WEBVTT - How A Profane Subreddit Moved The Market

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd LODs podcast.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy alliwit Uh, Tracy. It

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>really feels like, from a market's perspective, this is the

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>closest we've been lately to uh sort of two thousand

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and eight financial crisis vibes well since the financial crisis,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you say? I would say so, and I would

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly say the statistics back you up. Biggest weekly sell

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.319
<v Speaker 1>off since the financial crisis. We've just seen, right right,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>massive sell off and risk assets, an extraordinary amount of

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>repricing of expectations for central banks all around the world

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to come in and intervene. And we've had other periods

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of sort of semi crisis, um uh since the Great

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Financial Crisis, during periods to say the Eurozone, but it's

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>just never felt as extremely uncertain as it does right now.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I sort of remember late two thousand fifteen.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I mean late two thousand and fifteen you

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>had all the issues going on with credit and you

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>had one big fund blow up. So I'm still waiting.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm still waiting for the second order effects of the

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>market sell off that we've seen to emerge. That's true,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Like we haven't actually seen any sort of major liquidations

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>or institutions of various size like truly go bust yet

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>amid the volatility. Obviously nobody, uh, you know, we're not

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>hoping that that happens. For now. It's mostly been like

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a sort of markets reaction. But as you say, there

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really been a second order effect just yet. Ye,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>very true. So obviously the coronavirus is um you know,

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the leer contributing factor. It's people are gripped, my panic

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all around the world. It started in China late last

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>year and now it seems to be spreading to countries

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>basically everywhere. But I also think that there is another

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>contributor to the top. It's not just the virus that

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>caused the top. Well, I mean, the virus didn't cause

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the top. The virus was the catalyst for the top

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to no longer be the top and for markets to

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>sell off. But but what are you thinking about, Joe, Well,

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously it's our recent Business Week cover story

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that our colleague Luke Cowo wrote about when the bull

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>market got weird and uh about all these traders and

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>online forums making crazy big beds, and I think in

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>retrospect many people will see the recent cover as what

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>really did the bull market in? Yeah, it was good timing,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but in the history of of market crashes, people always

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>go back and sort of look for retail investors who

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>start to become really overconfident. Some people actually look at

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>retail investor participation in the market as evidence of the

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>top coming. And so some of the behavior that we

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have seen embodied in places like um what Luke was

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Uh, you could maybe see that as an

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>indication that markets were a little frothy. Yeah. So for

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>those who actually haven't been paying attention to this particular subplot,

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>which is probably most people, because there's bigger things going

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on in the world. Over the last several weeks, prior

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to this extreme bout of selling in volatility that we saw,

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of attention paid to the behavior

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of people on a certain Internet web page or chat

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>room or message board, whatever you want to call it,

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in which there was an extreme subreddit. It was on Reddit,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>an extreme level of speculative activity, particularly the options market,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the likes of which we haven't really seen, arguably since

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the glory days of the Ahoo message boards back during

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble, and it's a really fascinating story.

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really uh interesting look at how the markets work,

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>um and how retail players can really make a dent

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>in publicly publicly listed equities. Yeah. So this is the

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>thing that I find the most fascinating about this sub breddit.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It's called Wall Street bets, and in recent months or

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>over the past year or so, a lot of the

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>people on it don't just think that they found good

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ways to make money through investing in the market. They

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>think that they found a good way to sort of

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>force the market into or force the market to do

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted to do. So they actually think that

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they're impacting how Wall Street functions and pushing up the

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>stock price. And that's where it gets really really interesting.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Are they in fact having this impact on the market? Right?

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And I remember the message boards, the Raging Bull message

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>boards Silicon Investor Yahoo message boards from nine and two

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and I think they were far less ambitious than

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>what people are doing uh these days. So for more,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for more on this, let's start by bringing in uh

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's own Luke Kala, who did have the cover story

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that cursed the market overall. Uh luke, thanks for joining us.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, it just basically describe what it

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was that was worth covering here about this uh about

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this subread Well, I think for so long we've been

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the return of the retail investor, and you know,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>it's been this kind of long awaited thing that's never

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>really happened throughout any time during this bullmarket. And this

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like the be careful what you wish

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>for story, because what became quite interesting is how you

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>were seeing retail enthusiasm get to express in the markets.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>And so I remember there was one day, it was

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>January eight, and this is when Tesla was still below

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, if you can imagine a day in which

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that existed. But it was a Wednesday, and you saw

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bidding for the Tesla seven hundred strike

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>call options that would expire at the end of that week.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Tesla had already been up like that week, as was

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>its want earlier this year. But it just seemed like

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>this is this is such a ridiculous bet. Why would

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone do this? This doesn't make sense as a hedge.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>There's got to be a better way to express a

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.559
<v Speaker 1>hedge if you're you know, if you're short the stock

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>or if you sold calls like what's going on here?

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And someone said, you know, this is just a yolo bed.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And the second I heard, you know, yolo bed, I

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>went to Wall Street bets and tried to see what

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>what they were in. You only live once, why not

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>make a huge exactly? And you know when I when

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I went there, I saw you know a lot of

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>people just uh that were seemingly enjoying a lot of

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>success on Tesla. And then that spiral to kind of

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>other story stocks where they, you know, thought the it

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>would do nothing but go up and up and up.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Virgin Galactic is the you know, the

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>next example. Plug Power another one that had its kind

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of time and the headlights, and then lumber Liquidators is

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one I find very interesting because it's not like it's

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>not that fun of stock, like Lumber Liquidators compared to

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Virgin Galactic, compared to Plug Power, like it's it's really

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to wrap an enthusiastic you know, big story around it. Uh.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And yet you know a lot of the ones of

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the three ones I've lastlisted, they have in common. It's

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively low float relatively high amount of short interest. So

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>when you got a group of people together, that thought,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we're all interested in the same thing,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and if we are all kind of you know, combining

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>buying power, where can it have an impact. Well, in

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>names like this, it can. And you were seeing at

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>least the volumes go up like crazy in it. Uh,

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it became too much to call it coincident, coincident timing,

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or coincidence after a certain amount of time, So luke

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to things here. Can you walk us through exactly what

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the options trading strategy was here, because you know, Joe

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of alluded to this in the intro.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't just that they could push the stock up.

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>It was that they could actually exploit a loophole in

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the way certain financial contracts or Wall Street actually works

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to make the stock go up. And then secondly,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>would you say that Wall Street bets is representative of

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the average retail investor? So on the on the first part,

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the and this this relates to I'm not sure if

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>if people actually believe this or this just becomes a

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, very happy supporting evidence and something that makes

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you feel a lot better about making your moon shot

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at the you know, the fact that someone might be

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>there to help accentuated and help bail you out. So

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the thinking here is that when you like, say you're

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>buying a call option on on the other side of that,

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's a fresh option, there's going to be a dealer,

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and dealers are not in the business of taking directional exposure.

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So when they're selling that call, what are they doing.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>They're also you know, buying a certain amount of stock

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to hedge their exposure. That's called delta hedging. And as

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if the stock does continue to go up from there,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it you know, resetting your delta hedge your which would

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>be kind of gama hedging, but it's really just resetting

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>your delta hedge would entail that as the stock goes up,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you would be required to kind of buy more and

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more to make sure that your directional exposure to the

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>stock hasn't changed. So when we describe this dynamic, when

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the Tesla calls, the testas see

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one thousand straight calls, and I believe late January, someone

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit latched onto this and said, you know, l

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>O L. Bloomberg is admitting that the stock can only

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>go up if we continue to buy calls because of

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the hedging algorithms, which is, you know, it's it's very

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>much an overstatement of of what can actually happen. Can

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I just step in real quickly, because you mentioned delta

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>hedging and gam hedging and all this stuff just for

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>people who need a little bit of time to catch up,

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>walk us through very simply. The idea is people buy

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of call options. The dealer who sells it,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sells the call options, are then on the hook if

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the call options essentially are become in the money right,

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and so in order to avoid that risk of having

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay out a big wager, just like a casino,

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they have to sort of balance their own books, and

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that requires them to purchase the underlying stock. Yeah, dealers

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>are trying to make money from from the bid ask

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>spread and making you pay both sides of it during

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>your transaction. They're not in the business of really making

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>sure that or or hoping that tesla goes down. They'd

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>like to be, you know, cover their butts in all

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>contingencies in all cases. So that's what's kind of going

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on there, and it's just you know, with some Greek

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>letters surrounding it. But that's the that's the basic kind

0:10:55.880 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of scenario and mechanism you described perfectly. So trying to

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>exploit the fact that dealers are big banks on Wall

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Street need to maintain a neutral position when they're writing

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all these contracts doesn't strike me as something that your

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>average retail mom and pop investor is really doing. So

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is Wall Street beats a little bit different? I'd say

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot more aggressive about certain tactics being

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>used and the kind of the hurting behavior. I don't

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>think the average retail trader is really trying to think of. Okay,

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like if I get together with Jim down the street,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Marry across the road, who I play

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>bridge with, if we really get together and start, you know,

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>stockpiling our potential buying power that we can kind of,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe maybe lift some bids here, maybe get

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>some dealers offside, maybe cause some kind of a gamma chase. So, yeah,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>it does seem from that from that point of view,

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sophisticated and ambitious than you know, some

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>people others speculating options might be. On the other hand,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>just because it sounds more sophisticated, doesn't mean, it's a

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>our strategy doesn't make what's being said more true, because

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if we've learned anything about kind of the recent market dynamics,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>presuming you are the only actor in the market and

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>able to move it is kind of it's it's a

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fool's errand. And that's why you know, if some if

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there's power out there too to buy all these options,

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to recognize it. On the other side of it,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be uh, potentially a desire to sell,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen you know, a lot of selling pressure

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>come into the market that's completely overwhelmed whatever retail buying.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>The markets probably, I mean the markets kind absolutely clover

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>rejuice to your article came out and presumably if you

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>had been buying a bunch of call options ahead of that,

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you are one is not doing particularly well this week

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>with that strategy. Yeah, Like we we saw a bunch

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of ten thousand percent updates for a lot of these

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>mood shot options, but most out of the money and

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>very low delta options are going to expire worthless. It's

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>just the kind of the name of the game. Okay.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So on that note, in addition to having Luke join

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>us for our episode. Today we have another guest. Luke

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>has said, uh set the stage, but we actually have

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the founder of the subreddit Wall street Bets joining us now,

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Ugazinski. He uh founded the page, got it launched

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>in twelve. Jamie, Thank you very much for joining us.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. Okay, so I want to

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously get to everything that Luke talked about and this

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of crazy phenomenon and force in the market that

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall street Bets has become. But you started it in

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>what was the purpose? What? What do you're like, Okay,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start a new page on Reddit called Wall

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>street Bets. What what were you thinking? Well, I mean

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>back when I started it, I was looking for a

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>forum where we can discuss high risk trades, um work

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>into day trading, or high risk or active investing. All

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the forums that I found on my both on Reddit

0:13:54.720 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and off wridit we're traditional, diversified, long term, long time

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>time horizon type investing, and so I since I couldn't

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>find find it, I decided to found Wall Street Bets

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and has evolved a bit from what they originally intended,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but that was the original idea behind it. Can you

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>describe the Wall Street. That's demographic like who is your

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>average user on Wall Street bets? And why are they

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on that subpreddit versus something like the investing subreddit. So

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the I don't actually have access to the specific demographics,

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to take a very educated guest and

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>say it's going to be mostly males young probably eighteen uh.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously there are old enough to open a

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>brokerage account and and have enough of an income so

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that they can, um they make the type of bets

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're trying to make. And why are they hanging

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out on Wall Street bets? I mean, for I have

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>various reasons or various ideas as to why they I

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>want to be doing it, but for uh, probably similar

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>motivations that got me in the first place. Right, I

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was single at the time, out of disposable income, had

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a reason to be a little bit more aggressive. When

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when people are older and they have a family and

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to be a little bit more cautious, well

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>defin whally they want to start taking um more of

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a precautious person to investing. But when they're younger, thing

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>can afford to take the risks, and so you know,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>all Street Bets is a place where what we welcomes

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that type of behavior, and the welcome welcomes the type

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, on some capacity it's aggressive investing, active investing,

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, oftentimes it's straight of gambling. So um,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd say it's people that are just in that demographic

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're looking to make some quick money. Yeah, we

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't really talked about this aspect. But in addition to

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the demographic, and you mentioned people who are willing to

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>take more risk, there's a certain like Wall Street Bets mindset.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And I've been reading the page off and on for

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>several years, and it's not it's not only that it

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like there is a high degree of sort of

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>like risk taking or thrill seeking. There seems to be

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>also like a certain amount of nihilism associated with it,

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in which people seem just as excited to massochism. To

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>people seem just as excited about posting screenshots of them

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>losing a hundred thousand dollars or losing a fortune in

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a single day, um, as they are as excited about

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>making a bunch of money. There's a lot of egging

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>people on to take more and more risks. What talk

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to us about that mindset, just the sort of the

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>thrill seeking, massochistic, nihilistic aspect that we see on Wall

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Street Bets and why you think that's that emerges. I'm

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure necessarily that I've people egging people on to

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>take on more risk. I think that the peer pressures

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly exists. Uh, you know, I see where you're coming out,

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but I have have yet to see somebody to say, oh,

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you should increase your possession position. I think

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a peer PRESSU your type scenario that

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>people try to maybe just attention. People want to impress

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>each other, right, is that kind of what you're saying,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>They just want to be cool and impress each other

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for to who took the wildest riscue. Yeah, it would

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>probably be more of motivation like that. But um, you know,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as far as the massacre is, I think it's more

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a very honest forum. Right. If you go outside

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street Bets, for you know, you go on

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or finn Twitter, you go any of the other areas,

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of people that have just these

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>huge egos that show these really impressive trading track records.

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, look at my fancy car that I'm driving.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, check out this impressive statistics for

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>my uh, you know, trading history and whatnot. And so

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you you have these glorified people that it's almost impossible

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>to become them, whereas in Wall Street, bets are just

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>very honest with each other and to say no, no, houn,

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to actually recreate what they're talking about

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in some cases statistically very improbable. Some people obviously can

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>do it, but most people cannot. I'm the statistics also

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>backed that up. People who want to actively beatreud most

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>of them to. So I think that it's more of

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>an honest approach to it, where they say, okay, I

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm likely going to lose money into it,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>so let's just be honest about this. Let's let's not

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>try and pretend that I'm something that I'm not. And

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and I think it's would celebrate it is more

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the honesty behind that more so then hey, check it out, guys,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I lost a lot of money. Go ahead and give

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>me some some up votes. In karma, it's hey, guys,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>look I try this. I put my money online. I

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>said this was gonna happen, and I failed and so

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>people celebrate that follow up honesty and they say, wow,

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a genuine conversation that we're having. So I

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's more the motivation that that you and it

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>comes off more as the celebratory law. I mean, i'd

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>agree totally in my in my time very good because

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, thinking about all of these stocks that were

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, going up, there's there are people on all

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>street that's going, no, no, I'm I'm selling Tesla calls,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing I'm doing this, I'm doing that, and then

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>you'd see them come back, you know, a week, two

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>weeks later and go okay. So yeah, all those positions

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about earlier, I'm getting completely completely host.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know how much I'm going to

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>get host in the future. Here's the other strikes. I'm

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>short out of the money, have fun ruining my life

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>type of thing. But it's it's very much a an unpretentious,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>honest conversation and it's, uh, it is refreshing for those

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>who have spent uh, you know, their their lifetimes are

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 1>most of their waking hours on finance Twitter. But you know,

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on the on the other side of things, the there

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the degree of you know, kind of willingness to go

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in with no information. On the other hand, the I

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think the best example would be, you know, one person posting,

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know what I don't know what

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>options are, and I don't know what l L is,

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>but I'm up ten thousand this morning and thank you.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This is my lunch break, coming on to post it.

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. And then you know one person going,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, what the hell can you expect? It's

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lumber liquid it or they liquidate lumber. It's right there

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in the name, and uh yeah, it's it's fun, it's entertaining,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's definitely it's definitely a different scene from what

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been used to on the internet. Right. One can

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>never admit on finance Twitter that they made a mistake,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>but on Wall Street Bets, it's almost a badge of

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>honor if you have this big loss. Jamie, you actually

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book about Wall Street bets. And this is

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna sound really condescending, but I thought it was surprisingly

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful and kind of earnest, which wasn't what I was

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>expecting because the subredit itself tends to be the sarcastic, jokey,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>macho place. But there was this one chart in your book,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and it shows robin Hood account openings alongside the growth

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of users on the Wall Street Bets subbredit. Can you

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the importance of this new crop

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of online brokers or the dynamics in the brokerage industry

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>currently in fueling Wall Street bets. Yeah, I mean to

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, when when I came up with

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that chart, I was not expecting that. I was very

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>surprised and uh and even more so surprised when I

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>broke down that chart a little bit further. So I'll

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>first describe that chart. What I did is I superimposed

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the growth of Wall Street bets since the inception of

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood. Uh, you know, the growth in terms of subscribers,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the growth of users of robin Hood, and

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>those lines were pretty much right on top of each other,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the growth right on part of the

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>correlation was very easy to see. And the the what

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was even more surprising was, I think it was around

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen, if I'm not mistaken, robin Hood introduced

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>stock options as part of their offering, the product offering

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>to their users, and they saw a very steep change

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in their growth, they ended up having a dramatic increase

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>um and users and Wall Street bets had the exact

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>same slope change, right, So the the adoption or increase,

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and so you know it does ask the questions, Okay,

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>what is there a correlation here? And I obviously, I

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>mean it's hard to um repeat those because both of

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>those numbers are big enough to distally significant. I think

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the proliferation of not just robin Hood, but just all

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>these low commissions now zero commission burke ridges are making

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>lowering the barriers to entry for pretty much anyone and

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>all the even traditional brokers. I mean I'm talking merrit

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Trade and Charles Schwab and even Vanguard is now offering

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>stock options, Vanguard being the holy grail of you know,

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>stafe ets for index fund uh the type investing. Right. So,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have all these brokers making it

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>really cheap, lowering the barriers to entry. Have a lot

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of let's call them younger people, are people that have

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>they want to enter this market with less money or

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>or want to even experiment. Maybe they have them on

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>even maybe they just want to play with less now

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're able to do so. Anyone that wants to

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>play with it just by definition would want to find

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a way to experiment. And I think that experimenting with

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a place that has more aggressive or more diverse type

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of conversations of different types of security is more more

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so than just the stock stock options. We don't talk

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about cryptocurrencies very much on the Wall Street Bets, so

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously that's also part. I'm glad you mentioned cryptocurrencies

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>because when you talked about the honesty of Wall Street

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bets reminded me of an important point I saw someone

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>make with your that there are a lot of similarities

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>between this sort of like casino options betting that you're

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing now on Wall Street Bets and the crypto craze,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>especially of late. But the differences, to me one is

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that you guys seem fundamentally more honest, because I remember

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and all the people going crazy for crypto, we're also

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to pretend that they like understood something about the technology,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>or like, oh, we're like building some really important decentralized

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>system here, or we're gonna like run to all these Uh,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a really important smart contract platform

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>upon which all these apps can be built and stuff

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 1>like all they're gambling was couched in the language of

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>technological innovation, whereas it seems like you're gambling is couch

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to the language of gambling fundamentally just way more truthful

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and honest than cryptos right there in the names. But

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you a little bit more about

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the sort of mentality because I think the tagline on

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the page is like if the if the Bloomberg terminal

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>met forte and message boards or something like that, and

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>there is you know, it's extremely crude. It's extremely uh

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>politically incorrect, to say the least. Uh. There's a lot

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of people who like refer to each other using homophobic

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>slurs and other things that we have to edit out

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever we do an article or talk about a comment

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>on the page. So I'm just like sort of curious, like,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>could you explore or explain that aspect of it more

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like I don't know if it's a

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>deep irony or profanity. I mean, it's right there in

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the description with the four chune aspect of it. And

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>from whence that aspect of it emerged? Why is Wall

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Street that's so offensive? Yes, that's a good that's a

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>good way to put it um all right, So the

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>tagline itself, Yeah, I came across it when I was

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>reading a different forum. It was the Finance Forum, many

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>many years ago, and when people were trying to find

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a way to describe Wall Street bets, it was very difficult. Case.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Somebody just said, hey, Wall Street bets is like a

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 1>four jan or to find a Bloomberg terminal. So I like,

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do really like it. There is there

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is a petition underway to potentially change the tagline to

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>how can we have insider knowledge when we don't have

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 1>any knowledge? And I fully, I fully endorse that one. Anyway,

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>go on, Yeah, you have that tagline. I put it

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>up there, and it's still true to this day. So

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>we get that one, you know, with regards to the

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>overall culture of it, the crudeness of it, the language. Look,

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>anyone that's been following Wall Street beds for for a

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>long time is realized that the the I guess there's

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a locker room mentality, the the instults, slurs they are

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they come and go and fad. I guess it's just

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the way that to add on to the fact that

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this place has you know, no filter, No, Yeah, there's

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to contain the way that you're expressing yourself,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the way that you're trading on the way that these

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>people are trading. And you know, I can't really explain

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>how or why it is that that came out that way,

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but what I do know is, you know, the way

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that these guys come off, it's very seldom offensive. So

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>for example, recently, you know, they've been referring to anyone

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>that's been bearished in a homophobic manner. And now that

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we've had a pretty rough week class week, a lot

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of these guys are in the form of endearing saying, hey, guys,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know now I'm part of that category, and there's

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>an endearing passion, not in a derogatory extent. Obviously it's insulting, obviously,

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it is you know, offensive, um and uh and and

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I realized that. But I think that having watched these

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>terms come and go, give it a year, and now

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it's instead of you know, referring to homophobic, it's going

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to be maybe you know, tall people or people that

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>drive certain types of cars, or people with certain color eyes.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, they they're equal opportunity insulters. And I've seen

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>these trends come and go so often that I've no

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>longer taken and taken it too seriously. At one point, obviously,

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Wow, this is really distasteful. I can't

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't be associated with this. But having

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>seen the way that it's not used in hateful fashion,

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not used in a in a way that it's

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 1>means spirited, it's obviously offensive, I acknowledge that, but it's, uh,

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's I guess, a phenomenon that I can't

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>really explain. So we've talked a little bit about the

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>mentality behind Wall Street bets, and we've talked a little

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>bit about the language used on Wall Street bets, and

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Luke knows very well that it has its own terminology

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But Jamie, maybe you could talk a

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit about why certain investments seem to be favored,

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or why certain bets seem to be favored over others,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Like why options versus futures, Why the emphasis on stocks

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of say currency trading, which used to be where

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we used to get these big leveraged bets, or we

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>still get a lot of leverage bets, but it seems

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>like an obvious choice for for Wall Street bets and

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>instead they've focused on some very particular types of investments.

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is that an excellent question? I want that actually

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>blowed in the book the the I guess I'd break

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it down into two separate components, right, So why going

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for leverage versus not leverage? UM? And that's I think

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>self explanatory. If you're going to go out and make

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a bet, you wanted to be leveraged. If you want

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy a lottery ticket, you want to be able

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to the multiplayer money by a huge percentage, so buying

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost impossible to do that with stocks, uh,

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and the leverage is the way to go. So looking

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>at the scope, you know the tools that are available

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and the leveraged the universe. I've asked myself the same question,

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>why why future specifically UM a tool that I personally favor,

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Why what if they want to use that as opposed

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to stock options? And my thesis I can't back it up.

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>My thesis is straight up, it's more available. Right if

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to get approved for stock options on your

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.719
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood account, you can do it instantly or not.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Just I don't only can pick on robin Hood, just

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>all of the stockbrokers. You go in there and you

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>answer a quick little survey and UH, for a lot

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, the answer is obvious what they want

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you to answer. And many cases even if they answer honestly,

0:29:58.080 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do have a lot of dependence on

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of income, but you know, I

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think that they want me to say that I don't

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>want to lose my money. They'll get approved right away

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for stock options and they can instantly start treating them. Um.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm going to say that it's because it's

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the most widely available. My guess would be if futures

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>or if for you know, for x uh or to

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>become just as easily available would probably also start getting

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>more popular when when you look at the combination of

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, new retail online focus brokerage UH that combined

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with you know, also high nominal prices on a lot

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of stocks, your Amazon and your Tesla increasingly and then

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the potential for nonlinear payoffs. So like that's that's just

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the recipe for options in general. And you've you've seen

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it really be taken up by the market. First six

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>weeks of twenty you had single stock options up seventy

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>seven percent the notional volume off of record levels already

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of so this is this is the

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Bets field search. So I want to uh

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about the evolution a little bit of the page

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>because when I first came across Wall Street Bets, maybe

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it was I don't know, twenty fifteen. I forget when

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I started really looking at it early on, Like it

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>always had this sort of like you know, crude, offensive

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>gambling nature, but you know, a lot of memes. I

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>remember in the early days when I was paying attention,

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of memes about say, the CEO

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of a m D, Lisa Sue, because that stock was

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>doing really well and she was making everyone a lot

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of money, and so there was a lot of like

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of glowing memes about her and all the money

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they were making and stuff like that. And it is

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of, you know, just normal sort of message board

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>chatter and so forth. When did this new phenomenon emerge

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:55.479
<v Speaker 1>where it became less about sort of just posting stuff

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.959
<v Speaker 1>and ideas versus what the emergent coordination where we started

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing it earlier this year maybe last year, where the

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>idea is like, oh, we can all be a team.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>We can all jam the call option purchases, and at

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the same time it became less about just trading ideas

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>versus let's see if we can move the market. Well,

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that I still seen that, to be

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>honest with you. You You know, like you've had a lot

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of this group think mentality going back from for for

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Just like you just mentioned with m D.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, that was what they referred to as a

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>meme stock or even there was an article on market

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>watchman years ago, uh when they covered Wall Street Pets.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>They were talking about the stock at the time where

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it was an ef the u w T I, which

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was like a crew A Creed early TF. You know,

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned a lot in that article. A couple of

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>months ago, somebody brought that article on on Wall Street

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Pets and when people read it, they said, what in

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the world is what you w T? I've never even

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.719
<v Speaker 1>heard of this thing before? And how come this market

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Watch article is pumping that stock so much? You know,

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that's Allably the didn't the thing that

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we care Obviously the crowd that was reading this article

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't remember or wasn't a part of it. I think

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there's always been a kind of a group mentality, So

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go so far as connecting it as trying

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a coordinated um buying a tent.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that what we you know, what we've said,

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what we saw this year, or you know what Lucas

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>wrote about her has been writing about. You know, it's

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely interesting. But I've yet to see a group effort

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>where they say, oh, gay guys, let's let's try to

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>manipulate the market. So this phenomenon was first spotted by

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>by him using tesla. I believe obviously Tesla had already

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>been u somewhat of a meme or a meme stock

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>or a focused stock of a subreddit. And so you

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.719
<v Speaker 1>know that one, I think inherently was already being the

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>focus of a subreddit, and maybe it was receiving a

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention, a lot of additional volume on the

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>stock options, just because I'd be curious to see if

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you did a similar study, like at dating back all

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the way am B was popular, if you find something similar.

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know the point of this is, I'm not

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>really sure that some new campaign came out there. He says,

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, guys, this is a new name of the game.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's try and you know, pump stocks. This This one

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>guy that came out shortly after this article. Obviously, the article,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, put it in their heads that they can

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>now you know, found a new cheat code the way

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>they like, they're referred to it as, so that that

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of became a thing. And that brought one guy

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that posted an article on what was the liquid Lumberjacks

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I don't want to pump their name anymore,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but they they put the article up there and there

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was whatever happened and that that post was removed and

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>they tried again with the second stock and that was

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>removed as well. But that wasn't a case where everybody

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>decided to all right, this is the this is how

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to try and and play the stocks from

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>now on. Now. I think that it's I think it's

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>always just been the focus. If they have a stock

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>this a lot of focus is going to get a

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of volume, is gonna get a lot of activity.

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm be surprised if they both put them calls

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>depending especially right now that we're entering into a shop

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of your market, that they're going to see some more

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>disagreements with regards to which direction these things are going

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to go on, the disagreements with regards to how to

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>play any particular stock. Yeah, the places where I go

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to kind of hang my hat on this are well,

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>lumber liquid it. This is the best example because nobody

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 1>in the world was talking about it. And then there

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was the post from someone who had been a member

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street Bests for three years but it never

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>posted anything. And that morning you suh, you know, the

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of the last twenty days and call options trade

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first twenty minutes and ultimately call volumes of

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>over seventy x the twenty day average when nobody else

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world was talking about it. That's that's where

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I go to hang my hat. And Microsoft is another

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>one because it really blew my mind that uh, And

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>this was the discovery soon after the kind of the

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>delta hedging cheap ode was first kind of bandied about

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>more on Wall Street Bets, was Microsoft became a target,

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>which is odd to me because I you know, it's

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a big company and the the idea that you know,

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>moving that would be very difficult. And the next morning

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you did see the unusual call activity a pre market

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of activity that was suggested as the desired tactic

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that people should take up. So it and mapped out

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a little too well. No, so I so I agree

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with you on percent. What my point is not, um,

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know whether or not the your observations are or correct.

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>My point is, as an overall community that says, hey, community,

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this is all what we're gonna do. What you found

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is one actor that decided to come up with one stock,

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.919
<v Speaker 1>as you say, is a boring stock that doesn't quite

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>fit the thesis of what they usually like to talk about.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Comes off and yes, he makes the post and and

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you make the argument that he had a measurable impact

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on the on the market. So that's that's fine. UM.

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>My point is as a community, that's not what their

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>efforts start to be. This is this one guy that

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>that came on there with a shady history, like you said,

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.919
<v Speaker 1>o lack thereof and therefore you know, the moderator team

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>took action, and not only with that particular guy, but

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:22.399
<v Speaker 1>now a proactive action before identifying those types of individuals.

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's what they are, their individuals. They're not

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily as much as the as a collective of Wall

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Street Bets. You know, I think the Microsoft observation I

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think is more um accurate and that and that's that

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. You know, obviously they joke around a

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>lot and the joke and I did see what you're

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>talking with regards to Microsoft, like, all right, now, let's

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>do it with Microsoft, because that one is more of

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a spot that fits into the Wall Street Bets portfolio

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of stot to like to play with. And obviously it

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would be a much harder stock to move if they

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>were ready to do that, but they fail, you know,

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>they want for it anyways, because the stocks are volatible

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>and they're you know, oftentimes they pick these stocks because

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they're already on the move, and that's how they get

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on their reader Jamie. I've tweeted a couple of screenshots

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>from conversations going on in Wall Street Bets, and I've

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>had at least one instance of someone ceasing in the

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>U S Securities and Exchange Commission, and even on the

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.919
<v Speaker 1>subreddit itself, every once in a while, people will joke

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and say, hello, Hi, the SEC is watching that sort

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Do you worry about the regulators coming in

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and seeing some of that activity and viewing it as

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a pump and dump scheme. Yeah, so ever since you know,

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we started with wall streets, we've always been conscious not

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>just with the sec just with overall UM laws and regulations. Right,

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So this this goes all the way to anyone that's

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>making any types of threats or any type of suicide

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>threats are or any type of activities is just considered

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>UM gray area. So this, this dates back to this

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is just part of the terms of service with Reddit,

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's also part of our moral obligation is is

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>UM as moderators and we have a big moderator team.

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 1>We have about fifty moderators, and many of them are

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>very experienced, and many of them are professionals that actually

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>do have Bloomberg terminals and they do you know what

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>they're they're uh talking about, and they're they're helpful with

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to identify this. So they're answering your question. I'm

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not worried necessarily that they're they're going to come after

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>UM walls, be bets, uh specifically if they're doing any

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>type of investigation, Well, I guess they're gonna make whatever

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of investigation they want to make. I know that

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>from the moderator standpoint, we do everything that we can

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 1>to try and be responsible with this. We do have

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>very clear rules listed on the subwada, which include, do

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 1>not manipulate the market, do not attempt to manipulate the market,

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>do not give any type of false information, do not

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>try to pump any particular stops of stock, do not

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>pump and dump, I mean all this stuff that that

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 1>is clearly again the laws or against the regulations or

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>against the rules, and we enforced those very strictly. And

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not only because there against the laws, that it's also

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>against the spirit of the subreddit. You know, we're we're

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>all out there to try and hopefully make some money

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 1>or to learn and and keep the community entertaining. And

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>um that's that's what we're there to do. And uh

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and so as long as we're doing our part to

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>actively proactively handle any types of things, and look, they

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>come up all the time, you'd be surprised a lot

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of them never even make out the

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>light of day. You know. There was, for example, a

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago, a situation in which somebody posted

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>a link to a um A tour and onion site. Right,

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>these are these underground I guess you could refer to

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>them as websites. Really sure the league activity and these

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>guys were trying to share inside information. And not only

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that that post it removed within seconds of getting up there.

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>We change the logic of the moderator to make sure

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that it can automatically filter out any type of conversation,

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>regard any links uh to these court sites or in

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>cet information. There's a lot of stuff that never makes

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it out to the light of day. So if he

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ever wanted to make an investigation, they'd see without a

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>reasonable doubt that we have done very much, um everything

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that we do uh in order to uh to keep

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this place, you know, fun and legal. I'm curious or

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you see as where the typical Wall Street

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Bets user eventually goes. Do they go broke and get

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so angry with the markets that they sort of walk away?

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Or do a lot of them sort of graduate two? Okay,

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 1>this was their fun intro to the space, but they

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>want to learn more about investing or do they invest?

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>But this is sort of like their version of gambling,

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like after what what do you what

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>do you see is the trajectory of a typical Wall

0:41:54.719 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Street betsh participants. Well, what I see is probably not

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what actually happens. Once again, I'm gonna take an educated

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>guest just based off from my experience. Specifically speaking, most

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people probably lose their money. Um, it's just the name

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of the game. Especially with the types of trades that

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. They are not only going with stock options

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one of their favorite types of plays. Obviously, stock options

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't just unlike for X or futures where you can

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just put on direction, there's there's more variables to it,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and they choose the types of variables that are the

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.919
<v Speaker 1>riskiest possible, that the highest likelihood that they lose their money. Um.

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And so just just given that, common sense tells me

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that most people probably lose money. UM. That's that's not

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily what we get to see on the step ddit

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.479
<v Speaker 1>because maybe they don't post it as much, or maybe

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not as animated to give the stories, or maybe

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't get as much visibility. When somebody makes millions

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, they do get a lot more tension, and

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's easier to make the assumption that everyone's making money. Um.

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>But what I have seen, which is very surprising, is

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that make money, a lot people

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that do end up winning the lottery tickets turned out

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to be extremely rational people. And obviously with exceptions, but

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these guys. You know, there was an

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>example that I think even Bloomberg covered it um back

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in October of twenty nineteen. You know, some guy put

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in seven hundred dollars or seven hundred sixty dollars and

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred thousand dollars. I spoke to him as

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>as part of the book to see how he was

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>doing it, to get some of his idea behind the trade.

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he immediately after making that trade closed

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>up his brokerage account. He deposited that money into his

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>retirement fun. I don't know if the I R or

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the one K or whatnot, but you know, he said

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't focus on work anymore and he had to

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>keep focusing on his job. So he did, and he

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has not to this day, at least until last months,

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>trading a getting or is he interested because he knows

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>he can't replicate it? Um. That's you know, that's an

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>extreme example if I'm straight up closing his brokerage account.

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But I've seen a lot of people that make it big,

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>take that money, stash it away and uh and use

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that money responsibly, you know, to buy a house, to

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 1>invest it into these dividend baying ets. They're well diversified,

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>they like to make fun of and they they're able

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to u to be responsible with the market. So you

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>know my thesis at this point, there's a lot of

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>these these this demographic which there's a lot of millennials

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and Generation Z. You know, they may they may want

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to actually build the next stag and they don't have

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:29.760
<v Speaker 1>what to do it with. Maybe it's because their students

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it's because of wages are cost of living.

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I really can tell you. I'm next putting that matter.

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know they're they're looking to try and get

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>ahead or get out of this rat race. And the

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>ones that do and there's been a lot of them

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that have made hundreds of thousands and even millions. And

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if it started to pull back and say, all right,

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>now I've set aside, I've accomplished what I wanted to accomplish.

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I can do this again. You know,

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to become a date trader. Uh. If

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 1>they've made enough money to retire, then you know they

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>do that even if they've made enough money of it,

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they can continue with their ordinary job and invest responsibly.

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>They've done that too, So that leads me to believe

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's more to that group than with the surface

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>leads people to believe. So one of the themes running

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>through Luke's article is this question of whether or not

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the bets made by the subreddit the options trading can

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>impact the wider market. And in your own book, Jamie,

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.839
<v Speaker 1>you also talk about the notion of systemic risks. So

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about when a bunch of people are

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>taking these kind of levered bets on online brokerage. Is

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 1>who's the loser here? Like, where does the lost money

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>actually come from? And is there a chance that this

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>could negatively impact the market if enough people do it?

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we're if we're talking specifically about these

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>options trades that that Luke was referring to, you know,

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess the losers whoever's on the other side of

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this bet. But it's really difficult to measure. I mean,

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 1>you guys understand it just as well as I do.

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not as easy to measure. Is just the winner

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a loser? Because there's a lot of things that play.

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You know that the market is fluid, and it goes

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>up and it goes down, and it depends on when

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>people enter and exit. A lot of these brokers are

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily just making money off the bid asked spread.

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>They're making money off to the premium from these options.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>And so if they do end up buying the stocks um,

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the stocks go off, one could argue

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that they're making money as well. If the entire stock

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>market goes up and everybody is long the stock market,

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:40.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's difficult to argue that anyone's losing. But

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not that simple, right, you know, It's happened last week,

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and anyone that had all those shares in their possession

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is no longer as happy as they were two weeks ago.

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm not assarily sure who the winner the

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>loser is, Like I suppose, it really depends what about

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>more generally, I guess what I'm getting at is if

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 1>someone takes a big levered bet, uh, and you know,

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they put in a thousand dollars, make some sort of trade,

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and they end up ten thousand or even a hundred

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand in the red, who's the loser on that one,

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and what happens to the brokerage that let that trade

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>go through. So you have a huge number of people

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that are taking that are playing with some very sophisticated

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tools right um, and they're using it in ways that

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:28.359
<v Speaker 1>they don't fully understand them um and and and they're

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>posing what I believe to be a systemic risk um

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>and so you know that some examples of this, which

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I find to be extremely fascinating, which was one of

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the biggest motivators that I had to write this book

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, was the securities like the VIX

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that they revolve around the volatility index that then have

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>ets on top of them, and then they have leverage

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>dts and they have you know, stock options on top

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of those. Um. Those are extremely extremely complicated. People that

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing don't know how to explain it

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to other people that also know what they're doing. So

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so if you have a kid that opens up his

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>his broker account on his cellphone during his lunch break

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and types the U v X Y or TVIX or whatever,

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just a symbol like Apple. They don't

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>know they've just got a price that moves up and down,

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and it moves up and down a lot, so it

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>looks like fun, right because it seems like it's got

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the properties that requires for them to make

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 1>a trade. So maybe they'll look it up and they say, oh,

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>something to do with alatility or whatever. I'm only gonna

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 1>hold this for a few minutes or a few days,

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>so I could care less what the what the company

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>does or what their earnings reports BIGGS has to do.

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, they buy options on top of that

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>because it turns out to those as well, and then

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll just you know, lever up, you know, in ridiculous amounts,

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>not realizing that there's a huge mechanism behind this, right,

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.839
<v Speaker 1>like we all well maybe you guys remember the big

0:48:55.920 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 1>volmageddon February fifty think that you know, we're we had

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>an example the the market showed a weakness in because

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of the existence of all these tools, right, because there's

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so many of these kas that they had to rebalance

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, both the ones that

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>were There's was the ones that were leveraged long the

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>vixit spiked so much that particular day that you know

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that come four o'clock they were all going to have

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy vixity cures, and so all the participants that

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 1>know this, which is pretty much everyone, decided the front

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on this during the daytime, so they drove up the

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>vix even further, you know, and that made part market

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 1>participants even more nervously ended up buying put options on

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the SMP, which obviously drive the vix even higher, which

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, made people nervous, and they started to start

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>selling some of their stocks, which you know, probably the

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger drop. And this feedback was disastrous and a lot

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>of what happened that particular they had nothing to do

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.359
<v Speaker 1>with coronavirus or some you know that that maybe that

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>was a complete systemic failure of these really sophisticated tools.

0:49:56.760 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And so now you have these kids that are you know,

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they're really is of them and millions of millions, and

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they're using very leverage tools to exploit these millions of

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>millions of uh, very complex securities, and they're plugged into

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, this interconnected system. And yes, I believe that

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>there is uh that there is a risk of play.

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Once again, I'll struggle to define the winner and a loser,

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, but I do worry, um with the

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 1>fragility of the of the system. Jamie. Uh. Before we

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>wrap up real quickly, I have to note the sort

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of poetry or perfection of this moment that we're interviewing,

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>because literally, while we're talking and recording this podcast, I

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>see that Robin Hood is experiencing an outage. Uh So

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>amid this extraordinary volatility that we're seeing in the market.

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there are a lot of frustrated Wall Street

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Bets users. They have a thing on their status page

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:55.279
<v Speaker 1>saying right now we're experiencing a system wide outage. We're

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 1>working to resolve this issue as soon as possible, So

0:50:58.000 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 1>presumably a lot of people not to trade frustrated that

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they can't take advantage of the volatility one way or another.

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Kind of perfect timing. Final question, just in terms of

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I have two very quick questions for you. Is one,

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have you yourself made money overall trading options? And to

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>where do you want to take Wall Street Bets? What

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do you see is it's a future or you're just

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:23.879
<v Speaker 1>going to sort of let the people do their thing

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 1>um with options. I have not made money. Uh. I

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:32.399
<v Speaker 1>guess that's that's probably the first of it. I've said

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that the options are really tricky, um and uh uh

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and I I lost a fair amount of money with them,

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I also learned a huge amount about

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the market with that, and I've since moved on to

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>different instruments that have there's being more profitable. But but

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>now the stock options are appreciate thing to make money with. Um.

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And with regards to the direction of Wall Street bets,

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's twofold number one. You know, it has

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to some extent of life of us. Uh. So I

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:07.919
<v Speaker 1>haven't directed Wall Street Bets into what it is now,

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have uh let the community take it

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever it wants to go, and the moderator teams take

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it to where it wants to go. And so we'll

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:17.799
<v Speaker 1>see what that means for the future. And as far

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>as what I might want to do with it, well,

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you might be hearing about some ideas here in a

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. I have no doubt about it. Okay, great, Well, Jamie,

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate you joining us. It's obviously sort of a

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:36.280
<v Speaker 1>fascinating experiment window into a psyche of uh at least

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:39.319
<v Speaker 1>a handful of market participants, and I really appreciate you

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>taking your time to uh explain the history and perhaps

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the future Ball Street Bets. I'm I'm problem. Thank you

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>very much for having me, Thanks Jamie, Thanks so much, Shamie.

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 1>And we want to thank Luke Kawa of course for

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>coming on and walking us through the technical details a

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of this options trading as well

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 1>as for his great bus this week cover story. So

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Luke Kawa as well. Oh my pleasure,

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure. So one thing I was thinking about is this, um,

0:53:18.280 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this difference between our investing and our Wall Street bets.

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 1>And on the one hand, you have a group of

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are sort of playing by the rules and

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 1>investing a little bit of money in you know, passive

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff like s SMP five hundred funds and sort of

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>eking out little returns every once in a while. And

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>then you have the our Wall Street bets people who

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 1>are making this big money and sort of well big

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:45.879
<v Speaker 1>money and big losses and also trying to find cheat

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>codes to exploit the system. And I guess the big

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 1>question that I'm thinking now is which one of those

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>should the stock market be Like? There's an argument that

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the stock market or the market in general should be

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 1>about efficient allocating companies capital or capital to companies, And

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I could sort of argue it both ways. Yeah, absolutely,

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think both need to exist. And you know, there's

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>always been this spectrum in any given market, right between

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the sort of pure speculation short term gambling mentality and

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the longer term fundamental investing mentality. And we did a

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:30.720
<v Speaker 1>some episodes recently looking at how the sort of pure

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:36.759
<v Speaker 1>long term passive investing mentality has been gone to a

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>very large extreme, with people not taking any risks of

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>individual stock selection or market timing and just blindly buying

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire index every paycheck. And so it's not surprising

0:54:49.760 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that if the sort of long term passive approach is

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more extreme, more and more vanilla, that

0:54:57.680 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you have then see the sort of mirror image happening

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other end. And so then you see the

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 1>people who do try to like quote beat the market

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>or take idiosyncretic security risk going absolutely to the extreme

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the other way. And what you get is you sort

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of hollow out that middle of the old days of like,

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, people buying thirty stocks for their portfrait value

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of investment seems really quaint. Yeah, stuff like that. Yeah,

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of two extremes um at the end of

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of barbell. I guess the other thing I'm

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>wondering is, you know, it's fine to see people taking

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.439
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of bets and blowing up their robin Hood

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 1>accounts as long as it's their own money and as

0:55:38.760 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>long as it doesn't affect the wider market. But then

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the point that Jamie touched on at the end, which is,

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we do have some instances where options trading has impacted

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the underlying index, such as x I V and the

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:55.800
<v Speaker 1>vix back and form and ged in and uh again,

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned the robin Hood blowout at the end, and

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you so would have to think whether or not a

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the brokerages and the zero commission trading are

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 1>encouraging a race to the bottom when it comes to

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:11.840
<v Speaker 1>enabling these sorts of levered bets. A yes, But B

0:56:12.040 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say, you know, for as big as they are,

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are institutions that are ten times bigger

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:24.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, established serious, respectable institutions where people have PhD

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>s and right equations and they all wear a tidal

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 1>work that have caused far more damage than anything on

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the message board. So while I'm sure that that is

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a potential phenomenon, uh, if Wall Street Bets did create

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of endogenous volatility, they would not be the

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>first buy any stretch. No, that is totally a fair point,

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:49.799
<v Speaker 1>and no ties or PhDs, presumably on Wall Street Bets.

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say it's probably a few now to be fair.

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, okay, Well that kind of brought me to

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 1>my last point, which was in Jamie's book The Guy

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that lost bunch of money on X I V who

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>was on Wall Street Bets. I think this was the

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest loss ever on Wall Street Bets. Jamie says he

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>ended up working for a unnamed financial institution, so there

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is some overlap between professionals. He wouldn't be the first

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>person who made his name and career by losing a

0:57:22.400 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of money or so. Somehow, I feel like in finance,

0:57:25.520 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if you if you lose a little bit money or

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in trouble, if you lose a lot of money, you

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 1>could probably uh you know, find a new job and

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>do something else. Yeah, so weird and yet so true. Okay,

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisn'tal. You can follow me

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at The Stalwart, and you should follow our

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>colleague Luke Colla on Twitter at l J Cola and

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>follow Jamie on Twitter. He has the handle at Wall

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Street Bets. And be sure to follow our producer on Twitter,

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg

0:58:04.160 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 1>head of podcasts, Francesco Levi at Francesca Today, and for

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:11.440
<v Speaker 1>all the Bloomberg podcasts, check them out under the handle

0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Thanks for listening