WEBVTT - A New Strategy in the Fight Against COVID-19

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:22.196
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:22.236 --> 0:00:25.676
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:26.196 --> 0:00:30.476
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. The CDC, also known as the Centers

0:00:30.516 --> 0:00:33.956
<v Speaker 1>for Disease Control and Prevention, has been emphasizing that a

0:00:33.996 --> 0:00:37.276
<v Speaker 1>strategy called contact tracing is going to be essential to

0:00:37.316 --> 0:00:41.356
<v Speaker 1>reopening the country. Here's Robert Redfield, the head of the CDC,

0:00:41.876 --> 0:00:44.596
<v Speaker 1>speaking at a White House press conference earlier this month.

0:00:44.996 --> 0:00:51.516
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be very aggressively focused on early case recognition, isolation,

0:00:51.556 --> 0:00:55.436
<v Speaker 1>and contact tracing. Contact tracing is the process of identifying

0:00:55.476 --> 0:00:58.596
<v Speaker 1>people who've come into contact with an infected person and

0:00:58.676 --> 0:01:01.596
<v Speaker 1>alerting them so that they can get tested and isolate

0:01:01.636 --> 0:01:05.796
<v Speaker 1>themselves to slow the spread of the disease. This is

0:01:05.796 --> 0:01:08.076
<v Speaker 1>a job that has traditionally been done by public health

0:01:08.076 --> 0:01:13.396
<v Speaker 1>workers in several countries around the world, including Singapore, South Korea.

0:01:13.596 --> 0:01:16.716
<v Speaker 1>Much contact tracing was done digitally with the help of

0:01:16.796 --> 0:01:20.836
<v Speaker 1>apps the people downloaded onto their phones. To learn more

0:01:20.876 --> 0:01:23.996
<v Speaker 1>about contact tracing, how it works, what it's good for,

0:01:24.116 --> 0:01:27.676
<v Speaker 1>and what the challenges are facing contact tracing. We're joined

0:01:27.676 --> 0:01:31.556
<v Speaker 1>by doctor Louise Iverse. She's the executive director of the

0:01:31.596 --> 0:01:35.596
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts General Center for Global Health at the Massachusetts General

0:01:35.636 --> 0:01:39.156
<v Speaker 1>Hospital in Boston. She's a doctor who specializes in infectious

0:01:39.196 --> 0:01:42.836
<v Speaker 1>disease and IT outbreaks, and she's been thinking very deeply

0:01:42.956 --> 0:01:46.436
<v Speaker 1>about that question. Louise, thank you for being here. I

0:01:46.476 --> 0:01:48.996
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could start by just explaining to us

0:01:48.996 --> 0:01:51.836
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing one oh one, what is it? And then

0:01:51.836 --> 0:01:55.716
<v Speaker 1>we'll move to what's it for. So contact tracing is

0:01:56.236 --> 0:02:03.156
<v Speaker 1>basically identifying and then isolating people who have been exposed

0:02:03.196 --> 0:02:07.636
<v Speaker 1>to an infectious disease. And the idea is that by

0:02:07.676 --> 0:02:11.636
<v Speaker 1>isolating those people who been exposed, you can interrupt the

0:02:11.716 --> 0:02:17.436
<v Speaker 1>chains of transmission and in good quality contact tracing. Explain

0:02:17.476 --> 0:02:19.716
<v Speaker 1>to me what the mechanics are. First we discover that

0:02:20.076 --> 0:02:23.676
<v Speaker 1>person X call M Noah has been exposed to the

0:02:23.756 --> 0:02:28.316
<v Speaker 1>virus and is infectious. Then what happens. So the first

0:02:28.356 --> 0:02:32.356
<v Speaker 1>step is identifying what we call an index case. So

0:02:32.476 --> 0:02:35.516
<v Speaker 1>an index case is a person who is confirmed to

0:02:35.556 --> 0:02:39.236
<v Speaker 1>have the illness in this situation COVID nineteen. So let's

0:02:39.276 --> 0:02:43.756
<v Speaker 1>say you have a positive COVID nineteen test. Then that

0:02:43.836 --> 0:02:48.316
<v Speaker 1>triggers a notification to the public health authorities. So then

0:02:48.356 --> 0:02:52.356
<v Speaker 1>what they do is call you up and speak with

0:02:52.396 --> 0:02:56.756
<v Speaker 1>you and try to motivationally interview you to remember where

0:02:56.796 --> 0:03:00.476
<v Speaker 1>you've been, who you've been in contact with. For COVID nineteen,

0:03:00.596 --> 0:03:05.636
<v Speaker 1>we think especially about being with someone within about six

0:03:05.676 --> 0:03:09.436
<v Speaker 1>feet of distance physically for about ten or fifteen minutes more.

0:03:09.996 --> 0:03:12.516
<v Speaker 1>And we make a list of all your contacts, and

0:03:12.556 --> 0:03:16.116
<v Speaker 1>then we set about communicating with those people who are

0:03:16.196 --> 0:03:20.036
<v Speaker 1>contacts and giving them particular pieces of advice. You might

0:03:20.276 --> 0:03:23.436
<v Speaker 1>offer contacts a test. You certainly want to know if

0:03:23.516 --> 0:03:27.116
<v Speaker 1>any contact is already having symptoms, because they might actually

0:03:27.156 --> 0:03:29.276
<v Speaker 1>become a case. Then if you have symptoms and a

0:03:29.276 --> 0:03:33.316
<v Speaker 1>positive test, you become a case. You definitely want those

0:03:33.356 --> 0:03:39.356
<v Speaker 1>folks to quarantine. And you know, many people are not

0:03:39.396 --> 0:03:42.916
<v Speaker 1>in a position to easily self isolate, so many people

0:03:42.996 --> 0:03:47.116
<v Speaker 1>talk about supported isolation or supported quarantine. You know, where

0:03:47.156 --> 0:03:50.996
<v Speaker 1>you investigate in speaking with the contact what their barriers

0:03:51.036 --> 0:03:53.276
<v Speaker 1>are to being able to stay home for two weeks.

0:03:53.276 --> 0:03:56.276
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of the process. And why does that

0:03:56.396 --> 0:03:59.356
<v Speaker 1>not very quickly spiral to enormous numbers. I mean, I

0:03:59.396 --> 0:04:02.476
<v Speaker 1>can understand that under social distancing it might not spiral

0:04:02.516 --> 0:04:04.556
<v Speaker 1>that much because I'm not sure I've actually been in

0:04:04.596 --> 0:04:07.076
<v Speaker 1>contact that much with anybody except from my kids. But

0:04:07.156 --> 0:04:09.356
<v Speaker 1>if I had been out and about because there wasn't

0:04:09.396 --> 0:04:12.316
<v Speaker 1>social distancing, there would presumably be many people, and then

0:04:12.356 --> 0:04:14.076
<v Speaker 1>that would lead to many other people and the tree

0:04:14.116 --> 0:04:17.956
<v Speaker 1>would grow very, very rapidly. So how is this doable

0:04:18.196 --> 0:04:22.396
<v Speaker 1>in a non socially distanced environment. I mean, you just

0:04:22.676 --> 0:04:28.236
<v Speaker 1>perfectly described the pandemic, you know, because that's exactly why

0:04:28.396 --> 0:04:32.676
<v Speaker 1>there's exponential spread, is because every person potentially infects other people.

0:04:33.036 --> 0:04:37.116
<v Speaker 1>So you're totally right. Contact tracing is a big task.

0:04:37.756 --> 0:04:42.156
<v Speaker 1>It quickly becomes very many people, and you are essentially

0:04:42.196 --> 0:04:46.276
<v Speaker 1>trying to chase ahead of the speed of the virus

0:04:46.516 --> 0:04:52.796
<v Speaker 1>and at least take out of circulation enough people so

0:04:52.836 --> 0:04:55.876
<v Speaker 1>that they don't go on to contribute to that exponential spread.

0:04:56.036 --> 0:04:58.876
<v Speaker 1>So it is a very very big task. It is

0:04:59.116 --> 0:05:02.436
<v Speaker 1>certainly normally in public health what we try to do

0:05:02.556 --> 0:05:06.676
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of epidemics, and so there's certainly debate

0:05:06.756 --> 0:05:11.396
<v Speaker 1>at the moment in Massachusetts, say about how helpful it

0:05:11.476 --> 0:05:14.916
<v Speaker 1>is to be trying to do contact tracing. I do

0:05:15.036 --> 0:05:21.516
<v Speaker 1>think that the human capacity to do it gets quickly stretched.

0:05:21.916 --> 0:05:24.876
<v Speaker 1>If we had over two thousand positive cases and new

0:05:24.996 --> 0:05:28.516
<v Speaker 1>positive cases in Massachusetts yesterday and the same amount the

0:05:28.596 --> 0:05:32.676
<v Speaker 1>day before you quickly get into the number of contacts.

0:05:32.676 --> 0:05:35.916
<v Speaker 1>It's very, very many. And this is why I personally

0:05:36.076 --> 0:05:39.836
<v Speaker 1>became interested in the idea that technology should be able

0:05:39.876 --> 0:05:43.956
<v Speaker 1>to somehow help us in trying to deal with this

0:05:44.036 --> 0:05:47.636
<v Speaker 1>huge task. In a place like Massachusetts is a good

0:05:47.636 --> 0:05:50.756
<v Speaker 1>example where we both are, where there's already what you

0:05:50.836 --> 0:05:55.436
<v Speaker 1>epidemiologists call community spread. What would the scale of contact

0:05:55.436 --> 0:05:58.436
<v Speaker 1>tracing have to be actually to use it to beat

0:05:58.476 --> 0:06:01.276
<v Speaker 1>the virus down? Has that ever been done? I mean, obviously,

0:06:01.316 --> 0:06:03.316
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing has been used successfully as it was in

0:06:03.316 --> 0:06:05.716
<v Speaker 1>South Korea to help control the virus, but only a

0:06:05.716 --> 0:06:08.196
<v Speaker 1>few people have it. But are there any examples in

0:06:08.236 --> 0:06:11.036
<v Speaker 1>the world where contact tracing has been used to knock

0:06:11.076 --> 0:06:14.876
<v Speaker 1>back community spread? I think you could look at Ebola

0:06:14.956 --> 0:06:19.316
<v Speaker 1>virus disease as a example of a very frightening illness

0:06:20.076 --> 0:06:23.076
<v Speaker 1>with a much higher mortality rate that we're seeing for

0:06:23.116 --> 0:06:29.556
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen, where contact tracing has essentially been a major

0:06:29.636 --> 0:06:33.156
<v Speaker 1>contributor to ending the outbreak. Certainly in the twenty fourteen

0:06:33.236 --> 0:06:37.796
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen outbreak in West Africa before there was a vaccine.

0:06:38.436 --> 0:06:41.476
<v Speaker 1>They're very different diseases, so I'm not trying to say

0:06:41.556 --> 0:06:44.676
<v Speaker 1>that they are transmitted the same way. But the question

0:06:44.716 --> 0:06:49.716
<v Speaker 1>for COVID nineteen is if we don't try to contain

0:06:49.876 --> 0:06:55.916
<v Speaker 1>the virus, what is our alternative. We don't have a treatment,

0:06:56.756 --> 0:07:00.476
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a prevention, a vaccine. I think from

0:07:00.476 --> 0:07:04.356
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of public health folks, if we don't try

0:07:04.396 --> 0:07:07.116
<v Speaker 1>to do contact racing, we're just kind of sitting back

0:07:07.156 --> 0:07:10.716
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, it escaped and there's nothing we can do.

0:07:10.756 --> 0:07:12.836
<v Speaker 1>We just have to wait. So I think when you

0:07:12.876 --> 0:07:15.836
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers in the United States and certainly Massachusetts,

0:07:15.876 --> 0:07:19.796
<v Speaker 1>it just seem overwhelming. But basically, the two features around

0:07:19.796 --> 0:07:22.996
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing that are important are you have to be fast,

0:07:23.716 --> 0:07:26.476
<v Speaker 1>because you need to identify the contacts and put them

0:07:26.476 --> 0:07:29.796
<v Speaker 1>in isolation quickly, and then you have to have good

0:07:29.876 --> 0:07:33.436
<v Speaker 1>quality testing. So if you have an accurate test that's widespread,

0:07:33.836 --> 0:07:37.836
<v Speaker 1>and you have contact tracing that's fast, then you could

0:07:37.876 --> 0:07:41.276
<v Speaker 1>be successful. You know, Massachusetts just hired or is in

0:07:41.316 --> 0:07:44.596
<v Speaker 1>the process of hiring a thousand people to work on

0:07:44.676 --> 0:07:48.316
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing, and I think that's a big start. I

0:07:48.356 --> 0:07:51.316
<v Speaker 1>think even if we don't really believe that it's possible

0:07:51.396 --> 0:07:55.276
<v Speaker 1>right now at the peak of our epidemics, we definitely

0:07:55.316 --> 0:07:58.796
<v Speaker 1>need to have contact tracing set up and established and

0:07:58.956 --> 0:08:02.236
<v Speaker 1>robust for when we do all start coming back into

0:08:02.636 --> 0:08:05.276
<v Speaker 1>circulation and moving around, when we get to the bottom

0:08:05.276 --> 0:08:08.356
<v Speaker 1>of our plateau, because we're going to have other waves

0:08:08.356 --> 0:08:10.876
<v Speaker 1>of illness and we need to be able to blunt

0:08:10.916 --> 0:08:13.756
<v Speaker 1>those much more aggressively than we did with this first wave.

0:08:14.316 --> 0:08:17.076
<v Speaker 1>If you have a thousand contact tracers up and doing

0:08:17.116 --> 0:08:21.156
<v Speaker 1>their jobs at their phones, and you have two thousand

0:08:21.196 --> 0:08:24.996
<v Speaker 1>cases in a day, does that ratio work? I mean,

0:08:25.036 --> 0:08:28.116
<v Speaker 1>how long does it take one contact tracer to trace

0:08:28.196 --> 0:08:30.596
<v Speaker 1>all of the contacts of a person? So I think

0:08:30.636 --> 0:08:34.316
<v Speaker 1>the first job is really the case investigation, so they

0:08:34.316 --> 0:08:37.196
<v Speaker 1>speak to the case. I've spoken with some people who

0:08:37.236 --> 0:08:39.996
<v Speaker 1>are working on this now and they say that first

0:08:39.996 --> 0:08:43.556
<v Speaker 1>call can be forty minutes, forty five minutes. Speaking to

0:08:43.676 --> 0:08:47.516
<v Speaker 1>contacts can be shorter. Some contacts don't answer the phone.

0:08:48.116 --> 0:08:52.356
<v Speaker 1>Some contacts immediately say okay, no problem. Others may take

0:08:52.396 --> 0:08:56.916
<v Speaker 1>a little more time. Others may be in difficulties, you know,

0:08:56.956 --> 0:08:58.916
<v Speaker 1>they're worried about their job. They need to be referred

0:08:58.916 --> 0:09:02.756
<v Speaker 1>to social services. It's not a fast task, so that

0:09:03.196 --> 0:09:06.916
<v Speaker 1>I grant you, It is not fast. And how does

0:09:06.956 --> 0:09:10.156
<v Speaker 1>one find people whose phone numbers one doesn't know, or

0:09:10.156 --> 0:09:11.716
<v Speaker 1>whose name is one doesn't know. Do you just have

0:09:11.716 --> 0:09:13.236
<v Speaker 1>to sort of give up on that person you try

0:09:13.236 --> 0:09:15.596
<v Speaker 1>to use some reasonable detective efforts to find them. Yeah,

0:09:15.636 --> 0:09:19.996
<v Speaker 1>I think you know. Again. Contact tracing historically is a

0:09:19.996 --> 0:09:24.436
<v Speaker 1>pretty nuanced activity, and the people who are trained to

0:09:24.476 --> 0:09:29.516
<v Speaker 1>do it in normal public health circumstances are like investigators.

0:09:29.516 --> 0:09:33.276
<v Speaker 1>They're like disease detectives. They tried to understand what's going on.

0:09:33.396 --> 0:09:37.596
<v Speaker 1>They tried to look at how many contacts became sick,

0:09:37.636 --> 0:09:40.396
<v Speaker 1>and so if many of the contacts became sick, you

0:09:40.476 --> 0:09:43.876
<v Speaker 1>might need to do a deeper investigation. It's nuanced, and

0:09:43.996 --> 0:09:46.716
<v Speaker 1>we are in the middle of this massive crisis in

0:09:46.756 --> 0:09:52.836
<v Speaker 1>some ways, you know, trying to adapt what's a thoughtful

0:09:52.876 --> 0:09:56.956
<v Speaker 1>and specialized and very human interaction into perhaps something that

0:09:56.996 --> 0:10:00.876
<v Speaker 1>can happen faster. But yes, one may not know all

0:10:00.876 --> 0:10:03.036
<v Speaker 1>of the people that you were in contact with. If

0:10:03.076 --> 0:10:06.316
<v Speaker 1>you took a bus or a commuter rail, you may

0:10:06.316 --> 0:10:08.876
<v Speaker 1>have been in the same car as someone for twenty minutes.

0:10:09.236 --> 0:10:11.516
<v Speaker 1>You don't know who they are. So there are certainly

0:10:11.516 --> 0:10:17.036
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses in the capacity at this level of scale to

0:10:17.196 --> 0:10:20.596
<v Speaker 1>do it. If we look at say South Korea, who

0:10:20.956 --> 0:10:26.556
<v Speaker 1>had a very successful containment effort. They used many components

0:10:26.596 --> 0:10:30.916
<v Speaker 1>to their contact tracing activities. They looked at closed circuit television,

0:10:31.436 --> 0:10:35.676
<v Speaker 1>they looked at credit card transactions. They had a lot

0:10:35.756 --> 0:10:38.476
<v Speaker 1>of components to their contact tracing, and they had large

0:10:38.556 --> 0:10:42.636
<v Speaker 1>numbers of people doing it. So I think on principle,

0:10:43.036 --> 0:10:45.636
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that it works. And I think the question

0:10:45.676 --> 0:10:48.876
<v Speaker 1>that you're coming back to me with is really is

0:10:48.916 --> 0:10:53.076
<v Speaker 1>this feasible at the scale that we're at. And my

0:10:53.636 --> 0:10:56.996
<v Speaker 1>response to that is, we have to make it feasible,

0:10:57.236 --> 0:11:01.076
<v Speaker 1>because in the absence of a vaccine, in the absence

0:11:01.116 --> 0:11:06.036
<v Speaker 1>of a treatment, if we don't try to expand our

0:11:06.076 --> 0:11:09.316
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing, I don't really see other solutions for us

0:11:09.596 --> 0:11:12.356
<v Speaker 1>for the eyebreak. We'll be back in just a moment.

0:11:21.596 --> 0:11:26.236
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the obvious appeal of so called digital contact

0:11:26.276 --> 0:11:30.196
<v Speaker 1>tracing or automated depending on what terminology you like better,

0:11:30.236 --> 0:11:32.156
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the manual or what I would call

0:11:32.196 --> 0:11:36.436
<v Speaker 1>the human form. And South Korea has gotten attention for

0:11:36.676 --> 0:11:40.956
<v Speaker 1>what it's done. Israel has also gotten attention, positive and negative,

0:11:41.076 --> 0:11:44.596
<v Speaker 1>for the fact that it's internal intelligence services. Just told

0:11:44.636 --> 0:11:46.716
<v Speaker 1>everybody one day, by the way we've been tracking where

0:11:46.756 --> 0:11:50.196
<v Speaker 1>you all are on your GPS phone data this entire time,

0:11:50.396 --> 0:11:53.196
<v Speaker 1>and now we're going to put that to COVID. I

0:11:53.196 --> 0:11:55.276
<v Speaker 1>actually know somebody who, as far as she knows, she

0:11:55.396 --> 0:11:57.636
<v Speaker 1>was just in her house and she got a text

0:11:57.676 --> 0:12:00.996
<v Speaker 1>message from the Internal Security Services in Israel saying you've

0:12:01.036 --> 0:12:04.116
<v Speaker 1>been close to somebody who has the virus, and you know,

0:12:04.156 --> 0:12:06.716
<v Speaker 1>she tried to reach some human being to say no,

0:12:06.836 --> 0:12:09.436
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't you know, maybe someone stood outside my housin

0:12:09.476 --> 0:12:12.196
<v Speaker 1>smoked a cigarette, but she wasn't able to reach anybody,

0:12:12.236 --> 0:12:16.396
<v Speaker 1>so she self isolated. So that's a very immediately intrusive

0:12:16.396 --> 0:12:19.316
<v Speaker 1>form of this. My questions about this are really fond

0:12:19.396 --> 0:12:23.956
<v Speaker 1>of two categories. One is can it work? That's question one,

0:12:24.076 --> 0:12:26.916
<v Speaker 1>and then question two will be can it be ethical?

0:12:27.436 --> 0:12:31.356
<v Speaker 1>So I think we see that it can work because

0:12:31.516 --> 0:12:38.196
<v Speaker 1>it has worked. So it worked in South Korea, some

0:12:38.236 --> 0:12:41.716
<v Speaker 1>component of it worked in Wuhan, and actually, from a

0:12:41.756 --> 0:12:46.236
<v Speaker 1>public health perspective, if we could identify every case and

0:12:46.916 --> 0:12:50.036
<v Speaker 1>identify every person who'd been in contact with that case

0:12:50.796 --> 0:12:55.516
<v Speaker 1>and isolate them, we would be able to stop transmission.

0:12:56.196 --> 0:13:00.196
<v Speaker 1>So theoretically it can work, and in practice we've seen

0:13:00.396 --> 0:13:03.316
<v Speaker 1>places being able to implement it, especially at the beginning

0:13:03.396 --> 0:13:08.596
<v Speaker 1>of their eyebreaks. So I do think it's feasible. The

0:13:08.716 --> 0:13:14.476
<v Speaker 1>question is, in terms of technology, what can work Bluetooth.

0:13:14.596 --> 0:13:18.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm learning a lot about. It's very interesting because our phones,

0:13:18.836 --> 0:13:22.556
<v Speaker 1>if they have Bluetooth in it, are emitting Bluetooth signals

0:13:22.636 --> 0:13:26.116
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And the idea that your phone itself

0:13:26.356 --> 0:13:30.236
<v Speaker 1>could identify other phones that you have been around and

0:13:30.396 --> 0:13:33.556
<v Speaker 1>hold that information for some period of time and then

0:13:33.676 --> 0:13:38.116
<v Speaker 1>notify you if and only if another phone gets flagged

0:13:38.156 --> 0:13:42.356
<v Speaker 1>as being infected. It's an interesting opportunity to use a

0:13:42.396 --> 0:13:45.436
<v Speaker 1>piece of technology that already exists, that many of us

0:13:45.516 --> 0:13:48.876
<v Speaker 1>already have. So I think the idea of using Bluetooth

0:13:48.916 --> 0:13:53.116
<v Speaker 1>proximity to try to help discover contacts is a very

0:13:53.156 --> 0:13:57.076
<v Speaker 1>interesting and intriguing idea, And I think we have to

0:13:57.116 --> 0:14:01.556
<v Speaker 1>figure out how it can be used, how accurate it is,

0:14:02.156 --> 0:14:05.836
<v Speaker 1>how many false alarms it might give, how well it

0:14:05.916 --> 0:14:08.716
<v Speaker 1>is at picking up whether you've been within six feet

0:14:08.876 --> 0:14:10.596
<v Speaker 1>or if that's an error, If it can tell if

0:14:10.596 --> 0:14:12.396
<v Speaker 1>there's a wall between your six feed like. There are

0:14:12.436 --> 0:14:15.236
<v Speaker 1>many questions about it, but I do think it's intriguing

0:14:15.916 --> 0:14:20.276
<v Speaker 1>and it's very laborious to do all the manual tracing yourself.

0:14:20.676 --> 0:14:23.116
<v Speaker 1>So I think technology should be able to help us.

0:14:24.356 --> 0:14:27.116
<v Speaker 1>Here's what seems to me to be the biggest challenge

0:14:27.116 --> 0:14:30.156
<v Speaker 1>there in order to do the human contact tracing, the

0:14:30.236 --> 0:14:34.036
<v Speaker 1>manual contact tracing. You said, what triggers the whole thing

0:14:34.116 --> 0:14:36.996
<v Speaker 1>is that the public health authorities are informed that someone

0:14:37.076 --> 0:14:39.516
<v Speaker 1>has had a positive test, and the people who are

0:14:39.516 --> 0:14:42.356
<v Speaker 1>doing the contact tracing are indirectly working for the government.

0:14:42.356 --> 0:14:46.516
<v Speaker 1>And if you're going to connect up the digital data

0:14:46.716 --> 0:14:50.116
<v Speaker 1>to actual human tracing in order to give people the

0:14:50.236 --> 0:14:54.676
<v Speaker 1>support and advice that you need, at some point you're

0:14:54.676 --> 0:14:57.636
<v Speaker 1>going to have to connect the digital data that's been

0:14:57.676 --> 0:15:00.436
<v Speaker 1>gathered to the real human being who is connected to

0:15:00.476 --> 0:15:02.836
<v Speaker 1>the government. And I imagine there are some barriers we

0:15:02.876 --> 0:15:06.116
<v Speaker 1>could put there to maybe keep certain aspects of the

0:15:06.196 --> 0:15:08.716
<v Speaker 1>data from the government. But I think for the ordinary

0:15:08.716 --> 0:15:12.116
<v Speaker 1>person going to think, well, look if my phone tells

0:15:12.476 --> 0:15:15.276
<v Speaker 1>somebody everyone I've seen and what that means where I've been,

0:15:15.396 --> 0:15:19.436
<v Speaker 1>that effectively the government is going to know that. How

0:15:19.476 --> 0:15:22.676
<v Speaker 1>does one begin to think about making people feel safe

0:15:22.676 --> 0:15:27.996
<v Speaker 1>and secure under those circumstances in the normal process. COVID

0:15:28.076 --> 0:15:32.876
<v Speaker 1>nineteen is a notifiable illness Therefore, anyone who runs a

0:15:32.916 --> 0:15:37.116
<v Speaker 1>test a laboratory, who runs the test, they must notify

0:15:37.556 --> 0:15:41.716
<v Speaker 1>the public health authorities of a positive result. So already

0:15:42.076 --> 0:15:46.476
<v Speaker 1>there's a kind of trust given to the state about

0:15:46.476 --> 0:15:49.836
<v Speaker 1>a medical condition. I think many people don't realize that

0:15:49.836 --> 0:15:53.916
<v Speaker 1>that exists. Already. There are notifiable diseases. They've always been

0:15:53.956 --> 0:15:58.476
<v Speaker 1>notifiable diseases that the public health authorities are told about

0:15:59.116 --> 0:16:01.276
<v Speaker 1>with your name, not just that there is a kise. Yes,

0:16:03.836 --> 0:16:08.116
<v Speaker 1>effilment has this problem, and that is what normally triggers

0:16:08.796 --> 0:16:13.596
<v Speaker 1>case investigators and contact tracers for other illnesses, although of

0:16:13.636 --> 0:16:16.636
<v Speaker 1>course they're much more snow moving in general, so it

0:16:16.676 --> 0:16:19.436
<v Speaker 1>happens at a much smaller volume. So no one has

0:16:19.476 --> 0:16:22.876
<v Speaker 1>really heard of contact tracing before. So if in a

0:16:22.956 --> 0:16:25.916
<v Speaker 1>perfect I'm calling it a human system. But of course

0:16:25.956 --> 0:16:28.276
<v Speaker 1>the people who do this for a living keep reminding me,

0:16:28.436 --> 0:16:32.796
<v Speaker 1>like we use software, it's not an unaided human process exactly.

0:16:33.076 --> 0:16:36.316
<v Speaker 1>But if you had a perfect process, there would be

0:16:36.356 --> 0:16:41.036
<v Speaker 1>this huge notebook or database that already did have all

0:16:41.076 --> 0:16:44.116
<v Speaker 1>your contacts and all your information, and we already allow

0:16:44.236 --> 0:16:49.436
<v Speaker 1>that to happen in the public interest because of notifiable infections.

0:16:50.156 --> 0:16:53.596
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing is that the human ability to do

0:16:53.636 --> 0:16:57.396
<v Speaker 1>that is flawed, and so that massive database is not

0:16:57.476 --> 0:17:02.556
<v Speaker 1>really there. And also in Massachusetts, for example, there are

0:17:02.596 --> 0:17:05.396
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty one boards of health. Those are

0:17:05.476 --> 0:17:08.956
<v Speaker 1>municipal boards of health essentially county and municipal authorities exactly,

0:17:09.196 --> 0:17:13.396
<v Speaker 1>And so there's some decentralization of the process, there's some

0:17:13.756 --> 0:17:16.756
<v Speaker 1>kind of enactment of local authorities to do things. So

0:17:16.796 --> 0:17:22.476
<v Speaker 1>there's not one massive, big data set of where everyone

0:17:22.516 --> 0:17:24.276
<v Speaker 1>has been and who they've been in contact with, but

0:17:24.356 --> 0:17:28.076
<v Speaker 1>in theory there could be. And yet when we propose

0:17:28.196 --> 0:17:32.196
<v Speaker 1>to do that through technology, it does increase I think

0:17:32.276 --> 0:17:35.316
<v Speaker 1>both the power of that creation of a data set,

0:17:35.316 --> 0:17:38.836
<v Speaker 1>which makes us concerned rightly so, and I think it

0:17:38.956 --> 0:17:44.996
<v Speaker 1>also would potentially increase the scale of the data that's available,

0:17:44.996 --> 0:17:47.676
<v Speaker 1>and it would congregate it in a single place potentially,

0:17:48.116 --> 0:17:52.876
<v Speaker 1>and it makes people concerned understandably about having a data

0:17:52.876 --> 0:17:57.516
<v Speaker 1>set that others could access or use. So two people

0:17:57.556 --> 0:18:00.596
<v Speaker 1>who I've been listening very carefully to and learning a

0:18:00.596 --> 0:18:05.756
<v Speaker 1>lot from in the discussion about digital tools, especially bluetooth tools,

0:18:05.796 --> 0:18:09.356
<v Speaker 1>have been a professor Ron Revest and Dannie Weisner, both

0:18:09.436 --> 0:18:15.436
<v Speaker 1>at mit Ron actually created this group which creates a

0:18:15.476 --> 0:18:23.196
<v Speaker 1>protocol a Bluetooth Proximity protocol CULPACKED that would ostensibly always

0:18:23.236 --> 0:18:27.476
<v Speaker 1>have the information remaining on the phone and really only

0:18:27.516 --> 0:18:32.956
<v Speaker 1>allow anonymized information into a centralized cloud. What Apple and

0:18:32.996 --> 0:18:38.716
<v Speaker 1>Google have proposed to do with their operating systems on

0:18:38.836 --> 0:18:42.516
<v Speaker 1>iPhones and androids to as far as I can see,

0:18:42.756 --> 0:18:46.836
<v Speaker 1>is following the recommendations that are in the PACKED protocol

0:18:47.396 --> 0:18:51.116
<v Speaker 1>that Ron has led, and that will maintain a degree

0:18:51.276 --> 0:18:57.596
<v Speaker 1>of privacy for individuals. That seems robust technological solutions, I'm

0:18:57.636 --> 0:19:00.276
<v Speaker 1>sure are part of the answer here, but they will

0:19:00.276 --> 0:19:04.116
<v Speaker 1>also have to be a policy component to it as well,

0:19:04.276 --> 0:19:08.916
<v Speaker 1>especially if we need to ultimately connect the data on

0:19:08.956 --> 0:19:12.676
<v Speaker 1>people's phones about their contact to human tracing. The state

0:19:12.716 --> 0:19:15.556
<v Speaker 1>will have to make a policy decision about that in

0:19:15.676 --> 0:19:18.876
<v Speaker 1>light of the full set of public values and public

0:19:18.916 --> 0:19:20.836
<v Speaker 1>norms and constitutional rules in it. That's going to be

0:19:20.876 --> 0:19:26.076
<v Speaker 1>a tricky moment. Yeah, no single component of addressing the

0:19:26.116 --> 0:19:31.196
<v Speaker 1>pandemic will work on its own. It just won't. Outbreaks

0:19:31.236 --> 0:19:38.876
<v Speaker 1>are complex social phenomena as well as scientific events, so

0:19:39.196 --> 0:19:45.756
<v Speaker 1>we have to have a comprehensive, integrated approach that acknowledges

0:19:45.876 --> 0:19:51.516
<v Speaker 1>that humans don't make rational choices, that the virus is

0:19:51.756 --> 0:19:55.236
<v Speaker 1>brand new and we're still learning about it. That we

0:19:55.316 --> 0:19:58.516
<v Speaker 1>have to test more, that we have to connect testing

0:19:58.556 --> 0:20:02.916
<v Speaker 1>to contact tracing, that some people can't self isolate without support,

0:20:03.556 --> 0:20:06.876
<v Speaker 1>that some people a particularly vulnerable boat to being infected,

0:20:07.356 --> 0:20:11.116
<v Speaker 1>and to the solutions we're proposed here, like the contact racing,

0:20:11.556 --> 0:20:15.716
<v Speaker 1>and that we have to have a smart approach that

0:20:16.556 --> 0:20:20.156
<v Speaker 1>can take care of the most vulnerable people, take care

0:20:20.196 --> 0:20:24.356
<v Speaker 1>of sick people, help other people from getting infected, and

0:20:24.476 --> 0:20:28.876
<v Speaker 1>allow us to start going back into society. Again, no

0:20:29.276 --> 0:20:32.636
<v Speaker 1>one thing is a silver bullet, and it really requires

0:20:33.396 --> 0:20:38.476
<v Speaker 1>strong leadership that has good scientific understanding and that embraces

0:20:39.036 --> 0:20:43.156
<v Speaker 1>the social component of disease as well as just the

0:20:43.236 --> 0:20:47.836
<v Speaker 1>medical component of disease. Sometimes when I'm listening to the

0:20:47.836 --> 0:20:52.356
<v Speaker 1>debates about should we quote unquote reopen things, it starts

0:20:52.396 --> 0:20:55.796
<v Speaker 1>with some people saying no, too dangerous, other people saying

0:20:55.796 --> 0:20:58.756
<v Speaker 1>we must do it, and then comes a sort of

0:20:58.836 --> 0:21:03.356
<v Speaker 1>reasonable voice saying, well, we can reopen once we have

0:21:03.756 --> 0:21:09.716
<v Speaker 1>sufficient testing and sufficient contact tracing and supported isolation, and

0:21:09.836 --> 0:21:13.076
<v Speaker 1>in a kind of Goldilocks way that seems to be,

0:21:13.516 --> 0:21:16.956
<v Speaker 1>you know, the reasonable middle answer. One takeaway from me

0:21:17.036 --> 0:21:19.396
<v Speaker 1>of our conversation is that it actually may not be

0:21:19.436 --> 0:21:23.116
<v Speaker 1>that simple, and that the presence of robust testing and

0:21:23.196 --> 0:21:28.756
<v Speaker 1>robust contact tracing where there's community spread doesn't guarantee successful

0:21:28.916 --> 0:21:32.676
<v Speaker 1>control of the epidemic. Am I hearing you correctly in

0:21:32.716 --> 0:21:35.956
<v Speaker 1>that regard? I think you know so. I'm an infectious

0:21:35.956 --> 0:21:39.876
<v Speaker 1>diseases doctor at Mass Journal Hospital in Boston, and as

0:21:39.956 --> 0:21:43.196
<v Speaker 1>a doctor in the hospital, it's been really terrifying over

0:21:43.236 --> 0:21:45.996
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks to see our cases going up

0:21:46.036 --> 0:21:48.796
<v Speaker 1>and up and up. So I think that some of

0:21:48.836 --> 0:21:53.236
<v Speaker 1>the hesitancies about reopening, so to speak, are that we

0:21:53.316 --> 0:21:58.196
<v Speaker 1>fear that reopening in a trickle wouldn't really work and

0:21:58.276 --> 0:22:02.756
<v Speaker 1>that we would quickly become overwhelmed. And I think the

0:22:02.956 --> 0:22:08.436
<v Speaker 1>tentativeness over the medical side's capacity to care for sick

0:22:08.476 --> 0:22:14.716
<v Speaker 1>people is really understandably a large part of the hesitancy

0:22:15.356 --> 0:22:18.276
<v Speaker 1>in terms of opening up. I do think if we

0:22:18.356 --> 0:22:21.636
<v Speaker 1>have really widespread testing, but we have to scale up

0:22:21.636 --> 0:22:24.676
<v Speaker 1>testing really a lot, a lot more than we're doing,

0:22:25.276 --> 0:22:29.236
<v Speaker 1>and if we have robust contact tracing in place, we

0:22:29.356 --> 0:22:34.236
<v Speaker 1>could start reopening. The fear is that that brings us

0:22:34.276 --> 0:22:37.076
<v Speaker 1>into a certain amounte of uncertainty, and none of us

0:22:37.116 --> 0:22:41.316
<v Speaker 1>like uncertainty. We're really fearful that our hospitals will be

0:22:41.556 --> 0:22:45.276
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmed and that people will die unnecessarily. And that's a

0:22:45.316 --> 0:22:50.076
<v Speaker 1>scary thought. But at some point, you know, my opinion

0:22:50.196 --> 0:22:53.436
<v Speaker 1>is that we have to make a plan. I think.

0:22:53.916 --> 0:22:57.076
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest challenge right now is that I

0:22:57.116 --> 0:23:00.436
<v Speaker 1>don't really see the plan. I haven't seen the plan.

0:23:02.076 --> 0:23:05.556
<v Speaker 1>You have you seen the plan? The plan, you know,

0:23:05.796 --> 0:23:08.276
<v Speaker 1>and if you haven't seen it and I haven't seen it,

0:23:08.316 --> 0:23:10.836
<v Speaker 1>there is no plan. I mean, I think, Yeah, there's

0:23:10.836 --> 0:23:14.436
<v Speaker 1>a lot of magical thinking. There's a lot of thought about, well,

0:23:14.476 --> 0:23:17.396
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could hold out until there's a vaccine, but

0:23:17.436 --> 0:23:19.076
<v Speaker 1>there may not be a vaccine. There's a lot of

0:23:19.076 --> 0:23:21.236
<v Speaker 1>thought of we have to hold out until the therapies

0:23:21.276 --> 0:23:23.396
<v Speaker 1>get much better, but we don't have any guarantee that

0:23:23.396 --> 0:23:25.916
<v Speaker 1>the therapies will work. And then the fallback is when

0:23:25.916 --> 0:23:28.556
<v Speaker 1>people say herd immunity in some generic sense, as though

0:23:28.556 --> 0:23:32.236
<v Speaker 1>they knew exactly what that meant. And that's obviously a

0:23:32.276 --> 0:23:34.236
<v Speaker 1>scenario in which you will be very difficult to avoid

0:23:34.276 --> 0:23:37.996
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming the hospital. So I agree with you. So I

0:23:38.076 --> 0:23:41.116
<v Speaker 1>have in my global health career, spent a lot of

0:23:41.156 --> 0:23:45.916
<v Speaker 1>time responding to eyebreaks. You know, none like this but

0:23:46.956 --> 0:23:50.836
<v Speaker 1>in disaster settings, you know, you have to move quickly

0:23:51.476 --> 0:23:55.996
<v Speaker 1>and make decisions in the context of uncertainty. You know,

0:23:56.156 --> 0:23:58.956
<v Speaker 1>in the US we are not as used to doing

0:23:58.996 --> 0:24:04.796
<v Speaker 1>that because we have always really got the resources to

0:24:05.116 --> 0:24:07.796
<v Speaker 1>do the modeling and get the science and wait until

0:24:07.836 --> 0:24:11.076
<v Speaker 1>it's perfect. And I think we have to move ahead

0:24:11.996 --> 0:24:16.476
<v Speaker 1>with making decisions that are imperfect using the best data

0:24:16.516 --> 0:24:18.196
<v Speaker 1>that we have. But we do have to use the

0:24:18.276 --> 0:24:21.756
<v Speaker 1>data that we have. I mean, we have to move forward.

0:24:22.556 --> 0:24:26.916
<v Speaker 1>So you know, technology and other ideas they may seem ambitious,

0:24:26.956 --> 0:24:30.316
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing might seem oh, it's not feasible, it's too many,

0:24:30.396 --> 0:24:34.716
<v Speaker 1>But the way to be successful is just to take

0:24:35.036 --> 0:24:39.236
<v Speaker 1>the next step forward and believe it's possible and keep

0:24:39.276 --> 0:24:42.636
<v Speaker 1>building it as you're doing it. I think that's what

0:24:42.796 --> 0:24:46.276
<v Speaker 1>we have to think about, or else, you know, we're

0:24:46.276 --> 0:24:49.476
<v Speaker 1>just going to be struck. Thank you so much. This

0:24:49.636 --> 0:24:52.516
<v Speaker 1>is tremendously clarifying, and there are bits of it that

0:24:52.596 --> 0:24:55.556
<v Speaker 1>are inspiring and make one think there is a way forward,

0:24:55.556 --> 0:24:57.636
<v Speaker 1>and then there are bits of it that cause one

0:24:57.676 --> 0:25:00.636
<v Speaker 1>to feel a bit more panic. And I really appreciate

0:25:00.636 --> 0:25:02.796
<v Speaker 1>it your honestly about it. Thank you all right, thank

0:25:02.796 --> 0:25:07.436
<v Speaker 1>you Here on deep background. We've spoken to several guests

0:25:07.636 --> 0:25:10.836
<v Speaker 1>who focused on the mechan that we can use gradually

0:25:10.836 --> 0:25:13.676
<v Speaker 1>to emerge from the conditions of social isolation that we're

0:25:13.676 --> 0:25:17.356
<v Speaker 1>presently in. Testing has been a consistent theme that we've

0:25:17.396 --> 0:25:20.876
<v Speaker 1>heard about again and again and again, more and better testing.

0:25:21.676 --> 0:25:24.796
<v Speaker 1>Speaking to doctor Ivers makes it clear that the testing

0:25:24.956 --> 0:25:28.436
<v Speaker 1>is primarily valuable, however, to the extent that it is

0:25:28.476 --> 0:25:32.596
<v Speaker 1>then used to lead to contact tracing, and the idea

0:25:32.676 --> 0:25:35.996
<v Speaker 1>is that contact tracing itself can help manage the disease.

0:25:36.836 --> 0:25:39.276
<v Speaker 1>This may be the only long run strategy that can

0:25:39.316 --> 0:25:41.836
<v Speaker 1>be used in the absence of a vaccine and in

0:25:41.876 --> 0:25:45.836
<v Speaker 1>the absence of better therapies. But contact tracing on its

0:25:45.836 --> 0:25:49.396
<v Speaker 1>own is not a magic bullet. You have to reach

0:25:49.556 --> 0:25:52.956
<v Speaker 1>enough people and that's a challenge. It's also very difficult

0:25:52.996 --> 0:25:55.876
<v Speaker 1>to make contact tracing work in a scenario where as

0:25:55.916 --> 0:25:59.116
<v Speaker 1>we have, the disease has spread into the entire community

0:25:59.116 --> 0:26:01.716
<v Speaker 1>and we're not just tracking down a handful of names.

0:26:03.356 --> 0:26:05.676
<v Speaker 1>Contact tracing is going to be central to our public

0:26:05.676 --> 0:26:10.276
<v Speaker 1>discussion in the weeks and months ahead, its successes, its limitations,

0:26:10.396 --> 0:26:13.076
<v Speaker 1>and the challenges that it faces. We will keep a

0:26:13.076 --> 0:26:15.996
<v Speaker 1>close eye on this subject going forward and come back

0:26:15.996 --> 0:26:19.236
<v Speaker 1>to you with more about contact tracing as this story develops.

0:26:20.236 --> 0:26:23.516
<v Speaker 1>Until I speak to you next time, Be careful, be safe,

0:26:23.756 --> 0:26:27.236
<v Speaker 1>and be well. Deep Background is brought to you by

0:26:27.316 --> 0:26:31.276
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia gene Coott, with research

0:26:31.316 --> 0:26:34.876
<v Speaker 1>help from zooe Wynn. Mastering is by Jason Gambrell and

0:26:34.916 --> 0:26:38.876
<v Speaker 1>Martin Gonzalez. Our showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Our theme music

0:26:38.956 --> 0:26:42.316
<v Speaker 1>is composed by Luis GERA special thanks to the Pushkin Brass,

0:26:42.596 --> 0:26:46.516
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Gladwell, Jacob Weisberg, and Mia Lobel. I'm Noah Feldman.

0:26:46.956 --> 0:26:49.676
<v Speaker 1>I also write a regular column from Bloomberg Opinion, which

0:26:49.676 --> 0:26:52.956
<v Speaker 1>you can find at Bloomberg dot com slash Feldman. To

0:26:53.036 --> 0:26:56.596
<v Speaker 1>discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go to Bloomberg dot

0:26:56.636 --> 0:27:00.356
<v Speaker 1>com slash Podcasts. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:27:00.436 --> 0:27:03.556
<v Speaker 1>Noah R. Feldman. This is Deep Background.