WEBVTT - Ep16 "Why is everyone who disagrees with you misinformed?"

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Why is there so much polarization in the world, and

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what does this have to do with the brain, And

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>what does any of this have to do with how

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you picture a cat, or why we respond to certain

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>cartoons or the British nobleman Lord Gordon, or the Iroqui

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Native Americans? And why do you naturally feel that everyone

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>who disagrees with you is a troll or misinformed? And

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>if you could just shout loudly enough in all caps

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, they would see that you're right. Why can't

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>they see that you know the truth? Welcome to inner

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>Cosmos with me, David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and an

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>author at Stanford University, and I've spent my whole career

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>studying the intersection between how the brain works and how

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we experience life. It hasn't escaped anybody's notice that we

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>are in a time in which polarization and disagreement is

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.279
<v Speaker 1>higher than most of us have seen in our lives

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so far, and so in the past decade I've become

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>very interested in the brain science behind that behind polarization,

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and more generally, how we come to believe our own

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>political opinions and why we're so certain that everyone else

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is wrong, and how if we could just talk to them,

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>if they could just listen to us, they would see

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the light and they would know that we are right

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and they were mistaken. Now, I want to set the stage.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Polarization is not a new thing. Although we are in

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a polarized era right now, this is far from unique.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Just think about the Civil War in America, where you

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>had brothers and neighbors taking up arms against one another,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>or in the nineteen sixties and seventies, people here held

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>vastly different opinions about the war in Vietnam and how

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to treat the returning soldiers or take stuff that's even bigger,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>like Nazism in Germany, which was the most advanced country

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. The thing to recognize is that in the

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty four elections in Germany, every single seat in

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Reichstag, the German Parliament, was either Communist Party far

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>left or National Socialist Party far right. Or look more

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>generally at the whole twentieth century, the Communist Revolution in

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>China or in the USSR, or the Hutu massacre of

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the Tutsi in Rwanda, or the Camera Rouge in Cambodia,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and on and on. There's nothing new about polarization and

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>people taking up arms. And what I want to talk

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>about today is why so the question on lots of

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>people's mind, it seems to be, is this because of

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>social media. I don't think that has much of anything

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. Keep in mind that all the

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>examples I just named preceded Twitter and Facebook, and those

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were much worse than what we have going on currently.

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>The fact is it doesn't take much to get people

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>all worked up over different opinions and taking up arms,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and you don't need social media for that. And my

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>goal today is to explain why it is so easy

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for people to get so worked up and believe their truth.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So this is what we're going to explore. Why does

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone have different opinions? And why does everyone with a

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>different opinion to yours seem misinformed or obstreperous or like

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a troll. So I'll start with a cartoon and a story.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>The cartoon was one that I saw recently on Twitter.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It shows a bunch of people walking on a road

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and up ahead there's a fork in the road and

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>off to one side there's a small number of smart,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:06.559
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful people that are following a windy path marked complex

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but right, and on the other side of the fork

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>there is a very packed group of people and they're

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all walking and it's labeled simple but wrong, and this

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>takes them to a cliff that they eventually tumble off of.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm going to come back to this cartoon later,

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and when I come back, we're going to understand this

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in a slightly different way.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>But first I want to turn to this.

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Story, which is a true story. Many years ago, I

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>got my PhD in neuroscience. I was a second year

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>graduate student when the new class of first year students

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>came in and one student really stood out, and I'm

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>going to call her Tanya.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>She seemed very sweet.

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And what we found out was that Tanya had extraordinary grades,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and she'd come from a very impoverished neighborhood in Chicago,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>but she had these incredible grades and these incredible letters

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of recommendation and great scores on her gres. So during

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the first month or two of school, she was given

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a special award and there was going to be a

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>banquet for it, and to my surprise, she asked me

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>if I would be her date to the banquet.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 2>So I said yes.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know her well, but I thought she seemed

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>very sweet, and so I said yes. So the banquet

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be on Friday of that week, but

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, the banquet never happened. Why it's

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>because on Tuesday of that week, Tanya was in the

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>women's restroom with one of the administrators at the school

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and they started talking. The administrator said, Wow, Tanya, everything

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is so amazing about you and.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Your grades and your skills.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to know how your school cultivated a thinker

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>like you. And so Tanya just had some humble answer,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and so this administrator decided she was going to call

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the school and find out how they produced somebody like Tanya.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 2>So she calls to.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Talk to one of the professors that wrote a letter

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of recommendations for Tanya. And so she dials up and

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>she gets the secretary and she asks to speak to

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the professor, and the secretary says who, and the administrator

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>repeats the name. I'm looking for, Professor so and so,

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.119
<v Speaker 1>and the woman on the other end says, there's nobody

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>here by that name. So the administrator says, yeah, this

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is the professor that wrote this letter, and the secretary says,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I've worked here thirty years and there is nobody here

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>by this name. So turn out to be a fake

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>letter of recommendation. So the administrator calls the second letter

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of recommendation, same story. So she calls the third recommender

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and gets connected, and it turns out that it was

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Tanya's mother's office. And so what quickly became unraveled is

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that Tanya had faked everything her transcript or GRES. And

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>this was by the way back in the nineties. So

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>she did this by digitally scanning her gres and then

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>changing them with early versions of photoshop, and then reprinting them. Anyway,

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>one of my colleagues equipped that she should get a

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>PhD just for the cleverness of her deception. But the

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>thing that struck me was how blind we all were

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to the deception. We were completely fooled by it. So anyway,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the graduate school said to her, WHOA, there's something really

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>strange here, and you have to come up with an

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>explanation for this, And Tanya just ran away. But one

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of my classmates caught her on the way out at

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the door, and she had an excuse for everything, and

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>she said, I got screwed by this person, and this

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>person cheated me, and I thought they were writing a

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>real letter, and I thought the school was accredited, but

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>they lied to me, so she had an excuse for everything. Now,

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously the details of this story stuck with me through

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the years because I had almost gone on a date

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>with this girl. Anyway, that was the end of the

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Tanya story, or so I thought. A couple of years later,

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>someone pointed me to an article from the Yale University newspaper,

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's how we learned that Tanya had left our

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>school and gone to ya next and faked her way

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>into graduate school there, and Yale had caught her. This

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was just like the first time, but Yale was mad

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>because they had been paying her a stipend, and so

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they put her in jail. And I pictured the girl

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that I almost went on a date with sitting on

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a cement bench in jail, and the next newspaper article

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I found showed that in jail, Tanya had bitten two guards,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and at some point she was released from jail, and

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>then we heard nothing about her after that until two

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>years later. Because Tanya went home to where she lived

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, and she and her mother decided to do

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a big drug deal with two men who turned out

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to be undercover agents, and they got caught and she

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was going to be sentenced for a long time, and

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so she and her cousin came up with an idea.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So they went out and they found a woman who

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was a drug addict, who who was approximately her size

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and looked a bit like her. And they said, hey,

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to give you free drugs if you come

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to the dentist. And she said she was doing an

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>insurance scam, and she said, come to the dentist and

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>say that your name is my name. And she had

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the woman wearing gloves to the dentist office so there

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be any fingerprints, and she accompanied her and she

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>signed the paperwork for her. And then after they had

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the imprints, they brought this woman home and they smashed

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>her on the head with a brick and they injected

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>her with a bunch of insulin to make her pass out.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all they had access to and that's why they

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>used the insulin. And their plan was to kill this

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>woman and burn the body so that the dental imprints

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>would be found and they would conclude that Tanya was

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>dead and then she wouldn't have to go to jail.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, this poor woman eventually came to

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in the basement of Tanya's cousin's house and she managed

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to scramble out of the window and she ran a

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>crossed the street to a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant. She

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>screamed for help, and Tanya realized that the woman had

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>just escaped, and she ran into the Kentucky Fried Chicken

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>right after her and started screaming that the woman had

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>stolen her money. And everything was very confusing, but the

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>police showed up and they couldn't figure out what was happening,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so they arrested everyone.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Here was this woman with blood.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>All over her, so they just took everyone into the station,

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and eventually the whole thing became unraveled and everyone involved

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>in this case was jaw dropped. As this story unfolded,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the ease and creativity with which Tanya thought of a

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>plan that went, okay, how about I just kill this

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>woman and then burned the body. And when you burn

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the body, the dental imprints are the things that last.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And so because this woman had gone to the dentist

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>under Tanya's name, then the world would conclude I'm dead

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I won't go to jail, and I was thinking, Wow,

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I almost went on a day with this woman. So

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this was one of the moments in my life when

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I was struck by how different people can be on

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the inside and how little insight we have into the

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>cosmos of someone else's brain and mind. And happily this

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>was positioned at the very beginning of my neuroscience career,

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and it influenced what I've been studying since. It has

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>always struck me as fascinating the differences between people. Everyone

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is very different on the inside, sometimes much more than

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we expect. Now it turns out my father was a

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>forensic psychiatrist and he was involved in most of the

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>big mass murder cases in New Mexico where I grew up.

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>One of them was a guy named William Wayne Gilbert

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who had killed three people cold blooded murder, and my

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>father became the psychiatrist in that case. Now, I was

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a child and we went to some social event with

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>my father, and I remember somebody saying to my father,

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Gilbert should not get the death penalty because presumably he

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>feels terrible for what he's done. Presumably he feels deep

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>regret for having killed three people. And as a kid,

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember totally feeling like I agreed with that, but

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I remembered my father's surprise at the statement, because my

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>father had just spent hours in deposition with Gilbert, and

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>he explained to this man genuinely and professionally that it

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>simply wasn't the case that Gilbert had regret, because when

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>William Wayne Gilbert would think about the idea of going

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to murder somebody, he said, he had the same level

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of excitement that he did as a child on the

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>night before Christmas. That's what it felt like for him

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>when he was thinking of killing someone. And so my

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>father's point to this man and to me when I

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was eight years old, is you can't actually stick yourself

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in other people's shoes, as much as you'd like to.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You think everybody's just like me, especially when you're a child,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>but in fact people can be quite different on the inside.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that the governor of New Mexico

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time commuted William Wayne Gilbert's sentence since he

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was sentenced to death, so Gilbert was not going to

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>die now, and to show his gratitude, he managed to

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>smuggle a pistol into the prison and led one of

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the most stunning prison breaks from a maximum security penitentiary

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>where he let out several other murderers. And so for

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a few months it was very tense in New Mexico

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because there was this group of mass murderers on the loose.

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>They were finally found again, but only after this very

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>scary month or two where they were hiding out and

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>taking hostages. So all this stuff really got me thinking

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>from a young age about the differences between people. So

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll just mention one more anecdote here, my father deposed

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a guy who was on trial. This guy had gone

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>into Western Union office and asked the clerk to use

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the phone, and the clerk had said, sorry, but the

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>phone is only for the back office people and not

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for customers. So this guy jumped the counter and beat

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the clerk almost to death. And the interesting part is

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that he said to my father during the deposition, but

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody would have done the same thing in that situation, right,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And he meant it. He was being genuine because we

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>all have an internal model of the world what constitutes

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>appropriate behavior in the world, and we assume that everyone

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>else's model is the same as ours, and this guy

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>genuinely could not imagine anyone having a different reaction in

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that circumstance. Now, when we think about the differences between people,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>were used to thinking about extreme cases like Tanya or

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>William Wayne Gilbert or this guy in the Western Union office.

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>These people, presumably have psychopathy paths make up about one

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of the population. These are people who simply don't

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>care about your feelings. You're just an obstacle that they're

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to get around to get what they want. But

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this idea that other people can be different from you

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on the inside can be generalized. So take something like schizophrenia.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You see a man on the street corner and he's yelling.

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>He's in an angry dialogue with somebody who's not there.

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>He's delusional, he's not in contact with reality. So in

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>situations like this, you look at the man and you say, Okay,

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess that man's internal model isn't the same as mine.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not experiencing reality the same way I do. So

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you might think, okay, I get that about different models

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on the inside for psychopaths and for people with schizophrenia,

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise the intuition is that the rest of us

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are all about the same. But there are some important

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>things to note here. First, when it comes to something

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like psychopathy or schizophrenia, we tend to think about these

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as being categories, like Okay, that person's psychopathic and I'm not,

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>or that person is schizophrenic and I'm not. But in fact,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>all of these things are now appreciated as living on

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a spectrum, so you have different degrees along the spectrum.

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So take psychopathy for example. There's a well used way

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to measure this. It's a questionnaire and you score a

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>certain number of points on this from one to forty,

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and in the United States, if you're above a thirty,

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>then you are labeled a psychopath. You don't want to

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>be roommates with the guy who scores twenty nine on

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>this test, even though they're not technically a psychopath, they

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>share a lot of the fundamental characteristics, so it's a

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>spectral issue. And by the way, this is the same

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>with everything in psychiatry. This has been the direction of

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bible of psychiatry called the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It used to be all about categories, and now everything

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is about living on a spectrum, but let's keep drilling down.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>When we look at mental illnesses more generally, we find

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>things that influence people's thoughts or feelings or behaviors, including

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>not just things like schizophrenia or psychopathy, but you presumably

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>know people with clinical depression or bipolar disorder, or anxiety disorder,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>or obsessive compulsive disorder or borderline or narcissistic or avoidant,

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or an eating disorder, or dissociated identity disorder or panic disorder,

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or many other things like that. There are at least

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty seven of these in the Diagnostic

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and Statistical Manual, So it becomes increasingly difficult to assert

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that everybody is exactly like you on the inside. Despite

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>superficial appearances, people can be very different in terms of

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>what is happening on the inside. And if you've read

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>my books or listen to my other podcasts, you know

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that when we see people with two strokes or brain

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>injuries to different parts of the brain, it's not hard

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, I guess their reality is a little

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>bit different than mine. But it proves harder to think

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>about this in terms of everybody that you know and love,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because we assume that the people in our lives have

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially the same thing going on on the inside. That

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>we do the same opinions, the same way of sense making,

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the same way of gathering meaning, the same political views

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on the world as you do, but they don't. Everyone

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>that you know is having a slightly different reality going

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>on than you are. We are very different people on

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the inside. Now, I want to be clear that I'm

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not just saying this as a philosophical claim. We can

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>increasingly measure so many examples of this, and this is

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>something I've worked on in my lab for most of

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>my career. Neuroscience has always cared about the big disorders,

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the things that are most obvious and societally costly. But

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>when we start looking at the more innocuous details, we

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>uncover these clear and measurable ways that reality can be

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>different inside different heads. So, for example, imagine that you

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and I and a bunch of other people are looking

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>over Times Square in New York. We're standing on a

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>corner and enjoying watching the crowd. So you open your

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>eyes and there's the world and all its blues and

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>golds and greens. But if you happen to be colorblind,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing it differently than the person next to you.

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you can't distinguish reds from greens those look exactly

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the same to you. Or maybe you have a more

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>extreme form of color blindness in which there are no

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>colors at all, just shades of gray. So for you,

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in the person next to you, the internal experience can

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be quite different, even though you're looking at the same scene.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>And we now know that a small.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Fraction of the female population has not just three types

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of color photoreceptors in their eyes and their retinas, but

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>four types of color photoreceptors, which means they are seeing

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>colors that the rest of us can't even imagine. This

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is called tetrachromacy, and I'll come back to this in

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a future episode, But the point I want to make

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>now is that we might all be watching the same

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:35.959
<v Speaker 1>corner in Times Square, but having totally different internal experiences.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the type of issue that I've been studying

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in my lab for many years, so you might have

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>heard about my episode on synesthesia. In synesthesia, people have

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a blending of the senses. About three percent of the

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>population will, for example, see a letter on a page

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and that'll trigger a color experience for them on the inside.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe s's a purple for you, and L triggers

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a green experience, and so on. It's different for every synesthete,

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and there are many forms of synesthesia. You might hear

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>a sound and that triggers a visual experience, or you

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>taste something and it puts a feeling on your fingertips. Essentially,

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>any sense can end up having crosstalk with any other

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sense in these different forms of synesthesia. And my colleagues

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and I have documented dozens and dozens of forms throughout

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the population. Now, synesthesia is not considered a disease or

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a disorder. It is simply an alternative reality. The point

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is that people can have very different experiences on the inside,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>but to a synesthee, their experience is precisely as real

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>as anything you might experience. So in neuroscience, this is

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>just one more recent appreciation that from one person to

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the next, reality can be a little bit different. And

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>let me give you one more example that's even newer,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the issue of how we imagine a visual scene inside

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>our heads. So I'm going to ask you to picture

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this picture a gray and white cat on a picnic

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>table eating colorful cereal and looking at you suspiciously, So

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>really picture that in your head now. There were two

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>researchers who began looking at this question of mental imageries

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>some years ago, Stephen Costlin and Zen and Felicition, and

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they ended up disagreeing very strongly. Coslin said, when you're

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>imaging something, you're essentially running your visual cortex to see

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this like a movie. It's like vision. And Felician said,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>that's ridiculous. You're not seeing something. It's purely conceptual. It

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't involve seeing in vision. And they both did experiments

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, and Felician said, look, you're insane. It's

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not stored like a picture, and Costlin said, no, you're insane.

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not stored like a proposition. You're actually seeing it.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was very difficult for a conclusion to be

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>reached here. Both argued passionately for their side of the argument,

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>and this went on for twenty years in the literature.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So why couldn't they come to an agreement on this.

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>The answer is Coslin had what we now call hyper fantasia,

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>which means he has extremely vivid mental imagery. When he

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>imagines something, it's as vivid as real seeing. Now, this

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>is the opposite of what Felician had, which is called

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a fantasia, where mental visual imagery is not present. He

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't see anything in particular, He just has a concept,

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and all of this lives on a spectrum from hyperfantasia

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to a fantasia. Everyone in the population is somewhere on

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this spectrum.

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 2>So think about this for a moment.

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Picture an ant crawling on a checkered tablecloth towards a

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>jar of purple jelly. Are you closer to the hyper

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fantasia side, where you're seeing it like a movie, or

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>closer to the a fantasia side where you can understand

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the concept perfectly fine, but you're not seeing anything. So

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>my lab has studied this in detail, and we use

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>neuroimaging to figure out what's going on in the brain

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>along this spectrum.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 2>But what I want to.

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Focus on today is why there was such a spirited

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>debate in the literature for two decades before anyone realized

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>there was a spectrum. It's because both researchers were operating

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>under the assumption that everyone else experiences visual imagery just

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>like they do. So when Felician introspected, he wasn't seeing

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>a picture, and so he felt clear that other people

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>don't either, And when Coslin introspected, he was seeing a

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>super clear image and he assumed that's what happens inside

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>every head.

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>And I want to use.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The debate between them as a more general metaphor that

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we all assume that everyone else is experiencing the world

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the way we do. My point in talking about color

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>vision and synesthesia and visual imagery is this, as neuroscience

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and psychology move on from studying the really big disorders,

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>we find increasingly more subtle issues, which caused us to say, wow,

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that someone could experience so differently than

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I do. But the fact is that everyone is having

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a different internal experience and this led me to search

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for a good metaphor. And when I saw the movie

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>poster for The Martian, I thought, Oh, that's it, because

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the poster shows a single person, Matt Damon, walking around

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on his own planet. He's the only one there, and

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought, that's the perfect model. We're each living on

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>our own planet, we're each having our experiences, and we think, yeah,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this is reality, and it makes sense that everyone has

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the same experience that I do. But in fact, just

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like in any galaxy, each planet is different. Everyone's got

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>their own atmosphere, their own landscape, their own experiences. But

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>we always feel certain that he or she feels exactly

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the same way that I do about whatever. Take for example,

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>what comes to mind when I say the word justice.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>What happens inside everyone's head is slightly different. Or fairness

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what comes to your mind it might not be the

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>same thing that comes to someone else's. Or attractiveness or love, home, freedom, success,

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>these concepts are triggering different neural networks and different people.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>They trigger different meaning, which is tied to your whole

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>personal history and your aspirations. But we assume when we

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>use words that the other person knows exactly what we mean.

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>We operate under the assumption that words mean the same

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>thing to me that they do to you. But in

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that never happens because we each have different internal lives.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ways that you can always appreciate

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this is just look around you. The next time you're

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in the bookstore or the library. There are so many

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>different sections, and nobody walks in and explores all the

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sections equally. Instead, people go in and they go straight

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to the section they want the thing that resonates with

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>their internal model of the world, mysteries or romances or

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>westerns or sci fi or whatever. They gravitate to particular

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>things and not others because of the differences in their brains.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So this is the first important lesson that I want

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>to establish. Others see the world differently than you do.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But why is this true? Why can't we have one

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really smart person who writes a blog post and says, hey,

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the way we should run the country,

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and all three hundred and sixty five million people read

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>then say, yeah, that's pretty good. Why are we all

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so different? This question has been at the heart of

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a very long standing debate where people attribute differences to

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>either genetic factors or environmental factors, in other words, the

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>nature versus nurture debates. Why do you argue with your

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>sibling about political issues? Does your sibling have very different

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>genes than you do, even though you have the same parents.

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Does your sibling have different nurture than you even though

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you were raised in the same household? So are we

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>determined by our genetics or our environment? And traditionally there

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have been very strong advocates on both sides of this. Well,

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>both of these have something to say. So let's start

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with genetics. Do genetic differences matter? Heck yeah they do.

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Although we're all members of this species, Homo sapiens, there

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>are millions of differences in our genomes from person to person.

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>For the cognitionanty, these are single nucleotide polymorphisms or substitution variants,

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or copy number variants and so on. And your genetics

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>matter for who you are. Take just as an example

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>from my book Incognito, so I compiled statistics that if

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you are a carrier of certain genes, your probability of

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>committing violent crime goes up eight hundred and eighty two percent.

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So I took statistics from the US Department of Justice,

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and I broke these down into two groups, those who

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>carry the genes and those who do not. And it's

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a massive difference. Can you guess what this collection of

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>genes is. We summarize it as the Y chromosome. If

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you have these genes, we call you a male. So

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>genes matter, but it's not all genes. It's also your

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>experiences in the world. We drop into the world with

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>half baked brains and we absorb everything around us, everything

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know that you believe, your language, your culture,

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>your memories. It's all stored in this giant neural network.

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And how does it get stored by reconfiguration of the network.

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>This is known as brain plasticity. Brains absorb the world

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>around them, and that's how the world shapes you. We're

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>influenced by our culture, our friends, our neighbors, our generation,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So you're shaped by both your genes

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and your environment, and these are intertwined in very complex ways,

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.719
<v Speaker 1>such that it's really rare that we can point to

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>one or the other and conclude that it's responsible for

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>something that we see. It's all about what we nowadays

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>call gene environment interactions. So you've got the genes that

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you drop into the world with, and then you've got

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>all these experiences, and these intertwined in this complex way.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Your experiences actually shape your nervous system and can feed

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all the way down to the level of which genes

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are getting expressed and which you are getting suppressed. And by

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, you don't choose your genes, and you don't

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>choose your childhood experiences. None of that is about choice,

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but it makes you who you are now. These differences

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can be quite subtle. You can disagree with your sibling

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>politically even know you're genetically similar and we're raised in

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a similar environment, but small differences can take you off

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in very different directions. So you're shaped by both your

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>genes and your environment, and hence the nature versus nurture

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>question is dead. And brains end up as different from

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.239
<v Speaker 1>one another as faces. Just walk along the street and

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>look at how different people's faces are. The variety of

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>faces that you see around you, Well, there's that much

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>variety in brains too. And just as a side note,

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I can recognize all my students just from their brain scans,

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because brains actually physically come out looking different from one another. Okay,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>so we've established that people are very different on the

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>inside and given a sense of how that comes about.

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But you may think, okay, other people are different from me.

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But what is clear is that I see the truth.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And if I could just sit down with them and

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have them listen to me, or I could just shout

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in cap letters on Twitter, everyone would see the correctness

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of my position.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So the main question that comes up in our lives politically,

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>whether on social media or and dinner conversations is why

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>can't everyone see the truth? So now we'll turn to

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Act three, where we'll ask how do you land on

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>your opinions, your notion of the truth, and how accurate

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and complete is it really? So the critical concept I

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you about here is this your brain

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is locked in silence and darkness, and your brain's job

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is to build an internal model of the outside world

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>so that it understands what is happening out there. So

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>everything in your life, everything about the way the world works,

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is represented in your brain, usually unconsciously. How you deal

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>with people, where your house is, how to operate the

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>appliances in your kitchen, what language you speak and your

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>spouse speaks, how to drive your car. Everything in your

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>life is represented in this internal model. And I'm not

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>going to talk too much about the internal model today

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>except to say that one of the fascinating things is

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that usually it's totally unconscious. And I gave an example

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of this in a recent episode about putting your hands

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>up on an imaginary steering wheel in front of you

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and pretending that you're driving thirty miles an hour down

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the road, and I asked you to make a lane

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>change from the center lane into the right lane. And

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>what essentially everyone does with their hands is they turn

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the steering wheel to the right and back to center.

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But that would actually steer you off the road and

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you would crash. When you actually get in the cart

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and watch what your hands are doing, you'll see that

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the way you make a lane change is by turning

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to the right, back to center, just as far to

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the left, and then back to center again. That's how

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.959
<v Speaker 1>you make a lane change. Your brain has made a

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>model of the physics of cars and steering wheels and

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>roads and so on, but you don't even know how

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you do this, and you didn't even know that your

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>brain had that model. This is the gap between what

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>your brain knows under the hood and what your conscious

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>mind has access to. And the point I want to

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>make is that you have this same sort of model

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>about the whole world around you and its political truths. Now,

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the details of your trajectory in the world up to

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>this moment convince you that you know the truths, even

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>though someone else's internal model might tell them that they

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>know the truth and it might be different. Now, the

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>really important point here, the thing that no one talks about,

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't usually take into account how poor

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 1>our internal models are. Here's just an example, starting in

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>early twenty twenty, when the pandemic hit, why did all

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>the bank lobbies close? After all, there were lots of

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>other shops that were open. The floorist was open, the

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>hair salons were open, and all of these were much

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>smaller spaces than the spacious lobbies of the bank. And

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the banks couldn't put up plexiglass in

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>front of the teller's windows. In fact, that was usually

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>already in place. And it's not that the banks wanted

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to be closed, because they still staffed the drive up

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>windows throughout the day.

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 2>So what was going on.

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Most people didn't know why, And this is an example

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of internal models. If something is not in your model,

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>then it just doesn't strike you. The answer was that

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the spring of twenty twenty, most of the population

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 1>began wearing masks, and the bankers didn't want masked customers

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>coming through all day. It's a perfect costume for a robbery,

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>so they closed their lobbies. The point is simply that

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we always think our understanding of the world is complete,

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>but we're always facing situations where we say, oh, I

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.359
<v Speaker 1>guess I didn't know that. Now it's complete, by the way,

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the limits of your internal model. This is the engine

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of comedy. So a comedian, I'll say something like this,

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I went to the doctor the other day and the

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>doctor said, put your clothes there in the corner next

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to mine. It's funny and surprising only because your brain

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>makes a full world of assumptions about the doctor, and

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then you realize that your model didn't have all the information.

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And there are so many examples of the limitations of

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>your model. Imagine I were to draw a handful of

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>diagonal lines on a page and ask you what you see.

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You'd say diagonal lines. But if I say to you

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 1>how many are there here, you'd realize that you don't

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>know the answer, and you have to deploy your attention

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to seek the answer. So this happens to us all

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the time, where we think we have a complete understanding

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>of what's in front of us, but a little bit

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of questioning unmasks that we don't actually have all the

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>details of the picture. And I'm using this all as

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a metaphor to emphasize the importance of genuine dialogue with

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>other people, because sometimes you can't see what questions you

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't asked, or the things that you're not even aware

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not aware of. And by genuine dify dialogue, I

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>don't mean how do I convince the other person that

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm right and they're wrong. I mean listening and considering

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and questioning, and trying where appropriate to change your own

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>mind or to stand in a slightly different viewpoint than

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you were before. Now, I want to come back to

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this issue that it's so easy to poke holes in

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>our internal models. And the question I've always wondered is

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>why do we think our models are complete when they

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>lack so many answers? So consider this. Do you know

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>what a bicycle looks like? Of course you do. Now,

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a place where you can get out

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a piece of paper, I'd like you to get it

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>out and sketch a bicycle. Go ahead, And if you

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>can't get the paper, then go ahead and sketch it

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>in the air with your finger. Just the basic outlines

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of the frame, the wheels, the seat, the handlebars.

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 2>That's all. Okay.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, I hope you'll actually do this, because assuming you do,

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you will find yourself shocked about how poorly you are

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>able to actually reproduce the bike on paper. You think

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you have your bicycle pictured perfectly in your mind, but

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your model, your internal model, is actually quite lousy. For example,

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>does the chain connect to both the front and the

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>back wheel? And what shape is the frame exactly? And

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>how do the handlebars plug into the front wheel. It's

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>shocking because you know what a bicycle looks like, or

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>at least you think you do. But it's actually a

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>big challenge when you're really pushed on your understanding. And

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this is known as the illusion of explanatory depth. Just

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>because you're convinced that your model has the full picture,

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that it actually does. So here's another example.

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that I ask you if you know how the

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>electoral college works in this country, and you might say, yeah,

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I know how that works. But now I say, great,

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>please explain it to me, and you might find that

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you get stuck. You think you know, but as soon

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>as I scratched the surface of something, you find that

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite as clear as you suspected. And there

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are a million examples of this sort of thing, And

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>if you start paying attention, you'll see more and more

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>of the limitations of your knowledge. So it's useful to

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>question ourselves, with all of our political opinions, about where

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 1>our knowledge is lacking, because not knowing information doesn't mean

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have a high sense of certainty about it,

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if you really don't know much about a topic

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>at all. My graduate advisor once told me to go

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>to the library to learn about lattice gases, and I

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>had never heard of that at all. So I walked

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>over to the library and I discovered there was half

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>a shelf with books all about lattice gases. And I

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>was shocked, because how could smart people have devoted their

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:56.919
<v Speaker 1>scientific careers to writing about something that I had never

0:39:57.000 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>even heard of just twenty minutes before. And this is

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the kind of lesson that emerges as you mature in

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the world. But interestingly, it takes a great deal of

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>work to get there. If you've studied less about a subject,

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you tend to overinflate your knowledge. This is what's known

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as the Dunning Krueger effect. So these are a couple

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of psychologists and they ran studies where they found that

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if they ask people a bunch of questions about humor,

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 1>or grammar or logic, you then take the people who

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:35.839
<v Speaker 1>score at the bottom quartile, and they grossly overestimate their

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>performance on the test. Although their test scores put them,

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say, in the twelfth percentile, they estimate themselves to

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>be in the sixty second percentile when you ask them,

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>how much do you know about this compared to other people?

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the less that you know about a topic,

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the more confidence you have in your own abilities. What

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>happens is that as you learn more about a topic,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>your confidence goes down, and it's only much later, when

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you become an expert, that it starts to go back up. So, now,

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>given everything I've told you so far, I want to

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>return to the cartoon that I described at the beginning

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast, about the fork in the road where

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>one sign points to complex but right and the other

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>points to simple but wrong, and almost everybody is going

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.919
<v Speaker 1>in the simple but wrong path, except for the few

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>people winding their way up the steep, complex but right path.

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Now the cartoon struck me as funny, but perhaps not

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>for the obvious reasons, because when I saw this cartoon

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I noticed that it had racked up many

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>thousands of likes. So I started to research who exactly

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 1>were the enthusiasts, and I had a suspicion that I

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>knew the answer, and that turned out to be correct.

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Each person of whatever political persuasion, sees himself in the

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>complex correct thinkers winding the steep path. Whether you are

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>on the right or the left, whether with the Independence

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or Green Party or libertarians, whether you're a fan of

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Antifa or QAnon, whether you're a denizen of Wokistan or Magastan,

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you fundamentally know that you are a person who engages

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in refined and proper thinking. You appreciate data that is

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>intricate and meaningful, while people on the other side, for

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons that you can only guess, they believe incorrect things.

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 1>What I want to emphasize is that each person who

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>clicked the thumbs up button knew that he was not

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like the sheep on the opposite side of the fork. Instead,

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he possessed an intricate and accurate view of the world. Okay,

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So which side of the political debate did the cartoonist support, Well,

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.279
<v Speaker 1>who knows who cares. It was presumably one of his

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>most successful cartoons because it was the skeleton key that

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>fit the lock of each reader's internal model. So the

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>first step to rising above our internal models is to

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>start watching for these bug traps that lure us in.

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I just saw an example yesterday, a bumper sticker that

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>read make America America Again. And everyone on the road

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>who saw this bumper sticker presumably thought that sounded great.

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Why because both sides of the political spectrum are equally

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>happy to engage in retrospective romanticization. Liberals and conservatives can

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>equally well reach back in memory to a time that

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>seemed less complicated, a totally illusory era where the nation

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>agreed with the logic of your political viewpoint, before the

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of the crazies with whom you now have to deal.

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So the only thing that the bumper sticker really points

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>back to is the impoverishment of our memories. The cartoon

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and the bumper sticker. These work because they can mean

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:18.280
<v Speaker 1>anything to anyone, and what they reveal is the degree

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to which we live inside our internal models. And we

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>assume everyone shares the same model we do, and anyone

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>who has a different internal model we tend to demonize.

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's because we believe our models so strongly, because

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that's all we have, whether that's our religion or our

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>political side. Of the spectrum, whether we're the Communists or

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the Nazis in nineteen thirty four, it makes us angry

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that other people can't see the truth as clearly as

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we can, and we are suspicious of them. And this

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>leads me to the final chapter of today's episode, which

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is the notion of empathy. And there's an important aspect

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of this that's typically over look So I'll illustrate this

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:05.839
<v Speaker 1>with a historical example. In the late seventeen hundreds, there

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>was a British nobleman named Lord Gordon, who was born

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>into privilege, but he found himself caring deeply about the

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>welfare of the sailors. He was an officer, but he

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>campaigned energetically to improve their conditions, and his empathy was

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 1>broader than that. When they sailed to Jamaica, he was

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>disgusted by the slavery there and he berated the British

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>governor about it. So here's an example of a guy

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:36.240
<v Speaker 1>where everywhere he went he sought to improve the well

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>being of.

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Those less fortunate.

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So the question, from a neuroscience point of view is

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>why did Lord Gordon care so much for others? And

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>why do any of us help strangers after all, the

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>driving force of evolution is survival of the fittest, not

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of the friendliest. Well, fortunately there's another force at work.

0:45:58.120 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Our brains are.

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Constantly in the business of simulating the experiences of other people,

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and under the right circumstances, this leads to empathy, the

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>experiencing of another's emotions. Empathy is what counterbalances our appetite

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for power and tribalism and violence. Empathy is the glue

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>that binds society together. Our species dominance is due in

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>part to our empathy, which helps us to cooperate flexibly

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in large groups. Now, how can we study empathy neuroscientifically?

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So in my lab we performed a brain imaging study

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in which you are in the scanner and you see

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 1>six hands on the screen in front of you, and

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the computer goes aroundoo and randomly picks one of the hands.

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So one of two things happens. Either the hand gets

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>touched with a Q tip or it gets stabbed with

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a syringe needle.

0:46:57.800 --> 0:46:58.359
<v Speaker 2>And when you.

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 1>See it get stabbed, it's very cringe worthy. And so

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing is we're looking in the brain images

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to understand what is the difference between these two cases.

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>That are visually quite similar, but in one of the

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>cases you have this very visceral response. And what we

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>find is that when the hand gets stabbed with the

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>syringe needle, this network of areas in your brain that

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we summarize as the pain matrix, this comes online. And

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>these areas in your brain are what would come online

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if your own hand got stabbed. So when you see

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>someone else's hand get stabed, that activates this same pain matrix.

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 2>You are not getting hurt, but you.

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Are simulating what it would be like to be that

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 1>person and have your hand get stabbed. This is the

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>neural basis of empathy. Now, if the story ended there,

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 1>all of us humans would operate like a big, cooperative

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>ant called But the reality is more complex. So let's

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>return to Lord Gordon. He empathized with sailors and slaves,

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but he had nothing but hatred for his Catholic neighbors.

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>He worked tirelessly to repeal the civil rights of Catholics,

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>and in seventeen eighty Lord Gordon marched a crowd of

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:26.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand people to the Houses of Parliament in London

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and for a week, the mob destroyed Catholic churches and

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Catholic homes in what came to be known as the

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Riots, which was the most destructive domestic upheaval in

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the history of London. So why did Lord Gordon, a

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>person so capable of empathy, have such antipathy for Catholics.

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The answer paints a fundamental fact about human nature, which

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is our tendency to form in groups and outgroups, groups

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that we feel attached to and those that we feel

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>opposed to. Our empathy is selective. So, especially after the

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Second World War, psychologists began to study this issue of

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in groups and out groups and how this can so

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>easily lead to violence. And my lab and a lot

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of others have done a lot of research into this

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 1>issue of how easily we form in groups and out groups.

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>And I'll give you just one example of this. So

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>come back to this experiment with the people in the

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>brain scanner watching the hands get stabbed. Now we take

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>these six hands on the screen and we just add

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one word labels to each hand Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Scientologist, atheist.

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 1>And now the computer goes around boo boo, boo boop,

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and it randomly picks a hand, and you see that

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hand get touched with a Q tip or stabbed with

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a syringe needle. And the question is does your brain

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>care as much if it's an out group versus your

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in group. We tested people of all different faiths and

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>atheists also, and the result is that you care more

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 1>about your in group and you care less about outgroups.

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>When you see the hand get stabbed that is labeled

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>with your in group, we can measure a very big

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>response in the pain matrix. And when you see a

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>hand get stabbed that has one of the other labels

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>on it, we see a very small response in the

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:30.319
<v Speaker 1>pain matrix. Your brain just doesn't care as much. This

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is a large effect and it's depressing that it's true,

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's just the way humans are. We care a

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 1>lot about our in groups. And these are just single

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>word labels. I mean, all the hands look the same

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>and they just have different colored wristbands on them so

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you can distinguish them. But it turns out we are

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>really really sensitive to these labels. So the issue of

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:57.280
<v Speaker 1>empathy is subtle and complex. With just a single word label,

0:50:57.360 --> 0:50:59.959
<v Speaker 1>your brain can feel more or less empathy for someone.

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>One can run the imagery about them and their pain

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>more or less vividly. Now, what's fascinating is how rapidly

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:12.439
<v Speaker 1>our levels of empathy can change. So we next took

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the exact same subject and we presented them with a

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>single sentence. The year is twenty twenty five, and these

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>three groups have teamed up against these three groups. And

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so now you find your in group teamed up on

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>one side or the other. The computer has picked these

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 1>sides randomly, and so you've got this team and the

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 1>other team. So what do you think happens? You care

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 1>now about your allies. The two groups have randomly got

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>lumped in there with your in group. So suddenly when

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you see their hand get stabbed, you have a larger

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>empathy response than you did just a moment ago.

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 2>And you didn't care about them.

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:50.319
<v Speaker 1>You still don't care about the out groups on the

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>other side, but you care about these allies now more,

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which is not surprising. Like, for example, when the Soviets

0:51:57.160 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>fought side by side with the Americans in World War II, too,

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they had been bitter enemies before then World War two happened,

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly their allies they're fighting together. They're clapping each

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>other on the back and sharing cigarettes and so on.

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And then the war ends and now their enemies again.

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Now take a moment to think about your own level

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of empathy towards others. Imagine that you see a seventy

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>five year old man get hit in the face and

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>his nose gets cut and he's bleeding. Do you feel

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>an empathic sting with that? Okay, Well, now imagine that

0:52:34.000 --> 0:52:38.240
<v Speaker 1>he's at a rally for Joe Biden or for Donald Trump,

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or just anyone you agree or disagree with. Is your

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:46.759
<v Speaker 1>empathy any different? And if so, does that challenge your

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 1>view of yourself as an empathic person. If you felt

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 1>unequal responses in those two situations, a Biden rally or

0:52:55.239 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a Trump rally, you're not alone. People generally assess their

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>own empathy by thinking about those in their in group.

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I've always been struck by this in action adventure movies.

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>When we see a person get hurt, if it's the protagonist,

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we really WinCE. But if it's the antagonist and he's

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>falling off one hundred foot cliff to his death, we

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:19.719
<v Speaker 1>feel just find about that, possibly happy about that. So

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what this means is that we have the capacity to

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:27.359
<v Speaker 1>feel someone else's pain in different ways, depending on whether

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they're a member of our tribe or not, and the

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 1>tribal tendencies of humans. This can incite murder and torture,

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>from the Spanish Inquisition to the Rwandan genocide. This can

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>buy the appeal of nationalist visions, from Hitler's Final Solution

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to Mao's Cultural Revolution. So, given how deeply our biases

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are ingrained, the question is, are we doomed to repeat

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of atrocities forever? So I'm going to suggest

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps apps not. I'm going to give five strategies here

0:54:04.600 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to narrow the empathic divide between people. The first thing

0:54:09.600 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 1>has to do with just understanding our own biases. We

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can increase our awareness of our own internal thought patterns

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 1>so that we recognize our partisanship as we experience it.

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>For example, in our social echo chambers, we tend to

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>accept the logic of our in group and we reject

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the logic of outgroups. And we're also predisposed to help

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:36.360
<v Speaker 1>those in our in groups rather than those a little

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>farther away who might need help.

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 2>More.

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Understanding the biases behind our actions in this way can

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>help lead us to more altruistic behavior. The second strategy

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for narrowing the empathic divide has to do with building

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a better model of other people. So instead of concluding

0:54:56.520 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that your brother or a coworker is a or an idiot,

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:04.720
<v Speaker 1>just try taking a crack at understanding his point of view.

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same as agreeing with his point of view,

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's trying to step into that person's world to

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:16.359
<v Speaker 1>avoid the oversimplifications that we typically accept. And by the way,

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this is often accomplished through art and literature, which has

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>for a long time wage day behind the scenes battle

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:27.879
<v Speaker 1>against dehumanization. Theater and books and movies. This lets people

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:30.840
<v Speaker 1>step into the shoes of other people, and in the

0:55:30.880 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fourteen forties, when the printing press was invented, this allowed

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>stories to spread widely. So, for example, when Harriet Peacher

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Stowe published the anti slavery novel Uncle Tom's Cabin in

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty two, readers stepped inside a shack that they

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>otherwise wouldn't have ever entered, and once in it was

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:55.239
<v Speaker 1>no longer so easy to relegate the characters to an

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out group. The third strategy is to learn and resis

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the tactics of dehumanization. There are a lot of tricks

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that governments and propagandists employ and I'm going to do

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a different episode on that, but I'll mention here that

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 1>one common ploy is what's called moral pollution, in which

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a group is socially smeared by association with something repulsive

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like vermin or insects, or anything that develops them in

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a negative emotional cloud. Once you have a negative emotional

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>reaction to a group, it becomes harder to hear their perspectives.

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So when you can recognize that a person is being

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>attacked for his identity rather than his arguments, you can

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>better defend yourself against this trick. The fourth strategy has

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with blinding your biases, so design processes and

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:54.240
<v Speaker 1>organizations that remove the chance that prejudices interfere with your judgment.

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>For example, a lot of software companies here in Silicon Valley,

0:56:58.840 --> 0:57:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll ask job candidates to submit code rather than to

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 1>show up in person. And many orchestras have blind auditions,

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 1>which means they audition people behind a curtain, so you

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>can't see the gender or the race of the person

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:15.800
<v Speaker 1>who's looking for the job. You're just listening to the music.

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And in the same way, many universities have a need

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 1>blind application process so they can separate intelligence from financial considerations.

0:57:25.520 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is, wherever biases can be subconsciously triggered,

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's best if you just remove the opportunity. And the

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 1>fifth strategy I think is the least intuitive, and that

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is to entangle group memberships. So what I mean is

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:48.840
<v Speaker 1>work to ensure that communities are intertwined. So to see

0:57:48.840 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>how this would work in practice, consider the five tribes

0:57:53.000 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Iroqui Native Americans, who fought intensely with each

0:57:57.080 --> 0:58:00.120
<v Speaker 1>other in the fifteenth century. So they had a new

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 1>leader come in named Deganaweda, who came to be known

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as the Great Peacemaker. And what he did is he

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hassigned each tribe member to one of nine different clans,

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Wolf clan or the Bear clan, or the Turtle

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 1>clan or Sandpiper.

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Deer so on.

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So members of each clan had representation from all the

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>different tribes, and these relationships were cross cutting. So I

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 1>say to you, hey, tribe member, let's go attack that

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 1>other tribe over there, And you say, oh, you know,

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I would. But I'm a member of the Eagle clan

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and so is he, and so I'm not really that

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in attacking him anymore. So by emphasizing the overlapping

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:47.480
<v Speaker 1>dual allegiances to tribe and to clan, de Ganaweda complicated

0:58:47.480 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the notions of us and them, and in this way

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he was able to defang the intertribal warfare. So what

0:58:55.720 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in today's episode is how different we are

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 1>on the inside, and yet how strongly we believe our

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 1>own truths, even though our knowledge of everything is so impoverished.

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet we all walk around with the impression that

0:59:10.160 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if we could just sit down with another person on

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side, we could show them the truth. So

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:19.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have the same opinions as everyone else in

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:22.919
<v Speaker 1>your life, great, But I hope you don't. I hope

0:59:22.920 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you can take the opportunity to dig deep and find

0:59:26.760 --> 0:59:29.200
<v Speaker 1>out how the other folks in your life see the

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 1>world and listen to them. It's not the same as

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:34.560
<v Speaker 1>agreeing with them or giving in to them, but it

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is acknowledging that your point of view doesn't have a

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>lock on the absolute truth, and it's allowing that the

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 1>most important thing you can learn is an ability to

0:59:45.160 --> 0:59:49.760
<v Speaker 1>dialogue in conditions of disagreements and discomfort. It's the most

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>important thing that you can do for each other and

0:59:53.080 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for your own brain. As Voltaire said, uncertainty is an

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable position, but certainty is an absurd position. So I've

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>given five directions for helping us to learn how to

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>bridge that gap, not by assuming we're right, but by

1:00:10.760 --> 1:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>having the intellectual humility to realize that it's a big,

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>pluralistic world out there, and that everyone, including you, has

1:00:19.360 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a model of the truth, and that only by adopting

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the stance of genuine dialogue and understanding your own biases

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and the possibility that we might be wrong, can we

1:00:31.880 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>hope to move things forward. If you're interested in learning more,

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>find further readings on these topics at Eagleman dot com,

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Slash podcast, and if you have questions, comments thoughts, email

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>us at podcast at eagleman dot com, where we've been

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>getting great responses. Watch full video episodes and leave comments

1:00:56.680 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube at Inner cosmospod. Until then, this is David

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Eagleman signing off from the Inner Cosmos