WEBVTT - Mini Crush #25

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you everybody? Welcome to movie Crush Miny Crushed style,

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the routiness, stuteness, Rambles, rambles show on the internet. We

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>all riding rope, some movies riding ropes, some movies riding

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>ropes and movie is that's the waynes world reference? Is it? Really? Yeah,

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're doing the green screen bit and it's like

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm in textas's go riding rope and broncos. And then

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like I'm in New York. I got a gun,

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to a Broadway show. And then it's like,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Delaware. Look, it's Delaware. You ever been to Delaware?

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Poor Delaware? Hi? No, I have been to Delaware. In fact,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I broke down on the side of the road in

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Delaware and uh, well, I'm not gonna finish this story.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, that's fine. We can use their imagination. You know,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Delaware is where most big corporations have their corporate address

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because of some tax loophole or like interesting, so a

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of places will have like a po box or

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>incorporated business address in Delaware because of some kind of

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>tax loophole. That's all I can tell you about that. Boy.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm gonna say, and this is controversial,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Delaware maybe the most forgotten state, you know what I mean,

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>except it's on It's where all your credit card bills

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>come from. Chuck, take a look. Really, I'm telling you, man, Yeah,

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>every one of them. But it's right there, like next

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to everything that gets so much more press yea, and

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Delaware is just Rhode Island. Though Rhode Island. Uh well,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Rhode Island gets a little bit more

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>love because it's uh so tiny. Yeah, and because it's

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on the shore line and Newport and is all wonderful

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and folk festival there. It's of I'm not dissing Delaware,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but I feel bad for Delaware sometimes. You know, I

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think Delaware gets and I don't I don't even

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>know the name of a city in Dela Dover. That's

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing, right, Delaware crushers right in give us the

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>scoop on why Delaware rules and maybe why there's tax

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>loopholes or a thing there. Yeah, they're like, you guys

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. We're living large. And I used to

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>go camping at the Delaware water Gap at Sunfish Pond,

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>but that is in New Jersey and it sounds nice though,

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Sunfish Pond, it's lovely. I took it was just you

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>were just holding back on the juice checkers. I had

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a good time there one time, A few times. Alright,

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>moving on, geez hey, it's a rough start, was it?

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was delightful. All right, we're gonna go

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>with social studies right out of the gate here everyone,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>social movie crosh because I posed this question to you

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>last night. Uh and no, this was inspired by you,

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>sirs um. I'm gonna call this deal breaker movies. Remember

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>when you talked about true stories. But here's how I

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>posed it. You're on a date, a blind date. It's

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 1>going great, you're having a good time. You're at dinner,

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and you mentioned one of your favorite films in your

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>date not only hates the movie, but like makes fun

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of it, actively chides the movie. Yeah, what movie of

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>your favorites would make you in the date right there?

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Like mm hmm, gotta go yeah check please yeah? No, No,

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like I said, I mind mind is always

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those like you know, something like a being

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>John Malkovich or anything that has like an absurd kind

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of Brazil quality. If they don't get that down with

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of weird, wacky filmmaking. Then I'm it's not

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, not gonna happen, and it's God forbid they

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>make a crack about that's where Eternal Sunshine or something.

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I will stupid movie. Just get over the girl already.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you are a horrible person. All right, here

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we go. We're gonna read through all these. Rick Broyder

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>says Shaw Shank. If you don't like that movie, we

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can't be friends. Lisa Pott says rocket Man. If you

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>can't enjoy the silly, stupid comedy, then hit the road.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Jack Megan Broyle says polar opposites, but probably the pianist

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>or step brothers. They either have no idea what a

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>good film is or a very different sense of humor.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm done with that. Ian Tyson says Princess

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Bride star wars with the Dark Knight. Movies are too important.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Horowitz says, I'm gonna go with a relatively new

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and but grand Budapest hotel. The pastel backdrops contrast with

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a dark humor was so comforting to me. All Right,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with that. I love that movie. Monica Voth says,

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>The Fifth Element my favorite all time movie in my family,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and I quote it constantly. My husband and I had

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a standoff when we first dated over

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Seinfeld versus Friends, because Friends is my favorite show. But

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we spent two years watching every episode of Seinfeld in

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>order then every episode of Friends and helps smooth things over. Clearly,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Seinfeld is the superior show. Just putting that out there

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>right now. I like Friends. I like them both. Okay,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of both. You like Friends? I

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>still watch Friends? Yeah, yeah, okay, you didn't like Friends.

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I take I did not like Friends. Just so basic.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>It's like an espresso versus a super double chi vanilla latte.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, millennials. Kindle Appell says, I'm not just saying

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this honestly, but Harry Potter the movies. Yeah, just trying

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to stoke the old fire here, I guess our Harry

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Potter fire. Well. A big sentiment on the Harry Potter

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>h Perma thread that that is a thing on the

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook group the Movie Crushers. You also check it out

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't already. Um is a lot of people

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>saying love the books the movies were mad and I

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>haven't read the books, so I have no nothing to

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>compare them. So you read all the books, and I

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>have not read all the books. I haven't read any

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of the books, Chuck, I haven't even seen all the movies.

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You keep doing this, you and you keep being surprised.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, I've never read any of the books, and

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I've only seen some of the movies. But the reason

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like make it to the end was because

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought the movies were just kind of mad as

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>movies and again explained the lower back tattoo of of

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>uh dim dimbl Edar Griffin ditch. You know it was.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a wild time in my youth. Ye, yeah,

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>late nights. Jessica Lynn Dialbo. She's back, She says hot

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Rod certainly not the best movie, but a good indication

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of my humor. All right, that's The Lonely Island dudes,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>She's oh sure, I never saw it though I haven't either,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but I've heard that I had someone a friend just

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>screaming the praises of this movie. And I really really

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like The Lonely Island guys, So I'm sure it's funny. Well,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Jessica says, her husband likes it, so they're a good match.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Let me see here. Patricia Caffrey says, I dumped my

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>crush on John Cusack due to his pretentious dissing of

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Better Off Dead. He is now dead to me. I

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that John Kusack himself, just his own movie.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Well he remember we've talked about how problematic he is,

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, that's true. He has come out and talked

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>trash about that movie, which is so short sighted because

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like, it's obviously an artifact of the time, and

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a delightful movie. And he's made so many shitty movies.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you diss the Edgar Allan Poe movie or

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Hot Tub Time issues, the Room seven there was one

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that was about Oh my god, all right, I think

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this has officially started what will become a long standing

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>John Cusack thread in this show. Yeah funk that guy.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Victoria Miller ten Drn says, Uh, my partner is a

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>bit older than me from a different country, so there'll

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be times, and we have no idea what the others

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>references are. However, if when we met he hated all

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>female reboots, we wouldn't be here today. So I guess

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about like the Ghostbusters thing. May It's my

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>question is is there a longstanding tradition of female reboots

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or is it sort of a more recently it's a

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>more recent that I think so too. Yeah, because there

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>was the Oceans uh female reboot or whatever, and then

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>there's the Ghostbusters and I'm all for it. Why not?

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, is this like really form firmly established

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or is it Hollywood just kind of testing the waters. Well,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the only reason I'm cynical is because it's Hollywood never

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>has like it's trying to put their best foot forward

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 1>as a as a people. Um, it's just a money

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to Hollywood, as it as always, so they're probably

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to take advantage of the female empowerment movement to

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>make some money. You know, there's an article I just

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>found on The Guardian called Lord of the Flies two

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Oceans eight how Hollywood reboots are flipping gender. So apparently

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a new thing. They're doing a Lord of the

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Flies all all female reboot, which could be super interesting totally.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Why not. Why not have boys and girls on the

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>island fighting each other? You know, it has to be

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all girls. Okay, that's fine. Uh, William Angus says, normally

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say die Hard. However, my first full date

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>with my new girlfriend was die Hard five. Well, that's

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not the original die Hard. Greta Coney, this says the

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>wedding singer. Carry mcquaide says, probably Emily or spirited away.

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Jack Colin Sarah, Noh, boy, this is a controversial in

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>my house last night. If she liked Boyhood, then we're done.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh if she liked it, Boyhood is not the worst

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>movie I've seen, but it's totally obnoxious and I barely

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>consider it a film. Uh yeah, And my wife saw

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this last night on the Facebook, and she wanted to

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>call Jack out and say, Jack, you should not be

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be on the internet. Interesting. Interesting, your your

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>internet licenses revoked, sir, That's what she said. See. I

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's a bridge too far, though, Chuck that level

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of of that level of just ire. Yeah about Boyhood,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>about Boyhood, because again I haven't even seen it, and

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I've heard people on both sides of the of the

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>aisle on that one. But but to hate it well,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and also on I thing too, This whole this whole

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>question was about a movie where if someone didn't like it,

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>then you'd be done with this. Guy is going so

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>far as to say, if you like this movie, She's like,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I really like Boyhood. It was very sweet, tender movie

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about a family. Fuck get out. Yeah, Internet privileges revoked. Sorry,

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Jack Close that laptop, Ted McDonald. If a girl was

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing the sand Loot and she didn't, at least I

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>think it was funny. If not a classic, there would

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>forever be a rift that I can't build a bridge across.

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>My brother worked on that movie, Holly Lancaster Memoirs of

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a Geisha. She said, maybe if they've never seen it

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>or even and I loved it, but if the downright

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>hate it and make fun of it, we're done. J

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>b Ray says, for me, it would be either Evil

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Dead Too or The Warriors JV. That's those are good movies,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>but uh yeah, not every I wouldn't say every woman

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on Earth loves The Warriors. Yeah. I haven't seen The Warriors. Um,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's kind of a dudes movie. Kind

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of it seems that way from the trailers area are

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the clips I've seen. But Evil Dead Too certainly does

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>point to the appreciation of a certain schlocky splattery aesthetic. Agreed. So,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would be down, you know what, I

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>would be pleasantly surprised and super stoked if if a

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>woman that I was seeing was really into like evil

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>dead to through the Army of Darkness or whatever. I

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like we did we have some stuff to talk about. Yeah, absolutely,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh Summer west Woodward Um, Forrest Gump shawshankin Silence of

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the Lambs, Kia, Chrisostom, Crisostomo, Um, if it didn't get

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>any money, Python movie, or I would know that our

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor would not jibe. Although she says jive

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>not to call you out, think you mean job. You know,

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I had a moment the other day where I almost

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>used jib instead of jibe. Caught myself last minute. Yep.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Would it looked like a fool? Now? I think so

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>many people say jib and don't even know jibs word.

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding, It's exactly right. Yeah. Uh. Duncan Creamer says, well,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be one thing if they didn't like it,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>no harm, no foul, but if they actually made fun

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of Blade Runner, Bye bye. I'm gonna go through some

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of these really quickly. Here Abigail Gonzalez as the Princess Bride.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Dale Nakagawa says the goonies agree there. Vicky Mahoney says

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>White Christmas. Lisa Pott says love Actually. Peter Middleton Jr. Crookland, Oh, Peter,

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>he said it is so nostalgic for me in a

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple message of families sticking together through thick and thin,

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and gets me every time at the end. Peter, Uh, dude,

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I love that movie so much. You and I park

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>our cars in the same garage. My friend, big, big

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>fan of Krookland Susan Fairchild Smith Breakfast at Tiffany's. Tyler

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Alton says the pest with John Leguizamo were Sir Ninja's interesting.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Serf Ninja Alright. Not not a good movie. I don't know,

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I mean, I haven't seen that, but

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I just love Tyler's. No, it's cool but pretty well established.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a good movie, but it's one of those

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>bad movies that's maybe so bad that it's fun. They've

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>actually done it. On how to this get made? Before

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with your buddy Paul Shear, Huh, I have to check

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that one out. Jill sort of Vinden says The Outsiders

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Isabelle calledwell, says Mama Mia, I actually like

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like that movie. Lee Dallas as Princess Bride, Lynn bob Um.

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>She says, it doesn't matter the movie. Anyone who makes

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>fun of something you love on a first date is

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a past Lynn. That is a great point. I'm with

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you there. Richard Memorris has Pixar films in general. Uh.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Cameron McPhail says Ghostbusters the original, Ashley Reynolds, Dead Poets Society,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Lee Less Stovica, Star Wars the original three of course. Uh.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Jean Sharp, Casablanca. I haven't seen Casablanca. I haven't either. Yeah,

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right. That was one of the ones on the

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>list that we were supposed to watch. Yeah, we should

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>watch it together. And my girlfriend has never seen any

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars movie, and she holds it as a point

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of pride. She's saving them for like her dying days,

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>when she can just marathon all of them. Be a

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of movies by that, and I think, so movies, Well,

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>she can just watch the good ones, the first three.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, A couple more here, Uh, my buddy, Debbie says.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>My roommate says, almost famous, I say say anything. Yeah,

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with both of those. Hi, Debbie Kristin

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Fordham says The Lost Boys. Tim Durante says Bill and

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Ted's excellent Adventure. Karina Kingtana Ferris Bueller or any Hughes movie.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Justin Ritter coming to America. Melanie Pearson star wars, Gary

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Garon Schuler Lonesome Dove. Al Right, Tyler Mink has to

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be RoboCop, Dale Fontaine, Forrest Gump or the original die Hard.

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And let me finish up with one more here, let

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>me see here. Ian Lyons has punch drunk Love. That's

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a classic. Al Right, everyone, I appreciate those. Sorry if

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you didn't get read, but we're moving on to segment

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>two now, another edition of Almost Famous, wherein we go

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>over actors famous or not to turn down what could

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have been roles of a lifetime. We're gonna start out

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>with John Lithgow. He almost played the Joker twice apparently

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>um in the original Joe Dante version of the movie

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that never got made, Joe Dante was gonna make Batman,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and then again in Tim Burton's first movie he uh

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was gonna play the Joker. I think John Lithgow would

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have been a great Joker Man. It's almost like more

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of a classic Joker And now I don't know that

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's an odd choice. I wonder how they

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>would have done him up. I wonder if they would

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>have like given him the the wig and the green

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hair and everything, or if they would have kind of

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>leaned more on the way he actually looks that. That's interesting. Well,

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if it would have been Tim Burton, I think he

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>would have gone with the same yea, the same kind

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of book he look But Jack was great in it.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But I could totally see John Leftgow. I'd been down

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with that Emma Stone one for La La Land. But

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>originally that movie was gonna be Emma Watson. In fact,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be Emma Watson and Miles Teller in

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>La La Land a movie you hate you mean Hermione

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Harry Potter films. Harry what um is that?

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>A movie about a Potter that's Harry? Yeah, that'd be funny.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>H A. I r y Potter. Yeah, the here suit Potter.

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I love that word. Here suits wonderful. Uh. Mark Wahlberg,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I ain't gonna call him out on this because he

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>originally read for Brokeback Mountain I believe in the Jake

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Jillenhall part, and he has admitted to quote being a

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>little creeped out after reading the script. What's all those

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna kiss the dude? Yeah, exactly, as that's how

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark Wahlberg talks. Uh. He said it was very graphic

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and descriptive. I told Angley, I like you, you're a

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>challenge to guy, and if you want to talk about

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it more, but thankfully he didn't, So Mark Wahlberg, Uh

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>g f y, sir, seriously, and good for you Jake

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>jillen Hall for not being a homophobe. Yeah, no doubt.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Back two steps. Did you hear that Joaquin Phoenix is

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>going to play the Joker in the new Joker only

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Joker centric movie? Oh? Really? And I like it so not?

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh what's his face? From? No? God? That Jared leto?

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Now they're done with that guy. I thought that he

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't see that movie, but I thought that was supposed

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to be like the only good thing was his Joker

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>was good. He was only in the movie for like

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>five seconds and then the real makeup of the Joker,

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>it was like he was we had like gold teeth

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and like dumb face. Tattoos, and it was just it

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was a weird choice. Did you see that movie? I did.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's that It's not good. It's just like you could

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>tell it was a movie. They had to like fix,

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>they had to triage that and and and post and

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>every scene was just a big set piece song with

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>very little like dialogue, and then the stuff that did

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have dialogue was like painful. Not do you make a

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>movie that bad? I mean, it's that that's that big,

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and like, you know, no exactly, I don't know. I

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>mean it definitely, it's it's it's a movie. It's a movie,

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's I don't know, it's it's it's it's it's

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a good popcorn kind of bullshit movie. But yeah,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Jared Leto's Joker is only in it like for a

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>few minutes at the beginning and then at the end.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So Joaquin Phoenix, huh, yeah, I can see that he's

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a he's a good actor. Boy. It's hard to beat

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to Heath Ledger, though he was fantastic. El Woods from

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Legally Blonde, who Reese Witherspoon played up almost went to

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Christina Applegate, and I believe she said that she felt

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like she was getting typecast a little bit. I could

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have seen her in that role though from Married with

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Children and Anchorman. Yeah, she would have been good. Will

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Smith almost played Neo in The Matrix. Interesting. I totally

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>could see that. Absolutely uh. And he says that he

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>does not regret it. He said, I don't think I

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would have been right for it anyway. He said, I

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't fully get it. The Matrix was a difficult concept

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to pick to pitch, and in the pitch, I just

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it. But when I saw Ki and his performance,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and I rarely say this, but I would have really

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>messed it up. I wasn't smart enough as an actor

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to let the movie be Yeah. Interesting, I appreciate that.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Will Smith, Yeah, uh, let me see here. Leonardo DiCaprio's

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>originally cast as Dirk Diggler in Boogie Nights, but he

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>turned it down to appear in Titanic and recommended his

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>friend Mark Wahlberg, who had been in The Basketball Diaries

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>with him, to Pete Anderson and I remember reading about Leo.

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>He said that he, uh, not so much regrets it,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>but really wishes he could have done both movies. He's like,

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I really wish I could have been Dirk Diggler. Sure

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he would have been. It would have been great. I

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>saw the first stills from the new Terrance you know movie,

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>How Did Too? Yeah, with the DiCaprio and Brad Pitt

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>looking like Paul newmanan and Robert Redford's right, and DiCaprio

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>still a weirdly ageless. He still looks like he's fifteen

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>years old. To me, I don't know, you think he's

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>getting there? Well, he's filled out as a man, I guess.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to say he's puffy, no, because

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm the puffiest. Well, you know, I guess that is mean.

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just a nostalgia thing. It's just that face.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>He's just got such a baby face. You know, that's true. Yeah,

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>it is weird because every remember when he first started

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>getting cast in like really adult roles. I was kind

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of like, yeah, but he's a kid. He didn't can

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he pull this off? But I think he does. He's

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>got the chops. Man, I'm looking. I'm I don't know.

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Tarantino has a little problematic these days, but I am

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>This movie is intriguing, kind of doing a big Hollywood

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>story with the Manson murders kind of at the center.

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting idea. Yeah, I can't wait. And I'm

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a jump a fan of like l A and old

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>l A history and yeah, me too. I'm sure it'll

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>look super cool and as much trash as I talked

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about Tarantino. I'm going to go see every one of

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>his movies. Still he still has me wrapped around his

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>his grubby little finger. I just mean the way he

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of defend didn't defend Weinstein, but it kind of

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>came out that like he knew more than that on

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you know what most of Hollywood did. You know?

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a big ugly secret out in public or

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not public, but you know, yeah what they call it

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>an open secret? Yeah, all right. Trueman Capody, the author

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of Breakfast at Tiffany's, wanted Marilyn Monroe to play Holly

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Golite golightly, but she turned it down because she was

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>warned it would be bad for her image. Classic movie.

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>You ever seen Breakfast at Tiffany's Only clips I've ever

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>seen the whole thing. Good movie, not what you think,

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it is, but it wasn't what I thought.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a very kind of depressing movie. Jerry McGuire,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>imagine Tom Hanks shouting show me the money is what

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>this website says. Uh. Cameron Crow had Tom Hanks in

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>mind when he wrote it, but he was directing his

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>other movie, That Thing You Do. I to believe the

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>first movie he directed. So Tom, the Beatles esk kind

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of boy band. Yet I don't know, man, That's sort

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of what Tom Hanks is about. He can kind of

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>fall into a lot of different roles. I think he

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>would have been good. Jerry McGuire think so. Yeah, I agree.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I like the Cruise though, as much as I want

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to punch his face. Yeah, Like that's a very punchable face. Yeah.

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But like usually, like most of his roles, he's good. Yeah,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>he's good. Uh, Tom Cruise. Once again, he was almost

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>in Footloose. He almost played Ran and Footloose after Risky Business,

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>but he did all the right moves instead. Uh. And coincidentally,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Rob Low also apparently auditioned three times for Footloose, but

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the end had an injury so he couldn't dance,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and so Ran became Kevin Bacon for life. Molly Ringwald

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was going to play the lead in Pretty Woman evidently

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and turned it down, and she says that she does

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not regret it. She said in a Reddit a m A.

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>She said, Julie Roberts is what makes that movie. It

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was her part, and every actor hopes for a film

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that lets them shine like that. So great attitude. Mully Ringwald.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It's weird. We we talked about all this stuff. You

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you think about a thing that maybe you don't typically

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>when you're just watching movies. Is the idea of like

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>walking into a room to audition for a part and

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>they're being fifty other people in there that look just

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like you and that are wearing the same you know,

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>piece of clothing that they ask you to wear, have

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>their hair done in a certain way. It's a very

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>weird world. Hollywood. Yeah, I used to occasionally I would

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>be in charge of videotaping casting sessions. Uh only did

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that like four or five times, but it was always

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting and I always felt not bad because these people

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>are there there by their own choice or doing what

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.959
<v Speaker 1>they want to do. But it's such an intimidating, awful

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>process to audition for a part. Um. I don't know.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I always just felt like, man, I'm glad I'm not

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on that side of camera. Totally, man, I don't think

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I've got the stones for it. Yeah. And then on

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Stuff You Should Know TV show, I was actively

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>involved in the casting, and UM, let me just say this,

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>there was one actor who really blew us away in

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>casting that ended up not being very good. And it

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was one of those things where I was like, Wow, interesting,

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>how that can happen like great in the casting room,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not good on set in real life. And I guess

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a good casting director kind of knows when to record,

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>how to recognize and to mitigate that kind of stuff. Yeah,

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly not me. I tried though. All right, stream

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:50.239
<v Speaker 1>this everyone, and then comment card. I'm gonna tell you

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie I watched recently that you can stream now

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>from last year Academy Award nominee Hostiles. Did you see that,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Noel Christi in Bale Western? Oh Hosta. I thought you

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>met the one with the chainsaws and the drills and

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the European tourists. Hostile. Oh no, not Hostiles. No. Do

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 1>you like Westerns? I do? All right, I would check

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>it out if I were you. Um, if you don't

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>like Westerns, then just go ahead and tune out. But

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>this is a different kind of Western it's um. The

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>story is Christian Bale is a a soldier, I guess

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a Union soldier post war who is been tasked by

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the president orders from the President of the United States

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>himself to take a a dying Native American chief and

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a warrior I believe, a Cheyenne warrior and his family

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>back to his homeland in Montana. Uh. And it is

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>said at a time this movie where you are, and

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the movie has a lot it's it's sort of kind

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of the point of the movie in a lot of

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>ways of the reparations to what we had done to

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the Native Americans, and even back then an early understanding

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of like, wow, this was really fucked up what happened,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and we need to sort of try and repair this

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in certain ways. One of the ways is returning this

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>chief to his homeland. Christian Bale is very much um,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>which you would call a hater of Native Americans because

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he fought in many wars against them and saw many

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of his friends brutally murdered in battle by Native Americans.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Although it's very complicated movie because it's not black and white.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>He himself, he said, at one time took more scalps

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>than sitting bull because Christian Bale was a fierce warrior

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in battle. So it's there's a lot wrapped up here

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot to unpack. Rosamund Pike is great in it. Um.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>She comes along in the journey. I won't spoil how

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they get hooked up, but she ends up on this

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>journey with the six or seven American soldiers taking this family.

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the warrior chief played by West Study,

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>who was great in this movie. And I think his

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>son and may be daughter in law and grandkids. I

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think there were like four or five of them. And um,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just the treatment. It also stars Rory Cochrane, Jesse Plemons,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Ben Foster, some of my favorite character actors, and uh,

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just interesting. It's interesting how they portray the relationship

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of these soldiers to the task at hand, which they

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>initially don't want to do. Um. Things kind of change

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the movie. The relationship evolves. It's

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>brutally violent. Um, and it's a backdrop of the American

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.479
<v Speaker 1>West where kind of anything goes. They could be attacked

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>by a Native Americans, they could be attacked by fur traders,

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they could be attacked by anybody at any moment and

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>our and um it covers PTSD and you know, like

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you never think of PTSD in these old school like

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Civil War Native American War films, and one of the characters,

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Rory Cochrane, is clearly experiencing PTSD from his time in

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the Native American Wars, and it's kind of rare to

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>see that kind of thing covered in a Western, not

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a I mean, i'd say, not a ton of dialogue.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of dialogue, but a lot goes unset in

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the movie, a lot of quiet moments. It's not it's

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>spoon feedee. I just found it to be a very

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>very interesting, different kind of Western, So I highly recommend Hostiles,

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're into Westerns. Have you been watching Westworld? Nope? Cool?

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you like it? Yeah? I do. It's one of

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>those shows though that like you almost have to listen

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to some sort of supplementary material the Yeah, there really is.

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>There's one particular podcast I like called Decoding Westworld that

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>gives you an episode by episode kind of breakdown and

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>some questions and some things they think are bullshits and

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>some things they think are interesting Easter eggs. But it

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is a show that rewards you if you give it

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a chance. But I'm not quite sure where it's heading.

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And it has some things in it that are kind

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of ridiculous, but there are a few moments of just

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>poetry in that show. It's it's there's a lot of

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>cool things about it. Yeah, it's good. I've been holding out.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I watched the first episode when it came out and

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>liked it, okay, and then just sort of got busy.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But how it happens and on tipe back. Yeah, alright,

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna finish up with five questions on the comic

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>card BINGI Jazak says, what do the initials A C

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and other initials at the end of people's names during

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the credit mean? Well, Benji, good question. Um, those are

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>those are unions? Uh, that's sort of the easy answer.

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think we had uh kind of talked about

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this before right now. Yeah, I think I asked something

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about it because like there's not some of those that

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are really long and convoluted, like they're more than just

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a C. There's a bunch of different letters for different positions. Yeah,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a C as American Cinema editors, So it's just a

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>union thing. Good question, though, Benji Uh, Laura Lynn like

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the singer you said that before too. Yeah, yeah, she's

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>written in which movie placement? Uh? Which movie product placement

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>did you find the most obvious or awkward? Well, Loretta,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>any car stuff usually makes me cringe. Really yeah? Well

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>how so, like how how how would it be really

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>obvious that it was this certain car? Uh? Having the

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>camera set low and the car going right up to

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the front of it with the Mercedes ben symbol perfectly,

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>or any just really obvious framing of the car logo

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or flat out mentioning the car. That's true. The one

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for me is always like soda cans or or beers

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that are turned just perfectly label facing the camera. You know,

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty obvious that that's that's for the opposite of

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that is if you don't have any clearance and you

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are clearly covering it. Yeah, that's also funny. Uh yeah,

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>any any of the the car stuff really bums me

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>out because it's sometimes it's just so obvious and gross

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and it takes me out of the movie immediately. Amanda

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Harris says, sorry if you've discussed this before, but what

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>is your ideal role on a movie set? Amanda, We

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have not discussed that. I don't think or maybe we have,

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think my ideal role would be either two

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs um writer, director, which is two roles. I mean,

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, yeah I want to make a movie. Yeah,

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but if I'm not gonna if I'm gonna give up

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the reins and and not to be the director, I

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>would say editor. I would love to edit a film.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I always loved editing when I made short films. Was

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorite part of the process, and I was pretty

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>good at it. I think do you feel like the

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>high level editors are like kind of verbally like telling

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>people what to do. Are they actually clicking the mouse

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and doing the doing the work. Well, I think they're

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>totally clicking the mouse. Yeah. I think editors really get

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>into that work, get in there, and they have assistance

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that log footage and cull things, do that kind of

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>grunt work. But I think the editors still very much

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like if like just back in the old days they

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sat there with their white gloves on and taped film together.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But there are probably situations is where a director might

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>be more directly involved with an editing pure where they're

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>out over their shoulder, almost sitting in the room sitting

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in the room. Yeah, and hopefully in that situation it's

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a collaboration, you know, Yeah, Because I mean the thing

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about editing too is if you it's a it's it's

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a specialized skill. But it's also one of the

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>first things you kind of have to understand when if

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you're making a film. So even if you're a director,

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got to shoot with the edit in mind and

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way. But like a lot of times,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like that we're talking about it with Suicide Squad, if

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you end up having to fix problems in the edit,

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you probably weren't that good of a director in the

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>first place. Yeah, And it's hard to fix in an edit. Uh.

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think a good director knows when to defer,

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>or good director knows when to defer to an editor,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know for sure. Oh and nowadays too, Um, a

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of times there they're doing a little rough cuts

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on set. Sometimes with the advances in digital filmmaking, they

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>probably have like a cart and of just like like

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>an editing a mini editing suite. Sometimes you can put

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>together a little rough kind of whatever that day. It's crazy, uh,

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>just to give the director and idea of what's going on,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of cool. All right, Alejandro Mehia green

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>beautiful name. Do you own and still buy physical media? Well, Alejandro,

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I still own physical media. I still own CDs that

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>are in a box in my attic and DVDs that

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are in a box in my attic. I don't generally

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>buy physical media anymore. I I'm a hold out in

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways. And I was hold out on

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>cassettes from records, hold out on CDs from cassettes, then

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to hold out on m P three's from CDs. I

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>was usually a late adopter of things, but I have

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>fully kind of switched over. Now what about you know? Yeah,

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a drawer of DVDs that I very rarely

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>pull out anymore because I can usually find what I'm

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for elsewhere. And uh, I know, our buddy Casey

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>pegram Um is an avid collector of Criterion Blue Rays

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>or four K Prince and he's just sort of a

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>classicist in that respect where he really likes to have

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that shelf of respect all his favorite films, which I

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>respect as well. And there's amazing stuff they're doing with

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>restorations and Blu Ray or four K restorations of like

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Prince and the whole Janie Films library and all that stuff.

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's pretty cool. Yeah, that's totally worthwhile. Uh. And

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>then finally, Brandy McCabe, what are your favorite heist and

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or grifter movies? Brandy, I made a small list. The

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>original Oceans eleven and by original, I don't mean the original,

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the remake, the first remake, the Soderberg I

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed that one. Reservoir Dogs, of course we've talked

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>about on the show Heat. We talked about on the

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>show Bottle Rocket, great heist movie. Uh. And The Underneath

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that I believe I've talked about during my Steven Soderberg

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>highlight reel his second film. Highly recommend The Underneath. And

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>then finally for heist movies, I think a movie that

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was a little underseen was Sexy Beast. Did you ever

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>see that? With Ben Kingsley? Great movie and one of

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the great bank heist I've ever seen. Because you think

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you've seen it all until you've seen an underwater bank heist.

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's all I'll say. Yep, You're like, what does

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 1>that mean? How could you do that? Here you go?

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Here it is love Sexy Beast, the great Ray Winstone too.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And then for grifter movies. While the Grifters classic film

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw American Hustle on there. Highly enjoyed that one.

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Catch me if you can. Great great heist movie, I'm sorry,

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>grifter movie. And then a movie I think is underseen

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and underrated, The Brothers Bloom. Did you see that? No,

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that was the first movie of somebody interesting though, I believe,

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.959
<v Speaker 1>well the second movie it was Ryan Johnson. Ah, yes,

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>after a brick and not. I mean a lot of

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>people saw it, but it was I think underseen and undersold?

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Was it Adrian Brody? Okay, I haven't seen it, I'm

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>just aware of it. You dig it? Very good grifter movie.

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Totally liked it. Uh. And then you know what I

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just thought it when dirty rotten scoundrels on the comedy

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>side of classic. Al Right, everybody, that's it for this week.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for tuning in your homework. Oh boy, James

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Bond fans, get ready, I was gonna say your homework,

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>should you choose to accept it that that would have

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>been a mission impossible reference. Uh, we have a James

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Bond special coming up this week, So Bond fans, you're

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really excited because I had the wonderful and

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the charming and hysterical Matt gore Lean. Matt has a

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of He has several podcasts. He's a member of

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the Super Ego, au Quatrete, Quatrow Quartet, Quatrain Quartet of

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>improv comedians alongside Jeremy Carter and Mark McConville and the

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>great Paul Left Thompkins and Super Ego. If you have

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a little into it, it's one of the great great

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>podcast comedy podcasts of all time. And they're doing stuff again,

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>which is great. And uh, Matt Gorley also does I

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Was There Too, a wonderful podcast where he interviews very

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>much side characters from movies, from famous movies and like

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>not even the co star, like the eighth person down

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>on the call sheet, which is why it's called I

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Was There Too. Pretty clever. And then his great James

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Bond podcast called James Bonding. He has a legit James

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Bond expert, very well known for his Bond knowledge and enthusiasm.

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 1>And I said, hey, Matt, come into l A. Can

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we do a Bond special and uh, talk about Bond

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>films in general. And then what what would be your

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>choice for a favorite film? Did you guys Bond over Bond?

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, sorry, I love it. That's a great ten

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty am joke. Uh So he went with Casino Royal,

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the the first offering from Daniel Craig. It's in his

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Bond franchise history, and I got to watch it again

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and man, what a fucking great movie. That part where

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets whipped in the nuts by the rope and

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>just that whole opening parkour chase. It's like, now it's

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a solid, solid picture. Yeah, really really good movie.

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's what Goreley went with, and we talked a

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>lot about Bond everyone, so you will be delighted if

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you're a fan of James Bond. Well that's the thing too,

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>It's like you can't talk about the new Bond without

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about the old Bond because it jumps off of

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the tropes of the old ones that

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of updates them, and there's a lot of the

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>character becomes a little more complex and the newer ones

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a little more brooding. And anyway, yeah, that sounds like

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a fun conversation show. Yeah, it's a good one. So

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks everybody for listening and we'll see you next week.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we will, indeed chucking