WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2023 Week 13 NFL MegaPod Betting Preview

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Thursday morning, November thirtieth, twenty twenty three. It is the

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book Podcast megapod for week number thirteen in

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League. It's Gil Alexander live from Bark,

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Canada at the D.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Where we've been recording all of our shows this year.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Can't wait to introduce our guest this week, an annual

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>guest these days upon whose shoulders? This podcast, in part

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>was built first Welcome to our pillars though from.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>His mom's cork attic in Pittsburgh, PA. Todd wish nev.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>What's hattening?

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 3>DoD Oh, I'm in a great mood.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Vanderbilt plus sixteen and the guy files with three seconds left,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 4>down sixteen.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to get that out of your system first?

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So describe it to everybody?

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 2>What happened? You had? Go ahead?

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 4>I have Vanderbilt plus sixteen and a half. They're down

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 4>eleven with one forty to go. They're down sixteen with

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven seconds left. The other team, but Boston College

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 4>is doing the dribble out. We've all seen the dribble out, right.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I know what you're supposed to do. You're supposed to

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 4>just dribble it out. Dribble it out, and then they

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 4>throw to a guy with nine seconds left. There's two

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 4>guys standing next to him, and then all of a

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 4>sudden they start slapping at the ball for no reason whatsoever,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 4>and the ref calls a foul with three seconds up.

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Then I lose.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.279
<v Speaker 4>Now give me a break. That's not supposed to happen,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.639
<v Speaker 4>have you? I mean, these kids went to eight hundred

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 4>AAU games. They don't know what a dribble out is.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Come on, never, I've never heard you angry about any bet,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>angrier about any bet that you've ever made.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>It'sfuriating.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, he's a guy out of your system. They're good.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>We're good.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Now we can move on and from his lair where

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he does the Bare Bets pod with Chris Phalika, both

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>college and pro versions and this megapod. You can follow

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>him on Twitter at not v will hill By the way,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you can follow Todd at t wishnev.

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 2>It's Wilson Hillson. How you doing, Will?

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 5>Boys? What's going on? I'm good?

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 6>I feel like we say it every other couple of weeks,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 6>But man, we get to flip the calendar to December. Here,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 6>in my goodness, where does the time go. It feels

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 6>like we're just sitting here end of August, Aly September eyed,

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 6>bushy tailed, and now the season is just you know,

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 6>a few weeks left, so man, it goes quickly.

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Two thirds of the NFL regular season behind us. It's incredible.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, I mentioned at the beginning this podcast was

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>built in part upon this man's shoulders.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:16.679
<v Speaker 2>We are.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We're happy to have him on once a year here

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on the show for an annual appearance. Love having him

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>still in the uh in the rotation. Ladies and gentlemen.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You know him by many names, Johnny, the Greek Vegas runner, Ace,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>how you doing, what's happening?

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 8>Please stop dead naming me and being violent towards me.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 8>Just you gotta remember it gets twenty twenty three. You

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 8>gotta be politically correct.

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 7>I'm just kidding. But with that added the way, I'm glad.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 8>To be on and your timing could not be any better, honestly, Gil,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 8>because I'm red hot right now.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 7>Like you know how during the year, sometimes you're hot,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 7>sometimes you're cold. It just happens. Where right now, anything

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm touching is going good.

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 8>Like actually got into stock two nights ago and I

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 8>woke up today and he gapped.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 7>Up over fifty percent overnight.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 8>Like things are just happening where I'm like, I need

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 8>to go downstairs and play Megabucks sometime today because I

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 8>just can't do no wrong.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 7>So I think the timing is good coming on.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>What stock was it?

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 8>If I might ask VFS, then Fast Motors, it's the

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 8>Vietnammese EV Company, okay, which is he's like the richest

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 8>guy in Vietnam and he created his own EV company.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 7>And yeah, I got into like five dollars in this morning.

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 8>I five eighty and I looked up this morning it

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 8>was gapped up to like eleven dollars.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Man sins, we're talking about that.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me just have a CNBC moment before I move

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on to football, which is I was saying this on

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game this morning, and Todd has a background

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in this industry. And I'm curious because Mark Cuban just

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sold fifty seven percent of the Mavericks for two billion

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars at a valuation of three point five billion, And

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>my first reaction was, Wow, Skins got sold for six

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>point oh five. They're one of the most valuable franchise

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in sports. Three point five million a billion pardon before

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball team. That's pretty incredible. But Joe Peta, who has

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>spent a lifetime in finance on a Wall Street, he

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, actually, the way to look at it is,

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, money that he pulled out aside. He's like,

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the S and P five hundred,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the appreciation of the Mavericks over the twenty three years

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that Cuban has held them is actually one hundred and

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourth out of the five hundred stocks in the

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred. If you had invested in

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Nike or even less sexy John Deere over that time period,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you would have actually, it actually compounded more for you.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So isn't the real lesson of the Mark Cuban thing,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd beyond the ego of owning a professional sports franchise

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and still being able to feed your ego and have

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>fun owning a sports franchise, But just from a seer

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>monetary standpoint, isn't one of the lessons of this sale? Hey,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>kids in your twenties and your thirties, max out your

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>furrow one k. Just let that shit compound over time.

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with that assessment from Joe?

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, of course, I mean, everyone knows that the

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 4>market historically is going to go up about ten percent

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 4>a year over the last you know, ninety years or so,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 4>and and the you know, in the world of compounding obviously,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, works for you when you when you're dealing

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 4>with that. The the the thing though, that I would

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 4>say is I think these sports franchises are on the

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 4>high side of their up trend because I remember, only

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>a couple of years ago the Bucks were sold for

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 4>like two hundred and sixty million.

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember exactly when that was.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 4>But there's going to be a point where they've pushed

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 4>it too far with the sports stuff, and it's going

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 4>to be and then you'll you'll you'll see, you know,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 4>it like any other thing, even even charts that trending up,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 4>they have downswings too, you know, And I feel like

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 4>we're just at we're closer to a top than a

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 4>bottom on you know, I mean, the Mavericks selling for

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, evaluation three point five bill. I mean, that's

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 4>just that sounds a little crazy.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>A little lot of me too, for sure, Okay, disagreeate,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you disagree.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 9>So fun It's all these valuations are based over the

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 9>last decade of free money. We had a zero interest

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 9>rate for the last decade, and all they did is

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 9>print money. All these valuations are just the reflection of

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 9>that printed money.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 7>It's not reflection of the value of the company.

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 3>As soon as.

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 8>We run into where we could no longer pay our debt,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 8>that we're going to find out what these companies are

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 8>truly worth.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 7>You agree, but surely.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 4>So you're saying you agree with me that the three

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 4>point five billion for the Mavericks is a little crazy.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 7>One percent.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 8>It's it's warranted in today's world, But I think we're

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 8>a few years away from realizing just how fake of

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 8>a sale that was.

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 7>It's all these valuations are ridiculous.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 8>It's also Nvidia Tesla, It's just ridiculous.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Peter actually said what you said too, which is

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it is backloaded, like he thinks.

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 2>That the spirt, that the the uh.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The jump in the valuation is probably backloaded to the

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>last ten years. He did say that as well. Okay,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Tom Todd Court stenographer, Please, I had my second bad

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>week of the year.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear it. What happened?

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Well, first of all, I apologize to the listeners

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 4>when I couldn't write in week eleven because I had

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 4>the injection on my elbow. I forgot to include those

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 4>records and the records and somebody pointed that out.

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 3>So I've got it all fixed up correctly now.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 4>So I appreciate whoever with that guy on Twitter who

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 4>pointed out Anyways, the point is Gilly had an two

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 4>and one, which is so ungilly, like mister eighteen in

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 4>one or whatever ridiculous run. He was on there for

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>a while, and I said it's going to come to

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 4>an end sooner or later, and it did come to

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 4>an end. He was fortunate with the Eagles minus three

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 4>to even get out.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>With a push.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 4>By the way, before I go any further, I will

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 4>say my best in game bet of my season, maybe

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 4>of my last five seasons of my life, was as

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 4>the Bills are driving down inside the twenty of the Eagles,

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 4>they're down by four, as we know they were losing

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 4>by four, and and I look at the book, it

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 4>says overtime plus nine hundred. I'm like, overtime plus nine hundred,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, what happens when they get a touchdown and

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 4>the Eagles come down and kick a field goal? That's

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 4>not a plus nine hundred, that's insanity. So I bet,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 4>like maybe like zero point two of a unit to win,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, like whatever, nine to one on that, and

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 4>of course we all saw I finally got a kicking, lucky,

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 4>kicking thing. Of course, it should have never been a

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 4>fifty nine yard or in the rain, because they were

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 4>down already at like the thirty three yard line with

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 4>plenty of time. But anyways, it went to overtime. That

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 4>might have been the best bet of my of my year. Anyways,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 4>the Eagles minus to be ended.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Up a hold on let me, I don't know if

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you explained it well, but if you missed what Todd

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>said as the Bills were coming down to take the

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>go ahead touchdown, which would have put them three up,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the Eagles would have had the chance to

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>tie it up, which is exactly what happened. It took

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a fifty nine yard or through the rain to do so.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But yes, nine to one. And what it speaks to

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for me is is you're not in Nevada and you're

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania. And I just can't emphasize enough how great

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it is to be outside of Nevada, because as I

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like to, as Will will and I have joked before, boy,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>when we get legalized sports betting in this town, in

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this in this state, it's gonna be something. We had

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a bets giving contest the seven seven Days at Viisen,

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so we were given access to Draft Kings app for

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>seven days where we normally wouldn't be for this contest.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the standings were all for Cocta

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up going. I ended up like making

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>over seventy bets. I was like thirty nine and thirty

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>five or whatever. But some of the best bets I

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>made yours is the best of them all. That nine

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to one was so sharp. We don't have that available here, right,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And you guys had access some of my bets, like

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, oh, look, Oregon is playing Oregon is playing

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>Oregon State. If Oregon State can score this game, make

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it a fourteen to seven. I'm totally betting Oregon right

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>here at minus thirteen and a half. Bang they score, right, Like,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have that readily available.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 2>In Nevada or more that we might have.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>But the third quarter bets, right, the Dolphins are getting

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the ball first against the Jets.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 2>They're minus two and a half. Thank you very much,

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 2>I'll take that like that.

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>That is, I so am envious of what you guys

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>have available to you that we don't. And so again

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just that it's our PSA for in game betting. Man,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a state that's not Nevada, so many

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that are better than any pre flop bet you

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>could ever make.

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, that's why I think we should get an RV

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 4>and we should. We should drive down to just past

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 4>the Hoover Dam. There's an exit right there that you

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 4>could sit on the side of the road, which I've

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 4>done before when I was in say two, You can

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 4>get all the.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Arizona betting things.

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 4>All we have to do is whoever whatever that county is,

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 4>are we allowed to have like a TV on the

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 4>side of the road there and have people's cars lined up.

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 3>We charge everybody like fifty bucks or something.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 4>That would be a great business, you know, for for somebody,

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 4>for those Vegas people who want to like, it's only

0:10:58.880 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 4>thirty minutes, it's.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Not that far thirty Hoover Dam.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's nothing there. The problem is there's literally nothing there. Well,

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 4>it's literally the desert.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's so funny too, because you are you are

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>driving to one of America's, if not America's finest engineering

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>feat the Hoover Dam.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>So as you drive there, like someone.

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:20.599
<v Speaker 1>That are you here for the Hoover the glory of

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the Hoover Dam, And I'm like, no, I'm just here

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>to make a bet, buddy. I'm just going to cross

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the day and just plant my car in this little

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>cove in the wall and in the mountain, and I'm

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna make a bet. We've all done it that I

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>did it for like some fan Dual World Series MVP bets,

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>not this year but last year. But the other part

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of your Nevada sensibility also is the one thing you

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>can say about Nevada is MGM and Caesars will take

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a big bet. I forgot they don't take big bets.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So you also have to factor that in. It's like,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 1>do I want to drive to Arizona to make a

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollars bet on Christian Hobvier?

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, So there's that too. Anyway, Sorry, go ahead with

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 2>the snogral.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So anyways, the records Gilly Fowls from twenty three

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 4>and ten, the twenty three, twelve and one will had

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 4>a one and two really last week, he goes to

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 4>eighteen and eighteen. Oh, by the way, both of you

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 4>are seven and five on teasers. We lost the teasers

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 4>with the Lions, so you're both seven and five on teasers.

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I go one and two.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Also, my Jags won in my Kansas City Under lost

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 4>and my Overbears loss. So I'm I am now eighteen

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 4>sixteen and two and I am leading in teasers at

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 4>eight and four, and then the guest spot. Ace is

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 4>gonna have to hold up the guest spot. It went

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 4>one and two. They're twenty fourteen and two, still very solid,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 4>and also seven and five.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 5>In the teasers.

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 3>So that's where we are going into week thirteen.

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I basically I sucked with you guys barely

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>made it a betty ground, is what happened.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 2>We had a bad week all around.

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But I will say this, though I knew and I

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>said this on last week's show, I had a bad

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling about that week. I didn't like anything that was Thanksgiving.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Was the to me, was the worst slate of games

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of a betting slate that I remember at

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 2>having all year. I feel completely different about it this week,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 2>which we'll get into here are three reasons. Zen is

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>America's number one nicotine pount.

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 8>We use food grade ingredients.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 4>We have a wide selection of varieties and they all

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 4>come in two strengths.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Find Zen at a store near you.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 5>Warning, this product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into our best bets, lasting, does anybody

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is one of your best bets? I don't

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>know anybody have a play on anything in tonight's Thursday

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>night football game where the Cowboys are nine point favorites

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Seahawks, the totals forty seven and a half.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it anybody? Is it anybody one of their three

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>best bets?

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna make it one of my bets.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Ace.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So first.

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 7>Yes, sir, I'm a on the Seattle side.

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 8>I think this is a great spot where I'm pretty

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 8>confident in it that I'm betting more points than I

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 8>should and that's the best I could ever ask for. Again,

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 8>I can't decide how it's going to come out, how

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 8>they're going to turn out the game. I mean, whether

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 8>there's calls, whether whatever happens. There's a lot of randomness

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 8>in Bob. But what I do know is that I

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 8>do believe that this line's inflated. There's a lot of

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 8>recency bias involved. We know how hot Dallas has been,

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 8>not only winning and covering, but blowing their last three

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 8>opponents out. They put forty plus points up in two

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 8>of their last three games. They've covered each of these

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 8>games by double digits. And more importantly, they got the

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 8>Philadelphia Eagles up next, which falls for a classic sandwich game,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 8>and you.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Already sold the books. Throw in the teaser protection. They

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 7>bumped that.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 8>One up immediately through that key numbers, so he can't

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 8>tease it down with that six point teaser. To me,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 8>just every signal that I look for pretty much earmph,

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 8>and now it's just we'll Seattle'll be able to keep

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 8>it close if they're able to get it done, and

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 8>I think they are. You know, they're top ten defense

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 8>when top ten offense. Excuse me, when you adjust FIRS

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 8>strength the schedule in their passing success rate, which is

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 8>enough to put.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 7>Some points up on this tough Dallas defense.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 8>I think Seattle's got a good, decent enough defense not

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 8>to allow Dallas to put up forty plus on them.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 7>I like Seattle plus the points hoping to be able

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 7>to get ten.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 8>I don't think I'll need it, but that's pretty much

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>just what I've been sitting back at to see if

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 8>I could get the ten.

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 7>All right, when I'm going to jump it nine and

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 7>a half anyway?

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Is it nine and a half now or nine? What

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 2>do we got? Nine and a half?

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Half?

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Nine and a half?

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 8>Nine and a half.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Todd, I can hear you. This is gonna be

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 2>one of your best bets to this game, Todd.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately I have two plus nine and a half.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, I would I guess that? Okay?

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 4>I look, I said last week, what is Dallas going

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 4>to just win every single game by a million points?

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what league is this?

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 4>I've never heard of a league where you can a

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 4>National Football league where you just every single week, nothing

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 4>bad happens and you just win by a million points.

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it just doesn't happen. And it was actually

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 4>on thinks it looked like it wasn't gonna happen on

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Thanksgiving when Washington was hanging there at fourteen ten and

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 4>then you know, the roof caved in on him. But

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, typically when I make these kind of pronouncements

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 4>like you can't win in the NFL by one hundred

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 4>points every single week, over and over. I'm usually one

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 4>week early as usual, and of course I was one

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 4>week early.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>In saying that.

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, but come on, you can't win every single

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 4>game in the NFL by twenty five points. It's just

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 4>not normal. And so and who are they being? Washington, Carolina,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 4>the Giants. Okay, the Rams was good. I'll give him that.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 4>But still, I've watched the National Football League long enough.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, Seattle. I don't like Seattle. I can't stand Seattle.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 4>But nine and a half points? Are you freaking kidding?

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 4>That's a lot of points in an NFL game? And

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 4>I just don't think Dallas can keep winning every single

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 4>game by a million points. So give me Seattle plus

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 4>nine and a half. I I'll grin and Barrett and

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I'll just do it.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's a good bet.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Todd, did you watch the Vanderbilt game last night?

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>But any Chane, Yeah, let me.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Tell you what happened. They were down eleven.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Will anything on this game?

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm going opo here. I will lay it with Dallas.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 6>Wow, they are custom built to just beat up on

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 6>these mediocre teams. I do think Seattle's a mediocre team.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 6>I don't like their secondary. It's sort of a young

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 6>and experienced secondary. They've been getting carved up here San Francisco.

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 6>They toyed with them last week. They could have named

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 6>their score. They really took the foot off the gas

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 6>in the second half. And Seattle is hell bent on

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 6>running the ball. Even last week when they're down two

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 6>three scores late, they're running the ball. Problem is they

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 6>can't run the ball and Walker's out sharpone's fine. But

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 6>to me, Dallas gets a big lead here. They if

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 6>my favorite my favorite player we can't use it, obviously

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 6>would be Cowboys. Team total, there's a twenty seven and

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 6>a half at DraftKings. I like the over their last

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 6>three home games forty three, forty five, forty nine. Okay,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 6>that's not sustainable. Okay, there's some recency bias, But six

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 6>straight games with thirty plus at home, I just think

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 6>they get well into the thirties here.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 5>And I just don't know it. Is Gino healthy?

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 6>Is Gino capable of fighting back here and getting the

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 6>garbage touchdown, which you always worry about laying a big number.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 6>But I'll plug my nose here. I'll lay the points

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 6>here with Dallas. I just think they're such a front runner,

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 6>is such a bully that I think they're good for

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 6>this number.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't think we've had a time this year

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>where three out of the four of us had a

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>play on the Thursday night game. And if I had

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>to guess, if you had told me that in advance

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that three of the four of us were going to

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have a play, I would have thought it one of

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>them would have been on the total primetime unders this year,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, twenty seven and excuse me, pardon me,

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine to nine seventy six percent. I don't think

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>there's anything to that other than it's just been a

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>big under environment period in the NFL.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 6>The Island games too, like the London games, all go under,

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 6>so that does encounter as a primetime game, but that's

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 6>still like a standalone game. So if you if you

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 6>factor in the standalone games, the one games even more,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 6>even tho, those.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Are unders, if I played anything here would be the

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>under on this. But I'm not touching it all right,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but those are so to me, even.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 8>Though it's that high gilt, even though the lines the

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 8>totals moving up and they threw that high of.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 7>A total with the trend being so under heavy.

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you why. I think it's it's under to me.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that the.

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Seat, like if you look at the Analys excites about

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks defense. I think they're underrated because they sucked

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>early and now they've got like Leonard Williams, and they

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>got guys back that are healthier now, obviously Jamal Adams

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>being one of them. So I think there's that, And

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Dak against the zone is not as good.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>They play a lot of zone Seattle does. They're like

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the second highest rate of zone. And then I think

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, they can't protect Gino at all.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Michael Parsons is going to just kill them

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 1>with a makeshift offensive line. They have like a rookie

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>playing on one side of the offensive line today. So

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not a best bet for me, but that would

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>be my instinct on that.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Wait.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Wait, I think I'm hearing something. Oh No, twenty eight

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 4>score twenty eight to thirteen. There's thirteen seconds left in

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 4>this ball game. Seattle at the Dallas nine yard line

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 4>and Gino out of the pocket.

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna run for it.

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 9>He done touchdown Seattle Penson's Hey, they're.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Gonna lose this ball game twenty eight nineteen, So what's

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 4>nine and a half's gonna cast?

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 2>I love when he loses his breadth of the end.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 2>This is phenomenal, all right?

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean I get to start best bets

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>since since you guys had one already. Yeah, so I snake,

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I get two right here?

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 2>All right? Pick numero Uno.

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Full disclosure, I have this in my betting account at

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>two and a half, but I got the Niners minus

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>three is my number one here. I got the Niners

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>minus three, And I know Will you said this yesterday

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game. Does it concern me that everybody

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>appears to be on the Niners? Yeah, a little bit,

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But I do think this is a spot the Eagles

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>can't As much as Todd is saying, the Cowboys can't

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>crush everybody by a million every week, the Eagles can't

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>win every damn game like this just can't happen over

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and over where. They have no business winning games, and

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they find a way to do so. Should have lost

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to Dallas, should have lost to the Bills, for sure.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>They should have lost the Bills. Maybe even should have

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lost the Commanders before that the Commodores. I think this

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is where they lose. The Niners are an extra rest.

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles played damn near five quarters in the rain

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, and I just think that the Eagles have

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>been skating as a luckbox, as a Stevie Fesik luckbox,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for so many weeks, and I think this is the week.

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>In my betting account, I have it at two and

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a half, like I said, but I have betted at three.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably I don't love it as much clearly, but I

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>like the Niners here. I think they're the most complete

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>football team in the NFL, and I think that becomes

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>readily apparent this Sunday to everybody who doubts them. And

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Brock Purdy after this week becomes a serious

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>MVP candidate.

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 2>That is my call on that game.

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm on the Niners in game number one, game

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>number two, and I bet four of these during guessing lines.

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Like as much as I hated last week's late I

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>love this one. Pick Numero Dose, Big Numero Dos. I'm

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you owe? They're at three and a half now,

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm still taking them. I'm still taking the Houston Texans

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at a bad number. I bet this at three. I'm

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna to take them on the megapot at three and

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a half, which is the consensus, because I that is

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the consensus everywhere. Now it's painted this. It was three

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>on uh on Monday morning. The Denver Broncos are a mirage.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody's really hyped about the fact that they've

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>gone from one to five to six and five. They

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have done so based on turnover differential last four games,

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>their turnover differential is plus twelve. This ain't the nineteen

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty three Washington Redskins, who for the season

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>had a unbelievably incredible and never to be broken plus

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>forty three turnover differential plus forty three.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Every week that.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Skins team was getting a plus three and a plus

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>four like clockwork. The Broncos have done in four games

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>where they're now.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 2>To plus twelve. You can't keep doing that.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>If anything beyond the nineteen eighty three Skins, it is unsustainable.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think they're a very good football team.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And I have the Texans as my ninth best team.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 2>We did Power rankings this week and the Texas is

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 2>the ninth best team in the NFL.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they roll here. I actually think they win

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this by margin. Give me the Texans even here with

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the hook Houston Texas, you're nodding, Ace, you liked that one.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 7>Huh yeah, I got.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 8>I bet them on the money line and I laid

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 8>the three as well.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a great spot for them, man.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, like the last three losses are by three

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 8>points or less, and I agree with everything you said.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 8>I think Denver's phony is a three dollars bill and

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 8>that defense is just so bad.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 7>I think Houston's gonna have a field day.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Phony is a three dollars bill. By the way, we'll

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 2>get back to Ace for his pick.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But you said off air for those wondering, because Ace

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>has been on the Vegas Lifestyle Show with us every

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 1>year until the last couple, you want to get on

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it this year?

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 7>You said, indeed, I think it's necessary.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 8>Like I said that, where the world is trending, I think,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 8>especially the young sports betting is just growing and growing

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 8>and growing. Younger and younger people are are getting involved

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 8>in it, and this podcast has a big enough reach

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 8>that I think we owe it to the listeners.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 7>We need to update some of that when they come

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 7>to town.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's do that. We'll get you on there. People

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are looking forward to that. No, is that a thing?

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that a Philly accent?

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Ace? Is that a Filly or Baltimore.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 6>I'm trying to place it because we have Todd's Todd's

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 6>Philly because it's strange because.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 8>English was my is my second language, like I actually

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 8>Greek was my what I spoke in the house. I

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 8>probably went to school and knew about five or six

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.479
<v Speaker 8>words when I got the kindergarten. But so a Philly

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 8>mixed with whatever else, that is an accent Philly Greek.

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I gave two. We're snaken back, so this

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is Will, Will. What's your next one?

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 6>I like to be different, but I'm totally in line

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 6>with your thinking. I'm going to take the Texans here.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Onay the three and a half.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 6>This is just a total house of cards here with Denver.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 6>All of their defensive stops are off of turnovers. All

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 6>of their offensive sex comes off success comes off of

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 6>short fields because of the turnovers.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 5>And when you're just.

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Plus three plus four all these weeks, you can't sustain that.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 6>They're they're just they're really handcuffing Wilson. They're asking him

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 6>not to lose the game if they get behind that.

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 6>I don't trust him to come back and you get.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 5>Him in the back door here. So I'll lay the three.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 5>I hate the hook.

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 6>I would love it obviously a lot more if it

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 6>was three. But this is just Denver winning close games

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 6>based on turnover look is completely unsustainable.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Texans minus three and a half.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Can I get some reaction to that? Redskins nineteen eighty

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>three thing plus forty three?

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 4>That was a different league. That was a different league

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 4>where there were turnovers. That a completely different.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Era, one hundred percent right, But I I watched every

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>play of every game that season. It was amazing. They

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>had sixty one takeaways.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 5>That's insane.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 3>Sixty one.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 4>You converted that in like the inflation rate, inverted that

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 4>to today's, it would be like five would still be great,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 4>but it would be much low.

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Forty three to thirty five. Okay, I'll get you know.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 5>That's a staggering stat.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a staggering Statutty era.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 3>They had forty three for the season, plus.

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Forty three, but differential.

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Right, so they would be they'd be like plus twenty five.

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 4>This year, you know, something.

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Like Todd wish neev turnover differential inflation rate.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying there were way if you look at

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 4>the NFL and the old days, there were much more

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 4>turnovers than there are today. If you know, each turnover

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 4>in those days is like two and a half of

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 4>a turnover nowadays, we don't have.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's correct, but the corct is that though, but

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the correct way, but the correct way of viewing that

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is what that was based on all the other teams then,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and it was still still exponentially more.

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Second, I'm not taking anything away from the Joe Gibbs

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 4>and jam It You're you're, you're, you're, you're never ending

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 4>love for this this franchise.

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm not don't have a problem with that.

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm just I'm just you know, because when people hear

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 4>these numbers, they probably like, oh, oh, that's a tremendous

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 4>amount of turn Yeah, it is because in those days

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 4>there were turnovers. Now there's not turnovers like that because

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 4>everyone's scared to turn the ball over. They know if

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 4>you turn the ball over, you're gonna lose. So it's

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a completely different league now, all.

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'm let me see I'm going from I'm just

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to the last decade. In two thousand and six,

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a plus seventeen.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Bear with me. Two thousand and seven, there was a

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 2>plus seventeen.

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just so yeah, I go buy this this.

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty incredible. It's pretty incredible what they did.

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 3>By That's what I'm saying. Yeah, we don't have that nowadays.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 3>You can't get to plus forty. It's impossible.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 2>This sandy forty. The San Diego Charters in two thousand

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and seven had a plus twenty four.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 3>How about that, which is a ridiculous number for that even.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>That, that's a ridiculous number. Anyway, Okay that what's your

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>number two?

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay my number two pick and you know, slim pickings

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 4>again this year this week, I disagree. You know, I'm

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 4>gonna I'm gonna go with the New or I'm gonna

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 4>hold my nose and go with the New Orleans Saints.

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I have two hold my nose plays Seattle.

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm holding my nose and I'm gonna hold my nose

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 4>again with the Saints. Plus four. Here's the thing, Detroit.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, I was all big Detroit. Look at Detroit. Wow,

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Detroit and I still think they're pretty good on offense, but.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Wow, the defense has really been bad lately. I can't

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:19.959
<v Speaker 3>believe that.

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 4>You know, Green Bay's just moving up and down on

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 4>the Bears, just moving up and down on them like

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 4>they're not even there. You know, the Saints at home,

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, as much as you know, Derek Carr makes me,

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, with his endless four yard.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Passes, makes me want to pew. You know, sooner or later.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 3>You know they're going to have a decent offensive game.

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 3>They're not that bad.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 4>And now they're at home and they're getting four points

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 4>in it. You know, you can't be laying four points

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>unless you're a really good team on the road in

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 4>the NFL. And and the Lions they're good, but I

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 4>don't know if i'd call them really good. I think

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 4>there's been some chinks in the armor lately, So I

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 4>think that that that that line's a bit inflated. I

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 4>think four is a lot of point to be laying

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 4>on the road when you're a team that's good but

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 4>not I wouldn't call the Lions elite. So let's all

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 4>just calm down with this whole Lions love. And I'm

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 4>gonna take the Saints plus four.

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how much incoming I took when I

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>had the audacity to have the Lions just outside my

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>top ten for most of the year, and the highest

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I've ever had.

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Them is tenth.

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>All the Lions lovers just coming after me, I'm like, no,

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly what they are.

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 3>And I would have disagreed with you.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Then I would have been like them, because I was

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 4>high on the Lions too. But I've started to, you know,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 4>lose a little luster with the Lions lately.

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Twenty ten Patriots plus twenty eight, twenty eleven, nine Ers

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 2>plus twenty eight, those I think are the next closest to.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>The plus forty three eighty three Skins. Okay, Ace, your

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>second and third picks?

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you got?

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 7>All right?

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 8>I like the New Orleans pick from Todd that's offense

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 8>versus defense, and I will take defense as well at

0:29:55.120 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 8>home for sure catching points with New Orleans. But real quickly,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 8>let me make this my second pick. It's the Chargers

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 8>New England over.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to go.

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 8>Over over forty and a half right now. At where

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 8>you're at, you could get over forty. That's what I did.

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 8>But with grade forty and a half. That's what it

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 8>is across market, and this is a simple case of

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 8>unefficient market correcting itself. Yes, I get it, these have

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.959
<v Speaker 8>been under teams of late, especially, but when you look

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 8>at the number for the Chargers, this is the lowest total.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 7>They've had in a long time.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 8>In there are last ten games, only once have they

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 8>had a total closed below forty four. So the market

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 8>has definitely adjusted for the lower scoring.

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 7>I like that, and then I look at the Chargers offense.

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 8>I think they'll have no problem putting up points against

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 8>a very weak New England defense that's ranked twenty third

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 8>in past success right especially they were coming off a

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 8>bad game last time he had a passer roating below.

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 8>He came back with the passer rating of one hundred

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 8>and fifteen his very next game, and that's what he

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 8>did exactly last game against Baltimore with a passer rating

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 8>of seventy five points seven.

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 7>I think he bounces back with a big game.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 8>And on the flip side with New England, the only

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 8>thing I can say simply is a progression to the mean,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 8>Like you can't get and get worse. Just look at

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 8>their quarterbacks play in their.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 7>Last couple of games.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 8>Look at those ratings twenty seven point eight forty two,

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 8>like the only way you could go is up. It's

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 8>pretty hard to go down from that. So I think

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 8>any improvement.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 7>To quarterback play is going to help his team put

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 7>up points. And going against the LA Chargers, who.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 8>Again defensive passing success rate are twenty sixth in the NFL,

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 8>I think even a mnemic offense like New England will

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 8>be able to put up enough points where combined they

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 8>get us Tough over forty.

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 7>I think Chargers, New England over forty forty and a half.

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 7>Excuse me.

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 8>And finally, this is one of the short plays. You know,

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 8>I provide accounts for different groups and different sports, and

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 8>two hit the same exact side within twenty minutes of

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 8>each other, and I agree with it.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 7>And it's the Green Bay Packers.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 8>On Sunday night catching the six against the Kansas City Chiefs. Lise,

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 8>I'm high on the Chiefs like everybody else, but I

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 8>like what I've been seeing of Green Bay of late,

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 8>especially of Love.

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 7>He's done nothing but improve.

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 8>And anytime he's had a bad game, he's bounced right back.

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 7>That's what I love. He's coming off a.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 8>Great game and I think that continues. He's had three

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 8>of his last four games.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 7>Have been nominal. Fine times under the He's given a

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 7>little bit too many points here. I think it's even.

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 8>Worth a sprinkle case. He's got a game with Buffalo

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 8>up next. Again, you're not gonna overlook for Little Green

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 8>Bay in Lambeau on Sunday night. But with that said,

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 8>it's still at a conference. You're on the right, and

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 8>I think the Packers catching six are live here. So

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 8>I'll go with over in the Chargers New England game,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 8>and then I'll go with the so called steam move

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 8>on Green Bay plus the six ace.

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you a question about sprinkle.

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>We made you made it famous on this podcast for

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so many years saying sprinkle, and I used to throw

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in the e forty jingle afterwards where it would hit

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as you said it. When you hear everybody in the

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>gambling world using that phrase, Now, do you believe you

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>had something to do with that, like or do you

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>believe that that was something that was said rampantly before

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you used to say it?

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 7>Oh god, no, no no, no, absolutely not no no no.

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 8>I started that back in when we were like over

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 8>a decade ago. Yep, when we were together, and it

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 8>came from something in my life that had nothing to

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 8>do with sports. Yep, that's why I know that I

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 8>brought it into this realm and.

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 7>We just said it so much, and the podcast was

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 7>so big.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 8>Remember there weren't a lot of shows back, No, it

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 8>was just Dustin Millman, so much.

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 7>To choose from, exactly.

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 8>So the betters were listening to us and they just

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 8>started using it in their lexicon, and then those people

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 8>started doing their own content and using it, and it

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 8>just spread. And of course you're never going to get credit.

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 8>Of course that's an originated but we did start it

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 8>so far back and now when I see it, actually,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 8>i'm proud of that that we actually added a word.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>We added a word to the you started breaking up there.

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 7>We left something behind that that will not be raised.

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 2>We left something behind.

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's so we left a lot of things behind, but

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that was definitely one of them for sure. Okay, that

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>means we're back to Todd for his final one.

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, I coined the phrase took us push that everyone's

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 4>using it.

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I started it out as took us push, which.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Is a by the way, somebody somebody made a college

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>game day sign for a Numbers game this morning, and

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 2>they did a Bingo card for all the ship I say,

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 2>and took us pushes on here Todd. It's one of

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the Bengos squares they got on there, So that's for me. Yeah,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 4>By the way, as far as aces over forty and

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 4>a half La Clipper bet, I kind of like that

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 4>one too, especially because remember we talked about it on

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Doctor Bob when when both teams, you know, when the spread,

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 4>like one team spread is seven and two and the

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 4>other team spread is like two and seven. Same thing

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 4>on the total, when both teams have the have the

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 4>under one is three and seven, one is three and eight,

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 4>like it is in the Patriots and Clippers game, Typically

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 4>it's going to go the other way because they've over

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 4>adjusted to this. So that's why I really like it

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 4>over forty theres. I just was scared that Belichick is

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 4>going to go into that thing where he gets stubborn,

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.959
<v Speaker 4>and he just says, Romandre Stevenson right, Romandre Stevenson left,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Romandre Stevenson middle, and he just starts getting stubborn in

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 4>the and then he just decides, Okay, I'm just running

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 4>the ball. I don't care whether we win or not.

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 4>And so that was why I didn't play it. But

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 4>that that's kind of you know, I like it too.

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, can I ask the book? Can I ask

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>a Bill Belichick questions? As you bring it up? He's

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 1>going to the Hall of Fame? But do you think

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>after this season that there is a comma and the

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>last phrase that people will have to say about him

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 1>is but he did kind of suck when Brady wasn't there.

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's part of it?

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Now? You don't think you don't think that's fair?

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I mean he was Look, he was

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 4>a good coach with Cleveland. He just kept running into

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 4>the Steelers with coach Kier and.

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 3>That we used to give him a whooping in that.

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 6>But he killed in Cleveland. What did you say, Well,

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean the move killed him in Cleveland. There's a

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 6>good documentary about that where they had a really good

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 6>team and a good season go in the middle of

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 6>the season they found out they were moving and that

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 6>team ended up being the Ravens.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 5>So like, I don't know, I don't know that that.

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 5>I think that is a part of it too.

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So so then what we're really saying is mac Jones

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and Bailey Zappi are so bad at football that any

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>coach would have been this bad.

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, how many years years old?

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Any seventy two years old, you're allowed to be You're

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>allowed to maybe the game pass you by a little

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>bit at seventy two. Yeah, if that's what you're saying,

0:36:57.960 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 1>will Yeah.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 3>He was only he was only a dominant figure for

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 3>what twenty years? Every single week.

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 2>I started by I started by saying, he's the first beat.

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's a Hall of Famer. No one's doubting that.

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, does that Does that sentence creep into

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>people's minds now?

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, because people are idiots and they'll say that. But

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's fair.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay, I think nowadays, But like but when you know,

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 6>twenty years from now, when the dust settles, I think

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 6>it'll get lost more than it is now.

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Like we're all I think you're.

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 3>In the moment.

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 6>There's recency bias where yeah, I said this about I

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 6>think when Durant signed with the Warriors, we're in the

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 6>moments like, oh.

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 5>My god, how could he do this?

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Nobody will remember these titles like twenty thirty years from now,

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 6>people just remember Durant won this many titles, scored this

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 6>many points, and things fate over time.

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Yep, I think you're probably right. Go ahead, Todd.

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, Okay, my third pick it it was between

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 4>going against my YenS ers down are.

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Where I got the free parking on seal.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, you got to get that email from the

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 4>River's Casino otherwise you're gonna pay one hundred dollars to

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 4>park at the casino and walk down into game.

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I got my free parking this week, and I was

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 4>thinking about going with the little Menchkin Guy, Kyler Murray

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 4>in at but I just can't pull the trigger because

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 4>that Cardinal team is not real good, and you know,

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 4>I have a feeling that maybe the Storers can cover

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the number. So I'm gonna stay away from my Stiller's game.

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking about taking Cardinals plus five and a

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 4>half in that, but I won't do it because I mean,

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 4>when do we ever win a game by five and

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 4>a half. When do the Stillers ever win by We

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 4>don't ever win by five, and in fact, we don't

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 4>ever win the first half.

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 3>We never win a It's ridiculous. Anyways, I'm gonna.

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Go with Instead of that, I'm gonna go with the

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Jacksonville jag Offs. That's another Pittsburgh word they call people

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:37.959
<v Speaker 4>jag off, Hey, jag off.

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 3>The Jacksonville jag Offs.

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Minus nine against the Cincinnati Bengals.

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 4>And the reason I don't like laying nine points? I mean,

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 4>who wants to lay nine points in an NFL game?

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.879
<v Speaker 4>But I am actually and I've been high on Jacksonville,

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 4>I think more than most people you know for a while.

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's because defense is better than people give.

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 3>It credit for.

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 4>And I just think that this Jacksonville team is a

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 4>real legit contender in the AFC. In fact, I think

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be between Jacksonville and the Ravens who

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 4>ends up being in the super Bowl. I think the

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Chiefs are not the Chiefs, and so I think it's

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 4>gonna be between Jacksonville and the Ravens. And I know

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 4>that Jacksonville got spanked by the Niners that one week,

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 4>but other than that, they've been playing amazing. And this

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Tim Boyle character or whoever they have not Tim Boyles

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 4>the Jets. Who's the guy for the Bengals, I forget?

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 2>His name is Jake Brown? Jake Browning.

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Jake brown Right, I.

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Put Tim Boyle and Jake Browning together, but Jake Browning

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 4>is not ready for the National Football League. And come on,

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 4>the Jacksonville defense is good. You know, when I'm going

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 4>to lay a big number, I want to make sure

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 4>my defense can hold the other team down. So that's

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 4>why I like Jacksonville this week. I think they can

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 4>hold the Bengals to you know, thirteen points and win

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 4>this game, you know, twenty four to thirteen or something.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 3>So I like Jacksonville.

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Minus the nine and and you know, I'll just hold

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 4>my breath that I can cover the nine.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, will your final pick?

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Todd hinted, I'll go with the Cardinals. I'll take the

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 6>five and a half for all the reasons he mentioned.

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 6>Steelers don't pull away from anybody.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Tomin It's interesting.

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 6>I'm not a huge trend guy, but Tomlin there's a

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 6>pattern with him where he's good off of a loss.

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 6>He's good as an underdog. Well, he's not off of

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 6>a loss, and he's not an underdog.

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 5>He's off of a win.

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 6>He's off a favorite, and he is a favorite. I

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 6>just think five and a half is a lot with

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 6>that offense for Pittsburgh, every single game they win.

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 5>Is twenty to seventeen, seventeen to fourteen.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 6>So that was ugly last week from Arizona. But maybe

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 6>you're buying a little low. You can get maybe a

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 6>backdoor from Murray there, run around and do something. I

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 6>don't think it's going to take a lot of points

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:49.479
<v Speaker 6>for Arizona to cover this. I will take Arizona plus

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 6>the five and a half. It was between that and

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 6>San Francisco, but I don't want to have two a

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 6>year's gil, so I will go Arizona plus the five

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 6>and a half.

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>My final one is the Indianapolis Colts taking the Indianapolis Colts,

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm laying the points against the Tennessee Titans on

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the road. It's actually a better number than I got

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it at now. It's what minus won or is it

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a pick?

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Olts minus one?

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Golts minus one? I'm taking this here. I don't know.

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>This is a really weird one for me, and I

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I've ever given this explanation for any

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>pick I've ever made. But you ever catch an interview

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of anything and it lands on you in a certain

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>way where you're like Oh, this team's about to do

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>some stuff. That's how it was for me with the

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Colts when they squeaked by the Patriots ten to six

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>right before their bye week. The Colts had one of

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>these buys the week before last, where I think it

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was perfectly situated on their schedule.

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 2>They're five and five.

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>They managed somehow to get a five and five into

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the bye without Anthony Richardson, without Jonathan Taylor for most

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of the season. I don't think Gardner Minshew is that

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>good quite frankly, but the interview was with Jonathan Taylor,

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and he was super excited about the fact that they

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>were having a week off and that then they could reset,

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and they knew that their schedule either way. On a

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>numbers game last week, I said take the Colts plus

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>one to eighty to make the postseason because their schedule

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>is cake cake the rest of the way. I don't

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're a great football team, but I think they're

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>better than the Titans.

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you read their schedule to us?

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I shall do that, thank you very much. I really

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 2>should do such a thing.

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Here was their schedule before the bye, by the way,

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it was at Carolina at New England, then they got

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>their bye.

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:29.359
<v Speaker 2>They beat Tampa Bay last week.

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's at Tennessee, at Cincinnati home Pittsburgh, at Atlanta home,

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Vegas home Houston. So they are winning the games they're

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to win. They've got Tennessee here.

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Now at Tennessee, I think if they look at their schedule,

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 2>this might be one of the.

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Easiest of the rest too as well. I should say

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they win this football game. I don't think

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>very much of Tennessee. I think the shine has come

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>off Vabel. I don't think we think of him as

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a particularly great coach anymore. I think we talked about

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this about Derek Henry and past weeks where it's like

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it might be over for Derek Henry, or might it

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>might be the beginning of the age curve for him.

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis has kind of just been meh. I think

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the Colts are better football team, and I think Jonathan

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Taylor now with all of these weeks at full strength,

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I like the Colts here. This is my instinct on

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines was Niners Colts, Texans. Texans was probably my favorite,

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth one was the Chargers over the Patriots.

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.359
<v Speaker 1>But I don't the Chargers still lay in a lot

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of points. So I'll make the Colts my third and

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>there you have our best.

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Before we go to the teasers, you can I just

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 4>say one quick thing about end game.

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, another one of the in games.

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 4>And this is why it's so important to watch the

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.399
<v Speaker 4>games if you want to, you know, win an in game.

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 4>I've been terrible this year. This has been a bad year.

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 4>I've also been unlucky with the kicking. But but you know,

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 4>last week Williams for the Rams was playing the Cardinals,

0:43:57.200 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 4>and if you watch the first game between the Cardinals

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 4>and the Rams, in the second half of that first game,

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 4>they just handed it off to Williams and he gashed him.

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 4>He looked like Wisconsin in twenty sixteen, where they would

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 4>just run for nine yards every play against Ball State.

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 4>That's what it looked like. And that's never what it

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 4>looks like in an NFL game. Typically, when an NFL

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 4>game is up like two scores and the other team

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 4>knows you're gonna run, it's hard to run.

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 3>But they were up big and.

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 4>They were literally handing the ball to Williams and he

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 4>was gashing them for eight yards, nine ten yards.

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 3>It was ridiculous. That was the last game.

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Then this game comes up, and the first half of

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 4>this game, he's got sixty four yards on ten carries,

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 4>which is six point four carry, which in the NFL

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:40.280
<v Speaker 4>is a gaudy number already, right, And if you're watching

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 4>the game, you're going wait a second. The last time

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 4>they played the Cardinals, everyone knew in the stadium that

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 4>he was going to run, and they ran like crazy.

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Now in the first half again they handed off to him.

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 4>He's running like crazy. I'm sitting there and he's got

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 4>sixty four yards, and I look at the ind game

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 4>and it's ninety seven and a half and the Rams

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 4>are up big in this game, and I'm like, it

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 4>doesn't matter what happens here.

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 3>They didn't keep giving it to Williams. He's going to

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 3>keep killing them. So what do they do.

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 4>The first handoff off at the commercial? I make over

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 4>ninety seven and a half. I texted it out on

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 4>my WhatsApp group over ninety seven and a half. He's

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 4>got sixty four they handed to Williams. He run for

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:16.320
<v Speaker 4>fifty yards on the next play. I literally won the

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 4>bet in one second, but I didn't even need to

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 4>because they literally were getting six and seven yards a gash.

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 4>And that's why when you're watching the games, if you

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 4>can notice these little, you know, subtleties and go, wait

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 4>a second, when in an NFL game, when you're up

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 4>three scores, is it that easy to run? It's never

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 4>that easy to run. And you see something like that,

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 4>you got to take advantage.

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But it brings up the bigger point that we've made

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>before about about watching games versus not watching games, and

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 1>we don't like Bob is always on the show, right

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Bob and a dear friend who you know, I've

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>said it with him President. I don't feel like I'm

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>talking behind his back. He makes it a point to

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>say and he almost wears it as a badge of

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>honor right where he's like, I don't watch that many games.

0:45:57.239 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think he's kind of fibbing because I

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>think he watches more than but it's kind of a

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>thing for him. You can't possibly, I don't care how

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 1>good your models are. You can't possibly win as many

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>bets not watching, and you can't pick up on as

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>much stuff not watching.

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 2>You just can't. You can't.

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>And we have guys who are super successful as contest players, right,

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas.

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Chris doesn't. He's like, I don't want to sit through this.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to sit through Yes.

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 3>So about Vegas to examples.

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you let will talk once for a second.

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:25.439
<v Speaker 3>No, I was just gonna say quickly.

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 6>I could think of two examples recently college basketball. Last week,

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 6>I was on the air VS and it was Syracuse

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 6>Shamanad and I think they were laying like twenty two

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 6>before the game, and you couldn't make the number high

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 6>off Shamanad.

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 5>It was the third game in three days against the

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 5>D one school.

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 6>They were just they had no legs, they were out

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 6>of gas, and Syracuse just beat him by fifty. And

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 6>every time you know, there's a TV timeout, I just

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 6>kept laying it and laying and this is in past

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 6>post and I was saying on the air and they.

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 5>Just looked completely overmatched.

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 6>The other example there was recently a Boston College Vanderbilt

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 6>College basketball game, and you could tell early on they

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 6>were calling a lot of fouls and that late in

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 6>the game that game.

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Might get a little dicey with the foul situation.

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 6>They might get foul that we could push it from

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 6>like sixteen to seventeen, so that was another one.

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Are you talking about drill?

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>It took me like ten seconds big duty?

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Did you have money on that one?

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 3>No, I haven't even heard about this game.

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 2>What happened?

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Did you tell me that Vanderbilt guy's just whacked up

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 4>the guy with three seconds off when it was a

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 4>dribble out?

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I heard about that.

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Will that one builds slowly. It took me a while

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 2>to catch on. I was like, what does he tell you?

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:24.240
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 2>I get it?

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 3>So all right?

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to the final two questions.

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:31.280
<v Speaker 4>What about Ace? You ask Ace about whether he watches

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:31.720
<v Speaker 4>the games?

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Ace?

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 2>You watch or you don't watch?

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 7>No, No, I'll be honest with you.

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 8>Since I've gotten divorced over the last couple of months,

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 8>it's been finalized, I have the TV on more on games,

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 8>and I've watched a couple more games than I usually would.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 7>And I'll be one truthful with you. It's been a

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 7>waste of time.

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:55.479
<v Speaker 8>Like all it's done is it's convinced me that I've

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 8>wasted my time and more importantly, my emotions, like I

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:05.240
<v Speaker 8>love game that I end like I did this ready.

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 8>It seems like I've already done this so many times

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 8>in the past why do I want to go through

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 8>this again? And it just doesn't help me at all,

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 8>gil Like and this isn't a brag or anything like that,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 8>but like light now at wager talk, I'm sitting at

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 8>number one in college basketball, I haven't watched the college

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 8>basketball game. I finished Major League Baseball number one in baseball.

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 8>I didn't watch a single inning of a baseball game.

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 8>I think if I did, I wouldn't be able to

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 8>do to profit like I have been able to in sports,

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 8>because I think my opinion would affect my judgment and

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.399
<v Speaker 8>my bias would affect my judgment. So I just don't

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 8>let that, you know, come into the picture. And I

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 8>think it served me well. I love the guys that

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 8>are able to watch a game and pick something off

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 8>and take advantage of it at the betting window.

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 7>I envy that.

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 8>I know I don't have that skill set, so I

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 8>don't even try to acquire it.

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 7>To me, it becomes a waste of energy and time

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 7>and like.

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 8>I said, emotion to where I don't even want to

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 8>invest that. I rather put that elsewhere to like, so

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 8>I won't even have the games on rarely.

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because this is what makes this is what

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 2>makes betting on sports so interesting, right, because it's a

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 2>spectrum of sports betters. And here's the thing.

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>If that works for you, whatever works for you is working, yelp,

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>keep doing it. There is There is no sacred correct answer, right.

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm just of the I'm not wired in a way

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>where I can't watch it, but you are wired in

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:35.839
<v Speaker 1>a way where you can avoid watching it.

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I.

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 8>Don't even want to know the results real quickly. I

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 8>check my results the next morning. I swear on everything

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 8>that I'll have my biggest bet on a Sunday night

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 8>ball game and I will put on a movie and

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 8>go to bed and wait till morning to find out

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 8>because I don't even want it to enter my mind

0:49:57.480 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 8>and have that affect me while I'm trying to get

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 8>my six hours of rest, Like I'm had to make

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 8>it that much a point to not let it affect

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 8>the rest of my life, like that's my business. I

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:12.880
<v Speaker 8>handle my business, and then I don't want it affected

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 8>me when I need to do something else. And I

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 8>know it would if I was going back and checking.

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 7>The score and if they lost, it would affect me.

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 8>And if they want it would have affected me either

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 8>way I don't see it as a positive, So I

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 8>just avoided. For other people that could handle it, more

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 8>power to them. And like I said, I envy that.

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 8>It's just I'm not capable of doing it.

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you're probably better at life balance than I am.

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You probably are. We're definitely cut from a different species cloth,

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure, but you you probably a better life balance.

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Sorry to hear about your your divorce. Maybe it's a

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>good thing. I don't know.

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you feel.

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 7>It's a positive. It's a positive.

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, divorce.

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 4>If you get divorced, then you don't watch any games

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 4>and think about how bad that marriage was.

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm just kidding.

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm just kidding, But I'm just saying, you don't even

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:00.360
<v Speaker 4>watch games and it still couldn't work.

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Usually usually get divorced because you watched you any gas,

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>for sure?

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, exactly. This was definitely not man to be.

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we have DoD on the bingo board

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 1>for a numbers game two, I'm trying to think what

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:18.840
<v Speaker 1>other really wish to ever related ones we have feik uh,

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not youta hobbs dobbs, whole bunch of

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff on here. Okay, teaser of the week where Todd,

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what's your record? And what will and me are seven

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:30.359
<v Speaker 1>and five?

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 4>The number one record on the teasers at eight and

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:34.439
<v Speaker 4>for everybody else is seven and five.

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 1>You have a one game lead, Todd. I know you

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>were very excited by that that comment right there, but

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a one game.

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:42.320
<v Speaker 3>And the fact I said I'm the number one record.

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Ace, your favorite two team teaser of the weeks

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are as the lines are currently constituted.

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I tease. I only tease the numbers.

0:51:57.440 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 8>You know that the key numbers through the outs that

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:02.319
<v Speaker 8>I have that give me six point teaser minus one ten.

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 7>I don't even lay minus one twenties anymore. If I

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 7>can't find one, nine, one ten at six points, I

0:52:08.080 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 7>don't even want to tease it.

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:13.240
<v Speaker 8>And I think with my approach, the only mathematical plus

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 8>EVTs are available. I believe would be Jacksonville tight end

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 8>with the Jets. But since I wouldn't have an opinion

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 8>and I would.

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 7>Just tease numbers, that's what I would do.

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 8>But for the show, I want to have an opinion,

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 8>and my I do like the Jets side. I do

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 8>think the wrong team's favored in that one. I think

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 8>that's a great teaser option number one. The total open

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 8>thirty six, its drop down the thirty four. We know

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 8>each point's worth more the less points expected to be scored,

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 8>So I like that. I liked that they're home, and

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 8>I like that they're getting through those key numbers of

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 8>three and seven by taking the Jets.

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 7>Up to eight eight and a half on a six

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:50.280
<v Speaker 7>point teaser.

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 8>And then I'm going to pick a sign that I

0:52:53.920 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 8>like on the points bread and this just adds a

0:52:56.280 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 8>little insurance. And that's the Tampa Bay Buck Carolina Panthers,

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.799
<v Speaker 8>excuse me over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:04.359
<v Speaker 7>And the reason simple.

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 8>As a kneemic as offense has been their top fifteen

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 8>defense as far as passing success rate goes. And I

0:53:13.440 --> 0:53:16.320
<v Speaker 8>think that's more than enough to keep this within the number.

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 7>And I like that the total is also dropping from

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:22.399
<v Speaker 7>a high of thirty nine and a half now as

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 7>low as thirty seven.

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 8>They would take them up to eleven and a half,

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 8>and thirty seven points are expected to be scored.

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 7>I think that makes some sense.

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:35.919
<v Speaker 8>I'll lay my teaser with the Jets plus the eight

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:39.240
<v Speaker 8>eight and a half whatever we're using and Carolina plus

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 8>the eleven and a half.

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, the long The longers are slim pickings right

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>at this moment, aren't they.

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they're just usually within the first day or two,

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 8>the ones that they know they're going to get wong

0:53:52.920 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 8>do they bomb bumped them.

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 7>Them like they did with Dallas. That teaser protection that.

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 2>They pull the ones that they noticed also a dead.

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:03.320
<v Speaker 7>Giveaway when they don't.

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 8>We'll get last week with Thanksgiving on Thursday, when they

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:09.919
<v Speaker 8>didn't tease or protect the Detroit Lions. All the talk

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.879
<v Speaker 8>was about how that's the most teased game ever. Oh,

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:17.399
<v Speaker 8>it was so much exposure, so much risk, and yet

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 8>they're not rushing. They go to nine or nine and

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 8>a half, they're willing to take a position. To me,

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 8>that's just the red flag. Again, I may be seeing

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 8>something that's not even there, but that to me is

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:28.840
<v Speaker 8>just the red flag.

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:30.319
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we didn't get to talk about this

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 1>game on this podcast, but that it was one thing

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that green Bay came out and popped them in the

0:54:35.000 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>mouth and took that early lead and held that lead.

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, the most damning thing about this game, and

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I said this on the radio side, which is the

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>lack of urgency of the Lions in the fourth quarter

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of that game when they were down two scores was

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so bizarre. I'm like, do they know they're down two scores? Like,

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>let's pick it up a little bit, guys. And then

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:56.319
<v Speaker 1>they finally did get with a one score. By that

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>time they had only an on side kick would have

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 1>saved them. So I mean, that was very odd that performance.

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Who we got here dad?

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 3>By the way.

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 4>One thing, also, I understand exactly what Ace is saying,

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:12.240
<v Speaker 4>by the way about not letting his mind get infected

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:14.880
<v Speaker 4>by what he's seeing. And there's definitely something to that.

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that there isn't. I just feel for

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 4>me personally it's better. And also I lose out on rants.

0:55:21.000 --> 0:55:24.360
<v Speaker 4>So for instance, I had the Jets team total under

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 4>four and a half against the Dolphins on Black Friday,

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:31.760
<v Speaker 4>NFL there brutal under four and a half first half

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:35.719
<v Speaker 4>with Boilet quarterback, and I will tell you right now,

0:55:35.760 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 4>the Jets did not get on the Miami Dolphins side.

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Of the field.

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:40.320
<v Speaker 4>You know there's two sides of the field in the

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 4>NFL that the fifty yard line is one side of

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 4>the field. The other side of the fields the other

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 4>the Jets had. I took under four and a half

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 4>team total after I saw they were not moving the

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:52.720
<v Speaker 4>ball and they never made it onto the Miami side

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:55.239
<v Speaker 4>of the field in the entire first half, and I

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 4>had under four and a half.

0:55:56.760 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 3>By the way, it's.

0:55:57.560 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 9>Hard to get to touch that effect the rest of

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:02.279
<v Speaker 9>your day, like the rest of your handicap.

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 7>In the last full game.

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 8>The game that I watched was last week when I

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 8>had Nebraska on throwing the I don't even know if

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 8>it was Saturday or the weekday game, and they ended

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 8>up you know exactly, and I'm like, why did I

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 8>even do that to myself?

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:18.759
<v Speaker 7>I swear that was the last That was the end

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 7>of it, because it affected me the rest.

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 8>Like I that was still early in the day. There

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 8>was still so much to handicap, so much to bet on,

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 8>and the fact that I had to go through that

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 8>those last five minutes, I just felt like, it's going

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 8>to affect the way I'm handicapping the rest of this card.

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 8>And it's like, you, it doesn't. That's awesome that you

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 8>could compartmental.

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean, at times, it doesn't. I've taken so

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 4>many shots to the keyster at this point that I'm

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 4>almost numb from from getting blasted on these ridiculous losses,

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 4>and that I just have to go, Okay, you know what,

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:54.799
<v Speaker 4>shake it off, Go to the next bet, Shake it off,

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 4>go to the next bet. But but the point is

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 4>is the Jets did not get on the Miami side

0:57:01.120 --> 0:57:03.879
<v Speaker 4>of the field and yet still had seven points. And

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:05.760
<v Speaker 4>I still don't know how they got to seven points.

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I think two of three a pick six book.

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:09.399
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, look at look how well, Look how well

0:57:09.440 --> 0:57:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Ace that he got over that Vanderbilt game. Yesterday He

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:14.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't talked about it at all yet today he oh,

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:14.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way.

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 3>And Ace is right, by the way. Ace.

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 4>I didn't bet the rest of the night after the

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 4>after the Vanderbilt game because of that.

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Ye Like, I was like, oh, should I keep Should

0:57:22.520 --> 0:57:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I keep going?

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Or should I just be like, you know what, that's

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 4>enough for tonight and I And part of the reason

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:29.920
<v Speaker 4>was that was such a heinous loss that I was

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 4>just like, Okay, you know enough for tonight.

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 2>So it is interesting.

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting, right because betting is a reflection of

0:57:36.000 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the human condition. People handle stuff and deal with stuff

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the same way or approach stuff in different ways.

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I should say, by the way, I spent the last.

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Five minutes looking at a football field to make sure

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that the fifty yard line in fact splits a football

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:50.000
<v Speaker 1>field at half and it does.

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Check.

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you can't get on It's hard to get

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 4>a touch down if you don't get on the other

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:55.200
<v Speaker 4>side of the other teams steal.

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 2>You are correct, Yes, yes.

0:57:57.000 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Hushem found a way to give me a keyster blast

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 4>the most ridiculous way of all time.

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think a Shem is in the business of

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 2>keister blast? You think that's up on his list?

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:07.080
<v Speaker 3>He thinks he does.

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:10.919
<v Speaker 4>He's like how sert a hot poker into the most

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 4>sensitive regions against Todd when he has the greatest bet

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 4>of all time a team to not get four and

0:58:16.800 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 4>a half when they can't even get on the other

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 4>side of the field. Okay, anyways, with all that being said,

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 4>I agree with mister Ace. I'm also taking the Jets

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:27.360
<v Speaker 4>up to eight. I don't believe in the Jets. I

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 4>can't stand the Jets. I can't stand their offense. I

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 4>can't stand anything about the Jets. I hate them, I

0:58:32.160 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 4>hate boil, I hate everything about them. That being said,

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 4>their defense isn't that bad. It's pretty good their defense.

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 4>So I will say there is a guy that I

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 4>hate more than the Jets, and that's mister Desmond Ridder.

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Mister stare down who you're gonna throw to and then

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 4>throw it directly to the opposing team, Desmond Ridder. He

0:58:50.320 --> 0:58:52.440
<v Speaker 4>stinks and he still stinks. I don't care that they

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:54.320
<v Speaker 4>won the game last week. He threw a pick that

0:58:54.440 --> 0:58:57.960
<v Speaker 4>was so ridiculously heinous. I couldn't even believe he threw it.

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:00.479
<v Speaker 4>And he's going to go into the Jet. The Jets

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:02.800
<v Speaker 4>could get some turnovers against him. It's going to be

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 4>hard for the Falcons to win by margin when they

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:08.160
<v Speaker 4>have Desmond Ritter at the quarterback position. Give me the

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Jets plus the eight, and then in the second side

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 4>of it, I'm gonna go with the Vrabels plus the seven.

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:16.760
<v Speaker 4>They're getting one, so I'll move it up to seven.

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:20.520
<v Speaker 4>I also am a little nervous. I think you guys

0:59:20.520 --> 0:59:23.040
<v Speaker 4>are right about Derrick Henry. You know, he's taken one

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 4>too many hits. I mean, how many of these running

0:59:25.200 --> 0:59:27.360
<v Speaker 4>backs can take as much punishment as Dereck Henry has

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 4>taken and then continue to come back every single year.

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:31.440
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:34.400
<v Speaker 4>The only thing is I'm not as high on the

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Colts as Gilly is. I think the Colts are decent.

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 4>But now you're asking him to win by seven on

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 4>the road, especially in a game that's going to be

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 4>like run, run, run, run the clock, run the clock,

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:46.040
<v Speaker 4>run the clock. You know the Colts are going to

0:59:46.080 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 4>give it to Taylor like a thousand times. You know

0:59:48.160 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna give it to Henry a thousand times. It's

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 4>going to be hard to lose by more than seven.

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:54.000
<v Speaker 4>I'll get Tennessee plus seven, but you're asking.

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Him to win by more than seven. I'm not Yeah,

0:59:56.400 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 2>oh no, you're not.

0:59:57.160 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying with the t I wouldn't take Tennessee

0:59:59.440 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 4>plus the one. But if you've given me all the

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:03.880
<v Speaker 4>way up to the seven, now I'm saying, okay, I

1:00:03.920 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 4>think I could.

1:00:04.400 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Do that, Willy.

1:00:07.240 --> 1:00:09.080
<v Speaker 6>I thought about using the Jets, but a couple of

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:12.680
<v Speaker 6>things concern me. I just worry that defense is quitting

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 6>at some point where like what are we playing for?

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 6>Like why are we trying to rescue this season with

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:19.920
<v Speaker 6>Tim Boyle? Like you worry about them. Defense is all

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 6>about intensity and if you just lose five percent of

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 6>that it takes you from a really good defense to

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 6>a less defense. So I do worry about that the

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 6>last whatever third of the season, and plus Rogers could

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 6>come back. I mean, you know, Rogers could be on

1:00:31.680 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 6>the field Sunday. Can we spend more time on a

1:00:33.560 --> 1:00:34.280
<v Speaker 6>dumber subject.

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:37.200
<v Speaker 5>I can't believe the amount of time. They're four and seven,

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 5>about to be four and eight. He's not playing. If

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 5>he is playing, they should fire everybody.

1:00:41.120 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm just so sick of that.

1:00:42.240 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I went off on it this morning, and

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. Will I need to get doctor

1:00:46.720 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>chow on. I need to like actually challenge him on

1:00:49.320 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this bullshit it is.

1:00:51.080 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 2>So I'll just.

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Real quickly in twenty seconds. First of all, they're not

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be in playoff contention. Secondly, I've ruptured two

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of these. There still a rate of rerupture. We're still humans.

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>As great as his surgeon might be in as great

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>as that technique might be, cam Akers is the gold standard.

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He was twenty two years old. He came back in

1:01:09.040 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>five and a half months. Aaron Rodgers thirty nine. He's

1:01:12.280 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>saying he's gonna come back in three and a half months.

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>There is if the Jets allow him on the field.

1:01:19.600 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It is the single most irresponsible thing they've ever done.

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Now here's here's the other. There's a performative part of this.

1:01:25.680 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Can Aaron Rodgers stand, take a snap, take two steps,

1:01:29.600 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>three steps back and throw a football. Yes, if that's

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about, and he wants to do that

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>just to show that he came back, that is possible.

1:01:38.960 --> 1:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about actually playing football, where you have to

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>scramble and plant and dart and go back and forth.

1:01:45.360 --> 1:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And actually play the real position and get hit.

1:01:48.200 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>You cannot let a You cannot let him get back

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>out there, even if you are in CONTESGI. It is

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>so ridiculous. And you have all these doctors online. Oh,

1:01:56.000 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very possible that I can do this.

1:01:57.880 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 2>No, no, not real for ball, no stop it dumbest.

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:04.960
<v Speaker 6>Thing, right, Yeah, I totally agree. All right, my teaser,

1:02:05.000 --> 1:02:06.680
<v Speaker 6>I'll just take the Jags down to the two and

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:09.240
<v Speaker 6>a half for obvious is it nine?

1:02:12.280 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Nine?

1:02:12.880 --> 1:02:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Jacksonville? We're using nine. I had to lay nine down.

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:21.920
<v Speaker 6>You're you're manipulating the records to begin with, so I

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:22.680
<v Speaker 6>can try to get.

1:02:22.600 --> 1:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right, who you have no credibility anymore.

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Titans.

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 6>I'll throw one little thing in there. I wouldn't be

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 6>shocked if we saw Tannehill again. I think the AFC

1:02:31.440 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 6>is starting to come back to the pack where the

1:02:33.840 --> 1:02:35.600
<v Speaker 6>Titans can talk themselves and hey, maybe we can get

1:02:35.600 --> 1:02:36.320
<v Speaker 6>into the playoffs.

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:36.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

1:02:36.960 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Tannehill is an okay player. It gives you I would

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 6>be shocked if we saw him again. Plus seven, What

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 6>the hell, I'll break the rules. I'll go Cowboys to

1:02:45.040 --> 1:02:46.600
<v Speaker 6>the minus three. If it lands on three, I get

1:02:46.600 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 6>a push. You're not supposed to do this. I don't

1:02:48.000 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 6>know if I would bet.

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 4>It three and a half because we're using Dallas minus

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:52.760
<v Speaker 4>nine and a half other picks.

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Jesus, Jesus, what a police officer. This guy is

1:02:56.480 --> 1:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>all right?

1:02:59.040 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 6>Jets plus eight, he's supposed to have jest plus I'll

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 6>live with it if Tim Boyle is gonna give me,

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 6>as Todd says, the old the old Keister shot here.

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't love it, but I'll just play the numbers here,

1:03:07.160 --> 1:03:07.920
<v Speaker 6>Titans and Jets.

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I just want to warn the Steve Phesicks of the

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>world that you can take away my sharp card before

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what I'm about to do.

1:03:13.120 --> 1:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>But I don't care. This is the week where they're

1:03:15.200 --> 1:03:15.720
<v Speaker 2>no longers.

1:03:15.840 --> 1:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I am taking the Jaguars down to what is it

1:03:18.280 --> 1:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>three about it?

1:03:19.840 --> 1:03:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Dag Wars is down to three?

1:03:21.120 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm taking the Jaguars down to three, and I'm

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>taking the Miami Dolphins sing it down to three and

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a half at Washington.

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>The Dolphins right now, what's that physics, Texas?

1:03:32.080 --> 1:03:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeaes Miami Dolphins. Miami Dolphins. They are not a long teaser.

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:42.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh Gilly, you're using it, and you're gonna take a

1:03:42.480 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 4>beating from our dad's.

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Defense, from our dad's defense. If if the Dolphs, the

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins should be able to name their score against Washington.

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>We saw the Washington defense against Dallas on Thanksgiving. Miami

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:58.919
<v Speaker 1>should be able to score one hundred. And I don't

1:03:58.920 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think Cincinnati's got any thing to push back on Jacksonville.

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:03.959
<v Speaker 1>So I'm yes, it's not wrong, gie, but I'm doing

1:04:03.960 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that one. That's gonna be Miami and Jacksonville as a teaser.

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, television recommendation in season Hard Knocks Miami Dolphins.

1:04:12.960 --> 1:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>They're two episodes in. It is so good, Mike ma

1:04:17.760 --> 1:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>is it really?

1:04:18.280 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike McDaniel is so likable he's so different. He has

1:04:23.640 --> 1:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely exists at his own constitution. He doesn't care what

1:04:26.520 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody else thinks about his personality. He's hilarious, he's smart.

1:04:33.080 --> 1:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Tua is super likable. Even Tyreek is super likable, but

1:04:36.960 --> 1:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Tua especially.

1:04:38.240 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I love it. I think it's a great and by

1:04:40.160 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the way, Jalen Phillips just a ruptured as Achilles, so

1:04:42.240 --> 1:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>that was kind of sad to watch also, but it's good.

1:04:44.320 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I like the Dolphins all hard nuts.

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:47.920
<v Speaker 6>I gotta check it out. I saw the first fifteen

1:04:47.920 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 6>minutes of like the first one, that it was late.

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 6>I was falling asleep. I forgot it was even on.

1:04:51.040 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 6>It just sort of came on, So I'll get back

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 6>to it. I just had a quick question, Gil, because

1:04:53.680 --> 1:04:56.600
<v Speaker 6>you're familiar with Washington in this field, do you have

1:04:56.600 --> 1:05:00.440
<v Speaker 6>any thoughts just handicapping this game. That track is always sloppy,

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:02.680
<v Speaker 6>especially late in the year. Miami's a team that needs

1:05:02.680 --> 1:05:05.040
<v Speaker 6>a good track. They rely on their speed. Is that

1:05:05.240 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 6>something that you think is a factor that field being

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:07.960
<v Speaker 6>a mess.

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a good point, but in the wash no, okay, yeah,

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think with that you have a defense.

1:05:15.560 --> 1:05:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you have to have some semblance of a defense.

1:05:17.840 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 6>And I do think I just need to maybe think

1:05:19.280 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 6>of playing an under or something like that.

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh that might be a play, right, because it's forty

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>nine and a half. That could be. But I just

1:05:26.520 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 2>like the law.

1:05:28.000 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>The trading of Chase Young and Montes Sweat has reduced

1:05:33.640 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>them to such little pass rush that it's just those

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>corners suck to begin with, So it's gonna be tough

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for Washington to keep contact with them. But yeah, the

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>under might be a play. Maybe that's enough to get

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it under. Which brings us to the final two questions

1:05:49.480 --> 1:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of every megapod in history. Hece, we'll remember these two,

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the first of which is of the big favorites, which

1:05:56.120 --> 1:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely to lose outright? Your candidates are

1:05:58.440 --> 1:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys nine and a half favorites at home against

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Seattle tonight Thursday night foot ball, the Miami Dolphins, as

1:06:06.600 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we just mentioned, nine and a half point favorites on

1:06:08.080 --> 1:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the road against the Washington Commodes, the Jacksonville jag Wires

1:06:13.480 --> 1:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, nine point favorites at home against the Bengals, Cowboys, Dolphins, Jaguars.

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Most likely to lose outright, Ace is.

1:06:24.160 --> 1:06:28.400
<v Speaker 7>The Dallas Cowboys to night. I do think Seattle is

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 7>live in this game.

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 8>Not just because I lean that way, but it's just

1:06:32.120 --> 1:06:37.160
<v Speaker 8>Dallas's history of a misstep when it shouldn't happen, and

1:06:37.200 --> 1:06:39.600
<v Speaker 8>this is prime. They're coming off a game where they

1:06:39.600 --> 1:06:42.480
<v Speaker 8>look great, a game that mattered, They had a couple

1:06:42.640 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 8>big games in a row, and now they have Philly

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 8>up next. I really do think this smells up a

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 8>huge letdown for the Dallas Cowboys. And you know they're

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:54.960
<v Speaker 8>a five to zero team at home. You really think

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:56.919
<v Speaker 8>Dallas is gonna end up going eight no at home?

1:06:57.080 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 7>I don't think. So.

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 8>Look for Seattle to throw a wrench to that home

1:07:01.080 --> 1:07:03.760
<v Speaker 8>undefeated record the night and get the money line win.

1:07:04.000 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>That's mine they get there, that's mine too. By the way,

1:07:06.120 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree with A's completely on that one.

1:07:07.960 --> 1:07:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Dodd, I agree too.

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:11.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if there was ever a team that was

1:07:11.880 --> 1:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>ready to make a duty down their leg, this is

1:07:14.160 --> 1:07:15.360
<v Speaker 4>the team that's ready to do it.

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:23.840
<v Speaker 6>Will I'll go Commanders, just because you know, Miami outdoors,

1:07:23.880 --> 1:07:28.000
<v Speaker 6>maybe in the cold, not a great track. I saw

1:07:28.040 --> 1:07:31.560
<v Speaker 6>some questionability about Hill being at one hundred percent, So

1:07:31.800 --> 1:07:32.280
<v Speaker 6>I don't love it.

1:07:32.280 --> 1:07:33.720
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it happens. I'll just I'll take a

1:07:33.720 --> 1:07:34.640
<v Speaker 5>flyer on Washington.

1:07:34.760 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, real brief survivor question. There's eighty entries

1:07:39.080 --> 1:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>left in Circus Survivor and sixty seven started us.

1:07:43.760 --> 1:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>The intrinsic value of each of those remaining eighty entries

1:07:48.160 --> 1:07:51.400
<v Speaker 2>is you're ready for this one hundred Let me get

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the exact number. One hundred ow places, sorry, one and

1:07:59.640 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>fifty teen eight and thirty seven dollars and fifty cents.

1:08:03.840 --> 1:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, most of these remaining entries have been chalky. They

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have any of the big favorites left. Some do,

1:08:10.320 --> 1:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but most don't. If you so, you didn't have Jacksonville,

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have Dallas, you didn't have Miami left most

1:08:15.560 --> 1:08:17.599
<v Speaker 1>of No, you didn't have Dallas or Miami because you've

1:08:17.640 --> 1:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>used those. Jacksonville you're probably saving for their home game

1:08:21.200 --> 1:08:24.639
<v Speaker 1>against Carolina later after Christmas, which you're already.

1:08:24.400 --> 1:08:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Saving the Eagles for. By the way, I didn't include

1:08:27.800 --> 1:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs in that group on the road against one

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:31.799
<v Speaker 2>of the Chiefs. Right now, those still six.

1:08:31.600 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Points and a half.

1:08:32.320 --> 1:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I can't excuse me, can't can't include this.

1:08:35.760 --> 1:08:38.439
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, they've used the Chiefs too. If

1:08:38.439 --> 1:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you had a choice, I did this with Will on

1:08:40.080 --> 1:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>air the other day. So you're reduced to a choice

1:08:42.960 --> 1:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of these three games. Chargers on the road against the

1:08:46.840 --> 1:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Patriots is choice number one, Steelers at home against the

1:08:51.200 --> 1:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals is choice number two, and choice number three is

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers at home against the Panthers. So Chargers on

1:08:59.080 --> 1:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the road, Bucks, and Steelers at home. If you had

1:09:03.200 --> 1:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to pick up one of those three for Survivor, it's

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>what now, Bucks, you said, touts Bucks.

1:09:08.240 --> 1:09:11.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, the Panthers are just a dreadful team.

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Will I, even though I like Pittsburgh, even though I

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:18.599
<v Speaker 6>like the Arizona getting the points, I think it's Pittsburgh.

1:09:18.600 --> 1:09:20.280
<v Speaker 5>I just I don't think they'll lose the game.

1:09:20.360 --> 1:09:23.280
<v Speaker 6>I worry about Trash playing quarterback for Baker. I worry

1:09:23.320 --> 1:09:25.679
<v Speaker 6>about a little bit of a coaching bump with Reich

1:09:25.760 --> 1:09:27.600
<v Speaker 6>being fired. Sometimes you see that for a week. I know,

1:09:27.680 --> 1:09:29.920
<v Speaker 6>it's kind of washes in the numbers, and I just

1:09:30.280 --> 1:09:32.040
<v Speaker 6>I would throw up in my mouth before I had

1:09:32.040 --> 1:09:34.640
<v Speaker 6>that much money relying on the Chargers to do anything productive.

1:09:34.720 --> 1:09:36.479
<v Speaker 5>So by default, sort of, it would be the.

1:09:36.439 --> 1:09:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Steelers ace those three games, Which which is the survivor play? Yeah?

1:09:41.160 --> 1:09:44.400
<v Speaker 7>For me, it's the Steelers as well. I mean not always.

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:47.920
<v Speaker 8>Arizona statistically one of the worst teams in all of

1:09:47.960 --> 1:09:50.040
<v Speaker 8>the NFL, but put them on the road and it

1:09:50.080 --> 1:09:52.320
<v Speaker 8>gets even worse for them. So for a team to

1:09:52.360 --> 1:09:54.760
<v Speaker 8>win straight off and power rating wise, I think it

1:09:54.840 --> 1:10:00.280
<v Speaker 8>makes sense. Pittsburgh's solid there and defensively, I take this steel.

1:10:00.680 --> 1:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Todd, I'm with you on this one. I think

1:10:02.640 --> 1:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the Buccaneers.

1:10:04.040 --> 1:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Just because if I played the Chargers, they would absolutely

1:10:07.960 --> 1:10:09.120
<v Speaker 2>lose if I.

1:10:09.040 --> 1:10:13.200
<v Speaker 4>Can't if I don't, if you lose with the Chargers

1:10:14.240 --> 1:10:17.880
<v Speaker 4>and you can't take the can't mortgage, if.

1:10:17.840 --> 1:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I could just finish the thought and if I took

1:10:20.280 --> 1:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but if I don't take the Chargers, they will absolutely win.

1:10:23.560 --> 1:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want I just want us to end

1:10:24.800 --> 1:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Chargers business. You're right, the self loathing would

1:10:27.120 --> 1:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>be off the charts. And with the Steelers, like Kyler Murray's.

1:10:30.280 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 2>Just pesky enough that I don't want to live. I

1:10:32.520 --> 1:10:33.519
<v Speaker 2>don't want to live through that.

1:10:33.920 --> 1:10:37.519
<v Speaker 1>But with the Bucks, God, there's just nothing on the

1:10:37.560 --> 1:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>other side of the field that makes me worry, even

1:10:40.240 --> 1:10:42.639
<v Speaker 1>with a new coach, right interim coach. So I would

1:10:42.640 --> 1:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>take the Bucks, even though I hate the Bucks.

1:10:44.080 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, final question. We live in a bizarre world.

1:10:47.160 --> 1:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>We must play a side on each and every one

1:10:49.000 --> 1:10:52.519
<v Speaker 1>of these games, but we are allowed one free pass.

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Ace. What's the game you want no part of?

1:10:57.360 --> 1:11:01.800
<v Speaker 7>And the Lambs? Yeah, there's just the line, the change

1:11:01.800 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 7>of line movements.

1:11:03.280 --> 1:11:07.679
<v Speaker 8>It just confuses me. Did the quarterback situation on both teams?

1:11:07.960 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 8>To me, that's just the stay away game again a.

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:18.360
<v Speaker 7>While ago with clear Swan now Slams minus four and

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:18.799
<v Speaker 7>a half.

1:11:19.000 --> 1:11:21.120
<v Speaker 8>This is one of those games you would have liked

1:11:21.120 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 8>to gotten involved with where you could middle if you

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 8>got out ahead of the market.

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:26.800
<v Speaker 7>Otherwise it's just nothing. I want to get involved.

1:11:26.520 --> 1:11:28.640
<v Speaker 2>With Cleveland at the Rams. What it's no part of

1:11:28.680 --> 1:11:30.599
<v Speaker 2>that game? Dad? What do you want no part?

1:11:30.680 --> 1:11:32.719
<v Speaker 3>I agree? What is Joe Flacco the quarterback?

1:11:32.760 --> 1:11:32.920
<v Speaker 8>Now?

1:11:33.040 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Like? Who's playing quarterback for the bre This is insane.

1:11:35.479 --> 1:11:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't want any piece of second. By the way,

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:41.200
<v Speaker 4>on that show on the Miami Dolphins in game, I

1:11:41.240 --> 1:11:45.640
<v Speaker 4>mean in season Hard Knocks, do they play the incessant.

1:11:53.520 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Three seconds?

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I know doing that, I know the song, but they

1:11:57.080 --> 1:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>don't use it as much in the end season Hard Knocks.

1:12:01.400 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 4>I love the show, but it's just like every two second,

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:08.280
<v Speaker 4>the guy's walking into the building, like it's dramatic.

1:12:08.360 --> 1:12:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's just walking in the building. Can we

1:12:10.080 --> 1:12:10.920
<v Speaker 3>call him the f down?

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:13.960
<v Speaker 5>In the summer one, they have the drama.

1:12:14.200 --> 1:12:15.840
<v Speaker 6>It's one of the big storylines of who's gonna make

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:17.400
<v Speaker 6>the team, who's gonna be cut, So there's a human

1:12:17.400 --> 1:12:19.240
<v Speaker 6>interest story. There's a little bit of drama with that

1:12:19.280 --> 1:12:20.840
<v Speaker 6>where you have suiting guys you're rooting for to make

1:12:20.840 --> 1:12:22.360
<v Speaker 6>the team and they could be cut any day. So

1:12:22.400 --> 1:12:24.200
<v Speaker 6>that's that's an element that's not really there on the

1:12:24.240 --> 1:12:24.920
<v Speaker 6>nd season one.

1:12:24.800 --> 1:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>But you know, yeah they have like yeah, but you

1:12:26.600 --> 1:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>know what they like. They cut back on that on

1:12:28.800 --> 1:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the preseason one too.

1:12:30.160 --> 1:12:31.960
<v Speaker 5>They didn't show that, they didn't show the cuts.

1:12:31.960 --> 1:12:33.960
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, we're still a storyline, right, this guy's on

1:12:34.040 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 6>draft or he's a seventh round pick and he's got

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:38.000
<v Speaker 6>kids and this is his life story. Well you're only

1:12:38.040 --> 1:12:40.760
<v Speaker 6>mak They weave that into the storyline.

1:12:40.400 --> 1:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>That used to be the best part of the show,

1:12:42.760 --> 1:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought where I think the best one ever was

1:12:46.000 --> 1:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns one where Baker Mayfield and that and

1:12:48.520 --> 1:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Jackson.

1:12:49.400 --> 1:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>That was so great, but you.

1:12:51.439 --> 1:12:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Just got fired by Jackson State by the way.

1:12:53.360 --> 1:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>He did, Oh my god. But like that. I remember

1:12:56.960 --> 1:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Rod Gardner when it was with the Chiefs because I

1:12:59.560 --> 1:13:01.599
<v Speaker 1>always us tomorrow. I was like, wow, all these players

1:13:01.600 --> 1:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>take this so well when they get cut, and I

1:13:03.320 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>remember Rod Garter of the Chiefs was.

1:13:04.800 --> 1:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Like, why the fuck y'all cut me? It's like finally

1:13:08.280 --> 1:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>somebody got that. That's great.

1:13:11.520 --> 1:13:12.479
<v Speaker 3>I like the one with Herm.

1:13:12.600 --> 1:13:14.559
<v Speaker 4>Edwards was the coach and he was bringing a big

1:13:14.600 --> 1:13:16.800
<v Speaker 4>sign to meet the bus, and I'm thinking, if he

1:13:16.800 --> 1:13:19.519
<v Speaker 4>has enough time to write a sign to meet the bus,

1:13:19.560 --> 1:13:21.680
<v Speaker 4>he's not doing his job. And I was never a

1:13:21.680 --> 1:13:24.200
<v Speaker 4>big herm as a coach guy, and that led to

1:13:24.240 --> 1:13:27.599
<v Speaker 4>many bets against Arizona State and the under I.

1:13:27.680 --> 1:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Love that Cleveland Browns one man, do you remember when

1:13:30.240 --> 1:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like I remember when Hugh Jackson were Yeah, because there

1:13:32.640 --> 1:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>was the who was the offensive coordinator? What was my

1:13:34.640 --> 1:13:39.519
<v Speaker 1>man's name, Mark Trestman, No.

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:42.040
<v Speaker 5>It was uh he was Chiefs head coach.

1:13:43.640 --> 1:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought Trustman was offensive order. Anyway, there was there

1:13:45.720 --> 1:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was this dynamic where I remember when they finally, like

1:13:49.800 --> 1:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Jackson finally made Baker Mayfield the number two guy,

1:13:52.400 --> 1:13:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and I remember Bayfield being like number two.

1:13:54.720 --> 1:13:55.719
<v Speaker 3>Like Todd Haley.

1:13:55.880 --> 1:13:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Todd Haley, That's who.

1:13:56.920 --> 1:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It was, the one that trust me, right, it was

1:13:58.040 --> 1:14:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Todd Haley. And I remember thinking about Baker may Vad.

1:14:01.680 --> 1:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>He was like, these guys expect me to like rejoice

1:14:04.880 --> 1:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that they gave me the number two job.

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:08.639
<v Speaker 2>It's like, I don't want this. I like, thanks, big deal.

1:14:08.880 --> 1:14:10.799
<v Speaker 2>There were so many little elements to that one.

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Carl Kucikuchi Cook, Carl Okay, so you say you agree

1:14:16.439 --> 1:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with Acetent Todd, You're you're on that Cleveland Rams game.

1:14:19.320 --> 1:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Flacco officially is still the headline still

1:14:24.200 --> 1:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>say could start for Browns, could start.

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:30.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean he's probably an upgrade from.

1:14:30.439 --> 1:14:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Dtr Adam si Adam Schefter's latest report with dtr now

1:14:35.600 --> 1:14:39.519
<v Speaker 1>in concussion protocol. Joe Flacco has been taking snaps, been

1:14:39.600 --> 1:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>taking snaps as Cleveland's QB won and practice could start.

1:14:42.400 --> 1:14:47.639
<v Speaker 2>He's also a could start all right, and then Ian

1:14:47.720 --> 1:14:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Rappaport says, would get the starter. What is your choice?

1:14:50.479 --> 1:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Will which which you want to part of?

1:14:52.760 --> 1:14:56.919
<v Speaker 6>I'll go Van Dy Boston College, I'll go I'll go Chargers,

1:14:56.920 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 6>Pat reasons wait second half of the Okay.

1:15:01.240 --> 1:15:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Chargers, Chargers Patriots. I am going to select the

1:15:11.920 --> 1:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Lion Saints game.

1:15:13.400 --> 1:15:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Actually I don't.

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like Cleveland Rams was gonna be my number two,

1:15:19.479 --> 1:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but Lion Saints, just because the Lions couldn't have looked

1:15:24.400 --> 1:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>any more listless this last game. I know they're on

1:15:26.720 --> 1:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>extra rest, and I think Derek Carr, like I, I

1:15:29.840 --> 1:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can't stand Derek Carr always makes the wrong choice the

1:15:32.040 --> 1:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong time. That that one you sent me will where

1:15:34.160 --> 1:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>he throws the four yard out. I let out an

1:15:36.720 --> 1:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>audible gasp watching that live. I was like, oh, that,

1:15:39.320 --> 1:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll get him to the sticks. I don't know, but

1:15:41.840 --> 1:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it's New Orleans at home. You know how that can go.

1:15:45.920 --> 1:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But they might not, so I just I just stay away.

1:15:47.880 --> 1:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I have no feel for the New Orleans Saints at all. Uh, gentlemen,

1:15:51.200 --> 1:15:52.679
<v Speaker 1>that's all wet, that's all we can offer.

1:15:52.920 --> 1:15:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it to everybody. Ace. Great to see you, man,

1:15:56.479 --> 1:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>great to see you.

1:15:57.280 --> 1:15:59.599
<v Speaker 7>I'm seeing you too, Gil and all you guys. Thank

1:15:59.600 --> 1:16:02.439
<v Speaker 7>you so much much for having me on appreciation.

1:16:03.000 --> 1:16:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for doing it, and we'll get you back

1:16:04.920 --> 1:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>for the lifestyle show.

1:16:05.960 --> 1:16:09.720
<v Speaker 8>Yes, thank you, of course, of course, thank you.

1:16:10.240 --> 1:16:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Pleasure, and I'm not going to ask you what you're

1:16:11.840 --> 1:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about.

1:16:12.400 --> 1:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like it sounds like, though, based on what

1:16:13.960 --> 1:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, that this is a more serious version of

1:16:17.000 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Ace coming up on the Lifestyle show. Yes, okay, all right, yes,

1:16:22.640 --> 1:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, and your Twitter.

1:16:24.240 --> 1:16:28.679
<v Speaker 7>Is greekunderscore, damnbler.

1:16:28.479 --> 1:16:33.519
<v Speaker 1>Greek, Greek underscore gambler. All right, Todd will thank you, gentlemen,

1:16:33.600 --> 1:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it very much. I will have a bounce back,

1:16:37.080 --> 1:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we ladies and gentlemen. I'm not letting these guys catch me.

1:16:39.640 --> 1:16:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, Good luck with all your best Week

1:16:41.560 --> 1:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and then National Football League