WEBVTT - TechStuff Goes Obsolete?

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tex Stuff from dot Com. Hey, Aron,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland, your beloved host,

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and today I've got a super special guest host live

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from c NET. It's I as Actar Hi, I as Hi.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan is good to be here, is great to have

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you on. Now. I AS and I go way back.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>We met when you were working with Randall Bennett, and

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>uh we became friends. So, just in the interest of

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>full disclosure, I AS and I are friends. I know

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it's shocking, So any sarcastic barbs, I take it, Jonathan,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>or he throws back at me. We do that out

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of love, entire absolutely true, absolutely true. And today, Uh,

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always asked my guests if they have

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a preference for the topic they want to cover. I

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>has actually looked through the list of articles and suggestions

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and things that I've been collecting for potential tech Stuff

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>episodes and picked one. There was a listener suggestion listener

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>named Jare shared a link to an article on Web

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>designer Depot and it was all about technology that had

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>gone obsolete, and Jared said, wouldn't it be great to

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>cover an obsolete technology podcast? So We're going to look

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>primarily at the technologies that appeared on that list, and

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna kind of talk about, you know, what

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>made them go obsolete. In a few cases, we might

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>even debate if it is in fact obsolete. I think

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some that are on the list that might have

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>been a little premature to say it's obsolete. When I

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>think obsolete, I really think that it no one uses

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. It's been completely replaced by newer technology, you know,

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like the crossbow. Not a lot of people using those.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>What's not obsolete that that still has a function, So

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that they will argue at that planning, like, what is

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the true definition of that is it's just no one

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in the world ever uses again? Or is this just

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>basically something that's been or its function has been traded

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in for another device. Well, I mean sure, a crossbost functional.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's not working. I'm just saying that,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're okay, that you're right. We're gonna get

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>into this throughout the entire episode. So, uh, spoiler alert,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>crossbow does not appear on the list, so we're not

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be covering that. However, I wanted to begin

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of where the list began, although I should also

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>add these are not necessarily in the same order as

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they appeared on the article, because a lot of the

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>technologies in the article were similar tech or at least

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we're technologies that fulfilled a similar role, and so I

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of grouped together quite a few of them. But

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in any case, the first one was super eight or

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>eight millimeter film cameras, which the article referred to as

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>video camera rus and I immediately got the giggles because

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>film and video are two different things. Now, I as,

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>have you ever actually used a film camera? Surprisingly, no,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The only cameras I ever used when I was growing

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>up were ones that used VHS tape, and that's it.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I never I never had the experience of the super eight.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are familiar with it

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Wonder Years. That's what it looked like, kids.

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted what it looked like, this film actually

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>going through but no sound, usually I think, yeah, exactly,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, you you had to record sounds

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>separately if you wanted to have sound with your films,

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>which meant that you would have to slate it. Slating

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of course for those who aren't familiar with the the

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>film production world. Slating is where you have some sort

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of visual and audio Q that tells the producer how

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to line or the editor how to line up both

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the audio track and the video track. So if you've

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ever seen the little slapboards are often used to you know,

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>whenever you're seeing a behind the scenes shot of a

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>movie or it's just a television show where they've got

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that in there, as you know, usually it's when they're

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>showing someone making a movie, that's what that's all about.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, yeah, usually these were just silent films. It

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:20.799
<v Speaker 1>was interesting to me that eight millimeter film was actually

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.799
<v Speaker 1>sixteen millimeters wide. Uh. It was just that you would

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>when you were shooting, it would record on one half

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>of the film lengthwise, and then you would turn the

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>cartridge upside down and reinstall it and then you could

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>shoot on the other half of the film lengthwise. So

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that was what allowed you to double the amount of

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>film that you had per cartridge. Um that's one of

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that is very different these days. Obviously, like

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we used to talk about film in terms of footage

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>literally footage, how many feet of film did you shoot?

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's while we still use the term ntage today,

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and we still use the term film today. That's no

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>longer the case. Now we're talking about how many bytes

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of data did it fill up? So I agree that

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this is obsolete in the sense that I don't think

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find a lot of places offering super eight

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>uh film cameras or even super eight film. But you

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>can still find a few places. It's just really tricky,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's also tricky to find places that can process

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that film because unlike video or digital film, you can't

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>just view it immediately. You actually have to process the

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff you shoot in order for it to become viewable.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm okay with this one being called obsolete.

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>What's your opinion. It's definitely obsolete. Although I'm sure they're

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of Brooklyn where this is like the coolest thing

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that kids do or hitchers do. Um, There's there's no

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>way I would see anybody using these things these days.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And unless you're like some kind of crazy enthusiast. It's

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like somebody who who set but like a flash with

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>that powder stuff that would go up flash that would

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>seem to be very unusual. So I would think absolutely, absolutely, Yeah, yeah,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>unless you're a film student trying to make some sort

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>of statement, I don't see this happening. Uh, it is interesting.

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Another little bit of trivia. The old super eight film

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>could hold thirties six hundred frames worth of film, which

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>amounts to just a few minutes, so two and a

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>half minutes of footage at twenty four frames per second.

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>If you change the frame rate, you could get more

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>or fewer minutes of footage. Helt. But just imagine, you know,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you are doing a take using a

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>super eight film camera, No take could be longer than

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>two and a half minutes. Obviously, that kind of pressure

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>makes movie making take a lot more time, and it's

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more stress I think. Um. Going along with

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>this one is home movie projectors. Again not a huge surprise,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't have the came rus to shoot

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the film, then why do you need something to show

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the film? Um? Yeah, I mean that's that's been gone forever.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've seen these back. Actually I have seen

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this in school, back when they actually the real the

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>reels would come in the wheel, this a V unit

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in and they'd have an old projector with this. But

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>usually there were science things not necessarily home movies. But

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking back to the the how quick you'd

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have to shoot things. I'd imagine the stress levels would

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be very high for families. It's like, get the shot right,

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>getting right, because we've got two and a half minutes

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. We're gonna have be happy here, that's it. Jimmy,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you gotta you gotta at least give a a a

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>false sense of happiness to everyone back home, and we

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>get one shot. That's it. It's not like the days

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>where we got to to retry everything right. If you know,

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>these days, if they take a picture with like a

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>smartphone and you don't like it, you just delete it

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and do it again. That was not the case in

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the old film days. Well yeah, these these projectors have

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>been largely replaced with DVRs, DVD players, Blu ray players, VCRs,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>even in some homes, and then some people have digital projectors,

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so kind of a spiritual successor to the old real

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>home projector, but it works on a very different technology. Now,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the next one I remember from my childhood. I didn't

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>own a Beta Max machine, but I remember the the

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>cassette wars between Beta Max and VHS and those are

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the next two on the list. Now, this is the

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>early video market for the consumer. Video had been used

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in professional capacity for quite some year, for quite a

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>few years, I should say, before it ever hit the

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer market. And then you had the VHS versus Beta

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Max battle. Um. The main differences between the two well one, uh,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Beta Max was made by Sony and v HS was

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>uh that came out from our c A I believe,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, so you had a format war that way.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But Beta Max also could record in a slightly higher

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>resolution and was limited to at least for the longest time,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to one hour long cassettes for home recording, whereas VHS

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't have that limitation. You could get longer recording VHS

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>tapes and that gave it an advantage. Also, Beta Max

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>tended to be more expensive than VHS, so this was

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a battle that we'd see play out again with Blu

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Ray versus h D DVD. That's sort of a fight

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that broke out, um. And in many ways the two

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>format wars are very similar to each other. So if

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you remember the old h D DVD war, then this

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>story is really pretty close. Uh. The big difference being

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't go to the c e S where

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Beta Max pulled out of the show at the last minute,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but that did go to the c e S when

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>HD DVD suddenly decided not to show up, uh the

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>day of the show opening. Yeah, this is Sony's like revenge.

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>At least the Blu Ray one was because when it

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>came to Beta Max, the quality was there. It was

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>higher quality, like you mentioned, and a lot of people

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that quality went out, but VHS was I'm just

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>much cheaper and you could have longer films, and I

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.959
<v Speaker 1>believe there was the adoption of pornography on VHS, so

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of led the way at times. But son

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you got to win finally with the Blu Ray. I

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>think the last major player they boughtut I want to

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>say it's Warner Brothers, but they basically paid a truckload

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>of money and ensured their victory in the home theater space. Yeah, VHS,

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>while I would say it's pretty, you know, it's it's

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>mostly dead and the Princess Bride sense of things. There's

0:10:55.400 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>still plenty of companies that are offering up vhs like VCRs,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but they're usually combo VCRs. There VCRs that are packaged

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as like a DVD or Blu Ray, even a Blu

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Ray vcr UM. But there still are some out there,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, some movies are still being released on VHS,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's almost always a gimmick, like The Horror Anthology

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>VHS two was released on VHS cassette, but that again

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a one off, like aren't we clever

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Yeah, you can tell someone has gone

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to the obsolete point when you see the prices start

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>taking on things like VCRs, the playback machines. They start

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>going down and they start decreasing to this point and

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>then like they're practically giving them away for free, and

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>then they start slowly increasing the price because so few

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>companies are making it. Because if you look up a

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>VHS player now, it's not as cheap as it would

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have been back when if the market was flooded. So

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's it's not dead, it's definitely

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>actually obsolete when it comes to video technology. It doesn't

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>have the quality, it doesn't have the amount of I mean,

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say bit rape if you're not in the resolution.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to this, you're not gonna have the

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>same amount of audio coming out of this this technology.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's definitely uh, it should be on its one

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>way out, but it's that it won't just die. Yeah,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I think obsolutely. It's a fine word because, like you

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>were saying, I as I think, absolutely does not necessarily

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>mean it has been white from the face of the planet.

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>It really just means that. I mean, if you were

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>going out today to buy a brand new home entertainment center,

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably wouldn't think of a VCR as a necessary component.

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But what about a LaserDisc player. I loved when the

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>LaserDisc came out. I was I saw it. It came

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>out in the store. I saw this massive box and

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>get these record size, shiny platters, and then I begged

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>my folks to buy me one. They bought me a

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>laser disc player. I came home with it and then

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, wait, how do you record on this thing?

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And they said it doesn't record, and I go, we're

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>taking this back to service merchandise right now. So at

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a lasers player in my ask for all of three

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>days because I was not happy about it, and my

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>folks were very nice and they were very happy to

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>get what I believed to be a four hundred and

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollar credit back from this store because that was

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>really really expensive and they were very nice enough to

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>get for me, So they get to uh, they got

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy the stork about it later. That's so hilarious

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that that you owned a LaserDisc for all of half

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a week. Uh. Yeah, I didn't have a LaserDisc player

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>at all. I did grow up in the era of

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the the home video you know, wars everything from the

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Beta Max to VHS. We had a VHS VCR, not

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a Beta Max. We didn't have a LaserDisc player. We

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>did have a totally different obsolete technology that I'll mentioned

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the show, but it's it was.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>It didn't make the list that we were talking about

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, the online list. LaserDisc players had a much

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>higher quality than vhs when it comes to resolution and sound.

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They were kind of the predacess sirs to DVDs. Uh.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They were and you know, really the first optical based

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>home media's format. And it also brought in the era

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of full motion video because there were laser disc arcade

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>machines that um used laser disc footage as the means

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of showing off the game, like like Dragon's Layer is

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the big example, where you know, at certain moments within

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Dragon's Layer, you can make a decision and the character

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>would go and either succeed or fail based on that decision.

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But everything has already been prerecorded, nothing was being rendered

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at the time that you were playing. You were really

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>just unlocking various sequences. And that was the limitation of

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the laser disc format. It couldn't do anything beyond that.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, people who own laser discs

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>love the quality of the picture and the sound. I

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>remember going to parties with people who had laser displayers.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>They would always have, you know, one of the movies

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on in the background, and it it was it just

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>blew away anything that was on vhs. You didn't have

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that tracking artifact that would go across when you know

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>your tape is not quite right, you have to fix

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the alignment so that you don't have the static or

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever on there. That was never a problem, but a

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>LaserDisc ultimately didn't catch on in the consumer market. UH

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to a wide extent. It had a very dedicated core

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of followers, but it eventually lost out to things like DVDs,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>UH and blue rays later on. So by two thousand

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Um, they were pretty much gone.

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So sad to say that it never really caught on

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in a big way, but it did kind of pave

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the ground for the following types of optical based media

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like DVDs and blue ray. Uh. Then we've got a

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch that I grouped together because they are similar.

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>There's the phonograph, turntables, vinyl records, transistor radios, boom boxes,

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the Sony Walkman, and the Sony Discman. So some of

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>these I could argue are technically not obsolete. Uh, they

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>might be niche markets. Um. In one case, the Sony Walkman,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the brand still exists, so I guess you could argue

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same piece of technology. That's not exactly

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the same they The Walkman used to be a cassette player.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>For those of you don't remember. Cassettes are like with

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>analog way of getting audio to you, and when the

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>tape itself would have an issue, you have to get

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a pencil and kind of rewind the actual tape. Yep.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's a whole generation that people have no

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>idea you know what I'm talking about. But when you

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>had these cassettes, you'd want to walk around with them,

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and unlike something that that succeeded them, like the discman,

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have a lot of skipping problems. You could

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>run around with the tape and there was no real

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>issue there, but you did have to deal with the

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>destruction and whear and tear of the actual tape. And

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I had a discman at one point. Uh,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it was great. Once they they invented anti skip technology

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was which basically just reading ahead and having the audio

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>set to go in case of a skip because optical

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>media not exactly designed to be ran around with back

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>first came out. Yeah, it had to buffer that audio

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so that should you encounter a bump, it could continue

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to play seamlessly. And like you were saying, the cassette

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have that problem, you have other issues, Like there

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>were times where maybe the tape could get caught on

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>something and unwind from the cassette and that was a

0:17:55.400 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 1>huge headache. Uh. You know, obviously it's a magnetic storage medium,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>so if you were to work near i don't know,

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>super conductors or something, you might end up having some

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>issues on your music. But but I, you know, I

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>certainly was a big fan of the cassette. Back in

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the day, it was one of the easier ways to

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have your music be portable, and the Walkman specifically made

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that easy. As for things like, well, the phonograph, Sure,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the phonographs obsolete. It's been obsolete for ages. I don't

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>even know how it made the list. It's kind of

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>like saying, you know, uh, I don't know, like the

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>horse and buggy is obsolete. Well, yes, that that is obvious. Turntables,

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm I don't know. There again, it's like a niche market.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>But there are lots of music artists out there who

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>will release their music on vinyl and you play it

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on turntables. I'm sure there's some people who collect that

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, even if they don't have the device

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to play the media on, but they're just a collector.

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>But I know that turntables and vinyl certainly still have

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a place. I mean, DJ's alone, make sure that that

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't die out completely. Would you go so far as

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to say that turntables and vinyl records are actually obsolete,

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 1>definitely obsolete at all, because their replacements would be something

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>like digital music, and they're The big claim is that

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>there is some kind of analog warmth that you get

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>that you just can't reproduce on it digital medium. And

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so as long as long as as there's gonna be music,

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>if there's still gonna be vinyl, because you know, of

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>all the things that try to replace Vinyl, the fact

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that it keeps coming back or just refuses to die,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's it's ready to be called obsolete,

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because then why why don't we other why don't we

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>ever see other analog audio take off as well as

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>vinyl does. I'm not really sure, yeah, I mean, the

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>only thing I can think of is that the cassette

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>tapes have the magnetic media tend to have a hiss

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>behind it, which people say that obviously takes away from

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the fidelity of the recording, whereas vinyl doesn't have a hiss,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>assuming that your equipment is clean and the record is unblemished,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, if your record has wear and tear,

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be some pops and scratches in it.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Some people say that actually adds character to the recording,

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh, for a for a full generation, that was

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the way people were used to music, and it sounded

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>weird to not have those kind of pops and scratches

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in it. So yeah, I agree with you. I don't

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think that one's obsolutely I would say that that one

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>that one probably does not merit inclusion on the list. Uh.

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Cassette tape recorders and cassette tapes are actually the next

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>one that we're listed in the the article, and I

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.479
<v Speaker 1>can see why. I mean, obviously, the music, like the

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>prerecorded music stuff. The music industry going out to buy

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>an album has largely and almost totally abandoned the cassette format,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with with a little one off exceptions, things that are

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>really more of a marketing gimmick than anything else. For example,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians of the Galaxy soundtrack They're Awesome mix tape

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be released or has been released out

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on cassette tape, but that's because the cassette tape played

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>such an important part in the movie. It's really more

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>movie memorabilia, I would say, than an actual musical album

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in that sense. Yeah, cassette tapes, obviously I was talking

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>about before. My big life with cassette tapes was recording

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>stuff off the radio. I'm sure you've done this too.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like you got your boom box, You're waiting for it.

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You're waiting for a song because there was no way

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to get audio very easily. You just have to wait

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>around for it to come in through the airwaves. Have

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>your cassette tapes, and like back when we're talking about

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the Walkman, nothing more. Nothing would cause a panic, like

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing that tape getting stuck between the heads and you're like, Okay,

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>did you get twisted? Isn't busted inside? Uh? When it

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to the cassette tapes, I remember just having a

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of them. I liked how small they were. That

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was something that was a big nice thing to have

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a portability. But I think definitely obsoustely at this point. Yeah,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I used to have cases of these things. My my

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>college roommate and I had dozens of mix tapes, including

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>tapes where we were doing just dumb things like we

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>each had vinyl record collections, including singles and full albums,

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>so we once did a mix tape that was all

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>vinyl albums played at the wrong speed, so we would

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have singles played too slowly, and we have full albums

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>played too quickly, and we thought that was the funniest

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thing in the world. Because our senses of humor had uh,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>stayed at the eight year old level. I have since

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gone up to twelve years old in my sense of humor,

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>So there's progress there. Did you have a tape player

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that variable speed so you could actually listen to it

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>back normally if you wanted to, or you just thought,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that's it, one speed, this is how it's going to be.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>It was one speed. Yeah, we I remember distinctly like

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we had um Anarchy in the UK played super slow,

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>which sounded more like a rob zombie cover of the

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Sex Pistols made it really really scary and ominous. But

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we also had a super fast version of Comfortably Numb

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and hearing Alvin and the Chipmunks cover Pink Floyd was amazing.

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So but we yeah, once once we recorded it, that's

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the speed it was gonna be. We didn't have a

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>variable speed tape player. Now, all of this so you know,

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>by two thousand one, those cassette tapes made up less

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>than five of music sales, and so pretty much you

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>don't find them for prerecorded music. You can still find

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>blank cassette tapes because apparently there are some people out

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there who are still using them to record stuff, but

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>as for like an actual album release. It's incredibly rare

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>except for the the random one off. However, the next

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>one on the list eight tracks, I think we could

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>just say is obsolute without even you know, any debate

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>on the subject. It was obsolete during the era of

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the cassette tape. Yeah, I think that's just like enough said,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is an eight track And if you if you're miss

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>hearing me, you're thinking the Sony a track, that's not

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. The eight track cassette tape that

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just kind of when went away. It was supposed to be

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>be higher quality audio then you'd be getting from other methods,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was these giant cartridges. They kind of look

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>like atry cartridges, at least that's where I remember them

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to be. I don't think I've ever been in a

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>car that had an eight track player, have you? I

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have been in a car that had an eight track player.

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>My my family did not own one. We always had

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>just the A M and then later the a UM

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>FM radio, but we never had an eight track player.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Eight track players had a lot of limitations. For one, uh,

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't rewind a cartridge. You could only play it forward. Now,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>some eight track players had a fast forward so if

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you really wanted to get to the other side of it,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you could fast forward the the cassette, or if you

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear a song again, you could eject it,

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>turn it over, fast forward to what you think is

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the song you wanted to listen to again,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>eject it, turn it over again, put it back in

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the player, and push play and hope that you guessed correctly. Um,

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you could also fast forward, or rather, when you did

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>fast forward, most of these players would cut the audio,

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so you're just fast forwarding. You wouldn't actually be listening

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to the stuff played super fast, so you wouldn't be

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>able to listen to music played at the wrong speed.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this format died pretty much in the seven knees.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So I was a kid in the seventies, but I

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was a very young kid in the seventies and I

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have no real memory of eight tracks. It was only

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>when I was writing in someone's car that dated back

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to that era that I ever saw an eight track player.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So we never had one in my family. There should be, uh,

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any adapters that have like an

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>eight track to Bluetooth adapters or adapter. Your CD player

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>not a thing. Causette Cassett's still kind of live in cars.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>The last car I owned had a cassette deck in it,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and that car was from two thousand and four, so like, yeah,

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>so they still had a tape deck and it was

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>had the ability at least for me, It's like, Okay,

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll get the adapter. But I've never seen an eight

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>track to c D or eight track to Bluetooth adapter,

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so definitely dead. Well, I I haven't even seen, like

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while since I've seen a car that

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>had a CD player in it, much less eight track

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or cassette player. But again, might be that bias creeping

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in where I just I tend to hang out in

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the other podcaster cars and we're all gadget breaks, so

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we tend to get the the various systems that are

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>all digital. Well, how about real to real tape? You

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think that one's still a contender or is that one obsolete?

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>It's not dead. I know this because I think one

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the last Food Fighter albums was recorded on real

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>too real. It was because they wanted total analog, they

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>wanted to not use pro tools. So there's some certain

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>bands that still use this to record, and the Food

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Fighters are kind of a big band, so and so

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's it's it's unusual that somebody would choose to do that.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>And I just remembered back with the cassette tapes, I

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>us have a four track machine so I could record

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>music on different tracks, and that was my second big

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>cassette moment because I was totally into CDs at that point.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But real to real tape, this is another like kind

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of niche kind of thing that people would be trying

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>only if you want to have the analog sound from

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, because there's no other real reason to

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>do it, because it's kind of limited. Yeah, it's it's

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>really for one, thing is just really big, right, I mean,

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a bulky medium, and so you have to

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of physical space to store it. So

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>that alone makes it less attractive than a lot of

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>other alternatives. Granted, you still have again this this sort

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>of perception that the sound quality on the medium is

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally different from other types of media, and that might

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that might actually be true. There are some things that

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>come up during recording that you know, you wouldn't hear

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>if you were actually in the room. While the recording

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was being made, it wouldn't be something you could perceive,

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but on the recording you get these kind of distortions

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and interference of various frequencies as they're being recorded, and

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that becomes part of the song or whatever is being

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>recorded onto that medium, which is kind of cool. It's

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>an idea that the the media itself is playing a

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>part in the quality of the song or whatever else

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it is that you're trying to set down. And I

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's really interesting. But I don't I think outside

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of that realm that you're talking about, I s it's

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>not terribly uh um popular or well known. There's some

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I know there's some computer systems that still use a

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>real too real type system to do backups, just because

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a legacy system and that's what they have to

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>work with. But I don't think that's terribly common either.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree that it's not quite obsolete, but it's definitely

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>very niche. It's very it's very useful if you're making

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like a period sci fi movie, because if you have

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a large computer, they almost always had two real to

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>real decks constantly going never knew what it was doing,

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>was always in the background with the flashing lights. So

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're wondering what those giant discs are, that would

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be real too, real in a lot of these sixties

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sci fi movies, and a lot of twilight zones as well.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It makes me think of airplane too. These lights are

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>blinking out of sequence. We'll get them to blink in sequence.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty much where that goes. The next one is

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is another one that I don't think really fits is obsolete.

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's ham radio. I think at this point I would

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>argue that the the author of the piece is perhaps

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>equating something that is not terribly popular with something that

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is obsolete. But ham radio, amateur radio is still a thing, right,

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>This isn't It didn't people didn't just stop. There are

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a few amateur radio operators out there. Yeah this,

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's not dead. I used to work in

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a place where this is very big with a certain

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>group of people. But it's definitely not something that is

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>marketed towards the general consumer or anything. So like like

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about with other devices, things that if we

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>want to think about it as will the normal person

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be like, Yeah, I'm totally into this and this is

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>what I will choose to you was over a cell

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>phone or whatever would be Uh, this thing is obsolete

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of not people Not many people are

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>using it that way. Yeah, I guess yeah, from that perspective,

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly they're not using it as a primary communication tool.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's one of those things also that I don't

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>think was ever popular enough for you to say that

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been replaced by something else. It was always kind

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of this hobbyist, uh market, and not something that you

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>would see, you know, it's not I don't think the

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>average home a few decades ago had a ham radio

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting around in it. It was one of those things

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that people who had a very specific kind of interest.

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That's those were the homes you founded in. Otherwise it

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was it was just not there. So I don't really

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>think of it as obsolete. I just think of it as,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of again very niche. But the next one, telegraph,

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel it's pretty obsolete. Yeah, I mean it's pretty

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>cool and if you don't again legraphs um. I think

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the last time I saw one on Madman, that was

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the last time I saw one. It was an ad

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>campaign for it and it was a pretty good episode.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's basically a piece of trivia in your head

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes is when a telegraph is because you

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just text people nowadays, right, Yeah, I mean there's so

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>much stuff that's replaced it the telegraph system. I mean,

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it was all introduced in the nineteenth centuries, so the

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds. Um, it really got running towards the end

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of the eighteen hundreds and wireless telegraphy came in. And

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing that surprised me was when I was doing

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>some research just looking into this, was how long the

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>telegram business lasted in the United States. Western Union shut

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>down their telegraph service in two thousand and six. I

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would have imagined that to have been much earlier. With

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>things like, um, uh, just the telephone system, computers, you've

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>got cell phones. The smartphone really wasn't a thing in

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>consumer markets in two thousand six. You'd have to wait

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>till two thousand seven when the iPhone came out for

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that to really happen. But still it was amazing that

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it stuck around that long. Uh. And then you have

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>telex machines, which were teleprinters. Uh. Telex actually itself is

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the name of the network. It's not the name of

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the device, but the network allowed printers that had been

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>hooked up to it to print text based messages that

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have been received over the network. So um, it's not

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>entirely obsolete either. It's still being used in maritime functions.

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's a requirement in the Global Maritime Distress

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and Safety System, mainly because other systems could fail. This

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is like a backup system for communication. It's not necessarily

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>something that would be relied upon as the primary source

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>for communication, but still an important network. I can see

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>why you'd say obsolete, however, because it's not like it's

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>something that the average person is going to ever come

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>into contact with. I'm actually generally unfamiliar with telex machines

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>other than like I guess the Simpsons referenced at times Burns.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Mr Burns does retalex, but that's about it. Like I

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know much about it at all other than

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 1>what you just said. Yeah, yeah, I mean I've never

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I've never personally encountered one. You know. My parents wouldn't

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>let me into the telex room at home, so yeah,

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they kept in that cabinet and we weren't allowed to

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>touch with the fancy soaps and the beautiful dishes. Actually,

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to correct you, as they kept me in

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the cabinet. Everything else was outside of it. That's much

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>more efficient. My folks should have done the same thing.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>They just locked us in the rooms. They should just

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>lost us in a tiny one Harry Potter. Potter was

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>largely based on my background. You and your owls man.

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Real problem. Yeah, yeah, well, okay, let's let's not reveal

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>my entire personal life to the internet. Let's move on

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to to Whang calculators. This was the Yeah, I remember

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Whang computers, but only because I remember people talking about

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 1>it after the computer company had already faded away, and

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's one of those things where the

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>more juvenile among us joke about it, Wanging computers. But

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Wang Laboratories was founded in nineteen fifty one, and the

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Wang Loki two or l o c I two was

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the first desktop calculator that the company offered in nineteen

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty five. They were enormous. Have you ever seen one

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>of these? I have not? Okay, well, you know, like

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the really big um office telephones, the ones that have

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>lots of different bells and whistles to them, not just

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.720
<v Speaker 1>your average ones, the ones that take up a good

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a desk. If you've ever seen one of those,

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the size of a weighing desktop calculator.

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>These things were enormous. They weren't It's not like a

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>pocket calculator. It was a big piece of machinery. Uh,

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and these really have become Obsoletely, you can get a

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>basic scientific calculator that could do everything that the Wang

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>calculator could do, and you can put it in your pocket,

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>whereas these things, again were huge. Uh. The company Wang

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Laboratories went bankrupt in two and it was eventually acquired

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>by a company called g Tronics in and then essentially dissolved.

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>They folded it into their other divisions and it no

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>longer exists as its own entity anymore. It's kind of sad,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, the I can't disagree that an enormous desktop

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>calculator is now obsolete. Definitely. Now I am looking, okay,

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I found some pictures of this thing. It looks kind

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of like a word processor. Yeah, it's just it is enormous.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>This is um it's it's a computer. That's what it is. Exactly.

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Does it computes things? Yeah? Yeah, specifically bath that's really

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>what it computes yea various like scientific calculator type um functionality.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it was. It was big now. Granted, at

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the time it was a very advanced piece of machinery.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It's easy for us to kind of joke about it now,

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>but at the time it was it was cutting edge.

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>So it shows that we've gone a long way where

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you can hold something in the palm of your hand

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that can do everything that machine can do. Plus you

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>can just carry it around with you, and you know,

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the device, you could connect to the Internet.

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's something that that that machine never could have done. Uh.

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Analog telephones is our next one. Uh. The landline service

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>has been declining steadily since the mid two thousand's, and

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>digital systems are a huge, huge deal. I've heard that

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the FCC will allow phone companies to stop supporting analog

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>lines by and that by we would expect them all

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to be gone. Uh. I asked, do you still have

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a landline? No, I've moved to avoid box. Uh. Landlines

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are They're really helpful for things like, UH nine one

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one calls because you actually can of the dispatch, can

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>actually see where you are with that kind of thing.

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But these days I believe you can set your home

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>location with E nin one one, so at least you

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have that kind of functionality built back in. Although analog

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just regular landlines in general just they run with no

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>power since this power always going through them. Is there

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>a digital version of that that exists where you can

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have power going to it all the time, you know?

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I've never heard of one. I've always seen

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the digital lines having to get supplemental power, so I

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I also don't have a landline. I really

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like solely on cell phones now. Um. In fact, I

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a landline and probably a decade. UM. It's

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been a really long time since I bothered to

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to maintain one. I know there are a lot of

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>people who advocate that you should keep one like a

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>just a phone just plugged in somewhere, even if you

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have a regular phone line, just in case of

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>an emergency. UM. I know a lot of my friends

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>out in San Francisco do because that's part of their

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>earthquake preparedness kit. But here in Georgia, I don't have

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to worry about that. We get if we get an earthquake,

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's likely not strong enough for us to notice it, So, um,

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I haven't bothered with it, But yeah, I can see

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>why this one's on the obsolete list. It's still again,

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if you live in an area where you have to

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>worry about various kinds of power outages or whatever, often

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the phone line, not all the time, but often the

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>phone line can remain unaffected by that depending on the

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>nature of the outage, and it can be a really

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>useful tool. I just it's just one that I never

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>really think of. How about p d A S. Did

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you ever have a personal digital assistant? I did. I

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>had a Handspring Visor, and uh, if you guys don't

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>know what that's like, it's kind of like a smartphone

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>without the phone connectivity. But the Visor was show because

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it had the ability to have something called springboards in

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the back, kind of like a game Boy cartridge slot.

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>You'd remove this little plastic placeholder you put in something

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like a physician's dictionary, dictionary if you wanted, or encyclopedia,

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that is. You could even attach a cell phone attachment.

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So I actually my first cell phone was a Visor phone,

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>which anytime I handed to other people to use, they

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>did not understand that they had to use a stylist

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>or touch the screen to actually dial a number. And

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they were like, what about all the face grease. You're

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>putting your face against the screen. That's just really weird.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>This is back in like two thousand and two, I

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 1>want to say, so this is a long time ago.

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>That concept was very foreign back then. Were you a

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 1>p D A guy? I was not. I never had one.

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I I was actually a late adopter of cell phones. Um,

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but once I did adopted, I never looked back. So

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I went from not having any kind of personal digital assistant,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing like that. I had a computer at home, and

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I had a landline at home, and that was it.

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I was out and about, there was

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>no getting in touch with me and I if I

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>needed to call somebody, I had better have that phone

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>number memorized because that was the only way I was

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get it, unless they happened to be in

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the phone book. Yeah, we used to have phone books. Boy,

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember those two. Yeah, I still get them, even

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>though I have put myself on the do not send

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>list multiple times. But yeah, it's that is certainly one

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of those things the Internet has helped replace. But yeah,

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I never I never carried one around and by the

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>time I would have cell phones were a thing, and

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they were. They had enough basic functionality for me to

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>have a list of contacts with the people that I

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>would call more frequently than anyone else. Um and I

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>never really worried about using them to keep schedules because uh,

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>no one ever wanted me to go to anything, so

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need it. Um. Yeah, I was more of

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a second gen p d A guy. I just realized

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that my dad used to have the radio shack Rolodex,

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like the large one that you would pair with a

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 1>smaller one with I R so you can actually send

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it over. And these little the small ones like a

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>clamshell little device. It kind of looked like a business

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>card holder had very very like the spongy little keys

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>on it. It It kind of like rubber membrane that you

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 1>push and actually input stuff. But if you didn't want

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to do that, you could use the larger Rolodex one

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that had much larger keyboard. It looked like a child's

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>cashier kind of toy if you wanted to remember that

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>look like. And then for myself not only have the

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>visor phone back in college, I had some p d

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>A with a stowaway keyboard, because back when I was

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in college, kids didn't use laptops for anything, and we

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have We didn't have WiFi. I'm not even

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>making this up. There's no WiFi and cell signals are

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>basically for the really wealthy. So I would download my mail,

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd be between classes, type out the responses, and then

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 1>go back to my dorm and then sink it back

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to send out my messages. That was a long time ago,

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and that is really scary. Yeah, I skipped all that.

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And see the thing is that these truly are obsolete.

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>The smartphone has completely negated any need for the p

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>d A. The smartphone can do everything that the PDA

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>could do and more so. Uh, these days, I can't

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>even imagine not having my smartphone with me. In fact,

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I start to go through withdrawal if I haven't, if

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I've left it behind. If I happened to leave the

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>house and I realized I left the smartphone back at

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the house, it starts to gna me, which really is

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>more of an issue with my psychology than anything else.

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, I have to force myself to

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>go on vacations where I don't have cell service or

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>WiFi so that I can just get away from it.

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because it's something that I never used until

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone came along, Like I never used the p

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 1>d A or anything like that, and now I can't

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine not using it. I think. I think that speaks

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.839
<v Speaker 1>highly of the technology and not so highly for me. Yeah,

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>you are definitely somebody we should all pity so with you.

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. So what about pagers? Did you ever have

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those? I really wanted one when I was

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a kid, but my folks were like, no, not getting

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a pager, and they were right because who would be

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>calling me? It was like an eighth grade. There's no

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>reason for an eighth period to have pages. But my

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.919
<v Speaker 1>friends had them, and I'm like, wow, that's so cool.

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Who's calling you? And you'd have these cool messages, like

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the special number code because you couldn't text yet, so

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they'd be like, I know, four one one means there's

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>some information, or there's nine one one means there's some

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of emergency. I better go home or whatever it was,

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>or you call those people back. But I did not

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>personally have a pager because I was deemed not popular enough.

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a pager either, and I never got one,

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>mainly because I couldn't imagine a scenario where someone needs

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with me that badly, where if

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't next to my phone, uh, that it would

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be something necessary, you know, that they would need to

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>go to that extra step to get my attention. I

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>figured my phone and my answering machine were enough to

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>take care of all of that. Uh. And again, now

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that we've got cell phones and smartphones, pages are largely obsolete,

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with it being on this list. What

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>about portable television? Well, I'm being reminded in my head

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that pages aren't dead. I mean, doctors use them, and

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 1>there there are other versions that are available, like when

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you go to a restaurant and they give you a

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>pager and still technically a pager. So so everybody wants

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:44.359
<v Speaker 1>them writing to go. They're not dead. They're not dead.

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>We just think that, you know, these days, you wouldn't

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>be going to the store to get a pager. Right.

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:53.240
<v Speaker 1>What was the the other item you just mentioned, portable TVs?

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I I wanted them to work. These are

0:45:56.719 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely this is obsolute, like crazy, because there's enough streaming services.

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You can get things on your phones. But I had

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a Sony Watchman. Okay, do you know what that is? Yes, Okay,

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So if folks I don't know, it was this portable

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>television had about two point two inch screen. It was

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like a brick. It was pretty large, had a telescoping antenna.

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It was black and white. I had a mono speaker.

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And because the old days before the transition, UH, pretty

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>much getting a signal on the go kind of impossible.

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you were in a moving car it was useless.

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 1>You basically couldn't watch anything. It was really about. You

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>could bring it with you and you can stop and

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>look at it, and it just it didn't do a

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>very good job when it came to that. Battery life

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was terrible, the audio was terrible. And then something like

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>recently there was a version of this that came back

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 1>for cell phones called media Flow or flow TV. They

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.840
<v Speaker 1>had their own spectrum. Once the analog to digital conversion

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>happened with television waves here in the US, they were

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all these free frequencies. So they had bought this frequency

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was gonna be here. People are gonna have

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of cable like TV on their phones, it folded

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>within a couple of years. Apparently nobody really wants to

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>watch live TV on the go. I'm not sure why

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that is, but that's what apparently has been happening. I

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.720
<v Speaker 1>think I think live TV in general has really taken

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a hit. I mean, we've had so many ways of

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>watching stuff on demand whenever we are ready to watch it,

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that we are not held to the

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:36.240
<v Speaker 1>schedule of a television station or a channel or anything

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think that's really kind of filtered out

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>through the entire spectrum of platforms that you would get

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>television on. Granted, there's still shows that I will set

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>myself down so that I can watch it when it

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>comes on, but there I think there are only two

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that I do that for right now, and only one

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of them is what I like. I watch a show

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't like when it comes on ahead? Which one?

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Sleepy hollow? Oh? You just watched as you

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can criticize it? Is that right? That's yeah, it's mostly

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so I can feel superior by criticizing the historical inaccuracies

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and ridiculous plot holes in that show. I think my

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite I think you tweeted about a scientific inaccuracy, you

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do my it seems like, yeah, you can let go

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of the anachronisms, you can let go of the license

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is being taken. But when they can't get basic science

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>right at times, that's your Your tweet was quite hilarious. Yeah,

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I go a little bonkers with that. Yeah. I can

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>handle the fact that there is a headless horseman walking around.

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you get basic science wrong by trying to

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>create gunpowder by just lighting sulfur on fire, then I

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>really flip my lid. But listeners of tech stuff, no,

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>we did a full episode about fireworks and I explained

0:48:56.239 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>how to make fire gunpowder essentially, and they know you

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 1>can't just light sulfur on fire and have it explode

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and be gunpowder unless you live in the world of

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>sleepy Hollow. I guess I'm getting off track, all right.

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Our next one is another batch which I think we

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can just kind of dismiss out of hand, which is

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>um led watches, TV watches, the Saco wrist, computer calculator watches.

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Basically all the little gimmick watches and watches in general

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have really taken a hit. I mean, they're largely used

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 1>as an accessory now as jewelry because almost all of

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:35.399
<v Speaker 1>us have some other device on our person that has

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the time on it, so they're not as necessary. In fact, Uh,

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten to the point where even the smart watch,

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which is still trying to make headway into the consumer market,

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is having some issues because a lot of people ultimately say, well,

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 1>why do I need this? So I definitely agree that

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>these watches and watch form factors are all suitably on

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the obsolete list. Yeah, and I think there's a need

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for him other than fashion. I have my own wristwatch

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that i'd like to wear, and the big reason why

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I wear it is because it's a kinetic watch. That

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>technology has made watches a lot more palatable to me

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>because then they never die. That's the big thing holding back.

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of these things, like the spot

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:19.240
<v Speaker 1>watch back when Microsoft tried it, or like the smart

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>watches that are coming out in this generation, is the

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 1>fact that you have to charge something every day or

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it could die. And this is not the device you

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:28.399
<v Speaker 1>want to die. You actually want to know the time.

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's relatively important because you know your life might have

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a schedule. So uh, these gimmick watches, yeah, nobody, nobody

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:38.759
<v Speaker 1>really needs to have like a time X watch you

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 1>hold up to a cr team monitor that flashes a

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>signal that will give you the data. That was a thing.

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I love that idea because it was so ridiculous and

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and when I saw the demo it looked like it

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to induce seizures because the cr team monitor flickering.

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Which was brilliant idea of getting data from one device

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to another. It wasn't the greatest in execution. Definitely great curiosity.

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I loved these devices when they came out, but they

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 1>just didn't hit it. It was a very creative approach

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to trying to solve a problem, just not one that

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>was necessarily effective. Um. Yeah, and our our next one

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>would be CRT. You it's good that you mentioned the

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>CRT monitor because CRT monitors and CRT televisions are on

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the list now. These are cathode ray tube displays. They

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 1>had a vacuum tube and an electron gun. The gun

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>fired electrons at fluorescent screens and that would create the images.

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So uh, these were that This was like the main

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of television before you got all the great technologies

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 1>like l C, D, l E ED plasma stuff that

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed us to have these super slim flat form factors.

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Everything before that was CRT uh, And by two thousand

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that technology was pretty much on the way out. And

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, depending on the store you go into,

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you may not even be able to find a CRT

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>monitor or display in the door. Um, did you do?

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>You have a CRT and e CRT displays laying around?

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Not anymore. I used to have some CRT suh. You can.

0:52:09.760 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>You can probably pick up c RT s free on

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the streets to New York. I've seen them outside. They're

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just literally by the garbage and says free on it

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>says working. But I mean, nobody's really using these devices anymore.

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like the idea of a thirty two inch television,

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Like that's really tiny nowadays. But if you're in a

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:27.839
<v Speaker 1>thirty two inch television and it's a CRT, you're talking

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:30.280
<v Speaker 1>about a good one hundred to a hundred and fifty

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>pounds of television. So it wasn't like, hey, you wanted

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this TV upstairs, It's like, what is it? It's a

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>thirty two in CRT. No, that is noting downstairs. Yeah

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be the basement TV. Yeah that yeah, yeah, No,

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I I have some sitting in storage that I just

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 1>never got rid of. I need to find a an

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>electronics recycling program and put them through that way, because

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of electronics, CRT s can have some

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>some materials in them that are toxic, and so you

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to just throw it out if you can

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>avoid it. Um, it's better to find a way of

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of taking that to a recycling area where they can

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they can strip it of anything that's useful and dispose

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of the toxic stuff in a responsible manner. But yeah,

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I was happy to get away from the CRT technology.

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's so bulky, it's inefficient to it. It

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>uses up more electricity than other types of displays, so uh,

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you you can only get to a certain size before

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it just got too heavy to be practical and it

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was an electricity hog. So yeah, I was glad to

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>see this on the list. I definitely agree that it's obsolete.

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, you know, some CRT s still being used

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in places, but usually it's because it's part of a

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.120
<v Speaker 1>legacy system. Once again, like I've seen c rt s

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in some um air traffic control towers, but these are

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>usually older air traffic control towers that have it upgraded

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>their systems yet, and they're relying on eighty pound CRT s.

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And I know this because I had to move them

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:13.960
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time. The syrtes were fascinating subject for

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:16.319
<v Speaker 1>me in school. They were in a physics textbook. They

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>explained how how things worked when it comes to this. Uh.

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>They mentioned the electronic gun that was in the back shooting. Basically,

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he's drawing the picture in line by line. It's happening

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:26.680
<v Speaker 1>so quickly, and it was it was drawing the screen

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like like the first line and the third line and

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the fifth and then it would fill in the even numbers.

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:34.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you have something called interlacing. So it's

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just interesting to see that this stuff actually does permeate

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:40.399
<v Speaker 1>and cause issues like even today with some DVDs. If

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you see interlacing, it's based on this idea of how

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 1>these televisions were drawing the screen for you. It's the

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 1>picture for you, which I was. I was fascinating because

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 1>whoever thought this is the way we're gonna show a

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>moving image is let's just fire a gun really fast,

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. Pretty freaking interesting. But yeah, the c

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 1>RT they fully for my back and yours. Uh is

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>no longer a modern day issue, except when you move

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty pound ones like you do. Yeah, that was not

0:55:08.680 --> 0:55:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a fun job. I'm glad I don't have that job anymore.

0:55:11.880 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So we've got lots more to get through. But what

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, I AS, if you're amenable to it, is

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>wrapping up this episode and then maybe chatting on a

0:55:21.560 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 1>second one about the remaining ones. And uh, I just

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have a discussion about any kinds of technology that we

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think are obsolete that should have made the list but didn't.

0:55:30.680 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>That would be excellent. I'd love that all right. Well,

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for our listeners who might not be familiar with your

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 1>work or where to find you, what would be the

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 1>best way to track down I as actor, you know,

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:44.279
<v Speaker 1>in a totally friendly kind of way, not a scary

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Liam Neeson kind of way. Right, So, if you want

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to find me on the internet, the

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 1>easiest way is to find me on Twitter. My husue

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 1>name is i As I y A Z. I got

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it early, so I'm usually just i AS on the Internet.

0:55:57.160 --> 0:55:59.439
<v Speaker 1>If you want to find me, like at where I work,

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:02.439
<v Speaker 1>check see net dot com. I have penn some things

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 1>every now and then I do some videos every now

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and then, uh so check me out and I usually

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:10.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly Twitter. I just if you want to find out

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing, like second to second and find out

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>what's irritating me today, Twitter is the way to go.

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 1>There you go. And if you want to get in

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:19.880
<v Speaker 1>touch with us, you can send us an email the

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:23.279
<v Speaker 1>addresses tech stuff at how stuff works dot com, or

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you can drop us a line on Twitter or Facebook

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or Tumbler that's the third one, or handle it all

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:32.919
<v Speaker 1>three is tech Stuff H s W. And we will

0:56:32.960 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>continue this obsolete discussion releases for more on this and

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:52.879
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics. Does it Works dot Com