WEBVTT - Ig Nobels 2017: Vampires, Vaginal Music & Cheese

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, I'm Christian Say, and I'm

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick. And here we are with part three of

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>our seventeen ig No Bells Prize Ignoble Prizes series, where

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we're discussing the recipients of the seen ig Noo Bells.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't heard the first two episodes, you might

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>want to go check those out first. If you're unfamiliar

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>with the prizes, we introduced them in the first episode.

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But hey, if you're here you just want to jump

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>right in. That's okay too, guys. We have already covered

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>liquid cats, cave bugs with swapped genitals, digeri do therapy,

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>crocodile gamblers, weird effects of twins taking selfies or just

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at their own faces, and then whether old man

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.319
<v Speaker 1>ears are big. I don't know if you can get

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>any weirder than that. And you know, before we get

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>into the categories, they do want to again point out

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Ignoble Prizes, they come out every year, they

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>put on by the publication the annals have been probable research.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I will include a link to their website on the

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>landing page for this episode Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Be sure to check them out. They are

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a publication. They put out a lot of great content

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>about cool, weird, and occasionally hilarious, well frequently hilarious uh

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>scientific studies. Uh. They're worth checking out. And we have

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to thank them, uh for putting out this content every year,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>drawing everyone's attention to these unique studies so that we

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>can highlight them. Yeah. Actually, and if you're really loving

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>these episodes and you want to know more, you can

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>watch their ceremony online when they gave the awards to

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>all these people for the articles we're talking about. You're

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a big fan, right. We're thinking of putting together a

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian singer commentary track. And as people know from past

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble episodes, I've watched them all the way through. I

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it this time. It's a little bit painful.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not my cup of tea when it comes

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to sense of humor. But I love the research that

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they pulled together. Yeah, alright, So what do we have

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for day? We have three left, one each to round

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>out the twenty seven Igno Bells. What's what's first, I think, Joe,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>we have you first with the nutrition prize. Let's talk

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>about vampire bats. Are they nutritious? They sure are delicious, delicious. Yeah.

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So there are three species of bats that are completely hematophagus,

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>meaning they can survive on blood as their only food.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>And these three species are des Modus rotundus, which is

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the common vampire bat. You'll find it all over Central

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and South America. Uh Diamus yungi, which is the white

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>winged vampire bat, and Diphila eco data, the hairy legged

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.839
<v Speaker 1>vampire bat. Now, all three of these actually you'll find

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in different parts of Central and South America. To survive

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on a diet of blood, these bats are equipped with

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>some pretty amazing equipment. They've got these razor sharp incisors

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and canines. And first what they do is they tend

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>to clip away the feathers or hair of their hosts.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>You get like a free hair cut out of it,

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and then puncture the flesh. So they get the sort

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of scissor like teeth to clip away feathers or hair.

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They get a hole in you. And then they've also

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>got this saliva laced with anticoagulants. So when they get

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it in the blood, it helps keep the blood flowing

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>instead of clotting. They're basically surgeons, really, I mean they're

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they're shaving the surface and then they're making the incision

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and using in Uh, they're basically drugging you so that

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel anything. We have a whole episode about

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>this actually about the physics of blood drinking as it

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.839
<v Speaker 1>relates to vampire bats and you know, also fictional vampires. Well,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>since you know that, you you guys probably know that

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't actually suck blood, but they sort of lap

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it up. Yeah, they let the blood pool and they

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lap it up, or they let it flow into the

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>blood funnels. The blood funnels on the tongue or the

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>roof of the mouth. So a blood based diet is

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a rare and highly specialized way for a mammal to

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>make a living. I would say it's like it's a

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>terrible way for a mamm living, Like it is a

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult life. There is a reason you don't see a

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of blood sucking mammals. It requires weird specific

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>behavioral and physiological adaptations that are not easily turned toward

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>other survival strategies. Basically, it's an extreme lifestyle. And and

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just imagining that like these bats at the X Games, Like, yeah,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that's extreme, bro right, Like I went all in on

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>learning how to rocket skateboard and I can't do anything else.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I never learned math, and now now I'm stuck with

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this is my career. Um so Hemata fagus bats are

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>not able to store body fat and generally can't survive

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>fasting more than a couple of days. And their bodies

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are also incredibly incredibly efficient at eliminating waste products from

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>their blood diets, such as urea and excess water. But

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>because of this elimination efficiency, they're also highly susceptible to dehydration.

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>It's hard being a vampire bat. Yeah. I remember in

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the episode of The Christian and I did we talked

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>which we extrapolated this to a humanoid vampire, and we're

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>basically describing this nos ferato like creature that would have

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to like barely drag itself into your room while you

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>were asleep and start feeding on you, and it would

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>be urinating at the same time. Uh and and and

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>basically in a state of constant dehydration because the bathroom

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>breaks everywhere. If I remember, I don't have the time

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>quantities in my head, but they can only do it

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>for a certain amount of time on specific animals before

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they're discovered, before you notice you've got one chomping on you,

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and so they have to like be real quick about it.

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And they only get like a little bit of blood

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>plasma with each feeding, so they could feed a lot.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that with a lot of these. It's typical that

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they can only get one host per night. So I

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>mean it's a it's a it's a rough way to

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>make a living. That's why they're also skinny and harry legged. Yeah,

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>always on the cover of magazines. Uh So, the first

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>two species I mentioned before are they find their blood

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in more diverse quarters, but the hairy legged vampire bat.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The third one I mentioned, Diphila eco data is known

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as a bird specialist. That means it makes its foraging

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>niche even tighter by surviving almost entirely or entirely on

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the blood of wild birds, unless maybe that is it

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>has to adapt. We'll see. So in the in this

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>study that got the ig Nobell from the journal Acta

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chiropter A Logica Bats, Yeah, authors Ferdinanda Ito Enrico Bernard

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and Rodrigo A. Torres set out to study the diet

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of diphila. This third bat I mentioned the wild bird

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>blood lapper in the habitat of the Katinga dry forest. Now.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>The Katinga is an ecoregion found in eastern Brazil, very

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>different from the wet tropical rainforest of the Amazon Basin.

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>The Katinga is this desert like region filled with dry,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>thorny trees and scrub vegetation. It's often referred to as

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like thorn forest, and some parts of this region have

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>been strongly disturbed in recent years by human activity, especially agriculture.

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>As always, human presence in and uh and and human

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>agriculture in an ecosystem can mess up local wildlife. So

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the researchers reasoned that you would be able to see

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this disturbance of wildlife through changes in the diet of

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>local vampire bats. If you move a bunch of farmers

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>into a patch of Katinga, driving out and hunting many

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the wild birds native to the area, would the

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>local diphila change their lifestyle or to praying on domestic mammals,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe in farms like cattle, goats, or pigs. Now here's

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a question for you guys. Let's say you want to

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>study what a bad eats. How do you figure that out?

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Follow bats around? Well, that's kind of hard to do,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and that maybe you made bat drones to chase something.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You go off the grid, man, I mean, I've seen

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>studies that that look at that behavior, and it generally

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>means you have to go where the prey hangs out

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have to just videotape the prey all night

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and then track what happens. But that would be assuming

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what the prey is. What if you want to find

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>out what the pray I imagine that you go through guano. Yep,

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there you go. So a common method of studying the

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>diet of a bat would be to study the shapes

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that appear in its poop. So, if it's a fruit

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>eating bat, you can look at the feces and see

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what kind of seeds and stuff like that you see.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>If it's an insectivorous bat, you can look for insect

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>body parts. But if you want to study the diet

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of a blood lapping bat, how do you do it? Yeah?

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>What is a vampire blood poop consist of? Well, I

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>mean it looks like soft poop. Yeah, it's soft poop.

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But like you can't identify what animal, Uh, some blood

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>came from just by looking at it in poop. So

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>enter DNA testing of guano. So you can use polymerase

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>chain reaction, which is known as PCR, the PCR technique

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on vampire bat feces to amplify fragments of degraded hosts

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>DNA in the feces and to turn rman what animal

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the digested blood came from. So that's what the researchers

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>did here. They collected fecal samples monthly from to January

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen from a cave occupied by a colony of Diphila ecadata,

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>which is the hairy legged vampire bat. The blood the

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>bird blood lappers, which was surrounded by many cattle ranches

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and subsistence farms with a lot of goats in particular

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in the area. So it's the situation where their natural prey,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the wild birds, have largely been driven out. You've got

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of agriculture and they're wondering, Okay, are these

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>things feeding on domestic mammals instead of the birds they

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>prefer in the wild. So they preserved all these fecal samples.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Then they did their molecular analysis to look for d

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>NA ques as to what species these bats have been

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>gorging themselves on. Researchers found DNA from two species, Gallus gallus,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the domestic chicken, and Homo sapetans, the domestic human being.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>These bats had been drinking human lud and this is

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>significant because while people have gotten bat bites before, this

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is the first known evidence of vampire bats consuming human

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>blood under natural conditions in the wild, and it contradicts

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the previous assumption that di Fila ecuadata would only drink

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the blood of wild birds. In previous experiments, this had

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>gone pretty far. For example, these bats have even refused

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to drink mammal blood when it was their only option

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in lab conditions. Given the choice between pig blood, goat blood,

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and nothing, they chose nothing. So the idea here was

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that they were birds specialists to the point that there

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was no going back, which is kind of the whole niche.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, the character of the vampire bat itself is

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's a creature that has chosen or chosen it is.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>It has gone down a very difficult road and it's

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>just making the best it can out of that to

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have those difficult circumstances. Yeah, and they can, and they

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>can specialize in different ways, Like rotundas drinks mammal blood,

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>but but ecudata does not drink mammal blood even when

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's got no other choice, except apparently when their habitat

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is disrupted and food sources are depleted, they'll make an exception.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Apparently not so much for goats or pigs, but for us.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is a consequence of our actions affecting their

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ecological area. Yeah, and I think it's interesting to wonder,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like why these would generally not go for other mammals,

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but they would find human blood acceptable. Probably got a

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of more plasma in it. It's all fat or

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>chicken chicken farmers taste taste like chicken. It could be. Now.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>One thing they found is that it looks like these

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bats cannot survive on mammal blood alone. So they can't

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>just drink human blood and survive their diet, right, so

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>they can survive on a mix of chicken blood and

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>human blood. Uh. And so that's pretty weird. But it

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder what other animals might decide we are

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>worth eating once we destroy their natural habitat and drive

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>out their natural prey, hippos. I think it's hippos that

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>we need to worry about the most. I believe you

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>guys brought up hippos recently, right first monsters, Yeah, yeah,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>watch out, they're gonna get you. It's harder to imagine, certainly,

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the hippo switching over like that. But I remember when

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>our in our episode on bats like that was part

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of the part of the really cool scientific theorizing is

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>how did vampire bats come to drink blood? And you

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>get into this situation of well, perhaps they were they

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>were cleaning up wounds of mega fauna, or they were

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>praying on parasites of megafauna. So you kind of get

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>into this position where the the the organism eventually just

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>cuts out the middleman. Why am I? Why am I

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>eating these these blood inflated ticks when I could just

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>drink the blood of the of the of the mammoth

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>or what have you. A. Right, it's big enough, it

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>won't notice. Yeah, that's interesting. So we ask our questions,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>why is it funny? Why is it important? Things are

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>always funnier when you explain why they're funny. Uh, this

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is funny because human blood is hilarious and why why

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is it important? Obviously, human incursion and into natural habitats

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>has consequences. We should think about what those consequences are.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting that, as far as I know,

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the people this blood came from have not been identified, Like,

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who this who the humans supplying these

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>bats with meals are, But these bats are drinking human blood.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Someone very anemic chicken farmer? Yeah? Um. I mean. The

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>other thing is it's funny because it's it's a hairy

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>legged bat. The hairy legged bat just sounds hilarious, harry

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>legged bat in the Henderson's all right, well, we're gonna

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, drink some blood, and then we'll

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>be right back for more ignobles. Thank alright, we're back.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're just talking about devouring blood, which sounds I mean,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat appetizing. Maybe not the best as are you guys

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>disgusted by the idea of drinking blood? I don't know.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have a blood funnel, why not

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>use it? Well, yeah, I mean it's certainly find for

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a vampire bat. I find that you Yeah, I find

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that the prospect kind of disgusting. I mean in the past,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I haven't been opposed to having pretty red meat,

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think once a year I'll have have some

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a steak that it has a fair

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of blood in it, but the idea of like

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>drinking it like scenes in movies where human drinks blood,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>like I'm thinking of. I think the movie Chronos and

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>also the vampire movie Habit both had scenes in which

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>someone drinks the juice out of a out of a

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>steak from the grocery store, you know where they like

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they drink, just drink the red liquid. We should clarify,

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not blood, that's myoglobin, that's right. So they're not

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>even doing it right, these poor vampires. So then related

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to how disgusting that is to you, how do you

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>feel about cheese? Oh, cheese is awesome. Is there any

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>cheese you guys won't eat? Um? Neither. I'm not a

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>big fan of cheese. Whiz well that's the products. I love.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>All cheese, even the really stinky cheese, blue cheese, goat cheese, feta,

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you name it. I love cheese. It's part of my

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a cheese addict. My favorite is the smoked accept

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>pic cheese that comes from sheep milk and zacapona poland

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's so good, It's really good. This next study is

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>all about people being disgusted by cheese and it is

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>called the Neural Bases of Disgust for Cheese and F

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>M R I study. Well, that does make me think

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>about how cheese is a is a largely cultural thing.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Like there are cultural cuisines that really do not include

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>cheese at all. Indeed, I mean you go to a

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Chinese restaurant, you're not going to find a lot of

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>cheese on the menu. Now that being said, I believe

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there are there are some regional Chinese cuisines that have

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>dairy products in them, some form of cheese. But about

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to put some shredded cheese on my

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>low mane, I wouldn't mind. It does sound kind of gross. Somehow,

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do anything Greeno style exactly everything. Well, I'd

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>ask Chinese listeners out there, do you find cheese revolting?

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Let us know, so that actually comes into play here,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>not specifically China, but regional you know, cultural tastes for cheese. Okay,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's coming up. But the researchers on this paper

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>were specifically interested in studying disgusted and discussed, as defined

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>by Charles Darwin in eighteen seventy two as a basic

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>emotion that's characterized by peculiar facial expressions, action of distancing

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>oneself from the offending object, and distinctive physiological manifestations like

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>nausea or revulsion. You know, I have to say that

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the cheese smell, and I'm I'm

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>very picky about this, Like I don't like people talking

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>about stinky cheeses, I because I think you're you're putting

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a label on it that is that is daring everyone

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to find other people. I mean, yeah, I like fragrant cheeses.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I realized that a lot of

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>people use the term stinky cheese um in a positive way,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>like that's a term of endearment for them. So I

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to judge your your language. No, it's just

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't really call them that either. It's just kind

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of what I've heard people who are disgusted by cheese

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>or first but but I have heard it used lovingly. Now.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I feel like that the specific

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>aroma of cheese. It is very contextual. So and I'm

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>even participated in sort of like mild studies of this,

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, the kind of thing that they'll

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>do it like World Science Festival where everybody smells a

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>tab of something. If you if you smell the cheese

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>smell while eating cheese, it feels perfectly natural. If you

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>smell the cheese smell while changing like your son's shoes,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of which I have encountered this, it's revolting because that's

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>not where it should be, right. Yeah, I think you

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>could even use just linguistic priming, Like if you smell

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>blue cheese while you're thinking about blue cheese and that's all,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it probably smells good. If you smell blue cheese and

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody calls it armpit cheese, I think that will probably

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>cause you to recoil. Now, another case where I see

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>something like this is with dury and fruit. Your fruit

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of smells like cheese, but a lot of people

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are really turned off by durian fruit because it is

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a fruit and it does not seem like it should

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>have this aroma. Yeah, I, as many of our listeners know,

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and you guys know, I grew up in Singapore Durian

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is quite popular the candy out of dry. Yeah, and

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was living over there, you could get dury

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and milkshakes from the McDonald's over there. No, I find

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>dury and gross multiple levels. It smells like you're into me.

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>But then also, have you ever like cut dury in before?

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a strange object. It's like this big spiny object

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and globes sort of. Yeah, when you open it up,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the insides of it look like the insides of a

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of a not a plant. It looks like a cow's

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>organs just spilled out of this thing. Well, I think

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it should be classified as an outdoor cheese fruit because

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't eat it indoors necessarily. And this is from me.

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>This is from a Western perspective that someone who hasn't

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>grown up with it and have a cultural appreciation for it.

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think I'm perfectly okay with it at an

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>outdoor scenario where I know that it is during Yeah, yeah,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. And if you want to experiment,

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth checking out as well. Try it.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing is, you guys actually just like

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>anecdotally talking about your your cheese experiences, just now hit

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of the points that we're going to

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>find in this study, because these researchers focused on sensory

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>factors and not just smell, and they also considered how

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>discussed can be a conditioned a version, So specifically, they

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>were looking at disgust of food and that was interesting

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to them because studies on food aversion are apparently rare,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and the reason why is because there's ethical issues associated

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with experimental induction of the gastro intestinal system. So if

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you cause somebody gastro intestinal pain as part of a

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>study and then you're trying to figure out if they're

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a you know, they have an aversion to that food,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>there's some ethical issues, so it's hard to get approval

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for studies that are designed to make people feel nausea. Yeah. Yeah,

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So they turned to cheese. Their first task was to

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>estimate what proportion of individuals are actually disgusted by cheese,

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and then they aimed to compare the brain activities of

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people with aversion to cheese with those who commonly eat cheese.

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And they used functional magnetic resonance imaging to do this

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and from now and I'll refer to that as f

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>m R. I their hypothesis was that several areas of

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the brain would be activated depending on if the participant

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was either pro cheese or anti cheese. And these people,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>these people were talking about here, whether they're pro or anti.

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>They claim to be able to detect cheese in a

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>room solely based on its odor. So they gathered a

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty five French men and a hundred and

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven French women using newspaper ads and flyers. Then

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they asked these people to complete a questionnaire evaluating just

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>general food items, and they broke them up into multiple

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>groups of fifteen which were either pro cheese or anti

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>cheese groups. There were anti cheese French people. It really

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>breaks the stereotype. This is important to this study and

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>surprising right. The groups were matched in age, and the

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>participants were checked for ola factory impairments and detection ability.

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So for stimuli, they used six cheese varieties blue cheddar goat,

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>gre air, parmesan, and then is it pronounced tomay? I'm

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>not I don't know this one. Actually don't know that cheese.

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it either, but it's t O M

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>m e, so maybe that's a French cheese. Were unaware

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of over here, they diluted these cheeses the odorance of

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>them in mineral oil down to ten percent in volume,

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and then five million liters of that solution was absorbed

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>into a squeeze bottle with a dropper. Then they used

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>an airflow old factometer to deliver a continuous stimuli that

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>was synchronized with the person's breathing through a standard oxygen mask.

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>These participants could provide five logic signals with their hands,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>so they had like a little like controller uh and

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>it basically indicated how pleasant or unpleasant their experience was.

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And they also had their behavioral responses measured, their stimulation

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>onset measured, and then the trigger signals were measured from

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the m r I that was recording them. They first

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>tested this out while these people were in what they

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>called the hunger state with normal food odors, not just cheese,

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and then again with odor, and then pictures followed up

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by them. So they wanted to see if like is

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the odor accompanied by visual going to make a difference

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>here the hunger state. What they meant here was that

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>these people had only had a light breakfast of either

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>tear coffee and just one single slice of bread, and

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the researchers hypothesized that the anti cheese subjects would answer

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>far more quickly than the pro cheese subject because they

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>knew they disliked cheese. Okay, here's what their findings were.

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>That a higher proportion of people who disliked cheese existed

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>than other food categories. It was thirty six point nine

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>percent of the people they studied disliked cheese. Some of

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>these people reported that they had family particularity with cheese.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that meant that up to six family members

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>related to them also disliked cheese. The other foods that

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>received low scores were mainly because of dietary habits, and

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting like vegetarianism. So for instance, back to

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>our thing, if you're a vegetarian and they missed a

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>steak ooze into your face, you might have had a

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>bad reaction to that in the same way some of

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>these people did with cheese. Okay, But there was no

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>significant difference observed between the two groups, the pro cheese

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>and the anti cheese when they were just stimulated by

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>odors only. So if they had cheese blasted in their face,

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a difference. But if they had cheese blaster

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in their face and they saw pictures of the cheese,

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>then there was a difference. So visual reference seems to

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be really important here, and that kind of ties back

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to what you guys were talking about earlier, right, like

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing. If it's your son's shoe and it

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>smells like cheese, that's gonna make a big difference. Right.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So what's interesting here is this goes against reports that

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>odor has an emotional impact on memory, and it actually

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>suggests that odor on its own is insufficient to trigger

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>disgust reactions. Perhaps what's going on here is it's the

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>subject conception of cheese rather than the actual sensory properties

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of cheese that give it a disgusting value. That's odd, yeah,

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. It's kind of you know, I have to

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>say when when I am smelling my sun's shoe and

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it smells like cheese, I mean, I'm kind of giving

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>it away right there. I am interpreting the smell is

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that of cheese in a place where cheese should not be.

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that should not be the monster. Whereas

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>if I was thinking of it more appropriately, you know,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>what if I was thinking of what I am actually

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>smelling Without bringing cheese into the scenario, it would be

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it would be a different experience altogether. Yeah, yeah, absolutely,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're talking about. So that was just

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>like their behavioral observations. Then they looked at these f

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>m R eyes and they showed that there was a

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>stronger activation of the g P I slash GPE and

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>s N areas of the brain in people who dislike cheese.

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So okay, that kind of went along with it. They

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that they would you some you know, reactions there.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>They also found that a lack of desire to eat

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>cheese was associated with a lack of activation in the

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>VP area, which is a core brain structure in incentive motivation.

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So subsequently they proposed that the motivation related activation in

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>our brains is suppressed in people who are anti cheese

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>because of their disgust for cheese, that just in general,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>they won't be motivated, so your brain doesn't get turned on. Yeah,

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>don't get it now. And it's not just about the cheese,

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's about anything else that's around you. Yeah, so here, okay,

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys were talking about France and how this is

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird, right, Yeah, their survey showed six percent

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the French population dislikes cheese more than any other

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>food category. That's way lower than their finding of thirty

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>six point nine percent in the lab. So they're like,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, what's going on. This especially interesting because

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>here in France, the country has the greatest variety of

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>cheeses in the world and has the highest level of

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>cheese consumption in the world. I think of France's cheese

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>cheese City, USA, like, I've never visited France, but I

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>know that if I get to one day, I will

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>eat a lot of cheese. Yeah, the world. So this

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating. It seems that like more people actually are

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>repulsed by the smell and visuals of cheese than report

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>they are. There's something going on here. They also found

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty of the people who said they dislike cheese dislike

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>cheese in all of its forms. It's not like they're

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>just like I don't like blue cheese. These sixty just

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like any cheese. Eighteen percent of the people who

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>said that they had a milk intolerance, so that makes sense.

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So in conclusion, they found that a higher than expected

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>proportion of individuals are disgusted by cheese to the point

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that they can't eat it. So this is interesting. There's

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>way more people at least in this study and in France.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We have to obviously do this culturally in different areas,

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but the disgust seems to be actually encoded into the

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>brain and can subsequently suppress an individual's other motivations. You know,

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how smelling cheese affects gambling behavior. There you go, right,

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you make people inhale the smell of blue cheese while

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gambling. You see what happens. So okay, why why

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>is this ignoble funny? Well, of course the idea of

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>people breathing in cheese and other smells they hate is

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of amusing, right, especially like they've got these oxygen

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.959
<v Speaker 1>masks on. Right, it's the d natured version of it.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>That's even funnier that they like had to extract cheese

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>odor and pump it into their faces. Yeah, they could

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>have just put them in a mascot cost him and

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>they would have had the same effect. But but it

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>also cheese is inherently funny. The word cheese has that, Like,

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there have been studies that have pointed

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this out that or at least there. It has been

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that the funnier words, uh, the most humorous

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>words in the English language, you're going to have the

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>chu uh kind of a sound of the sound is

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like clown cheese, clown cheese. That's innately. I

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder what pennymizes cheese smells like, Yeah, I wouldn't want

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that cheese Texas chainsaw mask or nine clown cheese. Well,

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they had cheese. It plays into that a lot. That's

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>probably so. But why is this study important? Well, it's

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what I said earlier, because it's really rare to find

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>individuals who have the same type of food discussed. So

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to find that like thirty basically thirty seven percent of

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the population dislikes this one specific food is important. But

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>also it's really difficult to study this without triggering gastro

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and testinal problems. So they found a way to do

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this without like actually inflicting harm on these people. So

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's my cheese report. Why don't we take one more

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>break and then when we get back, Robert's got our

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>last ig Nobel study for us. All right, we're back,

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So we have one left, and it is the obstetrics Prize.

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>He guys, ready for this, bring it forth into the world. Alright,

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to read you the title of the paper,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and in doing so, I'm going to answer the question

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>why the the Ignoble Prize committee found this funny. The

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>title is fetal facial expression in response to intro vaginal

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>music in mission. Oh music, emission, Yes, that is. I

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think emission should be the verb for music. Shouldn't

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it be like playing or well, wait, let's see if

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we can guess what this is about without having so Okay,

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to guess that this is looking at the

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>faces of fetus in utero. As you're I don't know,

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you put like a bluetooth speaker up against like the

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>belly of the mother or something like that. Well, let's

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you are not taking the premise far enough. Okay. Yeah,

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this sounds like a speaker is inserted through the vagina

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to play for the fetus in utero and then they

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>measure the fetus is face all expressions somehow exactly. Yeah,

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the basic idea here is that if music

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>has an effect on the fetus, then and this is

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just like playing music outside of the body or touching

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the speaker to the belly. Uh, then wouldn't it make

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.719
<v Speaker 1>more sense to get the speaker closer to baby and

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then baby will react even more. Sounds like somebody's trying

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to sell a product. I was gonna say, is there

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a specific speaker that is built for this? Am I

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just woefully unaware of this? Yeah, as the as the

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble Prices point out, there was, there was a patent

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>filed in and you can currently buy a product called

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>baby Pod if you look them up, go to the

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>baby Pod website. They even proudly have their Ignoble Prize

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like stamp of approval there to sell the product. I

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have a look on my face right now that thirties

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of people in France have when they sent paches. Well, well,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the into the study, let's get into

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the science, and maybe it'll it'll change your mind a

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So studies have found that fetuses can hear

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds from the side world while in the womb. They

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>can even learn to recognize words in the in the womb,

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and they can retain memories from this time after birth.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So into a two thousand thirteen University of Helsinki study

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>published in p os one found it playing music while

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:20.239
<v Speaker 1>you're pregnant may influence your child's auditory system. It's just

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just this this one study. But but building up here.

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>According to a two thousand fourteen Max Playing Institute study,

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>from twenty eight weeks that's the start of the third

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>trimester and pregnancy onward, the heart rate of the fetus

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>changes when it hears a familiar song, and from thirty

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>five weeks on there is, uh, there's even a change

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in its movement patterns. So the fetus is dancing in

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way. And if yeah, basically you're you're stimulating

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the fetus, you're providing auditories, uh stimuli, and it is reacting.

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Based on you know, my conversations with my friends who

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have been pregnant, this doesn't sound surprising to me, Like

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>people believe that there the fetus in utero can hear

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>music like while they'red that Like we react to music too, yeah,

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at that stage, I mean, yeah, obviously, yeah, yeah, I

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>mean you see a lot of this book playing music

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for the fetus and then of course playing music for

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the baby, for the infant. Once four friends who are

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>very specific about like what the playlists were that they

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>played for their kids, and like, like Brian Eno, I

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think was like a really big thing. Well, okay, I

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot of this relates to the parents, Like, yeah,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>if if you're having to deal with the newborn baby

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>or the stress of paranacy, imagined some soothing ambient music

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is great. I thought you were going to say a

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of black flag so that's why I'm not allowed

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to have kids now, I imagined a number of you

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>were thinking about the so called Mozart effect here. Uh

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to remind everyone, this was proposed, and this was proposed

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in a science journal paper. Um, and the ideas they

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>play classical music, specifically Mozart for a child, and it's

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have give them cognitive benefits. I remember hearing

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that people were questioning the mot There has been a

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of questioning. Uh. So, first of all, everyone has

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to remember that the effect in question in the original paper,

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's stemmed from the study of teen students, not babies,

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>not fetuses. And plus the effect in question was merely

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>an increase in performance on a specific spatial imagery task

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and it only lasted for a few minutes. So for

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the most part, the Mozart effect is largely dismissed as

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a myth. That being said, again, if you were to

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>play music for a fetus, which undoubtedly, again it's audio

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.919
<v Speaker 1>audio stimuli that generates a response, and uh, and there

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>are situations where that is certainly beneficial. Wouldn't they hear

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>it better if you put the speaker closer to the fetus.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's where this study comes in. I'm going to

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>read from you this is the the what I think

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty straightforward approach. Quote. The main aim of

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this study was to analyze fetal response to an acoustic

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>stimulus emitted by a device which, due to its location

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and characteristics, might provide better sound intensity and quality. To

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that end, we used a device specifically designed to emit

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a melody or vibration from inside the mother's vagina. This

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>location is closest to the fetus, so there are fewer

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>obstacles to attenuate the acoustic waves. The secondary objective was

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to identify quantifiable fetal movements that could be associated with

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the acoustic stimulus. So you know, they're not getting into

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>any situation here. You know, Can we pipe music into

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the womb and make babies smarter, et cetera. This is

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.720
<v Speaker 1>very much based on just stimulating the fetus with sound

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and or vibration. This is not a prelude to super

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>babies baby genuses too well, in a way, it's maybe

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a prelude to that, but but it's not intentionally a

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>prelead to that in thing. So these are the findings

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 1>quote at present, our data appears to suggest to interpretations

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that intravaginal application with fewer obstacles could be more effective

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and transmitting music to the fetus, and that the feet

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>might perceive these higher frequencies at an earlier age than

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>reported to date. Now, Robert, you mentioned a product earlier.

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I assume we're getting to that here. Yes, I mentioned

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the baby Pod, which I've seen with a price tag

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of around a hundred and thirty three dollars, And it

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a speaker device you can plug into any

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>musical device. You can plug it into your phone, MP

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>three player speaker with the appropriate jack, turn table, yeah, turntable,

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>what you can get a DJ out there. It's a

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>an an FDA approved device. Uh, and it's sold with

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea that will quote stimulate vocalization for babies with music.

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So oh interesting, Okay, Yeah, so it's it's going beyond

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this study and picking up on some of the results

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of other studies that it made the argument that exposing

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the unborn child to music will help in the the

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>development of vocalization. Got it so that they'll try to

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like make accompanying noises? Yeah, okay. One of the things

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>here is that we are getting into the realm if

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>not only like parenting science, but parenting advice. And I mean,

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>even when something has a scientific has a scientific basis

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to it, uh, it's often hard to really sort through

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it all. I get the feeling that in parenting advice

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and parenting in general, there is a whole lot of

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>overinterpretation of tenuous scientific results. That that is the that

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>is what I get from my experience with it. And

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>then of course, on top of that, there are a

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people with very firm ideas of like what

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is good parenting and what is bad parenting? And um,

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.479
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not always it's generally not as simple

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>as that for the most part. That being said, you know,

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what may or may not be the benefits,

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I can definitely see, you know, there's a benefit of

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>connecting with one's growing child like this. You know that

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you're that you're you're playing music and you can see

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a response. You know, there's something kind of magical about that.

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>UM as far as cognitive benefits go, I think that's

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that's something that if we were to talk about it here,

0:37:58.120 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to discuss it in more detail and draw

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in more studies. But there have been a lot of

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>studies conducted about this. Uh, it's just difficult to really

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>boil it down to you know, just a few minutes now.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I would do want to drive already hit on why

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>this is funny obviously, but as to why it's important, well,

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>there is one one potential takeaway here that has nothing

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to do with playing baby a song or you know,

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Mozart music for babies and so so forth, and that

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is that the researchers argue that the technology could also

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be used to evoke arousal responses of the fet is,

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to stimulate movements, to facilitate and shorten obstetric ultrasound examinations.

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here is you're you're you're trying to

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:42.760
<v Speaker 1>evoke responses and the feet is to determine its health.

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you could reach the baby, you know, more

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>easily and perhaps earlier, through this method, then there there

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>would there might be a reason to just to use

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it across the board. Yeah, well that's definitely got some

0:38:56.200 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>applications that are very important. Uh, you know what, Like now,

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>now I'm thinking of all these kinds of like ways

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>in which like further research needs to be done. Like

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what midwives would have to say about this,

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>given their like, you know, experience and matters. And I

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>would be very interested to hear from anyone who's tried

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>out the baby pot or or if there's another similar device,

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and just hear from you what your experiences were. Yeah. Well,

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the best way to do that, although if you want

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to do it privately, this might not be the best way.

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>But one way to do that is to reach out

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to us on social media and you could do that

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, or Instagram. What you could do

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is also go to our website where there's lots of

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>potential music to play for babies on their why because

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Robert blog posts all the time about space music. Yeah,

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>there's some eto in there. Yeah, definitely some good ambience

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>selections for baby. DJ food for the unborn. Yeah, um,

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know there was what's the name there was an

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>early synth guy that I've covered on there before that

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>actually they did. There's like a compilation of his work

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for babies and well like or at least I can't

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>recall the artist stuff hand. I'm sure it'll come to

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>me later. Hey, and Enforced. If you'd like to get

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us directly, as always, you can email

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>us at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Does it how stuff works dot com