WEBVTT - Barbara Corcoran: NYC Already Coming Back

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Now we have uh

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of a special guest right now. Barbara Corkrane joins

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>us from the Corkan Group. Made her famous, of course

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>and wealthy and she sold it. Now she is a

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>judge of Shark on ABC Shark Tank I believing executive

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>producer of that program as well, and she's also got

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a webinar coming out with a T and T um

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>to help small businesses I guess do better. Barbara, always

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure having on the program. Thank you so much

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Talk to me first about this webinar.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing? What are you doing with a

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>T and T today? It's actually a webinar series and

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we started a good seven eight months ago. I guess

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's called Business Unusual. Its presented by a T and

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>T business and it's intended to help the small business

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>person just succeed more with what they're doing nine to

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>five or small business really nine to nine every day

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of the week. And so we covered topics that we

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>hear are most in demand, that people are most confused about,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and we feel very proud that together we've been able

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to really push a lot of businesses ahead and give

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>them a lot of support. So, Barbara, you know, it's

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>been obviously such an incredibly difficult time for all businesses,

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly small businesses, over the past eighteen months. What do

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you think right now is the key challenges that the

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>delta variant? Is it getting labor? What's the primary focus now? Well,

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>let me let me frame by saying, no, matter what

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the focus is now, and I think that there's three

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>pieces that are may be equally important. Of the one

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that strikes me more than any of the detail

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is that most business owners feel the worst is behind them.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And that sounds kind of odd with all the talk

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>about the delta variant, but the attitude of the Delta

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>variant is so different. Initially with the pandemic. With the pandemic, nobody,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>no one had confidence. They didn't know what was ahead,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know what it was around the corner and

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they're scared to death and unable to make changes. But

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>now every one of those entrepreneurs that survived and came

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>through talk about the delta variant is we'll find a way.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>We'll find a way. And then on top of that,

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what is terrific now is that a lot of the

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>regulations are being mandated by townships, by states one on one.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>But at least business people know what's expected of them,

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>their rules to be played by, and that gives them

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>great peace of mind. But the biggest problem you named

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it on your list and I had to choose only

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>one is finding the right employees. Everybody's competing for employees,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's a single industry that doesn't

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>complain about that day in and day out. But there

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is a way to skin that cat. And some of

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the best businesses are having no problem at all hiring people.

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So what is the way? I mean, you just have

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay more or are you looking the wrong way?

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>What's what's the answer? I think I think the number

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing is, uh, they're not People who are not

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>winning in this regard are not creative. The creative people

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>are thinking of lures. Creative wars, whether it be additional pay,

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>which is not that common. Frankly, from what I could see,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's overplayed in the media as to how

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>much more businesses are willing to pay. But they're helping

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to pay for education, for night courses, and more important

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>than that, they're giving flexibility to workers. I'm telling you,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>when I look at my top performing business is making

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the most money, their attitude for their employees is that

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they're working for the employee. That's not a bad place

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to start if they None of those guys or girls

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like bosses at all. They're trying to figure out

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what could I make you? What could I do for

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you to make you happier today? And the number one

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>charm that can charm people to come work for you

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and stay put is to give people flexibility. Because people

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>have been spoiled, they need to be at home for

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons. They don't want to commit to

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>commuting anymore. The attitude has changed, and the employer that's

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>smart enough to give them exactly what they're looking for

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>there is cleaning up. It's every It's true of every

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one of my top performing businesses. By the way, you

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned commuting, um and I know you're I guess you're

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you're born in the Garden's date. But I think of

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you as a quintessential New Yorker. What do you make

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of Manhattan right now? I was there last month walking

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>up and down Lexington Avenue when I was shocked at

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>how many of the really big box businesses have closed

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>and are emptied out. Um, is Manhattan? Is this it?

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are people saying, you know, I've had enough

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of the big city and I'm out. You know, I've

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>lived in Manhattan long enough to never go for that,

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because I've never seen it happen. I've seen the claims

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>along the way, O, this is it, this is it''re

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. This ain't gonna happen. But one thing

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I've learned about the city of New York City, it

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>always comes back. It's just a question of when it's

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>coming back and how strong it's coming back. And when

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes back, I'll tell you I learned another thing.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>It always comes back like three to one in time,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>bang bang bang bang bang, and you go, WHOA, what happened?

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>The city is already coming back when you walk down

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Madison Avenue. I'm sure I'm sure you saw, which I see.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Roughly fifty percent of the stores are empty black windows.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>It's depressing, But I'm also seeing construction inside most of

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>those stores from new entrepreneurs, less impressive stores that are

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>making a go of it and getting their rent at

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>half price. And that's what regurgitates the city, that's what

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>gets it back on its feet. Because if there's one

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that New York City does better than any of

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the city in the world, that reinvents itself, it has to.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>It's been forced to over the years, and it always

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>rises to the price. So I don't see Manhattan as

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a problem everybody thinks it is. I think it's just

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like every other problem we had that was going to

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>put away New York City that never really happened. I

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's just a matter of short time before everyone

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges it. And in fact, even apartment prices are up.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>No one expected that even six months ago. Rental prices

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>are Everybody said, you could get a deal, and you

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>could you get off. Right now, it's about more expensive

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to live here already. Look how fast our city rebounds.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It is the nature of the town. Yeah, So it's interesting, Barbara.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I guess a lot of

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses big and small learned during the pandemic is the

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>ability to really have a really viable digital presence, you know,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's ordering online or picking up at the store,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that type of thing. For the small business operator, are

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they making the necessary investments? Do you think I'm gonna

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>tell you something that might surprise you. The necessary investments

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that small businesses have to make today to be vibrant

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the on the digital platform are next to nothing.

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The costs of these improvements have come down so dramatically.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>There's so many options, there's so much competition in that

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>space that they've actually been empowered to make changes very

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>radically and quickly, simply because there are so many options

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is out there. One of the best things I have

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>personally learned because I don't ever think of technology is

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>my strong suit. I think of people is what I

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>do well with right, But from running all these business

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Unusual webinar series presented by a T and T business,

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I have learned that the name of the game is technology.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It used to be an extra You've got to be

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.679
<v Speaker 1>on the digital space, no matter what kind of space

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you're Now, no, I feel very differently it starts with digital.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And when I see all the new businesses opening, and

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in fact, when I'm on Shark Tank, what I'm listening

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to the pitch is the only thing I'm investing is

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the people that understand the digital space. I really have

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>changed my whole attitude because only covid itself could have

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>brought about the radical speed that we've encountered lately. It

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>should have taken five years, but it took us dime month.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>That's it. It's changed. Is all about digital. It's all

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about digital. It's absolutely been compressed and we hear that

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of guests as well. Barbara, great having

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you on the program. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Barbara Corkran as she was saying, she's got a webinar

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.679
<v Speaker 1>series of a T and T business. Unusual with Barbara Corkran,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's geared towards um well small businesses, stores, marketplaces, restaurants,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>online merchants. I guess online is everything now and you

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>can watch it online. Her website is eight eight eight

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Barbara dot com, Triple eight Barbara dot Com. Always great

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk to, the founder of the Corkoran Group. This

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. Well, we've got some big spending bills winding

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>their way through Congress. Financial markets certainly paying attention. They're

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>including UH, especially the fixed income markets in municipal bond

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>markets as well. Michael Jesus, chief US public policy and

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>municipal strategist at Morgan Stanley joins us. Michael, thanks so

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>much for taking the time here. Again, a lot of

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:55.119
<v Speaker 1>spending bills getting through Congress looks like they're making some progress,

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>at least in the House and on the Democratic side

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective, UM, as a public policy I mean,

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>municipal strategists, what are the issues you're focusing on. Yeah,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost, it is going to be the depths

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>of impact, because that's what we think is going to

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>be the mean feed through to the economic outlook and

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to the level of treasury yield. UH. In our view,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this is tracking towards a total spending number spread over

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>ten years that is approaching four trillion dollars. But then

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the next question, I think this becomes particularly important given

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that some procedural hurdles were just clear. The next question

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is what types of taxes or Democrats gonna raise to

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>offset that spending? And then what's the remaining deficit. Our

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>view is that could probably get to two to two

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half trillion dollars of new revenue to offset this.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>That still means you're looking at a trillion and a

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>half over ten years of new deficits, and it's probably

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty front loaded given how these spending

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>bills have worked out in the past. So maybe it

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>does much as a trillion dollars over five years. All

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of that, when you mix it in with our expect

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>station that the Fed is gonna start talking taper here, UM,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is enough to push yield higher into your end and

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's probably gonna matter a lot more than you That's

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a that's a big statement considering what we've seen thus far. UM,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot that's enough to push yield higher

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and it still hasn't done it yet. Yeah, I think

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. I think that's fair. Um. But we've got

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a confluence of events here that we see coming together.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>There's this legislative package, Uh, there's the FED taper. Also,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's improvement in the trajectory of the delta

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Varan covid Are. Our biotech team which is modeling this

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>for us UM thinks that we're basically at a plateau there.

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>You've also got boosters coming out over the course of

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the fall, uh, and so all of that should continue

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to allow consumption, activity, travel activity, etcetera. To pick up

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that confluence of events to us can be pretty powerful

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to push field higher, Michael. As we think about funding

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all these pro rams, are we going to see a

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>revival of the Build America bonds uh that we had before? Yeah,

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we think so. There's obviously another important interaction with the

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>muni market. UH. This is a program that obviously state

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>governments generally wants, and the Democrats in Congress have supported,

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in particular Democrats in the House Ways Means Committee. Now,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>originally a revival of this program was supposed to be

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in the bipartisan bill. It seems to have been left

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>out of that bill. But this three and a half

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar budget reconciliation bill, we think we'll have plenty

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of space to include that. UM. That's important because what

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it does for the muni market over time is will

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>probably shift more of the issuance from tax exempt the

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>taxable market. That's probably good news for investors over the

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>long run because it creates some scarcity value. But we

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>probably take a long time before that market fully developed.

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any what's the multiplier when when the

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>general government spends um, you know, a hundred dollars, how

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>much does that boost growth in terms of GDP? Yeah, Well,

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously depends on how they're spending that hundred dollars um

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>our economists, and I think the consensus amongst economists is

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that hard infrastructure dollar spending tends to have the highest

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>multiplier effect over the long run. It creates the most

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>potential GDP. Uh, you're sort of your next biggest bang

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for your bucket is if you are taking dollars and

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>giving them to higher marginal propensity to consume cohorts. Right,

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the spending in this bill is

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>directed uh in ways that will impact middle and lower

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>income households UM. And then the taxes are also skewed

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>towards higher income individuals and corporations, which, given their current

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>wealth status, probably is a lower marginal inpency to consume.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the net effect here plus the depths to

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>affect our economists will probably view very favorably. Hey, Michael,

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>appy got you here. I love to get your thoughts

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on the taxable municipal bond market has been really a

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fast growing market and a good performing market as well. Yeah,

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so there is in the intaxable markets generally, right, so

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not just the muni market, but the corporate bond market.

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>There one pocket of the market that doesn't have a

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of supply is highly rated long duration taper, something

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that insurance companies need, banks, me etcetera. And muni bond

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>market can easily fill that demand, and it has been

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>increasingly over the past couple of years because that demand

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>pocket is there, so you brought to build America bond

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>program earlier. This is one of the reasons that this

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>type of program could create a relatively attractive source of

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>capital for municipalities because they can meet that demand that's

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>currently not being met by the corporate bond market by

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and large. All Right, Michael, always great to get some

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>time with you. Thanks so much for joining us. Michael

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>zesus their chief US public policy and muni strategist at

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley UM. And this is, you know, a particularly

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>important issue to discuss as we saw and Anti Pelosi

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>getting getting the the Reconciliation bill UM or at least

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>plans for it through the House yesterday. Now that has

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Senate and back to the House.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Plus we have to deal with the fifty slash one

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>point two trillion dollar bill. In any case, we could

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be looking at four to five trillion dollars of spending

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>from the federal government. I guess about four trillion in

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>additional spending. Matt. You know, when I was a sell

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>side analystson going out to see clients on the West Coast,

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>my boss wouldn't even pay for a ticket unless I

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>got a meeting with TCW and Capitol Group. Those were

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the lockdown meetings in Los Angeles. Uh, important folks to

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>chat with. Stephen Kane, He's a group managing director and

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at t c W. Steve, thanks so much

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. We've got um jackson Hole coming

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>up here. I guess really on Fridays, the big day,

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking for? What do you expect? What

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>do you hope not to hear? Well? Uh, good morning

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh and thanks for having me. Um. Yeah. In

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of Jackson Hole, I really wish I could give

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you and the listeners some exciting prognostication or some off

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>consensus view. But I really think the consensus, which is

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a fairly benign one UH is probably right, which is

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're not going to get much from Chairman Powell.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>He's he's likely to recognize that there's been some improvement

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in the labor market, and he's probably going to balance

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that with some negative concerns about the delta virus and

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>downside risks. UM. But the bottom line is he's most

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>likely going to stay away from any specifics on taper um,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's mainly because he wants to maintain flexibility and

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>really not to front run the f O m C,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>which is really the standard process US by which they

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>make formal pronouncements on on on paper and that type

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing. So as much as we'd like to hear

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>him get into the details of what substantial further progress

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>might mean or something along those lines, I think those

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>types of uh uh evolutions in the in the FED

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>will will occur at the September meeting most likely. What

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's I don't see how they can ignore

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the housing market. It's just unbelievable, um,

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>especially for younger you know, first time homebuyers, good luck.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Unless you have the cash on hand, you're just not

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>going to get it. Um. How does the FED contribute

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to that with its merches, with its mortgage bond purchases. Yeah,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Fed is all that concerned, although

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they arguably should be about the conditions in the housing

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>market actually the housing you know, their goal is to

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>provide affordable credit UM and assist in that way through

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the UH purchase of agency mortgages, which are doing to

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the tune of forty billion a month, so with UH

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty year mortgage rates below three um uh,

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>even though housing prices are high. I think they view

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>their job is controlling the price of credit and not

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the price of the asset UM. So it's

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit beyond their control, at least that's probably

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>how they're viewing it, all right, Stephen, Looking at the

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal, here, I see the tenure at yielding one

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>point three. It's it's higher than it had been over

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the last week or so, but still in that range

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen for such a long time. Here Where

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you and the good folks at TCW look for yield,

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>look for total return in this kind of market, it's

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, but it bluntly we're we're a value investor here,

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.959
<v Speaker 1>which means we tend to buy things as they get cheaper,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's not a whole lot that is cheap right now.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You've got, as you've just pointed, a very low treasury

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>yields um, and beyond that it's even worse as you

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>look to the UH, the risk markets, the corporate market,

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>in the high yeld market, emerging market, UH spreads and

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>risk premium are near all time tight. So the general

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>theme for us is to to begin, or we've already

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>been doing it, to rain in risk budgets. And what

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that means is carry our durations or interest rate risk

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>short of benchmarks or carry um short um with the

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>expectations rates are going to rise, pull back on our

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>credit beta, which means we've been trimming UH corporate exposure,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>although we do see idiosyncratically some some opportunities and specific

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>credits that are improving and deleveraging, but generally speaking we

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>have less exposure than the market. Some of the areas

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we actually find a little bit of value in is

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the agency mortgage back securities market. That's the Ginny Fanny

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Freddie market that the FED is actively supporting through UH

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>asset purchases and that those purchases are creating a bit

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of a distortion in the t b A or forward

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>delivery market that is giving additional carry to those securities

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in the market. So you're getting spreads beyond what you

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>get in corporate bonds for a zero credit risk asset

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and one that has very good liquidity. So I would

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>highlight that it's hard to get super excited about something

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>yielding you know, about one and a half percent, but

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless it's still fairly attractive on a risk adjusted basis.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And then I would say, beyond that, the high quality

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>area of the securitized market, um, non agency mortgages, some

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>areas of the commercial mortgage backed securities market clos are

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>actually an area of the market, uh, particularly that kind

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of triple A double A area that look reasonably appealing

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>when compared to un secure corporate credit. Just got like

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seconds left. But um, you agree then that rates

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to rise when and how high? Yeah, I

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>think our view is the market probably has it right

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at the front end of the curve, meaning you know,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>when you look at two years at a at a

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>whopping twenty four basis points, or even the five year

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at a basis points that implies a very slow gradual

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>pace of of FED hikes starting maybe late next year.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Where we think the risk is out the curve that

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>one thirty ten year or sub two thirty year. We

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's the FED tapers, and as the market begins

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate uh normalization of short term rates, you're going

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>to get higher rates out the curve. So we do

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>think you'll get tenure rates above two percent in the future. Hey, Steven,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate your

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on insight. Stephen Kane, Group Managing Director, Pultorlio manager

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at TCW, Let's bring in Steve quick right now. He

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is the CEO of Unit Space to talk to us

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>about UM, the future of work, how the office may change,

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>how the delta variant is impacting UM. The r t

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>O plans to use the popular new acronym for return

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to Office. Steve, thanks very much for joining us UM.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Everything seems to be there's a lot of deja vou

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>going on right now compared to what we had at

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of last summer. Is this the final year

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you think? I certainly hope, So thanks for having me.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Yeah, I here's what I think it's

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.239
<v Speaker 1>going to happen as it relates. I think it is

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>uh the final year. I think realistically, you know, we

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>could be seeing you know, and I'm no epidemiologists, but

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we could be you know, we could be seeing some

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>rolling COVID variants you know, over the next several years.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think we've we've got the mechanisms is to

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>adapt to that hopefully alright. So you know, I think

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting Steve. You know, back in September you said

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that the office space would not die per se, maybe

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>just be smaller. I think you said maybe smaller. It's

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>been almost a year. Is that still kind of where

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you think things are going to go here in US? Yeah,

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's exactly what we're seeing. I guess. We just

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>finished a survey with more of a hundred of Hunter

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Global companies and it still looks like about is sort

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of the sweet spot of range where people are looking

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to reduce their their footprint, UM kind of in this

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this new normal. And then and then what

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is, you know, they're reconfiguring, um, not just

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>their workplace but also some of their HR standards and

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>things like that to to adjust to as you said,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the the r T O the industry jargon here, because

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.959
<v Speaker 1>if we get back to r T O um, and

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>so that's what we're still seeing. Um. You know, I

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think the thing we're seeing in the US is delta

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>variant has has delayed that r T O by you know,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>six nine days. And you've seen all those those reports

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 1>to where you know, there was a return to office

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>by September one, October one, and now people are saying,

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>let's let's look further out in the fall. Um, so

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that's been that's been the return to the return to office. Um.

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Do a land hasn't changed. The timing has has has changed?

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Given the delta Bearriet. You know, when I was a kid,

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>my dad um had his own office, still has his

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>own office. It was great, his own whole room. You

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>could keep a few toys in there for the kid's visits.

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 1>He had a stereo and even a bar in the corner.

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>That's no longer, I mean that's been for twenty years.

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Not the way it works, right. We all have cubicles

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>that are slightly glorified, but not really. Is it going

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to get even worse going forward? Or we're gonna be

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hot desking in a bullpen from now on, I would Yeah,

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're saying that, it reminds me a madman or something. Um, yeah,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, but how awesome was that? By the way

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that that that that was you know, enough inspiration to

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>get up, have him get up and going to work

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at four thirty every day. You don't look forward to

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>going to a hot desk, do you? Yeah? No, I

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>so I said, I will tell you, I think it's

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna get better. So we've we've been on this evolution

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the workplace for you know, like you said, you know,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>arguably a couple of decades, but at least you know,

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it upfront and close for the last decade

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>as we've moved to the open plan, less dedicated offices

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, etcetera, etcetera. And so we've all seen that

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what COVID has done is accelerated that evolution by you know,

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 1>we've taken ten years or further revolution and we can

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>press in an eighteen months. And so you know, I think,

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>what's you're you know, because what was preventing sort of

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that true flexible working it was it was sometimes it

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was concerned about technology bandwidth and kind of figured that

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>out in the last eighteen months that was eight people

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>still couldn't get their head around well, I need to

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>see Some people still had the mentality of I had

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to see my employees to make sure they're doing the work,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think I was sort of people that were

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>last holdouts of managing employees that way have sort of

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>had to adapt. So we've broken down those barriers and

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>now now we're as we get back to work, it's

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be about flexibility or omni working is one

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of my friends likes to call it. And so I

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're actually gonna be in two many cubicles

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>crammed in doing heads down to work. The purpose the

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>office is going to be it's kind of you do that,

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>do that work wherever you want to do that work,

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>whether that's at home or the train or the Starbucks

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>or wherever. But when you do come to the office,

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be more and more about getting to

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>go with your colleagues, training sessions, collaboration. Mentoring has come

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>up a lot in our surveys where some of the

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>younger players aren't getting the mentoring like they do when

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of in the office or pulled into a

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>meeting and then have a debrief, and so the purpose

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of the office is going to be more around those

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>elements versus sort of let's let's get even closer and

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>heads down and crank out emails together. So I actually

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>think that that sort of Delbert approach is actually going

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to get better or not worse. It's my view. All right, Steve,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We really appreciate

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a fascinating discussion that I think a lot of

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>companies are having with their employees here. Um as we

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>get back and Labor Day seems to be one of

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>those kind of days where our time periods where I

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>think some companies are gonna want to try to get

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more uh, part of a getting people

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>back in your office, Steve Quick, CEO of unice Space,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to markets and focus in on what's

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>going on with Dave Harden. He's the CEO and chief

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>investment officer Summit Global Investments. They have one point eight

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of assets under management that assault Lake City

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and Dave um Let's start with just the fact that

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>even though we're not moving a lot today, we keep

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>having these new records. I think fifty new record highs

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this year, even as Dave Wilson shows us, the spread

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>between investment grade and high yield debt um and treasuries

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>gets wider and wider. What what are we? What are

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we missing? Who help? And it's hard, it's hard to

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>say we're missing anything, But I tell you, it sure

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>feels like a right. I appreciate you have me on,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt and Paul. You know, I would say that these

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>new highs were on pace for seventy seven if it continues,

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and that ties with record set in nifty four, and

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so definitely interesting that we're continuing to hit new hives.

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But can you really doubt it? We have a supported FED,

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we have a Congress that's writing bills like you know,

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they have a blank check. We have so much stimulus

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.719
<v Speaker 1>going into the market right now it's hard not to

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>be short term positive. So I guess one of the

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>issues that investors are working through, Dave is kind of

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>where do I want to be in this market? Do

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to stay with those growth stocks, the apples,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the amazons, the apples that have worked so well for

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>me for so long and have been the mainstay of

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>my IRA and my portfolio. Or do I want to

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>follow this rotation trade, which again has been a great trade,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know in terms of the cyclicles and maybe the

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>small caps and things like that. How do you think

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about that? Well, I think if you want to brag

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>about your portfolio by Christmas, then maybe staying with growth

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is where you want to be, uh, you know, because

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to not favor growth short term, but long

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>term I would favor more value. And if you can

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>find that very big quality company that also still has

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>value in it and they're out there, that's where I

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>would start to rotate. It's it's better to be early

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to the trade a little bit than late. So you know,

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as we look out, the growth is going to be hard,

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation is coming in hotter than expectator expat expected, and

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we have the possibility of taking the punch bowl away

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>from the FED and the quantitative easing. So if you

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>look out longer term, I think it's the right time

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for people to start thinking about, because they have not

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thought about it, whatsoever is risk and how to manage

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>risk and how to look at the potential dry powder

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>or the risk in their portfolio. And that's what we

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>do really well at st I is we look at

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the potential risk and we say, how do we put

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>prudently and properly manage your portfolio. These un teamed risk

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to hurt people in the future. All right,

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so what do you, um, what do you see? It's

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on it happening post Jackson Hole. You said the FED

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to take away the punch bowl. Obviously they're

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna at some point they have to scale back purchases.

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Do they ever raise rates? I think they. I think

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to. I don't think it's going

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to come right out after Jackson Hole. Um, it's it's

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just too great of a place there if you've ever

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>been there, um to take to kind of make you relax,

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think they're pretty relaxed. But the fact is

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we have delta, this COVID variant that's really

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>hitting the workforce productivity, and so even if it doesn't

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>do more damage in the sense of of deaths or

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>severe illness, it's stopping people from being productive. And that's

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>what seems to be the case of inflation, and it's

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>causing inflation. We've got these supply chains problems. So the

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>real reality is is that I think that it's gonna

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation is gonna be hotter. It's gonna put pressure on

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED, and they're gonna have to taper a little

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>bit sooner than what I mean, not tap, yeah, stop

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the quantitative evening a little bit sooner than what expectations

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are currently out there. So I do see interest rates rising.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I do see a pressure on the FED to act. So, Dave,

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>where's your asset allocation? Now, you know, equities, credit, that

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>type of thing. You know, from an assallocation standpoint, it's

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to say, hey, I'm really long bonds right now

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>with that, you know what with the ten year under

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>one and a half percent, right, So this is a

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>really difficult thing when you have a yield of like

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>exnmobile at six point two percent and uh, you know,

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>very low, shorter interest and marginal risk. So you can

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>get yield in a number of different ways if it's

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just yield. But from an asset allocation standpoint, there's other

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>things to take into consideration, and that is protection. So

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we do see, for you know, the kind of the

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>non aggressive investors that are more conservative in their portfolios

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to have some allocation to credit, to have some allocation

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>into this bond market um because it does offer protection

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you know there is some uh legitimacy to

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that that for decades has has has done just that

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>offer protection. All right, Dave, thanks so much for joining us.

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>To really appreciate you taking the time here. Dave Harden,

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Summit Global Investments. Thanks

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio