WEBVTT - How Chinese Real Estate Became the Biggest Bubble in History

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Authoughts podcast.

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Whisenthal.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 2>Joe, we've talked before in reference to I think it

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>was the US real estate market. Yeah, there seems to

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>be this weird thing going on with housing where it

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>feels like policymakers or maybe people even are not sure

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>what exactly they want it to be. Right, Is it

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be this social good, this affordable thing we

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.959
<v Speaker 2>all can live somewhere that we can, you know, preferably

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 2>a place we want to live in, something that we

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>can afford. Or is it effectively a giant piggy bank, Yeah,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>an investment vehicle, in which case we would expect prices

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>to always keep going up.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean my personal preference is for housing to be

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 4>very affordable, very briefly, and in that time that I

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 4>buy how to accumulate more hows and then it stops

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 4>being affordable.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 3>That's my I don't many people have different takes. I

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 3>just want a very brief period.

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Thing about it.

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Very important that in that brief period I don't lose

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 4>my job. It's very important that in that brief period,

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 4>my other investments don't go down. I just want a

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 4>very brief period of housing affordable.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 2>But this is another thing about housing, which is like,

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>historically it is one of the few ladders to big

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>yea for the masses. Right, We've all heard the stories

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>about artists and soho buying a loft correct for like

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 2>five hundred dollars and now it's worth ten millions, so

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 2>good for them.

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that's interesting about housing, particularly when it

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 4>comes to affordability, is that this seems to be a

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 4>truly global challenge. So people have lots of theories like, oh,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 4>it's because they didn't allow zoning and San Francisco or whatever,

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 4>and it's like maybe, but like I think any question

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 4>about housing affordability has to wrestle fact that this is

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 4>a really global phenomenon, so it can't be some idiosyncratic thing.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>It does seem as though places where housing is more

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 4>affordable do not have particularly dynamic economies. So it's like

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 4>I know that people are like, oh, look how cheap

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Tokyo is. It's like a umb success story, but like

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 4>they had a massive bubble and it's been deflating ever since,

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 4>and it's not like Japan, is it like some cutting

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 4>edge of particularly any booming industries and its population. Japan's

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 4>still pretty nice. I'm sure it's very nice. I'm not

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 4>saying otherwise. It's just not clearly not where the action is.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 4>I'd love to go to. Japan seems like one of

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>the nice places. And the other thing that's interesting about this,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 4>which is that there are all kinds of ills that

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of devil particularly the rich world these days, and

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 4>then we look at China's like, oh, they have it

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 4>all figured out. It seems like housing is a mess

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 4>in China too. One of these rare congratulate like sort

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 4>of like moments where we could shake hands with China's like, yeah,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 4>we're dealing with a lot of.

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 3>The same issues.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the thing. China is like the ultimate example

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>of that tension between investment, asset and social good, right

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>because even in China, as you point out, there are

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>affordability issues, and every once in a while you see

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>policymakers try to put limits on house prices in like

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 2>really expensive cities. But then when they start doing stuff

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>that actually pops housing crisis, everyone starts protesting, which is

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, a rare thing in China, so

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 2>that is the tension.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 4>I also find real estate speculation in China to be

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 4>kind of I thought there were communists, and I mean

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 4>that on ironically, like, where did communists get the idea

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:30.839
<v Speaker 4>of real estate?

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.399
<v Speaker 2>No, well, this is another thing because the social net

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>starts going away in like the nineteen nineties, and so

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>people have to do something with their money to have

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>retirement income to.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 4>I guess the houses in the old days used to

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 4>like be owned by the companies. There more dormitories, and

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 4>then when that started to split apart, I don't know.

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Maybe our guest knows more.

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we do have the perfect guests, the perfect guest. Yes,

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>we are going to be speaking with Mike Byrd. He is,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of course, the Wall Street editor over at The Economist

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and the author of the new book all about this

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>called The Land Trap, a New History of the World's

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Oldest Asset. So welcome to the show.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Mike, Thank you very much for having me. Great to

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 5>be here.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I love my We both love my, so we're excited.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Also, someone who spent some time in Asia when I

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>was there in Hong Kong as well, so knows the

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of global history of land, and I was reading

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>your book and you go all the way back to

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>like Babylon or Samaria, so very impressive. So why did

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 2>you decide to look at land?

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 5>It's a great question. I guess it started. I started

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 5>my career in London, and there's a huge thing in

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 5>London about housing as there is here, you know, people's

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 5>lack of ability to afford it. I think it's even

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 5>even worse than the UK than the US, because you know,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 5>the culture of equity investing in all sorts of other

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 5>things is so much weaker. But I guess I really

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 5>got into it when I moved to Hong Kong, because

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Hong Kong felt like London on steroids. The housing was

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 5>even more expensive. It was part of you know, I

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 5>moved in twenty eighteen. You there, Tracy, it was like

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 5>the extraordinary bull run, like the absolute peak the post

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and eight surge in Hong Kong. And learning

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 5>about how land was really expensive but also the government

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 5>owned all the land and leased the land out made

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 5>money from the land. I found it very confusing and

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 5>it helped me to sort of dig into things, and

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 5>I think it helped me to like start thinking about

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 5>this as like a framework of how land works at

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 5>different places and how you can use it and abuse

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 5>it and whatever. And yeah, Hong Kong was a great

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 5>place to think about that because it's such a example

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 5>story of how bad things can get.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 3>So if you buy property in Hong Kong, what exactly

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 3>are you buying?

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 5>You are buying like you're buying an apartment, right, but

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 5>you don't own the land. So if you say you're

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 5>a real estate developer, right, you buy a land lease

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 5>from the government, like a seventy five year, ninety nine

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 5>year land lease. They've clipped back and extended the terms

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 5>of the lease over time. But yeah, that's what you're buying.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 5>You're buying the right to use it for a certain

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 5>amount of time.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Does every just go away like other examples, like you

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 4>know what, seventy five years is up?

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Not your land?

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 5>This is a big problem. This is a big problem

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 5>them and in these places, in places like Hong Kong

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 5>and Singapore, there is the difficulty of when lots of

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 5>the land starts to roll over, when lots of the

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 5>leases start to get at the end, the question of

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 5>whether you just bow to political pressure and just give

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 5>it to people, right, just let people keep it, or

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 5>whether you kick them off and start again, whether you

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 5>knock something down and rebuild. It's a big difficult issue.

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mozambique is the other country I know that does this,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of funny. Also communist history there. Anyway,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>what role does housing actually play in the Chinese economy?

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 5>So, I think the best part of living in Hong

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Kong was learning how this relates to Hong Kong. Right,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 5>So put in very simple terms the nineteen eighties, Gemin

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 5>the Mau is dead dung shopping, consolidating power, and you're

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 5>in a strange position where you have to start or

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 5>dounge once to start bringing in market forces into the economy.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 5>But it's pretty dangerous. He's got a lot of political opponents.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 5>You've got to step pretty slowly. And housing is one

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 5>of the areas it's most difficult. China's housing at the

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 5>time is pretty ramshackle and terrible. It's attached, as Joe

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 5>suggested at the beginning, to like the industrial base. Your

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 5>employer houses you on a farm or next to a

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 5>factory or wherever it is. But what China needs is urban,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 5>modern residential housing. So Jao Xiang, who's the premier of

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 5>China later on, and he's one of the sort of

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 5>peak reformers in Dung's China. He credits this to a

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 5>conversation with a Hong Kong real estate developer called Henry Fox,

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 5>who said, in a conversation with him, where Joao is

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 5>explaining the difficulty of oh, we don't have any money

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 5>and we can't get foreign investment in and Henry Fox said,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 5>but if you have land, why don't you have money?

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 5>How can you not have money? And basically they started

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 5>adopting on a small scale, initially the Hong Kong system.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 5>They started leasing out land to make money. First one

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 5>of these is in Shenzen in December nineteen eighty seven.

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 5>There's an auction. The Hong Kong government gives them the

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 5>avil to do the auction, the auction of for pretty

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 5>small piece of land. But this is a symbolic thing

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 5>because you know, it's a communist country and the Chinese

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 5>government owns all the land. They hadn't even at this

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>point changed the constitution to make this legal. They're sort

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 5>of experimenting just at the edge, and then slowly this

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 5>becomes the main financing model. It's a big tax change

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 5>in the middle of the nineteen nineties that shifts this,

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 5>but it's it's a really good way of making money,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 5>especially if you're the government and you own all the land.

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 5>China owns that in the mainland for communist reasons, but

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 5>it's actually a handover to some degree from Hong Kong.

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Actually, can I back up a few decades? What's land reform?

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 4>You always here the people debating economics like, Oh, they

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 4>instituted land reformer, this is really important.

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>This is what else says? Oh no, actually, land reform

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 3>was not there. What is land reform?

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I've got a chatter on this in the book,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 5>and it was sort of towards the end of it

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 5>quite carefully worded to not upset the people that feel

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 5>very strongly about land reform.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Land reform things you don't talk about on Twitter. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 4>el asterisk and d reform. Absolutely, the bots don't attack you.

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 5>The land reform is mostly middle of the twentieth century phenomenon,

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 5>and it's basically there was a lot of economic thinking

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 5>at the time. It was a guy called Wolf Ladashinski

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 5>who was a US Department of Agriculture employee. He was

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 5>an economist and he was an obsessive about land reform,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 5>which essentially is redistributing really concentrated ownership of land to

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 5>larger numbers of people, especially in the developing rural world.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 5>We're not talking about like, you know, cities or anything here.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 5>And he went into Japan after World War Two, a

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 5>bunch of other reformers basically forced the Japanese government at

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 5>the time to pass a land reform bill which redistributed

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.599
<v Speaker 5>an enormous amount of Japan's agricultural land. This happens in

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan as well, it happens in South Korea, and there's

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 5>a huge amount of attempt to do it elsewhere, to

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 5>varying degrees across Asia in other parts of the world. Basically,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 5>it's by far the most successful in those three original countries.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 5>They try it in India, it doesn't work. They try

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 5>it in Vietnam at South Vietnam, it doesn't really work.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 5>You know. I think one of the.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Most impressing recurring themes on this podcast is the number

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 4>of times there is some like sort of very successful

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 4>project in industrialization or economic development, and then at the

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 4>end there's disasters. But it's only ever worked in three

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 4>like East Asian countries, and we have no evidence that

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 4>any of this works anywhere else.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Here's the problem.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Now you have a solution that you cannot use. Yeah, okay,

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Well the other thing about land in China, and again

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>we're sort of fast forwarding back to the nineties, and

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>we should talk about the hukou systems as well later on.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 2>But land has this really unique position I guess culturally,

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 2>socially and financially for Chinese people. Right, Like, everyone basically

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 2>decides they want to be a landlord, they want to

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 2>own an apartment, even if it's not built. You see

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the ads in like newspapers, flyers, things like that in

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>a way that you don't necessarily see them for stocks

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>or bombs.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 5>Right Totally. I think there's a big cultural thing there.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 5>I'm never too sure whether I'm like a culture is

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 5>downstream of policy or policy is downstream of culture guard

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 5>but it clearly is a big cultural impulse there, whatever

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 5>it's driven by. I remember when I lived in Hong Kong,

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 5>obviously not mainland China, but used to get adverts pushed

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 5>through your door and they'd be like invest in the

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 5>northern English riviera, right, there's housing in Leeds in Bradford

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 5>to be bought as investment properties. This is a big thing.

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 5>You didn't get those in Leeds and Bradford, right, if

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 5>you learn in the UK, you don't get those adverts.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it's a big cultural thing. It's also a

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 5>big thing in the mainland, I think because of financial repression.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 5>Basically you can't invest long term in the equity market

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 5>in China. Right, It's a sideways game. It's a terrible

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 5>way of compounding. Wealth. Bank accounts in general in China

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 5>for a very long period of its modern history had

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 5>like near a real negative returns because of financial repression.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 5>So the question is if you're saving a lot of money,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 5>where do you put it? And it's only really been

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 5>one answer. It's been a completely rational thing for China.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 5>These households to do that, you know, extremely high saving

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 5>households buying property after property, a lot of them left vacant.

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 5>One of the things I say in the book is

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 5>that China has the symptoms of both a housing shortage

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 5>and a housing glove. Right, it managed to get the

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 5>worst of both worlds.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Joe, you know what I call this what China's great

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>ball of money. Yeah, within the country, from asset class

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 2>to asset class.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 4>So, Okay, the stock market hasn't done well for a

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>very long time, raids on the savings are very low.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 3>How did like Chinese.

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Leaders feel about those emergence of a very speculative, high growth,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 4>high return at least during the good old days, Yeah,

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 4>before a few years ago, About the emergence of this industry,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 4>About this emergence of this sort of thing that's crucial

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 4>for a living and also becoming a major respeculative of vehicle.

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Houses are for living, not for speculations. Yes, say yeah,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean I should say. It's an incredibly useful way

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 5>of building out a city. Okay, this tool is like

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 5>super powerful if you're just starting out and no one

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 5>wants to invest. It's a really good way of pairing

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 5>real estate development with infrastructure. You can pay for a

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 5>lot of things. You can do it sort of expanding

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 5>very very rapidly.

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Plus you boost other sectors totally, construction, manufacturing.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Employment, build out. Right, you don't know the industry, Yeah,

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 5>you don't have to do that much administration. It's fairly

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 5>easy to do this stuff, right, So there's lots of

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 5>advantages to it. I think people start to see the

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 5>problems even at the level of the central Chinese government

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 5>in these sort of early twenty tens, right, and you

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 5>get this series of like whack them all attempts to

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 5>get the big ball of money, the big ball of

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 5>credit out of the system. So the first thing you

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 5>see is the Chinese leadership saying, okay, banks limits on

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 5>real estate lending to developer, right, which is what pushes

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 5>them into the international bond markets where most of the

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 5>Chinese property developers fund themselves. Then you see the limits

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 5>on borrowing from the bond market, which sort of come

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 5>in and out during the twenty tens, and eventually it's

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 5>sort of seriously limited in twenty twenty, twenty twenty one.

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 5>But even then you see Chinese developers trying to essentially

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 5>borrow through pre sales from ordinary Chinese households, right, which

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 5>is like, you give me all the money to build

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 5>your house up front, I promise I'll get round for it,

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, not stating actually, I've got twenty other projects

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 5>that I've got to build with your money first. There's

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 5>no escrosystem here. So yeah, you do see the Chinese

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 5>government sort of waking up to the problems, but it's

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 5>like in any other country you know, it doesn't have

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 5>same sort of Western democratic politics. But how do you

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 5>get off the train while it's moving?

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Right, And they've tried with the three Red lines and

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 5>the campaign against the real estate development sector in the

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 5>last five years, and it hasn't gone very well.

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>You know something I'm wondering about.

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 4>You always hear about the CCP trying to learn the

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 4>lessons of the collapse of the Soviet Union, and they

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 4>don't want to have that fan So they're very obsessed

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 4>with this question of what brought the Soviet Union down.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Do they spend much time looking at the collapse of

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 4>the Japanese real estate bubble and the effect that Dad

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 4>had on Japan as an industrial dynamo.

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 5>It's a great question. I'm not in direct touch on

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 5>a day to day basis. My understanding was that they

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 5>did that this was a preoccupation of the Chinese leadership.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 5>I used to hear it a lot from people close

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 5>to economic and financial policy making that this was a

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 5>serious consideration and it was why they didn't want to

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 5>pop the bubble, which is essentially what the Japanese government

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 5>and the Bank of Japan did at the very end

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 5>of the nineteen eighties early nineteen nineties, they seem to

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 5>have done that anyway. I mean, it is a fascinating thing.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 5>There's always this discussion of, you know, on an autocratic

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 5>regime can think in really long term, you know, they

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 5>think in decades and centuries. But in this case, you know,

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 5>there was a land final model that Chines's local governments had,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 5>which has been pulled out from under them. There was

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 5>an asset class that Chinese households could invest in, which

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 5>has been pulled out from under them. The government hasn't

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 5>replaced those two things with anything particularly good.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>We certainly know that they look at it now, right

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 2>because we had Richard Ku on the broadcast a couple

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of times, and we know that deflationary spiral caused by

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>real estate collapse is kind of a topic DuJour over there.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Talk more about the three red lines, because this is

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>something I remember. They came out when we were both

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>in Hong Kong, and you could see why policy makers

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>were doing it. And to some extent, you know, okay,

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>house prices came down and there's less new builds and

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>things like that nowadays, but they also seem to kind

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>of flub them, right.

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, totally so the three Red lines were basically the

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Chinese government identifies the real estate developers as the tool

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 5>through which they're going to cool the housing market down,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 5>and they come out with the three red lines, which

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 5>are three different metrics of debt to cash and other

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 5>sort of debt metrics, and they basically say, if you

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 5>violate one or two of these, you can maybe keep

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 5>borrowing only to refinance old debt. If you're green on

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 5>all of the three red lines, you're fine. Right, if

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 5>your metrics are okay, keep borrowing, go for it. But

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 5>none of them are at this point. And if you

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 5>have three red scores on the red lines, basically, if

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 5>you're violating all of these, no borrowing even to refinance. Right,

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 5>You've got to pay down debt. Now, these companies are

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 5>some of the most insanely structured financial vehicles in history. Right.

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 5>They can only expand through extremely rapid debt driven growth. Right.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 5>The model is such. You know, if you're Everground and

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 5>you're paying like a fifteen percent interest on your borrowing,

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 5>you've got to keep borrowing to expand. Right. It's not

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 5>a good idea, but you've got nothing else.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 2>So funny thing about Evergrand also is the diversification into

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of other things. I remember again in Hong

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Kong asking someone like, we should do a graphic of

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 2>China evergrands all there are different businesses, right because it

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>would be really interesting, And it took like three weeks

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to make and when it came out, it was almost

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.719
<v Speaker 2>unreadable because there were just so many of them, like

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>splayed out.

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, it sounds like we work.

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean that was a company that had diversified into

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 4>literal wave wavepool.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Business and about one hundred other things.

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 4>So also just an insanely complicated, leveraged organization. There was

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 4>a multi billion dollar unicorn now is where the bag Offridos.

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 5>We mocked when they bought Friday Futures, the US EV company,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 5>and we all mocked right everground saying honestly, now, I'm

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 5>like maybe if they the three red lines hadn't come in,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 5>we'd be like soon around me.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 4>This carsonization of Chinese companies were on a long enough timeline.

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>They're all becoming EV companies.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Like there was a great article in Bloomberg earlier this

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 4>week about multiple vacuum cleaner companies in China that are

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 4>now releasing EV.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 3>So I guess I'll make sense.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 5>That their argument was always like, you know, where do

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 5>you put your car in the car park in the

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 5>estate that you live in? Who built that? Yeah, they

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 5>believed in it, But basically, yeah, they bring the three

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 5>red lines in the real estate development sector begins contracting

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 5>very rapidly. The most in debted companies get into trouble

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 5>almost immediately, but also some of the companies that people

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 5>thought were pretty safe, that borrowed at pretty low rates

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 5>are getting into trouble fairly quickly as well. Your sort

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 5>of country gardens China, Vanka, like, they're all getting into

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 5>trouble quite quickly. The way I think of it is

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 5>that basically the Chinese government attacked the sector that had

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 5>grown up to intermediate between the households and the local governments,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 5>but they didn't change anything about the incentives to the

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 5>households of the local governments. The households still need to invest,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 5>the local governments still need money from somewhere, and these

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 5>companies were just making that arrangement work for those two sides, see,

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 5>and destroying them does nothing really, you know, it causes

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of distress, Construction activity drops, lots of people

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 5>aren't going to get the homes they invested in through

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 5>the pre sale system, But it doesn't really address the

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 5>actual core driving forces.

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Talk a little bit more about the local government finances

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 4>and what it is about land that is particularly importantly

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 4>because there are other ways that local governments could theoretically

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:15.479
<v Speaker 4>taxes on there.

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I was never sure what the driving if the driving

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 2>force was at the sort of Beijing national level, or

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 2>if it was the local governments that you know, first

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>started doing this because they're like, Oh, here's a way

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>to make money and develop and look good in Beijing's eyes,

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 2>and then Beijing just kind of went with it.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 5>So I would trace it back largely too. As I

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 5>said before, you know, people started experimenting with land auctions

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 5>land sales from nineteen eighty seven. It starts to get

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 5>more popular in the early nineties, but it's nineteen ninety

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 5>four when they change the tax and spending system, the

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 5>distribution of spending and tax responsibilities between the Chinese central

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 5>and local governments that really sort of hammers it home.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 5>So traditionally China People's Republic like decentralized in terms of

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 5>revenue and spending obligations. Local governments did most of the

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 5>tax raising. They did most of the spending. The central

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 5>government told them there were certain things they had to do,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 5>but they did it all fairly independently. And then nineteen

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 5>ninety four they switched the system and the central government says,

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 5>you could raise the red but we'll take most of that, right, yeah,

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 5>will tell you how much you get back of that.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 5>It became a much more centralized system, and overnight the

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 5>local governments were left with huge spending responsibilities those don't change,

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 5>but only making sort of sixty or seventy percent of

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 5>the money that they needed to fund them. They stumbled

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 5>through the nineteen nineties trying to find ways of doing this.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 5>There's lots of sort of flagrantly illegal administrative fees and

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 5>fines placed on things. This actually gets them in trouble

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 5>because it's very politically sensitive. You know, there's rural Chinese

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 5>residents being absolutely rinsed for anything the local governments can

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 5>get their hands on. And they land on land. Basically,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 5>they see the land auctions, which are off balance sheet revenues.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 5>They do not count for the purpose of being remitted

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 5>to Beijing in the same way that normal tax revenues do,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 5>and they say, right, okay, that's it. That's what we'll do.

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 5>That's so why I will raise money. And you see

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 5>the proportion of income rise and rise and rise very

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 5>aggressively through the late nineteen nineties from a pretty sort

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 5>of residual amount that was useful for it was useful

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 5>for land allocation, it wasn't mostly useful the beginning for

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 5>raising money, and it becomes the main fundraising tool.

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 2>And then they're in the trap. Yeah, the land trap.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Has any country ever successfully gotten out of this type

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of situation?

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 5>It depends what you mean my success.

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, without a massive collapse or without a period of

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 2>very long stagnation, which seems to be what China is

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>in now.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 5>I would say basically no. And funnily enough, I actually

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 5>think one of the best cases for relatively rapid like

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 5>return to normalcy is after two thousand and eight in

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 5>the US specifically. You can tell how few cases there

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 5>are that I'm using the Great Recession.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the best one, as like.

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 5>This might be the best outcome for a number of

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 5>different reasons. But yeah, that might be the best outcome.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 5>There are places that didn't get into the trap in

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 5>the first place.

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Right that that seems to be the ideal. Probably.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 4>I've obviously never been to mainland China. All of the

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 4>China news that I consume is on propaganda that makes

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 4>it onto my Instagram reels that shows all these incredible

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.479
<v Speaker 4>futuristic cities and robots doing everything. One hundred percent of

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 4>my China news consumption makes it look like paradise on

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Earth again, because I only consume propaganda.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it actually stagnating?

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 5>I will say I can't claim to have been to

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 5>mainland China for years now. I think it is. I

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 5>think the long term threat from undermining what was really

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 5>right at the middle of the Chinese development model for

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 5>a very long time and not replacing it with anything

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 5>has been really dangerous. You've seen this effort as investment

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.239
<v Speaker 5>in the real estate sector has dropped and dropped from

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 5>drop to drive it into the manufacturing sector. But the

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 5>reality is that the manufacturing sector, as big as it

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 5>is in China isn't big enough to productively absorb all.

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 4>This isn't the question like, can the Chinese manufacturing sector

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 4>just be so dominant that it just offsets the decline

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 4>of real estate?

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 3>And your analysis is no.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 5>My analysis is no, Chinese economy is too big. I

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 5>would say, and too big means that the domestic real

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 5>estate market is absolutely gargantian. Right. The thing you're trying

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 5>to replace is enormous, and there's only so many buyers

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 5>for your products in the rest of the world. And

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 5>this is why you see I think the anti evolution campaign.

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Trying to get consumption up exactly.

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 5>The pressure against it, because the sort of consequences, the

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 5>negative consequence is already starting to display themselves. And we're

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 5>really like three years into this really big push to

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 5>drive the investment into manufacturing, and it's showing those problems

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 5>in a way that it's a real estate much longer.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it can be a like for like replacement.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 2>Wait, talk more about real estate and productivity, because this

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 2>is something that I didn't really internalize until I read

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the chapter in your book China chapter.

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so there is a lot of really really interesting

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 5>research about real estate in China and what it's done

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 5>to productivity. So if you think about it from the

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 5>perspective of we're going to get into a banking argument

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 5>that's already got that's going to get me in trouble

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 5>as well in terms of like the you know, the

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 5>amount of credit you can have. But if you think

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 5>there's any constraint on the amount of credit, which obviously

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 5>in China there is, there are actual like targets and limits.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 5>It's still a fairly state oriented system in lots of

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 5>different ways. Then the resource is going to one part

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 5>of the economy means they aren't going to another part

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 5>of the economy. And in China's case, this means employment,

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 5>it means material investment, it means you know, steel and

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 5>concrete and copper and everything else. The real estate sector

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 5>in general, in a long run, I think has pretty

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 5>low productivity. Right. You can build constructively in places where

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 5>you know housing's really in demand, but there's only so

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 5>much you can get out of it.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not making new stuff.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 5>No, totally, and certainly in China. What has happened and

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 5>what was certainly happening during the run up to the

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 5>the three Red Lines policy is you saw a lot

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 5>of productive, entrepreneurial and innovative activity instead going into real estate.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 5>We talk about Chinese real estate developers having lots of arms.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 5>Every big Chinese company was trying to run a real

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 5>estate company on the side during the twenty tens, right,

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 5>because there's so much money to be made, why not

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 5>do that as well? And there's really interesting research from

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 5>yush at the IMF talking about how individual Chinese entrepreneurs

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 5>would go into real estate over time because there's so

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 5>much money to be made and it is productivity destroying,

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 5>especially if I think you're in a state oriented financial

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 5>system where you're not probably going to see like a

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and eight style crash. This is where you

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 5>see the consequences come through, you know.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I Wou was thinking about that the Sopranos where Aj

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 4>tells us Sunday's like by real estate, they're not making

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 4>any more of it, whether China elsewhere, that's not really true,

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Like a artificial islands exist b again in.

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 2>The islands literally a drop in the ocean.

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 3>You guys start somewhere. You guys start somewhere.

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 4>But more importantly, again if the my mainlining consumption of

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Chinese propaganda, I always see these things like this used

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 4>to be a desert. Now it's this beautiful like farmable

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 4>land and there's greenery here. Like whether it's China or elsewhere,

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 4>or the history of land like, it's not really that fixed.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 4>They always find new ways to sort of create habitable land.

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 4>That's that's what it used to be human.

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 5>I think there's two things. That one is like actual reclamation,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 5>which is like we've probably added like can you.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 4>But by the way, I think that's the most powerful

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 4>word in English language, reclamation, because it's like it means

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 4>turning watery land into land. Yeah, but the implication is

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 4>like we're reclaiming it. We are reclaiming what used to be.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Are think there's such a powerful world, right, It's very.

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Like Francis Bacon. It's very like, you know, man's dominions.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Like this land that we ken't live in was only

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 4>we were temporarily embarrassed.

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 5>It's always good to do land recommention where you can,

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 5>but there's really not very much of it, Okay. I

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 5>think that the more interesting way that you can create

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 5>more land in the way that I think of it

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 5>is more like if you think of land as a

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 5>like a commutable, reachable area, then we've always at treaded

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 5>more land. Right, It's like the Bronx wasn't useful land

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and fifty years ago, and now it's extraordinarily

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 5>expensive land because you can get into the productive center

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 5>of New York. And that's actually one thing that loosens

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 5>the sort of trap conditions around land over time. You

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 5>see this in the US, like during the early twentieth century,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 5>you saw New York, for example, loosen a lot of

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 5>its problems with housing in real estate because suddenly it

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 5>was like the outer boroughs you could populate full of

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 5>people and they could work in Manhattan still and that

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 5>was fine. And that was a bit like multiple New

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 5>York's worths of land to attach to it.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, here's where we can talk about the hook house system,

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 2>because that ended up being precisely a limiting force on

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>this dynamic.

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, And I think that that feeds into the whole

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 5>question of the Chinese welfare system and the fact that

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 5>Chinese households are driven to invest so aggressively in land. Right,

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 5>if your welfare is linked completely to the place where

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 5>you grew up, and you become a migrant worker and

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 5>you go and work somewhere else, then you're going to

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 5>want to invest very aggressively, either in real estate where

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 5>you can in the place you moved to, or in

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 5>real estate at home. It's essentially like a sort of

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 5>savings technique more than it is. Again in China, it

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 5>feels like the land use and the land as an

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 5>asset are more divorced from one another than anywhere else.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 5>You can see this in the rental yield data right,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 5>rental yields and rents in China aren't expensive, even in

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, the really popular cities, they're not expensive at all.

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 5>So that that sort of gap and the hook how

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 5>system really feeds into this by essentially it's another force

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 5>driving Chinese households to invest more and more and more.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, I don't totally understand, explain a lot of what

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 4>is the essence of the system, what are the constraints

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 4>are played, and then clarify like how it how the

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 4>incentives therefore are to enquire.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 5>But the essence of the system basically is that you

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 5>have a welfare system that is linked to the place

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 5>where you're registered as a household. It's usually the place

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 5>where you grew up, so you're able to get all

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 5>sorts of different ordinary welfare state things based there only.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 5>And if you move for work it doesn't matter, right,

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 5>So you're not eligible if you're a migrant worker to

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 5>all of those things in Shanghai, for example, And these

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 5>things are really really so you can move there, You

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 5>can move there.

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 3>But you really be a sort of literally a second classes.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Absolutely. So this is without huge amounts of external migration,

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 5>or with almost no external migration. Really, China has been

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 5>able to create system that lots of other parts of

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 5>the world have with very poorly paid migrant workers turning

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 5>up who don't have many rights in the place they'm

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 5>moving to. These are the people doing the construction jobs

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 5>that people doing a lot of low paid work.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this still happens, but I remember

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 2>in the two thousands, if you early two thousands, if

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 2>you walked around Beijing at night and looked in the

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 2>windows of some of the restaurants, the waiters would be

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 2>sleeping on the table because most of them came in

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 2>from the farmland, didn't have access to housing. So kind

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of crazy.

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Yeah.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 4>People who are sort of more on the immigration restrictionist

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 4>end in the US will often say things like, you

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 4>know what, the US has actually fallen behind on productivity

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 4>because we have this endless supply of cheap labor with

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 4>diminished rights. Had we not had that, that would have

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 4>forced US firms to do more capital deepening, maybe invest

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 4>in robots, et cetera. It's interesting because we think of

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 4>China as a very advanced industrial nation, and yet your

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 4>description that makes me think that's story doesn't really hold

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:01.719
<v Speaker 4>water totally.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 5>And I understand why people concentrate on that element of

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese economy. It's like the most exciting, interesting bit,

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 5>and you don't need to downplay in any way the

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 5>advanced manufacturing and sort of hyper futuristic elements of it

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 5>to say that that doesn't represent the overwhelming share even

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 5>Chinese industry, right, which is relatively low productivity, relatively low return.

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 5>It's at scale, but it's not enormously like futuristic, and

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 5>certainly once you get out of the manufacturing industry, you

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 5>are going into the standard East Asian development model, where

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 5>the service industries productivity is absolutely awful, right, really really

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 5>poor service productivity. So yeah, I think it's a the

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 5>two things are true at once. Right. It's large and

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 5>it contains multitudes, but it's not most of the story

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 5>to me.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you see any signs that Chinese people are starting to,

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess move into other assets like equities, probably not bonds,

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 2>But we know that government has been trying to stimulate

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the entire economy, and I think they've been pretty clear

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>they've been trying to lift various asset prices, not house. Well,

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 2>now they're doing housing as well. Actually, but do you

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>see any signs that people are starting to change their

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>minds on something like Chinese equities.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 5>I think to make the Chinese equity market really work,

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 5>you would have to make a series of deep political

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 5>decisions about the way China's run that I think they

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 5>probably won't make, which is basically things like Jack mal

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 5>when he got really slapped down right. Basically, you need

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 5>to allow that sort of behavior, right, You need to

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 5>allow the innovation. You need to allow the entrepreneurs to

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 5>sort of go nuts. You can't have all of these

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 5>restrictions around. We don't want the young people playing video games,

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 5>and we want it to be driven into this kind

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 5>of robotics and not that kind, and all of those

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 5>sort of limitations are going to I would say, prevent

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 5>that from happening. There's too much political activity that a

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 5>Chinese company has to do.

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 4>What about just like the hyper competitiveness. I mean, people say, well,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 4>there's hundreds of ev companies in China, most of them

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 4>are going to fail, and yet you read about launches.

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, like this is one of those stories

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 4>that I really like because it feeds all my biases,

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So therefore.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm sort of very skeptical of it.

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 4>But I've probably repeated it's like, oh, like China's stock

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 4>market hasn't done well because they're too good at capitalism,

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 4>because it's too competitive, because they really get it, they're

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 4>really competing has driven all this abundance and so forth, Like,

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 4>is there something to that that, Like, the reason Chinese

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 4>equities haven't done well is because with such intense competition,

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 4>with the provinces all having their normal champions, that none

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 4>can really sort of capture something that might reflect sort

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 4>of monopoly rents.

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 5>I think there's definitely something to that in a way.

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:38.959
<v Speaker 5>When I think about that, I would say, it's true

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 5>when you're subsidizing the competition, it's not true competition in general. Right,

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 5>It seems crazy to me to say, like, not bad

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 5>if everyone's getting like cheap inputs. There's lots of competition.

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 4>But the provinces still do have a role in subsidizing,

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 4>either implicitly or directly in subsidizing their national champions. And

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 4>when she says, yeah that we want to make spark

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 4>plugs big priority for the next five years they all

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 4>go They still do that, right, They scramble to find

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 4>their local spark plus.

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 5>And I think there's lots of like American examples and

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 5>examples elsewhere. And sector is where people said, oh, it's

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 5>too competitive, no one will ever achieve it. Uber is

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 5>a good example. People said this would never work. It

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 5>does work, right, So there is a scale that you

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 5>can build where I think you develop a value even

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 5>in a market with it's really competitive and really sort

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 5>of low entry costs. But you won't do that if

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 5>every other imagine a world with Uber but where every

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 5>other rideshare company was aggressively subsidized every time above a

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 5>certain market cap, then yeah, you wouldn't have Uber at

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 5>a certain market cap.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm really curious because again, the book goes through it's

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 2>not just China. It goes through all sorts of land models.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 2>But what was the most interesting one that you looked at.

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Not only does it go across different ways that different

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 2>countries treat land across the world, it also goes across time,

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.439
<v Speaker 2>like three thousand years worth of human history.

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I should emphasize to anyone listening. I was really

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 5>interest and the China stuff, but it's not a not

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 5>a child. The two most interesting to me, one of

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 5>which because I live there and I think it's the

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 5>most unusual and fascinating real estate system in the world

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 5>is Singapore, which has defied in many ways a lot

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 5>of the limitations that other countries have seen. And one

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 5>of the first parts of the book, which is like

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 5>Colonial America, where there were all of these efforts to

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 5>turn land into money. Right, these colonists get to a

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 5>place where they have essentially to them, infinity land. It

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 5>just keeps going on and on. They don't know where

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 5>it stops. It seems to be relatively fertile and good

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 5>and more people turn up, but have shortages and cash

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 5>and labor and everything else. And there's all of these

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 5>efforts to turn land into money with public and private

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 5>land banking projects. I found all of that like absolutely fascinating.

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not actually something I knew very well before starting

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 5>to research the book. Yeah, so Singapore and Colonial America.

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 4>What is it about Singapore that makes it? I actually

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why. I sort of assumed they did

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 4>the same ninety nine year they leason that this is

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 4>the most interesting thing. They start off with all the

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 4>inherited things that Hong Kong starts off with. Up until

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 4>the middle of the twentieth century, the cities have run

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 4>on very very similar lines. Hong Kong goes off in

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 4>one direction and Singapore goes off in another. And the

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Singaporean direction is basically, how do you maximize home ownership permanently?

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 4>How do you have a sustainable model for making sure

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 4>people can still afford to come in. So what they

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 4>have is this bizarre public private system. I say bizarre,

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's very impressive where the government owns most

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 4>of the city's land, not all of it like in

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong, but most of it, and they have the

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 4>Housing and Development Board that builds housing estates. They then

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 4>sell the units in the housing estates to Singaporean citizens.

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 4>You can only own one, you can't own multiple and

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 4>rent them out. There are restrictions on how long you

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 4>can hold them before but there's an internal market, but

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 4>you can only sell them to Singaporean systems and permanent residents.

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 4>The amount of building is done to make sure that

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 4>everyone can afford it. They've really divorced usage from speculations totally.

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 5>They divorce users from speculation and a place that I

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 5>think most people think of as very capitalistic, free market,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 5>low tax has basically decided this asset class land and

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 5>real estate, this is something different and we're doing Yeah,

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 5>we're doing a different thing with this. Were you know,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 5>the normal forces simple. There's so much international money center

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 5>of like capital and trade flows is.

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Rich commercial reachs though in Singapore they do. You remember

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 4>this because when I was in Singapore, I saw the

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 4>ticker symbol on this out of a few buildings. It's

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 4>like you could invest in this but anyway, Yeah.

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 5>But commercial state a little bit different. But the residential

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 5>and real estate and they've done this in again, they

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 5>decided land was different. They have a thing called the

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Land Acquisition Act, which really allowed them to strip a

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 5>lot of people of their land extraordinarily low prices through

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 5>the sort of sixties, seventies, eighties, and it's allowed them

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 5>to do something very very different. I don't know whether

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 5>most countries can sustain the idea that capitalism works for

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 5>everything but not land, and which is just going to

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 5>be One Singaporean senior politician described it to me as piracy.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 5>They did in the seventies and eighties. Pennies on the

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 5>dollar basically demanding people handover this land so it could

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:08.479
<v Speaker 5>be housing for Singaporeans. But it has worked very well.

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so China probably cannot pursue the Singaporean model at

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>this point, right, But why can't they institute like a

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 2>stronger social safety net so that the burden of saving

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 2>for retirement, for health emergencies, things like that doesn't always

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 2>necessarily fall on the citizens and therefore they have to

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 2>invest in highly speculative assets.

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they should, is the answer. There seems to be

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 5>huge political opposition to doing this at the top of

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese Communist Party, and it's bizarre again because you

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 5>talk to someone like Richard Ku and it'll give you,

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 5>it'll explain why if you don't do this, this is

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 5>the consequence, right Japan is the consequence long term stagnation.

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be really difficult. They should do all that,

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 5>and maybe they will be sort of drummed into it eventually,

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 5>because I think the alternative is both stagnation and lots

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 5>and lots of trade friction with the people you're exporting to,

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 5>as we've already seen.

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, because it's not just the US, is it.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's sort of no one there got to be a

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of countries that are not thrilled.

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 5>No one's totally happy with it. It's a weird mix

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 5>because for some countries it's like, if you're not going

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 5>to make some of these items, right, If you're a

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 5>country that's simply not gonna make evs, then why should

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 5>you care about getting the really cheap evs. But everyone's

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 5>got something to be upset about. In Southeast Asia, it

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 5>was always steel when I was there. Everyone wants to

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 5>have their own local steel sector, and they don't like

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese dumping of steel in Indonesia. They don't want

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 5>like cheap Chinese direct to consumer merchandise coming in because

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 5>it messes with their small and medium sized businesses. I

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 5>guess for most of these countries, the difficulty is do

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 5>you want to pick a fight with the Chinese government.

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 5>It's not an obvious question like it is in the US.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 4>I guess I just have one last question. And you know,

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 4>the sort of Singapore example is what reminded me like

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 4>land is weird, Like the idea that you could have

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 4>a capitalist system except for residential land.

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people actually kind of think that.

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 4>You hear, what is the Georgists right? And they think

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 4>like no land is special and we need to have

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 4>these like special taxes on ownership.

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, we love free markets.

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 4>But again, maybe because there's always so much land, they're

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.399
<v Speaker 4>not making much more of it, et cetera. Maybe there

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 4>really is something to do. It's sort of unfair, Like

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 4>I get born in the year nineteen eighty and I

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 4>already a bunch of people already own the land around me,

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 4>which doesn't really seem fair. It's like I was just born,

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 4>where's my chance? Like we're never going to go to

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 4>the pure Singapore model, But are there things that we

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 4>could do with the tax system that would like sort

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 4>of further hammer home the idea that residential land is

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 4>for living.

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think there's dozens of different things you could do.

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 5>But I mean one of the big things is that

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 5>the legacy of Henry George and the politicians in municipal

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 5>America that really loved Henry George is that America has

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 5>relatively high property taxes. Anyway, you can do all sorts

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 5>of things with property taxes to lean more of the

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 5>value on the land rather than the structures. Right, Yeah,

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 5>lots of states, lots of cities have done this. I

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 5>think it's going to be increasingly important in the future

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 5>because what you're going to get is increasingly people inheriting

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 5>homes from their parents when you can't afford them. And

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 5>then that main store of wealth is about whether your

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 5>parents decided to buy in the right place at the

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 5>right time. I talked to a lot of seventy year

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 5>olds will be like, wow, I picked my two bedroom

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 5>flat in nineteen seventy three, and yes I bought it

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 5>for three and a half dollars, but it's mine. That's

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 5>going to be a lot less tenable I think when

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 5>it's handed down wealth. So yeah, there's loads and loads

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 5>of things. And Henry George is in the book. The

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:42.439
<v Speaker 5>political consequences have George's and fell apart in there too.

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mike Bird, thank you so much for coming

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:46.439
<v Speaker 2>on our thoughts and grabs on the book.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much for events Joe.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That was really great and genuinely the book is great.

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I love talking to Mike once again. I'm just like,

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 4>hasn't he been like on the internet as much as

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 4>we have?

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 3>How do you? How did you write a book of

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:11.479
<v Speaker 3>this time?

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 4>I have no idea, don't understand how anyone writes a book,

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:18.280
<v Speaker 4>especially a very serious book on a very big, meaty topic.

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 2>But I just want tweeting constantly.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Well tweeting. He tweets a lot. Speaking of propect, It's

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 3>like it would be one thing if you were never online.

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 3>He's online as much as I am.

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you know you asked that question about whether or

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 2>not Chinese cities are actually futuristic. Yeah, I have an

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 2>anecdote on this point. I think I might have said

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 2>it before, but China is the place where I went

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to both the most impressive bathroom ever in like a

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 2>highly futuristic luxury shopping mall in Beijing, and also the

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 2>worst one ever in my entire life, which was a

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 2>rural It was basically a hole in the ground.

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yeah, terrible.

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 3>China. It's a land of contradiction. Thank you.

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for highlighting the cliche.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 4>No, I thought like it. It always did seem very interesting.

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 4>It still does that. Like there's so much speculation that

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 4>happens in China, and I always found.

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.760
<v Speaker 3>That to be a little weird. I also just find.

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 4>The idea of like buying a property, but it's actually

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 4>really you're not buying it early. Buying the property for

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 4>like seventy five years to be a little weird.

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, that kind of exists in

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 2>New York.

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, and in the US, like, look, we pay

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 4>property taxes and perpetuity, which means to some extent that

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 4>when you own something, you are paying a permanent rent

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 4>to use it, and if you stop paying that rent,

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:41.959
<v Speaker 4>then you could theoretically lose it. So maybe it's less

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 4>weird than I thought it is. Actually we should do

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 4>more on Singapore specifically, like but also you know, like

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure to your point in the very beginning

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 4>whether people actually want the divorce between usage and speculation.

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.720
<v Speaker 4>I just think that for several of the last decades

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 4>didn't have to choose. You got to live in and

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 4>he made.

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 3>A lot of money.

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very hard to get off the train

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:07.760
<v Speaker 2>once it's kind of rolling, right, And that's the problem

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing in China, and now they're trying to

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 2>walk this very fine tightrope where it's like, we don't

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 2>want to make everyone incredibly poor, but we also want

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 2>to depress housing and the importance of housing in our

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 2>economy in order to boost manufacturing and productivity.

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 4>This is why, again my proposal affordable housing for one

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 4>year and then it goes back to being really expensive.

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, well you can suggest that, Joe, Yeah, we

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 2>go to Baja.

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll run on that. I'll run on that. I'll run

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 3>on that platform.

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 5>All right. Shall we leave it there?

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.359
<v Speaker 4>And I'm joll Wisenthal. You could have followed me at

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 4>the Stalwart.

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Follow our guest.

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 4>Mike Byrd He's at Birdie Word and check out his

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 4>book The Land Trap, A New History of the World's

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Oldest Asset class Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman,

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 4>dash El Bennett at Dashbot and kel Brooks at kel Brooks.

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 4>From our odd Lags content, go to Bloomberg dot Com

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.839
<v Speaker 4>slash odd Latch. We've the daily newsletter and you can

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:06.879
<v Speaker 4>chat about all of these topics twenty four to seven

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:10.280
<v Speaker 4>in our discord Discord dot gg slash odlines.

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Thlots, if you like it

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about the world's oldest asset, then please

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 2>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 2>And remember if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.