WEBVTT - Elon Won't Leave Mar-a-Lago but are Users Fleeing X?

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 3>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 3>controlled by one man.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Starting his own artificial intelligence company. Well, he's a legitimate

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>super genius, I mean legitimate.

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>He says.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 2>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 2>be different.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 4>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 4>on him.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Anything he does is fascinating the people.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Welcome to Elon Ink, Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 5>It's Tuesday, November nineteenth. I'm your host, David Popadopolis. So

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 5>it's somehow been just fourteen days since the election. But oh,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 5>how busy they've been for Elon Musk, who still seems

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 5>to be basically living at mar A Lago, racking up

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 5>invites from foreign leaders, watching his wealth sore, and weighing

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 5>in loudly on Trump's cabinet appointees. All the while his

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 5>social media company x steadily loses users to rival Blue Sky.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 5>And We're going to get right into all of this

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 5>with our very own Musk cabinet, Ace reporter Dana Hall Hey.

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 5>They're Dana Hey, Kurt Wagner, who covers social media for

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 5>US here at Bloomberg, Hay, Kurt Hi, David Hey, and

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 5>then Max Chafkin, who around here feels a little like

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 5>Musk at the Mara A Lago ocean front pool.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk elan twa job. What a job he does.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 6>He's a great and he happens to be a really

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 6>good guy. You know, he likes this place. I can't

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 6>get him out of here.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 3>He just likes this place. And you know what, I

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>like having him here too.

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 6>He's good, He's done a fantastic job. Really an incredible

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 6>mind and these unbelievable entrepreneurs sort of everything.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking him, what do you do best? And we

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>were not able.

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 6>To figure it out. But it's a lot of things.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Amax, David.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I trust that my confirmation hearing will be food and uneventful.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Yes, it shall all right. We're going to dive right

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 5>into it. The Trump trade is working out spectacularly so

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 5>far for Elon Musk. As you look at the numbers

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 5>so far, his wealth is now up to three hundred

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 5>and twenty six billion dollars according to the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 5>which is about one hundred billion dollars more than his

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 5>closest rival, who would be Jeff Bezos. Tesla stocks her

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 5>up about a third since the election several hundred billion,

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 5>and Xai and SpaceX are cutting deals at record high valuations. So,

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, Kurt Wagner, in the run up to the vote,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 5>on this show and in other places, there was a

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 5>lot of handwringing and wondering about whether Musk was neglecting

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 5>his companies and neglecting his shareholders during the campaign by

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 5>spending so much time campaigning for Trump, and he was

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 5>essentially undermining these companies. I guess those numbers, as it

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 5>strikes me, at least those valuations put a rest to

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 5>all of that. The money speaks for itself, does it not,

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 5>mister Wagner to an extent.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it does, right. I mean, this is a

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>man who has built a reputation on making massive bets,

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>and this is a massive bet that he made that

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 4>is paying off handsomely. Right, he picked Donald Trump. He

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 4>put the full weight of his wealth, the full weight

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 4>of his time, his reputation behind him. Trump is now

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 4>president Again, Elon is you know, the most powerful non

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 4>elected person probably in the world, and he's reaping the

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 4>benefits to come with that, right, and that includes the

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 4>buoyancy of his his you know, companies, and the idea

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 4>that because he's close to the president, because he has

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>the president sort of in his ear, he's going to

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>be able to, you know, get the type of regulation

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 4>he wants. He's going to get the types of deals

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 4>that he wants, he's going to get the relationships that

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 4>he wants, and all of those things are beneficial to

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Elon Inc. And the world of Elon Muskin. We're seeing that,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 4>as you point out in the valuations.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and we're gonna we're going to get into the

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 5>breakdown item by item of what is pushing up that valuation.

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 3>Max.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's absolutely neglecting his companies. There's like no

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>question that he has spent the last month or so

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 2>doing nothing but hang around Donald Trump and go to

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 2>campaign events and focus on this election.

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the bet that the investors are making, as

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Kurt saying, is that he's gotten a lot for his companies.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 3>And and you.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Know, you could make an argument right that maybe having

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a guy who kind of is impulsive. Who's a let's

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>just put this generously, an unconventional manager has you know,

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>pensions for outbursts of anger, erratic decision making. Maybe it's

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>better for him to be, you know, kind of operating

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 2>at a high level doing the kind of political diplomacy

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>that could help a company of Tesla size or a

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 2>company of space exercise. And like that's the bet that

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 2>they're making. But I also think like we should not

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 2>just assume that the market has any idea whether this

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>is good or bad for Tesla. Yet this is a

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>bet that investors are making, you know, amid a moment

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of exuberance. And you know, we'll see

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Tesla stock, as we talk about all the time, it

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>swings a lot on this podcast.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 5>So Dannik Kurt I wonder on that point, are there

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 5>any signs inside Musk's companies that all the time he

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 5>is spending in Pennsylvania now in mar A Lago, that

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 5>top executives at that at those companies are now empowered

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 5>to do more make the decisions on their own. Is

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 5>there any implicit or explicit message, yes, go ahead and

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 5>do that, or is it too soon for that?

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, Musk has always run so many companies

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that his executives have always been kind of empowered to

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>do stuff without him. Like at SpaceX, Gwen Shotwell clearly

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>runs the day to day. At Tesla, there aren't really

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that many named executive officers, and like in the past,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, people would always complain that there were bottlenecks

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>because they were waiting for Elon to sign off on stuff.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>But like Tesla's a profitable company. It kind of runs.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>It's like they make cars, they sell cars, Like, you know,

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he's more focused on robotics in AI, like the basic

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know work of like running a factory, like he's

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>no longer sleeping on the floor or whatever. So I

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>just think that we as a news or operation need

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of stop looking for like these points of

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like everyone wants the narrative that like just falling apart

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>because Elon is doing politics and frankly, it's not like

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like now you have the whole like Trump administration on X,

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like X is doing fine. Like I don't know, I

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just I just sort of feel like there's a desire

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to find these points of tension and friction that might

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be premature because.

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, well, a a were journalists, and journalists by definition,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 5>that's what we do. We look for points of friction

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 5>and tension. But I guess that answer implicit answer is

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 5>that the CEO role doesn't matter, Then why the hell

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 5>do I need a CEO?

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it matters different at different companies, right, So, like, yeah,

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 4>when you're the CEO of six different businesses that are

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 4>all you know, at various stages, but for the most part,

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 4>relatively established, Yeah, maybe you don't necessarily need a traditional

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 4>hands on CEO, right, But that's going to be very

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 4>different when you have a startup or something like that.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I guess I would say I would maybe echo with

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Dana saying, and just add I think it's too early, right, Like,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 4>this is already someone who was who was spread incredibly

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 4>thin well before Trump showed up into the picture. For him,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>it's never He's never been someone who's like, you know, hey,

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to be at the office from nine to five,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, pop eye for office hours or whatever. Like

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 4>that's just not how he operates anyways. And so adding

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 4>this other you know, I don't even want to call

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 4>it a hobby obviously, because is much better than that.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 4>But adding this other commitment to his plate is obviously

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 4>it's a big deal, but at the same time, his

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>companies are used to only getting fractions of his time,

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 4>and so I think it's too soon to say whether

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 4>this is going to have a long term impact.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a lot of irrational exuberance right now.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I would like to point out that SpaceX is going

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to launch a starship Brocket this evening, and President Trump

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to go to that launch, as is the

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>new FCC nominated chair, Brendan Carr. So you might even

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>see like the entire Trump cabinet or like everyone from

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>mar A Lago like at this launch. So I think

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that for Elon that is really good, and he's neglecting

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>his companies, perhaps on the day to day, but just

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the sort of fact that this whole Republican entourage is

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>now hanging out with Elon, flying around with Elon, going

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to the UFC fight with Elon, like he is best

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in the glow of that adulation, which he never got

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Biden administration, as we have talked about many times.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>And so for a guy who really likes the dopamine

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>hit of adulation and feeling like he's in power, and

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>feeling appreciated. To have the President elect come to his

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>launch is like a huge thing for him.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 5>Let me just say this that all those things Max

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 5>you said are correct. We shall see ultimately where Tesla

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 5>and these other companies from an operating basis go from

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 5>here in the coming months and years, and whether him

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk spending so little time of late with them

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 5>ultimately hurts them or not. But if I'm a shareholder

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 5>in the company he's just added in Tesla, for instance,

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 5>he's just added several hundred billions of dollars to the

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 5>value of the company, I am thrilled. And if I

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 5>have those long term concerns, you know what I do.

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 5>I just sell the stock at an incredible profit right now.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>And one thing I'll say that I think where what

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the market is telling us is that there were a

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 2>lot of reports even before the election, but then then

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>definitely after kind of skeptical about hey, how long can

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 2>this Trump Musk romance last? You know, these you know,

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>they are so high on each other's presence, and I

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>think what we're seeing to Dana's point, is it's lasting

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 2>so far. Right Musk is in the inner circle. He

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>has not been pushed out. If anything, he has gotten

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>closer to Trump over the last fourteen days than he

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 2>was after the election.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 3>And that is true. It is holding for now.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 5>And we're going to get into that a little bit

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 5>later on, because there are some signs here and there,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 5>some fraying. But I first do want to go through

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 5>item by item if one is to make sense of

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 5>this enormous spike in the valuations of his companies in

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 5>terms of what a Trump administration can can bring about

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 5>for Elon Inc. Let's do that now. So, Dana, the

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 5>first thing that comes to mind and I need to

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 5>ask you about, is the possibility, as has been floated

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 5>in recent days, that the Trump adminished station brings about

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 5>some sweeping new rules to autonomous vehicles, helping pave the

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 5>way for Elon to roll out what are.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 3>We calling it, robo cyber cab. Tell us a bit

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 3>about that.

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So, as you all recall back in you know, April,

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk basically fired twenty percent of Tesla's staff and

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>completely pivoted the company. They're no longer chasing volume of

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>electric cars. The future is all about autonomy and AI

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and the robotaxi and on an earnings call, Musk said

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>very clearly, like if President Trump is elected, like I'm

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>really hoping for a kind of a streamlined federal process

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to autonomous vehicles instead of this patchwork

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>regulatory quilts where like one city has one rule and

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>another state has another rule. And that is very clearly

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one of his asks. And you know, I think that

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>just basically a streamlined, very fast track kind of regulatory

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>regime is really what Elon wants, and now he's probably

0:11:59.080 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get it.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>There was a report to that effect that correct me

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>if I'm wrong.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, our colleague David Welsh broke the story over the

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>weekend that the Trump transition team was like floating possibly

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Emil Michael, who used to work at Uber as like

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a potential Dot secretary. Now we know that he is

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>not the cabinet elect, but I mean, we don't know

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>yet who's going to end up running NITZ for example.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 3>Just a couple of things.

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Trump did not pick the guy that Elon seemed

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to want, Emil Michael, who would have been who's basically

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, an ex uber executive, former Silicon Valley guy.

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Seems like of all the people who could possibly just

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of ram this through, he'd be the most likely

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>to do it. I have to say, the guy that

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump did pick doesn't have any track record of or

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 2>as far as I could find in a quick search

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 2>since the pick was announced, of talking about autonous vehicles.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>And I would be skeptical that the Trump administration is

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>going to spend, you know, a ton of political capital

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>on this and and the other thing.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Would it take a ton of political capital.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 2>So the Bloomberg story we published is really good. It

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 2>explains that they would there are some rules that they

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.239
<v Speaker 2>could change, but they would need an Act of Congress

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to to really you know, to really like make the

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 2>cyber cab happen on any kind of big scale. And

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that the problem here, which was the problem

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 2>before Trump was elected, is that you can have the

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>best regulatory framework, the biggest, most beautiful, most glorious could

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 2>be like the toilet seat of mar A Lago equivalent

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of regulatory frameworks, and you need a cyber cab, like

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 2>you need a working car to like make use of

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 2>these regulations. And again it's not totally clear that that

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 2>has happened. So again this all feels like very hypothetical.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>We've got like, maybe there's going to be some kind

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 2>of thing that's that's going to happen to make Elon

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Musk happy on the regulatory side. But then Tesla would

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>have to turn around and take advantage of it somehow.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, it could actually backfire because you could no longer

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>blame regulatory approval for the delay. Like if they got

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this fast track regulatory aprival, they'd have to like they'd

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>have to actually like start an operation.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 3>Dan.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 5>Next up the sun setting of EV tax rebates for

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 5>car buyers.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the seventy five hundred dollars federal tax credit

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for buying an electric vehicle has been a huge part

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Inflation Reduction Act and really kind of encouraged

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of consumers who maybe weren't thinking about an

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>EV to buy a car. And the Trump administration has

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>floated about sunsetting that. Elon says that he's okay with that,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that he's right in that Tesla, by

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>virtue of their volume and can do a lot with

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>pricing and they don't need the credits as much as

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>their rivals do because Tesla is already profitable. Now, would

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>losing the credit hurt their gross margin? Absolutely? But it's

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>really going to hurt rivals, and so you know, Elon

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>might be willing to kind of go ahead with this

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>because it would just allow Tesla's moat to get so

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>much better. I mean, you have like GM and Forward.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>They poured so much money into trying to forecast the

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>EV market going forward, and they keep having to rewrite

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>their playbook and like scale back their ambitions, and it's

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so frustrating for them because like with every administration things,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Wax and Wayne, whereas like Tesla is the dominant player

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in the US, They're going to basically be able to

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, continue that moat and they still

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of funding from the IRA for manufacturing,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>for installing superchargers. I mean, I could see, you know,

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Tesla just basically like the credit goes away, Tesla just

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>slashes prices, which we've seen Elon do in the past,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and like, I don't think that the credit is that

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal, to be honest, I think that

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon would be happy to see it go away.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 4>I guess I would point out that this is not

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 4>the only sort of industry or major tech company that

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 4>is almost pushing for more regulation or in this case,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, fewer benefits in order to benefit them. It's

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 4>sort of it's counterintuitive, right, So I would point out

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 4>that Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram for years, has been saying, hey,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 4>regulate us, regulate the tech, regulate the social networking industry.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 4>And on the surface, you think, why would they ever

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 4>want more regulation?

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, this would hurt them?

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's because, as we pointed out, same with Tesla,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 4>they're in such a dominant position that any regulation they

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 4>can deal with. They have the resources, they have the talent,

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 4>they have the time to deal with it easily. But

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 4>it will close the door for a number of competitors.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 4>That will make it harder for competitors to catch.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Up to them.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Right, It's still a growing in somewhat new industry, the evs,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 4>but like it's much more mature than when Elon started

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 4>this out right, So like there is a dominant player

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 4>which didn't exist when he was first going. And so

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 4>I think that's why this counter into a intuitive idea

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 4>actually makes a lot of sense for him.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Max.

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Another thing that is helping Musk's empire is the idea

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 5>it's been floated or I guess Trump has said he

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 5>would like Brendan Carr to chair the FCC.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Why is this positive for elinning.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Brend And Carr is a long time Elon Musk fan,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 2>and in particular he's expressed appreciation for Elon Musk in

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of respects. But the FCC is an important

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 2>regulator for Starlink, which is a subsidiary of SpaceX. And

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of Elon Musk's big frustrations with the

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration is that there is a lot of money

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 2>for rural broadband internet and that money has not gone

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to him. There are a couple of programs and car

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 2>has been very outspoken about the need.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 3>To change that.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>And I actually think this is the way, like much

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 2>more than autonomous vehicles or some of these other things

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 2>that rely on a lot of hypothetical car.

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 3>This is a way.

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is like a way that Elon Musk can

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>put money directly towards his top line, you know, revenue

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 2>from the government to Starlink. And part of the reason

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>it's more plausible is because Elon Musk has like a

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 2>real plausible case for it.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, That's what I was going to ask you. Is

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 5>there a good inmate case that starlink deserves that money?

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 5>Just as much as these other companies do.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>It's complicated. I've done I've done a little bit of

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>reporting on this, and there are there's some analysts out

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>there who have been looking at this and talking about

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 2>it as a possibility. Elon Musk's argument is essentially, the

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>satellites are going to get better, and no one really

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 2>knows how true that is or to what extent they're

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 2>going to get better. Are they going to get better enough?

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 2>And like that's kind of where the rubber meets the road.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 2>But there is a case for satellites, like you could

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>roll these like give people starlinks. Is a lot cheaper

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 2>than laying out fiber. The question is like when you

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 2>try to do it on a mass scale, how does

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that work? And I think the from a from a

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of Elon point of view, he gets two things

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 2>out of this. One is potentially more revenue, but the

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 2>second is it slows down these traditional telecom operators that

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>we're counting on government subsidies for their own you know,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 2>rollout of rural broadbands. So this is like a definite

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 2>win for Elon. I think it's I think Brendan Carr

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 2>is like the biggest win he's had so far, even

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>bigger than getting named as the co chair of DOGE,

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and certainly better than these kind of you know, sort

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 2>of vague reports that the Trump administration is is you know,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>sympathetic to autonomous vehicles, because because again we don't really know,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 2>it's just a little hard to figure out how that

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 2>would benefit Elon, at least in the short term.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I wanted to jump in on is

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that Carr has advocated a ban on TikTok, citing national

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>security concerns because of China, and that could also benefit

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Elon because you know, as X adds more video capacity,

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>they're really rivals with TikTok. So I think when we

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>look at all of these cabinet appointments, it's really important

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to sort of think about how they benefit Musk not

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>just in one company, but sort of across all companies.

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And Brendan Carr is going to go to the Space

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Excellence today.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Also, it should be noted I guess that Elon has

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 4>claimed he doesn't want a TikTok ban, right, He's sort

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 4>of like, hey, this is against free speech, this would

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 4>be a bad thing. But as Dana very smartly points out,

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 4>like he's saying that in reality, I think TikTok not

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 4>being in picture would ultimately benefit X. So he might

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 4>say he doesn't want it, but when push comes to shove,

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure he'd happily you accept a lot more attention

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 4>coming towards X.

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, more on X in a moment, Max, thank you

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 5>very much for bringing up DOZE, the Department of Government Efficiency.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 5>We are absolutely, dear listeners, gonna be talking more about

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 5>DOZE in coming weeks and months. But I want to

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Dana before we move on to X, ask you this.

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 5>Max earlier had said that so far the Trump Musk

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 5>relationship seems to be holding up just fine, and that

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 5>indeed seems to be the case. But at the same time,

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 5>there are signs of fracture or at least tension emerging,

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 5>reports of insiders in the Trump team bristling at how

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 5>Musk is acting quote as a co president to Trump.

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 5>And I wonder if you feel like these are just

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 5>initial bumps in the road and the cost of doing

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 5>business with Trump, or a sign that things might come

0:20:58.280 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 5>to a head sooner rather than later.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of bs to be honest. I mean,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Trump team is famously leaky, right and right now,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>You've got all these people in mar A Lago like

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>jockeying for position and jockeying for power, and like you know,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there's this whole like fight about who's going to be

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury secretary in different camps or leaking things to

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>different things, and yeah, like oh, there was like a

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>dust up at a dinner with like boris what's his

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>name or like whatever, like Trump is going to the

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX launch today, Like that is what matters. Like I

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>used to cover politics, and I just don't take these

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like thinly sourced reports in certain outlets that

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>seriously like Elon and Trump, I've been thickest thieves for

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the past like six weeks, and until there's like a

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>real rupture, I just don't really buy it. I'm sure

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that some like old school Trump loyalists are maybe bristling

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>at the fact that Elon is around, but like you're

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing photographs of like Trump and Don Junior and the

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House and RFK and Elon like all

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on the plane Enan McDonald's together, there's no rupture. I've

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>always just been very skeptical of a lot of political

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>reput because that.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Is fair, but Max.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Trump has on a couple of occasions, including the clip

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 5>we played at the beginning of the show, he has

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 5>publicly started taking swipes at Eline.

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I gotta agree with everything down said she.

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, David.

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know that's not what you want to hear.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>But but here's the thing. Help, there are other there

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>are other constituencies within this transition who obviously have an

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>interest in marginalizing Elon, and and so and and there

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>there are other sources of power here. And and if

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 2>you just look at like the top line, like who's

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 2>at the McDonald's table, Like, I think that's a pretty

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 2>good indication. And what I will say is yes, in

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 2>the past and and we we get into this in

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the episode that's Forthcoming of Citizen Elon. There have been

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 2>signs like this before where Trump is sort of preparing

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>to like shift someone and he will start making these

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of cracks, right, and it's it's like a way

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to kind of open the door. And maybe that's possible.

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 2>It could also be that it's a warning to Elon.

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like, listen, you need to work with me, you know,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 2>don't get too big for your breeches. It could also

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 2>be a signal to some other part of Trump's coalition

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>who he's trying to play Kate. We just like don't

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>know what is going on. And I really think there

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of people who are like taking lessons

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>from the past Trump administration, which makes sense. But I

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 2>also think we need to look at Elon. And this

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 2>is not as much about to me anyway, This is

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 2>not as much about can Trump live in a world

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>where there's Elon Musk in his inner circle? It's can

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk be sufficiently subservient? And I think before this,

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 2>like last few months of political adventure with Elon, I

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>guess I would say no freaking way. But over the

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 2>last three months, Elon has proven himself willing to let

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump lead. And until we see a difference, then you know,

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna assume that's going to continue.

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 3>Okay, very good, Kurt.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Let us talk about the Exodu users leaving X. Things

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 5>are going swimmingly, as we just stated, or at least

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 5>for the market values of many of his companies in

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.959
<v Speaker 5>his empire, not so much right now. For X users

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.479
<v Speaker 5>are leaving. Tell us what's going on.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 3>It's this weird.

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Sort of like Jekyl and hyde situation at X right now,

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 4>which is it is more politically and culturally important than

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 4>it has been since Elon bought the company, right like,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 4>this is the most relevance X has had as a

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 4>social network and as a sort of distributor of Donald

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 4>Trump's agenda, news and information. At the same time, it

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 4>is probably maybe the weakest it has been from a

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 4>user standpoint, right because after the election, we saw all

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 4>of these people basically throwing in the towel on X

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 4>and saying I'm done with this place. And we've seen

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 4>that reflected in the numbers of two rivals, Meta's Threads

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 4>and Blue Sky, And with Blue Sky in particular, it's

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 4>been really interesting because Blue Sky's been around for a

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 4>couple of years. It had a lot of attention when

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 4>it first launched, and then it sort of went quiet

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 4>for a while. I think a lot of people were

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 4>just like, that's not it, that's not the place. We'll

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 4>just kind of let it sit over there. And it's

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 4>added I think it was at ten million users in September.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 4>The week after the election, it added about one point

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 4>five million, and in the week since then, so you know,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 4>week two after the election, I believe it's added about

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 4>five million users, and so it's now close to nineteen million,

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 4>up from ten million in September. As I mentioned, it's

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 4>almost doubled in size in just a couple of months.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 4>And if you go to Blue Sky, I think the

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 4>most telling thing is that your feed is going to

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 4>be full of people basically saying, hey, I'm new here,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 4>just came over from X, you know, leaving that place behind.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Tell me who to follow, tell me what to do,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 4>like how do I use this thing? Like ha ha ha, Right,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 4>But the idea being that all of these people are

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.959
<v Speaker 4>migrating to a new network because they no longer want

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 4>to be associated with X. And so I think that

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 4>that is anecdotal, of course, but I think that, paired

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 4>with the rising user numbers, that these two competitors sort

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 4>of tells a picture that you know, X is having

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a user user growth or user retention

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 4>issue at the moment.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>A Blue Sky has a lot of like high usage

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>people like Lizzo is now on Blue Sky, and epidemiologists

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and climate scientists like all of my energy peeps have

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>moved to Blue Sky. And I think the other big

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>thing driving this is that X changed its term of service.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So as of November fifteenth, if you're using X, you're

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>basically allowing them to use your content to feed into

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>XAI and like language models. And so the change of

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the terms of service is actually what kind of inspired

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people to start not just like leaving X,

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but like downloading their tweets and then like deleting them.

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's like another interesting part of this is just

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like people realizing that they don't want elon having their content,

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, Max and I go back and forth

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about this a lot. I struggle with my presence on

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>X because on the one hand, I feel like I

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be there because that's now where the incoming

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration is, like all the cabinet people like, that's

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:12.959
<v Speaker 1>where like a lot of people who are now going

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to be in power are posting. So I feel like

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to at least lurk. But I have also

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>joined blue Sky. I hope you will find me there.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I shall.

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>We need an el in ink, We need an el

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on ink starter pack.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 3>There we go.

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Some X is Blue Sky's gain, X's loss or are

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 5>there signs that indeed they are? For every one liberal

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 5>user that walks out the door. They are being replaced

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 5>by conservatives, conservative users. And even if that's not the case,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 5>does it exactly matter for X. You've drilled into my

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 5>head in recent weeks that we need to rethink our

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 5>understanding of X and its role and the Musk Empire.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean both things can be true. Like Chrit said,

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>like he's right, X has never been more relevant, at

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 2>least not in the last five years than it is today.

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 2>And we don't know what the value of X is think,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Like we talked about this on the last episode, like

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 2>the models of Elon's net worth rely on fidelities mark down.

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 2>If I were a shareholder of X, I would be

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>marking that way the hell up because clearly, you know,

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 2>association with Elon amid a Trump administration, whether or not

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>it translates to actual you know, business, is valuable according

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to the market. After the election, we saw all of

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>these CEOs, guys who had kind of been on the fence,

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, go and sort of kiss the ring to Trump,

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 2>and they all did it on X, right. They all

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Satyad Della Sun Dhar Pachai, Jeff Bezos, like all the

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 2>all the sort of tech guys who wanted to kiss

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>up to Donald Trump, went on X. They called him

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 2>President Trump even though he's president elect, and they and

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 2>of course they did it on Elon Musk's platform, and

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 2>so clearly it's it's like the Trump Hotel of social networks. Like,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 2>if you want to if you want to be in

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>this orbit, you got to be there. And I think

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and even even saying that probably understates it, because like

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 2>it is a really important piece of the right wing

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 2>media ecosystem right now, maybe the most important piece. But

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 2>what I'll say is, and like right wing media has

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 2>always relied on this relationship with quote unquote mainstream media,

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and what X had going for it before the election

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 2>was you still had a lot of mainstream journalists there,

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 2>You had a lot of mainstream news organizations. Despite the

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>fact that Elon Musk, the owner and now key advisor

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to the to the president elect, is going out there

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>every day saying really bad things about media, saying that

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>they're they're the opposition, they're terrible, and you know, cut

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 2>doing making tweaks algorithmically into the business that are harming

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 2>those companies' business. It's really only a matter of time

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>before mainstream media outlets try to find a different outlet,

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think what we're seeing now is is some

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 2>of that happening some of these You have a lot

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 2>of journalists, a lot of media outlets suddenly like paying

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>attention to Blue Sky. And if that happens in a

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 2>big way and X doesn't respond, that I think will

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>hurt X in the LNE long run. Because conservative media,

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 2>as much as it is its own ecosystem, as much

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 2>as it is, there is a big audience there. Part

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 2>of what makes the most successful conservative media plays work

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 2>is that they're able to kind of straddle both sides

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of it, but both the like hardcore activists as well

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>as kind of the middle the kind of mainstream audience.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Could I just add real quickly.

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's this idea that like, oh, is X

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 4>going to be relevant if it's just right leaning sort

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 4>of Trump fans without you know, liberal folks to poke

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 4>and prod or whatever. Right Like We've heard that for

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of years. I would point you to truth social, right, Like,

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 4>what is truth social? It is right leaning Trump supporters

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 4>without anybody to really poke and prod. And I would

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 4>argue truth social other than basically being a glorified way

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 4>for Trump to release press releases has almost no relevance

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 4>in general kind of modern Internet culture, right like it

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 4>is truly just like Trump Press release two point zero service.

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 4>And so I do think for X to stay relevant,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 4>they need they they sort of need, you know, people

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 4>from from both sides of this political spectrum to care

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 4>about what's happening on this service, because otherwise it does

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 4>become very kind of echo chamber isolated. And I'm just

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 4>not sure that it's going to jump off the Internet

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 4>onto television and radio and podcasts in the way that

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 4>it has historically if it becomes very very one sided.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Max.

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 5>So, one thing I've learned over decades covering finance is

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 5>that marks, when you're marking the value of a private asset,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 5>not a publicly traded asset, private marks are a dark art. Okay,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 5>they are a dark art. And so if you know

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 5>what if you have, if you happen to have a

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 5>little cut of that, you know, stock and X, and

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 5>you want to mark it up, go ahead, man mark

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 5>that thing up.

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I do think, like combo of Trump being president and

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the meme the stock market where it is, it's not

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>out of the realm of possibility that X could return

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to the public markets one day and even return at

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>evaluation that might be at least much higher than it's

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 2>current super depressed in.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 3>The abstract, That does seem plausible.

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 5>But Kurt, are there any signs of any kind that

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 5>there's any buzz among the banker investing community that man,

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 5>let me get my hands on some of them X shares.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 3>So I agree with Max.

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 4>I think when Fidelity comes out with its next report,

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 4>which will probably get to go up three weeks from

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 4>now or whatever, we can talk about when it does,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be I would be shocked if the value

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 4>is an up right, if it isn't up noticeably, only because,

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 4>as Max pointed out, being associated with Elon and therefore

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 4>being associated with Trump tends to signal we think, you know,

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 4>we're a buyer of this type of thing. At the

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 4>same time, if I'm Elon and X, the last thing

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I think I want to do is go public right

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 4>now and expose for the businesses. Yeah, but I think

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, this is not a strong business. I continue

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 4>to firmly believe that this is not a good business,

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:02.239
<v Speaker 4>right like it is a good cultural weapon in some

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 4>in some ways for Elon and Trump. But you know,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 4>there was a report, David.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 3>You may have seen.

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 4>Last week that all of these big blue chip advertisers

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 4>had returned. I wrote some of them down. It was

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 4>like IBM, Disney, Comcast, Warner Brothers, and it was like, oh,

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 4>they're no longer paused. They're spending on X again, Like

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 4>this is huge. And then you look into the report,

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 4>all of those companies combined spent three point three million

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 4>dollars on advertising over nine months. It was down ninety

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 4>eight percent from twenty twenty three. So my point being

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 4>is that even though they're trying to create.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Like wait a minute, well what about the cheach and

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 3>chong gummies? What about then? Tell me about the cheaching

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 3>chong gum, you are single handedly keeping those guys afloat. David.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about this. You need to stop those place chechicheng.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I'll get off my soapbox here, but

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 4>I just feel like the idea that this is a

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 4>strong business is yet to be Maybe I will be wrong,

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 4>and we've all been proven wrong by Elon at one

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 4>point or another, and this will be my big hill

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 4>that I die on.

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 3>But I don't believe right.

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Now that this is a very strong business and it's

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 4>not something you would want to say, Hey, let's open

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 4>up our books, let's go public, let's let investors get

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 4>a look at how this is actually going, because I

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 4>don't think it would go down with that.

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 5>I think then indeed the company has much greater value

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 5>for Elon and his empire as a private, small, private

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 5>entity within it that does access it to media.

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Arm I am.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Being told by our producer Magnus that we are skipping.

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 3>The feud or skipping the feud we don't have time

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 3>for it.

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 4>Sounds like there is a feud you and the producers.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 5>We have to let every once in a while we

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 5>have to listen to Magnus, Kurt, Dana, Max, thank you

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 5>very much for joining.

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 4>Great to be here, Thanks for having us.

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Always a pleasure.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.439
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 5>Anna Masarrakas is our editor and Rayhan Harmancier, senior editor.

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 5>The idea for this every show also came from Rayhon

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 5>Blake Maple's Handles Engineering and Emma Sanchez fact checks. Our

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 5>supervising producer is Magnus Henrickson.

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 3>The Elon Inc.

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Theme is written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugijira,

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 5>Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 5>is ahead of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks as always

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 5>to our supporters Joe Weber and Brad Stone.

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm David Papadopoulos.

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 5>If you have a minute, rate and review our show,

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 5>it'll help other listeners find us. See you next week.

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Elon Inc. Podcast. If you

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 5>never want to miss a story, become a Bloomberg dot

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 5>com subscriber today. Check out our special intro offer right

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 5>now at Bloomberg dot com Backslash Podcast Offer or click

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 5>the link in the show notes. You'll also unlock deep

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 5>reporting data and analysis from reporters around the world.