WEBVTT - The Story: The UK’s Race for Second Place in the Chip Wars

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech stuff. I'm os Voloshen here with Cara Price.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Hi Cara, hi os So. I recently talked with a fellow,

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Britt who reminded me of something that I think you

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Americans often take for granted.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>The center of gravity for the tech industry is so

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 2>much on the West coast of the United States. It's

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could imagine the whole thing just tipping

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>over into the Pacific Ocean. It's so it's so heavy.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>And that's great for California, it's great for Seattle at

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Washington State. But it's worrying and it should be of

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 2>a great concern to the rest of the world. What

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>is our future? Are we just going to be takers

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 2>not makers?

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's really interesting because as an American like

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>I rarely imagine what it's like to be a taker

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>rather than a maker, because so much innovation comes from

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 3>our tech sector.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's right. Nick McEwan has seen the story

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>play out from both sides of the Atlantic. He built

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>rather an impressive roster of credits, Professor of computer science

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and electrical Engineering at Stanford, Unicorn founder, and a meaningful

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>claim to having built the Internet. His work formed the

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>basis of Cisco System's GSR router, which at one time

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>made up seventy five percent of the backbone of the Internet.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But Nick recently returned to the UK and he's become

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly concerned about the fate of Britain's technology sector because

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>he in fact sits on the Prime Minister's Council on

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Science and Technology, which.

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Is like an incredibly powerful position to have. But I'm

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>also biased because of how much power this US administration

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>handed over to Elon Musk and Doge briefly, very briefly.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm glad you brought Doze up because I couldn't

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.279
<v Speaker 1>resist asking Nick when we first met on the phone

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>whether he was Britain's Doge. He laughed in that classic

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>English way, which I think was his way of deflecting

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and saying I think you just did it, his way

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of saying get lost. But of course when I got

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>him into the recording studio, I had to ask him

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>what he thought about Doge and how Elon ran it.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Immense respect for him as an entrepreneur and as a technologist.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that he's brought about some of the most

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 2>incredible technology, brought it to market. I think it turned

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>out that he wasn't so good in the political sphere.

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I think the sort of the slash and burn approach

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to trying to streamline government just showed that he didn't

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>have the experience didn't work, and I think it was

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>a pretty much in a visible failure. I think the

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>real sad thing about that is the wasted opportunity. I

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>think everyone who looks at the US government the British

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>government can say, of course it can be streamlined, of

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>course it can be improved, and by the abysmal way

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 2>that he handled it, it set us back a long

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>way because it's going to be very hard for someone

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 2>else to step in with the same role and say

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>that they'll give it a go. I don't think anyone's

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>going to trust that someone could do that.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Well. I'm curious, like how exactly is Nick helping the

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 4>UK government be more efficient and like, how does he

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 4>see you know, this role being something that could actually

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 4>be effective as opposed to dismal.

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, unlike Dough, she doesn't have executive function. He's literally

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>an advisor, right, and one of the things he's most

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>interested in is how Britain best positions itself for the future.

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We spoke a lot about AI chips, and interestingly, Nick's

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>great ambition for the UK is to take second place

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>behind the US in chip manufacturing. He wants, he wants

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to bet, but lifts on the rise right now.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Some people would argue it's better to be left.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Nick also sits on the border of this government agency

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>called ARIA, the Advanced Research and Invention Agency. For me,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it was just cool to get an inside view on

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>how my own country's government is positioning itself for this

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>new technological age, especially the time when something else I'm

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>fascinated in, which is how many nation states are starting

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to get deeply involved in the private sector, starting to

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of be market participants themselves, like you know, the

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>US investment in Intel under Trump. And actually Nick, funny

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>enough was a senior figure at Intel for many years.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But without further ado, here's the rest of our conversation.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So on Earth persuaded you to depart from sunny California

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to rainy Britain to advise the British government to move

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>from the future to a place that often looks like

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the past.

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, I left the UK in nineteen eighty nine

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>as a somewhat angry twenty six year old feeling there

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>was no future for someone that was interested in technology

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>and the UK. It was the time of the Thatcher government,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 2>where all of the emphasis and focus was on the

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 2>city and growing the financial institutions. You could look at

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and say that that paid off, but they came at

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the cost for technology, and it just seemed that engineer

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>was still a dirty word. Back in nineteen eighty nine,

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I left saying Okay, I'm done here. My tribe is

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>in California. But in the meantime, you know, it would

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 2>be easy to say, oh, the UK just languished. You know,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>we had our ups and downs, and there was certainly

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>some big missed opportunities we had over the years. But

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I really felt as though something was changing. There was

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 2>a much more of an optimism about our opportunity, both

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>in AI and in technology more generally. I'd seen that

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>firsthand through interactions with UK companies, UK universities, so I

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>felt sort of felt the ingredients seemed to be coming together.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 2>And I'd started to read about ARIA, you know, a

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>whole new bold way of funding research from government. Thought okay,

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you know there's there's something that's changing there. And you know,

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd been it fairly involved in a number of government

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 2>funded research projects Stanford, from NSF, from Darper, and various

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 2>other sources, and so it was very familiar with how

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that worked in the US, and you know, as a consequence,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 2>I then got more involved with ARIA and joined their board.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The paradigm established by Elon and Doge was basically, technologists

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are better than bureaucrats at deploying technology and creating opportunities

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>for technological growth, which should be kind of national strategic priority.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's interesting because the mission of DOSE was

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>really around slashing and cutting, whereas you know, the lesson

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you might take from Silicon Valley and the extent to

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>which it was built on the foundation of government investment

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>from the United States government over the last decades and

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the extraordinary concentration of wealth and power that investment created,

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>both the Silicon Valley, but you know, more widely for

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the United States. As you think about what you're trying

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to do in the UK, it sounds like it's much

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>more in that latter camp.

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, I'm an enormous fan of careful, thoughtful, bold

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 2>investment by government in order to be able to get

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 2>things started and wherever possible, for government then get out

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>of the way, because the free market and startups and

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>entrepreneurship are a wonderful way to create economic growth. But

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>you can kick start them with investment in university's investment

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in small companies in order to be able to get

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 2>this going. And Silicon Valley is a fantastic example of

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>this all across silicon value. We've seen how that model works.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I think what we can do in

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the UK is several fold. First of all, we have

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to look at strategically important areas that we can invest in.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 2>One that I've been focused on in particular over the

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>last year is the AI chips, so chips for the

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 2>AI market. Nearly everybody that's making money, serious money and

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>serious economic growth out of the AI market are the

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>people building the chips. In Vidia being the bright shining

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>example as the most valuable company in the world, just

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>top five trillion dollars in terms of its market cap.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>So you know, where is our role in all of this.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>What is the opportunity for the UK. We have a

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>strong history in the semiconductor industry. We have a strong

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>history in computer architecture. You know the stories we built

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the first commercial computer we built the first electronic memory.

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>We have ARM designs ninety percent of the world CPUs,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 2>so we've got a strong history in this in this area.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>How do we rebuild that in order to be able

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to take a sort of a chunk of this opportunity.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 2>To put it into perspective, the market value of Nvidia

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>is ten x that of open Ai. Yet when we

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>think of AI, we tend to think of companies like

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>open Ai and chat GPT obviously fantastic growth, but those

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>who are producing the infrastructure upon which it runs, they're

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 2>the ones that are bringing significant value and lasting value.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It takes a huge investment in order to build a

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>business like that, but this is where a lot of

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 2>opportunity is and it's growing currently at about thirty percent

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>per year. There are very very few markets that grow

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>at thirty percent per year. By twenty thirty three and

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the current growth rate, the AI chip market worldwide will

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>be seven hundred billion dollars. That is staggering. Imagine if

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the UK could reach up and grab five percent market

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 2>share of that seven hundred billion dollars global revenue, there

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 2>will be thirty five billion profitable, high margin dollars of

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>revenue into the UK. I think that is the opportunity

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>before us, and I think if we can be ambitious

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>and go after it and invest, train our workforce get

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 2>ready for it, it is an enormous opportunity for economic

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 2>growth for the UK.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's working back from a premise of where you

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>need to be in ten years in terms of having

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the best chip talent outside of the US.

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right, yes, and I happen to think that we're

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>in a very very strong position now. We need to

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>double our workforce in order to be able to do it.

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 2>We currently have about twelve thousand chip designers in the

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>UK and it's a slightly aging workforce, so we actually

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>need to move quite fast just to stay at the

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>status quo. But with an industry that's growing at thirty

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 2>percent per year, we probably need to double our workforce

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 2>within the next ten years. So we need to be

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>training a lot more people within the country. That's getting

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>more people into electrical engineering and computer science degrees. Those

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>are mostly people who are doing a level physics right

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>now in the UK, so you know they're the seventeen

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 2>eighteen year olds right now, and so you know, I've

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>been recommending to the government that they increase their bursary

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>scheme to incentivize and encourage more A level students to

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 2>go into electrical engineering so that they can be rare

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to be chip designers in four or five years time.

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>And this sends a message, right, It sends a message

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that this is important. We won't get there by training

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>our own A level students alone. We need to bring

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>in experience chip designers from overseas, So figuring out with

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 2>our visas and encouraging and incentives to entrepreneurs and chip

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>designers from overseas, encouraging outposts from chip design companies to

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 2>move to the UK. So we just increase that talent base,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 2>we increase the concentration. And frankly, the US is not

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>so appealing for many people who are in science and

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 2>technology right now, and they'll say, actually, that's not somewhere

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to go. I was just talking to someone

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the other day, very experienced technologist who had recently moved

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to the UK and who decided, I don't actually want

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>to move to the US right now. This is not

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 2>an environment that feels welcoming where I want to build

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>my career, where I want to move my family. I'd

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>actually much rather stay here.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to people who are that we're

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in a bubble right now? Obviously you were on the

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>inside at Cisco, which was briefly the most valuable company

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 1>in the world before the dot com crash. How durable

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and sustainable is this compute build out?

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>It will for sure have peaks and troughs, just as

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>we saw and the build out of the Internet. I

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>think it would be reasonable to expect that we're in

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 2>some kind of hype cycle at the moment. I have

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>no idea when that will plateau or when that might

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 2>have a sort of a correction, just as we saw

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>with the Internet in the nineteen nineties. It may be

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like a small version of the bubble

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>that may happen in the future. But just think what

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>happened afterwards. The Internet didn't stop. It just took a

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>setback for a little while, and then it came back

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>with a vengeance. Yeah, we got rid of a lot

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of the fluff that was being invested in at that time,

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 2>but the good companies survived. They continue to grow, and

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>all the social media companies that came along, all the

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 2>other Internet companies that came along, and then it made

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>AI possible because of the interconnection of compute the amount

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>of data that was available, and so I expect we'll

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>see the same thing happen with AI. It'll go through

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 2>cycles and plateaus, but long term, it's not a technology

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>that we'll forget. It's not a technology we'll say, oh, well,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 2>we don't need this anymore.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's an interesting position for you because you've

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>got to observe and participate in the proliferation of the Internet,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and now the proliferation of AI is starting in your view,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and you get to actually advise the government on how

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to think about it and how to prepare for a

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>future where the UK actually gets to capture part of

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the value. But you also have to think about downside risk.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to be prepared to make old

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>bets knowing that some of them won't work out, and

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 2>this is hard for government to do. Whether you're a

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 2>short term elected official or you're a longer term civil servant.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 2>No one feels that they get rewarded for taking a

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 2>big bet that doesn't work out. So the most important

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>thing I think is to help government get comfortable with

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the necessity of taking risk, and therefore the best thing

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 2>to do is to rather than thinly spread what will

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>always be a limited budget, particularly in fiscally tight times

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>like now, is actually to make a reasonable number of

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>bets and to go along with experts who have some

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 2>skin in the game investors usually or entrepreneurs, and work

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>with them or invest along with them in order to

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>be able to use their expertise. And I had said before,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the biggest growth potential that we have in

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 2>this country is in aichips, the design of aichips. I

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>don't think we should be manufacturing in them in the UK.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>That's a nation state activity which is well beyond our budget. Actually,

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity is to do what AMD and Invidio and

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Broadcom do, three of the most successful companies in the world.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>They design them. They create the intellectual property for the designs.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>After the break the race for second place in AI

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>chip design, stay with us. Welcome back. I'm as Velocian

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and you've been listening to my conversation with Nick McEwen,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>who sits on the Prime Minister's Council on Science and Technology.

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Before the break, Nick mentioned that he believes the UK

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>government should help Britain be a power player in AI

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>chip design. But what surprised me is that Nick is

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>vying for second place.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>What I'm looking to do is to see how can

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the UK be not first in the world. I think

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>we have to concede that the US has as pretty

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>much licked at this point, with a vast majority of

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the AI chips being designed there and the products are

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 2>sold from the US. But who's going to be second?

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Which country in the world is going to be second

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>in most areas of technology, that's China, We always say China,

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>and in fact often they come in, they commoditize, they invest,

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>like they did with solar panels and photovoltaics right, and

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 2>then anyone else that was trying to be in that

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>space basically was shut out and gave up. They can't

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 2>do it here. And the reason they can't do it

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>here is because AI chips use the most advanced processing nodes,

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 2>which in the semiconductor industry right now is three nanometers

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 2>or two nanimeter nodes. China can't use nodes below seven

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 2>nanometers at the moment because of export restrictions that don't

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>give them access to the technology that they need, so

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 2>held at Bay. So beyond the US, who are the

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>countries that are in the best position with the most

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>experience of doing chip design, that have an understanding of AI.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 2>We are, after all the only country outside the US

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>and China that has a foundational model company deep mind.

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>We have a long experience of being architects and designers

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of chips. If we can put those together, couple with

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 2>our universities, then we can be the second best in

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the world. So we should be able to get much

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>more than that five percent that I talked about earlier.

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 2>We should be able to get more than that, So

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty conservative ambition.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned ARM, which is one of the top chip

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>design companies in the world, founded in Britain, I believe,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but majority owned by the Japanese company soft Bank. Is

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that a win for the UK chip industry and would

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you be happy if creating the next ARM is part

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of your legacy.

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to see ARM continue expand it's foot in

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the UK. Has a significant number of R and D

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 2>engineers in the UK and to a large extent, it's

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>still very much a British company because of its large

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>footprint in Cambridge and other parts of the country, so

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 2>you know it is a true British success. Would we

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>have preferred that it's stayed as a UK company, of course,

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 2>but it's still bringing significant revenue and tax base into

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the country. It's still training. They have a very big

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 2>training and internship program, so they are training the next

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>generation of chip designers, whether they work for ARM or

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 2>whether they go off and start their own companies. And

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that's how these things work.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you think about what it might look

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like to own five percent of the market, what does

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that look like practically in terms of the product people

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>will buy. Will it be I can't get access to

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia and therefore are by British chips? Or I have

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 1>something which is less complicated and therefore I don't need

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the top of the line in video chips, so are

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>by British chips? Or is that more ambitious? Is there

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>more specialized in applications that you think will be geospace

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it may be that the Britain can win in.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's good to make an analogy here.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 2>We talked about Cisco earlier in the early days of

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the Internet. They were clearly a very dominant company very

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 2>early on and became for a while the most valuable

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 2>company in the world. And what happened to them was

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 2>what happens to many companies at that scale, and then

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>they start to look at markets in terms of are

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>they big enough, and so what happened is there would

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 2>be new markets. Frankly, they weren't big enough, so they

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't develop them, and so you had this whole ecosystem

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 2>of other companies that popped up producing them and lowerhol

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>those markets became a lot bigger over time, and so

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it suddenly diversified the market and there were many opportunities

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>for other players in the AI space. The same thing

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>will happen. It's sort of inevitable that Nvidia will start

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to look at some adjacent markets or smaller parts of

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the market. Sooner or later, there'll be markets for which

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 2>they say, these aren't really big enough for us to

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 2>go after. They could be in parts of robotics, they

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 2>could be parts of factory automation, they could be in

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 2>autonomous drones, they could be in medical equipment. And someone

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 2>will come up with an innovation that fits that need.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 2>And we have a number of promising startups, most of

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 2>them in stealth mode in the UK, who are doing

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 2>exactly that they're going after. Particular areas or different sort

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of different techniques that they think will be more efficient,

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 2>that will go after specific portions of that market where

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>we can best serve the needs that will be unmet

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 2>by other parts of the market.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry about the future of the UK if

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't take advantage of this on stony generation opportunity.

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's once in a generation because if we

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 2>don't step up and do it, others will and they

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>won't be room left for us. So it's one of

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>those things where we have to go and grab a

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>stake of the market because you have to be there

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>for the long term. You have to be there for

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 2>multiple generations to build the trust and the understanding for

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the customers. Who are those customers. They're big hyperscalers, they're

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>people that make cars, they're people that make robots, and

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>their system integrators generally people who are building systems out

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 2>of those chips. If we stay in the market for

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 2>a while, we'll have more of those system companies in

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the UK. Today we don't really have a large system integrator,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 2>someone that takes the chips and builds them up into

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 2>systems in the UK. If we're building the chips, those

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 2>companies will come along. We'll build that expertise.

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You mean cars factory like high tech manufacturing back on

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>British shaws.

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, robots, autonomous vehicles, drones. If we're building the chips

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 2>and we have the ambition they will come. We'll then

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 2>develop packaging technology for putting more of these chips into

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 2>one package, will gain a broader expertise and that's then sustainable.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 2>It's very difficult for that to then fail once you've

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>got that broad expertise across the market as a whole.

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>So if we don't do that, we won't have that,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 2>we won't get that revenue, and we will eventually be

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 2>crowded out and it'll be very very hard for us

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 2>to make in roads.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about manufacturing versus design. You are pushing the

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>UK to rush towards second place in terms of the

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>second leading chip designer in the world after the US.

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>The US is thinking about sovereignty and chips very differently,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>which is thinking about how can we ensure the actual

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing of the chips. Right, and you have a background

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and work at Intel, I think a still of senior

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>advisor there. The US government took a direct stake in

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Intel Recently, Intel is spending tens of billions of dollars

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on its new chip fabrication plants here in the US.

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>What's happening in the US in terms of thinking in

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>political terms about sovereignty of chip manufacturing and how's it

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>different from the considerations in Britain.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think that it's very important to think

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of the distinction between the design of a chip and manufacturing.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you know this already, but I think it's

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 2>it's good to be very crystal clear about it. Think

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 2>about when you're designing a building a house. You have

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>an architect who draws up the plans, and then you

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>have a contractor or a builder who will building. They

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 2>are two very different skills, three different skill sets that

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 2>involve a very different group of people. The design is

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>like the architect, it's where the creativity. It's the understanding

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 2>of what's possible, the understanding of what you're trying to accomplish.

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the building, which is sort of the

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>execution of that design of turning it into the into

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the building or into the chair. Today, it costs about

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty five billion dollars to build a manufacturing plant for semiconductors.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 2>You need to be all in, you need to have

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a huge economy, you need to have a very big

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>determination to be a part of that industry. And the

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 2>US has been part of that for a long time

0:23:55.920 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 2>through multiple companies IBM, Intel and now Global found But

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of expertise in the US, so it

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 2>provided a good base to be doing that from including

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the US economy is much bigger and can off forward

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that kind of investment. It also has a strategic imperative,

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>which is as a strong global presence. The US felt

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 2>that it was strategically important not only for itself, but

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 2>for all its allies, for the rest of NATO, and

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 2>for its friendly nations, which includes US. So to some extent,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 2>we get to ride on the coattails of that American investment,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 2>that American expertise, and that American ambition as the US

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>rebuilds and on shores that manufacturing through its investment in Intel, Anti,

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 2>SMC and others in order to make sure that there's

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 2>lots of manufacturing. And as you know, there are multiple

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing plants being built across the United States in Arizona,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 2>in Oregon, in many parts of the US and We'll

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>see more of that happen over the next few years

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 2>because of the approach that the US government is taking,

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and the great thing for US is that means we

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have to.

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>The US has those same challenges you outline for Britain though,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of is the workforce prepared enough for this

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>type of advanced manufacturing and is the immigration system flexible

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>enough to allow the people who can do a great

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>job of that to come in. I mean the images

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Hundai plant are unforgettable.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, I mean I answer where your question is

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 2>coming from. I don't believe this applies to the semiconductor industry.

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>We have been producing leading edge chips in the US

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 2>for generations. You have to go and visit Arizona and

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 2>you see the long line of plants that Intel has

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>their multiple generations, huge numbers of people that have been employed,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 2>very skilled operators that are expertise in manufacturing. You go

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 2>down the road, you see the same thing at TSMC,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 2>so that is already there. It's already present. Yes. Sure,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the US may have more stringent requirements on environmental regulations

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 2>on where you place those plants. It may not have

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the same sort of openness to immigration that it once did.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 2>But there are plenty of people in the US. There

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 2>are plenty of high paid jobs, and it's the sort

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 2>of jobs that many many people are trained for in

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the US way more than they are here in the UK.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 2>So actually very confident that the US is in a

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>very good position to be able to rebuild its manufacturing strength.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a long long way down that path already.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Just to close. I mean, it sometimes seems like there's

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this kind of new statism emerging where you know, in

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the past, people in the US or the UK would

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>look at China and say, there are these state and

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>enterprises and the private companies are very subject to the

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>demands of the Communist party, and that's one approach to

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>technological buildout. We in the West have a completely different one,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>which is all to do with private markets, and it

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to the market and the role of government, you know,

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>should not really interfere in the technological innovation and build

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>out process. It seems like of the course of a

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>very short period of time that's completely changed. So how

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 1>would you describe this new paradigm that's emerging in What

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>are the risks and what are the benefits?

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Of it. So I actually want to push back on

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the premise. I think the posters that say that that's

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>how the US operates and not really telling the truth.

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>The US has been a major investor in R and

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 2>D manufacturing over a very long period. Yes, of course,

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 2>not the same way as China, very different approach, but

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of investing heavily, this has been the history

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 2>of the success of the United States, whether it's through

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>funding into research from the National Science Foundation, National Institute

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>of Health, from DAPER, etc. All the way through to

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>government investment. So yes, sure, free market capitalism and capital

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 2>investment is a very important part of the process, but

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 2>generally that comes along later when you started to see

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the success. We should always be looking to see whether

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>we should make an investment in order to be able

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to get that edge. The whole world economy today runs

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 2>on chips, not just AI. Just to remember what happened

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic when there was a shortage of chips.

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>The automotive industry, worried about the economic downturn during the pandemic,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 2>said we don't need to buy the chips, okay, So

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the chip companies turned around and sold the ball to

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the data center companies that were growing. The automotive companies

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 2>came back a few months later and said, oh, turns

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>out there's an uptick in the economy and people are

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 2>buying cars again. Chip companies said, sorry, we've just sold

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 2>all those chips to others. You're out of luck, and

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>there was a catastrophic effect on the world market. I

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>joined Intel as an executive running the network and communications

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 2>business in twenty twenty one in the middle of the pandemic,

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 2>and I saw this firsthand as companies were duking it

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>out for access to chips. It was a very stressful time,

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 2>so we could see how important it is to the

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 2>underpinnings of the world economy, which is why everybody should

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 2>be worried about China's ambitions for retaking Taiwan and reintegrating Taiwan.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The risk there of it disrupting the foundation of the

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>world economy are very real, are very palpable, and so

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense for the US to be leading the

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>charge and trying to rebuild that semiconductor manufacturing capability on

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 2>its own territory. It's not specific to this particular administration.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Is the need that will live throughout multiple administrations. I believe.

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Nick every appreciding the time.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh thank You've been really enjoyable.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 4>That's it for this week for tech Stuff.

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kara Price and I'm os Valanschan. This episode was

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>produced by Eliza Dennis, Tyler Hill and Melissa Slaughter. It

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was executive produced by me, Kara Price, Julian Nutter, and

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Kate Osborne for Kaleidoscope and Katria Norvel for iHeart Podcasts.

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Jack Insley mixed this episode and Kyle Murdoch wrote.

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Our theme song. Join us on Friday for the Week

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 3>in Tech, where we run through the tech headlines you

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 3>need to know.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And please do rate and review the show and reach

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>out to us at tech Stuff podcast at gmail dot com.

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We love hearing from you.