WEBVTT - The Hot New Thing in Tax Avoidance

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Right now,

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 1>we know that investors are hoping for returns that are

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>often bigger than what a lot of institutional managers will

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>say that they can get, and they don't want extra

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>taxes cutting into that. And there's a new popular way

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to avoid taxes that has um name that's less than exciting,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>insurance dedicated funds. Here to tell us a little bit

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>more about these and why they're a little bit more

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>exciting than they sound, Tom Metcalf, who is able to

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>produce reporter in choices in our Brick eleven three our studios, Tom,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>what exactly our insurance dedicated funds? So they're pretty complicated product. Basically,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they're a way for very wealthy investors to invest in

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and without have to pay any sort of

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>tax on those gains. So there's two types a life

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>insurance product and an annuity product. But basically what you

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>do as an investor, you effectly buy a life insurance

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>product and then that insurer will invest for you into

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund and then there is absolutely zero tax

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>on that. Do you have a sense of how big

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea for the insurance dedicated fund industry has become?

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty hard to get like official statistics. One

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>guy said, you know, people are trying to keep this

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>relatively quiet just because it's so successful. They don't want

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone else to know how well it's going. But one

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one guy sort of estimated for us it was at

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>least fifteen and perhaps eighteen billion in terms of total assets,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's tripled over the last ten years or so.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Let me just get a handle on this, because it's

0:01:55.960 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily new that insurance policies are used for things

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like a state planning purposes. Right, if you have a

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>projected tax bill because of your estate, many times what

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll do is you, if you can afford it, you

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>will pay the premium for an insurance policy whose payoff

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>value to the beneficiaries is equal to whatever the tax

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>liability is. So in other words, you're getting a tax

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>free distribution from your insurance policy and you use that

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>money to go and pay your estate taxes. That's already

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>well known and I mean, I mean it's pretty widely widespread, correct, Yeah,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And this is sort of, I guess, even more grander

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>than that. So it's become a more popular because what

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is obviously family officers that have exploded, So

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you're getting so many more investors out there you can

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>afford to leave their money locked away effectively for decades.

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And also the difference here is effectively you can with

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this structure effectively avoid any sort of tax on that

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>death benefit if it's structured correctly. Well, So, just to

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of how this differs from a

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>typical annuity, just in terms of the promised yields. What

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of returns on their investments have some of these

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 1>wealthy individuals been expecting to receive. So in some of

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the marketing documents it's basically, over say a forty year period,

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you can under a normal structure, get about fifty million

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a total you investment two I think

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>it's two and a half million over four years, and

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>then leave it there, you know, making returns for forty

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>odd years, and that would be fifty million under a

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>normal structure, and in this sort of totally tax restructure

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that rises to about hundred and twenty million. Holy cow.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Well that's because of the tax, the tax status something

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of the investment, right, because it's growing status. This is

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're investing in huge funds. They're not investing in

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>just sort of income producing securities. Right. Um, it's both basically,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's effectively in terms of that hundred twenty million. Basically,

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if you are the beneficiary rather than ensured, that hundred

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty million will landing your bank account for all effect

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>without any tax at all. Right, because it's an insurance payout. Yeah,

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's a life insurance payout, right, and when meeting

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>life insurance meaning you're not going to get it, the

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>beneficiary is going to get I said, well, I could

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>buy the policy for and insure someone else, so I

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>could be the beneficiary. So you know, let's say I

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have a nice elderly relative. Perhaps that might be a

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>thing I could do if I had to spare. You know,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>people say about you need seven to eight million. But

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>that also used to be a very popular investment product.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Which is banks companies. I mean they were viadical settlements.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you would ensure someone else and when

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>they passed away that the benefit of that policy would

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>accrue to you because you paid the premiers for that person. Yeah, exactly.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And the guess the twist here is the involvement hedge

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>runs that you get to select because technically you don't

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>get to select what the insurance company invests in. But

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>now you're saying that you can do this by selecting

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>these specific kinds of products, these idefs. Yeah, you've got

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to be very careful. So the I r S looks

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>very closely at this in terms of you can't show

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>what they term investor control. But basically, and this is

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>another reason why it's becoming more popular, is what you

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>can do is move from fund to fund. So let's

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>say you're invested in one hedge fund and you go,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell them what to invest in, but I

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>don't like their performance. You can move to another. They

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are called insurance dedicated funds without any sort of kind

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of implications and tax works or anything. This is such

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>an interesting story. And one thing that you talk about

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is that these vehicles have become so mainstream that you've

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>got banks like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs offering them, as

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>well as hedge funds like Paulson and Company and Millennium Partners.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And it was interesting and somewhat telling that no one

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>wanted to comment for your story whatsoever. And you know,

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>do you do you think that, um that there is

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>some concern that regulators could kind of home in and

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>try to remove the loophole that's kind of being exploded here. Yeah,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we were asking the various people spect to the story

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>about that. And what has happened originally is the RS

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is constantly raised, a few lawsuits and stuff. I think

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at the moment there's a feeling which is again, popularities

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>increase and as long as you're very clear and can

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>make this case for invest in control that you're not involved,

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're quite secure. And I think part of the

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>reason they're not commenting as well is you know that

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a private placement, so they don't they're not really

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed to talk about sort of client issues like that.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what they told their compliance department would probably you know,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a brain uh melt down just just quickly. Insurance payouts

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are in a sense guaranteed. Right, you buy a life

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy for a million dollars, it pays out a

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. In this case, you buy a life insurance

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>policied invested in hedge funds? Is there any guarantee? Um?

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's variable. And in fact it was a

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>case where a guy who invest in these is a

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>rich head from guy and invested as in a I

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>d F and then try to sue them because they

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the returns he wanted. So there is definitely

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that risk level. But when you take out tax, as

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not going for a super super high

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>risk fund, then it's just easy returns. On that level

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>at least, it's almost like having an additional IRA A right,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean the money grows tax free. Although the IRA

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>case you actually attacks when you pull the money out,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>in this case you could potentially not pay anything. Thanks

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>very much, Tom Metcalf, always a pleasure talking about i dfs.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about insurance dedicated funds. Check it out Bloomberg

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Well, companies all across the world are still

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>grappling with a cyber attack that's similar to the want

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to cry attack that we saw a couple of months ago. Um,

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it's reached parts of Asia after hitting Europe, US, South America,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and who is really to blame? I want to bring

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in Robert Knapp's chief executive officer and co founder of

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>cyber Ghost, which is based in Bucharest, Romania. Robert, thank

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. In previous news articles,

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you've been quoted saying that, frankly, governments are in large

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>part to blame for some of these cyber attacks because

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there you know, for example, the U. S N s A,

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll find some of these loopholes and problems with programs

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>widely is programs, and they won't report them because they

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to access people's information. Can you

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about that exactly. I mean I

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was talking a couple of years now about the fact

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have to decide in the future how we

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>wanna move forward with online security. One of the big

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>problems we see now and these attack shows it, um

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and leave me. We are just now before the next

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>attack because all these attacks we see, how we saw

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in the last years, are using so called backdoors means

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>um loopholes in in normally secure systems that are either

0:08:53.840 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>implemented by um national security organizations or detect a financial

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>security agencies and not reported to the developers, because these

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>agencies use them to spire on people, which weakens the

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>security for all of us. And I think we need

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision um as a as a society

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about how we want to proceed in future with putting

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>our whole life on the internet. Robert, would this would

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>would an analogy be that, you know, in in some

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>science fiction movies, you know, you've got the scientist who's trying,

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, creating some crazy chemical, you know, to rule

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. But it gets loose, right, it gets loose

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and someone else takes it and does bad things with it.

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Is this what's happening right now? I know, not exactly.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I I know a better analogy. It's like, you know,

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it is like we live in a neighborhood and we

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>implement now in our houses absolutely safe doors so nobody

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>could break into the house. But the police has the idea,

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>let it make even more safe. Leave all of us,

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>give us a key, so so we could prevent the

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>bad guys entering the door. Okay, but here's what I

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>don't understand, Robert. But here's here's what I don't understand,

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because if the government is to blame for not reporting

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these back doors and loopholes, wouldn't the technology

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>companies hire some people If these hacks aren't that difficult

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to do, wouldn't they just hire a team of people

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to try to break in and go through every back

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>door and find every vulnerability and fix it. Um. I

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>disagree that the point is that would that would mean

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that we believe that it's possible to build one hundre

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the centature systems, so and that is simply not possible. Um.

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking here about highly complex systems with sometimes hundreds

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of thousands and millions of lines of codes. So the

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:08.599
<v Speaker 1>problem is, first of all, we cannot build safe systems

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>once we detect the vulnerability. We need to have laws

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that prevents anyone from using these vulnerabilities and to report

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>these vulnerability So that means we need a common effort

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>into into making the web more secure and not making

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the web more unsecure. And you know, having state organizations

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 1>having these keys are not giving them back to the

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>rightful owners of the doors. That doesn't make sense and

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the reality shows that, UM, this is not the way

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to go for the future because we're gonna see now

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>more and more of these kind of attacks that all

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>used vulnerabilities in normally secure systems. Well, given the current

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>political environment, it seems unlikely that there's going to be

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a consensus about very much, specifically about cyber attack accent

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to put forth some kind of legislation. I'm wondering

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>if you could offer businesses and individuals any advice on

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>how to prepare or deal with the current cyber attack

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and future attacks. What should people and businesses be doing. Look,

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the weapon of the twenty one century is encryption technology.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So the answer exists. The solution exists. We have it.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It's pure mathematics, and it's called encryption. So that means

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>protect yourself with tools like our cyberablest hand that is

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>an entrypted come into the internet, use PGP for your email,

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>use encrypted check systems, and do a pack up of

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>your data. So the problem that we see right now

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we want to try to take over these kind of

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a kick is that these people lock your data. That

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>means the only way to protect yourself from that is

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to back up, but to pick ups keys in a

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>way that you would encrypt your data in the cloud.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So don't pick ups in the clouds a pickups in

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>your own networkeding on and try and trypt your data.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And as long as we don't have bactors and encrypted solutions,

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>these solutions are really safe. I want to thank you

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>very much for joining us. Robert Napp is the chief

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>executive and the co founder of cybergost joining us from Bucharest, Romania. Well,

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he is here to continue the saga of Puerto Rico.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Masac is our editor for Bloomberg Briefs Municipal Market

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Brief and he joins us in studio. Joe, you know,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm I guess this is what chapter. I don't even

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know what chapter this is in the long saga and

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>story of Puerto Rico. But the Puerto Rico Board has

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>some checked in the power utilities debt restructuring. Bring us

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>up to date on what's going on. Oh man, the

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>board last night and executive meeting said that the Prepper deal,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which promised to give creditors but cents on the dollar

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and was the only deal that they came to pre

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy only deal right, Uh, that that no longer was

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>alive and that they should go back and uh it

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like, now it's going to happen. If Prepper is

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna wind up into some you know that they're gonna

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>wind up in Title three bankruptcy along with the you know,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Commonwealth, the GEO holders and Cofino holders are slugging

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it out. So now you're gonna have Preppa in the

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>same boat. And uh, the board not only did that,

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the Board also threwout the budget last night that was

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>passed by the legislature and said, no, you know what,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to take another three million dollars out of

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this budget and the budgets about nine and six billion.

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So they were very busy last night. The board is

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>asserting their power. Yeah. Well they also Puerto Rico also

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>said that their fiduciary duty was not too bondholders, it

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>was to residents of the island, which is a stark

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>departure from typical bankruptcies where the company's fiduciary duty really

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is two creditors first and foremost. Right, Well, you know

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, they're arguing that today in court. And uh,

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually, the the adversarial relationship there, we saw

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>glimpses of it in nine the Orange County bankruptcy, and

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>then it really came back in Detroit, where the city said, well,

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>guess what, GEO bond holders are going to have to

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>take a haircut, and they did. Uh So, the the

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>adversarial nature is something that we have seen in the

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>muni market, the business about well, we don't really of

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a fiduciary duty and guess what, we have to take

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>care of the people on the island first. Okay, So

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, why why is anyone surprised? Why

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is anyone anyone surprised that the Fiduciary Board is throwing

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>out these agreements, reducing the amount of money in the budget,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>basically doing everything that it can to protect the island

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and its people rather than creditors. Well, no, actually the

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>board went throughout the budget is really saying, you know,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, yes, on the PREPA deal, they're saying,

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it looks like bond holders are gonna have to take

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>more of a haircut than fifteen cents on the dollar.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But with throwing out the entire budget, they're saying, you

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't made enough cuts. There are going to have to

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>either be employee furloughs or we might have to cut

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>back those Christmas bonuses to government employees on the island. Uh.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So the board is being how should I put it there,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>being very hard right now, and they should be no cash.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was a story in the Wall Street

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Journal this week about how Puerto Rico is looking to

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sell itself off in pieces to raise money. Oh sure, yeah,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and I suspect that the board is going to have

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a very um uh you know, they'll have something to

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>say about that now. Whether they, you know, approve those

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sorts of sales or not, we'll see. But I would

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's almost good, you know, from a I don't

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>know from a public finance point of view, that somebody

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on the island is is sitting down and taking things

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>very very seriously as opposed to what's sort of gone

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>on before here. Well, let's can you just put this

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>into some kind of perspective. I think you mentioned what

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the total budget that was passed was nine point nine

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 1>point six nine point six billion, just to give that comparison,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the budget of the City of New York

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is eight five billion. Uh. State of Rhode Island I

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>think about nine point two billion. Why is I mean

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>these are they are large sums, but the havoc that

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they are going to wreck on the economy is gonna

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>last a much longer time than just a one year budget.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Is there a cohesive plan or is anybody thinking about

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>what life in Puerto Rico is going to be like

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for businesses and people after this happens? Or presumably the

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Oversight Board is and they they seem to

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have taken or are taking the long term. Look. You

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that the haddock that this is going to a reek. Uh,

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, recall back to the nineteen seventy five in

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>New York City, which did not go into Chapter nine bankruptcy,

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but entered a period of austerity that took perhaps ten years. Uh.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, a lot of the the infrastructure problems

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in New York City today or you know,

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>could almost be traced back to nineteen and that extended

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>period of austerity. So who knows how long it's going

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to take for Puerto Rico to you know, turn the corner.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, Joe, I have to wonder as we talk

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and focus on Puerto Rico's differ cultis I have to

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder what precedent it sets for Illinois, which is teetering

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>close to junk status with respect to its credit rating

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and is facing a whole host of problems. I mean,

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>is there anything that debt holders are taking. Are they

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>selling more aggressively because they know that they could get um,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>they could get shafted in a future reorganization. Actually, uh,

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the banks I've read several analytical comments in

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks saying, hey, you know what,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Illinois actually represents a value right now because it's trading

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>so far out of line, almost three basis points over

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the triple A scale. So Illinois gus. They're talking New

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Jersey appropriation back debt. Uh. The banks are saying that,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are recommended because the U States, unlike

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico, uh you know, A, they don't have bank

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>criptsy right now, but be the States are still very

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>strong and have a lot of flexibility. So it's sound

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you know it always it always sounds apocalyptic and now

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>all right risk on stale for at least across the

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street analytic desks. Joe Mysak, thank you so much

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Joe Mysak is the editor of the

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Brief that's focused on the municipal market. Talking all

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>things this moment of the muni, stock buybacks and free

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. How do you use them as a strategy

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to make money? Well. Charles Biederman is the

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>chairman of trim Tab's asset management and he joins us

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>now to tell us more. Charles, always a pleasure, Thanks

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>for being here in our studio. Maybe you could just

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>give a little bit of a description as to how

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you came to formula this strategy and the experience that

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>you have in implementing it. Well, all there is in

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>stock market of shares of stock and money, and so

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>if companies are growing cash and using a portion of

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it to reduce the share count, the price of the

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>remaining shares should go up by the percentage of the

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>share count reduction, everything else being equal, particularly since they

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>generate using cash that they're generating. Now there's a difference

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if they use cash that they're borrowing, because that increase

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>increases risk and it means they don't have the cash

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it. So you want to buy shares in

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>stock first. Companies are growing cash, and if they're using

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a portion to reduce the share a count and they're

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not borrowing to buy that's our strategy for trim tabs.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh Flow drink et F which we launched in October,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and as you know, we've done quite well since. I've

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>been on the show many times with you in the

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.239
<v Speaker 1>past us talking about it, Charles, I'm wondering there are

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>so many people who are launching exchange treated funds right now.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter whether you have a good idea or

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is there something else that works with respect to marketing

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and e TF Well, I think performance works, always hasn't

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>always will. In essence, we're a hedge fund at a

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine speak basis point price. In other words, we

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have a formula and no one else does. Now. We

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just launched today trim tabs International Free cash Flow uh

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>t t A I is the ticker symbol. It's gonna

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>do exactly what t t FS does in the US

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to non U S stocks. It's going to be about

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty five stocks UM Developed countries, Asia, Canada, UM, Europe, etcetera.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh it's companies growing free cash flow, reducing the

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>share count and maintaining a strong balance sheet. So it's

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a global compliment. So the U S one is work.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>We've outperformed in the past of the Numbers Show, Morning Star.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Whatever we've outperformed by several hundred basis points over the

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Russell three thousand, and we're hoping to count. You know,

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the design purpose of business is to grow cash, unless,

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of course, you're Musk or or Netflix, which is design

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>purposes to grow your stock price. But most companies, if

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they're growing their cash and they use a portion of

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it to reduce the share count, everybody wins. I want

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to ask about this idea of stock buy backs, because

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>what happens when a company buy backs buys back the

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>stock but doesn't actually retire the shares. In other words,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they just sit there in the corporate treasury for use

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>later on. Perhaps does that matter? Yes, we we don't

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>look at bibe. We look at share count. How many

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>shares are outstanding, what they do, how they got there

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is not really relevant. As long as they have more

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>cash than they started at the beginning of the period

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and their debt asset ratio didn't go up. You know,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>it's it's companies, uh or if they're doing well, the

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>management likes to reduce the share account because the management

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>then owns a greater percentage of the company, as does

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>every pre existing shareholder. And if they're not growing cash,

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>they probably want to sell stock. Well, Charles, how do

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Google fit into this equation? We know that Apple,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, has been a poster child of keeping cash

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>offshore and issuing debt to buy back shares simply because

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to have to pay the taxes on

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>repatriating some of that cash. So where does that company

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>stand in this whole equation. Well, there, They've been a

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>member of t T a C from the get go,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>or from when they started doing buy backs, which was

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think after eleven uh, and they remain. I mean,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>even though they do borrow occasionally, they're debt to asset ratio,

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they're growing cash so fast that even if they borrow

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>money so they don't have to repatriate, and they're borrowing

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a very little, very low rate, that they're still in

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>our model. Google, on the other hand, is not doing

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>any share count reduction that I'm aware of, So well

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they are Well, I personally own Google because they create

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>their own demand and they're growing cash there. Until they

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 1>do buy backs, they won't be in the fund. You know.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I thought was interesting is looking

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at the constituents of t t f S, which is

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the domestic T T A C T T A C

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I beg your pardon. The we were We were removed

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>as subadvisor. They kept the ticker symbol, but we relaunched

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>under a new ticker symbol, trimp TEPS, Folk Drink as

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>T T A C. Okay, So all right, so just

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>so just quickly, this idea of being able to put

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>these companies together eighty five in the new one, how

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>often do they change? Uh? Uh the twenty I'd say,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>uh have portfolio turnover is the third to a half

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a year. In other words, we only like the last

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>six months performance if a company stops growing or stops

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>meeting the criteria. Every day we track each of the

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>three thousand Russell stocks and on our Bloomberg terminal for

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a listing of which are the top one hundred, and

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>every so often we rebalance and typically h significant number

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>fall out. Yeah, Charles Peterman, thank you so much for

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Charles Peterman as chairman of trim Tab's asset

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 1>management and he joins us here in our Bloomberg eleven

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>three oh studios talking about his new International Free cash

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Flow et F. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Pam Fox. I'm

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abrama. It's one before the podcast.

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio