WEBVTT - Grief Author Murder Trial: Kouri Ritchins’ Ex-Lover Takes the Stand

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks. It is Thursday, March fifth, and what

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a day in the Corey Richands murder trial, the so

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>called grief author murder trial. The boyfriend of the woman

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on trial was on the stand yesterday and it was

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>more emotional than maybe folks had anticipated with that. Welcome

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to this episode of Amy and TJ. Roapes. He was

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the most anticipated witness, right, even if he might not

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be the most important.

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think the most important witness was at the

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>end of last week when we heard from the housekeeper

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 2>of Corey Richins, who claims that she secured the fentanyl

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>for Corey, who then, according to prosecutors, gave it to

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>her husband, first in a sandwich that was a failed attempt,

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>and then eventually in a Moscow mule which ended up

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>with him having five times the lethal limit a fentanyl

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>in a system. So, yes, she was important, But now

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>we're hearing the why this is going towards the motive.

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Prosecutors say she wanted money and she wanted her man,

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and her man was Joshua Robert Joshua Grossman.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is very important as far as establishing motive. Yet,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't know I was expecting I suppose more questions,

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed like they weren't to get a lot

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of stuff in evidence and have him confirm a bunch

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of their communications. But this was essentially Robert Joshua Grossman

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>sitting up their robes looking through a lot of their

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.919
<v Speaker 1>text messages. But it gave us insight into their relationship.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Where her head was and where his head was.

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was really fascinating to watch.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 2>So they put up all of their text messages in

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the month and then the weeks leading up to Eric

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Richand's death, and we're all reading them on the screen

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>along with the jurors. And then they'll throw a shot

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of the ex boyfriend and he had his head on

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the table. He was not looking, he was covering his

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:04.639
<v Speaker 2>eyes and when he would lift his head.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Up he'd be wiping tears.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 2>He I mean, this is it was four years ago

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>to the day that Eric Richards died. And to see

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>that emotional impact of just seeing those texts and where

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 2>he was. I mean, this was a man who seemed

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to be deeply in love with Corey Richins and hoping

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 2>to spend the rest of his life with her.

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they finally got him to admit on the

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>stand and maybe that was a little pie in the sky,

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but based on some of these writings, robes absolutely he

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was in to this woman in a major way. A

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>reminder here, Corey Richards out in Utah Park City, Utah,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>accused of killing her husband in March of twenty twenty

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>two by giving him that laced drink. She claims he

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>must have gotten somewhere else. He had pain pills he used,

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>he had THC gummies he used, So she's claiming maybe

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>he did it to himself or took it himself, but

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution doesn't believe that's the case, saying she poisoned him.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And then I guess robes the other part after that,

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and the reason they call the grief author murder trial.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess some of those details are the ones that

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are really often make headlines and have people interested in

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this story.

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 2>That's right, because she actually published wrote and published a

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>book about helping children get through the grief of losing

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>a parent, and she had actually been on local television stations,

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>local radio promoting her book, and then within weeks of

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>that book promotion, she's arrested for murdering the.

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Father of her children.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't make this stuff up. You cannot, yeah,

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>make it app So this is where we are. She's

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>facing and wild as it is roads you should mention, yes,

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>she's facing a murder charge, but also an attempted murder

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>charge because they say she failed the first time. She

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>tried to get it.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Right with that sandwich that she tried to give or

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>she did give him and he ate but apparently he

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>was able to survive it by he just was texting

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>her saying hey, and we've seen the text admitted into

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>court where he's telling her, I feel terrible. I might

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 2>have to go to the hospital. He ended up giving

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>himself an EpiPen and taking some benadryl and sleeping it

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>off and surviving it. So yeah, according to prosecutors, two

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>weeks later, she tried again and was successful.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird thing to think rogues and it's not

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a comedian would make a joke about it. What would

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>she try next if the drink didn't work? What is

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the next thing she's going to serve him? What other

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>dish is there? What other right? It seemed like she

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>was determined to kill. Excuse me, she's accused. She is innocent.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>To approven guilty, but based on the prosecution storyline, this

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>moment was determined to kill this guy.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and it's really you know, you look at her,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 3>she looks.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Like this girl next door, your next door neighbor, mom

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 2>of three, real estate agent. It's just she doesn't fit

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 2>the type of someone who you would think would be

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>capable of something like this. And then to actually yesterday

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 2>was so fascinating hearing from her then boyfriend and to

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>see the text. She didn't give him one indication that

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>she was headed in this direction. They were talking about

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 2>her getting a divorce, her needing time because she didn't

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>want to break up her family, and she absolutely kept

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>her boyfriend her lover, in the dark in terms of

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 2>her plans. If she in fact did murder Eric Richards,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 2>she certainly didn't let him know.

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 3>That's where she was headed.

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But there were other things the prosecution is trying to

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>piece together that seemed to allude to certain dates. We'll

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>get into that into a second. But Romes I didn't know,

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>but he explained on the stand how they met in

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the first place, and it was all because of a

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>help wanted add.

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so they met in South Carolina.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 2>He answered the help wanted ad because she was flipping

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 2>homes down there. So we started working with her, and

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 2>I believe he ended up. He said that it was

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>purely platonic for the first couple of years. I think

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>he said they met even in twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen,

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>so quite a while ago. But he ultimately moved to

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Utah in twenty twenty to work with her. But he

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>said before he moved to Utah, things turned romantic.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And I was, this is odd. He starts working with

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>her robes, but he didn't. He wasn't necessarily an employee.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting to hear the arrangement they had. I

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>guess once they started dating.

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so he had his He talked about he had

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 2>his dog with him and he would live in the

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 2>house that they were flipping, and so kind of basically

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 2>he was he was working for shelter and food and

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>a car.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>He said.

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>She bought him a vehicle, two vehicles actually, so she

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>said she would give him cash here and there. But

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't as if he was on the payroll. He

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>wasn't paying taxes. It wasn't as if he was a

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>formal or yeah, a formal employee. It was like kind

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>of her paying him on the side and letting him

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 2>live in these homes.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's a part of understanding where his head was

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and what, or at least how he felt about her.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>He said it on the stand. I liked her, so

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I worked for free, he said. And as this thing built.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>If you said it once, rogue, you said it fifty times.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>While he was testifying, Oh, I feel bad for this

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>guy because it did up there. He seemed like a

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>love sick puppy.

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 3>He did. Look, this is a look. He is a guy.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>He has a formidable appearance. He was in a rock

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>war veteran, a good looking guy, kind of like that

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>blue collar almost as if, I hate to say this,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>but like, oh, almost a suburban bored, suburban wife's fantasy.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>You go and you meet this kind of rugged, handsome

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>war vet who has his dog. He's good with his hands,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>he can build things, he can fix things.

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 3>And so let me a watch.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>But doesn't that sound like the beginning of a romance novel.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that you are familiar with them, but

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you that this is actually I was

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>thinking this as I was watching. It was almost as

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>if it was It was like a stereotypical affair in

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a way, like a board housewife looking for some hot,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>blue collar guy who's gonna love her and not talk

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 2>too much, not want to go too deep about anything philosophical,

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>just like.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Fine or sex.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Never would have thought that, Yeah, that's.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 3>What it looked like to me.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>And it looks like he fell hard for her, and

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>he was still so emotional. She was stonefaced by the

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>way because they would cut to her, and he even

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of he looked at her at one point and said,

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>this is the first time I've seen her since twenty

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty three and since they broke up, and they broke

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>up several months before she was arrested. But I felt

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 2>so bad for him. And look, I think when you're

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>hearing the story as a juror, you're feeling terrible for

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Eric Richins if you believe that she actually committed this crime,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>and it almost honestly, having him on the stand, looked

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 2>like this is a woman who basically manipulated two men

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 2>who were both wanting to be with her.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that if nothing else, And a lot of the

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>messages we read and some of the back and forth

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is stuff to be expect, and folks already knew they

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>were in a relationship. I don't know how impactful some

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of that is, but ro I told her from an

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>emotional standpoint, seeing that guy, mm hmm, I was upset

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with her.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 3>He was so genuine.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Because so much of the messages and so much of

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>what we did see was I don't want to say,

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>leading him on, But certainly what I even found a

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of it wasn't she apologetic the way she couldn't

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>spend so much time with him? She was?

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>She kept saying, I'm so sorry. You deserve more than this.

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>At one point it looked as though and the defense

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>really tried to hone in on this. You know, wasn't

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 2>she breaking up with you? Weren't you before Eric Richards died?

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>But I think she was just basically acknowledging that he

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>was only getting, you know, just a few drips and

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 2>drops from her. She wasn't able to give him the

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 2>time he deserved. But he's told her I'm in love

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 2>with you. And then she said, if I weren't married,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 2>would you marry me tomorrow? And he said, of course

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I would.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, she goes on and reciprocates, at one time, I'm

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in love with a man that's not my husband. She

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>says that to him and the guy on the stand,

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he kind of admitted maybe I go head

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>over heels more than most. But they asked him directly,

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that she loved you too? And he

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>said yeah, genuinely, like yes, I know when.

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 2>He said this, big gruff guy says, I have a

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 2>tendency for going head over heels, maybe more than most.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 3>The whole there was just something so heartfelt about that. Yeah,

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 3>I just I felt for him.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>But I thought one of the worst texts that they

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>were able to put up there for jurors to hear

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 2>was where Corey Richins talked about wanting to just be

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 2>with him.

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 3>She said, if he meeting Eric, her husband, if.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>He could just go away and you could just be here,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>life would be so perfect.

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I get the refusal on trial for cheating, that would

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>be awful. Does that suggest murder? We have seen robes,

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We've covered enough trials in the past six months that

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we have seen some Google surgers and text messages much

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>more damning than some of these we saw. But they

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>established whatever they wanted to, But the thing didn't make

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a difference to you, at least from a case from

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>an evidence standpoint, is it circumstantial the messages surrounding when

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they were supposed to meet for brunch and have mimosas.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>This timing of that was strange.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm thinking that she Look, this is a woman

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 2>who was if she is guilty, she was manipulating everyone

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 2>because she didn't let her lover in on her plans.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 2>She made him think about a year from now, maybe

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I could get divorced. So she wasn't saying anything that

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 2>would insinuate that she was planning. What prosecutors say, she

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 2>was very actively planning. So if she was planning that

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>would it also make sense that she was planning to

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>have brunch plans with her lover the day Eric died

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 2>that morning to celebrate a big real estate deal that

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>was about to go through that day as well. So

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>why would she If she did ill her husband and

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 2>plan this all out, why would she choose to do

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 2>it the morning and the morning hours or the night

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 2>before this big day? She had set up a big

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 2>celebratory day where she was closing on this house she

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 2>had been working on closing for many many months, and

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 2>going to celebrate with her lover.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Could she have thought that this would be.

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Something that police would look at, investigators will and say, oh,

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 2>there's no way she would do that. Look at what

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 2>this big day was that she had planned. Why would

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>she have done that. That wouldn't make any sense. She

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>knew that it was going to come out, probably that

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>she was involved.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>In an affair, So it doesn't make sense for her

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to have planned if she planned to have that brunch,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that would lend itself to suggesting not guilty. Is that

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so maybe she planned it so it would look

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>like it.

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So if it there, then it's you're saying, she's probably

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>guilty because this is now you're talking about a lot

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of manipulation and planning and surrounding this death, even looking

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate the police. That that suggests an extensive amount

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of preparation.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean she had to think maybe, because look,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 2>she her Google searches. I'm piecing this together. Her Google

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 2>searches were ken police, you know, look at your phone

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and look at your messages. So she was probably thinking,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>they are almost certainly going to find out that I

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>was having an affair and.

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Then me give us some break, crumps, Yes, give them break. Crumps.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It was the last thing here on him, just wrote.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Seeing him yesterday was at times a little devastating. We

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that the he got upset, he was crying several times.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>They at times when they were just showing on the

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>screen at least we were seeing just the text messages

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like a close up reading. Whoever's controlling the cameras did

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a cutaway to show him with his head down.

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>It was devastating.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>He stopped reading them and that's I'm sure he hasn't

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>read that stuff in years. And to go back and

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>put himself in that position to where he was, he

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>seemed like he was head over heels for this woman.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that was devastating. But also of note.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 2>She asked him, and he said, we both went whoa.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Towards the end, he said, she asked him if he'd

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>ever killed anybody and how did it make him feel?

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And he had been in a rock that so, he said,

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>looking back now, that might be a little weird. At

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the time, he didn't think anything of it, but he

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>has the hindsight now is at the end of the

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>world again. It's all circumstantial, right, It's all circumstance.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 2>It all looks bad It's another piece in the puzzle,

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and it helps durers get a fuller picture when they're

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 2>making their decisions. So I thought this was actually fascinating.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Also asking him about illicit drug use, she was asking

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 2>him if he ever did anything more than marijuana. All

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>of that now seems interesting given how prosecutors say she

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>killed her husband.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. No smoking gun quite just yet. But this wasn't

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the only emotion and also not the only drama in

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom yesterday. There was outside of the presence of

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the jury a pretty interesting back and forth between the

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>prosecution lawyers and the defense lawyers, including a flat out

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>accusation of one side misbehaving when it comes to the jury.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Stay here, Welcome back, everyone to this episode of Amy

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>and TJ, where we have been glued to the coverage

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and watching the trial of Corey Richins. She is the

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty five year old mom of three who was accused

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>of poisoning, first attempting to poison her husband and then

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>successfully poisoning her husband with fentanyl, and then writing a

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>book helping her children deal with the grief of losing

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>their father so that she could help children everywhere who

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 2>have lost a loved one. She was arrested a few

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 2>weeks after that book was published, and now she is

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 2>on trial for Eric Richards's murder. Saw her lover on

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the stand yesterday. But as you said before the break,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 2>this was not the only drama in the courtroom we

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>saw yesterday.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see this coming. We're used to at the

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>end of a try. Actually, it's usually the end of

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution making their case the defense. It's customary they

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>get up and make a motion for a dismissal. We

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>move for mistrial. Right, It's never granted, never almost.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen it.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Not a one oh right. That's a pretty high bar.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So the prosecution is still putting on its case. But yesterday,

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of the presence of the jury, this threw me.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>They always have some back and forth, they need to

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>work out an issue, and these lawyers have more issues,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems to work out than most. But there was

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>an issue that the defense said they received a text

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>message which said that Carmen Lawber, the housekeeper who got

0:16:55.040 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the drugs for Corey Richards, Carmen Lawber, had had a

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>violation in drug court. Why is that a big deal,

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Because the defense says, we didn't know about it. Ahead

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of time, which could have changed how we prosecuted our case.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution had the burden to tell us. They didn't

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and Roe, she explained it in about sixty seconds and

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know where it was going. Then she all

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, we immediately moved for a mistrial. What yeah,

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>because ro, this is a big deal. If you withhold evidence.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, if the prosecution withheld the fact that carbon Lauber

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>violated drug court, yeah, that would be that would change

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>perhaps how they cross examined her, what they held her

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 2>accountable for. It would call into question her credibility even further,

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 2>which they already tried to erode. But the prosecutor's response was, yeah,

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what you're talking about, wasn't us Yeah, I.

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Don't know what text she's talking about. You all have had.

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And then they went through, this information has been out there,

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>it's been in Then they said, we gave it to

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you several days ago. Was part of this. And so

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the judge in that moment said, look, you're gonna have

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to put this in writing. He said, I'm not going

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to shoot from the hip, is what he said. So

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to rule right here, right now, on

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a mistrial something like this. So they waiting on him,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>so it might be very interesting when they start today.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>So the trial continued as planned with him considering this,

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and yes, we'll hear on what he rules on later.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 2>He did, though, make a ruling on the other claim

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.959
<v Speaker 2>that the defense made. The defense was claiming that the

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>prosecution was making faces at the jury to try and

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 2>sway them in their direction.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hear. I don't know how you make a

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>face to sway, but they said during cross examination, when

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the defenses up there cross examining, they're getting reports that

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution at times just making faces in reaction to

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever is going on with the defense at times. How

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>do they know this? Television?

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 2>They said, people who are watching TV somehow let them

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 2>know that they have seen the prosecution. So yes, like

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 2>perhaps just I'm guessing when they're cross examining and say

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the defense attorney says something crazy, they're looking at the

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 2>jury like, uh huh, really right, Like that's what I'm

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 2>assuming they're talking about.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, A weink, a nod of rolling of

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the eyes, I don't know. I loved that the judge

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily entertain this much.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he shot it down, but he's gonna need he

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 2>hasn't seen anything.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>He's like, I'm looking at the prosecution.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And his point was I have a better view than

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>even the cameras, and I haven't seen a damn thing,

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, you got to give me more than that.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>And he was about to let it go. They have

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>now agreed to go back and get time stamps and

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>going to bring into the judge of the faces roads.

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait for the starter quars.

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I hope they have like a time stamp and then

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 2>like a freeze frame, like a a snapshot of whatever

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>these faces are they claim. Look, I wonder, though, I

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 2>wonder if you, just as a human being react, I

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 2>don't have a poker face. I do not, So when

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 2>someone says something that sounds fishy or a bunch of

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>bs or something seems ridiculous, you're probably gonna see it

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>on my face. Now, did they turn their faces to

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 2>the jury and do that? Are you not allowed to

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 2>have a human reaction to something if you hear it

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and you smell bs.

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Me, Obviously you're not allowed to interact with the jury

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in any way. Fine, but are you not allowed to

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>so that's the question. Rose. Can an attorney roll his

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>or her eyes just looking? Are you not supposed to

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>react in any way, shape or form emotionally in the courtroom.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 2>I've seen Corey Richins, and I think that's just a

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>human reaction when you hear something that you disagree with

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 2>her or you don't think it's right. She's raised her

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 2>eyebrows and tilted her head and splinted her eyes and

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 2>been like wait what and then whisper to her attorney,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and the jury can.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 3>See all of that, So I don't know.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess the difference would be turning your head to

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the dree like right right, you see.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Like that would be the distinction.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>So they'd have to actually show because I do think

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just an understandable thing to have a reaction to

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>something that you don't agree with.

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>They better come with receipts today. But folks, this trial,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what was the timing on this when they said how

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>many was this?

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 2>You know? I feel like all trials they always say

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 2>four to five weeks, and I feel like that is

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>about what they've said this one will go as well.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>So we're coming at the end of two weeks and

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 2>for the I don't know how much more the prosecution

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 2>still has. In terms of witnesses. It's always a little

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>bit of an unknown entity because sometimes they make decisions.

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>In fact, they had a surprise witness yesterday, so that

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>was why the court was delayed for an hour. So

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>we shall see. But definitely still many many days ahead

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of this trial. The defense still has to put up

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and we assume it will put up.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 3>It's defense.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>They don't have to, but it looks like they're going

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>to in terms of what we heard from opening arguments.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 3>We will, of.

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Course stay on top of this trial as always. Thank

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 2>you for listening to us everyone. I'm Amy Roboch alongside TJ.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Holmes. We will talk tears n