WEBVTT - 08/11/21 DPS Hour 2 Steve Palazzolo

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to The Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Our two on this Wednesday, Dan and the

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan n Stan Patrick Show. Glad to have you on board.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Which team has the worst backup quarterbacks situation? We'll explore that.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we'll hear from Russell Westbrook after his introductory

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>press conference with the Lakers. This in from Chris Mortenson,

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Eason, and Sam Ellinger competing for the backup role

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts. Yes, the backup role according to mart

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz trending to open the season as the starter,

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with All Pro guard Quintin Nelson on the same path

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>after foot surgeries. The Colts open the season versus the Seahawks.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>We will talk to the Colts owner Jim Erse. He'll

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>join us on the program tomorrow eight seven seven three

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>d P show email address DP at Dan Patrick dot com,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle it DP show mclove And the poll question

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>from the first hour and the results, do you want

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFL to enforce taunting more strictly? Sixty say no. Yeah,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's coming back, whether you ask for it or not.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>The NFL wants to enforce this. They've been a little

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>lax on this. In previous years, and I'm not sure

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what the point of emphasis is going to be. I

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to be narrowing this down to

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown celebrations. It's just I think what happened in the

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl. There were a couple of moments in the

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, including one with Tom Brady that the NFL

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't like playing out on worldwide TV. I loved

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>it because it was passionate, it was in the moment.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It was real, and that's what we love. Like reality

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>shows aren't real, sports is real. It's happening. It's not scripted.

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Hard Knocks last night, part of that scripted. What happened

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in a football game the Super Bowl. You know, the

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and a defensive back going at it. That's what

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we love. It's real and it's rare to find that. Yeah, McLevin,

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there's one kind of celebrating I have a problem with.

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>When you're losing by twenty five points and you get

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a first down and you do the arrow, or if

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a quarterback who's like, yes, I stopped this pas

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>where you've been burrowed three times. Yeah, you should get

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a flag for that. When a franchise has a young,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 1>unproven quarterback. They can take one of two approaches. Either

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>go all in make it known that you're going with

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy no matter what, like the Bengals did with

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow, or you can bring in the experience backup

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>who can step up if the team struggles. And right

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>now it appears the Jets they don't have a safety

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>net for Zach Wilson. The Eagles, i guess, are confident

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in Jalen Hurts at least for now. The Jags, of course,

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are building everything around Trevor Lawrence, but they have Gardner

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Minshew like they have a legitimate backup quarterback there. The

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Jets don't. But the thinking is, these guys got to

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>learn at some point what's the point of bringing in

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles or Ryan Fitzpatrick and going five hundred. And

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a scary proposition because I'll

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to there are a couple of really talented quarterbacks.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tim Couch was the number one pick out

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of Kentucky, went to the Browns. But you get in

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>there and then you start to build up bad habits,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>or you start to see what it feels like our

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>fourteen defensive players on the field. You're not a good player,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not gaining confidence. Derek Carr's brother David Carr. He's

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>as athletic as I've ever seen, but look at what

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>happened when he was with the Texans. He got sacked

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>more often than any quarterback in history given the number

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of games that he played. Sam Darnold, I don't know

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>how good he is because it was hard to tell

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when he was with the Jets. But the quarterbacks are

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle. We know that. The question is at

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what point do they learn the game? Does it slow

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>down for them? Those are the things that I'm always

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>watching for. You know, it happened Josh Allen in Buffalo.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It looked like, and he would probably say this, the

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>game was moving twice as fast as it did in college.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And then for a while, you sort of know where

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that person's going to be. You know what that rush

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>feels like. You know how long you have to get

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that ball out, you know the window of opportunity there.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>These are all things that you have to learn once

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you step onto the field. And we've seen this down

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>through history. Where it used to be if you were

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>drafted a high draft pick at that position, you sat

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve McNair famously sat for three years when he was

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>drafted and then when he had his chance to play,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>he was a very good quarterback. But you know, look

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>at Aaron Rodgers three years, Philip Rivers, like these guys

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>would sit because that's how you learned back then. Now

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, given what you're running in college, the

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL is borrowing from colleges as far as what they

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>do with their schemes, their formations. These players they've been

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>running a pro system since they were in high school.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>They're ready to go. They know, you know what it

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is being in a shotgun. You know. The interesting part

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of them are not good under center

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't need to be under center. You were

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in shotgun for everything. You know, Patrick Mahomes sat for

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a year. You have these certain situations. Is Zach Wilson

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle? Yes, he's going to struggle, and he's

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle because he's with a team that's not

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>very good and being a rookie quarterback. When Trey Lance

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>gets in there, he'll probably struggle, but he's on a

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>better team. He has a chance. They can kind of

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>smooth smooth over his rough edges there. I mean, Dak

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Prescott came in. They had the best line in football.

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You had a really good running back, give you a

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred yards, You had an owner who was offensive minded,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive driven, and Dak looked a lot better than he

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>probably was. Russell Wilson went into Seattle, had a good offense,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>not great, and they didn't need to score a lot

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of points because you had the best defense in football.

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So you can look at the success of a quarterback.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And I've brought this up before, and it's not a

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>knock on Patrick Mahomes. It's just we tend to look

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>at quarterbacks and say, boy, that guy's not any good.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>What is the situation? How many offensive coordinators have you had,

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>how many coaches have you had? Have they gotten free agents?

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you do in the draft? You know, if

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes played for the Cincinnati Bengals the last couple

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of years, he would not be making fifty million dollars

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a year. We would look at him and go, and

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>he's talented, but they're not a good team he's with.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>If I put some of these other quarterbacks on Kansas City,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll lead Kansas City to the super Bowl. But given

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>their current state in their teams that they play on,

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to have any chance. And you can

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>see the confidence level. Patrick Mahomes has as much confidence

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>as anybody except for maybe Aaron Rodgers, and he should

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because he's a wonderful talent. But when you go out

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>there and you know, offensive minded head coach. We got

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe the best tight end in football history, I got

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a game changer in Tyreek Hill, and got a defense

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that's been opportunistic, and I have had a pretty good

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. Why wouldn't you be confident going out there?

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady's confidence. Offensive line was good, solid, he had

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weapons there, you had a great defense.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You watched Carson Wentz last year in Philadelphia. He had

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>no confidence. Why because his offensive line wasn't good, his

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>team wasn't very good, and he was trying to do

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>too much. That's what happens to that position. Your confidence

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>can come and go. You know Peyton Manning when he

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>first started out, John Elway when he first started out,

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Montana didn't start like Dan Marino was, you know,

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>an aberration. It's like you're coming in and you're a

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>plan and he's having an impact, right away. It just

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen back then. Steve Young waited to have an

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>impact when he was thirty. Jim Kelly played in the

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>USFL and then came to the Buffalo Bills. That's why

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it's so hard to find your quarterback like Russell Wilson

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't miss any games. Came in and said hey, I'm

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>your starter here, and they haven't looked back likes. That's

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>why it's tricky when you try to handicap and you

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>say that guy's going to be good, and that guy's

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to be good. Trey Lance, I don't know,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>loved when we had him on. Seemed like a great kid.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot of talent. You're with Kyle Shanahan,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an offensive minded head coach. You have a good offensive line,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>you got a running game, you got a great tight end.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>He should succeed absolutely, justin fields in Chicago. You get

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>into those situations or get into an organization, you have weapons,

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What do they expect from you? Mac Jones New England,

0:08:55.640 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Hey he's got Belichick there, Okay are

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they what's their offense? They're gonna open it up. So

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that coach, sometimes the personnel sometimes just the dread

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>of playing in that organization. I mean, can you imagine

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>playing for the Texans right now? Any of these quarterbacks,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't care who it is. Put him in there

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Texans and tell me what kind of magic

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you create. Trevor Lawrence with Jacksonville, you know, urban Meyer

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is not going, Hey, this is a three year, five

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>year this is now. I want to win now. Okay,

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>what do we expect out of Trevor Lawrence? A lot?

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>And we should And we're gonna expect a lot out

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of Zach Wilson and should we Yeah, he's supposed to

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be great. He Patrick Mahomes esque with some of his throws. Okay,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>well let me let me see it. Jet's got some talent.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Let me see what you can do. Got a rookie

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>head coach. So there's a lot at stake, a lot

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of play when it comes to trying to handicap these quarterbacks.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't have a backup quote, how the

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Jets don't have a backup quarterback who is a seasoned veteran,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to me is idiotic, absolutely mind boggling that you don't

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have somebody who has played the game and played it

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at a high level might be a thirty three thirty

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>four year old veteran who can at least help this

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>kid because he is a kid. He looks like he's

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a kid playing somebody who was drafted by the Jets.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He looks like he's right out of a Disney movie.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna need a lot of help, and their backup

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation is not very good. The Jets backup quarterbacks

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>In case you were wondering, let's see, of course it's

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>James Morgan and Mike White. Yes, that's who you would

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>exept the James Morgan, yes, m v Mike White. Yes, yeah, Paul.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we think Zach Wilson is younger than

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>he is because he looks so young because he's twenty two.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was like twenty twenty one years old.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>He's actually older than Trevor Lawrence by a few months,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's the same age as Justin Fields. He looks

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so young and fragile, even though he's probably a big dude.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>In your mind, you think, wow, that's so young. He

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>just got the BYU. But not everybody's going to be successful.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>That just that's there's always one or two quarterbacks in

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>each draft where you go. I don't know, And Zach

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's that guy like I just don't know. Trevor I

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>think will be successful like I would be. I'd be

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>more surprised if Trevor didn't work out than Zack Wilson.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones is just a curiosity right now. Like I

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>get nervous with the one year wonder, Zach Wilson one

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>year wonder, Mac Jones one year wonder two got injured.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not sure about him. Yeah, mccluban, Well, what

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about the Bears factor? I hate to say it, but

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>can anybody be a good quarterback in that uniform? It's

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a hard At some point, somebody has to be good there, right,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Like the Lions have to eventually be good one day?

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Right at some point? Yes time another Jets? Are they

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>over under eight and a half or six and a half.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm still trying to figure that out. There's a little

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>callback from yesterday. No, I know, there's a very little

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>callback from yesterday over under the jet. No. No, eventually

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, Yeah, don't don't you worry about a time?

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>All right? Uh Russell Westbrook was introduced yesterday and UH

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of things to say, and you know,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll say this because we're gonna we're gonna talk

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to Pro Football Focus and talk to them about the

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>worst backup quarterback situations that'll be coming up here. Trying

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to think if there was anything else that we were

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>going to mention. Am I missing anything here, Paul? I

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think So we're gonna stay with that poll question.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>All the college football rankings came out Alabama, Clemson, Oklahoma,

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State, Georgia. No surprise there, but college football feels

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's the least surprising sport that we have, certainly

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the preseason. Here are the names,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the blue bloods. They're back again. But I think there's

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>six teams from the SEC in the top twenty five,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>including ole Miss at number twenty five. Yeah, mclo, look

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at who Alabama's put into the pros in the last

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>two years. They've had two first round quarterbacks, go at

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>about four first round receivers. Well, this is what Lane

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Kiffin had to say the other day when we talked

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to him, and he's like, Hey, you know, Nick used

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to get great running backs and great defensive players. Then

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Lane Kiffin goes in there and Steve Sarkisian and they

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>open up the playbook. And now, as Lane says, you know,

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not fair. Now you're getting the top quarterback and

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>you're getting you know, the top y receivers. I mean

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they've had four wide receivers drafted number one, you know,

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>first round draft picks in the last two years. Club.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they have the top guy this year. John

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Mechi I just saw a mock draft. He was like twelve.

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Now it's not fair because you know Saban, it was like,

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>do I want to go to a place where they

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>play defense and run the football? Now it's hey, come

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on in, we throw the football. We might give up,

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty five points, but we're going to score fifty.

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Come on in. He wants to play here, club and

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you make a million dollars, right or whatever. Saban was saying,

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, your name, image and likeness. All right, we'll

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>take a break the worst backup quarterback situation. We'll have

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that for you. Coming up. We'll hear from Russell Westbrook

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and Tara Owens on whether or not Tony Romo should

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be in the Hall of Fame. Yeah, we asked the

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>question the other day, and apparently somebody asked t o,

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have that for you coming up sixteen after

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the hour hour two here on The Dan Patrick Show.

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing Discover matches all the cash mac you earn

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on your credit card at the end of your first

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>year automatically no limit on how much you can earn,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>which is amazing. And it's even more amazing because of

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>all the places where Discover's accepted. Ninety nine percent of

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the places in the United States that take credit cards

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>take Discover. When it comes to Discover, get used to

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>hearing the word yes more often. You can learn more

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>at Discover dot com slash yes, Discover dot com slash

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes twenty twenty one Nielsen Report limitations do apply. Thanks

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to catch us live every weekday morning nine until noon

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or stream us live on the Peacock app. Colts have

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>signed their GM Chris Baller and head coach Frank Reich

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to contract extensions through the twenty twenty sixth season. We'll

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>talk to the Colts owner Jim URSU join us tomorrow

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and I believe Usain Bolt will stop by as well.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Phone calls are welcome. H seven seven three D P

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>show email address DP at dan Patrick dot com. This

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>program brought to you by Mercedes Spends Vans. They go

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>far beyond from their customization options, cutting edge check, five

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>star sales service, financial support crew, go that extra money

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.119
<v Speaker 1>take and the all important first step into an authorized

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>dealership today, before we get to Steve Palozzolo from a

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus talking about backup quarterbacks, tarall Owens, somebody

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>must have heard our show a couple of days ago,

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because we were asked if Tony Romo was a Hall

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of Famer. Tarall Owens had this to say on the

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Odd Couple on Fox Sports Radio. Tony Romola, he was,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You enjoy your time playing with him. He's up for

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Hall of Fame next year, Robin. I give him props.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>He was very good, but we don't think he's a

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer. Where are you adding on a Romo

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Hall nobly? I probably agree. I mean, I mean,

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm gonna give it to you real, I mean,

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>not just because he's my teammate, you're gonna assess his

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>body of work. Yep, you're gonna assess it and really evaluate,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>really to class that he's going in with versus some

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of the quarterbacks that are on the list or elisible

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to get in at the same time. So obviously had

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, sell a career there in Dallas. But is

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it worthy? Is it Hall of Fame worthy? That's not

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>for me to decide. Obviously, he was very very popular

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>with the media there. We know, you know how I

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>am and my thought process on you know, the process

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in which you know, guys are being nominated, who does

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and who does the nominating and that's that's mostly the

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sports writers and so you know, obviously I'm sure he

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>had a better rapport with the media than I did,

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>so that may factor into him, you know, making it

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>or not right. That's Terrell Owens, I think answering the question,

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he said no. But likability does play a

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>role there. But that's courtesy of the odd couple. On

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio, Steve Palezzolo, pro football focused senior analyst

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>who joins us, do you think Tony Romo has any

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>chance to get a Hall of Fame induction? I think

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance, I would probably lean. Know, though, I

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>think Romo probably lands in the proverbial hall of the

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>very good. And I do think because postseason moments do

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>matter so much, the fact that Eli is even being considered,

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to end up working against Romo

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because he just doesn't have it. Who do you think

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>was a better quarterback? Eli ar Romo? I mean, I

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>think throw for throw, Romo was a better quarterback. I

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 1>do think that the postseason moments do matter, and they

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly will matter with the voters, but throw for throw,

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're just evaluating how well they played, Yeah,

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Romo I think was better from from start to finish

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>more than Eli. Eli had some high peaks though that

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>were really really good, including the Super Bowl runs. But

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>do we over state overestimate playoff success like that? That

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>seems to be that that can decide whether you're in

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>or not. But you know, do we not give as

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>much importance to the regular season with some of these quarterbacks? Yeah?

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I think the postseason stuff does matter, though,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're talking about the most important position at sports,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and even everything we do at PF, this quantifying and

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff and even I'll acknowledge there's something, there's

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>something else when it comes to the postseas, there's something

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>else that like separates Tom Brady and separates guys that

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>do execute the way they do in the postseason. So

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe we overrated a little bit, but that's what where

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers and Tony Romo and those guys are going

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to end up probably losing out a little bit. Well,

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So you don't think Philip Rivers would go into the

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. The more I thought about it, I

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>was thinking no. I mean, I really think I've got

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this like top five in my head, right, top five

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of your era, and if you're in that, you know,

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>top four or five, it feels like you should you

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>should be in the Hall of Fame. Rivers top eight

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>type of guy. Matt Ryan, top eight type of guy.

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Eli honestly outside of the top eight or ten even

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in his eras Romo is probably a top eight guy

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>in his era. So to me, they're just on the

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>outside looking in. Can you get into the Hall of

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Fame now as a quarterback without a Super Bowl appearance? Yeah?

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I think you can. Appearance would be tough without an appearance,

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'm thinking Marino at least made it to the

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. But everybody watch Marino and said, Okay, this

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is the best quarterback in the league for a big

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>chunk of his career. So I mean, technically you can,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be it's gonna be really difficult

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>because the best quarterbacks usually at least make it to

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl and usually at least win at least

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.479
<v Speaker 1>one of them. We reached out to you with the

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>best and worst backup quarterback situations here. Given the news

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts, out looks like Carson Wentz is on

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>course to start Week one for the Colts against the Seahawks.

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if that changes your backup quarterback

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>situation or not there, but let's start with the good

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback situations right now. Yeah, So I look at

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>teams that have guys that I would consider, you know,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>low end starters that are sitting there as backup. So

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders have Marcus Mariota. You know, if Marcus Mariota,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not great, he didn't become that franchise quarterback that

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody maybe was hoping. But Mariota's the best backup in

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFL right now. We might not see a massive

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>drop off of dark car got hurt. I think Chase

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Tenham with the Browns, a guy that could come in

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>if Baker Mayfield got hurt, could come in run that offense,

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>especially with the way Kevin Stefanski calls plays. And and

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you have to highlight Tamos down in New Orleans, right,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Whoever loses in the Taysom Hill Jamis Winston battle there,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the other guy becomes one of the better backups in

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the entire league. So I think the Saints might not

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>know who their starter is, but they'll at least know

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that they've got the best backups. Wait, so they have

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>two high end backups. Yeah, but low end starters. That's right. Okay,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the question was best backup? So the Saints win in

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that game? How about I? Also, I have faith that

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Jamis could be a pretty good starter. Still, if I

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>give you Carson Wentz or you can have Tamis together,

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>who would you take? Oh Man, I would probably lean

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz, and that's because I do think he'll bounce

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>back from from last year's disaster. But but Tamos Is.

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting, you can run, you run the

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>ball with Taysom and I have a ton of faith

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in Jamis, but he needs better playmakers than what they

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>have down in New Orleans fans with Jacobe perscente. Yeah,

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>so I look at Brissette again, a guy that Chris

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Ballard was essentially in Indianapolis dealing with Jacoby Brissette. He

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>was kind of forced into the starting lineup twice in

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>his career. I don't think Jacoby Brisset's a guy you

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>want as a starter, But if you need to win

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>four or five games, I think Brossetts, you know, a

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>good solid option. So Miami, you know, could be good

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there with percent as their backup. All right, the bad

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback situation. So I'm gonna start with the teams

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that have two of the elite quarterbacks. You've got Patrick

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes in Kansas City and Russell Wilson in Seattle. So

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if Chad Henny had to take over in Kansas City,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>he did that in the playoffs last year, had a

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of good throws, but some disastrous ones almost through

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the game away. I don't have a ton of faith

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in Chad Henny take it over in Kansas City. And

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>then Gino Smith right now, the top backup in Seattle.

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that that offense completely changes if it goes

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>from Russ to Gino Smith. I also think the Ravens

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have a massive question mark trace McSorley Tyler Huntley as

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the backups. They've both shown flashes, but again, I think

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the drop off from a Lamar Jackson to whoever the

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Ravens would trot out there likely McSorley, I think, would

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be tough for the Ravens. What do you think about

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys situation? So Garrett Gilbert right now the top backup.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We just saw the Hall of Fame game, wasn't It

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the prettiest thing the other night, whether whether it's

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Gilbert or Ben Denucci. So Gilbert again had some

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>flashes against the Steelers a couple of years ago against

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the really good defense. But yeah, the drop off it

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>will be steeper than what they had last year. Andy

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Dalton is one of the better backups in the league

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>if Justin Fields takes over. But yeah, the Cowboys having

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>just Garrett Gilbert right now would be a big question mark.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't understand what the Jets are doing, And granted

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.959
<v Speaker 1>I've said that quite a few times in my career.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But you have James Morgan and Mike White behind a

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback. This is crying out for a Nick Foles

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>or an Andy Dalton, where you have that experienced person,

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a case Keenum, somebody who has experience, who's non threatening

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to that quarterback, who can help them with you know,

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the nuance of playing that position. Yeah, I completely agree.

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the Jets have made a lot of really

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>smart moves, but the quarterback room is definitely a questionable one.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they just grabbed Josh McCown back from from television, right,

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just bring him back. It's as as that guy that's

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the QP room all the time. But I think

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a really good point. You know, Zach Wilson needs

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to learn. James Morgan's never taken a snap. Mike White

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played well in his preseason action. So Jets are

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>making a lot of smart moves, but could definitely use

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a veteran back up there. I'm gonna throw out some

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers here with Romo and Eli losing seasons as his starter.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Romo zero, Eli five seasons throwing more than fifteen interceptions,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Romo two, Eli eight career completion percentage Romo sixty five,

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Eli sixty Yeah, I mean Romo was a better quarterback,

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. So the tricky part here, and I think

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a healthy internal debate if you were running an NFL

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>team would be would you actually want the Giants run?

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Would you actually take that? Or would you want the

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys run? Would you want a quarterback who is a

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>volatile And I use volatile in the terms of you

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>could be great or he could be terrible. That was Eli, right, volatility.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But the Peaks are so good twenty eleven. Eli was

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>so good that they won a Super Bowl and he

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>carried them. It wasn't like, oh seven, he carried them

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in two eleven. Do you want those peaks? Do you

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>want those two super Bowls but a bunch of years

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>where you don't make the playoffs? Or do you want to,

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, get it on the green every single year

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Cowboys did with Tony Romo and just kind

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of see what happens. I think it's a it's an

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>honest question that doesn't have a great answer, and I

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think depending on your perspective, like, yeah, give me the

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>two championships like Eli brought us, versus give me the

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>consistency that Romo brought us, but we never got, you know,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>to the championship games. I think it's an honest and

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fair question, but yeah, Romo throw for throw again, was

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely a better quarterback than Eli Manning. Good to talk

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 1>to you again, Steve, thanks for joining us as always,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you got it, Thanks Dan, Steve Bounzolo, Pro Football Focus

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Senior analyst, host of Pro Football Focus NFL podcast. We

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>should compare their playoff stats, oh, Romo and Eli to

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>look at? Okay? Um, yeah, those two Super bowls and

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you beat the Patriots, You beat the Patriots when the

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots were undefeated, You beat Tom Brady, you beat Bell Belichick.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>You know that goes a long way. Yeah, McLevin. For

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>some reason, Tony Romo's stats feel a little like empty

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>calories to me because but I don't know, I'd have

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to look at it. But like, that was a big

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>offense and had a lot going on where Elis and

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the Giants was a much smaller offense where he wasn't

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>asked to do his much, no, and he had a

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>great defense. I mean they won the pressure they put

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>on Brady, that's why they won the Super Bowl. Eli

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of throws and that's all you needed.

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>But without that defense, he has to make more throws

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>because he's going to be behind by a couple of touchdowns.

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>They kept it close, and Eli made a couple of

0:26:56.080 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>very very good throws. He's going into the whole of thing. Yeah,

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>m clob how much is it is his last name? Well?

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps. But then did we expect more

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>out of Eli? I remember when Eli came in and

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I was told by a scout he's got more talent

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>than Peyton does. Whether that was true or not, but

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I you know, winning is super Bowl, beating the Patriots

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what your last name is. So you, I

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>mean you can. He did throw for you know what,

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>three hundred touchdowns. He did throw a lot of interceptions.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I just never thought that he was great. I thought

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that he was opportunistic. He was always a A B plus,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>B B minus. Never felt like when you said, boy

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's an elite. You can't spell elite without Eli,

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, but thank you, Paulie, Jess mc glove. Who's

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>better Eli Manning or Phil Simmons, Like, who's got a

0:27:54.640 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>stronger legacy? Um? Eli, it's really you say it's a

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>second Super Bowl that if Simms did not yes, yes,

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>if he beats the Bills, the high powered Buffalo Bills offense,

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>then he would be he, in my opinion, be in

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. He's in the media. Uh. They always

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they tend to fawn over, you know, athletes who are

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in the media. And I think Phil Simms would be

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Hall of Fame. I think it's that close

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>for Phil Simms. Let's see Cody in Ohio. Hi, Cody,

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>what's on your mind today? Hey? Dan, Um, Bengals came

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>out with new jerseys and I just wanted to know

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>what Bengal you would invest a future then? And also, um,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do you remember a Charlie Ballman that played for Cleanson

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>backed around the late seventies. Yeah, with whatdy Hayes they

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what he punched him on the sidelines in a bowl Gables.

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I work for Charlie in Westchester. Oh nice, Okay, Well

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>tell him, tell Charlie we set alone and I hope

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>he's doing Okay. I think his number was fifty eight. Yeah,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>but he was a nose tackle, but he had a

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>linebacker number, I think, yeah, I just remember I think

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>he had an interception rand of the sidelines got tackled

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and then Woody Hayes punched him. The Ohio State head

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>coach Charlie Charlie Bowman. If I'm investing in anybody with

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, I would say Joe Burrow. I guess right.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's the playoffs. Eli eight and four, eighteen touchdowns, nine interceptions,

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rating eighty seven point four. Romo two and four,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>eight touchdowns, two picks, quarterback rating ninety three point zero.

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But when you think of Romo, don't you think of

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle game with the he's holding on the field

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>goal and the snap is botched, and then he runs

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and you think he's getting into the end zone and

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>he gets stopped short. Yeah. I don't remember much about

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Romo in the playoffs. I certainly do with Eli. Yeah,

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>mcleve or that Dez Bryant catch, don catch too, don't

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>get me started on that it's a catch. Yeah. I

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think though Romo, if he even had one Super Bowl

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>appearance or a little bit more success or, it would

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have lasted two or three years longer. He gets in

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.959
<v Speaker 1>because he had a likable story. He came from nowhere,

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>eastern Illinois. He was came Remember that when they brought

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>him in. He sat on the Cowboys bench until he's

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. He was third string on the Cowboys bench.

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>He had a good story, and then he retired just

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a touch early. Yeah, he had the back injury, and

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know because of that, you know, I mean, Dak

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have played, you know, because Tony was still going

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to be able to play and they had just signed him,

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>i think, to a long term contract and sort for

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the back injury, and then Dak Prescott got a chance

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>behind a team that was a playoff caliber team. Eight

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>seven seven three d P Show Email Andrew stp at

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick dot Com. Marco and Arizona's back. Hey, Marco,

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>what's on your mind? Good morning, Dan Patrick Show from

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Dan Nation. On Tony Romo. I agree he does not

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>belong in there. I'm a long time Jerry Jones hostage

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan and Um, yeah, you're right, PAULI. His career is

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty fascinating. He was he was picked up because he

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>was Carson Plumer's throwing warm up partner at the Combine

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and he was noticed by none other than Sean Payton.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And the rest is Romo history. But yeah, he was

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a Cinderella story that never he never never won the

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>chance to progress into the playoffs. Like like you guys

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>always mentioned it. Just it's going to keep him out. Yeah,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. But somebody brought it up. One

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners brought up if Romo was a Hall

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of Famer. You know the answers. No, I mean, if

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>he's going into the Hall of Fame, it'll be as

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a broadcaster, but not as a quarterback. Arnold in Pennsylvania, Hey, Arnold,

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what's on your mind? Good morning, Dan six four two

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>o nine. I wanted to weigh in as as a

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Giants fan, I think it's a no brainer. I love

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the discussion in the comparison between Romo consistently being a

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>bridesmaid with the Cowboys and Eli peaking in two thousand

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and seven and twenty eleven. As a Giants fan, the

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>most popular professional sport by far being the NFL, I

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>could put up with the subpar years with having two

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl titles in the twenty first century. I think

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>most Giants fans would agree with me. Oh, I think,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and so would Cowboy fans. It's like, hey, you know,

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we can have a steady run here. Thanks for the

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>phone call, Arnold, But you know, it's like the Florida Marlins.

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.239
<v Speaker 1>They won a couple of World Series titles, but it

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>was like five years and then they would rebuild, dismantle, rebuild,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and then five years later they'd win another World Series.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Would you take that? Would you take the losing four

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>years where you're not relevant if it meant and maybe

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>not every five years, but let's say every seven years

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>your team is playing for a championship, but in those

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>other years you're not. You're not even close. Here's something

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for you. How many quarterbacks in the history of the

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL have the following They've thrown for at least thirty

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>four thousand career yards, more than two hundred and fifty

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns, and less than one hundred and twenty interceptions.

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So thirty four thousand career yards, they have two hundred

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and forty passing touchdowns at least and less than one

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty interceptions. There's only two. One is Aaron

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers and the other is Tony Romo. Stat of the day,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stat of the day. But stat of the day, stat

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the day here comes that what stat of the day.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers can probably name every one of his interceptions

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd be curious if somebody ask him that, do you

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>know who has intercepted you? I'm he's thrown eighty nine.

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like Phil Rivers name of his kids. Yeah, well,

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Rogers might be able to name his interceptions over Rivers

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>with his kids. You know, Rogers has thrown fifty one

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand yards, four hundred and twelve touchdowns, eighty nine interceptions. Yeah,

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy. I mean, you're you're looking at what a

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>five to one over four to one ratio here for

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns interceptions. Although I did hear this criticism a couple

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of years ago by an NFL scout. Yeah, but you know,

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he throws, so he doesn't have interceptions. He'll he'll throw

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a ball away and I'm like, yeah, but why don't

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>other quarterbacks do this? Yeah, he's trying to protect his stats.

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>How's he protecting his stats? He's thrown four hundred touchdowns

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and eighty nine interceptions. Shouldn't all these quarterbacks aspire to

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>do that? Like, hey, let me throw this one away? Yeah,

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Seton Tony Romo has seasons where he threw for almost

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.439
<v Speaker 1>five thousand yards, which is good, and they went eight

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and eight. It's the year that he threw for forty

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>two hundred yards. They went eight and eight. Yeah, Paul,

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>here's one other than Eli mannings two Super Bowl runs.

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He never won another playoff game. The Giants never advanced

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>past the first round the playoffs. All of those other

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>years worn O four and O poe and four. That's it.

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>We had two great runs. Would you take that? Sure

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>from your quarterback? But that's so, that's how many years?

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Well he lost his job to Kurt Warner, or Kurt

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Warner lost his job to Eli or like Eli led

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the Giants to the playoffs six total times, and they

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>lost in the first round. Every other one except for

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the two Superol runs. Didn't. Ben McAdoo eventually bench Eli

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for I want to say, Gino Smith, is that possible? Yeah,

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that's to be the worst decision in the history of coaching.

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You got fired like three weeks later. I know it's

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna put in Geno Smith? Like how out

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of touch are you? This is Eli's last year? Is

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>swan song? Leave him out there? Who cares? All right,

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break. Well here from Russell Lesbrook Junior.

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The third after this, Thanks for listening to The Dan

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to nine Pacific

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us on

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live on

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the Peacock app. Hey, it's Ben, host of the Fifth

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Hour with Ben Maller along with my trustee sidekick David Gascon.

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Would meet a lot to have you join us on

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>our weekly auditory journey. You're asking one in God's name

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is the Fifth Hour? I'll tell you it's a spin

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>off of that Ben Maller show. Colt hit overnights on FSR.

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Why should you listen? Picture if you will a world?

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Will we chat with captains of industry in media, sports

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and more every week Explorer some amazing facts about a

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>human and more. Let's sen to the Fifth Hour with

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben Mallow or the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast or

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast. Don Who is this Seaton?

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>This is hate read our buddy Jamie Joston none of

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the stat of the Day. We haven't played his stat

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Day in a while. We kind of use

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it differently than the Ron Burgundy one. Why is that?

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Because the Ron Burgundy one is a good exclamation point.

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The Josta lun is sort of a good setup. That's

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the way that I figure it. Well, let's hear Jamie

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Johns too. This is stat of the day. Salvador Perez

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>entered the league in twenty eleven. No players hit more

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>home runs while playing catcher. One hundred and fifty eight

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of his one hundred and eighty one career homers have

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>come while Perez was behind the plate at your stat

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of the day on this Wednesday Hour two Dan Patrick show. Yeah,

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like riding a bike. Yeah, like more phone calls. Everybody's

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>fired up on the Cowboys and Romo versus Eli. I

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how we started on this, mclovin. Can

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we switch the Paul up to I like the question

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>who is a better QB? Not who's going to get

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in the Hall of Fame, but who's a better assure? Sure,

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious where people go. Isn't it funny that I

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think Romo's gonna win this pole? But Eli it's gonna

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>be the Hall of Famer? Yeah, all right, let me

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>let me play Russell Westbrook Junior the third He was

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 1>introduced to the Los Angeles media, and he had this

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to say about working with Lebron James. As you know,

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>bronis one of the best players to play this game,

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's his ability to be able to kind of

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 1>do everything on the for allows me to be able

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to just figure it out. I'm coming to a championship

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>caliber team and my job is to make sure that

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm able to make his game easy for him. But

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll find ways to do that throughout the game as

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it pertains the ball handling and all that, and it

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't matter. There's many different ways you can impact

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the game without having the ball in your hands, and

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I've been able to do that for many years, and um,

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I will figure it out right. Russell Westbrook talked about

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>finding success with Anthony, David sh and Lebron. I've been

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>blessed to be able to going to my fourteen season,

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and each year I try to find ways to be

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>able to uplift and make my teammates better around me.

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>When A D and Brown are friends of mins first

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and me being a teammate, my job is to come

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in and uplift him and they'll do the same with

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>me vice versa. And as a season prolonged, we will

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. There will be ups there would be downs,

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's normal, that's okay, But we will figure

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>out how to play the best way that we want

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to play that to be able to win a championship.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>He said he has nothing to prove. All right, I

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>would think you do, but maybe he doesn't feel like that.

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Knows he's going to be a Hall of Famer man,

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 1>he's made his money. I would think winning a championship

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that'd be something to prove. Neian McLellan, I have a

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>criticism of that takes he had. He was with Katie

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and he was with Harden, and he neither of those

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>guys figured it out with him. So why is he

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>could have figured out this time? Well, four teams in

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>four years that there's a reason for that. Does he

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>make does he make everybody better? I think he's fascinating.

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a one man gang, a one man stat book.

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think he makes others better. This is

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the challenge. That's what he has to prove, in my opinion,

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>prove that you can make others better, and not just

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at the benefit of your stats. This is about winning.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>This isn't about I average a triple double. This will

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be about Russ playing every game in the regular season,

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>taking the workload off Lebron. Hope. It all comes down

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to Anthony Davis. That's it. If Russ and Lebron play

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>like we think they will, and Anthony Davis is healthy,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.720
<v Speaker 1>then they're gonna play for a championship. It's that simple.

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You got role players, You're gonna need them at some

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>point during the season postseason. But if those three, if

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>they're healthy and they play, and they play at the

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>level we expect, then they're going to play for a championship.

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But if Ad is not you know, penciled in to

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>play you know, sixty five games here, seventy games, or

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, limping going into the playoffs, then there's

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a real concern obviously. That's all it comes down to. Yeah,

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Pa Westbrook played in Oklahoma City, Houston, Washington. Do you

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think he I know, he knows the league and he's

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>played in LA and grew up in LA. Do you

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>think he knows what he's in for? The day to

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>day coverage of the Lakers locally and nationally, the judgment

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>from night to night, quarter at a quarter that's about

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen to him that he hasn't had in his career.

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't strike me as somebody who cares or he's

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>really good with blinders on. Yeah. See, he's got a

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>bunch of dudes on the team now to take some

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of that heat off him too. Yeah, but the focus

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be on him. It's not going to be

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 1>on Malik Monk or Kent Baysmore. You know, these are

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the new players on there. It's gonna be all right, Russ,

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what you got here. You know, I was

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking more like Lebron and Ad and Carmelo Anthony. I

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're gonna take heat because the Laker fans,

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the media has already focused on Lebron. They've already focused

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on Ad. They got a title. It'll be Russell. Westbrook's like, okay,

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>let's see what you got. What do you add to

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this team here? Yeah, I'm a club. It's funny guys

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like me do like to pick on Westbrook, like the

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>analytics like for some reason, like obviously Lebron will get

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of attention, but yeah, we have our clause

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>out for Westbrook. It's bizarre. You know, he's a great player. Well,

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.399
<v Speaker 1>he's the walking triple double. He won an MVP because

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he averaged a triple double. That's it. I mean, it

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.919
<v Speaker 1>was just Hey, there's here's the storyline. This hasn't happened

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>since Oscar. Okay, if somebody averages eleven points, ten assists,

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve rebounds, hey, I average a triple double. Russ is fascinating.

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see if he makes the team better.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Final hour coming up. More phone calls, of course, Eli

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>versus Romo. That's what you thought we'd be talking about today, right,

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>One more items, second hour. M drive How does he

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>do it? I don't know if you're saying that consciously

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>or subconsciously. How does that guy, that old guy have

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all that energy every single morning? Yep, that's me. M

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 1>drive the everyday supplement for driven guys like me who

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:44.879
<v Speaker 1>want to maintain their edge and compete like they did

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>when they were younger. I got guys I'm competing with

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>or half the age I am, But can they keep

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up with me? No. Clinically tested ingredients help you fight

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 1>back against aging. M drive supports healthy testosterone levels well,

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>helping you shed pounds, maintain lean muscle, and you can

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>have the extra vitamins and nutrients that boost your energy

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and your strength so you stay at the top of

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>your game. M drive. You can find it at Allgreens,

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Right eight or Vitamin Shop. I would recommend going to

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>M drive dan dot com. Free shipping, sixty day money

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>back guarantee, nothing to lose. M drive Turn back the clock.

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Go to mdrive dan dot com. Try it for yourself.

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Don't let age beat you. rEFInd your prime with M

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>drive