Speaker 1: Team Buck. Welcome to the Freedom Hunt, Monday, January tenth
Speaker 1: edition of the program. Honored to have you with me
Speaker 1: as always, and we have a stacked newsday. The CDC
Speaker 1: says that they may have overcounted hospitalizations based upon the
Speaker 1: data deep dives they still need to do. New York
Speaker 1: has broken its COVID record of ninety thousand plus cases.
Speaker 1: We've had recently over a million nationwide cases, all time record.
Speaker 1: Plus New York City non citizen residents can now vote
Speaker 1: in local elections. You got a trans swimmer versus a
Speaker 1: trans swimmer. That's particularly interesting. An AOC has COVID after
Speaker 1: her Florida trip. I was down there too, and everyone's
Speaker 1: now saying maybe it's because COVID's obsessed with her, because
Speaker 1: COVID thinks she's so beautiful or whatever. So we'll talk
Speaker 1: about all of this in just a moment. We have
Speaker 1: a stack show. But let me just put this thought
Speaker 1: out there for you. The narrative is in freefall. It
Speaker 1: is in freefall right now, and they are scrambling for
Speaker 1: a way to make this all somehow hold together, and
Speaker 1: they can't. So now it's just a question of where
Speaker 1: we go. But the opening is their friends, the opening
Speaker 1: to change. Finally, the trajectory during this pandemic away from
Speaker 1: lockdown lunacy toward freedom and sanity. There is an opening
Speaker 1: right now. Are we going to take it? But first,
Speaker 1: if you're looking for a new year's resolution that's easy
Speaker 1: to keep, I am just the one resolved to help
Speaker 1: protect your personal identity and info with LifeLock Identity theft Protection.
Speaker 1: LifeLock alerts you to potential threats to your identity. You
Speaker 1: condmit certain ID threats by just monitoring your credit. LifeLock
Speaker 1: sees more like notifying you if it finds your info
Speaker 1: for sale on the dark web. And if you become
Speaker 1: a victim of ID theft, a US based restoration specialist
Speaker 1: knows the steps to take to help resolve your case.
Speaker 1: After all, more than seventy five percent of identity theft
Speaker 1: victims who had accounts opened in their name did not
Speaker 1: find out from their bank or credit card company. No
Speaker 1: one can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions
Speaker 1: at all businesses, but LifeLock is the new year's resolution
Speaker 1: that's easy to keep. Save up the twenty five percent
Speaker 1: off your first year call one eight hundred LifeLock or
Speaker 1: go to LifeLock dot com slash buck. That's LifeLock dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck LifeLock dot com slash buck to save
Speaker 1: twenty five percent off. I have this service. It's great.
Speaker 1: I do get notifications. I am concerned about identity theft.
Speaker 1: I have had things happen to me in the past
Speaker 1: where people have tried to steal my identity, use credit
Speaker 1: cards in my name, etc. So please get yourself LifeLock
Speaker 1: with this great deal. LifeLock dot com slash buck twenty
Speaker 1: five percent off. All right, this is a fascinating time.
Speaker 1: They cannot avoid the truth anymore. On some aspects of
Speaker 1: the COVID narrative, the fauciism is collapsing all around you.
Speaker 1: First of all, doesn't let's just start with the big thoughts,
Speaker 1: the important things that we know now does not stop
Speaker 1: the spread. Now. I know you're probably thinking of these,
Speaker 1: preferring to vaccines, and I am. But none of this,
Speaker 1: none of what they've made us do, stops the spread.
Speaker 1: Not the dumb ass plexiglass dividers in restaurants, not the
Speaker 1: mask between bites on the plane, not the double mask,
Speaker 1: not the N ninety five, none of it. None of
Speaker 1: it stops the spread in a statistically significant or even
Speaker 1: provable fashion. Does it theoretically limit droplets in the air? Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: But does it actually work as a mass policy, as
Speaker 1: a mandate, No, it does not. They can't avoid this anymore.
Speaker 1: We had this whole program, they had vaccine. Man, it's
Speaker 1: the federal government is trying to force everybody. If you
Speaker 1: live in Texas, the Dakota's, Florida, Nebraska, Wyoming, any red
Speaker 1: state out there, they want to force you to get vaccinated.
Speaker 1: You gotta remember this, folks. If you think this doesn't
Speaker 1: affect you, you're not watching the news. It does. Now.
Speaker 1: I understand the Supreme Court has taken this up, but
Speaker 1: the implementation of this is supposed to happen today, I
Speaker 1: believe the beginnings of implementation for the federal vaccine mandate.
Speaker 1: So time is not on our side here, It's just not.
Speaker 1: And as you look at this circumstances, look at the situation,
Speaker 1: how many times can they be enormously wrong before we
Speaker 1: all say these people are idiots, they don't actually know
Speaker 1: what they're doing. I mean, you listened to Rachelle Wilenski.
Speaker 1: She just came out and said that over seventy five
Speaker 1: percent of COVID deaths occurred in people with at least
Speaker 1: four comorbidities. Okay, covid is lethal to the old and sick.
Speaker 1: COVID is in annoyance, like the cold of the flu,
Speaker 1: to basically everybody else. We have effectively known this from
Speaker 1: almost the beginning, I mean certainly about April or May
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. Now we're going on two years of
Speaker 1: knowing this, and yet they set the policies in a
Speaker 1: way that is just real lockdowns have never been tried.
Speaker 1: Real vaccine mandates have never been tried. They fail and
Speaker 1: fail and fail, and they want to do more of
Speaker 1: what has failed. I mean, think of the lives that
Speaker 1: could have been saved if the public health experts had
Speaker 1: made sure we got ninety nine point nine percent of
Speaker 1: those truly at risk vaccinated, instead of firing thirty year
Speaker 1: old nurses with natural immunity for refusing the vaccine and
Speaker 1: forcing the shots on five year olds. Every time they
Speaker 1: tell me, oh, the people in the hospital are unvaccinated,
Speaker 1: the people dying are on vaccine, And I say, okay,
Speaker 1: what percentage of them are over sixty five? And it's
Speaker 1: a huge supermajority of them. What percentage of them are
Speaker 1: over fifty five, almost all of them. So why didn't
Speaker 1: we make sure that those who were at risk knew
Speaker 1: get the shot? My parents shots boosted. I've told you
Speaker 1: this from the very beginning. If you're at risk, this
Speaker 1: is worth it for you. Doesn't mean you should mandate
Speaker 1: it because of the personal freedom and autonomy and government
Speaker 1: overreach concerns, but it does mean we should have this conversation.
Speaker 1: And you know, if you're seventy five and you have emphysema,
Speaker 1: you should get the shot. You know, if you're seventy five, period,
Speaker 1: you should get the shot. Should not must, should, But
Speaker 1: think about if the government messaging had just been rational,
Speaker 1: if they hadn't essentially tried to undermine and destroy the
Speaker 1: Great Barrington Declaration, which came out what eighteen months ago,
Speaker 1: which said focus protection. Focus protection was always a better,
Speaker 1: smarter play, which is why they were brilliant epidemiologists and
Speaker 1: scientists who pushed for it. But now they've scrubbed this
Speaker 1: from the internet. Basically, I mean a Great Barrington deck larration.
Speaker 1: People are like, wait, what is that. Some of us know,
Speaker 1: some of us were pushing it at the time. If
Speaker 1: this does not stop spread and it doesn't. They can say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's because of omicron, Okay, well whatever, you can't tell
Speaker 1: what the next variant's going to be, so stop pretending
Speaker 1: libs like if we just listen to you and get
Speaker 1: the shot, it all goes away. That's not true. They
Speaker 1: were wrong. It does not stop the spread. They were wrong,
Speaker 1: they lied, or they assumed. You know, what do you
Speaker 1: call when someone assumes they have knowledge that they don't.
Speaker 1: If I tell you I'm a one hundred percent sure
Speaker 1: the stock market's going to be up ten percent this quarter,
Speaker 1: I'm one hundred percent sure, and then it turns out
Speaker 1: that I'm wrong. Is that a lie? I think it is,
Speaker 1: because there's no way I could be sure. I'm pretending
Speaker 1: to have certainty that I don't. And this is what
Speaker 1: they've done all along. This is at every stage, Oh
Speaker 1: we have the answer, we have the answer. Well they
Speaker 1: clearly didn't, and now they're in free fall over this
Speaker 1: and they're trying some of the same things. I mean,
Speaker 1: here's this guy's one of these blue check docs. You
Speaker 1: see a lot, Doctor ashish Jah saying that the hospitals
Speaker 1: are at the brink now because of the unvaccinated. We
Speaker 1: have two things happening at once. I mean, we have
Speaker 1: cases among vaccinated people that are not leading to serious illness,
Speaker 1: that are not leading to hospitalizations and deaths, thank goodness,
Speaker 1: particularly among those word boosted. And so we see this
Speaker 1: massive surge of infections among the vaccinated, it's not causing
Speaker 1: strengths on our healthcare system. Among unvaccinated people, and among
Speaker 1: unboosted high risk people, it is putting a big strain.
Speaker 1: And given how much infection there is, our hospitals really
Speaker 1: are at the brink right now. So cases still matter,
Speaker 1: but particularly because we have so many vulnerable Americans who
Speaker 1: have not gotten vaccinated and boosted. Okay, I'm calling bullcrap
Speaker 1: here on multiple levels. First of all, think of what
Speaker 1: the thing. You don't have to be a doctor. You
Speaker 1: just think this through, right, don't do but appidibiologist. Oh no,
Speaker 1: just think this through. He is trying to tell you
Speaker 1: that omicron, which I've seen now, is ten to one
Speaker 1: hundred times less lethal than previous versions of COVID, that
Speaker 1: omicron is going to overwhelm and that also directly hospitalization
Speaker 1: and mortality are obviously very closely correlated, that it's going
Speaker 1: to overwhelm the hospitals. Hospitals have never been overwhelmed during
Speaker 1: the entire pandemic in this country. They keep warning about
Speaker 1: it. It It has never happened. Okay, So what they're telling
Speaker 1: you is that a less lethal version of COVID, while
Speaker 1: you have all this mass vaccination, a natural immunity building
Speaker 1: up out there too, which they always ignore, that less
Speaker 1: lethal version of COVID is going to overwhelm hospitals when
Speaker 1: in January of twenty twenty, we had basically no vaccination
Speaker 1: in this country. I mean, I forget exactly when they
Speaker 1: rolled that out. It was right around now for some people,
Speaker 1: but yet very very low level, effectively zero vaccination. The
Speaker 1: general community and the hospital is warner overwhelmed then with
Speaker 1: a much more dangerous virus. This is just trying to
Speaker 1: twist the arms at this late stage of the unvaccinated
Speaker 1: based upon bull. It's just saying bullcrap here, right. It
Speaker 1: is dangerous to you if you are at risk to
Speaker 1: get COVID if you were unvaccinated and don't have natural immunity.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's a really important point here too.
Speaker 1: When we're saying the unvaccinated, we should really say the
Speaker 1: not immune. The not immune. This is essential. Do you
Speaker 1: have immunity if you are seventy and already had COVID,
Speaker 1: Do I think you should get the shot? I probably would,
Speaker 1: But I don't think you're being reckless or being foolish
Speaker 1: or anything like that if you If you don't get it,
Speaker 1: natural immunity has proven to be more durable. At every
Speaker 1: study they say, oh, you can't say that you don't know.
Speaker 1: Notice they get to claim certainty. We don't even get
Speaker 1: to claim when the data is on our side temporarily right,
Speaker 1: they can say, oh, we get a win locked in,
Speaker 1: this is the consensus. We don't get to say. Hold
Speaker 1: on a second, the most recent information supports the following conclusion.
Speaker 1: They say, oh, you can't know that forever. These are
Speaker 1: the games they play these people. Look, the left is
Speaker 1: not interested in an intellectual consistency or decency or even accuracy.
Speaker 1: They just want power. So this is what we're going
Speaker 1: through right now. And there are all these people who
Speaker 1: thought they were so smart. We were watching the collapse
Speaker 1: of this whole thing. Oh, on the hospitalization point, I
Speaker 1: wanted to make this. I wanted to make this a
Speaker 1: part of the discussion as well. The CDC has to
Speaker 1: essentially admit they're going to look into hospitalize with or
Speaker 1: from COVID. Lensky said that recently with or from COVID,
Speaker 1: what's the difference dead with or from COVID? Eight hundred
Speaker 1: thousand plus deaths. Lenski's asked about this, Okay, Well, how
Speaker 1: many of them died from COVID versus with COVID. It's
Speaker 1: a huge distinction, right, If someone's in the hospital for
Speaker 1: a heart attack and they have asymptomatic COVID, that's not
Speaker 1: a COVID death, right is it counted as one. Looking
Speaker 1: to that hospital data, you'll see some interesting stuff. We
Speaker 1: know because Fauci came out and said it that there
Speaker 1: is an excess of children supposedly in the hospital for
Speaker 1: the virus based on the data that actually our kids
Speaker 1: who are there have nothing to do with COVID. You're
Speaker 1: in for a broken arm, they test you for COVID,
Speaker 1: you're a COVID case for children. Foucci's already said that
Speaker 1: a big percentage, more than half, I believe was the
Speaker 1: most recent data. That is very meaningful. So the CDC
Speaker 1: is wrong on vaccine stopping the spread, too cowardly to
Speaker 1: speak the truth on masks too. Cowardly to admit that
Speaker 1: six feet and plexiglass dividers and sanitizing your hands are
Speaker 1: an abject waste of time. And they can't even count properly.
Speaker 1: What the heck does the CDC do. I wrote about
Speaker 1: this at Bucksex and dot com Beta. It's an abomination.
Speaker 1: CDC has been the biggest failure as a three letter
Speaker 1: agency of the government, or any agency of the government
Speaker 1: in recent memory, maybe in all memory. What a preposterous
Speaker 1: failure this thing is, and just full of coward so
Speaker 1: much cowardice. Oh, they've done such a good job in
Speaker 1: the fight against covidy. Have did a horrible job shutting
Speaker 1: down schools. Oh, by the way, Chicago is in it's
Speaker 1: what fourth day now of school shutdown? Oh, because the
Speaker 1: teachers are all so scared, the vaccinated teachers are so
Speaker 1: scared of COVID. They say, oh, but we can still
Speaker 1: get it. Notice they'll admit that they can still get
Speaker 1: it when it serves their purpose. And then when you say, well,
Speaker 1: hold on, but you tell us that it's not that
Speaker 1: lethal and with the vaccine, you're basically fine, right with
Speaker 1: the vaccine, will Enski of the CDC says, you know,
Speaker 1: we're talking about hundreds of people dying who are vaccinated,
Speaker 1: which I honestly find that hard to believe based on
Speaker 1: the UK data. But anyway, if you're vaccinated, the chance
Speaker 1: if you're dying from COVID in this country, according to
Speaker 1: the CDC, is tiny, not a concern, No more a
Speaker 1: concern than you dying in a car accident tomorrow on
Speaker 1: your way to get some coffee. Okay, not something that
Speaker 1: should affect your life at all. So assuming that's true,
Speaker 1: and there's an assumption there that I'm not entirely willing
Speaker 1: to make, but that is what they tell us, that
Speaker 1: is the data. Assuming that that is true, why are
Speaker 1: the teachers so scared? What do they have to be
Speaker 1: so afraid of? Huh, they aren't scared. They just want
Speaker 1: to have a taxpayer funded vacation, and they want to
Speaker 1: act like they're virtuous when they're being lazy and really
Speaker 1: being horrible because children are suffering from this. Families with kids,
Speaker 1: particularly families that need the school to provide not just
Speaker 1: structure and effectively a form of daycare, but also nutrition,
Speaker 1: to provide food, to provide you know, intellectual stimulation, to
Speaker 1: provide community and comfort to these children. Yeah, keep them
Speaker 1: at home for days and days on end. You know,
Speaker 1: this is it's awful. It's awful. Whether they're doing I know,
Speaker 1: the teachings is, oh, well what about Christmas break? We're
Speaker 1: just extending. I know, how they try to justify this stuff. Oh.
Speaker 1: You know what's been amazing too is to see how
Speaker 1: they try to shift the narrative now to oh, it's
Speaker 1: all about not Oh, the mandates are about making people protected.
Speaker 1: That's not how they sold the mandates. Not letting them
Speaker 1: get away with this. The mandates were about protecting the
Speaker 1: community from you? Was it about protecting you? We have
Speaker 1: to force that shot into your arm because otherwise you're
Speaker 1: a reckless risk to other people, which I reject the
Speaker 1: whole framework here, but that was their argument. Now that
Speaker 1: that's obviously bull crap. You know they they turn around
Speaker 1: and say, oh, no, we just want to protect you.
Speaker 1: Notice they're just such slimy, onlyaginous liars. It's just it
Speaker 1: just it just keeps moving, or the argument just keeps
Speaker 1: moving and shifting and you can never pin them down. Well,
Speaker 1: what is it then? Is it what you're saying today
Speaker 1: is what you're saying last month? The science has changed?
Speaker 1: Oh so the science is settled with until it changes
Speaker 1: to suit their political purposes, like oh, I don't know
Speaker 1: the CDC saying a five day quarantine's enough. It was
Speaker 1: ten days, why don't become five days. We don't want
Speaker 1: too many people out too long from work because that'll
Speaker 1: look bad for Biden's economy. That's the real answer, that's
Speaker 1: the reality. And this is why everyone needs to understand
Speaker 1: exactly what we are seeing right now and understand that
Speaker 1: this is this is awful. We need to understand what
Speaker 1: the real risks are out there. Here's a doctor who's
Speaker 1: talking about this issue and the management of anxiety. At
Speaker 1: this point, everyone on the libs need to calm down,
Speaker 1: stop being crazy, stop double masking and being so worried
Speaker 1: about going in public and I can't go to mind
Speaker 1: your job. Oh my gosh, calm down, Libs. If you're
Speaker 1: at risk, get the shot. If you're not, live your life.
Speaker 1: If you get the shot, live your life. That's it.
Speaker 1: End of speech, my friends, right, end of story. Here's
Speaker 1: just doctor Lucy McBride. Those of us in the medical profession,
Speaker 1: particularly those of us who are patient facing, who help
Speaker 1: people every day, understand their unique vulnerabilities for disease, whether
Speaker 1: it's from COVID or cancer. We have an obligation to
Speaker 1: help people frame risk, to deliver fact based, nuanced information.
Speaker 1: Fear does harm. It only makes people afraid. It doesn't
Speaker 1: affect people's decisions. So when I'm on Twitter or right
Speaker 1: now with you, I'm trying to help people understand that. Look,
Speaker 1: your risk for COVID is as different as someone else's,
Speaker 1: and revving the emotional engines of people's anxiety only does
Speaker 1: harm exactly. But you know what, the people that have
Speaker 1: been making all these decisions, the apparatus has been leveraging
Speaker 1: that has made people as fearful as possible. They made
Speaker 1: people as fearful as possible and blamed Trump and used
Speaker 1: that fear, weaponized it against a president who hadn't you
Speaker 1: know what, what was he going to do? The virus
Speaker 1: came in here, He listened to the so called experts.
Speaker 1: He didn't know. Now you should know these experts are
Speaker 1: morons and their political hacks. But in April twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: in March or twenty twenty, I mean, it was the
Speaker 1: best we had. Right you go to war with the army.
Speaker 1: You had to quote Rumsfeld, although he actually said much
Speaker 1: more than that, and they took that quote out of context.
Speaker 1: He said, we're doing this and that, and we're trying
Speaker 1: to upgrade, and we're working on this, and then he said,
Speaker 1: and you know, you go to war with the army
Speaker 1: you have. They used that as a smear against him,
Speaker 1: but anyway, it is true. It's a truism. You go
Speaker 1: to war with the army you have. You know, you
Speaker 1: fight the virus with the health apparatus that you have
Speaker 1: in place. And what we've seen is just complete and
Speaker 1: utter failure. I mean, we've seen just atrocious response from them.
Speaker 1: I don't have the time today to go into as
Speaker 1: much as I wanted to because I got so fired
Speaker 1: up about COVID. So I'll tell you this tomorrow. We'll
Speaker 1: speak more about a couple of things that I mentioned
Speaker 1: at the top of the show. Let me let me
Speaker 1: give you a little teaser, if you will. For one thing,
Speaker 1: letting illegals vote in New York City. It's just a
Speaker 1: harbin drove things to come. They want mass legalization and
Speaker 1: they want they want voting rights one hundred percent. They're
Speaker 1: gonna want voting rights for every illegal in the country.
Speaker 1: All they say, they say, twelve million try twenty, maybe
Speaker 1: twenty five. Some you're gonna yell at me and say
Speaker 1: it's forty. That may be a little high, but it's
Speaker 1: at least twenty. The numbers are off. And that's not
Speaker 1: just my theory. Every boarder patrol member, career boarder patrol
Speaker 1: agent I've ever spoken to is like, there is no way, buck,
Speaker 1: that we have had this outflow they talk about and
Speaker 1: that net migration was zero for all these years. Bullcrap.
Speaker 1: He's like, the numbers are at least fifteen to twenty million,
Speaker 1: and they say it's twelve. But they want voting rights
Speaker 1: for them, and it just undermines our whole system. Why
Speaker 1: not thirty days was the initial push in New York.
Speaker 1: You've been in New York City for thirty days, you
Speaker 1: get to vote for the mayor. You're not even allowed
Speaker 1: to be in the country. Yeah, that's what they want.
Speaker 1: This is how much they respect our institutions and a
Speaker 1: rule of law. I'm all, it's gonna tell you, Eric,
Speaker 1: in New York City, we're screwed, folks. Eric Adams, he's
Speaker 1: not going to get it done. He's talking about the
Speaker 1: threat of white supremacy against his person. So he needs
Speaker 1: to hire his not particularly qualified brother to run his
Speaker 1: security as a deputy commissioner for the NYPD. Give me
Speaker 1: a break. This guy's bad news. He's also keeping the
Speaker 1: vaccine mandates, wants a vaccine mandates for kids. Bad news.
Speaker 1: New York's in for a rough ride. Friends, It's gonna
Speaker 1: be bad. And on the transgender swimmer thing, I'll just
Speaker 1: say this. Ask every lib you know what they think
Speaker 1: about this, because I've found that this is finally, this
Speaker 1: is finally the attic. This is finally an issue where
Speaker 1: you go really when you asked him about it? When
Speaker 1: you say so, you think that this guy, because I
Speaker 1: knew you, get banned for this on Twitter. He's a man, Okay,
Speaker 1: he has male genitalia, he has X Y chromosomes. You
Speaker 1: think that a man? Change your name? Fine, Leah Thomas,
Speaker 1: name is Leah Thomas. My name is technically James, right,
Speaker 1: but everyone calls me box middle name. You change your name.
Speaker 1: I get it. If you want to tell me that
Speaker 1: biology doesn't matter here, you're lying and you all know it.
Speaker 1: Ask your lib friend, do you think this it's by me?
Speaker 1: The news is all we're all calling this person she.
Speaker 1: It's not a she. I don't know why we decided
Speaker 1: that this was just going to be conceited. It's a he,
Speaker 1: it's not a she. And I don't say this to
Speaker 1: be mean. I say this because it's a reflection of reality.
Speaker 1: Should you be kind and treat this person well, whether
Speaker 1: it's a he or a she? Of course? Should you
Speaker 1: mock or undermine this person? You know, if you ever
Speaker 1: were to meet this this individual, No, of course not.
Speaker 1: But is it a she? No, it's a he. Am
Speaker 1: I forty or am I twenty? I'm forty? If I
Speaker 1: tell you to say that I'm twenty, that's weird. It's
Speaker 1: not true, right, doesn't mean you can come up to
Speaker 1: me and say, wow, buck, you look old. You need
Speaker 1: to spend more time in the gym. That would be mean,
Speaker 1: although it would be true. So ask your lib friend,
Speaker 1: what do you think about the transgender swimmer. It's fascinating
Speaker 1: because they go they will just change the subject as
Speaker 1: fast as possible. And if they try to do the
Speaker 1: oh it's a woman thing, just look at them say really,
Speaker 1: just keep pushing go really huh, it's a woman. That's
Speaker 1: a woman. It's a woman, you know, beating all these
Speaker 1: other women and they're in their races. It's a woman,
Speaker 1: and now there's another transgender individual scrimming. I can't even
Speaker 1: keep up with this, but they're destroying women's sports. That's
Speaker 1: what's actually going on. Covered a lot today, We'll have
Speaker 1: a lot to cover tomorrow. Make sure you got a
Speaker 1: buckex and dot com. Check out the editorial there on
Speaker 1: how the CDC's an abomination that can't even count just facts.
Speaker 1: Your folks. Talk to you tomorrow. Shields Hie