1 00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:03,600 Speaker 1: Before we get started, a brief correction from last week's 2 00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:08,440 Speaker 1: methylene blue episode. My wife, the brilliant breast surgeon, informed 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:10,879 Speaker 1: me that I neglected to mention a very important use 4 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:12,960 Speaker 1: of methylene blue, which is that it is used for 5 00:00:13,080 --> 00:00:16,200 Speaker 1: sentinel lymph node biopsy in all types of surgeries where 6 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:20,320 Speaker 1: surgeons need to figure out where cancer may be spreading 7 00:00:20,360 --> 00:00:22,959 Speaker 1: and along what path. So one more good use of 8 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 1: methylene blue amidst the many bad uses that we talked 9 00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:30,320 Speaker 1: about last week. Let's get on with today's episode. 10 00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:33,160 Speaker 2: Okay, So, Perry, I'm going to tell you a story 11 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:36,000 Speaker 2: about a colleague of mine at my old job who 12 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:38,440 Speaker 2: ate only. 13 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:41,160 Speaker 1: Meat, only meat pretty much. 14 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:44,840 Speaker 2: Okay, So here's what happened. He was on a carnivore 15 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:50,519 Speaker 2: paleo meat granted diet and his main snack food was 16 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,680 Speaker 2: I want you to imagine, you know, those like ice 17 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:57,120 Speaker 2: pop things that your kids have that are like long 18 00:00:57,160 --> 00:00:59,480 Speaker 2: plastic things at blue ice in the middle and it's. 19 00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:00,160 Speaker 3: Like a pushpop. 20 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 1: Yeah. 21 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:04,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, it was like that, but instead of the blue ice, 22 00:01:05,120 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 2: it was a meat slurry. So it's sort of like 23 00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:12,040 Speaker 2: a like a like a beef tartar, but more of 24 00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:14,440 Speaker 2: a of a slurry he would just sort of like 25 00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:16,839 Speaker 2: push it up and eat it, okay, So that already 26 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:20,600 Speaker 2: was like m he had the office next to mine. 27 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:23,399 Speaker 2: Then it's the summer and he goes out of town 28 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:27,160 Speaker 2: and he gets right before it's like quite hot, and 29 00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:31,119 Speaker 2: he gets a box of this stuff delivered right before 30 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:35,760 Speaker 2: he leaves, and they put it in his office. The 31 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 2: course of the next few weeks, the smell just gets 32 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:42,520 Speaker 2: worse and worse and worse, and finally it's like our 33 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 2: offices are around this open space where like the graduate 34 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 2: students work, and she's getting worse and worse and worse, 35 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:50,920 Speaker 2: and finally we call in security and they go in 36 00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:55,680 Speaker 2: and there's just this box of like rotting meat slurry. 37 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:59,680 Speaker 2: Did you think that someone had died, Well, we thought 38 00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:01,560 Speaker 2: it was animal like we didn't think it was in 39 00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:03,880 Speaker 2: dead person, but we thought there was an animal that 40 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:04,320 Speaker 2: had died. 41 00:02:04,400 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 3: And then we opened it and the security guys are like, 42 00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:08,720 Speaker 3: there's a box of meat. 43 00:02:09,360 --> 00:02:09,600 Speaker 4: And. 44 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 3: I was mad. I was really mad. 45 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:18,480 Speaker 1: I mean I would be livid. We're going to talk 46 00:02:19,080 --> 00:02:22,880 Speaker 1: about the benefits and risks of a red meat diet today, 47 00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 1: but boy, this is what I didn't think of. 48 00:02:25,639 --> 00:02:28,800 Speaker 5: Keep your meat refrigerated people, geez, give your meat slurries. 49 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:31,360 Speaker 2: Guys, your meat push up slurry pops. They need to 50 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:33,720 Speaker 2: be refrigerated. If you learn nothing else from this episode, 51 00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:39,600 Speaker 2: it should be that I'm Emily Oster, I'm an economist 52 00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:40,560 Speaker 2: and a data expert. 53 00:02:40,639 --> 00:02:42,680 Speaker 1: And I'm Harry Wilson, I'm a medical doctor. 54 00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:45,920 Speaker 2: It's Thursday May twenty eight, twenty twenty six, and this 55 00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:47,280 Speaker 2: is wellness. 56 00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:50,520 Speaker 1: Actually, because you're getting a staggering amount of health and 57 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:54,560 Speaker 1: wellness information nowadays from every source imaginable, and some of 58 00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:56,520 Speaker 1: it is awesome and some. 59 00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 3: Of it is well actually both. 60 00:03:00,280 --> 00:03:03,320 Speaker 2: Fortunately we are both people who know how to read studies, 61 00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:05,880 Speaker 2: how to parse the data, and can tell you what's 62 00:03:05,919 --> 00:03:08,720 Speaker 2: worth thinking about and what you can safely ignore. 63 00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:11,360 Speaker 1: But before we dig in, a note that this podcast 64 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:14,000 Speaker 1: is for educational purposes and should not be construed as 65 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:17,240 Speaker 1: medical advice. We don't know your unique situation, so talk 66 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:19,400 Speaker 1: to your doctor for personal health decisions. 67 00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:23,360 Speaker 2: This week, we're asking what's the deal with red meat? 68 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:26,680 Speaker 2: Harry and I will give the official smasher pass, and 69 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:28,680 Speaker 2: then we'll get to your question of the week. But 70 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:30,440 Speaker 2: first let's do the health news roundup. 71 00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:31,720 Speaker 3: After the break. 72 00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:46,480 Speaker 1: And we're back with your Health News of the Week, Emily. 73 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:53,640 Speaker 1: Running influencers are having a moment with peptides. What's going 74 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:54,680 Speaker 1: on here? This is your world? 75 00:03:55,680 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 2: Okay, So there's a fight going on between two running 76 00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 2: influencers about use of peptides. So there is one running 77 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:08,720 Speaker 2: influencer who ran the Eugene Marathon and he's not even 78 00:04:08,760 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 2: really a running influencer. He's like a wellness guy influencer, 79 00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:15,480 Speaker 2: and he ran the Eugene Marathon actually quite fast, in 80 00:04:15,560 --> 00:04:18,160 Speaker 2: like two thirty nine. He's fifty, so it's actually a 81 00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 2: very fast time, and he won his like old person 82 00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:21,719 Speaker 2: age group or whatever. 83 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:23,560 Speaker 3: But he's not a professional athlete. 84 00:04:23,920 --> 00:04:26,719 Speaker 2: But then ex post he really he revealed that he's 85 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:30,360 Speaker 2: been using BPC one fifty seven, which you may recall 86 00:04:30,480 --> 00:04:32,640 Speaker 2: as being part of the Wolverine. 87 00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:35,120 Speaker 3: Stack that is recommended by Joe Rogan. 88 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:39,479 Speaker 1: And then the peptide episode please. 89 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 3: Listen to our theptid episode. 90 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:46,600 Speaker 2: And then another running influencer is an ultra runner influencer, 91 00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:49,440 Speaker 2: is very upset about this because BPC one fifty seven 92 00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:53,839 Speaker 2: is not sanctioned by WATA, which is the antidoping agency. 93 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:55,920 Speaker 3: But this guy's view is. 94 00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:57,919 Speaker 2: Like he's not a professional athlete, he's not in a 95 00:04:57,960 --> 00:05:01,719 Speaker 2: doping pool, and the other other guys view is you're cheating, 96 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:04,400 Speaker 2: and my view is there's no evidence that this peptide 97 00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:07,719 Speaker 2: improves your performance. But I love the overlap of like 98 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:12,200 Speaker 2: endurance sports and peptides and influencers. 99 00:05:12,360 --> 00:05:13,480 Speaker 3: It's just it's a dream. 100 00:05:14,160 --> 00:05:17,119 Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, as more of this stuff gets out there, 101 00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:21,040 Speaker 1: with less and less data, these issues just you can 102 00:05:21,160 --> 00:05:23,760 Speaker 1: you can impose whatever you want on the effects of 103 00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:26,000 Speaker 1: these things because there's no one who can prove you 104 00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:28,760 Speaker 1: wrong since there's no strong data. So you can say like, oh, 105 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:31,360 Speaker 1: this is the same as taking steroids, or you can 106 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,560 Speaker 1: be like it's a fancy placebo and it made me 107 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 1: believe in myself. And you've got equal evidentiary support for 108 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:38,640 Speaker 1: both of those statements totally. 109 00:05:39,200 --> 00:05:41,920 Speaker 2: So anyway, that was my that was my thing. I 110 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:43,680 Speaker 2: am going to refrain from making us do an entire 111 00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:45,919 Speaker 2: episode on a thing called the enhanced Games, but we 112 00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:47,599 Speaker 2: can discuss that at another time. 113 00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:49,160 Speaker 1: Oh I saw that fascinating. 114 00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:51,680 Speaker 3: Yes, absolutely, all right. 115 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,800 Speaker 2: In less fun news, please tell us what's going on 116 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:55,839 Speaker 2: with Ebola. 117 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:58,680 Speaker 1: Yeah. I'd like to not have this be a news 118 00:05:58,680 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 1: item every week, but it is important. The Abola outbreak 119 00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:07,240 Speaker 1: continues in the Democratic Republic of Congo right now as 120 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 1: of the recording, today's Tuesday, the twenty six, when we're recording, 121 00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 1: you'll hear this a couple days later. They're about a 122 00:06:13,960 --> 00:06:17,799 Speaker 1: thousand suspected and confirmed cases and two hundred and twenty 123 00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:22,680 Speaker 1: three suspected deaths. The outbreak has spread into Uganda now 124 00:06:22,680 --> 00:06:26,880 Speaker 1: with seven confirmed cases and one confirmed death. One American 125 00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:31,120 Speaker 1: has been infected. They were administering care to people in 126 00:06:31,160 --> 00:06:34,760 Speaker 1: the Democratic Republic of Congo, tested positive and has been 127 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 1: evacuated to Germany to a hospital there. Obviously, we wish 128 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:42,640 Speaker 1: them the best. I think. One of the concerning things 129 00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 1: that has emergency weeks, there have been several attacks against 130 00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 1: health centers in the Democratic Republic of Congo that are 131 00:06:49,320 --> 00:06:52,159 Speaker 1: you know, ministering to this population. You know. One of 132 00:06:52,200 --> 00:06:59,280 Speaker 1: the issues is apparently that the cultural funereal practices are 133 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:03,840 Speaker 1: very important in this part of the world, and healthcare 134 00:07:03,880 --> 00:07:09,920 Speaker 1: workers have been limiting access to dead bodies to their 135 00:07:10,040 --> 00:07:14,520 Speaker 1: families and loved ones, in part because inebola deceased bodies 136 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:17,920 Speaker 1: are highly highly infectious. This is transmitted by bodily fluids 137 00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 1: and in fact, in prior outbreaks, sixty to eighty percent 138 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 1: of the infections were attributed to funereal practices because there, 139 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:29,680 Speaker 1: you know, families will like bathe the bodies, even sleep 140 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 1: near the bodies for several days at a time. There's 141 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,040 Speaker 1: really interesting public health work being done there to like 142 00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: work within the communities, work with religious leaders to try 143 00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:44,280 Speaker 1: to you know, educate the populace on safe funereal practices here. 144 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:46,880 Speaker 1: But obviously there's a lot of anger and mistrust in 145 00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:48,920 Speaker 1: the populace as well, which is why you see these attacks, 146 00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:51,840 Speaker 1: which you know, it goes without saying, are a terrible 147 00:07:51,840 --> 00:07:54,080 Speaker 1: thing to you know, you're not going to reduce the 148 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:56,360 Speaker 1: spread of this if you attack the clinics that are 149 00:07:57,080 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 1: isolating and treating people as best they can. 150 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 2: This is very I hope we will not keep talking 151 00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 2: about this, but it is scary but also very very 152 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:08,120 Speaker 2: sad it is. 153 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,680 Speaker 1: Let's move on to let's add more crazy. I think 154 00:08:13,720 --> 00:08:17,040 Speaker 1: I read the wildest quote I've seen in a long 155 00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 1: time from a legitimate researcher. So this comes from doctor 156 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:25,920 Speaker 1: Glenn Jeffrey. He's at University of College London. He's a 157 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:29,640 Speaker 1: mitochondrial researcher. So there we go, all of you playing 158 00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:32,880 Speaker 1: the drinking game at home. We've now mentioned mitochondria. You 159 00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:36,440 Speaker 1: have to take a shot. He's a mitochondrial researcher and, 160 00:08:36,520 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 1: appearing on Huberman's podcast, referred to LED lighting as an 161 00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:49,600 Speaker 1: asbestos level crisis. Bonker's statement to make Emily, why does 162 00:08:49,640 --> 00:08:53,560 Speaker 1: he think that LED lights are as bad as asbestos? 163 00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 2: Asbestos a substance which, just to be clear, is well 164 00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:01,720 Speaker 2: known to have caused many, many cases of cancer in 165 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:02,920 Speaker 2: people over time. 166 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:06,439 Speaker 1: Yes, very difficult to treat cancer, MUSICIELI almost. 167 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:10,280 Speaker 2: Difficult to treat cancer, all right. So this researcher was 168 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:14,280 Speaker 2: working on LED lights and he ran an experiment in 169 00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:17,960 Speaker 2: which he exposed some people to LED lights with sunlight 170 00:09:18,040 --> 00:09:21,240 Speaker 2: and some people with INCANDESCI lights like different kinds of lighting, 171 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:25,560 Speaker 2: some of which was more LED focused than others. And 172 00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:30,880 Speaker 2: he showed some changes in the retina after two weeks 173 00:09:30,880 --> 00:09:37,200 Speaker 2: of this exposure and concluded that this might be related 174 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:41,560 Speaker 2: to the mitochondria, and as a result, it's as bad 175 00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:44,200 Speaker 2: as asbestos. I will be Frank. I can read the paper. 176 00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:46,360 Speaker 2: The paper says we did this thing with the light 177 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:48,640 Speaker 2: and there was some small changes in retinal function, and 178 00:09:48,679 --> 00:09:53,520 Speaker 2: that's an interesting thing to explore. But I'm failing to 179 00:09:53,559 --> 00:09:58,200 Speaker 2: see the link the jump between small changes to the 180 00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:01,320 Speaker 2: retina and then cancer. 181 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:02,800 Speaker 3: Did you did you see it? 182 00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:03,360 Speaker 6: No? 183 00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:06,079 Speaker 1: I the link as far as I can see. And 184 00:10:06,559 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 1: this is like a theme that I keep seeing now 185 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:12,959 Speaker 1: that I'm exposed to, like the wellness and influencer space 186 00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:16,040 Speaker 1: is like apparently you can just say like that that 187 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:18,520 Speaker 1: that's where we are right now, And it's much more 188 00:10:18,520 --> 00:10:21,760 Speaker 1: interesting to say this is an asbestos level health crisis 189 00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:26,640 Speaker 1: than as expected when exposing people to different kinds of 190 00:10:26,640 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 1: bright lights, there are subtle changes in the eye right 191 00:10:29,240 --> 00:10:29,920 Speaker 1: like this. 192 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:33,079 Speaker 3: I did not click on that. 193 00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:37,520 Speaker 1: I didn't So, you know, anyway, for listeners, just like 194 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 1: claims like this, you know, trustworthy science communication unfortunately is 195 00:10:44,640 --> 00:10:48,840 Speaker 1: not that exciting because most evidence is somewhere in the 196 00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:51,280 Speaker 1: middle and and requires nuance. 197 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:53,920 Speaker 3: And and most effects are small. I mean I think 198 00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:54,520 Speaker 3: that's the thing. 199 00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:57,800 Speaker 2: Like most things, if they have a positive effect or 200 00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:00,000 Speaker 2: a negative fact, most of these effects are very small. 201 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:00,680 Speaker 3: Yeah. 202 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 1: And also, I you know, one of the things that 203 00:11:02,840 --> 00:11:04,560 Speaker 1: he said was like, oh, you know, you should consider 204 00:11:04,600 --> 00:11:08,040 Speaker 1: moving back to incandescent lights, And it's like we've made 205 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:11,280 Speaker 1: so much like this is one area where technology I 206 00:11:11,320 --> 00:11:16,719 Speaker 1: think just completely fixed a problem like led lights are 207 00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:18,760 Speaker 1: so much better than incandescent totally. 208 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:22,800 Speaker 2: They are better for the environment, cheaper, last, longer, last way. 209 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:25,840 Speaker 1: Is there that a superior product in every possible way? 210 00:11:26,760 --> 00:11:31,000 Speaker 1: Don't move us back to the dark ages, no pun intended. 211 00:11:32,360 --> 00:11:34,680 Speaker 2: That is the health news of the week. After the break, 212 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:43,120 Speaker 2: what is the deal with red meat? Okay, Perry, let's 213 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:44,440 Speaker 2: talk about red meat. 214 00:11:44,760 --> 00:11:47,640 Speaker 1: I'm here for it. I am like a hack of 215 00:11:47,640 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 1: a politician. I want to throw out some red meat 216 00:11:50,679 --> 00:11:52,160 Speaker 1: to my listeners. 217 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:55,720 Speaker 2: So I want to start with a short disclaimer, which 218 00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:57,680 Speaker 2: is that we are going to talk here about red 219 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:01,480 Speaker 2: meat and its impacts on health and varying sources of 220 00:12:01,679 --> 00:12:05,199 Speaker 2: protein and how nutrition relates to human health. 221 00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 3: We are not going to talk about climate. I know 222 00:12:07,440 --> 00:12:07,760 Speaker 3: that a. 223 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:10,360 Speaker 2: Lot of people avoid red meat because of the impact 224 00:12:10,400 --> 00:12:13,840 Speaker 2: of cows on climate, and we are not going to 225 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:16,200 Speaker 2: be talking about that today, not because it's not important, 226 00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:18,599 Speaker 2: but because that's not the topic of today's podcast. 227 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:20,280 Speaker 1: Excellent disclaimer. There you go. 228 00:12:20,480 --> 00:12:20,680 Speaker 3: Yep. 229 00:12:21,320 --> 00:12:26,680 Speaker 2: Okay, let's start with some basic science. What makes red 230 00:12:26,720 --> 00:12:30,000 Speaker 2: meat red? Trivia question for the doctor? 231 00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:36,320 Speaker 1: My aglobin In a word, my globin is a protein 232 00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:40,920 Speaker 1: that lives in muscle, cells and has a heme group 233 00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:43,559 Speaker 1: in the middle, which is an iron containing group in 234 00:12:43,600 --> 00:12:47,400 Speaker 1: the middle, and it provides oxygen to muscle cells which 235 00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:50,640 Speaker 1: need that oxygen so that they can run their mitochondria 236 00:12:50,679 --> 00:12:53,839 Speaker 1: and contract and things like that. Differing amounts of myoglobin 237 00:12:54,679 --> 00:12:58,640 Speaker 1: colors muscles differing shades of red, and so you know, 238 00:12:58,679 --> 00:13:01,360 Speaker 1: when we think about red meat like cows and pork 239 00:13:01,400 --> 00:13:04,520 Speaker 1: and stuff like that, that's basically what you're seeing. It's 240 00:13:04,520 --> 00:13:06,800 Speaker 1: the same heme group that comes in hemoglobin, which delivers 241 00:13:06,800 --> 00:13:08,640 Speaker 1: oxygen to the rest of the body, but myoglobin is 242 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:12,000 Speaker 1: quite concentrated in muscle cells. It does lead to the question, 243 00:13:12,040 --> 00:13:17,920 Speaker 1: of course, like why don't birds and chickens have myoglobin 244 00:13:18,280 --> 00:13:22,280 Speaker 1: in their muscle fibers. And it turns out that birds 245 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 1: don't use aerobic respiration to fuel their muscle movements. They 246 00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:30,400 Speaker 1: use anaerobic respirations, so they aren't using their mitochondria, they 247 00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:34,760 Speaker 1: don't need an oxygen carrier in their muscle fibers, and 248 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:40,320 Speaker 1: hence they have white muscle, and fundamentally that's what explains 249 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:42,960 Speaker 1: the color. But of course what's interesting to us is 250 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:45,400 Speaker 1: less like a why is it red? And more what 251 00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:49,400 Speaker 1: are the nutritional differences? Writen large between you know, a 252 00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 1: given amount of red meat and a given amount of 253 00:13:51,520 --> 00:13:54,120 Speaker 1: non red or white meat. So we should probably dig 254 00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:54,360 Speaker 1: in there. 255 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:57,679 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think we should start there because in general, 256 00:13:57,880 --> 00:14:01,559 Speaker 2: when people are eating meat, this is an important source 257 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:03,000 Speaker 2: of protein. 258 00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 3: And that is what people are mostly getting. 259 00:14:07,280 --> 00:14:09,960 Speaker 2: That is the most important macronutrient people are getting out 260 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 2: of meat. 261 00:14:11,120 --> 00:14:11,880 Speaker 3: And there are. 262 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:14,360 Speaker 2: Sources of protein that come from animals and sources of 263 00:14:14,400 --> 00:14:18,520 Speaker 2: protein that come from plants, and I think gets useful 264 00:14:18,520 --> 00:14:21,200 Speaker 2: to do a little bit of a comparison for people about, 265 00:14:21,280 --> 00:14:24,720 Speaker 2: you know, what are some common sources of protein and 266 00:14:24,760 --> 00:14:29,040 Speaker 2: what do they deliver, So we can maybe think about beef, chicken, fish, 267 00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 2: and tofu as being kind of representative of the kinds 268 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:33,680 Speaker 2: of meat. 269 00:14:34,800 --> 00:14:38,320 Speaker 1: I would say the four proteins of the Apocalypse. 270 00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:41,840 Speaker 2: Lean, ground, beef, skinless chicken, breast, salmon, and tofu. 271 00:14:42,760 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 3: Distinguishing features among these are. 272 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:53,440 Speaker 2: Beef has more calories than the other items because it 273 00:14:53,480 --> 00:14:57,160 Speaker 2: has more fat. Like that's like the for me, that's 274 00:14:57,160 --> 00:14:59,520 Speaker 2: like the most crucial element of this is that that 275 00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:01,840 Speaker 2: for a guin amount of protein, beef is going to 276 00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:04,359 Speaker 2: have more calories because it has more fat, and particularly 277 00:15:04,360 --> 00:15:05,520 Speaker 2: more saturated fat. 278 00:15:07,760 --> 00:15:10,760 Speaker 3: Tofu is going to have sort of slightly. 279 00:15:11,280 --> 00:15:15,800 Speaker 2: Less much less fat, much less saturated fat. The lowest 280 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:18,360 Speaker 2: thing in saturated fat or Jeff fat in general is 281 00:15:18,400 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 2: like skinless chicken breast. That's why that's everyone's favorite nineteen 282 00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:26,640 Speaker 2: eighties diet food. But when I think about how we 283 00:15:26,760 --> 00:15:29,360 Speaker 2: organize the questions about health here, it is really about 284 00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 2: around the fact that this is a higher calorie food 285 00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:33,400 Speaker 2: because it has more fat. 286 00:15:34,040 --> 00:15:36,360 Speaker 3: Is there more that you would say about the nutrients? 287 00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:39,920 Speaker 1: I'd say a couple little other things, But yes, I 288 00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:43,440 Speaker 1: think when it comes to health, we're talking not just 289 00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:46,120 Speaker 1: about fat, but about saturated fat. And I think everyone's 290 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:47,760 Speaker 1: heard the term saturated fat, so we should, but we 291 00:15:47,760 --> 00:15:50,400 Speaker 1: should actually define it like what it is and why 292 00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:55,120 Speaker 1: we care. And that is kind of the distinguishing feature 293 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:57,480 Speaker 1: of beef. As you say, there are a couple little 294 00:15:57,480 --> 00:16:01,520 Speaker 1: other things that, like micronutrients, that are worth describing. People 295 00:16:01,560 --> 00:16:03,880 Speaker 1: won't be surprised to hear that beef has more iron 296 00:16:03,960 --> 00:16:08,880 Speaker 1: in it than chicken and salmon, although actually tofu has 297 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:12,320 Speaker 1: quite a bit of iron as well. The other major 298 00:16:12,400 --> 00:16:14,680 Speaker 1: thing that comes up all the time we talk about 299 00:16:14,680 --> 00:16:18,200 Speaker 1: carnivore based diets are heavily meat protein based diets. Is 300 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:22,560 Speaker 1: that meat has no fiber, not red meat, not chicken, 301 00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:26,000 Speaker 1: not salmon. There's no dietary fiber in these and in 302 00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:29,320 Speaker 1: so far as dietary fiber is important for promoting colon 303 00:16:29,440 --> 00:16:32,440 Speaker 1: health and reducing the risk of colon cancer, that is 304 00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:37,760 Speaker 1: the absence of fiber. It's something that we need to 305 00:16:38,000 --> 00:16:41,840 Speaker 1: think about. So, but maybe let's just start with saturated fat. Emily, 306 00:16:41,880 --> 00:16:43,840 Speaker 1: do you like? What do you think me? 307 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 3: Pushback on? 308 00:16:44,640 --> 00:16:46,920 Speaker 2: Like, I think fiber is very important, but none of 309 00:16:46,960 --> 00:16:49,000 Speaker 2: these things have fiber in them. So like if you 310 00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 2: said chicken doesn't have fiber. 311 00:16:50,560 --> 00:16:53,240 Speaker 1: Either, chicken doesn't have fiber either, right, I mean like, 312 00:16:53,320 --> 00:16:55,280 Speaker 1: but but plant based proteins do, right. 313 00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:56,880 Speaker 3: So plantbease proteins have fiber. 314 00:16:56,960 --> 00:16:59,960 Speaker 2: But is this is that people's most important source of 315 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:00,840 Speaker 2: fiber mostly? 316 00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:03,320 Speaker 1: Well, it could be like if you're if you're sitting 317 00:17:03,360 --> 00:17:07,399 Speaker 1: here and asking the question of my concern is getting 318 00:17:07,440 --> 00:17:09,399 Speaker 1: adequate amounts of protein and how should I do it? 319 00:17:09,640 --> 00:17:11,320 Speaker 1: By the way, call back to the what's the deal 320 00:17:11,320 --> 00:17:15,359 Speaker 1: with protein? Episode? Like plant based proteins would offer you 321 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:18,640 Speaker 1: fiber in addition to similar amounts of protein and less 322 00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:24,440 Speaker 1: saturated fat than red meat. Okay, if you think that matters, 323 00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:26,560 Speaker 1: I think, okay. 324 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:29,359 Speaker 2: Fine, I'm gonna I think we're already getting a sense 325 00:17:29,359 --> 00:17:30,920 Speaker 2: that Perry and I are not going to agree about 326 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:33,760 Speaker 2: everything here. I don't think this is that your protein 327 00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:35,600 Speaker 2: sources are an important source of your fiber. 328 00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:36,680 Speaker 3: But let's move on. 329 00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:39,359 Speaker 1: Okay, let's talk about saturated fat. 330 00:17:39,480 --> 00:17:40,760 Speaker 3: Let's talk about saturated fat. 331 00:17:41,040 --> 00:17:46,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, what makes saturated fat saturated? So should we do 332 00:17:46,960 --> 00:17:48,880 Speaker 1: a very quick chemistry? 333 00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:51,080 Speaker 3: Your fat carbon chains big. 334 00:17:50,920 --> 00:17:54,080 Speaker 1: Long carbon chains. So fat is just a big long 335 00:17:54,160 --> 00:17:57,000 Speaker 1: chain of carbons, you know, whereas sugars, like the kind 336 00:17:57,040 --> 00:17:59,560 Speaker 1: of sucrose that we eat, are two carbons stuck together, 337 00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:01,880 Speaker 1: so it's simple. And then like glucose is just one 338 00:18:01,920 --> 00:18:03,879 Speaker 1: carbon with some stuff attached to it, but you know, 339 00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:05,840 Speaker 1: you're getting their energy from there. And fats like carbon 340 00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:08,359 Speaker 1: carbon carbon carbon carbon, You can have different lengths of 341 00:18:08,400 --> 00:18:10,880 Speaker 1: these carbon chains, and then you break those things down 342 00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:12,880 Speaker 1: and you digest them, and that's how you get energy. 343 00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:14,760 Speaker 1: The end of that long chain of carbon has a 344 00:18:14,800 --> 00:18:17,320 Speaker 1: little acid on it, which is why people used to 345 00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:19,920 Speaker 1: talk about fatty acids. We now just say fats. That's 346 00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:22,400 Speaker 1: basically what we're talking about. It's all fatty acid now 347 00:18:22,920 --> 00:18:27,360 Speaker 1: saturated fats. The reason they're saturated is that their carbons 348 00:18:27,359 --> 00:18:30,760 Speaker 1: are connected are fully bound to hydrogen, so they only 349 00:18:30,840 --> 00:18:34,600 Speaker 1: have single bonds to each other. And the practical upshot 350 00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:38,600 Speaker 1: of that is that those long, squiggly chains can pack 351 00:18:38,760 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 1: very tightly together. And the way you notice that is 352 00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:46,080 Speaker 1: that when something has more saturated fat, it will be 353 00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:50,040 Speaker 1: solid at room temperature because the fat can all kind 354 00:18:50,040 --> 00:18:55,720 Speaker 1: of pack together. So if you're wondering like butter or beef, 355 00:18:55,760 --> 00:19:00,000 Speaker 1: tallol or like coconut oil, right, like, so there are more, 356 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:02,720 Speaker 1: there are relatively more and less saturated fats. And a 357 00:19:02,800 --> 00:19:05,400 Speaker 1: hint as to what that is is you know whether 358 00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:09,199 Speaker 1: it's a liquid or not at room temperature. But like, 359 00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:11,560 Speaker 1: that's a fun trivia fact, I guess. But the reason 360 00:19:11,600 --> 00:19:15,639 Speaker 1: people care is because I'm curious if you'll agree with 361 00:19:15,720 --> 00:19:19,880 Speaker 1: me on this, Emily. There is a clear and causal 362 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:25,280 Speaker 1: relationship between saturated fat intake and serum cholesterol levels. 363 00:19:25,920 --> 00:19:27,159 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that's true. 364 00:19:27,320 --> 00:19:29,520 Speaker 5: Okay, all right, just want to make sure you weren't 365 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:33,080 Speaker 5: like gonna come out with like, well, actually, okay, great, 366 00:19:34,000 --> 00:19:37,640 Speaker 5: So saturated fat raises cholesterol and higher. 367 00:19:37,480 --> 00:19:42,439 Speaker 1: Cholesterol levels are causally linked to cardiovascular disease and stroke. 368 00:19:43,600 --> 00:19:46,200 Speaker 2: Right, what I think is interesting and is a great 369 00:19:46,200 --> 00:19:48,520 Speaker 2: opportunity to get into some complaints. 370 00:19:48,119 --> 00:19:55,199 Speaker 3: I have, Okay, are how we draw links between those things. 371 00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:59,000 Speaker 2: So consumption are more saturated fat leading to higher cholesterol 372 00:19:59,640 --> 00:20:02,040 Speaker 2: on our ridge, people with higher cholesterol more likely to 373 00:20:02,040 --> 00:20:05,320 Speaker 2: have cardiovascular disease. I think the question is, then if 374 00:20:05,359 --> 00:20:08,399 Speaker 2: you change someone's diet from a low saturated fat to 375 00:20:08,400 --> 00:20:11,800 Speaker 2: a higher saturated fat or vice versa, would that alter 376 00:20:12,640 --> 00:20:15,560 Speaker 2: their cardiovascular risk? And that is the question that I 377 00:20:15,600 --> 00:20:18,359 Speaker 2: think we want to talk about because in the course 378 00:20:18,400 --> 00:20:20,600 Speaker 2: of this discussion on red meat, I think the core 379 00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:24,879 Speaker 2: question is whether a diet that has its meat source 380 00:20:24,960 --> 00:20:28,040 Speaker 2: be higher and saturated fat is going to put you 381 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:31,480 Speaker 2: at higher risks for cardiovascular disease than a calorically equivalent 382 00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:38,119 Speaker 2: diet with less saturated fat. Right, Okay, I want to 383 00:20:38,119 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 2: take an opportunity to give some complaints about nutrition science. 384 00:20:42,920 --> 00:20:46,000 Speaker 1: At this idea. This is a perfect time. 385 00:20:46,200 --> 00:20:46,440 Speaker 3: Great. 386 00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:50,960 Speaker 2: A lot of what we know about nutrition is based 387 00:20:51,040 --> 00:20:56,520 Speaker 2: on studies which are very large, but in my personal view, terrible. 388 00:20:57,359 --> 00:20:59,719 Speaker 2: Many of these studies, many of the studies you hear 389 00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:03,760 Speaker 2: about the difference in health outcomes for people who drink 390 00:21:03,800 --> 00:21:09,640 Speaker 2: more coffee, or drink more milk, or dark chocolate, chocolate 391 00:21:09,720 --> 00:21:12,959 Speaker 2: or GC's or blueberries or whatever. Is the most of 392 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:17,879 Speaker 2: that is based on getting data on people's diets and 393 00:21:18,119 --> 00:21:21,120 Speaker 2: comparing the health outcomes for people who have one kind 394 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:24,320 Speaker 2: of diet versus another kind of diet. The problem is 395 00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:27,719 Speaker 2: that those two groups are typically very very different in 396 00:21:27,800 --> 00:21:31,880 Speaker 2: many other ways that are not about their diet, and 397 00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:38,280 Speaker 2: it is extremely challenging for researchers to fully adjust for 398 00:21:38,480 --> 00:21:43,200 Speaker 2: those factors. And I think people would be surprised at 399 00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:47,520 Speaker 2: how much you can mess around with things to make 400 00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:51,240 Speaker 2: stuff show up in whatever way you want. So, for example, 401 00:21:51,920 --> 00:21:57,119 Speaker 2: I once took the Marquee study data source on diet, 402 00:21:57,240 --> 00:22:02,280 Speaker 2: the en Hanes, which is where we survey many Americans thousands. 403 00:22:01,960 --> 00:22:04,159 Speaker 1: Of nationally representative survey sample. 404 00:22:04,080 --> 00:22:07,440 Speaker 2: National representative survey, and I showed that you can do 405 00:22:07,560 --> 00:22:09,760 Speaker 2: something that looks very close. It actually is kind of 406 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:12,840 Speaker 2: the standard approach to analyzing diet, and you can show 407 00:22:13,280 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 2: that consuming iceberg lettuce raises your BMI, but consuming dandelion 408 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:18,919 Speaker 2: greens lowers your BMI. 409 00:22:19,280 --> 00:22:19,480 Speaker 1: Yeah. 410 00:22:19,480 --> 00:22:23,399 Speaker 2: Now, both iceberg lettuce and dandelion greens contain no calories. 411 00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:26,000 Speaker 3: They are calorically free. 412 00:22:26,320 --> 00:22:28,480 Speaker 2: But the difference is that people who are poor tend 413 00:22:28,520 --> 00:22:30,680 Speaker 2: to eat iceberg lettuce, and people who are rich tend 414 00:22:30,840 --> 00:22:31,679 Speaker 2: dandelion greens. 415 00:22:31,720 --> 00:22:34,080 Speaker 3: And in fact, even though you see in these. 416 00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:36,920 Speaker 2: Data sets things like education and income, you don't see 417 00:22:37,040 --> 00:22:37,840 Speaker 2: enough about them. 418 00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:39,560 Speaker 1: You can never adjust enough, you. 419 00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:42,960 Speaker 2: Can never adjust enough, and so in like, my view 420 00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:47,720 Speaker 2: is that basically all studies that rely on this kind 421 00:22:47,720 --> 00:22:52,280 Speaker 2: of observational data to analyze nutrition are just trash. 422 00:22:52,520 --> 00:22:55,440 Speaker 3: Honestly, that's my view that they're all trash. Okay, I'm 423 00:22:55,440 --> 00:22:57,080 Speaker 3: going it's a hot take. 424 00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:01,119 Speaker 1: It's a hot take, and I'm not I'm not even 425 00:23:01,160 --> 00:23:04,359 Speaker 1: that offended by your hot take. And I'm going to 426 00:23:04,480 --> 00:23:08,520 Speaker 1: add one other problem to this body of literature, which 427 00:23:08,520 --> 00:23:11,320 Speaker 1: is the food frequency questionnaire, where the enhanes data and 428 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:13,880 Speaker 1: a lot of other data comes from. A food frequency 429 00:23:13,960 --> 00:23:17,560 Speaker 1: questionnaire is something that says, over the past week, how 430 00:23:17,600 --> 00:23:19,680 Speaker 1: many times did you eat bananas over the past month, 431 00:23:19,760 --> 00:23:22,200 Speaker 1: how many times over the past year, how many times, okay, 432 00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:24,399 Speaker 1: over the past week, how many times did you eat 433 00:23:24,640 --> 00:23:27,119 Speaker 1: walnuts over the past month, over the past and so 434 00:23:27,160 --> 00:23:29,119 Speaker 1: on and so forth. And there's about one hundred and 435 00:23:29,160 --> 00:23:32,119 Speaker 1: ten different food items on the standard Food Frequency keshnaire, 436 00:23:32,119 --> 00:23:36,119 Speaker 1: there of course variants. Okay, what I can do with 437 00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:39,000 Speaker 1: that data if I have that on all the enhanes people, 438 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:41,480 Speaker 1: and I have outcomes on these endhanes people I know 439 00:23:41,520 --> 00:23:43,560 Speaker 1: who had you know, heart attacks or whatever, at least 440 00:23:43,560 --> 00:23:45,960 Speaker 1: maybe cross sectionally, I know what their BMI is, for example, 441 00:23:46,920 --> 00:23:49,280 Speaker 1: But in other data sets, I might have longitudinal outcomes. 442 00:23:49,720 --> 00:23:52,200 Speaker 1: I can take all of those one hundred and ten 443 00:23:52,280 --> 00:23:55,760 Speaker 1: things on the food frequency questionnaire and test whether they 444 00:23:56,119 --> 00:24:00,120 Speaker 1: you know, statistically associate with hard tech stroke divorce rates, 445 00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:02,040 Speaker 1: whatever it is. And because there's one hundred and ten 446 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:04,880 Speaker 1: of them, several of them just by chance alone will 447 00:24:04,920 --> 00:24:06,200 Speaker 1: be statistically significant. 448 00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:06,600 Speaker 3: Five. 449 00:24:06,920 --> 00:24:10,159 Speaker 1: Wait, there's more at the level. That's what Okay, go ahead, 450 00:24:10,359 --> 00:24:12,919 Speaker 1: weight there's more. People have taken those one hundred ten 451 00:24:12,920 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 1: items on the food frequency questionnaire and grouped them in 452 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:19,480 Speaker 1: weird ways. Sure, by macronutrients, right, like, okay, based on 453 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:21,640 Speaker 1: your answers, how much carbs do we think you get? 454 00:24:21,680 --> 00:24:25,640 Speaker 1: But they've done it for like pesticide exposure. Right, they'll say, okay, 455 00:24:25,960 --> 00:24:28,760 Speaker 1: based on your food frequency questionnaires, how much pesticide are 456 00:24:28,760 --> 00:24:30,840 Speaker 1: you probably taking in? Because we know that like whatever, 457 00:24:30,920 --> 00:24:35,040 Speaker 1: cucumbers have more pesticides than cherries or something like that. 458 00:24:35,200 --> 00:24:37,560 Speaker 1: And now you have a new exposure called like pesticide exposure, 459 00:24:37,600 --> 00:24:39,720 Speaker 1: which is based on no measurement whatsoever except how you 460 00:24:39,760 --> 00:24:41,960 Speaker 1: answer to survey, and you can link that to a 461 00:24:41,960 --> 00:24:45,520 Speaker 1: bunch of different outcomes. And so there's a huge opportunity 462 00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:48,959 Speaker 1: for kind of trolling through data and finding interesting things. 463 00:24:49,119 --> 00:24:52,160 Speaker 1: They often get published because people love to talk about 464 00:24:52,160 --> 00:24:55,359 Speaker 1: this stuff, right, like it's it's relevant to everyone. We 465 00:24:55,480 --> 00:24:57,960 Speaker 1: all have to eat. The one thing I do want 466 00:24:57,960 --> 00:25:01,840 Speaker 1: to say is that while I agree that randomized trials 467 00:25:02,119 --> 00:25:07,159 Speaker 1: are the gold standard of evidence, here, it is completely 468 00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:11,919 Speaker 1: infeasible to randomize someone's diet for a long enough period 469 00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:15,400 Speaker 1: of time to witness the effects of that diet on 470 00:25:15,800 --> 00:25:20,840 Speaker 1: hard clinical outcomes. And so we'll talk about. 471 00:25:20,600 --> 00:25:22,280 Speaker 3: Something rather trash than nothing. 472 00:25:23,160 --> 00:25:26,399 Speaker 1: I'd rather have trash than nothing. Yes, I think that 473 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:33,919 Speaker 1: I can, you know, take sort of triangulate from the 474 00:25:33,920 --> 00:25:36,720 Speaker 1: these I'm not going to call them trash. I'm going 475 00:25:36,760 --> 00:25:40,280 Speaker 1: to call them, you know, less than ideal study designs 476 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:44,399 Speaker 1: to make inference. And because if we don't, then we're 477 00:25:44,440 --> 00:25:46,320 Speaker 1: like we're totally what are we going to say? Like 478 00:25:46,320 --> 00:25:48,679 Speaker 1: we don't know? And we'll never know, so go crazy. 479 00:25:48,840 --> 00:25:52,159 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's I think that's fair. I guess for me, 480 00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:55,600 Speaker 2: that makes it very important to look at the size 481 00:25:55,600 --> 00:25:58,560 Speaker 2: of these impacts. So an example that people always give 482 00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:00,439 Speaker 2: in this space when they want to argue that we 483 00:26:00,440 --> 00:26:04,320 Speaker 2: should use observational data that it's good is smoking. They say, 484 00:26:04,359 --> 00:26:07,080 Speaker 2: you know, well, in you know, when the first evidence 485 00:26:07,119 --> 00:26:09,960 Speaker 2: that's smoking gave you lung cancer was from just comparing 486 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:12,200 Speaker 2: smokers to non smokers, And you know. 487 00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:14,440 Speaker 3: That if we had really trusted. 488 00:26:14,080 --> 00:26:16,680 Speaker 2: That evidence, then you know, which later was confirmed my 489 00:26:16,760 --> 00:26:19,080 Speaker 2: randomized trials. But if we'd really trusted that evidence, we 490 00:26:19,119 --> 00:26:22,000 Speaker 2: would have you know, told people to stop smoking earlier. 491 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:23,240 Speaker 3: And that's true. 492 00:26:23,600 --> 00:26:26,440 Speaker 2: But in the smoking data, the excess risk of lung 493 00:26:26,480 --> 00:26:29,200 Speaker 2: cancer was like sixty times. It was like a sixty 494 00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:33,919 Speaker 2: six thousand percent increase in lunchture and it was not subtle. 495 00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:36,000 Speaker 2: And so you could say, well, is it likely that 496 00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:40,399 Speaker 2: the other differences across these people could drive this effect 497 00:26:40,440 --> 00:26:43,840 Speaker 2: to be sixty times as big, especially given that it's 498 00:26:43,840 --> 00:26:47,399 Speaker 2: a cancer associated with something that you're inhaling through a smoke, 499 00:26:47,440 --> 00:26:50,919 Speaker 2: like there's some biological plausibility, and the effect size was 500 00:26:51,040 --> 00:26:53,879 Speaker 2: so big. I think where I get stuck in a 501 00:26:53,920 --> 00:26:56,720 Speaker 2: lot of these things. Is we're saying, Okay, we're comparing 502 00:26:56,720 --> 00:26:58,439 Speaker 2: this kind of diet to this kind of diet or 503 00:26:58,440 --> 00:27:01,520 Speaker 2: this food to this food, and the increase in cardiovascular 504 00:27:01,640 --> 00:27:04,679 Speaker 2: risk is like seven percent, And it feels to me 505 00:27:04,840 --> 00:27:07,840 Speaker 2: like I can I can imagine we get a seven 506 00:27:07,840 --> 00:27:11,040 Speaker 2: percent increase from the many other differences across these people, 507 00:27:11,119 --> 00:27:14,000 Speaker 2: and so like maybe we look at the observational data, 508 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:16,800 Speaker 2: but the kind of observational data with tiny effect sizes 509 00:27:17,560 --> 00:27:20,840 Speaker 2: tells me like you should this is it feels like zero. 510 00:27:21,160 --> 00:27:26,639 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, we may conclude that the evidence and 511 00:27:26,720 --> 00:27:28,919 Speaker 1: is strong enough for you to seriously worry about, and 512 00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:30,800 Speaker 1: like in terms of the mental energy you want to 513 00:27:30,840 --> 00:27:34,120 Speaker 1: spend trying to get healthier, Like there are other areas 514 00:27:34,160 --> 00:27:36,840 Speaker 1: where there's stronger evidence, like not smoking. Right, if you 515 00:27:37,000 --> 00:27:39,119 Speaker 1: are a smoker and are debating whether you should be 516 00:27:39,119 --> 00:27:42,480 Speaker 1: eating red meat or chicken, don't worry about it. Quit 517 00:27:42,520 --> 00:27:44,280 Speaker 1: stop smoking. 518 00:27:44,480 --> 00:27:47,280 Speaker 2: Yeah all right, I feel like I literally, I mean, 519 00:27:47,280 --> 00:27:48,639 Speaker 2: this is a topic of my research. 520 00:27:48,640 --> 00:27:50,160 Speaker 3: So I could literally talk about. 521 00:27:49,920 --> 00:27:53,720 Speaker 2: This for like an entire semester course, but maybe we 522 00:27:53,720 --> 00:27:54,560 Speaker 2: should move on to. 523 00:27:55,200 --> 00:27:58,240 Speaker 1: As long as I can get a credit because. 524 00:27:58,760 --> 00:28:01,760 Speaker 2: Continuing medici metaical education credit for I need some of 525 00:28:01,800 --> 00:28:06,040 Speaker 2: those we meant about my feelings. Okay, all right, So 526 00:28:06,160 --> 00:28:08,600 Speaker 2: with that as the background, I think that tells us 527 00:28:08,800 --> 00:28:12,000 Speaker 2: the to step out of the weeds a bit. I 528 00:28:12,000 --> 00:28:13,920 Speaker 2: think what this says is that it is actually quite 529 00:28:13,960 --> 00:28:16,240 Speaker 2: difficult to answer this question. And part of the reason 530 00:28:16,280 --> 00:28:20,919 Speaker 2: we see so much debate and discussion and disagreement about 531 00:28:21,000 --> 00:28:25,960 Speaker 2: questions around nutrition, including red meat, is that the data 532 00:28:26,080 --> 00:28:31,160 Speaker 2: is not perfect or really very good for the most part. 533 00:28:33,040 --> 00:28:37,399 Speaker 1: Yeah, so let's let me draw mechanism for you and 534 00:28:37,600 --> 00:28:40,520 Speaker 1: saying what we do have with high quality data. Let's 535 00:28:40,560 --> 00:28:43,600 Speaker 1: start with cardiovascular disease because I think that's what people 536 00:28:43,680 --> 00:28:46,520 Speaker 1: often think about, but we will get to cancer because 537 00:28:46,520 --> 00:28:50,360 Speaker 1: that's sort of an emerging concern from certain dietary habits. 538 00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:55,080 Speaker 1: So in terms of cardiovascular disease, we do know from 539 00:28:55,120 --> 00:28:59,240 Speaker 1: fairly high quality evidence that in randomized trials over a 540 00:28:59,240 --> 00:29:01,640 Speaker 1: limited period of time, yes not over years and years 541 00:29:01,680 --> 00:29:05,600 Speaker 1: and years, but over you know, weeks to months, replacing 542 00:29:05,600 --> 00:29:09,400 Speaker 1: a diet high and saturated fat with a diet lower 543 00:29:09,440 --> 00:29:14,960 Speaker 1: and saturated fat reduces LDL cholesterol. So this comes from 544 00:29:15,360 --> 00:29:19,760 Speaker 1: the Cochrane collaboration, which is many people would say the 545 00:29:19,800 --> 00:29:24,560 Speaker 1: gold standard of evidence synthesis groups. They performed a meta 546 00:29:24,560 --> 00:29:30,320 Speaker 1: analysis of fifty something trials in this space and found 547 00:29:30,320 --> 00:29:34,840 Speaker 1: this relationship to LDL cholesterol. It was stronger in people 548 00:29:34,880 --> 00:29:37,680 Speaker 1: who had higher LDL cholesterols to begin with. So there's, 549 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:40,120 Speaker 1: you know, potentially some floor effect here. You can only 550 00:29:40,200 --> 00:29:41,800 Speaker 1: you know, there's only so much bang for your buck 551 00:29:41,800 --> 00:29:45,520 Speaker 1: you can get by switching out saturated fats for unsaturated fats. 552 00:29:45,600 --> 00:29:47,680 Speaker 1: And of course you can get saturated fats from places 553 00:29:47,680 --> 00:29:49,480 Speaker 1: that aren't red meat. But I think if we're really 554 00:29:49,480 --> 00:29:52,200 Speaker 1: thinking about like a high red meat diet, that is 555 00:29:52,240 --> 00:29:54,920 Speaker 1: an area of major concern is the saturated fats. So 556 00:29:55,760 --> 00:29:59,320 Speaker 1: looks to me like it increases LDL. I think, rightly, 557 00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:00,800 Speaker 1: switching it out decrease LDL. 558 00:30:01,040 --> 00:30:03,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, that switching it out will decrease l D. I 559 00:30:03,760 --> 00:30:06,280 Speaker 2: think that seems that seems fair. I think the biological 560 00:30:06,320 --> 00:30:10,040 Speaker 2: mechanism works. I think the evidence is reasonable. But these 561 00:30:10,040 --> 00:30:14,640 Speaker 2: effects are not like spectacularly large, but they are. 562 00:30:14,440 --> 00:30:17,400 Speaker 3: Significant yep, in a statistical sense. 563 00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:21,360 Speaker 2: Okay, And then what we I think would most want 564 00:30:21,400 --> 00:30:24,680 Speaker 2: to know then is does that have any actual like 565 00:30:25,000 --> 00:30:26,080 Speaker 2: health implications? 566 00:30:26,280 --> 00:30:31,960 Speaker 1: Yeah? Like so okay, so we know, go with me. Here, 567 00:30:32,320 --> 00:30:37,600 Speaker 1: we know from randomized trial data that reducing LDL reduces 568 00:30:37,640 --> 00:30:41,640 Speaker 1: the risk of cardiovascular events. This is from Staton trials 569 00:30:41,680 --> 00:30:46,600 Speaker 1: for example. Okay, so I know what you're gonna say, 570 00:30:46,640 --> 00:30:53,040 Speaker 1: but you know, if reducing saturated fat intake reduces LDL 571 00:30:53,920 --> 00:31:00,000 Speaker 1: and reducing LDL, albeit by some other mechanism, reduces cardiovascular events, 572 00:31:00,720 --> 00:31:04,720 Speaker 1: I'm comfortable saying probably reducing saturated fat intake will reduce 573 00:31:04,760 --> 00:31:06,600 Speaker 1: the risk of cardiovascular events. 574 00:31:07,120 --> 00:31:09,640 Speaker 3: And I will say that. 575 00:31:10,880 --> 00:31:15,160 Speaker 2: If you look in the Cochrane review trials that do 576 00:31:15,400 --> 00:31:19,880 Speaker 2: try to look long term at saturated fat and cardiovascular events, 577 00:31:20,240 --> 00:31:26,800 Speaker 2: you do see a small, marginally significant reduction in cardiovascular 578 00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:31,080 Speaker 2: events with a diet. What you don't see is impacts 579 00:31:31,120 --> 00:31:31,800 Speaker 2: on mortality. 580 00:31:32,520 --> 00:31:33,760 Speaker 3: So although we see. 581 00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:37,320 Speaker 2: Reductions in cardiovascular events, we do not see reductions in 582 00:31:37,560 --> 00:31:41,640 Speaker 2: all cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. 583 00:31:41,840 --> 00:31:46,280 Speaker 3: So this relationship seems is more complicated to me. 584 00:31:46,360 --> 00:31:49,200 Speaker 2: Then we might think, Yeah, I guess I think it 585 00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:52,040 Speaker 2: would be a stretch to say that reducing your red 586 00:31:52,080 --> 00:31:54,760 Speaker 2: meat intake, of reducing your saturated fat intake would cause 587 00:31:54,760 --> 00:31:55,600 Speaker 2: you to live longer. 588 00:31:56,240 --> 00:31:57,760 Speaker 3: Maybe it's not a stretch to say. 589 00:31:57,600 --> 00:32:00,720 Speaker 2: It would reduce your LDL and that it might reduce 590 00:32:00,760 --> 00:32:04,000 Speaker 2: your risk of cardiovascular events by a small amount. 591 00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:07,480 Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean death is messy. That you can unfortunately, 592 00:32:07,520 --> 00:32:11,000 Speaker 1: you can die. You can die from many things and uh, 593 00:32:11,120 --> 00:32:15,640 Speaker 1: and so it's always harder to prove an overall mortality benefit. Certainly, 594 00:32:15,680 --> 00:32:18,920 Speaker 1: I'm not seeing anything that suggests that like enhancing red 595 00:32:18,920 --> 00:32:22,640 Speaker 1: meat in your diet is doing anything particularly wonderful for 596 00:32:22,720 --> 00:32:25,680 Speaker 1: you systematically, and we should say or in terms of 597 00:32:25,680 --> 00:32:29,440 Speaker 1: cardiovascular disease at least. And we should say though that 598 00:32:29,800 --> 00:32:33,160 Speaker 1: the vast majority of real studies that look at red 599 00:32:33,160 --> 00:32:38,040 Speaker 1: meat and take are using unprocessed like lean red meat, 600 00:32:38,080 --> 00:32:40,840 Speaker 1: like not lean, you know, but like red meat that 601 00:32:40,840 --> 00:32:45,400 Speaker 1: you would buy in the refrigerator section of the grocery store, 602 00:32:45,680 --> 00:32:48,080 Speaker 1: not processed red meat. And I think we need to 603 00:32:48,080 --> 00:32:50,640 Speaker 1: touch on this when we get to cancer, because there's 604 00:32:50,680 --> 00:32:55,120 Speaker 1: a big difference between eating like a steak, you know, 605 00:32:55,160 --> 00:32:57,920 Speaker 1: with its high saturated fat and but high amount of 606 00:32:57,960 --> 00:33:02,800 Speaker 1: protein and relatively little other things and like a equivalent 607 00:33:02,800 --> 00:33:06,800 Speaker 1: amount of processed salami or something like that, And we 608 00:33:07,160 --> 00:33:07,960 Speaker 1: can talk about that. 609 00:33:08,360 --> 00:33:09,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, let's get into that. 610 00:33:09,480 --> 00:33:12,200 Speaker 2: But I think here here we are really talking about 611 00:33:12,360 --> 00:33:19,120 Speaker 2: the like again kind of switching out your red meat 612 00:33:19,320 --> 00:33:23,959 Speaker 2: for a calorically equivalent amount of chicken. 613 00:33:24,480 --> 00:33:27,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a way to slightly party vascular resists. They're 614 00:33:27,520 --> 00:33:30,280 Speaker 1: probably they're probably better ways to reduce your cardiovascular risk. 615 00:33:30,360 --> 00:33:32,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, like exercising or not smoking. 616 00:33:32,440 --> 00:33:37,160 Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, those are better. But let's talk about cancer. 617 00:33:38,280 --> 00:33:40,280 Speaker 1: This is the concern I've heard most from people I've 618 00:33:40,280 --> 00:33:42,200 Speaker 1: talked to about this. But it's interesting. I feel like 619 00:33:42,200 --> 00:33:45,240 Speaker 1: for my parents' generation, like heart attacks and strokes were 620 00:33:45,400 --> 00:33:47,320 Speaker 1: the thing that killed everyone, and they were very concerned 621 00:33:47,360 --> 00:33:49,960 Speaker 1: about this. And I think to some extent, because we've 622 00:33:50,000 --> 00:33:53,080 Speaker 1: gotten a better handle on cholesterol management, like that's at 623 00:33:53,240 --> 00:33:56,000 Speaker 1: less scary to our generation who thinks more about cancer 624 00:33:56,000 --> 00:34:01,800 Speaker 1: and dementia. There has been a row eyes in colon 625 00:34:01,840 --> 00:34:06,920 Speaker 1: cancer diagnoses among younger and younger people in the United States. 626 00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:11,640 Speaker 1: There's an interesting discussion about what the causes of that are, 627 00:34:12,000 --> 00:34:14,600 Speaker 1: but it's certainly in the zeitgeist. People are thinking about this. 628 00:34:14,640 --> 00:34:17,920 Speaker 1: Even the guidelines for colon cancer screening have recently changed 629 00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:20,520 Speaker 1: to start at a younger age, to start at forty 630 00:34:20,520 --> 00:34:22,960 Speaker 1: five instead of fifty. Based on some of this data 631 00:34:23,480 --> 00:34:28,160 Speaker 1: and most of the again observational data would suggest that 632 00:34:28,320 --> 00:34:33,160 Speaker 1: higher red meat intake does increase the risk of correctal cancer. 633 00:34:33,719 --> 00:34:36,040 Speaker 3: Yes, most of the observational data would say. 634 00:34:35,840 --> 00:34:40,120 Speaker 1: That, yeah, does that worry you? 635 00:34:40,200 --> 00:34:45,160 Speaker 2: No? I mean, like, does it worry I am worried 636 00:34:45,200 --> 00:34:47,279 Speaker 2: about the rise in colon cancer among younger people? 637 00:34:47,320 --> 00:34:49,759 Speaker 3: Of course, do I. 638 00:34:52,320 --> 00:34:54,000 Speaker 2: Me think about how to say this? 639 00:34:54,320 --> 00:34:54,400 Speaker 4: So? 640 00:34:54,560 --> 00:34:58,319 Speaker 2: Do I think it is plausible that changes in dietary 641 00:34:58,360 --> 00:35:00,840 Speaker 2: patterns have driven some of this and colon cancer. 642 00:35:00,960 --> 00:35:01,560 Speaker 3: Absolutely? 643 00:35:01,920 --> 00:35:04,520 Speaker 2: I think people obesity rates have gone up. My guess 644 00:35:04,560 --> 00:35:08,320 Speaker 2: is that explains a fair amount of this surprise. Consumption 645 00:35:08,440 --> 00:35:11,680 Speaker 2: of whole foods fiber in particular, has gone down. My 646 00:35:11,719 --> 00:35:14,080 Speaker 2: guess is that also explained something with the rides, clearly 647 00:35:14,160 --> 00:35:17,399 Speaker 2: something we need to understand much better. Some of the 648 00:35:17,560 --> 00:35:19,920 Speaker 2: data that's come out of at GLP ones suggests that 649 00:35:19,960 --> 00:35:22,279 Speaker 2: they reduce the risk of colon cancer, which I think 650 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:25,520 Speaker 2: points to at least the first of those mechanisms as 651 00:35:25,600 --> 00:35:30,920 Speaker 2: being important. If you asked me, do I think that 652 00:35:31,040 --> 00:35:37,839 Speaker 2: replacing tofu and chicken with a calorically equivalent amount of 653 00:35:38,520 --> 00:35:42,560 Speaker 2: beef in your diet would raise your risk of colon cancer? 654 00:35:43,160 --> 00:35:46,960 Speaker 2: I do not think that that is supported by the data. 655 00:35:47,320 --> 00:35:51,680 Speaker 2: The observational data on this is just it's really weak. 656 00:35:51,719 --> 00:35:55,200 Speaker 2: It's confounded by other aspects of people's diet. It's confounded 657 00:35:55,239 --> 00:35:56,600 Speaker 2: by the fact that a lot of the ways people 658 00:35:56,640 --> 00:35:59,680 Speaker 2: are eating red meat are altar processed. 659 00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:03,120 Speaker 3: A Yeah, with Dorito's. 660 00:36:03,560 --> 00:36:06,279 Speaker 2: I mean this feels to me like the data is 661 00:36:06,400 --> 00:36:10,760 Speaker 2: so poor that if that's the question people are asking, 662 00:36:10,800 --> 00:36:13,719 Speaker 2: I think absolutely absolutely not. And I will say, let 663 00:36:13,719 --> 00:36:15,160 Speaker 2: me just say one other thing, which is that we 664 00:36:15,239 --> 00:36:19,520 Speaker 2: have one pretty large scale, long term health study that 665 00:36:19,600 --> 00:36:22,399 Speaker 2: evaluated the risk of cancer with a with a low 666 00:36:22,440 --> 00:36:24,960 Speaker 2: fat diet. It wasn't red meat and specific specifically, but 667 00:36:25,200 --> 00:36:29,440 Speaker 2: by evaluated low fat diet called the Women's Health. 668 00:36:30,760 --> 00:36:33,520 Speaker 1: Is Sorry, Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial. 669 00:36:34,120 --> 00:36:36,799 Speaker 2: Yes, the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial. And that 670 00:36:36,960 --> 00:36:39,680 Speaker 2: showed no impact of switching people to a low fat 671 00:36:39,680 --> 00:36:43,560 Speaker 2: diet on cancer risk or basically anything anything else. And 672 00:36:43,800 --> 00:36:46,640 Speaker 2: you know that's that feels informative to me. 673 00:36:47,960 --> 00:36:54,279 Speaker 1: Yeah. I suspect this is true for unprocessed red meat, 674 00:36:54,960 --> 00:37:00,360 Speaker 1: and I'm worried. From a biological perspective on process meats, 675 00:37:01,360 --> 00:37:04,080 Speaker 1: there has long been, for example, a dramatically higher rate 676 00:37:04,120 --> 00:37:07,480 Speaker 1: of gastric cancer in China than there is in the 677 00:37:07,600 --> 00:37:13,839 Speaker 1: United States and thought to be driven by heavily uh 678 00:37:14,480 --> 00:37:18,920 Speaker 1: preserved you know, meat intake and protein intake. There have 679 00:37:18,960 --> 00:37:23,160 Speaker 1: been a number of studies that show that these nitroso compounds, 680 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:26,880 Speaker 1: like use nitrates to preserve to preserve meats in things 681 00:37:26,880 --> 00:37:29,960 Speaker 1: like slim gems and stuff like that. There are studies 682 00:37:30,000 --> 00:37:32,920 Speaker 1: in you know, in patry dishes and stuff that that 683 00:37:33,000 --> 00:37:36,200 Speaker 1: do show that these these compounds can damage cells and 684 00:37:36,239 --> 00:37:38,880 Speaker 1: can affect the lining of the GI tract. And you 685 00:37:38,880 --> 00:37:43,239 Speaker 1: can actually recover these compounds in stool in like the 686 00:37:43,280 --> 00:37:46,480 Speaker 1: poop of people based on how much they take in. So, 687 00:37:47,520 --> 00:37:51,080 Speaker 1: you know, I think, you know, having that nice steak 688 00:37:51,200 --> 00:37:54,560 Speaker 1: is one thing. Having a bunch of slim gems is 689 00:37:54,560 --> 00:37:57,719 Speaker 1: another thing. But you know, to your point, Emily, there's 690 00:37:57,719 --> 00:37:59,839 Speaker 1: a certain type of person who can afford to have 691 00:38:00,480 --> 00:38:02,680 Speaker 1: the nice steak, and they probably can afford a lot 692 00:38:02,680 --> 00:38:05,160 Speaker 1: of other healthful things. And then there's a type of 693 00:38:05,200 --> 00:38:08,719 Speaker 1: person whose major source of calories is going to come 694 00:38:08,719 --> 00:38:11,480 Speaker 1: from that type of foods because they can't afford to 695 00:38:11,480 --> 00:38:13,400 Speaker 1: eat the nice steak at the end, and that's going 696 00:38:13,440 --> 00:38:14,760 Speaker 1: to be a major source of confounding. 697 00:38:15,360 --> 00:38:17,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a major source of confounding. And I will say, 698 00:38:17,520 --> 00:38:19,600 Speaker 2: you know, back to my point about sizing. If you 699 00:38:19,640 --> 00:38:22,000 Speaker 2: look at like these meta analyzes and you know, what's 700 00:38:22,040 --> 00:38:24,040 Speaker 2: the size of the increase in risk. We're talking about 701 00:38:24,080 --> 00:38:27,440 Speaker 2: like a twenty percent increase in risk, not a four 702 00:38:27,520 --> 00:38:30,279 Speaker 2: hundred percent increase or a four thousand percent increase, and. 703 00:38:30,480 --> 00:38:32,680 Speaker 3: That that's not that big an effect. 704 00:38:32,680 --> 00:38:34,960 Speaker 2: I mean, it feels big, it's like, wow, twenty percent increase, 705 00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:39,880 Speaker 2: but it's actually magnitude quite small, and it could easily 706 00:38:39,920 --> 00:38:43,640 Speaker 2: be explained by either other aspects of people's diet, other 707 00:38:43,680 --> 00:38:46,040 Speaker 2: aspects of their exercise smoking. I mean, we see like 708 00:38:46,480 --> 00:38:51,160 Speaker 2: everything is different between groups that eat more and less 709 00:38:51,200 --> 00:38:52,840 Speaker 2: red meat in these observational studies. 710 00:38:52,920 --> 00:38:56,840 Speaker 3: Everything, not just a few things, literally everything. Yeah, And 711 00:38:56,920 --> 00:38:58,839 Speaker 3: I think that's Destra's really hard to fix. 712 00:38:59,239 --> 00:39:02,760 Speaker 1: It's very hard to fix. And diet is so culturally relevant, 713 00:39:02,760 --> 00:39:05,560 Speaker 1: Like diet is just it's so much a part of you. 714 00:39:05,680 --> 00:39:09,480 Speaker 1: It is very hard to control anything here. I want 715 00:39:09,480 --> 00:39:14,240 Speaker 1: to move on to some other cancers, particularly breast cancer, 716 00:39:14,280 --> 00:39:18,960 Speaker 1: which is another obesity associated cancer as they are defined. 717 00:39:19,480 --> 00:39:23,439 Speaker 1: But there's an interesting trial here, the preadimed trial, which 718 00:39:23,440 --> 00:39:25,320 Speaker 1: I really like. This is about a seventy five hundred 719 00:39:25,400 --> 00:39:30,400 Speaker 1: participant trial who are randomized to sort of a Mediterranean diet, 720 00:39:31,000 --> 00:39:33,480 Speaker 1: which you know is again it's not really red meat. 721 00:39:33,480 --> 00:39:36,000 Speaker 1: It's actually a lot of like fish and legumes and 722 00:39:36,040 --> 00:39:38,800 Speaker 1: things like that. But it's a lower carb diet and 723 00:39:39,080 --> 00:39:43,000 Speaker 1: a higher amount of meat protein either with olive oil 724 00:39:43,160 --> 00:39:48,320 Speaker 1: or nuts versus a control diet. And the Mediterranean diet 725 00:39:48,400 --> 00:39:51,919 Speaker 1: arms which you know limit red and processed meat, significantly 726 00:39:51,960 --> 00:39:55,320 Speaker 1: had a sixty two percent reduction in breast cancer incidents. 727 00:39:56,239 --> 00:39:58,319 Speaker 1: Now this wasn't the primary endpoint of the trial, but 728 00:39:59,000 --> 00:40:02,919 Speaker 1: you know, this is a Hasard issue zero point three eight. 729 00:40:03,200 --> 00:40:06,160 Speaker 1: That's a relatively big effect size. You wanted some big 730 00:40:06,160 --> 00:40:09,920 Speaker 1: effects sizes. This is a randomized trial. It's not just 731 00:40:10,080 --> 00:40:12,600 Speaker 1: limiting red meat. It's also like olive oil and nuts 732 00:40:12,640 --> 00:40:16,759 Speaker 1: and beans and all the other wonderful things from the 733 00:40:16,800 --> 00:40:20,960 Speaker 1: Mediterranean diet that might be affecting things here. But it's 734 00:40:21,160 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 1: again some evidence that the dietary, a red meat dominant 735 00:40:24,640 --> 00:40:27,480 Speaker 1: dietary pattern may not be the best. 736 00:40:28,520 --> 00:40:30,839 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I think we have the Mediterranean diet 737 00:40:30,920 --> 00:40:33,600 Speaker 2: is one of our best tested diets. Like you if 738 00:40:33,640 --> 00:40:36,320 Speaker 2: you said, you know, I'm totally neutral. 739 00:40:36,360 --> 00:40:37,000 Speaker 3: I don't care what. 740 00:40:37,000 --> 00:40:39,960 Speaker 2: I eat, just tell me what's the best kind of 741 00:40:40,120 --> 00:40:43,520 Speaker 2: diet for overall health that we have seen in the data. 742 00:40:43,560 --> 00:40:46,080 Speaker 3: I think it is it is the Mediterranean diet. 743 00:40:46,440 --> 00:40:48,839 Speaker 2: This has a lot of components, as you said, not 744 00:40:49,000 --> 00:40:50,560 Speaker 2: just an avoidance of red meat. 745 00:40:50,920 --> 00:40:52,840 Speaker 3: It's not that we have head to head tested that 746 00:40:53,040 --> 00:40:55,360 Speaker 3: versus a version of that that has. 747 00:40:55,160 --> 00:40:58,440 Speaker 2: A higher red meat, right component, And I think that's 748 00:40:58,800 --> 00:41:00,440 Speaker 2: there's a limit to what we can from that. 749 00:41:00,840 --> 00:41:05,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, fair. There's a couple of things that people 750 00:41:05,520 --> 00:41:08,080 Speaker 1: wanted us to dig in on here as they're thinking 751 00:41:08,120 --> 00:41:10,920 Speaker 1: about red meat. I think people get the idea that, 752 00:41:11,000 --> 00:41:13,640 Speaker 1: like there's a difference between beef, jerky and salami and 753 00:41:13,680 --> 00:41:17,520 Speaker 1: like processed meats and the steak and unprocessed stuff. You 754 00:41:17,560 --> 00:41:21,239 Speaker 1: get people like eating steak. It's quite pleasurable for a 755 00:41:21,239 --> 00:41:23,640 Speaker 1: lot of people. One question I got asked a lot 756 00:41:23,840 --> 00:41:27,880 Speaker 1: is the difference between like grass fed and non grass 757 00:41:27,880 --> 00:41:30,879 Speaker 1: fed beef, Like should we be paying a premium for this? 758 00:41:33,480 --> 00:41:35,160 Speaker 3: I think it just it tastes different. 759 00:41:35,239 --> 00:41:38,040 Speaker 2: And I think this to me feels like you absolutely 760 00:41:38,600 --> 00:41:42,000 Speaker 2: absolutely are not going to get any evidence that is 761 00:41:42,160 --> 00:41:43,920 Speaker 2: meaningful on this. What you're going to find is that 762 00:41:43,960 --> 00:41:46,520 Speaker 2: grass fed beef is eaten by rich people, average people 763 00:41:46,560 --> 00:41:49,880 Speaker 2: are doing better on their health for a lot of reasons. 764 00:41:49,920 --> 00:41:53,479 Speaker 2: It's probably not the grass fed beef. But if that's 765 00:41:53,920 --> 00:41:55,279 Speaker 2: a thing you want to spend your money on and 766 00:41:55,320 --> 00:41:56,839 Speaker 2: you like the way it tastes better and you feel 767 00:41:56,880 --> 00:41:58,360 Speaker 2: better about it, like that's great. 768 00:41:58,840 --> 00:42:01,359 Speaker 1: It is it is a bit leaner. So again, yeah, 769 00:42:01,560 --> 00:42:03,239 Speaker 1: I agree, you're not gonna it's not gonna make a 770 00:42:03,239 --> 00:42:05,040 Speaker 1: difference in your in your long term health. It does 771 00:42:05,080 --> 00:42:08,000 Speaker 1: have slightly less fat. Actually in the research though, I 772 00:42:08,120 --> 00:42:12,560 Speaker 1: found that in twenty sixteen, the US uh what is it? 773 00:42:12,680 --> 00:42:19,080 Speaker 1: USDA eliminated their definitions, like their inspection process for grass 774 00:42:19,080 --> 00:42:23,959 Speaker 1: fed beef. So now it's it's via self certification, so 775 00:42:24,480 --> 00:42:28,279 Speaker 1: the meat producers themselves get to tell you whether they 776 00:42:28,320 --> 00:42:31,240 Speaker 1: are grass fed or not they have seen the cow. 777 00:42:32,200 --> 00:42:34,320 Speaker 3: Unless you have seen the COWI you cannot be sure. 778 00:42:35,000 --> 00:42:36,880 Speaker 1: You cannot be sure. This is like a trust us 779 00:42:36,960 --> 00:42:41,960 Speaker 1: brouh type of situation. So let's touch on the carnivore 780 00:42:41,960 --> 00:42:46,640 Speaker 1: diet because like we've kind of talked about dietary patterns. 781 00:42:47,040 --> 00:42:50,279 Speaker 1: Certain dietary patterns have more red meat. But like this 782 00:42:50,360 --> 00:42:53,319 Speaker 1: is the apotheosis of being a meat eater, right, I 783 00:42:53,360 --> 00:42:56,280 Speaker 1: am only going to eat meat. This isn't even paleo 784 00:42:56,360 --> 00:42:58,760 Speaker 1: where it's like we can have greens. This is meat 785 00:42:58,920 --> 00:43:01,200 Speaker 1: exclusively and or meets exclusively. 786 00:43:01,560 --> 00:43:02,799 Speaker 3: It's like the I mean, it's so. 787 00:43:03,239 --> 00:43:05,719 Speaker 2: I think what's interesting about the carnivore diet is its 788 00:43:05,719 --> 00:43:07,880 Speaker 2: connection to the keto diet, which is something that we 789 00:43:07,920 --> 00:43:11,040 Speaker 2: should spend an episode on, which is a diet with 790 00:43:11,080 --> 00:43:13,880 Speaker 2: effectively no carbohydrates. 791 00:43:13,080 --> 00:43:14,360 Speaker 1: Like extraordinarily low carbs. 792 00:43:14,480 --> 00:43:18,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, I had some interesting results on treating some diseases. 793 00:43:18,840 --> 00:43:22,399 Speaker 2: It's like, that's an interesting Diet's very very heartistic too, 794 00:43:22,880 --> 00:43:24,600 Speaker 2: because it's really really restrictive. 795 00:43:25,239 --> 00:43:27,000 Speaker 3: The carnivore diet is kind. 796 00:43:26,840 --> 00:43:29,920 Speaker 2: Of a like a Broye version of more relaxed Broi 797 00:43:30,120 --> 00:43:33,560 Speaker 2: version of that. It has almost no fiber. So I 798 00:43:33,680 --> 00:43:37,800 Speaker 2: would be shocked. I'm not saying I would be interested 799 00:43:37,840 --> 00:43:41,640 Speaker 2: in this. I am kind of interested in how people's digestion. 800 00:43:41,640 --> 00:43:43,080 Speaker 3: Is on the carnivore diet. 801 00:43:43,200 --> 00:43:47,680 Speaker 2: I would imagine if fiber is nature's broom, I'm concerned. 802 00:43:47,600 --> 00:43:51,920 Speaker 1: Oh my god, that what happens bro Bruh, I haven't 803 00:43:52,040 --> 00:43:54,320 Speaker 1: I haven't pooped in two weeks, bra, exactly. 804 00:43:54,400 --> 00:43:56,319 Speaker 2: I haven't put in two weeks, BRA, and so I 805 00:43:56,360 --> 00:43:58,279 Speaker 2: think this is going to be a this is a 806 00:43:58,400 --> 00:44:01,080 Speaker 2: very extreme form of the diet. To know often when 807 00:44:01,080 --> 00:44:04,120 Speaker 2: we are eating something that is so extreme, like what 808 00:44:04,200 --> 00:44:08,800 Speaker 2: that's going to do to our yeah systems. 809 00:44:08,520 --> 00:44:12,120 Speaker 1: And just like evolutionarily right, like we're not carnivores. Humans 810 00:44:12,160 --> 00:44:15,840 Speaker 1: are clearly omnivores. And in fact, you don't have to 811 00:44:15,840 --> 00:44:19,360 Speaker 1: take my word for it, we don't contain the apparatus 812 00:44:19,400 --> 00:44:22,000 Speaker 1: to synthesize certain things that only come from plants, like 813 00:44:22,080 --> 00:44:27,160 Speaker 1: vitamin C. For vitamin C, for example, some animals carnivores 814 00:44:27,239 --> 00:44:30,000 Speaker 1: actually synthesize their own vitamin C. So like tigers and 815 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:32,160 Speaker 1: lions don't get scurvy because they can make their own 816 00:44:32,239 --> 00:44:34,040 Speaker 1: vitamin C and they don't have to eat fruits and 817 00:44:34,120 --> 00:44:36,920 Speaker 1: vegetables and stuff. We can't, so we need to get 818 00:44:37,000 --> 00:44:39,759 Speaker 1: vitamin C from other sources. Actually look to see if 819 00:44:39,760 --> 00:44:42,240 Speaker 1: there's been case reports of people on the carnivore diet 820 00:44:42,600 --> 00:44:46,600 Speaker 1: developing scurvy. I did find one case of a guy 821 00:44:46,800 --> 00:44:49,880 Speaker 1: who was kind of he was living alone in a 822 00:44:49,960 --> 00:44:52,360 Speaker 1: hut in Appalachia. I don't think he would have described 823 00:44:52,400 --> 00:44:55,400 Speaker 1: himself as being on the carnivore diet, but he clearly 824 00:44:55,520 --> 00:44:58,600 Speaker 1: was only eating meat and he did develop scurvy. 825 00:44:59,040 --> 00:45:01,600 Speaker 2: There are some meat that have vitamin C at like 826 00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:05,080 Speaker 2: seal meat. That's what I learned from one of the many, many, 827 00:45:05,160 --> 00:45:07,839 Speaker 2: many books I've read about people who die in Antarctica, 828 00:45:07,880 --> 00:45:10,799 Speaker 2: which is my favorite book genre. But it turns out 829 00:45:10,800 --> 00:45:14,440 Speaker 2: eating like penguins and seals have have vitamin C. 830 00:45:14,840 --> 00:45:17,080 Speaker 1: Right. It was always kind of a mystery that, like, 831 00:45:17,120 --> 00:45:20,440 Speaker 1: how do you know Inuits who really have almost no plant 832 00:45:20,480 --> 00:45:23,279 Speaker 1: intake like not get scurvy? And and yeah, that's part 833 00:45:23,280 --> 00:45:25,879 Speaker 1: of it. Blubber has vitamin C. Vitamin c's broken down 834 00:45:25,920 --> 00:45:28,399 Speaker 1: by heat though, so a lot of that comes from 835 00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:33,480 Speaker 1: like eating stuff raw, the organ meats that people who 836 00:45:33,560 --> 00:45:36,080 Speaker 1: adhere to the carnivor diet, like liver does have some 837 00:45:36,200 --> 00:45:38,120 Speaker 1: vitamin C and it's still very low, like you've got 838 00:45:38,160 --> 00:45:39,280 Speaker 1: to be eating a fair amount. 839 00:45:39,360 --> 00:45:44,560 Speaker 2: But you know, let's just say it probably don't do this. 840 00:45:44,680 --> 00:45:48,439 Speaker 1: Don't do this. I'm not sure what it like. It's 841 00:45:48,480 --> 00:45:50,000 Speaker 1: of a theme of do you remember when we were 842 00:45:50,040 --> 00:45:54,200 Speaker 1: talking about declining sperm counts and we were sort of 843 00:45:54,239 --> 00:45:59,200 Speaker 1: like like, if you're not trying to get someone pregnant, like, 844 00:45:59,640 --> 00:46:01,160 Speaker 1: why do you care about that? I don't know there's 845 00:46:01,200 --> 00:46:04,759 Speaker 1: some like relationship here that I see. I think this 846 00:46:04,920 --> 00:46:08,080 Speaker 1: is a manosphere thing. I think this is a diet 847 00:46:08,120 --> 00:46:10,040 Speaker 1: that's like I'm a big tough guy and all I 848 00:46:10,080 --> 00:46:11,680 Speaker 1: have to do is eat me. And it's like I 849 00:46:11,719 --> 00:46:15,200 Speaker 1: don't care if I get you know, calling cancer from 850 00:46:15,480 --> 00:46:18,719 Speaker 1: you know, or just severe constipation from not having any 851 00:46:18,760 --> 00:46:23,320 Speaker 1: fib or scra or whatever terrible. Like you know, guys 852 00:46:23,520 --> 00:46:24,400 Speaker 1: eat a very diet. 853 00:46:25,440 --> 00:46:30,000 Speaker 2: Let's talk about beef tallow before we end, because people 854 00:46:30,040 --> 00:46:33,080 Speaker 2: love beef tallow and really loves it. 855 00:46:33,360 --> 00:46:33,520 Speaker 1: Yeah. 856 00:46:33,600 --> 00:46:35,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, Sometimes people as just like what do I do 857 00:46:35,719 --> 00:46:38,839 Speaker 2: with beef tallow? And it's just an it's another fat 858 00:46:38,880 --> 00:46:40,279 Speaker 2: and you could cook with it, and he can has 859 00:46:40,480 --> 00:46:43,719 Speaker 2: quite a high it has quite a high smoke point, 860 00:46:44,719 --> 00:46:47,239 Speaker 2: maybe making it good for cooking. I have one friend 861 00:46:47,280 --> 00:46:49,680 Speaker 2: who's like a very serious chef, and he said he 862 00:46:49,719 --> 00:46:52,600 Speaker 2: has beef tallow in his fridge because it's useful for 863 00:46:52,680 --> 00:46:57,319 Speaker 2: particular cooking cooking sources. People do like to put it 864 00:46:57,360 --> 00:47:01,239 Speaker 2: on their face as a moisturizer, but it can clog 865 00:47:01,280 --> 00:47:01,840 Speaker 2: your pores. 866 00:47:01,880 --> 00:47:05,200 Speaker 1: I think so, I would imagine it can. 867 00:47:05,440 --> 00:47:08,759 Speaker 2: But as some other moisturizers that you might purchase from, 868 00:47:08,920 --> 00:47:12,440 Speaker 2: say CBS so you know, we have I would say 869 00:47:12,880 --> 00:47:15,320 Speaker 2: this is a fat, you could use it to cook. 870 00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:18,840 Speaker 3: It's not a magic fat. 871 00:47:18,880 --> 00:47:23,239 Speaker 1: It's just no, it's not particularly healthy. There's a meta 872 00:47:23,320 --> 00:47:28,280 Speaker 1: analysis of fifty four randomized trials looking at LDL reduction 873 00:47:28,440 --> 00:47:33,120 Speaker 1: through supplements of various types of fats, and all of 874 00:47:33,160 --> 00:47:37,680 Speaker 1: the plant based oils reduced LDL more than beef tallow, 875 00:47:38,080 --> 00:47:42,200 Speaker 1: but beef tallow was better than butter. Like beef tallow 876 00:47:42,239 --> 00:47:45,480 Speaker 1: raise your LDL less than butter. So but like you've 877 00:47:45,480 --> 00:47:48,719 Speaker 1: got a million choices for fats, I don't particularly know. 878 00:47:48,760 --> 00:47:50,239 Speaker 1: I mean, it tastes good, actually, I mean, I think 879 00:47:50,280 --> 00:47:52,960 Speaker 1: the reason to use beef tallo is it's actually quite tasty. 880 00:47:53,360 --> 00:47:55,960 Speaker 1: If you've ever had French fries deep fried in beef tallow, 881 00:47:56,200 --> 00:47:59,120 Speaker 1: this isn't a good healthy snack by any stretch. But 882 00:47:59,160 --> 00:48:01,279 Speaker 1: they do they do taste good. Maybe that's okay. We're 883 00:48:01,280 --> 00:48:03,280 Speaker 1: supposed to get enjoyment out of life, right. 884 00:48:03,160 --> 00:48:05,200 Speaker 2: Totally, And I think that is I mean, that is 885 00:48:05,239 --> 00:48:07,640 Speaker 2: an important point for me here because sometimes we will 886 00:48:07,680 --> 00:48:12,120 Speaker 2: talk about sort of these these products that you'll say, well, 887 00:48:12,160 --> 00:48:15,080 Speaker 2: you know, what's the reason to have steak? If you know, 888 00:48:15,160 --> 00:48:16,800 Speaker 2: even if we only have a little bit of evidence 889 00:48:16,800 --> 00:48:19,799 Speaker 2: that plant based sources reduce our LDL and we can't 890 00:48:19,800 --> 00:48:22,480 Speaker 2: really connect it to health outcomes, you know, why not 891 00:48:22,560 --> 00:48:25,279 Speaker 2: do it? And the answer is like, well, I I 892 00:48:25,520 --> 00:48:28,440 Speaker 2: that's not the diet I would most prefer, and food 893 00:48:28,520 --> 00:48:33,120 Speaker 2: is something that we enjoy, and so that's actually a reason. 894 00:48:32,840 --> 00:48:33,640 Speaker 3: To do it. 895 00:48:34,280 --> 00:48:36,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. Life is for the living. 896 00:48:36,880 --> 00:48:37,800 Speaker 3: Life is for the living. 897 00:48:38,160 --> 00:48:40,839 Speaker 1: I've got to go to one more thing before we 898 00:48:41,000 --> 00:48:43,759 Speaker 1: smasher past this one, Emily, because I had a feeling 899 00:48:43,760 --> 00:48:45,520 Speaker 1: how this was going to shake out. I felt like 900 00:48:45,560 --> 00:48:47,520 Speaker 1: Emily was going to look at all the observational data 901 00:48:47,600 --> 00:48:51,000 Speaker 1: and be like, this is all crap. It's fine, you know, 902 00:48:51,239 --> 00:48:54,640 Speaker 1: just be healthy. And and then I was like, but 903 00:48:54,680 --> 00:48:57,240 Speaker 1: I've got a trump card because I'm going to scour 904 00:48:57,280 --> 00:49:02,080 Speaker 1: the literature to find a study of endurance athletes and 905 00:49:02,719 --> 00:49:06,279 Speaker 1: see if I could show her that actually, if you're 906 00:49:06,280 --> 00:49:09,160 Speaker 1: an indurance athlete, eating red meat is better. So I 907 00:49:09,280 --> 00:49:14,520 Speaker 1: found a study, a huge study of twenty eight cross 908 00:49:14,520 --> 00:49:20,800 Speaker 1: country runners who were randomized to their usual diet versus 909 00:49:20,960 --> 00:49:24,839 Speaker 1: supplementing nine ounces of lean red meat a week times 910 00:49:24,840 --> 00:49:26,399 Speaker 1: eight weeks. It's not that much, but it's the best 911 00:49:26,400 --> 00:49:30,320 Speaker 1: I could find they looked at about eight hundred different 912 00:49:31,120 --> 00:49:32,560 Speaker 1: outcomes like metabolicalcy. 913 00:49:32,600 --> 00:49:34,080 Speaker 3: How you get some things to be significant. 914 00:49:34,200 --> 00:49:37,920 Speaker 1: It's an insane amount. And actually I was quite surprised 915 00:49:37,960 --> 00:49:41,560 Speaker 1: at how few of these were statistically significant, because just 916 00:49:41,600 --> 00:49:43,960 Speaker 1: my chance, they measured so many things. But I do 917 00:49:44,040 --> 00:49:48,840 Speaker 1: have one women in the control armed hamatocrit, which is 918 00:49:48,880 --> 00:49:52,080 Speaker 1: their red blood cell concentration, decreased by three point eight 919 00:49:52,160 --> 00:49:56,200 Speaker 1: percent over the eight weeks, and women who got randomized 920 00:49:56,239 --> 00:49:58,879 Speaker 1: to have the lean red meat had a fourteen point 921 00:49:58,920 --> 00:50:03,080 Speaker 1: eight percent in the harmatocrit, that's their red blood cell count. 922 00:50:03,320 --> 00:50:09,480 Speaker 1: This is biologically plausible because red meat contains iron, and women, 923 00:50:09,719 --> 00:50:14,960 Speaker 1: as a postman, certainly college age women, premenopausal women have 924 00:50:15,080 --> 00:50:21,319 Speaker 1: ongoing iron losses due to menstruation, and maybe this is 925 00:50:21,360 --> 00:50:24,920 Speaker 1: a decent source of iron to help mitigate the anemia 926 00:50:24,960 --> 00:50:25,600 Speaker 1: that can come from that. 927 00:50:26,320 --> 00:50:31,840 Speaker 2: Yes, Actually most of the serious endurance athletes that I 928 00:50:31,880 --> 00:50:35,319 Speaker 2: know do eat like do eat a reasonable amount of 929 00:50:35,320 --> 00:50:39,320 Speaker 2: red meat or eat red meat because it is very common. 930 00:50:38,960 --> 00:50:41,720 Speaker 3: To be anemic and iron. 931 00:50:41,840 --> 00:50:45,480 Speaker 2: The iron levels that are optimal for endurance performance are 932 00:50:45,719 --> 00:50:49,480 Speaker 2: typically much higher, particularly ferretin levels are much higher than 933 00:50:49,960 --> 00:50:53,160 Speaker 2: would be sort of necessary for just being a person. 934 00:50:53,360 --> 00:50:56,080 Speaker 2: And so people like to sell thement with iron, but 935 00:50:56,080 --> 00:50:59,120 Speaker 2: they also like to eat meat. But I will say 936 00:50:59,200 --> 00:51:03,280 Speaker 2: that the carnivore diet is not well suited for endurance 937 00:51:03,320 --> 00:51:07,239 Speaker 2: efforts who primarily should be consuming carbohydrate. Yeah. 938 00:51:07,640 --> 00:51:09,799 Speaker 1: Now, when you have ten pounds of stool that you're 939 00:51:09,840 --> 00:51:13,200 Speaker 1: carrying around on the run, very. 940 00:51:13,360 --> 00:51:17,360 Speaker 3: Very challenging to run. If you have eaten exclusively liver. 941 00:51:19,840 --> 00:51:24,800 Speaker 1: Iron is absorbed from my globin better then it's absorbed 942 00:51:24,800 --> 00:51:28,319 Speaker 1: from plant based sources. So like soy. I mentioned early 943 00:51:28,400 --> 00:51:30,160 Speaker 1: on that soy has a fair amount of iron in it, 944 00:51:30,200 --> 00:51:32,439 Speaker 1: but it isn't absorbed quite as well as from red meat. 945 00:51:33,040 --> 00:51:35,680 Speaker 1: That is mitigated somewhat by vitamin C intake. So if 946 00:51:35,680 --> 00:51:37,319 Speaker 1: you really do want to avoid red meat but get 947 00:51:37,320 --> 00:51:40,680 Speaker 1: your iron through a natural source, you can soy plus 948 00:51:40,680 --> 00:51:44,319 Speaker 1: something that contains vitamin C, so soy plus orange, or. 949 00:51:44,280 --> 00:51:47,879 Speaker 2: You can take a hymn adecriate iron pill which comes 950 00:51:47,920 --> 00:51:50,600 Speaker 2: to vitamin C. You can also that is that is 951 00:51:50,640 --> 00:51:54,799 Speaker 2: mostly what people are doing. Okay, very are you smashing 952 00:51:54,960 --> 00:51:56,000 Speaker 2: or passing red meat? 953 00:51:56,000 --> 00:51:56,880 Speaker 3: I'm so interested. 954 00:51:57,440 --> 00:52:02,239 Speaker 1: I am as on processed or red meat. I think 955 00:52:02,280 --> 00:52:05,959 Speaker 1: it should be avoided. I think go ahead and eat 956 00:52:06,320 --> 00:52:09,680 Speaker 1: unprocessed red meat if you enjoy it. But I wouldn't 957 00:52:09,719 --> 00:52:11,400 Speaker 1: like target. I'm not gonna smash it. I'm not going 958 00:52:11,480 --> 00:52:13,120 Speaker 1: to say, like, go out and have more of it. 959 00:52:13,160 --> 00:52:14,880 Speaker 1: I think there are plenty of other good sources of 960 00:52:14,920 --> 00:52:17,759 Speaker 1: protein that are probably better for you. So I guess 961 00:52:17,760 --> 00:52:19,880 Speaker 1: I'm a pass. Emily, smash your pass. 962 00:52:21,080 --> 00:52:24,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm I'm a smash. I think that again. 963 00:52:24,280 --> 00:52:25,920 Speaker 2: I will say I don't think eating a lot of 964 00:52:25,960 --> 00:52:28,399 Speaker 2: processed food in general is very good, so let's put 965 00:52:28,440 --> 00:52:28,920 Speaker 2: that aside. 966 00:52:28,960 --> 00:52:33,440 Speaker 3: But on the red meat, I think that this can. 967 00:52:33,320 --> 00:52:36,880 Speaker 2: Be a part of a balanced diet, and if it 968 00:52:36,960 --> 00:52:40,640 Speaker 2: is something that people enjoy, they should consume it. 969 00:52:40,719 --> 00:52:43,080 Speaker 3: I'm a smash. 970 00:52:43,160 --> 00:52:45,359 Speaker 1: All right, that's it for red meat. Your mail back 971 00:52:45,440 --> 00:52:46,879 Speaker 1: Question of the week after the. 972 00:52:46,800 --> 00:52:55,640 Speaker 4: Break, Hi, Emily and Perry. I'm Genevieve calling from Hudson, Ohio, 973 00:52:55,719 --> 00:52:59,480 Speaker 4: and my question is do dath piercings really help with migraines? 974 00:53:00,160 --> 00:53:02,319 Speaker 4: Something to do with the pressure points. I would love 975 00:53:02,360 --> 00:53:04,160 Speaker 4: to get one for the looks, but I just think 976 00:53:04,160 --> 00:53:07,440 Speaker 4: it's interesting that people say they helpathetics. So thank you. 977 00:53:08,480 --> 00:53:12,000 Speaker 1: So this is an interesting question. I'm going to disclose 978 00:53:12,040 --> 00:53:15,799 Speaker 1: something here like I lack the part of your ear 979 00:53:16,280 --> 00:53:20,919 Speaker 1: that gets a daith piercing like it is. I don't 980 00:53:20,920 --> 00:53:23,680 Speaker 1: know if you can see on video here. It is 981 00:53:23,760 --> 00:53:27,319 Speaker 1: problematic because like, earbuds don't stay in my ears, like 982 00:53:27,360 --> 00:53:29,960 Speaker 1: they have nothing to tuck into, so they just kind 983 00:53:29,960 --> 00:53:33,759 Speaker 1: of fall fall out. I did look into this. It 984 00:53:33,840 --> 00:53:37,000 Speaker 1: is apparently a normal and atomical variant. So if you're 985 00:53:37,080 --> 00:53:38,759 Speaker 1: like me and your earbuds always fall out and there's 986 00:53:38,760 --> 00:53:41,600 Speaker 1: nothing to pierce in your like inner helix of your ear, 987 00:53:42,960 --> 00:53:44,840 Speaker 1: I guess we should say that, right, A dath piercing 988 00:53:44,920 --> 00:53:48,480 Speaker 1: is like that, like inside of your ear helix piercing. 989 00:53:48,960 --> 00:53:50,640 Speaker 1: Look it up. I think it looks kind of cool. 990 00:53:50,680 --> 00:53:52,200 Speaker 1: Actually you don't like it. 991 00:53:52,200 --> 00:53:53,200 Speaker 3: It seems still painful. 992 00:53:53,200 --> 00:53:56,279 Speaker 1: Oh, definitely painful. But you know, yeah, it's better to 993 00:53:56,320 --> 00:53:57,319 Speaker 1: look good than to feel good. 994 00:53:57,640 --> 00:53:58,880 Speaker 3: Not No, I don't think that is. 995 00:54:01,239 --> 00:54:07,000 Speaker 1: Anyway does help with migraines. I don't know. Uh no, 996 00:54:07,280 --> 00:54:07,880 Speaker 1: I don't think so. 997 00:54:08,800 --> 00:54:08,840 Speaker 4: No. 998 00:54:09,120 --> 00:54:11,000 Speaker 1: I mean this is out there, like people people say 999 00:54:11,160 --> 00:54:15,280 Speaker 1: and and they argue that, you know, maybe it's stimulating 1000 00:54:15,280 --> 00:54:17,919 Speaker 1: the vagus nerve or something like that, but there haven't 1001 00:54:17,960 --> 00:54:20,800 Speaker 1: been any rigorous studies. But even the sort of observational 1002 00:54:20,920 --> 00:54:23,839 Speaker 1: ones don't support any long term benefit, but. 1003 00:54:23,800 --> 00:54:26,280 Speaker 2: It could be the placebo effect, which is our favorite effect. 1004 00:54:26,520 --> 00:54:29,960 Speaker 1: Short term. Absolutely, if you believe it. Yeah, if if 1005 00:54:29,960 --> 00:54:31,960 Speaker 1: you believe you're not going to get migraines, you will 1006 00:54:32,000 --> 00:54:36,120 Speaker 1: get less migraines. But those things do tend to wane 1007 00:54:36,160 --> 00:54:38,239 Speaker 1: over time. You sort of forget that that it's there. 1008 00:54:38,840 --> 00:54:41,120 Speaker 2: Yes, the all of the evidence for this is like 1009 00:54:41,280 --> 00:54:44,000 Speaker 2: some people said, it might help. 1010 00:54:44,120 --> 00:54:48,839 Speaker 1: Yeah, yep, that's fine. But I but it does look cool, 1011 00:54:48,880 --> 00:54:51,960 Speaker 1: So go ahead and and uh and and get it 1012 00:54:51,960 --> 00:54:53,120 Speaker 1: if you can tolerate the pain. 1013 00:54:53,280 --> 00:54:55,280 Speaker 3: Do you have any weird body parts pierced? 1014 00:54:56,160 --> 00:54:59,360 Speaker 1: I have entirely normal body parts pierced. No, I'm just 1015 00:54:59,360 --> 00:55:01,759 Speaker 1: going I don't have I don't have any what's a 1016 00:55:01,800 --> 00:55:04,200 Speaker 1: weird body part? No, I don't. 1017 00:55:04,719 --> 00:55:08,120 Speaker 3: I have no piercing the unusual like piercings that you do. 1018 00:55:08,160 --> 00:55:09,120 Speaker 3: You have any tattoos? 1019 00:55:09,400 --> 00:55:11,680 Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't have tattoos. I don't have 1020 00:55:11,760 --> 00:55:14,440 Speaker 1: no tattoos. No, what about you? You don't have tattoos, 1021 00:55:14,440 --> 00:55:18,840 Speaker 1: I'm sure absolutely, I don't even have botox. 1022 00:55:18,880 --> 00:55:20,880 Speaker 3: I'm afraid of needing to forget about tattoos. 1023 00:55:20,880 --> 00:55:26,600 Speaker 2: Okay, all right, that's it for us today. Stick with 1024 00:55:26,680 --> 00:55:28,880 Speaker 2: us next week when we'll ask what's the deal with 1025 00:55:29,000 --> 00:55:35,560 Speaker 2: cupping and dry needling? Speaking of needles, Wellness Actually is 1026 00:55:35,600 --> 00:55:37,800 Speaker 2: produced in association with iHeartMedia. 1027 00:55:38,360 --> 00:55:40,320 Speaker 3: Our senior producer is Tamar Avishaik. 1028 00:55:40,719 --> 00:55:44,359 Speaker 2: Our executive producer at iHeart is Jennifer Bassett. Our theme 1029 00:55:44,440 --> 00:55:47,080 Speaker 2: music is by Eric Deutsch, and our content is for 1030 00:55:47,160 --> 00:55:48,400 Speaker 2: educational purposes only. 1031 00:55:49,120 --> 00:55:51,359 Speaker 1: If you like the show, help other people find us. 1032 00:55:51,719 --> 00:55:54,480 Speaker 1: Leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or your 1033 00:55:54,560 --> 00:55:57,319 Speaker 1: podcatcher of choice and help us spread the word about 1034 00:55:57,320 --> 00:56:00,120 Speaker 1: the show. You can follow us on Instagram at all 1035 00:56:00,160 --> 00:56:02,839 Speaker 1: miss actually pod and don't forget We want to hear 1036 00:56:03,000 --> 00:56:06,160 Speaker 1: from you. Head over to Wellness Actually dot fm and 1037 00:56:06,200 --> 00:56:08,680 Speaker 1: leave us a question for our mailbag or suggest a 1038 00:56:08,719 --> 00:56:09,799 Speaker 1: topic for a future show. 1039 00:56:10,600 --> 00:56:12,439 Speaker 2: We'll let the influencers have the last word. 1040 00:56:12,760 --> 00:56:15,160 Speaker 6: I've eaten nothing but meat and butter for seven years. 1041 00:56:15,239 --> 00:56:17,879 Speaker 6: My husband thinks I'm absolutely insane for this, but I'm 1042 00:56:17,920 --> 00:56:20,440 Speaker 6: obsessed with eating cold meat. The flavor and texture it 1043 00:56:20,480 --> 00:56:23,240 Speaker 6: gets better, and the cold fat turns into this buttery frosting. 1044 00:56:23,320 --> 00:56:25,799 Speaker 6: I literally cook extra steak on purpose, just so I 1045 00:56:25,800 --> 00:56:27,440 Speaker 6: can eat it straight out of the fridge. Am I 1046 00:56:27,480 --> 00:56:44,200 Speaker 6: the only one