 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 2>the mail stream, unquote. So the new rule requires states

0:44:55.540 --> 0:44:59.420
<v Speaker 2>to use standardized mail-in ballot envelope designs to be compatible

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.860
<v Speaker 2>with automated processing to display a consistent election mail logo

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.470
<v Speaker 2>and an intelligent mail barcode. State and local election officials

0:45:08.630 --> 0:45:12.510
<v Speaker 2>will also have to use a new federal ballot mail

0:45:12.730 --> 0:45:17.310
<v Speaker 2>portal to administer absentee ballots. And this portal will be

0:45:17.370 --> 0:45:19.469
<v Speaker 2>used for two things. This is like a digital portal.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 2>State officials will use the portal to certify the design

0:45:23.140 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of their new envelopes in accordance with the new requirements

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and must provide the name and address of the voter

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 2>as found on the outbound federal mail ballot envelope. the

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:40.700
<v Speaker 2>issuing state and the barcode on the outbound and return

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:45.689
<v Speaker 2>federal ballot mail envelopes prior to presenting an outbound federal

0:45:45.770 --> 0:45:50.890
<v Speaker 2>ballot mailing for acceptance. So that's the data states have

0:45:50.930 --> 0:45:54.930
<v Speaker 2>to submit to the Postal Service. It is a name, address,

0:45:55.489 --> 0:45:58.299
<v Speaker 2>the barcode and the state. That does not go as

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 2>far as what Trump's executive order wanted the Postal Service

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:02.950
<v Speaker 2>to go. But this is going to be a new

0:46:02.989 --> 0:46:04.900
<v Speaker 2>step or at least a new process to do some

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 2>of the same steps that have already been kind of

0:46:06.580 --> 0:46:09.780
<v Speaker 2>been done in like an ad hoc manner. And rather

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 2>than this following a 60-day deadline as set in Trump's

0:46:13.860 --> 0:46:17.580
<v Speaker 2>executive order, the Postal Service's final rule contains an optional

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 2>90-day notice for states to tell the Postal Service that

0:46:21.460 --> 0:46:26.280
<v Speaker 2>they'll be using mail-in ballots and a recommended 30-day soft

0:46:26.340 --> 0:46:29.660
<v Speaker 2>deadline to upload voter data into this new portal and

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 2>before the Postal Service will accept any mail-in ballots. And importantly,

0:46:34.660 --> 0:46:37.590
<v Speaker 2>if states do not follow the new proposed rulemaking, the

0:46:37.630 --> 0:46:40.350
<v Speaker 2>Post Office just will not accept mail-in ballots. Quote, The

0:46:40.390 --> 0:46:44.050
<v Speaker 2>Postal Service will generally not accept outbound federal ballot mailings

0:46:44.510 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 2>unless compliance with the rule's new standards has been verified.

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:51.740
<v Speaker 2>Meaning they have to upload that data into the portal

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:55.419
<v Speaker 2>and have these new envelopes. Now, the rule does note, quote,

0:46:55.890 --> 0:46:58.430
<v Speaker 2>the Postal Service will not play any role in determining

0:46:58.580 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 2>voter eligibility, maintaining voter rules, or counting ballots, unquote. So

0:47:04.140 --> 0:47:07.060
<v Speaker 2>they're not directly, as of how this rule is written,

0:47:07.340 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to be directly reviewing citizenship lists when

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.700
<v Speaker 2>they receive those ballots, but they will have the name

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and the address and the state and the barcode. And

0:47:17.980 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 2>even if the Postal Service themselves will not be verifying eligibility,

0:47:23.180 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean Trump officials won't ever use this new

0:47:26.540 --> 0:47:32.220
<v Speaker 2>centralized mail-in ballot portal database for other purposes in the future.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:35.290
<v Speaker 2>The published final rule says that the post office is

0:47:35.310 --> 0:47:39.730
<v Speaker 2>ready to implement this rule after the government obtains timely

0:47:39.790 --> 0:47:43.570
<v Speaker 2>relief from the lower court injunction in preparation for the

0:47:43.570 --> 0:47:47.130
<v Speaker 2>2026 election, which has yet to happen as of recording.

0:47:47.790 --> 0:47:51.530
<v Speaker 2>But on Wednesday morning, a few hours ago, 23 states

0:47:51.690 --> 0:47:56.390
<v Speaker 2>have sued over the final rule, over this new rule,

0:47:56.770 --> 0:47:59.390
<v Speaker 2>as the Supreme Court told them they could once this

0:47:59.830 --> 0:48:02.489
<v Speaker 2>rule was published. So again, this rule does not go

0:48:03.130 --> 0:48:05.709
<v Speaker 2>as far as what Trump wanted, but it does open

0:48:05.730 --> 0:48:10.170
<v Speaker 2>the door for certain things. And combined with the DHS

0:48:10.330 --> 0:48:14.129
<v Speaker 2>citizenship lists and the Attorney General being able to prosecute

0:48:14.430 --> 0:48:16.910
<v Speaker 2>people who do not essentially follow those lists at the

0:48:16.930 --> 0:48:20.230
<v Speaker 2>state level, This could be combined with aspects of Trump's

0:48:20.270 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 2>executive order to make mail-in voting more difficult and introduce very, very,

0:48:26.450 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 2>very severe penalties for states that don't follow what the

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:31.020
<v Speaker 2>executive order is outlining.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:34.700
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is great. This has been part of the

0:48:34.739 --> 0:48:35.980
<v Speaker 1>project for a while, right?

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:36.180
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:48:37.110 --> 0:48:40.740
<v Speaker 1>Attacking elections has been the thing that has been like

0:48:40.780 --> 0:48:44.380
<v Speaker 1>the cost of entry into the Republican Party since 2020.

0:48:44.380 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 3>They hate the idea of people voting.

0:48:46.300 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like a free and fair election is something you

0:48:48.100 --> 0:48:49.020
<v Speaker 1>have to be opposed to.

0:48:49.219 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Like that's the most disgusting thing that a conservative can

0:48:52.180 --> 0:48:52.760
<v Speaker 3>imagine today.

0:48:52.780 --> 0:48:52.980
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:48:53.380 --> 0:48:56.220
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure like if I had to guess, we will

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:59.250
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more visible eye stuff again, give it

0:48:59.270 --> 0:49:01.710
<v Speaker 1>a couple months, you know, right before the election. That

0:49:01.730 --> 0:49:02.489
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't shock me at all.

0:49:02.890 --> 0:49:03.129
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:49:03.910 --> 0:49:04.770
<v Speaker 1>Quick update here.

0:49:05.450 --> 0:49:10.490
<v Speaker 2>After recording... a federal judge lifted that final injunction blocking

0:49:10.590 --> 0:49:14.609
<v Speaker 2>parts of Trump's executive order. So now the administration is

0:49:15.150 --> 0:49:19.950
<v Speaker 2>fully cleared to implement aspects of that order ahead of

0:49:20.100 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the midterms. That new 23-state lawsuit will target the Postal

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:30.009
<v Speaker 2>Service's final rule, which can now be implemented following the

0:49:30.170 --> 0:49:34.770
<v Speaker 2>lifting of the injunction. For our last section, let's turn

0:49:34.870 --> 0:49:38.370
<v Speaker 2>to the U.S. military. Let's start with Carlos.

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 6>The oceans around the U.S. have once again become killing

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:45.730
<v Speaker 6>fields because the U.S. military carried out two strikes against

0:49:45.790 --> 0:49:48.830
<v Speaker 6>vessels in the Pacific and the Caribbean that it alleges,

0:49:49.150 --> 0:49:53.130
<v Speaker 6>without publishing any proof, were trafficking drugs. The first strike

0:49:53.170 --> 0:49:55.230
<v Speaker 6>was in the Pacific on Sunday, and it was the

0:49:55.290 --> 0:49:58.670
<v Speaker 6>first one of these strikes in roughly two months. Meanwhile,

0:49:58.710 --> 0:50:01.980
<v Speaker 6>the second was in the Caribbean on Tuesday. Per The Guardian,

0:50:02.020 --> 0:50:04.860
<v Speaker 6>this brings a total to 68 strikes with an overall

0:50:04.900 --> 0:50:08.260
<v Speaker 6>death toll of at least 227 people since the strikes

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:11.630
<v Speaker 6>began in September of last year. These strikes come at

0:50:11.660 --> 0:50:14.790
<v Speaker 6>the same time as the U.S. announced that Colombia, Guatemala,

0:50:14.850 --> 0:50:18.730
<v Speaker 6>and Honduras agreed to allow joint military operations against criminal

0:50:18.770 --> 0:50:22.030
<v Speaker 6>groups on their soil. It's worth noting that, per The Guardian,

0:50:22.110 --> 0:50:26.450
<v Speaker 6>Guatemala denied reaching such a deal. Ecuador launched these operations

0:50:26.690 --> 0:50:29.450
<v Speaker 6>earlier in March. And right before we started recording, the

0:50:29.510 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 6>Ecuadorian police announced that it had dealt a, quote, strong

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 6>blow against organized crime through operations Factoría and Jericho with

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:41.500
<v Speaker 6>international cooperation of the DEA and Southcom that led to

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:42.800
<v Speaker 6>the arrest of 43 people.

0:50:43.780 --> 0:50:45.500
<v Speaker 2>Robert, do you want to close this out? Yeah.

0:50:46.060 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 3>So as I'm going to guess, everybody remembers about six

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:52.660
<v Speaker 3>months ago, Iranian strikes crippled a U.S. base in Bahrain

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:55.870
<v Speaker 3>and damaged a major logistics hub. This is part of

0:50:55.930 --> 0:50:59.590
<v Speaker 3>why the Abraham Lincoln has been running short of supplies

0:50:59.790 --> 0:51:01.350
<v Speaker 3>and has been just out of a bunch of stuff

0:51:01.370 --> 0:51:03.150
<v Speaker 3>because they had to redirect and move supply. We talked

0:51:03.170 --> 0:51:05.070
<v Speaker 3>about this last week to the base in Diego Garcia.

0:51:05.540 --> 0:51:07.870
<v Speaker 3>One of the other things that happened after that base

0:51:07.890 --> 0:51:09.670
<v Speaker 3>in Bahrain was struck is that the U.S. Navy found

0:51:09.690 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 3>themselves planning a hasty evacuation for roughly 1,300 family members

0:51:14.060 --> 0:51:17.180
<v Speaker 3>of servicemen and women, as well as civilian employees of

0:51:17.219 --> 0:51:19.830
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Defense that worked at the base. If

0:51:19.870 --> 0:51:22.810
<v Speaker 3>you aren't super familiar with how the U.S. military's overseas

0:51:22.850 --> 0:51:25.940
<v Speaker 3>footprint works, we've got a shitload of bases all over

0:51:25.980 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the world, and those bases all fall into two broad groups.

0:51:29.219 --> 0:51:31.060
<v Speaker 3>You've got ones that are large and safe enough for

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:33.379
<v Speaker 3>soldiers to bring their families and to host large numbers

0:51:33.420 --> 0:51:36.930
<v Speaker 3>of full-time live-in civilian employees, and you've got bases that

0:51:36.969 --> 0:51:39.130
<v Speaker 3>are considered too close to the action for all of

0:51:39.170 --> 0:51:42.250
<v Speaker 3>that to be safe. These DoD communities of civilians are

0:51:42.270 --> 0:51:45.870
<v Speaker 3>like little chunks of suburban America transplanted to locations across

0:51:45.910 --> 0:51:48.370
<v Speaker 3>the globe. They have their own schools, bars, clubs, and

0:51:48.410 --> 0:51:51.049
<v Speaker 3>grocery stores. Most of my family grew up around the

0:51:51.130 --> 0:51:53.850
<v Speaker 3>air bases that we have on Okinawa, and even during

0:51:53.870 --> 0:51:56.069
<v Speaker 3>the Vietnam War, there was never any chance that people

0:51:56.150 --> 0:51:58.790
<v Speaker 3>living there would come into direct danger, unless, like, there

0:51:58.810 --> 0:52:01.390
<v Speaker 3>was a nuclear war, but then who gives a fuck? Iran, however,

0:52:01.430 --> 0:52:04.360
<v Speaker 3>has the ballistic missile capacity in order to strike these bases,

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.860
<v Speaker 3>and this has been the case for years, for a

0:52:06.900 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 3>long time. They've been able to hit these bases in

0:52:09.060 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 3>Bahrain and other parts of the Middle East that they've

0:52:10.780 --> 0:52:13.860
<v Speaker 3>been hitting lately, but they've restrained themselves historically because in

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:17.820
<v Speaker 3>previous iterations of this conflict, Both sides abided by certain

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:21.100
<v Speaker 3>lines and rules. Trump threw the whole playbook out, and

0:52:21.140 --> 0:52:23.260
<v Speaker 3>it turns out that none of our facilities within missile

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.580
<v Speaker 3>range of Iran were hardened and ready to be shot

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 3>at by missiles. There had not been, and it would

0:52:28.660 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 3>have been extremely expensive to do that for all these bases,

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:35.060
<v Speaker 3>and nobody really thought it was necessary. And even when

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 3>we started a war with Iran and knew that there

0:52:38.300 --> 0:52:40.529
<v Speaker 3>was a chance they were going to start retaliating, There

0:52:40.570 --> 0:52:43.310
<v Speaker 3>was so much arrogance within the administration about both our

0:52:43.350 --> 0:52:46.310
<v Speaker 3>missile defenses and about Iran's lack of capability that I

0:52:46.350 --> 0:52:48.330
<v Speaker 3>don't think they thought it was possible that we would

0:52:48.370 --> 0:52:51.469
<v Speaker 3>get struck in any meaningful way. So the evacuation from

0:52:51.510 --> 0:52:53.890
<v Speaker 3>Bahrain was chaotic and poorly executed.

0:52:54.390 --> 0:52:56.009
<v Speaker 1>Laura Corte reported.

0:52:55.770 --> 0:52:59.110
<v Speaker 3>On this in an August 21st article for Stars and Stripes,

0:52:59.150 --> 0:53:01.570
<v Speaker 3>which is a newspaper owned by the Department of Defense

0:53:01.930 --> 0:53:05.589
<v Speaker 3>that is at least on paper editorially independent. And we'll

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:06.170
<v Speaker 3>talk a little bit.

0:53:06.140 --> 0:53:06.930
<v Speaker 1>More about that later.

0:53:07.580 --> 0:53:10.370
<v Speaker 3>But from that article, quote, Early in the war, a

0:53:10.450 --> 0:53:13.330
<v Speaker 3>mass text message went out to evacuees directing them to

0:53:13.370 --> 0:53:16.830
<v Speaker 3>contact the Navy Marine Corps Relief Society, a nonprofit that

0:53:16.870 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 3>aims to assist military families during emergencies. However, when one

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.450
<v Speaker 3>spouse called the phone number listed in the announcement, they

0:53:22.469 --> 0:53:24.640
<v Speaker 3>were connected with the National Bank of Canada.

0:53:24.700 --> 0:53:25.379
<v Speaker 1>The spouse said.

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 3>That gives you an idea of just how piss poor

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the planning was.

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Like no one checked.

0:53:29.500 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing they probably had some AI like throw shit

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:35.820
<v Speaker 3>together for people, but nobody was like prepared to evacuate

0:53:35.860 --> 0:53:37.590
<v Speaker 3>these people. And even once they knew they had to,

0:53:38.060 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Nobody took the care to make sure that these.

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.060
<v Speaker 1>Folks got correct information, right?

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:46.109
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not asking you, the listener, to sympathize with

0:53:46.150 --> 0:53:48.350
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of families of servicemen and women who are, again,

0:53:48.930 --> 0:53:51.670
<v Speaker 3>participating in an illegal war against Iran. What I am

0:53:51.750 --> 0:53:53.850
<v Speaker 3>asking you to do is look at what this says

0:53:54.370 --> 0:53:58.090
<v Speaker 3>about the lack of planning and understanding of what we

0:53:58.130 --> 0:54:02.250
<v Speaker 3>were getting into when Trump and his cronies started this war, right?

0:54:02.770 --> 0:54:05.109
<v Speaker 3>Here's another quote from that article. Many say the prolonged

0:54:05.130 --> 0:54:06.810
<v Speaker 3>displacement has taken an emotional toll and worry about its

0:54:06.830 --> 0:54:22.950
<v Speaker 3>long-term effect on their family's financial and emotional well-being. We

0:54:23.010 --> 0:54:25.009
<v Speaker 3>literally have been making this up as we go because

0:54:25.110 --> 0:54:27.510
<v Speaker 3>nothing is conceived to go on for this length of time.

0:54:27.610 --> 0:54:31.299
<v Speaker 3>Vice Admiral Kurt Renshaw, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command,

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:33.739
<v Speaker 3>said on Wednesday at a virtual town meeting, when you've

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:37.580
<v Speaker 3>got the commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command being like, well,

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:39.500
<v Speaker 3>we're making up the evac plan and how to take

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:40.980
<v Speaker 3>care of these people as we go because we never

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:43.320
<v Speaker 3>thought that we would have to care about this. That's

0:54:43.380 --> 0:54:45.320
<v Speaker 3>a bad fucking sign, right?

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 6>So U.S.

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:51.129
<v Speaker 3>Naval Forces Central Command are an absent. was based in Bahrain, right?

0:54:51.170 --> 0:54:53.549
<v Speaker 3>That's where their headquarters were. And we've had to move

0:54:53.590 --> 0:54:56.150
<v Speaker 3>the HQ. I think it's floating right now, but none

0:54:56.170 --> 0:54:58.250
<v Speaker 3>of the civilian staff who are critical to keeping it

0:54:58.290 --> 0:55:01.710
<v Speaker 3>going are working wherever they've got it right now. And

0:55:01.750 --> 0:55:04.549
<v Speaker 3>it's unclear where they're going to relocate to because again,

0:55:04.650 --> 0:55:07.410
<v Speaker 3>nobody knows fucking anything because they didn't plan for any

0:55:07.450 --> 0:55:11.730
<v Speaker 3>of this. Furthering the confusion, the Washington Post recently reported

0:55:11.770 --> 0:55:15.299
<v Speaker 3>that top Pentagon officials are currently considering a massive drawdown

0:55:15.450 --> 0:55:18.339
<v Speaker 3>of US military presence in the Middle East After the

0:55:18.390 --> 0:55:22.250
<v Speaker 3>war ends. Now, I find this interesting because this reporting

0:55:22.310 --> 0:55:25.490
<v Speaker 3>came out the exact same time Trump started threatening slash

0:55:25.570 --> 0:55:27.990
<v Speaker 3>promising to make the Strait of Hormuz a U.S. territory

0:55:28.050 --> 0:55:31.739
<v Speaker 3>and charge tolls, which would obviously necessitate an expanded U.S.

0:55:31.780 --> 0:55:35.380
<v Speaker 3>presence in the region. This report was put together by

0:55:35.420 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 3>people within the Pentagon who were kind of acting on

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:40.700
<v Speaker 3>their own recognizance. They were not ordered to do this.

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.210
<v Speaker 3>So this is basically a result of people who are

0:55:43.450 --> 0:55:46.509
<v Speaker 3>somewhat smart in the Pentagon going, we cannot maintain all

0:55:46.530 --> 0:55:49.650
<v Speaker 3>these bases with the increased level of hostility and knowing

0:55:49.670 --> 0:55:51.790
<v Speaker 3>that Iran now can and will strike them. We need

0:55:51.830 --> 0:55:55.270
<v Speaker 3>to reduce our capacity because we cannot defend all of

0:55:55.310 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 3>these bases or keep them safely operational. Whereas Trump is

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.020
<v Speaker 3>just blasting off and we're going to take the straight

0:56:01.060 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and hold it. So you have inside the Pentagon, people

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:05.540
<v Speaker 3>saying we absolutely cannot hold on to all of our

0:56:05.580 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 3>current possessions in the Persian Gulf. And Trump just sort

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:11.509
<v Speaker 3>of making whatever fucking statements he wants to make. Per

0:56:11.530 --> 0:56:13.860
<v Speaker 3>the Washington Post, one of the key areas the Defense

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:15.799
<v Speaker 3>Department is assessing is whether to pull back troops from

0:56:15.820 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 3>the Persian Gulf, where America's large overseas military bases have

0:56:18.580 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 3>been battered for months by Iranian strikes. And the damage

0:56:21.500 --> 0:56:24.110
<v Speaker 3>to these facilities has prompted a once-in-a-generation chance for the

0:56:24.140 --> 0:56:26.910
<v Speaker 3>Pentagon to reconsider its presence in the region. The Defense

0:56:26.930 --> 0:56:29.490
<v Speaker 3>Department has already signaled that it might not rebuild bases

0:56:29.550 --> 0:56:32.850
<v Speaker 3>as they were before the conflict. Now again, This review

0:56:32.930 --> 0:56:35.490
<v Speaker 3>was not ordered by Pete Hegseth. This is the thinking

0:56:35.510 --> 0:56:38.010
<v Speaker 3>of sober and prudent people who remain at the Pentagon,

0:56:38.290 --> 0:56:39.780
<v Speaker 3>and they have to do it on their own because

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 3>they know that none of their bosses are going to

0:56:41.620 --> 0:56:44.319
<v Speaker 3>order this, right? If it becomes immediately obvious that, oh,

0:56:44.340 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 3>we actually have to do a drawdown, they'll get the

0:56:46.620 --> 0:56:49.060
<v Speaker 3>order like they did with the evacuation of Bahrain, and

0:56:49.080 --> 0:56:50.910
<v Speaker 3>they'll just be told to figure it out suddenly. So

0:56:50.930 --> 0:56:53.830
<v Speaker 3>people are trying within the Pentagon to make sure they

0:56:53.870 --> 0:56:56.310
<v Speaker 3>have a fucking plan together, knowing that no one in

0:56:56.370 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 3>charge is going to plan things out properly. And there's

0:56:59.980 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of funny quotes from that article. I'm going

0:57:02.219 --> 0:57:04.100
<v Speaker 3>to read another here. Before the start of the war

0:57:04.140 --> 0:57:06.860
<v Speaker 3>in February, U.S. Central Command evacuated many of its bases,

0:57:06.940 --> 0:57:09.380
<v Speaker 3>judging them too vulnerable to Iranian missiles and drone attacks

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 3>to maintain normal staffing levels. Some of the shifts away

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:14.219
<v Speaker 3>from the major Gulf facilities might last after the war,

0:57:14.260 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a person familiar with the posture adjustment said. Iran thinks

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:19.500
<v Speaker 3>we are in the traditional places, the person said, declining

0:57:19.540 --> 0:57:21.470
<v Speaker 3>to specify the changes so as to not put U.S.

0:57:21.510 --> 0:57:22.390
<v Speaker 3>service members at risk.

0:57:22.790 --> 0:57:23.550
<v Speaker 1>And we are not.

0:57:24.220 --> 0:57:25.740
<v Speaker 3>And then the article immediately goes on to.

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Say six U.S.

0:57:26.620 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Service members were killed in a March strike on Port Shuaiba,

0:57:29.340 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 3>a military facility in Kuwait. And more than 200 U.S.

0:57:31.700 --> 0:57:34.170
<v Speaker 3>facilities have been damaged or destroyed during the conflict. I

0:57:34.190 --> 0:57:36.750
<v Speaker 3>just find that that clash between when we moved our

0:57:36.790 --> 0:57:38.830
<v Speaker 3>stuff before the war. So Iran doesn't know where our

0:57:38.890 --> 0:57:40.910
<v Speaker 3>stuff is. You know, they think that we're one place

0:57:40.950 --> 0:57:42.270
<v Speaker 3>and we're in the other. And it's like, well, then

0:57:42.290 --> 0:57:44.030
<v Speaker 3>they hit and killed and wounded a bunch of guys

0:57:44.050 --> 0:57:45.890
<v Speaker 3>because actually they had a pretty good idea of where

0:57:45.930 --> 0:57:46.190
<v Speaker 3>we were.

0:57:46.210 --> 0:57:46.590
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:57:47.430 --> 0:57:49.290
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking, as you mentioned those bases, Robert,

0:57:49.310 --> 0:57:52.630
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw this tweet, Zeet, maybe

0:57:52.650 --> 0:57:55.230
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to call it, by Barry McCaffrey, who was

0:57:56.170 --> 0:58:00.210
<v Speaker 1>a US general, commanded US forces, I think, in the

0:58:00.250 --> 0:58:01.630
<v Speaker 1>first war in the Persian Gulf, right?

0:58:01.850 --> 0:58:02.210
<v Speaker 6>Right, right.

0:58:02.990 --> 0:58:05.380
<v Speaker 1>In my judgment, the US armed forces have probably permanently

0:58:05.410 --> 0:58:09.120
<v Speaker 1>lost access to 15 Persian Gulf bases. Iran now poised

0:58:09.140 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to control access to the Gulf states. US will have

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:15.180
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate new access into Western Saudi Arabia, Israel, Southern Europe.

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:15.580
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:58:16.380 --> 0:58:19.740
<v Speaker 1>Like, oh, that's bad. It's sometimes just so revelatory to

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>pull out and be like, oh, fuck.

0:58:22.660 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:26.990
<v Speaker 1>Like a change in the global order of things. Yeah, exactly.

0:58:27.410 --> 0:58:30.550
<v Speaker 5>The age of uncontested U.S. hegemony is over. And it

0:58:30.590 --> 0:58:33.790
<v Speaker 5>was ended for absolutely no reason other than a bunch

0:58:33.810 --> 0:58:34.710
<v Speaker 5>of people hate Iran.

0:58:34.830 --> 0:58:35.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:58:35.210 --> 0:58:37.050
<v Speaker 5>And thought they could just instantly win a war.

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:39.980
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like we wound up to take a haymaker and

0:58:40.020 --> 0:58:42.380
<v Speaker 1>ended up missing and falling over and hitting our head.

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like fighting an allergy.

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.180
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is kind of funny to think that like

0:58:47.820 --> 0:58:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the British Empire lost its largely uncontested power and wealth

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:53.060
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of areas because there was like a

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:56.470
<v Speaker 3>nightmarish war that cost millions and millions of people their lives.

0:58:56.510 --> 0:58:58.770
<v Speaker 3>And Britain burnt a shitload of its treasure and young

0:58:58.810 --> 0:59:00.910
<v Speaker 3>men fighting it. And there was another war not that

0:59:00.950 --> 0:59:01.630
<v Speaker 3>long later in.

0:59:01.610 --> 0:59:01.970
<v Speaker 1>Just the day.

0:59:02.430 --> 0:59:04.430
<v Speaker 3>Whereas the US was just like, I don't know, why

0:59:04.450 --> 0:59:06.940
<v Speaker 3>don't we just shoot ourselves in the dick for no reason?

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:08.690
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if that works.

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:10.720
<v Speaker 6>Swing and a miss.

0:59:10.900 --> 0:59:11.340
<v Speaker 1>It's great.

0:59:12.020 --> 0:59:13.200
<v Speaker 6>The patterns of empire.

0:59:13.220 --> 0:59:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:59:14.240 --> 0:59:17.660
<v Speaker 3>And that Stripes article is just there's I'll read one

0:59:17.700 --> 0:59:19.340
<v Speaker 3>last quote from it just for an idea of like

0:59:19.460 --> 0:59:21.700
<v Speaker 3>what this is doing to the families of these people.

0:59:22.360 --> 0:59:24.900
<v Speaker 3>One spouse of an active duty sailor who requested anonymity

0:59:24.940 --> 0:59:28.450
<v Speaker 3>for fear of reprisal said the repeated displacement has traumatized

0:59:28.490 --> 0:59:30.780
<v Speaker 3>her children. The family first fled to a U.S. base

0:59:30.820 --> 0:59:33.220
<v Speaker 3>in Germany, where donations from the local military community helped

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 3>them set up a temporary household. They were later told

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:37.980
<v Speaker 3>they had to relocate again, this time to the United States.

0:59:38.420 --> 0:59:40.900
<v Speaker 3>She said her kids are developing serious behavior issues as

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 3>a result of the move, and that the youngest now

0:59:42.540 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 3>barely recognizes her husband during video calls. This is all

0:59:46.340 --> 0:59:48.780
<v Speaker 3>really bad. There's a lot of ugly quotes in that article.

0:59:48.820 --> 0:59:53.380
<v Speaker 3>And again, this is a Defense Department-owned newspaper. Within hours

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.100
<v Speaker 3>of that Stripes article being published, the Pentagon went after

0:59:56.120 --> 0:59:59.710
<v Speaker 3>the supposed editorial independence of Stars and Stripes. They basically

1:00:00.030 --> 1:00:02.670
<v Speaker 3>wound up firing the editor in chief, the publisher and

1:00:02.710 --> 1:00:05.630
<v Speaker 3>the reporter who wrote that article, Laura Corte. The editor

1:00:05.670 --> 1:00:08.070
<v Speaker 3>who stood by Laura is Eric Slavin. And I think

1:00:08.090 --> 1:00:09.970
<v Speaker 3>that's why he lost his job because he refused to

1:00:09.990 --> 1:00:11.890
<v Speaker 3>throw her under the bus. And I do applaud them

1:00:11.930 --> 1:00:14.310
<v Speaker 3>both for doing the right thing. But that is also

1:00:14.390 --> 1:00:17.890
<v Speaker 3>noteworthy that Stripes has always had a degree of independence.

1:00:17.910 --> 1:00:19.990
<v Speaker 3>They have reported on things that the Pentagon, the DOD

1:00:20.030 --> 1:00:22.790
<v Speaker 3>didn't want them to because they're reporting on like actual

1:00:22.850 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>issues that like troops and their families are facing, you know,

1:00:25.220 --> 1:00:28.380
<v Speaker 3>and that's an important thing for that community to have.

1:00:28.940 --> 1:00:30.900
<v Speaker 3>And one thing this signals is that that does not

1:00:30.940 --> 1:00:34.230
<v Speaker 3>exist anymore, nor no degree of independence can be allowed

1:00:34.270 --> 1:00:35.470
<v Speaker 3>when it threatens the propaganda.

1:00:36.350 --> 1:00:37.270
<v Speaker 6>Anyway, that's what I got.

1:00:38.190 --> 1:00:38.790
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff.

1:00:39.890 --> 1:00:42.750
<v Speaker 2>Carlos, where can people find more of your journalism online?

1:00:43.150 --> 1:00:46.380
<v Speaker 6>You can find me pretty much on every social media platform.

1:00:46.580 --> 1:00:52.740
<v Speaker 6>My at is Vaquero2XL. It's V-A-Q-U-E-R-O-2-X-L.

1:00:53.220 --> 1:00:54.300
<v Speaker 2>And on It Could Happen Here.

1:00:54.620 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:57.530
<v Speaker 6>As well as it could happen here. That is true.

1:00:57.610 --> 1:00:59.850
<v Speaker 6>I forget that. But yes, I just spoke with James

1:00:59.930 --> 1:01:01.570
<v Speaker 6>about U.S. colonialism.

1:01:01.630 --> 1:01:01.970
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:01:02.330 --> 1:01:04.850
<v Speaker 6>How it started. And now it looks like it might

1:01:04.870 --> 1:01:05.990
<v Speaker 6>be ending. We'll see.

1:01:06.410 --> 1:01:08.030
<v Speaker 1>We're pivoting in a different direction.

1:01:08.410 --> 1:01:09.169
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there we go.

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 2>What a heartwarming story. I guess there is hope for

1:01:12.840 --> 1:01:13.420
<v Speaker 2>the future.

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what we do here at CoolZone Media.

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 6>That's what we do.

1:01:18.420 --> 1:01:18.660
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:21.070
<v Speaker 1>If you want to email us, you can do it.

1:01:21.200 --> 1:01:25.130
<v Speaker 1>CoolZoneTips at Proton.me. Should I list the categories of emails

1:01:25.190 --> 1:01:28.740
<v Speaker 1>I will not be responding to? Because they grow every fucking...

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:31.580
<v Speaker 1>Just don't be weird in there. It's for tips about news.

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:32.520
<v Speaker 6>Don't be weird.

1:01:32.540 --> 1:01:34.020
<v Speaker 1>Don't be weird.

1:01:34.140 --> 1:01:36.470
<v Speaker 2>Don't be weird in there. I think that's enough said.

1:01:36.550 --> 1:01:39.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is not the place to flirt with people or...

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:41.960
<v Speaker 3>It might be the place to tell us your conspiracy theories.

1:01:42.000 --> 1:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Tell us your conspiracy theories.

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:43.660
<v Speaker 1>All right.

1:01:43.820 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Episode's done.

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:45.900
<v Speaker 5>No, don't tell us.

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:47.060
<v Speaker 1>Your conspiracy theories.

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:49.320
<v Speaker 6>No, Robert. That's going to be horrible.

1:01:49.420 --> 1:01:53.930
<v Speaker 2>Send all your conspiracy theories to at James Stout.

1:01:54.140 --> 1:01:56.250
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how much I fucking work already?

1:01:56.870 --> 1:01:58.770
<v Speaker 5>Anyways, put a trans girl on your couch.

1:01:59.390 --> 1:02:00.650
<v Speaker 2>We reported the news.

1:02:01.750 --> 1:02:02.490
<v Speaker 6>We reported the news.

1:02:11.100 --> 1:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.